TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wantonton Archive

View 26 posts and 1,185 comments by wantonton on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
301

Red Pill Theorywantonton/r/TheRedPill27/12/16 06:29 PM
169

Red Pill Theorywantonton/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 01:07 PM
153

Red Pill Theorywantonton/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 08:42 PM
134

Red Pill Examplewantonton/r/TheRedPill22/02/17 05:58 PM
117

Red Pill Theorywantonton/r/TheRedPill13/12/16 06:51 PM
65

Red Pill Theorywantonton/r/TheRedPill25/04/16 03:52 PM
57

Field Reportwantonton/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 08:21 PM
54

Red Pill Theorywantonton/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 07:03 PM
50

Red Pill Theorywantonton/r/TheRedPill04/01/15 07:56 PM
46

Metawantonton/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 02:42 PM
37

DISCUSSIONwantonton/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 07:23 PM
33

Metawantonton/r/TheRedPill01/12/17 09:42 PM
30

Red Pill Examplewantonton/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 10:46 PM
22

wantonton/r/RedPillWomen15/01/15 06:30 PM
18

Red Pill Theorywantonton/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 11:54 PM
12

Metawantonton/r/TheRedPill03/05/17 01:09 PM
11

Metawantonton/r/TheRedPill30/10/15 08:37 PM
9

wantonton/r/MarriedRedPill28/10/14 01:57 PM
6

Metawantonton/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 10:16 PM
4

wantonton/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 05:31 PM
1

Off Topicwantonton/r/TheRedPill15/07/16 07:24 PM
0

Red Pill Examplewantonton/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 04:22 PM
0

Red Pill Theorywantonton/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 07:28 PM
0

Red Pill Theorywantonton/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 04:17 PM
0

Red Pill Examplewantonton/r/TheRedPill03/03/17 06:06 PM
0

wantonton/r/MarriedRedPill11/06/15 10:16 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,185 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

This isn't to tell you what to do, but explain why it happened. First, she wasn't wanting marriage, she was jealous of the attention and social boost her friend was getting via the wedding. She wanted that as well, that's all. (Giving her an exciting exotic trip ripe for selfies likely would have diffused this). When you dumped her, her social standing tanked and she was standing there with egg on her face. She couldnt exactly tell everyone, especially that friend getting commitment, that her bf…
/r/askTRP27/02/18 02:36 AM
33

Except, that you've lost the single most important atractant--social proof. She wanted you because someone else had you. Now you're not only alone, but you've been dumped for someone "better." Friend will be too busy eye fucking new bf to even see you. Forget them; move on; build your circle creating ongoing social proof from friends; slay more pussy.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/18 07:39 PM
1

CONTEXT! This is a sub about attracting women and a post about social orientation. Yes you can be isolated and successful--in some metrics. But, when one of your goals is social standing/influence/etc, beware the Scrooge effect. He was enourmously wealthy and with no friends. Why? Because everyone knew association with him could not benefit them. But, once he changed--everyone was his friend immediately. Why, because he had so much they could get from him.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/18 04:43 PM
22

I'm fairly certain she never filed a police report. All of her accusations were made on her blog site.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 01:05 PM
46

The only thing you can control is yourself. You'd be surprised, though, at how much influence doing that well will give you.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/18 11:14 PM
14

Evryone wants to get on the gravy train. If you're having great amounts of success, people will gravitate towards you. They'll have different overt ajendas and they'll have differing levels of social graces, but they'll all hope to benefit by proximity to you. If noone is gravitating towards you, it's because noone sees value in you.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/18 08:07 PM
3

She's an opportunity for you to develop your social skills. If what you're doing isn;t working, change what you're doing. Perhaps try to get her to qualify herself.
/r/askTRP16/02/18 11:06 PM
2

No, you dont put yourself in this kid's life. Build your life for yourself. But, leave the door open for the child to always come be a part of your life. If you build it they will come. If you maintain the first mindset, the child will be the chains mom uses enslave you for the rest of your life. You are the prize. They either see that or lose out.
/r/MarriedRedPill13/02/18 01:37 PM
36

Absolutely. When she tells this story to her friends and future boyfriends, and she will, OP will unequivicaly be an abusive, mysoginisitc monster who wrongly judged her for things having no bearing on him. This will only reinforce for her and others how evil men are and how justified women are for behaving this way.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/18 08:51 PM
16

The difference between then and now is societie's expectation for women. Today, women are not expected to have integrity, honor, or loyalty. Therefore, one can freely analize a situation involving women without having to factor in how she did or didn't act. In the case of Weistein, the fact that he didn't recognize that she was entitled to what he had by virtue of her being a woman and he a man is the crime. If he'd have just done what she was entitled to have him do, then her character would ne…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/18 08:47 PM
3

Take special note of what she told you: "What does she have that I don't?" She wanted to marry him. She's not with him because he wouldn't propose. If he'd have proposed, she'd have never been with you (as a gf anyway).
/r/askTRP09/02/18 08:52 PM
2

Giving her the best possible benefit of the doubt, here is how you break down her situation from her point of view: She blows him and his real g.f. finds out--she is trashed socially and looses status and the sisterhood attacks and brands her a slut her for betraying one of her own and likely gets dumped because she blew him. So, a net loss for her. She blows him and her b.f. finds out--she gets dumped is known as a cheater and easy to other men, and may risk retaliation from the sisterhood if i…
/r/askTRP09/02/18 05:01 PM
8

If you want to see women freak the fuck out, just stop and walk away. Not from a conversation or a room, from everything. No declarations of intent, no follow up, no conversations, no checking up--a complete denial that what ever it is even exists. Social inclusion is to women what sex is to men. I don't know of a single man I've ever respected who did not go through an extended period of "isolation" be it mental or physical and come out stronger because of that. In fact, that usually becomes th…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 11:48 PM
4

Porn, TRP porn. Keep mentally masturbating your brain with visions of comeupances for women who don't even know you're alive.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 11:43 PM
11

Solitude is the strength of men and the death of women. Once you fully understand that, you can see why society has simultaneously chained boys to society while isolating them from men.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 04:14 PM
5

Overly dramatic presentation, but solid advice.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 08:57 PM
4

I straight up asked her, if she feels anything for me, other than friendship. My mistake was doing this while she was layed down on the sofa and I was on another sofa, not really close to her, I couldn't escalate physically Your mistakes were two fold: 1. You said anything at all. Acta non verba. Do it, don't talk about doing it. Girls talk. Once you started talking abour feelz and relationships you became her girldfriend. 2. You Straight Up asked her! You began the whole interaction by absolute…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 07:53 PM
10

Excuse? I'm not justifying anything. I'm explaining. Do what you need to do and let others act the same. As for the decrease in sex, that proves my point, she back tracked the relationship on her end to meet what she thought she was getting from him: no resources commitment = no sex. She was trying to establish an equalibrium, she just grossly miscalculated her value. No point in closing the barn while the cow is out. I agree she is NOT entitled to anything from him. If he isn't giving it enthus…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 05:49 PM
29

There is actually a reason behind her actions: You said they'd been dating for about 4 years. To her that likley made her feel she was in a secure relationship. She was giving her part and he was giving his. Then, she gained additional information; i.e., he had a lot more resources he could commit to her but was not. That scared her and made her rethink the stability of their relationship and his commitment. A male correlary goes: we're together and sex is a huge part of our relationship, so we …
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 03:43 PM
5

she admitted it to me and begged me not tell our mom she still lives for my mom That explains it all. No mention of Dad. It's Dad's job to keep dauthers off all poles.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 05:03 PM
7

Here is a tried and true method, but it does eliminate the "romance," "spontaneity," and other such nonsense. Buy a set of but plugs that are progressive in size; the smallest about the size of your finger to the largest being bigger than your thumb with several steps in between. Get an ass douche as well. Again, this is NOT romantic, but why the fuck should you care. If she's not just manipulating you and really is into you, she'll do this. First, douche her ass a time or two to make sure it's …
/r/askTRP12/01/18 04:20 AM
13

Can we change the banner to UHD?
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 09:51 PM
12

Women have no loyalty except to themselves. Their MO for survival is social positioning. They have a certain place in their own society. If something threatens that society and thereby her secure place in it she will fight and demand others fight to protect that society and thereby her. If however, she perceives that no such defense or no such meaningful defense will be mounted, rather than wast time and energy into fighting a lost cause she will actually begin to embrace that likely new society…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 09:27 PM
2

The laws themselves were written in a gender neutral language. They are to be applied equally to men and women as dictated by the situation. The laws that were written were chosen to be written based on known tendencies to act along gender lines. A man can benefit as much as a women, if only he'll make himself like a woman. As your example illustrates, she the ambitious go getter. He's the tag along content to let her do all the work while he goes out and plays. He made himself a woman, he was r…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 09:20 PM
1

I don't think you two are agreeing, I think you missed everyone of his points.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/18 10:25 PM
2

I don't think you two are agreeing, I think you missed everyone of his points.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/18 10:25 PM
0

Uh, he's gay.
/r/askTRP06/01/18 02:09 PM
1

Pedestals are great--as long as you're what on it. Otherwise they are horrible.
/r/askTRP05/01/18 08:09 PM
14

Current feminism is simply unbridled greed and hate. The only equality they care about is equality of outcome. "He has it, therefore I should have it." The problem with this mentality and reality is that it deprives such recipients of the pride of accomplishment. Therefore those who are accomplishing must be denigrated until they too are deprived of the pride of their accomplishments. The end result is what we now see--women don't want to be men, they are demanding that men must become women.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/18 12:52 PM
1

With your personality issues--you're probably right.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 06:16 PM
1

First, why would you want to lie to her or otherwise deceive or manipulate her? Those issues from women are shit tests anyway. The issue isn't what you want but what she wants. What she's obliquely telling you is that the only thing she's getting out of this is sex and she wants more. It's up to you to see if she's worth it or not. Assuming you think she's worth it, don't be a fool and think that what she wants is commitment. What she wants is more tingles before, during and after sex. Commitmen…
/r/askTRP04/01/18 05:35 PM
2

It can absolutely happen on the same night.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 05:15 PM
5

Short and direct diagnosis. You have a MASSIVE chip on your shoulder. You don't want to improve, you--just like a woman--want to be able to say you weren't wrong. You aren't doing anything to improve your life, you're marking off a checklist so yo can say you did everything you were supposed to so that you can further say your life isn't your fault. It's simple, you are a one way street. You only see people in terms of what they are or can do for you. You have no self awareness except that lurki…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 04:26 PM
7

No. And you should understand that completely given all the women who've said it to you before. No one here can, or will, do anything for you and most certainly cannot do anything worthwhile for you. It's 100% on you; swallow it or don't. You either care enough to improve your life or you don't. The convincing comes from your application.
/r/askTRP04/01/18 03:57 PM
3

Yes! That's solid advice. Risk your life and well being for someone else's benefit. Directionless--the military will teach you to run towards the hale of fire. No cause/system of belief--the military will teach you to fight the good fight to further enrich old money war profiteers. Undisciplined--the military will teach you how to wake up early and struggle all day to better kill people you've never met and never hurt you but who might pose a threat to some old man's fortune or some young cunt's…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/18 11:35 PM
11

What the fuck does their relative's treatment have to do with how they feel? If grand daddy has to get a beat down, so what the fuck if I feel good? If he were truly a good man, he'd want me to feel this way even if he had to suffer for it. Stop expecting them to be rational.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/18 11:30 PM
8

That's a habituation of the female environment. Women are completely bound, psychologically, to the hive mind. Don't fuck with the in group and never shake the status quo. So, if you can't break out or change, how the fuck is a woman supposed to progress up in the social ranks? By being the biggest contributor to the group and thereby showing her importance and dedication. Grand ma was making sure you knew how important she was and ensuring that you were sufficiently awed. She's talking about ho…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/18 11:27 PM
13

Because the PB has conditioned you to believe that women want a match or a soulmate, they don't they want an avenue up. You've also been conditioned to believe they are rational and will act in their own best interests. They aren't, they are emotional teenagers. Most DT type personalities often (appear to) live exciting social lives. The crowd is king for women. Women never ever want enough, they always want more. More excitement, more attention, more emotions. The epiphany phase isn't when a wo…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/18 11:20 PM
15

I'll piggy back on this excellent post for those in TRP still struggling with their religious/Christian upbringing. A lot of Christians try to shame men by saying they should forgive women their pasts just as Jesus forgave multiple promiscuous women. My replies to those are always two fold: 1) he said forgive them, he never said marry them; and 2) (and this is the important one) look at what those women had to do to obtain that forgiveness: they had to publicly come clean and reveal all (the pro…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/17 06:42 PM
17

Social status. The more people who want to be with/near you, the more she'll want to be near/with you. Remember women are solipsistic. They are programmed to take from the group. SO if you can take from the group and she's with you--then she can take from the group in same amount you can (that's the fundamental of coupling from the female perspective). The closer to the center/resource pool of that group, the better off they are. The larger the group, the more resources flowing in. So, be the ce…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/17 06:30 PM
100

It's very simple: if he doesn't have a great, fun, exciting life, how the hell is she going to get her life to be that way? You think she will go out and put in the hard work of making herself and her life interesting? No fucking way. She's going to wave the pussy in the face of someone who's already done all the heavy lifting and get it that way--just like God intended.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/17 06:59 AM
12

You'll move out the the exact moment you've exhausted your infinite number of excuses, and not a moment before.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:11 PM
9

Family is the end all be all. That doesn't mean it can be achieved. The other issue to be aware of is the almost ubiquitous phenomenon of "We are all using the same words, be we are using different definitions." When the FI says; "family" it does NOT mean a family unit of close kin working together for future benefits and continuity under a relatively homogeneous identity." No, what it means is, "What ever the fuck the women wants at that moment." Women cannot differentiate between themselves an…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 04:07 PM
1

You don't need your house, car, clothes etcetera. If fact, without them you'd likely develop a whole new skill set, outlook, and personal best. That said, if I tried to take those things from you, I believe you'd fight me tooth and nail. That's why you can't pull people out of the bp mindset--it's sole purpose is comfort. People won't give that up. They have to let the bp reality naturally run out of comfort--only then will they look around, not for reality and truth, but for comfort.
/r/askTRP19/12/17 10:22 PM
1

The Bible makes a lot of statements about marriage and extramarital sex. Collectively, those passages were written over a span of about 2,000 years. So you need to be more specific about you questions. As for the NT, I clearly read it as saying men shouldn't get married and if they do, celibacy is the likely result and an outcome to be strongly guarded against.
/r/askTRP19/12/17 10:11 PM
1

Exactly. 99 times out of a hundred she pulled the trigger on the real father, without regards to him or what it would do to her kids. Don't think for a second she won't do it to you just because it's Tuesday.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/17 11:07 PM
11

You grant LTR status as a reward for good behavior, and not because of your growing oneitus. This is based primarily on how much of a priority she makes you. As your place as number one priority in her life slips, so does the LTR. Most women want something more than just a quick lay from most of their (potential) partners (there's nothing you can do about the "you're so hot fuck me in the restroom" guy). As she begins to invest in another she will begin to redirect her time and energy away from …
/r/askTRP17/12/17 11:05 PM
3

It's the best possible advice for anyone who needs to be handed the answers.
/r/askTRP17/12/17 10:29 PM
2

Did it ever occur to you that they are giving you advice in those responses?
/r/askTRP17/12/17 10:12 PM
2

Porn, fapping, gambling, high adrenaline activities; it's all the same; excuses you hide behind because you life isn't meeting your expectations. It's easier to go to McDonalds and eat a greasy burger than to make a healthy meal, that doesn't mean you're addicted to McDonalds, it just means you're lazy. There are studies on addiction in rats. Most show a strong correlation between the rat's environment and its propensity for addition. Stress it out=addition. Give it a healthy environment with go…
/r/TheRedPill10/12/17 01:19 AM
1

You're addicted to fapping like I'm addicted to breathing. Both are biological imperatives meant to ensure life continues. You have significant mental confusion going on. A) you are failing to be the person you believe you should be. As a result you are acting out your internal self disgust. B) You believe that fapping indicates you are less than you should be. That feed unto A. C) You are using A and B as covers and excuses as to why you aren't who you should be. It's easier to talk than it is …
/r/TheRedPill10/12/17 12:58 AM
10

No. You're still stuck the BP mindset that says the human condition is nothing more than a social construct. Human behavior is ultimately dependent upon evolutionary cause and effect. Women may have a secondary, lesser emotional reaction to social pressures, but they have an overriding primary reaction to biology.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/17 07:54 PM
4

No, she wants a puppy in her pocket. She can't help but sploosh when she rubs the wolf hound and he doesn't rip off her arm.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/17 10:10 PM
17

And the blue pill prophet speaks...
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 02:53 PM
0

Your father didn't and doesn't owe you anything. It's clear you aren't concerned about him, but that you are trying to gauge how much he gypped you out of your due.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 12:11 PM
1

Specifically because he wrote a TRP post using the constraints of academic scholarship.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/17 04:39 AM
1

Yes and no. There is no "Hindi" or "Hindu" religion. But Brahmic teaching and traditions are very old. And pre-Brahmic Aryon belief systems are far older still.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 06:43 PM
2

The Epic of Gilgamesh is technically Assyrian, but records of its stories can be dated back as far as 2,100 B.C. and there is strong evidence that they were known throughout the whole regions. So, people living in Babylon during it's high period almost certainly would have been aware of most of the stories.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 04:44 PM
1

Judaism borrowing from the Babylonian traditions is more closely akin to forced assimilation than what you were describing. Judaism, as illustrated through the Torah and subsequent works, began to coalesce during a forced captivity of elite Jews in Babylonia. It was not some Jews sitting in Jerusalem appreciating the works of people 500 miles away in Babylon and deciding to incorporate them. Several generations of Jews educated in the Babylonian environment used their knowledge when deciding/bei…
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 02:38 AM
39

Not a long time, just a lifetime.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 01:24 AM
1

I never gave you anything from wikipedia.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 12:35 AM
1

Depends on your definition of marriage: pair bonding? probably much older than society. Religion? it's a societal construct as is legal marriage. It was likely religion that created the desire to articulate what would be a legal marriage.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 10:30 PM
0

Several things: Religion is very likely not 200,000 years old. Superstition and organised ritual activity is likely much older. Definition is of key importance here. Yours may be different than mine, so I don't think anyone every realized the similarities in various religions and said "screw it" lets just join them (except maybe Mohammed with Islam). More likely similar pressures caused similar societal formation with allowed assimilation between similar peoples and ideologies.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 10:27 PM
0

You're clearly not half as smart as you think you are. Science in its modern usage derives from the scientific method. The scientific method relies on, as a fundamental keystone, the ability to repeat findings and experiments. It is the capacity for replication that necessitates and validates peer review. Can peers replicate the process. Otherwise peer review simply devolves into a peanut gallery of politics "i.e. our current western academic situation." Your above reply repeatedly acknowledges …
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 10:21 PM
13

You're not wrong, but you are looking at it from a too narrow perspective. Using your watch analogy; there's no need to have a watch at all any more given the ubiquity of timekeepers in society. We have everything from huge, multi-million dollar clock towers which chime the time across town, to radio and tv broadcasts constantly telling the time, to bank signs flashing the time and temp to phones and countless other devices people carry with the time. There is no reason whatsoever to shell out m…
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 02:34 PM
23

Religion did not arise to regulate monogamy, pair bonding, or sexual activity in any way. Evidence suggests that religion is at least 12,000 years old. Judaism, the oldest currently practiced major religion, is, at most, 4,000 years old. Religion arose as a proto-science attempt to understand natural phenomena such as weather and animal tendencies. This evolved into practices which became rituals which became generational traditions. As societies coalesced religion then evolved accordingly. The …
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 01:38 PM
176

Number 5 is spot on. The ironic thing is the first person who told me that was a woman, and not just any woman, but the mom of my then girl friend. She new I could have gotten hotter, but she advised they'd never love me like someone like her daughter would.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 02:13 AM
1

Because most of the women using those agencies are looking for marriage. Marriage is a raw deal for a man no matter how he finds it. If you exclude that, then absolutely agencies looking to bring men and women together with no expectations of commitment are fantastic. In fact, TRP routinely encourages their use, especially those under the heading of Brothel.
/r/askTRP22/11/17 10:13 PM
1

I've been re reading the side bar as of late and two one things stuck out to me: dont marry a girl with an n count of 5 or higher because it makes it difficult to pair bond with their husband 2. Iron Rule of Tomassi # 2 NEVER, under pain of death, honestly or dishonestly reveal the number of women you’ve slept with or explain any detail of your sexual experiences with them to a current lover. So basically my question is: How do you determine your partners n count relatively accurately without re…
/r/askTRP17/11/17 05:54 PM
12

Here's the thing about reports of rape such as this--we have no idea if she's being truthfull at all. We have to trust her completely without question, or we have to ascertain from an analysis of the facts we do know. The only facts known here are her actions prior to the rape. They are inconsistent with her story. SO either the facts are lying or she is. And facts don't lie. This is why "always believe her is so important to feminists and progressives. It is a mantra that prohibits anyone from …
/r/TheRedPill17/11/17 04:17 PM
-1

What is your point? Are you pissed that others aren't acting in the way you perceive to be most beneficial to yourself? Tough shit, no one owes you anything. Crying that it isn't fair to you is just your own personal brand of feminism. As for what society does or does not teach, it's very simple: when you allow others to do for you you will be stuck with what they do. Don't let anyone tell you anything. Listen, but see and determine for yourself. Finally, no worries. To paraphrase, nature will o…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/17 04:28 PM
1

After living in that world for hundreds of thousands of years, a few decades of mechanically induced equality isn't enough to wipe the slate clean. It's part of our hard wire. I'm not saying force people into roles, I say stop denying that the vast majority will assort themselves into those role eventually and stop denying that traditional gender roles are what will be most satisfying to the most people because it satisfies innate needs. It's a lot like gravity--you can't see it; you wouldn't ev…
/r/askTRP27/10/17 12:25 AM
1

There are lot's of waxing about "roles" and the ways things should be. It is best summed up by a simple thought exercise. Let's say you were just told that you were being dropped, with no tools and no hope of assistance in a remote location that had many natural dangers and predators and which would take you months, at the earliest to traverse to the nearest populace. However, you could take one person-any real person, with you. Of course that person would also have no tools. Who would you take?…
/r/askTRP26/10/17 09:00 PM
1

Very good points. And you're right, I spoke a bit too broadly for too many people. It would be more accurate to state that much of TRP tries to encourage and enable men to see the truth behind the lies. If you've found something that turns your crank--more power to you. Just don't believe that your feelings, or someone's lies, including your own, will dictate the truth. It also helps us to understand women. In your situation, it would advise, "If today was great, enjoy it. But don't believe that…
/r/TheRedPill26/10/17 08:36 PM
3

I think I understand your point/question. As I understand it you are asking, "If having great, mind blowing sex, is important; and if most people on TRP equate great mind blowing sex with kinky/extreme sex; and if girls who love kinky/extreme sex are almost always only going to arrive at that love through having an open, numerous and varied sexual past; then how can people on TRP say that women who have had that past (which is likely a requirement for great sex which is a requirement for commitm…
/r/TheRedPill26/10/17 08:02 PM
4

I don't believe toxic masculinity exists, but I think you're suppressing a lot of your inherent aspects due to preconceived notions. Julius Caesar viciously and brilliantly conquered the Gauls then wrote an excellent treaty about it that was a major component of western education for a thousand years. Alexander the Great is said to have cried at the thought of there being thousands of planets and he couldn't conquer even one. Your definition of Alpha will always having you lose to a Great Ape, o…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/17 09:34 PM
1

Oh, and now the accord has been broken. And it was full of such promise. Alas!
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 01:20 AM
1

See, once again civilized and measured discourse has brought about a consensus.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 01:12 AM
1

You're not intelligent either.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 01:07 AM
1

I hope to God you don't have kids, or if you do you learn better by the time they are this age. I remember well being 14. I remember well what I was doing. I remember well the 14 y.o. girls I was doing it with.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 01:04 AM
2

It isn't just the clothes. If she dressed that way and went to play hop scotch, that's one thing. But she took her work and went to the local coffee shop. Why? because that's what college kids do. She dressed that way because that's what college kids do. She wanted attention, because that's why college kids do it. Did she imagine herself blowing some old guy? Probably not. Did she fantasize about telling her friends about getting hit on? certainly. Might she have even fantasized about bragging t…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 12:56 AM
0

You are correct that his reaction to a 14 y.o. girl is so extreme. I can't imagine how he functions as an adult. It just illustrates why he needs TRP. But that girl was very much aware of what she was doing. She was acting the part of an adult--as she understood it. That's why she was following the trends--so she'd know how to pass herself off as an adult. I will admit, it is sad that society is so happy to sexualize girls, and all children for that matter, at such a young age. I will also conce…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 12:36 AM
-1

Nothing about what she was doing was "reasonable." She does have the ability to stop it--she can stop deliberately passing herself off as an adult woman. She knew she was wrong when his emotions showed that he so greatly disapproved of the situation when he finally understood them. THAT is why she attacked.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 12:27 AM
4

Don't worry, I'll fuck your share of the girls for you.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 12:20 AM
2

The reason she attacked you was to keep you, and her, from understanding how wrong she was. Your silence made it awkward, which made her wonder if you were judging her. Rather than allow that she instinctively sprang into attack and ensured that it was you who were in the wrong.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 12:19 AM
11

Let's be clear what's happening here: you, with all your lover boy shit, are priming her pussy to be railed by the other guys. You do the work, they bust a nut in her snatch. Then when she's filled with their cum, but hungry for food and emotional validation, she comes to you, until that pussy is throbbing again and off she runs to some guy's pole. They don't do any of the work and you get none of the reward. I want you to go to the mirror, look deep into your own eyes and repeat: I treated her …
/r/TheRedPill04/09/17 11:38 PM
15

Because the only truth which matters to a woman is the truth about the man (men) she's with. The truth about her can only hurt her, the truth about you can only help her understand what she can and cannot count on. When she's been caught lying the only truth that matters to her is what you will do about it.
/r/askTRP04/09/17 06:53 PM
1

My boyfriend and I had a rough week. Normal enough. We had been bickering Since the entire description of what constitutes a "rough week" was encapsulated in word play "bickering" I feel confident in assuming you were verbally pushing issues and doing so all week. No healthy man ever prolonged a conversation that long. on Friday he forgot our date was tired of me and flaked rather than continue to be harangued. I felt really disrespected and hurt and sent him a message telling him so am entitled…
/r/RedPillWomen04/09/17 06:36 PM
1

It depends a lot on what type of women you want and what you want them for and how you are trying to market yourself. For example, some skilled tradesmen can make as much as some of the lower paid physicians in the U.S., however there are a whole group of women who will want the physician because of the status of his job and they will never want you--for that. So, if you want to fit in as the posh Chad of the uppercrusts and have successful LTRs with the Cindys of the uppercrusts, then it might …
/r/askTRP01/09/17 07:44 PM
8

You want to know which guy is worse than the one taking her to hotel for several nights and not getting laid or even a kiss? The guy who believes the girl when she says that's all that happened!
/r/TheRedPill31/08/17 01:21 AM
1

That's more about trying to fix and maintain the relationship or alternatively trying to settle something unfinished or obtain closure. Depending on why/how the break up occurred and OP's frame, a quick pump and dump should be fine, he just needs to keep a handle on the eject lever and pull at the first inkling he might be veering into anything else.
/r/askTRP28/08/17 10:11 PM
3

Do you have any citations to back up that claim?
/r/TheRedPill26/08/17 09:01 PM
2

Self congratulatory exposition is always necessary.
/r/RedPillWomen25/08/17 07:13 PM
9

I have watched you over the years like an uncle watching his niece grow in fitness and beauty a creepy fucking perve. You have a good man Jeff (also a changed name) who loves you and two beautiful children. who I'm terribly jealous of so I watched you guys running up hills in our neighborhood together. And now that you are this sexy fit woman with a great body there will be many men who want to fuck you. Like me. You are about to be thrust into the world of being an aging MILF where you will mee…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/17 08:37 PM
3

I tend to see myself as a “great catch” You don't get to define this. and think the right man should love this and appreciate this awareness from me. Which is just you saying you're a special snow flake and deserve a man simply for being who you are. You're perfect and he better show up knowing it and bringing to the table all you deserve as a special snow flake. Here's the truth of the matter. Men are always looking for attractive women. Not necessarily every man, many are pathetic now, but sti…
/r/RedPillWomen23/08/17 06:19 PM
2

Don't buy her anything of the sort. Lingerie is so she can seduce you, you can't tell her to do that, she either wants to or she doesn't. Otherwise you'll end up buying what you like which isn't necessarily what she feels comfortable in and if she isn't confident in it...
/r/RedPillWomen23/08/17 06:04 PM
3

100% of women are female SJW's would beg scream to differ.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 09:04 PM
4

She's a shit writer (she really, really needed a great editor) but A.S. and/or T.F.H. should be required reading for everyone.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/17 11:26 AM
15

Let me understand this: You verbally attack a girl by calling her out and calling her a bitch because she isn't living her life the way you think she should, even though it is none of your business. Then, after you pull that super captain autistic shit you find out she now has an issue with you and lets it be known to others. And you feel this is her betraying you? And this proves to you that women aren't trustworthy?
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 03:21 PM
1

There are scientific tests which prove some of what your saying-at least in fruit flies. And not all ancient ideologies prized virgins, just those based in animal husbandry.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 12:26 PM
1

Uh, no. The entirety of your post can be restated as: "I'm good, everything that doesn't fully agree with me is bad/evil/satanic, and women are the worst, because they believe they are good and hate everything that doesn't fully agree with them."
/r/TheRedPill07/08/17 12:05 PM
4

We were there just a few weeks ago at a restaurant and movie theatre (which is right above her work). That proves it, you don't just develop such a strong aversion for no reason, especially not that quickly. Something happened, or is happening, to change things and I don't mean stress at her job.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/08/17 08:17 PM
4

I think you completely missed out on the true sub communication. She was afraid of being there with you. Mom was meant simply to be cover or a breaker, i.e. she knew you wouldn't go there with mom, so she insisted on Mom so you wouldn't go. You need to do some serious surveillance on your girl.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/08/17 07:55 PM
11

Why the fuck do you care? Do you really have nothing better to do than argue with people over the internet? The fact that this is so important to you does not reflect well on you.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 07:43 PM
1

Actually, what you said can be A&A, depending on the delivery and frame backing it up. She wasn't being literal when she said "The other 20 girls your (sic) fucking." She was shit testing you wondering if there is another girl or two in your life. You answer was A) you agreeing, there are other girls and B) amplifying, a good number of other girls at that. It's one thing for her to compete against another girl, who may not have great tits, or be smart, or quite as pretty, but 5 or 6 girls can ha…
/r/askTRP01/08/17 07:48 PM
2

I always had a mantra that I'd rather have peace in the house than be right, so I am the one to make amends. In the last couple of years, my wife has become increasingly frigid, Did you intend to place those two points together as they are in fact connected and the latter flows from the former, or was it wholly subconscious?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/17 07:34 PM
3

She gave your a backdoor-good guy test. Were you too good of a guy to kick her out for not wanting to sleep with her. You passed, in that you were too good of a guy, but in passing you failed royally and therefore only you got fucked that night.
/r/askTRP31/07/17 07:38 PM
11

Be amused that there is no point! It's not a game, it's a joke.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/17 05:10 PM
3

And if you're having sex with a female NON-human, keep it to your fucking self you fucking perv.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/17 07:48 PM
3

I figured such was the case. The reason for the details depends on your message. You made him out to be a natural alpha, so I didn't see much evidence of BP conditioning. Your post could have been a good one about frame and the pitfalls of being a "natural."
/r/TheRedPill28/07/17 02:46 AM
6

You need to decide if you're a rationalist, a moralist or a hedonist (prioritizes emotions). You are trying to resolve this conflict via a slip shod application of all three of the above. Prioritize between those three and assign to each it's proper place, then, and only, then work through your issue(s).
/r/TheRedPill27/07/17 05:20 PM
1

I went to bed still telling myself I was a feminist, even after having only just discovered that its fundemental premise (that women have fewer rights and privelages than men in modern society) was basically false. I went to bed still telling myself I was a feminist, even after having only just discovered that its fundemental premise (that women have fewer rights and privelages than men in modern society) was basically patently false. FTFY
/r/TheRedPill27/07/17 04:13 PM
25

You've not relayed a single fact or character trait which indicates Katy is bad. The only thing you've relayed is that she and your uncle can't get along. Why is that automatically her fault? You say she's bullying him, how so? TRP is about understanding women without rose colored glasses, not blaming them because everything goes wrong. The entire premise of your post is that your uncle has always been a winner, but now that he's met this woman his life has gone to shit, so she must be a horribl…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/17 04:10 PM
1

And now you're likely right, but for all the wrong reasons. TRP doesn't give a shit about morality, sluts or "good" girls. It prioritizes sex, and for a large contingent, it also prioritizes how to be the best male you can be. Starting with the latter issue, there are long traditions, usually but not always religious, increasingly supported by modern studies, that progression, especially continued progression (usually termed as one's mission), is a key element to sustained happiness. Those same …
/r/TheRedPill27/07/17 03:42 PM
2

Absolutely, just because she failed to show you respect doesn't mean she isn't entitled to it from you.
/r/askTRP27/07/17 02:35 AM
2

I'm still trying to figure out if I trust my desires with all these AWALT stories. This reveals a major problem. You've let the information on TRP develop into paranoia instead of understanding.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/17 05:41 PM
-9

You don't know that and he doesn't know that. Why don't you know? Because he got all butt hurt and took his ball(s) home.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/17 03:04 AM
11

I understood the nature of her comment, I don't understand why he cares. Was he originally after her pussy or was he more concerned with a deeply moving and mind altering connection with the one? She fucked those other men for the same she reason she ate her breakfast that morning, they were there and she was hungry/horny. Giving it any more weight than that is moronic.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/17 10:44 PM
14

Why the butthurt about not being the first choice? Are you looking for a unicorn? DO think two guys over three weeks put substantially more miles on her pussy than all the guys previously and now it's all used up? If she's down to fuck now, why do you care why she wasn't before? Your ego is the path back to the blue pill.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/17 09:40 PM
3

The trend is simply that women don't value the truth at all. That's not the issue. The issue is that the truth never benefits them and usually hurts them. If for no other reason it hurts them because making explicit declarations of fact limits their options in the future. Plausible deniability/options, not diamonds, are a girl's best friend. But women do value honesty, when its in men. Not as a virtue, but as a tool. They will flat take advantage of a guy who only tells the truth.
/r/askTRP24/07/17 09:23 PM
6

Completely on point. Several years ago I took a self defense class with a fantastic instructor. He flat out said that what he was teaching was meant to keep you alive, not safe. He always reminded us at the start of each lesson that when confronting a person with a knife you were going to get stabbed. A person with a gun--you were going to get shot. The only thing he was teaching was how not to get killed. His first step was always, ALWAYS, look for the way out.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 06:12 PM
2

Doesn't sound like she's your g.f.
/r/askTRP23/07/17 02:01 PM
7

That's just wrong and defeats the purpose of EC's and pointed contributors. I don't have to be at the end to be further along than you. Hell, simple encouragement has value in and of itself. It is good to remember to consider the source, as a lot of the issues you describe are accurate.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/17 11:29 PM
2

As a side note: there are a number of people in TRP who believe that what you have can be preserved, even with your now going out and obtaining a soft harem--if you're where you need to be as a man. Those people will debate with you whether your "moral" choice not to do that is in fact a cop out as to your terror of losing. Some of those will actually tell you that accepting where you are now is a disservice to your wife. Why? Because women would rather share a winner than have a loser to themse…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 09:45 PM
1

Having read through the exchanges in your thread, I think you and OP are on the same page, just different parts of it. Van seems to be saying that higher level understanding of RP dynamics requires certain prerequisites. You simply cannot achieve that level of understanding any other way. So, for all those who haven't gone through those required prerequisites, lets be clear where you're coming from... I don't think it was ever meant to be a criticism for those who haven't gone through those prer…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 09:39 PM
0

How condescendingly helpful: "Hey Van, I fundamentally disagree with the point of your post, but good try, let's see some more hustle..."
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 03:25 PM
24

Less thinking and more doing motherfuckers. I learn the truth of this everyday and from a million sources.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 03:13 PM
1

Yeah, this a veiled attempt to vent about the unfairness of the universe as illustrated by the fact that this pitiful girl has commitment from a high SMV male, social ease and orbiters while you, clearly and unequivocally a gem, even if in the rough, don't have any of that.
/r/RedPillWomen19/07/17 02:19 AM
14

Actions cannot be creepy, only people are creepy. If you are creepy, then everything you do is creepy, if you are not creepy, then nothing you do is creepy.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 02:12 AM
1

No it's all relativistic moralizing. At no point have you offered anything to support any or your positions. You start with an end point that YOU believe is superior, with no no support for it's superiority. You then extol the only way to achieve that end goal, without support that that will even achieve it, let alone that it is the only way to achieve it, all still without convincing me it ought to be achieved. And rather than attempt to build a cogent argument you lead by slandering a large pa…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 02:03 AM
0

I'm sorry, I didn't realize that the only valuable characteristic you had was your supposed intelligence coupled by your self perceived moralistic supremacy. I understand why you have to advocate for a world that prizes those attributes above all others--otherwise you'll never get laid and never have kids. But, look on the bright side, you can criticize my kids all you want safe and secure in the knowledge that you'll never have any that I can criticize.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 01:44 AM
1

Except, absentee fathers is a hugely successful mating strategy used widely, if not predominately, across the entire animal kingdom. Look at the inner cities of any western nation. Almost no fathers acting as fathers and yet there is a population explosion. And those cities are creating cultures than the pacified westerns are assuming in whole. There are more art galleries, concert venues and even University classes dedicated to what is coming out of those cities than are coming out of suburbs o…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 01:17 AM
1

So...you come to a group which, to a large degree, espouses, "We will no longer be shamed, we will instead apply logic to determine what is most beneficial," and immediately try to shame them without once backing up your position with logic or even any attempt to show how applying an alternative world view could possibly be beneficial.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 12:54 AM
30

It's creepy when a man's attentions make clear that his sexual expectation exceeds the benefits he can provide in exchange for granting him that desired sexual attention.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:07 AM
10

What I want to know is: How to I help build a world where the women have equally impressive mating resume's? Women have spectacular mating resumes: pert titties, taunt asses, beautiful faces, long luscious legs, and tight little pussies. I don't give a shit about degrees, or charities or mountains climbed or any other "accomplishment."
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 04:05 PM
26

That's the issue right there. OP doesn't know what to do with her.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/17 12:57 PM
11

They mirror their experience, which is usually a long succession of assholery.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/17 12:56 PM
4

king whose family has been in the game for 1,000 years, whose past and future depends on it That's not a guarantee either, quite the opposite. Many ruling families throughout history collapsed under the ineptitude of moronic heirs. For examples look at some of the Roman dynasties or Chinese dynasties. A catastrophic example was the Spanish Hapsburg family.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/17 08:56 PM
1

I especially love the part about how they enforce the natural roles by keeping men in the fields and women in the kitchen! Hopefully you realize that both of those are modern constructs. Man kind is several hundred thousand years old. Agriculture and kitchens are, at most, ten thousand years old...about 2-3 percent of the human experience.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/17 01:21 PM
27

The article goes to great length to avoid stating the obvious:as women make it clear they will give it away for free, more and more men realize they would have to be chumps to pay. Now is a great time to be a man learning about women. I think women will soon learn to go back to hiding their true natures and all the TRP confirming behaviors of women that are on display everywhere will largely disappear.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/17 07:41 PM
5

With whore mothers especially, fathers are under an obligation to create the alternative. Under no circumstances should children ever be allowed to become adults thinking that whoredom is normal and appropriate. You must create that alternative no matter what. That's your duty as a father.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 08:51 PM
2

Centralized control equalls greater and more efficient control. What it doesn't equal is greater trust between the controlled. The result is an unquestionable authority over a divided and warring people.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 07:09 PM
6

No. You are always the priority. What you are espousing is one of the quintessential BP myths used to control. It goes like this: you must place the child first; we have control of the child and deny you even basic access; to get that access so you can prove you're making the child a priority you must first adhere to all of our demands without question. They have you hogtied and your neck in the noose. Why do you think all these horrible mothers who clearly treat their kids like they are burdens…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 05:59 PM
63

Mad props to that girl. She fucks another dude and has you convinced it's your fault and your just punishment for your transgressions and you're wondering what further self abasement you can heap upon yourself to show her that you've learned you have no right to be who you are. Do you think you could talk her into coming to TRP and sharing some of her wisdom?
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 04:58 PM
9

You're wrong about all absent fathers necessarily being of no value. There are a number of reasons why a father might have taken off. Some reasons would indicate PB or other undesirable mind sets, but not all. He could be gone because it was the only way to be true to himself in the western world of state sanctioned absolute female/mother control.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 04:52 PM
15

I disagree, both with your premise and your understanding of TRP. I disagree with your premise, because it seems to elevate the importance of what a guy wants. (See TRP's discussions on feelz before realz). That's not to say that what a guy wants isn't OK or valid, that's to say that placing what you want above a rational consideration of what is is not OK or valid. The message you seem to be so concerned about having TRP convey is conveyed. First in the discussion about the anger phase of accep…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/17 01:33 AM
11

Something can be both complex and predictable.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 10:23 PM
12

That reply is wrong on every point and contradictory as to the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs. Overall, your view is naive at best, idiotic at worst. It is tantamount to a child sticking his fingers in his ears and declaring he can't hear you. People are complex. They often vacillate between points. They might love you while also loving someone else. They might only love you while desiring someone else. They might only desire what you have while lying about loving you. People are complex, ever changing,…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 09:09 PM
100

You misunderstand what TRP teaches. It never teaches that a woman cheating is OK, it teaches that no matter what you do, every woman will at some point be tempted to cheat. The difference is in how a man prepares for that eventuality. Much of the BP is sold to men based on the lie that if you do this, your reward will be the guarantee that your woman won't cheat. The main way of ensuring that she won't cheat is to invest yourself without reserve into her and your relationship. TRP states that ch…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 08:16 PM
1

Sigh, not only are you BP, you're a BP Omega. I feel for you son.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 08:07 PM
1

No, those are your concepts and definitions. See my other comments to you elsewhere. In short, you are pissed because you just found out the world does not conform to your belief of how ti should be. Welcome to TRP. You can feel however the fuck you want to about it. The truth doesn't care. When you find yourself drowning you can swim or you can sink. Either way keep your crying to a minimum because my ass made the swim a long time ago and now I'm just trying to relax on the beach with a drink.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 08:05 PM
1

Objectively I know what I should believe in, but personally I don't want it to be true. That contradicts the very definition objective! ob·jec·tive əbˈjektiv/ adjective adjective: objective 1. (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions *in considering* and representing facts. Not only are you not objective, you are convinced you are free to define words as you please.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 08:00 PM
1

No it doesn't. However, your motivation for doing those things does.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 07:55 PM
1

But you aren't seeing everything objectively. You might be seeing a few small things somewhat objectively, but if you're rejecting the larger picture based on feelz, that's not objective.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 07:52 PM
1

Point taken, I should have said, "Hypergamy seeks to be contained by masculinity" or "Hypergamy developed in an environment where it was contained by masculinity."
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 07:48 PM
2

invalidates any human unconditional relationships Why should unconditional relationships be valid? For example, lets say the absolutely most sexually unappealing same sex individual wants to have sex with you, why should you be allowed to say, "no." There is an absolute give and take in that situation. You are glorifying unconditional relationships, but only because you are assuming they would conform to all your pre-conditions.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 07:46 PM
4

seeing things objectively has been a strong suit of mine OP, you are self delusional. Your entire post is about how you're going to reject the truth you can clearly see because it conflicts with your feelz, then end the post with the above line. You aren't some special loner who alone can see the truth, you're a baby whining that you're going to have to work for your share. Grow up.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 07:20 PM
7

Your theory is all over the place and disjointed. But in short you are wrong because hypergamy isn't evil, it just is. You keep talking about love and the way things ought to be. Your view of love is still wholly BP. And your view of how thing "ought to be" is just wrong. There is no "ought to be" there simply is what is. What I mean by that is, if you remove all people none of what you're discussing will still be present. Once you add all people back in you'll get all the issues you just descri…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 06:10 PM
4

You seem to be conflating the fact that she's a phenomenal person to mean she will also be a phenomenal partner. Here's the salient point. By her own admission when things got to the breaking point with her she repeatedly jumped on strange dick to keep herself sane. Now, you want to place her in a situation where she has to give up her high achieving career where she's in charge of people, makes high pressure decisions and is surrounded by alpha men giving her constant attention so she can be in…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/17 02:03 PM
5

CJ's the Red Pill was a joke. There was nothing Red Pill about the men she interviewed. Each of those men who sat on the couch to be interviewed were either too fat or too scared to get off that couch and truly go out into the world and make it as a man. Those men were not red pill, they were screaming that the blue pill wasn't being fair to them. They fully rejected any sense of being responsible for themselves, instead they were crying that the system wasn't handing out to them as much as it h…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/17 05:07 PM
2

It depends on how one became popular and what one does with it. Good social skills tend to make one popular and help make social connections. Years spent expanding social circles and building a network can pay massive dividends. Social proof has more uses than just bedding girls.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/17 11:07 PM
47

As a man, good sex will make up, at most 10% of your happiness. As a man bad sex/no sex will make up at least 90% of your unhappiness.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/17 10:25 PM
2

Non-intimate, emotionally distant sex doesn't have to be reserved exclusively for strangers.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 05:23 PM
3

I agree as far as digging through the trash goes. However, I don't put work into the relationship. I put work into myself. The results are what motivates her to work to ensure the relationship remains appealing to me. If she doesn't keep it going, it will quickly end and that won't bother me.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 03:53 PM
17

For plate management you need to understand the dynamic at play to understand what you can and cannot expect. First, what are women looking for in you? There are two important categories, single and not single. For the single women, there are then four rough categories fro women: 1) under 25, 2) 25-31, 3) 32-37, and 4) 38 and over. For single women 25 and under they just want a good time or to set up a future LTR while they continue to have a good time. You can have plates with this group, but t…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 10:23 PM
2

You're right, but the discussion wasn't about outliers. It was about Society In General and the laws/cultural expectations. What I said was accurate as far as the what the average person was expected/forced to do and what the laws/cultural expectations were intended to accomplish.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 05:41 PM
10

Not quite an accurate portrayal. There were a number of laws in place meant to enforce marriage and even to ensure marriage was the only legitimate option. For example, most jurisdictions had Laws against Bastardy. Maybe the husband could just up and leave or throw the woman out. That didn't mean he could shack up with any other woman he pleased. Co-habitation in an unmarried state was highly illegal. Before arguing what was and wasn't cohabitation, keep in mind the whole point of the laws was t…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 02:41 PM
3

Every man who has ever had sex knows all about the post sex clarity. You don't know about post sex clarity? Here's the scenario: Before sex: A man looks deep into a woman's eyes. She's the most beautiful creature he's ever seen. She has the most wonderful smell, like ambrosia. Her laugh is like the fluttering of angel's wings and springs from the deepest, most gentile and fascinating soul God ever created. After sex: OH MY FUCKING GOD!!What foul sewers of Hell did this reeking, cackling, hag-tro…
/r/RedPillWomen25/05/17 04:13 AM
29

So, you're pissed you've yet to receive the relationship you're entitled to. Moreover, you're especially pissed as you've put in all this work to get one (not work for a specific man, mind you, just work for yourself that you believe entitles you to a relationship) and still no man has shown up to give you what you clearly deserve. You know, I'm at a complete loss as to why. Why would men run from you?
/r/RedPillWomen25/05/17 03:59 AM
2

Feminism is merely projection. Women assign to men the same motives and intents that drive women. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/17 01:58 AM
242

I almost felt like you were making fun of TRP, but that just isn't possible as everything you say is SO in line with TRP. I'd ask my dad to help me understand, but he went out for cigarettes years ago and still hasn't come back.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/17 05:53 PM
1

It bothers you because on some instinctual level you know it's wrong, you just don't know how or why it's wrong. That means you also don't know how to fix it. And, as most people are conditioned to do, you're looking at her to fix it, or at least hoping that how you look at her will fix it. You have to fix it. Don't know how? Get out there and continue to get experience until you do know how.
/r/askTRP09/05/17 08:04 PM
4

She's going to end up getting hit with the wall of life There was no mention of her whoring it up. Instead, it seems she understands her position and how to exploit it. Will she succeed in nabbing a rich husband? That's only 25% likely, but it's also 70% likely she'll settle for some slightly upper middle class beta who will pay for her to be a SAHM for the next 20 years and only about a 5% chance she'll crash and burn.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/17 07:52 PM
7

No one was going to be better than Michael Jordan while MJ was playing. No one. Still, lots of others went into the NBA, scored points, won games, won championships and made millions. Were they MJ? No. Were they multimillionaire champions? Yes.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/17 07:47 PM
3

It's all about status. They are intimidated they won't measure up publicly and will therefore lose position. The loss of position is the sword above women's heads. They also project this on men when dumped or snubbed. Rather than actually get into character analysis which might force self reflection, they lob out social intimidation. It's an issue all women know and will accept. He was just intimidated.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/17 12:14 AM
5

It's genetics. A man appreciates a woman based on her genetic fitness to be a vessel for his seed. He doesn't need anything else from her. The better her genetic fitness the more he appreciates her.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/17 01:22 PM
49

A few years ago I read a book by a female journalist examining this very thing. She laid out how women will spends months, often even years, conducting a whisper campaign against the s.o. She'll do this until she's certain she can leave without being seen as bad. They know what they are doing, they still deny it though.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 12:59 AM
33

This can work the other way, especially in a work setting. When a woman finds something she can safely do, she'll often work it far more diligently than a man would so that that becomes her thing. This is what she does, this and this alone. It is an effort to ensure that once she's found her place she is never required, or even asked, to do anything else. You can use this as well to maximize benefits from a woman.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 09:57 PM
1

The reality in which the surrounding billions live is just as real as any objective truth to come out of science. Tesla believed that since those billions of people didn't have to live that way and since he could imagine a better way, the reality of their lives was imbecile and therefore free to be ignored. The men who thwarted him, though very intelligent, weren't nearly as intelligent, yet they still won. Why? Because they understood the reality that was and dealt accordingly with it to forge …
/r/TheRedPill03/05/17 03:59 PM
-1

You go and mentor yourself until that happens to you. Neither do I have the time nor am I willing to do so. Why would I? You are still looking for other people to help you into the cockpit and take over the steering-wheel, validating the decisions you make or even telling what to do. Then why TRP at all? If TRP isn't about teaching and learning, then what's the point? The original mutuality when it was just a few people working together to understand I get, but now? Moreover, from the mod and EC…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/17 12:07 AM
1

I haven't changed at all Then you haven't swallowed the pill?
/r/askTRP25/04/17 06:16 PM
1

What do you expect to get as a result of stopping all masturbation? I'll play on a hunch here, but arguments around no fap often involve playing up the amazing, maybe even magical, effects of not tugging you string. It's all b.s. Self mastery is what is amazing. Have a goal, stick to it, reap the results then repeat. For a sea of people who lead wholly passive lives never receiving anything that wasn't handed to them, any taste of discipline and self direction seems totally mystical and wonderfu…
/r/askTRP25/04/17 06:13 PM
3

But even then, ECs can only mentor people who come to them for help. That's where I strongly disagree. EC's can choose to go to contributors. I'll use Jesus as an example-but simply from an academic perspective. If you look you can find many works on how everything about Jesus and what he taught was already being taught elsewhere in the Roman-Greco World of his day. Many of his teaching were already wide spread and well entrenched in society without any connotations of Jesus or Judaism. However,…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 05:30 PM
8

And that's evident. But, it was much more evident 3 years ago when I first started coming around. It's clear the mods are finding it more difficult as the community grows. It's only going to get harder. EC's seem to be the key, but how many EC's joined the ranks within the last year? How many are there total? How many of those are still active? Perhaps the Mods should initially focus on finding and mentoring prospective EC's who can mentor in kind and have the connections with the community to e…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 05:15 PM
2

Flush with cannon fodder. Parasites are clearly the bane of societies--no arguments there. But a sword doesn't get sharp without something to grind against. Have system not to keep everyone who comes, but to offer an outlet to those who can and will make meaningful contributions. Your position makes more sense if you are advocating MGTOW. You don't need to worry about others if you are seeking to eliminate them. Otherwise, you live in a society. You've chosen to interact with others. Those inter…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 05:11 PM
5

I'm eating Freetos, shows how much you know.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 04:54 PM
3

You're response ignores some very important lessens from history. Because it's such a well known example, start with the Spartans in their war against Persia. Without a doubt, one on one, the Spartans were the baddest of the badasses. Still, when the Persians came, they didn't look to face them alone. They immediately set out to unify as much of Greece, through diplomacy or war, as possible. If a city wouldn't join the alliance, the alliance waged war on that city--not to destroy it-but to force…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 04:48 PM
58

This issue acknowledges that TRP is, or is becoming, an institution. Institutions, especially those depending in some form on new participants, usually have to address the multi-tiered membership issues. How to make it accessible enough to encourage new participation, how to maintain the growth once there' commitment, and how to make sure those who have true, persistent, high achievement maintain their level without atrophying when there's no more "growth" (growth in this case being fully unplug…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 04:18 PM
3

You laid it out in full detail! All that crap she's spewing about how she wants him to do this or that so she can help...it's all bull shit...it's clearly all for her. She wants him to talk so she knows exactly what's going on so she can react accordingly. It's all about making her feel better under the pretense of helping him.
/r/RedPillWomen23/04/17 01:18 AM
170

Thus, even though feminists demonize testosterone and have tried to lower it, they are actually increasing testosterone by creating a society where dark triad men pump and dump, get the women pregnant and get the hell out of dodge, while the truly good men have less success Biology in action. Biology has been at its game for millions of years making sure that no matter what obstacle arises, there's a way to overcome it. It doesn't give a shit about the feminist tirades of the last 60 years. It h…
/r/TheRedPill21/04/17 04:40 PM
3

Not sure what exactly you are asking or the perspective you are asking it from. However, my response to those heavily advocating that women's promiscuity is not a big deal or a non issue, is to point out that no one fights so hard to protect something that doesn't matter. The simple truth is it changes women, not necessarily for the better or for worse as far as most women are concerned, but it does change them. Obviously, that really isn't an issue for most women. It's huge for men wanting wome…
/r/RedPillWomen19/04/17 08:51 PM
2

I guarantee you don't understand women.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/17 06:09 PM
14

I want some of what ever shit you are smoking!
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 07:01 PM
6

There is a huge difference between good and bad sex for men. However, almost universally, one thing and one thing alone determines what is good sex and what is not--enthusiasm. If it conveys a woman's enthusiasm to have sex with a man, it's good. All bad sex, for men, boils down to not feeling the enthusiasm. That is why men hate starfish/duty sex. Not because he didn't have to work for it, but because he knows he isn't wanted.
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/17 08:31 PM
5

In my point of view You're projecting. No man EVER left a woman simply because she provided sex on demand. He'll likely leave her if that's all she offers and she offers it to all, but not if it's just for him.
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/17 08:13 PM
4

First, your bf didn't make you do/feel anything. He was being honest with his opinions. I find it very interesting you don't put that conversation into context so we can see fully what he was saying and why. It sounds like you still have insecurity/low self esteem issues. However, rather than acknowledge that these are your issues and therefore your problems for you to solve, you're placing them wholly upon your bf, blaming him for your having them and secretly holding him responsible for not ha…
/r/RedPillWomen09/04/17 05:43 PM
39

Enough about C, what about A?
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 04:34 PM
4

The biblical concept of love as usually illustrated in biblical stories almost always compels the protagonist into societal conflict so as to allow him to save people from themselves. Sounds a bit like an idea I heard somewhere around here.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 12:04 AM
15

You misunderstand the Biblical term "love."
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 08:23 PM
9

She's also a lot uglier than me, DING, DING, DING, DING, and here we find where OP buried the lead. She isn't a unicorn, she's the epitome of AWALAT and hypergamy. If all you say is correct then you are several SMV points above her so you are satisfying her alpha needs. But, you are also admittedly beta so you are satisfying her BB needs as well. You are satisfying all of her hypergamous drives. That doesn't mean she wouldn't leave you for someone who does it better, but your SMV is so far above…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 03:33 PM
29

(She has social anxiety and very few friends so I didn't have the heart to just ghost her) This is great, you still tell yourself this is true, even though she always had enough social options to reject you! And just in case you think I'm wrong... Everytime I see her with her other orbiters, I get jealous. You think you've swallowed the pill, but it's clear you're just pushing it around your mouth. You're still too protective of your ego. You weren't worth it to her, plain and simple.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 02:55 PM
5

If your goal is to be retarded, congratulations you succeeded! FYI: Men don't shit test, shit tests are about investment potential, and men shouldn't care enough to invest.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/17 03:51 PM
0

So, you reject our beliefs but still want advice for how to live according to yours? Why not ask a Muslim how to be a better Christian?
/r/askTRP23/03/17 08:35 PM
-1

This is just more PB pussy worship. It's simple she cannot love you for you, only for what you provide her. If you make her your priority and do nothing but chase her, she can never get from you anything other than what she already has (herself). You must chase greatness. That greatness, and your chances of achieving it, must be greater than her fears or you will never be her love, only her placeholder.
/r/MarriedRedPill21/03/17 09:38 PM
74

That was exactly my point. BTW, did you mean for "Women fuck up" to be a pun?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 02:31 PM
100

This is the PERFECT example of the effects CC and Chads have on women. Notice her wedding picture: pinched eyes, pig nose, she's a 6 at best. However, because some gorgeous guy wants to use her for a month or two as a warm hole, she can't help but hamster that it HAS to be because she's truly beautiful. She's not and she never was. But she fully believed that because she would never fuck down, men wouldn't either (solipsism), so her being with a 9 meant that she had to be a nine! To this day she…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 02:17 PM
2

I do this because frankly as a man it's incredibly enjoyable just to think about how a woman can influence a man. I can't wait for you to start up your "Women, let's devise strategies for cuckolding your man" thread. I bet you enjoy thinking about that even more.
/r/RedPillWomen19/03/17 04:27 PM
1

He's incorrect because he's trying to argue correct Christian theology and I'm discussing the political influence of a voting demographic known as the American Religious Right.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/17 03:55 PM
12

Spot on, but you skimped a bit on the effects of ignoring the wall for women. If a woman is alert and quick, she might make the transition quickly and suffer little loss in the SMV of her "permanent" mate. Think of it as analogous to being on a game show and losing out on a million dollars but going home with $800,000. You're certainly alright. You can do a lot with that, be quite happy and think to yourself, "I did an excellent job"--provided you're a mentally healthy woman. If a woman fights o…
/r/RedPillWomen18/03/17 09:55 PM
1

What I can safely call you is a moron.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 05:33 PM
3

It's a no true Scotsman fallacy because you're applying your definition instead of their own on the basis that they can't legitimately claim that label or no one else can legitimately apply that label because "no true Christian..."
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 04:08 PM
8

And now you're applying the "no true Scottsman" fallacy and solipsism, in that since it isn't true for you, it just can't be true. The religious right is a very large group of people. They aren't all identical, but as a group, it's easy to see see what they've done and are doing.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 02:47 PM
5

You're confusing what you hear with what was said. The full sentiment is "just be yourself, because the other person isn't worth changing for." What is usually heard is : "other people should like you just as you are, so there's no need to change."
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 02:05 PM
10

The SJW left and religious right have the same core tennant in common: Both firmly believe that their beliefs justify their controlling others through whatever means available.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 01:51 PM
8

That's exactly like asking a straight man to get horny for a homosexual male who offers to take care of him in exchange for sex. It's a great offer, but goes completely against the wiring.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 11:40 PM
22

An example of a woman's refusal to accept the responsibilities of her actions. The rational behind abstaining from sex to fix the problem is very simple. But when you spell it out, the ridiculousness of it becomes readily apparent. Men are the problem, so not having sex with men until one comes along who isn't the problem will solve the problem. The End. Except, how are you going to know when that man arrives? The problem is women in this situation are totally fucked up. THEY are the problem. An…
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 07:13 PM
10

I think it is very important that she originally chose not to pursue child support, then, and only then, changed her mind at a significantly later date. It's arguable that when she first elected not to pursue it that she waived it, much like a non-biological father can waive the right to contest paternity. I would like to read the whole opinion.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/17 11:41 PM
1

BBBWWWAAAHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH....GASP...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Thank you so much, I really needed that.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/17 09:53 PM
10

Not sure I understand what you are trying to say, but it sound like: It is systematically oppressive towards women to consistently treat them better than men. Women can stay home while men have to toil in factories, but when men are placed in the hell of trenches then women need to leave home to take the men's place in the merely troublesome industry, but when men are done being the living dead they have to go back to the less hellish factories while the women get to go/are made to go back home.…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 06:28 PM
2

Critical analysis, critical analysis, critical analysis. There are often discussions back and forth about displaying one's alphaness and being the quiet alpha. I am squarely in the category of actions speak volumes over words/displays. Winners write and even rewrite, history. To effectively do this consistently, you must both know and understand the situation. To do this you must learn to identify, extrapolate, surmise and predict. To do that you MUST learn critical analysis. The reason the hors…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 03:49 PM
4

Is he your captain or not? If he is, is it time to stage a mutiny? If he's not your captain, and it doesn't sound like you yet trust him to be, then that needs to be clear and your relationship choices need to reflect that. If he is your captain, then your choices need to reflect that. But, the captain can only make decisions that are as good as the intell he has. If he's not getting reports, he doesn't know what corrections need to be made.
/r/RedPillWomen07/03/17 09:38 PM
2

I see cheating as a bad thing, I never have and never would cheat. I also see marriage as a lifetime commitment. Because this isn't consistent with hypergamy. Hypergamy isn't the criteria for choosing the mate you will have and remain loyal to for a lifetime. It's the drive that makes you forever continue to chase upwards in mate selection no matter your current mate or past commitments. To have a lifetime monogomous commitment, you must significantly curtail hypergamy. Without hypergamy you wou…
/r/RedPillWomen07/03/17 09:31 PM
7

You're her plan B, or C, or D, or... should a more primary plan fail.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/17 06:57 PM
17

The worst part about it the man who hit the kid wasn't held accountable due to the fact the kid popped in the road out of nowhere like an emerging deer. Held accountable? It's not his fucking fault. Don't come to my house with a Southern woman...sense as this happened in Florida. Florida isn't part of the South in that regard.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/17 06:56 PM
6

BF still doesn't understand the nature of relationships. He believes you are in it for the same reason he is in it--for the other person. To him, you are the prize. That's why he will work so hard and give it all up for you--because you are all he wants and so long as he has you, everything is OK. He still believes that's your reasoning as well. That's also why he thinks letting you be a stay at home mom is such a good idea, it eliminates any distractions you may have that keep you from focusing…
/r/RedPillWomen03/03/17 05:16 PM
17

Just so I am more confident.. NC this girl correct? I love this. In your mind there is some sort of a relationship here. There isn't. Act accordingly.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/17 02:54 PM
2

naturally voluptuous and large framed (large chest, broad shoulders and hips, big butt) and tend to put on muscle easily I could be in perfect shape (as much as my body allows) This smells like the female hamster. What's your body fat %. Don't talk about big bones or muscles unless your body fat% is where it should be. (You don't have to have a low body fat %, but no complaining about other reasons for being big until that's low). If you have to have someone taller than you, yes that cuts down o…
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/17 09:45 PM
2

The original writer whole sale invalidates the male's perspective simply because she doesn't agree. Moreover, she doesn't make it a one on one disagreement She isn't making an argument so other can evaluate and decide for themselves. Her sole intent is to recruit society to force him, and other individuals like, him to abandon their positions. This is the MO of all current -isms: create one set of universal values and force all people to adhere-period.
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/17 09:39 PM
3

The benefit is that you don't spend years of your life building a relationship/family that falls apart when this bombshell inadvertently explodes/is revealed. She needs to know her SO well enough to know how this will effect him and then deal with it honestly. She can't guarantee he won't find out and it is the epitome of selfishness to con a man into a situation he wouldn't otherwise go into and especially if you then bring kids into it all because you otherwise wouldn't get what you want. In f…
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/17 05:16 PM
5

I don't advocate lying, but at the same time, I don't see the benefit to sharing everything about your past no matter who you are. The benefit is that you don't spend years of your life building a relationship/family that falls apart when this bombshell inadvertently explodes/is revealed. She needs to know her SO well enough to know how this will effect him and then deal with it honestly. She can't guarantee he won't find out and it is the epitome of selfishness to con a man into a situation he …
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/17 05:13 PM
1

There are 3 things going on in your scenario. 1) her plausible deniability. She's hedging her bets. She doesn't want to tell you what happened because she thinks at best you'll think less of her and give her less as a result or at worst, she thinks you'll just leave. Trust her, either way she's right. 2) your validation. You're seeking validation from her. Stop it, for two reasons. First, because there's nothing special about being the first to make her feel a certain way, it's all a matter of t…
/r/askTRP27/02/17 06:34 PM
28

OP believes that she only would suck the guy as compensation, and not for her own satisfaction at all. There's the key passage. He fundamentally fails to understand women. He can't conceive that she has ANY actual sexual desire. In his mind sex is commodified. Women don't want it, but will give it in exchange for what they do want. He can't understand her, he can't see her for what she is and therefore he can't satisfy her or make her happy.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 05:30 PM
9

It's about the attraction/repulsion. It's easier to give a blow job emotionally because her body knows she can't get pregnant.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 08:09 PM
1

If you felt comfortable with yourself, you never would have posted. You don't deserve pussy until you can walk away from it.
/r/askTRP22/02/17 06:18 PM
1

She will try to fuck me tonight. What the ACTUAL FUCK! Are you a fucking rabbit to be stalked? That is of course if I don't let her in on my weakness. That answers that. It's not weakness, it's fear. The difference? weakness is something you haven't yet learned how to do. Fear is when you won't even try. My advice is to blow her off and actually go do something, anything social and make an ass of yourself. If you can't do that, go out with her and do everything wrong. Either way you'll see that …
/r/askTRP22/02/17 05:38 PM
0

That's right, I have a better use for your mouth.
/r/askTRP22/02/17 05:28 PM
2

Good luck with that. Scientists aren't independent researchers out doing their own things. They have to work of grants that are provided by people/agencies with agendas. So you know of any deep pocketed people/agencies looking to show that men and women are fundamentally different that women acting like whores is a bad thing?
/r/askTRP22/02/17 05:26 PM
1

You either have to be really fun or dangle the prospect of an LTR to her. Otherwise, why would she give you the time of day? It's not because of your dick, for women, dick is cheap and plentiful.
/r/askTRP22/02/17 05:24 PM
6

Why would you want to steal her away? Steal her away to the bathroom for a quick fuck without anyone else the wiser, sure. But are you looking to LTR her? That would just be plain stupid. Seems more likely you are wanting show her BF you can steal her and that you are more man than him. Assuming there are no sublimated homosexual tendencies at play here I advise it's quicker and easier just to ask him to whip out his dick so you two can eyeball who is bigger and if it's too close to call just se…
/r/askTRP22/02/17 05:18 PM
2

You are an inconsiderate bastard. You say you were concerned about your gf, but if you were truly concerned about her, you'd have invited her to share the kissing pleasures with this new girl. What? You don't think your gf would be up for that? THERE'S your problem, your frame and the frame of your relationship is all wrong. That's what you need to fix.
/r/askTRP22/02/17 05:12 PM
3

You're still stuck in a scarcity mindset and experiencing an alternative sort of oneities. You say you've been seeing this girl for months. What about the other girls you've been seeing during that time? Oh, there are no other girls? That's why you're still in a scarcity mindset. This girl is the only one you "have." That leads to the alternative form of oneitis. She may not be your dream girl, but she's the girl you've pinned all your hopes for escaping your incel life on. She's your only hope …
/r/askTRP22/02/17 05:07 PM
13

Knowledge without experience is masturbation. Live, use this sub to help understand what happened, what is happening and what will likely happen. Make mistakes, use this sub to help you understand why they were mistakes and how to avoid them in the future. Keep what works and throw away the rest. Repeat until you become who you need to be.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/17 10:10 PM
3

Side Notes She interested in MMF which I might give her if the FFM goes down well So, you're negotiating desire? (And just no on the whole STD approach and believing anything a woman tells you.)
/r/TheRedPill21/02/17 09:16 PM
2

Without a doubt the dirtiest and easiest sex with my LTR comes after I have made one of her frenemies want me. If it's an old highschool/college frenemy, I can do whatever I want with her, no hesitation whatsoever. No matter what the other girl has done, what career she has, who she married, how many kids she has or what they've done, the Queen bee is ALWAYS the one with the man the other women want to fuck. And few other things turn her on as much or as easily.
/r/MarriedRedPill21/02/17 06:14 PM
2

She can't highlight the relational aspect because, as you're seeing, that isn't the priority to the man. It's like her saying, "You're the best servant I've ever had." You don't want to be the man who makes her feel like she's rich, you want to be than man who makes her feel like she's a woman.
/r/RedPillWomen19/02/17 01:25 PM
0

I was with you until I read she should let him experiment with others if he wants to. That is not red pill advice at all. That is unquestionably Red Pill advice, it isn't Red Pill Women advice.
/r/RedPillWomen18/02/17 11:27 PM
11

Well, I didn't mean you, of course. You're special.
/r/RedPillWomen18/02/17 05:13 PM
29

No, they don't want to have to GIVE commitment, they absolutely want to have it given to them. That's the whole point of orbiters.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 09:47 PM
28

Yes and no. Women absolutely love sex. But they love commitment and social status more. They also want to get the most return on anything they do and they understand sex is valuable. So, yes they enjoy riding Chad and to some degree she'll use that to hamster the situation when Chad promptly dumps her. But she hurts that she can't get it. Even if she doesn't want the commitment it hurts that she can't get it. She's wired to want it. It's similar with men. Most men actually can enjoy just hodling…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 09:26 PM
10

She could get on her knees and playfully ask him to forgive her for being a little slut, and ask if he'd like her to stop or continue for him. ;) As long as she happily followed through, I could see that going a loooong way to fixing a lot of the issues. But a big part of her ability to do that will be her understanding and accepting that the current relationship stands alone.
/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 09:17 PM
4

Without a doubt.
/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 08:03 PM
26

Consciously and explicitly? No. Unconsciously? Yes.
/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 07:54 PM
13

If you perform a job, you expect to get paid. If your employer stiffs you, that sucks but you have to let it go. If you bring a rotten attitude to your new job you'll get fired. It's true you were wronged, but that's got nothing to do with your new employer. It seems a lot of women don't get this. They just have a "relationship ledger." They keep track of what they put in and have their expectations of what they expect to get out. They don't care where/how they get it so long as they get it. Con…
/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 07:50 PM
4

Bingo!
/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 06:53 PM
7

But you say that as if it is an absolute and it's about sexual experiences, so I think you're contradicting yourself.
/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 06:51 PM
4

I absolutely can, will, and do.
/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 06:45 PM
7

If you party hard it will age you, but sex less so than drinking and smoking. Not correct. The CC doesn't age you physically (though extreme sex can wear you out physically) but it does tremendous damage emotionally. It will absolutely make you old and bitter while still young. Youth is both physical and emotional.
/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 06:28 PM
2

No problem, but let me suggest this. From all that you've described, she has her life and is willing to allow you a place in it. Is that dynamic really going to sit with you long term? If you're so low ambitioned as to consider being a kept man, why are you playing with the pill?
/r/askTRP17/02/17 06:23 PM
2

Whether or not he was a cuck depends on how you define it. Is it better to have one child with a woman who is a total bitch or many children with a woman who already had one? The thing about Mary is that the Bible went on to show in great pains she was a "good woman." That appears to mean the following: even though she was Jesus' mom and the book is all about Jesus, she's still usually known as Joseph's wife. That's quite likely because that's how she saw herself. It also appears she bore Joseph…
/r/askTRP17/02/17 05:35 PM
1

The best thing you can do is to grab the ball yourself and make sure you and he do wild and crazy things sexually, even well beyond what yo did with others (depending on what you did with others that may not be easy but it's necessary). Take warning though, how you do this is VERY important. You need to take the lead on this, but make him think he is. If you are overtly leading he may assume it's because you did "that" previously with someone else and liked it and compound the issue that you did…
/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 05:26 PM
2

If they do it in front of everyone you should jokingly offer to give him pointers.
/r/askTRP17/02/17 05:01 PM
2

where did I go wrong In believing: in regards to my male coworker, who should have had my back
/r/askTRP17/02/17 04:59 PM
4

A couple of things. Doing good for the sake of doing good, is perfectly fine. So, if you feel like "adopting' these kids go ahead and do so. Just remember you're doing it for them not for you. Kids are very hard to raise. As for them ever being "your" kids, let me address it this way. You're English seems good enough I'm assuming you're native to Western Culture so will relate to/understand Christian influences. I know many Christians point out Joseph and Jesus as examples of why it not only is …
/r/askTRP17/02/17 04:56 PM
7

Several tips and considerations that might help the situation, but understand nothing will "change" it and it will always be what it is (whatever that may be). Understand you're trying to lock him down just as he's gaining value. That's the equivalent of trying to lock a girl down just as she turns 16 or 17. There will be issues down the road. There will be, start preparing now. Make damn sure you never deny him anything you gave to someone else. Make sure you do it with a smile and enthusiasm, …
/r/RedPillWomen17/02/17 04:43 PM
1

Speak with an attorney. Every state has it's own paternity/marriage/support laws though there are a few federal funding programs which require compliance for a state to partake in. Generally speaking for most jurisdictions: a child conceived in wedlock is presumed to the be natural child of the husband. Almost every state will allow an initial time period in which to contest paternity. For some states that's as little as 2 months. Some states allow up to 2 years after cause to suspect. Speak to …
/r/askTRP16/02/17 05:34 PM
20

You're not saying anything other than "the secret to getting rich is to make a lot of money!" Yes, if someone could do what you are advising, they'd make money, but that's because so few people can actually do it. If it was as easy as you imply, it wouldn't be worth anything.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/17 02:46 PM
1

That's a thought. A TRP sub dedicated to MAPS.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/17 10:52 PM
4

Welcome to the world that is hell bent on keeping men from learning to be men. He's likely been conditioned to not have an identity except one connect to and approved by a female which means he'll always be more focused on helping you than developing himself. He has no concept of what he wants to do because he has no concept of who he his. All the institutions and organizations that previously helped men mold the identities of younger men have been demolished. Out of curiosity, is his dad in the…
/r/RedPillWomen11/02/17 02:43 PM
1

Learn the difference between a shit test and comfort test. Also, make sure you understand yourself how you feel about her and what your intentions are. Women are great manipulators. Is she asking A) to shit test you, B) to receive comfort from you or C) tom manipulate you in way including but not necessarily limited to A and B?
/r/askTRP10/02/17 10:37 PM
39

Exactly, it proves the projection of feminism when they scream about being objectified. It isn't the hot guy she has uninhibited sex with that is being objectified, it's the man who she has "to do it the right way" with. With the latter it's about his wealth, his status and his position and how much of those she can take. With the former, its just about him. Women hate the concept of being objectified because they know first hand the difference. They know how they feel about the man they are wit…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/17 09:30 PM
58

No one has mentioned it so I will. She called her bf to raise the level of dread with you. She wanted you to know just how fast she can get another guy's attention should you ever pull shit like that in the future. Wonder if everything was a power play meant to drive a wedge between you and your family in favor of her.
/r/askTRP09/02/17 09:33 PM
32

His friend actually did him a fucking favor, as he proved that his GF was full of crap No. His gf wasn't full of crap. It's clear she knew why she was with her bf all along and nothing indicates she was lying to him about why. I'm sure she said things like I'm so comfortable with you, you're my best friend, I can tell you anything, that's why I love you. There's no indication she ever tried to play up his masculinity. His friend did him a favor by showing that HE was full of crap. He was living …
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 03:00 PM
3

I for one like it when I can bend (over) a woman at will.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 12:54 PM
5

The fact of the matter is that if Christ is who he says he is, and who his followers this he is (supreme alpha, Colossians 1:15 onward) Well, that's the rub. Traditionally, Jesus and the disciples were usually portrayed as uneducated and poor, in short simple people with little ability and certainly no inclination to say anything other than exactly and clearly what they meant. The truth seems to be quite different. In fact, all the Gospels, except John, make it quite clear Jesus intentionally ta…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 05:10 PM
2

But that mentality denies a woman's own volition and capacity to choose. I agree that desire isn't negotiable, but relationships are. She can fully understand that she made a choice and a commitment and honor her obligations therein. She can chose to have sex even if she isn't feeling it. She can even choose to fake emotions. Most aware men will quickly realize if she's faking just to be a good wife. If that's enough for the man, then there you go. If he isn't satisfied with duty sex, then yes h…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 04:58 PM
1

gave me some time to be on my own and kind of forget the focus on other women Sounds like this is the real issue and not something that requires a LDR, just understanding and commitment to yourself. That doesn't mean an LDR is bad, it's just a word to be cautious about using things as fronts for what you really want--that always ends badly if for no other reason than it's so inefficient with your time and energy.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 04:07 PM
1

Dry isn't the issue. The issue was, why did she choose to have sex with you? Was it because she was so turned on by you she couldn't help it or was it another reason? When a woman's body becomes aroused, the vag begins to moisten and change its shape. It begins to dilate and lengthen to accommodate the penis. So, for an un-aroused woman, penetration can be very difficult as there is no lubricant, and the vag can be to tight and too short to accommodate the male. Even if she's having some difficu…
/r/askTRP08/02/17 04:04 PM
1

You're looking at this from the wrong perspective. If you're asking can you/should you set up a long distance plate. The answer is, sure if it's worth it. If you're asking should you be exclusive with a girl you can't even be with the answer is an unequivocal no. Are there no other girls around? Why would you give up actually being with them so that you look at a screen of her? How does that benefit you in any way? On the other hand if your asking, is it worth to keep the lines open with her so …
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 03:54 PM
2

You clearly know the answer, but let's go through some of the points for readers who might not. She's a surgeon which means she's dedicated years to her education and career and has no family. She's a cosmetic surgeon who looks for clients in bars so she's not working for the betterment of others but to correct shallow issues and make a lot of money doing it. She gets drunk and high every day she can. She clearly has voids in her life and is desperate to fill them. What from everything you've se…
/r/askTRP08/02/17 03:35 PM
4

There are several partial discussions by Paul, but the fullest treatment is in 1st Corinthians chapter 7. Read chapter 6 on a wider discussion of sexual immorality. Read a number (10-12) of different translations to get a fuller sense of how these passages can be translated. Traditionally it has been from the stand point that any extramarital sex is sexual immorality and most translations read along these lines. However, the original term Paul was using was pornea. That in no way necessarily mea…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 12:54 PM
10

Moreover, in France it's a serious crime to get a paternity test without the Court's order.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 11:43 PM
1

if a wife is refusing to have sex with her husband By definition that does make her a bad wife. A more nuanced question is does being a bad wife in that way make her a bad person/Christian. Dalrock (link on the side bar) has dedicated a lot of space to that issue, you should read it if you're interested in the topic.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 11:40 PM
6

Or that you were not accepting your responsibility as the Man in the marriage Peter makes clear that a man's failure to be Godly doesn't excuse a woman's failure to be so.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 07:59 PM
2

What sealed the deal for me was learning about the effects of circumcision - loss of sensitivity, loss of lube, and erectile dysfunction; all this, and it is only done to men, despite the same "benefits" for women. A point of thought about possible alternative motives for the rise of circumcision. Though circumcision is an old and now widely practiced, such wasn't always the case. In the places where it did originate, it doesn't seem to have been anti-male but pro male. It could be argued circum…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 07:49 PM
18

Not quite what you asked, but it is certainly possible to be Christian and Red Pill. Of course, not all Christian thought/teaching is compatible, but then not all Christian thought/teaching is correct. The first step to harmonizing Christianity and TRP is to stop using Christian intermediaries and go strait to the source material. Having well developed critical reading and analytical skills helps in this tremendously. One of the Biblical passages that helped me see a lot of the similarities betw…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 06:43 PM
2

Finally, I have lived like I was going to die next month -- I just did a lot of drugs and got laid, and I lived this way for years. That's living like you have no hope. Live like you have no limits.
/r/askTRP01/02/17 09:00 PM
9

Ever hear of projection and rationalization? Here's what you wrote: Outside of women, the only other thing I'm interested in is drugs, and even that is getting old. I just see the world as a big ball of shit -- the women, the liars, the "alphas" who are just assholes, the betas who are weak, blah blah blah. I used to like to volunteer, but now I realize that I'm just helping take care of other people's kids when I volunteer to teach reading -- I'm being a cuckold and I'm not even getting a wife …
/r/askTRP01/02/17 06:10 PM
12

She started crying She sets. she thought I didn't have feelings for her She shoots. it got me thinking that I actually do like her too She scores!!! Well done OP's gf, well done.
/r/askTRP01/02/17 06:01 PM
4

I could reply about this just being your ego or a well playing opponent, or some such but I won't. How many blow jobs could you have gotten elsewhere that you won't get because you're with her playing games? Is she worth that?
/r/askTRP01/02/17 05:54 PM
1

I really think you're barking up the wrong theological tree with how you approach your Biblical interpretation, but because I'm bored... When God created Adam and Eve did he create them as perfect beings? If so, how did they sin? If not, why did he create them imperfectly and with what imperfections did he create them? Somewhere in that boondoggle of an ideological backwoods you'll have to come face to face with the nature of truth.
/r/askTRP31/01/17 11:47 PM
59

It's not is she's that kind of girl, but are you the kind of guy she'll do it for.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 01:57 AM
1

Why? Why risk it? What does she have that can't be found elsewhere? This is why abundance is so important.
/r/askTRP26/01/17 01:53 AM
6

No. Women aren't logical but they are cunning as hell. Why don't your improvements work when married? Because you're fucking married! That was the whole purpose of marriage, so she didn't have to continue performing to continue obtaining. No matter what you do she has the commitment to counter it. That's why dread works--it nullifies the commitment. If dread isn't working it's because it isn't sufficiently exceeding the commitment. Maybe you are extremely desirable to all women everywhere and sh…
/r/MarriedRedPill26/01/17 01:26 AM
23

You've been reading the sidebar, good for you.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/17 09:08 PM
4

Mistake of fact is extremely, extremely rare being used as successful defense to statutory rape. It isn't rare, it depends on the jurisdiction. Quite a few allow it, more don't. Also, the liability potential for me posting something like this is nonexistent. Based on those two reason I do not think I need to be "very careful". I wasn't talking about your liability, just your likelihood of passing along faulty info. The point of this thread was to make it known to people that things like this hap…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/17 08:58 PM
1

Several have said exercise Law 38 and that's good advice. It is also a great opportunity to practice amused mastery and agree and amplify. The point is never to contradict the ideology, but to make people laugh while leaving them with the tiniest of thoughts in the back of their heads about how strongly you actually believe.
/r/askTRP25/01/17 08:10 PM
1

Asshat? Asshat? It's an assfedora, bitch!
/r/askTRP25/01/17 07:48 PM
6

You should be very careful in posting generalized legal advice. Most jurisdictions don't work quite the way you describe. First, very few have rape by deception, of those that do, the deception has to be regarding certain crucial aspects. Also, many jurisdictions have defenses to age, such as mistake of age--a complete defense in some jurisdictions-and/or defense of similar ages (e.i. she's 15 you're 18, all is OK, she's 15, you're 28, you're going to jail.) If worried then get with a reputable …
/r/TheRedPill25/01/17 07:43 PM
3

The difference is options. Women will always have a multitude of options given to them. They may not be the best or most desirable options, but they are free and many. By the time a woman has explored most of them there is no time or energy left in her life to create her own alternative options. Men will never have any viable options he didn't create for himself.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/17 01:19 PM
0

Not sure what you're asking, but if we're just commenting... You don't know what the dynamic between to two is. Was this a woman who tried to trap a man? Did she believe, consciously or otherwise, that by having his child she could somehow obligate him into a relationship? That's dangerous and risky on multiple levels. Additionally, many women try to use thier children to obligate the fathers. It isn't a child, it's control. In either situation there's only one thing you can do...be who you are …
/r/askTRP22/01/17 12:25 AM
11

You're raising very good and valid issues. When analyzing what fills in a power vacuum, you have to look at the whole environment. Russia and France make for good comparison. Russia has a much larger population than France. At the start of WWI it had a population near 91.5 million people or 45 million men. Kill 10 million you still have over 75% of your men. France, in 1914 had a little over 33 million people, or roughly 15 million men. Kill 10 million of them, and boom, 2/3 or roughly 66% of yo…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/17 12:25 AM
19

Let's put this back into a slightly larger perspective. Men didn't fuck up when they failed to stop the rise of feminism. Western men fucked up when they failed to stop the rise of self cannibalizing, militaristic imperialist states. Between 1914 and 1945 three successive generations of western men were annihilated. Those who were left were those not manly enough to go to war in the first place or those left over and shattered by the war. You can track the rise of feminism and decline of masculi…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/17 11:17 PM
2

There are two rules/dynamics you must understand and never lose sight of. 1) You, and you alone, can determine what it means to be a father. 2) Society will do all it can to use the love you have for your children against you, e.g. "if you truly loved your children then you'd do..." The main point of this is to usurp your role as father and as the one who defines what it means to be a father.
/r/askTRP19/01/17 06:33 PM
1

It sounds like you have a more fundamental problem: misidentified priorities. It is clear that for the foreseeable future your priorities lie in education and career. That's fine, don't take any part of this as indicating you shouldn't have those as your goals (only you know if you should/shouldn't). However your concern with your count seems to come from concern for how it will effect future LTRs. There's the conflict. Which is more important for your total future happiness and fulfillment: LTR…
/r/RedPillWomen19/01/17 06:26 PM
2

It's like she totally rearranged her perception of reality the moment I stopped helping her more than necessary You're sort of on the right track with this, but you're looking at it from the wrong perspective. She's worried about the change in perception of others. Social status/power is everything to women. Illustrations of said power is a form of currency for them. It isn't entirely clear from your post what was happening, but appears to be the following. You were her bitch and people knew it.…
/r/askTRP17/01/17 09:27 PM
37

Yes, but it's easy for red pill guys. They're 10 feet tall and shoot fire out their asses. They aren't working twice as hard, they're working half as hard but producing four times as much!
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 03:20 PM
2

It certainly does. But does it happen because of hypergamy or something else?
/r/TheRedPill13/01/17 09:28 PM
1

That will absolutely work, until someone better at it comes along. You're convinced you're just competing against her, or maybe her and some other guys. But you're always competing against biology as well, and biology has fixed the game. You either have to be the best or you will be replaced by the best. You can't out compete biology. At some point if you aren't the best, it will show. This is true even if you are being the best possible you you can be. And for every lie in nature, there's somet…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/17 06:22 PM
10

Seriously, how did you ever get endorsed? First, are you really taking her at her word? What women, anywhere, have you ever met that speaks the unvarnished truth? That woman thinks about sleeping with other men all the time, probably thinks about sleeping with other women as well. However, she can't say that. What she can say is, what's in the article. As for hypergamy, let me say this as simply as I can. It is a comparative analysis. It is comparative against her own SMV and against competitors…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/17 05:23 PM
10

Example: SMV 5 Female SMV 6 B.F. SMV 10 Chad Doesn't matter what b.f. does, she's going to be with Chad. B.F. hasn't done anything wrong (assuming he's maxed out SMV capacity). He hasn't done anything different. She's going to be with Chad. That's the nature of hypergamy. She will pursue the higher SMV without regard to why the SMV's are as they are. Two questions, then. Why would Chad be with her? And, what to expect in the aftermath. Likely, Chad is with her because she's the easiest quick opp…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/17 04:54 PM
9

No woman will ever activate Hypergamy unless she loses attraction. This is the design of women... AWALT. No, that's a logical fallacy wherein you put the cart before the horse. It is hypergamy that causes the loss of attraction, not the other way around. Per your logic, the candle dims when placed before the sun. That's just not true; it's out shined by the sun. The candle is as it was. The greater man will outshine the lesser causing the woman to no longer see, and therefore no longer feel, wha…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/17 04:28 PM
2

It can't be denied that gender fluidity is an actual part of the human cultural dynamic. The reason this can't be denied is because it has been documented time and again in various places almost all the way back to the beginnings of human culture. What can be argued are issues such as: Why is it a part of the dynamic? Is it innate or cultural or something else? If innate, is it sexual or psychological or something else? Is it normal/healthy or abnormal/unhealthy? What are the consequences of emb…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 07:13 PM
1

just try living without one.
/r/askTRP01/01/17 02:15 AM
1

Look up cortisol. What causes it; how it effects men and how it effects women. Will explain 80% of what you see in the west.
/r/askTRP31/12/16 01:28 PM
3

Generally? Evaluate on a case by case basis.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 12:09 AM
4

Not necessarily. You wouldn't say that just because one person received a black belt in BJJ no one else can receive one. It is true that if no one else has ever practiced any martial arts, you have the advantage when it comes to fighting. However, that just means you're the best of the worst. To be a truly great fighter, you'd have to be pushed by other fighters who have skill and knowledge. What you're advocating is fear. Be afraid that you can't meat others toe to toe and win, so instead look …
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 08:53 PM
7

That misses a lot of the nuance. Attractive guys can be creepy, unattractive guys can be nice guys and assholes. A solidly nice guy or even an asshole can suddenly fall down to creepy if unaware of the dynamics.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/16 07:00 PM
5

Or, she's trying to up dread in her own relationship so her BF will quit being such a boring beta loser.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/16 04:13 PM
8

Obviously my bullshit meter is off the chart but Idc at the end of my day I still want to stick my weiner in her. I will not compromise my frame. These two sentences are completely at odds with each other--unless your frame is that her pussy trumps you totally and completely. That those two sentences come back to back shows your hamster is spinning a million miles a minute. Look, it's a ploy for you to be her "knight in shining armor." She's vulnerable and you'll protect her. Then she'll give yo…
/r/askTRP21/12/16 05:13 PM
9

This is good, but can be broken down a bit more for OP. Think of your RMV as your social circle currency and your SMV as your access to individuals currency. For example, how do you make sure your LTR is the manager of a fortune 500 company instead of the manager of the local convenience store. Your accomplishments only serve to grant you access to social circles where you can meet people. Your SMV gives you the chance to attract those people. You need both to land a high quality guy. Think Lena…
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/16 04:09 PM
2

No. Abraham rejecting city life to live by his own strength in the wilderness. Moses leading the Israelites into the dessert for 40 years until they were hard and lean and rolled over the Cannanites. Samson. King David being the ultimate king-philosopher: being a warrior, a leader, a poet a musician, sage. Judaism is chock full of great masculine examples. Christianity was originally about waking up and knowing the truth. Don't rely on political institutions, or religious institutions or even so…
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 02:40 PM
4

You're putting emotions above all else. Who else does that? Women. That is the very definition of not being a man. Your argument would justify still shitting your pants because you once did it as a baby.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 01:23 PM
1

There is a huge difference between how an idea starts and what it becomes after several thousand years. The religions you cited all encourage men to be real men. That invariably caused prosperous societies which led to successive generations of ever weaker men. The balance of interpretation, then, always became ever weaker. But the original messages were all one of true masculinity.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 01:17 PM
1

Unless she's a social retard, she'll already have a general understanding of your boundaries. Your frame will do the rest.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/16 11:10 AM
5

Nothing wrong with your approach at all, but I note you also never try to explain to her how it's going to be.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/16 01:42 AM
5

They'll consider/ignore anything when they're so desperate they lock down the first girl who gives it up.
/r/RedPillWomen13/12/16 09:17 PM
4

My guy wouldn't have cared one bit if I'd been with 20 people, instead of 2. I love that! And he wouldn't care if you got fat and ugly either, right? The fact that you have no past and your SO isn't upset over your past aren't incidental, one causes the other.
/r/RedPillWomen13/12/16 07:08 PM
8

I just criticized the responder but shit I am at a loss too on what advice to give her . She needs to stop with the sunk cost fallacy. She most likely can't now create what she could have created 20 years ago, but she can still create a better future than the one she's currently working on. She is finding that accomplishments and money aren't as important to her as human connections and an identity rooted in that. There are many people who are lonely and in need of companionship. She can start b…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 07:41 PM
3

Do women, in general, try to live by that rule?
/r/TheRedPill06/12/16 05:32 AM
28

Women judge social currency. Not status, per se, but her capacity to leverage social position based on her association with you. Men view women as sex objects; women view men as success objects.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 06:40 PM
44

It's very simple. As a society we have determined that a man is more likely to rape than a woman is to lie. And we have reached that determination despite the fact that very few in this society have met a male rapist and despite that very few in this society have met a woman who doesn't lie (or even lie about her sexual activities.) Feelz before realz.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 06:18 PM
1

It could be translated a thousand ways, unless you're imposing your frame.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 01:06 AM
9

I can't imagine what your alternative would be. "I don't have an ugly sweater." "Great! Topless it is!" You took her far too literally. I promise you she wouldn't take the above response literally either. She'd understand, if the groundwork had been laid properly, that this is simply a fun tet a tet. Instead of being a fun, exciting guy who might be a bit edgy, you took her at face value, didn't exercise any cleverness and put to the fore your tendencies to view things only at surface level and …
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 07:52 PM
12

Let's see: You ask her out and she replies she can't (doesn't have a sweater). Your response is to then provide for her so she can, and in return she upgrades you to noncommittal. You then up the ante again and offer to provide everything from before plus substantially more. At this point she consents to receiving the tokens of appreciation you've offered her. Absolutely no mention from you of any sort of physical interaction with her, not even a kiss. Conclusion: if a girl has nothing better to…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 05:38 PM
7

it erases any chance for you to be victim of rape allegations later on No. It's just a level of protection should such allegations arise.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 06:09 PM
1

That ignores the cost-benefit analysis. Assuming all you say, if evolution taught women to lie, it should also have taught men to ferret out those lies. You are also ignoring the approach OP wants to take.
/r/RedPillWomen23/11/16 10:33 PM
5

So your answer to bad people is to become a bad person? That's wrong on every level. Moreover it is terrible advice. Lying to obtain a relationship is like building a house on broken foundation. It may be ok for a while, but eventually it will break and the whole thing will crash. So, she'll have put in how many years to pursuing a relationship that is one or two sentences away from being destroyed? Or, she can spend that time building a solid life for herself and trying to find a man that will,…
/r/RedPillWomen23/11/16 03:42 PM
2

This has to be the most BP post I've seen in quite some time.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/16 04:26 AM
12

It's simple: women have sex to obtain the relationship; men have the relationship to obtain the sex. For women, relationship > sex. For men, sex > relationship. In her mind she is reserving the greater for her boyfriend while simply using the lesser for personal gain. In her mind, she's a good girlfriend. She either cannot understand it from her bf's point of view, or can but won't through high level hamster application. The thing to take from this is that this is how all women view sex--in a st…
/r/TheRedPill21/11/16 02:50 PM
8

You don't have friends because you can't be a friend. You don't have anything a "friend" has. And you can't give what you don't have. You need to be a friend then be open to those who need one. Learn to like yourself and being with yourself. That way you can be more enjoyable when with others. Start doing things. Things, like sports/mma that are inherently social and things that aren't, like fishing/hiking. Learn to be with others learn to be with yourself. Stop targeting people who are only att…
/r/TheRedPill21/11/16 03:21 AM
31

in response to your comments on female deception and intention. Women don't wear make up to deceive men, but to put themselves in the best light so others will like them. They aren't interested in being deceptive, just in being liked. That covers 90% of women's dishonesty, it isn't about deceiving just about being liked.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/16 11:55 PM
1

You aren't any use to her while she's on deployment. However, any one of the highly trained, amped up,men she's on deployment with could be very useful to her. So what's she to do? Dump you to take advantage of a temporary situation and risk losing you if you prove to be the best long term option? Cheat on you and risk you finding out (and again limiting her lomg term option?) Feed you lines about finding herself (so she can give herself, presumably to you--nice carrot she's dangling). If you bi…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 07:30 PM
9

TRANSLATION: "I'm great, you're not. Unless you're just like me you're a pussy. And you're doing everything wrong. How do I know? Because you aren't doing it like me so you are necessarily wrong and a pussy." Wow OP, what a great post. Can you please teach us some more?
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 11:17 PM
3

I also understand that if I wanted to sleep around, I wouldn't want to be shamed for doing so. This is a central logical fallacy of feminism and progressive leftism in general. Prior to stating the above, you laid out quite clearly how you believed being a "slut" actually harmed other women (by showing how it devalues other women's attempts to forge relationships). You then, in the above statement, show how you see nothing wrong in taking those harmful actions without consideration of their effe…
/r/RedPillWomen17/11/16 09:09 PM
6

No, what they want is open hypergamy and Rollo has been doing a great job describing it. A key to the open hypergamy concept, and what you seem to be missing, and what a lot of TRP often misses, is the usefulness of betas to women. Women would not willingly give up that usefulness. No, I don't think women would give up, en mass, one-on-one commitment to betas for a partial commitment from alphas when the partial commitment means the women will receive less support from the alpha than they would …
/r/TheRedPill14/11/16 08:31 PM
11

It can all be boiled down to biology and the selfishness of our genes. Women want men who can out compete, without alienating, others and thereby produce and secure social status and resources which the women can then use to care for her offspring. The more a man can do this through, or along side of, his showing other good genetic fitness traits, the more she will want him. At some point, he becomes such a potential genetic jackpot, her body will throw all consideration out the window and she'l…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/16 08:26 PM
2

for a while The point is to help readers be more aware. Once you understand what it is and what can be done with it, then you can use it properly.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 07:40 PM
45

Sex is the payoff for a man's performance. When he is lean, strong and in charge (i.e. he's out competed the male competition) he will have access to young, beautiful, willing, women. Porn, and especially masturbating to porn, is a cheat. Your brain gets to see young, beautiful, willing, women in all manner of sexual acts while you come to orgasm. It's not exactly the real deal, but it's close enough to induce millions upon millions of men into a stupor as the brain thinks to itself, "I've achie…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 06:08 PM
52

Unlimited porn "validation" is to men what unlimited social media "validation" is to women.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 04:36 PM
3

The problem isn't with the advice, per se. It's with the context and intent. It's used by most to avoid actually engaging in meaningful discussion with another--it's easier than caring. It's received by most as an invitation to avoid the need for any real introspection--it's easier than doing something. However, understanding the need for, and benefit to be gained by, developing yourself into a valuable and unique commodity cannot be understated.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/16 10:51 PM
1

No. A valid partnership is subject to end without warning or cause. It doesn't, however, pit the partners against each other during the duration of the partnership the way a male-female parenting relationship does.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 07:57 PM
3

No it's not a partnership. It's a competition. What he want's, from a biological perspective is very different than what she wants. He wants assurance of paternity-she wants assurance of fitness. Each has two ways to do this. Men through maximization of opportunity (if I have sex with 100 women, they won't all bear my children but some surely will) or investment (let me be the only one having sex with this women and she will surely get pregnant and it will surely be mine). Women aren't concerned…
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 04:15 PM
2

People are tools, plain and simple. I mean that in both senses of the word. What ever it is you set out to do, having the right tools makes all the difference, it very well may be the difference between success and failure. People are your tools for so many things. And, the more tools you have the more options you have and the more capable you become. Imagine a carpenter with only a hammer and saw, he can probably join a few pieces of rough cut wood, but that's it. There are so many other things…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/16 01:32 PM
6

It's not cheating if they aren't exclusive, and she just made clear they aren't.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 01:29 AM
4

He doesn't have to dump her but he does have to permanently demote her to plate status.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/16 09:11 PM
31

I don't know how Steve was handling it inward, but outwardly he was on point. He said just enough to make it clear he knew what was going on and then he exhibited IDGAF attitude. Anything else would have hurt his standing. Inwardly, he should be demoting her to PERMANENT plate status and start treating her accordingly. If he doesn't have other plates he should acquire them, and rate her accordingly with the provisio that while she can still be plate #1, she can never be anything more than a plat…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/16 08:56 PM
9

I wouldn't say the Mongols were a matriarchy. given the nomadic warrior lifestyle, it made sense for women to have a significantly expanded caretaker role given how often the men were absent. The issue was who set the direction. It was very similar to Spartan culture in that ideology. For Spartans, business and banking and farming and infrastructure were all very important, just not as important as warfare. And, as all the Spartan men were needed for warfare, that left only the women to fill the…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 10:31 PM
1

The main issue to both of the issues you raise is the modality of thinking pre and post scientific revolution. We have become accustomed to atomizing everything first. We fully define it in a vacuum and then allow it, if possible, to interact with other concepts. That's the exact opposite of how antiquity typically viewed things. (I'm not asserting there were no cases of proto-scientific analysis, just that it wasn't widespread). In antiquity, everything was mainly understood as being interconne…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 02:30 PM
1

As to "marriage" you missed my point completely. State/government defined and enforced marriage is not the same thing as the natural pair bonding God intended. The N.T.'s discussions on marriage highlight this. One confuses the two at his/her own risk. Those are poor interpretations of the original Greek. Be careful not to mistake as fact what is actually the translator's interpretation. Even modern translations are somewhat bound by traditional interpretations which were highly influenced by po…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/16 09:55 PM
-9

You're right. It's because I don't give a shit if people believe me or not. As I said in my reply, here's the info make your own observations draw your own conclusions.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/16 09:45 PM
-6

You're missing the truth of the issue and as such you're expectations are incorrect. For example: if places like that were in every corner it would change the sexual market entirely. Women would be the ones begging men to marry them. Read about brothels around the world. Many women working them have men begging THE WOMEN for marriage and the women saying no. Why? Because the men have less to offer than she can get being a whore. It's the same principal as what is happening n the West. Because it…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/16 05:31 PM
98

I like how they imply that the decision afterwards to end the marriage was mutual or maybe even her decision, it wasn't he left her. I also like the part where she admits that after fully indulging in the CC she couldn't just come back and be a housewife. It changed her, just as it indelibly changes all women.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/16 12:41 AM
2

Male desposability is very real. A male who does not inherit money, power or position has nothing except what he builds. Women always have a vagina. This is why when armies invade all the men are killed and all the women enslaved. Male honey bees don't have stingers, they are called drones. All of the worker bees with stingers are female.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/16 03:12 AM
1

You've lost the parameters of the discussion. I never said altruism didn't exist. I said it wasn't biologically programmed in us to simply protect the weak because they are weak in the manner that OP was asserting.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/16 06:34 PM
1

Some traditional tribal societies value women, others don't, so it's not so simple. I didn't say it was a universal societal norm-Queen Isabella sent Columbus--just showing how 'protect the weak" absolutely isn't in our DNA. Protect our own, probably. But sparing women and children is still significant. It may still be linked with altruism on some subconscious level. I disagree, it's profit.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 10:42 PM
2

Again, we're talking about an attitude of "protect the weak." There is an almost universal history of treating the weak as tools and fodder. Keeping women as slaves is also not protecting the weak. So long as someone had value, for labor or sex, or even selling on the slave market, they usually did get some form of protection so long as the benefit clearly justified the cost. But that isn't "protect the weak" especially not protect the weak regardless of the cost.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 06:26 PM
1

It's a whole other discussion to get into the functionalities of religion. To be sure, most, if not all, cultures developed a standard of conduct, both as to individuals and to groups. Charity seems to have long been a part of that. Throughout the medieval, and perhaps before, era middle east there were highly developed expectations of magnanimity and generosity, especially for hosts as to guests. But to say charity and good social etiquette rose to the level of wide spread expectation of "prote…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 05:51 PM
1

I should have clarified to say that outside of a few religious sects, you never saw it applied in any large scale societal way. It certainly was never a part of chivalry.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 05:07 PM
5

No, just no. For the vast majority of human history, across all cultures, there was virtually no concept of "protect the weak." Think about the term "cannon fodder." The first recorded instance of "Women and Children first" was in the 1800's on a sinking ship. Think about that. Over 6000 years of civilization, and the first time you hear anything about protecting the weak for being weak is the 1800's. I don't mean it's the first instance of a man protecting his woman and children, just the first…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 04:16 PM
1

This is really the matter of evolutionary psychology, so it's deeply ingrained. Except that it clearly isn't. It isn't a universal trait among all peoples. Hell, even in the West Chivalry wasn't "All men should protect all women" it was a code for the noble warring class on how to conduct themselves in battle, court and society. Chivalry as you mistake it for grew out of courtly love, or how a warrior wooed a high born woman. After a life times of brutality on the battle field, it was important …
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 03:33 PM
2

I cited to Romans when discussing Paul and that passage. Read it yourself.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 04:31 PM
2

I wasn't saying homosexuality was or wasn't good, just pointing out this passage's often misuse. To illustrate, think of drugs. When used properly they make everything better. When abused, they tend to destroy the user and his life. The main reason for this is the law of diminishing returns, you constantly need more and more to satisfy until it has consumed all. Sex is one of the great natural highs. Read through all the no fap posts. See how often they talk about needing ever more extreme porn …
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 01:59 PM
2

love with or without merit This is absolutely true, but easily twisted. God always loves, even as he withdraws his protection even as he punishes the evil or allows them to be punished. Love has expectations. Anyone who will submit to love can receive that love. Anyone who will not submit will not receive. Jesus did not treat those who refused him the same as those who loved him. But of those who loved him, he did not care who they were or where they came from, so long as he/she loved. Don't let…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 01:54 PM
8

I almost always shy away from arguments that rely on cobbling together selected verses for support. Almost without fail those verses are interpreted against their original context. At least 50% of the passages cited in that blog don't actually support the argument. Try reading each book as its own work. Read nothing in to it, just see what the author is trying to convey.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 11:54 AM
4

There's also,a good argument Paul was specifically calling out the abusive power element often found in brothels concerning forced prostitution.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 02:22 AM
6

Very good question. To give a full answer I'd have to write something nearly as long as the above analyzing all the way that term/concept is used. So I'll give simple definition:actions of betrayal that risk/lead to perversion. In the Bible you see fornication of the Jews against God and fornication of men. Both lead to ruin. Paul discusses this in Romans. He talks about fornication leading to perversion and men laying with men and women with women. This is often used to justify anti-homosexual …
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 12:36 AM
16

Peter had a mother-in-law, therefore he was married.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/16 09:40 PM
69

WARNING__WALL OF TEXT INCOMING OK, I'll take a stab at this. I am a Christian and I have a background to justify waxing philosophic on religion, though due to doxxing concerns I won't post that background on a general thread. Keep in mind my answer is a mix of RP and Christian reductionist thought. It isn't strictly RP and wouldn't be accepted by most "Christians." First things first, according to the Bible, God didn't create the secular institution of marriage. Re-read Genesis, you see nothing …
/r/TheRedPill15/08/16 08:57 PM
2

From a evo-psychological standpoint, it's a mutual fitness test. From an evolutionary standpoint, sex/reproduction is a high risk activity. Pregnancy and birth are high risk and resource intensive for women. Commitment is resource intense and highly option limiting for men. So, the parties have a high incentive to engage only with the best potential mates. For men, we need to know she truly is into us, or she's a high cuckhold risk. If she doesn't have a hard time keeping her clothes on for us, …
/r/askTRP11/08/16 04:20 AM
16

Once heard an older women tell a younger one, "Don't waste the pretty." They were discussing the fact that the younger one's bf wouldn't commit.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 12:25 PM
22

Because even the biggest guy can be a no-spine beta when around M'lady.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/16 01:00 AM
24

I wouldn't call a self handjob sex...
/r/TheRedPill04/08/16 12:21 AM
31

If you can't obtain sex from women, you'll provide to yourself--by way of hand and lotion. If women can't find strength from men, they'll provide it themselves--by way of developing their own strength as much as they can.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/16 12:06 AM
14

he doesn't seem to even care about what I would want And you don't seem to care about what he wants (no marriage or the prenup) loving me should be enough Why? I don't care about money Then what's the problem with signing? You're holding on to something you don't want just to force out of him something he wants--his continued single status. when all I'm doing is giving up everything to start a life with him Well, that's just bad business. If what you are giving up isn't eclipsed by what you are …
/r/RedPillWomen02/08/16 11:00 PM
1

The irony of your statement is nice.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/16 06:06 PM
2

It's not that female friends are bad, it's that they are impossible. This is a situation where everyone is using the same word but applying a different definition. Most psychologically healthy men understand the true friendship requires a real respect between the parties. For women, as with all relationships, except the mother-child relationship, it's all about utilitarianism--how useful is this person? You can respect the hell out of a woman, you'll still just be a tool to her. I don't call tha…
/r/askTRP28/07/16 08:04 PM
2

You've missed the point entirely. It isn't about fishing. It's about feeling the beta need to include your girl in everything instead of keeping some aspects of your self, including hobbies and time away "fishing," to yourself.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/16 07:22 PM
1

Because when you do it's never truly about fishing.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/16 12:16 PM
4

Never take her fishing..unless she was already fishing before she met you.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/16 03:25 AM
1

I agree. Anger/understanding often go hand in hand, especially in today's world. This is a matter of self control though, you can't control your height or your race, you can't control the court. But, if some woman takes you to court and gets child support and graciously gives you a weekend a month but otherwise no real say in the matter, don't pretend you're being allowed to be a father. You aren't. Since you aren't act like it. Refuse to acknowledge the child. Pay the support, decline any and a…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/16 07:47 PM
9

True, but it's important to realize that while the search for Chad is constant, the search for Beta Bob is not, and important to understand why.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/16 12:45 PM
303

You misunderstand, she's not looking for a beta, she's still trying to compete for Chad. She's about 6-12 months away from her "epiphany" phase where she grows up and realizes biceps aren't nearly as important in a man as is a house and 401k. That's when she'll really feel the pain-when she finds out she should have realized this five years ago.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/16 02:16 AM
1

Was going to say this. My biology professor used to say, "anyone can be a female, it takes an extra something to become a male"
/r/TheRedPill12/07/16 01:22 AM
19

This is the TRP and MGTOW friction. MGTOW are, at least in theory, arguing that making sex/women a priority, even just for fucking, is compromising, if not outright sacrificing, the male imperative for the female. There are two strong factions within TRP about the correct TRP ideology. One says it's about developing strategies for getting laid. The other says, no, it about being the best man you can be which also happens to be the best strategy for getting laid. A lot of the older/longer contrib…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/16 04:45 PM
2

The reason she told you was to shame you into acting like a man. She was hoping the revelation would awaken and unleash the man inside. Instead, you bent over and asked her to be gentle. At that point, you were done. You might offer benefits, namely safety and security while she sought out another a man, but for all intents and purposes you two were through. She used you until she could safely branch swing. After the first time, and maybe even the first time, she wasn't cheating, you can only ch…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/16 04:40 PM
1

It's boxes all the way out.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/16 02:37 PM
4

TRP believes you're delusional.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/16 10:49 PM
2

Agreed, it is most common in chronic binge drinkers. However, it isn't absolutely limited to them, and we don't know if she was a binge drinker or not. So, what then seems most relevant is that 1. She doesn't remember anything, including before she left the party, and 2) I don't see any reports that the people at the party recalling indications she was intoxicated. That would mean her memory was shut down but not other brain functions. That's highly indicative of blacking out.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 11:05 PM
19

Came here to say this. It's about social status. In fact, I disagree with the old adage that "women aren't logical." Of course they are, they're just playing a different game. Men live and die by their ability. Women live and die by their social status. Both are looking for signaling mechanisms. The ability to bed hot women has always been, and always will be, a signal for a capable man. The ability to lock down a high status man has always been, and always will be, a signaling status for women.…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 10:07 PM
18

One of the things that many people fail to understand is the difference between "black out drunk" and "pass out drunk." To be clear, as the facts for this case are hard to come by, I don't know what happened. What I do know is that the girl claims not to be able to remember anything about the events. I'm going to assume the girl is being honest about her inability to remember. So, that means she was likely either black out drunk or pass out drunk. The difference is huge. As most people know, and…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 09:36 PM
8

Not personally advocating for or against morals, there is nonetheless an argument to be made for them. An example can be drawn from retail. If you steal something, you get a clear benefit; that product for free. There is loss as well. Either you lose when you are caught and punished or the retailer loses when you aren't caught and they lose their wholesale investment in the product you stole. So clearly, shoplifting is, at best, a win-lose scenario. One side wins, the other loses. But you must s…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 08:16 PM
21

You should read the excellent post, "Overcoming adversity with paragraphs," I guarantee, it will change your life.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/16 12:33 PM
3

Actually, I think there are several studies showing that women are better at multitasking and men are better and more prone to focusing on one task at a time. That doesn't mean men can't multitask, it just means women tend to be better. There are several studies as well that show that the cumulative results of multitasking are substantially less than the cumulative results of focused application.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/16 07:31 PM
-6

This article is a great example of why a man's word is so important and protecting your reputation should be your number one priority. Stanhope has no credibility. He admits that he'd sit on the truth to stay in Depp's good graces. (He says he didn't tell the truth about Heard because he feared reprisal from Depp.) Well, how do we know he isn't now sitting on the truth to stay in Depp's good graces? After all, if Depp's reputation is ruined and his fortune taken, what good is it to be his friend…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 02:46 AM
1

I'm not sure how what you are saying is any different than what I said, not being carried away by one's emotions can help one establish calm, but yes, I agree with what you're saying.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 08:57 PM
1

Perhaps the best way to understand meditation, prayer, and like "spiritual" practices to to equate it to exercise. The body is meant to be used, as is the mind, to stay healthy. Our modern lifestyles often mean that our bodies, and our minds, are not used fully or properly as designed for maximum health. Sometimes we overuse them in certain ways and wear them down. Other times we under use them and atrophy sets in. When our bodies, or minds, because damaged through misuse, rest and exercise beco…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 02:28 PM
5

Actually, she's "simply a woman" to do so. That's what's meant by AWALT. If you don't want to deal with this, don't get married-but since he's MRP, we're looking at this from a different angle than strict redpill--because every woman will do it.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 01:54 PM
5

Because he's married red pill. Most MRP guys want to keep the marriage intact for whatever reason--usually kids. There's a reason it's called redpill on hard mode, can't treat LTR's, especially spouses, the same way you'd treat a plate.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 01:51 PM
43

Be careful with this. You want her to realize you have other options and to realize you know it as well, you do not want her thinking you've already got one foot out the door or she might just start looking for her own escape plan. You want her to see that you have options by how other women treat you and you want her to see your comfort with other women by how comfortably and naturally fun you are with them. Do that and handle her comfort tests will be all the dread you need without risking her…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 12:02 AM
1

"Good sign?" I don't know, that's awful vague, could you read her body language? It seems like it's out there now, so being consistent is key. You are a rock. Do not say or do anything to disparage your current employment but continue to "consider" the alternative. However, once you've made your decision you've made it and they need to believe that to be true--a rock. Good luck.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 03:04 PM
2

Since you're dealing with a woman, go about this indirectly--and with a whole lot of flattery. You need to go to her on a CLEARLY personal and professional basis with a bit of a "crisis." Personal because you've gotten to know her and trust her good judgment and professional because you look up to her as a mentor. Present the crises as a crises of having to choose between two great options: 1) your dream job and 2) the current opportunity which was a godsend you never anticipated (doesn't matter…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 02:47 PM
7

I gathered very quickly it wasn't his 1st language. That's why I didn't say anything about his word choice/use. I commented on his writing. It is wholly unorganized and fails to anticipate the reader's needs in reading and understanding the work. Those are usually issues that are quickly corrected in higher education.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/16 05:31 PM
24

licensed psychotherapist Being a licensed psychotherapist requires a certain amount of higher education. Your writing indicates you lack any.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/16 05:13 PM
1

That's it. A very good read.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/16 09:27 PM
2

You seem to be confusing slutty with stupid. She can fuck 500 men, no problem, so long as she's smart enough to eventually adjust her expectations to the reality. At 27 she has to marry a 7, at 32 it's a 5, etc. On the other hand, she can be a 35 year old virgin, if she won't accept her SMV, she'll be alone.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/16 01:45 AM
18

Without censorship by the government. everyone else can censor the shit out of you.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/16 02:20 PM
1

Why treat this any than any other teaching opportunity? You correctly instruct the child: when dealing with bullies ask (ask them to stop), then tell (tell them to stop), then defend (make them stop). Advanced rule is: if a bully uses force, there is no asking, only telling; if they use, or appear to be about to use, excessive force there is only making them stop. Reward the child when he does well. Show disappointment when he does not. Tell the child what he should do the next time it happens a…
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/16 06:57 PM
-2

Stop worrying about whether or not other people get theirs. Focus on getting yours.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/16 02:37 AM
10

OK, so you're arguing for a positive abundance mentality over a cynical scarcity mentality. Anyone who doesn't understand what is meant by those two outlooks or why the former is hands down the better of the two, has no business blaming anyone for much of anything, except them self.
/r/MarriedRedPill01/04/16 06:41 PM
33

She wasn't a lesbian. She was trying to be a modern woman who can do anything a man can do including run man's game to pick up a lay. She wanted to fuck you and opened with a neg that was also meant to misdirect you while also making you automatically picture her naked and thereby stimulate your lizard brain. Maybe she wasn't trying to fuck you, but she certainly had you marked and was running game.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 01:18 AM
6

The word "hysteria" comes from the Greek. It derives from the Greek word for "uterus." For the Greeks, Hysteria was a female condition resulting from the uterus literally wondering around the inside of the woman's body disrupting her normal capacity to function properly. The remedy was to get her pregnant. Pregnancy would permanently root the uterus to the body where it was supposed to be and therefore forestall any future excessive emotional outbreaks.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 03:52 PM
3

I like your post. I think it's more accurate to understand this phenomenon from the standpoint of identities. Understanding someone's ego investment in their own identity allows you to sell yourself, via your own presented identity, in a way that makes them feel they need to identify with you in order to preserve their own identity. Does a person feel he/she is worth paying more for the high quality, aka name brand, product, or does it not matter if they just buy the nameless cheap stuff.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 02:26 AM
3

That goes along to a large degree with my belief about feminism: the reason so many women are so adamant that men are monsters is because they are projecting. If many women had the physical and emotional capacity that men have, they'd treat us the way they accuse us of treating them.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/16 06:55 PM
8

I wonder what would happen if every man who was divorce raped, in the process of being divorce raped or might one day be divorce raped would take the following attitude. A father is not a pay check. Depriving a child of a father is a terrible crime against that child, even if the father is complicit in that deprivation. Therefore, if the Court allows the only real role of the father to be child support, the man should understand what is happening. The Court is depriving the child of a father. Th…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 10:35 PM
4

The nature of men is action. The nature of women is reaction.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 02:04 AM
10

I love this: I'm pretty lean and in good shape except for this spare tire That's like saying I'm an 8 or a 9 if you ignore the fact that I'm ugly!
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 10:11 PM
1

From what you say, it seems your father isn't concerned about the biology of "his children." It also seems that he's well aware of the relationships he's entering. What's to spring on him? That he "shouldn't" be ok with it? TRP is amoral. It's about knowledge, not shoulds and shouldn'ts. Lastly, if you're not "his" what makes you think he doesn't already know? He's already shown a willingness to knowingly raise another man's kid as his own.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/16 12:24 PM
7

Because you aren't quantifying the "should" on anything other than moral grounds and TRP is amoral. If you proposed a risk-benefit analysis whereby one could more safely determine when to sleep with a married woman and when not to, that would be one thing. What you are proposing though is that it is wrong because it offends you or you dislike the outcome. Perhaps some people want to watch the world burn, in that case cheating would be a good thing.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/16 12:07 AM
33

Hell the,whole justice system is rigged against the defendant. That aside, stay on top of case law interpreting the language. While those are in short supply, reread the prior opinions regarding the prior language and argue that those opinions based on unchanged language are still applicable. And finally, if you ever do have to cross one of these experts, hit them with this one two punch, "can you explain to the jury what you would expect to observe in a person who was lying about being a victim…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 03:15 AM
33

Half will end, but of the half that stay together, what percentage will also stay happy?
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 03:17 AM
-5

BBWWahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Sorry, you wanted advice. So, how I see it is, BBBBBWWWWWAAAAHHHHahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 09:19 PM
0

Never considered placing a person into a catch 22 situation as "losing" but I guess that just places us back into the "relative" area, doesn't it.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 06:29 PM
0

Too bad your parents didn't adhere to that belief!
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 11:33 AM
3

As is what constitutes human life.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 04:59 AM
5

I was discussing potential, why are you discussing "good?"
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 03:15 AM
3

Who said potential was necessarily good?
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 03:14 AM
1

But that gets into what is life and what is human? Your analogy is flawed because of limitations. A spider can only ever be a spider. That "hollow ball of unaware cells with maybe an anus" can, if the pregnancy isn't terminated, become a human. A human with unlimited potential, something the spider can never be. In every other aspect of western law that potential is recognized and is actually the basis for much of our litigation law. Future opportunity is a legal right and if someone impinges on…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 12:14 AM
1

It was my understanding that he didn't conceive of these ides at the patent office, but while still in doctoral studies. It was these ideas which often put him at odds with the established "experts" of the day and caused the animosity. This seemed to be a continuing trend for much of his career. He was correct, he was unwilling to accommodate incorrect viewpoints, but he was always working from the outside trying to effect the changes. Eventually he triumphed and became not just well known in ph…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/16 05:36 PM
1

I always view our innate drives as engines. Sex drives us as men, among other things, to perform/achieve and to be social (a brilliantly performing but highly autistic person is likely to have trouble betting laid.) The capacity to be socially adept doesn't seem to be innate in a lot of men but always helps in every situation (I often wonder how much more Einstein could have accomplished if he hadn't had to spend years in the patent office post graduate school making up for the fact he was black…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/16 04:19 PM
6

That's why they tend to coexist. Women use sex to obtain commitment. Men use commitment to obtain sex. And how is this exchange negotiated? Historically in the west it's negotiated through dating. When a woman becomes easy, she has lots of sex but no commitment. When a man becomes beta, lot's of women develop "friendships" with him, but it never leads to sex. Can you guess what else you never see in these situations? Dating. Why? One or the other is offering up what they have for free which mean…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/16 09:04 PM
9

SHE IS NOT YOUR MATE. She is simply your temporary companion. There was a period when you were not together. There will be a period when you no longer are. Temporary.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 06:12 PM
2

I did just that in response to another comment on my comment.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 05:55 PM
2

There's a lot of situational context in OP's scenario so it's hard to be specific on what might be appropriate. So I'll work off of his facts, but I'll liberally add my own to try and illustrate. So, if what I say doesn't exactly line up with what OP said, don't point it out because I don't care. Start with the letter. First, if he'd handled the situation correctly there wouldn't be a letter. But now there is. So, one way for OP to handle it would be to very quickly, once he sees what's happenin…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 05:49 PM
10

I understand where you are coming from, but that's still too BP. but I would rather be known as a tyrant than be thought unobservant. Valid point. Unobservant would likely be seen as week. However, playing with her about it shows you aren't unobservant. And reinforces her perceptions of your ability. She knows that submission always earns her cuddles and good feels. Again, another valid point. But wouldn't it be better if she preemptively offered submission as opposed to just when being called o…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 08:29 PM
35

I guarantee you that what she has learned is to hide and lie. She has no more interest in your logic than you have in her emotions. She wasn't submitting to your superior analysis, she was protecting herself from further proof that you weren't reinforcing her feelings. Your disapproval of her motivated you to raise the bar for her performance. You expected more from her. She doesn't want to give more, she wants to get more. Instead, you should have accepted her form what she is and what she does…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 07:45 PM
12

Quite likely, and gaining more support in academic circles, the harlot and the beast represent Judaism (the harlot) and Rome (the beast). There seems to have been a late first century concern among Christians asking why if Jesus was the son of God, the people of God, especially their God inspired religion, rejected Jesus. The counter was because Judea, as a client kingdom of Rome, and Judaism, a state sanctioned religion of Rome, had traded their holy positions for positions of power provided by…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 11:45 PM
1

I agree with what you state, but disagree with the implication that what you say encompasses the full picture. We are discussing hypergamy which includes, but is not synonymous with desire. True female desire almost always entails a male with a higher SMV. But situational desire only entails the opportunity to improve her situation. Most women will gladly swing from a lesser beta to a greater beta. Why? Because women aren't controlled by desire but by hypergamy. Provisioning is fully half of the…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/16 11:42 PM
1

I'm not sure that Chad's SMV has to be higher than hers if hers is much, much higher than her husbands. If she significantly outclasses her husband, she'll instinctively feel a strong desire for "more." If the best she can get, or thinks she can get, is still lower than hers but higher than her husbands, there's a good chance she'll cheat just to satisfy the "more" desire.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/16 06:50 PM
2

I would say make her a plate, but that would actually be a very bad idea. You are looking for someway to justify making her more even though you A) know what she is, and B) know how blatantly she lied to you. She is not the issue, your mentality is the issue. The fact that you would even try to overlook this says you have a long, long way to go. You will absolutely sabatoge yourself for your feelz regarding her. You need to get away and go full no contact--permanently. Then, cautiously start spi…
/r/askTRP19/01/16 10:02 PM
12

For someone who says "look it up" so frequently, you haven't looked up the necessary citations, have you?
/r/TheRedPill16/01/16 01:12 AM
2

Would you recommend her to your brother as a LTR?
/r/RedPillWomen14/01/16 05:54 PM
21

Man=singular; men=plural. Learn the difference.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 01:37 PM
3

I forgot about virginity. Yes, a 30 y.o. virgin is likely cold and too invested in her status as virgin. The point of the response wasn't to advise one to do nothing, but to help see what another might be concerned about. Once you understand the concern, you are in a much better position to alleviate it if it arises.
/r/RedPillWomen14/01/16 01:12 PM
1

The problem, and confusion, about multiple partners is what information it potentially conveys and who's trying to understand what it means. Decide what type of guy you want. How would he feel about a potential LTR candidate? ONS: is she too impulsive? Is she too open to manipulation? Too desperate? Unconcerned with relationships? Place no value on sex? STR: Is she unable to properly vet potential partners? If so what does it say about her choice in you? Or, is she too picky? Does she get itchy …
/r/RedPillWomen14/01/16 02:16 AM
6

"... or anti-feminist (patriarchal/sexist)" Attacking the question, even if valid, is not answering it. If the question is flawed, pick another. Or, approach the instructor beforehand and address the issue of the apparent non-sequitur. and see if the question can be altered in such a way to make ot a more fair and balanced question. If not, then that forewarns you how the instructor is likely to receive anything expressing the sentiments in your friend's paper. Remember "think what you like, but…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 04:54 AM
5

When used in these type of descriptions, "salt of the earth" tends to have a very dense meaning. Basically, slat was important, valuable and multi-functional; but it was also strait out of the dirt and was unrefined. Compare this to so many other things which came out of the earth, like ores, which had to be heavily refined to be of value. Add to that those items often ended up with only one use (think sword or plow) or had no real functional value (think jewelry). In large part Paul's statement…
/r/MarriedRedPill12/01/16 04:05 AM
72

I read a good portion of the paper. It's a piece of shit. It is not the well thought out, skillfully articulated critique of the analyses posed by the question he selected, it's a rant. It rambles, it jumps, it assumes, it even forgets its own arguments mid sentence. Finally, it was not even an attempt to answer the question. The question was: "assuming for arguments sake that "feminist critical theory" established the minimum requirements a written work must have to be considered a "feminist wo…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 03:51 AM
3

She fundamentally fails to understand what it means to be male. To be fair, it sounds like she comes by it honestly in that she had a shit example for a father. She is taking that which comes naturally to her and assuming, because she can't imagine it being any other way, that that is how it had to be for everyone. When you indicate that that is not how it is for you, she freaks because it's literally beyond her comprehension. The result is fear. At some point you have to make the decision that …
/r/MarriedRedPill10/01/16 04:29 AM
13

Both subs are redpill in the sense that they both agree that a fully realized, self possessed man is the highest achievement. RPW just realizes that from a woman's perspective, you do what ever it takes to get and secure one since you can't be one.
/r/MarriedRedPill08/01/16 08:37 PM
1

I agree completely and that was the point I was trying to make. However, a number of responses seem to confuse the appropriate response to AWALT and one's role in that dynamic. The appropriate response to AWALT has two components, first, understanding AWALT and second, understanding your own reaction/treatment of AWALT. Understanding AWALT should not engender mere stoic acceptance. The reason stoic acceptance is so key, is because it is what allows one to make the appropriate adjustments in one'…
/r/MarriedRedPill07/01/16 06:45 PM
3

This is some crazy beta shit right here. Go back and reread what I said. At no point did I say anything personal or specific about his wife, I merely pointed out her actions and how OP responded and encouraged (harangued?) him to understand the dynamic. Saying that understanding the truth about women and relationships and calling them as they are is "anger phase shit" is white knighting. It's not. You may hate that you have a piece of shit car, but hating the car for being a piece of shit makes …
/r/MarriedRedPill06/01/16 04:46 PM
-3

Whether or not she's been forgiven is one thing, whether she's benefited or lost out due to her treatment of you is another. There's BP behavior, and the expected advantage a woman will take because of it, and then there's outright lying, manipulating and disrespecting she's shown towards you. My first question is have you done anything but reward her for her behavior? It sounds like she's gotten everything she wanted and is getting more as a result of her actions. My second question is, why doe…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/01/16 01:32 AM
8

I agree you should never "ask." But, make sure she knows that it is expected, not wanted, expected. I mean by this don't hide the fact that you want it and don't "oh it's OK" her when she doesn't do it-of course, don't be butt hurt either. Also make sure she knows you intend to have it done. This is key. You don't have to explicitly say it, but make it clear that you intend to have someone regularly sucking you off and swallowing, even if it isn't her. This is where your SMV improvements kick in…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/01/16 10:38 PM
6

If he wants you to meet his family that is because he finds that you are worth being a part of his family. Not necessarily. You assume it means something and OP's friend assumes it means something, but does it mean that same something to OP's boyfriend? It honestly may have been nothing more than, OP's bf thinking, I like spending time with my family and I like spending time with my GF...the holidays allow for the ultimate twofer. Or even, hey I can get a cheap date with my GF by taking her to t…
/r/RedPillWomen05/01/16 10:25 PM
14

First, congratulations on the progress you've made on yourself and with your wife. Take heart and continue on. However, lest you think "you've finally made it" or "you're pretty close to making it" let's place all of this into it's correct and larger perspective. She admittedly, unabashedly and without guilt lied to you about something which was clearly very important to you for no reason other than she didn't care about you in the face of her convenience (and let's be real here, it's no great l…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/01/16 09:52 PM
14

See, you're actually not being RP with that, you're being a progressive egalitarian who believes in equality and 50/50. You've learned the benefit of sharing decisions, such as sex, so it's a joint venture. Your example is the perfect 50/50 split: you decide when you're having sex, she gets to decide if it's with her. And see, with that division of decision making authority she's always in the mood! Being an egalitarian nice guy really does work!
/r/MarriedRedPill05/01/16 09:18 PM
1

I agree that everything has to be taken together. However, you're not getting what I was trying to convey. As I explained in another response to my response to OP here, when I said "work to get her" I was referring to the BP/BB mentality of making her the prize that had to be won by your work. I specifically did not mean work as in Game or self improvement. I was implying the BP/BB mentality of "she's so great, I don't deserve her." Again, the point of my response was to relay how the Rule helpe…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 03:40 AM
3

Answered like a little boy.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 02:48 AM
1

This shit is too long, so I only skimmed the last half. I think I understand what you think we should do. I certainly understand what you want us to do. Nowhere did I see why we should care.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 02:13 AM
1

You are correct, sir. That's why the one thing you never, under any circumstances, see is old, fat, awkward, ugly ass, and ass ugly, pasty white media moguls/stars with smoking hot wannabe starletts. No sir, you will NEVER see that. Never gonna see the likes of uber dork Lyle Lovett with Julia Roberts. Never going to see old, bald author Salmon Rushdie with Padma Lakshmi. You sure as hell wont see old nasty ass Harvey Weinstein married to someone like Georgina Chapman. What about scrawny Marc An…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 12:38 AM
1

Then you underestimate the seduction of extreme fame, millions of dollars, high talent, oh and the ability to write a script which will undoubtedly be made into a major motion Hollywood production the contract for which allows you to force them to cast the young, gorgeous Hollywood starlet of your choosing.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/15 11:38 PM
3

It is not through meditation - but through extreme self reflection, self manipulation, and studying the lives of others in great detail - that you can reveal the secret patterns that guide who you are. Actually what you are describing are major tenants of some schools of Buddhism. These schools teach that through mediation one can become aware of one's true being/essence and understand that there really is no "you." There is simply the illusion created by the balance of one's cognitive aspects s…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/15 03:08 AM
2

Did you have a plan for the household? Did you alter it to accommodate your illness? Did you adequately convey that plan, and alterations, to the wife? Did you see it carried out, despite you illness? If not, there's your problem. If so, was it successful (her feeling don't determine success or failure). If so, it's all a matter of frame and you've got to hold against her pressing. If not, it's still a matter of holding frame-without gas lighting her- while you analyze the problem and make sure …
/r/MarriedRedPill28/12/15 04:54 AM
1

It might take up to half the time you've been together to undue the damage your blue pill ways inflicted. So, if you've been together and BP for three years, it might take up to a year and a half to turn things around completely and have a truly RP relationship. If it takes longer than that you are either doing something wrong-and need to go back to basics and start over as a novice/beginner or the relationship can't be saved and you should cut bait and leave. An example of an unfixable relation…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/12/15 04:46 AM
5

There's still an argument regarding what you're saying. You have to put in the effort of gaming her. Most guys do. Brad Pitt, likely would not. He put ALL the effort into himself. I suspect the same would likely be true for Bill Gates, Barack Obama, Stephen King, David Beckham, Justin Beiber, etc. The question is does a man believe that he can achieve the level of success necessary to make everything else irrelevant. (Gates has no looks and, from his public appearances, little in the way of char…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 04:41 AM
37

Sigh, OK, for those unable to employ any sort of contextual analysis I'll break it down to a 1st grade level. By "work" I meant effort exerted by a man directly to/in benefit of a woman so as to convince that woman that she should should grace him with the glorious gift of her attention. Examples would be rearranging your schedule to benefit her convenience, taking her on expensive dates, doing her all sorts of favors so that she will notice you. In short, all of those behavioral traits consiste…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 01:37 AM
71

I used a version of this to help kill my belief in unicorns: If Brad Pitt ran into your girl in a bar, how hard would he have to try? For most girls, he wouldn't have to try at all. After making sure the girl saw him, he could send over a member of his entourage to tell her Brad would like to meet. The lackey could then escort her to Brad's room and she'd go. The chances of him not banging her within 20 minutes is slim, the chances he won't bang her at all is almost nill. (You can substitute Bra…
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 09:46 PM
34

Gotta disagree. I disliked Anakin because he to was too skilled, but those skills had limits. He was good without training, but not a match for someone trained with the force. Sure he didn't need as much training, but he still needed some and he got it from Obi, Quigone and Yoda. Luke was the same. He used the force to blow up the death star, but only after training with Obi. Even after training with Yoda he barely survives fighting Vader. Rey on the other hand needed no training to be a pilot, …
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 07:33 AM
11

This is actually a good lesson to learn about all laws. No matter why they were put into place, they will eventually be used for something else. We need laws. But we also need as few of them as is possible for society to survive (the emphasis is purposefully ambiguous).
/r/TheRedPill26/12/15 03:11 AM
4

You don't believe in "physics?" Damn son, girls are not your problem.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/15 05:14 PM
8

Two things: 1) Hire a lawyer familiar with higher education laws AND criminal defense. You might need to go to a multi attorney firm to achieve this. 2) Find and watch a TAM talk given by Carol Tavris called "Who's lying, who's self justifying? Origins of the he said/she said gap in sexual allegations" In fact everyone should watch that talk.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 07:51 PM
1

I agree with that interpretation. I also agree it's better to be the buffalo than the weasel. The reason it's better, though, has nothing to do with women. When I see posts like these I'm usually reminded of Rollo's arguments against trying to be a stronger beta. And OP shows exactly why. Per his analogy: The weasel gets the girl first The weasel doesn't have to do anything to get the girl except have fun The girl leaves on her own with no muss or fuss The buffalo gets the girl only after she's …
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 02:57 AM
1

I didn't misread anything. I know what you meant to say. You meant to say that buffalo being so much bigger and stronger than weasels will always win in the end, just like the nice guys. However, you had to conceed that before the buffalo the women had fun with the weasels. You also played up all the ways big strong buffalo can provide for women (BB) so much better than a weasel. My point is that no matter what you choose to be, NEVER forget what women ARE. You seem to think they are this "kindl…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 02:23 AM
1

But never forget how much she she wanted to play with the weasels and for how long before turning to the buffalo. Also do not fail to understand than unlike her desire for the weasel's fun that made her seek them out it is not because of her desire for the buffalo that she now follows him, but a desire to escape the freezing and unforgiving wind. EDIT: The more I think about it I have to ask, how in the fuck is it superior to be so damn stupid you don't know to get the fuck out of the winter win…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 02:13 AM
200

Chasing money won't bring you any more happiness than chasing women will. In fact, it's the same enterprise. Men chase women because of what women have in hopes that women will give it to us. When you chase money you are chasing what someone else has (money, resources, validation, approval, etc.) in hopes that you can obtain it from them. Either way, someone else is still setting the price and calling the shots and you're jumping obstacles like a trick dog. Instead, chase yourself. I don't neces…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/15 06:05 PM
6

No. South Africa is a huge welfare state, but welfare was meant to be a solution to massive problems which already existed, it did not create them. S.A. is great to learn from though and parallels to the U.S. exist. In S.A. huge portions of the population were systemically excluded. The non-whites, through application of the law, were denied education, experience or the capacity to create and/or hold any real wealth. The degree of exclusion was stunning. And that's all before getting into the tr…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 09:33 PM
1

Not at all, respect is not the same as condone or approve. I can respect another's right to make what ever choices he/she chooses to make, but I will hold him/her accountable for those choices in a manner consistent with those choices. If you act like an ass or an imbecile, I will treat you as an ass or an imbecile. I will respect you enough not to infantilize you by making excuses on your behalf.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 12:46 PM
1

What you advocate for is not equality, but meritocracy. Most well adjusted TRP participants are strong supporters of meritocracy. Think about it, given all of the participants, what's the likelihood that all, or even most, are going to have equal capacity? More likely, you have a lot of different people who have different strengths and weaknesses achieving different results. That's simple reality. However, what we are confronted with is a societal mentality that automatically equates any differe…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 04:11 AM
6

It's why a man should have no problem with a woman being promiscuous, but he can never ignore it and what it means either.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 08:54 PM
18

Everything in that article is 100% accurate. Those are the aspects of being a man as opposed to being a boy. However, that article doesn't need to go into all of that, it could say all of that and everything else about being a man by simply saying, "a man demands accountability; both from himself and others." But people like the article writers don't want accountability, certainly not for themselves and certainly not from women. They don't want men, but they do want as many of the benefits of me…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 07:17 PM
0

Exactly. So, you no one can argue they don't understand why choice, and preserving it, is so important. You do not even the equation by eliminating choices but by expanding them.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 05:44 PM
9

This is absolutely horrible advice, assuming OP is not a troll. This is highly illegal. At a minimum, it will be felony assault and perhaps some form of felony endangerment. In some jurisdictions it might even be murder/attempted murder (the baby, not mom). I know of at least one man who was charged with several felonies, including murder for inducing an abortion by slipping the woman medicine he knew would cause the fetus to abort. (It wasn't the morning after pill and there was no doubt the la…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 04:34 PM
4

Uh, no. What she wants is for OP to hang around and be available for her even though sex isn't on the table. Her questioning is a different form of the old shit test "all you want me for is sex." The reality is (and I know most here already know this) that no sex equals no relationship from MRP's perspective. She also needs to figure it out. However, most here advise against ever being explicit, only implicit, and allow her hamster to make the connections. So, when she makes the connections expl…
/r/MarriedRedPill07/12/15 04:38 AM
0

I feel like humans have a need to suffer This. Life is a struggle. That's what evolution is all about, the struggle to survive at the expense of the losers. But, and this is key, how we will struggle is always uncertain. So, how does evolution prepare us for a guaranteed fight with an unknown competitor? By evolving for as many potential capacities as possible, without committing to any certain outcomes. We have the potential to meet our obstacles, but if we refuse to meet them, then potential i…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/15 02:12 AM
2

This post illustrates a good point: this is not a formula but a skill set. "All women are AWALT, but each is AWALT in her own way."--Leo
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 12:50 AM
27

I don't think she wants to have sex with him even now, she just doesn't want to lose the relationship. What he needs to understand is this: 1) he wants sex and she knows it, and 2) she wants sex as well (if we believe she was masturbating). However, and this tells us everything we need to know about this girl, she can easily, with one fell swoop, satisfy both their desires but absolutely refuses to do so. No, no, instead she satisfies herself and leaves him as he is. This is what we get when we …
/r/TheRedPill28/11/15 04:20 AM
5

Mansplaining: the term a woman uses to try and cover the rage she feels at knowing she needed a man to teach her.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/15 02:43 AM
11

Almost, your commitment in and of itself isn't valuable. Your commitment to allowing her full access to your abilities/resources is what has value and only has the value of your abilities/resources.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/15 06:35 PM
23

You forgot an axiomatic truth: men are disposable women who can still reproduce are not. What she did or did not do is not relevant, she can carry, bear and nurse a child, you cannot and that is all that matters. Only when a) your actions bring more value to the group than her potential to have children and b) her actions threaten the continued enjoyment of your benefits by other child bearing women; then and only then will your perspective matter over hers.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/15 06:11 PM
111

They know exactly what they want, however, by it's very definition, it cannot be stated exactly. This is another of those differences between men and women where our biological programming forces men and women to see the world differently. Women, because they are not self agents, need to maintain multiple options at all times to be safe. Men, because they are self agents, need to eliminate/combine multiple options into one avenue on which they can act. A man who can't narrow his options/make a d…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/15 05:00 PM
46

I can tell you all you need to know.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/15 02:09 AM
1

HEY! Don't white knight shame ME. Take your redneck, mysandric double standards and leave. You're going to make me organize a white knight pride march up in here.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/11/15 11:11 PM
1

You said that that "was the purpose" it's not. You also now say it's the "net result" again it isn't. Is higher attorney fees a consequence of that decision? Quite possibly (but not necessarily, you'd have to show how arbitration routinely allowed for more billable hours than adjudicating cases strictly in the court room). The net result for those making the choice to send these cases to arbitration is decrease in case/work load without a corresponding decrease in court fees (attorney fees are n…
/r/MarriedRedPill23/11/15 09:36 PM
1

Court's don't send cases to arbitration to pad the wallets of attorneys. They do it to lessen their case loads. Judges receive static salaries that are always the same whether they hear 1 case or a 1000. Their view is let someone else do all they work as they (that being the judges) will still get paid.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/11/15 09:02 PM
3

It isn't a double standard, it one trait being applied to two seperate issues. The trait is promiscuity and the issues are 1) sex and 2) commitment. If sex is all you are looking for then the easier the girl, the more likely you are to succeed. However, if you are looking for commitment (including exclusivity), then you always have to wonder, if it was this easy for me, and everybody else, how do I know it won't continue to be this easy with her in the future? True, the past is no guarentee of f…
/r/TheRedPill21/11/15 05:59 PM
5

I agree and I don't. We should always strive for OI. However, a woman's reaction to you is a good indicator of how you are coming across. There are studies suggesting that how much a woman enjoys sex with a man depends not so much on what he does or doesn't do in bed but on how she views him to begin with. These studies indicate that a woman's raw sexual attraction has more to do with her enjoyment of sex with him than does anything else. So, you could be physically masterful, but if she doesn't…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/15 02:51 PM
3

Then you are doing it wrong. As women get older they don't want the feelz any less, they just want the bux even more. So, their public persona changes. Rather than publicly be a party girl, they are now 'looking to settle down.' However, they are still very much up for having the alpha, so long as it's on the dl. If they are only bringing their bb game to you, that's because of the image you are projecting. Where as before they may have seen both in you but only wanted the alpha, now if they see…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/15 04:49 AM
3

Not necessarily. This highlights how big an impact attitude has on your life. Let's look at some examples. The natural in college, was he fat or social awkward or scrawny? Not likely, which meant he didn't sit on his ass glutting in donuts and was active quite often, likely lifting, he also spent a lot of time being social. Maybe he never went through a fat/awkward phase, that just means he was doing the right things from day one-but he was doing them. But, and here's the kicker, he did them not…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/15 04:37 AM
2

Sorry, that's not what that article is saying. It's a cautious reminder that anything not subject to strict scientific application, and much of science falls into this designation, can at best be indicative not definitive.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 06:20 PM
1

Fine, you've appealed enough to my commitment to help everyone self-educate who is interested. We discussed a lot of fields so I'm not going to provide works into all of them, but I will give you a beginners list. Keep in mind, there is nothing even close to a work wherein the author is intentionally trying to explain history/genetics from an RP perspective. First, read the Red Queen. It is a good book on how genetics influence behavior and how those behaviors in turn influence genetics. It even…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 04:02 PM
1

The word you want is "negate," not negative.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 02:24 PM
3

I knew after his/her first reply what I was dealing with. My point was to provide valid counter points to others who might read. That's why once it got to the point that our convo wasn't automatically on the main page I simply began pointing out his own logical flaws and cognitive deficiencies because that is always lie throwing gas on a flame. His/her hamster damn near went into orbit. Thanks for the positive feedback, though. Glad to know my time wasn't wasted.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 10:43 PM
1

That's true and a very good point. That's also why I said God's love for the world instead of saying God's love for his bride. God's love for his bride is an offshoot of his love for the world. Stated another way, the bride can be the bride only because God already loved the world. The "bride" is that person, or people, who choose to accept God's love (I'm purposefully avoiding predestination/free will implications here) and attempt to enter into a relationship with him him based on that love. G…
/r/MarriedRedPill18/11/15 07:14 PM
1

Boys learn by doing. Young boys' typically begin this process by imitating what they see older boys and men do. You need to identify men, and hopefully the father is one of these men, who have the masculine attributes you want your sons to have. Find ways to maximize your sons' exposure to these men in "men only scenarios." If it can't be arranged in a "men only scenario" I suggest you are not identifying the correct men or the correct masculine attributes.
/r/RedPillWomen18/11/15 06:43 PM
6

Game recognizes that social interaction is dominated by a single man (the AMOG, alpha-male of the group), group interactions are dominated by a single group. I don't think this is correct as stated. It would be more correct to say something along the lines of: Game recognizes that biology has predisposed humans to prefer social dynamics dominated and/or led by a single man (the AMOG, alpha-male of the group), or a small group of men, exhibiting or clearly possessing certain masculine characteris…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 05:11 PM
4

Sigh, you truly are a moron. Best of luck to you.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 05:04 PM
1

I could argue a number of the points you're making, but more about how you're making them than the point you are trying to make. I always found an easier way to make the argument. There is no more perfect love than the love God has for the world. However, that does not mean that the world will love God back. It does not mean the world will be happy with God. It does not mean the World gets to tell God how he should love or what it means for him to love the world. It does not mean that God cannot…
/r/MarriedRedPill18/11/15 05:02 PM
5

"You can only think of these prehistorical societies in terms of overt competition between men and women. Those simply weren't issues. It was a common endeavor to survive. Issues such as consent had yet to be conceived. Individualism as we understand it today was simply not possible. Survival was too tenuous. Everyone's drives were sublimated to group cohesion and prosperity. This is what allowed those groups who innately favored eggs to out compete those who didn't and also what kept that innat…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 04:49 PM
4

We have some genetic testing studies that show a smaller group of men mated with a larger group of women. The rest of your argument is speculation. It is very possible that the alpha males just formed harems of women like in many primate cultures. Under these conditions, women would have zero rights and were passed from "alpha" to "alpha" depending on who won the wars and secured the booty. Women would essentially be war booty/chattel under this system that men fought over. Under such brutal con…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 04:33 PM
6

1) Do these tools and "art" show how men treated women in those days? Men allowed themselves to be routinely cucked and divorced by women? The little information we have gives MAJOR gaps in terms of knowledge of how male/females interacted during those times. Its all speculation. We have more info that you seems to realize and you also seem to have problems of conceiving anything different that what you have experienced. Divorce in pre-historic times? Hello? There was no such thing as "marriage"…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 04:10 PM
8

Fallacies of this argument include: 1) You have NO IDEA of how societies worked before modern civilization. Some pseudoscientific models of societies "millions of years ago" can't be proven at all. We have absolutely no records from those times. Yes we do have an idea of how these societies worked, they are called theories. Yes we do have records, such as cave paintings, tools and "art" all of which are called artifacts. Do these constitute proof beyond all argument? No, but it's how we obtained…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 03:53 PM
9

Again, you are focusing on too narrow a time frame and on too narrow an issue, plus you are over generalizing. Time frame. You want to make 4-6 thousand years out of 1.8 million controlling, you can't. Long before organized religion and society you still had fundamental hallmarks of human culture, i.e. tool making and art. Both seemed almost exclusively concerned with animals, especially hunting, and the feminine form. We don't have 20,000 year old statuettes of men, we do have 20,000 year old s…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 03:18 PM
7

Biology is a starting, not an ending, point. There are a couple of competing theories regarding societies treatment of the elderly. First, it's possible that post menopausal women weren't as common one hundred thousand years ago as they are today so evolutionary controls weren't as necessary. Evolution is full of isolated species failing to develop protections to absent dangers, such as the Dodo. It evolved in the absence of humans and had no fear of them, unlike almost all other birds. The seco…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 02:20 PM
13

These are all very good points, but show a lack of full perspective on the question. First, clarifying the hierarchy under this theory of evo-psychology. It is not correct to say that it places women above men. It is more accurate to state that ALL people are less important than the egg/child. A person's societal ranking is determined by his/her relationship to that egg/child. This necessarily gives women an in because they alone have the eggs, gestate and can nurse the baby prior to the baby's …
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 01:52 PM
1

But you are Chicken Little, right?
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 06:45 PM
1

You forgot to point out that the sky is falling!
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 06:10 PM
2

In the US, truth is considered an absolute defence to allegations of libel and slander That's not accurate. Many jurisdictions in the U.S. allow slander/libel claims when the information stated/written is unquestionably true, but only stated/written for the sole purpose of causing injury to the subject in question and for no other beneficial or justifiable purpose. There is a well known Massachusetts case where a women sued an ex because he called her a whore in a crowded restaurant. I can't rem…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 07:42 PM
10

I don't believe for a second that that was what she was implying. She was saying that the women's feelings, be they of loss, despair, or heartbreak, and the fact that they as women can no longer receive the benefit of their relationship with the now dead man trump any reality of that man's demise. Plain and simple: the real conditions of a man do not compare to the feelings of a woman and once he is of no further benefit to a woman he simple ceases to be considered, except where his demise const…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 07:01 PM
1

AA might have helped here. Something along the lines of "Baby, fucking you IS me being nice to you! I hear the noises you make, I hear how much you love it. Come on, let's see how loudly I can get you to scream it now!"
/r/MarriedRedPill05/11/15 08:04 PM
8

I HATE being accused of being an ape.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 01:13 PM
52

Should be required reading for ALL men. That a female author wrote a book about a woman who, from moment one, manipulates a man in every way for years without end with no remorse no guilt and no conscience amazes me. That is was published was a miracle. What Amy does is what every woman does-automatically-though they usually stop once they've socially destroyed the man, though through false rape accusations we are seeing more and more carry over into truly scary criminal justice manipulation.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 10:09 PM
10

The only information she cares about is how you feel about her. Nothing else matters. That's why the more sparse your statement, with less emotional implication, the more she'll be offended. It's the equivallent of freezing her out.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 12:35 PM
2

You're correct that society has likely had little, if any evolutionary impact on people. However, numerous lifeforms seem to have innate population controls. One example is with viruses. Extremely virulent/lethal strains come in, explode and destroy most, but not all of the hosts, If it killed them all. the virus dies for ever without new hosts, victims of it's own supremacy. Instead, it reached critical mass an collapses. It exists marginally in a population mostly immune, until it makes a smal…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 04:48 AM
2

In this whole situation you are trying to lead from behind. It will never work. Issues I see: How much heads up did you give your wife abut her needing to do the shopping? Did you really just tell her out of the blue to plan all the meals and obtain all the food on no notice? How did it get to such a last minute issue that you had to do that? You started from behind the 8 ball. Your wife handled this like a boss. You blind side her with something and her response? Was it to bitch? No, Was it to …
/r/MarriedRedPill27/10/15 07:14 PM
189

For the general public, differences in capacity between men and women are not nearly as great as differences between desire. The reason women in the west are underrepresented in the STEM fields is not because they lack the capacity, it's because they don't enjoy the work and don't have the motivation to persevere on a path they dislike when other more enjoyable paths are open to them. In highly "equal" countries, such as Scandinavian countries, you see a huge divide between the fields men and wo…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/15 12:32 AM
80

I suspect women sometimes "store" their betas or even their alternative alphas. If he isn't her best option now but she knows he won't last long single, she might be inclined to hook him up with a significantly lower SMV girlfriend. That gets him off the market, keeps him nearby in case of emergency, and control her competition making sure it's with a woman she can out compete.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 11:09 PM
9

There are already several takes, but I'll add my own. Start with how/why women are AW'd. Women are not self agents. They obtain their status through their "mate." AN AW is a woman who: 1) through her mate, has obtained a very high status, 2) subsequently lost that mate and status, 3) cannot obtain another mate of that status and therefore can not regain her own prior high status, and 4) as a result cannot truly connect and be invested in any current or future (potential) mates and is usually, in…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 07:36 PM
0

Their nature is what sets up their drive. Their drive dictates what can be used to motivate/socialize them. Their drives also dictate how those socializations are expressed. I'll give you some examples. Throughout history, the vast majority, but not all, women have actualized (achieved their goals) through men. Hellen didn't just leave Sparta, she hooked up with Paris and left with him under Hector's protection (fiction, I know). Cleopatra seduced Caesar to fight her brother for him. After Caesa…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 01:27 AM
26

This is an issue geneticists are already tackling. The simplest was of describing their currently applicable guidelines is "don't ask, don't tell." What this means first and foremost, is identify the client/patient/etc. He/she controls all info, so no one else can piggy back on the tests. For example, if they have to run tests on a baby to diagnose an issue, and the tests shows that the "father" is anything but, there is no reason to share that info with the father and it will remain hidden from…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 09:44 PM
4

It's just good practice that when you say something has been studied, verified, etc., that you link the source.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 04:02 PM
2

Do you have links to any of these studies?
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 03:21 PM
3

True, and neither does a woman.
/r/MarriedRedPill19/10/15 10:15 PM
1

Think of it like a car. If they are not taken care of they break down. When one breaks down it's not the car's fault. That's neither good nor bad, it just is. Don't cry over it, just get a new one. It's the same with women. If she has been so let go that she can no longer effectively pair bond and behave so as to contribute to a LTR, you simply have to understand how it happened. Crying over it will get you nothing. Having obtained the correct diagnosis, you simply do an analysis about whether t…
/r/MarriedRedPill19/10/15 08:11 PM
2

You're taking that statement too literally (no wonder you have issues with women). Yes, the same set of rules, moral or otherwise, can be applied to men and women. But that then leads to the questions 1) will they respond the same, and/or 2) will they be applied equally. We don't need to go in depth to those answers (No and no respectively) because that's likely not what Iliads meant. What he meant was some nebulous moral code arising from within which governs the minds/actions of men and women.…
/r/MarriedRedPill19/10/15 08:06 PM
1

If it makes no difference then random choosing is fine. If asked to explain simply reply, "Because I said so." End it with a quizzicle look like you can't believe you were questioned. If you'd like and it makes things easier, anytime you're asked to choose, first counter with something like, "what are my choices." This allows input from the other parties and allows them to feel like they are being heard/considered. It is ok to follow this up with one, maybe two, more clarifying questions. Just m…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 02:16 PM
2

Don't run from the pain. A lot of older philosophies liken pain to a purifying/forging fire. It burns away the impurities leaving only the true metal which is now much, much stronger and higher quality. I'm not saying divorce, I am saying don't avoid necessary pain. It will help you become stronger and will burn away the weakness. In your case leaving an IDGAF attitude which will leave you with the OI you need whether you're with your wife or other women.
/r/MarriedRedPill19/10/15 11:50 AM
19

I understand what you're trying to say, but that not extended boyhood, it's just being smart. Making intelligent decisions is the hallmark of maturity.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/15 03:28 AM
43

I agree with you, but a simpler way of stating it is women value utility and men value integrity. The key is in understanding why. Men are self agents. We do. Therefore we need the space to do. Men being exactly where they say they will allows men to coordinate the space they need without unintentionally colliding. In short we need trust to turn our backs on each other, otherwise we have to be much more cautions which slows our movements which limits our capacity. Women do not pursue self agency…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 05:02 PM
9

Because, though men and women both use talking to communicate, we are trying to communicate different things. Women are trying to communicate feelings. Men try to communicate information (but usually NOT information regarding feelings).
/r/TheRedPill16/10/15 08:51 PM
2

I think what you describe is spot on for most situations, but doesn't seem to apply here. He stated that sex was always plentiful ("active sex life") little drama and she always met her obligations. Seems more like it's a comparison and confidence thing. As more and more attractive women notice him, his wife seems less and less attractive by comparison. Add in all the hard work he's done and it seems like he should get more of a reward than continuing with what he's always had.
/r/MarriedRedPill16/10/15 08:50 PM
10

You can NEVER stop a woman from going, only from coming back.
/r/MarriedRedPill16/10/15 04:47 PM
3

I took two things away from The Game: Women cannot control themselves, they have to have something guide them. Women, no matter how many you have, can never make up for the validation you won't give yourself.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 09:14 PM
2

I never said I didn't feel anything for her, I just wasn't ever go to fall in love with her or feel as though I needed to commit to her. I enjoyed her company and had a lot of genuine fun with her. The short answers to your questions is, yes. She was pretty "enough" but not beautiful and not what I routinely pulled before and after. Definitely not my type. What she wanted was the exact opposite of what I was pursuing. And her personality was not complimentary to mine. She was always trying to ou…
/r/RedPillWomen15/10/15 08:51 PM
1

I think there's a red pill subreddit for gay's somewhere. Seems very appropriate for you since you're so keen on discussing men having sex. Additionally, what does it matter? If what I say works great for me but doesn't help you at all, you'd be an idiot to follow it. On the flip side, if it's working for you why do you care if it works for me? If what is said doesn't work for you, what else do you need to know?
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 07:31 PM
12

Dogs will smell assholes and women will lose interest in Men who won't do. Neither dogs nor women are wrong for doing so. The issue isn't that she acted the way her hard wiring demanded, but that we live in society that lets men grow up not knowing this.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 06:15 PM
5

If Bernie is dependent on people like you to win, he's already lost. Your post is full of logical fallacies and inconsistencies. For example: These are all goods that should be common to everyman, regardless of his income. They should be common to all not because of any emotional argument, but simply because it would be inefficient or all together impossible for the free market to supply them. There are a lot of people purposefully choosing to live off the grid who'd disagree. You say you don't …
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 09:17 PM
3

Sigh, I think you might be deliberately obtuse. You can't say there wasn't a commitment issue when you don't know all of the facts. Did she leave because he wouldn't propose? That's a commitment issue. Did she leave despite his willingness to marry? That's also a commitment issue. You can't say there isn't one simply because you don't want there to be one. Can women have high libidos? Absolutely. Can they have one because they are ill? Absolutely. Can they have one because they are healthy? Abso…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 08:56 PM
1

The watch face is simple, the gears moving it are not. Too many people misunderstand why the numbers matter and therefore miss what the numbers are trying to tell them. My point was not to pass on information, but to impart understanding; the gears that move the process.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 06:44 PM
6

I was describing a comparative analysis. Her genes might not be "low quality" genes. However, it appears, from your description that she's consistently chasing men who are at the very top and unable to get them to commit. You said she had a "partner" for 11 years. Really, she dedicated herself to a man for 11 years and couldn't get him to propose? In the past year and a half she's slept with at least 10 different men and not obtained a commitment from even 1? She's using Tinder? Her genes are to…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 06:39 PM
0

I know it is possible because I was the girlfriend of one for about a year when I was eighteen to nineteen. This doesn't necessarily mean anything. Women constantly fail to understand the fact that many men will happily sleep with a women, even repeatedly, he would never commit to. To better understand what that relationship meant, you have to look at the following. Who chased who? Who broke it off? If you chased him and he broke it off, he was clearly well above you. If he pursued and you walke…
/r/RedPillWomen14/10/15 06:15 PM
10

It's been said in several forms already, but I'd like to make it clear and without decoration. You can't control how he'll react. You can control how he finds out. And that gives you the best chance to influence how he reacts.
/r/RedPillWomen14/10/15 05:44 PM
2

Very good point. I tried to make it clear in my analysis that I was discussing how these behaviors lead to social cues and therefore SMV. That necessarily implies the capacity for manipulation through subterfuge. I'm considering a follow up post on how the dynamics I describe above are open for exploitation and the behaviors of men and women which seek to do, and prevent, just that. As for unknown prior partners, that experience is important, but plays out differently. If a man has had 1000 part…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 04:57 PM
3

You accidentally hit her with dread. The material made it clear to her that you were going to make changes as regards your capacity to make women attracted to you. She, quite likely, didn't know what changes you intended: maybe just be better with her, maybe get a side piece, maybe work up to upgrading her for a younger, cuter, nicer chick. Since she didn't know what the problem was that was motivating you to change, she just covered all her bases to make you happy without change so you wouldn't…
/r/MarriedRedPill14/10/15 04:16 PM
7

I can't disagree with your reply, but that's in large part because it's so unspecific. Some women are bad partners some aren't it's up to each guy to do his best to figure it out. That's true, but not helpful. My post is an attempt to help men understand the driving dynamics at work. With an understanding of the process they can better interpret what they see which helps them determine what to do. I never said marry only virgins, I said understand what her past says about her; and what your own …
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 03:49 PM
14

If that were the issue, it wouldn't be an issue. No, what it means is that unless properly vetted any LTR partner has the potential to be using you as a safety net and base of operations from which to continue the search for ever better genes, through cheating and cucking and/or branch swinging. If you are unaware of this, because you didn't properly vet, or because you believed the Disney narrative, you can't protect yourself.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 03:22 PM
3

Yes, but more importantly make it clear what the intentions were. The best way is in a prenup/postnup. An alternate way is, when she's there and after she's agreed with you on the plan, share that bit of info with EVERYBODY. With in-laws talk about the plan "Suzy's going to place her career on hold for 3 years until JR. gets into pre-preschool." Repeat it with all your family, friends, church group, social group, etc. That set's up the time line for return to forestall "Well I DO plan to go back…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 12:16 AM
4

As an attorney who does family law, I endorse this as a good post as to theory. Most of these laws are written as gender neutral. The bait and switch part of the laws is that they are written in a gender neutral way but also written to apply to our anything but gender neutral society. Nothing in the law says a woman has to get maintenance, everything in our society says she does and nothing in the law prevents it. If this appeals to you, go speak to a family law attorney. You cannot completely i…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 11:52 PM
1

Actually, that's not what society is saying. With the rise of the female imperative society has assumed a female voice. Females never say directly what they mean if they can avoid it. "Just be yourself" means don't judge me for being me and in exchange I'll pretend that I won't judge you. And men are stupid enough to agree.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/15 03:26 AM
13

I think even women understand that jewelry, and engagement rings especially, are symbolic totems. It's all about the status. The status she receives from having someone willing to propose, the status she receives by the value of the man she can get to propose, and the status she receives by how high she can get that high value man to jump to prove himself worthy. (The lower his value the quicker and higher he better jump when she snaps her finger.) Though he did propose, the way he did it not on…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 07:50 PM
1

I believe she's highly accurate to the micro issues she describes, but not the macro. I say this because I fully believe her libido acts/reacts exactly as she describes, however what she seems to fail to realize is that it isn't just responding to the men in her environment, but in huge part it is responding to the environment its self. Huge parts of the female libido seem driven to cure, or even head off, environmental problems in child rearing. Some if these problems include resource scarcity,…
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 09:22 PM
0

Perhaps more important than what you should do is the question. "What would he do with the info?" Would he use it to understand women better? Would he think it's just her because she's an example of bad women, as opposed to good women? Or, even worse, blame himself and try to prove himself by upping the beta?
/r/askTRP07/10/15 08:29 PM
1

The market doesn't care if you're male or female, only if you work it correctly or not. If there is only one or two but a hundred buyers, then the value goes up accordingly. You don't cry, you just elevate yourself until you become one of the two.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 04:12 PM
0

Sounds to me like you need to save up a bunch of money so you can pay an attorney to look into that.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 01:08 PM
0

Their axe is to get those who prospered without regard to who set up the system. As I said, repeatedly, attorneys can profit from this, they do profit from it and are happy to do so, but they didn't cause it. This was set up by legislatures catering to feminists, liberals and progressives. Change will not come from attacking attorneys who know how to work the system, it comes from leaning on legislatures who create the system.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 10:50 PM
0

Because it's easier than making a well thought out argument supported by facts and critical analysis.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 07:57 PM
-2

Given the vaginal nature of your diatribe and the elevation to top priority of yaaaahhhh fffeeeeellllllzzzz, your complete abandonment of neutral facts from the movie in favor of your personal experience (can anyone say solipsism), and plea that the big manly mods come save your pussy ass from the mean oppressive man destroying your arguments with simple logic even after you've point out how that makes you ffffeeelllzzz, I have to advise you that you'd likely be better off in another sub. I trul…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 07:54 PM
1

It is true, you have to prove your claim. I'm sorry he got a bad lawyer, but I'm glad he finally got justice as well.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 07:47 PM
-2

I have watched it. It was made by people with axes to grind. Rather than accept their responsibility in the process they'd rather blame others and the system. The proof is that in most places an agreed divorce costs about $500. If your divorce costs more than that it's because you'd rather pay to fight than accept what the other side is offering.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 09:44 PM
2

If you'll reread my original response I clearly stated, the film got the issues right, but the reasons for those problems wrong. A divorce can easily bankrupt you. That's why most family law firms will do an agreed divorce for a very low cost. It is the the legislature that allows people to abuse the system. It is people's greediness that compells them to do so. Will attorneys gladly let you pay him /her $300 an hour to do this? Absolutely. But they won't advise frivilous pursuits. If they did t…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 07:11 PM
-1

My problem is I bothered to debate a moron who thinks because he saw it in a documentary it has to be true. And, I'm sure your one of the TRP people always spouting off how stupid women are.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 06:56 PM
-4

A malpractice suit would be on a contingency fee basis-attorney only gets paid if victorious. As for attorney-legislatures they would have to be family law attorneys to care. Are there some? I'm sure. But not tons and certainly not enough to pass so many of these laws all over the country--you have to have a majority to pass laws. As for affording attorneys, most attorneys will do an agreed divorce for far less than they'll take a contested divorce Depending on area: 1-3 k in large metropolitan …
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 06:52 PM
1

As a fact, I am a lawyer. I do family law. I will drop a client as soon as she says she want to take him for everything-still never had a man say that. I know what the movie says. That's how I know it grossly misrepresents the truth. Let me ask you this? Who made the film? Who funded it, what's their agenda? My first misgiving was when I heard/saw they had Drew Pinksy narrating. What the hell does he have to do with Courts or divorce? Also, do you believe something just because someone says so? …
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 06:39 PM
-3

That simply is not true. Attorneys can't keep clients from settling. On the other hand, they can't make them settle either. It is an attorney's job to make sure a client understands all of his/her options, even those that are costly to pursue or not likely to have good results. An attorney is also required to advise what is the likely outcome, but client's don't have to follow advice. It is true, judges won't conserve property, i.e. will force sales of property, if the parties refuse to settle b…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 06:15 PM
17

I watched the movie. It correctly identifies the issues, but not the reasons. While attorneys make good money off the cases, it is the client's refusal to settle, not the attorneys, that causes the cases to drag out indefinitely. Another example; the movie says attorneys have clients fill out asset sheets (it lists all money, property, etc.) so they can figure out how much to milk the clients for. That's not true. The assets info is the point of the divorce--what has to be split and how. Not giv…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 12:58 PM
1

You're overlooking a very important point. Our species' sexual selection process is designed to keep people like that from having sex. If it doesn't then you end up with possibly generations of males who'll go psycho if they don't get sex, instead of just one.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 09:24 PM
10

Dude, seriously, have you never seen the Dark Knight documentaries? Bruce Wayne is alpha as fuck. Still, he gives all his money away and everything he does he does for the less fortunate.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 02:37 AM
31

I've got to disagree with a lot of your analysis. This doesn't sound like a woman failing because she's a woman. It sounds like a woman who is failing because she believes she can be a man and acts as she thinks men act without any understanding of the male dynamic.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 09:44 PM
1

There would be no reason the cops couldn't tell him her name.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 12:55 PM
1

My point was to specifically NOT obligate the wife. At home, we again flirt a little, but also get on with our routine. We both work, so when we get home with the two small kids there is a lot to do. Cooking, cleaning, baths etc. We finally put the kids in their room and hang out before they go to sleep. Once asleep, we cuddle on the couch and watch some TV. The problem here is after work, chores, and putting the kids to sleep, she is pretty tired. By OP's own admission, all he did was participa…
/r/MarriedRedPill24/09/15 06:43 PM
2

As I said, the two courts were merged into one system. That system is subdivided into different areas of law (and some jurisdictions will set up courts dedicated to just one, or a few, of those areas) such as criminal, contract, domestic violence, family law, etc. Each of those areas has different degrees of specificity as to what the court is required to do. Some have lots of discretion on lots of issues, others don't; it all depends on the area of law and what the relevant laws permit/require.…
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 06:26 PM
-3

A piece of advice to help with this in the future. Just as you decide what time the kids go to bed, you may need to decide what time you and the wife go to bed. If you've let her run herself nonstop all day until late and she has to get up early, it is more than just a bit inconsiderate to expect her to have the energy for prolonged enthusiastic sex and in fact be enthusiastic when she's worrying about how little sleep she's going to get. There is nothing wrong with saying the kids need to go to…
/r/MarriedRedPill24/09/15 04:24 PM
6

No, it is a court of law. In the U.S., Family courts are established through statute (law). They are governed by statutes and apply statutes to facts as determined by the court. It is a court of law. In the U.S. ALL courts are courts of law. Your link is on the right track, though, but misapplies the origin of courts of equity. Prior to the Norman conquest of England, England had never been truly unified (close under the Romans) so different standards arose in the various areas. When the Normans…
/r/TheRedPill23/09/15 02:35 AM
5

A family court is a court of law.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/15 01:30 AM
3

Just to knitpick here, Constantine didn't use Christianity to justify having his position. He'd won the battle and the Romans were unequivocally a "might makes right" society. He used Christianity as the ideological lynchpin for the massive social change he forced on the empire.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/15 02:54 PM
6

Actually, "social contract" is not an oxymoron. Oxymorons are compound words/terms comprised of two words with opposite meanings, such as "jumbo shrimp" or "idiot savant." It is not a word whose definition/usage encompases contradictory ideas and/or logical inconsistencies. "Social" and "contract" do not have opposite meanings and therefore is not an oxymoron.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/15 02:48 PM
2

To be fair in regard to those numbers indicating women are the primary parental abusers; that's only because the government has exiled fathers from the familial residences, if not flat out incarcerated them for child support non-payment!
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 04:16 AM
1

Any knowledge we obtain, regardless of the source will be imperfectly obtained and therefore less "pure" than the source.
/r/askTRP14/09/15 09:22 PM
31

"Why does it matter how many people your partner has been with in the past? They've made the decision to be with you now." These two sentences contain the core issues TRP tries to address. "Why does it matter how many people your partner has been with in the past?" This question assumes the correct attitude. Live your life and view people, especially women, so that her past makes no difference to you. You need to have conquered so many women so thoroughly that anything she might have done pales …
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 08:08 PM
13

Notice how she gave her daughter 7 years to ride?
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 02:45 AM
17

He said dating would adjust to the realities; he didn't say they'd adjust to accommodate the ends you think need to be achieved. Quite likely both men and women will come to expect less. Women will more and more pick nurturers (male providers will dwindle to negligent numbers because there's no incentive to work) to marry while continuing to share the alphas with other women. The alphas will happily maintain their harems and the beta's will allow their women to fuck because when they, the beta's…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 08:51 PM
7

She may not be lying, she might just be bad at anticipating how long things take. Get into the habit of asking her what she's planning on doing instead of how long she plans to be gone. This will help you better understand what to expect. It will also help determine if she's intentionally misleading you or not. If she's consistently doing things she didn't tell you she was going to do, there's your clearly identifiable problem.
/r/MarriedRedPill09/09/15 04:54 PM
7

Two issues here: You failed to give clear expectations You're sending mixed messages about her actions after the fact; i.e. being beta. If she was wrong to spend that much money then the bed goes back. If it can't go back, then there needs to be other clear consequences, such as explicitly tighter controls of the money. However, you're just being pissy. You're upset and "emotionally punishing" her with your bad attitude. No. If she was wrong, fix it and, if appropriate, punish. If it wasn't wron…
/r/MarriedRedPill08/09/15 08:52 PM
4

Something many people studying christian scripture/tradition often overlook is the concept that according to the Bible man is created in God's image. You are created in God's image. The best, clearest, closest access you have to God is yourself. Studying yourself is studying God. Getting to know yourself is getting to know God.
/r/askTRP05/09/15 03:04 AM
3

And when he does initiate don't just jump on him, playfully defer. If he misunderstands and stops bring him back into the chase. Make him work a bit for it through a bit of mutual teasing (there's a reason we do that). The point is not to play "games" or be manipulative, it's to trigger/satisfy his deeper biology.
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/15 08:01 PM
0

Is it possible he isn't getting to chase you? There's an argument that men evolved to chase women who were, or at least pretended to be, coy. If he doesn't need, or can't, chase you his biology may not be getting the appropriate sexual stimulus from you. It's like when men don't realize that always being emotionally available and accommodating to women can result in the women unable to have any sexual desire for the man. Why give sex to a man already giving you everything you want? It short circ…
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/15 07:11 PM
81

As I've said before, women want a kind, funny, and nice MAN. The key is to understand their definition of man, because it is NOT the biological definition of man, i.e. any human entity bearing an X-Y chromosomal makeup. The female definition of man is such that without those desired qualities above, said man would be a very scary individual. To women, men are strong, dominant, capable, exciting, (and possibly aggressive, and unpredictable--it is a desire for these last two traits that women are …
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 05:45 PM
1

If you're getting nothing out of it, then yes, something needs to change. It might be your routine, it might be your mentality, it might be your understanding, or maybe just your discipline. Why not talk to some of the others at the gym who are getting results? If they can get them, maybe they can help yo get them. Why does enjoyment have to matter? Henry Rollins wrote a great article on lifting. For him it was more of a meditation/discipline thing than physical exercise. Do you have goals? Do y…
/r/askTRP31/08/15 10:19 PM
11

It's not the "world view" though, just the "western world view."
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 02:26 PM
1

Not sure if it relates to theorizing a round earth, but shadows were used to by ancients to calculate the circumference of the earth. I forget who, but someone placed a rind on the ground in Greece at noon on a certain day and measured the length of the shadow compared to the height of the rod. A year later, to the day, that person placed a rod on the ground at noon in Siwa and measured the shadow. This allowed them to calculate how many degrees south Siwa was from Greece and attributing the dis…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 04:05 PM
5

Don't ask the fish how to catch fish, ask the fisherman.
/r/RedPillWomen20/08/15 01:38 PM
2

stick up the ass? Who's projecting now?
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 05:52 PM
2

http://www.thisdayinquotes.com/2010/11/spare-rod-and-spoil-child-is-not-in.html It’s not surprising that many people think the quote “Spare the rod and spoil the child” comes from the Bible. There are at least five verses in the Bible’s Book of Proverbs that talk about using a rod to beat a child — for his own good, of course. The most famous is Proverbs 13:24: “He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.” Proverbs 23:13-14 offers this bit of Old Testam…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 05:02 PM
1

This is from a poem about BDSM, by the way.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 03:40 PM
13

Since you seem to be trying the analytical approach, look at it this way. First, we are a product of biology. We may not be slaves to biological impulses, but they are our points of origin and if we deny them they are likely to trip us up repeatedly. The female human imperative for procreation is quality, quality, quality. Quality genes, quality provision, quality protection. If her offspring lacks one of those there is a good chance it won't survive. Female reproductive needs set the bounds for…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/15 10:48 PM
118

This brings up some very interesting points I had not considered. I knew respect was integral with women's sexual desire, but hadn't applied that to other areas. Women desire men who have great ability/achievement/gravitas. That sexual desire is usually manifested, in large part, through respectful sexual submission. Men likewise respect ability/achievement/gravitas in other men, it just doesn't engender sexual feelings. I wonder if that's why women had such a hard time when introduced, en mass,…
/r/TheRedPill14/08/15 05:27 PM
57

One of the main reasons this fails is because you are rewarding the gir'ls behavior. Men seem to forget how much women LOVE to talk about anything, but most especially about their relationships and feelings. Offering to talk it out with a girl after she does something is the same as a girl offering a guy a blow job after he does something. Far from working to change the behavior, you are ensuring its repetition.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 03:21 PM
3

Exactly. They are pissed that men still have some level of autonomy/authority, which is simply unacceptable.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 02:32 PM
2

I used to believe that a river was a river and a mountain a mountain. Then I understood. No, in fact, a river is a river and a mountain a mountain.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/15 05:49 PM
5

I'd call the realtor and put the house up for sale. She fundamentally disrespects you and that can only lead to A) your ultimate submission to her, or B) divorce. If you still have the house when/if B occurs, she'll get it, you'll have to pay for it until the kids are grown. Sell it now.
/r/MarriedRedPill09/08/15 04:56 PM
7

There are two takeaways: People are selfish. She did wrong to her boyfriend (she cheated on him AND continued to use him for her own needs), her boyfriend did wrong to her (he cheated on her AND continued to use her for his own needs), and the new guy did wrong to both of them (he didn't care what commitments either of them had made or the consequences of his actions on them). All of them were looking out for themselves and no one else. This leads into the second takeaway. Do things for you. Bot…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 03:53 PM
-14

That's right, TRP should be a love fest. We're all good enough, special enough, and doggonit, people like us!
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 10:28 PM
-9

Ah, another "let me share my alpha insight courtesy of all my beta game playing" post.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 07:27 PM
87

Let's flip this around: maybe he's the smartest guy in the world. He knows she's a wanderer who doesn't want to stay at home. What are his options that won't result in the immediate loss of at least half of all his assets followed by decades of child support and alimony and loss of significant time with his children? If she leaves the planet never to return! He gets to keep everything! And chase new women. Is it too late to apply and can you send in an application of behalf of someone else?
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 08:32 PM
3

You completely missed theultimatecad's point: it is complete pussy beta to go to some woman for help. The only thing worse is being her emotional tampon. You interact with women because: 1) you share projects/responsibilities in common and must coordinate such as a work or association colleague, 2) you're going to fuck her, 3) she's helping you (with or without her knowledge) fuck some one else. If you're talking/texting to her doesn't fall in line with one of those three (and it can actually fa…
/r/MarriedRedPill03/08/15 03:37 AM
2

You read too much into the analogy. I didn't compare men's and women's intelligences. I compared a horse's intelligence to a farmer's to show that despite all the advantages a horse has, the farmer's intelligence gives him control of the horse and that control means that despite all of his disadvantages he is not inferior to the horse. Likewise, OP was discussing all the ways he believes men are superior to women. His ultimate conclusion seemed to imply that men are wholly superior to women and …
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 12:01 AM
34

Let's force things back into perspective, here. You say women are "physically ...inferior in every single way" they "aren't as interesting" and "can't ...piece together a coherent ...sentence." Instead they "always try to look 'pretty' and 'cute.'" However, look at how many men fall all over themselves to do for these women. Men will craw across broken glass just for the implied chance to sleep with these women. Legions of men throw money and time and resources and opportunity at these women. Th…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 04:54 PM
6

Watch out for your wife using your promise that: I very firmly stated that if there was any fuss/controlling from him then I would stand up to him and deal with him as well. as a way to once again control you. She'll likely be using anything from your brother as a way to make you keep your promise. DO not allow her to substitute her judgement of what is a fuss/controlling behavior from your brother for your own determination of what constitutes a fuss/controlling behavior. Just because she's det…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/07/15 03:42 PM
0

My response in no way, shape, form or fashion is meant to suggest you should stay with her, it is only my advice if you choose to do so. Very likely, she has not been able ascertain the relationship between her actions and another's romantic love. Before you, having no boundaries didn't get her what she wanted. With you she got everything she wanted handed to her even when she didn't earn it. For women, that is both ultimate validation and absolute terror. It's validation when she get's it witho…
/r/MarriedRedPill25/07/15 10:30 PM
-2

There are two (at least) possible dynamics for women in this situation. She's a hard CC riding whore who gets off on pleasing Chads. You're not a Chad, but you will commit. You're only worth the very bare minimum. She was not as socially adept as she needed to be. Whatever the realities was for her it felt as if she could find no real emotional, relational and/or commitment validation. She was starving and willing to do anything because it was better than the alternative--being forever alone. Yo…
/r/MarriedRedPill25/07/15 01:44 AM
1

Go back and speak with a dean or the department head. Unless you've already taken several, see about taking a self guided/taught upper level class. All you'd need is a willing faculty adviser (perhaps the one who steered you wrong owes you a favor?) who would set the parameters and requirements. You do the coursework on your own time in your own space and check in with the adviser time to time. This would allow you to do the course work this summer/fall in your bf's country--as long as you have …
/r/RedPillWomen22/07/15 09:38 PM
19

My understanding of the Body Acceptance and HAAS movements is that they were intended to address the mental health aspects of weight issues. It is believed that a lot of body weight issues tie directly into mental health issues. Anorexia and bulimia are considered mental health disorders. Depression and other like illnesses often accompany, if not cause, overweight/obesity issues. The idea was to tell people, hey you don't have to be a size 0-2 to be happy and have a good life. Go ahead and live…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 07:13 PM
7

You're correct if someone thinks this "proves" fatherlessness causes violence. You're also correct if someone tries to use this as proof against an otherwise scientifically proven/correlated phenomenon. However, you are incorrect to the degree you are implying that because it is not scientifically proven it can have no value to people. It can and does--though people might well misjudge that value. Science has yet to give us as many answers as we need, though it is working hard to do so. In the m…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 09:35 PM
1

Everything work out satisfactorily?
/r/MarriedRedPill20/07/15 10:37 PM
4

There are several issues here. First, is your lingering nice guy-ness. Throughout this encounter, I DID NOT act butthurt tried to keep it light, with no accusations. I was wondering it, but never said anything. She on the other hand, was saying all sorts of things. Not acting butthurt is always a priority. However, knowing that she did something wrong or investigating whether or not she (knowingly) did something wrong so that it can be properly addressed is not being butt-hurt. It is mandatory. …
/r/MarriedRedPill19/07/15 09:26 PM
6

So why do you stay? It is only because men like you stay and continue to do the real work that companies can treat women that way and not go bankrupt. Leave and do something on your own. If you lack the skills/trade to do so start learning something now. Yo might end up making less, but at least you're not making a fortune for someone else. I'd rather be content with what I've earned, than be bitter that someone else got most of what I made.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 04:09 PM
36

In the absence of such men, most women can be happy indefinately without sex. men cannot.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 12:17 AM
15

OP may be the most brilliant genius to ever live. He has figured out the cure for procrastination! AND IT IS SOOO EASY! What is it? DON'T PROCRASTINATE! Why the fuck didn't I think of that earlier?
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 10:46 PM
90

Women DO NOT have a greater sex drive than men. What women do have is a greater capacity for desire. If no worthy man is around, women don't have much to desire and, consequently, their sex drive is nowhere near what a man's is. It is basically a commodity they can use to trade. Let a worthy man come around, and her desire turns on. The more worthy he is the greater her desire and therefore the greater her sex drive. If he's worthy enough, she will do anything to have him and pay any price--with…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 10:43 PM
4

I'd say no name change, no marriage. Doesn't mean the relationship has to end, just the legal aspect of it.
/r/MarriedRedPill12/07/15 12:52 PM
1

Don't cancel the trip, just go alone.
/r/MarriedRedPill10/07/15 10:55 PM
1

Women shaming men may not be a bad thing, from en evo-psychology perspective. I suspect (warning: bro science ahead) it is an evolutionary adaptation meant to stimulate men to greater action/exertion. Female disapproval likely means no female nookie, which aught to be a motivator.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/15 07:31 PM
10

Fuck her, then find her bf on FB and let him know, otherwise, she'll lie about the nature of the interaction. WARNING: if you do tell bf, before or after fucking her, make sure you have proof it wasn't rape or you know that's exactly what she'll claim.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/15 07:28 PM
1

May be I misunderstood, but it sounds as if your situation is great because you make it great. She's just a long for the ride. You're the one with the ability to make it what it needs to be, she's just well positioned to benefit. When you aren't there the best she can be is a cheating whore. Given that a person is limited by the quality of his resources, in this case your wife, why would you settle for working with a deeply broken woman? Why not dump her and use all of your skills on someone of …
/r/MarriedRedPill08/07/15 04:50 AM
31

"Yes, excuse me. I'd excuse you, but there is simply no excuse for you."
/r/TheRedPill06/07/15 08:26 PM
9

You don't seem to understand the nature of women. She isn't being submissive, she's being manipulative. The easiest way to have control is to convince the other person he/she has it. They will never fight. Let's look at this. In the past month she's had the joy of fucking two men. She fucked both of them in highly charged emotional states (emotions are like crack for women). Rather than suffer consequences when they find out she gets to see them fight over her (God the validation she must feel).…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/07/15 03:58 PM
1

The point is to be happy. Were you happy before? If not, then that clearly isn't the correct course. Do you have a better alternative to mrp?
/r/MarriedRedPill05/07/15 07:37 PM
2

She asks several just to get the ball rolling then stops. Remember, these aren't dates so she isn't "asking them out."
/r/RedPillWomen30/06/15 11:09 AM
3

You've received a lot of good advice, so I won't rehash it. I will add to it, though. Don't focus on just one guy. Meet and casually date as many men, at one time, as you can. Don't hide this fact. Don't try to make these dates serious. Don't be physical with these men, beyond light kissing and touching (as soon as you break, or it even appears you've broken, this rule this won't work). Make it clear, more WILL happen if a relationship develops, i.e. commitment. Instead of trying to focus everyt…
/r/RedPillWomen29/06/15 11:36 PM
1

I find that's why most men on here don't catch or won't call others out for this type,of behavior. They're still too in their BP behaviors, otherwise why would you tolerate someone treating you that way?
/r/MarriedRedPill24/06/15 11:32 AM
1

She was doing exactly what she was insisting you not do. She insisted on the position-no discussion. When you did likewise, she called it a powerplay.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/06/15 02:50 AM
1

She was doing exactly what she was insisting you not do. She insisted on the position-no discussion. When you did likewise, she called it a powerplay.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/06/15 02:50 AM
1

Explain how it's not a power play when she does it but it is when you do it? You still care to much about being fair and being nice.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/06/15 06:48 PM
42

It would be better if she had to wonder why you didn't sleep with her than to have her wonder why she slept with such a poor lay.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/15 02:44 AM
1

Again, it depends on how you define "asshole." Always being the leader who can process information is good. Being someone who gets off on frustrating others, not a good fulltime endeavor.
/r/MarriedRedPill12/06/15 12:47 PM
2

You can't miss what isn't gone.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 12:41 PM
-1

Agreed, that's why I felt it was important to remind the readers.
/r/MarriedRedPill11/06/15 10:58 PM
0

I don't think anyone on MRP explicitly promotes it. However, I've noticed a number of FRs wherein the OPs are failing shit tests because they are afraid of being assholes and they are uncomfortable being anything other than the Nice Guy TM. They seem to be so conditioned into disavowing assholes and/or bad guys that shit tests to the effect that they are being an asshole are a form of kryptonite for them. My post was to help them understand why being an asshole is not only good but necessary whi…
/r/MarriedRedPill11/06/15 10:56 PM
3

First, it seem implied that you're somewhat afraid that you've been "caught." You haven't. Your posts are how yo think, so own up to them. If she doesn't like it she can leave, throw a fit, whatever. This feeds directly into the rest of the post. At no point did you assert yourself as an individual who has the right to think and feel what he does, at all times you tied it to extrinsic results and defended your nice guy position. I flat out told my SO almost a year ago that no pussy = no relation…
/r/MarriedRedPill11/06/15 09:22 PM
3

You either tell her it's a deal breaker and stand behind the threat, or You hire a baby sitter to watch the child while mom's at night work and make mom pay (it's a business expense for her) and then go get a job at a female strip club acting as a bouncer, DJ, janitor, what-the-hell-ever (yes, you'll have to split child care fees), unless of course you're fit enough to be a male stripper and then that's even better.
/r/MarriedRedPill10/06/15 05:53 PM
2

The animal killing thing is the greatest issue here. What types of animals does he try to hit? Has he said why? I know of a person who will risk major car wrecks to run over any snake he sees in the road, he hates them that much. All other animals, though, he avoids. Is it only animals he considers vermin such as rats, possums, armadillos? If he's a farm boy he may have had a lot of run ins with animals that spread disease to the live stock, tear up fences or predates the animals such as foxes a…
/r/RedPillWomen08/06/15 11:07 PM
2

Good advice. OP keeps talking about motivation, but that's overrated. Discipline is what is needed. If she can't supply it for herself then it's his job to supply it.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/06/15 11:57 AM
15

large audience.
/r/RedPillWomen01/06/15 10:14 PM
1

I meant to say "we are disposable but not dispensable."
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 11:40 PM
2

Semantics. Adaptation is change though it might be mal-adaptation if it put's the individual in a worse position. However, there was no articles the men weren't doing just fine. It was the women who apparently couldn't handle the new dynamics.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 09:45 PM
1

That's why she sets the pace. If men would simply innovate without regard to women, we would be much, much further along than we are. If men didn't innovate but instead waited on women, we'd all still be roaming the planes naked running from lions.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 05:50 PM
6

I disagree. Men lead, because women simply won't. If all men stopped all their activity today, most everything would fall apart. It isn't that women couldn't do it, they just wont (a small percentage would, but in far to few numbers to lift the tide). Men lead because they want women (a small few would anyways, but far to few in number to lift the tide). Men innovate either to impress women directly, or obtain something that will then allow them to impress women. So, men lead, women set the pace…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 05:44 PM
4

I understand what you're saying and agree--to an extent. Men are the disposable gender, but that means as individuals we are disposable, as a gender, on the whole, we are not. No men at all means no women either. So, we are disposable but not indispensable. Nature also seems to build in safeguards as well. Women appear to have a built in drive to seek out utility in men--before it's needed (see beta orbiters). Women do not set the direction, they set the pace. When women try to set the direction…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 05:27 PM
49

The problem with both the article writer and Ohio is that they fail to fully understand the whole paradigm. A persistent fallacy of many people's logic is that they want to cherry pick only those points of which they approve, confirmation bias. The article says the men have failed to adapt. That's not true. It's clear they have changed their behavior from what it was before. Failing to adapt means non-change, it does not mean changing in a way of which you do not approve. The men adapted, in fac…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:08 PM
5

I'd rephrase 2) to say, "be true to yourself." And to be true to yourself even if other don't like it or understand it and sure as hell don't sell yourself out for money, or pussy, or anything. It will never be worth it.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 02:56 AM
10

I agree. I couldn't decide, though, if the husband was holding frame or not. My initial thought was that he wasn't. That he was a true beta letting his wife run all over him. But, then I realized, he seemed to know exactly what was going on at each point. I then thought maybe he was letting her learn. That he was setting up the bounds and monitoring, but like a good parent he was letting his teenager learn from experience all the while he was ensuring the safety of the exercise.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 09:19 PM
3

This. Water droplets, and other "biomass" can be thrown upwards and outwards from a flushing toilet up to six, or even eight, feet away. (How close do you keep your toothbrush?) I'd insist that the lid must be lowered by all people before all flushes or that she shut up.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 06:06 PM
38

An article about two fucked up women.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 06:03 PM
4

If not, no worries, next them. But being treated like a prince is nice from time to time as long as it's cost is minimal.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 10:44 PM
4

I disagree with your understanding of the attitudes. Most women today DO want to get married, they just aren't interested in it as an institution of mutual giving but as an an institution for them to receive. However, most men aren't in a position to add to the woman's life anything she considers valuable. However, that changes as she gets older, it's called hitting the wall. When she wants more than she can provide for herself and she wants the social "validation" that being a wife and a mother…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 10:41 PM
1

Groucho was saying that if someone was willing to have him (Groucho) as a friend, then that person wasn't worth having as a friend. He was essentially making fun of himself. What he actually said was " I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member." The issue with a woman isn't does she have the opportunity, it's do you understand what she will do if she has it? Also, are you selling yourself short, because you're confusing her opportunity with her nature? I'm not one who opposes marr…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 10:31 PM
3

Marriage really was a concession from both sides that could swing to favor one side or the other in individual instances or generally in certain societal instances. Women were driven to marriage by the need for protection and provision. As a bonus, they had help, to varying degrees, raising their children. Without others, they usually couldn't raise children and forage simultaneously. If the help wasn't from a man, she had no protection from other men. So, she needed help and she needed some of …
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 10:20 PM
1

No, didn't leave any words out, punctuation might clarify though. I understand what you're saying. I think a lot of guys here would disagree with you though. You seem to have the attitude that most women wouldn't be that easy and that if she is that easy, then there's something wrong with her. A lot of guys here, though, would say, no, any girl is that easy if she thinks you're valuable enough. If she's not easy for you, that says more about what she thinks of you than than it says about her. Yo…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 09:49 PM
1

To clarify my point. I don't believe marriage was looked at by women as a way to obtain the benefit of a man's hard work if only she'd lie to him and string him along (an attitude many women today DO have). Marriage was, quite truly, do or die for women, with the further back you go the more literal that statement was. Women didn't have a choice. (Men didn't either but we aren't really discussing them.) So, they made the best of that situation that they could individually and collectively (yes, …
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 08:58 PM
7

How can so many men be so clueless about women?
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 08:44 PM
5

You have a Groucho Marx attitude. He said he'd never have a as a friend a person who'd have him as a friend. Your value of yourself is so low you think it necessarily makes any girl who wants you low value as well. If she doesn't hold out not just for you, but for all your hard work as well, she's necessarily a slut, because you, alone, could never be worth it unless she was worthless.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 08:43 PM
-2

How does a person who is denied a choice but nonetheless makes the best of that situation become incapable of showing love and commitment and also become a disloyal slut by doing so? Not marrying for love, doesn't mean they didn't honor their vows. They may well have stayed loyal and committed to the man who provided for them, they just did so out of pragmatism instead of love. They may have been virgins when they married and never strayed, again, out of necessity and not love. So what? The key …
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 08:35 PM
0

First of all, why are you taking anything women tell you at face value? Second, "love" is the reason men married? Really, that they could say that with strait faces tells you all you need to know about women and their willingness to lie and/or self delude. That said, the other thing to take way from this, assuming it was in fact true, is not that women are evil, but exactly how pragmatic they really are. Taking away all independent economic viability from women and then "blaming" them for not re…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 07:31 PM
5

I'd like to suggest an alternate way to look/handle the extended provisioning. If it really isn't a problem, then go for it, but just as your plate has to show "appreciation" for your largess, so does everyone in the family. No, I'm not talking about an incestuous orgy, just everyone bows to the prince. If the 12 y.o. wants a blizzard, get her a damn blizzard, AFTER she's cleaned out and vacuumed your car and any other errand you need done and is appropriate for a 12 y.o. Same for everyone else.…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 06:56 PM
1

You do realize that was lifted from Orwel's 1984, don't you?
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 02:00 AM
2

Men are one of three things, creeps, assholes or invisible. Which do you want to be? Moreover, women only care about one of those types (as opposed to what the other two types can provide for her which she does care about, the provisions not the man). Which type do you think it is? I like to say the difference between creeps and assholes is, a creep is when a woman knows what a man wants and can't stomach the thought. An asshole is when a woman can't stomach the thought that he doesn't fully wan…
/r/MarriedRedPill26/05/15 08:11 PM
3

Two ways to handle this. Arrange for you to spend the night with an attractive female and tell your wife. Her reactions will tell you all you need to know. Now, for how I would handle it. I'd simple tell her that it appears as if she no longer wants to be your wife so you'll make it official. We are so steeped in the western culture to elevate the individual above all else. Here you are so concerned about offending her right to be her own woman you are barely admitting the damage she has done to…
/r/MarriedRedPill26/05/15 08:07 PM
1

You have a long way to go, but we all did at some point, many of us still do. There are a couple of issue that jump out in your post. First, your christian faith. Start reading dalrock, google him, he's not 100% right, but he's better than most. Christianity today caters to women in every aspect. I've spent years studying religions, especially christian texts. PM anytime with questions. First and foremost for you to remember, neither she nor her emotions, dictate whether or not you are following…
/r/MarriedRedPill26/05/15 08:02 PM
8

There are two main aspects to this hypothetical for TRP. Why are you living with a woman you don't trust? (AWALT, I know: they all do it, but they don't all do it to the same degree.) There's a good chance this is your child and in utero development is very important for a child. Make sure it get's everything it might need, then, once born get a DNA test to verify (in the U.S. you have 60 days to rescind voluntary acknowledgment of paternity). You don't want to spend the next several decades dea…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 07:02 PM
1

Several things might be at issue here: 1) He's gay. 2) He is in fact emasculated by something in the relationship (a female's sordid past can often do that to a man, but it might be something else) 3) Low T or unknown (at least by you) stress. My guess it's either 1 or 2.
/r/RedPillWomen23/05/15 12:21 AM
2

I like to think of men's and women's societal roles as: men procure and women consolidate.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 02:52 AM
3

No. Marriage greatly amplifies the power (or power disparity) of the individuals that was present prior to the union. Catherine the Great was not owned by her husband, despite the fact that he was the Russian noble. Also, only medievel and later marriages made women chattle. Roman marriages, at least among the elite were much more level.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 02:48 AM
0

I agree with what you are saying, but would like to add that morals can also be comprised from pragmatism. I can steal from my neighbor and doing so might be more efficient, time wise and economically, than earning/making it otherwise. There is a clear benefit in stealing it. There is also a risk. What might my neighbor do if I'm found out? This applies directly to societal moral codes as well. I don't have to follow it, but what will my reputation be if I obviously don't adhere to societies acc…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 09:53 PM
4

I have no problem believing this at all, but I wonder what's at play, simply beyond AWALT. Is this a case of an evil, selfish woman or atrophy? By way of example, there was a study that took 3 very well conditioned athletes and had them become bed bound for 90 days. At the end, the differences is capabilities were amazing. Strength, endurance, speed and agility took huge hits. It was as though they had spent years struggling with significant diseases. If this woman was spoiled by her husband to …
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 08:27 PM
1

At best, giving him as much credit as can be mustered, his argument is flawed. It's proven that hormones, if nothing else, greatly affect the body, including the brain. Men and women are subjected to vastly different hormones in our development cycle. Therefore, the results must likewise be different. That's not to say nurture (environment) has no impact, it most certainly does. However, your friend is using the impact of the latter to obfuscate the impact of the former. Imagine a cue ball sitti…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 04:40 PM
1

This analogy may or may not help, but it does help me put this issue into perspective. You have two people of roughly the same age and monetary resources. Person A obtained all of his/her economic ability via trust fund. A has no real education, no skills and doesn't work. A has several mansions, a private jet, an extensive car collection and a huge yacht. A has no idea how much they cost, A just keeps spending and lets the accountant worry about it all with no apparent inclination to alter that…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 03:09 PM
20

While I agree about not being an asshole while making the decision, I caution on allowing her to veto it. If she wants to veto it, hear her out and then consider it appropriately. If it's a legitimate reason then OK, provided there's a viable excuse for why it wasn't mentioned to begin with. If there isn't a legitimate reason then don't let her veto it. Basically, make sure her veto isn't another shit test. Most of the times when presented by others with a decision I didn't foresee making, my go…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 09:02 PM
60

The entirety of her definition of manhood is, "a male who will dedicate himself to the providing of others." At no point did she waste a second discussing why a man should be that way or what a man who acts that way should expect in return. No, the only thing that matters is that he dedicate himself solely to the provisioning of others. Any male who doesn't do that is "shameful." The hallmark of feminism is to shame, because it has no other rhetorical devices to support its positions.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 10:57 PM
19

As a fellow attorney my motto has always been: When they yell, I've won.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 10:06 PM
9

Your anger is natural but misplaced. You weren't played but you were playing and you lost. Despite how it feels, and how TRP looks, no one is given the rules or winning strategies before hand, though quite few figure it out in part or whole. You are projecting your motivations on to others. You weren't being nice solely for the sake of being nice, if that were true yiu wouldn't care, you would have gotten exactly what you wanted; the opportunity to be nice. You were nice because of what you thou…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 03:38 AM
8

A couple of responses have delved into evolutionary psychology. I agree with those. There is another less techincal way to consider it. Getting the most for your buck. If you LTR the girl you are investing your time, resources energy and perhaps commitment into her. For what? What can you expect to get from her in return that you also couldn't get, to an even greater degree, from someone just like her but with a lower count? Think long term investment returns. She likes to fuck lots of different…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 04:14 AM
6

It involves several issues each of which may or may not come into play, but all of which have the potential to arise. She has settled for less than want she wants,or worse, less than she deserves. Resentment will come out at some point and becomes a never ending stream of poison. Her husband is her daily reminder of all she couldn't nail down but which other women could. If only he could... A different version of 1. He simply doesn't measure up to all who came before. She spent years handling po…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 12:30 AM
8

I never understood this. If "polite" society refuses to participate in "impolite" conversations, "polite" society is then, by necessity, abandoning those listening to such conversations to be informed solely by those who are not so polite.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 04:47 PM
10

To be honest, guys don't stay with broke women because they are loyal. They stay because they don't care about her money. On the other hand, let that pussy dry up and go away, how long are you staying then?
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 02:28 AM
1

WOW, OP, three whole paragraphs about your last relationship that tells us absolutely nothing about your last relationship. How can we ever resist telling you the specifics that lead us to TRP?
/r/TheRedPill04/05/15 10:28 PM
2

For men, love seems to be more of an idea. You love what she is. That's why information about who she really is can have such a huge effect. It forces a change in the idea. It's also why women can't understand that. They love what they receive. If his past doesn't change what she gets from him, it doesn't change anything. They assume we work the same way.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 03:27 PM
48

Congrats, you macked on a 4year old. And your niece no less.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 03:22 AM
1

This post and your attention to it proves you do care. Just go. Her actions will show you what she meant.
/r/askTRP03/05/15 03:21 AM
1

Then what's the problem. You have something to do. If she shows fine if not, fine. Once there start working on working any women there.
/r/askTRP02/05/15 07:55 PM
2

and that's when the government will make up the difference for them at men's expense.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 07:54 PM
1

What will you be doing there if she doesn't show?
/r/askTRP02/05/15 07:27 PM
2

You're forgetting a very important societal element--pussy pass. It doesn't matter if their lifestyles breed lower income and higher costs, men will, one way or another, be forced to pay the bill. We'll either marry them and be legally obligated for life or be hit with a huge bachelor's tax and pay for the government programs designed to do for them what they wont do for themselves. Deferring to their men? Shit man, they're hambeasts specifically because they lack self control and demand instant…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 07:25 PM
6

The issue here is your frame. It's all about her. This night is centered on her. There's no abundance mentality. You should have plans which don't depend on her but to which you've invited her to tag along--for a while. If she doesn't come it's no big deal. The psychological difference is huge. People hate to "miss out." If she's the center of attention she already knows what it's all about-her. She can't miss out on that, though you can and she knows it. What she can miss out on is more. So she…
/r/askTRP02/05/15 06:14 PM
1

The motivations for mate seeking are different in men and women. They produces different processes. Many here will say men tend not to cheat but women do. That's just not true. They both do, just for different reasons. So, you have to look for different indicators. Dating history is a good indicator of a woman's internalized mate selection process.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 02:23 PM
3

Yes. Provided you take his message as a whole. There's what he said but there's also the example he set.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 02:00 PM
77

They both had a mission, which they followed relentlessly, would not allow themselves to be deterred or distracted. They had the capacity to see those missions fully realized and in doing so garnered for themselves huge fame and influence. They didn't just succeed they became the standard. Mr. Rogers especially demonstrates, it's not about being an asshole. It's not about being hard. It's not about being cutthroat or even competitive. It isn't about whatever it is you are doing/acting/saying/thi…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/15 10:28 PM
1

Yes and no. Men tend to like ideas and being active. If we like the idea of what we are doing or the idea we are exploring or the activity we are doing, chances are we will be enjoying ourselves and the people, who ever they happen to be, that are around us so long as those people aren't interfering with our ideas or activities. Women seem to like emotions and receiving. So long as they are being supplied with good emotions, such as comfort or excitement, or are receiving something they desire--…
/r/askTRP01/05/15 03:16 PM
7

Perhaps this will help you to understand. TRP advocates for being in control of yourself and through that being in control of the situation. You feel as though you took control of the situation, and in a way you did. So, you feel good. But you've missed several points. One you get control of the situation by getting control of yourself. Screaming in someone's face and throwing objects across the room is NOT being in control of yourself. Even if you did manage to get control of the situation, you…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/15 01:52 PM
5

Just based off of what you posted, I don't think she could do anything with just that. Moreover, I don't think she intends to (unless there's more to the story than you've shared.) I think she's shaming you for control. Most western men are taught to be ashamed of their desires--especially their sexual desire. It makes it easy for society to control us and easy for women to manipulate us. What's threatening about your wanting to fuck her? What's wrong with it? She's a woman; you're a man. You fi…
/r/MarriedRedPill30/04/15 08:23 PM
2

You were wrong on this from the get-go. You started in a weak position. You are struggling professionally and in your relationship. You wanted more sex because it validated you, not because you deserved it or desired it. You were expecting your wife to support you not the other way around. Being in a weak position, you tried to bluff your wife and she called it. Know where you are at at all times. You can't win a fight from a position of weakness. Only when you feel good about you can you get yo…
/r/MarriedRedPill30/04/15 08:09 PM
19

"She cried a lot and said she wished she never told me." <--- Read that a few times. The wife wasn't upset because she felt bad or guilty, she was upset because she got caught. This is a common phenomenon among cheaters and I'd argue, women in general. They are deathly afraid of the gravy train coming to a halt (ie getting divorced or having their pedestalizing boyfriend leave them). So they'll try to bury their animal instincts under mounds of obfuscation and shrewdness. If they're caught, the …
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 06:44 PM
70

You've stumbled on one of the issues that plague all societies and is especially virulent between men and women: common words with uncommon definitions. My guess is you were tripped up by your use of the words "problem" and "solve." What you consider to be a problem is not what they considered a problem and what you consider to be a solution is not what they consider to be a solution. Likely for you, as a man, a "problem" is something that will prevent future action/success/progress. A "solution…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 06:30 PM
4

I ignore, and she keeps talking, and I head out the door to put my pizza on the oven. That's what he did. When she began to escalate he walked away. He held frame. This isn't the only way to handle it, but it's acceptable. He refused to disrespect her with his words or other actions. He refused to be drawn into her frame. He left rather than risk anything else. As it's her house, that was his only option given his skill set.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 06:15 PM
1

I agree. Keep in mind that one of the most important things for a woman is social status. She (potentially) looses status if her "man" has a side piece. If, on the other hand, that's unknown and she feel's she'll lose more status by leaving him then she likely won't. That's why they don't tolerate beta's cheating. Her status comes from how much she can exploit out of him with little or no investment.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 06:35 PM
22

A word of caution. Try and be aware of the difference of someone expressing concern for your safety and well-being, as opposed to someone trying to use a shut down on you. There is a significant difference and must be treated with either the respect it deserves or the disdain that it should receive. Learn to reply to these with, "Please explain." That has two benefits. First, it makes them legitimize the statement--if they can. If they have ready answers listen to them, they may be valid. If the…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 02:49 PM
50

I agree with you that the story illustrates female crazy and serves as a good warning. I want to point out, though, that the prosecutor is taking the right track. She isn't trying to minimize or excuse the actions, she's trying to convict on the harshest crime possible--attempted murder. That requires intent to kill. She knows the defense will argue emotions so out of control she had no intent at all and she just reacted without thought. The prosecutor is trying to get ahead of that argument. Mo…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 02:44 PM
1

It's about the programming. I might just actually want to play the game, run the programming, whatever, but if it's not working, if something is bugged, you've got to go down to what's driving it in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 08:15 PM
1

I figured, but it highlights just how deep into the root we have to go to change our way of thinking. We even need to change the metaphors and words we use to think with.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 08:04 PM
4

Anytime a woman asks you how she looks, if she's losing weight, etc. and you want to be flirty, just say "Hmmm...turn around." As soon as she starts say "Slowly." If she goes with it, then you know she's ok with flirty and you didn't misunderstand. If she doesn't and acts put off, just respond with "I guess, I can't really tell." If she does it, this gives you time to think of a more witty reply. Also, it allows you to show your level of appreciation. Make a big deal of stopping her when her ass…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/04/15 06:16 PM
3

You might be unfairly comparing your old feminist conditioned expectations for marriage, and the way yours doesn't meet those expectations, to the shinney newness of other women and the unlimited potential you believe they possess. It's a bit of alpha widow in reverse. Husbands must forever be judged by the reality of the work they do to maintain/achieve what they have. Old boyfriends are only remembered by the flash they showed w/o regard to how shallow such flash was or how unsustainable it mi…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/04/15 06:03 PM
9

That's the rub: you don't trust him as much as you want him to trust you. You want him to trust you so completely he willingly walks into a terribly unfair legal situation. Yet, you are not willing to trust him enough to stay with him without his agreeing to those terms, because what happens if he changes his mind after your looks have left? Here's the thing. If he's a good catch, women will want him for a couple more decades. How long will your looks last? If he's good, your trust should evoke …
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/15 05:28 PM
2

This is on point. When she says you're too walled off and unemotional what she's saying is she's not having a rich enough, deep enough, expansive enough emotional experience while with you, She wants to feel more emotions and she's expecting you to provide them. Can an "alpha" play an acoustic guitar? Can he sit back and sing songs about the good life, love, margarita's? Of course he can. A pussy can as well. What's the difference? Attitude and mastery. A true master understand hows to pluck and…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 04:37 PM
2

Good post, but I'd like to comment on a few things. First, you're right about unplugging from feminism means unplugging from other mental traps as well, that's because society uses these paradigms for the very reasons you described, and feminism is just the latest of these paradigms. Feminism isn't the problem it's our desire for safety and luxury. It wasn't the bell that allowed for the conditioning of Pavlov's dogs, it wasn't even Pavlov himself, it was the innate hunger of the dogs that allow…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 04:32 PM
36

She does have a moment of absolute honesty. "We don't have the time for jerks." That's exactly the issue. The clock is running out for these women and they no longer have time to waste. It isn't that they don't still like these assholes, it's just they no longer have the time.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 12:04 PM
3

That's what the studies suggest. Women during their ovulatory phase become more attracted to angular faces, facial hair and dominant social behavior. During their lutial phase (when the are not fertile) they prefer rounder faces, no/little facial hair and more conciliatory social behavior.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 11:58 AM
1

No More Mr. Nice Guy
/r/askTRP28/04/15 11:54 AM
7

There are several problems with what you are suggesting, not least is that you assume the two drives, for genes and support, remain relatively constant and equal throughout a woman's life. They don't. They don't even remain constant throughout the month. Watching women's actions provides a strong indication that many follow a pattern of early 20's promiscuity followed by a desperate dash to obtain a provider when the ticking clock starts drowning out everything else.Then, once she has kids and t…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 02:00 AM
1

It's mostly mental. Never let her figure you out. Never respond as she expects and never give her until she's earned it.
/r/askTRP28/04/15 12:39 AM
5

no. don't give her "assignments." Just tell her to masturbate while you watch as foreplay. Tell her how hot she is, you're getting and how awesome the whole thing is. Without waiting too long turn that into how much you want to watch her make herself come. Keep throwing that in there more and more and about how much the thought of it makes you so hot. Continue until done. Watch what she does. Nothing like a live demonstration to learn from.
/r/MarriedRedPill28/04/15 12:36 AM
2

Do you want sex daily or near daily? If so, why are you afraid to say that and stand your ground? She has no problem clearly saying what she wants. Why does she get to and you don't? That's your starting point. Agree and amplify and amused mastery will do 80% of your work.
/r/MarriedRedPill28/04/15 12:24 AM
1

TAM2014 - Carol Tavris - Who's Lying Who's Self-Justifying That's the title of the talk. It can be found on Youtube. A quote starting at 25:25 is "A third to half of the females reported that they first respond to a sexual overture with an intentionally token 'no.'"
/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 11:25 PM
1

Candide by Voltaire. It will illustrate everything in NMMNG perfectly.
/r/askTRP27/04/15 09:59 PM
2

Women use sex to obtain something they don't have. They hate using it to keep something they do have. Think of it this way. You will work for a future paycheck but how long will you continue to work for the checks you've already received knowing there won't be any more? She's the same way. She has you. She doesn't need to get you, you're already hers. Therefore, she wants to enjoy you, i.e. cuddling. The reverse is men who want sex from their girlfriends but don't want to work for it, "Why shoul…
/r/askTRP27/04/15 09:57 PM
2

I agree with a lot of what you are saying, except my regressive tendency towards the definition. I'll admit there's a strong push to change it, but many people wouldn't define rape as "She just thought it'd be easier if she said yes." Most importantly, I think you're on the right track about women equating sex with trading. She's offering something and if she doesn't get enough in return, she's upset and seeking retribution. That in itself is despicable, she made a trade, and thinks she's owed s…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 09:23 PM
2

I disagree that this is the norm. If a person believes he or she has consent, it isn't rape. If a person is unsure or unaware, then it is something else. That something else may be a crime. It may even be "rape" as defined by statute, but such definitions are new and not what has been traditionally termed rape. I have a particular issue with the argument, "Well, if it isn't rape, then we should change the definition." No we shouldn't. Rape covers a specific set of actions. It conjures a certain …
/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 08:30 PM
2

There are always outliers. Also, this is where mental health and insanity issues come into play.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 12:49 PM
1

I wasn't commenting on the referred article. Of course it's not his fault that she shit tests him. It is his fault that he caves to them. If he so lacks self awareness and self worth that he can't make sure he has a significant role in his child's life, I don't have much sympathy. What she is doing is so clearly wrong he should be furious and wholly unaccepting of her b.s. Instead, he has a crises that maybe he isn't good enough. He needs to man up. His failure to do so is solely on him. The fac…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 03:12 AM
84

Here's the thing. Rape is an intentional act. You have to know you are raping a person, or it isn't rape.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 02:24 AM
5

To chime in on your chime, I have to disagree. I don't think TRP ever preaches a man is responsible for a woman's choices/actions. It does teach that a man is always responsible for his own choices/actions. This includes failing to understand that a woman will always be a woman. I think you're right that some women will not stay married, regardless of the man or how he acts. It's the man's fault if he gets married believing otherwise. If he believes he can absolutely guarantee the outcome solely…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 06:39 AM
1

The reason thus seems so crazy is because of how you define "truth." you define truth as "incontrovertible facts" she defines truth as "the beliefs that will control the situation." You believe the facts will control, she is showing they don't.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 03:50 AM
1

A few animals are almost entirely monogamous, I think wolves and swans are popular examples. A few more create exclusive parenting bonds, but where one or both partners will cheat. Humans seems to have evolved using a harem strategy. For humans, marriage can have benefits, especially in resource scarce or where violent competition is high. Those benefits are magnified when coupled with male centered families and societal honoring of fathers. Basically, men produce much more than they need which …
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 09:33 PM
3

I'm fairly certain the whole point of this sub originally was based on the question(s) "why do women say they want nice guys but fuck jerks." what you see is a result of the answer. People are complex and multi-facet. Answering the question begot more question with more answers revealing more questions. Even if this sub were truly desirous of only being a men's subreddit, and equally open to all facets of being a man, you'd still end up in the same place. At the core of the male identity is our …
/r/TheRedPill13/04/15 01:13 AM
9

Being dominate kicks it up to a whole new level, but when it gets her off that it's YOU doing the dominating,shit is just beyond.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/15 12:37 AM
3

It was her suggestion, not his. Add to that the other male's opinion of her and the fact that his wife, her friend, supports him in that opinion, she's trouble and what I said above is exactly what girls like her do. Drop the guy. He's not RP, he's a beta. He had no problem sitting for years watching what he wanted, which was 2 feet away, without ever even going for it. You expect him to lead? You aren't his #1 choice, an objectively attractive, but very well used CC rider is (sorry). You can do…
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/15 10:17 PM
8

She's pulling your bf back into orbit. Best case scenario: It's not her intent to sleep with him. However, she is certainly dangling that carrot, and will let him catch it a time or two if that's what it takes to make sure he prioritizes her over you. Worst case scenario: she feels she's getting close to the wall and her contingency plan, aka your b.f., is getting serious with someone else. This could be her plan to make the jump from AF to BB. The fact that he hasn't slept with her, instead of …
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/15 10:05 PM
64

You're right, sex, in and of itself, is not that good. Having a girl get off because you're dominating her; that shit's phenomenal.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/15 09:52 PM
1

The main problem with this is that you assume the woman will actually follow the terms of the agreement. If she'd do that, marriage wouldn't be the shit hole it is.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/15 12:29 PM
1

It likely had more to do with social cohesion and a woman's role in society as a wife and mother. As a wife, if a husband believed he had been his wife's only partner, and divorce was not an option, a rapist took a lot from him. Also, there's the husband's shame aspect, was she really raped? Also, if he had to mate guard all day, he wasn't likely to spend 10-12 hours a day working away from the home for the lord/in a factory. There's also the mother aspect. People didn't know the biological aspe…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/15 06:01 PM
7

Just because someone doesn't have two pairs of balls hanging between their legs, doesn't mean they're unable to cause physical harm. Or that she's unable to control herself and act like a well adjusted adult.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/15 05:51 PM
4

Actually, a close reading of the texts strongly indicate that Jesus' disciples, including Paul, and early church followers were well off business owners and well educated.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 01:55 AM
5

If those thoughts keep you warm at night, enjoy them.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 08:20 PM
9

No, not enough violence here.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 03:41 PM
3

Is this in reply to me, or to jus10beare who brought in the issue of true? I didn't say what was true, I merely asserted his definition didn't have to be true and gave an alternate understanding of scriptures, one more closely aligned with TRP's teachings.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 03:35 PM
11

No, true Christianity isn't necessarily as you describe it. The Christian scriptures (as opposed to 2 thousand years of church teaching) can just as easily be understood as the search for self through: A) our struggles, and B) abandonment of goals we pursue merely because others also pursue them and we are so out of touch with ourselves we can't conceive of any other purpose. (Think of the crucifixion, which the Bible says all Christians must undergo (???) as an analogy. It is a painful process,…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 02:58 PM
1

I didn't say I was working to support this system.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 11:12 PM
1

I wasn't confusing you with anyone. I didn't say you wrote it. I was distinguishing between a principal which you were arguing but which I had never argued against because it had not been asserted. Empowered women isn't shtick. Feminism is, as is much of what's argued in the name of "empowered women." It's basic common sense that protects two very important societal issues. First, people need to freely choose. Why? Because if only the people in power get to chose, what happens when you aren't in…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 06:23 PM
0

Except that's not what was written. It was very clearly written that it's best to hold her down so the threat of her leaving is minimized. You can argue anything you want. That doesn't change what was written. You want to know what does? Changing what was written.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 04:57 AM
0

No, there's a difference between her choosing a course because she understands why it's best for her and your forcing it on her. You weren't writing about how her being a house wife is what's best for her or how it provides for you in a productive way, you wrote about how it eliminates your need to better yourself and maintain yourself because it makes her unable to have the option of leaving you for another or even to be by herself. If you weren't advocating eliminating a woman's choice then yo…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 04:28 AM
24

Look through her prior postings. Two or three back is one she wrote about how much better second marriages are compared to first marriages. This is her first marriage!
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 03:29 AM
14

Agreed. He's probably rubbing one out right now in anticipation of the post lunch sex "when he'll have his wife back."
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 03:20 AM
7

I disagree. Instead of making yourself the best you can be, you would rather stunt her ability to be a full fledged person. The weaker she is made the weaker you can afford to be. This is not abundance mentality. This is not self confidence. This is fear that if you have to compete with a woman you will fail.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 03:08 AM
40

He isn't the subject or the concern. She only cares what others will think when she leaves. She isn't apologizing for the way she treated him, she's apologizing to women for the female initiated divorce she's about to instigate as the "repentance" portion of her redemption.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 02:48 AM
62

A while ago I was reading an article about how women control the social perception before they will risk divorcing. The book, written by a woman, explained that it simply isn't acceptable for a woman to divorce, except in a few select situations (cheating, severe abuse). So, when a woman is leaving, she'll spend, sometimes considerable, time prepping the social circles for it. So that A) it doesn't look like she just decided to leave, but that this has been a long time coming, B) he's the primar…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 02:07 AM
0

All alimony is spousal support, not all spousal support is alimony.
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 06:01 PM
2

You need to find a way to get to know him better without actually dating him. This allows you to vet him better without "making him work." You can't be expected to sleep with him if 20 other people are around. This also gives y better opportunity to guage his personality and values. After having done that if you think he's a very good candidate, fast track the relationship (including sex).
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 03:13 AM
2

College isn't income. Single women make more than anyone else, married men rank second. Married women rank last.
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 02:45 AM
2

Hobbies.
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 02:31 AM
1

I read that the other day on a different subreddit. She talks about all of the other things in the marriage that should make her husband happy. However, sex, at least for most men, is like a governor (limiting factor) on a relationship. The relationship can never be better than the sex. Sex alone won't make a relationship, but sex alone can and will limit it (it can also unleash it).
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 02:28 AM
5

You and I have different definitions of LTRs. If she's 28 and had 15 partners, that a new one every 6 months. That's not very long in the context of running up to marriage. If she started much earlier than 18, then you have a whole set of other issues.
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 01:48 AM
1

The problem with your solution of finding something to represent good girls, is that society had that and women hated it, that's what caused feminism. Originally, it was marry them young before they know what's up and have a chance to ruing themselves by riding the CC. Are you ok with that? As for an older (25 plus) woman telling me we have to wait? I'd walk out of the date. I don't actually care about waiting, I just won't believe her. I only see two options: a woman who in fact previously cave…
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 01:34 AM
4

I have to strongly disagree with you. You've said multiple times on this post that "in my state there is rarely alimony." That's technically true. However, it's been replaced with spousal support. What's the difference? Alimony, almost by definition, is permanent. Spousal support can theoretically end when appropriate. They've changed the terms, not the practice.
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 01:26 AM
3

I suspect they did this purposefully and that's why I suspect it is a very pro-feminist article, regardless of what ever it might say trying to indicate otherwise. Marriage brings with it legal obligations in every jurisdiction in the western world. The overwhelming result of those obligations is to financially tie men to women and children with control resting with the state. This is a VERY necessary aspect of feminism. Without being able to bleed men dry, feminism will die a very quick death. …
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 01:22 AM
2

That's an argument that goes both ways. You need him to trust you forever, but you refuse to trust him. The only answer is to trust yourself and no one else.
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 01:18 AM
4

Here's the rub on that, though. If you don't believe it "all" then you don't necessarily have to believe that the Catholic Church has final say on such issues, such as "you have to believe it all to be Catholic." He's free to believe what he wants, including that the Church can't decide he's Catholic!
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/15 01:15 AM
-9

They're called compound sentences and anyone with an 8th grade education should have no trouble with them.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 04:57 AM
5

It's not that he can't find someone with whom to have kids, it that he can't find someone whim who he wants to have kids who is also willing to have kids with him.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 04:01 AM
1

The world is always in flux. There has never been a "golden age" when things were just great. There have been times when things were better, but those time had to be fought for. The Baby boomers were a product of WWII. The Pax Romana came after centuries of legion warfare. As bad as things are now, they've been much worse: the black plague (which hit Europe several times and wiped out huge portion of the population each time); the fall of the Roman empire, the Mongol invasion, the Timurid invasi…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 03:57 AM
2

Thinking about the "what if'" is part of being human. Thinking about the "what if's" regarding women is part of being beta.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 03:50 AM
-15

This is something that bothers me about TRP. It insists that something isn't rational when it absolutely is. Responsible and rational are not the same things. It is absolutely rational to think, "Hey, I bet if I can find an excuse to justify something that otherwise can't be justified, I can get others to justify it for me!" That's rational and logical. I don't need to do what I can get others to do for me. If it works then its valid logic. What it isn't is responsible. But even that's logical a…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 03:45 AM
8

Worrying about the "what if's" is just part of being human. If two people are honest and OK then there you have it. They are adults and should be free to do as they want. Lying or hiding is not acceptable. It denies the other person the opportunity to make a fully informed decision. I believe it rises to the level of evil when that decision is marriage and or children. It should not be tolerated. The information should be freely presented when asked for, with the gist of the question, and not ju…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 03:37 AM
12

On the chance that you're not just a troll, I'll bite--though I shouldn't. The counter argument is that two people, when young go out, party hard have lots of fun, do things they probably shouldn't and certainly won't admit. Later they meet each other and get together. Society says their pasts shouldn't matter. They both did things but are now ready to move into a new phase of settling down and being more circumspect. To the degree that's true, there probably isn't a problem. However, you have t…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 03:02 AM
5

AWALT is the basic programming structure. Each woman's biology and environment will build upon and flush out that structure differently. Some portions will be more prominent than others. Some will be stronger motivators than others. However, for 100%, it is all there somewhere and it is all involved, however minor the involvement, in supporting her psyche. The other closest analogy I can think of is language. I think it's fairly well established (though I could be wrong) that we have biological …
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 06:50 PM
1

I never said it had an effect on their demise and I'm not sure why you're fixated on that. As for the harem effect, I figured it was ubiquitous in history that citing wasn't necessary.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 11:30 AM
2

No. The Inca model is far more likely than widespread freedom of choice for women.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 02:47 AM
1

I never said it disintegrated. I said it experienced a degree of destabilization.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 09:02 PM
7

First, you think anyone involved would be bound by personal responsibility. I guarantee you the royal family wouldn't hesitate to kill all women in the harem even for the actions of just one. Second, your conflating two separate issues into one. You're saying the fact that they didn't hate it so much they were compelled to action is tantamount to they in fact wanted/desired it. That's non sequitur. I hate paying taxes. I don't hate it so much I'm willing to risk prison to avoid paying then. I su…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 05:13 PM
171

Be careful in how far you take this. You're assuming free choice on the part of women in choosing their mates. It's my understanding that women were allotted in the Inca empire (or at least during periods of the Inca Empire) based on position of the male. The emperor was allotted many, maybe thousands of women, the high nobles were allowed hundreds, all the way down through local government and village elders to the peasants who were allowed only one. As one can imagine, by the time you filled t…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 03:00 PM
1

I'm not sure they view it that way. It's the relationship/emotional aspect of it that they are focusing on (not saying the sexual aspect doesn't have an effect, it's just now what most are paying attention to.)
/r/TheRedPill16/03/15 09:01 PM
2

If it helps, understand it this way. You weren't lied to; you were allowed to lie to yourself. TRP doesn't teach anything that can't be readily observed. The reason you realized TRP when you read it was because it made sense of what you already knew but were denying. No one was out to get you or lie to you. You were hearing everything from a perspective of a pre-concieved notion--that being that you're great and you're a special snow flake. No one else (well, maybe your parents) was saying that …
/r/TheRedPill15/03/15 07:18 PM
1

She clearly doesn't care about marriage. That's the thing. She's self absorbed and condescending--BUT--she's upfront about it. Again, I don't care what other people do/think so long as they're honest.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 06:22 AM
1

I was pointing out the capacity to stand alone, not the need to do so or inability to be any other way.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 11:40 PM
3

Couldn't have said it better.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 09:33 PM
1

I don't think that's happening here. I agree, and said as much, people with an agenda who manipulate/hide facts are a problem. Here, she's acknowledging the issues, up front. She's free to her opinions and to argue them. I happen to disagree with them. But, so long as she's honest about her positions, even if she's wrong, I have to be supportive of open debate. It's how we get a scenario wherein all the info is put out there, with support for positions, and people are allowed to choose for thems…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 09:33 PM
5

That's simply not true. They question themselves all the time-ever spoken with a woman? The issue is that they ask the wrong questions, assume as fact what is actually desire and wishful thinking, and employ faulty logic. BUT, they do question themselves. If they didn't they wouldn't need to go to such great lengths to produce the twisted answers they champion.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 08:10 PM
5

Fine, but you seemed to have confused stubborn or anti-social with independent.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 08:10 PM
2

That's simply not true. They question themselves all the time-ever spoken with a woman? The issue is that they ask the wrong questions, assume as fact what is actually desire and wishful thinking, and employ faulty logic. BUT, they do question themselves. If they didn't they wouldn't need to go to such great lengths to produce the twisted answers they champion.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 08:08 PM
1

No. The word "charm" actually has more to do with magic than power hierarchies. It means to persuade, usually through words, another person. The ability to convince people through words was often looked upon with great mystery, before psychological understanding. That's why so many of the associated words are what they are: charm, spelling (as in casting a spell), and grammar (a corruption of glamor) to point out just a few. Charm is invaluable anytime one wants to convince, without force, anoth…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 06:58 PM
15

I agree with some of what you've said, but not all. Independent is a good quality. It's also rare. That makes it valuable. A good leader has to be independent, otherwise he can't lead. Independent doesn't mean unwilling to consider, it means consensus isn't required. The problem isn't being strong nor is it being independent. It's the use of that phrase; it's redundant. No one who is not strong is truly independent. It takes strength, courage and fortitude to stand alone. So, only people who do …
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 06:51 PM
3

No problem. By why did that segment make you so mad? One of the issues TRP seems to have is the deceitful way the liberal agenda is pushed. At least these people came right out up front and said what their position was--marriage isn't as important as promiscuity. And notice their later arguments weren't that men won't use promiscuity as a reason to not marry but that no one should use that as a reason and such a reason is stupid. They are free to their opinions and open and honest debate is good…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 06:44 PM
28

I don't see what made you so angry. FOX was discussing men not marrying and said that if women want to get married then not giving sex away outside of marriage would be a good place to start. The liberal show, although they weren't convinced on the sex-marriage connection, start off saying, if I can't have BOTH sex outside of marriage and have marriage then I'll chose to have sex outside of marriage and marriage be damned. TRP is, or should be, pro choice for all, not just men. Good for her if s…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 05:29 PM
3

I'm not sure where you live, but in America whether or not something is Constitutional depends solely on whether or not the U.S. Supreme Court says it's Constitutional. Don't want health insurance? Too bad, you have to buy it and if you don't they'll come take the money for it anyway, but they won't give you anything in exchange. The SCOTUS says it's Constitutional because the government isn't taking anything, it's only taxing. So, they'll tax the ever loving shit out of people. Do you know wher…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 12:26 AM
2

Laws can be passed to make that difficult or even impossible.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 12:01 AM
2

Absolutely, it will effect the gender dynamics, but it won't break the misandry bubble, if anything it will strengthen it.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 09:06 PM
0

Given the fact that females will still have the same demand for a relationship as before. How do we know this for sure? Reading through your explanation, which is good, by the way, I really felt you could just as easily defined "f" as "all the things guys like" and "g" as "all the things girls like." Basically, Guys are trading a bundle of goods for a bundle of goods from girls. As we've seen, when the trade becomes bad, it becomes less desirable. Alternative solutions are explored, both within …
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 08:50 PM
2

Agreed, but what were the other men doing?
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 07:32 PM
2

How the hell is she, or women in general, silly for doing this? Shit, as much as I hate to admit it, if I believed I could play all day everyday and still get a lifetime economic care package, I'd likely be first in line.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 07:06 PM
17

I don't think VR will have quite the impact you predict. The first big, and maybe biggest, impact it will have is on confirming even more men into full blown betas. VR won't be a field leveler, or even a bargaining chip, for them. As fully disengaged, i.e., hiding, men this will be their drug and they will cede all conflict issues to others to decide, while they go fap. This will place a greater need on society to implement laws seeking to shift wealth from those who have it (typically men) to t…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 05:00 PM
1

Only if you didn't care. But you do, so no. Trying to hold on to her will only do you damage. It is your lack of option, not her or her ability, that creates the value you reference. There are literally billions of women out there, most of whom know how to use their bodies to please men sexually. You're tied in knots over 1. Why? because she's all you see/know. You need to understand, the entirety of this problem is you. You believe you are a person of very limited options. These limits are cont…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 04:11 AM
2

Yes. The easiest/only way to fix this is to proactively move on and find someone else. You can do this explicitly by "officially" breaking up with her and then cutting off all contact (no exceptions), or "unofficially" by simply making yourself 100% (no messaging/texting etc.)unavailable to her while you go out and find your next girl(s).
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 04:05 AM
1

This is also the wrong place. (Besides, others have already told you all you need to know). TRP will only tell you that so long as you care whether or not you have her: A) you are wrong and B) you will not have her. That's the paradox of women, the only way to have them is to not care if you do.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 04:00 AM
1

solid, logical reply if ever there was one. how can one not be won over to your point of view?
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 01:09 AM
3

The lock analogy is apt, because locks keep things safe. That's the issue with sluts, they aren't safe. Most people view it as a sex issue because sex is the measurable factor, but that's not correct. It's a relationship and trust issue. If the question is just sleeping with a girl, I don't care about her past or number (beyond STD issues). To some degree, if it's just sex, sluttier is better. She's likely to require less work and be more fun in bed. What I won't do is invest my time, energy or …
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 12:18 AM
4

Wrong. Penetration has it's issues, weakness being one of them but it is not a part of the fidelity/slut dynamic. It would not make me feel any better to know that my SO did spend the night with a man and that there was penetration, but 100% of it was her pegging him with a dildo. Not o.k.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 11:56 PM
1

Joseph Smith didn't get his revelations through "visions." An angel, maybe Gabriel or Michael, can't remember and don't care to look it up, revealed to Joseph where several golden plates, or scrolls, were buried. Those scrolls contained accounts of Jesus's visits to the Americas by the native American Indianans (not withstanding that there had never been Native Americans in the Vermont area with a written language). Using something, again I forget what, he was able to "see" these ancient languag…
/r/askTRP11/03/15 04:20 PM
1

You don't say how old this other girl is, but I'm assuming she's 18, or whatever the legal age is where you reside. No you don't "practice" with her. That's unnecessarily disrespectful to her and to yourself. You interact with her-honestly. Tell her what you think, feel want. Don't manipulate her, don't hide who you are. That doesn't mean you have to be a continuous verbal puke of information. Simply let your actions and accompanying words be clear. Having a good conversation with her doesn't me…
/r/askTRP11/03/15 04:02 PM
2

The only opinion she had that should concern you was her "I'm not feeling you" opinion. You HAVE to respect that. You respect it by immediately terminating the date and communication (after all you're only reason for being around her was sex and she's shut that down). Be honest in what you wanted and respectful of her decision. As to whether or not you need to improve yourself and if so in what way and how, all of those realization should only come from you through self reflection. Understanding…
/r/askTRP11/03/15 03:51 PM
1

Learn to view emotional pain as an opportunity to learn something important. Never shy from it. Afraid to leave your gf? That's why you must leave her. Jealous when she's with other guys? That's why you have to let her be with them. This type of pain is caused because you placed upon her a responsibility you must learn to keep on you--your emotional fulfillment. Take these opportunities to learn how you did that, why you did it and how to fix it. I guarantee, she is much more likely to not cheat…
/r/askTRP11/03/15 03:45 PM
5

Comfort isn't the issue, it's jealousy. Women cannot stand when someone else, especially if it's another woman, has something they themselves do not have. As a secondary issue, you've dropped frame. You're agreeing to abide by her terms that A) there is something wrong with sex and B) it is therefore wrong ever allow one's sexual actions to be observed by non-particpants (her). That simply isn't true. There is nothing wrong with sex, in and of its self (I'll leave for others to argue if sex can …
/r/askTRP11/03/15 03:38 PM
2

Your logic is fallacious. You're conflating the treatment of two separate animals, the species specific traits of which are well known and documented, according to those animal's well documented behavioral tendencies to illustrate why it's appropriate to NOT treat a third animal, whose behaviors is also well know and documented, according to said well documented behavioral tendencies of that third species. You're using these animals because, to a high degree of probability, their conduct can be …
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 02:56 PM
1

let's change up how you are looking at this using two different scenarios. how you answer them will give you more insight than anything TRP has to say. To begin, let's re-quantify your relationship mathematically, just for illustrative purposes. Let's say you have four (or however many) fields a man must satisfy before you can truly consider him relationship material. Now in each field let's rank his ability to meet your need on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high). It sounds like your current so mee…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 04:14 AM
2

Learn to watch your wife from the corner of your eyes. Pay attention to her facial expressions. Be very careful, she's already doing this with you. I have caught women many times feigning one emotional state when I engage with them, when just seconds before they were unequivocally shooting daggers at me when they thought I wasn't looking. I don't know what was going on with your wife, but just because she reacted a certain way when you interacted with her does not mean that that reaction was gen…
/r/MarriedRedPill07/03/15 12:48 AM
1

It's clear you're putting a lot of time and effort into this. Thanks for the work.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 09:47 PM
-2

I disagree. You are advocating the next step in learning to take it lying down. If he can't survive w/o a degree (and I seriously doubt the degree would be in jeopardy at all) the only life he'll know how to build with the degree won't be worth shit.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 09:21 PM
9

Pre-Industrial Revolution, most work was manual labor. Women are not built for it, can't do it or won't do it, nor do men wish them to participate in such activities ... In other words, women were completely reliant on men to survive beyond impoverished levels. (This why family was extremely important.) I understand you're trying to offer up a very simple assessment of a complex system spanning thousands of years, but what you wrote simply isn't correct. Women could and did perform manual labor …
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 09:13 PM
44

Maybe, but the hardest part of her life will be keeping her affair hidden from a wealthy BB who is desperate to NOT discover it.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 08:06 PM
-5

Why are you posting on RP if you're such a pussy? No, she is absolutely not allowed to reduce your grade for "vague" reasons. She MUST have explicit reasons. Otherwise, by definition, it is arbitrary. Given the circumstances, in a women's study class arbitrarily reducing the grade of a male for arguing that women aren't oppressed if prime material for discrimination claims.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 07:54 PM
-4

You can't correlate this to all women. This is just one woman. Moreover, this would be a slanted pool on top of that. You know going in she has no desire to be reasonable or rational, if she she had any desire to be either, she would never have pursued a Phd in women's study. It would be like waiting outside a rape crisis center to conduct a poll of priorities and thinking it truly indicates 100% of people place rape as their top priority.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 07:49 PM
3

The problem isn't her past, it's your oneitis for her. No oneitis and no issues. Why? Because her past is interfering with your fantasy that this girl is perfect. The solution is to kill the feels. I'm not saying dump her, just stop fantasizing about her. The bad side of her is you have to share her with at least 40 men (she cut her number WAY down for you, I guarantee). The up side, you know beyond all shadow of a doubt she's a slut. She was a slut before you. She'll be a slut the entire time s…
/r/askTRP05/03/15 03:40 AM
1

I fuck her until she squirms in orgasmic waves so there is no way she would cheat on me with him. How does her liking dick mean she won't cheat on you?
/r/askTRP05/03/15 03:28 AM
79

The best analogy I ever heard about (the lecturer was actually talking about sex) instincts is to compare them with fire. You do not want fire running loose-ever. It might might be awesome to watch, sublime, maybe-but in the end it's just destruction and death. You want to bank and bind that fucker. Our instincts are our engines and drives. They are also our early warning detectors. So, the point with discipline is not to put out the fire, bury it or even make is smaller. It's actually to make i…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 02:49 AM
17

TO clarify. I think a lot of people like to tell themselves that an absent bio-father was just a "sperm donor." Basically he had and has little to do with the child. If accurate, this study suggest differently. Children are more their biological father's child than anyone else. Something to consider before "saving" a single mom. As for the scientists, most won't go near gender issues with a 10 foot pole, unless specifically funded to do so. Most scientists work off of grants. Most grants are giv…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/15 11:03 PM
3

So, you're suggesting a fantasy wherein a woman chooses to ditch her educated, caring, providing HUSBAND in favor of a young, dashing, man is RPW?
/r/RedPillWomen04/03/15 10:58 PM
0

It would take an inter-generational group to do this, but what about changing up the M.O.? Why not have girls marry between 18-22 for the express purpose of quickly becoming mothers? Have them marry an man in his late 20's. That way he has his education complete, and a few years on the path to a career to make sure he's headed in the right direction. Instead of going to college, girls, upon graduating high school, could volunteer in programs wherein they work/volunteer in lines of work meant to …
/r/RedPillWomen04/03/15 10:53 PM
46

I think this is relevant to wanna be step-dads. It's not primarily her kid, it's the bio-father's. So it's all truly one big happy family. You, you're (now) woman and her exe's (primarily) kid. Still want to sign up? It's not even primarily her kid, just her responsibility; well your responsibility. As a note, the researchers didn't "miss" anything. There is no way they are going to jeopardize their funding supply by even acknowledging their findings could have relevance to gender relationships.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/15 10:44 PM
1

Beta, Beta, Beta. Could you have tried any harder to prove to her "you aren't like other guys?" You're texts make it clear she had you pegged, and you were lying. You wanted to see her pictures to know if you wanted to fuck her-period. You made it clear that regardless of anything else, even if you were legitimately looking for a LTR and thought she was fantastic in every other way, there was going to be nothing if you didn't want to fuck her. However, you were too big a pussy to admit it. If yo…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/15 05:59 PM
5

I don't exactly disagree, but I think you're fixing the issue to the wrong female choice/drive. I think the nexus in all of this is scarcity or female eggs which sets off a chain of necessary issues, one of which is the female's mate choice. Children control the whole issue. To be worth the energy they have to survive. Biology has selected for humans an investment strategy as opposed to sheer numbers strategy. That means every bit of investment matters. That starts with the mate. Get the best. T…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/15 05:51 PM
1

You're advocating the love others as yourself theory with a focus on the duality of that statement not the dichotomy of it. Most people believe the statement is a counter to love yourself at the expense of others and means, place others before you. But, that not what the statement says. In order for the Golden Rule to be implemented, a person must first love him/her self. If you do not love yourself you cannot love others (if you don't love yourself and that's the degree to which you love others…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 01:20 AM
11

Happiness might be easier to find if you think of it in terms of the simple mathematical concept of multiplication. You are the base number. Other people are multipliers. You must create an initial value. Other people can multiply that value, but they cannot create it. If you can provide zero happiness for yourself it doesn't matter what the other person does: 0x1, 0x100, 0x100,000, 0x1,000,000, 0x1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. It doesn't matter, it's all the same, it = 0 happiness, for …
/r/RedPillWomen27/02/15 10:30 PM
2

If he truly stands up for himself, support him. Don't tell him you'll do it, he has to think he's doing it on his own. If he won't stand up for himself, let it happen. Just like you had to find that reservoir in yourself from which to draw, he has to as well. Finding help once you've taken the leap is good, getting help and not having to take the leap is bad. It's ok to encourage him. Point out: "which is worse, 5 minutes of pain from being hit once, or 5 months of eating the same shame everyday…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 07:42 PM
6

Wrong on both counts. This is absolutely RP, if just a small baby step, whether you take the self improvement approach or the get laid approach. Having confidence in and placing value upon yourself is RP any way you look at it. Making sure others respect it is important to frame. Also, women don't go for the weaklings, they go for the badasses who aren't afraid to go toe to toe with the much larger bullies. As for his friends? He should support them, but not do for them. Why, because if he does …
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 05:57 PM
1

Did I say anything about maturity? No. I was merely talking about whether or not the brain might process certain stimuli differently depending on whether or not it's male or female (huge amount of scientific research indicates this to be true). I was then advising OP not to automatically project his experiences onto others. To assume that something that is true for him must necessarily be tree for another only because it's true for him is arrogant and fails to see the other person as an individu…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 05:14 PM
3

Good post. I have a question/alternative interpretation of female emotions. In dealing with women I have slowly come to the conclusion that women do not process emotions the same way men do. Not only do theirs seems to be far more nuanced, they seems to be far more important. Your definition of emotional "hurt" may not be hers. (I'm not saying women don't have emotions, aren't human in their emotions, or that their emotions should be ignored.) By analogy: by and large, men, especially younger me…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 03:28 PM
1

Being socially adept is a must for anyone. This includes understanding the culture you are in and self awareness of the non intentional communications you are making. However, entering into another person's frame, by definition, means abandoning your own. There is a difference between the tools we use and the experience/identity we have acquired. My primary language is English, at times, though, I speak Spanish because that is what the other person understands. If you believe the only way you ca…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 03:18 PM
0

You're missing my point, so I'll give you an example. I grew up rural. I went to college in a huge city in on the other side of the country. By chance, another guy who grew up very close to where I did also attended (it was a large school) and ran in an overlapping circle. He took a lot of flack because of where he was from. One night while drinking at a party it was relentless.In desperation he nearly yelled "but wantonton is from there too! Why don't you say anything to him? He talks the same.…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 02:33 AM
0

I don't think you understand the difference between being alpha and having a desperate need to have people like you.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 02:16 AM
6

You're right. Because we clearly aren't moving in the direction of codifying laws that prefer women over men.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 02:08 AM
3

Or, you understand that you can completely not give a shit what anyone else thinks and do whatever you want. And if others don't like, fuck them. If they think you're weak, make them suffer from their stupidity.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 02:07 AM
5

Not sure what you mean. If you're referring to the wall disappearing: it's because without having to use their rapidly diminishing youth to secure a provider to start a family their age doesn't matter. Husbands won't factor into women's timeline for childbirth, science will and it will greatly extend the time frame (the fact that the eggs might be less healthy likely won't be any more important to women then than it is now). We might see a trend towards younger mothers when husbands are no longe…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 01:04 AM
3

True, but read the last paragraph I wrote. Upwards of 50% of women won't hesitate to use a rule, whose sole purpose was to prevent forcing another person into a relationship, to force men into relationships they don't want or to ruin their lives if they still resist. No should be taught as meaning either, "no" or "this bitch be psycho-run like hell!" Don't try to guess which it is and you'll be just fine. Women want tigers, but they want them on leashes. Of course, that was the whole point of th…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 11:47 PM
1

No. It was a TED type talk...
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 11:42 PM
4

I'm fairly certain science shows that children of significantly older fathers suffer from a greater incidence of genetic issues than do children of younger fathers (when controlled for the age of the mother). http://healthland.time.com/2013/04/11/too-old-to-be-a-dad/
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 10:14 PM
18

I see the possibility of another outcome, one where marriage disappears. As women obtain more and more protected jobs and income, male resource provisioning will play an ever smaller role in mate choice. Many men will understand, as they always have, that the key to getting women is to simply develop the correct persona, money be damned. Given how hard it will be for them to make money, as women squeeze them out of the workplace, persona will be all they care about. These will become women's go …
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 10:07 PM
15

Not too long ago I watched a TED type talk with a professor out in CA. She was one of the original feminists from the 60's. She was very smart and a psychologist. Her specialty was studying cognitive dissonance. While it was not the main topic of her discussion, she actually spent quite some time on this very phenomenon. She said that as a dyed-in-the-wool feminist it infuriated her. She said over the past several decades she's had tens of thousands, if not more than a hundred thousand, college …
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 09:41 PM
1

Yes. But whereas all lying is deception, not all deception is lying.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 09:24 PM
1

For now, this government is reality.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 12:30 PM
0

What about the lies of her makeup, support undergarments and hundred dollar hair dos and stilletto heels?
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 12:29 PM
-1

It's all an epic game of "Calvin Ball!"
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 06:46 AM
2

You have a lot of people on this sub who are unhappy and finally have someone to blame other than themselves. That accounts for a lot of the flip flopping as well. As for the merger of two people, that's the basis for this sub. However, it supports an actual merger not an entanglement of lies and manipulation. To do this it tries to teach why men and women typically seek out such mergers so that readers can increase their frequency of these mergers. It also encourages readers not to fall into co…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 06:21 AM
-1

That's a good argument, but consent can also be extended to the act in its entirety and the consent in its entirety. To understand the entirety of both of those is always a bit sticky. For example, what exactly does the "sex act" entail? Is it merely piv penetration? If so, what foreplay or ancilliary interaction is or is not allowed? Can I slap her ass? Her tit? Her face? If so, how hard or often. What if she's unaware that others are watching? Did she consent to tjat by consenting to sex, and …
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 06:06 AM
1

I think N.M. was referring to a far broader range of mis, dis, and non information than just simply lying, though lying would certainly be includes.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 05:38 AM
3

Estopple only applies when a man, knowing he is not, or might not be, the father, induces a woman or the system to allow him to be the father of the child. For example, a boy friend and girlfriend breakup, she has a ons, they get back together and find out she is pregnant. He doesn't want to dump her and instead says he wants to be a family irregardless of the paternity. As a result she does nothing to establish paternity, including not allowing the child to establish a bond with its real father…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 05:29 AM
5

I agree with you completely, but feel the need to clarify the child support issue. It is not that easy to be hit with child support obligations (most outrageous cases of c.s. are where the alleged father didn't respond the the allegations, despite notice of them, the court entered a default judgement against the man and, again, provided him notice and the man still did not appeal the judgment until after all time limits allowing him to challenge said judgement has expired). Taking on a "fatherly…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 05:14 AM
11

A lawmaker in NJ is actually trying expand the criminal definition of rape to include men seducing women under false pretenses such as intimations it will lead to a relationship and/or misrepresenting who he is be lying about facts such as his employment, net worth, etc.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 12:55 AM
8

No. They obligated women into socially visible roles. This is to ensure men's continued participation in the system. Except in certain circumstances, she can't leave the marriage, thereby ensuring it is a safe long term investment for his resources and time. However, history clearly records that behind the scenes liasons between married women and other men were common. Patriarchies forced the BB dynamic on every marriage and divorce was not an option. It was guarenteed safety for both, if not mu…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 12:52 AM
6

Your question is really akin to, "Which tastes better, apples or oranges?" The answer is completely subjective. If you like a girl and believe she is good for you, then most likely she is good for you. The linchpin to the situation is not her, but you. Are you making your analysis based on an accurate understanding of women in general and her specifically? If your thought process is. "I've found the one, I can trust this girl to remain faithful in all situations and to remain loyal and never lea…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 01:57 PM
1

Is that what he promised? Re-read the Gospels, especially John. What Jesus taught/promised was a life far better than one's current life through "spiritual rebirth" whereby one could participate in "God's Kingdom." When/where "God's Kingdom" was is debatable, but Jesus used contemporary times/places when explaining the kingdom lending strong support for the belief that it is in the here and now (and possibly in the future and/or post life). The only death he spoke about (accept in regard to thos…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 01:54 AM
6

Common, generic, obvious advice. It has helped thousands of us, but it doesn't work for everyone. You may fail. The odds are against you. (If they weren't, you wouldn't be looking for a magic pill.) How is that a lie? What he's saying is, success is never guaranteed. You might luck into it, you might not. But, if waiting passively to win the lotto of life isn't a life course you can live with, the only other alternative with any realistic chance of paying dividends consistent with the investment…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 01:37 AM
0

It's dependent upon a common fallacy about human nature. Two lines can support your argument, both are wrong. You are arguing that as a balance it provides the most benefits to the most people. It doesn't. It cuts out a huge portion of men who would then offer up ever greater stakes in exchange for relations with women. This allows women to maximize personal gain thereby elliminating the appeal of balance. This results in the AF/BB contest we have. The alternative is that the balance comes at th…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 11:44 PM
0

I agree 100%. I do wish you had tied this into all people are like that. Humans have an intrinsic desire to better themselves and their positions. "Loser" applies just as well to people who wont do better as it does to people who can't. What you have described is the female expression of this human dynamic.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 11:31 PM
3

A big part of Christianity, as contained in the scriptures-not the current teachings of the church, deal strongly with not obtaining validation through outside sources, such as sex. To the degree that you are using sex to obtain validation/build up the self, you likely can't reconcile the teachings and your actions. (Reconciling your actions and current teachings is even harder-simply because you are denying the teacher's control over you/your actions.) However, the Bible really is TRP once you …
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 01:57 PM
12

Your argument supports OP's assertion. Nowhere does OP argue that women will want to be responsible, he's merely arguing that they can be, at least to a greater degree than most women currently are. The key is that we, as men/partners/etc. must consistently hold them to higher standards than the ones currently in use. Your argument is a valid point, though. Women will only hit those higher standards with the same frequency we hold them to it. But, that's not a failing of women, it's a natural hu…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 01:49 PM
2

Do you have a link for that assertion? Most of what I've read indicates weightlifting has no adverse affects on height or growth. http://www.livestrong.com/article/430166-can-lifting-weights-when-young-stunt-your-growth/
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 05:45 PM
20

The story I read said the groom and his whole family hid his the illness from the bride and her family. If you are a liar, do not bitch when people treat you like a liar.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 10:04 PM
3

Start scouring your interactions for anyone who works for him/her self in a job that your background will also allow you to do. Find several and then become super curious about those people and their jobs. Position him/her to be a mentor. The goal here is to become self employed in a job with long term need. This mean something that has to be done on site (can't be outsourced to someone across the state/country/world) and requires real time thinking (can't be automated). In the mean time, learn …
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 08:19 PM
4

It's a serious case of projecting. People can either be mad at themselves for having been misguided and off base for years or they can blame someone else.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 02:47 AM
3

It will matter tremendously to him. If he ever figures out that he cannot, and never has, inspired your desire the way other men can/do, he will quickly get to the point where he cannot stand to look at your or think about you.
/r/RedPillWomen16/02/15 06:07 PM
5

I'm an INTJ. Sigma describes me much better than alpha despite my ability to easily control social interactions and attract women. I've never had a problem getting people to like me, I've never been able to like people.
/r/RedPillWomen16/02/15 06:06 PM
1

This is so on point. Most guys can handle a girl's past, if it's within reason. It is an entirely different matter knowing what she would do just for the chance to be with some other guy who likely was treating her poorly to begin with, while she responds to your offer of a lifetime of commitment and investment with far, far less. If he is a self respecting male, he won't extend an offer and if he has and is committed, he'll walk with the understanding it was fraud in the inducement.
/r/RedPillWomen16/02/15 05:32 PM
12

You have any links to this? The way you are reporting it as working seems extremely untenable, even as a feminist wet-dream; and India is not a bastion of feminism.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/15 05:06 AM
18

Is it contradictory/hypocritical? Yes. So what. Most everyone uses what they can to their benefit. People who are athletic try to leverage it into sports contracts. People who are smart try to get great educations and great careers. People who have money spend it. People who don't have money try to get it. People who don't have natural skills try to develop them, school, training, practice etc. Why do people do those things? To benefit them and to give themselves as many options as possible. So …
/r/TheRedPill16/02/15 12:10 AM
4

How can you call him weak? At least he did what he did for pussy. You caved to both of them. You apologized to her. You failed to call him out on his deceptive shit, his cheating, his pussy passing her and failure to keep your confidence. And why did you do ALL of that? "Friendship" that clearly isn't worth shit, at least he'll get laid. He did far less worse than you for far greater reason. If he's weak then what are you?
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 05:21 AM
1

Not sure where you reside, but in the U.S. you can Google all criminal statutes by jurisdiction. Make sure you look through both the federal and relevant state statutes. It takes a while but saves on consulting with an attorney. Of course, the best bet is to consult with an attorney. It always help to have an established relationship with a professional. (you need to have a "guy" for everything).
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 12:25 AM
1

About how she had to do the five dishes in the sink. How she put the leftover pizza away and how the door knob wasn't installed. This is what qualifies as an "indication." Is it possible she was pissed and confronted him about more issues than he relayed to us? Sure. That's why I used the term "indicating." I have no idea what underlying issues are or are not present here. However, I can address the facts as they are related by OP. If his situation is substantially different than he related, the…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 06:45 PM
2

OP does a good job indicating the house wasn't messy, just remnants from a meal that he simply hadn't cleaned prior to his SO coming home.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 06:05 PM
2

A day off from work, is in fact a day off from work. If OP never cleans up after himself, then I understand the issues. However, deciding to take one day and do little to nothing except relax/have fun is not a problem. Religions, such as Judaism, took this one day off business very seriously. You could not do ANY work on the sabbath. Your total steps for the day were limited, your capacity to prepare food was limited, your total weight to lift for the whole day was limited, etc. The idea was to …
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 05:35 PM
1

What do you think is the relevance of a woman's past sexual liaisons with other men to whether or not she was raped by the accused? Typically, her past sexual liaisons WITH the accused are admissible per the above rules, ostensibly to help show he might have thought sex was OK (implied consent). Other trysts are admissible if they might explain the presence of physical evidence, such as physical signs of penetration. Don't confuse prior sexual trysts with prior false claims of sexual assault. Fa…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 05:29 PM
4

I have to admit I'm shocked the journalist managed to be as fair as she was. I got the distinct impression she didn't like the girl too much. I wonder if this story was originally meant to be another UVA story but was edited heavily in the wake of that story's fall out.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 06:03 AM
5

Good post, however, your use of a term needs to be corrected. You are using "logic," at least in part when you should be using the term "discipline." The result of working to bring the wants into line with thought and making sure one's actions follow one's thoughts as opposed to one's emotions is discipline/self control. Logic is a type of thought process closely akin to analysis. One may use/apply logic when one is developing discipline, but they are not the same. Succeeding with one does not g…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 11:32 PM
-2

Agreed. TRP may explain why her suicide is "news worthy." It has nothing to do with her suicide.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 08:39 PM
15

Seriously. This girl had a mental health problem. Depression and suicidal idealization are found in all sorts of situations. This has nothing to do with men, women, feminism, TRP, etc. Although outside factors can trigger a depressive episode, such as the unexpected loss of a parent, once in motion all it's looking for is an excuse. Any excuse will do. She killed herself because of a tragic neuro-chemical imbalance, not because she was lonely or unmarried.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 06:53 PM
3

If it's a mutual understanding, then settling for the sake of family is a perfectly fine plan. In general, though, I'm against women settling. Their capacity to control their emotions through rational understanding is typically limited. The result of settling for women is a lot of resentment on her part and a continual stream of implied deficiencies from her to him on his part. It will be a long slow process as he realizes that her desire to get married does not mean what he thought it meant. Re…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 03:25 AM
22

She doesn’t want absent-minded groping or quick release sex. She wants to feel your passion. Can you feel your passion? Can you show her? Not just your passion for her or for sex; your passion for being alive. Do you have it? It’s the most attractive thing you possess. If you’ve lost it, why? Where did it go? Find out. Find it. If you never discovered it you are living on borrowed time. This is actually on point. Not sure where it came from being in the middle of the rest of that drivel, but yes…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 04:21 PM
15

Would that make her "right?" Or maybe "obtuse?" Certainly not "a cute!" Seriously, angles are the worst. You think everything is going fine, then all of a sudden, BOOM, a 90 degree tun you never saw coming. Do not date angles.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 03:55 AM
1

-I have a hard time with male friendship because all my father figures were abusive or absent- No, you HAD a hard time for these reasons. You HAVE a hard time because you've never taken the steps as an adult to better develop these skills. As for everything else, it sounds like you've got a good handle on it. Just remember, with religion each person has his/her own ideas and they usually involve beliefs of safety. Trying to get them to abandon those beliefs will induce great fear-tread lightly.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/02/15 04:01 AM
2

You've raised a couple of issues here. One is, how to handle people you see regularly but who are going to have a serious issue with your choices. The answer is simple, understand that they have a right to disagree with you. They have a right to bring it up with, just as you brought it up with them. If you don't want to here, politely deflect, if they persist, raise the level to a more direct deflection, after about the third time, tell them point blank, not going to talk about it. Remember, it …
/r/MarriedRedPill04/02/15 11:48 PM
2

That's what it means to be the leader in your marriage. She doesn't get to tell you how to act or what's right/appropriate for you. On the other hand, your leading the MARRIAGE, not off doing your own thing. To some degree, you just have to trust that if you hold frame, she'll eventually get it once she becomes more accustomed. It isn't unusual for someone to react with fear when introduced to a new idea or an idea different than what they expected. Calmly, and without help or words from you, ju…
/r/MarriedRedPill03/02/15 03:16 PM
3

I think this goes back to a self worth thing. It seems as though the issue here is whether or not it's OK if you find other women attractive. Well, yes, not only is it perfectly OK, it's perfectly natural. One of the things that bothers me about how boys/men are raised today is that we are taught that our natural emotions and drives need to be shut down completely. That leads to a situation like this, you are feeling a completely natural reaction and have no idea how to react. Dude, own your sel…
/r/MarriedRedPill03/02/15 02:14 PM
3

They place people in jail over here for tax evasion. They also place people in jail for not paying sufficient child support (the overwhelming majority of whom are men) even if the person has no money or job or other source of income. In the U.S., the idea has been codified that a child is born with a number of rights against the parents. Failure of the parents to sufficiently provide these rights is criminal and punishable by serious jail time and felony status. Do not have and never have had th…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 07:08 PM
2

It is and it isn't. In a world of 7 plus billion people, a small percentage still adds up to a lot of people. Say you've got 1 million dyed in the wool real men. They can do a lot of damage, especially against societies that really don't want to fight. Just look at Afghanistan. It has been invaded by multiple first world countries. All of them, including the USA, have failed.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:46 PM
7

They won't gender it. They'll tax everyone the same, howver parents with at home children will receive far more tax deductions, breaks and refunds than adults whose children do no live with them. Moreover, there will be far more government programs to support parents with children in the home such as day care and medical care and job training, etc. It will all be written gender neutral, but you will find an inordinate percentage of the benefits going to women because of their status as mothers w…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 03:06 PM
7

No. Women's social value will not plummet. Quite the opposite in fact. While it's true there is no "sisterhood," women nonetheless are far more naturally inclined to be social. This will keep them involved in issues such as government and management pursuits. Men, on the other hand, are more likely to go their own way and form a loose fringe around society. Add to this the need for more children and women's status as mother will always be important and ensure that the government provides to an e…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 02:57 PM
4

I agree that the career accomplishments for the black community us very lacking. On the other hand, I'd say being a natural alpha is very much a part of that culture. Still, women aren't swooning. They're getting knocked up by the the best alpha they can get, have Big Daddy Government act as their provider and while it may not be what they most desire, to a one, they'll take it over changing themselves into better behaved women. All women are the same, black, white, Asian, etc. And all women wil…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:36 AM
15

I agree with your underlying premise, I don't think results will come the way you believe. You seems to think that if/when men begin to reject marriage en mass, things will snap back to a much more neutral ground. Don't fool yourself. Look at the black community. I don't have the numbers off hand, but marriage rates for blacks are terribly low. It is very much a culture of one woman, one house multiple kids. Have they snapped back? Hell no, they are more to the left than most feminists. Why? Bec…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:14 AM
6

Dude, you need to read or reread the whole side bar. You do not understand TRP.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 08:04 PM
2

She's a plate. That's it. If your status is wholly dependent on how you manage this one girl, your status isn't worth shit. From what you described, you are in the frame of that particular group of women. Your best bet is to use that time while she's,in Vegas to expand your social circles andmlime up your next several plates.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 07:46 PM
5

Something that might help a lot of people is to remember that social proof is very important. Get out as much as you can and involved in as many things as you can. Clubs, groups programs. If you're an introvert going to a club alone and sitting in the corner all night not talking won't help you. Just get out and get involved. You don't have to make life time commitments, just get out. Treat this as gym time for your social skills. Don't worry about picking up girls. If you have approach anxiety,…
/r/askTRP31/01/15 03:09 AM
1

Your first mistake is believing that what she tells you she believed when the events were occurring is in fact what she believed when they were occurring. Human biology has fairly good feed back mechanism. If it thinks something is good for us it will cause us to see it in a good way and encourage us to chase it. If the result is bad, it can then try to teach us to not do it again by creating guilt or shame which is the body's way of saying-never again. However, since a woman's feelings determin…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 11:21 PM
1

I think everyone who's already posted missed what's really going on here. Yes, NOW, she says she's never had a boyfriend, but I bet a month ago she'd have said differently. A month ago her supposed boyfriend took of with a HB 10 to Peru. This chick thinks you're a big enough mark that she can con you into taking her down there so she can "surprise" her boo.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 11:09 PM
1

As guy, I think you're best bet is to be true to your nature and be understanding of her situation. Leave emotions to the women.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 03:28 PM
2

I think your issues is going to be accurately defining "early." Does that information have to be the first thing out of her mouth when speaking with anyone who might be interested? Can she at least wait until it appears as though she's being asked out? If so, does she have to say something to the effect of, "Yes, but in the interest of full disclosure I have an STD?" Can she at least wait until the actual date (it might get canceled or postponed after all)? If she can wait, does she have to lead…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 02:45 PM
1

It's not her "opinion" so much as her biological response. As to why. Because no matter how much we want to focus on our conscious, rational minds we are instinctual as well. Ignoring our own subconscious biological drives is no less dangerous than ignoring them in women, in fact it's much more dangerous as we can't next ourselves. We want to have women on a very primal level. That can be addressed several ways, I was offering one. Another way to view women is as an entertainment luxiory for a j…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 05:09 AM
2

while they can't tell the truth for shit, they can show it to you. So long as she's single her attitude towards you can show you in unvarnished truth just how much of a man you truly are.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 04:09 AM
2

You can perhaps set up a revocable trust. Talk to an attorney.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 04:04 AM
2

If women in fact have that power, then their belief that they have it is not distorted.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 12:02 AM
12

Let's see, she wants you to trust her with your financial future by entering into a contract with her that places you at her mercy, BUT she does not even want to enter into an agreement with you whereby she has to trust you simply that you'll do what you say? How does that work? She wants to make you obligated. Let me state that again. What she told you was that if in the future she doesn't like what you are doing, she wants to have legal recourse to force you into financial support. Again, but …
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 10:22 PM
21

I can't really tell how you actually handled this with her. I certainly understand that you didn't sleep with her or pursue a relationship. However, she should be treated very well given that she told you ahead of time. I hope you let her down very gently and very carefully. For anyone reading who finds them self in this situation in the future, I'd recommend, pulling the person in close, thanking them for sharing, acknowledge how hard it had to have been and saying that as a sign of trust you'd…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 08:05 PM
1

Some of the comments already talk about how it doesn't matter what you wife did or didn't do in the past, or what she did and didn't feel. I disagree for two reasons. First, I guarantee you it matters to her. Second, this is part of the whole rewiring your brain thing that swallowing the pill should bring about. Men are goal oriented. We take validation from our achievements. Most of us are here because we internalized the idea that getting a good women and being the end all be all man for her w…
/r/MarriedRedPill29/01/15 07:13 PM
3

what's the best way to use this info?
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 04:53 AM
2

If it helps, remember, she doesn't do that for any of the reasons you would do it. Yes she's attacking you, yes she knows what she's doing, she she knows it hurts, but the point is to get an emotional reaction from you SO SHE KNOWS HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT HER. When we are being calm and unemotional, we are working some voodoo shit from the women's perspective. It would be a lot like us going for a run with someone and after 2-3 miles realizing the guy isn't breathing, just running along talking to yo…
/r/MarriedRedPill29/01/15 01:18 AM
2

I think you approach your wife the same way you would a child. If you were dealing with a child would you A) feel the behavior is what one should expect from a child that age, or B) feel that it is a behavior that needs to be corrected? If the latter, would you wait to correct it or do so immediately? You cannot get mad at her for her feelings. You can correct her actions. You might be able to help her analyze.
/r/MarriedRedPill29/01/15 01:13 AM
26

I agree and disagree. You are correct on what women do, I think you are wrong on why you think they do it. The nature of your error is the support of my position. You were dealing with truth and lies. At the end you could not help but ultimately bring those two terms back to how, you as a male, must necessarily define them. It is so incontrovertible to you that they be so defined you cannot accept any explanation allowing them to be defined differently. Women are the same. To you what is true an…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/15 07:39 PM
7

It isn't necessarily miserable for women who've locked down a good enough BB. They aren't wired like us, so we shouldn't assume they'll respond to a situation the same way we would. As long as they make enough money and are submissive enough, it can be a walk in the park married to a BB. Is she with the man of her dreams? No, but from her perspective she's still progressing through life and hitting her goals. Does she have a successful husband? Check. Does she now have the associated female stat…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/15 02:55 PM
0

Most commentaries I've seen though he had a significant speech impediment. However, if he's having visions of burning bushes and hearing voices, a mental defect certainly sound plausible.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/15 12:49 PM
51

If I recall correctly, when Moses went before the Pharaoh, his long hard staff turned all limp on the floor. Just saying.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/15 04:09 AM
1

Agreed!
/r/MarriedRedPill27/01/15 03:16 PM
13

Have you made it clear to your mother what her leaving your father over this will do to the relationship between you and her? How much of a relationship would you have with your father if you found out he was violent rapist? This isn't so different.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 01:05 PM
2

This is why there are attorneys. Consult with one.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 01:02 PM
2

I have been practicing something very similar for a long time. I have found a good way to view it is to understand it's not being manipulative, it's being what women call emotionally engaging. It's about never being emotionally/mentally where she expects you to be. Dealing with you should be a surprise (a pleasant and exciting one.) The result is she'll want to do this more and more, it's a never ending reward for her. She'll want to see what happens next. That also means she becomes very willin…
/r/MarriedRedPill27/01/15 04:21 AM
1

Ah, two people who don't know how to be sexual. Gotta love it. It's been years and years, so I don't want to look up the link, but I recall reading an article written by a scientist studying ants. For some reason or another, he discovered that ants communicate with each other through chemicals on their body and excreted from their bodies. If you isolate an ant from these chemicals and other ants for a long enough period of time (and it wasn't really all that long) you'll notice the ant getting p…
/r/RedPillWomen27/01/15 04:06 AM
3

ON further thought, she could also be setting up a swing back to you and wants to minimize any perception on your part that she's slutty A) for doing those things, B) for being with her new guy while also being with you and/or C) being with you while also having a bf. Perhaps this is a story meant to mitigate any swings she's made or is about to make and may be attempting to place the onus on you and perhaps establish a connect to you, or even obligation by you to her. Just thoughts.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 11:45 PM
3

Some of your explanations are very good and in line with what women often do. However, I'm not sure why she'd rely to them when she's only around you. Those tend to be face saving excuses and you already know what she's like. A possible alternative explanation may have to do with desire. I'm not sure of the events around the breakup, but her new guy might not be igniting her desire. I'm of the opinion that women, unlike men, do not have a constantly active sex drive. Where a man's desire is cons…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 10:55 PM
6

Sandman, or who ever made those videos is an idiot. He doesn't even understand the nature/mechanics of mens' love, how in the hell is going to teach us anything about womens'. It is clear from the beginning that he has a bias and that that clouds all his thoughts and judgments. He defines love as a chemically induced altruism. I wouldn't define love that way, but fine for him if he wants to. His problem is that he believes that defines what men mean when they say they are in love. Not even remot…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 10:38 PM
2

I agree completely, and in fact often run myself through a similar reminder when I come up short and am frustrated. While I agree about the advice to not get upset or angry about it, is there any value, however, to fully pointing out all of the options made available by the rules? For example, is there ever benefit in pointing out to women in general, "Of course you're free to act that way. And we are free to judge you accordingly and treat you as you've acted."
/r/TheRedPill23/01/15 06:41 PM
1

Very good, well thought reply. Thanks. That said, you've shifted my argument and instead of trying to critique/counter it you attempted to make it mute and therefore missed my point. You are right that earlier societies had many cultural aspects which, likely, developed as a way to counter undesirable female tendencies and would have more then handled the situation. You also made a persuasive argument that these aspects would have been largely self perpetuating (except that it wasn't in all circ…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 09:26 PM
1

I disagree, and I addressed that in my post, but perhaps it wasn't clear. Yes, we had norms that were meant to control the worst aspects of human nature. Yes, they did give some insight into what was driving the need for such controls and of the natures being suppressed. Certainly there were cultural stories used to justify some norms. Finally, some of the more egregious aspects of nature that couldn't be hid were openly taught. But, that's nothing compared to what's being put on display today. …
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 08:15 PM
1

It's not a true matriarchy. Though women do hold a huge amount of influence/power, it still historically coalesced around the male lineage. By that I mean, men made their mothers their focus which meant a women had to leave her families to join her husband's. That's why it was so important for women to learn social graces in China, she had to learn to integrate into her husband's family which was ruled by her mother-in-law. Women who could make that transition well prospered, those that couldn't…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 05:58 PM
3

And how is Communism doing in the Soviet Union? Oh that's right, there is no Soviet Union and Russia is a "democratically" elected totalitarian despotism.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 05:32 AM
3

Exactly, it's about the totality not an individual factor.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 05:14 AM
1

Yes, it's been established; you are receiving delusions.
/r/MarriedRedPill21/01/15 04:58 AM
2

No, I was referring to a macro issue you are referring to a micro issue. It would be closer to my analogy to state, it is historically shown that the army that can most readily and consistently deploy its weaponry for use that wins. It's not about who has what weaponry, or even what technological advantages. Its about identifying what it takes to win and who can and will most readily do what it takes. For example, America had every advantage, including logistics, technology and firepower over th…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 04:57 AM
1

As I said; delusional moron.
/r/MarriedRedPill21/01/15 04:44 AM
1

Like I said, I'm conversing with a delusional moron.
/r/MarriedRedPill21/01/15 04:29 AM
6

Historical patterns strongly indicate that patriarchies significantly out compete other forms of society. That holds true even when the non-patriarchy society has significant advantages. It happened several time with Rome. They'd dominate everyone, get rich, build up institutions, society would become much more egalitarian, Rome would bloat outside forces would squeeze, Rome would revert back to a more partiarchal society. Happened all over the world through all eras. If nothing else, the birth …
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 04:22 AM
2

No, Samson should not be on the list. Though he never married and his greatness had nothing to do with female support, come on man, he spent the bulk of his life a blind trophy of the philistines because he couldn't say no to pussy. Also, it is not stated (by contemporary records) one way or the other if John the Baptist was married.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 04:15 AM
2

Nietzsche died in relative obscurity. He is only famous because after he dies his sister spent years gathering and editing his writings and working to have them published and reviewed. Otherwise, it is a good list.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 04:09 AM
1

Fine, my last bit. You can illogically arrive at innumerable conclusions. You can only logically arrive at as many logical conclusions as are logically possible, that might be multiple, one or none. I have not said anything about my analysis and never claimed to be applying logic. I have, with a fair degree of accuracy, identified the assumptions from which you start, how they force your conclusions and do so as a basis for why I reject the entirety of your assertions and why I believe others sh…
/r/MarriedRedPill21/01/15 03:49 AM
2

You have convinced me that I am in error; I have failed to ascertain that I have been conversing with a delusional moron. You have shown me the truth. I thank you.
/r/MarriedRedPill21/01/15 02:46 AM
1

No, that's illogical. If our society spends its time and resources attending to squeaks, then when feminism stop squeaking, society will attend to the new thing that squeaks the loudest. What leads yo to believe that the new squeaker would be advocating for a system that works? Feminism was once that new squeaker and it made everything worse. Society needs to undertake a new system or understand it will only achieve more of the same. But, how will it begin such a new undertaking, if those with t…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 02:31 AM
1

Of course, there are always consequences to choices and actions/inaction. My point was that he hasn't persuasively argued any such consequences or why I should care. He gave platitudes about being "the better man." My counter was that what he is advocating for is what got us here to begin with. He is literally arguing that "You know this attitude that has made everything progressively worse for the last sixty years? Let's keep doing it because I like what it allows me to believe about myself and…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 02:26 AM
1

Pretty much, yes. So what if they undertake a long publicity campaign? If they untruthfully malign the Sun, then the Sun can sue. If they only tell the truth, that's why we have freedom of the press to begin with, to make sure the truth is accessible. It's a battle of ideas. Let the one with the most merit thrive at the expense of the other.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 02:22 AM
2

Unless I misread what he said, he said he had a moderate amount of alcohol and cheered at a live game. Two things which are entirely appropriate. You're attempts to rebut my response only proves that you're coming from the wrong perspective. You said marriage is a partnership, she is not the enemy, it isn't about who's right or wrong, nor is it about cutting off communication. However, as he clearly explained, she is not acting like a partner, she is acting as hostile as any enemy, she is blowin…
/r/MarriedRedPill21/01/15 02:11 AM
2

In one way they are similar, in another they aren't even close. Yes, both instances reflect a situation where a group of people are trying to influence a business into doing/abstaining from a practice that group dislikes. Both threaten the possibility or actuality of some type of harm. However, one group is using methods inherent in the system (free market enterprise) and which constitute adherence to the rules everyone has agreed to honor. The other is trying to dictate absolute terms and condi…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 01:39 AM
2

The key to having the "she can leave anytime she likes" attitude is making sure she can't get the state to give her 2/3 of your stuff as a parting gift.
/r/MarriedRedPill21/01/15 12:04 AM
3

This response is complete shit. You're assumption is first and foremost that he is wrong. I can't tell if you are applying the "She couldn't possibly have gotten this upset if he wasn't wrong somehow" bullshit or if you're asserting that, "It doesn't matter what she did if he didn't cave to her unreasonable demands which would have mollified her as it would a small child, then he's wrong because her feelings are as important, if not more so, than anything else such as reason or being a sane adul…
/r/MarriedRedPill21/01/15 12:01 AM
1

Actually I think the term is "woman." Unfortunately, there is no cure for that condition.
/r/MarriedRedPill20/01/15 11:52 PM
2

Really. Feminism has been running rampant for nearly 60 years. I don't see a ground swell rising against them. I do see them changing laws and societal expectations in their favor in many ways. I do see men, sitting quietly by, losing more and more legitimacy as people in society. There is a reason that everyone knows the saying, "The squeaky wheel gets the grease." No one knows the saying, "The measured respectful and well mannered person with the sound argument carries the day."
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 11:44 PM
2

I'm not saying I disagree with you, per se, but I'm happy to point out how flawed your logic is and that it is fact the logic that allowed craziness such as feminism to flourish. You are in effect arguing that since men have put in the effort to throw off the blind fold of ignorance, we have an obligation to others, to either, maybe to both, do for them since they can't or conversely refrain from using our new found advantage of knowledge. That's dangerous. Never assert that someone's efforts an…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 10:23 PM
2

Try is all you can do until you succeed. We are extremely complex bio mechanical machines (that's only slightly redundant). Also, I am not an expert or a doctor or anything like that. I don't doubt for a second the truth of a chemical imbalance as being what causes the depressive symptoms. But what causes the chemical imbalance? Humans have existed relatively unchanged for over 50,000 years. That's roughly 1,515 generations. We've existed for millions of years before that in varying degrees of s…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 09:05 PM
2

Horse and cart. Is your situation caused by depression or is your depression caused by your situation? If the only things you will allow yourself to consider are things you don't want to consider or if you consistently pursue things to make you happy that have no means to provide you with happiness, what other result would you expect?
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 08:48 PM
2

"I survive as best as I can, trying desperately to find a way out by means of therapy, TRP, and a few other self help things that I am doing." This is the problem for everyone. What are you trying to get out of? Fear. Fear of the future. Fear of failing if you have control. Fear of not having control. Fear of what you don't know. Fear of not having possessions or positions or admiration. Fear of not having the love and respect of others. Here's the thing. You will never have control of others, e…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 08:45 PM
3

I'm sure you've heard the saying that a house divided (against itself) cannot stand. I think the principle applies to men as well. You are either true to yourself or you are neither yourself nor true. There isn't a real middle ground. If you are divided you will fall and fail. You will do so for as long as you are divided. I cannot image how being subject to repeated failures would lead to anything but depression-unless it leads to worse. What I like about RP isn't all the points for getting sex…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 07:14 PM
11

I have to absolutely disagree with your sick and twisted position. Happy, moderately happy, whatever, people should NEVER be allowed to marry their own kids. Waite, maybe the inflection of your sentence is vague...
/r/TheRedPill18/01/15 05:39 AM
2

Again, it's not about black or white, men or women. It's about the system that's used to weed out the productive from the nonproductive. Promote and retain those whose work is the best irregardless of color or gender. Having quotas necessarily prevents a meritocracy and can only result in mediocrity-at best.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/15 01:17 AM
4

I was not supporting affirmative action. I was laying out a brief historical pattern showing how diversity appears to greatly contribute to the rate of invention and innovation. However, that's only present when there is a freedom of information pursuit and flow by and between people. The more you regulate that and limit/force it, the less results you obtain. Predetermined "diversity" (in both frequency and composition) is not the same thing as free diversity. The former rewards those who are go…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 11:09 PM
13

9 times out of 10. BUT, the father is reserved for the most important role in a child's life--the checkbook.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 10:19 PM
12

Men yes, white no. Printing press? China had a version before Guttenburg's. China also had gun powder and gun powder based weapons (and fireworks)-the Europeans figures out the benefits of pouring gunpowder down a steel barrel plugged with an iron ball. Arab traders developed the sailing tack that allowed ships to effectively sail into the wind. It was this advancement that allowed the Spanish and Portuguese to traverse the world. Diversity is good, but only because as history shows, you never k…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 10:16 PM
10

Actually, most laws truly are written in a gender neutral manner. that means they do not inherently favor men or women. On the other side, that means there is little to constrain the decider (usually a judge). It's the societal conditioning and prejudices that make application of the laws so unfair. For example, when dealing with primary custody. The laws almost always prohibit basing it on the gender of the parent. Instead it should go to the parent that typically cared for the child the most: …
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 05:47 PM
2

First, prenups aren't easily thrown out. They can be, but usually it is because of economic differences that allowed one party to have good legal representation while the other party had poor representation or none, for example he has an attorney but she doesn't; when there is an extreme difference between the inducement and the benefit (I'm not taking the time to explain that); or because the prenup is trying to do something the law doesn't allow. What you need to do is sit down, by yourself, w…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/15 06:45 PM
1

Yes. I am beginning to notice that blogs and web sites such as RSD are becoming more and more like women's magazines. In order for them to sell a product, first and foremost they have to make sure you have a need. They accomplish this by creating self help or self improvement articles but in fact the articles are actually veiled attacks on your worth. They are designed to make the reader compare himself to a fantasy so ensure he perpetually comes up short. Insecurity follows, but at least the "s…
/r/MarriedRedPill15/01/15 03:39 PM
2

Understanding that you're coming from a large scale perspective, these specific considerations should also be part of the factoring process. First, sleep with the hoe and ensure the SO finds out. It is destructive and creates a bit of danger for you (retaliation by the SO) but can be beneficial in two ways. Makes sure he understands the nature of women/his relationship and ensures, if he's willing to really look, that he has major improvements he needs to undertake. Second, high quality women ar…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 09:23 PM
6

This. I know he's discussing dogs and wolves, but he definitely has a point he thinks people should take, but Teddy Roosevelt wrote about two huge mastiffs confronting a lone wolf. He said each dog (150 pounds)was far larger than the wolf(100 pounds). Still, it only took seconds for the wolf to kill the dogs. He went on to talk about how the wolf had to fight each and every day to obtain and maintain each of those pounds. It's life was killing and nothing else. The dogs who ate from a bowl simpl…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 03:39 PM
1

As I said, role models would help tremendously. But too many people never even picked up the flint. They just expected someone else to light the fire. Now they're pissed that they spent so long in the cold after having been shown. If they were one of the one's banging the rocks together, fine. If they were one of the one's just sitting there, that's not their real propblem.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 12:37 PM
2

I don't see where that's necessarily anti trp. TRP is simply an analysis of predictable behaviors in men and women pursuing sex (at least that's what it was originally). what you do with that knowledge is up to you. You'll see a lot of contradicting information here. An example is the 48 laws of power that says protect your reputation at all costs. You'll then see a post advising to sleep with married women. Those two precepts can arguably be said to contradict. People will argue that the concep…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 03:45 AM
3

Everything you needed, whether at 10, 15, 20 or 25, you had within yourself. If you weren't realizing it and using it that's your fault, no one else. Might it have been easier with a role model, sure. So what. You had everything you needed anyway. We are victims of ourselves. We were born into lives where we knew we'd eat, have clothes and basic necessities and endless forms of entertainment without lifting a finger. We had nothing forcing us. Howevr, each of us could see. We could see what ther…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 03:37 AM
2

You don't connect with her emotionally, that's just an illusion on her end. It's created by positively reinforcing her emotions with your actions. Key words: her emotions and your actions. You do that by being aware and in the moment. You know all that talking you do to yourself in your head? Stop it. Watch, understand, react. Will you make errors? Yes, that's how you learn. See what she's doing and react. See how she reacts. Was her reaction what you expected? No, remember and adjust either wit…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 06:49 PM
2

True, but if there are no more new marriages all f the existing ones will either end in divorce or death. Then, when there's no more marriages anywhere, the divorce rate will be zero.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 05:42 PM
1

Not sure if you're agreeing and expanding or disagreeing and countering. I agree that women will often say what they believe to be socially expected and safe as opposed to the truth. I also agree with Rollo's assertions that women, ideally, want commitment from AF's. I.e. they want to get the alpha and then make him commit. No part of women wants to end up with anything less than an alpha, but the reality of the wall usually imposes the choice of no one or a beta. They'll settle for beta when th…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 05:40 PM
2

Good job on trying to improve and it sounds like you're having some initial success. However, I believe you're still over thinking things. This may be because you simply need to build your confidence to do anything, but keep this in mind. She's giving you clear green lights and you're hesitating. Stop, confidence is what women want, not calculation or planned desire. When she says you're not giving a clear indication of interest, RIGHT THEN fix it. Give her unequivocal interest. Not later. What'…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 04:25 PM
1

Post script* Mouth breather has traditionally been associated with less intelligence and, more importantly, less education. Ergo, your aversion to words such as "irregardless," or for that matter perhaps "ergo" or "aversion" would appropriately relegate (there's another one) you to the status of mouth breather. I get the impression people thought I was attacking your TRP views-though perhaps not.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 07:49 PM
1

I've always believed the mind adheres to the same principals as the body. Exercise is the best way to improve it. If you wanted to learn a new physical skill, you'd study what it involves and begin a workout/practice routine starting small and working up from there. Mental skills follow the same rule. The more you put into it the more and faster you'll develop. I'd suggest a program with some form of daily practice (doesn't have to be the same thing every day) with a once a week "game." Game bei…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 01:04 PM
2

I agree with most of those, but have to strongly disagree with Joaquin in Gladiator and DiCaprio in the Great Gatsby. Gatsby has the ultimate case of oneitus. EVERYTHING he does he does to re-win Daisey, who he lost to the rich, strong, young, handsome, fearless, jock who attended an elite university owned industry and had his own harem of women. Not exactly alpha. Commodus was weak and afraid. He was in an Alpha position, but only by birth and treachery. Treachery isn't necessarily bad, but giv…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 02:43 AM
2

You have some strong arguments. However, the studies you cite can only compare happiness between men who are living one of the options currently available now which includes how they feel about not living one of the other available options. If society basically stopped all committed monogamy that would create a whole new slew of options as well as a whole new paradigm for men. We have no information as to how men would or would not feel in that new paradigm and as such cannot state with any cert…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 12:18 AM
3

If that's the case, TRP needs to shut down now. It is unequivocal that feminism is the dominant societal orientation. TRP not investing in it threatens society with a loss of function and cohesion. You're advocating that we are all obligated to support societal constructions solely on avoiding breakdown and not because we personally believe it's correct. I cannot support that. That's the rub, am I free to pursue my own path as dictated by my own conscience, or are you free to try to force me to …
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 12:13 AM
-2

Well, those are your values not mine. You provide no reason why I or anyone else should care. If you want a family, have one. Part of that necessarily entails choosing a good partner. If you can't even get through the first step correctly, then you likely don't need a family. I also don't see how that pertains to TRP, keeping in mind that TRP's main stated goal is to maximize your N count. Lastly, you might want to take some time and read up on satire. It was very heavily laced throughout my ori…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 07:10 PM
1

I think your argument is flawed. Yes, there were limitations on women's past access to higher education, limited more by necessity than patriarchy, but that's irrelevant. While it might not be fair to compare any specific generation against other generations, it is fair to compare within. No man today has any greater access to the benefits of past experts than does a women. Past theories and developments and contributions are fully recorded and available to all. It has been this way for several …
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 07:02 PM
3

I don't have a problem with what he's advocating. I do have questions. Is he arguing that traditional commitments are relics of the past and should be forgotten? If so, I'm ok with that. Two, or more, come together to get their needs met. When their needs take them elsewhere, they go. In going they either completely detach from their prior commitments or they don't. At all times, the other party is entitled to the same level of freedom. No fuss, no muss. I'm married, but no longer feel obligated…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 06:47 PM
3

I'm fairly certain Neville Chamberlain had a foreign policy that adhered to your guidelines.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 02:31 PM
-11

I understand. You mouth breathers must maintain your non-standards.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 02:16 AM
1

But that goes back to proper nutrition education to know what is toxic to begin with. Sugar isn't toxic in and of itself. It's actually an important part of nutrition. The issue is having too much of it. Perhaps a better phrasing might have been "Gentlemen, be aware of and avoid foods with artificially high amounts of sugar added." But, and this is important, most foods that contain an excessive amount of added sugar also have high levels of other ingredients that are bad, such as fats and God k…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 02:13 AM
2

No, his advice was. "Sugar" is actually a catch all term. It applies to a number of highly modified and refined molecules that can be found in food and found added to food, such as corn syrup, high fructose syrup, and high fructose corn syrup. It can be applied, I believe to several hundred different food additives including sugars refined from, cane (what most people think of as sugar) corn and beats (sugar beats). That doesn't even count naturally occurring glucose or fructose that most all pl…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 01:46 AM
4

It doesn't work that way. Understanding how markets work and why bubbles come about and pop are one thing. Identifying when something has moved into bubble territory is also somewhat common. Predicting exactly when, how and why the bubble pops? Not going to happen. Also, don't delude yourself into thinking people (women) will then passively roll over and cry and beg for forgiveness and mercy for being wrong and take their lumps for being foolish. Just like animals from a fire, successive waves w…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 12:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter