TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

treybuchet Archive

View 8 posts and 87 comments by treybuchet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

It's simply a fact that chromosomes are a lot more complicated than simply "XY MEANS YOU ARE A MAN".
/r/MensRights15/01/12 07:33 PM
–

Well, not exactly. Chromosomes are a lot more complicated than that. It's not worth getting into right now.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 06:21 PM
–

Third wave feminism though, the most recent(who notably have a lot of conflict with radfems and second wave, because there are different and opposing views), is quite good with transfolk. Girl scouts tends more towards thirdwave and is quite nice.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 04:49 PM
2

Erm, the equivalent phrase for a stay at home mom is housewife. Not sure what you're getting at here.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 07:24 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-wave_feminism And as for breaking gender roles and how this benefits both genders. If gender roles are made unnecessary, or the firmness of them is removed, then custody discrimination will be gone, as will many other issues.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 02:05 AM
0

So, for example, there also can't be black rights groups, or gay rights groups, or any sort of specific issue groups because they focus on one aspect? Feminism strived for women's rights out of a time when women heavily lacked them. Now, more modern feminism tends to focus on breaking gender roles and whatnot. Breaking gender roles benefits everyone, not just women.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 09:51 PM
2

You know, people can focus on one issue. It's not a zero sum gay. Just because feminists and women's groups focus on women specifically doesn't mean they are anti men or they don't care about men's issues, they just have specific things they work on.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 09:39 PM
4

Wearing nothing but underwear is incredibly comfortable.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 06:27 AM
3

http://www.safe4all.org/resource-list/index?category=1
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:57 AM
2

http://www.safe4all.org/resource-list/index?category=1
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:57 AM
2

They do. There are battered men's shelters.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:12 PM
3

Hell, George Washington was a male gold digger. Know how he became the richest man in Virginia? He went and married the richest widow in Virginia.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:06 PM
–

err Transmen are men who were born/biologically women.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:34 PM
1

That, or they have other things that are more important to them for them to work on.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 05:00 AM
-5

So what, do you think A Modest Proposal is real as well?
/r/MensRights02/01/12 04:59 AM
–

Because it'd be pointless and honestly kind of silly. It's like how people complain that you can't say "white power" without seeming racist. It'd be a silly and pointless satire.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 04:59 AM
1

Actually, most feminists aren't against the draft in any form and believe it's quite sexist and detrimental to men. http://www.now.org/issues/military/policies/war.html
/r/MensRights02/01/12 04:36 AM
1

You can campaign for one thing without being against another. It's not a zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 04:34 AM
–

FYI the SCUM manifesto is satire.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 04:21 AM
–

Let's not use the word dyke, it kind of validates everyone who claims we're being misogynistic or homophobic.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 12:29 AM
1

http://www.gaycitynews.com/articles/2011/11/09/gay_city_news/news/doc4ebace95a0c26985577656.txt Not entirely started. Objectively, it was largely started by Adbusters. But they were and are one of the biggest voices.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:51 PM
–

Technically, Occupy Wall Street was started by trans women anarchists, which could be considered relevant. As well, the face covering simply works quite effectively in showing it as a sort of anonymity and whatnot.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:21 AM
2

No prostitute would go at it without a condom for "a bit extra money". It's simply not worth it to them.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 03:27 AM
–

Not true, actually. Generally, the women who pay for such a thing may not be looking for the best looking of men, though it can be reasonably important. Often, the reason goes down to the fact that either they're unattractive, or they're incredibly busy. Either way, it's a situation where they'd simply rather not take the time to go out and meet a guy at a bar or whatnot, and it's faster and easier, with more guaranteed, especially a focus on them, that they do it for.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 03:23 AM
3

You do know that there are POGs(Personnel other than grunts) who aren't female, and in fact many choose to do so. In fact, most combat soldiers aren't going to resent "females" for not doing combat. Sometimes they'll sort of look down on or poke fun at POGs in general, largely because they consider themselves soldiers without having to be in combat. POGs are still mostly men, not women. If you're an idiot, maybe you can't get a position other than a combat one, depending on your ASVAB scores. Ho…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:27 PM
1

Depending on your age, you don't have to, as long as you become legally male after age 26.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 02:57 PM
–

There are men that view women as resources as well. Ever been to r/seduction?
/r/MensRights29/10/11 06:47 PM
–

At the least, we must move away from the gender binary and the stereotypes and preconceptions about both genders.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:01 PM
–

I'm not sure what relevance this has here? I'm guessing your intent is to show that what, women can be monsters just as much as men can be? I can understand where you come from, I suppose, however this is definitely a stretch. No need to gain equality for men by attacking women.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:36 PM
–

Think of it this way. Even if a child comes on to you, asks you for sex, whatever. You can't fuck that kid. They can't legally consent.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:20 PM
–

Here's the thing. Bestiality involves rape by definition. Animals can't consent to sex, and as such there's no reason it shouldn't be taboo, much like pedophilia.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:10 PM
3

Technically, the US military doesn't actually allow women to do a lot of jobs.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 06:11 AM
–

Technically, Africa and the middle east were considerably more important than the white parts of the world for most of history, as well as Asia(to a point). I would argue that white hetero men(although hetero is questionable at times) did put much of the more modern times, the framework for such was laid earlier than them, and then destroyed and rebuilt by the same.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 03:54 AM
–

I'm not calling it on the fact that many don't think it's an issue here. I'm calling homophobia on the homophobia I've seen here, which I felt was an issue with the subreddit and it's people.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 03:45 AM
2

No, it simply does not protect them and attempt to correct for other societal/structural issues.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 01:41 AM
–

I didn't say myself. I said what other people viewed you as.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:52 PM
–

Because, by and large, many of them view you as largely misogynistic, and many of you are a bit homophobic at times. It's the same reason many otherwise egalitarian feminists(and don't say there aren't any) are against Men's Rights activists, because they aren't big fans of the whole "hating on feminists all the time" and the whole misogyny thing.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:38 PM
–

Erm, male-male relationships aren't exclusively sexual.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:21 PM
–

There are XY females, in fact.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 02:59 AM
–

I'm not sure you know how chromosomes work, but I would argue there is a definite difference between those two. What exactly defines a woman?
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:54 PM
–

Technically, it means she's bisexual, not heterosexual. to be honest, as sexuality is distinct from gender, does it really matter? And it's not a charade, stop being an ass.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 03:06 PM
–

Some trans women can self lubricate(and hell, some ciswomen can't.)
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:49 PM
–

And you understaand why they had to do that? Hint, it's not because they were viewed as superior, it's because they were viewed as incapable. Yes, they didn't have to do the dangerous jobs or participate in wars(Although some did). They also, however couldn't do the good jobs, the interesting, powerful jobs. It's not that they had it worst in every way. It's that they were considered something less than men. Hell, for a while, rape was considered entirely the raped woman's fault. And a woman who…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:44 PM
–

I wouldn't describe them as the most privileged demographic in society. By and large they were unable to speak or participate in much of christianity, in many cases they were considered worthless, as they couldn't carry on a family name. Describing them as the most privileged demographic in society throughout Western history is a bit ridiculous. Now, the jewish analogy? A definite stretch. A huge one. But saying that women were the most privileged group in society is preposterous.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:08 AM
1

I'm not seeing much in there that applies. The latest thing? It's in Israel. The rest so far seem to be about false claims, none of which have been successful.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:08 AM
–

I'm not sure how you think things work. I haven't seen any relatively recent cases of this, although if you could show me one which was both recent and resulted in a conviction I might believe you.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:46 AM
–

I believe that people have been falsely convicted of things. I believe that's true in a lot of cases. I also, however, believe this is a considerably smaller problem now, when you consider that most of these wrongful convictions were prior to the advent and spread of DNA evidence.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:11 PM
1

The thing is, you can't test it. The evidence is flawed, and as such isn't really evidence that's usable. As such, there's nothing to retry him about.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 07:56 PM
1

No, I totally agree with you in that regard. There is a great lack of justice in this case, and a lot of issues. The problem is, I don't see a true solution to it, for this case. In the future? It's less likely that this would happen.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 07:06 PM
1

Said evidence wasn't really used in the case, and as such there's no real grounds for a mistrial. There might have been some issues with the jury, but I doubt that's provable enough to create a mistrial. I hate that an innocent man is convicted as much as you do, but there doesn't seem to be much here that would suggest the case could be overturned. He's not exactly a good person(He's been convicted of robbery, he's attempted to break out of prison multiple times), but he doesn't deserve to be i…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:47 PM
1

Victims, there were two of them. And I looked into this case. Honestly, I feel bad for this guy, but he made poor decisions as a whole, as well as being black. He seems innocent(After looking over his case information.). I think by and large, his race was the biggest factor here, and he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. (He was probably falsely convicted, however a rape did happen. The rapist was likely a serial rapist named Carl Martin, another black male, who was later convicted f…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:41 PM
1

I agree with you in that regard, sure. Here's the thing: He was already proven guilty once. Now, there is no evidence that could prove him innocent, there's nothing. Contaminated DNA evidence is useless. So, as far as anyone can tell, he's guilty.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:13 PM
1

Technically, the judge states it because the only evidence DNA wise was stored in the worst way. As such, it's likely contaminated. This could result in him going free while in fact being guilty, due to the contamination, which could essentially make it seem like the DNA isn't his, whether or not it originally was. Again, this isn't an issue that we have much anymore, as we keep everything quite well.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:06 PM
1

Let's see. How many of those refer to things prior to the advent of DNA. Aha! 1,870,000 results. How many refer to defending oneself or otherwise: 2,650,000 results. Hell, look at this: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bronx/justice_happened_things_system_solomon_JyyLFVitMM4bx63gpD1ouI A woman convicted for 3 years in prison because of her false claims which were proven false. I can find no recent false rape cases which haven't been overturned due to new DNA evidence. Yes, life was robbed from…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:47 PM
1

You're saying that it may eventually cost the accused their freedom. This implies that they got a guilty verdict. If there was enough evidence to get a guilty verdict, it's reasonably likely that they were actually guilty.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:40 PM
1

Here's the thing. Those are true of any criminal accusation that isn't verifiable immediately. I make a claim of theft, or anything that could get them arrested, they get arrested. Maybe false claims should have a higher penalty, but nothing unique. Again, the stigma would be gone if any publicity was gone from the case. And if it costs the accused their home/property and their freedom, then I'm honestly surprised. If there is enough evidence to show that they actually committed the crime, they …
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:35 PM
1

Then it's perfectly fine. If the case is unlikely to succeed, has a reasonable crime in place to deal with false reports, and the main issues involved aren't exclusive to it, then the idea that false rape claims are a major issue is entirely flawed.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:25 PM
1

Here's the thing. You would need another law in place, as well as a separate trial just for that, to prove she malevolently created a false claim, as well as likely needing the man to bring such charges against her.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:19 PM
1

Again, the issue there isn't a false rape claim issue alone. It's an issue with court cases and the media. There should be restrictions on information from cases getting out.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:11 PM
0

Why punish the accuser, if it's proven impossible and thus the man can't be punished. They've already wasted money and time on the accusation. A probation would be reasonable enough as it is.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:02 PM
1

Alright. How do you exactly prove the difference between an unsubstantiated claim, which is in fact true but results in a not guilty verdict, and a malevolent false claim, which is also unsubstantiated.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:43 PM
1

That's ridiculous. This would make people with real claims be even more afraid to come forward than they may already be. The chance of being put in prison because you lacked the evidence for your case would make almost nobody come forward for rape out of fear that they could get tossed in jail.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:28 PM
0

Here's the thing. You shouldn't be rallying against false rape charges at this point. You should be going for fixing prisons. Hell, if someone actually rapes me, or someone commits a crime against me, should I not bring charges because prisons are godawful? Forgot to mention this as well: In the UK, rape convictions have been on the decline, with a rate of 5.6% in 2002. Finally, there are no solid statistics as to false rape accusations. The best study out there, one done by the British Home Off…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:06 PM
0

Being acquitted would be all fine and dandy if we didn't release information about court cases to the news who then spread all of it, which isn't just a men's issue. I decided to take a look at the "False Rape Society" thing on the sidebar. To be honest, while I see some evidence that this happens, I don't see anything which suggests it's a purely men's issue, and often has more to do with the concept of evidence. As well, testimony can be accurate. It generally requires quite a bit of repetitio…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:18 AM
-1

Did you read my original post at all? I straight up said that the issue wasn't the claims themselves, but the fact that information about any case is released even before the case is over. It doesn't just affect men, Casey Anthony(Who may be guilty, who fucking knows), was considered a criminal before her case was even over. Now, if a case results in prison, then there is somehow enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it happened, at which point there are more issues than the fa…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:47 AM
1

Perjury is generally used for when the defendant is the one lying. A false claim for a crime is generally an accusation, and it's quite hard to prove that an accusation is intended to be false and the person behind it doesn't legitimately believe it.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:42 AM
6

I'm not sure any trans person has ever tried to get advantages over non-trans people. Mostly, they just try and get acceptance. And no matter what the hell you seem to think about it, trans people are quite oppressed and fucked over in much of society. Can you find a single entitlement or privilege trans people have gained or tried to gain over non trans people?
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:55 AM
-2

Alright, let's go for a few things. If a claim is truly false, then it doesn't result in prison. Rape may last for less than a few hours, however it results in trauma, psychological issues, and disapproval by society.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:45 AM
1

Do we? I'm not sure anyone is punished for false claims of other crimes. And no, It wasn't satire. I'm not even sure how it oculd be considered satire.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:40 AM
11

I'm fairly sure the fact that AnnArchist is a mod undermines your whole argument there.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 05:41 AM
–

That's not really what the notion of patriarchy is, for most people. The patriarchy isn't a physical thing, or a statement about all men. It's a statement about the balance of power in the world, and how it is tipped in the favor of men in general. It's not saying that all men oppress women, simply that they exist in a way such that women are oppressed by an unintentional effect, not a direct decision.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 11:00 PM
1

Technically, he'd probably end up with custody once she died.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 03:33 AM
4

Rape kits bro. They have these things that let them get DNA evidence, as well as needing to ask both parties enough questions to tell. It's that the other person took advantage of them, not what they did. If I scammed you, it's criminal, despite you doing something stupid and giving me your money.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 09:42 PM
–

Here's the thing: You don't really understand what is actually a thing here. Rape investigations are a pain to do and hardly ever pan out, purely because of the lack of evidence. The issue with the news is less a rape issue and more a general issue. Hell, look at Casey Anthony. It was publicized, and nobody believed she didn't do it, despite her getting off innocent. The whole exchange about drunk driving and drunk sex/giving away money is quite flawed. Drunk Driving you do yourself. You go, and…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 08:10 PM
–

Technically, you can be raped without violence. It's called "Rophynol", or "Roofies".
/r/MensRights19/09/11 08:05 PM
–

I'm not sure you understand how voting works: Say a downvote brigade comes into a small subreddit such as this. They downvote comments, or threads they dislike, or find ridiculous. Now, maybe this means it doesn't show up on your front page. It still shows up, because the average of votes really hasn't changed. Hell, certain subreddits(SRS) don't even try and downvote, they often go the other way, as a sort of upvote brigade, to bring attention to it. Either way, votes aren't affected enough by …
/r/MensRights19/09/11 08:00 PM
–

AnnArchist: Claims to be pro-equality for all, posts things which are misogynistic, transphobic, or otherwise not conducive to r/mensrights and that goal.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 07:48 PM
-1

make a troll + mod tag broseph
/r/MensRights19/09/11 07:43 PM
-3

the proper name would be "againstfeminism".
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:21 PM
1

Say I believed that women who could not bear children, or maybe women who had some chromosomal issues(that didn't cause any real issues, they just had an extra Y or something), weren't real women. Does that mean they need to disclose this with me? No, they don't. You wouldn't ask all infertile women to immediately disclose to you, or anyone who had chromosomal issues to do so, so why should trans women be any different.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 07:39 PM
–

The thing is, they are women. There isn't anything making them not women. Chromosomes? Chromosomes are bullshit anyway, there are people with fucked up ones anyway. Ability to have children? There are sterile women, too. Periods? I suspect(Haven't really looked into this) there are women who don't(likely in relation to said sterility). Yes, at some point they had a male body. Now, however, they have a female body, and are in every way female. At some point, you were a child. Should I not want to…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 05:32 PM
1

Well, he paid her, I suppose.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 06:07 AM
5

What if the financially independent parent still had something preventing them from really being effective parents, such as a history of domestic abuse or something of that sort?
/r/MensRights05/09/11 11:49 PM
3

You're, not your.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 12:50 AM
–

Um, I'm not sure where you get that. For one, a man who has sex with a lot of women? He's an alpha male. A woman who does the same? A slut.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 05:06 AM
2

I was kind of walking through random shit and I ended up here. I'd just like to note that MTF transexuals have it worse than FTM transexuals in regards to passing, because it is somewhat easier in many ways. However, MTFs have better surgery available and by and large, everything sucks for both groups.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 04:15 AM
–

"because she was verbally abusing me and it made me feel bad" I'm not sure you understand what abuse is or what defenses based on such are.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 04:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter