TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

typhonblue Archive

View 140 posts and 9,512 comments by typhonblue on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
209

typhonblue/r/MensRights04/08/13 06:55 PM
141

Activism/Supporttyphonblue/r/MensRights09/02/17 04:02 PM
119

typhonblue/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:17 PM
111

typhonblue/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:37 PM
107

typhonblue/r/MensRights31/08/12 11:15 PM
86

typhonblue/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:39 PM
79

typhonblue/r/MensRights10/10/13 06:21 PM
79

typhonblue/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:23 PM
78

Activism/Supporttyphonblue/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:33 PM
77

typhonblue/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:48 PM
65

typhonblue/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:39 AM
63

typhonblue/r/MensRights24/10/13 06:11 PM
62

typhonblue/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:27 PM
58

typhonblue/r/MensRights05/04/13 03:31 PM
57

Action Op.typhonblue/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:44 PM
54

typhonblue/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:20 PM
50

typhonblue/r/MensRights26/04/19 08:55 PM
48

typhonblue/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:29 AM
48

typhonblue/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:47 PM
46

typhonblue/r/MensRights28/12/13 11:32 PM
46

typhonblue/r/MensRights07/11/13 06:25 PM
42

typhonblue/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:45 PM
40

typhonblue/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:05 PM
39

typhonblue/r/MensRights12/12/13 03:54 PM
38

typhonblue/r/MensRights07/01/12 07:53 AM
37

typhonblue/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:01 PM
36

Activism/Supporttyphonblue/r/MensRights19/04/16 12:03 AM
35

Men's Rights Newstyphonblue/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:12 PM
35

typhonblue/r/MensRights23/01/14 04:56 PM
34

typhonblue/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:16 PM
33

typhonblue/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:04 PM
32

typhonblue/r/MensRights21/11/13 03:36 PM
32

typhonblue/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:28 PM
32

typhonblue/r/MensRights18/05/14 11:16 PM
30

typhonblue/r/MensRights06/02/14 04:48 PM
30

typhonblue/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:46 PM
28

typhonblue/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:24 PM
28

typhonblue/r/MensRights17/02/14 05:44 PM
28

Discriminationtyphonblue/r/MensRights05/02/15 01:11 AM
27

typhonblue/r/MensRights22/10/13 03:17 AM
27

MR Blogs/Vlogstyphonblue/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:28 PM
27

typhonblue/r/MensRights30/01/14 05:33 PM
27

typhonblue/r/MensRights10/09/13 01:49 PM
26

MR Blogs/Vlogstyphonblue/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:12 PM
26

typhonblue/r/MensRights22/08/13 08:29 PM
26

typhonblue/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:59 AM
26

Blogs/Videotyphonblue/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:25 PM
25

typhonblue/r/MensRights27/03/14 04:49 PM
25

Blogs/Videotyphonblue/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:20 PM
25

typhonblue/r/MensRights11/01/12 09:42 PM
24

MR Blogs/Vlogstyphonblue/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:39 PM
23

typhonblue/r/MensRights15/01/16 11:13 PM
23

typhonblue/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:18 PM
23

typhonblue/r/MensRights25/09/13 04:12 PM
22

typhonblue/r/MensRights03/10/13 06:23 PM
22

MR Blogs/Vlogstyphonblue/r/MensRights29/04/14 03:58 PM
21

typhonblue/r/MensRights13/02/14 04:48 PM
21

typhonblue/r/MensRights05/09/13 04:10 PM
21

typhonblue/r/MensRights27/11/14 11:18 PM
21

typhonblue/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:57 PM
21

Generaltyphonblue/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:29 PM
20

typhonblue/r/MensRights26/12/13 05:11 PM
20

typhonblue/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:14 PM
20

typhonblue/r/MensRights24/12/11 06:03 PM
19

typhonblue/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:48 PM
19

typhonblue/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:25 PM
19

typhonblue/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:36 AM
19

typhonblue/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:21 PM
18

Raising Awarenesstyphonblue/r/MensRights12/02/15 09:07 PM
18

typhonblue/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:14 PM
17

typhonblue/r/MensRights26/09/13 01:29 AM
16

typhonblue/r/MensRights04/09/14 10:36 PM
16

typhonblue/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:03 PM
16

Opiniontyphonblue/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:53 PM
16

Opiniontyphonblue/r/MensRights02/04/15 07:15 PM
16

typhonblue/r/MensRights29/08/12 10:53 PM
16

Opiniontyphonblue/r/MensRights15/01/15 06:28 PM
16

Blogs/Videotyphonblue/r/MensRights03/07/14 06:50 PM
15

Blogs/Videotyphonblue/r/MensRights14/08/14 10:02 PM
15

typhonblue/r/MensRights10/12/11 08:29 PM
15

Newstyphonblue/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:51 PM
15

typhonblue/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:03 PM
14

Discussiontyphonblue/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:50 PM
14

Opiniontyphonblue/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:55 PM
14

Blogs/Videotyphonblue/r/MensRights31/07/14 04:14 PM
14

MR Blogs/Vlogstyphonblue/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:58 PM
14

MR Blogs/Vlogstyphonblue/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:44 PM
14

Blogs/Videotyphonblue/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:19 PM
13

Discussiontyphonblue/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:47 PM
13

typhonblue/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:55 PM
13

typhonblue/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:10 PM
13

typhonblue/r/MensRights18/12/11 06:27 AM
13

typhonblue/r/MensRights07/04/12 08:54 PM
13

Raising Awarenesstyphonblue/r/MensRights22/01/15 04:14 PM
12

typhonblue/r/MensRights04/12/14 09:03 PM
12

typhonblue/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:12 PM
12

MR Blogs/Vlogstyphonblue/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:35 PM
11

typhonblue/r/MensRights02/01/14 04:26 PM
11

typhonblue/r/MensRights08/12/11 02:41 AM
11

typhonblue/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:15 PM
11

typhonblue/r/MensRights14/11/13 03:56 PM
10

Blogs/Videotyphonblue/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:37 PM
10

Ragebaittyphonblue/r/MensRights26/02/15 08:06 PM
10

typhonblue/r/MensRights31/08/12 12:54 AM
10

typhonblue/r/MensRights02/11/13 12:28 AM
9

Discussiontyphonblue/r/MensRights08/01/15 10:08 PM
9

typhonblue/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:49 PM
9

typhonblue/r/MensRights30/10/13 05:08 PM
9

Feminismtyphonblue/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:42 PM
9

typhonblue/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:44 PM
8

typhonblue/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:11 AM
8

typhonblue/r/MensRights09/01/12 03:06 AM
8

typhonblue/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:03 PM
8

Newstyphonblue/r/MensRights01/01/15 10:53 PM
7

typhonblue/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:19 PM
7

Social Issuestyphonblue/r/MensRights18/06/15 07:02 PM
7

typhonblue/r/MensRights27/12/11 09:37 PM
7

typhonblue/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:31 PM
6

typhonblue/r/MensRights05/01/12 03:56 AM
6

typhonblue/r/MensRights02/06/13 03:53 PM
6

typhonblue/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:39 AM
5

typhonblue/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:55 AM
5

typhonblue/r/MensRights26/09/16 12:37 AM
5

typhonblue/r/MensRights10/09/14 02:52 AM
4

typhonblue/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:29 PM
4

typhonblue/r/MensRights10/08/12 01:03 AM
4

typhonblue/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:53 AM
4

Raising Awarenesstyphonblue/r/MensRights25/12/14 04:15 PM
3

typhonblue/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:32 AM
2

typhonblue/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:03 AM
2

typhonblue/r/MensRights07/01/12 08:59 PM
2

MR Blogs/Vlogstyphonblue/r/MensRights08/05/14 06:22 PM
2

typhonblue/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:06 AM
1

typhonblue/r/MensRights29/04/14 07:05 PM
1

typhonblue/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:15 PM
1

typhonblue/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:44 PM
1

typhonblue/r/MensRights11/01/12 06:14 AM
0

MR Blogs/Vlogstyphonblue/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:42 PM
0

typhonblue/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:15 AM
0

typhonblue/r/MensRights14/09/12 09:33 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 9,512 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

This isn't progress. They've been 'acknowledging' male victims for thirty years without acknowledging the actual rate at which women abuse. I'm sorry, it isn't.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 04:29 AM
2

Boys being bulled, specifically by girls, should get a whole lot more social attention but instead we choose to focus on an outlandishly unlikely scenario that demonizes bullied boys.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:45 PM
2

That wasn't a 'child's doctor' it was an interrogator, further it was a scene created for our entertainment. Who tf is entertained by watching a boy asked intrusive, sexual questions by a creepy adult?
/r/MensRights15/05/25 07:59 PM
1

Exposure to sexual materials is also a form of abuse. Not just during the strip search, but also during the overtly sexualized 'interrogation' by the creepy female psychologist of the boy.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 07:57 PM
1

The vast majority of boys bullied by girls will kill themselves, not someone else. Here, this is what we're actually ignoring. Girls bullied this boy until he took his own life; one of those girls went to his funeral to take a picture of his open casket like a sick trophy. https://x.com/mensrightsbunny/status/1921936978280317148
/r/MensRights15/05/25 07:56 PM
1

For saying men and boys are bad. This film is not an 'attempt to understand' its successful agitprop intended to demonize boys and father-son relationships. It's far more statistically likely for a boy to kill himself as a result of female bullying, as you can see here. https://x.com/mensrightsbunny/status/1921936978280317148
/r/MensRights15/05/25 07:53 PM
1

You sound like a bot. And I do blame women. I blame feminists for getting rid of juvenile detention for bullying female monsters like the ones linked below. And I blame women for not pushing back. https://x.com/mensrightsbunny/status/1921936978280317148
/r/MensRights15/05/25 07:52 PM
1

Feminism is institutionalized and the manosphre is just a reaction to it. I think you don't realize who you're talking to here. I'm about as extremist as it gets. I blame women. Completely.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 07:50 PM
1

This entire scenario is scare mongering bullcrap. Boys are more likely to commit suicide as a result of girl's bullying. https://x.com/mensrightsbunny/status/1921936978280317148
/r/MensRights15/05/25 07:49 PM
1

Literal example of what he's saying. You think this demonizing caricature is reality.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 07:02 PM
2

This is a fictional caricature of a group of people your ideology targets for demonization. As such it does not resemble reality.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:57 PM
2

This caricature is an invention of your ideology. It does not resemble men or boys. You are doing exactly what the previous poster said you would do. You are using an invented stereotype, actually an invented demonization of men, in order to justify ignoring their issues.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:56 PM
1

'My failure to teach boys is because of culture or because of boys, not me!' Also you. 'Men don't blame anyone else for their failures.' No, you do. You just blame the things you're allowed to blame, like a coward.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:52 PM
1

Nationalism, religion, ethnic conflicts all 'influence boys to become murderers.' And at astronomically higher rates than any murder classified as a result of the 'manosphere.' Even with all the stretching everyone's doing to do so.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:51 PM
1

That women constantly saying that men and boys are bad is bad and they are bad for doing it.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:17 PM
3

It's fiction. There were no victims. 'This problem kills four times more men, but more women are diagnosed with it.' Shut up.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:14 PM
2

'Experience patriarchal society', such as?
/r/MensRights27/04/25 03:42 AM
1

I think the boys who are being subject to UK politicians, school administrators and teachers who are presenting it to them as a 'teaching moment' because it's a documentary are the ones losing out.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 03:41 AM
3

If you go up to a 13 year old girl and ask her if she wants to touch penises what happens? Why is it that it's okay when it's Hollywood?
/r/MensRights27/04/25 03:40 AM
1

The show doesn't have feelings, boys and men do. Stop caping for it.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 03:34 AM
1

Engage with the point, please. Young girl is alone with male doctor. He asks her if she wants to touch penises, she's then subject to a body cavity search. Netflix shows this for shock value. Nope. Someone's getting sued for sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 03:34 AM
0

Can you give an example of what you're referring to as hate?
/r/MensRights27/04/25 03:29 AM
10

Thank you, good sir!
/r/MensRights01/01/25 10:53 PM
1

It's not even accountability, it's the potential of accountability. If you don't do it, ladies, you won't be held accountable. So... what's the problem?
/r/MensRights20/09/24 08:11 PM
1

It is already criminalized when it comes to men. It's considered domestic abuse for a man to be 'withholding' in a relationship.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 12:58 AM
1

Right next to 'my account' is 'help' here: https://www.feedthebadger.com/help/
/r/MensRights05/09/23 06:45 PM
1

The honey badgers are hard to contact directly without paying even more money, so I have to ask this question here instead. Right on the website, next to the shop|cart|checkout|my account| is the 'help' menu item. If you click it, it takes you to the following page: https://www.feedthebadger.com/help/ There are multiple ways of getting ahold of me(Alison)--including phone number--none of them cost money.
/r/MensRights05/09/23 06:44 PM
2

I may have already responded to you via email when I received your message if you're the person I'm thinking of. If I haven't then contact me at: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])
/r/MensRights05/09/23 06:41 PM
3

Yes. For once.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 01:01 AM
5

The 90s? WTF? No. Good lord. NO.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:53 AM
3

So instead of discussing how men's vulnerabilities could be helped which is actually a radically new way of looking at the relationship between the sexes, they returned to their stoic identities as protectors and providers of women's [insert the current thing]. Shocking.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 08:58 PM
2

Yes women were the perpetrators. It doesn't matter how hard this challenges your presumptions, it's just reality.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:52 PM
8

The rate of men murdering their wives was roughly equal to the rate that women murdered their husbands in the 70s. Since then, with the advent of domestic violence services for women, the rate at which women murder their partners has decreased at a greater rate then the reverse. The likely culprit for the rate of men murdering their wives not going down like the revers did is Feminism's policy of ignoring male victims of domestic violence. Why should men be blamed for this? As for rape, men repo…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:17 PM
1

Well you see, I have no clue how to do that.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 06:39 AM
19

Hi fellow mods! I am not involved in the organization of this event but I believe it's of significant interest and value to the community so I applied a sticky. If this was in error, please remove it!
/r/MensRights10/12/21 01:22 AM
7

Thank you for throwing me under the bus. I'm a woman who's worked for 20 years on men's issues where and when I can.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 08:16 PM
1

So I excused both the OP's bad behaviour and the woman she was insulting because they engaged in their slap fest in a space for slap fests. We should be better people by calling out hypocrites.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 08:15 PM
2

I'm not judging anyone not based on experience or reason.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 08:03 PM
1

I'm ignoring everything not relevant to myself or my actions. And you've ignored the entirety of mine.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 08:01 PM
4

They define sexism as "opposing feminism." Good luck not being seen as sexist.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 07:48 PM
2

If you want to look good the only way to do it is to be a feminist and agree with corporate and government PR.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:45 PM
3

Were you there?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:06 PM
6

And I ignored the awful things you said despite them being personally harmful. What are you not understanding about PvP? I gave you both exactly the same lenience. I also didn't lecture you about your misandry or stigmatizing the mentally disabled. The original statement was by another user and after the mess of the fight I spoke to him about it and he reconsidered his stance. Your approach of abuse, shame and insults creates more entrenched misogyny, while it took me a few moments to simply exp…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:06 PM
6

I didn't dispute your abhorrent views which were personally hurtful either. Because it was a... FREE SPEECH PVP AREA. As for the original statement, I did shut it down with reason and logic, rather than abuse.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:52 PM
8

I did shut it down. Through logic and reason. Not through insults and shaming.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:50 PM
7

The people who disagree with us disagree that masculinity should exist. Or even does. I will definitely push back on that.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:48 PM
7

If it wasn't representative, you'd think someone would have come out of the woodwork to dispute such conduct and views. So you failed to see me doing just that?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:45 PM
4

Where has "incel" or "femcel" been used to suggest that women are criminal or potential terrorists because they haven't gotten men's sexual approval?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:44 PM
6

Show me where "incel" has been used to cast women as criminal and potential terrorists because they aren't sexual with men. I'll wait.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:32 PM
6

You categorized misogyny as 'punching up' which is ridiculous. You sound like feminists when they defend misandry because it is 'punching up' This entire situation has been exhausting and depressing so I've missed some allegations against me. I did not call misogyny "punching up." I told you that misogyny and misandry are treated differently by society using the example of an opinion piece recently published by a reputable mainstream media outlet unironically referring to men as "scrotes." Foid …
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:30 PM
4

Why?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:07 PM
17

I want to say this. Censoring people, forcing them to conform to your aesthetic preferences in how they behave with one another is not kind. Freedom of speech is more than a right, from what I've observed it's critical for men's mental health to be able to express and process thoughts in the way that they do, which requires the ability to articulate even things that others find offensive. But it can be extremely difficult to balance freedom of speech and being considerate. I have done the best I…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:02 PM
9

I'm not interested in your apology, particularly not since you seem to be giving it to use it as leverage to demand things of me. I want you to understand that it's a sacrifice to set my emotions aside to give you freedom of speech, which I did. That's what's expected of everyone in the PvP space. Are you honestly going to go into my discord, use a PvP space to freely insult the mentally disabled (thus hurting me and others who struggle with that) and then complain when your own feelings are hur…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:55 PM
9

Isn't it?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:49 PM
17

Fellow mods, I stickied this comment because I believe I should have the right for my rejoinder to this allegation against myself and my discord be highly visible. If this was an abuse of my mod powers, please unstick it.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:49 PM
6

She started a fight in a PvP area of the discord by calling two of my discord members "mentally disabled." I am mentally disabled. I watched as she used my status as a means to insult multiple people for their opinions. Apparently the mentally disabled are horrible people or something. And at the end of it? I did not censor her or reprimand her because her freedom to act and speak is more important to me than making her take responsibility for making me uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:44 PM
5

You did exactly the same thing she did. You know there are mentally disabled people on the discord right? In fact I have a mental disability. Do you think I enjoy having my own trials be used as a means to insult another human being? Yet I set that emotional response aside to give you freedom of speech and action.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:38 PM
12

We specifically have an area set aside for fights and free speech. She initiated a fight in that area by directly insulting other users as 'mentally disabled'. A lot of people took issue with her using the term 'incel' as an insult. Thank you for your appreciation. It means a lot.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:35 PM
9

You used incel and retard to insult her. And that's fine, it was in a PvP area. You and her were free to be assholes to each other. And people are free to respond to you being an asshole. But that's all it was. I'm not going to crucify either of you for your bad behaviour because it was done in the area designated for it.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:24 PM
2

This is a mischaracterization of what happened. It was a mutual fight in a PvP area of a server that you started by calling two users "mentally disabled" and continued by referring to them as "retarded." I defended your right to be aggressive, insulting and non-PC in the PvP area as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/21 03:50 PM
11

The insinuation when you use the term "Incel" as an insult, not a descriptor, is that men's worth is based on their sexual behaviour with women. That's dehumanizing.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:43 PM
5

And what about your insulting of all men and the mentally disabled?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:37 PM
18

I myself did not even know it was a PvP area until you told me. Because you didn't take the time to read the rules, nor did you apparently listen when I told you multiple times. Luckily for you you started your fight in the PvP channel completely by accident; otherwise I would have warned you for insulting another user directly. ​ Shes a shitty person to be sure, but why call being female a birth defect and be racist? Why did you engage in misandry and use the mentally disabled as a way of insul…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:33 PM
10

Yes, because the two of you were in a fight. You threw the first punch, then she punched back and it devolved. What you're doing is saying "didn't she punch?" as if you weren't doing the same.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:28 PM
49

The primary reason that you should not police the movement like this is because this is a false accusation. I witnessed this all go down because I am the owner of the server. One user said women didn't have evolutionary pressure to love men(which is allowed because I promote free speech, I later told him that his statement wasn't accurate.) Jackie called him and another female user who agreed with him "mentally disabled." The other user called her a foid. She called her an incel and we were off …
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:16 PM
26

You were throwing things around like this: "I don't give a fuck retard" In a fight you started by calling two people "mentally disabled". In a channel specifically created for fights. With a known FEMALE troll.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 02:32 PM
6

If you judge feminism by only doing good for women and ignore the situation for men I suppose you can say that.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 05:49 PM
1

No one is saying that it's 25% based on this survey. Maybe others. You comfort with the fact that a substantial number of men and boys are raped is not relevant to the message I intend to broadcast. Build your own platform and decide what you put on it.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:55 PM
2

There's absolutely no mechanism to stop it. Any questioning is considered social heresy punishable by being shoved on an ice flow. The other thing is, this is a very resource-intensive activity to pursue. Instead of going to other planets our civilization has decided to worship equality.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:52 PM
1

That was the result of a FOIA.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:06 AM
2

Am I missing something here? Please, tell me... The "made to penetrate" category involves violence or threats of physical violence and drug facilitated rape. It doesn't include "saying yes when you didn't want to." Begone. Who is upvoting these people?
/r/MensRights20/08/21 04:07 PM
1

We don't need #believeallmen or evidence-free prosecutions of women accused of sexual assault. We need equal rights and the presumption of innocence. Until you identify the person who suggested we needed this, you're trying to dismiss this finding by pretending it means something it doesn't.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 04:04 PM
2

We did, years ago. Go to the end to listen to a phone call with the CDC. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ncjGFIFPJI&t=326s
/r/MensRights20/08/21 04:02 PM
29

Feminists promote the idea that men have constructed society for their own benefit at the expense of women. This idea prevents any work being done to help men. Full stop.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 02:05 AM
14

One of the biggest problems that men have to face is being blamed for having constructed a system for the benefit of themselves at the expense of women. We can't address any of these issues until this idea is defeated.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 02:04 AM
4

The 90% male perpetration is based on presumably a study by the Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center that's inaccessible. The fact that the cases they deal with are overwhelmingly male is likely due to the fact that female-perpetrated sexual abuse of children is so taboo, most children who report it are not believed by anyone including psychiatrists, social workers, teachers, etc. Notice how the female abusers abuse twice as much as the male before they're caught. ​ According to the Pennsy…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 01:59 AM
4

That US dept of Justice survey asked the "adult caretaker" (usually the mother) if the child was sexually abused. These were proxy interviews. Quick question. How likely is that to capture sexual abuse perpetrated by women? Also the second report you link, links itself for the stat on 96% of the abusers being male. And that document isn't available.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 01:52 AM
1

Female perpetrated child sexual abuse is the least reported crime. Aside from female perpetrated sexual abuse on adults.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 01:41 AM
3

Running society is just a job. Feminism continues on to assert that men use that job to benefit themselves at the expense of women (male privilege). And that where they don't appear to be benefited by their job (because it is just a job and not an easy one) feminists term it "patriarchy backfiring" because when men don't benefit from the society they created, it's because they made a mistake according to feminists. The idea that men construct society for their own benefit at the expense of women…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 12:56 PM
11

Whatever you consider to be the equivalent part on a girl's body--let's say the toenail--do you advocate for taking a scalpel, inserting it under the nail bed of an infant girl's big toe and then scraping it back and forth to pop it off?
/r/MensRights24/07/21 12:47 PM
7

How do we know when feminism also doesn't allow itself to be questioned? Feminism did indeed invent the idea that men constructed society at the expense of women for their own benefit. And somehow that feminism itself is responsible for making men care about women in the 1960s.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 10:24 PM
2

Two men expect the same respect from a woman in regards to their sexual consent as women demand of men. ... You: HOW DARE! Men should not demand respect like this in order to be respected!
/r/MensRights23/07/21 07:51 PM
7

Without feminism we wouldn't have the primary excuses used to dismiss men's issues from public consideration: Patriarchy Male Privilege Toxic Masculinity
/r/MensRights23/07/21 07:31 PM
3

Please update this with the published version of your fourth cite. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33328202/ A disingenuous person in the comments is trying to discredit it.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 10:15 PM
7

Openly lying is a tad disingenuous, no? First link: "As part of the Global Early Adolescent Study, an 11-item measure of ACEs was developed and piloted with 1,284 adolescents aged 10-14 years in 14 urban communities in an equal number of countries." Did a search on "nonsignificant" in the second link, no where mentioned. I believe you're referring to the third link. "A meta-analysis of 172 studies attempted to resolve the conflict between previous narrative reviews on whether parents make system…
/r/MensRights22/07/21 10:15 PM
2

Post studies and original sources for all your assertions here.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 10:08 PM
3

It's all just wafer thin nonsense intended to give women the upper hand morally over men. Recognizing men's sacrifice or victimhood reduces women's ability to control them. Women who disavow these systems of feminine moral supremacy are, of course, exempt from this criticism. That's it. There's no logic or reason behind it. It's just a button to push to get men to do stuff.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 08:07 PM
2

And then blames you for the negative effects of its own expectations on you. ;) Toxic masculinity!
/r/MensRights09/06/21 02:55 AM
2

I dunno, I've seen plenty of men who love iguanas and snakes.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 12:46 AM
1

When you're ready please send an email to: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/21 11:08 PM
6

Sorry to hear about your struggles. I can relate. I'm actually interested in hearing about your insights into men's mental health. Would you consider coming on Honey Badger Radio to talk about them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/21 09:12 PM
1

This isn't as much of a cultural constant as it is in those countries. Daughters aren't considered our old age pensions here because we have completely different economic circumstances. TBH there's as much of a sex skew towards girls being born in our country as boys in others because of sex selective abortion here.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 02:40 AM
1

Old age homes predominantly take care of old people.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 10:06 PM
-1

Those countries that abort female fetuses usually have customs in which boys take care of their parents. It's more a practical choice than anti-female; they want someone to take care of them in their old age. There's no excuse for sex-selective abortion in our culture.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 07:39 PM
7

Men are more likely to die in extreme poverty. Not to mention this won’t include women who get food and shelter but not an income from family taking them in.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 12:33 AM
9

The primary reason is that men are taught they are worthless if they need help. What’s your solution? Blame them for believing it and not wanting to lose the last thing that makes them feel they have worth? I don’t often say this but what are you doing in this sub and how did you get so upvoted?
/r/MensRights09/09/20 12:28 AM
2

My friend this would be a book, a lecture tour, a new portmanteau coined, possibly a new protest series and an appearance on Oprah. Also it would be considered definitive evidence that all men are bastards and society hates women.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 09:08 PM
1

The feminist quest for new victimhood to exploit created all forms of intersectionality. It will likely also be eaten by what it gave birth too, but... it's still responsible.
/r/MensRights19/07/20 09:25 PM
4

Working on it!
/r/MensRights19/07/20 09:23 PM
2

But that's technically not "all." Just 90%.
/r/MensRights19/07/20 09:23 PM
5

It doesn’t matter if women are good people. What matters is the power the law gives them over men.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 02:19 AM
-12

For future reference, what compelled you to fuck a piece of shit you barely knew? Don’t say ‘because I’m a man’ because I know men who wouldn’t.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 02:18 AM
4

"You're complaining about police punishing men without due process? Why are you also complaining about metoo punishing men without due process?! What hypocrisy!"
/r/MensRights07/07/20 01:30 AM
1

What’s holding you back is a set of instincts you have no control over and can only be overcome via severe abuse.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 05:54 PM
4

Why do you think this started in the 90s? My mother was pursuing ‘women’s lib’ in the 70s. And I suspect women prior to her were pursuing whatever they called liberation. Freeing women is a millennia old project.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 02:49 AM
6

Do you have a link to this interview?
/r/MensRights28/05/20 02:46 AM
0

A pickpocket works without the awareness of their victim. In your analogy the women would have to be unaware of being touched which is patently ridiculous for a conscious being with normal nerve response. Do you often regard women as inanimate and insensate objects?
/r/MensRights17/05/20 10:47 PM
3

Yes because Men's Rights Activists don't face any hurdles.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 01:02 AM
2

The posted Australian ones.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 05:00 AM
5

And thus they became MRAs.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 11:52 PM
3

They are a taxpayer funded group that only offers services to one group of taxpayers based on a biological feature. This is exactly the crap this sub exists to call out. An actual inequality under the law.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 11:50 PM
1

Of the resources posted are any of them legitimate in your estimation? I’m compiling resources for men in the HBR discord.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 11:49 PM
5

You never know. Things can always change. ;)
/r/MensRights12/04/20 11:47 PM
10

Yes it was. They sold a line of kids clothing including the classic line “boys are stupid throw rocks at them.”
/r/MensRights12/04/20 11:44 PM
10

Except that they then go on to blame “toxic masculinity.”
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:59 AM
2

And both believe “men oppress women.”
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:58 AM
11

She’s pushing the “toxic masculinity” narrative using people’s concern for rape victims. It’s actually despicable.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:58 AM
15

Is it “toxic femininity” when women don’t report?
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:57 AM
2

Nah, they’re several steps ahead of you. It isn’t mental illness it’s “toxic masculinity.” When a man commits suicide because society doesn’t treat him like he’s a human being society just continues to blame him for it. People think it don’t be as it is but it do.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 11:00 PM
8

No shit it’s a trap. I went to a feminist panel once and they said “why can’t we have a conversation.” So I responded to what they had to say about MRAs with my opinion as an MRA. They then kicked me out of the convention.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 10:51 PM
6

Where is the research into the impact on men?
/r/MensRights29/03/20 11:55 PM
6

Why are you attempting to delegitimize his opinion by using stigma against a man being a victim?
/r/MensRights29/03/20 11:52 PM
4

Hehehe
/r/MensRights28/03/20 01:21 AM
6

None of your links provide evidence for women being gang raped or beaten to death on women’s day. They don’t even provide evidence of police brutality. But I did see one woman attack a man.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 01:10 AM
9

And good for him!
/r/MensRights28/03/20 12:52 AM
6

When you realize that men get into positions of responsibility by either proving that or displaying the impression that they provide and protect women best... or “society” which is basically another word for women... you understand why. That IS the merit all politicians are fighting to embody. “I won first prize in the ‘protect women’ race!” “Because you’re a man that means you advocate for men not the thing that got you in power in the first place!” What’s hilarious is that we’ve collectively d…
/r/MensRights24/03/20 02:29 PM
3

And yet if men reject the feminist enforced “masculine norm” that men as a group take responsibility for the world’s ills they get called hateful and misogynistic. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights21/03/20 08:11 PM
1

Explain what you mean by “femmephobia shouldn’t be the basis of pro-masculinity.” And why are you associating psychopathic traits with masculinity at all?
/r/MensRights21/03/20 08:04 PM
8

This subreddit is about calling out double standards tho.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 11:01 PM
1

Avoid unnecessary interaction with racists if you’re black. Same difference.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 04:32 PM
4

“Believe the woman” often equals “believe the rapist.”
/r/MensRights05/03/20 03:26 PM
13

They have supremacy. Now they they don’t know what they want unless It involves making men miserable,
/r/MensRights02/03/20 02:11 AM
1

How so if you don’t mind me asking?
/r/MensRights15/02/20 10:33 PM
1

Yes this is what I've found as well among a lot of young men. Did you feel that being a "victim of problematic thinking that mental illness was unmanly" contributed to your situation?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 08:42 PM
2

"They are the victims of problematic thinking that says mental illness is an unmanly signs of weakness." Let me ask you something if you don't mind. What thoughts were making you feel suicidal?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 04:07 AM
3

Absolute number one. Never date, speak to or interact with a woman who believes "men oppressed women" ever. Historically or in any other society. The instant she indicates she believes this, walk. I don't care if it's in the middle of a movie, meal or the Queen's tea. WALK. Change your phone number, change your locks, change your email. Ghost. This isn't a belief so much as it's social dominance positioning, it's a dehumanizing tactic intended to establish her as the moral authority in your rela…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 04:04 AM
2

Replace her with a cardboard cut out. No one will be able to tell the difference.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 09:26 PM
4

By happenstance I ended up on a ten hour transatlantic flight with a professor who had a professional contact with someone studying men’s suicide. Apparently many men get a hotel room before shooting themselves so they won’t traumatize their family.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:47 AM
13

The thing is, "toxic masculinity" must exist technically speaking because it is defined in terms of things that actually are real: it is a list of all the bad behaviors that men can possibly engage in. ​ It defines gender neutral bad behaviours--like rape and violence--as exclusive to men. Further it attributes blame for a tiny minority of brain damaged men who engage in anti-social violence(usually as a result of abuse) to the vast majority of normal men.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 03:53 AM
2

Giving women free passes to commit violent criminal acts is reverse evil. Therefore good.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:55 PM
18

Did he earn that money and assets?
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:29 AM
39

You asked him to give you an example of women shutting down a men's event. He gave you that example. You then insisted on seeing the men as somehow responsible for the women shutting down their event. Somebody has an uncomfortable relationship to recognizing women's agency.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:28 AM
37

I think I see your problem. You're incapable of seeing women's agency because it threatens you as a man.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:12 AM
15

No fault means no one gets away with adultery because it's not considered relevant who's "at fault" anymore.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:08 AM
3

First thing she does: Insults women who don't agree with her. Second thing she does: Defends feminist extremism as caused by "damaged women." Third thing she does: Blames men for how male rape victims are viewed. Fourth thing she does: Tells people to talk to those with a more open mind.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:05 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 02:18 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 02:01 PM
24

This is a "backtrack?!" Are you fucking kidding me? A soldier gets browbeaten by his wife to do "right" by his family by abandoning his service. I can't believe they had the gall to say this message supports servicemen. How? By saying their service damages their families? Not to mention this commercial is just... poorly executed. What does deodorant have to do with the central conflict? Can I hate this man's wife anymore? Did you not know he was a soldier when you married him? And what does any …
/r/MensRights02/03/19 05:03 PM
2

We will try to offer a discounted rate for attendees in the future but we have to cover our financial bases first!
/r/MensRights21/02/19 05:05 PM
4

It's completely statistically inaccurate. The "right" is now home to far more diverse viewpoints than the alternative conservatives who erroneously call themselves the left. They are more defined by a black and white moral world view, a desire to create a moral caste system and bronze age attitudes towards gender (minority and poor men should be removed from their families, minority and poor women should be used for their reproductive value.) I'm trying to think of a cute term for them. Alt cons…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 03:41 PM
3

Try force feeding a steak to a wolf vs. a dog. It doesn't matter how tasty the steak, if you manhandle a wolf into doing something he will bite your hand off and possibly tear out your throat. The dog will tolerate it. The difference is that one is domesticated. I'm sure this individual is well versed in the opinion of domesticated animals who may or may not have had their balls cut off. ​
/r/MensRights12/02/19 07:48 PM
3

Yes. Boys and men are not allowed to take a positive identity with anything they share with other men and boys(because male identity not real), but they are expected to take collective responsibility as men and boys for having created all sin in the world. Where is the recognition of men's humanity in all this? It is nullified and replaced with the belief that "humanity = femininity."
/r/MensRights05/02/19 06:02 PM
1

You probably mean "percentage wise" not "raw numbers"
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:27 AM
3

That's not "toxic masculinity." That's either structural brain deficits (anti-social violent men) or depression(suicidal men.)
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:20 AM
7

Even in their fiction this is true.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:19 AM
38

It's more narrowly defined because it doesn't exist outside of femininity at all.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:18 AM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 12:42 AM
5

Nonsense. Here’s why. If a paramedic at the scene of an accident just gawked and didn’t intervene to try and help the victims you wouldn’t accept her justification that ‘everyone else is doing it.’ Feminists claim for themselves a label that they say means challenging inequality. Therefore they are held to a higher standard than the average idiot. One that they consistently fail tbh and justifiably earn our scorn.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:45 PM
17

The ones making life harder for us are our fellow men. And there are plenty of men(and women) who say their primary tormentors are women and/or men have offered emotional support and condolences. Perhaps your suspicion of your fellow men may be clouding your judgement? ​
/r/MensRights02/02/19 06:03 PM
3

Men under the age of 33 are still more useful than women. At least when it comes to being a net contributor to society.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 04:27 PM
1

And you assumed a context in which a man would use violence against a woman. That would require the man to have brain damage that inspires anti-social violent behaviour. Just as far fetched.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:10 AM
2

It's not really a men's center, it's a studio space. You're thinking of CAFE. But thanks. :D
/r/MensRights30/01/19 03:17 PM
2

It's a hypothetical worse case scenario that any man would use violence against a woman. So let's take that out of the picture as well shall we?
/r/MensRights30/01/19 03:16 PM
6

But you know, he has duh pissical advaduhge as duh mehn. To bad if he uses it the system will swat him like a bug.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 09:18 PM
14

Men are physically stronger than a woman. They are not physically stronger than the half dozen men she can call to her aid at any time.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 09:16 PM
1

Is that really sexist tho?
/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:01 PM
2

That has to be a record for going from "big supporter of Men's Rights ACTIVIST" to "you just want to feel like a victim of society dick riding anything vaguely resembling a men's rights issue." Care to resolve your personal bullshit and try again?
/r/MensRights28/01/19 03:14 AM
1

I don't remember that particular crisis. I suspect it's not comparable tho.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 03:13 AM
5

You’re the one reacting to your identity being bruised.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:31 PM
4

Uh no. If we were acting ‘just like feminists’ we’d be justifying the double standard not consistently pointing it out.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:30 PM
6

But they likely didn’t get ‘niiiice’ enshrined in government policy. Often cited feminist Mary Koss creator of the 1 in 4 stat for rape of women DID get the idea that ‘rape is different for men, more like pre-consensual sex than rape’ put into government policy.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:28 PM
28

Americans are savages. They leave their shoes on.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:44 PM
17

If that's all you want women to be sure.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:42 PM
11

And yet she's supported by Netflix. At what point do people stop dismissing these individuals as cranks with no influence?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:38 PM
3

It's a huge misunderstanding of male sexuality as well. From what I've been told men don't go from 0 to 60 that fast either. Nor should they be expected to. For some men the sense of entitlement to his sexuality itself would be a turn off.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:19 AM
3

I'm trying to imagine a world in which I'm expected to open my legs to every hot guy no matter who he is and it's... not pleasant, really. Especially when you add in the fact that the same world would go "meh" if I was raped by an ugly one too.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:57 AM
2

There may be women in the world who don't actually want to have dimpled thighs and would appreciate a product that does something to heal the cellulitis that represents.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:17 AM
5

Why would anyone consider Joe Rogan's opinion important to anything? Of course it was offensive, it was associating a phrase defending the social behaviour of boys with rape and sexual harassment. It was saying that all men are responsible for the behaviour of an abusive few who, I might add, have brains noticeably different than the average men and usually come from situations of extreme abuse, neglect or single mother households.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:15 AM
6

As long as you're okay with a "Are we the best women we can be" add that asks if women are doing enough for men and children.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:10 AM
4

Women are told that fat, dimpled thighs are ugly = body shaming. Men are told that most men are either criminals or bullies or supporting criminals and bullies = calling out assholes. You logic is impeccable. Does it work with other groups?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:08 AM
1

"Poor oppressed white man." Go away bigot.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:52 PM
1

I got my civil rights stripped by a provincial civil court in Canada for standing up for men's rights. I suggest you slink off now.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:08 PM
3

You might as well ask why the us always seems to invade nations with oil reserves.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:04 AM
1

And when women got the right to vote they got it without the same citizenship responsibilities as men. Meaning that one act created a massive and to this day unaddressed inequality in favour of women.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:03 AM
3

So what?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:01 AM
21

I hope they mock cutting clits off too.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:42 AM
3

Flowers, a make-over and a gift certificate.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:20 AM
1

This one is biased towards women's issues too.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 06:08 PM
9

Nope. This is still biased towards women's issues. Further do they count "domestic technology" in the education category? When a household is producing 70% of a family's material wealth and living, how can you possibly say that being able to run it isn't an important skill?
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:12 AM
49

But feminists can be trusted with men's mental health!
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:50 PM
7

To those of you who think the ‘sub has gotten more hateful.’ I’d like to offer an observation. Society in general as demonstrated by media publications is getting exponentially more hateful towards men.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:06 PM
4

That won’t happen. It’s women’s traditional role to advocate for the vulnerable(usually children). No matter what white women will not be dethroned from that role when it comes to minorities.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:58 PM
27

Those are the wages of feminist victim mentality.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 06:38 PM
8

If they acknowledged it's primary causal factor (boy having been raped, particularly by a woman) and focused on therapy for male victims of sexual assault, we probably could reduce rape of adult women significantly. That's not what they care about tho.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:37 PM
2

Whenever women perpetuate patriarchy, a man is to blame for it.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:48 PM
1

They've already stripped black men of their protections due to stereotypes, then they moved on to white men as Luthor-esque supervillains, Asian men will be next. Gotta knock down all the pins.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:54 PM
1

At "least" 1 in 4 but definitely only 1 in 7? FFS. This is weaksauce.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 06:31 PM
23

There is an entire political movement devoted to women complaining about shit. Give it a rest.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:52 AM
12

All hail the omnivictim! Allmen!
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:49 PM
1

Attempters were presented with 3 statements describing the lethality of their attempt. Of the attempters, 39.3% (3.5) endorsed the statement that they made a serious attempt, and it was only because of luck that they did not die; while 13.3% (2.1) endorsed the statement that they were serious, but knew the method was not foolproof; and the remaining 47.3% (3.9) endorsed the statement that their attempt was a cry for help, and they did not want to die. No break down based on gender. However since…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 04:27 AM
2

Again, there are "attempts" that are intended to be discovered prior to death. Those shouldn't be counted the same as someone with the intent to end their life without any possibility of intervention. Notice women choose drowning and heights--both extremely lethal--more often than men, if access to guns was an issue, there are other equally effective methods that are accessible and women choose more often. So if there are the same motivations, women should be successfully committing suicide with…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:17 AM
2

Give me the statistics then. Did they test for the factors I mentioned to rule them out? Because I have received a significant amount of correspondence from men who have said that those were the factors involved in their depression/suicide attempts. Also there is evidence that men constantly fall through the mental health care cracks. "And to be clear, 'why more men are successful at commiting suicide' is statistically clear, it is due to methodology used." Yet female doctors and women in some p…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 12:04 AM
4

My argument is that you can't tell if people use less lethal means in order to pursue a "cry for help" rather than actual suicide. Not to mention most of the time when men attempt suicide they don't come to the attention of anyone. For each successful male suicide there was likely a number of attempts that were never detected. So men aren't detected when they're suicidal because society doesn't give them the same amount of support; and men are more likely to be suicidal due to greater social pre…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 09:58 PM
1

I'm putting out a final video for the fundraiser. I'll put another day on the clock when I do.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 09:19 PM
8

The one mental health charity specializing in men that I know of in the UK attributes men's lack of coping to "toxic masculinity." Further method itself can easily be an indication of intention, not to mention with more violent means "suicide attempts" may not be able to be recorded. We don't record every time a man puts a gun into his mouth and doesn't pull the trigger leading up to the one time he does.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 09:17 PM
3

Men who suicide are victims of not getting help from society, a pervasive belief system that blames them for the ills of society and socialization to regard themselves primarily in terms of protecting and providing for others. This last part has been stigmatized and lied about as "toxic masculinity." And to add a cherry to the shit sunday, feminists claim that men who suicide due so despite getting every advantage from society. So instead of recognizing men are dealing with greater pressures as …
/r/MensRights14/09/18 05:53 PM
2

LOL! A car person?
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:35 AM
7

yes!
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:09 PM
11

NCFM has been around for decades!
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:46 AM
2

There are issues for both genders but recognizing men's issues is icky so... women have it worse.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:44 AM
1

How many more boys are on the streets?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:42 AM
2

Well, Karissa, grab up a chair and watch us annihilate ourselves. Or just me. ​
/r/MensRights05/09/18 01:42 AM
2

Nope. If you extend an invitation to the general public, you're defined as a public event.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:14 PM
3

I'm already at risk of that. It was the risk I took on when I started to purse this lawsuit.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:39 PM
4

Calgary Expo is not a private event, it's open to the general public. Regardless, no where in the contract I signed did it indicate that I could not talk about men's rights. Further, I didn't talk about men's rights till it was brought up by a Calgary Expo volunteer in a panel discussion. Finally, I harassed no one. Now Karissa, why don't you just enjoy watching me be destroyed even more? I'm sure it'll be delicious for you. Why don't you invite friends? I do hope you upload that reaction video …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:11 PM
3

My first sentence: If you can't advocate for men's rights publically, we have nothing. How can you address issues you can't talk about? I really really object to you scamming MRAs I highly doubt that because if you did you'd realize that if people can't even _talk_ about men's rights in public without being persecuted, then it's completely sunk.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:52 PM
5

If you can't advocate for men's rights publically, we have nothing. How can you address issues you can't talk about? if you hadn't posted the banner no one would have known about your association with Gamergate Sam Maggs had been gunning for me due to the "Women into comics panel" and even prior. She would have just told the Expo we were "gamergoobers." Oh God, I am sure we all just can't wait for you to post more videos of you pathetically crying over this latest "injustice". Coming up. I hope …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:17 PM
3

The complaints about the banner, but not the banner. The association with gamergate indicated by the banner, but not the banner.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:20 PM
6

To kill a mocking bird
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:46 PM
3

Nope. The Expo, on stand, didn't reference the banner, but my association with Gamergate as the reason to evict me. The judge referenced this as well. Therefore if my association with gamergate is now an acceptable reason in Canada to break a contract with me, I am effectively unpersoned under Canadian law.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:12 PM
3

1) This one did. Right there in black and white. 2) I attended that seminar because I was a "woman in comics." Nowhere did it state that that seminar was feminist. I recorded it because we record everything at the events in order to prepare a video documentary for the patrons who pay for us to go. 3) The stated reason was my "association with gamergate." If the courts uphold that as the reason to break a contract of with me, then I've basically been unpersoned. "Oh, the contract said I had to pr…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:04 PM
3

Then it's only a matter of time before I am unpersoned since every single financial interaction in our society is governed by contract law. The Expo "reserved the right" to expel people after a mediation process that included an investigation if the allegations were false or not (if they were, they themselves breached the contract) then requesting the offending behaviour stop, then removal from the event, then possible banning from future events. There was no investigation that could have possib…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:45 PM
2

We submitted the appeal a week ago. Now, answer the question.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:08 PM
3

Answer the question.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:45 AM
3

You do that.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:01 AM
3

They've interpreted his ruling that way, yes. However the Gamergate BANNER wasn't cited as a reason. Just the association. In other words, no banner, still kicked out. So just to be clear, do you think it should be legal to discriminate against me as a proponent of gamergate in every aspect of my life?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:50 AM
3

You haven't read the contract have you? Yes they did.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:49 AM
4

There were 15 errors in fact and law. The banner wasn't reason enough. Not to mention it wasn't even cited as the reason I was kicked out. You didn't read any of this did you?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:35 PM
5

Have you read the judgement? Just one error. The judge ruled that evidence he decided not to look at in its entirety after I asked him to should be dismissed because it hadn't been looked at in its entirety.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:34 PM
2

What don't you understand about a Judge deciding law and fact don't apply? There's not much anyone can do when a Judge decides to go off-script.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 03:11 PM
1

Uh... incompetent lawyers are incompetent _in the law_ not incompetent at book keeping.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 03:10 PM
2

Should I have payed 110K for exactly the same result? The Judge didn't make his judgement based on fact or law.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 02:58 PM
3

Only if you actually have a real lawyer. Not with someone who has been disbarred and is not even allowed to call himself a paralegal "representing" you. Which he could only do because it was small claims court which does not require a lawyer. So why would I pay for one? He wasn't disbarred for being an incompetent lawyer.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 02:57 PM
2

How about this for a reason? If you can't advocate for men's issues in public, you can't do anything about them?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 12:37 AM
3

Uh... I was paying for legal representation. Around 55k in fact. Which left 29k for 26 trips to Calgary for everyone involved.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 12:36 AM
6

As long as women "have it worse" male pain doesn't exist, I think is the logic.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:04 AM
1

Heh.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:55 PM
2

Still not seeing these Killer cases and the Killer evidence of systemic illegal activity against MRAs. Of course not.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:55 PM
7

So what you've done here is, in response to someone correctly pointing out that men have to earn their identity to be men (without blaming women) said "well MEN blame all women for the failures of one woman." That's fascinating.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:34 PM
2

Who is 'we'?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:17 PM
2

Fundamentally the next fight is going to be over the financial and contract law system being politicized.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:11 PM
2

2014 - A detroit venue cancelled it's contract with AVfM leading to a huge financial loss. The ICMI didn't happen in 2015 because of it. 2017 - Birmingham cancelled its contract with J4M&B illegally due to pressure from feminist groups. A 2017 showing of the red pill in Calgary nearly was cancelled because the venue was going to pull out of its contract but apparently decided against it because of our lawsuit. One of the staff said "you know how litigious those men's rights activists are." I've …
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:06 PM
2

I am Canadian, the company is Canadian. No one else really had grounds to sue. >I'm bemused by the point that a contract was agreed upon, including the authority of the organiser to define what was not acceptable. It's not legal under Canadian consumer protection for a corporation to create a contract in which they don't have to uphold their side of it. What was "not acceptable" was defined in the contract. >I'm still unclear as to what is the advantage in Men's Rights to this case being won in …
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:50 PM
3

"Where is the Honey Badger Suing the American Government for equal treatment under the American Constitution?" I'm not american. "Where are the MRAs in the USA fighting to have the ERA enforced as it will give men rights they are denied on grounds of sex. It applies to Custody." That's the entirety of what the NFCM does. "Why anyone is investing emotional capital in a small claims case over a trade stand beggars belief. " With an appeal, this is kicked up to Queen's bench. It could end up being …
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:14 PM
2

A 7 day civil trial in costs approximately 82k.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:12 PM
3

In 2013 the average cost for a 7 day trial was 82k. Our trial was 7.5 days. Do the math. "The previous peak for a two-day trial came in 2009, when responses averaged around $29,000, but then dropped every year until 2013, when the average fee hit $18,000. The fall was arrested in 2014 with a 19-per-cent jump, but that was dwarfed by the 2015 hike. At $56,439, the national average cost of a five-day trial was up 30 per cent over 2014, while the cost of a seven-day trial was also up around 40 per …
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:11 PM
5

The Judge's opinion is read in the video. It's also linked in the low bar of the video.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:18 AM
1

I think it was administrative.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 10:37 PM
1

What were the findings of the inquest? Asking for evidence is now a down voteable offence? WTF?
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:35 AM
0

Is there a link to evidence for that?
/r/MensRights26/06/18 04:39 PM
4

Generally what I hear is that they're a bunch of fat, ugly lesbians who hate the pretty girls because they can't get laid. I'd actually prefer it if that was all it was. And yet feminist thinking saturates everything. How many people believe we live in a patriarchy (that was a radical belief a generation ago) and that women in the past were oppressed?
/r/MensRights25/06/18 04:18 PM
2

How about we just deal with the problems?
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:55 AM
-1

It makes sense if you define the poor as being given value by serving the rich. Every time a rich person gives a poor person a job, she's doing him a favour. Likewise every time a woman opens up an opportunity for a man(woman saver) to save her, she's doing emotional labor for him.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:54 AM
2

What do you think constitutes "male privilege"?
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:52 AM
2

He's not looking at ratios of news coverage.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 09:46 PM
1

Either the stories in the news undercount or accurately reflect the rate of female perpetrators. UNLESS you are saying that the news is inventing female perpetrators.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 07:01 PM
6

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175099/ Table 4. It's more likely for a male helpseeker to be arrested then his female abusive partner but not three times more likely.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 11:39 PM
1

We already can identify the sub-group of men who are likely to go on to become rapists of adult women. We've done the science. If society doesn't want to deal honestly with this sub-group of men and boys then there will always be a number of male rapists of adult women lurking around for targets. If women don't want to be responsible for their safety and they don't want chaperones or to be restricted in their movements, then we have to identify and deal with the boys who go on to become adult ra…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 06:28 PM
4

"A man dying of thirst in a lifeboat just can't understand that salt water will kill him." I think they understand all right.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 10:39 PM
3

The men’s rights community has become more cohesive and powerful. The greater society has become more deranged and psychotic. But here’s the secret. They’re destroying themselves. As they grow more invested in ostracizing their most productive class, their most productive class starts to turn away from them. We don’t have to fight them or appeal to them, we just continue to grow.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:09 AM
1

Yes. It should be on Canadian association for equality’s youtube channel at some point.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:41 AM
2

Thanks for the sticky!
/r/MensRights05/06/18 05:27 PM
11

As a women the fact that women allowed this horrific message to seize control of our society is a shame that I don't think I'll ever live down. Feminism is appalling. It literally cribs from the worst war propaganda narratives of the 20th century and turns the firehose of acid on it's own fathers, husbands, sons, brothers and countrymen.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 12:42 AM
3

It's an interesting theory, what's annoying is some articles are presenting it as fact.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 02:40 AM
3

Are you kidding me? We're able to do things now I couldn't have imagined 5 years ago. A couple of weeks ago Justin Trottier contacted me about promoting CAFE's annual conference because it not seeing the funding/ticket sales it needed and they were going to have to cancel it. Within a week or two of advertising it, the community we built up around HBR was able to turn that around and now it's a go.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:52 AM
3

I remember all the MRAs on twitter tweeting incessantly a year ago about some feminist academic who said that ski slopes are sexist or some dumb shit like that. Sure, it's fun to make fun of this, but honestly who gives a damn? Because it establishes a disturbing pattern in feminist thought namely reducing women down to victims of nigh everything. Check out feminist-run "Campaign against living miserably", "Fatherhood institute", "Mankind initiative", and many others. I already have slammed CALM…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:50 AM
2

Please do. I would love to get Hannah researching this case and doing a series on it.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:38 PM
5

Recognizing that when you give the average human a powerful excuse and a persecution complex that they can use to avoid taking personal responsibility... the average human will use it is now dread misogyny.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:41 PM
1

Yes exactly. Could you imagine if civil engineers were allowed to "not be happy with a single, unified solution?" Any "scientific" group that's expected to inform government policy shouldn't be allowed to get away with "there are many kinds of feminism..."
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:17 PM
8

Then they shouldn't be considered a group that defines reality or informs government decision making.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:12 AM
3

Meh. She lied about us in order to fit her narrative. Let her continue to do so.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 11:02 PM
2

They tell men and boys that they’re killing themselves because they don’t cry and then tell them that women and girl’s problems are superior and should be centred. It’s men and boys’ problem that they’re killing themselves because of stoicism; now be stoic and put women and girls first. It can’t be because men and boys problems are being ignored and they’re actively blamed for being harmful agents to women and girls, no! It’s because men and boys don’t center their feelings. Even though they sho…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 12:38 AM
1

They tell men and boys that they’re killing themselves because they don’t cry and then tell them that women and girl’s problems are superior and should be centred. It’s men and boys’ problem that they’re killing themselves because of stoicism; now be stoic and put women and girls first. It can’t be because men and boys problems are being ignored and they’re actively blamed for being harmful agents to women and girls, no! It’s because men and boys don’t center their feelings. Even though they sho…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 12:38 AM
2

They tell men and boys that they’re killing themselves because they don’t cry and then tell them that women and girl’s problems are superior and should be centred. It’s men and boys’ problem that they’re killing themselves because of stoicism; now be stoic and put women and girls first. It can’t be because men and boys problems are being ignored and they’re actively blamed for being harmful agents to women and girls, no! It’s because men and boys don’t center their feelings. Even though they sho…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 12:38 AM
2

You have your answer.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 12:28 AM
1

How did the girls react to boys crying?
/r/MensRights06/01/18 02:58 AM
2

You were supposed to express "sadness" and cry but over what exactly? What were you allowed to cry about?
/r/MensRights05/01/18 06:08 PM
10

How is it possible you can simply ignore the harm done by all of those feminists in the name of feminism? How can you want to focus on browbeating people into "respecting feminism" in the face of that much reckless hate?
/r/MensRights01/01/18 02:41 AM
3

Any woman who questions the "oppression of women narrative" now or in the past is categorically removed from the label of feminist by other feminists.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 02:36 AM
1

I would argue that challenging social norms, government sponsored campaigns that are deterious to men’s mental health is essential to overall improvement. What happens when you’re asked to choose between a politically “correct” position that is, nonetheless, antithetical to men’s health and well being? For example, advocating the notion that men are disproportionately to blame for social problems, or advocating that boys be taught to take responsibility for violence against women and girls in sc…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 11:55 PM
5

Milo isn’t a men’s rights activist, tho.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 11:46 PM
11

That’s a really good point. :\
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:39 PM
1

So... you recognize men’s rights reddit as a biased sample, but not support forums on the internet also representing a biased sample of people who have an innate belief that their illness/vulnerability entitles them to support from others rather than condemnation and blame?
/r/MensRights25/12/17 04:07 PM
1

But it's cultural marxism that's the problem!
/r/MensRights21/12/17 10:57 PM
1

Because I was asked.
/r/MGTOW21/12/17 04:00 PM
1

I almost never do anything mod related.
/r/MGTOW20/12/17 08:39 PM
3

http://www.femalesexoffenders.org/resources
/r/MensRights20/12/17 08:33 PM
4

They mention that kind of thing plenty in places like this. Support forums select for those who believe they’ll get support from randoms on the internet.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 02:41 AM
4

Or your help line isn’t getting to the men who decide to kill themselves rather than reach for help. Consider just how stigmatized sexual abuse by mothers is. Is it that inconceivable men and women just don’t reveal it? There is a huge population of male suicides that never make it to the attention of the authorities or help lines or support groups before they kill themselves. All of these sources are self-selecting thus no use for uncovering prevalence. Unless you can cite the statistical studi…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 03:19 AM
4

From what I’ve seen, you can’t make the statement that child molesting is more common in men. More commonly reported, yes.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 11:29 PM
11

Men may have been in charge, but they always existed in a system that expected them to protect and provide for their women. Feminists don’t want a reversal in which women exist to protect and provide for men.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 08:06 PM
4

Women don’t get arrested for being raped in Saudi Arabia. The story that this is based on was one in which a man and a woman were having an adulterous affair by the standards of Saudi Law (which are absolutely draconian) who were both raped by a gang. The two were arrested for adultery when they reported the rape; the man was subject to 120 lashes, the woman appealed her sentence and eventually was pardoned. Is it awful? Yes. Absolutely. It’s absolutely awful that both men and women get punished…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:46 PM
9

“True padeophilia is enormously more common in men?” Based on what statistics?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:43 PM
1

Black and white thinking ascribes blame to one side.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 01:35 PM
1

That is definately pushing a political agenda. I’m actually dumbstruck you aren’t able to recognize that.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:37 PM
1

The issue of holding women to a lower standard of accountability. So you think gender roles don’t exist?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:36 PM
5

Why do wammenworsters always go for this?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:35 AM
3

If he swipes them away, then what? He gets in trouble.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:34 AM
1

Men can't do what to women? Accuse them of harassment for breathing?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:32 AM
3

Did we read the same comment? Anyway, my psychologist went on to explain that I shouldn't use the term "Mens Rights" because it's been taken over by misogynists and turned into a hate group.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:31 AM
2

It is a fault inherent to the gender it's not a fault inherent to the sex. If you don't hold women to an equivalent moral standard as you hold men, then you will end up with immoral behaviour.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:28 AM
2

Women are held to a lower moral standard than men. It's right in the gender identity... be a man, man up, etc. A man must be strong and protect and provide for others to be a man, a woman is a woman by virtue of her biology. If we don't recognize it we can't fix it.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:27 AM
2

Are you mindful of the fact that this psychologist is making him uncomfortable and he feels unable to challenge her on that? This is madness.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:25 AM
2

If you don't have the confidence to challenge your psychologist on something that she's doing that's making you uncomfortable you need to leave. Now. No fucking excuse here. Get out.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:24 AM
5

Not in this capacity. A psychologist wields a certain amount of power over their patient. To use that power to push your political agenda is, frankly, disgusting.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:20 AM
1

You need to report your psychologist to a professional association. What she did was abuse and she should not be practicing.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:19 AM
2

You’re not as sensitive the way a cow is less sensitive than a buffalo.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:21 PM
4

Considering that the majority of rapists were themselves raped by women and that having been sexually abused by a woman as a teen is the largest risk factor for going on to become a predator... I would rather men become “over sensitive little damsels” and recognize the harm women’s sexuality can do... you know, then have them become rapists. Not all abused boys go on to become rapists, just of the men who rape, the vast majority were sexually abused.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:16 PM
1

And you damsel down on your damseling! Really, because you're only doing exactly what I said was going to happen? Calling out you damseling? A woman can't set foot in this sub without being vilified left and right. XD Why don't you all just be honest with yourselves, you're not looking for justice and "men's rights", you want a boys club Hey fellow penis havers! We just want a boy's club! XD where you can circle jerk over all the women who spurned you. You're making my penis so sad right now. So…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:03 PM
1

Then your first response wasn't related to what I said. "They're speculating on getting rid of Lincoln." If you think these individuals won't eventually... oh wait, they already DID engage in vandalism against a statue of Lincoln.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 09:47 PM
1

This is what I see he said: Everyone had difficult lives in the past, and you could even argue that men had it worse. Everyone had difficult lives. And you could even argue that men had it worse. Which mean's he isn't arguing that, just arguing that men didn't have it better. I'm a female who's all for men's rights, but I'm sure you'll treat me like this fragile, pampered, lazy idiot, self entitled, man hating straw-woman you've invented, anyway. This is presenting yourself as a victim. You just…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 09:45 PM
2

What the hell? Let me untangle this. He said that women “swept and cooked.” Yours is a distortion of history. Women worked, earned income and had property throughout all of human history. They certainly were doing more than “sweeping and cooking.” Not to mention in times past without public utilities, women WERE the public utilities, controlling medicine, water, heating, lighting, clothing, and edible food. That was a power that’s conveniently overlooked by Damselized history. He’s not treating …
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:44 PM
3

Goal posts they are a shifting!
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:33 PM
2

Do you believe that men as a group are to blame for ‘oppressing’ women? Do you believe they have unearned privilege over women? Do you believe that their gender expression is potentially toxic? You may not be aware and I hate to be the first person to tell you but... the vast majority of feminists believe these things. In fact these ideas wouldn’t exist if feminism didn’t exist and promote them. That’s not to say they are entirely to blame for how well they resonate. Other ideologies who talk ab…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:28 PM
3

My mistake. It wasn’t speculation. https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Abe-Lincoln-Statue-Burned-on-Chicagos-South-Side-440897443.html
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:23 PM
3

What are you basing this one?
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:48 PM
24

It's not because she doesn't know International Men's Day, it's because she's giving you shit for not knowing International Women's Day.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:45 PM
8

They're speculating on Lincoln now too.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:44 PM
8

Men are honoured for their achievements; they aren't honoured for their potential.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:43 PM
2

A summary dismissal involves a judgement by the judge which is then entered into record as case law. I read multiple records on summary dismissals prior to attending the trial in January, all of which could be used to argue a case in a court of a law as a precedent.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 02:14 PM
3

I’ve already explained the legal process to you. Continue to argue from your alternate reality.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 02:13 PM
3

"Allison was just like fuck this." To the panel. Why are you lying? If you went through all the trouble to go through this video why wouldn’t you look at what was actually said AT the panel?
/r/MensRights13/11/17 02:11 PM
7

Our council is disbarred. He was famous for his work for human rights and was disbarred under somewhat fishy circumstances. We’ve never hidden this fact. If the people funding this lawsuit wanted a team of lawyers to take on the case we would have had to fundraise in the hundreds of thousands to pay for four or five times the legal fees.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:27 PM
7

Does that sound like a good use of donated funds? We probably won’t even get a monetary reward. The point of this is to contest corporate abuse of power and to pave the way for others to contest it. when they didn't even have nine people at the conference? Karen Straughan, Brian Martinez, Hannah Wallen, Sage Gerard, Rachel Edwards, Alison Tieman, Jonathan Doyle, Mike Stevenson, Anna Cherry and her partner Shiva That’s ten, actually. Congratulations that after many many attempts they have finally…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:24 PM
6

A judgement occured when a Judge says “I’ve found in favour of [x].” Then that judgement sets a precedent. Which can then be relied upon by other lawyers representing clients in similar trials.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:17 PM
2

And then the same people wonder why women's achievement isn't just less than men's, but less than women's forty years ago.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:59 PM
1

Personally I think it runs the risk of advocating for a position that, while closer to the men's rights position, is still informed by pseudoscience.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:48 PM
5

Despite all the organizations fighting on behalf of female rape victims to get them justice and help... we're still disadvantaged relative to men? Why? Because my brain is inferior to yours? Because I'm more vulnerable emotionally?
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:36 PM
1

Feminism is harming men.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:39 AM
3

And for anyone who gets upset, it's because we don't expect women to regard men's sexuality as something they have to earn.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:37 PM
5

This sense of justified entitlement is much more common among women than men.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:06 PM
1

some consessions are just going to be necessary "Gay men are mentally ill, not sinners. They should be chemically castrated instead of jailed!" "Some concessions are just necessary for gay rights!" Fuck it. Time for the Gay dollar and some hard power.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:03 PM
2

It also wasn't built in Siberia.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:01 PM
2

Why is this pinned?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:00 PM
3

"There is a key difference of course – alt right ‘ironic racism’ is enforcing an existing dynamic, whereas feminist ‘ironic misandry’ seeks to flip an existing dynamic." Huh? Ironic racism is intended to mock racists. Ironic misandry is intended to mock men because "misandry don't reals."
/r/MensRights13/10/17 10:59 PM
8

That's what's so ironic about this conversation about "strength." The strongest people are the ones who are fully aware of where they're weak.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 02:53 AM
1

It's going to be a lot of abstracts. Let's start with the most painful statistical reality for men. If they report abuse to the police they are more likely to be arrested than their abuser. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175099/#!po=2.27273 Table 4.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:56 PM
1

If I list it for you will you read it?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:00 AM
2

You mean anecdote? I use this thing called "research" to come to my conclusions. Although anacedotes I have plenty of, far worse than I've ever heard from women too.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:17 AM
2

You know when I read comments like this by men I spend a few moments staring at them in shock. I've spent a good portion of my life researching all the ways men are degraded by society and nothing women come up with compares. At some point this assertion becomes insulting to me. As a woman.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 01:15 AM
2

I know it is.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:12 AM
1

How much is the net harm to men versus the net harm to women from "patriarchy?"
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:09 AM
1

So what does "patriarchy" mean exactly?
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:09 AM
7

Several posters have pointed out to them that the conclusion they posed is wrong.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:20 AM
5

Hmm... I may have misread or responded to an incorrect comment. Regardless. I personally criticize feminists because their beliefs are harmful to men's mental health and for no other reason.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:19 AM
7

How is that consistent with a system that preferentially benefits men?
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:57 AM
23

The research I've seen suggests that this is from a campaign that did only depict men as abusers and women as victims. I'm afraid you're right it's the community's responsibility not to upvote terrible content. Unfortunately your post is evidence that they don't take it seriously.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:53 AM
29

So you were corrected on this point and you're not updating your highly visible and upvoted comment. Interesting.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:45 AM
5

They're not going to take us seriously based on posts in a forum. Further who is "they?"
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:43 AM
2

I don't think you know where you live. Men have been removed from their own houses because they offered their couch to a couch surfing acquaintance and she charged them with DV which mandated the cops step in and evict him.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:40 AM
3

And yet, what is being promoted in million dollar advertising campaigns?
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:36 AM
15

Tell that to the government funded group making sure one side isn't seen. http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:35 AM
2

And in the rest of the world...
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:32 AM
5

How does it come from a system that preferentially benefits men exactly?
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:30 AM
1

https://youtu.be/ZXK0bfrvjPM
/r/MensRights17/08/17 11:12 PM
7

Because being blamed for things you have no control over is one of the central pillars of abuse. If we had a movement presenting an abusive narrative directed towards women, no one would argue why it needs to be opposed for women's well-being.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 11:10 PM
2

Wut.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 11:05 PM
2

You're right he does say 'left bias' but he says it right next to 'right bias.' This context changes the meaning from a negative to a neutral. Just a quality of liberal thought. Take a deep breath and read the whole document for context not just the stuff that confirms what you want to see.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 03:16 PM
2

I read the memo. He didn't say "compassion for the weak" was a liberal bias, he said it was a liberal quality. His memo didn't actually suggest that being liberal was bad.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:30 PM
6

and as odious as some of his personal and political views are Such as?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:39 AM
44

Yes. That's why I was drawn to this side is the equation.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:38 AM
5

This from the side that created "made to penetrate" in order to hide the fact that over half of the victims of rape in the last year (for three years running) on the biggest survey dealing with sexual violence are men. This media monopoly has to stop.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 07:11 PM
3

Wolves and dogs love raw meat. Try force feeding a dog. Then try force feeding a wolf. The difference? It doesn't matter how tempting the meat, a wolf prioritizes his free choice because he's not a domesticated animal. That's the essence of wildness, no matter how tempting something is, autonomy comes first. A wolf doesn't have a master. Obviously you do. Think about it.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 07:08 PM
14

"This project shows the status quo at the moment is to be supportive of hiring more women in the public service." Fucking stop blaming men for "patriarchy" plxkthx.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:39 PM
2

That's a little strong. Apparently what's being done is to stop the Title Nine witch hunt on college campuses by presuming good faith on the part of college administrations. As far as I can tell the Dear Colleague letter is just being looked at, nothing more.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:04 AM
3

Non-profits also can't issue tax receipts. You have to be non-political to be a charity. At least in Canada.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 02:46 PM
11

They're essentially selling indulgences. The more things change...
/r/MensRights02/06/17 02:45 PM
2

I've updated the post with the Melbourne meet up details. If you want to RSVP, please send an email to: [email protected] https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/6e4iuf/meet_the_badgers_in_australia/
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:24 AM
2

Send to: Badger Cave c/o Alison Tieman 113 First Avenue West Kelvington, SK, Canada S0A 1W0 For the reddit admins, I am the person who owns the office at at address. I am Alison Tieman. This is not doxxing. If you want proof I'm happy to provide. Write to me at [email protected]
/r/MensRights30/05/17 02:00 PM
2

Explain male privilege.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:16 AM
3

The Janissaries were a ruling class during the days of the Turkish empire. They occupied most of the positions of power politically and militarily, they were the "white collar" skilled workers and they acquired great fortunes in the service of empire. Only catch was... they started out the sons of christian slaves, kidnapped, force marched hundreds of miles and then brainwashed into Islam. A thousand years after the Turks started this practice of turning the sons of their enemies into the skille…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:09 AM
2

You're registered. Does Minnesota facilitate draft registration? Yes, like virtually all other states, the State of Minnesota facilitates draft registration by routinely sharing data with the federal Selective Service System on all male applicants aged 18 through 25 who apply for a Minnesota driver’s license, driving permit, or state identification card. The Selective Service uses such information to automatically register those applicants for the draft. http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/pubs…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:59 AM
1

Does the system you checked through also check automatic registrations? What state are you in?
/r/MensRights25/05/17 10:12 PM
1

It checks out. I've accessed government services, and I'm not registered. I don't plan on registering. If you've accessed government services you are most likely registered.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:59 PM
2

https://www.sss.gov/Registration/State-Commonwealth-Legislation Consent to selective service registration is automatic when applying for a drivers licence or state ID. In many states an ID is required for identification prior to voting. It's possible that a young man could go his whole life without needing a drivers license or recognition of his US citizenship, but in order to vote he would likely have to engage with the system at some point, whereupon he is automatically registered. Also the id…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:58 PM
10

Not registering for the draft does not directly prevent you from voting. They've gotten rid of conscious draft registration in favour of simply registering men whenever they access a government service. If a man doesn't want to be registered he has to forgo all government services granted to citizens.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:21 AM
1

Actually I won't ask that last bit because that's silly.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 12:37 AM
6

Does anyone have any numbers? It's getting to the point where I just want to reverse the typical shit this culture does. "22 dead, including 3 boys and 2 men."
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:31 PM
6

Please RSVP to come to the meetup! [email protected] Also consider supporting our fundraiser to get the Doge(Brian) to Australia as well: http://www.feedthebadger.com/projects/badgers-to-infiltrate-australia/ After we fund Brian, we'll work on getting a Melbourne meetup funded as well as an Anaheim meet up on the way back!
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:41 AM
9

You asserted that women have it shitty as if the shittiness is unique to women. You created the contest.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:26 AM
12

Jesus fucking Christ that person is a goddamn monster!
/r/MensRights23/05/17 05:37 PM
1

I didn't create the post or the request to sticky either. You seem really grouchy.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:00 AM
2

I don't think you are moving on. I think you just want to get the last word in. I mocked you by quoting what you said and asking the chat if we should shut down? Btw I plan to do a video on this. I'll ask the hbr audience if we should waste more money by trying to do a meetup in Melbourne and Anaheim as well. In fact I'll ask them if I should close the fundraiser as to prevent them from even being able to waste their money.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 09:10 PM
6

Women are more empathetic people than men because men aren't people. Empathy FTW!
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:21 PM
3

When you take out everything that directly references us, the only thing left is one sentence about Dean and sentences that indirectly reference us.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:04 PM
2

your one little sticky. ???
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:03 PM
1

This isn't self-policing. It's bad faith. There's no indication that Cassie Jaye is asking for an unreasonable amount for the rights from Netflix.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:02 PM
3

If Netflix didn't say why, why would you expect her to invent a reason why?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:44 PM
2

I'm betting not. Sometimes I am amazed how willing the men's rights community is to eat it's own.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:28 PM
3

That's your post after removing any direct references to us. All that's left is sentences telling everyone that funds are better spent elsewhere. As for whatever productive is in your criticism, we're already trying to deal with the loss of subs and views that, apparently, many creators on youtube are also experiencing. If you were aware of our operations enough to give constructive criticism that is valuable and not 'let's stop supporting them monetarily!', you would be aware of the steps we're…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:23 PM
3

I believe Dean Esmay even got money for a tooth, which would've improved the image of the MRM considerably at the time if he did indeed get his tooth fixed. Couldn't men and/or the MRM be better improved by putting this money elsewhere? I would encourage the mods to really think about if all this money spent is really in the best interest of the MRM at this point, and is really a good way to spend the money within the community of the MRM. Or, is this unreasonable spending that has almost no imp…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:22 PM
2

It wasn't my sticky. I neither created the post, stickied it nor asked for it to be stickied.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:19 PM
3

I'm not pretending "something is growing" I'm simply doing my best. Sorry dude, no gaslighting. You are being a hater.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 03:02 AM
3

If it doesn't you'll be happy to know that I'll starve and/or be humiliated too! I've pretty much staked everything on this gamble.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:17 AM
3

This has got to be the most hilarious thread yet. I have one person bitching about me because we "changed business models" and another saying we haven't changed business models. Holy shit, you people. Look, as long as people pay me I'll continue to do what I do. The end.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 11:30 PM
2

Just so you know we're attempting to get a meet up in Melbourne funded as well.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 08:41 PM
2

You're right, I don't remember this. She might have said it as a joke but what I remember was that she was coherent throughout the night. It was a party, btw.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 03:36 PM
2

The New York showing. I was there. How did you come by this information?
/r/MensRights21/05/17 02:28 AM
2

Yeah you're right.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:23 AM
3

Too late.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 11:51 PM
3

I'm surprised you don't remember. It was quite embarrassing. Who was it and which showing?
/r/MensRights20/05/17 11:38 PM
5

Taking funds for personal gain, aka 'vacations' is profiteering.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 11:38 PM
6

As a result of our fundraiser gaining publicity we were invited to speak on a tv show. If this comment is successful in diverting people from these sorts of endeavours that's one possible avenue of exposure lost to the MRM. Personally I don't treat these trips as "vacations." On every single "vacation" I worked the entire time gathering interviews to archive the people and perspectives in our community. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyRwczIsk2BBXrsZWLb-9SHrh1jjQZKeS I haven't requested …
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:39 PM
3

I'm okay with us not going to Australia; people vote with their wallets. And I have to say, the way they went to one of "The Red Pill" documentaries and got incredibly drunk was extremely unprofessional. They were slurring their words, being incredibly inappropriate, etc. Sorry what?
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:36 PM
8

This comment isn't a five page essay on the biology of eating cats. You're an imposter.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 03:22 AM
2

We're trying!
/r/MensRights17/05/17 04:35 PM
3

I didn't call you a liar I asked if you were being intentionally misleading. If you aren't then you're not a liar.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 09:15 PM
2

And to answer your question. If you aren't misleading people intentionally, then my response to your information is different than if you are. If you're intentionally misleading people that means you're going out of your way to paint a picture and nothing I do will change that. If you're not, that means it makes sense for me to tweek the system we've developed for publishing content. Which is not easy since it requires coordinating several people.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 08:17 PM
5

Someone can be mislead without lying. I'm asking which one it was.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 08:07 PM
2

As for your last question, why the fuck would I lie about that? what do I stand to gain? in what world do you think "I wish I had more content" is a smear? Get over yourself. You said we went from a free model to "paid" when we did not. A yes or no is fine.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 07:36 PM
3

The full video isn't behind patreon. The link is in the card at the beginning of the shows, it's in the low bar, it's accessible through minds at: http://www.minds.com/honeybadgerradio The full length podcasts are also available in audio at: http://www.honeybadgerradio.com Finally, the podcasts are not "behind patron" but uploaded with show notes for free on patreon. Now, I have a question. Was this distortion of the truth intentional?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 06:56 PM
1

No. The court case is ongoing because after actually taking a look at the case the judge realized it would take more than one and a half days to accommodate.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 06:36 PM
2

Which was?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 06:36 PM
6

The court case is ongoing.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 06:35 PM
2

The meteor hit earth because it hates women. Just as many men died so how can it specifically be targeting women? Meteor-appologist!
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:04 AM
1

meninists Seriously?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 08:55 PM
3

I see someone trying to maintain her identity as the "weaker gender."
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:15 PM
5

https://phys.org/news/2015-10-men-women-biased-stem-gender.html Here's another article reporting on the study's findings. Scroll down to the second graph. In reality despite the fictitious "bias" people who peddle diversity training are always finding, women are hired 2 to 1 over men. Scroll down to the second graph. That's reality.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:10 PM
5

So we have statistical evidence of institutional preference for women in the real world and evidence of some illusive bias against them. Which doesn't translate to actual loss of real world opportunities. https://phys.org/news/2015-10-men-women-biased-stem-gender.html Scroll down to the second graph notice how the number of women hired in STEM always exceeds the percentage they represent in the applicant pool.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:07 PM
10

Functionally every child in the west is chosen by the mother. She has effective birth control, abortion and adoption to choose from should she not want a child. A man has no legal recourse to avoid fatherhood even when raped. At this point in time if a woman chooses to have an expensive, time consuming hobby that impacts her ability to work, it's on her. Society has given her every possible out aside from cutting out people's tongues if they disagree with her choice.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:52 PM
5

We're both paid equally as genders and you gotta stop the "men are better in every way" mentality because that's how you let equality get away from you. How did you get that from what Bascome said?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:50 PM
2

At what point does men doing everything for women become oppression? Because that's the guardian system in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 11:46 PM
5

Just a question, you want the names of services that are afraid to operate openly least they be shut down?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 10:19 PM
3

I don't have a source except my experience talking to people and reading their stories.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:42 AM
3

It is absolutely true. At least some services for men have had to operate on the down low because if feminists get wind of it they will get shut down.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:04 PM
2

Because "made to penetrate" is rape. Not only are men raped by women but researchers bend over backward to hide the fact behind weasel words.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:01 PM
4

Uh...
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:15 AM
3

I replied about "made to penetrate" because THATS what they exclude from the rape statistics in order to undercount male victims. I never said the only male victims of rape are victims of "made to penetrate."
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:09 AM
3

Re-read the exchange. I made it clear that the largest portion of raped men are raped via "made to penetrate" and 80% of them are by women. This proves that statistics that exclude female perpetration of rape against men significantly undercount male victimization.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:08 AM
2

There are other organizations that don't engage in dishonest tactics. Give to them.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:57 AM
6

Whatever helps you sleep at night, bigot.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:56 AM
5

Literally the NISVPS says 80% of men who were "made to penetrate" were "made to penetrate" by women. That was the only statement I made. You are the one who added in all this nonsense about me excluding male victims of other forms of sexual abuse. Even when you include them my statement that statistically most men are raped by women is correct. I know these statistics like the back of my hand. I know that when you include the far smaller amount of men who are raped by our traditional measure of …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:54 AM
1

You need to see my receipts?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:51 AM
2

I'm getting really tired of this. I didn't only include "forced to penetrate."
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:50 AM
18

Or... um... they're being raped by not-homeless women? Like caretakers? Considering the rate of mental illness and the appalling level of sexual abuse by female caretakers for, example, boys in juvenile detention centers, I wouldn't be surprised. Please think about how the world works, how the physical strength and hormones of the sexes work, how genders work, and admit to yourself the fact that probably homeless women are in more danger to be sexually assaulted :( Blah blah blah.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:50 AM
3

However, empty beds in a men's shelter does not translate to beds available for women, no matter what. This sounds like a universal, yet as we've determined it only applies to one religious-run shelter in your knowledge.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:59 AM
2

Actually I do donate, but not to dishonest organizations that lie about data in order to exclude the needy.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:58 AM
8

Me: 80% of men who were "made to penetrate" (aka rape, they just didn't want to call it such) were forced by women. NIPSVS There were 1,581,000 men who were victims of completed or attempted rape, and 5,451,000 men who were "made to penetrate" someone else. Page 24 gives some perpetrator statistics. 93% of the 1,581,000 reported male perpetrators, 79.2% of the 5,451,000 reported female perpetrators.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:57 AM
37

Third, do you really believe that women-on-men rape is going to account for the enormous discrepancy? Yes, since women constitute the majority of those who rape men. Somewhere between 60-80% which means the male number could be 60%-80% higher. They say 55.9% of women had been subject to rape, which in most surveys seems to include completed, attempted and drug facilitated. They say 14.3% of men experienced completed rape. I don't know if these two statistics are comparable, because they could be…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:54 AM
5

However, empty beds in a men's shelter does not translate to beds available for women, no matter what. Empty beds at a religious shelter. What about government shelters?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:43 AM
38

He';s not being "made to penetrate". He's being penetrated. Which isn't as common as "made to penetrate." You're basically saying forcing penetration is the only way to rape a man. What? I'm saying most men are raped by women. This is what I said: it excludes most forms of female perpetrated rape thus excludes most male victims Notice I said "most male victims" not all. How do you people keep getting upvoted with this shit?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:39 AM
0

uh...
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:02 AM
8

It is. Believe me, a lot of the people on r/mensrights have gone over these statistics with a fine tooth comb. Most of what we consider "common knowledge" is based on cooked books.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:00 AM
7

We've already determined it's likely conservative christians not wanting men and women to mix, you can take your bigotry elsewhere.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:57 PM
13

Why?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:44 PM
10

http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf Quoting Munchausen-By-Proxy Table 2.2. There were 1,581,000 men who were victims of completed or attempted rape, and 5,451,000 men who were "made to penetrate" someone else. Page 24 gives some perpetrator statistics. 93% of the 1,581,000 reported male perpetrators, 79.2% of the 5,451,000 reported female perpetrators.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:41 PM
35

Look at all the upvotes on this comment that is essentially a misrepresentation of the survey. Enjoy your gross ignorance everyone!
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:39 PM
101

Look at the definition of rape, it excludes "made to penetrate."
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:31 PM
13

Excludes women. I assume for conservative religious reasons. So what's the situation in your city for government shelters?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:30 PM
15

Why don't they just create a bill to take away men's reproductive freedom... ... oh, right.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:28 PM
9

Is "forced to envelope" a narrow definition of female rape?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:26 PM
7

Yes. Unless khanfusion wants to dig up the "stats that say otherwise."
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:25 PM
16

I restrict my admiration for those who don't discriminate based on biological factors.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:24 PM
0

You might want to read the article again, that's just what it says. The fact that apparently 60% of UK victims are male compared to only 20% worldwide suggests that the gang aspect is much stronger in the UK, as opposed to 'honour' attacks, mainly on women, elsewhere. Where did you get 20% from? The stats I've seen are no where near that.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:19 PM
67

I do. I just don't donate to any organization that engages in bigoted shit like this.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:13 PM
83

NIPSVS: 80% of men who were "made to penetrate" (aka rape, they just didn't want to call it such) were forced by women.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:12 PM
10

So a private religious shelter excludes men. What does this have to do with public government services again?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:11 PM
32

The survey used, not how they reported on it, excluded male victims of "forced envelopment." I know why women are favoured, I'm not interested in your excuses. That is the most we can do in the current environment of funding and attitudes towards the homeless. The most we can do is not give money to bigots who discriminate.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:09 PM
81

Statistically it is.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:08 PM
11

Why?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:39 PM
7

Also, we don't have a waiting list for men, we have on average 30 empty beds, or more, at any given time. Is there some reason women can't stay there?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:39 PM
575

From your source: A total of 78.3% of homeless women in the study had been subjected to rape, physical assault, and/or stalking at some point in their lifetimes. Of victimized respondents, over half of the respondents (55.9%) had been raped, almost three-quarters (72.2%) had been physically assaulted, and one-quarter (25.4%) had been subjected to stalking. These rates of victimization were much higher than the national average found in the National Violence Against Women Survey. By comparison, w…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:36 PM
1

yeah.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:01 PM
14

Do you know the biggest difference between women's role in the war and men's? Consent.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:50 AM
14

Wanting the law applied equally is radical?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:36 PM
2

Allah Right, is that you?
/r/MensRights10/03/17 11:01 PM
9

Holy shit. Well prepare for more Rasmea Odehs in your respective countries because the right has zero argument against unchecked female muslim immigration. After all they're the most oppressed people on the planet and no danger to anyone. It's just muslim men who are the problem.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:58 PM
8

I think you missed your /s
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:57 PM
19

Actually no, the hormonal system that supports sperm production is more complex than women's. That's one of the reason why a male pill has taken so long to develop. (Doesn't explain why other forms of reversible male BC haven't come to market yet though.)
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:54 PM
8

That's because the article about "women wanting to be raped" is complete fiction. The last sentence reads(paraphrased) "all of the citations in this article were made up. This article is an illustration of the dangerous consequences of making up citations."
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:43 PM
1

Where are you getting "segregation?"
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:39 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_money
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:38 PM
3

The "gay dollar" isn't a boycott as it's a whitelist. Instead of taking money away, it's giving money to companies that openly advocate respect for the human dignity of gay men.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:37 PM
1

What? LOL!
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:56 AM
4

Personally I kind of like being a woman. If I'm abusive I can still get my husband arrested and freeze our joint accounts so he's out on the street if he doesn't have family. Then I can abuse him some more by taking away his kids and making him pay for the privilege of being an absentee father. Or maybe I'll just charge some guy I don't like with rape, feminists have incentivized every accusation going to court while reducing the burden of proof I need for a conviction. That means I can make his…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:20 AM
23

It'd be as if men not only could call women a "fattie" but imply she's also probably a criminal at the same time.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:03 AM
7

Karen won't be able to attend as she's going to be in Toronto to do a CTV panel discussion on feminism for women's day. She will try to skype in however.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 01:42 AM
7

You fucking privileged white male, go pay for your sins by being a slave! This totally won't come back to bite them in the ass in a few generations.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:44 PM
16

Will the media erupt into condemnations of feminism as "responsible" for this killing? ... ... Nope.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:23 PM
3

Tokenism has to be the emptiest form of self-righteousness known to man.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 10:30 PM
1

Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 10:25 PM
2

From the BJS. Further, there's no indication that the number they gave is sourced anywhere or that they did their own study. Large organizations make mistakes or gasp lie with alarming frequency.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 10:23 PM
3

Unless they provide a link to a source or study that can be analyzed, what they've given is meaningless. You would be a fool to believe it.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:17 PM
4

Let me give you a proper source. The Bureau of crime statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ipv01.pdf An interesting point to consider is the changes over time in homicide statistics. 2000 440 3.7 1,247 33.5 1993 708 3.7 1,581 28.5 1990 859 4.7 1,501 29.3 1980 1,221 6.9 1,549 29.6 1976 1,357 9.6% 1,600 34.9% The second column is men murdered by domestic partners, the third is the number of men murdered by domestic partners as a percentage of all men murdered; the fourth and fifth are th…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:42 PM
3

What's the APA's source?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:28 PM
4

One might only assume there's a male bias in that environment. A "male bias" of what nature?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 03:35 AM
2

What's your source?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 03:33 AM
8

Those parts of the world that circumcise girls also circumcise boys at around the same age.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:20 PM
1

Why would men and boys want to become oppressors by paying for women?
/r/MensRights09/02/17 04:24 PM
2

The kind of guy who values his own independence.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 06:46 PM
1

I'm not going to judge you for how you feel about your body. You just did. Frankly the entirety of your post indicates you're not okay with someone else's opinion on their own body. You might want to give careful thought as to why.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:49 AM
7

Is it okay for a man to be intact and proud?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:14 PM
10

So? What's wrong with a man being pissed that part of his penis was cut off without being consulted about it? Actually come to think of it, men who aren't pissed when they find out that someone cut off part of their dick are a little... hm...
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:13 PM
6

It's simple, part of his penis was cut off. He didn't appreciate it.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:12 PM
9

Wait ten years when they lose sensitivity. BTW, I've read threads about men who are genitally mutilated as an adult with exactly the opposite conclusion of what you've stated.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:11 PM
5

I guess it shows men are subjected to pressures of society as well. Interesting view of men being far more powerful, potent and resistant relative to women. Not my experience. Rather the reverse actually.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:10 PM
6

Just reread the OP, where did it say feminism?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:08 PM
12

Mostly no.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:56 PM
4

Eh? no. Read again. I have no information one way or another on that part of it. But it would surprise me if there was a big difference on the daughter subject. Even in the presence of evidence directly opposing your assumption.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:54 PM
7

You're also told you have mental health issues despite essentially being carried about in golden litters born by women and minorities. Apparently despite your incredible privilege and ease of life, you're just that emotionally fragile.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 03:09 AM
2

What's your citation for 50 men stoned to death? I want to add it to my citation horde.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:37 AM
14

Feminism is a celebration of male hyperagency.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:34 AM
10

I have a theory that we express disgust towards what we desire. In that sense feminists desire more than anything to be dominated by men. When I realized that I realized probably the number one reason I shook off feminism was because I'm one of the least submissive people on the planet. Just naturally.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:31 AM
6

The Affidavits posted are in support of a summary judgment application. The defendants are seeking to have the claim dismissed without a trial on the grounds that there is no chance of success. As we explained, the Summary Judgement was deferred to the trial date. The Judge who deferred the Summary Judgement also informed the Defendants that they better have their witnesses ready for trial on that date. I guess his opinion matters less than yours.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:56 PM
5

Thank you! I see the usual suspects are out and about, trying to spike the fundraiser.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:53 PM
4

Sounds like they were groping to find a man to blame.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 02:00 PM
6

Not enough to cover everything.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 01:47 PM
3

Not enough to cover the entire cost.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 06:18 AM
6

lonely.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 01:01 AM
9

So the fact he was willing to let her kill him. The fact that he tried to get her a way to get back to sleep. The fact he felt guilt... the fact he only did it in the first place because he was going insane with loneliness. Let's just switch the genders. Woman is woken up through no fault of her own, decides after going slowly insane after a year to wake a man up to that she finds attractive. Feels such guilt for it that she lets him beat her up out of anger and then gives him access to a way to…
/r/MensRights30/12/16 01:00 AM
8

Saving the man indicates internalized misogyny as the woman regards the man as more important than her. Saving the woman indicates benevolent sexism as the man believes the woman can't save herself. All movies should preferably involve people simply standing around and watching as others die.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 12:57 AM
5

What's your point exactly? That we're not everything to everyone? We never said we were.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 05:22 AM
4

Like a fungus, the more you scratch, the more it spreads. Guh.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 05:21 AM
4

Nothing "magically disappeared" you strange person. Most likely you fantasized some damning nonsense me because I'm obviously a space leper.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 05:03 AM
5

Oh ffs. Can you pick nits somewhere else?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 05:02 AM
9

No I didn't. Additional members of the Honey Badgers who couldn't afford travel did. Not to mention my own personal funds I put up for equipment and outfitting the booth.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 04:19 AM
4

No one pulled anything.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 04:18 AM
3

Defamation can be upheld against a US company as long as the ruling would hold in the US courts. The Speech Act isn't a silver bullet. Regardless the Calgary Expo also defamed us.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 04:17 AM
8

The reality is that men don't have any good choices representing them in Western politics. If they did, things would be very different. E-yup. All political parties don't represent men; they represent how men can best serve them.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 12:23 AM
10

Did you actually look at the fundraiser? I paid my own way. Further I paid for a significant portion of booth equipment and set up.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 12:02 AM
6

I'm not your gofer, I'm not responsible for finding evidence to support your accusations against me and I'm in the middle of preparing for a trial.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 11:33 PM
6

In some ways you're right. But the small claims court can kick this up to the Court of Queens Bench. Maybe if we can get this initial ruling, they'll advise us to go for defamation and sue for an order of magnitude more. Defamation is far easier to prove than injurious falsehood too. Keep talking, you're persuading me that taking this to a higher court might be worth it.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:58 PM
7

The services it provides is administration of honey badger radio. As of now, I do. That's how businesses work.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:42 PM
8

Damages will be awarded for the pecuniary damages I've sustained. I've already said multiple times there will be no settlement with a gag order. People are donating because they want to see this bullshit ideological puritanism curbed, not because they want me to collect damages. Although some also want me to collect damages.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:41 PM
9

I definitely believe you have my best interests at heart as the Plantiff. The judge is not going to be concerned about the popularity or publicity of a very minor contractual dispute. They will be concerned if they are politically biased against gamergate or men's rights due to the media narrative targeting both groups.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:32 PM
11

Karen didn't initiate the badger cave project nor does she directly benefit from it. I do. And I stand by what I'm doing. I'm trying to create a business that serves the men's rights community that lasts. If I don't make that business separate from myself, it will only exist as long as I do. And it will be limited to my vision. Of course I could just use the funds to live off of and then the service that I've built with the financial resources of men's rights advocates and gamergaters goes poof …
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:10 PM
9

The lost wages are for witnesses who wouldn't be able to attend otherwise as they have to earn money to eat.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:02 PM
8

Setting aside everything else... how is this a "fake" lawsuit?
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:02 PM
6

Actually everyone we're bringing up can potentially testify if necessary. Further the more of the team we bring to the trial, the more likely other people who are not part of the team are to come to participate which means the more likely we are to fill the court room. Because of the nature of this trial and the possibility of a hostile judge, this was something our legal agent requested we do.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 09:59 PM
1

Men are better at representing women's interests than women are as they've essentially been "bred" for the task. In the west the word "men" isn't even a uniquely masculine identity. You can tell because there used to be a word that was and it fell out of use. The identity of "man" is to serve, to provide and protect. And that's what they do. As such it isn't really an identity but a job description. Feminists are saying "our servants can't represent us!"
/r/MensRights28/12/16 02:53 PM
6

And so is this.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 03:40 AM
3

Well thanks, glad to serve.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 12:55 AM
18

Are complications related to female genital mutilation "women's issues?"
/r/MensRights27/12/16 10:45 PM
3

Hello!
/r/MensRights27/12/16 09:41 PM
18

Government decides that only one group--women--count as it's citizens. Men are enemy combatants. Women do nothing. Government enacts laws to protect it's citizens from enemy combatants. Women do nothing. Men treated like enemy combatants by the government start to act like they're in hostile foreign territory in relationships with women who are treated like actual citizens. Women: "whu...? Why? dindu nuffin!"
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:52 PM
13

Did you update your understanding based on the new information you received below and are you going to stop saying "half this sub is just strawmen?"
/r/MensRights26/12/16 06:03 PM
3

Feminism is essentially identical to war propaganda except that it paints male citizens as enemy combatants of their own nations. Being painted as an enemy by your own government is most definitely a men's issue.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 06:02 PM
3

Must have hit a nerve. But I can't see where I'm logically wrong. I've studied wartime propaganda and the stuff directed at western men is identical.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 11:16 PM
10

Not until we get rid of the government campaign to paint them as enemies of the state.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 08:59 PM
10

I dunno. Are there any feminists who don't believe that men are to blame now or historically?
/r/MensRights24/12/16 12:43 AM
7

Because they are hateful.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 12:33 AM
1

Save the Red Pill in Melborne! https://www.change.org/p/kino-cinema-stop-susie-smith-from-stopping-palace-cinemas-screening-the-red-pill-film
/r/MensRights24/10/16 03:27 PM
17

Second class citizens have to go to court to get their rights upheld. First class citizens just get their rights.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 05:19 AM
9

Last I heard he was arrested for attempted sex with a minor. Maintaining our belief that female sexual predation on male minors is harmless really comes with a downside. I wonder where he learned that?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:30 AM
13

Society to boy: "You're worthless, go make yourself useful." Society: "Why are all these boys achieving so much more than girls?" Society to boy: "Not only are you worthless, you're actively oppressing girls, go make yourself useful so you can give girls the shit you took from them." Society: "Why are these boys achieving so much more than the girls?"
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:24 AM
9

I hate to sound old fashioned, but seeing men stand idly by while their girlfriends go histrionic in public should make a person feel ashamed or attempt to control the woman, but if I suggest that out loud I would be crucified. What are they supposed to do?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:21 AM
11

This is what happens when women can't decide between men bowing to their moral self-righteousness or making them feel desirable.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 07:35 PM
5

Report this to the police. You don't need to get video proof. Come back and tell us what they told you.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:37 AM
9

Why is the hoax still being reported as if it happened?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:15 AM
1

It's at these moments that I... can't even.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:11 AM
4

Let's see what comes of it then.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 01:11 AM
3

Already tried posting a question. Was removed. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/54i2b1/advocating_for_men_in_the_paradigm_of_the_female/
/r/MensRights26/09/16 12:39 AM
13

Isn't that... toxic femininity Hilary?
/r/MensRights14/09/16 12:06 AM
1

He doesn't want to roll those dice. He should consider all authorities simply a machine to take his kids away and give them to their mother.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 11:59 PM
2

... because men piss on each other and birds?
/r/MensRights13/09/16 02:06 AM
2

They'll still do it and they will get away with it.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 02:01 AM
8

Was she abusive to you or your children? Get a restraining order. Always be recording every interaction with her and if the school won't cooperate then take them out sick till she no longer smells blood in the water. It may be a choice between losing your kids or their education as there is the highest probability once they're in her clutches they will never be returned to your custody.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 01:59 AM
1

Actually this authoress has just given the best arguement for encouraging 'tickle rape' articles and the like yet. They serve to discredit douchy bigots like herself!
/r/MensRights11/09/16 09:46 PM
3

Abusive people don't come out of nowhere. They come out of having been abused.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 09:43 PM
9

The parents lament that two of their other children have moved away to live with relatives because they don’t want to face teasing in school or risk running into Mitchell. Contrast this with Brock being protested by armed vigilantes. The siblings of victims of female pedophiles get teased.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 07:10 PM
15

Doesn't using patriarchal concepts like "lookism" and "fatphobia" to bully people and exert your dominance only strengthen their structural power? Come to think of it, if we got rid of all sexist, racist, lookist slurs, what would be left of feminist arguments? And if your moral supremacy is entirely based on insulting people using the language of patriarchy or telling minorities and women they don't know their own thoughts because they're weak minded... then how is that compatible with "smashin…
/r/MensRights10/09/16 06:57 PM
1

The bank thing fell through so I extended the fundraiser till friday. :\
/r/MensRights08/09/16 12:26 AM
2

I have a new one! It's about the narrative around men's suicide and how toxic it is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmFkG1CHoV8
/r/MensRights07/09/16 08:20 PM
11

Look up Denise Hines and "helpseeking behaviours of battered men". She found that men were twice as likely as their abusers to be arrested by police.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:18 PM
4

Actually it's a day and some change because of the goofy way the fundraising platform counts time. But thanks. :D
/r/MensRights31/08/16 08:34 PM
18

Feminism is not women's rights. It's an ideology that promotes gender roles more toxic then anything it campaigns against.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 10:47 PM
1

Instead of being quiet about them, talk about them in your own personal life when it's appropriate.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:11 AM
3

Why would you send your son to one of these fucked up institutions that are going to treat him like an enemy combatant?
/r/MensRights05/07/16 07:18 PM
2

Unless they rape him.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 01:10 AM
1

Yay!
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:38 PM
2

So you had to pay for your wife's lawyer and your own. Do you realize how few men are capable of that?
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:43 PM
3

Only when I started talking to lawyers in my area did they assure me that they absolutely do not operate like that anymore, but it generally depends on the judge. Did your wife have to pay for a lawyer? Also, it shouldn't 'depend on the judge' that's one way of describing a crap shoot.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:29 AM
0

Learn to read. If the plaintiff was the mother and sought primary physical custody, she got it in 81.5% of the cases (145/178). If the plaintiff was the father and sought physical custody, he received it in 33.7% of the cases (29/86). It's comparing when mothers are the plaintiff to when fathers are the plaintiff.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:27 AM
5

That's a study based on hermaphroditic worms. Goddamn fucking pop sci strikes again.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:23 AM
1

What "disadvantages"?
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:16 AM
-2

Without feminism there wouldn't be very well funded propaganda campaigns to paint men as "privileged." That rhetoric makes it nigh impossible to recognize when men have actual needs.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:00 PM
11

Men experience these forms of disenfranchisement AND they are simultaneously painted as privileged by very well funded propaganda campaigns. The 'us vs. them' mentality in this graphic is a response to men being subject to that propaganda.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:59 PM
3

GIVE UP THE VOTE.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:08 PM
18

Women are the real victims of everything! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvfuoW8ET1o
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:37 PM
1

Anti-feminism is not woman hating. Why do we support exploiting women for their fear? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvfuoW8ET1o
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:36 PM
3

REPORTED violence against men is by men.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:34 PM
3

Nothing? Something can be offensive and pointed out without it needing to be censored.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 10:51 PM
5

If you don't understand the difference between being offended by something and censoring it... um... are you a feminazi?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 10:27 PM
4

Then put it together because what you have right now is a baseless assertion.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 03:15 AM
4

I actually second the commentator below. Do you have evidence that this helpline isn't helpful for men?
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:58 AM
2

Yes. If both parents and the teen agreed that they should try out the arrangement.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:07 PM
3

You are in your own fucked up world. He said he discussed the issue with the mother and they AGREED to give him a trial month at his fathers'. The daughter just mentioned she wanted to go too. My child and I met with his mother to discuss and made an arrangement to give him a trial month to make sure that is what he wanted before filing any papers with attorneys.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 12:58 AM
4

Yes.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:46 PM
3

Ya know how you said someone was delusional earlier in this thread? What situation exactly are you responding to, because it ain't any situation I can see.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:45 PM
7

One that hears a woman say "I'm afraid of him."
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:40 PM
3

No, I guess I couldn't be terribly overt about my intentions to lie about stuff. If you can make someone else assume the liabilities legally then you would be an unethical but at least shrewd businessman.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 06:43 PM
4

Maybe if you use sepia tones in the tasteful nudes that'll help your SMV?
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/16 01:32 AM
5

So giving you what you want is more "alpha?" Interesting. Also interesting: How can I help him understand that it's okay to be more aggressive, to try new things, to let the "beast" out, to be more in charge in our relationship? You frame this like you're letting him discover the way HE wants to be rather than what it actually is which is you getting him to be the way you want him to be. How about this. Ask him why he doesn't want the relationship to be about sex. Figure out his head space. See …
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/16 01:27 AM
1

Sounds like you've identified everything you're doing wrong. Change it. BTW, are you doing it for him, or because you don't want to lose him? When you can look at your partner's vulnerabilities and want to do anything you can to ease them, not see him as less of a man for them, then you'll be ready for marriage.
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/16 01:19 AM
1

Why would you be hanging out one-on-one with your boyfriend's friend? How did this "date" come about?
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/16 01:12 AM
3

If you feel contempt for men who don't initiate, what happens when you're ten years into a relationship and your husband no longer "does it" for you because there is nothing left to initiate?
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/16 12:52 AM
5

I'm not a lawyer but I know it's a PAIN IN THE ASS and that it would take a shit ton of feminist lobbying to change what they need to get what they want. If no one mounts a continued opposition, they will get what they want. It being a pain in the ass non-withstanding.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:16 PM
6

Constance Backhouse went on cbc with screaming headlines that cross examination in rape trials was a "relic of the 19th century" and should be done away with. Now with the verdict therr is s full blown outcry to reform the judicial system. In the 18th and 19th centuries the conviction rate for rape when the accuser was a lower class woman was exactly the same as it is now. In the 18th and 19th centuries the conviction rate for rape when the accuser was a higher class woman WAS TWICE WHAT IT IS N…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:15 PM
1

It sounds like you're going out of your way to defend the practice of sweat shops that work their workers to death by spontaneous haemorrhage.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:46 PM
2

Oh shit are you a slavery apologist too? Get this. I'm against both! The rest of your comment is inarticulate gibberish; do you feel that the only slaves throughout history were Blacks in America? In other slave owning societies, slaves comprised what we would consider white collar work. They were still slaves because their owners could dispose of them as they wished, regardless of how highly paid they were. Just like soldiers!
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:42 PM
1

You were the one who introduced the specific example of black slaves in the US as a red herring. There were many forms of slavery throughout history with different specifics. From your own source on forced labor: "The remaining 2.2 million (10%) are in state-imposed forms of forced labour, for example in prisons, or in work imposed by the state military or by rebel armed forces." State-imposed forms of labor? Conscription?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:39 PM
3

Slaves often were paid a wage; some slaves weren't slaves their entire lives because they earned enough to buy their freedom. Many slaves were treated better than indentured servants because they had monetary value to their owners. In fact there was a specific group of slaves in history that quite resemble men subject to government conscription: the Janisaries of the Ottoman empire. They were boys taken from their Christian parents, force marched hundreds of miles (with subsequent deaths due to …
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:14 PM
3

I don't even understand how people can think calling conscription "state slavery" ridiculous hyperbole. Men subject to it 1) had no choice, 2) were even called "government property" or GI 3) lost all their legal rights to humane treatment and minimum standards of workplace safety. All upon risk of death or imprisonment. How does that differ from slavery? In all eras where men are disproportionately subject to state slavery, calling women "oppressed" is beyond laughable.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:28 PM
7

It happens all over the globe currently. And the threat of it hangs over every man in the US in the form of Selective service. It'd be sort of like... I dunno... if every black person had to sign up instead to put their lives and futures at the service of the state. But of course it hasn't happened in 40 years... Incidentally what would you call being forced out of your homes into situations where you are expected to face a high rate of death while engaging in labor with no controls on your livi…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:56 AM
8

Conscription targets men because they are men. Are you really going to say that widespread state slavery and execution of men is not something worth talking about?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:21 AM
9

And no one was aborting female fetuses because they're female, they were aborting them because they can't sue their daughters for elder support.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 10:56 PM
2

Hey now. You can always give it to me!
/r/MensRights28/02/16 03:28 AM
1

Do you feel that Muslims that target civilian western populations because of the actions of these groups are also wrong or are they justified?
/r/MensRights17/01/16 02:58 PM
1

You're absolutely right, dare I say morally correct? I'm just as debased, silopsistic and selfish as any other female. Or female stereotype. Also you're probably right that I did more harm than good. Only time will tell for sure. I feel that I've at least gained some insight based on the observation of threat narrative function and perhaps I can turn that into some good for explaining the anatomy of mutually supporting threat narratives in the future. Thanks for the enlightening exchange. I thin…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 02:35 PM
1

I'm glad you agree that preserving moral high ground isn't worth Muslim lives. Like I said no one can pursaude from a position of moral authority over the person they're trying to pursaude. In addition no one can overcome emotions that aren't recognized as valid. My hatred and anger at Muslims afforded me a rare opportunity to abdicate my position of moral superiority over those who fell the same as a result of seeing their countries being attacked. From that position I am more effective at vali…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:28 AM
1

Condensing threads. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/416y9w/shark_infested_waters_stop_ignoring_rape_of_boys/cz19dkx
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:11 AM
1

Oh I think you would be equally committed to getting someone else admit your moral correctness to you. So let me ask you... If I admitted your moral correctness at the cost of being able to pursuading people to step away from a threat narrative towards Muslims should I admit you're correct? (I see you're starting to resort to force to get me to admit you're right.)
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:38 AM
1

youre really invested in having me admit I'm wrong aren't you?
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:25 AM
1

Do you feel morally superior to them?
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:18 AM
1

How do you argue with an islamophobe? Trying to get them to Submit to your moral condemnation will simply entrench battle lines and likely end with either superior social or physical force. Of course pursuading them away from a threat narrative towards Muslims will require abdicating the moral high ground. I guess which you choose depends if you prioretize being right over caring about protecting Muslims.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:16 AM
1

Do you hate those people and groups you've listed?
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:46 AM
1

how can I accept your moral condemnation to your satisfaction?
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:44 AM
1

I'm just going to drop this here as I'm tired of answering questions about my islamophobia. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/416y9w/shark_infested_waters_stop_ignoring_rape_of_boys/cz16tl2
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:24 AM
1

Hate speech? Acknowledging you have negative emotions as a result of having had negative experiences with a group of people is hate speech? I accept your condemnation as your moral inferior along with all the people who are currently listening to extreme Islamic rhetoric about destroying the 'great satan' and watching the attacks in Europe and feeling fear and anger. Although before you get giddy and declare your moral victory consider this... You never persuade people from a position of moral a…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:20 AM
1

Then your respect was misplaced. I understand your need to condemn me and walk away.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:54 AM
1

My islamophobia existed long before current events in Europe or even 9/11. It comes directly from my experiences living in Saudi. Now obviously I am just as worthy of scorn and distaste as any other islamophobe. If you respected me prior to this revelation your respect was obviously misplaced.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:50 AM
0

I understand your need to despise islamophobes. Feel free to despise me and regard me as unfit for your respect.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:31 AM
1

I understand your need to feel morally superior to myself and anyone else who has negative emotions towards people of islamic faith. After all us "islamophobes" should be thrown under the bus, like any other miscreant.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:29 AM
1

Feel free to feel morally superior to me. I understand your need to.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:27 AM
1

Probably not. Like I said(or implied rather), this is an irrational feeling on my part.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:16 PM
1

I lived in Saudi for 10 years and I saw how they treated men of every other race.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:54 PM
2

Where larger groups are perpetrating the same thing collectively, it is usually the result of an admixture of extreme in-group sense of superiority and racism* And I see no evidence that this is the case.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:27 PM
1

Because I'm a misandrist when it comes to that one specific group of men.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:27 PM
1

Muslim refers to an adherent of an ideology. Arab(Semetic) is the race.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:23 PM
1

I approved your comment, not sure why it was removed. Arab(Semetic) is a race; Muslim is an adherent to an ideology. as Alison says - that it was the preachings of Islam that ‘made’ them do what they did to those 1,400 and rising white girls - it was racial prejudice and bigotry that did it. What? Did you watch the video or just knee jerk about "hate speech"? I never said that the "preechings of islam" drove anyone to commit rape. could just as easily be incorporated into a Feminist narrative of…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:22 PM
1

Muslim refers to an adherent of an ideology. Arab(Semetic) is the race.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:19 PM
2

Same culture. The west. Same cultural messages, "men ask for it." Jezebel women rape and rationalize, other women don't. Why?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:24 AM
2

Why don't you just answer the original question rather than bringing in abstractions? Same culture. The west. Same cultural messages, "men ask for it." Jezebel women rape, other women don't. Why?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:23 AM
2

But the message did not cause the behaviour. Unless you're saying that both raped but only one rationalized it with the message.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:05 AM
2

But the message did not cause the behaviour.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:05 AM
2

So the message doesn't cause rape. Thank you.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:52 AM
2

Every woman in the west is told that men are "asking for it", including anti-feminist women. What's the difference between the ones who rape and the ones who don't?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:51 AM
2

Same culture. The west. Same cultural messages, "men ask for it." Jezebel women rape, other women don't. Why?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:49 AM
2

What is the difference between WOMEN who hear the cultural message that men are "asking for it" and rape and those who hear the cultural message that men are "asking for it" and don't rape? (Does that help with the whole "acting on their maleness" issue?)
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:46 AM
2

Oh stealth edit. You didn't answer the question. I'll rephrase it. Read it carefully. What is the difference between women who hear the cultural message "men are asking for it" and rape and those that hear the cultural message "men are asking for it" and don't?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:42 AM
2

What is the difference between the people who give in to cultural messages and rape and those who don't? (I'm ignoring anything but this question now.)
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:39 AM
3

Why?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:38 AM
2

And here's the part of the convo where I start to repeat the question you are refusing to answer. Then if women aren't rapists because they're taught that men are "always asking for it" then what is the reason why those women who rape, rape?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:36 AM
2

What is the difference between the people who give in and those who don't? Muslim women are almost completely inaccessible.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:34 AM
2

Then if women aren't rapists because they're taught that men are "always asking for it" then what is the reason why those women who rape, rape?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:24 AM
2

Do you believe that people rape because they're told people are "asking for it" yes or no?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:21 AM
2

If people will rape because they're told group X is "asking for it[for doing/being X]", then it follows that all women will rape when given the chance since they're told men are "asking for it by being male."
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:16 AM
2

By this logic all women are rapists because they're taught that men are "always asking for it." I also think this is a ridiculous assertion. The fact that women can get away with rape and their victims are ignored doesn't affect the rate of rape directly. It may indirectly by preventing identifying female rapists or bringing them to justice. But only people who have been raped or suffered severe abuse rape.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:15 AM
2

So you don't give a shit about men. It doesn't change those cultural messages that lead to western women being seen as fair game by a minority of these people. By your logic all women are rapists. After all they're told that men are always "asking for it". Why do you believe all women are rapists?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:11 AM
7

Prove it. Find one shred of proof that you can teach a child to RAPE by saying other people are asking for it. You can say its western women abusing them till the cows come home, no ones going to buy it and it wont change a thing. Of course not, we're all in the grip of a threat narrative and the process by which men lose more rights by first demonizing a male out group and then turning on the male in group. Men themselves are complicit in this. I have no doubt my words are falling on completely…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:02 AM
7

It doesn't matter what Muslim Clerics are teaching. When you agree that you can teach rape through words, when you agree you can teach rape by saying "she's asking for it because she wore X", when you agree you can teach rape by saying "keep women in fear", you are creating the foundation for the feminist rape culture narrative. And once they successfully apply it to Muslim men, YOU ARE NEXT.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:47 AM
5

All of what you're saying applies to men in the west and the feminist narrative about "rape culture". Muslim's/Men think women are lesser? Check. Muslims/Men think women "ask to be raped for wearing mini skirts"? Check. Muslims/Men rape to keep all women in fear? Check. Throughout history I've seen this time and time again. We start demonizing the male out group and then we import the whole shebang to the male in group. Whatever you guys say about Muslim men is going to end up being legally appl…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:41 AM
5

So instead of looking at the rate of sexual abuse of boys in the middle east, which is higher than that of boys in the west, and adding to that the fact that the strongest predictive factor for boys to become abusers is having been abused... And everything I'm saying is backed up with science and statistics... I'm supposed to agree with feminists that if we say a woman is "asking to be raped" if she engages in X, Y, Z behaviour that will cause men to rape? When this incredible leap in logic has …
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:25 AM
4

Why? Also, when did this become r/feminism, that's exactly the logic behind rape culture.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:17 AM
3

I found something. Rates of CSA of boys in the Middle East are not only higher than that for boys in western cultures but also higher than rates of CSA of girls in the Middle East. This is opposite to findings in North America and Europe and authors in the studies reviewed commented on this. For example, in observing that male students were significantly more likely than female students to be victims of CSA (recall 20% v. 15%). In addition the table figures for Palastine indicate that only 5% of…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:32 AM
3

Unfortunately the citation I saw for sexual abuse of boys in Islam has disappeared into the ether. Try looking up "bachu bazi"
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:23 AM
3

Due to social mores against premarital sex, there is a large degree of sexual abuse of boys.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:12 AM
3

Sexual deprivation and believing "women don't sexually gatekeep well enough" have never been studied as causal factors in why rape happens. I imagine because researchers in the field don't find them plausible. However I'd be interested in seeing any studies that do look at those causal factors.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:10 AM
1

Someone like her is in your government.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 04:26 PM
2

No, this isn't internet drama. This is for real. She's in your government, feeling up your laws.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:50 AM
4

If a men's rights activist anywhere defined rape to exclude a man penetrating a woman, then got a government body to agree with him and exclude female rape victims from statistics... Do you realize that MRAs as a whole would be utterly vilified by that and I'm not even sure it would be wrong to do so.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:50 AM
3

This absolutely affects male-male rapes as well. And, presumably, the female-male rapes that utterly dwarf them in number.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:44 AM
3

It's not "atypical" for violent crimes. You're comparing rape to all crimes.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:43 AM
5

Because it is societal pressures that cater to women emotionally, whereas men are catered to politically and socially. How?
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:37 AM
1

I meant that in contrast to what she did do.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:53 PM
2

“You’ll never get this chance to know me ever again!” Huh. So she couldn't come talk to you? I mean with a polite display of interest.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:08 PM
32

Yay! Go get em karen!
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:28 PM
7

I felt so abused , depressed and hated it. Never again I told myself , no more beta male . Not sure how you're supposed to "alpha" your way out of being crushed by the state.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 02:09 AM
1

Either that or give me the child and have her have access to both of us. Why would giving you custody give her access to you and the child?
/r/MensRights07/11/15 02:06 AM
3

I'm guessing she'll probably rape an unconscious drunk guy and then accuse him of raping her because she was wasted when she did it. In fact anyone want to bet that was what she "survived?"
/r/MensRights26/10/15 03:30 AM
1

Wow, congrats Jonathan! The message is really getting out there.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 09:10 PM
3

When I look at feminists, I see idiot children right out of 1984--the junior anti-sex league--who are basically the attack dogs of the political elites. You really think that the elites aren't the masters of manipulating female nature to their own tyrannical ends? It sounds like this is motivated more by "let other men suffer for being inferior to me" and is the attitude I pointed out in this: https://youtu.be/Dey4zm2M7Ks?list=PLJOWMtQBIv1sFM-u8FIKZxK0_AkoBzeCV
/r/MensRights14/10/15 11:48 PM
3

Male soldiers are primarily assaulted by other men, and the assaults they face tend to be more violent. Actually no Cracked. If you look at the stats they're primarily assaulted by women. Civilian women in particular. Go fucking figure. And let's be frank here: If ISIS released a video depicting themselves sexually assaulting a captured American soldier, the nation would demand their entire hemisphere get nuked. Only if that victim was female.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 10:48 PM
2

the GQ article even goes on about why men are unwilling to come forward and talk about what happened to them. GQ said this did they? The same GQ that published an article mocking my husband for being a victim of attempted rape?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 10:45 PM
3

If we let feminism win, there will be no internet for men to find MGTOW forums on.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 10:42 PM
5

The problem is, rhetoric like that allows for ignoring men when they do need help. No there may never be a widescale roundup of men to shove into gas chambers, but we'll still practice neglect of men when they're mentally ill, suicidal, suffering from DV, rape victims etc. We should be able to say this shit to all people or no people. Preferably all people.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 08:30 PM
6

When people with exceptional skill are looked at for why they have exceptional skill it's found that they focus on their failures and how to succeed despite them. Failure is both an essential component of being exceptional and also an essential component of satisfaction. Nothing is satisfying if you risk nothing in the process of accomplishing it. Further the successful navigation of failure creates esteem and a sense of efficacy in oneself. It develops our concept of personhood--of agency.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 08:23 PM
3

For women it's sort of like circumcision. Because they've never experienced having that "part" they don't know what it's like to have it and think it's irrelevant. How would you experience growth as a person if all the negative consequences for your failures were erased?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:10 PM
6

in real life I'm pretty happy when I do NOT get the consequences of my failures. Think about having no consequences to your actions. Ever. And it's the negative consequences to your moral choices that make the positive consequences meaningful. That's why games have the negative choice tree even though fewer people take them. Essentially it's a form of inverted isolation--no one is actually recognizing you exist as a person; to be honest I'm surprised more women aren't completely apeshit mad.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:26 PM
4

1: We've started to use gynocentrism as a trigger word in a similar fashion to how feminists use 'The patriarchy'. We? How many people here agree with me that gynocentrism is damaging to women, and not in a vague "patriarchy hurts men too" way? Have you asked? In a real and verifiable way backed by science into human psychology and possibly to the tune of a dollar amount. By centring women, society also removes their personhood--removes recognition of the consequences of their actions--turning t…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:10 PM
0

Statistically police are twice as likely to be abused by their wife than the general population. This may hold true for male soldiers too.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 10:34 PM
10

Abused men are statistically more likely to be arrested than their abuser. So, no, men don't "get away with this shit" like women do.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 10:30 PM
0

Perhaps you just stated what was said. Regardless your podcast was quite negative about the panel discussion I thought the internalized misogyny on display was disappointing, yes. But before they kicked you out of the convention. No. That would be after the allegations of harassment were made. Directly attacking panel members publicly to a large and perceived as hostile (to them) audience is a much different thing. So remarking on someone's internalized misogyny (aka. their desire to remove thei…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:02 AM
2

You didn't read the placard on the feature image that says "honey badger brigade?"
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:55 AM
3

As I recall this was one of the stipulations required of attendees at the conference. As I also recall, on the evening of the 17th Alison published a Honey Badger podcast on YouTube which was quite negative about this panel discussion, selectively used recorded quotes that were not fairly indicative of the entire panel discussion, and generally accused the panel members of "damseling". We didn't use "recorded quotes" during the podcast. And yes, I did point out that they damseled which I found d…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:51 AM
3

There are two potential comic book conventions that I'm now excluded from. The 12,000$ is a separate issue from my potential income as a comics artist and relates exclusively to the HB presence at the convention.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:49 AM
2

Right in the feature image to this post you can see "Honey Badger Brigade" printed on the placard to the booth.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:48 AM
3

As you can see from the feature image, the booth was registered under "Honey Badger Brigade."
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:46 AM
1

But they never learn, do they?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:37 PM
2

Actually this is fantastic. Reddit investors and admins are now responsible for us. Welcome to the hellhole of social ostracism, boys! Don't bother trying to climb out by stepping on the rest of us in here, they won't ever let you escape.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:37 PM
3

Equality is when women are exactly equal or superior to men in any particular area.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:37 PM
10

I mean, most the people who tell men "don't be a pussy" are probably other men. K I'm gonna need you to turn the victim complex down to maybe an 8? Wow... did that hairpin turn hurt?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:51 AM
1

You know two other things that are good at taking beatings? Slaves and oxen.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:49 AM
2

Death in childbirth is also natural and arguably it would improve the species considerably if we allowed useless women who fail at giving birth to bleed to death as nature intended. Yet we do everything to prevent this natural occurrence from benefiting us all.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:41 AM
9

Take a stiff drink first and see for yourself. But don't invite Amy Schumer over.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:46 PM
3

Peirce, I wanted to ask if you'd be interested in coming on Honey Badger Radio to talk about this issue this coming Thursday?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:57 AM
2

And how would we do this? By doing it.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:36 PM
2

It's also noteworthy that the female actually commits "sexual assault" at one point when she escalates without the consent of the male. To be honest, this is the only solution: Men need to start nailing women for their sexual abuse. The tidal wave of cases would sweep the justice system into oblivion.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:26 PM
1

Also if we don't reach our funding goal, it doesn't refund, we just figure out another way to pay the legal team the remainder.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:59 PM
1

We didn't raise over 10k.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:24 PM
1

Privilege is a tactic often used to demonize a group of people. In other words you paint them as having "unearned privileges." I don't need to buy into a rhetorical weapon to spread hate to see that gender is a dynamic that both benefits and harms men and women(and that we can intervene in a nuanced way that benefits both.)
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:19 PM
25

You don't get it. Your privilege doesn't protect you from being abused and demonized--it explains why abusing and demonizing you is justified. Your privilege's only tangible real world effect is as an explanation why people get to treat you like shit.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:52 AM
56

No because Feminism is an ideology not a sex.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:50 AM
4

Hey thanks! I'm sorry I've been MIA on the subreddit lately.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:00 AM
2

Inflating women's victimhood relative to men is misogynist. Men's issues are the best counter argument to that toxic notion of womanhood being equal to victimhood.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:41 PM
7

Because this entire video is essentially a troll.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:56 PM
4

All feminism is is an elaborate way to maintain women's dependancy on men, while blaming men for them being dependant.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:19 PM
1

And then, fifty years from now, "THEY TREATED WOMEN LIKE PROPERTY!"
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:18 PM
14

Because a media outlet is blaming a group of men for one woman's decision? This is exactly the fundamental issue of men's rights. The consequences of women's choices and actions get foisted onto men. Not good for either.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:15 PM
1

Hi!
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:14 PM
3

Empathy is said to be a positive trait women have. Empathy is a positive trait people develop by recognizing that they don't necessarily have it innately. We think that women have it innately... the result is that women as a group don't develop their empathy.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:12 PM
3

Net worth and income are irrelevant to determining oppression. There have been slave classes in history that earned more than their slave masters, some even kept it!
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:32 AM
5

And a gelding yoked to a plow is rather more productive than a wild stallion...
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:13 AM
50

If they would stop being your friends because you disagree with them... wow. That's a funny sort of "friendship."
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:10 AM
4

Me, I love women How is this any better than hating women? Me, I'm neutral towards both women and men. Until someone gives me a reason to be otherwise.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:52 PM
24

Believe me, it will end with "for your own good ladies" laws if feminists continue on their current path. Incidentally I believe that feminism is exactly how strict and severe male legal domination ends up happening in the first place.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 01:35 AM
2

Because the context makes it worse. Mary Koss: "If men tell me they weren't raped, I believe them; if women tell me they weren't raped, THEY WERE RAPED!" BTW, capturing the rape of men with more neutral wording doesn't make it any less dishonest to advertise it as non-rape when it's a man but rape when it's a woman (and saying that you're "respecting" men's definitions is incoherent when you don't respect women's.)
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:00 PM
3

prevalence of sexual violence against men perpetrated by women is inappropriate because men may be less likely to use that label themselves. 75% of the women Mary Koss labeled "raped" in her famous 1 in 4 study did not say they were raped. My god what a bunch of mealy mouthed rape apologia. If it's rape if its done to a woman, it's rape if it's done to a man. End of story.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:51 PM
5

That's directly from her own published study. There is no context in which that statement isn't a feminist flatly denying the rape of men (and then going on to influence the CDC to do the same.) The fact you all are defending this behaviour rather than calling it out speaks volumes.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:26 AM
1

That's not the point. The point is that safe haven cannot be used without the consent of the mother. Or the father first establishing custody; which is ridiculous. Does the mother first have to establish custody? A "right" exercised only at the consent of another person is not a right.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 06:08 PM
6

I don't think it's blame, but you are right. Men shouldn't have to fight back; women should be doing it for them.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:49 AM
7

And yet, no safe haven laws apply to fathers. The most wonderful thing about fathers is that there can be bad ones and everyone admits as such. Mothers become the sewer of society because there is no cleansing light of scrutiny that can penetrate our idolization of motherhood. Except the mother's own moral code. Which no one else will hold her too.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:40 AM
5

Do they: 1) make any effort to locate the father or family and determine if he consented to abandonment? 2) when they found the mother and found out that she wanted the child, was the father still expected to assume responsibilities? We both know the answer to these questions is "no" and "yes".
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:36 AM
12

Actually no conservative position on women's reproductive freedoms even comes close to the reality of men's lack of rights. Not only would female rape victims have to carry to term, they would also have to give up custody to the rapist and pay him.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:33 AM
6

This presumes the courts can make such a determination with fairness and lack of bias.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:55 PM
1

As long as they are allowed to co-opt the movement for social justice for their own personal aggrandizement, the world will not improve, not for women, people of color, gay and transgender people, or the poor. You're missing someone.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 09:20 PM
8

In the interests of women's advocacy alone I will oppose feminism. They target women with a relentless deluge of terroristic propaganda; eroding away women's confidence, independence and self-worth in the process. I won't say feminists are the enemies of women; at least no more than factory farmers are the enemies of the pigs they slaughter.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 08:59 PM
15

Why is this an issue? If it's this contentious let the kid choose for himself when he's 18.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:27 PM
14

I've also observed that women fail to assimilate to a culture that does not pander to them emotionally and then blame that culture. And then there are women who do assimilate to a culture.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:23 PM
25

How does this woman still have her job? Because she does racism the progressive way.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 06:04 AM
3

First example. Someone needs to do time under a good Samaritan law. Second example. Someone needs pay up for defamation.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 12:23 AM
3

Poorly equipped to meet the needs of DV victims is an understatement. One man left an abusive situation at home and suffered an assault in a homeless shelter that left him hospitalized.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:19 PM
26

"I don't want my wife to send me to the hospital." "YOU'RE TRYING TO EXTORT COMPLIANCE YOU ABUSER!"
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:18 AM
3

Oh I misread what you were saying. BTW, that's a very clever framing.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:48 PM
1

....the heroes leave earth at FTL speeds and return to find that the entire human race has been, voluntarily, genetically altered to be genderless. If the race is genderless feminism is out of a job. Who will be the victims and who the aggressors? Feminism isn't about un-gendering the human race, it's about promoting the most gendered set of psychological rules in human history. By reducing women down to victims in every conceivable circumstance and socially shaming anyone who disagrees, feminis…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:40 PM
5

"Nazism is about fixing the german economy. It just also asserts something about the cause of economic collapse." So much can be hidden with this nonsense.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:08 PM
124

Yeah, I would have to agree. If the other parent is basically coming after your child's genitals with a knife, kidnapping becomes far more defensible.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 05:31 PM
2

Cash is king. As the games industry is finding out the hard way.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:37 PM
1

Begun?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:33 PM
2

[email protected]
/r/MensRights05/03/15 10:58 PM
2

think of themselves as victims in every facet of life? Are there any facets of life that men are victims and women are not?
/r/MensRights04/03/15 05:11 AM
3

question the narrative of a movement that sometimes makes some pretty bold claims about gender dynamics. Such as?
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:48 AM
3

At what point does pointing out misogyny become rude? This subreddit is for discussion of men's problems. At the very least women's issues are off topic; at the very worst it's bringing the traditional narrative of womanhood as victimhood to the one place that challenges it. Why do you feel compelled to do this?
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:48 AM
4

That's because you don't care to know. Once again you're promoting misogyny with your womanhood-as-victimhood narrative. Do you think you can stop metaphorically punching women in the face for one fucking minute? You just said that men are experiencing problems and yet the real issue is that women are still victims. Do you people ever listen to yourselves?
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:14 AM
4

You are if you're promoting a one sided view of victimhood. Tell me how much work you've put into looking into how men are victimized. Exactly. Because the point for misogynists like yourself isn't to combat victimhood, it's to promote viewing women as helpless and inferior.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 10:38 PM
5

Why is there a nasty connotation to the word victim? Because promoting it as an identity for women is toxic and often creates the very social issues that so called women's "advocates" decry creating a self-fulfilling moral panic. If you are going to promote women as being defined by victimhood, I am going to question it. HARD. You defend your shitty, abusive, misogynistic belief and if you can with reason and logic I might concede that women are actually facing "their own set of problems" becaus…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:57 PM
4

There are no NGOS and few government programs that help men. In fact what little gains the men's rights movement has made wouldn't exist without the internet making the bar of entry to mass media lower. Why is this? Because men actually are discriminated against when they need help. Women are not; at least not when it comes to occupying the role of victim.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:02 PM
0

No we can't.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:38 PM
1

I was referring to the rationale for circumcision in the 1850s when the whole mess started. Why, pray tell, would you think I agreed with it? I'll indulge your tangent. What possible relevance is the reason why these women cut in the 1950s to the topic of why doctors started the practice in the 1850s? Because the reason why we cut vast numbers of infant boys today has also changed from the 1850s.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:37 PM
0

Meet offence with offence.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:33 PM
5

You. You're coming here guzzling the female-as-womanhood koolaid like an addict. Have you ever questioned that toxic belief about women?
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:32 PM
3

The genital structures of both male and female fetuses develop from the genital tubercle which is an external structure. The erectile structures of the genital tubercle migrate into the pelvis in the developing female fetus and are entirely internal--the same size as a male penis in fact. If the clitoris was the analog of the head of the male penis, it would be the same size and would actually be composed of erectile structures instead of being entirely composed of connective and nerve tissue. T…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:48 AM
4

The victimhood is strong with this one.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:40 AM
1

During that era, the 1850s, that was the stated reason for preforming clitorectomy. They did not routinely cut girls to "cure" them of having intact female genitals as they did with boys. There had to be an additional reason to preform it.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:36 AM
1

less likely to be killed but more likely to be raped and forced into marriage There's no evidence that women are more likely to be raped or forced into marriage.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 12:58 AM
8

Though I'm sure she would be the type to blame her husband for cheating. She might be the type to also cut off his genitals for cheating. And then she'll be cheered again by the audience for being strong and independent! "I think it's absolutely fabulous!"
/r/MensRights02/03/15 12:54 AM
2

During that era, they cut off the clitoris as a cure for female compulsive masturbators or as a cure for epilepsy(castration was the cure for men and boys), they did NOT ever advocate it for all girls as they did for boys.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 12:49 AM
1

No it isn't. The head of the penis is erectile tissue; the clitoris has no erectile tissue as all erectile tissue in women migrates into the pelvis during the formation of the genitals. The counterpart of the foreskin is the inner labia plus clitoris and clitoral hood.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 07:00 PM
3

You think there's a win condition here? How droll. Why don't you look into how gamer gate is being portrayed in the media and they don't even advocate for men's rights, they advocate for journalistic ethics. The choice here is between--sensationalist media coverage and no media coverage. Incidentally the only way to avoid Sharlet-style "coverage" would have been to exclude the majority of media from the event entirely. Because aside from his apparent fixation on fucking underage girls as a fanta…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 11:17 PM
2

I'm going to have to ask you what you think AVfM could have done?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 09:20 PM
10

The researchers found the exact opposite of what they wanted to find. I'm amazed they published it at all.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:23 PM
9

Yep. The evidence is actually stronger that female circumcision reduces the transmission of HIV. Source(just a quick search): The Association between Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and the Risk of HIV/AIDS in Kenyan Girls and Women (15-49 Years)
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:43 PM
2

They only cut off the clitoris for compulsive masturbators, not as a cure for female sexuality entirely. Also the clitoris--which is non-erectile connective and nerve tissue--does not correspond to the erectile structures of the penis since all erectile structures in women are internal. It most likely corresponds to the male frenulum (the french call it the "sex nerve") which is also connective and nerve tissue.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:42 PM
2

I'll just leave this here: http://youtu.be/0ncjGFIFPJI
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:40 PM
1

Human males tend to be characterized more by elaborate cooperation rather than competition.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:39 PM
2

Interesting how the summary is directly contradicted by the text lower down in the page: A. ramidus existed more recently than the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees (CLCA or Pan-Homo LCA) and thus is not fully representative of that common ancestor. Nevertheless, it is in some ways unlike chimpanzees, suggesting that the common ancestor differs from the modern chimpanzee. After the chimpanzee and human lineages diverged, both underwent substantial evolutionary change. Chimp f…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:38 PM
7

Just a brief note. In anthropology the canine size of Ardipithecus (the possible common ancestor of both chimps and humans) suggests low competition between males and pair-bonding. 1* (Incidentally the greater dimorphism in chimp canines has caused at least some researchers to consider them compromised as a human behavioural model.) There is some controversy over whether or not Ardipithecus is in the human lineage, however Australopithecus, also shares a lack of canine dimorphism with Ardipithec…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:28 PM
5

I think perhaps one comment he made explains better than anything else: "I don't read the comments" This is always telling. The comments are where the common rabble are; if you're saying "don't read the comments" then you ARE the establishment.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:08 PM
7

As a warning for the female guest to not visit this subreddit to see the vile hate, he warned her that you could not go to a page without seeing links to videos of men beating women, with exultant comments by men saying she deserves to be raped. Ah the abusive lengths white naughts will go to keep women from seeing their own agency and becoming independent from them. He admitted that it enrages him when a woman beats him in an argument. Female agency enrages him? Fancy that.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:05 PM
12

Hey thanks for the welcome... rewelcome?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:15 AM
5

I lay odds she's the real predator.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 10:32 PM
6

How do you know?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:41 PM
12

50% custody doesn't even phase you? Perhaps the mom should be paying him... that is if she makes more.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:21 PM
6

Remove all mention of woman as class victim from feminism and what are you left with?
/r/MensRights25/02/15 11:38 PM
6

Again, Feminism tries to get women to submit to a snivelling, servile victim identity. It's supposed to be pro-woman but fails miserably. Which really doesn't bode well considering women are who feminists say they "advocate" for.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 11:31 PM
5

Brace yourself for your daily dose of "woman as eternal victim". Please assume the position for insertion, head down, mouth closed, hands holding anus open.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 11:25 PM
9

Feminism sells submission to a victim-identity for women. You can say it isn't misogyny to do that or that feminism is really about "equality" but... that's still what feminism does.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 11:21 PM
6

You are using a common sense appraisal to sell this: Women get more support for defending themselves against an abusive partner because they have, throughout history been made to be weak and not fight back. You want me to submit to a victim-identity as a woman? No sale.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 11:20 PM
18

You're not getting it. Males get the privilege of being RECOGNIZED as able to work harder than everyone else. This needs to end!
/r/MensRights25/02/15 11:07 PM
5

I don't think you understand what I'm saying. This isn't a patriarchy it's a feminist dystopia based on rendering all consequences to women's actions null and void. It's a hell of pointlessness.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:19 AM
5

Well sisters, here dies our agency. They WILL create a world in which every woman is reduced down to how she's acted upon in every conceivable situation. And what will that world look like when they've final raped it into being?
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:36 AM
5

This "deadbeat" situation seems to have a very simple solution. Instead of forcing fathers to pay to be IN their children's lives, why not force them to pay to be OUT of their children's lives. I wonder why governments haven't thought of this?
/r/MensRights21/02/15 05:19 PM
10

those gender roles were created by men. Not by the gender that does most of the socializing of children? This woman as passive vessel of men thing is so... tiresome.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 09:48 PM
7

And people don't "assert dominance" because they feel powerless?
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:20 AM
9

Feminists are deliberately hiding evidence of male victimhood by women in order to maintain an ideology that defines women as primary victims. http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf Now, admittedly they are simply buying into the traditional role of woman as weaker vessel, but they are the only ones who are not just promoting it but politicizing it.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 10:25 PM
3

The concrete lawful discrimination of men Such as discrimination in government mental health funding and services? Also recognizing that the wage gap is due to women's choices and not discrimination means that if a group wants to actually address the problem, they should address where it lies. I don't care if there's a group of people addressing the fact that women are less motivated to make money. Actually I think that would be perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 10:04 PM
16

Feminists are also responsible for hiding symmetry in domestic violence for years. I think we can safely say that it's feminist hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 10:03 PM
17

You want a man who acts like your inferior while no doubt wanting him to also act like he's your superior for purposes of arousing you. Guh. You. Out of my sex.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:56 PM
16

FFS, men did NOT consider women property. Women were not property in the 1950s, the 1850s or the 1150s.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:54 PM
3

All you need to do is say "yes, and all men deserve respect regardless of who they are or what they do." When she sputters some form of "b-b-but norealmanchivalrywahwahwah...." You respond with one word. Equality.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 10:59 PM
2

As someone who's been observing the "progress" of feminism on the issue of men and boys being raped... They have a lot of ground to cover before they can even be seen as neutral. http://youtu.be/h7kqIHdIo2Q
/r/MensRights15/02/15 05:06 PM
6

For something that doesn't exist, they sure do have to say it "doesn't exist" a whole lot.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 05:03 PM
5

But then MRAs showed up to protest having a man in the kitchen, showing that there's just no way for them to win with some people. Wait, wut? Did some atheists then show up and complain that the pie doesn't have homilies to God written on the crust?
/r/MensRights14/02/15 12:16 AM
20

And do what exactly? Ignore 3/4ths of the problem in favour of focusing on the women? The men get raped and THEN murdered.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 12:10 AM
10

1) She. 2) Those men who did have suffrage also had obligations to the state if they failed to full fill they could lose not just their citizenship rights but their lives. Therefore suffrage was not a right.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:05 PM
11

Men didn't have a right to vote either.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:10 PM
5

Women victims because they're women? Yep.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:35 PM
7

Feminism necessitates agreeing that women are victims of inequality. I disagree that women are victims now or ever.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:22 PM
1

What's your background and how do I get ahold of you?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:08 PM
2

Yes, that's a great help! We'll credit you and read it on air.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:29 PM
6

I'm a woman and my relationship is none of their goddamn business. This big sister crap has got to stop.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 10:58 PM
4

I would leave if I were in those classes and not return.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 10:51 PM
5

It's amazing how well that works to illustrate what they're actually saying.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:45 PM
2

This may be relevant to your interests: http://youtu.be/0ncjGFIFPJI
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:20 AM
3

“Ultimately, the costs of wrongly disbelieving a survivor far outweigh the costs of calling someone a rapist.” Because the costs to certain groups of people(aka men) don't matter!
/r/MensRights25/12/14 04:34 PM
3

Women have the privilege not to be beaten with the privilege stick.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 04:33 PM
1

Oak, long time no talk!
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:07 PM
2

Yes we know. Can we move on to the issues now?
/r/MensRights25/09/14 11:30 PM
3

Feminists want to enjoy the zero culpability level of children: consent does not equal consent. Feminists want to crawl back into the comforting arms of coverture, except, in this case, every man is responsible for her actions instead of her rather than just one.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:50 PM
6

get implants so if they make a generilzation about men to make themselves feel better How do you feel about men making generalizations about women to make themselves feel better? I've heard feminists call this "sexism."
/r/MensRights18/09/14 11:52 PM
2

From the article: A state health survey in 2012 found that more boys than girls were getting married before reaching the legal age of consent. In one district alone, Madhya Pradesh, 18.9 percent of males were married before legal age, compared to 12.5 percent of females. Yet a little more than 5 percent of boys are married between 15 to 19, while nearly a quarter of girls are wed during those years in India, according to a 2006 Population Council survey. The statistics aren't matching up. If mor…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 10:59 PM
4

While it's still terrible for these young boys to marry so young and perpetuate the cycle of poverty, this article states that they're marrying girls of the same age or younger than them. Do you have any evidence that child brides are more likely to marry older than child grooms and that rape and abuse is regularly practiced(as opposed to the older groom waiting?)
/r/MensRights18/09/14 10:09 PM
5

Because it demonstrates something about our priorities. When an issue overwhelmingly leaves dead male bodies our approach is gender neutral. When an issue leaves a majority of dead male bodies our approach is female centric.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 04:21 PM
0

Let's count the falsehoods. Victims, especially women, have always had to battle taking the blame for being attacked, said Laura Dunn Because male victims of rape are less likely to be blamed? While about 99 percent of rapes are committed by men, according to U.S. government figures, few men are rapists. When you need a penis to rape by definition, it's amazing even 1% of rapes are committed by women. People who have been burglarized aren’t blamed for not having enough surveillance gear in their…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:29 AM
19

So women should "always someone to be respected." What if they choose to do things that would, were a man to do them, result in a loss of respect? Sounds like this is sexist to erase women's individuality in favour of fetishizing the fact they have cunts.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 07:54 PM
2

Although all SJWs want us to believe they can save the world. Funny how that works. Maybe that's the real difference. Gamers know that saving the world is a fantasy; SJWs think they're all the Special in the real world.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:19 PM
2

And we're the ones presenting the most widely known critique of feminism.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:34 PM
10

Because we're not people, we're tools of feminist theory.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:39 PM
7

The community of harassers, whiners and those not wanting critique is mostly feminist.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 07:15 AM
3

And to think people consider women harmless.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:53 AM
6

It's an ideological clown car that takes itself very seriously and forces you to too. (Remember the "biggus dickus" scene in "The Life of Brian"? A twitter will cost you a crucifixion. Yeah.)
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:26 PM
47

They are every bit unethical as anyone else. Here is where you're wrong. They're worse.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 03:56 PM
12

I find it more toxic to women to see them as victims because they're women than to experience cat-calling. Where's my movement?ohhereitis
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:43 PM
2

yay for fuzzy memories of things of a thing.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:39 PM
1

Hm. I don't think it's quite the same. If a child has a bad mother it's usually 75-25 that they'll be blamed for it and not the mother. Whereas if a man fails to protect a woman it's rare that someone will blame her for being an incompetent coward and not protecting herself.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:27 PM
1

Enjoy your prison.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 11:46 PM
1

Removed all the double negatives. If you are a thing, then you are another thing and you do this other thing. Thanks. Very insightful.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 11:38 PM
12

I'm just going to put this here...
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:24 AM
1

it simply cannot be said that women don't have an expectation of service placed on them. It's not tied to their gender identity. Most human beings are expected to be polite, to give to others, to be kind, to be attractive, to apologize even when they aren't necessarily at fault. Only men are told they are not men if they don't serve others. Literally are not men. As in an adult male human does not have a sexual identity outside of service to others. If you doubt it just think about what it means…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:21 AM
3

The problem is that women do not have an expectation of service to others built right into their gender identity. And by that I mean they aren't considered "not real women" if they don't protect and provide for others. "You're not a real woman" means that the woman in question has a penis. "You're not a real man" means that the man in question has either put his own interest first or failed to protect and/or provide for someone else. These differing social pressures are going to produce differen…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 12:54 AM
5

He's pointing out real phenomena. It does women no favors to ignore it.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:44 PM
32

If a woman has bad relationships with men it's because men are bad. If a man has bad relationships with women it's because men are bad.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:42 PM
1

Here's a question... Is that an accurate observation?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:38 PM
1

How are you able to pass judgement on me being "too proud" without actually understanding my pov?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:35 PM
3

Technically they're already excluding people with "special needs" since men are particularly vulnerable to dying during famines! Info in the show notes
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:02 PM
3

Actually, previous research has found men are the most vulnerable population during a famine. They're the ones most likely to starve to death. Hardly evidence that they're preventing food distribution to other people. Info in the show notes.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:00 PM
4

Men are also more likely to die during famines so essentially the WFP is taking a situation in which men are more vulnerable and ensuring that they're even more likely to die. Info in the show notes.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 01:59 PM
5

Started?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 01:50 PM
4

I don't see hatred. I see criticism. I know you'll try and call this satire or sarcasm Perhaps my bar for "woman-hatred" is set differently. I'm still not seeing it. This tends to discredit your argument: Men need to feel useful and to have a positive male identity. Men relate to each other by doing things. Not by blathering about their "feeeeelings." How is this hatred of women by any stretch of the imagination?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 01:50 PM
1

Yes, if you don't see the point of view of another person, you are incapable of seeing them as human. That doesn't mean you have to agree. (However in this case, she can't see that justifying cheating on your partner because they won't comply with your sexual requests is hardly sympathetic--because the person being cheated on is male.)
/r/MensRights24/08/14 01:48 PM
10

I've read the first page of his comment history. I see nothing to support your assertion unless you define hating women as seeing them as moral agents who can be shitty people and deserve to be called out for being shitty people.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:17 AM
8

Really? And it hasn't been feminism opposing the official recognition of male victims of domestic violence for the past fifty years? Processes concealing symmetry in domestic violence Feminists have essentially locked down domestic violence services as female-only. Them saying that the lack of recognition for male victims of domestic violence is due to patriarchy is like a racial segregationist saying that the lack of recognition of the worth of educating black people is due to black culture. Th…
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:12 AM
1

Yep. If she can't see a situation from the male point of view, it's less that she doesn't see men as decent human beings but doesn't see them as human beings.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:05 AM
3

The feminists should be happy! More women for the male rapists!
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:16 AM
8

Tell everyone how to identify a crazy bitch before she reveals the crazy. Please.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:14 AM
1

Actually from what I've seen I wouldn't take that bet. She presented evidence that women who have male partners who don't have sex in the positions they like are more likely to cheat. She presented it in a way that was sympathetic to the cheating women. Sounds okay, right? Well reverse the genders. What if it were men who cheated because their female partners didn't want to have sex in the positions that they liked. I doubt Laci would consider that sympathetic.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:11 AM
1

I'm surprised even one percent of rapists are women when it's legally impossible for them to rape.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:14 AM
2

Try coming back to the show page after the show. We try to get up a download link and video up as quick as possible.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:01 AM
1

Unfortunately we don't have the server power required to host a chat! We found that out during one of our previous shows.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:00 AM
1

Is this what is to be expected from journalism in the future? People desperately trying to keep their heads low when negative news breaks about individuals who happen to be feminist icons? I wonder how far they'll take this blanket immunity. Feminists certainly don't mind rubbing elbows with those among their number that talk about a Final Solution.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:39 AM
2

It read more like an awkward joke to me.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:35 PM
1

Stop whining.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:33 PM
6

Feminists say they're for equality but don't want to be judged on whether or not they achieve it. It's like a road crew that doesn't want to be judged on whether or not the roads are fixed. "Are you doubting that we fix roads? We're a road crew?" Yes, yes we are doubting that you fucking fix roads because the roads are not fucking fixed.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 02:59 PM
5

Viruses have an even longer history yet...
/r/MensRights17/08/14 02:07 AM
16

You can only use misandry "ironically" if you actually agree that 1) it exists and 2) it's something you want stopped.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 02:51 PM
3

Yeah, no.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:28 PM
6

"Stop pretending that one has to hate men in order to believe that men should not be unfairly privileged over women." "Stop pretending that one has to hate jews in order to believe that jews should not be unfairly privileged over gentiles." No... you don't have to hate jews to believe in "jew privilege", but... generally believing some group to either be advantaged over you or unfairly targeting you or somehow dangerous leads to promoting hatred of that group. The question is... can you prove it…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:22 PM
2

Men certainly aren't being helped or recognized as victims.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:41 PM
2

Yes, hilarious that. "We'll make sex-descrimination illegal, except against men."
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:08 PM
3

Great. Now support equal services to male victims.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:39 PM
8

Men are the primary victims of genocide across the planet. www.gendercide.org
/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:14 PM
3

43% of college men and high school youth report being sexually assaulted or raped. 95% by women. http://tinyurl.com/nsdsxgg 51% of college men report being sexually assaulted or raped since the age of 16. 95% by women. http://tinyurl.com/qgjzfwk Here’s a recent world wide survey that found that 3% of men reported forced sex in their heterosexual relationships and 2.3% of women reported forced sex in their heterosexual relationships. http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID45-PR45.pdf
/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:11 PM
2

Upvote for the name.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:36 AM
2

I have made inquiries. The mods have made inquiries. Other honey badgers have made inquiries. So far we've met a wall of silence.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 12:52 AM
5

Just stop paying attention to the media. Let them die and be sloughed off.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:37 PM
1

We've been dealing with this nonsense for months now. Sorry for jumping the gun on you.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:32 PM
1

Vice somehow got around the fact that this subreddit has been sold out through 2017. Try placing your own ad in this subreddit if you have doubts. None of the mods are part of the show.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:47 PM
1

We don't know. But we're looking into it. Try placing your own ad in this subreddit if you have doubts.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:45 PM
0

Yes it can. But you'll most likely spend a great deal of money to lose.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:15 PM
3

The thing I'm most concerned about is that all of the work that I've put in to completing college and working my way up to where I am today (which was all before we married) will end up allowing my wife to continue to slide by with minimal effort on her part. And the reality is that it will.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:15 PM
2

For any man thinking of getting married, take note of this individual's situation. Under no circumstances marry a woman who makes less than you. In fact you should hold out for a woman who, if she would quit her job and rely on solely on yours, experience a substantial decrease in her standard of living compared to living on her own. The only man I've ever heard of who got a fair shake in this situation held out for a woman who accepted the following terms: 1) He would work no more hours than he…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:13 PM
31

Female chauvinism is the most retrogressive, neanderthal chauvinism on the planet because it's usually self-righteous about it's boorishness.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:38 AM
6

Go talk to some feminists online and tell them stuff like "it's okay to be a stay at home mom", or "it's okay to dress sexy for your man", or any of the other messages that the WomenAgainstFeminism have been portraying. Most of the messages I've seen are more of the form "I don't want equality to exclude men's issues" but perhaps I'm biased.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 06:44 PM
2

We're working on that.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 05:58 PM
50

Here's an even more radical idea: we blame rape on people that actually rape (men and women).
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:27 PM
1

Everyone understands the insult when you misguider a trans person, but apparently it's all men's fault when they're upset when they feel like their gender identity is in question. How does that make sense?
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:13 PM
12

No, no, no. What MRAs demand is that Feminists be AWARE of both sides before proclaiming on equality. That's how equality generally works. Instead Feminists are asserting this: X = ? And saying it's misogyny to ask what "?" actually is.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:29 PM
3

Would "that man(who raped a woman) should be burnt alive" be perceived as misandrous?
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:20 PM
14

But feminism, of course, was not shaped by patriarchy. That's what's so hilarious about this.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:54 PM
5

A mythology of eternal female weakness also cannot correct the perception that women are weak.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 07:02 PM
9

Boys are the shit can of the human race, apparently.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 06:34 PM
2

And that fits right in. We're either doing it for their own good or doing it to prevent them from destroying us and society. Often both at the same time.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:45 AM
11

It's going to be interesting to watch the hypocrisy as feminists suddenly recall things like "due process" and "innocent before proven guilty" in his case.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 04:35 AM
10

The number of convictions for rape is right in line with other violent crimes.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 03:36 AM
1

Yes... it's offensively bad artwork.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:51 PM
5

It was spent on all the cops patrolling the perimeter of the conference. I was there. I saw them. And I think raising a concern that the "honey badgers" seem to be short-changing their own activism/accomplishments by casting themselves as mascots rather than legit MRAs Please, don't be concerned on our behalf. I insist.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:11 PM
9

The world where the so called 'oppressed' holds the leash to their 'masters' collar. That's the basic story of every marginalized group of people. The society they're in has a widespread narrative that the "slaves are the one's oppressing their masters." As soon as you start hearing the word "oppression" it's a red flag that, once again, a marginalized people is being targeted for slander.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:37 PM
3

Did you listen to the radio show?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:34 PM
2

Yes but I think the negativity isn't real negativity once the majority of the community uses it to masturbate too.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:36 PM
9

hahahaha... oh my. My anger at feminism is rooted deep in a sense of betrayal.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:15 PM
1

You realize that Solanis shot two men right?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:29 PM
3

Would it be satire if Jonathan Swift actually ate babies?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:52 PM
3

but then that gives credit to the feminist claim that Solanas is satire. It's not satire when someone ends up shot.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:31 PM
16

It takes one. Specifically a woman's decision to gestate to term is what creates a baby.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:10 AM
2

Because women aren't people, they're women.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 11:00 PM
2

Basic politeness extended to all humans is all that's necessary.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:58 PM
11

"Man" is not a gender, it's a social role defined by: "benefits woman". By definition women are better able to define their benefit then the neuters who serve it.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 11:27 PM
7

'If "boys will be boys," then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression.' I wonder how "masculine ideology" relates to women raping men and boys? Or is this author presuming 100% male sexual predation of women?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:00 PM
1

Even with the misspelled title. >.<
/r/MensRights04/07/14 05:11 PM
1

She's one of the co-hosts of Honey Badger Radio. She also did some IRL activism challenging the Game of Throne's advertisement "All Men Must Die".
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:26 PM
2

What? It's absolutely true that only 1 in 33,000,000 women are raped. That's because it's only rape when you're forced to penetrate!
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:43 AM
1

They haven't changed the wording from previous surveys.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:07 PM
1

Yep. Asking men to define what happens to them as sexual assault (and the survey uses rape later) does undercount male victims.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:53 AM
2

Do you have a citation for the 'gender-neutral' definition? Any survey that asks men to define what happened to them as "rape" rather than restricting itself to the definition--forced sex--will lead to an undercount of male victims simply because it's not commonly accepted that men can be raped.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 10:11 PM
17

Sample size: 284. We've mocked "feminist" studies for being so small. No "we" haven't. We've mocked feminist studies that extrapolate from samples of female DV shelter clients to the entire population of women. There's nothing wrong with this sample size. It stands as authoritative till superseded by a study with greater scope. Further a second study confirms this one. 51% of college men report being sexually assaulted or raped since the age of 16. 95% by women. http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 05:00 PM
13

Bossy men are called assholes and tyrants. Acting bossy isn't acting like a man.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 03:13 AM
5

Why are feminists so tied to the woman-as-victim narrative?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:09 AM
6

Why the Christ would a man need a domestic violence shelter? For that matter, why in christ would a woman?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 12:27 AM
5

They are in a society that deifies women.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 12:09 AM
9

If people don't get education and health services.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:05 AM
1

Dark people, amirite? It's not poverty and lack of resources but sheer darkie immorality that leads to them treatin' their wimmin folk wrong!
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:03 AM
8

These are country's where women are really oppressed and denied educations based solely on gender. You know that Boko Haram killed boys trying to pursue a western education right? Until otherwise proven, extremist muslims do not want boys or girls to pursue a western education. Also boys are conscripted into being child soldiers which is, on the whole, pretty horrible. So why play the "who's oppressed more" game?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:01 AM
12

The one who was shot... with a shotgun?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 03:59 AM
9

Recasting abuse of men as abuse of women is par for the course for a feminist.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:59 AM
11

You realize that White Nationalists are obsessed with the purity and beauty and superiority of the White Female, right? Darkies despoiling their driven-snow princesses is one of the drivers of their racism.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:46 PM
8

Men need to make up for all of women's vulnerabilities yet still remain inferior to women.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:45 PM
6

Whyyyyyy are they so meeeeeean to us?
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:39 PM
4

Upvoted for demonstrating querulous.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:24 PM
14

But despite the fact that fear is a uniquely female emotion and only women have vulnerabilities... they are exactly as strong and stoic as men and thus should be trusted as soldiers and leaders.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:49 PM
13

She is the kind of woman I can only assume would be a rapist as a man since she assumes that all men rape, all women are victims and social (in)justice trumps evidence. Why would she have to be a man to be a rapist?
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:47 PM
18

Upvote for upvoting querulous.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:47 PM
17

very telling contrast in terms of the two movements That Elam satirizes the raft of father-invective spewed out on father's day? Some feminist campaigns that explicitly blame men for violence that are not satiric: White Ribbon Name the Problem Don't be that guy Here are more: http://youtu.be/ZXK0bfrvjPM
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:57 PM
1

This is a different show then the usual Honey Badger Radio so it has a different archive that I don't think is available yet.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:34 PM
5

Link to the proposal being something other than a REBUTTABLE presumption of joint custody, please.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 09:35 PM
16

They don't have misconceptions, they have convenient lies.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:09 PM
7

No!
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:31 PM
24

Cuckolding is an appalling act of abuse, selfishness and cruelty. Women who do it deserve to be locked away.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:30 PM
1

Do you realize how annoying it is to watch a guy talk about a problem I don't have and don't even have an equivalent to (seriously, guys are bigger, but that's of marginal utility when all of society will beat your ass for laying a hand on a woman) and then conclude with... women have it worse. The only logical explanation for that I can see is that he really does think women are the weaker sex and getting a scratch for a woman is like having your arm sawed off for a man. Ah well... I understand…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:11 PM
7

Naw, it wasn't the same because the Jewish cabal really did own everything and control everything. /s
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:48 PM
3

I did it! https://www.gittip.com/Typhonblue/
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:27 AM
2

If it's not true it should be clarified and that clarification shouldn't be stigmatized. Because if it is stigmatized the only take away is that all men is exactly what feminists mean.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:27 AM
5

I identify as "non-feminist". I refuse to dignify ridiculous nonsense like feminism with an oppositional stance. I don't call myself an anti-flatearther or anti-6000-year-old-earth-creationist either.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:50 AM
2

They do when they go to work.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:49 AM
2

In my experience, feminists only stigmatise statements like "not me therefore doesn't apply" in contexts where "men" is clearly meant to mean "some men". Why do men feel the need to say "not all men" in that situation?
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:46 AM
21

To be honest I have some sympathy for his desire to believe it. Sympathy runs out when it's at the expense of other men(and women, if we're going to be comprehensive.)
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:39 AM
4

It's almost as if women are the weaker sex! Actually they have exactly that belief.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:36 AM
49

Feminists won't challenge his comforting machismo lie that he's ultimately in charge due to penis...
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:32 AM
1

They're not just saying that it's a derailment they're stigmatizing saying "not all men" as another form of misogyny. They're trying to omit it from the discourse entirely instead of asking themselves why people are saying it whenever they spout their rhetoric. can still be damaging to the reputation of "all men" Essentially what they're trying to do is stigmatize men saying "not me therefore doesn't apply." When you stigmatize men saying "not me therefore doesn't apply" you are SAYING it applie…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:10 AM
1

I'm not seeing the inconsistency with what I said. ;)
/r/MensRights10/06/14 11:12 PM
2

There's no reason to believe that more women than men are raped in war. Any studies that look into the issue of male sexual victimization in war do not find women to be a vast majority of the victims. Further from anecdotal reports of male survivors, they literally were survivors... they were raped, shot, stabbed or hung and left for dead. Men are raped then killed leaving fewer of them to be counted in the rape statistics. Women are simply raped.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:21 PM
2

The fact is, it is extremely rare for feminists to use the phrase "all men" when making any kind of accusation. Now that they're trying to stigmatize people saying "not all men" with #notallmen by definition they are saying all men. It's more important to them to paint all men with the same brush then respect men's humanity.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:16 PM
8

Who do you think the two guys who showed up were? 1) Agent Orange 2) A sleeper agent of Agent Orange
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:39 AM
2

Idiots got to idiot.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:36 AM
2

Does she allow that men have value as sex objects who do as they're told?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:25 AM
8

Sex positive feminists allow that men have value as sex objects who do as they are told.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:27 PM
26

How is it a "ridiculous straw man" to recognize that this is bigotry?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:20 PM
1

Just point that out whenever anyone brings it up. "He minimized female rape victims!" "He also minimized male rape victims, but I notice you don't care about that."
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:44 PM
5

There are numerous videos where she is actively cursing out opponents. Link to one.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:18 PM
8

If you include the funds raised by Honey badger Radio, it's more like 40x bigger at this point.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:06 PM
10

How come everyone always misses the fact that he minimized MALE rape victims in that article?
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:00 PM
17

Do you know what Paul Elam and Warren Ferrel share in common? They're both considered rape apologists by feminists based on things they've said. Though I agree with many of her points she has become unpleasant to listen to because she is frothing at the mouth and cursing. What? Link please.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:59 PM
19

And let's note that Valerie Solanis has been more honoured by feminists than her. (This is the first time I've heard of Karen DeCrow)
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:36 PM
13

I hope this explained it to your liking. Don't bother.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:45 PM
6

Do you know what the correct answer to this is? If you are a man, you are part of rape culture. "Yes, of course I'm a fan of rape! Aren't you?" "sputterNo!" "Well, aren't you a strange little man. Rape is all the rage in our culture, you just said so yourself." Then get on with your life.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 12:29 AM
3

She decided to come on the show of her own accord. We're here to teach, not just preach. I'm not going to change my position (unless someone gives me an excellent logical or rational reason to, which won't really be changing my position) but exposing others to my position who don't necessarily agree is exactly what I want to do.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:48 PM
3

Gracias
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:16 PM
3

There's very little social censure against women sexually assaulting men.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:55 PM
2

Just ask yourself this. What kind of person is attracted to an ideology that minimizes, excuses or outright hides the fact that their sex can be abusive?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:46 PM
2

When our patreon page is up, we're going to be offering wallpapers as pledge rewards.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:45 PM
5

Load. Aim. Shoot. It's become automatic.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:13 PM
9

And women like to rape men. 43% of college men and high school youth report being sexually assaulted or raped. 95% by women. http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/men-a0035915.pdf 51% of college men report being sexually assaulted or raped since the age of 16. 95% by women. http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/men-13-3-243.pdf Here’s a recent world wide survey that found that 3% of college men reported forced sex in their heterosexual relationships and 2.3% of college women reported for…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:08 PM
5

You often state that feminists view themselves as victims but as a feminist I would take the exact opposite stance. How are you fighting? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PF_WLlMWk6U
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:38 PM
11

It's your choice, of course... but it's foreign to me to value your own bodily integrity so little.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:53 AM
16

Bless her heart. She's trying.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:42 PM
6

hehehehe
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:41 PM
4

That is a title X lawsuit waiting to happen.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:57 PM
7

Those aren't accurate rape statistics. Here's a round up that's a lot more accurate when it comes to male victims. 38% of the victims of rape were men in the 2012 National Crime Victim Survey. (This study requires men to classify their victimization as rape and as a crime, both requirements lead to a reduction of admitted male victims relative to other survey instruments so this number is only a lower bound on the number of male victims of rape.) —http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:17 PM
70

When you were a child, did you ever see a parent have a complete freak out? Do you remember how that felt? Like your world was going to end? Male vulnerability does that to feminists because they still relate to men the way you related to your parents as a child.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:34 PM
11

Soldiers generally do soldier so civilians can do civilian shit.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:48 PM
4

It's really surprising isn't it? Just like some of them say they want.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:40 PM
13

No. That's why feminists have to hijack groups that hate other specific groups and say their victims are "women by proxy." Or they just say society is and laugh as society scrambles to do whatever they say to prove that it's something it's not.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:30 PM
24

Oh, I'm sorry! I think you have the wrong group. r/feminism is that way. Do give a hat tip to the radical feminists who want to murder women like me (after a bit of the ol' in and out with a broken bottle of course).
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:31 PM
13

Perhaps we should ask these people to clarify what parts of ourselves hate the other parts.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:10 PM
14

Then ditch it.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:57 PM
15

Are you still enjoying Cracked?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:14 PM
27

Indeed. Do you think its a full body proclamation? Or do I just hate my breasts and vagina?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:14 PM
33

You would think, if feminism was working on these issues, they would have already hosted and funded a conference on them.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:10 PM
6

Ur sur rit! I dernt new werds good!
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:57 PM
2

I don't even remember.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:36 AM
11

All men's rights groups are closer to the Average Joe or Jane then Feminists and other traditionalist-corporatist-biggov elitists.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:08 PM
27

Women are more likely to be poor because they're also more likely to survive being poor. That's like saying women are more likely to be refugees. Yep. They are. That's because men are more likely to be dead in a ditch.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:10 AM
1

"It's not my job to be educated by you."
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:10 PM
28

The only problem is that this has happened. If not this specific person than another.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:22 PM
2

I'm saying men are more likely to exploit other men than this. Give me a few days, I might be able to shake this nihilism.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:57 AM
0

I hate it when that happens aka. I forget a source.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:02 AM
2

Sensitive to what?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:01 AM
3

How are we supposed to talk to the people sending death threats to try and prevent our conference from happening? http://youtu.be/TZPCw616Kd4
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:11 PM
10

Do you have stats to back that up?
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:10 PM
6

Most men are in a situation where they're treading water, barely able to keep their mouth above the waves. Occasionally they can manage to get a good lungful by climbing on top of another man, but he drowns and they're back to treading water. You're asking men to essentially leap out of the water onto ground that doesn't exist and proceed to build a boat.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:07 PM
7

As they get shown the door by female feminists look for them being increasingly violent towards men who they suspect are MRAs.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:03 PM
7

The reality is that we need to build a new society without these people.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:59 PM
23

She handcuffed him to the bed. Regardless of what your woman's studies degree told you women are 1) not that fragile and 2) not that weak.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:58 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:55 PM
1

I have. Likely significantly more than yourself.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:55 PM
14

Is there a reason why you think they're not?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:55 PM
5

Like who?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:41 PM
18

How about all feminists who agree that men oppress/oppressed women?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:39 PM
4

Then why focus on "bitch"?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:22 PM
5

First of all, do you care about male-gendered insults like dick, prick, cock, and bastard?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:29 PM
9

I'm going to take on one of your points "how do you define Rape culture." 38% of the victims of rape were men in the 2012 National Crime Victim Survey. (This study requires men to classify their victimization as rape and as a crime, both requirements lead to a reduction of admitted male victims relative to other survey instruments so this number is only a lower bound on the number of male victims of rape.) —http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301946?journalCode=ajph 43% of…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter