TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

valenin Archive

View 0 posts and 1,633 comments by valenin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,633 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

‘Eh, who cares what the people who constitute your biggest obstacle are doing. Just ignore them, maybe they’ll go away.’ See? We can do this all day.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 08:43 PM
1

Hmm, yes. Truly art has never been used to make social, political, or ideological statements. It would have no power in that capacity. What a backwards idea, that people could count artistic pieces as any kind of statement. Simply laughable...
/r/MensRights14/10/20 08:34 PM
1

In a conversation about gender bias, the race bias of supremacists isn’t really relevant. That aside, it’s almost like studies reveal trends and generalities. Studies show that men are more likely than women to die of heart disease. Yet there are still plenty of women who die of heart disease, and plenty of men who don’t. But I get the feeling you didn’t really need either of those things explained to you, did you?
/r/MensRights04/10/20 12:35 AM
2

Stay with me here. I’m not saying women can’t drive forklifts. I’m not saying women couldn’t eventually learn to drive forklifts. I’m saying they wouldn’t have time to learn. Society doesn’t run itself. And the people responsible for turning the nuts and bolts and put oil in the engine are largely—but not exclusively—men. If they disappeared, women could learn to use the wrench and pour the oil. But long before they could, the engine would grind to a halt. Some people would probably survive. But…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 11:56 PM
1

all those things you said are not hard things You have zero idea what it takes to keep food in your pantry. This makes that clear. Women are already 50 percent of the workforce So? It’s not about how many people there are—although a 50% reduction of the work force creates its own problems—it’s about what they do. Labor isn’t fungible. You can’t take a kindergarten teacher and put her on a forklift in a dairy farm and expect it to ‘just work.’
/r/MensRights02/10/20 09:18 PM
7

somewhat of a real picture No.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/20 08:43 PM
13

An aphorism related to your last two paragraphs: Women go into relationships thinking men will change. But they won’t. Men go into relationships thinking women won’t change. But they will.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/20 08:37 PM
2

Even if one believed that might happen, it wouldn’t have time. The farming, food processing, and commercial shipping industries are overwhelmingly reliant on men’s physical labor. There are machines involved, but by and large the operation and maintenance of those machines is performed by specialist men. Similarly, the trucks that distribute all that food, and the fuel infrastructure to keep them moving, are driven by men. When that machine stops working, the countdown begins. Supermarket shelve…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 08:32 PM
12

There’s been a lot of people around lately who are still in the ‘feminism was about equality until something happened very recently to veer them off track’ mindset. Not the concern trolls, or the ‘can’t we all just get along’ crew, I suspect something in another forum drove a lot of people here and they’re just relatively new.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 08:08 PM
4

You are a cultist.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 09:34 PM
3

couldn’t be further from the truth, men are individuals Group bias and individuality are related, but it’s maybe more impactful for discussions like this to note that not only do those studies show that men do not have an in group bias, they show that men have an out group bias. All things being equal, women tend to act in a way that benefits women. In group bias. But it is also true that all things being equal, men also tend to act in a way that benefits women. Even at their own expense.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 09:25 PM
10

I suspect there’s an angle of, ‘my parents wouldn’t ever mutilate me, so what happened must not be ‘mutilation’’ at play as well.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 09:19 PM
1

Happiness is not a switch. Being unhappy but not enough to ris your job is not the same as being happy. I won’t even bother to address the rest of whatever it is you want to say about me. Strut around the chessboard. Peck at the pieces. You’ve won. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 09:17 PM
1

I mean, if you’re happy with your job just because you have no reason to sue them, that’s like saying you’re happy in general just because you’re not suicidal and well fed just because you’ve got gruel. But that doesn’t mean we’re on the same page. It just means your standards are very, very sad. And I’m sorry to hear that. I hope the couple seconds of smug satisfaction you got from putting words in my mouth helped, even just a little.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 03:56 AM
5

I wish someone would tell every generation of educational reformers who throw a wrench into things because of how our sexist system leads to girls underperforming that’s gotten their tentacles into things and made the environment more and more hostile to boys with every iteration since at least the 60’s. They have studies, too. Someone’s lyyyyying...
/r/MensRights29/09/20 03:52 AM
2

HR is the division of a business that is charged with making sure nobody is unhappy enough to sabatoge or (worse) sue the company. They don’t care about your comfort as long as it’s above the threshold that will prevent you from losing the company money.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:43 AM
1

In your 30s is when men really start to get their feet under them. Their career is established and their salary is starting to reflect it, they can start thinking about a house if they don’t already have one, they have some experience on them but dad bod hasn’t kicked in yet, their student loans are going away, etc. In your 30s is also when women are around the corner from the wall and baby rabies. The reasons women start bringing up ‘dating your age’—and bonus for the women who dated ‘older men…
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:41 AM
5

What a good question! Maybe we should spend hundreds of millions of dollars studying it. Like we did studying girls’ learning needs to remodel the educational system to accommodate them forty or fifty years ago.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:31 AM
1

There is no ‘off the record discussion’ when it comes to HR. Don’t shoot yourself in the foot.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:00 AM
0

No, it isn’t. Disabuse yourself of that belief, it will end in misery.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 11:59 PM
1

‘jerky’ and ‘rough’...terrifying for the patient I’ve been that patient. Depending on their circumstances, it can also be both excruciating and dangerous for the patient.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 11:56 PM
11

I’ve read the report. Which claims are bogus?
/r/MensRights28/09/20 11:52 PM
2

‘I can’t be expected to compete against an inanimate object, that’s not fair!’ Also, have you ever heard how women talk about men who are insecure about dildoes?
/r/MensRights27/09/20 08:51 PM
4

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. I’ll never understand how women have been using dildoes, happily, practically unchanged for thousands of years, and that’s all well and good. But sex toys for men have gone from practically non-existent to crude blow up dolls to relatively lifelike multi-thousand dollar mannequins, and now they’re flirting with having embedded AI, in under three generations. Women have been satisfied with disembodied penes for as long as they’ve been able to procure them. …
/r/MensRights27/09/20 08:48 PM
1

She’s not going to sleep with you, dude.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 08:30 PM
4

‘WhAt? YoU cAnT jUsT tElL tHeM nOt To HaVe SeX!’ Why not? We do it to men without even thinking about it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/20 09:55 PM
2

Someone did the math about how much various demographics pay in taxes versus receive in benefits. It’s not ‘mostly.’ One single demographic group is a net positive taxpayer over the course of a lifetime. White women nearing retirement spend a couple years as positive contributors, but by then they’ve spent so much time taking they can’t make it up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/20 09:53 PM
1

I can’t help but notice a lot of posts now don’t say they’re looking for someone who’s 6’, they just say they need someone ‘tall’ because they’re 5’10”. Always 5’10”. That’s the 99th percentile for women’s heights in the United States. Men’s 99th percentile is something like 6’3”. Crazy how they’re all suddenly on Tinder.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/20 09:41 PM
3

Nonstarter. The admin absolutely know what mods/subs do it. They absolutely do not care. The rule exists to be selectively enforced. See also the rule about using words like the ‘r’ word associated with Down’s Syndrome. I’ve been in subs that got shut down for using it. At the same time you’re likely to find it in the comments of posts to front page subs like news and politics and nobody gives a damn.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:35 PM
0

And why do you think that is?
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:28 PM
11

60% of women will lose... More than that. If those 20% can get their dick wet by snapping their fingers and not making any commitment, they’re not going to commit unless they find a unicorn. So if we assume that 80% chasing 20% are ultimately after a relationship, if not all of the 20% commits when the music stops, the number of losers in the 80% is higher than 60%.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/20 09:45 PM
5

You know what attracts good men? Being a catty ‘mean girl.’ Yeah men love that shit, but good men really crave it. So if you’re not attracting good men, sharpen those claws, ladies! /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/20 09:40 PM
3

I suspect the number of men who would willingly and obligingly pay taxes into the welfare system would be higher if it the welfare system wasn’t what it is. If it was really a fund to help people whose circumstances completely fucked them get back on track, that’s a noble goal. As it is though, it’s paying for millions of grifters and single moms who blew up their families because ‘I’m just not haaapy’, there’s no accounting for where the money gets spent, and there’s little to no incentive to g…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/20 09:28 PM
6

I haven’t watched the video, but just in the thumbnail she looks like young John Leguizamo doing a character.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/20 09:18 PM
3

But she had so many Instagram followers, she loves computers!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/09/20 09:08 PM
6

businesses are patriarchal and men are willing to burn money to keep women out I love this line. Because you can point out that the local supermarket knows, to the fraction of a penny, the bottom line difference between leaving the Cheerios where they are and moving them four feet left. They spent hundreds of thousands in time and money figuring that out. Car manufacturers spend millions figuring out how thin they can make the plastic pieces in cars to eke out a penny in savings on every vehicle…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/09/20 08:59 PM
2

Don’t know if you check threads after having commented on them, but this guy posted a good response with multiple legal and social advantages women have.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 08:39 PM
1

It’s cool, bro. I can see how your vast intelligence would have trouble reading more than a couple words posted onto a screenshot of Baby Yoda.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 10:51 PM
3

I’m guessing the male vs. female genital mutilation is about circumcision and.. I forget, but the female equivalent of that, which does the same thing + a few more risks? Roughly: ‘What is the difference between MGM and FGM, if not the difference between male circumcision and something female to which I can only vaguely allude but that’s actually worse?’ I will admit some guesswork was involved, considering your lack of a subject. Or a complete sentence. So. Please take a third attempt to ask a …
/r/MensRights21/09/20 10:49 PM
2

Your assumption about why I’m asking is wrong. I’m asking because I suspected you’re up and down this thread using ‘toxic X’ in a way that I’ve been assured repeatedly—by social scientists both personally and in published literature—it isn’t actually used. You don’t even have to bother to answer the question by now. This reply clarifies that you are using the ‘wrong’ definition. At this point, either all the social scientists who coined and use the phrase are wrong, and the foundation upon which…
/r/MensRights21/09/20 10:43 PM
2

It wasn’t that you need to rephrase, apparently. You need to read more slowly. I’m not sure how much clearer ‘Male Genital Mutilation is extremely common in the US. Female Genital Mutilation is illegal, as it should be.’ could possibly be. What kind? All kinds. You may not practice any kind of FGM in the US, by law and by taboo. You may practice at least up to foreskin removal, and in many cases not doing so is taboo. What are you still confused about? This waffling about ‘but what about acid?’ …
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:27 PM
2

The Tender Years Doctrine Created and instituted by the campaigning of one of the grandmothers of the feminist movement. Keep that in mind when you hear feminists claim that women have always been relegated to taking care of the children because the sexist society thinks that’s what they’re good at. The claim that women should have default custody because vagina is a relatively recent notion, and it exists because a feminist demanded it. Not because society is foisting the responsibility of chil…
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:16 PM
1

Privileges are not rights. Women have more of both, but the difference is important.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:13 PM
1

they feel less safe than men, which is probably also true As a point of order here, it’s important to note the distinction between feeling less safe than men and being less safe than men. Men are drastically more likely to be the victim of every type of violent crime. Except maybe rape. There’s a strong argument to be made that men are comparably or even more frequently rape victims but that’s not this argument so I’ll leave it at ‘maybe.’ Whether you feel less safe can have little bearing on yo…
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:12 PM
1

https://gotopless.org/topless-laws There are more places in America where women are perfectly allowed to go topless than not. The fact that none of them do brings into question how seriously the issue of, ‘well men can go topless and there are places women can’t’ should really be taken. I’d say it’s probably a slightly less important grievance than something like the sentencing disparity or circumcision debate, but hey what do I know?
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:06 PM
2

He answered your question. The male v. female circumcision thing is because, for social reasons, we use different words to describe them. They are otherwise strictly comparable. There are degrees of both, there are complicating risks of both, but one is absolutely illegal and taboo in every form and the other is staunchly defended even in a pretty drastic form. If you don’t see how that answers your question, you need to rephrase the question, or read more slowly.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:02 PM
0

That’s a funny way to word things. What do you think toxic masculinity is?
/r/MensRights21/09/20 08:54 PM
0

You make some compelling points, clearly I underestimated your mastery of the subject. Have a life.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 01:14 AM
16

If I may turn the irony up just a touch in here... Women explicitly identify with a real woman who’s a drug-addled suicide who made her living being passed around and objectified on and off screen and nobody bats an eye, men implicitly or even jokingly identify with a character whose lifelong mistreatment drives him around the bend and everybody loses their minds. Something something society. Imagine the responses you (wouldn’t) get if you put the Conan The Barbarian ‘what is best in life?’ line…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/09/20 11:10 PM
1

The level around here is falling. How upsetting. I didn’t say anything about gynocentrism. Nor did I say Patriarchy ‘isn’t a thing.’ I said it has a specific meaning. One that isn’t met by almost every culture accused of embodying it. One you don’t know and didn’t bother to look up. Of course I don’t think every male felt privileged. Do you?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 11:01 PM
2

No. Capital-P-Patriarchy has a specific meaning. Even if men get more privileges, which they don’t anyway and I could make an argument they never did, that’s not enough to qualify.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 06:15 PM
1

what we need to fight for is what they didn’t Go read more. You—and you’re not alone, you got (mis)educated the same way almost everyone else did (hence this post)—don’t know how it actually worked at the time. It’s not that they didn’t fight for their responsibility to be draft eligible in exchange for sufferage. They explicitly demanded not to be draft eligible. A lot of women were very firmly against women’s sufferage at the time, there’s a lot of writing about it. One of their primary concer…
/r/MensRights20/09/20 06:11 PM
4

That’s just aristocracy.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 05:46 PM
24

You know how many love letters Dahmer and Manson got in prison? Wanna guess how many Casey Anthony got?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/20 07:39 PM
2

All the boys are starving but if we grow more food and give it to women and girls, there might be more leftovers for the boys. Lovely.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 07:17 PM
12

I don’t have it in me to dig up the kind of sources you do right now, but it’s worth mentioning that (in the US, at least) the ‘women couldn’t vote’ thing is doubly incorrect. As you point out, men didn’t have universal sufferage until shortly before women, but there a correlation that’s also true: women weren’t disenfranchised. The requirements for voting tended to be left up to the state. Since electoral votes are what counted at the national level, it was up to each state to decide how they g…
/r/MensRights17/09/20 10:09 PM
1

Interested to see results from a comparison where everybody is asked to multitask things that either everyone is familiar/comfortable with or uncomfortable/unfamiliar with. I don’t consider it surprising that each group is better at multitasking things that they do more than the other group. The reduced cognitive overhead from not having to think as hard about performing the actual tasks can be applied to context switching.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 09:50 PM
-3

Hold on, I’ll try using smaller words. My analogy wasn’t meant to reflect your post. It was meant to reflect your defense of it. Posting a meme with no commentary or thought added via cross posting is no different than posting the meme directly.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 08:07 PM
17

You understand. It doesn’t justify or excuse it. But you know exactly why.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/09/20 07:19 PM
0

T-shirt and tunics. Shapeless sacks, basically. I don’t agree with your assertion, but if I were to address the sentiment behind it, the fact is that there are gendered body differences. Yes, outliers, yes generalization, blah blah blah. Typically men have broader backs and shoulders. You can look at a hip:waist ratio and make a good guess whether it’s measured off of a man or a woman. Men have longer legs. Once you start talking about clothes that... y’know... fit—even t-shirts—you need to star…
/r/MensRights16/09/20 07:16 PM
4

The same Ghislane Maxwell known to party with Reddit’s old CEO Ellen Pao? That one?
/r/MensRights16/09/20 06:44 PM
3

So? Women have an in group preference where men don’t. Women are more likely to act on behalf of another woman or group of women, all things being equal. Not only will men not act on behalf of other men, they act on behalf of women all other things being equal. Add on the fact that not only do women outnumber men by population, and that they vote in higher numbers, and the picture changes. What you’re seeing isn’t ‘men making decisions with bad results’, what you’re seeing is, ‘select men acting…
/r/MensRights16/09/20 06:41 PM
-3

‘I wasn’t broadcasting snuff films, I was broadcasting a feed of a camera focused on a television displaying snuff films!’ I like memes, and I like pedantry. But we don’t need this place to fill up with stuff like this. Take it to mramemes.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 06:29 PM
9

Did you miss that day in grade school where they separated the boys and girls so they could teach the girls about periods and the boys about the best ways to rape people? That little pamphlet they gave out was jam packed with helpful tips. /s
/r/MensRights16/09/20 06:24 PM
6

Women are welcome. Even a lot of feminists are. It’s when people (men or women) start using barely-literate insults like ‘the entire circus of clownery that you all call a men’s rights sub’ instead of talking like grown ups that the wind shifts against them. And you’ll note you’re just being downvoted and argued with. Not outright banned as your sisters would have done to one of us who’s showed up and called them a cackling flock of loons that calls itself a feminist sub.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 08:43 PM
5

Wow, that’s a lot of agreement for a cartoon based on a definition of ‘toxic masculinity’ that we’re assured repeatedly that nobody really uses...
/r/MensRights15/09/20 08:37 PM
3

As a point of order, the female dominance of pre-university teaching positions isn’t the only cause of the school system being biased against male children. Another cause is that it was literally designed to be. Some 40 years ago, a bunch of studies came out that showed boys outperforming girls in just about everything but English, where it was a close race. The usual suspects diagnosed this as the result of a school system designed around educational methods lost effective for teaching boys: in…
/r/MensRights14/09/20 11:18 PM
1

Assuming these weren’t lesbian marriages, there’s an alternate headline in which he throws 439 men into the wood chipper...
/r/MensRights14/09/20 11:11 PM
1

To further muddy the water, ‘rape culture’ isn’t even a quantifiable concept. The idea of rape culture isn’t that rape happens frequently, it’s that rape is an accepted part of the culture. One of the major problems with that is that one side (and I won’t even pretend to be neutral, you’ll be able to tell from my wording what side I’m on) can point out that rape is pretty universally reviled, both legally and culturally, but there’s no problem with two people gettinn a little done up at the bar …
/r/MensRights14/09/20 11:05 PM
3

Knock knock. Who’s there? A feminist. A feminist w— THAT’S NOT FUNNY!
/r/MensRights14/09/20 10:46 PM
13

Norah Vincent says hi. TL:DR: Lived as a man for book research. Had to quit early and check herself in for psychiatric help because it was too much.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 10:38 PM
6

A haunted house for cis women where they aren’t allowed to put men between them and their problems?
/r/MensRights14/09/20 10:37 PM
6

Nice attempt It’s true though. They’re both chasing money, just not with the same strategies. And they’re both chasing deals. They just aren’t chasing the same kinds of deals.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/20 09:39 PM
15

There’s a reason Marilyn Monroe is iconic and Ruth Bader Ginsburg isn’t.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/20 09:28 PM
2

BuT sHe SuPpOrTeD hIm WhIlE hE gOt RiCh!
/r/MensRights13/09/20 09:23 PM
1

She made the choice to have sex with him just as surely as vice versa. Nobody’s blameless. ‘But she’s already facing other consequences! She’s either carrying a child or going through a procedure!’ So? She knew going in those were on the table, and she made her choice. That’s the nature of being responsible. If you’re more invested in a choice than someone else, you think harder about it or you take what you get.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 09:21 PM
6

changing ‘firemen’ to be gender neutral But never things like ‘gunman’ or ‘conman’. Odd, huh?
/r/MensRights13/09/20 09:09 PM
4

Ugh. Feckless cunts. Edit: Hi downvoters! Not sure what your problem is. If you’re not a feckless cunt you know I don’t mean you! See how that works?
/r/MensRights13/09/20 09:08 PM
2

You see, she’s financing the foundation of a library dedicated to collecting and preserving rare and historical volumes and manuscripts. Oh wait. No, sorry I was reading the wrong card. Turns out docking fees in party cities for three yachts add up. Keeping gourmet feed, liquor, and drugs in you and all your girlfriends adds up. Paying the chauffeur(s) adds up. VIP rooms at trendy clubs—and the clothes/makeup/accessories to wear in them adds up.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 09:04 PM
4

Why don’t we bring up the oppression card like they always do? Because nobody cares. The fix is in. Try it, you’ll see how much even non-MRA men deride the idea of male ‘oppression.’
/r/MensRights13/09/20 08:59 PM
5

I hate to be the ‘lOoK aT hIs PrOfIlE’ guy, I feel like I’ve been doing it so much, but these random ‘what do you think of (topic that’s commonly discussed and you’d know the answer to if you’d read a little first)?’ question posts are becoming so frequent that I’m beyond tired of it enough to be suspicious. That said—look at his profile. A month old, spent his first day making a litany of posts asking questions just like this one, with little to no engagement in the replies. Then reactivates to…
/r/MensRights12/09/20 05:58 AM
11

Narcissistic horse girl whore.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/20 10:10 PM
6

Going to guess he doesn’t believe in the mythology behind Jesus’ birth. Mary was pregnant, but claimed she didn’t have sex. And since AWALT, the conclusion is she was cheating and Joseph was cucked. The church then plays up the mythology because ‘our Messiah is the Son of God’ is a more powerful narrative than ‘our messiah is a bastard.’
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/20 10:09 PM
1

That’s not a problem for them. Remember the 80/20 rule in regard to the SMP. Those 20% guys getting passed around demonstrate that women are, by and large, perfectly willing to share their dildos.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 09:48 PM
7

21 days old. No other posts or comments. Anywhere. Obviously hasn’t read anything else on the sub; asserts as axiomatically true talking points that are addressed repeatedly here. Don’t waste your time on bait, people.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 09:38 PM
1

Match Game didn’t run the polls themselves. They used to have a research team that looked at studies and polls published by other people. The standard question format included the source, something like, ‘According to Home and Garden magazine, what should you put in your garden to discourage slugs? Is it X, or Y?’ or ‘A survey recently published by the CDC revealed that more than 40% of people have done this. Did they do X, or Y?’ Unfortunately I don’t remember the source for that particular que…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/20 09:31 PM
41

Remember Hollywood Squares? Late at night you can catch reruns of it from 1983, when it was part of the Match Game Hollywood Squares Hour. The other night, one of the celebrities was given a question like: According to a poll published in Cosmopolitan magazine, have more women been unfaithful to their husbands, or do most women honor their marriage vows? The male celebrity almost immediately said they honored their vows. The 8/9 male celebrity board agreed. There was a weird stillness among them…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/09/20 09:13 PM
1

There aren’t that many. So I took a brief look. There aren’t any. One or two have a single post in TwoX. Most of the self-implied feminists have a couple comments in subs like AskWomen. One of them is a little bit of a look-at-me lesbian. That’s about the extent of it. For some reason two of them have comment after comment in AskReddit, like they just hang out there all night using it like a chat room. So yeah, like the other commenter here said, they’re the useful-idiot type of feminists who sa…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 09:03 PM
3

Highlighted bullshit aside, I’m in absolute awe at the size of her balls for that hipster claim that she did a gender reveal party first/before it was cool. Gotta let all you normie sheep know that this ridiculous practice she’s calling out and shitting all over was cool when she did it.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 08:48 PM
3

thousands, if not millions You’re off by at least a factor of 1000. It’s millions, if not billions. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/skills-employability/girls-stem-computer-science That’s a link to Microsoft’s page where it jerks itself off about what it’s doing for girls in STEM. Just developing that web site is a ‘thousands, if not millions’ proposition. Any one of the projects it links probably had at least 7 figures thrown at it. Multiply by the number of project, mu…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 08:42 PM
12

Bingo. The part that should really give people pause though is that the drugs aren’t weed, club drugs, and sometimes coke. Sure some people flamed out and ruined themselves on those. Hormone blockers/replacements are on the scene for this round, and their intention is to permanently fuck you up. Ditto body mods. Piercings close. Even the emo kids only got away with some embarrassing scars. Trans surgeries are a whole different ball game. The Society Approved Rebellious Teenagers used to do shit …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/20 09:36 PM
5

Look at that reply. Even in her suggestion, the commenter is spinning another woman’s hamster wheel for her! ‘I’ll date people shorter in height but not shorter in character.’ -> If your preferences don’t run my way, that’s a character flaw in your part. It’s not that Ms. Can’t Find Mr Big needs to re-evaluate her expectations, it’s that any guy who has a preference analogous to one so commonly expressed by women that it’s become a meme is a bad person.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/20 09:27 PM
2

The Soviets in WW2 had a couple female air-force regiments. A handful of men filled in roles where they couldn’t get women tall enough to use unmodified plane equipment (tail gunners, mostly), but in general everyone in the group from pilot to mechanic was a woman. They were so successful the Germans started calling them the Night Witches, because you couldn’t hear them coming, as if they were flying in on brooms. As far as I know, the Night Witches were volunteers, not conscripts.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 09:14 PM
2

I hear you. I may have used the wrong word. I agree that outspoken women are fine, but my vocabulary was failing me and I couldn’t think of the word I wanted, one that also carried a subtext of aggression. Confrontational, maybe. ‘Bitchy’ is stronger than what I want, and women don’t like bitchy men anyway so it’s not the right word.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/20 05:57 AM
3

There’s a scary implication when someone says, ‘man I’m tired of wading through ethots’ and a bunch of regular women pop up to sympathize with the ethots.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 10:24 PM
2

Yes. Nothing you’ve said there is incorrect. But note the difference between ‘I’m getting fit so I can get a girlfriend because I want a girlfriend’ and things like ‘I’m getting fit so I can get a girlfriend because all my friends have girlfriends’ or ‘I’m getting fit because girls say guys need to be fit.’
/r/MensRights07/09/20 10:21 PM
7

They always chalk it up to guys being awful. If I’m supposed to believe what I see, guys aren’t anywhere near as awful as they’re describe. In either quality or quantity. So you either have the bad judgement to get married to one of the awful ones, or you’re just lying to me. If I’m supposed to believe what I’m told, you still married an awful guy. Either your taste or your judgement sucks, and why would I marry you knowing that? You dated an awful guy, maybe even a couple, that’s a conversation…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/20 10:15 PM
10

Which is—as far as I’ve seen from reposts, I haven’t gotten self-loathing enough to go there in person—a pretty straight ripoff of RP, only with their own lingo. Your use of RP being developed and FDS being created was pretty spot on. A lot of people around here notice the trap women falling into by trying to become what makes men attractive to them, assuming it will make them attractive to men; outspoken, hard drinking, kind of arrogant, hard degrees, impressive title, blah blah blah. Maybe tha…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/20 10:08 PM
1

It might be worth reading about the Tender Years’ Doctrine in the context of this discussion. The short version is that the proto-feminist wife in a rich family got divorced, and they were going to give custody of the children to the husband. Which was common at the time because Patriarch... I mean because the man generally had access to more assets with which to raise the children. But this particular ‘social reformer’ (to use her Wikipedia page’s phrasing) didn’t want her ex husband to have th…
/r/MensRights07/09/20 09:25 PM
4

It’s worse than that. The socio-political decisions actively endanger the child medically. They’re not just ignoring the Oath, they’re actively breaking it. There are a lot of genetic components to a lot of diseases. Alzheimer’s and cancer spring immediately to mind. If you know there’s a family history, you can sometimes do some preemptive mitigation. If you don’t—say, because your parentage was hidden to spare mommy’s feelings—well, you’re on your own I guess. Good luck!
/r/MensRights07/09/20 09:15 PM
4

My favorite thing about the Bechdel test is that soft core porn of cheesecake cheerleaders talking in a locker room about their upcoming university exams while helping each other undress would pass it. ‘Gee, Tiffany, I’m worried I didn’t study enough for Thursday’s test in my gender studies class!’ ‘It’s okay, Sarah, come help me unhook my bra and I’ll help you study... later...’ Tah-Dah! Bechdel tested, feminism approved!
/r/MensRights07/09/20 08:59 PM
71

Hot take: No you aren’t. You need to keep improving. The important part is that you’re improving for yourself, and you don’t let other people define improvement for you. When you think you’re perfect, you stagnate.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 08:51 PM
1

Your argument is is that it shouldn’t be done because it’s a significant minority of people who like it and a significant majority who get uncomfortable about it? Did you make the same argument against gay rights? Do you make it against trans rights now? Because those populations are/were-until-very-recently, a significant minority of people whose behaviour makes the significant majority ‘uncomfortable.’
/r/MensRights07/09/20 08:42 PM
3

Condoms and other BC methods can fail. Your rubber can break, for example. It’s a pretty low chance, but it happens.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 08:35 PM
9

Top comment right now begins: NTA. It's his prerogative to put that kind of thing in his bio but it is unnecessarily rude. It's going to turn off anyone who expects a reasonable degree of freedom in a relationship. TIL expecting your partner not to be an active sex worker while they’re with you is an unreasonable curtailing of freedom.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 08:29 PM
1

Good catch, thanks.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 11:32 PM
2

That’d be the ‘otherwise’ in my last sentence, yes.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/20 11:32 PM
22

Women aren’t perfect corporate employees. They get pregnant. You end up paying for it via insurance, you pay their maternity leave, you hold their job (because ‘I’m coming back, as soon as I can!’) while everyone else carries the slack, until they leave to raise little Dylan and take with them any training or experience you paid for and nullifying the broader opportunity-cost style social investments that went into their scholarships and educations, they do it with zero warning, and if you say o…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/20 09:17 PM
1

For a long time the rape-crisis industry was pushing the stat that 1 in 4 college women would be raped during their time on campus. Think about that. 25%. That claim means that if you were a woman going to college in America, you were stepping into an environment that was more dangerous than the Congo. And at the exact same time, the number of women graduating was continuing to outpace the number of men, and there was—as always—clamoring about how women need more representation in higher educati…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 09:09 PM
3

No kidding. This guy either really needs to go to Vegas because he’s super lucky, or he’s got to avoid it like the plague because he used it all up at once.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 09:01 PM
6

Here’s a thought. Make a cap. You can’t get more than minimum wage plus whatever benefits you’d otherwise receive, subject to all the same restrictions. Meaning you have to show evidence of looking for a job or proof that you can’t, and all that fun stuff. There’s probably some wiggle room to be found, I’m not completely unsympathetic to the ‘I sacrificed my career potential...’ or ‘it’s not fair for a kid to swap between living with minimum-wage mom and Dr. Dre dad, and it’ll breed resentment’ …
/r/MensRights06/09/20 08:50 PM
2

It’s monthly. That’s $30000 a day. The average American wedding is currently clocking in at $33000. Imagine throwing a wedding a day.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 08:44 PM
8

Her entertainment isn’t what our entertainment is. We watch Netflix. She goes out on yachts, takes her friends to a $1200/head Michelin restaurant, and swings by to pick up her new designer outfit (and accessories) on her way to the VIP room. And then there’s the drugs.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 08:41 PM
10

It’s both. We need to reform the system so that teachers stop treating boys like defective girls, but beyond that we need to advocate for more male teachers. Not because ‘they’ll stop boys from becoming potential rapists.’ That’s bullshit scare tactics. They’re already no more potential rapists than little girls are baby killers. Because the children—both the boys and the girls—need exposure to positive male role models. The boys as mentors, as examples of what they can become, and to have peopl…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 08:34 PM
5

I will never understand that line of reasoning. ‘This prenup doesn’t count because I signed it under duress!’ This is a serious question, if anyone here has experience dealing with these situations. Preferably if you’re professionally legal and witness it with more frequency than ‘when I got divorced...’ What constitutes ‘extreme duress’? If Dre had a gun to her head and was yelling at her to sign or die, there isn’t a chance in hell the articles wouldn’t mention that. So what was it? Sign, or w…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 05:28 AM
3

Seconded. Post title’s wording sucks. It sets up a false dichotomy of ‘these things are our biggest demands’ and ‘these things don’t matter.’ They matter, just not as much as things like bodily autonomy and parental rights.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 05:17 AM
35

That ‘Political’ slide. Holy crap. Let me get the snide joke out of the way, first. ‘We get shit done.’? Mostly by badgering or bribing men to do it. So... huzzah, I guess. Good luck. For real though, the two women who answered that must either be high schoolers or are so out of touch they shouldn’t be trusted on the internet to begin with. Walk into a McDonald’s and ask all the employees to make and implement a single meaningful policy change, and bet them a million dollars they can’t get it se…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 05:14 AM
20

We’re told everything. Grievance studies has a long history of throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks. I’m sure there are men here who remember when ‘women are just as high-libido as men’ was the party line to sell sexual liberation and downsell slut shaming, despite it having been obviously false forever. Regardless, it’s perfectly possible that both sexes boil all their decisions down to sex and they prioritize them differently. It’s not even surprising.That’s what happens when one group…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/20 07:51 PM
5

Or if the situation warrants being crass, you’ll stop mansplaining when she’s no longer so cuntfused.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 07:33 PM
13

Pretty soon she’ll be able to stage an exhibition baseball game. A whole team of her children versus her four or five grown-men baby daddies. What a fucking world.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/20 07:42 PM
7

That whole ‘paragraph’ about having shit together is criminally horrible. Just in terms of coherency. Not to mention the fact that she apparently is taking at face value the people online who claim to have their shit together.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/20 07:39 PM
1

You must have heard the phrase ‘first world problems’ by now? It’s that writ large. I’ll bet you a beer that nobody in your country has ever written or published an article seriously making the claim that their workplace is sexist because the air conditioning was making the office colder than room temperature.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 07:04 PM
3

Eh. There are certainly situations where that’s be a valid concern. For a fictionalized example, look at The Firm. Cruise was in a situation where he was absolutely right, but whistleblowing would ruin his career. For a real one, recall Snowden. Less ‘spy-novelly’, go read about how many conservative professors there are in academia who know about the establishment’s manipulation of the education system but are afraid to say anything because they’d never work again. Regardless of the truth in th…
/r/MensRights03/09/20 06:54 PM
1

Yup. Our culture is replete with warnings about putting yourself into a position you can’t undo. From the Pandora’s Box myth to sayings about closing barn doors after horses I’ve bolted. But we still put ourselves in situations that require us to rebreak the limb before it can really heal, and without the determination and willingness to sacrifice to do that, we’ll end up limping along until something gives completely. Which, if I may torture yet another aphorism, leads to the recent quote about…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/20 06:38 PM
15

“Remember that just because one feels guilt, doesn’t mean they are guilty.” Except in this case she totally fucking is. Everyone in this situation, even in her own maximally lenient telling, is unhappy with the results. She fucked her husband. She obliterated her kids. The extended families on both sides are upset. Even she isn’t really satisfied. The only ones who weren’t hurt are her pussy and the ‘driven and creative people’ (yeah, right) filling it up. You pulled the trigger and upended at l…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/20 08:30 PM
36

The whole first paragraph is a (the) litany of ‘I should be excused because...’ Yeah it sucks. Assuming it’s true, being a foster kid is hard. Being an abuse victim is hard. But note how she segues from that into ‘sex and drugs’ like someone made her spend 7 years smoking and fucking. If she was trafficked, you know she’d have said that, so she wasn’t. She was a participant. But she’s framing it like something that happened to her. Even so, being fostered/abused doesn’t dictate your life. If she…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/20 08:22 PM
61

If sex work is work, we need some massive social change in the name of equalizing male sex workers, don’t we? Let’s get some grants/subsidies for guys who want to sling sausage. Let’s shame or even litigate women who are so bigoted they won’t pay male ethots (ethugs) to flex on Twitch. You heard them, ladies. Time for equality. Subscribe to my OnlyFans! (Oh, and we need to bring back the thotaudit. If it’s work, there’s even less excuse for not paying income tax on it...)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/20 08:10 PM
3

You can if it doesn’t paint the picture you want to see! /s Reminder that a lot of those studies trace back to CDC reports, and those reports specify that ‘rape’ means the victim was penetrated. If you were made to penetrate someone against your will, it gets counted separately from rape. But if you count those cases the numbers are about 50/50. And the you add prison rape on top of that, and suddenly things look a whole lot different than people are led to believe... So we just don’t talk about…
/r/MensRights02/09/20 08:03 PM
4

It’s obvious bullshit. They say they care about men’s rights, but making sure men have equal parental rights is on their todo list behind ‘making sure men can’t sit comfortably on public transit’ and ‘making sure all women have a pleasant room temperature at their office jobs’... both of which are behind ‘make sure men dont have equal parental rights by shooting down legal initiatives to guarantee them.’ Meanwhile, since they’re ‘helping men too’ we nasty MRAs should just shut up and not do anyt…
/r/MensRights02/09/20 07:58 PM
4

Reading a lot of Heinlein lately, I suppose. You don’t ‘make friends’ with enemies. You make friends with people who disagree with you. But people who idolize thought leaders who advocated culling your population to 10% and that high only because it’s literally impossible for the world to run without that fraction, who impose their will on everyone else by way of lies and deception, and who won’t even talk to you... they can’t be befriended. They can’t be converted. They can’t be trusted. You’d …
/r/MensRights02/09/20 07:52 PM
8

There isn’t much to add, but I wanted to toss in a little aside: they don’t make bedsheets which aren’t white as white ones get discolored Besides the obvious fact that yes, they do make colored bedsheets... that looks like an untapped market! Whoever was complaining about that should start her own company! Lean in, girlfriend! Oh, wait. No? You’re going to sit on the Internet, screaming into the void because men won’t put your favorite dye into your 300 thread count $5.99 sheets you got at Targ…
/r/MensRights02/09/20 07:31 PM
1

I see what you mean. ABC has a long history of covering stories for humorous reasons. They revel in their reputation as purveyors of tongue-in-cheek commentary. (PS: Rent-free.)
/r/MensRights01/09/20 10:35 PM
7

It is kind of interesting that anyone is taking her seriously. Enough for ABC to cover this farce of a lawsuit. You think the husbands of women authors don’t proofread or brainstorm worth them? Imagine if Jorge Arantes (JK Rowling’s first husband, who was with her while she was conceiving the series and writing thre first one) showed up out of nowhere demanding credit and money for his inestimable work on Harry Potter. You think anyone would take him seriously?
/r/MensRights01/09/20 08:28 PM
1

If you think I was making an argument that everything (or indeed anything) is an entirely social construct, you must have bad genes.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 08:11 PM
2

Let’s put the issue of being actually right or wrong about issues aside for a minute. This isn’t that conversation. Putting yourself in an echo chamber is so you can hear only what you want to hear. Being somewhere people can say things you don’t want to hear but encouraging the people who say the things you do isn’t that. It’s... well, how a lot of society works, for better or worse.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 08:09 PM
2

Well since we’re going to do this, I think it’s you Johnny-Come-Latelies who want to snuggle up to the useful idiot faction of a movement predicated on the work of—among others—a woman who wants to kill 90% of the male population who are going to be ruinous to the cause. If you want something more in line with your approach, r/MensLib is that way. They’ll give you a fancier collar if you tell them you left here and converted. But what do I know? I’m just the CEO of a fortune 50 company and on th…
/r/MensRights31/08/20 09:52 PM
2

...not entirely sure you’ve disproved my echo chamber conclusion. Because you completely and utterly missed my point. I wasn’t suggesting you do it to bide time. I was suggesting you do it so you can see how an echo chamber reacts to behaviour like yours. (Spoiler: It isn’t by having a conversation with it.)
/r/MensRights31/08/20 09:44 PM
2

... What relevance does your opinion have on anything? Especially when it’s in such a niche and deeply corrupt environment? If you can’t give any example, just say so or disappear like everyone else who can’t back up their vague reassurances, don’t try to invent credentials for yourself and tell us you’re better than having to back up what you say.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:24 PM
2

Is this sub not an echo chamber? Well you’re here arguing with us for however long you’ve been here. Go post with a similar tone on r/feminism. Hell, go make a post there asking why everyone on there is suddenly an MRA. (Yes, I know you’re not OP.) See how fast you catch the banhammer. If you haven’t already just for posting here. And we’re an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:20 PM
1

I like how the phrasing used by her strawman is actually an invitation for challenge. ‘If I’m wrong, please tell me how. I want to improve not only my understanding but the group’s.’ What a terrible, terrible position to hold, right? /s
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:18 PM
1

Eh. They’re still pretty awful, but this is a good move. I’m okay praising them for doing something right without excusing all the wrong.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:14 PM
1

Doesn’t sound like much of a problem... It’s not, but that doesn’t matter. The cost/benefit to do this is infinitesimal. The tools to do this are free and run suitably quickly on consumer level hardware. It’s the kind of exercise you can do in your second or third semester at some universities. There are people who do it that aren’t out of high school. From a corporate spending point of view, this project is free. But selling it as a service to Twitter for a hundred million dollars (I didn’t che…
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:12 PM
1

No. They’re probably doing machine learning for this. There’s no list of ‘this phrase makes a tweet Badthink.’ Instead they gather up a bunch of tweets, label them badthink and goodthink, and feed them all into an algorithm. It (huge simplification incoming, data scientists please don’t hurt me) looks for common features of bad tweets and good tweets, and for obvious differences between the groups. Then it remembers that stuff. When you give it a new tweet, it runs down the list of features and …
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:06 PM
1

That also didn’t answer the question. ‘How are women disadvantaged?’ is not addressed by saying ‘They’re less disadvantaged than they were.’ It’s begging the question.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:54 PM
1

I believe feminism to be focused on gender equality. Your belief is unfounded. It’s as simple as that.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:52 PM
1

There’s an angle to cases like this in addition to the obvious paternity/relationship one. Medical history. There are a whole bundle of serious medical problems you can mitigate or avoid with the foreknowledge that there’s a family history, but if your ‘father’ isn’t actually related to you and you think he is, not only are you missing half of your family medical history, you’re substituting a false one in its place.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:46 PM
5

actual true original feminism is helpful to us, actually in many ways Doubt. Enlighten us all, please.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:35 PM
3

Can we finally make MGM illegal too, since we’re finally getting things done?
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:33 PM
4

Wow, Jonathan, whose past contributions here include reposting from FDS with the title ‘She’s Not Wrong.’ Thanks for your valuable input.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:32 PM
2

The comment immediately to the call for sources: Good lord, this place really is just an echo chamber isn't it. Misinformation perpetuated by clueless victims. No wonder nobody gives a fuck about mens right with people like you and OP making up the ranks. Nope, no condescension here.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:22 PM
32

Even the bumper sticker ‘ideal woman’ on subs that are constantly under fire for misogyny has nothing—zero—to do with genetic features. The phrase is, ‘a debt-free virgin with tattoos.’ Some guys will add the (again, not genetic) ‘not morbidly obese’ rider, but even that’s up for negotiation for most guys.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:08 PM
1

Not a actively denying. Just passively. Because you’ve dragged out two more replies without actually saying anything. But it’s okay. We understand how you feel. Even if you don’t, and as much as you would like us not to.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 06:38 PM
7

Upset? I asked a simple question. Which you didn’t answer, choosing instead to launch into a near-unintelligible scramble of words. Yes. Women do most of the work of physically producing a child. Do men do most of the work maintaining the society and the lifestyle to which we all—even the women and children—are accustomed? Just ‘yes’ or ‘no’ will be sufficient.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 05:35 AM
9

People talk about those studies that reveal that most abusive relationships are reciprocally abusive; both people are giving as good as they get. And of the remainder, with only one abusive partner, it’s more likely to be the woman. But someone the other day did the math and made a comment that’s a sobering realization: If a woman says she was in an abusive relationship (just one, not to mention all the women who seemingly have a string of them) there’s an 80% chance that she is abusive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/20 04:36 AM
6

What does ‘give the kid to daddy to babysit while I jump on a dickplane to play globetrotter’ say about her sense of responsibility? You don’t want to date that. Fool around with it a little, but you don’t need to go anywhere with it—literally or figuratively—to do that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/20 04:29 AM
9

It’s hard to deny that the society that relied on ‘praying sex away’ didn’t have anywhere near the number of teen or single mothers that we do now. I’m not stupid enough to think that trying to enforce old-fashioned (lack of) birth control methods would or could work in today’s climate, but I’m also smart enough to realize that if teen pregnancies are your concern, it was part of a formula that worked way better than the current one...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/20 04:25 AM
1

In defense of computer science, its own definition is a little bit up in the air anyway. Depending on who’s trying to sell you a piece of paper, it’s anything from churning out CRUD frontends using the framework of the week—which I’d argue fits best into tech—to the finer points of NP completeness—which is almost pure math.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 04:14 AM
1

Anecdotal, but: I’m in a field that’s an intersection of tech and math. There are, predictably, few women. I’ve noticed that even the women making it professionally are—in general, not all of them—performing in a way consistent with what you point out. They can integrate, but they don’t know what it means to do so. They can do multidimensional operations but generally only up to about three dimensions, because their calculus/matrix algebra/discrete math courses taught how to do two and three dim…
/r/MensRights30/08/20 04:08 AM
3

I love the posts that do the playing-neutral thing. Four day old account posting ‘Misogynists of MensRights, I’m interested in being an MRA but you’re all so wrong about everything. Why are there so many evil people here?’ No posts here, posts mostly to AskFeminists, then one day we see, ‘MRAs, I consider myself an egalitarian, but the feminists are right about everything, why don’t you just do what they want?’
/r/MensRights30/08/20 03:48 AM
1

The Mother returns in The Trial at the end of the album. In context, doubles down on the savagery.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 03:41 AM
10

Do you believe men have a more important role in keeping society functioning? They literally die more at work by orders of magnitude than women, and by your own logic that’s the criterion.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 03:38 AM
5

It’s a screenshot and not a link to the article, but why do I suspect that context isn’t in the article? ‘Women encouraged to protest because men get beaten when they try’ would make for an interesting conversation.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 03:32 AM
6

Go look up a graph of welfare spending as a % of GDP for as far back as you can find it. Spoiler: It’s a flat line until almost exactly 100 years ago, when it suddenly starts an obvious upward trend (with a couple isolated and temporary drops) that continues through today. Need I remind everyone what else happened almost exactly 100 years ago?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/20 03:43 PM
6

They get it coming and going, too. Not only do they get double the taxes, but what happens to wages when you double the size of the workforce?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/20 03:37 PM
14

In America, Congresspeople and senators have pretty good health care. Why do people say the American health care system is so broken?
/r/MensRights28/08/20 03:26 PM
3

Cargo cult youth. At some point they were teenagers: young, had no responsibilities, no real consequences, lived, thought, and behaved like teenagers. Then they grew up. Now they just don’t have real responsibilities or consequences. But maybe if they live, think, and behave like teenagers, the last piece will fall into place and they won’t be 50 years old and saggy anymore. Haha, just kidding.... unless...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/20 08:03 PM
7

You know what happens all the time? One girl in a group of friends is raped, and one of her sisters goes, ‘I’ve got to get in on that guy!’ only to get raped herself, and so on until that last girl looks at the situation and thinks to herself, ‘Well, he raped four of my friends, but I can’t wait to go out with him!’ It’s a tale as old as time, it isn’t suspicious at all, and doesn’t call into question the mental facilities or honesty of those women at all. What a joke.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 07:56 PM
7

I loved that line. All the snide comments about ‘why do working people support Trump? He’d feed them to hyenas for a dollar!’ Out of one side of their mouths, and then ‘it’s our turn’ out of the other, like they go shoe shopping with ‘Hillie’ every weekend.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 07:41 PM
1

I told you, just once. You still want to be wrong, that’s on you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/20 03:59 AM
11

A more cynical person might note that title and point out that this guy isn’t getting praise for teaching that little girl to punch better, but for doing it for her and letting her think she did it herself. But not me. I’m not that cynical.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 03:55 AM
6

I rather suspect the tendency to point out the importance of being a good father isn’t to push men into fatherhood roles but to counter the common messaging that men have to be coerced into fatherhood (‘deadbeat’ accusations, paternity fraud) and are indifferent or actively bad parents when they’re in that role. It’s useful to spread the message that it only are there men who choose the role, many of them excel at it.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 03:51 AM
1

Yeah as written, it doesn’t mean what OP is trying to say.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 03:46 AM
1

Once. I’m going to explain this once. Food criticism is a valid job. As is photographer, model, and dancer. Mukbangs aren’t really terribly relevant, but you know what? Let’s me be generous and grant that the people making money on them are doing a real job. The actual point however, is that eating doesn’t make me a food critic or a dancer. In exactly the same way that posting your flappy tits online doesn’t make you a photographer or a model. Anyone can eat. Everyone has a chest. You need to br…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/20 03:18 AM
2

Thanks for that. What a neat observation.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 10:34 PM
4

Eating is a form of food critique and dance. Pay me.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/20 09:49 PM
3

That’s bullshit. You don’t build the safety net after you fall off the trapeze.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 09:39 PM
4

Your last paragraph is important. The clamor we see/read is selection bias. The MGTOW you see spending words on women are the larval form. They’re mostly men who are embracing the philosophy but not yet fully realized. You don’t read much from the ones who are finished because they’ve... well, gone their own way.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 09:37 PM
2

one prosecution That means that there was one accuser who both made enough of a problem for government employees and who left enough evidence to prosecute. That number means nothing about how many times it happens. Unless the feminist side is willing to give up on counting ‘rapes that weren’t prosecuted’ as rapes. That would be a starting point for negotiations, I suppose.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 09:34 PM
5

This is interesting. Is there any feature you can describe that you find is a decent cue towards the player’s sex? To make up an example so you have an idea what I mean, does one or the other tend to do crescendoes faster or to a higher peak?
/r/MensRights26/08/20 09:06 PM
4

‘Finding themselves’ in another stranger’s apartment.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/20 09:05 PM
3

You need to read better. I’m fine with pinups in either restroom. But I have all the faith in the world that one of my coworkers would go running to HR before the end of the day. I’m here for a paycheck, not in solidarity.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 09:02 PM
11

Oh look, the cavalry has arrived! Welcome. Have some cake.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 08:58 PM
6

I’m sorry it happened to you, however you feel about it. It was a bad situation. Incidentally, it touches on why the Mary Koss definitions I mention are so messed up. Her definitions... well... didn’t exist until she made them up. She asked people if were ever raped, and some of them said no. But then they also answered that, for example, they’d been made to kiss someone when they didn’t want to. And she decided that counted as rape. So they got counted as rape victims, they just didn’t realize …
/r/MensRights25/08/20 08:57 PM
12

Speaking of nice tries... How many men are falsely accused of rape? Over 5,000 people were prosecuted for rape in 2016-17. But only 2,991 were convicted. Does that mean the remaining 2,199 defendants were all victims of a false allegation? In short: no. Not being convicted of a crime is not the same as being found innocent. I only clipped the first part of this section because it’s pretty long and just full of ridiculousness. The first being that they make their case by ‘helpfully’ reminding the…
/r/MensRights25/08/20 08:54 PM
2

I’m a programmer. I’ve been lucky (or cursed, whatever you like) to work in office environments, mostly around blue cities. Which probably explains it.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 08:10 PM
28

It’s not statistically more. The reports show that its equal. But really, it’s likely more. Here’s an article about it in Time Magazine. Turns out, the CDC (and other government bodies) use the FBI definition of rape. (Some of them still use the Mary Koss version, but trust me, you don’t want me to use those studies...) Which specifically says you need to be penetrated to be a rape victim. If you’re made to penetrate someone, it’s counted (and reported) as something else. Add ‘made to penetrate’…
/r/MensRights25/08/20 08:05 PM
13

Just a patently false assertion. Try harder.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 07:44 PM
1

In theory. In practice in most places I’ve worked, I would expect one of the other guys to report cheesecake in the men’s room because ‘c’mon guys, that’s inappropriate....’ I have way more faith that no woman is going to report cheesecake in their bathroom. Women are all in the sisterhood. A bunch of the men want to be so badly that they forsake the brotherhood.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 07:43 PM
2

So much insanity in the comments there. I had to stop reading at the comment thread where one woman says the real solution is to wncourage more girls to go into STEM at early ages, and a train of ‘As a woman in engineering...’ replies show up to nod theor heads and gabble in agreement. As if that hasn’t been happening for 30+ years. These women in STEM apparently never bothered to look around and realize there aren’t boys only coding camps, scholarships only available to women, cheerleading from…
/r/MensRights24/08/20 07:39 PM
4

Wow, is this the same person who sent me a DM at the same time as this post calling me trash and a brainless dumb fuck, among other things? Sorry if I hit a little too close to home, I’ll lay off so you can have a sit down and compose yourself.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 07:55 PM
2

No, see, she just wants to chat with a guy. Online? 4 billion guys online who can chat? No, she has to see that he’s tall. And hot. And buying her dinner. You know, just going out to chat.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/08/20 07:46 PM
3

Not exactly. You’re expected to be the bad parts, too. Women still love bad boys. It’s just that you’re supposed to let them blame and shame the bad parts, and perform even harder at the good ones to ‘make up’ for being ‘such an asshole.’
/r/MensRights22/08/20 07:35 PM
33

If the horrible side of feminism is the one making speeches for the DNC, holding public office, and setting policies and laws, you’re going to have to try a little harder to dissociate the label from their actions than, ‘no, please, I, the random internet stranger who isn’t doing anything of consequence to/for anyone is the real feminist, don’t associate me with her!’ If you don’t want people to associate you with her, don’t associate yourself with her.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 07:31 PM
3

And how does that reconcile with the fact that there was so much research into how boys performed better in school until we decided it was because our educational methods favored boys and addressed that by rebuilding almost our entire approach to education to accommodate girls? Or to put it more directly, why is male dominance in a system that supposedly catered to them evidence of sexual inequality, but female dominance in a system explicitly designed to cater to them evidence of their superior…
/r/MensRights22/08/20 07:20 PM
2

Just so I’m sure I understand what you’re saying: ... and it should be expected. Why?
/r/MensRights22/08/20 04:52 AM
1

Top Spotify Artist: Chris Brown. Mmmm-hmm.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 03:52 AM
3

They help nurses by doing the dirty or easy stuff that doesn’t need actual medical training. If someone’s taking your vitals, it’s probably an assistant. Other response similitude include emptying ostomy bags, helping invalid people eat/bathe, and cleaning up the incontinent or nauseous. You know. Stuff that needs enough schooling that some people are still studying it at 44.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/08/20 04:35 PM
3

I know a woman who didn’t know the difference between a variable and a database row, and now she’s a “director of engineering” Remember the Equifax debacle we’re all supposed to have forgotten about by now? Remember who was CTO of Equifax when that happened? She had a BA and MFA in music composition. (As a side note, she doesn’t have a Wikipedia page. Does anyone else find that... uhh... strange?)
/r/MensRights21/08/20 04:21 PM
7

She’s (presumably) an adult. And should be held responsible for participating in the conversations into which she inserts herself. If she can’t have a conversation rationally because of her trauma, it doesn’t become the responsibility of everyone else to abandon rationality to spare her feelings. That’s not insensitive. You can be completely sympathetic to someone’s situation without allowing them to leverage that sympathy as a rhetorical device. We’d probably be in a better place if more people…
/r/MensRights21/08/20 04:10 PM
3

Oh Christ. Is it time for this tread again?
/r/MensRights21/08/20 04:01 PM
6

‘Why stay at home raising your own children when you could be at the grindstone making money for strangers with more money while a stranger with less money raises your children?’ Sign me the fuck up. 🙄
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/20 06:42 PM
10

I’ve heard it phrased as, ‘Women want the wedding, not the marriage.’
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/20 06:39 PM
16

All those abusive guys... /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/20 06:32 PM
10

That’s an interesting idea and I wonder if it’d turn out that way. I’d assume that most could hold off ‘just six more months, then I get half of everything’, but maybe I’m wrong.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/20 06:30 PM
17

https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/astounding-increase-in-antidepressant-use-by-americans-201110203624 1/4 women between 40-60 (I know, they’re not the bulk of the dating pool, but that’s the statistic the article gives) are on antidepressants. Women are 250% more likely than men to be on antidepressants. And this is just antidepressants, not other psychiatric educations.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/20 06:23 PM
5

In the immortal words of Eleanor Roosevelt, ‘Fuck off, troll.’
/r/MensRights19/08/20 03:52 AM
5

Because you lose 95% of your audience if you don’t. Imagine going to talk about the Bible with a bunch of old church ladies. If you don’t make it very clear to them that you’re on the ‘Devil bad, God good’ team and you aren’t a blasphemer, you’re going to have a bad time.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 07:11 PM
3

Not everyone is comfortable being front-line confrontational. Even the people who are burn out and take breaks. That’s fine. You do what you’re comfortable with, whether that’s writing articles, giving lectures, or just being counted, or—ultimately—deciding you disagree. If you want to contribute but are stronger out of spotlights, research. Look at history. Look at now. Bring relevant information and events to people who aren’t aware of them. Stay healthy. Keep reading. Keep your eyes open. Kee…
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:32 AM
3

You’re a smarter person than I am.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 09:13 PM
1

That doesn’t even make sense.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 08:03 PM
2

You just don’t understand the message behind shoving the contents of a can of Spaghetti-Os into your vagina and discharging them back into the can. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 07:59 PM
2

It shouldn’t be a hard question. It doesn’t need an essay. And you still won’t or can’t answer it. Barring obvious body language cues, there’s no way to tell what effect a compliment will have on a person. And even then, complimenting a grumpy/angry person can turn their mood around. What you’re suggesting is that you never compliment anybody because they might take it badly, a strategy which denies compliments—and the resulting mutual good feelings—from everyone who’s normal and well adjusted. …
/r/MensRights16/08/20 09:25 PM
27

Not even. Look around. The guys here are asking what you’re saying. Most guys are actually more along the lines of, ‘please don’t be too fat.’
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/08/20 09:09 PM
6

Please note: This woman’s go-to example for something that’s ‘really hard’ is preparing for the SAT. Can anyone here honestly say that if someone asked you to come up with one of the hardest things you’ve ever done, you would have even thought of ‘preparing for the SAT’ (bonus points of it was the JAMB, which as far as I can google is the Nigerian counterpart? Sounds incredibly taxing...) in your top 25? Not only that, she implies that holding her job and SAT prep are comparably difficult. Poor …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/08/20 09:03 PM
13

There are about 165 million women in America. I guarantee your 6 million is way too low.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/08/20 08:54 PM
11

You’d be surprised.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/08/20 08:49 PM
0

None of that answers my question. What about them indicates anything except sincerity. Why is the bottom right one ‘definitely’ not a compliment? It’s clumsy, sure. But what grounds are there for imputing malice/sexism/whatever on the speaker?
/r/MensRights16/08/20 08:48 PM
2

Other people are pointing you at other posts on this sub that ask basically what you’re asking. Some people are pointing out that we’re generally not the ones stonewalling things. We have specific and addressable problems with feminism that make us... hesitant to band together with them (to put it lightly) but you’re generally getting a lot of responses. In your original post, you even say basically ‘this might get taken down but I’ll try anyway’ (and good for you for that attitude), but people …
/r/MensRights16/08/20 08:39 PM
12

Cry me a river. ‘Geez, people are just too nice to me, it’s so annoying!’ ‘I hate spending so much time and mental effort in the morning deciding which Porsche to drive to work!’ ‘I’m getting so tired of people handing me dollar bills wherever I go!’ Tall people generally act like grown ups and don’t get butthurt and try to rewrite the rules of social interaction when they hear ‘how’s the weather up there?’ for the millionth time. They roll their eyes and go on with their day or reply with a jok…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 08:20 PM
8

badly delivered “nice” things can be used to deliberately hurt or make people feel uncomfortable Roughly how often do you think that’s the case versus someone actually trying to be nice and being misinterpreted? I see further down thread you give an example of sarcasm. And yes, sarcasm exists. But look at the examples in OP. What about them indicates anything besides sincerity on behalf of the ‘bad’ people?
/r/MensRights16/08/20 08:11 PM
8

very right wing traditionalist argument which they would view as shaming women if it was put to them Some other people here might remember that that ‘if it was put to them’ isn’t an ‘if.’ Even for a while after Roe v. Wade, there were people—and not all hard right fundies—trying to point out that sex makes babies, and if you aren’t prepared for the possibility of a kid, you should abstain from sex. And exactly as you implied it would be, the response was vitriolic. Her body, her choice. You can’…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 07:59 PM
11

‘No baby, see, I only took girls I don’t care about to Europe to buy them designer stuff and fuck them stupid. I care about you, so we can go on day trips every once in a while, maybe spend a weekend in California on our 5th anniversary...’
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/08/20 09:38 PM
13

I have it about 50/50 between her taking all day to unclog a toilet and the plumber she called not being able to make an appointment until late afternoon, so she turned that into ‘I spent all day on Instagram waiting for the plumber to get here dealing with it.’
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/08/20 09:11 PM
3

That’s the one, thanks.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 08:54 PM
21

Does anyone have that GWW essay about ‘real’ feminists handy? I feel like we need a bot we can call to post it in response to comments like this.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 02:54 AM
32

‘Tolerate my sarcasm and humor’ + ‘doesn’t take himself too seriously’ = I will constantly pick on you and if you ever get tired of it I will claim I was kidding and call you an asshole for taking yourself too seriously.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/08/20 07:48 PM
9

Of course ‘distance is just geography, not an obstacle.’ She’s not the one who is to traverse it. You go to her, chump. The mountain is just geography, not an obstacle. Carry me!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/08/20 07:46 PM
5

How come I read that and my brain automatically added, ‘... but I won’t.’ to ‘I can make you a sandwich.’?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/08/20 07:44 PM
14

It’s those men at the higher end of the socioeconomic spectrum—Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Salman bin Abdulaziz—that are the victims of Patriarchy. Yup. Seems legit.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/08/20 07:39 PM
3

His link supports him. The numbers you’re working with use a definition of rape that amounts to ‘did you stick something into someone they didn’t want inside them or when they couldn’t consent?’ That’s called ‘rape’ in crime statistics. There’s another statistic they keep track of. ‘Did someone make you stick something inside them when you didn’t want to or couldn’t consent?’ That’s called ‘made to penetrate’ and doesn’t meet the legal definition of rape. So even though it is—if one is intereste…
/r/MensRights13/08/20 07:34 PM
4

It’s exactly what they’re saying. It’s the path most people use. (I’m not saying that makes it the right path.) the fact of the matter is, the companies that don’t just plain have ‘hire the woman by default for “representation”’ policies will still favor women in situations like this, because not hiring a man can’t come back to you legally no matter how often it happens, but not hiring a woman might get you into court for discrimination lawsuits.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 07:25 PM
3

If Biden’s elected, he’s not making it through a term. She’ll be the first female president, snuck in the back door. And it won’t satisfy the feminists. For one, did Obama satisfy the race baiters? For another, when have feminists ever been satisfied?
/r/MensRights13/08/20 07:11 PM
0

Let me guess. They couldn’t attend college or work, either. That sound about right?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/08/20 05:30 PM
12

Yes. Absolutely. I’d argue a BS In a STEM is probably worth more than a gender studies PhD in almost every context. What I was getting at is that this woman’s MS isn’t going to help anything but her ego.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/08/20 12:17 AM
15

CS degree is worth something Your master’s degree in CS isn’t worth as much to your career as your bachelor’s unless your intended career is research or bleeding edge industry. In the first case, you’re going to want your PhD anyway, and if you’re still on your masters in your 30s, going for a PhD afterwards means your career isn’t researcher, it’s ‘professional student.’ In the second, 30-pushing-40 is starting to get mighty close to the age at which the age discrimination that absolutely doesn…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/08/20 10:38 PM
1

I’m going to take one crack at explaining why you’re being dismissed here. Just one. I’m not replying after this. We don’t challenge people to post threads like this to the feminism subs too to demonstrate ‘they’re violating your free speech!’ You assumed that, and it’s wrong. The reason we do it is to demonstrate that when someone posts here about ‘we should all work together!’ They end up getting in discussions. And arguments, generally, but the idea is entertained and well try to talk with yo…
/r/MensRights12/08/20 10:22 PM
4

There’s also the fact that in most ‘pink tax’ comparisons, the products being compared arent actually the same thing. Mens shampoo for example, is generally a lot harsher chemically because men generally don’t care about having healthy, shiny hair. The women’s line of the same brand of shampoo usually has a bunch of extra oils and conditioners—driving the price up—because women, again generally, won’t buy shampoo that dries their hair out. But the ‘pink tax’ comparisons will take SuperHairSoap f…
/r/MensRights12/08/20 10:13 PM
8

Not content to be the oldest teenager in the room, some women are apparently satisfied being the oldest teenagers in the armed forces. FSM forbid someone entrusted with weapons, relevant training, and the reputation of the country be given any personal responsibility, right?
/r/MensRights12/08/20 09:51 PM
7

No other posts or comments in the sub, either, apparently. Clearly someone who has a lot of strong feelings about how things are.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 09:49 PM
1

The draft still exists. Just because it hasn’t been invoked since 1973 doesn’t mean you don’t have that little string tied around your finger.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/08/20 09:43 PM
1

Article 1, section 4 of the federal constitution delegates voting (and the eligibility requirements) to states. I’m not going to look at law for every state, but to back up my NJ claim I cite article 4 of their constitution of 1776, which lays out eligibility requirements: You have to be a NJ citizen, living in your voting county for 12 months or more, and be worth 50 pounds in cash or land. Period. You meet that, it doesn’t matter what’s in your pants or under your frock. I’ll go one further. W…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/08/20 09:41 PM
12

Why are you going on Tinder dates if you’re not trying to smash? You’re not going to meet someone on there who even looks like a unicorn if you squint, in dim light, and fog. Unless you’re just trying to string them along and leave them with blue balls. In which case there are just plain better things to do with your time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/08/20 08:48 PM
86

Lot of people out there who can’t read a line graph but turn into Rainman when it’s time to calculate those benefits...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/08/20 08:45 PM
22

Yup. The combination of ‘land-owners get to vote’ and the family being considered the basic social unit instead of the individual is the actual reason ‘women couldn’t vote.’ In quotes because women could vote. If they met those requirements. Hell, NJ explicitly codifies that in its state constitution. The thing was, women joined their assets to men’s when they got married, as the men became/represented the head of the household. It was presumed that he’d vote with his family’s best interest. (An…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/08/20 08:44 PM
2

I once had a common but life threatening problem, and multiple specialists independently agreed on what was wrong. But my insurance was giving me a hard time because I hadn’t seen a GP. So I set up an appointment with the nearest GP with the soonest open appointment slot. Said GP agreed about what the problem was, and recommended acupuncture.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/08/20 08:26 PM
3

If ‘punching up’ is allowed, why do we care about North Korea’s nuclear program? Why don’t the people hiding behind, ‘I’m just punching up!’ ever go tell their boss what they really think of him?
/r/MensRights10/08/20 08:16 PM
6

I’d love to share your optimism. But look at the Kavanaugh thing. That should have put questions in people’s heads. But it didn’t. Instead, we’re in a situation where everyone thinks, ‘When your guy is accused, where there’s smoke there’s fire. When my guy is accused, it’s a blatant political hit. When my team wins it’s because we’re right. When yours does it’s because you corrupted the process!’ It’s tribalism all the way down, and gynocentricism slinks around unquestioned in the background.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 03:42 AM
2

And who’s taking the pictures?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/20 10:50 PM
19

In other news, that thing that never happens happened again.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 07:28 PM
1

I don’t agree, actually. I said that to illustrate how sexist the idea is. The post in OP is a-ok on reddit apparently. I dare you to post what I did to a default sub, though.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 07:22 PM
2

Yes, thanks.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 07:21 PM
1

You should. Let your enemy show you where is weaknesses are.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 06:10 PM
1

Yeah, it’s a well known fact that kids learn best from uninteresting books they’re forced to read in bulk. They don’t end up deriding and resenting them at all. Look at all the people with a deep love of Shakespeare, having had it shoved down their throats all through high school.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 06:08 PM
6

If there were no women for a day, I’d relax in peace and quiet.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 06:05 PM
6

TikTok is a plague. But don’t be mistaken. It’s not responsible for this. If it wasn’t TikTok it’d have been Instagram. Or twitter. Or Facebook. Or... Hell, at some point it has been done in all of those places.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 05:56 PM
16

That’s an important observation. If we grant this woman’s assertion as true, the only way to explain one gender getting more dates than the other (ignoring the frequency of homosexual dates, I suspect it’s not enough to skew the numbers) is that the Pareto Principle applies to intersexual relations. Exactly like TRP says. Not only that, the fact that the many dates women are going on aren’t ‘quality’ means that... well, not only are women regularly stepping out with the same guys over and over, …
/r/MensRights06/08/20 08:36 PM
9

social expectations Because FSM knows, men don’t face any of those, right? Hold on, I think I sprained my eyes rolling them so hard.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 08:27 PM
6

This is an angle that nobody wants to hear. One of my very few posts to a public/all sub was in a thread I don’t really even remember. There was the typical circlejerk about how incels are the devil. One dude then posted a comment self-identifying as an incel, saying that the rejection wasn’t as bad as the fact that women just plain ignore him like he’s invisible. But that didn’t make him hate women, it made him hate himself, and a couple ‘maybe it’s time to end it’ style comments. When I read i…
/r/MensRights05/08/20 07:22 PM
3

Yes. That’s exactly what’s being asked for. But even if it was, hey, it’s worked for feminism, maybe it’s worth a shot.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 07:08 PM
1

What nobody seems to be talking about is she slipped ‘socially acceptable’ into that list of the traits her more successful sisters have. I suspect she thinks she means that in the SJW ‘society doesn’t accept fat people’ bullshit way. But I also suspect she subconsciously realizes it in an ‘I’m antisocial and it drives people away.’ way. I find it hard to believe the author of an ‘I’m perfect, it’s everyone else who needs to change’ article is a nice, well-adjusted person you’d like to deal with…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/20 06:56 PM
3

Seriously. It’s a completely valid threat though, just not in the way she intends. I don’t care if people know I’d asked for nudes. I’d care if people knew I’d asked for nudes from her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/20 06:47 PM
3

Asking you to define the term you used isn’t ‘fighting over definitions.’ It’s establishing them. And your second ‘answer’ is begging the question. You think what you do because you’ve been told to. You were never given reasons, you never asked for them, and you never even justified them to yourself.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/08/20 07:43 PM
8

The people calling you out for dodging the question are right to do so, but you know what? I’ll bite. Why not? Because allowing people to vote for things like... say... pursuing aggressive foreign policies or expanding welfare programs when they won’t be expected to put their necks out if those foreign policies lead to war and they’ll never be the ones paying for the welfare policies, only beneficiaries, isn’t just. In the best case scenario, people put less consideration into decisions whose ne…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/08/20 07:41 PM
19

Could’ve been a slump-buster.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/08/20 07:31 PM
1

Eh. Personally, I’d say it’s... uhhh... lets go with ‘morally questionable.’ I don’t know NY law, it might be in a Romeo and Juliet statute somewhere, but I don’t feel like looking it up so I’m just not going to go there. But morally... forget physical, the difference in mental development between a 16 y/o and a 13 y/o is nothing to sneeze at. Especially in this configuration (and I don’t know you or her, I’m talking about the (admittedly extreme) general case not your specific one) you could be…
/r/MensRights02/08/20 07:51 PM
3

Men are more likely to be mentally retarded. It’s worth noting that this is another consequence of whatever causes the difference in standard deviation/higher variability you point out in your previous point. The wider IQ curve we see for males means the lower end is stacked versus females, but it also means the higher end is. More male geniuses.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 07:36 PM
2

Not weighing in on your question, but reminding everyone that whether this or anything else is morally wrong doesn’t imply anything about its legality. Nor does the legality of an act imply its morailty.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 07:29 PM
2

Pretty much my point. I’ve had friends go from shiftless party seekers to dad of the year like a switch got flipped when their first kid was born. And right here in this sub is an endless parade of thots like the one in OP.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/20 05:26 AM
9

Think about how many times you’ve heard a man say something that basically boils down to, ‘when I had a kid, that’s when I finally realized it was time to start taking things seriously.’ Then think about how many times you’ve heard a woman say it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/20 09:01 PM
13

TLDR: If you hear the dog whistle, you’re the bitch.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/07/20 06:39 PM
2

Her tits have rolls. Of course she is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/07/20 05:35 PM
5

Huh? I’m out of the loop, what’s going on in those states?
/r/MensRights29/07/20 06:03 PM
3

Wedding cake is usually a special kind of bad. Especially the big towers. In order to support the weight of all the layers, the cake has to be pretty dense/dry to begin with. Then they usually just freeze big sheets of it for a while and carve it up when it’s time to assemble the cake. None of that is good when you’re trying to make a cake people will actually enjoy. To say nothing about the decorations, which as someone else pointed out usually means fondant these days.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/07/20 05:55 PM
3

Pedant mode engaged, sorry, It’s important to draw a distinction between becoming a mother and rearing young. Becoming a mother, yes, you’re right. That is 100% the animal drive. But you can do that and go right back to the office. Rearing young, which this conversation is about, is not a universal animal drive. Mammals, sure, and some others. But look at fish, for example. Lay those eggs and fuck off, the fries are on their own.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/07/20 07:00 PM
2

Something you said here kind of makes my point for me. ...paying $1300 for a Galaxy S20 makes no sense when you can get an S8 for like $300 that does the same shit for the most part. This right here. You just said that I can go buy a phone for $300 that’s just about as good as a $1300 one. And either one—even the $300 one—would have more chug than the $5k gaming PC from 1991, let alone the $1500 PackBell. That isn’t an argument that things aren’t getting cheaper. It’s an explicit example of thin…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/20 10:39 PM
-1

As someone who thinks the racial grievance industry goes way too hard: That’s a stupid thing to say. It’s like saying that you can’t know how painful the iron maiden is unless you’re responsible for putting people in them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/20 08:25 PM
2

You’re comparing computer models 30 years apart. What you’re really buying—the processing power—is unquestionably cheaper. You pay 1000 for your smart phone, but it’s not even a contest to compare the function/power of it and your $1500-in-1991 Packard Bell. If you want something consumer level that’s as close as you can get to the PB you paid $1500 for 30 years ago, your main options are to go to government auction sites and buy lots of 25 computers for 100 bucks, or go to amazon and order a Ra…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/20 07:48 PM
1

I’ll spare you the ‘Source? Do you have a source?’ copypasta. I won’t even ask which numbers you mean, considering my post didn’t have any actual number in it, just a statement of a principle. And you’d think that you could verify someone saying that a definition used by a nationally critical department of law enforcement or health could be pretty easily verified by something like a google search, or (Heaven forbid) going to the web site of said department. But I’ll spare your wittle fingers. He…
/r/MensRights22/07/20 02:45 PM
5

Counterpoint: Words mean things. This one doesn’t mean what you think it does.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/20 07:10 PM
2

Or livestock.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/20 06:25 PM
1

I gather you’re speaking about British history, but if you’re interested in an American source for their opinions, check out problem_redditor’s comments downthread. They include (among other useful things) a link to a document on nationalhumanitiescenter.org that includes a military/draft based rejection of franchise in its list of other considerations.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 06:06 PM
18

A little background on the usage of that term in that report. The CDC (and the FBI, incidentally) uses a definition of rape that requires the victim to be penetrated when they’re compiling crime statistics. You’ll note they do actually count when someone rapes a man by forcing him to have sex, but since rapists with male victims don’t usually stick anything into the victims they disappear as ‘rape victims’ and fall into the ‘made to penetrate’ category. Whenever you hear reports that X percent o…
/r/MensRights21/07/20 05:57 PM
1

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/africans-speak-out-against-the-mass-circumcision-campaign-300370353.html There are reports (and some amount of photographic/video evidence) that the ‘voluntary’ part of the campaign’s name is played fast and loose, but I’m not trying to start a game of ‘no, find me a source that I liiiike.’ One might try to argue that ‘even if it’s all above board, it’s all voluntary!’ But I don’t buy that. The campaign is run on false pretenses, it’s obviously failing in…
/r/MensRights21/07/20 01:44 AM
5

Could they ever come at a grown man... Check out what missionaries and ‘health organizations’ are up to in Africa. Though you can probably guess.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 06:55 PM
4

Dear women, please stop wearing clown makeup. Fair’s fair, right?
/r/MensRights20/07/20 06:47 PM
6

You can start with the SCUM Manifesto, which contains calls for genocide. Maybe follow with anything by Sally Miller Gearheart, who established the first university level ‘gender studies’ program and maintains that men should be culled to 10% of the population and that ratio maintained. As for the pedophilia, feel free to attend an unexpurgated performance of The Vagina Chronicles, in which one player describes her rape at the hands of an older woman and concludes, ‘if it was rape, it was a good…
/r/MensRights20/07/20 06:39 PM
3

Lover of music and art. Anyone want to go in on a pool for her favorite songs and paintings? I was here first, so I’m reserving Starry Night and ‘whatever she heard most frequently on the radio in the past 24 hours.’
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/20 07:32 PM
8

Don’t miss her allusion to ‘I didn’t get to travel like I meant to in my 20s.’ She’s a big fan of anthropology, you see. Wants to take in all the interesting foreign cultures.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/20 08:49 PM
5

Mom? Where are you getting that from? I bet dude is in one of those industries that still holds onto the ‘need a wife to swim with the big fish, even if it’s just for appearances’ point of view. So he keeps a live in sex toy who pretends to be wifey for work functions and has no contracts or legally binding agreements. She’s not his wife, just part of his outfit. Who cares where their socks are when they aren’t being worn?
/r/TheRedPill16/07/20 08:44 PM
1

This headline reads like it was written using a dartboard.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 08:33 PM
24

Ahh the Snopes method of establishing truth. Claim: ‘Studies reveal that 60% of apples are red.’ Verdict: FALSE. ‘Studies reveal that only 58% of apples are red.’
/r/MensRights16/07/20 08:29 PM
14

By the time the men had established a shelter, made a bunch of tools to get steady food, and even a couple luxuries, the women had... fire and a pile of leaves to sleep under. They found lounging around in the (admittedly beautiful) water more important than anything else. They started to lose competitions and get eliminated so when the teams were two unbalanced there was an trade’ where a couple people from each team went to the other. The women on the guys team were welcomed to heaven like ret…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/20 02:08 AM
3

Men are always a commodity in any model. True, but I didn’t bother pointing it out because there’s no interesting choice involved, let alone one with consequences of such magnitude. ;)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/07/20 08:51 PM
29

Not enough people see or understand this broad view. The views expressed by the post in OP aren’t wrong in the broad strokes. But the suppression of the dynamic she’s describing is what created the world we live in. Unbound hypergamy => no civilization. No hyperbole. In effect, the ‘deal’ with familial arrangement is that women are guaranteed safety/protection/resources even after they aren’t reproductively valuable. Children get stable homes and (at least, considering siblings...) two people wh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/07/20 07:06 PM
2

Gabapentin isn’t a mental health drug. It helps with seizures and nerve pain. Everything else you said, I hear. The way we find the ‘right’ prescription for people is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 06:43 PM
10

Let’s be real, this exact person is in everyone’s city.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/20 08:54 PM
0

...chicanery is really huge distortions... Yes. Absolutely. But ‘hey let’s use the completely artificial and obviously insane state of affairs as the foundation going forward’ is like building a castle on a swamp. Justifying something that contributes to the problem on the fact that the problem exists is just buying yourself more problem. more staff and equipment than a hotel Sure does. Kind of a non sequitur though. There aren’t insurance companies and government programs paying for (read: dist…
/r/MensRights13/07/20 08:52 PM
1

There’s a huge middle ground between the ‘less time in the hospital’ cost and ‘free for everyone.’ The first shouldn’t even be part of the consideration considering all the chicanery involved with hospital costs in the first place. There was a thread on all the other day where people were talking about hospital costs, and a lot of employees were throwing in their workplaces’ data. I saw a couple of people pointing out their hospital charges $800 day just to lay in a bed, regardless of occupancy.…
/r/MensRights13/07/20 08:04 PM
1

I’m not saying latent bisexuality drives them to do it. I’m saying it allows them to do it. Those ‘straight’ men are also at least a little bisexual. It just happens that most women have that feature and most men don’t.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/20 07:50 PM
0

I suppose so. Which is a little surprising because this conversation started with you denying that women are naturally a little bisexual. But I’m glad I could help you understand.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/20 11:51 PM
0

Alright. Let’s change the question accordingly. Have you ever kissed another guy for a raise or promotion? To win a contest/sport? The actual point—and of course I’m generalizing here, deal with it—is that men don’t perform sexual acts with other men to get what they want. Women will do it just for attention. You don’t jump right into ‘hey I’ll do something a little gay’ unless you’re already open/predisposed to at least a little bisexuality.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/20 09:34 PM
4

Her: Did somebody say Dairy Queen‽
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/20 06:31 PM
5

Have you ever wanted attention so badly you kissed another guy?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/20 06:27 PM
3

So the threads read by the wider reddit user base, that have attracted the attention and participation of people who may never have come here before and may never come here again demonstrate the problem. The threads that don’t, dont. And we’re being called on to watch our tone? Have you ever seen a tourist beach after a holiday weekend? Is it appropriate to go up to the locals wagging your finger and saying, ‘you really shouldn’t litter, it makes you look terrible...’?
/r/MensRights12/07/20 06:17 PM
13

Post wall? Post menopause.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/07/20 07:14 PM
19

I can’t get over that. That outfit is a stitch perfect recreation of the Hollywood shortcut for streetwalker. Give her the boots and bend her over into a car window and you couldn’t tell the difference.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/07/20 07:10 PM
4

Finding an ideologue who’s familiar with their own foundational texts is like finding a debt-free virgin without tattoos.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/07/20 05:49 PM
3

1 vile Indeed.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 05:34 PM
1

Don’t be willfully blind. It’s one of the tails that wags the dog. Hollywood is the vehicle for a lot of the NPC programming, of course it’s relevant.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 05:32 PM
11

Have men abandoned this notion of chivalry as a backlash to women outperforming them, surviving without them and living on their own terms? Replying to you because you read the article and I didn’t. I love this particular rhetorical question—in a deeply cynical way—in all of its forms. Because the rational response would be, ‘alright then, you’re outperforming men, living on your own, and all that. Time to end the quotas, the affirmative actions, the sex specific protections, all the welfare pro…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/07/20 07:42 PM
2

excellent DMs judgement on the interaction. ... which he then followed by an absolute smooth brain translation from his game table to real life. ‘Girls are such peaceful and productive problem solvers because I let my daughter domesticate an imaginary pack of wolves with some imaginary steaks’ makes exactly the same amount of sense as ‘boys are natural entrepreneurs, for example my son just made his little video game guy slam his head into a brick and coins came out!’
/r/MensRights05/07/20 07:20 PM
3

See also: Funded and was primary beneficiary of the colonization of the New World for which it is so lately fashionable to blame men.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 07:08 PM
7

Having completed all of the essential units, I am a qualified graduate of this program. Cushy HR job here I come!
/r/MensRights05/07/20 07:00 PM
3

Here’s something to think about when you’re trying to go to sleep tonight. If you’d need to do research to find a single example of ‘a real feminist’ and can’t name a single one off the top of your head, what does that say about your concept of real feminism?
/r/MensRights02/07/20 09:56 PM
1

You didn’t quote shit. You said he had a bad take and that he ‘sounded like and may be an asshole.’ Your lead ‘argument’ was exactly ad hominem.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 09:21 PM
7

I promise, it doesn’t. The first clue that it doesn’t is that you don’t actually provide any examples. Of anything. The second is that your post is almost literally, ‘yes, but they’re not the real feminists!’ Which you’ll notice is only one synonym and a subject swap away from being the literal textbook example of ‘no true Scotsman.’
/r/MensRights02/07/20 09:15 PM
2

See? There it is! Right on schedule!
/r/MensRights02/07/20 09:12 PM
2

Just no. What the fuck is your game? Get this bot out of here.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 09:10 PM
1

What the fuck do frat parties have to do with this?
/r/MensRights02/07/20 09:06 PM
3

Is that even a serious question? Women control every parameter of sex and the shape of courtship/dating. Men control commitment. The young men getting laid in the current environment are getting easy tail, but that’s just right-place-right-time. If the sisterhood decided that the ‘giant slut competition’ was actually something they didn’t want to participate in it would end tomorrow and there wouldn’t be a goddamn thing the well-lubricated young men would be able to do about it. The current dati…
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:19 PM
26

She looks like Steve Buscemi and Anne Hathaway or Shelly Duvall had a daughter.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:01 PM
3

Queen to find her king - harmless euphemism Yasss Queen! Not an inflated ego at all! law office bathroom pic - suggests responsibility, at least it’s not a club I’ll grant that it’s not a club, but it does indicate either workaholism (pic taken ina free minute at work), trashiness (pic taken in a bathroom, come on), or both. This woman has no pictures of herself in respectable clothes in... say, a park? She has no way to take one?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/06/20 05:30 PM
6

The edge cases that MRAs talk about... ... aren’t the edge cases. Millions of guys work dangerous, dirty, backbreaking, hard jobs. The edge cases are the couple thousand (b)millionaire CEOs and celebrities feminists point to when they say men run the world.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 04:55 PM
2

Considering the educational track that produces counselors, it might be harder to find a neutral one than to build a marriage that doesn’t require counseling in the first place.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 04:52 PM
3

What do you want, a press release? Watch what they do, not what they say.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 03:14 AM
11

This one is too.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 11:23 PM
8

Rolls up her windows and raps along to songs that use the n word.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/20 06:28 PM
5

Or he’s... y’know... not looking for a boyfriend.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/20 06:27 PM
1

That’s not a valid paraphrase though. What theyre expressing isn’t a contradiction, it’s a(n unrealistic, IMO) standard. Think about it this way. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see someone on our side of the matter say that he didn’t expect a woman he was dating to be debt-free, but that a woman carrying a pile of student loans wasn’t wife material. And that’s perfectly logical. It’s the same thing as saying, ‘I have a criteria that rules out the majority. I expect to find the typical person …
/r/MensRights28/06/20 06:10 PM
10

Blatantly sexist? Sure. But that hasn’t stopped them in the past. Ruin their reputation? Hardly. We’re the boogeyman. We’re one of the ‘you don’t get to talk, your post history says you posted in that sub once’ subs.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 06:00 PM
8

There used to be a subreddit but it got banhammered recently.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/20 08:07 PM
3

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/penile-vibratory-stimulation-and-electroejaculation Various methods of coaxing ejaculation from men with little to no neural pathway between their upper and lower bodies. Again, I’m not saying that the brain isn’t involved. Of course it is. Even above this facile ‘you can’t feel shit without nerves, checkmate!’ interpretation. But there’s... some explanation to be made that your brain is ‘by FAR’ the most important factor unles…
/r/MensRights26/06/20 01:04 AM
2

Calling hunters reading this: How many women hunters are there, actually? I’m a city boy, and even I know a couple of honest-to-goodness hound-breeding rifle-hunter men. Even their daughters won’t hunt.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/06/20 07:41 PM
2

Neither organized religions nor society are patriarchies under the feminist definition. The rest of this is... what’s the phrase, ‘just... like... your opinion, man’?
/r/MensRights25/06/20 07:36 PM
3

Alright. So given you’ve just told me that: thinking alone is not the primary means And: Most people use their genitals in addition to their brains. Do you still want to take the stance that ‘The brain is by FAR the most important sex organ for men and women’? Mind you I’m not arguing that it doesn’t have an important role, but just as people have orgasms from dreams, direct genital nerve stimulation can produce it, too. So they’re both involved, I have no problem agreeing with that. It’s the ex…
/r/MensRights25/06/20 07:22 PM
4

Alright. Let’s grant that for the sake of argument. Would you say that doing so is the primary means people use to do so? Is it easier than via genital manipulation for most people?
/r/MensRights25/06/20 04:10 PM
2

He could have said James Dean.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/06/20 08:27 PM
27

thatsthejoke.jpg
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/06/20 08:20 PM
5

By far, the most important taste organ is the brain. Without a tongue, your brain will remap taste sensitivity to the insides of your cheeks and your hard palate. Tell me: can you think yourself to orgasm?
/r/MensRights24/06/20 08:13 PM
3

Wanna rustle your jimmies? Go look up the Tender Years Doctrine.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 07:55 PM
7

You’re going to have to try harder than that to blend in, dear.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/20 09:48 PM
9

What exactly are they up to over there that there may not be a single person in the EU qualified to do it? Any program that specialized doesn’t get funded unless they already have an idea of who’s eligible for the ‘uniquely qualified’ positions and how amenable they are to taking them. You don’t build the Hadron collider and then post on LinkedIn to find your head researchers.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 09:41 PM
11

So in economics, there’s the idea of a ‘Veblen good.’ A Veblen good is an object which is desirable because it’s expensive, as opposed to normal objects that are expensive because they’re desirable. Luxury cars, LV bags, things like that. Their ‘value’ isn’t so much derived from their quality or utility, but from their rarity—their ability to signal, ‘I’m so rich/successful that I can afford to spend extra money on this weak value proposition.’ Has anyone done a study on companies like this tout…
/r/MensRights20/06/20 09:06 PM
1

That’s a piping hot take right there. I’m sorry you were so slippery as a baby.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 04:46 AM
1

Welp. I’m going to respond, but only to the very last part. The rest is just making assumptions about me. I don’t blame the government for any and all issues. But I don’t pretend it isn’t responsible for any either. The intended role and organization of the government and its actual execution aren’t the same thing. At any level. Go to the DMV for an afternoon and tell me how efficient, helpful, and effective it is. While you’re there, think about what the tenth amendment means to you. I’d be int…
/r/MensRights18/06/20 08:46 PM
6

No, can’t you read? She said Méxican. As in Méxica. It’s near Thailand.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/06/20 08:22 PM
1

Come on, if you read here at all and still have such a rosy view of the government, it’s function, and its approach to abuse of power, you’re either lying or deep in some kind of hole.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 08:06 PM
2

Oh, I’m aware. But it’s a powerful question for the ‘arguing to convince the audience, not the opponent’ angle.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 08:50 PM
11

What, you’re not impressed? How about if I told you I could give away some cash to a random woman any time I want? That’s not easy, you know. /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/06/20 08:11 PM
3

I’d actually kind of love to see the feminists freak out because they were being excluded. The louder and more public the better. Because then the obvious next question is, ‘Why does a feminist want to be on a dating site with the filthy mysogynist red pills? Are you trying to date them?’
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 07:39 PM
14

Remember Cosmopolitan magazine? The one whose primary demographic was single women between 15 and 40, which ran articles every issue about how to find and keep a great man? It was crazy. It’d be like hiring a bunch of diversity officers to fight discrimination and telling them that their jobs were bulletproof until discrimination was gone...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/06/20 07:34 PM
1

If you’re going to travel, I hear you can make some money in Dubai...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/06/20 07:30 PM
6

That one jumped out at me, too. It was a weird ‘imagine saying the reverse of that’ moment, considering I haven’t heard the analogous insult in so long I forgot it for a minute or two.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/06/20 07:29 PM
17

Why would you be taken aback by that? It’s what’s to be expected somewhere with such a low barrier to entry. Look at people trying to make their cash on youtube or twitch. There are more webcams in the world than people who want to use them and everyone figures ‘well I can do that!’ and hangs out a shingle. The problem, for both video stars and prostitutes, is that with so many people in the game you have to either actually be good or be hot. Otherwise you hustle all day and if you’re lucky you …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/06/20 07:24 PM
3

There’s another reason for the dry cleaning discrepancy. Men’s dry cleaning is almost entirely dress-casual or dress clothing. And men’s dress-casual/dress clothing is so uniform that there are machines to automatically dry clean them. Women’s dry cleaning has embellishments, mixed materials, all kinds of cuts, sewn-on beading (from cheap plastic to pearl), ruffles and frills, you name it. It’s often sent out from the dry cleaner to be handled manually. The ‘pink tax’ in dry cleaning is the resu…
/r/MensRights09/06/20 06:48 PM
1

It’s hilarious if their glossary really includes ‘the wall.’ For so many reasons.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 04:51 PM
5

I’ve told this story before, and it’s not about something as serious as murder, but it’s something I keep in the back of my head when this topic comes up. I used to have a neighbor who was a druggie. Not a marijuana addict, but a ‘disappear for weeks at a time, tell stories about stealing copper from abandoned buildings, new boyfriend every time you see her, broke all the time’ junkie. One night I was taking a walk and I ran into her. We had a friendly but not close relationship, and I noticed h…
/r/MensRights08/06/20 06:04 AM
6

Are any of those advantageous in a deployment/engagement? Some may be neutral at best (curved hips?) but are there any benefits? Maybe the ‘smaller body profile’ one, I suppose.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 05:40 AM
3

I once had a 6-figure salary feminist yelp like a kicked dog and call me from four rooms away to kill a house spider.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 08:07 PM
14

yeschad.jpg
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/06/20 09:48 PM
8

Last study I saw, they’re positive tax payers for about five years just before they retire, and a liability all the time before and after. White men are the only demo that pays more into the system than it takes out.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/06/20 09:45 PM
1

Shrug. In my school experience (quite some time ago, I’ll grant) I never saw anyone left behind for behavioral issues, only academic ones. The district I was in was more of a ‘give the troublemaker the lowest passing grade you can so we don’t have to deal with him longer than we have to’ environment, when they couldn’t just expel and be done with it.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 07:33 PM
1

Whatever grade you’re getting in your logic class, you don’t deserve it.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 07:29 PM
7

I’d love to see someone try that in response to a soliciting charge. ‘No, your honor, I wasn’t hiring a prostitute, I was engaging in a targeted relationship!’
/r/MensRights01/06/20 07:16 PM
1

That’s how it’s always been, not just with being shot. The overwhelming majority of prisoners being minorities is used as evidence of systemic racism, but the even more overwhelming majority of prisoners being men is hand waved away because men are just more criminal. It’s one of those things that nobody will ever even try to explain rationally, it’s just How It Is.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 07:13 PM
3

They don’t make you repeat a year as a prize, you realize?
/r/MensRights01/06/20 07:02 PM
2

A women’s demonstration showered with bullets and punctuated by deaths? Name one.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 06:56 PM
4

I know when I’m doing well, it usually makes me feel alone and miserable. I’d ask whether she even thinks about what she writes, but the answer is right in front of everyone.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/05/20 05:29 PM
2

I didn’t make this racial. The comment that started this subthread asserts that being African American cost this man his life. And since you’re calling me mad and the gloves are off, you can fuck right off with your ACAB bullshit. That logic doesn’t fly unless you’re also willing to argue that all Americans are jingoistic petty tyrants, all the black ones are on a hair trigger to riot, all Saudis are careless and exploitative psychos, and so on. The fallacy of composition is still a thing.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 08:51 PM
2

Yes. That still doesn’t make all cops abusers, or all black victimizations hate crimes.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 07:42 PM
6

Can you do those things? Your original comment’s wording implies that all cops are racist murderers, when the numbers say they aren’t. Using this specific case of what appears to be an inexcusable abuse of power to promote a worldview that’s exactly counter to what actual data says is a failure to ‘separate THIS murder from your narrative’ as you’re asking of others. Something about tending to the mote in your own eye...
/r/MensRights29/05/20 07:25 PM
5

Iirc, proportionately, it wouldn’t. A single-father child is more likely than two-parent children to be criminal and all the other bad stuff, but significantly less likely than a single-mother child. That was clumsy wording, but as an example with made up numbers to show the principle, if a two-parent child is 10% likely to develop a drug addiction, a single-father child would be 15% likely and single-mother child would be 25% likely,
/r/MensRights29/05/20 07:19 PM
15

Even if you grant that more men are quiet about things like the schoolteacher rape, my questions is, ‘so what?’ How many times have you heard ‘feminism helps men, too!’? If feminism helps men, why is their crusade to end ‘manspreading’ more vigorous than any attempt to address rapist teachers? They can’t have it both ways. If feminism helps men too, then it doesn’t matter that men aren’t marching in the streets to end rapist teachers, because helping men means even helping the ones who won’t hel…
/r/MensRights29/05/20 07:09 PM
1

Africa as it will be easier to relate and also black culture is very different. American black culture and African black culture are very different. ‘Yeah you were raised on a continent on the other side of the world in a society with different religions, mythologies, technologies, history, geography, folklore, and all that other stuff, but I have more in common with you than my American neighbor because we’re black and she isn’t.’ That’s a pretty hot take.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 08:08 PM
1

Men are more expensive to insure on the road so their premiums are higher. Similarly, women are more expensive to insure with health insurance so it’s illegal to charge them more. Wait...
/r/MensRights28/05/20 07:59 PM
2

Reread your first paragraph, the one you describe as the alternative to my model. That fits the model I propose. The leader is directing his subordinates towards growing the society instead of scheming against him and rewarding them with women/reproductive access. The only specific difference is that he’s not directing them to build fields and huts, but to seize them from others. That model became the dominant model and fails in the same way you described for polygamous societies. Because it fin…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/05/20 07:52 PM
15

It’s fad food. They replace sugar with stevia, cross their hearts that there’s only organic wheat in your box of herbed crackers, and leave out preservatives so everything always tastes a little stale until it tastes really stale. Then they cut portion sizes and raise prices by 15% and sell it to white women who’ll take it home, dip it in ranch dressing, and eat the whole container at once.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/05/20 02:41 AM
18

Men are willing to compromise on their standards because it gives them access to more women and more sex. Women have so many options that they think the illusion of choice is a good thing. This is the consequence of today’s people being sold a bill of goods, and men just realizing it before women. Once upon a time the sexual market and the commitment market were separate. Way back when. Tribal times. The men all hunt but the leaders get to fuck. Then they got mashed together, and that started a …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/05/20 02:29 AM
8

She can find a simp to take care of her. ‘What employment?’
/r/MensRights27/05/20 01:56 AM
5

Made that journey to the halfway mark 5-6 inches at a time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/05/20 06:38 PM
38

It’s largely learned. Until recently you learned from your mothers, aunts, and grandmothers about how the real set of books worked. Similarly to how men used to learn from dads, uncles, and grandpa how to be a man. But I’m not writing about the male side here. Your aunt or grandma would tell you the joke about keeping his belly full and his balls empty, mom would remind you that pretty girls don’t, and they would all ask you if you really need that hamburger. But then three things happened. Soci…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/05/20 05:49 PM
3

A woman completing 14 push-ups isn’t demonstrating a similar level of fitness as a man completing 28. There isn’t an ‘if.’ She simply isn’t. She’s lifting less weight, fewer times, with better mechanical advantage. The best you can say is that she may be demonstrating a similar percentile ability score within some population (in this case, a gender breakdown), but that’s not relevant when the question you really want to answer is ‘who can hump a 50 lb ruck twenty miles before noon?’ It’s simply …
/r/MensRights23/05/20 06:40 AM
6

‘Fitness’ isn’t an end, it’s a metric, and it isn’t arbitrary. It represents something. Specifically it represents the ability to carry out the tasks you will be expected to carry out as a soldier. For example, carrying another soldier to cover. If one person can carry that soldier to cover, they are fit for the task. If they can’t, they aren’t. It doesn’t matter if only the most exceptional of their demographic can carry that soldier, that only means that they—and most of that demographic—is un…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 05:44 AM
2

they know the red pill stands for MGTOW He just had a baby with his long term girlfriend. How MGTOW is that? Red pill, MRA, and MGTOW are three different things.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 09:13 PM
17

Someone else answered what it is in this context, but it’s also a general slang term for ‘a desparate last minute attempt.’ In basketball, when the clock is running down, if a ball is in the air when the timeout buzzer sounds you get points if it goes in. But if it’s not, play just stops. So sometimes whoever has the ball when there’s a second or two left (and not enough time for a full play) will just hurl a shot no matter where they are or how likely it is to go in, hoping to ‘beat the buzzer.…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/05/20 08:31 PM
1

one that’s actually killing people hehe Yeah. Hilarious. I can tell how seriously you take it.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:41 PM
3

If this is a good faith effort to figure out where you stand, cheers. I wish you the best no matter where you end up. That said, you say, ‘I need to know where we stand...’ If you don’t know where a group stands—this or any other one—you shouldn’t refer to ‘we.’ It’s lending your voice to something you might not actually support and you will eventually be taken advantage of. Set up your tent first. Then the people around you are ‘we.’ Not the other way around.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:40 PM
12

Any of you guys young enough not to have previous examples in mind, take note. This is the American newspaper of record blatantly gaslighting the world.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:35 PM
2

I’m glad this worked out for you, but I’d be wary of adopting your title as a general strategy. The advice people will give men online and the advice people will give women online is different, and what will actually help men and what will actually help women is often different. Look at all the gender swapped stories on subs like relationship advice. Men are told to suck it up and be better, women are told to drop that loser, Queen. You witnessed it in action first hand. It happens in this case …
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:26 PM
5

Eh, possibly. I don’t think it’s as simple as ‘porn tells guys what petite is.’ I knew what petite was as a child, before I had access to porn and way before hashtags existed. It means small, with a subtext of delicacy. A teapot in a dollhouse is petite. A fancy cupcake is petite. A chubby person is not petite—despite the fashion industry usage of the word, remember how they use the word ‘goddess’—even if they’re 4’8”, because they don’t have the same quality of seeming delicate. Hell, a skinny …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/20 11:00 PM
8

You shouldn’t think of it as petite, either.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/20 08:56 PM
13

‘What, you can cook and stick to a budget?’
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/20 08:55 PM
1

If you’re ever tempted to take the Bechdel Test seriously, remember: The cheesecakiest 80’s ‘Gee, Tiffany, this cheerleading outfit is so tight! I need you to help me take it off!’ lesbian porn passes it with flying colors.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 09:14 PM
19

IIRC it was a breech birth, the head was stuck, and her solution was basically ‘grab the legs and pull.’
/r/MensRights05/05/20 09:05 PM
12

It’s important in this case to draw a distinction between the legal contract of marriage and the social concept of marriage. The legal contract, not so important. The social concept though, is one that is very important. Hear me out, this isn’t a simping ‘suck it up and support a worthless freeloader’ angle. The idea of a marriage is (was, but I’ll get to that) to provide stability. I’m boiling this down ruthlessly, but the man gets a stable home (and so freedom to spend more energy in pursuit o…
/r/MensRights04/05/20 09:00 PM
4

I once caught, ‘I’m dating this new guy! He’s so awesome, he’s just like you!’
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/04/20 08:37 PM
1

Removed. Someone beat me to it and I didn’t see before I posted.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/04/20 08:33 PM
11

This is the thing to remember. Women don’t want to be married. Women want to have a wedding.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/04/20 08:32 PM
14

Not enough begging the question. Maybe something more like: How oppressed are women? Very Mostly Completely
/r/MensRights27/04/20 07:42 PM
2

The draft should be abolished, but if it isn’t, yes, despite that it would require a huge overhaul to what it means to be ‘drafted’ to begin with. With that out of the way, why is the BBC writing this article, anyway? Is this not an attempt by a foreign nation to stir the pot in a way more blatant than half the things Russia and China are accused of? Wouldn’t it be out of place to see a New York Times article questioning whether Britain should outlaw the Shadow Cabinet?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 02:23 AM
1

Come on now, don’t be lazy. At least make an account for your false flag that doesn’t scream ‘I’M ONE OF US, RIGHT FELLOW MRAS?’
/r/MensRights27/04/20 02:14 AM
6

Aww, everyone come quick! Babby’s doing his first troll!
/r/MensRights21/04/20 09:39 PM
7

when more women come into these fields the pay and reputation sinks What do you expect to happen? I don’t mean that in a ‘hurr hurr women are bad’ sense. I mean when the effective pool of labor available to fill a job literally doubles, do you expect the wages to go up? That aside, you’ve completely missed (or ignored) the point on the jobs thing. The point is that there’s a lot of money being thrown and a lot of ink being spent and a lot of words being spread to get women into board room and ST…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 09:24 PM
0

Many of them productive and civil, no doubt.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 09:11 PM
21

Never happen. If women were a union, prostitutes would be the scabs.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/04/20 06:23 PM
5

That’s still not answering the question. You want people to stop X. You were asked why they should stop X. You said you didn’t want to name people (apparently one person) who you feel did X. Someone else named that person. And still, neither you nor anyone else has given a reason not to do X. You want people to change their behaviour? ‘Because I said so’ isn’t justification. We’re not your children.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:38 AM
4

That’s not what witch hunt means. He didn’t ask you to call out people doing it, he asked you to support your assertion.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 01:16 AM
2

People say their children are important. Some people aren’t lying when they say it. But one in eight households in America are below the poverty line. 87% of them are also in debt to the average tune of $40,000 per household member. No matter how good your intentions are, working two jobs and still not having enough food every week puts a dent in how much energy you can spend researching/second-guessing the system, especially when—again—it could make life for you and yours even harder even if yo…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 09:19 PM
3

Why the hell do the parents allow that? Because parents are, by and large, normal people. Normal people don’t know/aren’t told that such drugs are over prescribed, let alone participants in any kind of discussions about why. All they know is that the doctor and the school say Jimmy needs medicine, and they’re Experts, right? They wouldn’t prescribe something like that unnecessarily, right? And even if they did want to reject it, how many of them do you think have the time, money, and patience to…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:06 PM
1

It absolutely does. The curriculums and methodology have been changed multiple times to accommodate the ways that (it’s believed) will make girls more successful, often at the expense of boys. For example, all the group learning and collaboration in classrooms is because girls were ‘suffering’ in classroom environments that were traditionally rigidly structured and geared for independent learning. Since girls were more social, the theory went, a more social learning environment would help them ‘…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:56 PM
6

Consider the social contract that goes along with the right to vote.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:44 PM
19

Google says there’s 328.2 million people in the US. The $100 grand 14th percentile is 45.9 million people. It probably skews a little male heavy, so let’s say 70% of those and we’re down to 32.2. 0.01% of those packing 8” leaves us with a group of 3200 men. That’s 0.001% of the country. Not even pretending to count her other two requirements, and generously assuming that all of those 3200 meet the unspoken requirements you know are there (Is she going to go with a 70 year old widower? What if th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 07:50 PM
11

the technology is coming It’s here. If some rando Chinese dude can produce it, a billion dollar company can. Hell, Facebook had ‘you might be in these other photographs’ features years ago. Google photos let you automatically add tags to photos in your collection by doing face recognition on people in them. I don’t know if they still do, but I know they did last time I used them years ago. Yeah, that’s photographs. But self driving cars tell us that they can do complex analysis of live video, le…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 07:31 PM
14

Don’t laugh too hard yet. You may have five conservative kids but they have thousands of fraudulent votes and millions of welfare recipients your five kids will be paying for.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 07:25 PM
1

Ouch, I think I cut myself on that edge!
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:33 AM
3

No. Go away.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 05:54 PM
3

Eh. Dude’s ‘analysis’ is wrong from the get-go but he’s not actually saying implicitly that there’s an inequality. He’s saying that there’s an idea that we’re unequal. No doubt if you tried to call him out he’d say that he’s claiming that it’s the result of an incorrect perception rather than a real inequality.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 05:36 PM
3

I wonder how someone who posts that they don’t believe it’s possible to feel genuine love for someone who isn’t their equal feels about their child. Or their pet.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 06:15 AM
122

If you’re ever told the past doesn’t matter, heave a huge sigh of relief and tell her how glad you are that she feels that way. You see, you spent a couple of your past relationships traveling the world, going to France, on cruises in the tropics, eating at fancy restaurants all over the world, but you eventually grew up and realized that it’s time to settle down and have a nice quiet life with a simple job and a frugal lifestyle, and you’re glad that she understands that. She’ll tell you how mu…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/04/20 09:09 PM
1

I’m aware of the state of our manufacturing industry. But Asian workers aren’t ‘slaves, in prison.’ Criticize the conditions available to those workers and I’ll back you up. Criticize our prison system and I’ll probably back you up. But trying to use Asian laborers to support a claim that our economy is based on enslaved prisoners is just flat out wrong.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 07:02 PM
6

A huge amount of manufacturing is done by slaves, in prison. That seems pretty hyperbolic. What manufacturing do you mean?
/r/MensRights03/04/20 07:30 PM
3

Yeah that one. My rebuttals begin with: 1) Let’s assume they watch twice a day. That’s 60 times just this month. How much do you think they’re picking up on their 60th viewing? Your 5 year old isn’t sitting down to think about relationship dynamics and mature conflict resolution after their first viewing, let alone their 59th and clearly nobody is talking to them about what lessons there might possibly be. They’re just parroting the characters, and kids can do that after a handful of viewings at…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 09:49 PM
9

Perhaps tellingly, they stole it from the incel subs that coined ‘foids.’
/r/MensRights31/03/20 09:29 PM
9

Second top comment right now is from someone who ‘worked in childhood education in the past’ selling the idea that watching Frozen 2 a couple of times a day is more educational than educational children’s programming. Jesus wept.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 09:19 PM
16

I like the pet where someone gives examples of ‘toxic masculinity’ then says the the same behaviour performed by a woman would still be toxic masculinity, and the response to ‘maybe we should use a less gendered term for it’ is ‘yeah, maybe something like macho or patriarchy.’ Big brain time, there.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 07:03 PM
7

I don’t know how more people don’t seem to realize that. This race isn’t going to be Biden running, it’s his VP running under his name, and it’s going to be Hillary. Put the DNC behind him and for him into the nomination, get all the party-liners on board with the media blitz, and announce a Clinton VP at the last minute to sweep in all the ‘it’s her turn’ bobble heads they can. Then steal the election, and Doddering Joe either serves as a figurehead for Madame President, or they regretfully ann…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 05:49 PM
3

And claims to be 34. What a temptation. Get to know her well enough and she’ll tell you all about the story she’s been working on continuously since she was in fifth grade. That sounds enthralling to me, doesn’t it to you?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/20 07:34 PM
6

the difference between the teacher and Weinstein... You never finished. What is the difference? They’re both slime who should be punished. Is the difference that one is going to jail for 20 years and the other is getting ‘tee-hee naughty girl’ articles written about her where the accompanying photograph is a bikini vacation shot instead of a perp walk? Because that’s one difference I see. What difference did you mean?
/r/MensRights13/03/20 06:56 PM
4

Check out orange, second from the bottom. ‘As an indigenous artist who dropped out of a composition program twenty years ago...’ Wow, with credentials like that, we should absolutely drop everything and listen to what you have to say! Fuck off. That’s just an attempt to make ‘high school graduate who hasn’t accomplished anything in the two decades since I couldn’t hack a BA’ sound like it isn’t embarrassing.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 06:33 PM
2

‘I want to be chosen because I’m good at what I do, but since I can’t have that...’
/r/MensRights13/03/20 06:28 PM
1

So it’s cool if you only rape one or two boys, got it.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 06:19 PM
1

https://offkilterrocks.bandcamp.com/track/green-fields-of-france
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:08 PM
11

I love that one. Because their grandmothers had pockets. A needle, some thread, and some old linen will get you all the pockets you want. But today’s strong independent women apparently can’t handle such a gargantuan undertaking.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:00 PM
1

Just what?
/r/MensRights11/03/20 03:53 PM
3

Also note: by every standard we use to measure equality Is a slick way to basically ignore inconvenient truths. ‘Well that doesn’t count, we don’t have a standard based on that because it would ruin our argument.’
/r/MensRights11/03/20 03:47 PM
5

She is wrong, even globally, except maybe on the education point. The only interpretation that admits, for example, a conclusion of ‘more women in the world are victims of violence’ is that one where the baseline is skewed because of all the dead men.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:35 PM
2

1: GTFO with this spam. 2: Dont give reddit money.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:31 PM
2

There isn’t anything to understand as far as I can tell. They just don’t realize the size of the chasm between how they live and how the rich live, and/or they think there are only a handful of people who have that kind of mobility. I’m friends with a family whose patriarch was in the right place at the right time in a company that was always-a-bridesmaid in a very important industry, and now the family pretty much works so that they don’t ever get to a point where they have to take a job more s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/03/20 08:49 PM
13

I mean, she’s 28. Let’s not get carried away.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/03/20 08:15 PM
18

‘The peasants choose to eat potatoes. If they didn’t want potatoes, they should just eat something else. Incidentally, do we have any more roast pig, your majesty? I tire of all this lobster and veal.’
/r/MensRights05/03/20 06:22 PM
30

Carrie Underwood would like to know your location.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 06:12 PM
2

1940s. And their criticism is so off the mark it’s not even fair to call it wrong. It’s beyond wrong.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 12:50 AM
4

It’s a double whammy of nonsense. How do ‘economically empowered female consumers’ drive a change in the gender of health care workers? Are said consumers shopping around? Do they demand female nurses or they’ll take their surgical needs to another hospital? Retail? I mean, fine, I’ll grant for the sake of argument that women prefer to buy from other women. But then we have to ask, isn’t that sexist? Tsk, tsk, tsk.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 01:27 AM
1

Not sure I agree. There’s a pretty substantial gap between: You decided to dip/But now you wanna trip/'Cause another brother noticed me/I'm up on him/He up on me/Don't pay him any attention/I cried my tears/For three good years/You can't be mad at me And: You ain't gotta worry, it's an open invitation/I'll be sittin' right here, real patient/All day, all night, I'll be waitin' standby/Can't stop because I love it, hate the way I love you/All day all night, maybe I'm addicted for life, no lie.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 09:33 PM
1

It’s not recent, but if the claim is ‘ever’ there’s the counterexample of ‘I Will Always Love You’ (Houston, and I think Parton). More recently, Gomez did Come and Get It. Which is a little on the lascivious end of things but the sentiment is there.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:33 PM
4

Well, for starters I screwed it up. It was supposed to be the sub abbreviation: WhereAreAllTheGoodMen but I accidentally swapped two letters.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/20 03:27 PM
27

WAAGTM knows no borders.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/03/20 03:36 PM
2

Al Franken? Really? If ‘we would win if Al Franken was still an option’ is your best play, you might as well pack it in.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 02:12 AM
1

Truth hurts.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 10:43 PM
23

How about b-list pop stars’ stalkers? Are they men?
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:21 PM
31

BuT hE iSnT pAyInG fOr AnYtHiNg!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/02/20 07:07 PM
11

Eh. You can make real progress without a personal trainer. If you take it seriously. Which she won’t. But a trainer isn’t a necessary condition.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/20 03:30 PM
1

There was an /s in there, but you probably couldn’t see it through the thick layer of sarcasm.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 12:25 AM
3

She couldn’t even find (take?) a picture where she isn’t literally slack-jawed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/20 11:17 PM
4

She likes to think she’s funny. Unlike other women, who like to think they’re annoying and humorless. Maybe I should hit her up, I like to think I’m a millionaire.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/20 11:10 PM
3

would require judges to consult with mothers on payment plans and would give mothers discretion ‘The law says I have to ask you how big the check should be. We’ll be using force to make sure it goes through, so shoot the moon.’ Such oppression.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 10:44 PM
2

Does ‘exploitation’ not work for you?
/r/MensRights26/02/20 10:39 PM
3

Of course not. It’s succeeding. Now that women are only marginally less oppressed than they were when Ug clubbed Ugha and dragged her back to a cave to cook the mammoth he caught, their natural superiority is shining through. This is a step in the right direction, but we mustn’t get complacent. We must instead push harder and let feminists take the reigns of society completely and without question, so that women may finally reach their full potential.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 10:34 PM
3

I like that they accidentally posted the refusal twice so that they can really drive home the stupidity. Meanwhile, it gives me a chance to tell this story again. Yes, anecdotes are not data. But they beat absolutely nothing, and you wouldn’t deny lived experiences would you? A friend of mine works for a company. They hired a fresh graduate dangerhair with pronouns some time ago. Within their first month said person took the initiative to send an email to a couple of departments encouraging peop…
/r/MensRights24/02/20 03:58 PM
10

I maintain that that there are a number of terrible factors reinforcing each other in certain pockets of feminism, and that phenomenon is usually the wedge you can use to explain it to people. What does it say about a guy who can be told things like, ‘all men are the same, oppressive rapist brutes’, then look around, look at himself, and nod and go, ‘yeah that sounds about right?’ What does it say about his company? And these are the men with whom feminists interact. These are the ones they call…
/r/MensRights24/02/20 03:48 PM
7

https://news.gallup.com/poll/259571/americans-greatly-overestimate-gay-population.aspx As of 2019, one of the premier polling firms on the planet determined that Americans think that the percent of the population who are gay is around 600% what it actually is. They think that one in four people are gay. There are similar disparities in the perception versus the reality of other demographics. Just about all demographics, actually. Go ask people you know. What percent of Americans are black? Jewis…
/r/MensRights24/02/20 03:40 PM
4

Not only can you start falling down the slope like that, it’s ripe with the opportunity for abuse. ‘That dead guy isn’t because of malfeasance, he called me a dirty word!’
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:14 PM
8

Most cops also want to keep food in front of their kids.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/02/20 12:06 AM
9

I don’t know about this one. You usually find some stuff that went under the radar to lots of other people, and what happened here is terrible, but trying to prevent it with a ‘this happened because nobody listened to the husband’ angle seems a little too ‘women are the primary victims of war’ to me.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 02:25 AM
2

You drive a hard bargain, but I really need to make this deal so I can afford that bridge.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/02/20 03:30 AM
1

What list do you get your 1% from? Because if you’re taking it from the lists that are based on income taxes, you’re not seeing the people whose wealth isn’t income based. And if you take the estimates based on reported wealth, those are... well, reported. There are people who have yachts that have yachts the way your house has a car or bike. People who own masterpiece paintings and the art world can only guess where they are because they were last seen being loaded onto one of said yachts. Thos…
/r/MensRights11/02/20 02:52 AM
22

PETA would like to know your location.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/02/20 12:05 AM
7

Here’s a shower thought you won’t see on the sub. Sex Ed in public school in its current form was implemented and defended with the ‘abstinence doesn’t work’ argument. And here we are. Clearly the youth take to heart the lessons of responsible birth control.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/02/20 11:21 AM
1

Hunting/fishing show is a bad analogy. It’s a bridal show. A convention nominally aimed at helping you plan a wedding, what is supposedly one of the biggest milestones of your relationship. Imagine instead, ‘well honey, the guys and I are going to choose and get fit for our tuxedos, maybe make some arrangements for the honeymoon, I’ll be at the strip club.’
/r/MensRights07/02/20 11:40 PM
3

For the same reason chubby chicks befriend fat ones.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/20 06:37 AM
4

Oh come now. That can’t be the best troll you’ve got in you, surely you’re better than that.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:31 AM
2

If you find someone who can give a convincing answer to that question let me know. I’ve got a couple more for them.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 08:26 AM
5

One wonders how they’d feel about being associated with an ‘It’s okay to be white.’ art installation.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 04:38 AM
4

asexual, as many guys are I suspect we have differing opinions on what constitutes ‘many.’
/r/MensRights24/01/20 01:27 AM
2

Good question. As is its follow-up, ‘What else is being obscured or misrepresented?’
/r/MensRights21/01/20 04:35 AM
7

Phrasing it like that obscures what really happened. Women weren’t given the right to vote. (Nor were the men who got to vote three years earlier.) The restrictions that made most women (people) ineligible to vote were lifted. That’s a material difference. As pointed out by the person to whom you replied, the laws extended voting rights to those who met certain criteria, most of which had to do with owning land, but almost all of which were in place to ensure that those who were allowed to vote …
/r/MensRights20/01/20 10:53 PM
3

It’s true though. Feminists complain like bears shit in the woods.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 07:44 PM
2

Probably a lie. Feminists complaining about something? I’ve never heard of such a thing!
/r/MensRights16/01/20 07:16 PM
3

‘Fucking bitches’ isn’t that much mellower.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 07:06 PM
2

It already costs money to operate the way it does now. Lots of money. Would it cost more money? An argument could be made either way. On one hand, obvious overhead. On the other hand, bulk cheese is a lot cheaper than kraft singles.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 07:05 PM
3

... no? He was going to remove it for being outside the scope of the sub/rules. Y’all can’t behave is when the mods don’t like comments and decide to shut it down.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/20 06:14 PM
5

He’s not. He’s doing the opposite. He’s not locking an otherwise fine thread because he doesn’t like the comments, he’s allowing an otherwise off topic thread because it has commentary worth reading. Not all mod-stickies are created equal.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/20 01:31 AM
4

That is absolutely Herman Munster.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/20 08:04 AM
8

You forgot the third one. Why keep going to work when you’ve qualified for the pension?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/20 08:02 AM
2

It’s because the victims were girls. If she’d done it to boys she’d be a free woman and the headlines would say things like ‘tryst’ and ‘sexual relationship.’
/r/MensRights10/01/20 08:31 PM
0

Do I really have to explain it?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 12:00 AM
2

Maybe not but it sure is a good time.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 11:38 PM
9

Social signaling.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/20 08:18 PM
68

Thots with spots.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/20 01:14 PM
3

That’s an important thing to note, too. It might be the case that the men she deals with don’t see candy as an important part of apology. Are you contrite? Act like it, don’t try to buy my forgiveness. In the other direction, when I’m contrite I’m going to take steps not to let it happen again, not bribe you.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 12:54 PM
20

Ahh yes, sales. I know when I’m asked to consider which professions are most empathic, ‘salesman’ is up near the top of the list. Running neck and neck perhaps with lawyer.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 09:59 PM
5

‘A’? Just the one time?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/20 11:27 AM
1

Little Women/A-Team, though. That was a winner.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 01:33 PM
1

His inheritabce. You’d have to earn savings.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/12/19 10:47 AM
11

Don’t forget that art school. That degree she’s not using isn’t going to pay for itself!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/12/19 10:23 AM
-1

It doesn’t support your point. It refutes it. If the link doesn’t work, googling for the paper named ‘Father Absence and Youth Incarceration’ by Harper and McLanahan will find you other copies.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 10:19 AM
1

Fuck it. A crossover where Jo is dissatisfied with her life of poverty until one night a blue, horned monster named Maurice appears from the shadow under her bed. He leads her into a world of vice and excitement until she’s forced to make a decision between marrying him and ending up like him or staying with her family. Little Monster Women.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 10:12 AM
1

She was wrong to say that, but I can’t resist this joke: At $2 a job, she’s already fucking you. Seriously, my dude. You’re all over this thread saying money is money, but that’s not even minimum wage. Have some self-respect. At least raise your prices.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 10:00 AM
8

Eh, no big deal. 180 years is more than half the lifetime of America itself. I understand hyperbole. I just think it’s worth mentioning that we’ve had it both ways. Granted there are a lot of other forces at play, the social/economical/political/commercial/every-other landscape is so different now than it was 180 years ago that there are no end of confounding factors, but ‘single motherhood is how humans default’ is one of those impressions people are taught so deeply now that it’s good to remem…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 09:47 AM
6

‘... controlling for income and all other factors, youths in father-absent families (mother only, mother-stepfather, and relatives/other) still had significantly higher odds of incarceration than those from mother-father families.’ http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.519.2721&rep=rep1&type=pdf
/r/MensRights30/12/19 09:41 AM
22

Society has always held... that the mother is so important... Strangely, this isn’t true. Until 1839, fathers were in the position that women have now, the child custody statistics skewed in their favor by virtue of the fact that they more often had access to the resources to provide for the child. Then a rich woman lost her kids and campaigned to change the justice system, giving us what’s known as the Tender Years Doctrine. It asserts that women are a more positive and meaningful influence on …
/r/MensRights30/12/19 09:34 AM
78

It’s even creepier. She says firstly that it’s because she has the preference, then mentions she believes others do too. So it’s closer to forcing your daughter to get breast implants because you like bigger tits.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 09:24 AM
1

Like I said, mutually influential but not causal in any way. I don’t know how much clearer to make it. You want me to use the words you read in the tumblr pages of people who read them in their high school sociology books? A class revolt that overthrows the capitalists won’t make gynocentrism go away. (It might even strengthen it, considering the proletariat won’t have market pressure to apply anymore.) An awakening of men as a collective identity won’t upset the bourgeoise, they’ll take capital…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 12:07 PM
3

It’s exactly that. Those words just set them off. I’ve seen people describe TRP theory using TRP terms on main subs and get crucified. But then somewhere in the replies someone will come along and say the exact same thing without the jargon, and the same people swinging hammers will reply with praise and agreement.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/12/19 02:49 AM
2

The front page thread for this story included one commenter who argued that the headline wasn’t an example of specifying the female body count to elude the number of dead men. Their argument, no shit, was that nobody knows the gender of the other 1471 corpses yet.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:33 AM
2

⁠"What’s striking about so many of this year’s men-in-trouble movies is how women don’t factor into the stories or solutions." Talk about having blinders on. Maybe men-in-trouble movies are incorporating women less because it’s becoming clear that women are—at least—not part of the solution? Or, to borrow a quote from a men-in-trouble move fromtwenty years ago: We're a generation of men raised by women. I'm wondering if another woman is really the answer we need.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:24 AM
10

Also, the draft was something men created and chose to put men in. That was never women's decision nor creation. There are a lot of things you can put instead of ‘the draft’ in that sentence and have it be just as true. But for some reason I don’t think you’d accept that as an argument if instead it said, ‘c-level jobs’ or ‘mass media’ or ‘voting.’
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:50 AM
2

Economic warfare and gender warfare are two separate things. They can have an influence on each other, but they both exist independently of each other. Even after completely ‘solving’ the economy, we’d be subject to the forces of gynocentrism. Even after solving the genderinequality problem, economic disparity would remain. TLDR: This isn’t the battlefield you’re looking for, stop trying to turn it into it.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:34 AM
3

There’s a front page thread right now about kinks. There’s a loooooot of women talking about being degraded and getting slapped. Even some watersports. Take a guess which way the ‘treat me gently’:’hurt me, daddy’ ratio skews.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/12/19 04:40 AM
2

A taxi for her sister to use to make money. No mention was made of the dude seeing any of the profits. Honestly, considering it never came up again, would anyone be surprised if she just flat out lied and bought her family a car?
/r/MensRights21/12/19 04:01 AM
9

Eh. When she’s not in hypebeast clothes and pouting, she’s not bad. Google ‘Billie eilish tank top photo’ to get an idea. She goes out of her way in public to make herself look plain-but-weird to discourage people ‘objectifying’ her. Which is a weird stance to take when her hit single is a musical entreaty to stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 03:50 AM
2

Sure they would. You think ‘alpha fucks, beta bucks’ is bad now though...
/r/MensRights14/12/19 05:57 AM
2

It wasn't "designed" for either gender group to succeed. It might be the outcome, but it was simply made because it made it efficient for 1 teacher to lecture to lots of pupils. That makes no sense. The grade levels in question aren’t taught in lecture format. The farthest thing from it. They’re cooperative, interactive, multiformat, engaging... And when they’re not, the education system trips over itself to make them that way. It’s a format that incorporates a lot of social aspects—exactly the …
/r/MensRights14/12/19 05:54 AM
5

No. If one group is trying to make ridiculously restrictive rules for everyone, and then they hold you to those rules but don’t follow them, and that is your response, not only are you allowing them to dictate over you but you’re encouraging them to push harder. It’s not an ‘error’ to hold someone to their own standard.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 12:44 AM
1

Sometimes they do. Maybe not if the testee knows the deal, but sometimes—like in this case—they make people tell the truth without even hooking them up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/12/19 03:28 AM
5

‘I wasn’t there and don’t actually know what happened, but what I think happened proves my point.’
/r/TheRedPill09/12/19 08:10 AM
1

So they ruled it was unconstitustional and included women in selective service... You did.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 09:23 PM
3

To play devils advocate: No, they shouldn’t be. Feminism will never be seriously challenged by only men. Gynocentrism sees to that. We need non-feminist women to stand for us or we won’t ever be heard or cared about. But catering to non-feminist women not just allows but incentivizes their complacency, because they reap the benefits of feminist campaigning as well as the treatment you’re proposing they receive for not being actively feminist. It also allows feminists to camouflage as normal wome…
/r/MensRights07/12/19 02:59 AM
0

Where are you? Because that absolutely didn’t happen in the US. https://www.sss.gov/Registration/Women-And-Draft Women are specifically not required to register, and this implies that there is no ability to accept/process any attempt at registration they do make.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 02:49 AM
4

...thinking about asking the question... Don’t bother. You’ll never get a real answer, because half of them know what they’re supposed to say, and half of them are lying to themselves. The same reason all self-reporting statistics are questionable if not outright invalid. Try sneaking up on it. Mix up asking, ‘Hey, why not date (that waiter/your building janitor/etc.)?’ with ‘Hey why not date (that guy in the tailored suit/the VP from the other department/etc.)?’. Take note of the differences in…
/r/MensRights07/12/19 02:30 AM
84

She didn’t realize the running a brothel was against the law. That’s her excuse. Bull. Shit. I know you don’t have to be intelligent to get into uni anymore, but she made it to an age high enough to attend college and didn’t know that prostitution was illegal, let alone being a madame? Does she realize how absolutely stupid ‘I couldn’t handle a drama degree, got into a black market profession, and didn’t realize it was illegal!’ makes her sound? She should be ashamed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/12/19 01:30 AM
2

I’m older than you, almost certainly. When I was a child, my grandmother had a friend who was already an old woman. One of her favorite stories to reminisce about was the time she kicked her husband out of the house, threw a frying pan at him through the front window, hit him, and when his yelp of pain made the neighbors call the police, she got him arrested.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/19 10:11 PM
9

There was some thread on the front page the other day, and it was one of the times I had to actually make an effort not to break my ‘don’t post on default subs’ rule. There were people in the comments going to the mat to defend the idea that men and women have dating hard, just in different ways. You see, men have it hard because they have to find women who want to date/fuck them, but women have it hard because they have to find men they want to date/fuck. That’s not a translation or paraphrase …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/19 09:59 PM
6

Oof. Wow. Okay, Sweaty. Who hurt you? There’s a lot to unpack here.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/12/19 10:28 PM
3

Alright. Let’s run with that. So if a working woman has a husband and it adds seven hours of work to her schedule, she’s out seven hours, but she gains an entire extra income. And if a non-working woman adds those seven hours she gains the income... for less than a quarter of the work it would take to earn it herself. In either case, excuse me while I rosin up my tiny violin bow. It might take a while because it’s hard to see through the tears I weep for them. Looking at the cost without looking…
/r/MensRights27/11/19 02:25 AM
5

It was a valid way to state what you meant. ‘He backtracked and [consequently] removed something from his website’ is as correct an interpretation as ‘he backtracked and [also] removed something from his website.’
/r/MensRights27/11/19 01:32 AM
26

‘The City’ is slang for the closest major city. Everywhere.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/19 10:05 PM
5

It’s worse than that. Urinals, especially trough style urinals because they can handle more people at once, are a large part of the reason the men’s room has a higher efficiency/turnover. So they see the men’s room being underutilized, elbow their way in, and the immediately try to eliminate one of the main reasons it’s so quick.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 09:52 PM
5

more skin in the game [because they] vote at a higher percentage That’s not how that works. I don’t get to, say, dictate your household budget because me and two dozen friends are louder about it than you and your spouse. The population ratio is your stronger point. At least there you can start talking about why the original voting requirements were what they were.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 11:39 AM
-2

conceivably Actually. The word is actually.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 07:52 AM
1

Good for you, but that’s not an argument against the magic spreadsheets. Without the spreadsheet you pay five people a hundred grand each, because you need five people who can go down and perform every step on the checklist. When things change, change the checklist and potentially retrain those five people. With the spreadsheet you pay two people to keep it oiled and up to current requirements for $120k. Then you fill the three other roles with people you’re paying 60k because all they have to k…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 06:17 AM
1

otherpillers You can’t figure it out from context? If tech in dating empowered women, more of them would be using it. Usage comparison means nothing except that men are thirsty. Have you been on dating apps? Hell, go look at r/tinder. Post after post of men jumping through hoops trying to get a whiff of pussy. Ask your buddies how many matches they get. Then ask your girlfriend’s friends. Dating tech isn’t giving men anywhere near the leverage it’s giving women.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 06:01 AM
1

I think you skipped ‘women forced to do all the work, when will lazy men step up?’
/r/MensRights12/11/19 10:06 PM
26

‘I want success and the trappings that come with it, but only if I don’t have to do much to get it.’
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/19 08:34 PM
3

It shouldn’t need to be said, but think long and hard about participating here. Here we have a stranger called tacopower69 claiming, with zero evidence or even detail, to be interested in asking questions about sensitive topics and asking for real life contact information. I’m not going to say it’s a trap, but I find myself disinclined to stick my hand in it.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 06:48 PM
138

Imagine someone who decided they didn’t need emergency service workers in their lives and made a decision never to call emergency services no matter what. Now imagine that person’s house was on fire, or they got in a car accident, and someone called the firemen or an ambulance. The emergency service workers are bound by duty/morality/humanity to help, despite the fact that the person didn’t engage them explicitly. Now imagine those service workers weren’t bound to behave the way they do. Suddenl…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 09:23 PM
2

‘There’s a difference?’ t. Them
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/19 09:45 PM
7

wHy CaRe? Don’t close your eyes just so you can pretend the elephant isn’t there. For just one thing: Women are, from the point of view of planners everywhere, a big group. Economists, politicians, marketing groups, PR groups, churches, all care about making women happy. Feminism has, for better or worse, inserted itself into the public sphere as The Voice For Women. So all those groups who want to take women into account and make them happy instead—often misguidedly—take feminism into account a…
/r/MensRights29/10/19 09:12 PM
3

I’m the only one who had to double take because I thought she had a cigarette in her navel, huh?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/10/19 08:12 AM
4

There’s a post up on r/science about a study that concludes that men are actually funnier than women and guesses that it’s probably because they need to be and women don’t. The same stuff the Evil Misogynists have been saying forever. The comments are a wasteland of deletions.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 09:27 PM
1

Whoa, now there’s one for r/menkampf.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 09:22 PM
1

gamete Gamut. Unless that was intentional, because if so it was somewhat clever.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:09 PM
2

It’s possible that one side of the other is actually right when they make their argument of systemic bias. The feminist side would argue that there are some significant numbers of rapes that aren’t counted. Their cases are covered up, tampered with, the result of corruption, left to die in the evidence room, and so on. Counting them properly would skew both the rape conviction 10% and the ‘unknown’ assumed 40% of rapes higher in reality than the numbers show. On the other hand, the other side ar…
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:00 PM
1

Ave!
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:51 PM
1

To add to this though, while some percent of the remaining 93% represent rapists that were incorrectly found innocent, the questionable status of the middle ground cuts both ways. You’ll often see people make the claim that only a small percent of rape accusations are false. But what defines that category is ‘rape accusations gone to trial and found to be false accusations.’ So if we acknowledge that only 7% of rape cases produce guilty verdicts, and a similarly small number are on the record ar…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:49 PM
1

Or forgo alimony.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 12:10 AM
5

tax free... free... Nothing’s free. ...men don’t have to deal with the associated costs... Play the lottery. You seriously have amazing luck.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:42 AM
5

Seeing a profile with something like ‘poetry addict’ in it makes me feel the way profiles with ‘artist’ in them make me feel. I want to take them out for coffee on a slow day, because $5 would be worth the entertainment value of hearing what they have to say about the topic.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/10/19 07:39 PM
0

There is a reason you can’t do both. There are many. I listed some of them. He can learn more than one thing, but he can’t learn everything.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 04:48 AM
3

likely resort to requiring demonstrations of capability, giving them free labor This isn’t a prediction. Most employers want a link to your github account now. In other words, they want to see what you’ve put into OSS on your free time. Considering how much use every modern company gets from open source software, it’s hard to argue that the community doesn’t serve as a source of free labor for them. Asking to see your contributions at application time is effectively asking for that demonstration…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:31 PM
1

He’s not saying what you think he’s saying. I’ll try to explain, but I’m necessarily going to have to use a gross simplification. Let’s say a soldier’s training in a given field can be ranked 1-10. Let’s also say there are five fields in which he can be trained. Again, gross simplification. Focus on the principle. Training resources are limited, including soldiers’ time. An individual soldier can only learn/train so much in a given amount of time. So let’s say a solider can receive 30 training u…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:23 PM
4

The graph shows that men become profitable at 40 and remain so until 80. Male life expectancy is 76 years. He’ll die before he becomes a net burden, versus women who are born and remain so. In other words, you’re wrong, and the money is coming from all the dead men.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:00 PM
2

Also consider the number of people who call bullshit on the prison system, arguing that the overrepresentation of blacks in prison is evidence of systemic discrimination, but at the same time use the even more overwhelming overrepresentation of men in prison as evidence that men are more prone to criminality.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:51 AM
3

Ehhh... that seems like a pretty dangerous statement to make in general. Lots of children think it’s in their best interest to eat chicken nuggets every night for dinner. Should they have input? Absolutely. Should it be given more weight than we currently give it? Probably. But I know adults who are monumentally bad at determining what’s in their own best interest, I’m not going to nod along that children have it figured out.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:47 AM
1

Real talk: She probably has it backwards. I’d be interested in who brings in what % of the household income. It’s possible she can afford to only work 24 hours a week (read: working not to be bored) because of the bank her tradesman husband who she complains about brings in when he works ‘too much.’
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:41 AM
3

Just for the sake of argument let’s assume he’s wrong. What position do you believe is most likely to be held by progressive women?
/r/MensRights09/10/19 10:32 PM
15

ethics committee decision Phew. I’m a pretty cynical guy but that is some shiiiit.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 09:39 AM
5

A friend of mine was once fired for sexual harassment because he was talking to a couple of his friends at lunch and referred to a woman—a manager one step up the pyramid from him but in another department—as a bitch. A guy who worked under that woman was eavesdropping on the conversation from the next table and reported him. If only he’d been committing felonies with minors he could have just been suspended with pay.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:20 PM
9

Just wow. Yikes, Sweaty. There’s a lot to unpack here. Who hurt you? Did I miss any?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/10/19 12:03 PM
5

Take it easy on them. The people who did the report were liberal arts majors.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/10/19 12:00 PM
3

taking trips and hanging out without friction. Hey now, don’t forget (probably) swinging the hammer and (certainly) swinging the credit card to renovate ‘my’ home.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/10/19 11:54 AM
3

Don’t spend too much time in it. You’ll get banned in a day.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:10 AM
1

Seriously. 130k isn’t three years’ tuition at Pomona. They basically nullified any work he’s done on his degree—I sure as hell wouldn’t want to keep attending there if they did that to me, and who knows what kind of transfer credit he can get. And that’s depending on what college he can switch to—colleges look extra hard at applicant not coming right out of high school—if any will take him when they see the scarlet A on his name when they google him. Not to mention the delay in starting his care…
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:09 AM
2

Usually people are quick to paste this, I’m surprised nobody has yet. See this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_real/
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:58 AM
2

Tinfoil hat time. I’m not saying I believe the following but it is something I thought about: This is an opportunistic move to shift public perception. Not exactly the Overton Window but something like it. Find a trial for something heinous where pretty much everyone ‘knows’ he deserves whatever they throw at him. Then start sliding things into evidence that don’t necessarily belong there, like this. ‘She doesn’t know he was perving, but she felt that way...’ And count on everyone shrugging and …
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:49 AM
6

On Netflix? Shockedpikachu.jpg
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:42 AM
1

Or those numbers that someone put together some time ago showing the lifetime cost/benefit by gender in the tax system...
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:39 AM
2

didn’t collect SSI Fuck that. It’s incredibly likely that he pays into it disproportionately, as will his son. If he’s entitled he shouldn’t turn that down. Take it and invest on behalf of the kid. Take it and put it towards him starting a consulting business. Don’t just leave it on the table.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:36 AM
12

ITYM they can’t talk TO men so they talk AT men.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:30 AM
6

Because if she said those things in a voice that didn’t sound like a six year old girl in a cartoon, there’s a chance people might actually make her take responsibility for the meaning of the words she’s saying.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:28 AM
1

Western Society does that. How and why? the Dark Ages vs. The Enlightenment And between that was the Reformation: ‘The Reformation stressed the importance of literacy and being able to read the Bible. The Protestant countries were the first to attain full literacy; Scandinavian countries were fully literate in the early 17th century. The Church demanded literacy as the pre-requisite for marriage in Sweden, further propagating full literacy.’ (source) So we have a population where the church is h…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 06:20 PM
1

There are plenty of details that would need addressing. What if, for example, a parent with a two year old lost their head of household partner? I’d be fine supporting that person a while. What I’d prefer is actively discouraging single parents with no realistic means/intention of supporting their kid themselves.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:49 PM
3

Yes. For example, (western) religion exerts a force that converts things like sexual drives into civilized behaviour. To some smaller degree, middle eastern religion does as well, it just has a different structure to that civilization. I won’t speak much to eastern religions as I’m less familiar with those. Religion didn’t actively spread literacy but its existence did. The Bible was the first book off of the Gutenberg press. Lots of people like farmers and peasants had no need to read letters, …
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:35 PM
1

I’d add a caveat that Daddy Government doesn’t fund the child either. Yes, that’s callous. But otherwise it’s effectively saying ‘Sperm donor isn’t on the hook for the best, everyone is!’ That’s not a deterrent. It’s an incentive. Because you don’t have to chase dad and hope he pays and wait for the court if he doesn’t and... when Daddy takes over, you’re getting your check. Period. And everyone else is paying. Period.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:25 PM
3

This is one of those things we can’t ever have a real number for because of its very nature, but I suspect there are a lot more male suicides than even your analysis would reveal because their methods aren’t seen as suicides, but accidents/circumstances. There are men whose attempts are considered disturbing the peace, sure. But, for example, suicide by cop is a thing. I’d wager a number of single-occupant car crash fatalities (and you know the statistics there) aren’t accidents. I know people w…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:17 PM
3

If it can’t be controlled it can’t be routed. Having the technology to create solar panels doesn’t mean we control the sun. Religious Wars And literacy, the foundation of most of philosophy and literature, common culture around which to build the first blocks of civilization... It’s a heavy millstone and it’s hard to turn, but you can’t argue it doesn’t make flour.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 10:49 PM
3

Picked up ‘6 feet’ but not ‘8 inch’? Tsk, tsk.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 12:32 AM
22

Observationally: I avoid posting on main subs. But one time in a comment thread on a post I don’t even remember, they were bashing incels. Then one guy joined the thread. He self-identified as an incel, explained that he’d been kicked around his whole life, he was treated like an outcast, said that when he tried to do anything about it he was outcast further, and wondered whether he’d be better off just shuffling off. His post, when I found it, was hours old at zero karma. So I replied to his co…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 08:10 PM
9

Women who got their bachelors’ in an unemployable field working in Starbucks or the grocery store, married to construction guys/plumbers/tradesmen. She has a degree, so she’s ‘educated’ and he doesn’t, so she’s ‘marrying down.’ Remember, reality doesn’t apply in these articles.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/09/19 01:29 AM
1

I just thought it was interesting. No... Be the change, people. You made a faulty observation and a call to arms.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 09:47 PM
1

It’s not the same thing though, is it? We want, for example, boys on the spectrum to have access to help and resources besides ‘drug them off their gourd.’ We’re not here calling to drug ASD girls more. We’re not calling to drug this ASD girl more. (Note the distinction. It’s relevant.) We’re saying—granted, sometimes indelicately—that maybe we shouldn’t let global policy on what we’re being told is an extinction level threat be driven by a literal child with literal mental disorders.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 07:34 PM
25

Easy. They just do. Nobody is going to ask them to admit or explain anything. They’re going to rely on everyone nodding along and agreeing that it’s offensive to both women and Islam and just ignoring the inherent paradox. The point of the sign isn’t to make the media address their stance. It won’t. That’d be tilting at one of the biggest windmills in the world. The point isn’t to make everyone stop and say ‘hey wait a second...’ They won’t either, they’re too comfortable to do that. The point i…
/r/MensRights27/09/19 09:26 PM
0

Think bigger.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 11:36 PM
3

People say they mature faster, but they mean sooner. Women mature sooner.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/19 10:30 PM
12

40 y/o hair dresser with a hair cut she stole from Megan Rapinoe pointing the ‘loser’ finger. Sounds legit to me.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/19 10:27 PM
136

‘My time is valuable!’ sounds best to me when it comes from someone who complains that they can’t get scheduled for more hours at their minimum wage job.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/19 10:23 PM
1

It’s a mistake to think that economics is fundamentally about money/wealth/capital. Look to economics.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 10:03 PM
6

Also: MensRights: ‘fixed’ refers to solved MensLib: ‘fixed’ refers to neutered Joking. Maybe. Or maybe not.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 09:38 PM
5

I know 1984 gets a lot of lip service these days, but so rarely do we get to mention the Junior Anti-Sex League.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 10:28 PM
7

Why? Do you want the shitstorm that’ll ensue when she goes to check up on the case and finds that the complaint was binned? The cop should have made an annotation on the case file. ‘Complaintant seemed jovial and upbeat, she giggled when I took her paperwork. Security footage from the station is available.’ Then if the case goes to court, let her try to explain it.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 10:24 PM
2

I think my favorite part was when she used TwoX as an example of a sub that welcomes men.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:13 AM
2

I’m not sure if you think you’re making a counterpoint. But they’re also favored at every step of the path towards getting those degrees. They’re starting off on a better footing because they’re being placed there explicitly. When men were ‘starting off on better footing’—with less artificial interference—we were told that it was unfair and it lead to restructuring the whole educational system and a lot of the business world. So I expect it will be any day now that the programs favoring women fo…
/r/MensRights24/09/19 08:36 PM
5

It’s a stale joke so you don’t see it much these days, but anyone older than... say their teenage years will certainly remember when there was a common sitcom joke in which the mild mannered or generally harmless man inadvertently committed a crime, or looked guilty via bad circumstances, and the punchline was: ‘I can’t go to jail! I’m too pretty to go to jail!’ Because the court doesn’t care, and neither will Bubba. Ha, ha, he’s going to be raped! (/s on that last line, of course.) And now ‘I’m…
/r/MensRights24/09/19 08:28 PM
1

Sure you did. You just didn’t recognize it. It has a name. The reason it’s accelerating is because it can. The further along the process gets, the more control is in the hands of the marchers, the less subtle they have to be.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 08:19 PM
4

Or they make an account to be that one retard, then hop on their main to use the alt comment as ‘evidence’.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 12:46 AM
1

It was just as vague then as it is now. People just had a different idea of what ‘insults modesty’ back then. Which supports the statement that the law is vague. If it covered things like looking at her calves when she sits down and doesn’t now, it’s because what ‘insults modesty’ is a subjective and vague standard.
/r/MensRights21/09/19 08:00 PM
12

100% the case. People already believe men are responsible for all the crime and women are almost always the victims. Explicit data showing otherwise didn’t change anyone’s mind. What could possibly make someone think that taking away data nobody looked at or believed would make them change their minds, let alone reverse them?!? This is a move to make disproving the popular perception more difficult now that the popular perception is generally where it’s ‘supposed’ to be, and maybe to head off at…
/r/MensRights21/09/19 07:52 PM
1

It makes a difference when you’re talking about the person on the business end as a ‘perpetrator.’
/r/MensRights20/09/19 08:39 AM
1

Any law is only as good or as equal as its enforcement.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 07:44 PM
3

Judging by that picture, not for long. As soon as she finds a ceremonial athame, she’ll be able to bring him back.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/19 07:38 PM
10

There’s a difference between your title and the thing you posted. The thing you posted doesn’t say anything about false allegations. Just allegations in general. That difference actually implies that they haven’t moved on. Their post still carries in it a premise that false allegations don’t exist.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 07:36 PM
2

Not gonna lie, if I had the chance I’d seriously consider setting up a date with her so I could make conversation by asking her to tell me about her art. Taking her out for coffee and a sandwich would be worth the potential entertainment value there.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/19 04:54 AM
3

That is a piping hot fresh fucking idiom right there.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/19 04:43 AM
1

It’s signaling. She can’t tell the difference between 5’11” and 6’4”. See other responses for other testimonies to that phenomenon. Most short people measure tall people on a scale of ‘taller’ and ‘a lot taller’ rather than inches or cm. She puts it not because she thinks she can tell the difference or because she expects to find a guy that big. She puts it because she sees all her girlfriends and tinderpetitors asking for 6’ and needs to find a way to tell guys (and herself) “I’m good enough to…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/19 04:39 AM
2

Top comment right now: Well, I guess my girlfriend's unmarriageable, then /s I love it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/19 04:23 AM
4

This is a particularly fun reverse-the-genders scenario. Imagine how hard a dude would get roasted for writing a news article about how he can’t get laid because women don’t want men to see their saggy tits, cellulite, back fat, and floopy pussies.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 12:19 AM
93

Look around, man. Look at the front page. If that video went viral it’d be with the message ‘point and laugh at this misogynist getting justice served by strong and wonderful woman!’
/r/MensRights18/09/19 12:15 AM
2

Recumbent bikes. And yes, they’re for people with back problems, mobility issues, or rehab needs. They try to market them ask ‘great cardio’ but nobody can say what’s so great about them in comparison to any other cardio exercise except ‘supports your lower back.’ Which—again—healthy 20 year olds shouldn’t require back support to do their cardio.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/19 12:41 AM
4

It got old quickly. Like leaves falling off a tree. It took a year for them to do it, but when it happens, it happens all at once. Or... say... driving full speed for 30 years, then crashing into a wall.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/19 12:35 AM
2

Yes, dear.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 08:19 PM
3

Maybe if you’d read more as a child you’d have caught up to everyone else in realizing that words don’t hurt your peepee. But hey, what do I know? Random Internet Hard Guy #7624954 says I’m just a nerd.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 04:54 PM
1

Their work isn’t important because of the wireless aspect, it’s important because of the frequency shifting. That said, the Ms. Monopoly claims are bullshit, and that woman no more invented WiFi than Thomas Newcomen invented the locomotive.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 08:44 AM
1

In the ‘maybe in a year or two’ vein, I’ll add a recommendation for Where the Red Fern Grows.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 08:32 AM
3

Reading is at least as valuable as anything else you could legitimately recommend a boy that age spend his time doing. It’s not the only thing he should do, just like sports aren’t the only thing he should do. But on the flip side, he should be encouraged to do it as he should be encouraged to be physical. Raising a balanced and literate boy is the right thing to do by any measure, and denying that to him will result in him falling further behind in an educational system that’s already hostile t…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 08:31 AM
3

I’m going to try to say this without sounding like too much of an asshole. Your math might be impeccable. But it’s really hard to tell because the way you express it is unnecessarily non-linear and hard to follow.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 08:15 AM
21

Mail route. She’s looking for a job with the postal service.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/19 10:05 PM
14

It’d be a shame if someone replaced all of those with cookbooks.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:36 PM
14

What, you aren’t impressed by her disorderly row of bills? That’s like 40 whole dollars there, man! Riches the likes of which us mere losers can only dream!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/19 07:38 PM
20

Here’s a story I like to tell when this topic comes up. I’m friends with a seriously-but-not-militantly progressive woman who wrote and shopped around a book in the sf/f genre. She did it using her first initials instead of her name (JK Rowling style) because she wanted to obscure the fact she was a woman because it’s a man’s industry. When she landed an agent, the first advice she got was to use her full name because publishers won’t even look at a manuscript from a first-time author unless it’…
/r/MensRights13/09/19 07:22 PM
4

no kids == major fuckup I’m going out on a limb that that ‘have fun’ part of ‘have fun and drink’ probably involves pro-am pharmacology.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/09/19 07:58 PM
3

Hard to keep your progressive street cred when your name sounds like it’ll be followed by ‘Duchess of...’
/r/MensRights12/09/19 07:44 PM
14

There’s an argument that’s interesting to think about. Strap in. From the woman’s point of view, it was about securing access to resources. You enter the marriage to secure the work, assets, and protection of the man for the benefit of you and your children, ‘Til death do you part. From the man’s point of view it was securing access to fertility and monogamy. Pairing off men and women into long-term and exclusive partnership, the man could ensure that his resources were spent on his offspring. I…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:01 AM
4

coded by researchers This is what makes it particularly egregious. IIRC, many of them women who were counted as raped in the study conclusion replied that they didn’t consider their experiences rape when asked. It was solely the determination of those conducting the study. Those women were wielded as weapons in a social war against their will.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 07:38 PM
25

Reminder that the evidence of male rape victims isn’t anecdotal, it’s official but obscured. The government reports detailing rape victims by gender would be close to equal if they counted unwanted sexual contact as rape. What they do is define rape such that it’s only rape if you’re penetrated. ‘Made to penetrate,’ a category which for the reasons you’d expect contains almost entirely male victims, is counted separately and never associated with the word rape. If it were, therle would be about …
/r/MensRights11/09/19 07:34 PM
10

tricked the guy... false pretenses It’s worse than that. The guy was doing his job. The actual ‘reverse the script’ scenario is ‘two guys call a housekeeping service and violently gang rape the maid who shows up.’ Sounds even more despicable when worded that way, doesn’t it?
/r/MensRights11/09/19 07:24 PM
37

Since you know someone wearing a shirt like this buys into the wage gap BS, maybe ‘You look like you’re worth 70% of what I am.’
/r/MensRights11/09/19 05:12 AM
1

What argument do you think you should give? I’m not being flip. It’s a question you should honestly ask yourself. If you’re putting yourself in a position where you’re defending a stance in an argument, you should already know why you hold that stance. You can (and often should) refine both your beliefs and their reasons over time, and it’s worthwhile to compare notes with people who agree with you as well as those who don’t. But asking a question like the one you’ve asked is setting yourself up…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 05:09 AM
3

Hedy Lamarr invented WiFi the same way Thomas Newcomen invented the locomotive. Also: [in 1942] the navy was too conservative to realize that a woman was capable of such a groundbreaking discovery. This was about the time when Grace Hopper was rejected from the navy—for being too old—and worked on UNIVAC instead. ‘We can’t use that to beat the Commies, a woman made it, so it has cooties!’ is bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 08:16 PM
3

Don’t brigade. Admins get all itchy about shit like that, and I’m sure they’d love the excuse.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:27 AM
2

Yes, probably. I am not Jewish myself, but have in laws who are. So I end up hearing things, but assume (sometimes I correctly) that I know more mundane things like that, and I assume (sometimes incorrectly) the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 03:57 AM
10

Judaism—and its various levels of observance—is weird in that it’s really strict in some ways you wouldn’t expect and really flexible in ways you wouldn’t. For example, there are households that maintain two entirely different sets of plates/utensils/kitchen equipment because their dietary restrictions say that it’s improper to use the same ones for certain types of food. On the other hand there are people whose belief that they must rest on the Sabbath dictates that they may not leave their hou…
/r/MensRights07/09/19 01:57 AM
3

I liked the analogy that says they differ in how they react to realizing the rules of the game. PUA: Min-max. MRA: Rewrite the rules. MGTOW: Play a different game.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 01:48 AM
3

At some point it doesn’t matter. Anything we say, and often things we don’t—are going to be used against us anyway. In light of that, why tapdance around trying to make a message palatable for someone who’s not listening anyway?
/r/MensRights06/09/19 06:07 PM
1

I can’t speak for mtcapri, but: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/163269-i-ve-found-out-why-people-laugh-they-laugh-because-it
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:36 AM
9

The school engagement point is a good one. I’ve been out of school a while, but during my education I knew a handful of really smart guys. More than a couple of them could bang out any work they had to do or excel without apparent effort if they had to. But they spent most of their time... well, trolling teachers, ignoring assignments, and posting grades that reflected that. Because they were bored as hell, and taking the piss out of the system was more rewarding than pretending they’re not mult…
/r/MensRights03/09/19 08:11 PM
0

That’s good. But until his policy reflects something besides ‘yup, status quo is cool’ on the issue he doesn’t get political points for it.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 07:51 PM
3

They sometimes don’t even make the resulting slight of hand that explicit. Look for tactics ranging from ‘for the purposes of this study, ‘rape’ is defined as (blah blah blah) or unwanted interactions.’ Then the headline will just say ‘rape’ and not mention the non-standard definition (The Mary Koss 1-in-5 study is illustrative here.) to just rewording the conclusion to something like ‘when asked if they had been raped (note the omission of ‘or subject to unwanted advances’) 89% of women said ye…
/r/MensRights02/09/19 08:03 PM
11

Yeah, baby. I took all my ex girlfriends all over the world, first class. We went to all the best restaurants. Got ‘em all designer clothes and jewelry that almost made ‘em go blind. But they were all bitches, I don’t want that life anymore. I just want to spend my weekends at home around the house. But if you do a really good Donna Reed impression all year, I’ll take you into the city on our anniversary. Sometimes. Love you!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/19 02:39 AM
15

Dress for the job you want.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/19 02:07 AM
11

forgotten what it means to be ladylike Bullshit. It’s worse. If they’d forgotten, they could be taught. They know what it means, and they believe it’s anathema.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/09/19 06:00 AM
1

Because nobody talks about it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_bazi The victims of the Catholic Church abuses are generally boys, but that’s not exactly trafficking, I suppose. Then there’s things like Boys Town, which clearly never happened so there’s no need to look into it, what are you, some kind of crazy conspiracy theorist?
/r/MensRights30/08/19 06:38 AM
47

They don’t even think about what they’re saying sometimes. This is literally a bunch of men who spent time, effort, and money, explicitly to focus on women’s health, comfort, and hygiene. That is exactly what they claim to want. And all they can do is REEE about where are the women?!? Indeed, where are the women who will spend their time, effort, and money on women’s health, comfort, and hygiene?
/r/MensRights29/08/19 12:51 AM
8

As a non-abstinent person, let’s not shit on people who decide not to fuck. Abstinence isn’t a dirty word, and practicing it doesn’t make you bad or wrong. I happen to think avoiding premarital sex for religious reasons is silly, but there are plenty of other valid reasons to practice it. Self-defense being one of them. Hard drugs, I’m told, feel awesome. But they’re so dangerous that we not only don’t shame people who avoid them, we actively promote avoiding them. Bad eating habits are pleasura…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 06:51 PM
96

Oh come on. You and I both know that that’s how all the strongest and most stable relationships start. I remember when my dad took me fishing, and I asked him how he and mom met, and he said, ‘Son. I was at a Bruce Springsteen concert, and your mother was drunk. I mean staggering ‘four sambuca’ wasted. And she climbed up on stage with one of those giant foam fingers and started to diddle herself. Just really going at it. I thought to myself... I had to have her. This was the woman who would bear…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/08/19 12:21 AM
4

‘She-animal’? If you’re insinuating what I think you are there, gtfo.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 10:22 PM
2

Note also that his lawsuit-friendly version takes the accuser at her word. She’s automatically a victim. She wouldn’t say anything otherwise, right?
/r/MensRights21/08/19 01:48 AM
15

Join me in ending domestic violence against men.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 01:42 AM
2

IIRC, the laws against knives over there are overzealous. It’s too bad rolling that back is tied to this other dreck.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 03:47 AM
4

Tangentially, I think it was teal deer (is he still doing his thing?) who looked into the complaint that women’s clothing was so much more expensive to clean professionally. Turns out men’s clothing is so uniform they can automate it and put it on machines that carry out the whole operation, rumpled mess to clean mess to nicely folded garment. On the other hand the variety in sizes, cuts, styles, and materials in women’s clothing means that each garment pretty much has to be done by hand.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 03:42 AM
2

The snag there is that the bill of rights is (was, F) traditionally interpreted to enumerate ‘inalienable’ rights. It’s not a list of rights granted by the government, it’s a list of shackles on the government, a written promise not to infringe on rights that are already yours by virtue of being a human. In addition, the militia in the second specifically wasn’t intended only as a bulwark against invaders. It was also intended as a bulwark against the federal government becoming tyrannical. This…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 03:37 AM
7

Hard, hard laugh if the boy ends up gay.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 05:13 PM
1

Examples?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 05:10 PM
2

Ironically, presenting and interpreting data in this form is in the realm of mathematics.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 01:57 AM
82

Anecdote from an Internet stranger alert: I have a friend who works for a company that’s particularly ironic. He tells me that there’s been a batch of dangerhair recent hires, including some into their statisticians. Shortly after starting they started an on the record initiative to share salty info, offering to collate and analyze the data to present to management a proposal for wage fairness. They were encouraged off the record not to do so, management had a handle on things, and that’s not re…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 01:55 AM
3

Well since were talking gaps in usable waking time: The study’s numbers work out to 360 hours a year. In 2017, the American female life expectancy was 81.1 years. That’s (81.1*365) 29602 hours of lost sleep. In 2017, the American male life expectancy was 76.1 years. That’s 5 years less than women, or (536524) 43,800 hours. (Life expectancy source: the CDC) You can try to argue that the study only looks at hours lost because of. But then we’re going to talk about net tax burden demographics, and …
/r/MensRights16/08/19 01:46 AM
1

be outraged at it Why? I don’t find it particularly outrageous. I want cheeky cheesecake available to everyone, my only problem with the status quo is that it’s only available if it’s the right kind of cheesecake. My real problem isn’t with the depiction, it’s with the double standard. Asking someone to ‘imagine the outrage’ is an attempt to make them recognize it, if not confront it. Actually being outraged just reinforces the (wrong, IMO) idea that content is outrageous in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 01:26 AM
7

that scummy house description Brutal.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/08/19 12:33 AM
2

Schroedinger’s Uncertainty Principal says that we can either know where a cat is, or if it’s dead, but not both.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/08/19 12:27 AM
1

I was thinking about that the other day. If you’ve ever had any major surgery (at least in the US) you know that the hospital, the anasthesiologist, and the surgeon all make you sign separate consent forms. The clown world part of me wants to see someone try to sue a hospital for completing their surgery, because they revoked consent during the middle of the operation to which they previously agreed. Bonus points because the plaintiff would have been—at the time—in a state of incapacitation even…
/r/MensRights15/08/19 12:15 AM
2

I kind of love that logic. No dice so you can’t gamble. I hope nobody ever realizes you can flip a coin. Or a piece of paper. Or bet how many words will be in the next sentence Officer Tony says. Or...
/r/MensRights15/08/19 12:08 AM
1

For one thing, think about what it takes in terms of resources to educate each of those majors. An English department has to pay for... professors. Students pay X tuition and are expected to bring their own books (lots of them, at bookstore markup). An engineering department had to pay for professors. And gear for each specialization. Microscopes, centrifuges, chemicals and the facilities to store and dispose of them, telescopes, circuit analysis gear, computer labs, CAD packages... Those studen…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/19 12:03 AM
3

Right? Good thing they studied that. Wonder when we’ll see the corresponding study about how men get further and further underwater with each marriage. The academic establishment hard at work, ladies and gentlemen.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:35 PM
3

I’m onto you. There can’t be that many chickens in Manhattan, Mr. Coop.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:30 PM
5

I’m not sure how I feel about that part you quoted. Because on one hand the logic—if you accept that feminism’s angle is what OP says it is—is sound: it’s a little more clear if you imagine someone saying ‘they can call themselves an ocean-protection activist and still be an environmentalist.’ But on the other hand, that premise just can’t be granted. Feminism is demonstrably not interested in equality. Imagine someone saying ‘the only way to save the environment is to sink all the forests into …
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:13 PM
19

Not only seriously considering, paying thousands of dollars. To those men, the women they’re giving up are worth so much less than the sexy vacuum cleaner that they’ll give up... say a new car or a couple of pretty amazing vacations as a premium to make the switch. ‘Huh huh but dildoes are cheap, and those replace men, so...’ Nope. No woman expects to replace men with a dildo. She can have her dildo and her man, and if the man doesn’t want that deal she’ll have the rest of the culture behind her…
/r/MensRights13/08/19 02:27 AM
3

Brb, staring Baby-Bugatti. We make top of the line, elite, $5m MSRP strollers. And you’re much too poor to afford them. We pay very special attention to who is allowed the honor of having their nanny pushing their mewling larva in our limited edition prams. The former Ms. Bezos is one of our customers, but we do have... err... slightly less prestigious subsidary lines for any such divorcee who suddenly finds a need to account for the finer things provided for her precious spawnling. Baby-Bugatti…
/r/MensRights12/08/19 02:12 AM
1

Uh-huh. Keep going...
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:55 PM
1

Now you’re staring to get it...
/r/MensRights06/08/19 06:46 PM
38

true equality women are given options Sure, why not.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 06:16 PM
4

I’d argue that the lie you call out is a factor, but there’s another factor also at play. When men express themselves and face that reaction, it’s often the case that they’re not reaching out for themselves. Mens’ tendency not to express their problems doesn’t (always? Maybe even usually?) mean they aren’t dealing with them. Consider the problem a lot of men have that they’re expected to perform. Meet expectations, make other people happy, sacrifice what you’d otherwise choose for the sake of yo…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:53 PM
1

Not Jason Momoa sexy, granted. But they get reflected glory from the fact that the field is. Self driving cars, machine learning, VR ‘finally’ happening (for at least the fourth time, but that’s a tangent...), space programs spinning up again, the ‘geeks building the cool shiny future’ angle absolutely makes the people involved look more sparkly than they actually are.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:37 PM
1

Is there? Good to know. Maybe I just don’t see it as much from where I sit. Thanks.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:32 PM
1

See my (and other) replies to Content_not_history who also asked for examples.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:29 PM
20

You know what? You’re right. It is important. So let’s talk about not only the state of affairs via a vis computer science and female enrollment but also the choice of words that create a disconnect between the headline and the caption. Get some coffee. Why are women ‘unable to succeed’ in computer science to the extent that it, specifically, warrants calling out? Are there lower numbers in CS than there are in... say mechanical engineering? Physics? Trading and banking? Oh wait, that last one i…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:17 AM
18

Does your daughter have bound feet? Or neck rings?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 03:29 AM
24

At what scale? Ask most dads who take their kids to the store—or worse the playground—how comfortable they’re made to feel. Ask centrists or conservatives who work at... say google how comfortable their work environment makes them feel. Ask every male teacher what they think of the Pence Rule. Ask any guy in an abusive relationship who’s learned about the Duluth Model first hand. And those are just social ones. If you want to broaden it away from strictly social discomfort, let’s start talking a…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 03:26 AM
2

Not saying this is what’s happening, but she might be trying to set up an argument for herself in the future. She moves outside the radius, but just far enough that making an issue out of it would seem petty. Then a year or two later she moves another 49 miles, for a total of 99 miles from the original agreement. Then if you try to call her on it she could try to pull ‘he didn’t argue when I originally broke the agreement, so he doesn’t care about the agreement!’ in court. Now, that argument sho…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 11:19 PM
956

Check out that photo caption, too. Men are expected to succeed in circumstances that make them feel unwelcome every day. But women are ‘unable’ to do so? That’s a pretty sexist thing to say. Edit: ‘succeed’ not ‘succeeded’
/r/MensRights05/08/19 11:10 PM
8

It’s insane. Think about what that says about the ‘equality’ aspect of things. If men and women are equal, male pedophiles can’t be held responsible either, because the children ‘take control’ and (to paraphrase) the adult deserves pity. The alternative is that children—and going by numbers, it’s boys; female pedophiles don’t seem to go for girls—can manipulate grown women to such a degree that it’s probably not a good idea to let them have a seat at the grown up table. There’s no way to maintai…
/r/MensRights03/08/19 09:02 PM
14

No, it’s absolutely true. I’m sure she’d tell you herself. (Sorry I messed with your eyes again.)
/r/MensRights03/08/19 02:47 AM
15

I know someone who only talked about doing that, in private, and to women who consented no less, and there are still people trying to hit him with way more than those consequences.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 02:28 AM
26

Yup. But... and brace yourself because you’re going to have to go hunting for your eyes when they’re done rolling after this... she’s only encouraging women to apply. That doesn’t mean she’s biased, she’ll treat women whose applications she went out of her way to solicit exactly like the men.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 02:24 AM
2

act on our desires as they surface Is she kidding? I’ve been told explicitly more than one from multiple sources while I was growing up (and I realize it’s impractical, bullshit, and inconsistent messaging, but those aren’t exactly the point here) that it is inappropriate to approach and ask out a stranger (say at the grocery store, gallery, or subway stop) because it puts her on the spot, or she’s just trying to get her chores done, or relax a while. And here this woman says that we should all …
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:27 PM
2

I’m willing to excuse ‘to tell you the truth’ implying that someone isn’t honest all the time, because nobody is honest all the time. Consider something like, ‘hey I’m about to leave for work, do you need anything?’ Maybe it would really help me if you take the trash out on your way out, but your hands are full. So my options are either lie and say ‘no, I’m fine’ or ‘to tell you the truth, it’d be really helpful if you could put the trash out on your way.’ It’s almost like an acknowledgement of,…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:20 PM
3

That’s the crux of it. That one game dev was the match, not the powder keg. The people who mock GG by saying sarcastically, ‘ItS aBoUt EtHiCs In GaMe JoUrNaLiSm’ are only trying to get people who are unaware or only tangentially aware to dismiss the fact that it is actually about an ethical problem in media by preseeding the idea that that’s just a smokescreen/conspiracy theory. Remember when that video went around that was a super mix of a bunch of different ‘unrelated’ news shows describing so…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:07 PM
3

She looks drunk. That’s actually a good observation. Part of me wants her to try to capitalize on that. ‘Brad Pitt kissed me while I was too drunk to consent. MeToo.’ The fallout would be amazing entertainment.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 06:49 PM
2

Certainly! They don’t deserve to be the victims of violence against women any more than their nonviolent sisters! /s
/r/MensRights02/08/19 06:41 PM
9

P&G is an umbrella corporation that owns Gillette as a subsidiary. A lot of the guys who are boycotting because of the ads are boycotting the parent company, not just the one brand. So it’s not X billion dollars of unsold shaving gear, it’s X billion dollars of shaving gear, diapers (Luvs, Pampers), detergent (Tide, Bounce, Downy...), paper goods (Bounty, Charmin...), and so on.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:36 AM
1

Your wording made it sound as if you were taking a ‘well you can’t blame them...’ approach. In any case, see my other (top level) comment on this thread.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 01:43 PM
5

Everyone commenting who points out that these women are only a subset of the women on tinder is missing a broader point. According to men who use tinder, it’s a shit show out there. Women won’t approach, the have an attitude, and it’s basically a ‘dance monkey dance’ situation just to get them to talk to you. There’s literally a subreddit for talking about tinder, and the most popular posts on it tend to be ‘hey guys, this line actually worked, you try!’ And then there’s this post. So even if th…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 06:16 AM
1

So you’re on Tinder and you come across a blonde teacher whose profile has a link to a news article about how she got arrested/convicted for ‘having sexual relations with’ one of her 13 year old students. You’re gonna shoot your shot?
/r/MensRights01/08/19 06:05 AM
4

Probably not, it’d be bad optics. Sometimes you get a glimpse when someone calls them out on sausage-fest STEM programs and their defense boils down to ‘we can’t accept women if they don’t apply, so ladies please come, we’ll pay your tuition and hold your hands just please save us from this PR!’ Talk to admissions officers off-the-record, though...
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:06 PM
12

I dare say that most of us who make that argument know that it’s at odds with the idea of pay-by-merit and that it’s hypocritical to support whichever one favors men at the time. That’s kind of the point. Because as it stands that’s exactly what the grievance studies do from the opposite side. Everyone should be paid as much as men when we’re talking about industries dominated by them, but when we’re not the system is just fine and men just can’t keep up. If that’s the tack our opponents take, f…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:02 PM
5

‘There’s no skid marks or anything. Just a van with somewhere between four and five bodies in it, wrapped around a pole. You think maybe there was a deer or something?’
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/19 03:46 AM
3

How about a picture of a selective service registration and a woman asking, ‘what is this? We don’t have government credit cards!’ Typical feminist, right TrollXers? Hahaha, so funny.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:33 AM
1

Clearly the solution is to siphon testosterone off of all of us (less natural T -> more moral) and swap it around for reinjection (more exogenous T -> even more moral)! (Please tell me I don’t need to clarify this is a joke.)
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:28 AM
1

It’s not about essential jobs. You nailed it in your second paragraph. They don’t want dangerous or low profile jobs. They’d love to take over essential jobs so they could have the ability to say things like ‘if it weren’t for all the women making widgets, society would grind to a halt!’ Their problem is that all the actually essential jobs tend to be the most unpleasant and dangerous, and it’s easier to sit in an air conditioned office and tell everyone how valuable elementary school teachers a…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:13 AM
1

How entertaining would it be if he worked with S. Copolla and Jolie for his next couple movies; women who don’t need him for their exposure. Something tells me that wouldn’t satisfy the ones who are upset...
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:08 AM
2

The interesting thing about the slippery slope fallacy is that it’s not one. Rather, the term applies to a type of argument. The argument can be used to construct a fallacy, by arguing that one thing will lead to another without evidence or reason to believe that it will. But it can also be used to describe something that is actually happening or which can be shown to be likely to happen, in which case it’s... well, more of an observation. Way back when, a lot of people who argued about pride pa…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:01 AM
2

I’d like it in more places, and I’m not giving them the click, but I’m not going to complain if HuffPo wants to run it. Their readership tends to be the demographic that needs to hear it most, and having a source they ‘like’ saying it is a powerful thing sometimes.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 07:15 PM
2

Why is this guy getting downvoted? The state absolutely takes a cut off the top of child support payments, so it’s absolutely in their interest to keep the payment flowing despite whatever arrangement the parties want. Here’s a piece from just a couple of years ago, from a source that’s generally biased towards the opposition, and even it acknowledges that fact. https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/04/23/collecting-child-support-without-making-matters-worse/the-child-support-system-should-…
/r/MensRights23/07/19 07:10 PM
3

What do you think my odds are of winning an award with my funny new joke: a baby gate to keep women in the kitchen?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 07:01 PM
1

There’s four reasons to carry a weapon in both GoT and in the real time that inspired it. 1) To attack someone. 2) To hunt. 3) To defend yourself. 4) To defend others. Knives and swords aren’t for hunting so let’s ignore 2. I submit that the vast majority of all the men carrying blades fall into 3 and 4. They were all carrying because they were taking responsibility for taking care of not only themselves, but the women who didn’t carry, against the minority of people who fall into category 1. Sa…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 10:41 PM
3

Also a valid point. I tend to use subtitles because while I can still hear it’s not as well as I used to be able to. And yeah, they tend to be pretty bad if they’re even there in the first place. In most cases, producing a video requires more work for a product that is inferior in almost every way, but people still do it. I don’t get it.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 07:00 PM
1

The ‘suitable for practically all cases’ argument is the only one that ever comes up here. The two related questions nobody has an answer for are, ‘practically all firemen (or to use one of your examples, fishermen) are male but we still weren’t satisfied with them, why?’ And ‘how big, say in percentage, is ‘practically all’? 99%? 80%?’
/r/MensRights20/07/19 06:56 PM
5

Absolutely. It’s everywhere. Programming subs are really bad for it, too. I pretty much refuse to watch a video unless someone makes a really strong case for me to do so beforehand. Video is such a bad way to express most of what people use it for. Don’t read your essay on top of a slideshow of google image results and screenshots of other web sites. Just publish the fucking essay in text. And that’s if you even actually wrote an essay. If you’re going off script, gods help us all because only a…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 06:58 PM
1

For a while there was a retort you’d hear a lot from the sjw camp. They’d list a bunch of typical complaints. Men interrupt, men are sexist, men are rapists, blah blah blah. Then someone argue that that’s bullshit generalization. He didn’t interrupt, he’s good to women, he’s certainly not a rapist. Then the first person would snap that ‘you don’t get credit for doing what you’re supposed to do anyway!’ And here we are. With those same people now demanding they get headpats for behaving like the …
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:38 PM
7

How important? Important enough to change terms like ‘gunman’ or ‘con man’? No, I didn’t think so. Weird.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:25 PM
2

It’s not supposed to be comfy. I’m not saying this in a ‘ha, ha, she designed an uncomfortable chair because she’s a bad designer’ way. She knows the chair is uncomfortable. The people praising her know. She’s being celebrated for purposefully and successfully designing something painful for men that ‘makes a statement.’
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:22 PM
3

Art matters. The economy isn’t the only important thing. That said, the list of great artists is as much a sausage fest as most of the other lists of greats. And there’s not even a ‘women weren’t allowed to paint or write!’ to fall back on like the (wrong, but granted for the sake of argument) ‘women weren’t allowed education!’ One.
/r/MGTOW18/07/19 09:16 PM
7

What? Women like music that’s demeaning and objectifying because gynocentrism? That seems like some dots got left unconnected between A and B.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:08 PM
8

rude, vulgar, or offensive Please. Reading the Hofax isn’t any of those things. Adding to it is at least two of them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/07/19 06:59 AM
3

The key words to remember here, so you can call out what’s going on, are ‘prescriptive’ and ‘descriptive.’ Tangential nerdery from here. You’ve already read the TL:DR, feel free to move on u less you want to nerd out. Compiling a dictionary isn’t an objective activity. As an editor (or a group of them) you should make a decision whether your dictionary will be one or the other. A prescriptive dictionary’s guiding principle is to lay out how language should be used or understood—it prescribes usa…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 05:07 AM
11

I hope you come to terms with yourself someday.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 04:39 AM
2

Yes they are. I maintain that for any given X, a lot of people who say they couldn’t/wouldn’t/don’t X only have the luxury of thinking that because they’ve never had to consider it as a serious option. ‘I wouldn’t put up with that no matter how hot the guy is.’ just says to me you probably haven’t had a hot guy try it on you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/19 10:26 PM
1

I wish I’d found that myself so I could post ‘YTA... oh wait, wrong sub.’ and have it not be brigading.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 09:29 PM
1

My bad. I got Poe’d I guess. In my defense it’s not clear from her post that she meant that. You’d have to know the current bank note demography before reading this shot.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 09:26 PM
5

It’s not about you. You are, if you’ll excuse an unflattering analogy, a smiling pig standing at the door of the abbatoir, telling the other pigs how awesome it is inside. We’ve seen buddies go in. Some of us have stuck our noses in and seen some of the whirling blades. We know that any participation in the process will be used to reach one of two conclusions: ‘Men are this way, here’s why it’s bad for women so they have to change!’ or ‘things suck for men, isn’t that weird? Why would we waste o…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 06:38 PM
1

It’s the methodology—both of the study and the education system—that’s the sticking point for me here. You’ve mentioned the documented grading bias given to girls on an individual level, but there’s more to it. Something—to use one of the SJWs’ favorite Important Qualifiers—systemic. Up until (and through) the 90’s the common refrain from the usual suspects was that girls showed poorly in school because the educational system was designed in such a way that it catered to boys. This was presented…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 06:30 PM
2

That ‘75% male’ bit is pretty telling. Being gay makes you less of a man? So you’re saying gender and sex aren’t independent? You’re saying that manhood is conditional on how much you live to please women? You’re saying that the black lesbian you want on the currency wouldn’t actually be a ‘real’ woman? So revealing for such a throwaway jab...
/r/MensRights16/07/19 06:17 PM
3

On that point, wouldn’t ‘effect’ imply a cause? There’s an interesting line of study. Find the cause of that ‘effect.’
/r/MensRights16/07/19 06:12 PM
23

Be clear, gentlemen: The state does not care about justice, or children, or men. It cares about (a) happy women and (b) keeping the money flowing through the system so it gets its cut. If a hearing to straighten out who’s paying and who should be comes up, the result will be ‘whatever resolves this with minimal disruption and unhappiness for the mother.’
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:45 PM
6

There’s actually a name for that phenomenon. ‘Political lesbianism.’ It’s pretty much like MGTOW except instead of focusing on self-improvement instead of relationships, they fuck themselves. To highlight how enlightened and independent they are? Or something?
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:39 PM
2

They aren’t being threatened in the same way a boot on the neck isn’t a threat. When you have someone on the ropes you’re well past the point where you can be said to be ‘threatening’ anymore.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:35 PM
7

This idea that power dynamics somehow don’t apply anymore, at least for humans, is ludicrous on its face anyway. We have structures in place to prevent overt conflict because the benefits of doing without actual violence are so great that it’s usually worth avoiding it, but even they rest on the unspoken foundation of ‘I/we can make you do what I want, if I/we want it bad enough.’ When those negotiations break down, the decision will ultimately be made—as it always has been—on the end of a heavy…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 03:59 PM
2

That’s not even new. They did that when I was in school longer ago than I’d like to admit. I didn’t pay much attention to gender discrepancies in it it the time. I did notice that there were plenty of kids who only passed because they had their notebooks in order despite their actual performance being a train wreck, and a number of kids whose otherwise phenomenal grades got hit because their notebooks sucked because they knew the stuff so well they didn’t bother taking notes. I just assumed it w…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 09:21 PM
1

I’d be nervous about even calling them ‘ladies.’ People who want to be offended are going to be offended. Just wait until you get a complaint that calling the administrative staff ‘ladies’ is sexist and demeaning and blah blah blah. Call them by name? Or say ‘can someone...’?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 09:14 PM
2

It seems to me that things are a lot more low effort. There are a lot more ‘look at this shitty thing’ or ‘if the roles were reversed...’ posts, and less posts about why things are the way they are and what to do about it. The posts pointing out that shitty things happen are necessary, as evidence that the things we talk about aren’t made up for example, but I see so many of them that are basically just screenshots. No commentary, no explanation. And I feel like that’s because we’re at a point w…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 09:06 PM
3

To add onto your points about the Pareto distribution and the men with power using it for themselves and not the remaining 80%: Women are both a source of power (as the majority and often more engaged voting block and as an almost unquestioned gatekeeper of social power) and an indicator of it (both in terms of social proof and in terms of biological success). There’s also the well established psychological predisposition to protect and please women regardless of any obvious power dynamic. So th…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:49 PM
4

Even if the 50% and 42% overlap entirely, those numbers are still probably low. People lie on surveys. People lie to themselves. Plenty of people say ‘I’d never do X.’ because they haven’t ever (yet) been put in a position where doing X is an actual option instead of just a question on a sheet of paper.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:31 PM
2

please your lady if you want to get invited back repeatedly The poster’s complaint gives lie to this. Dude didn’t give a fuck about her and she brought him back over and over again. He wasn’t after a relationship he was just trying to get off. And he did. Repeatedly. She got over it and decided to shut him off? I’m sure he’ll never again find another drunk hookup who he can wank into, the poor guy.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/19 08:25 PM
1

There’s a subreddit called ‘trashy’ for posts that are trashy people, trashy things, or both. I didn’t/don’t want to link it directly because I don’t know what the sub link policy is here.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:44 AM
16

I can’t keep up with my alimony payments, so you’re going to have to work and pay them for me. Y’all need to woman up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/19 08:24 PM
2

Post it to trashy, I dare you.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:12 PM
3

https://m.imgur.com/t/ericandre/hFgj3jD
/r/MensRights12/07/19 03:40 AM
3

Let me go back over that, because I’m afraid you think I was expressing my own opinion when I was pointing out the implication of what you were saying. Someone claimed the positions in the democratic debate were extreme. You didn’t argue that. Instead you said that you didn’t watch it because the debate at that level is pandering to the base, and they won’t pitch their appeal-to-moderate positions until later. If the positions in the debate weren’t moderate enough for you to pay attention to, bu…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:22 AM
7

Absolutely not. If you and I are each given $1000 dollars, I take it to Vegas and blow it all on one lost hand of blackjack and you make investments that turn it into $10000, is that equitable? Is it equal?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 01:37 AM
8

So the you didn’t watch the debates because of the extremist views that pander to their base. Or to put it more clearly: The Democratic base is extremist. (Also, hate to break it to you, but campaign promises don’t matter. At any level. From any party.)
/r/MensRights11/07/19 01:29 AM
5

they play the same game and better But they don’t, do they? I play tennis at the ‘a couple times when I needed an excuse to go outside as a teenager’ level. If I went out and played a game against someone who plays at a ‘what is this weird flyswatter in my hand’ level and win, can I make the same claim about someone like Serena Williams? I did after all play the same game, and I’d be undefeated because I avoided playing anyone better than me, not because I beat anyone who claimed to be better th…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 01:15 AM
12

You know why. It was a purity test. If he’s pure, he gives a pandering statement about how women’s tennis players are just as good as men and deserve their spot on top and hurt me more, Mistress. If he’s impure, he’ll say anything else and we’ll know it’s time to ruin his career.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 06:52 PM
2

If you mean what I think you mean, are you sure those guys have strings on their banjos? If they don’t, they might not even know about it.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 06:43 PM
1

I’m not sure you understood that part of the post.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 06:40 PM
2

I’m not trying to autoban them. It just seems that an auto response would be able to sum up the typical responses/rebuttals without wasting the time of the people who currently bother typing them out anymore. If OP doesn’t interact beyond their initial post, nothing of value was lost. If they actually try to engage, then we can talk to them with all the common point already out of the way.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 08:50 PM
3

This is an interesting idea, but you’ve got a tough row to hoe trying to make it catch on. Like you said, there’s a certain unwillingness to address the elephant in the room that male and female brains are intrinsically different. The fact that we don’t know how and have such difficulty studying or even accepting it is shameful. I don’t understand how fields from neuroscience to psychology to psychiatry have settled on a gentleman’s agreement that all behavioral differences are social in origin.…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 08:21 PM
25

We need a bot or something that autoresponds to tone posts like this. It’s getting ridiculous. One day I’m going to get bored enough to make a parody post along the lines of: ‘Guys, we need to talk. It seems like more and more lately this sub is less about men’s rights and more about how to moderate our tone to please people who are going to interpret whatever we say, however we say it, in the way that will piss them off most. You don’t know me and I’m not going to bother giving evidence, but tr…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 08:02 PM
0

You’ve got to be kidding me. I showed you the exact law. You interpret it how you want, it’s not my problem.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 11:12 PM
1

‘As far as I’m aware’? Exactly how aware is that? Look. I don’t know what you expect the law to say. It can’t enumerate every possible variation emit every possible infraction. You’re not going to find a law that says it only counts as rape if it’s between 00:00 and 23:59:59.9999 on a Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, or Saturday during the months of... Look at the Ohio drunk driving laws. 4511.19 on the same site. They say you’re guilty if you ‘operate a vehicle, streetcar, …
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:59 AM
6

Why does it matter where it’s from? My arguments are that there’s laws against it. You didn’t agree. I admitted the example I gave was debatable, and showed you a less flexible one. The part about drunkenness is the phrase ‘substantially impaired because of a mental or physical condition.’ If you think they need to specifically enumerate every possible condition that could cause substantial physical or mental impairment... well... I hope you brought a snack because that’s going to take a while.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 11:44 PM
9

I’m seeing that Minnesota defines consent as a strictly positive act: it can’t be assumed from body language, previous encounters, relationship, etc., and that those under the influence are incapable of giving it. Those unknowingly/unwillingly drugged or given alcohol are obviously nonconsenting. I find people saying both yes and no that voluntary intoxication means no consent. But that’s Minnesota. There’s also Ohio. 2907.02 (A) (1) No person shall engage in sexual conduct with another who is n…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 06:30 PM
4

Sure they would. But the adjective would be ‘deadbeat.’
/r/MensRights05/07/19 05:13 PM
2

‘A man marries a woman thinking she won’t change, but she will. A woman marries a man thinking he’ll change, but he won’t.’
/r/MensRights05/07/19 05:11 PM
2

It depends who you ask. Probably not, though. Most of the studies and statistics passed around (including the ones that use the 2-5% false accusation statistic) leave them uncounted. Generally the definitions you see are split into ‘convictions’ where someone was charge, tried, and found guilty, ‘false accusations’ where the accuser admitted somewhere during the process that she was lying, and ‘everything else’ which contains everything from ‘the accusation was so unbelievable that it discredite…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 05:06 PM
38

Minnesota, for one example, holds that one who is drunk cannot render consent. So if you have sex with a drunk person (let’s be frank, a drunk woman) you’re legally raping. Even if she is tearing your clothes off and saying ‘Gadaeus1 please have sex with me!’ in front of a cop. The only thing that stops every drunk bar pickup from being rape there is whether it’s brought to the police.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 04:52 PM
4

I don’t spend much time on the NSFW subs but when I did spend more they were full of thirsty ‘wow, you’re amazing, I’d do all these things to you’ type comments. Even on posts where those comments... let’s say they indicate that the commenter might have pretty unusual taste. Where’s the ‘locked because the trolls have shown up’ pinned mod comment stopping people from taking jabs at this dude?
/r/MensRights05/07/19 04:45 PM
3

Sounds like bullshit all around to me. It’s not going to help the women’s game, because why the hell would it? Just because you bought a ticket for the men’s’ game doesn’t mean you have one for the women’s game. And even if they decided to do something ridiculous like honoring mens’ tickets at the women’s game who’s going to decide, ‘y’know, I didn’t care enough to buy a ticket but sure I’ll go sit in an uncomfortable seat for a couple hours eating overpriced food watching players I don’t care a…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 04:38 PM
3

gender anarchist 6’ requirement Six foot women are almost three standard deviations away from normal in the US. They’re top 0.2%. In other words: Straight, lying, racist attention grabber.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/19 08:38 PM
0

... yes? I agree with you. What I’m saying is that OP recognizes toxic masculinity but not toxic feminity. She recognizes ‘toxic feminism.’ Which leaves her a rationalization: ‘That’s not me, it’s just toxic feminists.’ Her wording revealed that she still thinks NAWALT, despite what she says.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 08:03 PM
2

HGTV is almost all Reno shows these days. It’s almost funny. There are husband and wife Reno teams, and one or two shows where the single host is a woman in a tool belt. And when it’s demo time, the wife or the tool-beltress will pull off some molding or swing a hammer through some drywall, and they’ll cut to commercial. When they come back, hubby and/or general contractors are crawling all over while the wife/hostess (in her tool belt and linen blouse) will walk around talking about what kind o…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:58 PM
5

Matriarchy hasn’t ever happened for the same reason patriarchy never happened. The kind of dominance colloquially implied when talking about patriarchy just doesn’t happen; in either direction. There are female-dominated societies—mostly tribes—but even the most ‘pure’ matriarchies are generally ‘women wield overt social and familial power, men wield political power.’ Which is interesting because the case could be made that that only differs from most western societies because of the word ‘overt…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:52 PM
5

outside NYC I’m sure many of you have also been to NYC. Some of you probably work or live there. Anyone find that the women in NYC are the shrinking violets this woman is saying they are? Hauling off and clocking someone who says something mean to you isn’t strength, it’s a lack of self control. Does this woman really think we’d be better making physical violence the default response to social or verbal opposition? Because I suspect that she hasn’t completely thought through the implications of …
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:38 PM
3

To look at the statistics involving the results of growing up in single mother household, a lot of them may low-key actually believe that.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:30 PM
3

This needs to be 101 material for subs here. A lot of the specific issues we have with the legal system are direct results of earlier feminism. The overwhelming tendency to give child custody to women and finance it with men’s resources are a direct result of an early feminist campaign that argued that that’s how it should be because (paraphrasing) ‘sure men have the resources, but women are just better at parenting, so they should be given those resources to use as they please.’ And that’s not …
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:26 PM
0

I know nothing about OP, except that I generally support her side in this story as told. But note that even she chose ‘toxic feminism’ as the correlative to ‘toxic masculinity.’ Toxic masculinity implicates all men. Toxic feminism leaves a window open for ‘we normal women’ to escape scrutiny.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:23 PM
3

And women are like cheap curtain rods. Only good for one thing, and usually pretty bad even at that. Ha ha ha, hilarious, right? Where’s my article?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:17 PM
3

As other have said, this definitely happened. But in addition: MGTOW On a date Following the ‘I’m a good earner’ script.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:13 PM
24

‘Not beating senseless everyone who has rocks shinier than yours and taking the shiny rocks’ is imposed on us by families and society. Not at the macro level, and not always successfully, but in general. And we’re better off collectively for it. ‘Social construct == bad’ is bullshit. It’s just the other side of the coin with ‘naturalistic fallacy’ on it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/07/19 08:55 PM
6

Could have taken him to a parade to dance on a float for cash!
/r/MensRights02/07/19 04:32 AM
1

What’s with their skin? Everything in that picture that you’d expect to be white is white except their skin.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 04:31 AM
2

Her name is in the photo caption. Stuff about it shows up on whatever search engine you like.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 04:27 AM
4

I don’t know, sorry. I can imagine a number of scenarios, but they’re all conjecture.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 07:39 PM
26

how If you really want to know: The delivery was breach, the mother wasn’t dilated enough. The baby was stuck. Rather than performing an emergency c-section, she decided to pull it out. She pulled the body, the head remained stuck.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 07:28 PM
1

We aren’t going to agree. And next time you want to insult the person you’re taking to, come right out and say it. Coward.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 09:14 AM
9

Something’s keeping those legs from atrophy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/06/19 09:29 PM
5

And one of the earlier rallying cries of feminism—though you still hear it today—is ‘smash the patriarchy!’ Which would then translate to, ‘smash those who oppose us!’ Which then frames the situation as ‘a group of people making demands to upset societal order rallying behind a cry to destroy all who oppose them.’ Sounds reasonable, to me. Lets put them in charge. /s
/r/MensRights30/06/19 09:01 PM
2

A profession that they’re committed to equal opportunity immediately followed by a statement that they will give preferential treatment (read: extra opportunity) to women.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 08:53 PM
1

I’m not saying it wasn’t effective. It was. Shame is a powerful force. I was trying to convey ‘look how well that worked’ in the sense that it didn’t work because we basically decided as a society to drop the facade that we don’t cater to women’s feelings and agreed to sacrifice various social checks and controls on the altar of gynocentrism. It worked. Until it didn’t. But men don’t have such an altar, and it’ll probably work—now, on us—because who cares about hypocrisy anymore. We’re fucked.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/19 06:32 AM
1

Granted they’re not actively campaigning for circumcision. They do campaign actively against female circumcision. Male circumcision’s role in that conversation generally ranges from ‘its not the same thing’ (which is actively harmful to the Anti-MGM cause) to ‘oh yeah and that too, I guess.’ Their silence on the matter when they wield the influence and resources they do and proclaim to be a movement for equality is damning.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 08:34 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science,_technology,_engineering,_and_mathematics Yes. I’ve read both of them. So you’re arguing that medicine doesn’t involve ‘testable predictions, performing controlled experiments, relying on quantifiable data and mathematical models, a high degree of accuracy and objectivity, higher levels of consensus, faster progression of the field, greater explanatory success, cumulativeness, [and] replicability’?
/r/MensRights29/06/19 06:58 AM
2

If the article is about women not enjoying being choked, then it’s just a fairy tale, and nobody should bother to read it for anything besides entertainment. Because the phenomenon of 50 Shades of Grey (as well as a not small body of research, and an even bigger body of anecdotal evidence in the wild) suggests that there are a significant number of women who do actually like various darker activities.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/19 05:22 PM
1

Check out Wikipedia. There’s a section on variations. Some of them explicitly use ‘medicine’ for the M. I’m not even saying it myself. I’m not in medicine. I’m in computer science. ‘Math’ makes more sense. But there’s an argument to be made for ‘medicine,’ and people make it. As for it being a hard science, how do you classify hard vs. soft science? I categorically disagree with you, but I suppose you could have some criteria so different from mine that it would explain it.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 05:19 PM
1

You realize those are categories? You don’t get a degree in ‘Technology’ or ‘Science.’ You get a ______ of science degree in the field of physics, or informatics, or in this case your favorite field of medicine. I can’t find a list of STEM majors that doesn’t include medical sciences, let alone excluding them specifically. I do even see people referring to the ‘M’ as meaning ‘medicine’ and while some people say it more usually means math, nobody is saying that it can’t mean medicine.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 07:21 AM
9

If you are friends with a child, you aren’t mature enough to raise it. You should instead be raising the child to be a man you can be friends with. You can respect your child, love your child, admire your child, and so on. But they aren’t your friend for the same reason high school kids don’t have friends in grade school. The maturity and developmental difference is just too wide (ideally, I’m not going to even address the ‘my daughter is my best friend’ women in question) for that to be healthy…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/06/19 07:57 PM
23

Compare it to the shrieking on other posts about how women who accept invitations to hotel rooms for coffee and are then shocked and disgusted when the guy makes a pass are given sympathy and everyone’s behind them. Those guys should know better, they’re assholes for assuming that going back to the hotel room has implications. But this guy’s an asshole because asking the girl to share a hotel room has implications, and the girl was justifiably salty because she behaved accordingly.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/06/19 07:47 PM
1

Agreed that it is what it is, and it’s completely fucked. It should immediately signal that we should pay zero attention to anything that person has to say on the issue. Death, though? Not going that far.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 07:30 PM
7

Not only that, but ‘the debate rages on whether medical counts as STEM’? Has anyone here even heard of this?
/r/MensRights27/06/19 07:24 PM
3

On call/overnight employees.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 07:20 PM
6

stood up to the feminist lobby and won won Don’t start counting chickens. They’re still cutting boys, registering young men for SS, divorce raping men, and so on.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 07:18 PM
5

Imagine saying that to women. They did say that to women. Up through the 80s and early 90s. It was one of the major suggestions offered by conservative groups to those who wanted abortion to be/remain legal. You can see how that went over. But nobody seems to (want to) remember that.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 07:16 PM
1

Help me out here. Are you implying that because accusations aren’t generally leveled against a particular group, the accusations that are leveled at their opponents are more likely to be true?
/r/MensRights27/06/19 07:09 PM
1

You don't change minds by talking shit on other rights movements. You change minds by presenting solid arguments. When the solid arguments support the fact that ‘other rights movements’ warrant shit talking, what then? And that’s granting that ‘you change minds by presenting solid arguments’ is true. Ask Pizzey how that works out. Or Warren. Or Silverman, but you’ll need a Ouija board to do it and I’ll let you find out why.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 11:47 PM
5

All the single moms you see around here. Well, everywhere. I’m sure they’re all adamantly ‘pro-choice.’ But they still have kids they clearly didn’t/don’t want, and create a situation that fucks everyone involved. Someone reassure me they’re not all ‘if I get pregnant, Chad will stick around’-hidden-until-too-late-for-abortion situations or child-support tickets. We’re all doomed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/19 11:43 PM
3

Simple: Use a definition of ‘their fair share’ that’s basically, ‘all of it.’
/r/MensRights26/06/19 11:15 PM
3

Oddly, nobody is willing to call out Joe ‘Where’s Your Daughter Hidin’’ Biden though.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 11:10 PM
3

Hey everyone! GrantNexus kicked my dog, broke all my car windows, and stole my lunch when I wasn’t looking! Does anyone else out there want to come forward about how GrantNexus did them dirty? You might get a book deal or a sympathetic interview on national television about what a brave hero you are. I’m looking for true accounts only. Well believe anyone who comes forward because I’ve asked for true accounts only and besides, who would lie about something like that? I’ve said what he did to me,…
/r/MensRights26/06/19 11:03 PM
4

Does it go on to explain how 50 Shades didn’t get people who haven’t been in a bookstore since they bought Harry Potter (which success involved appealing to both genders, so twice the potential audience...) back into Barnes and Noble?
/r/TheRedPill26/06/19 10:53 PM
4

Let’s be honest. This sub will eventually be quarantined regardless of posts like this being here or not. They’ll either make up a reason or send in someone to break rules so they can point at it and say we’re at fault. I’m surprised it hasn’t happened yet, frankly.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 10:49 PM
2

I’m not sure this shouldn’t also be considered rape.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:52 AM
4

The instafilter and/or uneven makeup doesn’t help, it just exaggerates it. But let’s talk about that wonklip/sneer.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/06/19 05:02 AM
5

Shrug. It probably differs person to person. That kid doesn’t seem too upset by it.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 07:28 PM
4

You’re a grown up. This is a kid. The kid sees the thing that caused him so much pain and stress and marks him as different, and he sees that his dad is there to support him, to be marked as different with him so he’s not so alone.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 06:49 PM
17

“Goddamn incel bullish—oh wait, it’s a woman? Get this woman what she’s entitled to!” Is that how it works, then? We’re just ignoring all pretense at sanity?
/r/MensRights23/06/19 06:46 PM
2

A shitty team? The US women’s national team was at the top of the rankings in 2017. That year they lost to an under 15 boy’s team. https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/a-dallas-fc-under-15-boys-squad-beat-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/
/r/MensRights20/06/19 12:32 AM
5

And yet prior sexual history is inadmissible evidence when it supports the male side of the case. Funny, that.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:15 PM
3

Feminism is for men, too. Just they’re in line behind the female lab rats.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:11 PM
1

Too risky. If we ‘infiltrate’ feminism to leverage their platform for one of our causes, the victory adds to their credibility, not ours. It gives them something to point to when they need evidence that ‘feminism is for men too’, and they want too many negative things for men that we shouldn’t give them that chance. It’d be sacrificial in the long term.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 11:17 PM
1

Edit: deleted my own useless post.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 10:47 PM
1

On one hand, yes. Having a woman as president would be an important data point to illustrate what you’re saying. On the other hand, it makes me nervous because of how much we let women get away with. Would Madame President be allowed to dial it up to eleven or twelve? The public blowback of a course of action is something every president deals with when making decisions. It’s intended as a check on their actions. But the inability/unwillingness to recognize or call out women behaving badly is we…
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:21 PM
2

G R O O M I N G T I P S. I look forward to their feminist article with advice on shaving your legs.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:04 PM
2

Headline says world’s first. Comparing it to ‘big pharma’ and ‘big oil’ puts it in a global context.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:23 PM
8

Nobody’s saying that this industry will be all men except the fearmongering author of the article. I had a buddy survive testicular cancer, and the resident specialist at the hospital responsible is a woman. The author’s line of reasoning relies on the assumption that all women are as man-hating as her, and it’s bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 06:41 PM
4

... surprise?
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:08 PM
5

Ask them whether the justice system is biased against black men. They’ll probably say yes. It’s hard to compare the skew in racial incarceration statistics to the skew in child support payment by gender statistics (because there are a lot of races and two genders) but they’re both pretty heavily skewed. Ask why one indicates a biased system but the other doesn’t.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 08:57 PM
3

Not gonna lie, expected two fingers of whiskey.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/19 09:29 PM
6

I know someone who tried to sell a house—one she wasn’t living in—with exactly this mindset. Now that circumstances mean she has to move it, it’s deteriorated to the point where demolishing the house might raise the property value enough to be worth paying for the demolition. Dark stuff.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/19 09:28 PM
4

White men probably aren’t even the majority of the top 1%. Just the visible ones. See, the lists that get published all have weird conditions. The big headline is ‘FORBES’ 100 RICHEST PEOPLE!’ and the small print is ‘(according to US tax returns)’ or something similarly weird. The actual richest people in the world include people like most of the Saudi royal family, a bunch of Chinese real estate barons, and the Rothschild family. See that article that made the rounds the other night about how t…
/r/MensRights11/06/19 08:27 PM
8

In addition, a woman’s fear of her risk of rape is not necessarily proportional to her risk of rape.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 07:44 PM
2

Don’t feed the troll, people.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 07:34 PM
6

I had the misfortune to be in a physical rehab center/nursing home to learn how to walk again after a medical shit show. I know exactly what you mean. In a sick way the lack of care itself was a good thing, because it was a tremendously strong motivation to get the fuck out. On the other hand, the sympathy I have for the people who won’t ever leave that place is boundless.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/06/19 08:35 PM
1

That rule #4 sounds like someone wrote it who has no idea what they’re talking about. Firstly because the forms you sign for medical procedures aren’t ‘waivers.’ You’re acknowledging that you understand what’s about to happen and that you consent to it. Yes, there’s usually a clause about ‘I give permission for the facility to share information with other parties who require it for purposes of material aid,’ but even that’s not a waiver. Even those clauses are interpreted within the context of H…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:01 PM
1

You’re preaching to the choir.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 06:48 PM
1

I like that clumsy attempt at... well, I don’t even want to call it extortion, but I don’t know what to call it. ‘Nice account name you have there, be a shame if something were to happen to it.’ Oh, please don’t turn me in, I’ll do whatever you say!
/r/MensRights06/06/19 12:59 AM
3

They also got the right just by asking. Men didn’t get universal sufferage until after their demographic was eligible for selective service.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 12:52 AM
2

To add to this, specifically #6: In every category—with the possible exception of DV where the statistics are suspicious at best—men are more likely to be the victim of violence. Yet ‘we have to be afraid of violence!’ Is a common refrain from women. There are a couple of questions raised. Why is the public call always to stop violence against women when that is a minority of violence? We should be stopping all (criminal, immoral, pick your adjective, I’m not here for a semantic or moralist deba…
/r/MensRights06/06/19 12:48 AM
9

Alright, now that we’re past being flip, here’s why I was being flip. Every week—often multiple times a week—we get concern trolls here. Their posts look exactly like yours. An accusation of the ‘both sides’ flavor, usually a plea to be kinder and gentler. The account is usually pretty new. But the comment I’m replying to here makes me think you aren’t just doing a drive-by. The thing is this: You’re not offering a solution. Your post is not even offering to spitball about a solution. You’re jus…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 12:57 AM
11

I’m old enough that young people think I’m on the ‘fuckin millennials’ train, and I’m young enough that old people think I’m a fuckin millenial. So take this for what it’s worth. It’s bullshit to bitch that young people haven’t been taught those things, but it’s also bullshit to bitch that you were never taught those things. If your grandfather didn’t teach your dad how to change his oil, your dad had a handful of options to learn it himself. But you know what wasn’t in that handful? The interne…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 12:10 AM
7

It’s even worse than that. Reproductive pressure only works on reproductive agents. By which I mean a five year old doesn’t care what kind of people women fuck, because he isn’t trying to fuck. BUT, the five year old still gets all the messaging. Raised by women completely on board with the women are queens agenda, taught by women in a school system based on it. And they see what happens to men in their lives who don’t toe the line. Mommy says baaad things about those men, you don’t want mommy t…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 12:02 AM
7

Hey, hey everyone. Listen up! IHope2Reddit is here to tell us the best way to do things! And we should all listen because of his earned credibility and long history of getting things done in the best way! So... go on, man, we’re listening...
/r/MensRights03/06/19 11:53 PM
11

It’s not a panopticon if you can’t look at everything. Everyone remembers the original google motto of don’t be evil. Fewer people remember that google’s original mission was to index and catalogue all the information in the world.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/19 11:42 PM
10

Big talk, but have you been around a woman announcing to another (or most illustratively, the group of friends that she hangs out with regularly) that she got engaged, especially without the guy around? The ring matters. Almost the only time the first question isn’t about the ring is when she presents it as she’s saying what happened. You probably even pictured the gesture when you read that. What people say they do on reddit and how they actually act in real life don’t always square.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 06:45 PM
3

Pay attention to the aggregate result, too. If any significant number of men followed the advice here, the result would be a swelling in the numbers of docile (meditate, eschew violence) followers (collaborate, don’t lead) with no self-sufficiency (don’t fix things, don’t hunt) but an ability to dilute the labor poo—I mean commoditization of an economically important but currently expens—I mean code. This is a propaganda article aimed at making serfs and saving money for the powers that be.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 07:58 PM
2

replace fixing things at home with decorating ‘Yes honey, but we live in a pretty pile of rubble!’
/r/MensRights25/05/19 07:45 PM
1

... What? It was a joke about how Australians’ common use of ‘cunt.’
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:09 AM
4

Don’t tell me. I can’t do anything more about it than you can. Tell your political representatives.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:26 PM
2

Change your name in your phone to Cunt, so he sounds more authentic when he talks to you. ‘How can I help you, Cunt?’
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:21 PM
2

Off topic, that might produce an interesting meta. What would chess look like if the goal was not to mate the opposing king but to force your opponent to mate yours? There’d probably have to be some rule like the forced capture rule in checkers to prevent pawn-twiddling stalemates, but I wonder what kind of game it would produce.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:15 PM
4

Those some women are great. But they’re the minority and/or not speaking up. As desirable as your analogy might be, when the one who has candy will throw tantrums and lash out when you try to give candy to the one without, the strategy of ‘have the one without ask the bully nicely’ is a losing one. If the moral/empathic argument was going to sway the bully, he wouldn’t be a bully in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:04 PM
2

My bad. Somehow I missed the ‘in Canada’ in the title. Sorry. That situation is messed up.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:36 AM
3

.... aaaand I need to get more sleep. Oops.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:35 AM
10

Men’s value is not tied to their fertility. Not societally. There are some families that take dynastic inheritance seriously, but by and large, no. Because men’s fertility is effectively an infinite resource. A healthy man will continue to make viable sperm well into old age, and does so at a rate far faster than the sperm could possibly be used. A woman does not produce new eggs over her lifetime and will at some point well before her death become unable to reproduce. Compounding that, gestatio…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:55 PM
5

Nope. Behold the Unborn Victims of Violence Act. In America, federal law states that if you commit certain crimes—including murder—against a fetus, it will count as if you committed it against a non-controversially-human human. Forcing a miscarriage and killing a pregnant woman (even via manslaughter, not just murder) have resulted in murder and double murder charges. Yes, the Supreme Court has upheld both this and RvW in conflict with each other. TL;DR: It’s a human until mom doesn’t want it to…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:34 PM
9

Female anger is fetishized. Male anger is violent and toxic and dangerous.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:57 PM
3

courageously Yeah. It must take such bravery to say the same thing that’s been the pushed narrative for decades. This woman is a real hero.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:56 PM
1

‘Too many’ isn’t all. You’ve just conceded that ‘bodily autonomy’ itself is not a sufficient reason to dictate the law. ‘A risky medical procedure with permanent bodily damage.’ You mean abortion? I know you don’t, but both delivery and abortion fall into that category. So if a woman gets pregnant she’s in line for a risky medical procedure and permanent bodily damage no matter what she chooses to do. Your opponents at that point are free to point out that they’re trying to restrict the option t…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:49 PM
1

See my response to someone else in this thread. Society restricts bodily autonomy all the time. If you’re trying to argue for abortion from the point of view of bodily autonomy absolutism you’d better also be arguing for legalizing every drug on the planet, among other things.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 11:21 PM
3

That’s a thing. But nobody wants to hear it. We tell everyone what to do with their bodies all the time. Especially in a prohibitive sense. You can’t put this chemical into your body. You can’t prick your daughter’s genitals. Those are violations of bodily autonomy. (Calm down, intactivists. You’re fighting the good fight and I support you. I don’t like FGM or MGM and would have them both banned for children. This isn’t a thread about that.) The argument is about where to draw the line. But that…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 11:15 PM
50

People actually tried that, when birth control was invented and then when abortion was going through the courts the first time. The response boiled down to, ‘zomg you can’t tell a woman what she can and can’t do with her body!’ The more things change, the more they stay the same.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 01:06 AM
2

That’s it, sorry. I remember her screen name more easily than her actual name. I need to fix that.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:16 PM
2

I think it was GWW who called it ‘communism in panties.’ Same idea, but a more earthy phrase, depending on your audience.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:55 PM
1

In the context of this thread, which is harm across genders, I’ll assume you mean to imply that men harm women via FGM practices. In which case it’s worth noting that in most societies that practice FGM the women as much as the men (often more than the men) support the practice. Actively. As in it’s not just passively accepting it as a part of life. They will act in groups to take daughters to have it done and shame and question women who don’t have it done. It’s not men inflicting it.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:54 PM
3

too generous towards her profs’ intentions/roles Absolutely. As a professor, teaching is only one of your responsibilities. In a lot of places it’s not even your primary one. One of your other responsibilities is research. Building and tending to your field’s body of knowledge. Research professors have no excuse. They are ultimately producing the results of their field. If those results are bunk, they’re either malicious or incompetent. I’d allow for the possibility of mistakes, but not on the s…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:42 PM
1

It makes sense to filter them if you’re comparing baselines when circumstances are what they aren’t. The study that says ‘this is a baseline comparison of human libidos’ is one study. The study that says ‘this is a practical comparison of human libidos’ is a different one. They are both valid. I’d actually argue that the second one is more valid though. Because it’s practical information. Think about it this way, how many ‘baseline’ people are there? What does it mean to be at the baseline? Lets…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:47 PM
1

within the timeframe in which the woman can have an abortion I actually support something more unusual. TLDR: Men should have the option to waive responsibility up to five months after they become aware of the pregnancy. Pregnancy symptoms can start at 4 weeks. You don’t necessarily share showing until 3-4 months. (Averages, google, I know your aunt ballooned up at 2 months and you have a friend who didn’t k ow she was pregnant u til she was in the delivery room, spare me.) That means a woman kn…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:28 PM
1

I made a lengthy comment about this a day or two ago, check my history if you want. My theory is that it’s because men who become women are seen as trying to dodge their male responsibilities and muscle in on female privilege. Take note that there’s no equivalent of TERFs complaining about FtM people. Anyone who hates transgenderism hates both sides. But there are enough people gatekeeping just feminity that there’s a name for it.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:15 PM
70

I personally love when something from science gets to the front page. When that happens it’s usually space related, or something like this with all the comments nuked. Which says that a lot of people think it needs to be seen (or it wouldn’t be upvoted to the front page) but we’re not allowed to talk about it. The part of me that isn’t dead yet hopes that every time it happens one more person stops and thinks to themselves, ‘hey wait a minute, what were all these people saying that I’m not allow…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/19 04:07 PM
5

If enough women/people are on such medications to skew a study like this, it makes sense not to filter them out. By all means feel free to also perform a similar study controlled for such things, but you can’t dismiss this one when the people you’d disqualify are a nontrivial portion of the population. Imagine if a study on the prevalence of depression only studied people not undergoing treatment people and came to the conclusion that only a tiny number of people are depressed. It would be nice …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:02 PM
2

They weren’t paying attention. The first and second waves were still, at their core, about more freedoms for women without the corresponding responsibilities, and more responsibilities for men and a limit to their freedoms. The only differences are: The first wave taught via bulletins, letters, and bullhorns some children who became the second wave and taught from classrooms all the children who are now third wave. This means the first and second waves aren’t radical ‘feminist revolution’ materi…
/r/MensRights15/05/19 09:59 PM
2

Your last two sentences. The lack of care for men is a big problem but it has pretty deep psychological causes. Ones we can’t easily address directly for a host of reasons. One of those is that it is a taboo to examine that lack of care too closely, or even to acknowledge it except in certain ‘acceptable’ ways. Feminism, however, is in some sense the result of weaponizing (or at least exploiting) the lack of care for men. It is, in fact, the modern arbiter of the ways which are allowed when ackn…
/r/MensRights15/05/19 09:27 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 10:42 PM
8

The grandmothers of feminism weren’t poor folks. Nor were they virtuous champions of the downtrodden. The ones with the most valid complaints against capitalism do one of two things: they get back to work because they need to survive, or they revolt. They don’t wage ideological war through social institutions. You could argue that the anti-capitalist factions insinuated themselves into feminism to a greater and greater degree as time went on, but it absolutely was not founded as an anti-capitali…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 03:33 PM
2

tried Works real well when the police oversee investigations against themselves. Let’s let judges get a slice of that action.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 03:18 PM
38

FYI: I’m single and my options will remain until I meet the right person. Says it all, really.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/19 10:24 PM
3

All except the ones named Veronica and Betty hated it but couldn’t say why. It was weird.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 04:00 PM
1

The Woozle Effect.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 03:55 PM
6

At this point I wouldn’t be surprised if it was simple sampling bias. ‘We surveyed 1000 boys and 1000 girls, and more girls said that bullies made them sad than boys!’ Well, sure. The boys who would have told you that weren’t surveyed because you can’t survey a corpse.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 03:53 PM
7

That’s just plain untrue, that nobody gives a shit what feminists think. It’s bullshit that they’re given so much attention, but they have government departments, and are the prevailing dogma behind most social policy, media messaging, and academic discourse. To say that nobody gives a shit what they think is just flat out denial, and it isn’t helping anyone. Edit: I’m wrong, it is helping someone. It’s helping them. They derive a not-small amount of their clout from the perception that they’re …
/r/MensRights09/05/19 03:40 PM
2

Top 1%? Nationally that means you make almost half a million a year. In some places about $750k. These aren’t people making ‘go out to eat without thinking about the costs’ money. These are ‘buy a motorcycle without thinking about the cost’ people. Lets go down the list: control bills and finances No. The accountant and financial manager do that. take care of the kids When the nanny, private school, and tutor isn’t, sure. promote the guy’s product or job Nobody would be using Windows if not for …
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:39 AM
2

At that tier, the SAHW isn’t running the finances. The accountant and investment manager are.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:26 AM
2

... who are you? I mean, I wish you well, but what does anyone get from a goodbye letter telling us how disappointed you are?
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:20 AM
2

It’d be amazing to see the sparks fly when some groups have to decide between trans-acceptance and Bad Orange Man being the first female president.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:14 AM
1

So here’s a story you might find interesting. I was in college when 9/11 happened. Without giving too many details, I was in an overwhelmingly male student body very close to New York City. In the days and weeks following the event, when nobody was sure about anything except ‘there’s going to be boots on the ground and blood spilled for this’ there was a definite mood. We were all pretty anxious, we all remembered signing up. Some of the women picked up on the mood, and I heard more than one req…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:17 PM
3

No, you start with the specifics first, then generalize. Why is the justice system against men? Present the mountain of data. Why is the media against men? Present the data. Why are corporations against men? Present the data. Why are governments against men? Present the data. Then eventually you write the why is society against men paper and cite the previous ones. This gets you five or more papers, and the grants/tenure/citations/etc. associated with them instead of just one. All the research y…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:08 PM
2

To add to this, there’s a third reason in the case of certain issues. It’s similar to but not the same as your second. I won’t speak for everyone, but I’ll give you a specific example from my own point of view. I don’t like the draft. But my current political position is not ‘abolish the draft’, it’s ‘require women to register.’ Because the fact of the matter is that the draft will never disappear as long as it applies to only men. The way to get rid of unfair rules or norms isn’t to appeal to p…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:01 PM
23

Really anxious too, pushing around a baby carriage before the baby’s born.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 12:29 AM
6

We live in a society that expects women to be responsible for raising children and controlling the rate at which they have children which leaves men stripped of this responsibility. I’m amazed by this. Floored. Who does she want ‘to be responsible for controlling the rate at which [women] have children’? Is ‘women can’t be responsible for deciding when to have a child, they need someone else to control that’ the new progressive stance? What fucking planet am I on?!? That’s the straw man they’ve …
/r/MensRights01/05/19 02:16 PM
80

She chose them. Repeatedly. But yeah, it’s the universe’s fault she can’t find a guy who isn’t a piece of shit. She tried everything. She used two dating services.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/19 03:48 PM
1

I hate the attempts to spin things like this as ‘ackshyually misogyny.’ It’s not because we as a culture hate femininity. It’s because we don’t like (note: not hate, but I’ll get to that...) gender nonconformity. We don’t like men who behave like women, and until relatively recently we didn’t like women who behave like men. Conversely, we’ve given admiration to our most masculine men and written poems about and waged wars to protect our most feminine women. The reasons? Who knows? I have my own …
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:40 AM
2

Hell. I believe in prion diseases. I’m sure as hell not rooting for them.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:16 AM
0

You worked for 38 years. You ‘retired.’ Then you went to college. And you’re asking what to expect in ‘the real world,’ even if rhetorically. Something doesn’t add up.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:13 AM
4

Wait, I thought you aren’t supposed to just ask strangers on a date. I thought you should get to know someone in casual, platonic settings before you ask them out, not just harass good looking strangers you know nothing about. Because if you’re following that advice, and you only agree to date someone after you’ve gotten to know them and you still think they’re going to kidnap you or worse, I think it’s fair to call your judgement into question.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:06 AM
1

I don’t think it’s exactly that. ‘Victim’ carries both of those connotations. Namely that something actually happened and that the recipient is a victim. And neither term, carrying those implications, actually implies ‘the named perpetrator is actually guilty.’ They can try to play it that way, but it doesn’t actually. The real reason to push ‘survivor’ over ‘victim’ is that it exaggerates the amount of danger the recipient was in. Survivor implies that your survival wasn’t a given. Victim is us…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 01:10 PM
5

Worse luck for women, as usual. Hold on, I think I just sprained the muscles that roll my eyes.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:14 AM
3

So many that it has a name. Political lesbianism.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:02 AM
2

She’s had a room full of the richest and most famous people on the planet call her to the front of said room so they could tell the world, live, that she was the best one of all of them that year. Multiple times. Of course she feels a bit entitled. Sickening.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 12:57 AM
6

They weren’t women. Bad luck for them.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 12:42 AM
7

Interesting choice of words. Most people wouldn’t say they ‘get’ to suffer oppression.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 10:56 AM
1

I’m not sure if you misunderstood or you’re doubling down on my implied sarcasm.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 10:56 PM
2

It’s very simple, ‘Women’s issues’ are issues affecting women. ‘Men’s issues’ are the issues they have with men. Feminism is about everyone’s issues, you see.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 08:52 PM
4

The actual site like this is twitch. It’s not plumbing and working on cars, it’s ‘playing video games’ (but actually mostly preening and dancing in most cases). OPs cap is a parody of the situation to get people’s disbelieving attention so you can see how insane the idea is without putting on the ‘they’re just boys, fuck it’ blinders.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 08:50 PM
1

Someone should show them the breakdown of who does what percentage of consumer spending.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 08:45 PM
2

The grown ups? Sure, they’re not blameless. OP specifically called out 9-14. In which case, no. Their responsibility is limited as it is in every other part of society because they’re literally children. Their parents might be negligent. The streamers might be predatory. The platform may be both. But the children are not responsible.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 08:42 PM
22

The spin people come up with for this data set would make any billiards champion jealous. This graph hit the front page earlier today, and one of the major counterpoints was that the study also indicated that men flood the top tier of women with messages, and women message more uniformly. As if that indicated that women are more gracious and willing to accept a lower tier man, and men feel entitled to their top tier women. Which completely ignores the lesson that this graph teaches: women only a…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:39 AM
20

Fortunately she didn’t succeed. ... yet. This is one of those ‘we have to win repeatedly, they only have to win once’ situations. Stay vigilant.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 05:38 PM
13

In addition to the euphemistic word choice, that copy editor needs to be fired. Was he sleeping with his leg when she beat him, or did she beat him with his leg while he was sleeping? Also, cheers to the credited ‘Dailymail reporter.’ Either you’re writing articles for no credit, you’re too ashamed of your work to put your name on it, or you’ve been replaced by a computer. Whichever option is the case, it’s bad news.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 05:36 PM
1

Gah. I misread ‘caregiver’ and went off. This subject makes me touchy. They’re getting custody because ‘caregiver’, yes, for better or worse. Sorry.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 05:31 PM
6

Anyone saying so is making postrationalizations. Until relatively recently, men got primary custody more often than not. Because they were the ones with jobs, they had the resources to raise the children. Then Caroline Norton (an upper-middle class woman who Wikipedia describes as ‘a society beauty’) got divorced and lost her children. She launched a campaign that leaned on the idea that women, being more empathetic and caring, should have responsibility for children during their development. Yo…
/r/MensRights16/04/19 02:44 PM
4

The wars won’t stop. They’ll juggle assignments. Expect to see studies nominally to assess where each gender will be most effective. Then expect to see that men are most effective on the front line because carrying capacity and endurance, and that women are most effective in follow up operations (read: PR among the locals) and operating drones from as far from the bullets as possible.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 09:53 PM
1

I didn’t miss your point. Your point is just wrong. If you’re going to end up forgotten, would you rather have your name praises on the front page of every newspaper in the English speaking world first, or not?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:43 AM
1

That’s actually kind of the point. For curiosity’s sake, if we did find the names of the people responsible for the items on your list, how many would be women? Probably not many. Especially because many items on your list were collaborations such that it doesn’t make sense to credit any one person. But let’s say we just credited team leaders. How many are women? Again, probably not many. Because when a man is ‘responsible,’ the headlines read, ‘Scientists Do Cool Thing’ and the man gets obscure…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 03:28 AM
1

It’s the same story as always. Print the headline above the fold on the front page, and the retraction in two sentences on page 17 of the local news section right up against the crease. For the past day or two, there was a front page post about this woman from each of dozens of subreddits. Today I’ve seen no fewer than three posts about ‘muh incels are saying she isn’t STEM Jesus, what losers!’ on there. The dude with the huge git log on the project saying that people upset about it are dumb ass…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 03:16 AM
2

Find yourself a traditionalist housewife. I mean one of the ones who chose that lifestyle, not one who ended up there. Ask her what the ‘women should be allowed to make their own choices’ crowd thinks of her choice, and how they’ve expressed those thoughts to her.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 09:37 AM
4

But you saw the comment you replied to here, which was posted after it? You have weird usage patterns.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:36 PM
5

I’ve posted about this before but it goes even further than that. The dildo has been around since before recorded history. Museums have stone ones in them. They also have models from the 1600s (you know, when women were repressed property without rights and we didn’t acknowledge their sexuality) that are made with a hole and a pump to shoot fluid. There are woodcuts of ladies with their maids working the pumps. And now, of course, you can walk into any mall in America, find a Spencer’s, and walk…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:32 PM
3

This was posted 33m ago as of right now. 2 hours ago, factsd0ntlie posted an explanation that she didn’t develop the algorithm, she was on a team that did. The conclusion to draw is that you’re willfully choosing to ignore that.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:13 PM
9

No, it’s be news, but the headlines would be ‘scientists produce first picture of black hole.’ The name of the person in her role would be mentioned once, in the second paragraph, in a ‘John Smith, who lead the team, had this to say...’ capacity. The story would be about the accomplishment, not the person.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:11 PM
1

There’s also the possibility that ‘I fight bad guys’ immediately frames anyone who doesn’t agree with you as a bad guy. Not ‘someone I need to understand better’ or ‘someone who needs to understand me better’ or ‘someone who’s making an innocent mistake’ or anything else that might lead to dealing with the difference like rational people. It’s immediately alienating. We’re seeing the effects of that everywhere these days.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 01:10 AM
5

I can’t speak for everyone, but i suspect I’m not exactly alone: It’s not so much that I think 17 year olds can’t consent. It’s that those are the rules they insist we play by, so we’re perfectly justified in insisting they follow suit. You bet your bottom dollar that if Weinstein had slept with a 17 year old actress in a jurisdiction where that was ‘too young’, he could have a notarized statement of intent from everyone involved, a video of her screaming his name in enthusiastic consent, and a …
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:49 AM
5

FWIW, it’s taken on an additional subtext. Some incels have adopted pretty ugly attitudes (bitter, violent, misogynist, etc.) and people who use it as an insult are usually implying that the person they’re insulting are also that way. It’s not just ‘this guy can’t get laid’ it’s ‘this guy is a woman hating psychopath and he can’t get laid.’
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:40 AM
51

Abundance allows pickiness. Imagine you’re hiring for a job. You can only hire people who live in a five mile radius. The best candidate, Adam, may not be so great on a grand scale, but you’ll never see, talk to, meet, or interview anyone better. So you hire Adam. But what if you could hire people from your state? Suddenly your chances of finding someone better than Adam is way better. And you’ll probably find better Bob. So now Adam has competition. And then you look at your country. Now Adam’s…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/19 12:04 AM
26

Dude’s dick must have been so big he added its length to his height measurement.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/19 11:46 PM
2

guy would be considered creepy. The word you want is stalker. He would be a stalker. As in a recipient of legal restriction.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 05:22 AM
7

Hillary Clinton said exactly that in a speech. Before she ran for president. Nobody except us ever brings it up.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 05:17 AM
1

Where are you getting that ‘actual rate’? I don’t have the data to do a call-out, that isn’t what this is. I’m just curious because when you say that you can’t call it 20% because that number comes from the men suspicious enough to run tests, you can’t assume that all three men who run tests are raising their own kids. They could be just not suspicious enough to get it tested, or they’re suspicious but afraid enough that they don’t want to have a piece of paper verifying it.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 05:16 AM
2

Which papers?
/r/MensRights30/03/19 05:13 AM
4

18-30? It’s women rejecting men. The wall hasn’t reversed the economics yet.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 04:57 AM
8

If so, their marketing team is pretty twisted. ‘Domestic strife, blow up your family, end a marriage, start some fights! Only $59.99 from Acme!’
/r/MensRights30/03/19 04:49 AM
2

2014? So she’s what now, 15?
/r/MensRights30/03/19 04:47 AM
5

Doesn’t seem sexist to me. Just observational. They’re right, most guys don’t get that kind of compliment often if ever. They didn’t say it was a good thing, or that they don’t want us to. They actually said they’re sorry we won’t. (Assuming they aren’t being sarcastic, I suppose.)
/r/MensRights30/03/19 04:45 AM
2

In my very first comment, I said ‘this isn’t an argument against equal access.’ You replied that ‘it absolutely is.’ You’ll forgive me for thinking you were arguing against the access to (and the implicit allowance to take the associated risks of) HBC in light of the fact that you explicitly said you were.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 09:52 PM
1

‘Classical artist’ is a broad term. Is he a symphony musician? A chamber player doing wedding gigs? A classical-style painter? The salaries of even just those three vary wildly. My bad on the kids, maybe that specific couple doesn’t have any but they’re on the table in case of the general phenomenon.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 11:40 PM
1

The numbers don’t change the point until they’re on the same order of magnitude at least.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 11:34 PM
3

Can I drink alcohol? That’ll fuck me up. Can I smoke? Can I eat products containing refined sugar? Can depressed people take medicine? Ask one how many they had to go through to find one that works. Ask them about the side effects of the ones that didn’t. What changes am I allowed to risk, according to you?
/r/MensRights28/03/19 11:33 PM
0

I’ll try again within smaller words. ‘The changes female hormonal BC leave on women is devastating.’ (Sic) I agree. ‘I sure as hell ain’t gonna be taking a drug designed to mess around with me like that.’ That’s good. I won’t be taking it either. But neither of those is a reason to deny the choice to other men. Women have the choice. Men should be given the choice. There are some women who take BC knowing the side effects. There would be some men who do it. It’s not my place, and it’s not your p…
/r/MensRights28/03/19 05:27 AM
2

Subjecting the existing members of the field to that survey is, itself, demeaning. The implication is that the majority of them can’t be trusted to come to a common consensus for acceptable culture among themselves and then behave like adults.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:01 PM
3

This isn’t an argument against equal access to birth control for men. It’s an argument for transparency and the right of everyone regardless of gender to make informed decisions. Women’s hormonal birth control is a thing. That cat is out of the bag. It’s not going away. What we should be fighting for now is equality in availability of options for men, and safety and information availability for everyone.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:59 PM
1

If you really, truly want that, your beliefs are in contradiction with feminism. What feminism says it wants is betrayed by the way it collectively acts. Its statements of intent are the velvet glove over the iron fist of its actual agenda. North Korea calls itself the Democratic Peoples’ Republic of Korea. 4.5 of those words are simply false.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:53 PM
1

Not all feminists generalize men. Find me a feminist that doesn’t believe in patriarchy and male privilege. Christina Hoff-Summers doesn’t count. Extra credit: Find me a feminist who has actual power who doesn’t believe in those things. It doesn’t matter if Jane the librarian down the street is a feminist but thinks patriarchy is bullshit. It matters if the head of NOW is that way.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:48 PM
2

Yeah, no. They’ll find that list, maybe tell the girls not to be so silly, and never say anything about it again.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:38 PM
3

All the most rabid feminists are college-aged and/or childless. Yes there’s an aspect of ‘rabid feminists probably aren’t jumping to be domestic goddesses’ selection bias to that observation. But the number of feminists who ‘grow out’ of the more radical ideas is something nobody talks about. I always suspected it’s exactly this effect at work. You’re a frothing ‘all men are rapists’ type when you’re young, hot, and surrounded by other horn dogs, and you can use it to seize some power. Then you …
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:37 PM
1

G E N T L Y G U I D E S.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:27 PM
1

Why were you supporting Joe ‘Where’s Your Child Hidin’?’ Biden anyway?
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:25 PM
3

‘My wife—who can divorce me and take my kids and half my stuff with the blessing of hundreds of thousands of men with millions of guns and the media industry’s billions of dollars—writes articles that reinforce the narrative that’s been the dominant one for sixty or more years, the one that gets people fired or unpersoned for disagreeing with it. I agree with her.’
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:22 PM
5

That’s the key. The major ‘study’ that every 1/4 claim ultimately traces back to is one that gathered its data by telephoning (if I recall correctly, and I mention it because that’ll give you an idea how ‘fresh’ the data is) a bunch of college students (Women. There’s no comparable statistic for men because they didn’t actually talk to any men.), asking them questions, and classifying the respondents as a rape victim or not according to the questioner’s chosen definition of rape. Anyone who answ…
/r/MensRights26/03/19 10:10 PM
2

I hear you. My parents live in an ocean town on the east coast. They bought their house and the land it sits on with cash. At the time my dad was an employee mechanic with a high school education and my mom was a housewife.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 09:19 AM
3

You think they care about doing a good one?
/r/MensRights26/03/19 04:22 AM
1

... it’s in the post OP linked to. It’s a summary conclusion drawn from a a bunch of sources. It’s even emphasized. Must not be interesting enough to you to even make you click a link, huh.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 04:01 AM
1

Law is a fun one to think about. There’s a premise in democratic systems of government that the law is accessible, that the common man should be able to read understand the laws of the land or a contract to which he might be a signatory. But over time it’s evolved into almost another language. That’s partially because common prose isn’t exact enough for legal reasons, and exacerbated by people (malevolently, ignorantly, or innocently) misinterpreting things. (We still argue about the first two a…
/r/MensRights26/03/19 01:57 AM
1

So you have a problem with babies as well as birth control, except barrier methods and (I presume) abstinence? That’s certainly an... interesting world view. At least you won’t be passing it on to any children. I’ll spare you the trouble of clicking. Abortion causes physiological changes, too. But I’m sure you knew that already, because taking such a hard line without knowing what you’re talking about would be an indication of ignorance, and you’re not ignorant.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:46 PM
4

Academics produce reports that declare academics least replacable positions in society, news at 11. Ask any actual mathematician, computer scientist, or AI researcher how close we are to replacing any work that requires judgement or subjectivity. Machine learning shows promise, but its limitations are stark. Relevantly, it learns to do what you tell it to learn to do. What that translates to practically is that you’re just pushing humans one step up a ladder of abstraction. Consider automating a…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:44 PM
8

Unless something changes, they may not be wrong. Handout programs are expanding over time, the trend is established. UBI is a national issue at this point, one the media is pushing pretty hard. There’s an article on the front page right now about how 50% of Americans read at or below an 8th grade level. Do you expect those people to read better analysis of the issue than the newspapers’ summaries? And if they do read it, to understand it? The bigger companies (read: the ones who can pay politici…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:22 PM
4

Like abortion does? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/12777435/
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:14 PM
15

Hell. Make it even more personal. Claim that most women are dumb. If that were not the case, there’d be more of them in STEM. See how long they accept that logic.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:11 PM
5

The ground water’s fucked too. Sorry about that.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:03 PM
6

No way, we should be dumping this stuff into the water table unadulterated and in mass quantities. It’ll cancel out the estrogens that got there through medications/plastics/whatever. Trust me. I’m a stranger in the internet who speaks with conviction.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 09:59 PM
42

The whole situation is ridiculous. The list of side effects on some of these drugs is absolutely insane, and as a nonprofessional but unfortunately too-acquainted-with-medicine person there’s no way to tell which to take seriously. If my medicine has an X% chance of giving me blood clots, I want to know that. On the other hand if one person in your trials develops something, and you’re not 100% sure what caused it, you have to list it as a potential side effect of your drug. So your allergy medi…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 09:56 PM
14

The weirder corners of tumblr (used to, not sure if they still do) use the term ‘goddess sized.’ I’ll be glad if that one never catches on.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 09:45 PM
1

One: “...he is more easily replaceable. Dudes are everywhere, and they’re always available.” Sounds an awful lot like objectification. But that can’t be because objectification is naughty, right? Two: Come talk, dear author, when you’re 30, then again when you’re 40. We’ll see how replaceable and available you find men.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 11:09 PM
1

It isn’t just elections. Ask your local conservative housewife how her more liberal/feminist sisters treat her.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 10:53 PM
56

Dude’s wife took the kid. They had an informal arrangement where he gave her $500/month for child support. She decided it wasn’t enough and took him to court. The court assessed the situation and said she’s only entitled to $238/month, half of what he’d been paying. So he started paying less. Now she’s slamming him for being a ‘deadbeat.’ She gives/gave him no credit for doing extra unasked, just shame for doing only what he’s required to do after she took the gloves off.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 08:15 AM
12

Hot take: The boys were creative, trying to come up with their own ways to determine the leader. The girls just did what the book told them to do.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 11:48 PM
4

I have no idea who this person is. I read your comment. I scrolled past. Then I had a sad realization, and came back to comment this. I had no question that there would be an article written about someone whose relevance can be conveyed by the phrase ‘her anti-Kavanaugh tweet went viral.’ It was ready to go under the radar that people give a shit—or are being told to give a shit, if tinfoil’s your style—about someone whose only noteworthy contribution was writing a bumper sticker. I need a drink…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/19 08:41 AM
3

Keep on picking that cotton, guys. It’ll get better if we keep on singing our spirituals!
/r/MensRights20/03/19 03:58 AM
3

As many people here have pointed out, trying to paint the various branches of the ‘manosphere’ (as much as I hate that term, it’s a convenient one) as somehow responsible for crazies is just a flat out smear job. That out of the way, what’s your game? I’m not playing the ‘this guy posts on X, so unperson him!’ game, but questions like this often indicate someone who’s coming in hoping to quote mine responses for the sake of said smear job so I had to check and see before replying. Your question’…
/r/MensRights20/03/19 03:53 AM
4

Pay special attention when she tells him the little black girl is going to build her own spaceship, he says, ‘I don’t know about that.’ and she smugs at him long enough to crack out, ‘No. You don’t.’ Thank you, ‘pretty’ blonde white woman who has accidental superpowers, for reminding the odd looking black dude who got where he is by training and effort not to judge people. He sure needed to be put back in his place!
/r/MensRights19/03/19 12:38 AM
17

I feel like there’s a lurking threat behind this type of app that nobody’s mentioning. If they do ever get off the ground in a non man-bites-dog sense, you’ll almost be forced into needing to have and use one every single time. Why? The general public has gone completely off the rails and either can’t understand or is willing to abandon such concepts as ‘censoring people you disagree with is a net loss to the fabric of society’ and ‘innocent until proven guilty is pretty neat.’ What do you think…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/19 12:20 AM
12

App: Takes consent so seriously it tries to maintain valid legal evidence of its presence. Douchebag: ‘[The app] indicates a culture of nonchalance around consent...’
/r/TheRedPill19/03/19 12:14 AM
11

Hell, in some sense it’s even for people who don’t. Feminists, for example, are free to come talk with us even if they can expect a somewhat chilly reaction. On the other hand, for example, OP is probably already banned from the feminism sub just for making this post.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 12:08 AM
6

Debtors prison is illegal in America. It’s illegal to jail someone for debt with two exceptions (and your state may take advantage of them or not on a state by state basis): Unpaid court fees. Unpaid child support. Make of that what you will.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 12:04 AM
3

What do the absolute numbers look like? If 20% of men is a smaller absolute number than 78% of women, it’s not those men competing for women as the article frames it.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/19 09:33 AM
1

Why vilify him? Because he went on a rampage. He’s not absolved of guilt because of bad circumstances. The single mother -> criminal link is something we also need to talk about. However, it doesn’t exonerate him any more than ‘I had to kill him, he beat me’ exonerates women who make that claim. Edit: Just reread the general ‘men’ in the title. My point stands but it’s something of a non sequitor, I suppose. Men aren’t guilty even if this one is.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 11:27 PM
1

That article keeps using suspicious phrasing. They say that both genders say they have ‘shared input’ concerning purchases, or they have ‘control and influence.’ Without better insight concerning how they come to those numbers—specifically the questions they ask and the definitions they use—I’m not on board with their conclusions. I like Nathan’s hot dogs. I can ask for Nathan’s hot dogs. But when my wife goes to the grocery store she’s the one pulling the trigger. She can buy any brand she want…
/r/MensRights17/03/19 11:12 PM
8

Spot on, but I thought I’d mention: Men do find ‘well dressed’ attractive. The problem is that men and women have entirely different opinions about what it means for a woman to be well dressed. ‘Designer slacks and flats’ isn’t catching any men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/19 10:55 PM
2

It’s not just aesthetics. There are other factors that can be in play at any given time. It’s rarity: I snagged an exotic and exciting one. It’s control: Westerners (especially Americans) have it beat into their bones to please women. Local guys might be henpecked but they’re not going to apologize and write a pleading post on AITA because they went out for beers after work and the Mrs got angry. It’s different expectations: related to the last one, his idea of how a woman in a relationship shou…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:33 PM
6

I’ve been using men’s public restrooms my whole life. Not giving a number, but let’s say enough years to have a pretty good idea how they work. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a dick in one besides my own. In light of that fact and this article, I have questions. Does the author think we just run around sword fighting and helicopter spinning? Do you guys just run around sword fighting and helicopter spinning, and I just happen to come in during the break? Do women walk around with their pants off i…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:10 PM
4

She was brought in to tackle a pervasive culture of sexism and sexual harassment.... Now, she says she has changed her priorities and wants to promote feminist causes. Do they realize the implication of these two statements? Because I don’t think they realize the implication of these two statements.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 06:39 PM
2

The segregation isn’t as absolute as that. A frat house is just like having a bunch of guy roommates renting a house together. They usually live on or near campus, and there’s often a street or two that’s all fraternity/sorority houses. You could be living next to a house with as many members of the opposite sex as your house has of yours. In addition, a lot of Greek organizations are paired. I forget what they call it, but a fraternity and a sorority will work together to plan and attend social…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 06:26 PM
8

Believe me, I get it, but you said their projects rely on these women’s ‘excellent communication skills’ to happen, and that’s just not true. I’m in tech. Their communication skills aren’t excellent. They’re not keeping things together. Unless you were being sarcastic and I whooshed, in which case I’ll go sit in the corner.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/19 01:52 AM
8

Excellent communication skills, you say? Are they as good at communication as Weihan and Amit are at coding?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/19 01:30 AM
1

Someone tell me if I’m crazy. I read about experiments like this, and I hear people talking, and the conclusion is always m, ‘women are so much more empathetic than men.’ But in most cases it doesn’t actually show that. It shows that women don’t want people to feel bad. What I’m getting at is that I understood empathy to be a quality that allows you to understand and consider others’ feelings even if (especially if) they differ from yours. And what I see here doesn’t actually show that. The girl…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 11:51 PM
2

It’s a social club and networking thing. There nominally an aspect of unity for self improvement (with your brothers there to both support you and hold you accountable) and/or some social cause like furthering the goals of charity by doing good works. But it’s practically also a way to meet and get close to people like yourself, with benefits that stretch outside the school. Alumni will ask among brothers when they’re filling job positions, or will ask the organizations members for help if they …
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:06 PM
2

Even in cases of boys raised outside abusive environments. The vast majority of single parents are mothers. In two parent heterosexual households, the mother holds the reins while raising children (a fact feminists will not stop complaining about, why doesn’t dad step up more, raising kids being women’s work is sexist, blah blah blah). Outside the home children are socialized by teachers, who are overwhelmingly women. If we’re to believe that socialization is the cause of all this horrible stuff…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:01 PM
1

There’s a lot of begging the question going on here. That one question, #5, that asks if you think the wage gap is fair, for example. Without actually defining ‘the wage gap’ you’re counting on the reader to intuit what wage gap you mean, and you’re assuming you’ll both be talking about the same thing. Then you assert that it exists. And there are many people here—myself among them—who disagree. It doesnt exists, except as a phantom resulting from the dishonest manipulation of statistics. But th…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 10:55 PM
6

Phones too big: You want small phones? Pay for them. They’re out there. ‘But the flagship superphones are all big!’ Yup. Because (A) they sell and (B) if they weren’t, people would bitch that Facebook looks shitty on their tiny screen. Have your cake or eat it. Chilly offices: Put on more clothes. Your dress code is way more lenient than men’s, it’s harder/impossible for them to take off clothes. So either present them with an inconvenience (And that’s what this is, that’s what all of these are.…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 10:37 PM
1

I get it. I didn’t say technical solutions were better than social ones. Just easier.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 10:28 PM
1

You can’t fix someone who is committed to their ignorance.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:09 AM
1

Because technical solutions are easier than social ones.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:49 AM
1

I don’t know about Denmark but the Japanese government is shitting itself because young people aren’t having kids. But there’s definitely an attempt being made there to head off the catastrophe it’ll cause if allowed to continue.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:48 AM
0

Is that Christian Science Monitor as in ‘the planet is 6000 years old’ Christian Science?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:28 AM
2

Fair enough, you were there, not me. I was just spitballing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 11:50 PM
1

It’s possible they were showing you off. If nobody gets out of town, but they see Jennifer dating some dude from Notaroundhere, she gets bonus points for having one foot outside the bubble.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 10:04 PM
33

Some of those pics look like she just peeked into the Ark of the Covenant.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 09:52 PM
6

MPDG is such a specific thing to be wondering about that she wouldn’t be wondering it out of the blue. In other words, if you wonder if your profile ‘screams MPGD’, it does. You advertise a bike for sale, don’t be surprised when bikers show up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 09:51 PM
5

Everywhere. You just don’t know because they’re ashamed to speak up. It makes perfect sense. It’s the correlary of the fact we’re all familiar with, that 90% of supermodels are secretly looking for dad-bod paper pushers but are just to ashamed to say anything.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 09:37 PM
1

The tooth fairy stole it.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:41 PM
2

The thing about wall-victims trying to keep younger women out of the competition happens, but I don’t think this is actually that. This pamphlet explicitly points out that ‘he can drink and you can’t’ and has a warning about statutory rape laws. This pamphlet is aimed at teenagers. High school girls dating college guys. If it was a warning against even older guys it’d be even rougher.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:28 PM
1

That second paragraph is the key. If you’re in second place and you can make something happen that makes everyone move up except the winner, it doesn’t matter if the person in tenth place moves up eight spots and you only move up one, you’re still the new winner.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:18 PM
2

gazillion-zillion-billion That’s a funny way of spelling ‘thousand.’ $800 thousand.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:15 PM
1

I’m sure someone who hatched that plan would react well when the employees reported daily encounters with freaks coming in to make the jokes sane people would see coming from miles away.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:12 PM
1

Linking to other subs is a grey area because the sub behind the link can say it was a call to brigade and the admins can use it as an excuse to punish the linker. If you’re seriously interested, go look there (or anywhere) for articles or posts about ‘emotional labor,’ that’s the phrase they use to talk about it.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:05 PM
1

Show me your Hellfires, baby.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:38 PM
1

So? I feel underrepresented in boardrooms. I’m a white man and they certainly aren’t representing me. They aren’t representing anyone but themselves. Besides which, think about what this implies. I can’t say think about what it means, because they don’t actually explain what it means and I can’t find their source. If you’re a woman in STEM, your presence itself argues that representation isn’t what’s keeping women’s numbers down. If you’re not a woman in STEM, why not? Any reason you could give …
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:28 PM
1

Oh god she’s going to paper cut her lip get it out of my head.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:21 PM
2

Before we try this, is it ‘don’t let my family see my browser history’ illicit or ‘beep beep I’m on the party van invitation list’ illicit?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:20 PM
1

The CDC is sponsored by the government and (nominally, at least) staffed by American scientists. That’s their only authority. The only modern nations that agree with them also happen to be heavily religiously tilted governments and/or dependent on American economic support. Every other modern nation’s equivalent of the CDC says circumcision is unnecessary and has no medical benefits for the normal male. So in one hand, America and a handful of religious sycophants. On the other, the rest of he s…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:15 PM
1

It’s exactly the scam Scientology runs to recruit people. They hook you up to their magic gizmo that tells you your Thetans are out of whack, but don’t worry, donate to the Church and we can fix you, hallelelujah and praise Xenu. In this case, they hook you up to their magic gizmo that tells you you’re abusive, but don’t worry, pay our counselors and we’ll stop you from being a Bad Man.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:09 PM
3

The people involved in the movie baited trolls, making up a narrative that white men are up in arms about it because of their soggy knees. (I would probably argue that they did that because it’ll get them rah-rah-stick-it-to-the-man ticket sales and publicity articles from the usual suspects, but that’s editorializing.) Then people started to complain because they don’t like billion dollar companies putting words in their mouths to paint them as assholes, and started pointing out the pandering a…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 10:57 PM
12

I still suspect there’s a life insurance factor involved.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/19 06:34 PM
7

Sure there should be. The fact that there isn’t is a combination of factors, but mentioning them generally makes people immediately dismiss you as a crazy so surely that I’ve felt it necessary to beat around the bush through even this conversation. So whatever, here goes. A combination of feminism, a well-documented bias in all humans towards the well being of women even to the detriment of men, and a similar lack of a bias towards the well being of men especially when it might cost women mean t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 06:39 AM
21

People do track it. And report on it. It usually ends up with them being no-platformed, fired, or otherwise pariah’d. The woman who founded the first DV shelters spoke to the people taking advantage of them, and found that most DV cases were both members of a couple beating on each other, most of those were the guy retaliating, and the non-reciprocal cases were about as likely to be women hitting their men than vice versa. She was driven out of the movement she started, and had to move and have …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 05:53 AM
18

Hahahahahaha! Oh wait. Are you asking that seriously?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 05:07 AM
1

women for all intents and purposes didn’t have rights You lost me.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter