TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

whatafoolishsquid Archive

View 186 posts and 945 comments by whatafoolishsquid on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2240

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights18/09/18 05:31 PM
1756

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights19/01/19 02:12 PM
1565

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/10/20 05:59 PM
1564

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights23/09/21 11:51 AM
1455

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights04/04/21 02:36 PM
1304

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:15 AM
1178

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights17/06/25 10:00 AM
1120

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:17 AM
1102

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:06 AM
1018

Intactivismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights19/04/21 09:54 AM
1005

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights30/01/22 09:01 PM
942

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/02/24 03:30 PM
890

Legal Rightswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights24/04/24 12:53 PM
794

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights06/09/24 02:13 PM
783

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights07/11/24 09:02 PM
692

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights14/10/24 12:13 PM
674

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights03/10/25 07:19 AM
627

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights15/11/23 08:14 AM
618

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights11/01/24 06:14 AM
599

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights29/01/26 10:32 AM
596

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights06/03/24 12:57 PM
590

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/07/23 06:08 PM
587

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights29/05/25 12:56 PM
572

Activism/Supportwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights20/03/24 03:31 PM
518

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:37 AM
516

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights01/06/24 10:01 AM
514

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights26/08/24 08:52 AM
510

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights28/07/22 11:22 PM
508

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:05 AM
494

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/01/19 07:44 AM
461

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights11/05/18 11:28 AM
461

mental healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights05/07/24 01:08 PM
455

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights01/03/24 01:29 PM
442

Healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights12/06/24 03:57 PM
413

Legal Rightswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights24/04/24 07:04 AM
406

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/05/24 12:55 PM
387

mental healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights10/07/24 08:14 PM
387

Anti-MRMwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/01/24 06:21 AM
386

Intactivismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights29/05/24 07:46 AM
383

Progresswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/07/25 04:47 AM
378

Legal Rightswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights13/08/25 02:49 PM
352

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:35 PM
352

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights06/12/24 05:34 PM
334

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights14/12/20 12:24 PM
325

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:05 PM
323

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights17/07/24 05:20 PM
322

Healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:53 PM
285

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights23/12/20 10:44 AM
285

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights23/07/24 06:11 PM
279

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:41 PM
268

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:10 PM
260

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights13/03/24 12:17 PM
259

Progresswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/04/24 12:43 PM
251

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights08/10/20 11:23 PM
250

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights06/09/24 06:44 AM
242

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights11/09/24 02:32 PM
225

False Accusationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights17/07/24 05:15 PM
225

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights11/07/24 04:39 PM
212

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/03/21 12:30 PM
211

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights29/01/19 07:37 AM
209

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights02/11/23 03:17 PM
195

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights23/07/22 11:07 PM
190

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights12/07/24 04:07 PM
189

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights17/10/24 09:21 AM
189

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights23/02/24 07:40 AM
185

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:23 AM
185

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:00 PM
180

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights05/09/24 06:40 AM
180

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:19 AM
162

Healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights03/12/20 09:30 AM
157

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights10/10/20 06:03 PM
154

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:49 AM
153

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights18/02/21 09:44 AM
153

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:12 PM
152

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:32 AM
147

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights26/08/24 08:50 AM
146

whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights02/01/21 12:46 AM
141

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights10/10/25 04:25 PM
138

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:16 PM
136

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights17/04/25 12:02 PM
131

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:15 PM
130

mental healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights02/04/24 11:46 AM
126

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights20/01/22 06:28 PM
123

Activism/Supportwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:20 AM
123

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights10/10/23 05:55 AM
118

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:21 AM
117

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:16 AM
117

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:18 AM
116

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights29/02/24 10:35 AM
116

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights21/04/18 09:54 AM
113

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:41 PM
112

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:46 AM
111

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights27/05/24 09:07 AM
105

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights18/02/21 12:01 PM
104

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:51 PM
95

Healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights10/09/21 04:22 PM
93

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights24/04/22 12:39 PM
92

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights07/01/21 12:20 PM
90

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights11/10/20 07:35 PM
89

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights23/11/22 07:35 AM
89

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights31/08/23 05:04 AM
89

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights22/04/18 02:28 PM
88

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:32 PM
87

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:44 AM
84

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:20 PM
82

Anti-MRMwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights30/12/21 07:36 PM
81

False Accusationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights13/10/18 06:16 PM
79

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights31/07/19 01:13 PM
76

whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:31 PM
75

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights22/05/18 11:59 AM
74

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights28/08/23 01:08 PM
64

Intactivismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/11/20 08:58 PM
63

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights13/09/24 07:54 AM
62

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:20 PM
62

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights22/10/20 08:40 PM
62

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights13/10/20 08:20 PM
59

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights14/01/22 01:55 PM
58

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/11/20 11:59 PM
53

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights07/07/19 02:36 PM
52

Intactivismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights21/11/20 09:30 PM
52

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/01/22 11:05 AM
52

Healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights06/05/22 03:16 PM
51

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights15/10/19 09:09 PM
50

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:16 PM
50

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights29/09/19 07:39 PM
50

Progresswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights31/07/23 06:08 PM
50

Intactivismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:54 PM
49

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights02/11/20 06:02 PM
48

Legal Rightswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights25/10/23 05:25 PM
48

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights30/04/21 10:42 AM
48

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights30/07/22 03:05 PM
46

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights06/08/24 10:28 AM
45

whatafoolishsquid/r/MGTOW24/02/19 08:51 PM
45

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights17/09/20 12:35 PM
42

Healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights01/01/22 06:01 PM
42

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/11/19 11:32 AM
39

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights30/12/20 09:26 PM
36

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights21/07/23 07:57 AM
35

whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights19/12/20 04:33 PM
34

Legal Rightswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights01/05/21 03:38 PM
34

Activism/Supportwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:16 PM
33

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights23/10/20 07:52 PM
33

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights02/04/24 01:49 PM
33

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights14/01/21 07:00 PM
33

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:11 PM
30

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights14/01/22 02:01 PM
30

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights18/09/23 05:49 PM
29

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/11/19 10:10 AM
29

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights29/05/19 07:15 PM
28

Discriminationwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights15/10/20 07:39 PM
27

Legal Rightswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights26/10/20 08:13 AM
26

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights14/05/21 08:32 PM
25

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:54 PM
24

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:13 PM
24

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights23/01/24 10:39 AM
22

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/12/20 09:35 PM
21

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/03/23 02:33 PM
21

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights19/11/19 05:28 PM
18

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:53 PM
18

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights17/10/20 09:29 PM
17

whatafoolishsquid/r/MGTOW29/05/19 07:31 PM
17

Healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights22/11/20 08:25 AM
16

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights26/09/20 05:38 PM
15

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights16/12/21 08:06 PM
15

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights21/10/20 09:43 PM
15

whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights11/12/20 01:19 PM
14

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights05/02/21 08:26 PM
14

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights10/07/19 09:36 PM
14

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights10/12/20 10:48 PM
10

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:26 PM
9

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights12/12/22 09:02 PM
8

whatafoolishsquid/r/MGTOW15/12/19 01:35 AM
8

Edu./Occu.whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights18/01/22 04:15 PM
7

Marriage/Childrenwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:27 AM
4

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights01/01/22 05:52 PM
3

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights24/01/22 01:08 AM
2

Anti-MRMwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:12 PM
2

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights17/08/23 01:31 PM
2

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights21/10/23 02:58 PM
1

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/03/23 02:31 PM
1

Feminismwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights09/03/23 02:29 PM
1

Social Issueswhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights10/02/22 06:45 PM
1

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights21/01/21 12:41 PM
1

whatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights19/01/19 02:10 PM
1

Healthwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights31/12/21 11:32 AM
0

Generalwhatafoolishsquid/r/MensRights05/02/21 09:44 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

Your own example disproves your point. Gynecomastia is an excellent example. It abnormally affects men, yet surgery for is not covered by the NHS. It's certainly not considered a disability.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 03:08 PM
45

Buddy, this is a men's rights subreddit. The discussion is not whether baldness should or should not be a disability. It's whether the law can classify a condition that affects both genders as only a disability for one. Especially when it affects the other gender more.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 10:56 AM
2

Well I don't agree with bullying being "against the law" so to speak, especially in a specific instance like this. However, you've touched on how small penises are treated by society... particularly feminists. In fact, the small penis emoji has become a symbol of feminism. Which shows how full of shit they are. They want to free women from traditional gender roles but still want to control and invalidate man by policing masculinity. Feminists have a long history of this, like the White Feather c…
/r/MensRights10/10/25 04:30 PM
4

A violent threat was already against the law. It's assault. Why do women need extra legal privilege? Regardless, you can't honestly be acting like the government has unlimited resources.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 03:59 PM
9

Because it highlights societal priorities... Society cares more about protecting women from speech they don't like than it cares about protecting boy children from physical violence.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 03:43 PM
13

This is an archive link.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 07:11 PM
9

None of these exist in the way they're used. I would systemic misogyny does exist but not in the sense that "the system" is misogynistic. There is also systemic misandry. I'm sure boy's clubs exist. But it's not a major source of social disparity. As for privilege, the term has historically meant legal privilege. Before liberalism, laws applied to different groups differently. (You could beat a slave, but a slave couldn't beat you, for example.) Liberalism believes all people should be treated e…
/r/MensRights09/05/25 07:34 PM
26

I know more men in my life who have been falsely accused of rape than I know women who have been raped. 50% of people say that all a woman has to do is say she was raped, and that’s all it takes to get a man sentenced to 20+ years. The other 50% say it’s not so easy and that actual rapists don’t ever see jail time Neither of these is true. The burden of proof is increasingly low for rape cases but there still must be something there. However, I would argue that all a woman has to is say she was …
/r/MensRights09/05/25 06:47 PM
17

That is mostly a myth anyway invented by the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 08:26 PM
23

No, that's not true. The feminist movement at large pushes policies that harm.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 08:25 PM
133

What's funny is it doesn't matter. Men are expected to subsidize women's biological disadvantages all the time (health insurance, for example). So even if men's shorter life expectancy is biological (it isn't), women should still be subsidiziing it if people really believe in equality.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:55 PM
14

Not sure what you are wanting from the subreddit. This is a subreddit about men's rights. If you think that advocating for men's rights, like the right to not have our genitals mutilated, the right to have equal access to our children, the right to not be enslaved as soldiers, the right to be treated equally under the law, is a "push back" against women's rights, then that right there is your problem. What "women's rights" are being pushed back against?
/r/MensRights06/12/24 07:56 PM
87

Exactly. Ie, they are for traditional roles for men but no roles or responsibilities at all for women. Many times, they promote laws that enforce traditional roles for men, like paid menstrual leave and disproportionate paid maternity leave. Then they simultaneously criticize traditional masculinity.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 05:48 PM
61

Yes, I checked commenters' profiles. Many/most of them identify as feminists or at least liberals. Let this be a reminder: you cannot win. Being a traditional masculine provider is "toxic," but this is how you're treated when you have a progressive feminist attitude. Feminists have never wanted liberation from gender roles—they want men to continue providing and protecting them and subsidizing their existence even more than we already were without having to give anything in return. Speaking of w…
/r/MensRights06/12/24 05:37 PM
4

https://scitechdaily.com/wide-and-lasting-consequences-teachers-give-girls-higher-grades-than-boys/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://mitili.mit.edu/sites/default/files/project-documents/SEII-Discussion-Paper-2016.07-Terrier.pdf https://www.theedadvocate.org/4-troubling-truths-about-black-boys-and-the-u-s-educational-system/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/education-department-black-preschoolers-more-likely-to-be-suspended/ https://www.wokefather.com/educati…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:29 PM
4

https://scitechdaily.com/wide-and-lasting-consequences-teachers-give-girls-higher-grades-than-boys/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://mitili.mit.edu/sites/default/files/project-documents/SEII-Discussion-Paper-2016.07-Terrier.pdf https://www.theedadvocate.org/4-troubling-truths-about-black-boys-and-the-u-s-educational-system/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/education-department-black-preschoolers-more-likely-to-be-suspended/ https://www.wokefather.com/educati…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:29 PM
167

Not only does this absolute tool think that our failure of boys in education isn't about the blatant preference given to girls well documented in studies, but the fact that we let them be "offensive," but he also thinks "shame" is a good punishment. As a former educator, he should not be one.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:07 PM
7

As a man, you will be shamed for being sensitive and shamed for being insensitive. You can't win.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:20 AM
2

Thank you for the late irrelevant comment. No Reddit thread is complete without it.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:38 AM
4

Spelling is not grammar. The irony is too much.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:31 AM
7

Are you confused about what sub you're in?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:29 AM
2

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:28 AM
1

I get the impression you don't even understand what this sub is for or what we're talking about.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:49 AM
1

I mostly agree, but that's beside the point.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:17 AM
1

That's not relevant to the point at hand.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:54 AM
39

Except the goal of such movements and feminism in general is to force men to subsidize women at the state level, among other things.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:37 AM
8

Oh good I was 50/50 lol. Plenty of people seem to actually think that.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 01:32 PM
12

I genuinely can't tell if this is sarcasm or not. This is the same logical fallacy as the man vs bear meme. You're orders of magnitude more likely to die falling off 23 floors than at the hands of a man if your mom just put you on a ledge 23 floors up.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 01:29 PM
4

It's no coincidence that the supposed outrage towards the word "female" coincides with an uptick of the use of "male" versus "men."
/r/MensRights17/10/24 12:12 PM
90

Somehow, all the comment sections ended up turning this into the father's fault. The worst comment: Why everyone blame women? Imagine, mom decides that it’s safer for her kids than staying inside near angry father.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 09:24 AM
6

You really came into a thread three months late to leave that embarrassingly brain dead comment?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 06:15 AM
22

Yeah, you're probably right.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:32 AM
40

Another article where a woman has to have sons to realize the struggles men face... because I guess she didn't pay attention to men before. And as usual, it ends with a "women most affected" caveat to a whole article about a problem boys face. But otherwise some good points.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 07:55 AM
2

Regardless, needs don't confer rights. You need food, but you don't have a right to it.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 02:14 PM
29

Wow not what he said at all. Not sure if you just didn't read very accurately or are being purposefully dishonest. He said the insult "childless cat lady" is equivalent to the insult of *femcel," ie the female version of "incel."
/r/MensRights11/09/24 07:03 PM
28

Feminism is a religion and relies on the religious shame of misanthropy, and this is one of the ways it manifests.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 11:25 AM
3

If the other parent also has custody and the one parent takes them, they've violated the other's custodial rights. I don't know if police or court would bother in such a mild case as I'm describing (though as I said I'd imagine they'd be more likely to with a man), but if you were clearly leaving with them, going to a different state or country for example, it would definitely be treated as kidnapping.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 02:21 PM
7

Very interesting stories, thanks for sharing. I suppose I'm thinking less of a woman running away with the kids from an abusive partner and more what the TV tropes is of, they get in a fight and the woman wants to cool off and takes the kids with her. Maybe I'm wrong as I've never seen it either way in real life. I just can't imagine a man packing the car and saying "I'm taking the kids and going to stay with my dad for a while" and people being ok with it.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 11:56 AM
5

Act like you have no issues = toxic masculinity Talk about your issues = fragile masculinity You can't win against misandry. They hate men just for being men. All these pseudoacademic terms are just trying to make it sound sophisticated. Like the invention of the term "antisemitic."
/r/MensRights06/08/24 10:40 AM
8

Of course, none of them were willing to take me up on my bet.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:50 AM
3

The NYT also said Venezuela's economic collapse was the result of capitalism, so...
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:33 AM
41

And especially Black men! I'm sure the irony of that would be lost on them, though.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 07:19 PM
84

I also find the "men should reflect" line super eerie. It makes it obvious this is all just a same tactic to control men. Reflect on what? Either you're not a rapist... and so what do you have to reflect on? Or you are a rapist... and therefore don't care.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 06:26 PM
6

This is the comment section on an article https://www.boredpanda.com/woman-robbed-in-front-of-3-men-revives-man-bear-debate/ that picked up a video posted on this sub: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1e5o7d3/so_let_me_get_this_straight_men_are_obligated_to/
/r/MensRights23/07/24 06:13 PM
1

We don't play "no true feminist" here. Feminists push policies and laws that harm men. If you have a problem with that, find a new movement.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 08:10 AM
1

"Just talk normally bruh" Welcome to Reddit.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 08:09 AM
2

Oh yeah, and keep in mind that the "patriarchal" Romans exclusively used male victims in their human sacrifices, organized by female Vestal Virgins.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 07:57 AM
25

Well, they don't. All the feminists in the comments are quick to say "but no man wants that" just like they do with women-only gyms. But they're lying. I was once on a plane with a group of Orthodox Jews. I was seated next to a man, but then my wife and I decided to switch seats. The man suddenly switched seats with his wife. Then my wife and I decided to switch again, and they switched again. Confused, we talked to them and learned that religiously, the husband couldn't sit next to another woma…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 06:11 PM
144

This is, of course, NOT progressive. Sex-segregated transportation to "protect women" was common until the 20th Century and is still common in more conservative societies. Feminists got rid of all that, now they want it back. They pretend to be victims regardless of the circumstances. https://www.wokefather.com/egalitarianism/sex-segregated-facilities-progressive-or-re-inventing-the-wheel/
/r/MensRights17/07/24 05:41 PM
17

The story in question: https://www.boredpanda.com/five-year-old-boy-vanished-two-years-ago-found-in-indiana/
/r/MensRights11/07/24 05:39 PM
9

I should've included her caption and the top comments as well. She got absolutely obliterated: https://imgur.com/a/9h8jeyX
/r/MensRights05/07/24 05:29 PM
4

This is the full vid, or at least what she posted on Instagram. She's definitely being sarcastic, and she got absolutely eaten alive in the comments. Like I said, not sure I can post the link, but I guess I could send it if you DM me.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 05:21 PM
11

Male rape victims have been forced to pay child support.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 05:18 PM
27

Originally an Instagram reel. Not sure if I'm allowed to post the link.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 01:09 PM
3

The easiest refute to living in a patriarchy is to ask why women never complained about it... or even mentioned it... for 10,000 years.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 12:52 PM
3

Lmao what. You seem to be getting super upset to have the truth pointed out to you. Since clearly you're the one in need of a fourth grade lesson, I'll break it down for you. Local laws exist to address things not covered by the state code. For instance, a city can say it's illegal to ride a donkey on the road if the state code does not otherwise address the issue of donkeys on roadways. However, if the state code or constitution expressly states that people in that state cannot be arrested and …
/r/MensRights05/07/24 07:35 AM
15

The fact that women are more likely to suffer from depression while men are more likely to kill themselves is pretty telling of how society treats each gender.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 06:57 AM
23

"People randomly compliment me on the street. I'm so oppressed."
/r/MensRights04/07/24 06:02 PM
17

First of all, public toplessness is the only example anyone can ever think of, and it is not true. Many cities have anti-topless laws, but nearly all states have laws superseding them that make it legal. Additionally, a US federal court ruled any laws making it illegal for women to be topless are void. While this theoretically applies only to the states in their circuit, any case brought in another circuit would inevitably have the same ruling. Second of all, the original defintion of "privilege…
/r/MensRights04/07/24 05:52 PM
30

Precisely. At least in western nations, only women have privilege. There are numerous laws that expressly favor them.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 02:35 PM
71

Ironically this list proves men don't have privilege since they are all either absurd first world problems (catcalling) or just straight lies (men earn more than women).
/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:12 PM
2

Tell your dad to post a TikTok video next time and we'll compare how it's received.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:51 AM
2

First of all, I'm asking you to make a bet and put your money where your mouth is. You sidestepped that part. Second of all, you're misrepresenting the situation. It has nothing to do with privacy. Neither the article nor my statement make that claim.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:25 PM
1

I agree with what you're saying but just pointing out how it would play out in real life. You could theoretically refuse surgery unless a man were present, or a white person, or a Christian, or whatever. Frankly, I don't think they would even oblige in those cases, and even if they did, you would be publicly shamed if anyone ever found out, not applauded like this woman.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:22 PM
3

And then you'll get banned from Uber. Try asking for a white driver because you've had "traumatic experiences with black people." In modern society, people generally frown on discrimination. The only exception is women discriminating against men because women are privileged.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:12 PM
2

Would you like to make a bet on that? Next time you're seen by a female physician, tell her she can't treat you until a man is in the room. We'll see how obliging she is.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:27 PM
3

Lol don't talk about straw men when you just accused me of claiming that the oppression of women is "just." The whole point of this post is to say the oppression of women didn't exist. You know that. So how could I be saying it's just? When your honesty compass is that off-base, I'm done talking to you. Don't bring up slavery either, as you know full well slavery bans, ethical debates about slavery and slave revolts (yes, despite reprimand!) are as old as history itself. If you do have an open m…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 05:10 AM
3

I always chuckle at this narrative because at the same time, feminists then champion as idols thousands of women who did have careers going back thousands of years. My favorite is the example of Agnodice that feminists hold up as a hero. The best part is she wasn't even real, and historians know that because female doctors were commonplace in Athens... 2500 years ago. Or maybe how feminists champion Lady Butler for breaking the glass ceiling and getting into the Royal Academy in the 19th Century…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 04:58 AM
3

Give me a break. You know full well none of those were female revolutions against "patriarchy." Good grief. When you have to lie to maintain your ideology, maybe it's time for a new one. Oh wow! Women would be "reprimanded" for challenging ideals. Good thing none of the other revolutions throughout history faced the terrible fate of a "reprimand"! Unbelievable. And here you are doing exactly what the post describes. Women are just the victims of socialization, is that it? None of the billions of…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 04:44 AM
3

Is it the number 10,000 you're having trouble with? Or do you just lack intellectual honesty?
/r/MensRights08/06/24 04:17 AM
4

Not sure what part of "10,000 years and seven civilizations" you're having trouble with. I can only imagine you're being purposefully obtuse. Women's suffrage was not a revolution, and even if it was, 1840 is in the modern era. Historically speaking, it only proves the point that women never resisted their oppression until the modern era. Women have always worked on family farms, and many of them worked in factories after the Industrial Revolution. So which is it? Earlier you said women had to f…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 01:31 PM
4

It's not a recent phenomenon. Some of the earliest ancient civilizations banned slavery at various times or another. And slave revolts are as old as history.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 01:22 PM
0

I actually don't think it's cool to get a vasectomy without at least telling your wife, but yeah, I agree that if a man said he was leaving his wife because she was using birth control and he didn't know about it, he would definitely not get 6,945 upvotes. In fact, I recently saw a post where the headline was the woman called to ask the man for permission to tell people she was pregnant. The long story was this tipped the guy off that she was cheating, but regardless, people were still blasting …
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:36 AM
11

LMFAO astounding you have the gall to call billions of women brainwashed when you have some of the worst cognitive dissonance in a long time. You're... seriously asking me to list oppressed groups that have revolted against their oppressors despite shame? That list would be a thousand pages long, and you know it. And the deterrent was a lot more than "shame," they also faced, you know, torture and death. "Shows how uneducated you are about history, can you describe to me in detail how exactly YO…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:23 AM
10

Weird all the other thousands of groups that have revolted then. "As for raising children, women were also met with patriarchal beliefs, which influenced them to teach it onto their children" Haha this is exactly the whole point of my post. See, you think women are idiots who can't think for themselves, don't even realize they're being "oppressed." Or maybe you could respect those women and realize they weren't oppressed.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:05 AM
7

Asking male leaders for something and in historical terms immediately getting them hardly qualifies as a "revolt." And even if it did, the fact that women didn't resist the so-called oppression until the "right" to work meant a "career" instead of backbreaking farm/industrial work, or until the right to vote wasn't tied to the military, further proves the point.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 07:22 AM
4

No, Facebook group to shame straight men for how they dress.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:54 PM
40

Legally? None. They are legally privileged in the West. Their biggest disadvantages are all physical.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:54 PM
68

Only if you think men are people.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:47 AM
2

Yes, look at all his comments in this thread. Those early 2000s chatbots made more sense.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:35 AM
1

Haha ok now you're clearly just talking out your ass. I guess if the US economy gets bad enough, it'll make sense for us to all build our own cars and houses too. And no, you didn't even portray my argument correctly in the first place and tried to make a silly argument about "affording" a maid, which is not the question at hand.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 11:08 AM
2

Bud, the state of the US economy has nothing to do with the fact that division of labor is more economically efficient, a simple fact of life. Stop trying to move goal posts.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:29 AM
2

Not sure what that means. I'm guessing you just know nothing about economics.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:47 AM
2

The same one as everyone who has ever lived: where division of labor and specialization are cheaper than sharing labor.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:45 AM
15

And like I said, in other contexts where it benefits them, they'll then suddenly fully admit men do more work... like when they want all men's money.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 06:18 PM
12

I've never seen an example of a woman who actually wants to divide housework equally. Anything physically demanding or dangerous will always fall to the man. Yet then the woman will want the light housework 50/50. At best, I could imagine a woman saying an equal split is the man paving the driveway for five hours while the woman folds laundry for five hours. (Though frankly I've never even seen a woman be this generous.) Yet in reality, as I pointed out, this isn't an equal split. Paving a drive…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 12:40 PM
6

Watch any sitcom from the 90s. Disrespecting your husband isn't just common, it's expected.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 10:14 AM
1

They can be anonymous. However, some corroborating evidence is certainly helpful either way, but it's doubly true if it's anonymous.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 03:53 PM
1

Worldwide.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 03:52 PM
8

No, we run worldwide stories, but since the bulk of our audience is American, US-based stories usually do better.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 03:45 PM
5

Tell me that next time a government bureaucrat won't let you see your own children or even tell you where they are.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:32 PM
3

In the future, they'll see it for what it is. All national and international institutions privilege women, even in the traditional definition of "legal privilege." Ie, the law favors women over men, in text, spirit and application. As for man vs. bear, the idiocy of that argument just reveals how based on emotions feminism is. By that argument, you should also choose to be alone with a bear over a child, mouse or coconut. It's moronic.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 09:05 AM
1

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 07:09 AM
8

Very good point as well.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:29 PM
18

A couple of interesting points here IMO: She went from one extreme to another. This actually highlights a bit of the radical feminist worldview. It's either misandry or subservitude to men. They can't just imagine equality because their sense of gender dynamics is unhealthy and warped. All the comments are calling her terrible. As far as I can tell, she's not trying to force her lifestyle on anyone, yet the people supposedly for women's "choice" are telling her she shouldn't be living her prefer…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:23 PM
3

I see you're unfamiliar with analogies.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 04:33 AM
54

First of all, it's a very intimate thing to do one's hair.. Lol yeah alright dude that's why I pay a stranger with a beer gut 20 bucks to do mine every month. Not all physical touch is sexual or even intimate.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:45 PM
79

Only in the most perspectiveless puritan American mind could touching someone's hair "become grooming."
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:38 PM
93

I've seen students do way more "intimate" things with their female teachers in two separate countries.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:24 PM
103

Agreed. Especially when we need more male teachers and good role models like this guy.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 01:10 PM
35

My guess would be she gets validation from being "stressed."
/r/MensRights16/05/24 12:09 PM
14

I would bet good money when furniture needs moving she's off to the side telling him and his friend how they could do it better.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 12:05 PM
14

I don't think you know what "projecting" means. I'm sure some people are "happy" being slaves. That doesn't mean slaveholders are free from criticism because their slaves might be happy. Good grief.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 11:46 AM
23

This is the attitude someone has with their college roommate, not their spouse. Any adult with moderately proficient communication skills should be able to navigate a household division of labor without having to make this innane list that sounds like a teenager made it, which is incidentally exactly how she speaks. If the laundry needs done, my wife or I do it, all of it. If I have a slowdown with clients, maybe I end up doing laundry more often. If it's summer and my wife is off work (she's a …
/r/MensRights16/05/24 11:12 AM
124

Yeah, her profile is a shitshow of self-righteous indignation.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 11:05 AM
1

What... are you talking about? The guy asked when I went to high school. Class of '08 means I graduated in 2008. I said '04 or '05 because the anecdote occurred when I was in ninth grade. Read the whole thread next time. "Lmao"
/r/MensRights12/05/24 05:20 PM
3

"The shocking list was posted by Year 11 students from Yarra Valley Grammar School in Ringwood onto the platform Discord and was discovered by the school last Wednesday." Always hilarious when someone makes it so embarrassingly obvious they didn't even read the article. The school has a secondary school.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:01 PM
27

Screw, marry, kill were the three options as I always heard the game.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:36 PM
3

Noted, I'll make sure to nominate you for PR head at the next meeting. Ffs, get over yourself.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:15 PM
9

If girls did the same to guys, the same rules should apply. Yes, again, welcome to the whole point of the thread. As every commenter above you has pointed out, those same rules don't apply. You're welcome to disagree, but that doesn't make it not "men's rights."
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:10 PM
3

True, but those women and men are all presumably adults. Maybe if high school girls had an "Are We Dating the Same Guy" group they should be penalized, though I doubt they ever would be.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:06 PM
5

Just because you don't think it's a double standard doesn't mean it isn't up for debate, the whole point of the thread. Believe it or not, your personal opinions are not the standard for what counts as "men's rights."
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:05 PM
9

Yes, heaven forbid people discuss social issues in a discussion forum for social issues.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:59 PM
2

Would've been 04 or 05 I suppose. I was class of 08.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:48 PM
13

When they do that, it's also men's faults. Women's issues are men's fault, and men's issues are men's fault.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:36 PM
39

The incredible irony of saying you only want daughters because of "toxic masculinity" or because "boys are trouble." In other words, you are saying these things not only exist, but are innate, blatant misandry.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:45 AM
1

"Nazism isn't a problem, it's a response."
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:43 AM
90

Ah, but that's the old definition of "privilege." The Newspeak definition of "privilege" is whatever you want it to mean in the moment to discredit a given group.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 08:23 AM
16

So I suppose since black people proportionately kill more white people, Google should also discriminate racially?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 12:33 PM
1

This is like a 14 year old's analysis of gender relations. In what universe do you think young men, in any era but especially today, need to own a home to have sex?
/r/MensRights03/04/24 11:09 PM
117

As usual, men's problems are only recognize when they cause problems for everyone else. Also, is anyone surprised. Why would a young man want to start a family and build a home when his role will just be villainized.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 04:03 PM
7

Please consider donating to Dan's crowdfunding campaign to help with his legal fees as he fights to get custody: https://chuffed.org/project/106605-solo-dad-collecting-baby-from-the-us
/r/MensRights02/04/24 01:49 PM
7

"Divorce her and have proof she's dangerous and get custody." No wonder you have such a fucked worldview. You either have zero experience with reality or have completely denied it.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 01:31 AM
14

Yeah I guess he should've just abandoned his kids. That, which apparently you'd do, is what's really pathetic.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 08:02 PM
8

Deal. If I win $2,000. Shall we draw up a contract?
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:47 PM
10

Would you like to make a bet on who "won" the argument? If I lose, I will gladly pay for you to see a therapist.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:43 PM
10

Nothing says "I don't care" like spending hours writing dozens of comments.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:35 PM
9

"Other than judging others" Your first comment: "How about just leaving those bitches? Or too dumb to do that?"
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:18 PM
20

I have never seen someone in a comment thread make it so clear they have severe mental issues so fast.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 03:53 PM
15

You might start with the fact that any man who leaves a woman is basically saying goodbye to their children. Which is this case means leaving them with an abuser. Sounds like you're a kid who's never seen the real world.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 03:47 PM
42

What a sick comment. You might start with the fact that any man who leaves a woman is basically saying goodbye to their children. Which is this case means leaving them with an abuser.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 03:44 PM
203

Ironic to say this when women in most Western nations are legally privileged, ie, they enjoy societal advantages codified into law.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 12:17 PM
1

Nobody has responded to your moronic comment and blocked you. Not surprised you can't even navigate a simple social media platform when you clearly can't even read.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 06:50 PM
1

Dude ar eyou really this stupid or just looking for a reason to be outraged? The point is that women get more benefits and higher pay than men. Literally has nothing to do with trans. Fucking troll.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 11:18 AM
15

Weird to call a system that oppresses both genders "patriarchy."
/r/MensRights23/02/24 03:49 PM
4

Russia has a perfect storm of factors in this regard. First, the male population was more than decimated in WWII, creating a highly feminized society. Second, Marxist narratives about "women's liberation" have been part of the politicians' arsenal for a century. Consider that the USSR made a big deal about women serving in combat roles in WWII, and female Soviet snipers are still hailed by feminists today. Yet... some three times more Soviet men died in WWII than women, and that's counting civil…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 07:45 AM
1

No, in these places where you've been told women lack "fundamental rights," men lack commensurate "fundamental rights" because they do not have Western ideals of equality under the law in the first place. Those women receive a number of benefits from men that compensate them for the privileges they don't have. Meanwhile, men receive benefits from women that compensate them for the privileges *they* don't have. The proof of this is the simple test of Occam's Razor. Civilizatoin has arisen indepen…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 07:15 AM
4

There never was at any place in any time.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:10 PM
16

What's bizarre is that feminists hated Barbie like three months ago, but I guess that's in the memory hole now.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 10:01 AM
2

Nobody has a lower opinion of women than feminists. 10,000 years of human civilization and women never rose up against their so-called oppressors. Feminists blame "internalized misogyny" which is a fancy way of saying they think all women were gullible idiots. If men and women both create culture, and women arguably more so since they raise and educate children, how else do you explain women perpetuating this supposedly "patriarchal" culture for thousands of years? Takee other examples like femi…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 08:20 AM
33

TikTok is a cesspool. Events or videos I'd never even think are remotely related to gender dynamics will get bombarded with comments about misogyny and toxic masculinity. The same post on other social media, nothing. It's bizarre.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 06:57 AM
204

Society: Men, you must continue doing all the hard and dangerous work, sacrificing yourselves for women and supporting women and children. But you're no longer going to get anything in return because we have to "liberate" women. Oh, also we're going to shame and criticize you for the very efforts we're forcing you to take. Men: Yeah, this doesn't sound like a great deal. I'm going to play video games instead. Society: There must be something wrong with men.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 06:52 AM
10

They do this all the time. It's great evidence that feminism is a mythological archtype. The oldest example Agnodice, the first female doctor in Athens, which feminists STILL talk about as if a woman breaking the glass ceiling 2,500 years ago doesn't prove the opposite point. But even worse, Agnodice wasn't even real. She was a fictional character, and female physicians were actually quite common in Athens. Even back then, a woman in a man's world was a good trope for a story. Another good one i…
/r/MensRights09/01/24 02:33 PM
12

Definitely. it's a dead giveaway she's not interested in an equal partnership, but a relationship where she's in charge and simultaneously gets to play the victim and berate you for her own role of being in charge.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:26 PM
20

Oh damn. I actually meant to go into that. Advantages groups usually get disadvantaged groups to do their dirty work. Wealthy people pay poor people to fight their wars, for example. Women usually pay or seduce men into doing their killing for them.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 08:12 PM
4

Yeah, take any art or art history class, and you'll have celebrations of vaginas thrown in your face. Try to paint a penis for your next art class and see next happens. You'd have to go back 2,000 years to find a society that celebrates the penis. Yeah, complaining about stigma regarding periods is the "first world problem" aspect of feminism. It's such a minimal issue compared to the equivalents men face.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 04:24 PM
19

Is this in Spain? I taught in a Spanish elementary school and we actually had to do this. Girls went to a party, boys had to do busy work. One sad boy asked, "When is our day?" It's fucking disgusting. Fuck feminism.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 04:16 PM
2

The Men's Lib sub.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 06:32 AM
41

Just remember. All the men feminists hate were raised by mothers and female school teachers, probably spent 90 percent of their childhood under the direction of a woman.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 01:18 PM
6

99%? What a joke. There's the occasional woman hate, but an order of magnitude less than the man hate you'd find on a feminist sub... or just in society at large. And men are not "privileged." What? Name a single law in any Western country that discriminates in favor of men. Meanwhile there are tons that discriminate against them.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 06:28 PM
12

Men literally died at hired rates. Just more "world ending, women most affected" bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 04:13 PM
2

Feminists in Nordic countries always oppose these gender equality measures, like when Norway and Sweden instituted conscription for women.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 08:35 AM
21

The biggest hole in patriarchy theory is that over 10,000 years of human history and seven separately evolved civilizations, women never revolted against this so-called oppression. There is also the fact that men have by and large sacrificed themselves for and subsidized women throughout history. Men have had to do all strenuous and dangerous labor. Men have been more frequently homeless, incarcerated and conscripted. Since when do dominant groups do that? Did European slaveholders subsidize the…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 07:45 AM
1

I think OP is a teenager. He's all over the thread talking about respecting others' opinions but gets triggered if something comments something slightly different from what he wanted to hear.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 07:03 PM
0

Lol, that was not an opinion. He said "most women" are financial drains. That's a statement of fact, and a false one.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 04:45 PM
-1

By that logic you should never enter into a mutually beneficial relationship with anyone. Yes, society functions on trust which carries risk...
/r/MensRights16/10/23 03:33 PM
-1

I would not consider it a matter of "getting lucky." There are plenty of good women out there. You are not marrying these women blind. Make grown-up decisions for yourself.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 03:24 PM
-6

Most woman are finance drainers, not equal partners. Can you be a rational adult and not just hate on women for three seconds. You know full well that's not true. Some women are financial drains, and so are some men. Your wife does not even need a "well-paying job" for her to help you build wealth. It would be more economical for you to devote 12 hours a day to your profession while she does the housework versus you devoting eight hours to your profession and doing all your own housework. It is …
/r/MensRights16/10/23 03:09 PM
2

Historically, marraige evolved as a mutually beneficial relationship between a man and woman (or man and women where environmental conditions mean women need even more subsidization from men, and rarely, the reverse for the reverse reason). Women contractually receive a man who will provide for them and have their sexual consent registered. Men receive acknowledgement of and rights to their children as well as a sexual and reproductive companion. Obviously modern marriage doesn't include most of…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 02:52 PM
168

Men "care more about money" because they have to. Men do not have the social support, both in the form of official government programs and unofficial community support that women do, yet more is demanded of them simultaneously. They're expected to be providers, men have to subsidize women through taxes, and where I live, I literally have to pay a higher tax rate. It's like I remember once I went to dinner with my family and my dad paid. I said to my mom and sister, wow shouldn't the proud femini…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 11:24 AM
3

women are supposedly more likely to be held "accountable" for child neglect because of so called "gender bias" Any knowledge of the US Justice System is enough to refute this. As of 1997, about 22% of all incarcerated people had comitted crimes against children. That was an upward trend, but we'll leave it at 22 to be safe. As of 2021, there were 1.12 million men in prison, 93% of total. That would suggest 336,000 male inmates for crimes against children. 59% of child abuse cases are for neglect…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 05:19 AM
4

You seem to be deliberately missing the point. You don't need to know the percentage of men paying child support. That was a hypothetical example. The whole point of the violence-from-oppression theory is that it's evidence in and of itself. Minorities are more violent. Why? They are marginalized. Poor people are more violent. Why? They are marginalized. The mentaly ill are more violent. Why? They are marginalized. Men are more violent. Why? They're socialized that way??? You aren't being intell…
/r/MensRights11/10/23 05:12 AM
4

Obviously it counts people living in homelessness, that doesn't mean it counts them in the poverty rate because that is a convoluted measurement. For example, a man could be living in worse conditions than the woman he pays child support to but not counted as in poverty while the woman is because of the "household" size. Nevermind the fact that nearly every single person in prison is male. I guess they aren't "in poverty"? What correlation do you not see? You cannot say in every situation that v…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:44 PM
3

The federal "poverty rate" is determined by "household." This has been a metric used by the government for some time because it's not a constant. A household can be one person or 30... and you have to have a house in the first place. As you've seen, far more men are living on the street than women (it's 70% actually). "I don’t think it’s wise to compare the two as if you share the same struggle." Wtf. Once again, I DIDN'T. You even admitted that already.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:31 PM
3

This is not the only context in which "violence results from oppression is used." In fact, the whole point is a "remember, this is the paradigm" thing. Anyway, maybe you should consider which men are the ones committing the violence in the West. When you then compare that with which gender has more homelessness, more drug abuse, and fewer public dollars spent on health care and social security, maybe you'll start to understand the correlation.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:02 PM
3

More than just blamed on themselves. It's used as proof men are the oppressors, which makes no sense when in every other context the opposite is claimed.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 05:58 PM
7

That's not what I did. So... is just flat out lying the gotcha YOU want?
/r/MensRights10/10/23 01:49 PM
3

"I think the oppression leads to violence theory only works when you are acting violent towards your oppressors. Most male violence isn’t towards an oppressor. It’s not like men are attacking politicians or corrupt police agents." This was your original comment. I have to believe you are being purposefully obtuse. This is absurd. You: Oppression leads to violence theory only works when you're acting violent towards your oppressors. Men aren't acting violent towards their oppressors because they …
/r/MensRights10/10/23 11:03 AM
7

You really can't see the parallel? You literally just said men aren't attacking their oppressors, your evidence being that they aren't attacking politicians. Hamas isn't attacking politicians either. They're attacking random people. Don't move the goalposts. And the parallel with African-Americans is equally obvious. Moreso frankly. Blacks commit proportionately far more violent crime. Any progressive readily points out this is because "violence results from oppression." Black people are not att…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:50 AM
8

Neither is Hamas? Neither are African-Americans committing violent crime?
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:40 AM
11

This is how I describe men's lib: In the past, there were two gender roles. They maximized sexual specialization to the benefit of each gender, though there were downsides to each. For example, men had to do all the physical labor and provide for a woman and children who could otherwise not provide for themselves. Women had less dependence outside the home but got their existence subsidized when it would otherwise have been hard to survive. In comes feminism. They don't like the downsides of the…
/r/MensRights30/09/23 02:33 PM
1

I have not just "suddenly" got a boner since I was like 13 years old, hence my question.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 05:58 AM
1

You're advocating for textbook discrimination. You know that right?
/r/MensRights27/09/23 04:08 AM
1

Are you 13 years old?
/r/MensRights27/09/23 04:06 AM
2

Men's rights is not inherently about being anti-feminism or about getting women. It's about... men's rights. More importantly, why is your comment written like a poem in a high school lit mag? Are you a bot?
/r/MensRights27/09/23 04:06 AM
2

I could not care less about gender ratios when going nude.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 04:03 AM
5

Making a rule about men in general because of what some men do is the definition of discrimination.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 04:02 AM
54

I'm straight but would love men's only spaces. Beaches, gyms, hotels, whatever. Pipe dream, though.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 12:16 PM
74

Where is this? I'm in Spain and go to "nude beaches" all the time, by which I just mean the beach. Never had an issue in this regard, though I'm not going to nudist meet-ups or anything like that. What's funny is American feminists tend to be super Puritan even though they think they're "progressive." Most of their rhetoric revolves around clear sexual hangups, this being an obvious example. The OnlyFans thing you mention adds an extra level of absurdity. But I don't want to even start on the "m…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 11:36 AM
6

Because men have been dealing with uniform and dress requirements since the beginning of time. It is far more an issue for men that our appearance is restricted. Yet someone dress-codes and uniforms are made a sexist issue... against women? It's twilight zone shit.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 02:00 PM
8

The former is not a legal issue. The latter is no longer true, at least in the US. Federal courts have struck down laws against female toplessness in the vast majority of the country.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 06:21 AM
2

"A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction." So yeah, more dishonesty on your part, or just idiocy. I never claimed a single father couldn't be on welfare, I claimed there isn't a welfare programs for single fathers. Holy shit, just because WIC may fund a child of a single father doesn't mean it funds the father. Holy shit, what do you…
/r/MensRights30/08/23 04:45 AM
2

Do you think there is no welfare or assistance for single dads...? Just because you cowardly hid this as a sarcastic rhetorical question does make it any less of a strawman. I never said that, yet you suggested I did. No shit sherlock. Women receive billions more in support BECAUSE millions MORE women are single mothers than single fathers. This is equally if not more dishonest. We aren't talking about the percentages of a given program end up going to men and women, we are talking about what is…
/r/MensRights30/08/23 04:32 AM
2

No, don't play dumb. You specifically used a strawman and sarcastic questioning to try to act like my comment was absurd. I'm not "cherry picking" anything. The US has like three social programs for families, so the fact that one of them is only accessible to women alone means women receive billions more in support.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 04:21 AM
2

Did I fucking say that? I thought we were having a conversation, but I see you're just going to be dishonest. "Welfare" is an incredibly loose term. Hence why I specified WIC, which is not available to single dads, no.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 12:03 AM
2

Cons of being a man: high likelihood of having your genitals mutilated at birth, always susceptible to conscription as cannon fodder, no social support so you have to make more money to support yourself and family and then are simultaneously villainized for doing so.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 11:50 AM
2

That's probably true, but the very fact that there is welfare for single moms (the program is Women, Infants and Children after all) shows that on balance far more support is offered to single moms than single dads.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 06:05 AM
5

Lies. If you pay taxes, you do. Feminists have convinced the government to force the patriarchy on men as much as possible.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 09:53 PM
38

Yeah, the accusations of pedophilia is a good point. Wasn't there a story recently where a man was detained at the airport just for traveling with his own kids?
/r/MensRights28/08/23 01:24 PM
1

That's moronic. Women aren't "judging" men. They're having natural attraction to certain traits just like men. If there's an underlying social problem here, it's that men are told their self worth is what women think of them, not that women are evil for having preferences.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:37 PM
0

Looool half the comments in this thread are complaining that women unrealistically want a big package and the other half trying to claim they don't. Unreal. The only thing more head-in-the-sand is now claiming men don't generally like big breasts. Incredible.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 10:42 AM
0

It's not. Men face serious social issues, so these threads are an embarrassment to our community, frankly.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 10:31 AM
0

How is that even relevant to the discussion? The issue at hand is men telling women they should or shouldn't like a certain penis size because their vaginas are such and such measurements. That's stupid. Sexual attraction is not based on logical, functional considerations. Women aren't attracted to tall men because they measured their cabinets and realized a man of x height could reach the top shelf, they are just instinctively attracted to them. They are similarly instinctively attracted to big…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 10:27 AM
-2

These posts are disappointing. Your ability or lack there of to attract women shouldn't be a men's rights issue. Women are allowed to be attracted to whatever the hell they want without men telling them they should or shouldn't be based on logical arguments.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 10:24 AM
2

That's so not remotely what I said and you know it.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 10:20 AM
-1

Of course not. But that's because your self worth shouldn't be determined by what women do or do not like. That doesn't mean when should go around telling women what they should like based on some irrelevant rational argument.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 08:01 AM
3

Yeah, but that has nothing to do with whether a woman is instinctively or emotionally attracted to a certain penis size. When you see big tits, do you consciously think, oh, that will mechanically make sex more pleasurable. Or do you just subconsciously like them on a deeper level?
/r/MensRights27/08/23 07:33 AM
37

Women don't think men are invincible. They think our lives have less value, so we should die first.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 07:01 AM
-32

Cope, dude. Women don't like or dislike a penis size based on its sexual functionality, just like men don't like or dislike a breast size for its ability to give tit jobs. They just like big breasts, and women likewise like big penises.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 07:01 AM
1

That happened just recently, and I'd hardly compare having a few extra miles to kill your baby with having your genitals chopped off.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 11:11 AM
2

There’s more nuance to this than you think and it’s not as simple as the OP is trying to make it seem. Don't play the fence now. Those are your words. Your comment was intentionally designed to undermine the claim that it was discrimination by injecting "nuance," which is irrelevant to the discussion. As a side note, I find it exceedingly ironic that you suddenly know all about the reasoning behind a feature of the Spanish tax code that a couple of hours ago you claimed was an "outlandish" possi…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:45 PM
3

Ironically, of all the countries in the world, Spanish women are just about the least likely to have had children by that age—or even at all.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:25 PM
6

Discrimination is discrimination no matter how much you try to flower it up with sentiment. In a liberal society, the law is applied equally to all. Not all women have children, and plenty of men face hindrances to entrepreneurship more severe than childbirth. These are the "nuances" you speak of and precisely why the law can't address "nuances" and must be applied equally. Moreover, men subsidizing women due to childbirth is the definition of the male provider gender role. You're literally advo…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:12 PM
5

I'm sure the reasoning is women business owners are discriminated against or at least that social factors make it harder for them to start a business. So they are given a tax break to help them. However, it's unequal application of the law by gender regardless of how you spin it. (This was actually the original definition of the word "privilege" before it got co-opted.)
/r/MensRights21/08/23 03:54 PM
2

Colombia is indeed an amazing country, though they're pushing the limits of an Argentina-style inflation crisis. Like a lot of people have pointed out, being born a man there has considerable disadvantages, but living there as an adult man with a steady income (especially in USD, EUR or AUD) is great.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 03:33 PM
1

Looooool nice, pat yourself on the back for that one.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 03:18 PM
2

The USA is indeed a great country for a lot of reasons. However, again, circumcision alone makes it pretty low on the list when it comes to men's rights.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 03:14 PM
1

I suppose that's probably true, though it doesn't *necessarily* mean that white men are less likely to be conscripted than other races since that list is merely by country, not per capita or something. As you can see, a lot of Europe and Latin America have conscription, even during peace time, so a high number of white men.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 03:08 PM
1

Yeah, minus the mutilation of baby boys and selective service.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 02:49 PM
0

It's literally slaverly...
/r/MensRights21/08/23 02:47 PM
2

By a lack of respect? Correct, I am, enlightened one.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 02:42 PM
2

Imagine being so braindead you don't even know what a "question" is. I'm the only one who's stated a "fact," so far, but yeah, keep lying to yourself.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 02:17 PM
2

Only if conscription isn't considered "labor trafficking." I don't what else you'd call being forced to sacrfice your life to the state for €5/day.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 02:15 PM
1

You have to be joking. The US mass mutilates baby boys...
/r/MensRights21/08/23 02:12 PM
2

The sources are in the thread, so you can stop thinking you know everything about the entire world. It's not outlandish at all since it's a simple fact. Maybe have a bit more humility next time and ask for a source like an adult instead of being a dick.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 02:08 PM
17

The self-employed in Spain must pay a flat-rate social security tax. "Young entrepreneurs" receive a discount. However, that discount discriminates by gender. Men receive the discount until 30 while women receive it until 35, so men aged 30-35 pay higher taxes than their female counterparts. They just overhauled the self-employed payment scheme starting this year, but as far as I know that discount is still in effect. https://www.seg-social.es/wps/wcm/connect/wss/8338a90c-fbd9-4f5a-bcf1-f5e2b18e…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 01:59 PM
1

Fuck off. I resent your arrogance. This is a Reddit thread, not a doctoral thesis. I don't "need" to do anything. I'm having a conversation with like-minded people and you're not in charge.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 01:53 PM
45

I live in Spain. The government has been leaning into a moral panic that men are constantly murdering and abusing women. The feminist indoctrination in schools is really bad. Once when I was a teacher, I got to watch the girls go have a party for women's day while the boys had to do busy work. It was heartbreaking. I've really wanted to start an organization to pressure at least for men's issues presentations in schools to complement the feminist ones, but it's a pipe dream...
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:24 PM
143

In some instances, Spain literally taxes men more just for being men.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:20 PM
2

Latin America.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:19 PM
6

Mallorca is in Spain, just fyi. Though she could presumably still be Latina.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 06:29 PM
3

I would deal with it by quitting.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 06:51 AM
2

No, that is labor theory of value, and it's utter nonsense. If you and I live on an island and must catch fish by hand, catching barely enough to survive, but if I forgo eating for several days and risk my life to build a fishing rod, then emplo you to catch fish for the both of us while I work on building a boat so we can catch even more fish and more efficiently use our time, you are not creating wealth, I am.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:24 PM
2

What do I think what is called? A system whereby the owner of capital reeps the profit produced by the capital? Normally I would call that "capitalism," though I generally refer to "capitalism" merely as opposed to "socialism" in that it respects private property. But yes, as a recovering Marxist myself I'm aware of all the silly dogmatic definitions that ideology gives to things. Anyway, the fact that men are discriminated against in hiring has little to do with "evil capitalists" and everythin…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:17 PM
4

That is not how I have ever seen or considered "capitalism" to be defined, but at least you have a concrete defintion unlike most people.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:52 PM
19

I live in Spain and know a Ukrainian woman in her 20s always posting about how the West needs to do more to help Ukraine, but then her next post will be her partying in some club, and it's just beyond me...
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:09 PM
3

The original academic definition of "privilege" was an unequal application of the law. In this sense, women are the only privileged demographic in the US. There are no laws that specifically discriminate against women left in the US, except a handful of places that have anti-topless laws but haven't fallen under US circuit court rulings overruling them. Men, however, face several laws that discrimate against them. Just off the top of my head: Men do not have legal protection of their genital int…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:07 PM
10

I doubt you could even define "capitalism" if you tried.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:33 PM
7

I will not be a birthing servant! (Oh, but as a man, could you still be my money servant. Paid maternity leave, period leave, subsidized women's health care, plz.)
/r/MensRights12/07/23 08:08 AM
1

Yeah what's crazy is she's presumably sharing the screenshots that show her in the best light too. I'd love to see what she's not showing.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:23 PM
5

Except that these feminists simultaneously want to be subsidized by the government. Menstrual leave, free everything, equal health care premiums. In other words, they still demand men provide for them... but we just have to do so quietly and forced by the state while getting nothing in return.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:06 PM
1

Wow, your insistence on playing this semantic game is really proving to me how disingenuous you know your argument is. I don't give a fuck what your textbook says, but to suit you, from now on, we will never use the word boundary. We instead use 'hobgob.' Jonah Hill has hobgobs in his relationship. He is allowed to. Just like I have a hobgob in my relationship that my wife not sleep with other people. Not everyone has this hobgob, but those who do may if it is under voluntary agreement. The Orth…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 05:15 PM
1

LOLOL deflected? You're still trying to debate the definition of a word like it matters at all, so I don't think you should be accusing others of deflection. You ARE allowed to make demands over your partners autonomy. I don't want my partner sleeping with other men. I don't want my partner doing drugs. I don't want my partner eating poorly or getting overweight. I am quite liberal with my partners and usually don't care much about their interactions with the opposite sex, but some men do, and t…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 01:59 PM
1

Right, you are playing semantics with a word and trying to discredit him because he didn't use it in the exact same way as someone with a certain piece of paper does. When in reality, he could have called it glibbdeehock, it doesn't matter. People are allowed to have limits for the relationships they enter into with others. This is what's so utterly absurd about your position. What is your alternative here? How could Jonah Hill have done things "right"? There are two other options: He continues …
/r/MensRights10/07/23 01:12 PM
1

Are you purposefully missing the point. :L
/r/MensRights10/07/23 11:36 AM
2

Don't forget these are only a couple of texts she carefully selected too.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 11:18 AM
2

Ah so you've taken the Orwellian strategy of playing semantics with the word "boundaries" and acting like you have to have a certain status to use it. Just like I can say I'm not going to get in a relationship with a woman who fucks other men, he can have his own limits for relationships. So by your logic, next time my wife has a gangbang at the local heroin den, I should "tell her how it made me feel" and "discuss some sort of compromise." 🙄 This is feminism, men.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 11:06 AM
6

Give me a break. I was recently on a flight where an Orthodox Jewish man had to change seats because he was married and therefore couldn't sit next to my wife. While they're stricter than my personal requirements for a relationship, that doesn't make them "unhealthy." In the leaked text, he bluntly says he supports her but just can't do a relationship like that. Plus, don't play me for a fool. These are obviously just a few leaked screenshots that best support her side of the story. From what's …
/r/MensRights10/07/23 11:01 AM
14

It's very clear from the published texts (of which we probably only see the ones that support her version anyway) that she had a history of pushing the limits. So he's setting black and white boundaries he now needs to feel comfortable in the relationship but respectfully says if she can't meet them, he supports her, but he can't be in the relationship.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 07:08 AM
7

So now you're just resorting to semantics to move the goalposts. That's exactly what he did.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 04:27 AM
35

I love doing fun things alone. If you don't, you must be in bad company.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 07:45 PM
85

By that logic having the boundary that my wife can't sleep with other men is "controlling what she can and cannot do." He even told her he supports her if that's what she wants to do, but he can't be in the relationship in that case. And no, she said he was "abusive." You're entirely misrepresenting her accusations. Not to mention the fact she published a private conversation.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 07:42 PM
82

Right. She clearly needed a new way to leech off his success.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 07:03 PM
384

TL;DR Jonah Hill's ex is now blasting him on social media because he respectfully told her he couldn't be in a relationship with her if she posted bathing suit photos on social media. This was all apparently emotional abuse and gaslighting stemming from his insecurities.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 06:12 PM
6

I clearly meant "they AREN'T mutually exclusive." Either you're bad at context clues or just being an ass. I'm guessing it's the latter since you have the intellectual immaturity to call out a spelling error on the internet. Your historical revisionism is even more irrelevant than your original point.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 09:11 PM
6

Right, so you are disagreeing. Which is wrong. It's puratinism being applied discriminatorily due to misandry. The two things are mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 07:05 PM
7

It's because you said "Y'all do realize" as if you are in disagreement with the OP and the thread.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 06:48 PM
8

Because the whole point is that it's puritanism being disproportionately applied to men. The focus of the post is the gender discrimination, so you aren't refuting or contradicting anything with your comment.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 06:08 PM
10

for sure this has occurred due to, unfortunately, previous issues with male teachers in the past Excuse me?
/r/MensRights09/01/23 05:36 PM
10

Yeah, the US is stupid about sex. How is that relevant to the gender issues presented above?
/r/MensRights09/01/23 05:36 PM
9

I was a teacher. I left in large part due to feminist indoctrination and discrimination. Women dominate the education system. And it's ironic that feminists then complain about the "patriarchal culture" when women have a total monopoly on raising and socializing children.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 05:33 PM
2

That's probably why Amber Heard moved to Spain to hide out after the trial. 🤮
/r/MensRights16/12/22 08:41 AM
1

I'll gladly start my own. I'm definitely not finding much, but I don't know how much interest there would be. I'll make a separate post.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:07 AM
2

Yeah just aobut. The government encourages a moral panic that says men are constantly killing their wives, girlfriends and children in Spain, even though Spain is one of the safest Western countries. I used to teach here, so my personal experience is with how bad feminist indoctrination is in the public school system. Both my local elementary and high schools have giant purple ribbons painted on the side. On international women's day the girls get a pizza party and the boys have to do busy work.…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:05 AM
6

Immoral obviously. Honestly, I think it's "immoral" to opt out of a pregnancy, but let's not get into that. My question is should it be legal? As it currently stands, the law makes no sense whatsoever. A mother, or two parents, or even a single father presumably, can opt out of raising a child they already had by dropping it off at the fire station. So it seems bizarre that then a woman can sue a man for child support for basically doing the same thing.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:02 AM
7

There are no laws in any Western country favoring men. There are numerous ones favoring women. This is just fact.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 09:04 PM
8

Yeah it's pretty ironic really. In reality, the only reason this story is even making national headlines is because it was a bunch of young, beautiful women. Men are stabbed to death all over the country all the time and nobody cares.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 12:13 PM
3

Yeah, I try to avoid Reddit, but I was actually just Googling this story and that 2X post actually ranks... A nice reminder how terrible Reddit is.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 11:09 AM
8

I pretty much assume this is 90% of domestic abuse cases. Just mutual fighting.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:21 AM
1

Except this definition isn't applied consistently. By that logic, women should be submissive and overly caring would be "toxic femininity." Yet no feminist or academic uses that term. Instead they call that "misogyny."
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:58 AM
2

There was a "study" that found carbon fiber is part of the patriarchy and toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:53 AM
5

Based on this logic, women calling other women bitches for being assertive or sluts for liking sex, or a traditional mother criticizing her daughter for following her career instead of having children, would all be examples of "toxic femininity" since it's women being shamed for possessing masculine traits. These are things feminists complain about (and label as patriarchy) all the time.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:11 AM
6

Yet when people did this 150 years ago, it was oppressive patriarchy.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 06:02 PM
1

I know right. Does this supposed ex-MRA believe feminism has the solution? Because feminism has been around for like 200 years and all of men's problems are still here...
/r/MensRights21/09/22 06:25 AM
8

Then why are feminists complaining that men aren't watching them?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 10:19 PM
9

I worked in a Spanish elementary school and the amount of feminist propaganda really bummed me out. For example, on international women's day, the girls got a party while the boys had to do busy work. And one of the boys was like, "Why don't we get a day?" Heartbreaking.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 09:05 PM
8

Nonsense. In practice, the policies and movements promoted by feminism reinforce the male gender norm while eliminating the female one. In other words, having their cake and eating it too.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 09:03 PM
5

You're joking right? That's... your argument. Your projecting an isolated marketing strategy onto the whole firm. You said "decades of failure" when those companies have been successful for decades and generally successful now, including in franchises you mentioned like Star Wars and MCU. They have not been repeatedly trying this culture war strategy for decades, and there are examples of firms who have failed due to it or changed their strategy. "No, I simply pointed out it doesn't. You're pret…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:37 PM
11

Even if that's happened here, that's not what that thread is? And even if it were, it wouldn't make that thread not dumb? It would also just mean people post dumb things in this subreddit too.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:12 PM
3

Dude, what are you even babbling about? There is no existence of decades of failure. Disney, Amazon, HBO, etc. are wildly successful companies. Even many of these reboots are successful. That does not mean they don't have certain productions that fail. So your issue with capitalism is that the market rewards good products and punishes bad ones? I guess you'd prefer a system when a bureaucrat decides what's good or bad ahead of time and that's all that's ever produced? I like how you didn't even …
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:47 PM
16

I wouldn't be surprised if half of the people in that sub are white knights.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:36 PM
6

Men's Rights Activists
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:33 PM
7

First of all, it DOES increase viewership, at least in specific demographics. It guarantees that everyone on whichever side of the culture wars will watch it even if it's terrible. Next, there's another economic level that's relevant in our monetary system. Especially for streaming services up till now, actually getting revenue from customers is less important than securing low-interest credit from someone politically connected enough to get a lending license. So to some extent a successful busi…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:10 PM
9

The UN and WHO are funded by western governments and have perpetrated the mass genital mutilation of men and boy children in Africa known as "Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision."
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:26 PM
3

Lolol Cuba? Is your great socialist success story seriously a country so poor they beg for aspirin and pencils on the street and have so little infrastructure there's a water shortage because they can't manufacture something as simple as plastic bottles? Try again.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:04 PM
4

Please for the love of God study history so you realize every socialist economy has failed miserably.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 02:26 PM
2

I don't know why you're talking about intelligence when you apparently can't even read. I didn't say that criticizing capitalism is doomsday mythology. That was in response to, you know, your literal warnings of doomsday: "The planet is on life support". Criticizing capitalism is just its own special kind of stupid. Only forgivable if you're a teenager, which is likely. The economics of it all is as clear as that the earth is round.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 02:25 PM
5

Yet I don't think an academic claiming there should be more studies in African-American radicalization because they commit more violent crime would be taken very seriously...
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:37 PM
7

Why are you investing so much time and energy into judging into what makes other men "men"? They can do whatever they want. They're still men. Being in a relationship with a hyper feminist probably means they're getting disrespected regularly, but that's their problem.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:34 PM
3

Frankly anyone who actually criticizes "capitalism" and defends "socialism" in the 21st Century doesn't deserve to be taken seriously. The economic principles involved have been tested for the last two centuries and the evidence is pretty clear. But yeah keep talking about how silly conservative ideology is when you're sitting here going on deranged rants about your doomsday mythology like a street-corner prophet with a the end is near sign.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:24 PM
9

Western governments: identify as feminist, fund atrocities. Feminists: but that's not real feminism!
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:20 PM
13

No surprise. Spain is even more of a feminist dystopia than most western countries.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:19 PM
6

Well I misunderstood you then. My apologies. I just didn't make that connection since the article is about feminism first and foremost.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:59 AM
3

No, what makes you think I do? I didn't say anything even remotely related to that statement. The commentor above you said, "But don't imagine for one minute that genocide was widely popular in white society." And your response was, "Hello? The holocaust happened less than 100 years ago!"
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:30 AM
6

Do you honestly believe the Holocaust was "widely popular"? The Nazis went to great lengths to hide it even from their own population. While it obviously had its supporters, Pankhurst's support for the Nazis and ethnic cleansing put her in a unique group.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:38 PM
2

Everything you're saying could be applied to socialists as well, yet no one would say "socialism" isn't an organized movement. Where I live there is a "week of feminism in schools" where they make all the kids draw purple ribbons to hang up outside. It's definitely organized and supported by the government and wealthy/powerful individuals and NGOs.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:37 PM
0

You're obviously being purposefully ambiguous. Explain what you mean.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:34 PM
1

"I'm for parental leave regardless of whether it's the father or the mother." Then you're not disagreeing with me? "Women-specific leave..." It's right there in the title.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 09:41 PM
2

Except that forcing all men to support all mothers and infants because it's "good for society" is the same principle as forcing women to be mothers in the first place, which no one would consider "progressive." The point of the article is to point out that, for instance, traditional gender roles like provider and homemaker were already about what's "good for society." Yet when it comes to women, we recognize that women are individuals and shouldn't be forced to do what's good for society. Yet we…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 08:17 PM
1

This comment reeks of economic misunderstanding, which is not surprising for socialist ideology Inflation is a tax. It transfers wealth from holders of the currency to producers of the currency. Moreover, this distinction is irrelevant in this case. As the example in the article illustrates, women and men receiving equal resources while men produce more is men subsidizing women regardless of how you spin it. Which is ironic since you're trying to claim that one woman depending on one man is trad…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:16 PM
22

If it's subsidized maternity leave, then it's subsidized by men (or women who don't have children). As is the thesis of the article, that's just codifying the provider gender role into law.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 12:21 AM
7

That world governments spend millions to end female genital mutilation and even more millions to promote male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:59 PM
4

I could easily do this too (and have it be more valid). When men complain about inequality, they're talking about having their genitals mutilated and being forced to be cannon fodder. When women complain about inequality, they're talking about getting complimented too much on the street.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:58 PM
2

Lol no they were a shining example of "equal rights" while giving men the responsibility. Like how the USSR bragged about how women were an equal part of the fight against the Nazis and painted female snipers as folk heroes... yet WWII killed something like 20% of Russian men not women. Women were not put in equal danger. For all the "equal rights" men, as always, subsidized women's existence with their blood.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:58 AM
3

Literally? Please copy and paste the part of Afghanistan's legal code or any other that states such.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:53 AM
1

I assume we're talking about equality under the law. Now that all military roles are open to women, the only example of this inequality under the wall disadvantaging women is laws on toplessness in public, but there are hardly any jurisdictions where that's even the case still. Of course, the list of laws applied unequally to disadvantage men is several volumes long.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:51 AM
10

What this means is that men have to subsidize, ie, provide for women. Spain reinvented traditional gender roles with that law and is acting like it's progressive.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:49 AM
1

Except in like Spain and Denmark, you still have to pay a copay to use public health services...
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:40 PM
2

As someone who lives in Europe, that's not remotely true...
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:39 PM
5

https://www.wokefather.com/body/gender-bias-in-healthcare-5-ways-men-are-left-behind/ In 2017, about 30,000 men died from prostate cancer, and about 42,000 women died from breast cancer. As of fiscal year 2018, the National Cancer Institute has about $239 million allocated for prostate cancer research and $575 million allocated for breast cancer research. That’s about $8,000 per prostate cancer death but nearly $14,000 per breast cancer death, or 75% more money. It’s not just prostate and breast…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:37 PM
3

It's projection. The court that ruled in Roe v Wade was all old white men while the one overturning it was more diverse. Additionally, minorities and women favor more restrictions on abortion than whites and men. These leftists cannot admit to themselves that they are the thing they supposedly despise: the establishment. For clarification, I actually support abortion rights. Nevertheless, these statements are purposefully tribal and inflammatory and do more to promote excessive abortion restrict…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:56 AM
14

Yeah I despise Republicans too, but if there's a party that should get criticized for pandering, it's the Democrats. They basically have no consistent platform and will just take whatever inflammatory position stirs up voters that year.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:44 PM
7

No one is more misogynistic with a lower opinion of the female intellect than feminists.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:53 PM
2

You were so close to understanding that taxes are theft... but then went the other way with it. Regardless, it's not the same. If you have no income, for example, you don't pay income tax. However, child support is something that must be paid regardless. If you don't pay it, you go to jail. Imagine if the government said pay $20,000 a year or go to jail. Don't make $20,000? Too bad, guess it's jail for you.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:16 PM
5

I think you misunderstood me. I'm saying YOU are the misogynist one because men and women are raised by the same culture yet you're somehow blaming societal institutions on men as if men rationally decide to continue a culture or not while women are just swept along like blissful idiots. You seem to have a very low opinion of women's intellect. Somehow though the way societies work benefit men more than women. This is simply untrue on the face of it and would require some serious ideological spi…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:17 AM
1

Good question. Any ideas? I'll try to do some research and write another article, but frankly, I don't know if there's enough material. East Asian countries? They still seem to promote a provider gender role where men work themselves to death.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:56 AM
4

Pew asked people with a uterus. More women favor abortion restrictions than men. That's cited in the article.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:44 AM
5

Wow your comment is incredibly misogynistic. You make it sound like women are irrational idiots who just go with the flow of whatever men tell them. Men didn't design society. Societies evolved. As they evolve, culture directs each generation, men and women. Implying that women are brainwashed by culture but men are rational thinkers who maintain institutions is sexist as hell.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:43 AM
4

Also not true. Black women have an abortion rate five times that of white women. https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2008/08/abortion-and-women-color-bigger-picture Are you purposefully trying to be as wrong as possible?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:45 PM
9

Sorry, what? The Supreme Court that presided over Roe v Wade was all white men while the current Supreme Court is not. You should also educate yourself over the opinions of minorities regarding abortion. Blacks and Hispanics are more anti-abortion than whites: https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2014/10/16/chapter-2-latinos-views-on-selected-2014-ballot-measure-issues/
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:23 PM
1

The website I write for: https://www.wokefather.com
/r/MensRights09/06/22 09:04 AM
1

Awesome channel! Keep up the good work. I'm gonna recommend you in the article if that's all right.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 07:44 PM
2

The men's rights issue is that this addresses a social stereotype that always blames men for marital problems. One, it says women's lack of sexual interest or marital problems in general are the result of a man not fulfilling her emotional needs. Two, it mocks and dismisses men who suffer in a marriage because their sexual needs aren't being met. This article and study should shed some light on that. Not that anything will change.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 03:00 PM
1

The study literally addresses that, hence my title. The social stereotype is to blame the man, but the study shows the woman's drop in sex drive happens before any marital problems.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 02:56 PM
2

She's an idiot, but I'm more concerned about the UK government apparently arresting people based on speech and prosecuting thought crime.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 06:03 PM
23

Anyone who believes in "the patriarchy" has their hands over their ears so tightly you'd be more likely to talk sense to a snail. Men control the culture to oppress women and that's why they make themselves sacrifice their lives for women and send themselves to prison 10 times as often and make themselves the vast majority of the homeless. Makes perfect sense!
/r/MensRights25/01/22 03:03 AM
4

What an asshole. They're clearly a teenager (or still have a teenage mindset) and go telling an adult with real problems like their fucking children how the world works. Why do we even use Reddit?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 02:59 AM
79

Men do not receive society's sympathy, love or compassion. If they're successful, ie socially valuable (so maybe like 20% of men), they get respect. The other 80% of men get derision. I'm sorry for what you're going through. I'm glad you've found a supportive community at the gym, though.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 05:46 PM
3

Yeah, man, it's bizarre that a professional writer would promote their own writing. Not that you would know anything about the professional world. You made it very clear you're a young know-it-all still in school with your weird "bibliography" comment.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 05:25 PM
3

You... realize the article had the official sources included right? Welcome to the internet, dummy.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:58 PM
8

Well a man invented the car! If he'd never have invented, you wouldn't have to suffer the breakdown!
/r/MensRights20/01/22 06:34 PM
1

Do women—or women like this/feminists, I should say—seriously not realize men go through identical and similar thing?
/r/MensRights20/01/22 06:33 PM
1

Post scarcity is a nonsense term. The main resource that humans have to calculate is time, and we will never not have a scarcity of time.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:56 AM
1

Money is humanity's greatest invention. It allows an entire society to accurately calculate costs of investment and risk without any individual person having to make calculations. Well, it works that way until the government takes it over and starts printing a bunch of it.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:54 AM
2

ideology and religion truly are interchangeable. "Ideology" is just a word invented by people who want a religion but also want to look down on religion and act like they're too smart for it. As you can see, I already told you. Nothing.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 10:06 PM
2

Yeah, I saw that when looking through the undergraduate program that someone mentioned at Hobart above. Honestly, that would be better than nothing. Most gender research does not even give the time of day to the male experience. I think a faculty advisor that studies men's issues would at least be something, and willing to work with me if they were truly professional, even if we did not see eye to eye on everything.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 09:51 PM
2

My friend, I studied linguistics in college. You are totally off-base and spouting nonsense to save your case. You originally tried to claim that there was an inherent difference between religions and ideologies (like feminism) because religions have deities and afterlives. That is not a prerequisite for something to be a religion, not by usage, meaning, or floobledigook. The only place it's a prerequisite is in your own mind. You were wrong. Just accept it with dignity.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 09:48 PM
1

Except that we don't speak Latin. Basically, all I'm hearing is that you're the god of words no matter what everyone else thinks. So when someone on Reddit says, man that Tsunami really decimated the island, you respond, nuhuh, decimation means 10% and it killed 12%. Arguing semantics is silly regardless, but this is especially ridiculous. You have no argument for why ideologies aren't the same as religions other than your own personal interpretation of the word.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 08:28 PM
1

Lolwut. What people commonly use a word to mean *is* what it means. You're the one here playing with words. Everyone regularly refers to Buddhism as a religion, but here you are creating your own definitions to fit your ideas about things.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 08:09 PM
16

Religions do not have to have any of those things. Buddhism is a religion and does not have deities. Many of its sects do not have an "afterlife" either. Look up the definition of "religion" and you will see neither of those things mentioned. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/religion "specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:" Sounds like feminism and every other ideology to me.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 07:07 PM
21

In general I would agree, but in this case, ideology and religion truly are interchangeable. "Ideology" is just a word invented by people who want a religion but also want to look down on religion and act like they're too smart for it.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 06:51 PM
3

That's really cool. Unfortunately, it looks like they don't have graduate programs. But hopefully they're faculty members can point me in the right direction.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 05:38 PM
6

Being exposed to different perspectives and only being exposed to one narrative that explicitly forbids the whole premise of your study are two different things. I would not go study under an Austrian school of economics if I were a Marxist either, and I wouldn't choose a faculty advisor for string theory research if that professor didn't believe it. That should be fairly obvious considering the whole point of the post is asking for faculty/departments within this school of thought.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 05:35 PM
7

So you want to find a department that will solely allow you to study a topic without challenging your views on that topic or exposing you to alternative ideas surrounding it? Yeah, if you want to just put words in my mouth I didn´´'t remotely say.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 05:11 PM
93

Feminism is a religion.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:15 PM
14

I don't know. You make a good point, but I doubt people would admit to a murder they were otherwise trying to hide just because a researcher ensured confidentiality. I know it's not exactly the same, but I still think it's safe to say that statistically someone would be less likely to admit a secret to a researcher than something that's already been revealed.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:42 AM
13

Do you... even know what that word means?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:32 AM
3

Yes, I totally believe that a neo-Nazi made an account this morning, filled it with Hitler imagery, and then decided to only participate in r/MensRights. /s
/r/MensRights24/09/21 09:43 AM
4

This account is pretty clearly a feminist or other radical trying to make the men's rights movement or anything else they dislike look bad by association.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 09:40 AM
19

Indeed. When feminists complain that so many men watch porn where the men dominate the women, I point out that porn is a man's fantasy, what he feels like he doesn't get in real life. In other words, the majority of men feel powerless in their real-life sexual relationships.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 08:39 PM
16

Yep, I agree 100%.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 05:03 PM
55

The vast majority of women under 30 are "attractive." The exception is, yes, being overweight, something they can control. Except maybe the deformed, women do not have nearly the same barriers into dating that men have. Even height for a man will be more of a deal breaker than weight for a woman. A woman's major disadvantage, which I alluded to above, is age. A woman's sexual value decreases from its peak to almost nothing in an incredibly short time, something men don't have to deal with. Yet y…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 04:30 PM
3

Writer myself and thought about trying Medium once. Seemed like a waste of time because that whole site is just the same feminist rant posted over and over again.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 11:40 AM
28

Anyone who thinks men as a demographic have the power in society have to be so adept at tuning out 99% of what happens right in front of their face and living with the cognitive dissonance that there is no reasoning with them. Feminists could put men in camps and gas them, and they'd still be talking about how men have all the power. That's how mythology works.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 10:27 PM
27

Yet there are plenty of examples of wives giving their husbands an "allowance" out of his own salary. That's fine though.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 04:36 PM
1

Mary Moser and Angelica Kauffman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Academy_of_Arts?wprov=sfla1
/r/MensRights18/09/21 09:51 PM
9

And this is just one example of this feminist mythology, one that happens to be easily refutable because it happened within the lifetime of many people. But that won't stop them Malcolm Gladwell from making a podcast about the first woman to break into the British Academy of Art... even though it was founded by two women. Or Disney writing Beauty and the Beast as if Belle French society prevented women from reading even though that time period saw the greatest jump in literacy for both men and w…
/r/MensRights18/09/21 04:14 PM
7

Ah the usual. You can't refute a factual statement, so you just call the person relaying it and "ist." Don't shoot the messenger for a mere fact that contradicts your worldview. The dress codes for boys/men are almost always more restrictive than for girls/women. That's just blatantly true. I've never been in a professional workplace where men could wear anything shorter than full-length pants, while women can wear skirts. Yet because they can't wear even shorter skirts than they already wear, t…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 07:41 AM
2

Well that I don't know. I've never been to Sweden to compare, but based on what you're saying and the stereotype out there that Sweden is pretty much the SJW capital of the world, I suppose Finland probably isn't quite as bad. I mean, overall I like Finland quite a bit. There just seems to be plenty of feminism there.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 03:00 PM
-1

As far as I know, yeah, but like I said, I've never lived there or anything. From what I understand, the country is very united behind the one dominant political party, Fidesz. This was the party that resisted the communists and was "centre-left liberal." But now they're classified as "far right populist." Ask a Redditor, and they're fascists, but I always take that with a grain of salt because on Reddit, anyone who isn't farther left than Fidel Castro is a fascist. I have heard they've had some…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:58 PM
4

I have a good friend from Finland and have visited a little. Seems as feminist as everywhere else imo.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:50 PM
3

Not Spain. I've only visited, but Hungary seems like an optimistic, vibrant country on the rise with little of the culture war bullshit infecting the fully developed Western countries. However, based on what people say on Reddit, you have to deal with right-wing fundamentalism instead. I haven't seen any of that there either, but like I said, I've only visited.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:48 PM
2

The government should not be excluding specific demographics from jobs if it has nothing to do with said job. I could name a few other regimes throughout history who have banned certain demographics from public posts because they claim that demographic has the "power." Which, if they can get banned from goddamn street sweeping, I don't think they run the world after all. If you want a less generalized argument, look at it like this. Men make up the bulk of dirty jobs, homeless and the unemployed…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 06:49 AM
16

This comment doesn't even deserve my sarcasm. You know perfectly well that pointing out that the culture forces men into dirty jobs and then simultaneously criticizes them for making more money does not mean we advocate for banning men from those jobs. In fact, quite the opposite. Men take dirty jobs because they have no other option due to the fact that they receive much less social support. Now apparently they're banned from those jobs too. It's closer to pouring salt in the wound than a "win.…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:29 PM
15

It's absolutely a myth. The reverse is true. From my article on the subject: In 2017, the NIH spent three times more money on general female-specific research as opposed to male-specific ($4.5 billion to $1.5 billion). In some areas, the difference was even more astounding. For lung cancer, the NIH spent $180 million on female-specific research but only $318,000 on men. https://www.wokefather.com/body/gender-bias-in-healthcare-5-ways-men-are-left-behind/
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:20 AM
9

By this logic Islam is dangerous because that's where Jihadists all start. Something tells me whoever made this graphic wouldn't agree with that.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 07:13 AM
2

By your logic, the male population in Afghanistan would be much larger than the female one. Yet at birth there are 1.05 males for every female while at age 65 there are .87 males for every female. Hmmm, I wonder where all those men went...
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:15 AM
1

You're just proving what I'm saying. The only way you can remotely make the claim women face a greater threat is if men dying doesn't even cross your radar as a problem. Something like 70,000 Afghans have died fighting the Taliban, almost all men.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:11 AM
40

Damn nice. I got on the sub bc I wanted to write a post saying the same. It's amazing that now all the posts are lamenting the loss of rights for Afghan women, as if Afghan women are incapable of fighting for their own rights? Instead men should die by the thousands to give them something. Men sacrificing themselves for women is really this ingrained in the collective psyche that no one thinks twice about it.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 08:39 PM
1

Bill and Melinda Gates are feminists and fund the forced circumcision of millions of African boys and men. www.vmmcproject.org
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:17 PM
3

Bill and Melinda Gates are feminists and fund the forced circumcision of millions of African boys and men. www.vmmcproject.org
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:17 PM
8

Yet the mainstream narrative is that society represses women's sexuality...
/r/MensRights20/06/21 12:48 PM
1

Wut. I never said that you said that. You said: "There is so much degrading shit against women in porn, i bet if it was against men, you guys would go apeshit" There is so much degrading shit against men, and do you see us going apeshit and kink shaming people? No, you made a strawman and a bad one at that.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 03:31 PM
2

Yeah dude that was the whole point. It was said sarcastically. Chill.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 02:05 PM
3

Never mind all the ways women degrade men outside the sphere of sex. Feminists only ever seem to care about sexual dynamics. Society can use men's bodies for cannon fodder and cheap labor all it wants, but the second it sexualizes a woman, it's evil.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 02:03 PM
3

There are terabytes of porn on the internet degrading men. Patrolling people's sexuality, I see. How progressive of you.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 01:59 PM
4

I'm sure the same would happen for men and shoulder width, for example.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 09:28 AM
13

It's kind of funny to me that feminists only leg to stand on these days is that men like BDSM porn. It's a well-known psychological phenomenon that people use sex as an outlet for their fears and anxieties. If so many men have sexual fantasies where they have power over women, all it shows is that most men feel powerless in their relationships with women in real life. Not that they care about that. They'd rather police men's sexuality even in perfectly consensual situations.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:47 AM
26

Except prison doesn't "help men." It's designed to make them miserable. If prisons are "made for men" that only suggests society hates men.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 12:04 AM
6

Trying to figure that out myself. Been looking at Thailand.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 09:50 PM
13

Leave the West for another country. Sounds extreme, but the state of things in the West is only going to snowball in the next decade.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 03:28 PM
2

I'd read that.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 09:46 PM
4

No shit. Obamacare promoted "gender equality in health care" by giving women a bunch of free programs and making men pay for it.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 10:20 AM
1

Yeah, on the street. Idk the technical law and what distinguishes the street from the beach where people go topless to the beach where people go completely nude. There probably isn't one and is however the police decide to enforce it.
/r/MensRights23/05/21 01:27 PM
4

Socially acceptable where? Here in Spain men get fined by the police for going shirtless. In a nightlife district I even saw a man get stopped by police while walking around with a Hawaiian shirt unbuttoned down the middle. At the exact same moment a woman walked by wearing little more than a strip of tape over her nipples.
/r/MensRights23/05/21 11:28 AM
20

No shit Sherlock. That's why 101 ≠ 163. The population of the US is about 330 million. There are about 380 million native English speakers on Earth. If 101 of 330 are adult males, then how many of 380 are adult males? I'll give you a hint. It's not more than 163. Try reading before you try to boost your self esteem by proving someone wrong next time.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 06:54 PM
149

Yeah just to reiterate, that number, 163 million, is absolutely absurd. There are only 101 million adult males in the US. That would be almost one search of that keyword for every adult male native English speaker on Earth.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:04 AM
617

Yeah I don't believe that for a second. Sounds like that thing claiming it was a TikTok trend to rape as many women as possible. It's moral panic bullshit. I'll gladly admit I'm wrong if that article has reliable sources, but consider that "sex" is only searched about 27 million times a year according to searchvolume.io. By the way, Google Trends isn't showing you the number of searches. It's showing you its relative popularity. For good search numbers, you have to use a paid site unfortunately.…
/r/MensRights30/04/21 10:54 AM
1

"If you mean socially looked down upon, then you are wrong. It doesn't matter who marries who, if you marry someone from another caste, people won't like it." That's... what being socially looked down upon means.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:52 AM
4

Yes, responsible for the child's WELLBEING. That doesn't mean a parent can just do whatever they want with their child. By your logic, if you wanted to cut off your baby's ears, it's okay because you're the parent. And an ear is a lot less functional and important than foreskin.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 02:51 AM
7

Please read the article. Circumcision serves no practical purpose. It became popular in the Anglosphere during the Victorian Era because people believed it would keep boys from masturbating, which isn't even true. The original ritual has been practiced in ancient cultures worldwide, and anthropologists like Joseph Campbell have linked it to the male body's sacrifice to his tribe. In other words, it teaches boys their bodies belong to their tribe, not to them as individuals.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 10:20 PM
4

I'm glad you're so blase about permanently removing one of your child's body parts without his consent for literally no reason other than that yours was removed. EDIT: I also don't believe for a second all your friends that aren't wish they were. For starters, they could just go get circumcised if they hate their foreskin so much. Of course, I've never met a single man that felt that way because any man with a foreskin knows first hand what a functional and important part of the penis it is and …
/r/MensRights19/04/21 09:12 PM
8

It is not a health issue. As stated in the article, circumcision became popular in the Anglosphere in the Victorian Era because people thought it would keep boys from masturbating. It serves no medical purpose, removes the most sensitive parts of the penis thereby reducing pleasure, and can cause even further damage and death.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 07:56 PM
3

I think a lot of people are responding to the headline and not reading the article. (For what it's worth, my editor actually changed my original headline.) The article is a specific response to a tweet from the American Pediatrics Association promoting teaching consent specifically to boys, despite the fact that the APA also promotes infant circumcision, only for boys.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:00 PM
8

If you don't have one how do you know how much upkeep it requires? Which is literally none. It's more of a hassle to clean my ears.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:57 PM
7

It always causes at least one medical issue: missing an important body part
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:55 PM
1

Idk, if I were writing a Reddit post like that, I just wouldn't think to include anything like that. Like her (presumed) goal is to make her out to be the good guy and him the bad guy. Her point was that he thinks his problems are clinical but really he's just emotional weak. So she says he bought a weighted blanket without asking her. That's all the info she needs to make her point. I think most people would end the story there in this situation. Not that everyone writes logically online, but i…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 11:11 AM
3

Yeah, but like for example I don't think someone would say "He has a curfew of 9:20." Rather they'd say like, "He has to stop staying out later than 9:20." It means the same thing, but the former obviously makes her look like more of an overbearing monster. Similarly, the detail about throwing the weighted blanket in the trash is irrelevant to what she is trying to say in that section and only serves to make her look bad. If it's genuine, she can't even be sociopathic as then she wouldn't care a…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 10:57 AM
4

There are probably people that think that way, but they don't articulate it to themselves in that way and then post it on Reddit. The way that woman is describing her own thought process is as if she's trying to make herself look bad. If she truly believed it, she would justify it to herself in much different words, and those would be the words she'd post on Reddit.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 10:13 AM
4

I agree to an extent. A post shitting on gender studies will get 1,000 up voted while one promoting intactivism will get 20. I disagree that ranting about feminism is "pointless." Maybe truly ranting, but most of the time, most of us are complaining about the ways feminism and feminists actively push through policy and legislation that harms men, not to mention their overall promotion of anti-male culture. I think it's a little ironic that your problem here is the "culture war," but are advocati…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 10:10 AM
17

Pretty sure that's just a troll.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 10:03 AM
223

SJWs have a savior complex, which means they need someone weaker than them to save. They've inherited the philosophical tradition of the white man's burden.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 11:31 AM
2

Same experience for me, except with my Millennial peers. Even saying something moderate will get you attacked by "liberals" for being racist and alt-right. Meanwhile, I'll say something anti-comservative, and the conservatives respect my opinion. I have a buddy who's gay and a PhD in anthropology and was pretty radically left wing until he lived in China for five years. Now he's an outspoken libertarian and posts screenshots of the death threats he gets from "liberals" on a daily basis, many att…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 10:47 AM
5

So why do we still use Reddit? Let's go somewhere else.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:25 AM
4

Headlines published by major media outlets aren't "examples"? Wtf? But yeah, your arguing semantics is exactly one of the points in the article. "What feminism really is"? Are we going to play no true feminist now? You are living with your head in the sand if you think feminists fight for equality in the areas you mentioned. It's literally the exact opposite. You really can't think of any rights women have men don't? How about the right to bodily autonomy. It's illegal in the United States to ev…
/r/MensRights05/04/21 12:02 PM
4

Feminism is responsible for an endless list of policies and cultural practices that harm men.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:26 AM
16

Lol obviously you didn't read the article, but not even the headline mentions women gaslighting men. It's feminists gaslighting everyone else. Male feminists gaslight worse than anybody.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 11:53 PM
14

Probably nothing, if I had to guess.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 11:47 PM
5

Yeah, maybe, but it's like an emperor's new clothes thing, and that's where they have success. Like maybe two people read a really informative book and share the same opinion, but each is scared to mention it to the other in case they end up getting labeled "alt-right." So the opinions never gain traction, even when they're shared by a majority of the population.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 07:52 PM
9

Forget about disagreeing. There was an article in the Economist recently implying that reading certain books makes you "alt-right." They're using it to control what information you consume now. https://www.economist.com/united-states/2021/02/20/what-their-chosen-reading-says-about-americas-far-right
/r/MensRights04/04/21 07:44 PM
2

You're kidding right? This wasn't a suspension, but I got my comments deleted on Instagram when I defended American servicemen in a post claiming they were as bad if not worse than the Axis soldiers. Meanwhile, I reported a guy a the other day whose bio says "eradicate the white race" with the emoji of a baby and a coffin, and they said it didn't violate their rules.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 07:42 PM
31

I'm hoping they were being ironic by doing an example of exactly the kind of thing laid out in the article.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 05:43 PM
8

Talk about irony.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 08:39 AM
10

I... don't know why every number is a 1. I'm bad at Reddit editing.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 12:38 PM
3

No they didn't.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 07:22 PM
10

Last IWD the girls at the school I worked at got to go to a party while the boys did busy work. A number of boys were like, why is there no International Men's Day. To which there's no good answer. Either you lie and tell them they don't have a day, or tell them the even worse truth, which is that there is a day but no one cares.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 01:35 PM
1

"You replied to me, mate." What does this have to do with anything? Another non-sequitur. Is your debate strategy to just say irrelevant things the whole time? "And I don't understand what 'analogy' you're referring to" Literally the comment you replied to was an analogy. But yeah I'm not surprised you don't understand. You already made that clear you just started talking to make yourself feel morally superior and virtue signal to anonymous strangers.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 01:15 PM
1

That is a non-sequitur and has nothing to do with what I or anyone else said. Go away.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 10:08 AM
5

So we can make generalizations about other demographics and it isn't sexism/racism/whateverism? Is generalizing African-Americans as criminals not racist? Generalization is one of the corner stones of discrimination, man.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 01:45 AM
2

What? He was just giving you an analogy. He wasn't "fighting fire with fire." Get off your moral high horse.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 12:19 AM
10

It was saying "men" as a demographic need to be "better"... Plug in literally any other demographic for men and you'll see how abhorrent it is.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 12:17 AM
28

Idk about shaving products specifically, but it's well-known and considered in the marketing world that women account for the majority of consumer spending, like 60-70% I believe.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 11:22 PM
1

Well considering your original comment was trying to explain the study as if you're the only person smart enough to understand an abstract, it's clear you just came in here to try to make yourself feel intellectually superior. That'll never lead to a productive discussion, but I hope you got your day's worth of self-esteem.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 05:32 PM
1

Lol how is that what I said at all? You were making more sense when you were womansplaining.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 05:12 PM
1

Right, exactly... Getting sacrificed first because your welfare is less valued than that of women's is already the male gender role. This has been found by numerous studies of the trolley problem. So feminists were not "resisting gender roles" by sacrificing men first, they were reinforcing them. It goes to show how deluded by privilege feminists really are. Their impulses regarding gender dynamics are completely detached from reality.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 03:03 PM
11

Yeah, it's ironic because they're openly admitting that men have the burden of work. They have more pressure to work and be successful because they don't have the same safety nets women have. Their conclusion is to then put an even heavier burden on men...
/r/MensRights18/02/21 09:16 PM
1

The article advocates raising taxes for men.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 05:03 PM
519

Weird because when I was studying English literature less than a decade ago, Shakespeare was used as the exact opposite. Weird how the politicization of academia can create completely opposite narratives based on the virtue flavor of the week.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 12:52 PM
23

people really don't care about men in this country I don't know if it'll make you feel better or worse, but this is true for basically every country.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 08:31 PM
8

This subreddit is filled with examples of people trying to do just that. It's an express ticket to getting banned from those subreddits, meanwhile feminists who come here with questions get pinned to the front page. To me, this just proves the cognitive dissonance required to believe the many paradoxes central to feminist ideological theory. Feminists try to avoid that discomfort by creating insulated echo chambers. Also, we all know what feminism. It's part of elementary school curricula ffs. I…
/r/MensRights09/02/21 03:00 PM
32

Oh look, another Redditor who cannot read. Do you see the word "oppressed" anywhere in my comment? No, but I do see the word "silenced." Why do you think Einstein was a patent clerk instead of working at a university like he'd been trying to? Are you under the impression that Special Relativity was accepted with open arms when he published it? Most established physicists were still obsessed with the Aetherean interpretation of electromagnetism and refused to give it up. Older physicists continue…
/r/MensRights09/02/21 02:47 PM
91

Do feminists not realize they're playing the role of the "establishment"? In the future, these dissenting voices will be the Copernicuses and Einsteins, under the boot and silenced by bullies who are too proud to admit the blatant flaws in their theories.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:40 PM
12

I hate men because I can be rude to someone in public and my boyfriend gets violently attacked instead of me. Talk about being blinded by your own privilege.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:29 PM
4

Aside from making the ultimate Reddit faux pas, what are you even talking about? Are you... suggesting his men's rights positions are wrong because he... bought a gun? Or are you just following him around on Reddit attacking him on random pages?
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:28 PM
2

Ah yes. You must be referring to the Medieval Period where men readily had the choice between being a peasant or a different kind of peasant. Or maybe you mean the Industrial Period where men had the choice between working in a factory or a meat packing plant.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:18 PM
4

Ah, my mistake. You've totally changed my opinion with this comment.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 03:30 PM
7

I don't much like Ben Shapiro either, but you sure showed your true colors with this comment.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 02:34 PM
9

You translate that sentence into "but now they're open to males joining"? And we're the ones with poor reading comprehension? In what universe do "now" and "will have five years" mean the same thing?
/r/MensRights07/02/21 01:19 PM
5

Weird. I've been told sports are examples of toxic masculinity multiple times.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 07:35 PM
3

Looks like you either need to look up what the word "supposedly" means or you need read mor slowly before jumping to your keyboard. Neither I nor the OP are justifying the previous standard or criticizing the new one. If you'd thought about our comments for three seconds, you'd realize we're criticizing the double standard. Most of men's personal appearance regulations are SUPPOSEDLY so they can be combat ready. For example, no beards so you can wear a gas mask. The point was if you are going to…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 07:02 PM
3

As far as I can tell, "toxic masculinity" means whatever they want it to mean to prove their narrative. Your comment case in point.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 06:37 PM
15

Okay, so why can't men wear beards?
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:32 PM
10

The cognitive dissonance that must be required to claim using men as cannon fodder and sending them to prison at higher rates for longer times is actually sexism against women and favoritism against men... Besides that logical absurdity, you actually have several facts wrong. Society imprisons men longer not because they see women as weaker but because they see women as morally superior. This is called "the-women-are-wonderful effect." Second, misogyny had nothing to do with social formation. An…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:32 PM
16

Every comment of yours has severely flawed logic. I can tell you are an intelligent person, though, so I'd ask you start debating in good faith instead of just throwing out exaggerated statements to manipulate the flow of the conversation. No, makeup doesn't affect how well you can shoot a gun. But neither do fatigues. You could shoot a gun in shirts and a t-shirt, so why does the army make you wear fatigues. Maybe because there's more to combat than shooting a gun? Of course you already knew th…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:23 PM
7

Lawl. Way to insert a flawed premise into your argument and just assume it's true. If you're seriously going to sit there and say nothing in society has been anti-man, you're living in a goddamn fantasy world. You're going to say the selective service isn't discriminatory against men? You're going to say getting 63% longer prison sentences for the same crime isn't anti-man? Are you going to say higher tax rates for men aren't anti-man? Yet these examples of institutional sexism have endured the …
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:19 PM
14

They'll get some downvotes because they're spitting the inherently contradictory feminist narrative: Men discriminating against women? Men's fault. Women discriminating against men? Men's fault. Men discriminating against men? Men's fault. Women discriminating and women? Men's fault!
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:14 PM
22

The entire military is supposedly held to a combat-ready standard. Why do you think they wear fatigues even if they're just doing paperwork? To hide from the copy machine?
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:12 PM
14

Are we totally redefining "special treatment" now? If a teacher lets one child sit up front at a nice new desk but makes another sit in the back at an old broken one, the first is still receiving "special treatment." It doesn't matter if they somehow asked for it more convincingly. Implying men deserve the double standard because they're bad at expressing their wants and needs sounds a lot like "victim blaming" to me. That said, yes, women are better at asking for what they want. Men as a demogr…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:10 PM
25

Looooooollllll. The classic "but it's men doing it" line. Alright, well I guess the next time a traditional mother gets upset with her daughter for putting her career over kids, that's actually misandry? Women are getting special treatment, don't be ridiculous. Men have wanted to wear beards in the military for decades and no one has obliged. So what is that then? Is the military brass both misogynistic and misandrist??? I guess they hate everyone.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 04:51 PM
36

I don't know what you mean. Men with gender dysphoria, who would be the vast majority of men petitioning to be allowed to wear makeup and nail polish, have always gotten kicked out of the military.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 04:37 PM
85

No, because historically they've just been kicked out.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 04:28 PM
24

Well see, you're confused about what the definition of misandry is, which is: whatever the hell serves our purposes in the moment. For example, hate speech against a gender is illegal in France, yet the book literally titled I Hate Men was published with impunity.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 10:35 PM
75

I used to teach. Both in elementary and high school. One time, the high school kids had to listen to this presentation from the city hall about sexual abuse. I wasn't there for it, but when I came back, one of the teenage boys was complaining about how it was just making men out to be villains and women innocent victims. That's just one story I have about how fucked up public schools have gotten.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 09:57 PM
4

Yeah, 90% of it reads as, "everything that sucks about being a man is men's own fault." Imagine an article like that about women. He said a few good things, though, like pointing out that men don't make more because of discrimination against women but because they're pressured to make more. He doesn't follow that train of thought to the ultimate conclusion, though: men are pressured to make more money because if they don't no one will help them.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 11:55 PM
8

There is no slur for men so men can't be discriminated against? What is the slur for women? And also, what?
/r/MensRights26/01/21 11:19 PM
10

Personally, my response would be, we should do what we can do address discrimination within the field, but to a certain extent, you chose to be a minority and that will always come with challenges. I used to work in primary education, and I definitely believe we should encourage more men to get into the field, as well as things like psychology and, god forbid, gender studies, but I would draw the line at creating quotas or similar regulations to artificially equalize the genders.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 01:16 PM
32

I think you're being downvoted because the principle behind what you're saying goes against another stance MRAs tend to take, which is that men and women usually choose different jobs. You didn't promote this explicitly, but for example, I wouldn't want the government to try and force psychology or STEM fields to have equal men and women employees. I would rather minorities in their fields just be treated with respect.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 01:01 PM
16

If patriarchy were the idea that men hold more positions of political power, then it would be undeniable. But that would also be useless. Patriarchy theory explains why men hold more power by claiming society oppresses women and values men more, which is completely at odds with the data. All the lowest levels of society are full almost completely with men. Homelessness and incarceration for example. The explanation for this is rather obvious when someone takes off their feminist bias glasses. So…
/r/MensRights21/01/21 02:14 PM
1

The tldr gist of the article: WHO numbers show boy and girl children die at roughly equal rates in natural disasters. More adult men die than adult women. As a result the average age of a female natural disaster victim is much younger. Therefore, WHO concludes natural disasters affect female life expectancy more than male life expectancy. Media report natural disasters kill more women than men.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 12:41 PM
13

Lol don't get mad at me. They're not my words, they're the words of the academics who have invented the ideology you're espousing. Again, it's like you're right on the edge of it.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 10:49 AM
36

It's like you're so close to understanding the two sided coin of gender relations and the fact that a Marxist intersectional interpretation where one gender must necessarily oppress the other is nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 08:46 AM
101

It's not discrimination when it's against men. It's "rebalancing."
/r/MensRights19/01/21 08:44 AM
3

It is much, much higher. Hospitals rarely if ever record a death as being due to circumcision. Rather they might put that a baby died of infection, even when that infection was a result of circumcision.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 10:18 PM
7

It sure is funny then that the same people who complain about "toxic masculinity" are the same ones who promote policies that pressure men into having those traits. They don't care about the traits or "society," they just hate men. It's women at the salon complaining about their husband getting transformed into legislation.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:29 PM
17

Great example. Society only ever sees one side of the coin. "It's not fair that women are only celebrated for their sexuality!" Agreed, but how is it any fairer that men are only celebrated for their labor and financial success? No one made these rules and no one is to blame, but the feminist perspective ignores the male side and simultaneously blames him for the female side.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:24 PM
33

I first heard this story on the radio where female newscasters were criticizing men's fragile egos for needing products "for men." Not kidding. As if a million times more products don't exist "for women." Is a perfume named "princess" fragile femininity because it appeals to their particular interest? What about pink legos and construction toys "for girls" that feminists have always championed. More importantly, it's evidence of the true attitude of feminism. Not one of equality, not even one of…
/r/MensRights14/01/21 07:04 PM
11

New? "Feminism" as an articulated movement has been around for 150 years, over six generations. And its mythology and dogma has existed in the Western cultural subconscious since its beginnings. Consider the myth of Agnodice, Ancient Athens's first female doctor, breaking the glass ceiling in a man's world. Of course, she didn't really exist and there were always female doctors in Athens.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 11:07 AM
78

Because as demographics go, society automatically cares more about "women" than "men." So they care more about righting injustices against them.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 11:02 AM
18

Not only fine but government sanctioned.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 05:51 PM
11

Menslib isn't about rights and liberty for men, it's about forcing men to conform to whatever feminists want men to be.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 09:52 PM
1

Feminism is a cult, an identity, so they try to convert people and steer them away from the "other." Hence why you could agree with every stance a feminist has, but if you don't identity with the label "feminist," they'll crucify you.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 09:50 PM
4

Wait till they learn that all the "oppression" POC suffer from applies to men, not women... Higher homeless? POC and men Higher homicide? POC and men Higher substance abuse? POC and men Higher drop out rates? POC and men Higher incarceration? POC and men How are women oppressed? Oh right, manspreading.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 09:45 PM
24

I don't see how anything you said refuted the comment you replied to. Other than semantics.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 12:53 PM
9

I wonder if he'd say the same thing about female genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 01:54 AM
16

I know it would hilarious if it didn't actively harm me. It reminds me of the hundreds of stories throughout the past of an establishment refusing to accept to information and instead trying to come up with increasingly convoluted ways to justify the established narrative. Think Copernicus, Galileo, Einstein, etc. If they just ditched their previous assumptions for one second, they'd realize everything makes a lot more sense... But no... It looks like they're going down with the ship.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 04:31 PM
14

I have a feeling these researchers aren't going to last very long.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 04:29 PM
1

Yes, a homeless woman would presumably also not have a social support network. And there are three times as many homeless men as women, so what does that tell you? Men on average receive less social support. For one thing, parents more readily support their female children than their male ones. However, this is all marginal compared to how much the government supports women over men. The vast majority of welfare programs support women but are paid for by primarily male tax revenue. It even exten…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 09:22 PM
1

Explaining the women are wonderful effect using the fact that women are considered more beautiful is circular logic. Women are only considered more beautiful because feminine characteristics are held in higher regard culturally, not naturally. The Ancient Greeks, for example, found the masculine form much more appealing. My guess would be that modern society has become heavily slanted toward feminine qualities. In the hunter-gatherer setting where humans first evolved, violence, whether between …
/r/MensRights15/12/20 10:19 PM
29

I'd add to this by saying that there are more successful male billionaires than female billionaires precisely because there are so many more homeless men dying in the streets than homeless women. Society takes care of women. They know they have a safety net, so they don't feel the same pressure to succeed. Men know that if they don't excel, they'll end up on the streets.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 09:17 PM
6

It's irrelevant what a therapist's intentions are, just as your anecdotal experience is irrelevant. The APA has made its position on the matter clear with their guidelines for treating men and boys. If a woman has mental issues, she's been victimized by an oppressive patriarchal culture. If a man has mental issues, he needs to change himself and stop being a cig in that machine of oppression. If that's therapy, I don't want it.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 01:33 PM
5

No reason to get all high minded. I'm clearly talking about the general social attitude. Obviously there are individual people who care about average men, but that's still not how the society and culture are set up.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 11:07 AM
19

It's because no one gives a shit about men, and men feel it. Unless you are one of the .0001% of men who manage to rise to a position of power, you are not valued or cared for at all. In fact, it's that rather than patriarchy that pushes men into those positions of power. Women can fail and still be cared for and supported. Men have much more pressure to succeed.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 09:53 PM
8

Looks like someone wants to play no true feminist
/r/MensRights14/12/20 09:50 PM
41

Definitely, and they receive less return on their taxes. Most public services benefit women more than men. There was a study about this in New Zealand, and it found that women are tax negative over their lifetimes, paying less in than they get out of the system. Men are tax positive, paying more in than they get out.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 02:30 PM
11

They also sell the book entitled, literally, I Hate Men by Pauline Harmange.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 12:02 PM
10

70% of boy shave PTSD after having part of their genitals hacked off without their consent? Who'd have thought...
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:47 PM
4

I think you'll find that most of us here agree with you. What we're usually pointing out is that the reverse happens. For example, men must subsidize women's health care by paying equal insurance premiums and paying more taxes while women receive more government benefits (there was actually a recent Guardian piece advocating for literally taxing men at a higher rate).
/r/MensRights03/12/20 11:27 PM
3

They have no problem with men subsidizing women's physical health care. I have a feeling they wouldn't be so happy about women subsidizing men's mental health care.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 08:21 PM
29

Men are straight up second class citizens these days.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 02:38 PM
1

Well I'm from Arkansas, but I live in Spain.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 07:34 PM
5

I actually don't know how I feel about that strategy, though. Reactionary never turns out well. We absolutely have to defend society against woke nonsense, but that should be on the periphery. Half the time wokesters destroy themselves anyway. Just look at JK Rowling.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 07:34 PM
7

Because the education system is run by women.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 12:15 AM
7

http://culture.affinitymagazine.us/hollywoods-hypocrisy-scarlett-johansson-natalie-portman-call-out-james-franco-at-womens-march-fail-to-rescind-support-for-woody-allen-roman-polanski/
/r/MensRights12/11/20 03:25 AM
73

Hollywood doesn't care if anyone is an abuser. Remember when Scarlett Johansson called out James Franco based on unsubstantiated accusations but seems to have no problem hanging out with Roman Polanski who plead guilty to abuse. Just one example of thousands. It's just whatever maximizes their airtime.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 05:52 PM
4

Author here. My article is merely a summary. Please visit https://www.vmmcproject.org/ to learn more in detail, watch interviews with victims and discover how you can help.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 10:14 PM
10

He's literally a Stalinist Marxist. He's not mentally stable and probably a teenager, hence the edgy "getting laid" comment.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 06:48 PM
11

Of course I agree. The issue is the double standard. Academics and the government claim misandry doesn't even exist, yet here's this book. Meanwhile far less blatant texts are banned or sued for "misogyny."
/r/MensRights02/11/20 06:58 PM
8

This despite the fact that studies suggest women are as likely if not more likely to abuse their partners. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/close-encounters/201410/6-myths-about-men-women-and-relationships https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/close-encounters/201410/6-myths-about-men-women-and-relationships
/r/MensRights02/11/20 06:34 PM
9

I reported it for promoting hate now, so we'll see how hypocritical Reddit really is.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 06:27 PM
40

I'd also like to point out that this was posted for an anti-man circlejerk in r/TwoXSupport. One of my anti-feminist articles was deleted for "promoting hate" but championing a book literally called "I Hate Men" is not promoting hate, I guess.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 06:05 PM
23

Circumcision is male genital mutilation. They are the same thing.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 11:34 PM
-2

Maybe since you're so much smarter than most people, you can dumb it down for the rest of us.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 08:51 PM
36

I agree. In fact, I don't even agree with the conclusion of the study that men face more discrimination. Imo it's not really quantifiable, and both genders have their challenges. However, the point is, feminists always refuse to even listen to anything about men's problems. They just meet you with "oh you poor menz, it must be soo hard" and walk away. Studies like this show men at least have as many societal issues to face.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 02:36 PM
4

Yeah. In fact, the front page of the selective service website says, "The law currently requires that only men register with the Selective Service." When I applied for student aid back in 2008, I had to verify I was registered.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 08:45 AM
8

There is, at least, the selective service.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 08:32 AM
7

Men didn't "decide" the Patriarchy. That's so dumb. Even if we assume the "Patriarchy" as stated exists, it is a product of cultural evolution, invented by no one but reinforced by everyone, including women.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 08:10 AM
1

I doubt the author even believes her own bullshit. NYT just knows the outrageous headlines they make, the more pageviews they'll get.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 05:26 PM
1

You're right. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll try to find a better source.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 09:57 AM
2

Yeah, definitely. I believe research has shown that mothers bad talking children's fathers (or the other way around, though that's less common) severely harms the children's mental health. Children are, of course, aware they are half one parent and half the other. So when a mother constantly belittles the father, the child takes a major hit to their self esteem, assuming that that half of them must be flawed or worthless. Of course, then the societal part is the fact that these mothers who are e…
/r/MensRights22/10/20 10:38 PM
10

Certainly. This article is to dispel the myth and stereotype of the black deadbeat dad and show that it's really a manifestation of a larger societal problem of not valuing men and fathers.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 09:01 PM
3

If you actually read what I said, I never refuted the sales statistics of men vs women. But that was the whole point of the thread. So then why did you comment?
/r/MensRights21/10/20 08:11 PM
3

If women bought more games That was the original comment that you disagreed with. Of course, I know you're just moving the goalposts now, but let's say I humor you and believe that you really were just trying to that the minority of women who like video games like them just as much as men. Well that's a non sequitur if I've ever seen one. Imagine if I said, "They make waffles shaped like Texas but not like Florida because while 75% of Texans buy state-shaped waffles, only 5% of Floridians do." T…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 07:59 PM
2

You've lost the thread. The whole point of this conversation was that women do not buy games as much as men which is why the industry caters to men. That was literally the comment you replied to. You tried to disagree. So if you weren't saying the opposite, just what exactly are you even trying to say? ​ I don't recall ever insulting your sexuality Well now you're just lying. This comment thread started because you called someone an incel. If you were really so nonchalant, you wouldn't have comm…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 07:46 PM
3

You're not helping yourself. https://www.earnest.com/blog/the-demographics-of-video-gaming/ Men are more than three times as likely as women to purchase video games. So, you are "in fact" wrong. I gotta say, though. I love you're strategy of trying to prove your point by tangentially insulting the sexuality of the person you're talking to. Real open minded and progressive. In the same vein, I hope you know no one actually buys your emojis and believes you're just super laid back and lighthearted…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 07:23 PM
3

"... reeks of incel energy..." "... you're just an idiot..." Damn. Next time you're at the store shopping for one of those video games that girls love but just don't buy for some apparent reason, pick up some self awareness while you're at it.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 07:12 PM
1

I second this. If I've learned anything in life it's that the more you ask people to respect you the less they will. Just be a respectable person, which means respecting yourself first and foremost. Tell her to cut it the fuck out, and she doesn't, then tell her to fuck off.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 09:26 PM
2

Many come out saying it's a myth and red herring that boys are lagging behind in education, despite these numerous statistics. They'll go on and belittle our boys by saying they just don't know how to behave, as if children are responsible for the function of the education system they're mandated into. I have to wonder what they'd be saying if it were girls getting worse grades, more punishment and higher drop outs every year.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 12:25 PM
1

I think it's supposed to be ironic? I'll mention it. I'm not a fan of it either tbh.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 12:21 PM
5

Yeah, that's the root of most gender roles. For example, women are expected to be homemakers because they produce breast milk so they're naturally in a better position to care for the children. These days, though, we aren't allowed to expect those things from women. In that case, we can't expect similar things from men. Just like there are formula and breast pumps in modern society, we have weapons and machines that make a man's increased physical strength basically irrelevant unless you're on a…
/r/MensRights14/10/20 09:24 AM
8

It would only be "normal and healthy" if we could expect equally gender-specific behavior from women. As it stands, you cannot expect anything of a woman you wouldn't expect of a man. If that's the society we're going to build, then it also cannot expect anything of a man you wouldn't expect of a woman.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 09:19 AM
1

When did not wanting to wear female clothing become toxic masculinity? Same time that literally everything else in the world did.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 08:16 PM
9

Look at their post history and you'll understand. Actually, I'm like 50% sure it's a troll that's been making new accounts to post on every article.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 09:45 PM
9

Why on Earth would I tell you that? Do you want my social security number too?
/r/MensRights11/10/20 09:16 PM
10

I am an author of WokeFather, yes. Not this particular article, though.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 09:10 PM
16

Lol yeah if feminist gender theory were remotely consistent and unbiased.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 07:33 PM
8

Men forcing male gender role on men? Toxic masculinity? Women forcing male gender role on men? Toxic masculinity? Women forcing female gender role on women? Toxic masculinity. Men forcing female gender role on women? Toxic masculinity. Any bad? Toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 07:32 PM
1

Damn, you're just really going all in here.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 02:49 AM
1

Well, that statement is based on the fact that social science departments became heavily politically homogenous beginning in the 90s. But yeah, the Marxist Feminist nonsense began in the 70s. I believe a couple of the scholars at the forefront are mentioned in the article.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 02:46 AM
1

He tried to be an economist. And was terrible at it. Billions of people have paid the price.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 02:45 AM
2

It may be anecdotal, but it fits with my experience. Only some rich enough to have no real problems could invent nonsense like mansplaining, patriarchy and manspreading. These are the pet theories of bored wealthy women who don't know the things affecting normal people.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 02:44 AM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights10/10/20 10:42 PM
6

I think they already do. But yeah, I'd definitely rather have elimination of the selective service than equal liability, but if there's going to be one, it should have equal liability.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 09:49 PM
3

God, I really hope you aren't going around calling yourself an MRA.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 09:25 PM
1

Says someone who literally and unironically wrote the sentence "wow you're uneducated". Projecting much?
/r/MensRights10/10/20 08:31 PM
4

What's terrifying is you're not even joking. Feminists actually say that.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 06:19 PM
1

Well aren't we a pretentious one.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 06:00 PM
2

All statistics in the article have linked sources. Many may come from the same source which was linked before. If a statistic doesn't have a hyperlink, go back in the article to find its source. I'll see about changing the citation style.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:33 PM
2

Oh snap, nice one. That is an example. The other day I was trying to argue the feminist side with some MRAs who were trying to claim men are oppressed, which I find equally ridiculous. But one of them was like, Name a law that discriminates against women. And I couldn't think of one, but that's one. Although here in Spain that's not the case at least. It's also illegal for men to go topless in town. I think it's equal under the law in a lot of US states, but not all. Either way, you're right. Th…
/r/MensRights10/10/20 11:59 AM
1

On the contrary. Throughout human history men have had some of the shittiest roles: cannon fodder, sacrificing themselves for women, all physical labor. Is that what a group does for a group is dominates and oppressed? Did slave traders always go down with the ship so the slaves could live? The only argument for patriarchy is that men hold more government positions. That's bad historical interpretation for one, but I'm not going to get into that. Men holding government positions is the phenomeno…
/r/MensRights10/10/20 09:06 AM
4

Lol give me an example of one legal advantage men have over women. Literally one.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 06:56 AM
5

Patriarchy is easily deniable. And I will deny it.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 06:55 AM
4

So the studies that show that they give higher marks for the same work? Also linked and cited in the article? You just posted a single study over and over again in a thread, but now you're just going to ignore others? I AM a teacher, and I've worked everywhere from preschool to college. Around 80% of teachers are white women. They are certainly prejudicial. They don't understand boys or minorities, and the statistics prove it.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 06:40 PM
3

Are you like a bot or something? No. Shit. Because schools are places designed for female behavior. If schools adapted to the more active and less conforming behavior of boys, they would not get lower achievement. Why am I typing this out for you. It's literally the original post.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 06:17 PM
5

You really are the most annoying kind of troll. You don't even read an article, comment on it, and then just post the same thing over and over? You're the one who needs to actually try reading what you're talking about. The fact that girls and boys have different behavior, and school does not adapt to boys behavior is the whole point of the original article. Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 05:56 PM
5

You clearly did not even read the article since the whole point of it is addressing girls' higher overall achievement.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 05:36 PM
12

You're wrong.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 03:52 PM
7

You literally posted a link citing research that discovered discrimination. Separate research from the numerous studies cited in the original link. Of course boy have less interest in school when it's a system designed by women for girls. It's not an enjoyable place for boys.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 09:38 AM
45

In her research on why girls “do better” than boys, Smyth found unconscious gender stereotyping may play a role. Teachers were more likely to have lower expectations for boys, and to see them as “underachievers”. A “good student” is seen as a compliant one, with boys more frequently sanctioned and girls spending more time on homework. Bingo. Although I find it bizarre the researcher then goes on to claim her own findings aren't what's responsible and that it's somehow that schools aren't feminis…
/r/MensRights09/10/20 12:04 AM
4

"virgin" They always attack your sexuality. Speaks for itself.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 06:47 PM
28

In all great ape species including primitive humans, males kill other males and their offspring and then mate with their females. Nothing about choice or "those times" has anything to do with it. Now, it would be silly to blame women for this. It isn't their fault. It's just the way it is. What is silly, though, is that they play the victims. Give me a break. Women aren't the victims of violence. They're the beneficiaries of violence. They always wind up with the most competent provider who clai…
/r/MGTOW21/12/19 12:33 AM
5

Men don't cause the world's problems. That's just stupid. The world is a dangerous place on its own. What men have done is solved most of humanity's problems since the beginning.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 08:15 PM
35

Incarceration in the US is absurd, especially for men, and long sentences is the primary culprit.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 10:40 AM
6

Only men are responsible for their actions.
/r/MGTOW15/12/19 01:39 AM
17

A woman has a right to an abortion because it's her body. If a baby's foreskin is physically attached to a mother, than yes she would have a say in circumcising it to remove it. Otherwise, the foreskin is only part of his body and therefore his to decide. A woman who has an abortion unnecessarily is still doing a terrible thing, though.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:02 AM
24

Hair grows back and doesn't feel pain. An adult person has every right to change their name regardless of what they're parents names them. You cannot change your circumcision, though. It's permanent. By your logic, you should be able to castrate your own child. Then again, feminists have actually started claiming this, so...
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:50 AM
15

Not really. Men are generally tax positive while women are tax negative. While as a man you receive some tax-funded government services, it's usually less than you put in.
/r/MGTOW04/12/19 03:09 PM
55

Except then the money just goes to a feminist government that gives it straight back to women anyway...
/r/MGTOW04/12/19 02:12 PM
6

Feminism is rooted is communism/socialism. Yeah, this is a big one I try to explain to people. Do people honestly think if you traveled back in time several hundred years and asked a woman, she'd say she was part of an oppressed group and men were the oppressors? No, that whole lens of historical analysis comes from Marxism. And besides the fact that Marxism has shown itself to be practically and philosophically bankrupt a dozen times over, that means it isn't universal. Feminists refuse to even…
/r/MGTOW26/11/19 12:29 PM
6

Not in Spain. I learned European Spanish and then went to Bolivia. Some people were telling me the government wanted to make it illegal to "cazar" and I was super confused because I could only think of getting married.
/r/MGTOW23/11/19 10:55 PM
4

I commented on that post. Some guy was complaining about how false allegations end up with so many men in prison. He got a lot of flak and said just because women have had to put up with centuries of men's violence against women doesn't justify this. I told him women haven't been the historical victims of male violence but rather that they've benefited. He flipped out and called me a redpill fuck and asserted that men are "the bad guys in this movie." Never seen such cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 07:20 PM
2

Humans are violent because the world is violent. Resources is scarce and the universe is constantly trying to kill us. Those who don't realize this are the "privileged" ones. Men are the ones who constantly have to face this violence. Then feminists reap the rewards and complain about how violent men are. In the past good women appreciated strong men who provided for them.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:54 PM
5

The fucked up thing is men get the blame.
/r/MGTOW23/11/19 12:51 PM
9

I didn't even know they were triggered by this. A therapist told me the exact same thing, and he was feminist as shit.
/r/MGTOW23/11/19 12:50 PM
3

I have been very careful to be supportive and not pressure her into the sex act. Damn someone got indoctrinated hard.
/r/MGTOW22/11/19 09:09 AM
2

So much worse going on the world... Like catcalling and manspreading! No time to devote to men dying.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 09:01 AM
1

I couldn't find a single top comment where Orr actually got to respond. Every comment was just, "How dare you go against the women are oppressed orthodoxy!!!!" Everyone else jacks off commenter furiously
/r/MensRights21/11/19 08:23 AM
35

Negative.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:30 AM
18

That's why there are so many fat people in third world countries, right?
/r/MensRights17/11/19 12:44 AM
8

Last year, Bedford’s decision to sell seven artworks in the museum’s collection by such modern masters as Andy Warhol, Robert Rauschenberg and Franz Kline to purchase paintings and sculptures by women and artists of color aroused an art world uproar.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 03:50 PM
15

No, it's so they can fight over territory and resources which benefit the females. They benefit evolutionarily by being able to reproduce with those very females. What you're claiming isn't seen in the animal kingdom much at all. If that were true, there wouldn't be such an emphasis on sexual selection for males. Why do lions need big puffy manes to attract the lionesses if they can just rape them anyway?
/r/MensRights16/11/19 12:06 PM
4

Right, so it effectively doubles. It promotes people going into wage slavery instead of working for themselves. Socialism... All about the workers. /s
/r/MGTOW11/11/19 07:07 PM
42

It would be self fixing if the government allowed the market to function, but instead it props up these failing firms and then punishes entrepreneurs. Just consider that if you're self-employed, your social security tax suddenly doubles.
/r/MGTOW11/11/19 02:22 PM
1

I agree. But if we are going to single out a gender... Well the headline of this article makes it clear... "Prisons are designed for men." Yet it then somehow arrives at the conclusion that because a few women are also affected, it needs to change. It's just crazy.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 10:50 PM
4

I don't agree with the thesis of the article. I'm just posting it to show what's out there in the world. I agree with you that the prison system in general is not effective or beneficial, and I think it's crazy to say that when the whole thing is designed to incarcerate men, we should focus on giving special treatment to women.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 10:31 AM
8

It's crazy man. For any other demographic, this exact shit is used as evidence of their oppression. For men... it's evidence of our privilege somehow?
/r/MensRights05/11/19 09:49 PM
3

Lol. I know, that's exactly what I'm saying. It's clear you didn't even read what I wrote.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 08:19 AM
11

I use progressives because that's what they call themselves and I don't have a list of the 93 different acronyms they use for their ideologies. Also, you are simply wrong. Man and woman are social labels, so they are determined by society. For example, our society divides people into majors and minors based on age (far more arbitrarily than basing gender on biological sex). Why are there only two classifications you ask? Why can't you be a flibberdeegoop from age 26-33? Well you can identify how…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 11:42 PM
10

This is because the European media have even more an agenda than the American ones. I currently live in Spain, and a few weeks ago all the papers had a story about some "German tourists" raping a Spanish girl. The pictures always had their faces blurred out. Something seemed fishy. I dug around and finally discovered the perpetrators were actually Middle Eastern immigrants in Germany. Go figure. The refugees have become such a problem in Germany that even some of my more leftist German friends h…
/r/MGTOW01/11/19 11:16 PM
1

Well, women always getting primary custody is ostensibly for the children's sake as well, but it still results in men getting the shaft. Is it really true that a single father, for instance, could receive WIC for his children? I'll happy be proven wrong if so, but I was under the impression only women with children could apply for it.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 11:07 PM
6

When men start losing their jobs, they start killing themselves and overdosing on drugs. When women start losing their jobs, there is minimal change. It's almost as if women receive several times more support from their communities and the government.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 10:29 PM
4

I would not say it that way. Men do not vote for equality as if they are morally superior beings. Women vote entirely in women's interests. Men vote in their own interests but perhaps even more in women's interests. This is because protecting women's interests is men's interests, or at least that's the instinct. I think men have more a self sacrificing instinct because within a species they're more disposable. Males fight for resources which the females then use. As a result the male can breed w…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 10:27 PM
25

I think that's exactly what this is pointing out. Progressives make the claim a biological male who wants to perform the woman gender role was "born that way." Yet when a biological male wants to perform the man gender role, he's the product/victim/promoter of a toxic culture.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 10:19 PM
5

But the "patriarchy" is established.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 10:14 PM
14

I don't have a problem with an adult man deciding to get himself circumcised, but baby boys have their genitals mutilated without their consent. I wasn't circumcised, though most American males of my generation were, and it horrifies me that someone could've chopped it off when I was a baby without repercussions. As for government funding as genders: I currently live in Spain self-employed. People under 30 get a tax break on their self-employment tax here, but that extends to 35 only for women. …
/r/MensRights31/10/19 08:31 AM
15

Circumcision. The wealth of government benefits that exist for women but not men.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 08:07 AM
1

That's like saying all blacks benefit from black violence because it keeps whites in check. It's the most ridiculous thing.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:09 PM
38

I hope she never gets trapped in a burning building and needs a hypermasculine man to save her.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 12:05 PM
4

Maybe consider that male suicide and the gender gap in life expectancy has increased since feminism began. Believe it or not just because someone doesn't express themselves just like you doesn't mean they aren't "in tune with their emotions."
/r/MensRights27/10/19 12:30 AM
4

Exactly so let men do what they want and stop telling them to be a certain way. Pressuring men to not be traditionally masculine is even worse then pressuring them to be because at least traditional masculinity comes in part naturally to the majority of men.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 11:47 PM
3

Because I don't mind doing it? I just don't want to be told I'm an asshole for it either? It doesn't sound like you want people to be free from social expectation. It sounds like you want people to adhere to what you want the social expectation to be. Otherwise, you wouldn't be calling traditional masculinity (the most common form of masculinity and hence the tradition) toxic. No man should be pressured to be traditionally masculine. But if he is traditionally masculine, he shouldn't be told he'…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 11:38 PM
6

Women have never been any more oppressed by their gender role than men have been by theirs. It wasn't oppression, it was survival by cultural specialization building off biological specialization. Feminism is the way that Marxism has entered the mainstream, though, and so everything must be seen through the lens of oppression. It's basically a mythology.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 01:34 PM
10

You're calling it "toxic." That's shaming. It's also pretty fucked considering how much traditional masculinity focuses on sacrificing oneself for women... so they can sit at home and whine about it. You're not stating facts. You're regurgitating the buzz words of your new religion.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 01:26 PM
9

A man can be traditionally masculine if he wants. What's "toxic" is a bunch of self-righteous pseudointellectual women thinking they get to define what manhood is to me. Besides being rooted mostly in biology, I enjoy being traditionally masculine. I don't enjoy you shaming me for it. The Patriarchy is a myth.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 01:16 PM
34

They don't mean harm to men, just extra privileges for women... at the expense of men. So the end result is the same. It'd be like saying, I don't want to harm black people, I just think white people should get special treatment.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 01:57 PM
1

Rape is an order of magnitude worse than cheating.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 10:15 AM
1

"How do women get away with this lie?" Same as all of them. Men have no organization and are internally competitive. Plenty of men will delusionally appease feminists because they incorrectly think it'll give them a leg up getting laid. Then feminists take advantage of this. Once I had the audacity to suggest women weren't the giant victims feminists claimed they were, and I got called an incel. If you care about men's issues it must be because you can't get laid!
/r/MensRights10/10/19 10:09 AM
3

They can't find men who will take care of them so they want the government, funded by taxpaying men, to take their of them.
/r/MGTOW08/10/19 02:14 PM
2

And women were responsible for raising and educating all those men, so I guess maybe they're to blame? Since you like reading so much, maybe go check out the Wikipedia articles on "society," "scarcity," "war," "competition." How high on your own privilege do you have to be to live in a society whose incredible wealth is a direct result of the wars it's won and shit all over the ones making the sacrifice.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 05:06 PM
2

You must not have very good critical reading skills then. Or be just completely oblivious to how human or just animal society work? mEn fIgHt thE wArs Men fight over wars to secure resources. Considering the men are dying, the resources aren't for them. They're for the women and children back home.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 04:48 PM
11

I haven't cried since I was a toddler. I get sad, but crying is not the reaction. No one ever told me not too. In fact, I've always been shamed by all the progressive women in my life for not crying. Idk why people can't just leave men alone.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 03:04 PM
8

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights07/10/19 02:13 PM
11

Did I mention making a law anywhere in my comment? People are allowed to dislike things.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 02:07 PM
11

I don't think they should be banned or something. I just don't like them and don't watch Netflix originals anymore. Netflix was just a platform. Now they are mostly their own original shows. The shows are made by outside studios but Netflix has considerable production influence.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 01:53 PM
61

Try to find a Netflix original that doesn't blame men for all the world's problems within the first ten minutes.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 01:24 PM
1

This is why the first American on Mars won't be the first person. She's going to get there to find a bunch of Chinese men waiting for her.
/r/MGTOW05/10/19 03:30 PM
8

I guess I was living in blissful ignorance.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 01:25 PM
2

Exactly. They flip out over less.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:10 PM
38

Personally, I wouldn't even care that much about this if it weren't for the double standard. Feminists freak out over anything "men only." Even the Boy Scouts had to let girls in.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 09:07 PM
3

Sometimes. Check out this great example: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson%27s_paradox#UC_Berkeley_gender_bias Feminists got all upset because one department at Berkeley favored men, but when the university released the data it showed that the university as a whole favored women.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:16 AM
2

Nothing about feminist pay gap economics makes any sense. If greedy corporations could pay women less for the same work, wouldn't they just hire all women?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:39 PM
11

More importantly, demand male mental health professionals. Going to a female therapist as a man these days is asking for trouble.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:38 PM
3

Even as a small man you probably have more heat-producing tissue relative to surface area than the average woman.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 07:32 PM
45

Plus men are larger and therefore overheat more easily. In other words, "sexist" is just code for not giving preferential treatment to women.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 11:21 AM
1

Women are so oppressed that this is what feminism focuses its efforts on.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 12:47 AM
3

References to history that are simply untrue, no less.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 11:33 PM
2

What?
/r/MensRights08/07/19 07:35 AM
3

This is great, thanks, better than the one I had.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 09:46 PM
6

What about this says competition. It's making a comparison to highlight hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 09:19 PM
3

I don't think single men get very far in the adoption application process.
/r/MGTOW29/05/19 08:04 PM
2

What's wrong with kids? I love kids. I wish I could have them without having a relationship with a woman. Too bad the most likely result of creating a kid is that, one, the woman kills it, or two, doesn't let me see it but makes me pay for it.
/r/MGTOW29/05/19 07:57 PM
8

That thread physically hurts me. If he didn't want a baby, he should've watched where he put his dick LOL. And these people are probably pro-choice. Fuck the West. I'm tired of these double standards.
/r/MGTOW10/03/19 12:26 PM
1

Yeah it's a hard pill to swallow because it means rejecting everything your female overseers have been brainwashing you with for decades.
/r/MGTOW09/03/19 06:34 PM
7

Women are at an evolutionary disadvantage because they can only have a few offspring. Their best chance is to have a son that'll get laid like crazy, and they know this on an instinctual level. A man who takes what he wants is more likely to sire a son who takes what he wants, so that's what she looks for.
/r/MGTOW09/03/19 06:31 PM
2

I think it is safe to say women are subsidized in the US as well. The amount of government money that goes towards female benefits is astounding. This could only be offset by veterans benefits, which are mostly paid to men. And I'm not saying there aren't men who "win" in this setup. Like I said, I don't even mind the setup. I'm refuting your point wars are started by men ergo women have nothing to do it and can't be criticized. Men are military leaders, of course. But women are a part of the wh…
/r/MGTOW09/03/19 04:27 PM
5

You're missing my point. US involvement in the Middle East is about securing interests in resources, specifically petroleum. Those resources benefit males insofar as the females in their territory live more productive lives and produce more offspring, and yes, many males benefit from the resources themselves. Just as a troop of Chimpanzees who beat rival groups away from a watering hole, the males will also benefit from the watering hole as well, but as individuals it's simple that the females r…
/r/MGTOW09/03/19 12:43 PM
3

So I guess feminists can't complain about Patriarchy when the majority of women are Pro-life. Wars being started by male politicians is simplifying the situation. Men are military leaders just like they are soldiers, yes, but the social function of the military itself is protecting women and their resources and their children's resources. In most species males compete over territory that provides resources to females. Humans are no different. Personally, I don't even mind that much, but it's cle…
/r/MGTOW09/03/19 08:43 AM
2

Classic. When a woman is emotionally abused, it's the man's fault. When a man is emotionally abused, it's also the man's fault.
/r/MGTOW08/03/19 09:51 PM
11

To elaborate, this is the exact reason women are mostly responsible for slut shaming. Prostitutes (and slutty women in general) increase the supply of sex thus decreasing the leverage it gets them. The fact that prostitution is illegal is honestly one of the biggest evidences that Western society is gynocentric, NOT patriarchal. I'll never understand how feminists rationalize men are in power + men are obsessed with sex = buying sex is illegal? Cognitive dissonance I guess.
/r/MGTOW06/03/19 09:41 PM
34

Or the exact opposite. He's a man who's realized it's cheaper if you just pay women for sex, and you don't have to deal with the emotional nightmare involved.
/r/MGTOW06/03/19 07:39 PM
1

Isn't the Sun a tabloid?
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 12:05 PM
5

Cat calling is so hilarious. If you ever bring up men's issues up to and including being forced to go to war, the response is, "Oh fragile masculinity" as if it all pales in comparison to the horrors of being a woman. So what are women's issues, you ask? An ugly person talked to me on the street!
/r/MGTOW27/02/19 03:20 PM
13

Anyone who's been in a relationship knows this double standard well. Any given woman has a lifetime of experience rejecting men's sexual advances, frequently even her own sexual partner's. But then when a man rejects her, she loses her shit.
/r/MGTOW25/02/19 11:42 AM
1

Yeah because deep down they know they'd be worse off considering men subsidize their existence on an individual and national level.
/r/MGTOW25/02/19 09:49 AM
1

"How dare the peasants speak to me."
/r/MGTOW21/02/19 08:18 PM
1

Touche.
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 10:26 PM
1

Body fat increases buoyancy, so it might be true... It just isn't any work.
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 07:05 PM
5

Because women never face consequences for their actions.
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 11:21 AM
12

Oh, yeah, Emma Watson... how badly she's been oppressed by the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 11:45 PM
4

It's a whole comment Emma Watson made about the book.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 11:44 PM
13

I'm just gonna take this as a compliment.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 11:34 PM
4

Sounds like a pretentious douche.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 11:33 PM
2

I wouldn't call it "empathy" exactly. I would say we need more masculine energy. Men and women have a lot of things to offer each other, and an over-feminine society is not any better than an over-masculine one, but that's what everyone seems to be trying for these days.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 11:23 PM
15

Incel means *involuntary* celibate. According to incel culture, a woman can't be incel because there's always some man out there willing to have sex with her, so if she can't get laid, it's because of her hypergamous standards. She's therefore "volcel." While there are probably some women out there who truly can't get any no matter how far they lower their standards, the idea is mostly sound.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:58 PM
38

The real answer is: Women are valued by society simply for being women. Men are only valued at best for being productive, at worst for outcompeting other men, which is obviously way more stressful.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 11:53 AM
1

But an effective one apparently.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 11:26 AM
1

r/AsABlackMan
/r/MensRights19/02/19 11:25 AM
1

Yeah, but all men lie about their height, so for a woman 5'10" translates to like 5'6". I'm 6'3" which is even sort of a lie because it's really like 6'2.5". I'd say about once a week someone asks me how tall I am and when I tell them, they say, "No you're taller than that. My brother/dad/husband/boyfriend/uncle is 6'4", and you're taller than he is!" It even happens with men. A few weeks ago I had a guy who was pretty tall but about an inch shorter than me try to tell me I must be taller than 6…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 11:13 AM
46

Just proof we don't live in a patriarchal society. If men did only think about sex and they controlled society, then it wouldn't be considered bad to only think about sex. But culturally, this woman considers it logical to say only think about sex = morally corrupt. So either men don't only think about sex, or they don't control society.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 11:03 AM
3

"Investigation."
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:54 PM
1

People keep saying "world" but they mean the West. Time to start learning Chinese. Our time on top has come to an end.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:51 PM
15

The Right to Vote is one of the biggest examples of feminist historical revisionism they use to pretend they were oppressed. Men did not have universal suffrage until the 20th Century either. Going clear back to Rome, voting has always been associated with military service, arguably a sensible system since government historically has been more about military administration than policing people's social lives. That's more of a modern invention. For example, to go back to the Romans, they had rela…
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 09:48 AM
3

I wish these women could somehow experience what their lives would be like without men. Let's see. She wouldn't have a house because there'd be no construction workers. She wouldn't have any infrastructure or technology because there'd be no engineers. She wouldn't have anything resembling a stable lifestyle because there'd be no soldiers. Most agricultural workers are men, so she probably wouldn't even have any food. Now let's see...if there weren't any women... Well, there'd be no agents of go…
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 07:50 AM
4

Interesting how "decent human being" for men always equates to suck it up and go to work.
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 05:42 AM
8

I understand it quite well. It's a nonsense term made up by pseudo-intellectuals to demonize a group not for their actions but for who they are. It's a brilliant if devious political strategy as old as time.
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 05:40 AM
51

I disagree. Feminism has always been bullshit. That they were ever oppressed is part of their mythology that they use to justify their current destruction of society.
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 05:33 AM
2

This comment just proves our point.
/r/MGTOW12/02/19 09:50 PM
1

Am I supporting my wife in this instance or is she supporting me or are we utilizing our strengths for mutual benefit? Well, I believe this one. Feminists claim you're oppressing her, is what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:20 AM
1

But that amounts to protecting. I hate the oppression olympics as much as anyone else, and I don't personally believe men have it any worse in traditional society than women, but come on, if you had to choose between getting nerve-gased to death and making babies, which would you choose? To be honest, I wouldn't mind the male role if feminists weren't simultaneously trying to strip me of its advantages, but it blows my mind feminists can make it out like women get the short end of the stick in t…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 11:34 PM
1

r/AsABlackMan
/r/MensRights03/02/19 03:30 PM
3

Men do not exert power over the system. Such a claim is absurd. Men and women have gender roles that each come with their advantages and disadvantages. Fuck off with you I'm guessing early high school psychology bullshit. Being masculine doesn't make me feel bad. People like you trying to guilt trip me for being masculine would make me feel bad if I didn't know the whole attack is laughable bullshit. Developing boys, however, don't, so thanks for contributing to fucking them up.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 02:44 PM
6

This isn't a patriarchal society. There is no such thing.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:59 AM
5

This is what happens when boys are only raised by women. I can count the number of times I've cried since I was four on one hand, and it's not because I think there's anything wrong with it or try not to. On the other hand punching things, hitting baseballs or just lifting weights have been great emotional outlets since I was about 14. Feminists just want to demonize anything male.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 12:15 AM
2

I always swear off Netflix originals but then after a couple months something comes out that looks interesting, and I think, "Surely there's no say they managed to turn that into Feminist propaganda." I am always wrong.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 11:38 AM
13

The collapse of Western Civilization, yeah.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 11:11 AM
2

Yeah, it's Netflix. I wouldn't even say they make entertainment, just propaganda.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 11:08 AM
2

Psychology is also a field that's dominated by women and becoming increasingly redundant as advances are made in neuroscience.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 11:06 AM
3

if you get offended by someone asking you to be nicer. you need to re-evaluate what that means about yourself God I don't understand how people can be so fucking obtuse. Take the formula "Hey, [Demographic], be [comparative positive adjective]" will always be insulting. Let's review some examples. Hey, black people, be more peaceful. Hey, Jews, be more generous. Hey, women, be more rational. Hey, Muslims, be more tolerant. Hey, Italians, be quieter. Hey, people from Mississippi, be healthier. Ho…
/r/MensRights31/01/19 11:05 AM
5

This is his idea of misogyny despite the fact that it doesn't say anything about women in the meme.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:54 PM
5

I can't speak for everyone here, I only ever use the term "toxic femininity" ironically to highlight how ridiculous the concept is. I don't actually believe it's a thing.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:20 PM
1

The response of course is that it's to make up for the decades or centuries or whatever of the reverse happening. However, if that's true, it still doesn't make any sense because young men and women entering the workplace now weren't even alive back then. But, it's not even true. Are we really supposed to believe that 50 or even 500 years ago, professional recruiters made a point of saying, "We only want men"? I sincerely doubt it.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:16 PM
7

One of the biggest companies in the country just made an ad portraying rough housing as toxic. Just the term "toxic masculinity" by itself hurts boys' self-esteem.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 06:53 AM
10

Lol this doesn't say anything about women but it's misogynist? Or maybe you can't accept that men will defend themselves against misandry?
/r/MensRights29/01/19 06:38 AM
20

All "patriarchal" societies strangely value women more than men.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 06:08 AM
12

I love how feminists post this kind of shit daily, but if a man does it, he's "fragile." I guess you only oppose gender roles when it serves you.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:44 AM
1

While it was once assumed that married women had little or no access to legal recourse, as a result of coverture, historians have more recently complicated our knowledge of coverture in the Middle Ages through various studies of married women's legal status across different courts and jurisdictions.[5] Collectively, many of these studies have argued that 'there has been a tendency to overplay the extent to which coverture applied', as legal records reveal that married women could possess rights …
/r/MensRights28/01/19 10:20 AM
1

Everyone knows that's an excuse. 100 years ago people were much poorer and had more kids. People in poorer nations always have more children. Wealthier people simply don't want to spend their money on children. Let's not pretend like they'd starve to death if they had kids. They'd just have to take fewer vacations.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 10:09 AM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 10:08 AM
2

Encouraging adoption is fine, but telling people not to reproduce is a terrible idea. Many Western countries are already having problems due to declining birthrates and aging, unproductive populations. For example, starting next year Germany will have more people over 60 than under 30. This is going to wreck the Western economies, but it also means the decline of the culture. Culturally Western people refuse to have children, and it won't be long before the West as a culture disappears altogethe…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 09:32 PM
3

I've never seen anyone call feminists names. Not saying it doesn't happen, but I frequent this sub and don't see it as a major theme. Yeah, we bash the hell out of feminists, but with facts not insults. That's what it seems like to me anyway.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 03:16 PM
1

The myth of women's historical oppression is the casus belli used by feminists to advance their political goals. MRA can't make any progress if we keep conceding to it. At best, most claims of historical oppression are exaggerated accounts based on historical revisionism by feminist academics with an agenda. More often, they're just straight lies.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 02:34 PM
5

Don't agree with that middle one.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 02:22 PM
65

It's funny because this basically says exactly why their program is worthless. "Gender equality" isn't a tech innovation. It's a political goal. When your tech programs focuses on politics instead of tech... well there's a reason China's landing shit on the moon, and we don't even have shuttles anymore.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 12:51 PM
2

Lol oh my god did you not even read the very article you linked? It specifically gives examples of how the idea of coverture is feminist revisionism.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 06:00 PM
16

Also one of the dumbest parts. Like are we supposed to assume he's going to rape her? Why should men stop other men from talking to attractive women?
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:07 PM
7

It's about men's rights because feminists blame "masculinity" for this exact kind of violence, yet this was a feminist, feminized man. But watch CNN carry the story.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 01:00 PM
41

How self-loathing do you have to be to get shafted in a custody dispute and still talk about the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights26/01/19 12:58 PM
2

Lol well yeah, you can make women seem oppressed if you just lie. None of that is true. Women couldn't vote in Victorian England but neither could men. Universal suffrage for both genders was granted at the same time--by the exact same act. No, women did not belong to their husbands by law nor could their husbands beat them legally. Wife beating was charged under assault statutes clear back in the 17th Century, and women could own property and businesses from the beginning of the Anglo-Saxon sta…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 08:27 AM
3

I like this video but also fucking hate it. I'm tired of women thinking they get to define what "being a man" means.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 12:41 AM
2

No, it lists numerous North American tribes. But only white people conquered all over the world and oppressed >multiple groups of people. Have you not taken a history class yet? Literally every "race" of people has had massive empires. The largest empire on Earth ever was the Mongolian Empire, which was run by the Mongolians, obviously, who are not "white." Japan, China and Korea have all expanded their territories significantly as one point or another. The Incans took tribute from nearly all of…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 11:39 PM
2

Yeah, those were all my thoughts in college too. Many parts of the world had no slavery in the first place! Like many native >american tribes, (who white men slaughtered and enslaved, btw.) This is blatantly false. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_among_the_indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americas#Indigenous_enslavement_of_indigenous_peoples This idea comes from the romanticization of Native Americans as noble savage simpletons, which honestly, is more racist than the opposite. Native Americans w…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 10:38 PM
2

Seriously, are you still in high school? You clearly missed the entire point I was even referencing. Western Europe used military force to end the slave trade in Africa. The slave trade was, of course, African and especially Middle Eastern peoples conquering other African peoples and then selling them into slavery. I understand why you wouldn't know that historical fact because the white guilt media likes to portray slavery as white people kidnapping happy black simpletons from Africa, but that'…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 09:41 PM
2

Yeah, I'll never subscribe to Netflix or bother watching anything they produce. It's guaranteed to be SJW bullshit. You have a better shot with books. Cormac McCarthy writes great masculine characters.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:34 PM
3

Man one day I get insulted as a chad, the next an incel. Which the fuck is it?
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:15 PM
2

Ah we finally arrive at the crux. White men are to blame for everything. What nonsense. Every human society has oppressed others, but I'm pretty sure the terrible white men were the first to sacrifice themselves in war for equality for totally other groups.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:13 PM
2

Lol. In every category you mentioned men have it worse. I'm not one to say men are oppressed either. Each gender just has its advantages and disadvantages. But your examples were terrible.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:11 PM
2

50 years ago.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:17 AM
1

I wouldn't be surprised if this is true, but only because cultural attitudes about having kids have become so backwards. The West is so fucked.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:52 PM
7

Lol well yeah. Society helps women. Men are supposed to help themselves.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:04 PM
18

This a rampant problem and one of the worst things women do, in my opinion. Bad mouthing fathers especially ruins the self esteem of the sons. A common thread in violent criminals is a mother who berated the father.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:03 PM
4

Of course if you chop off part of your dick, your chance of dick cancer goes down. Why don't we cut off boys' testicles to decrease their risk of testicular cancer?
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:52 AM
6

It was ruled that the federal statute is unconstitutional because it's a state issue. It's still illegal in more than half of states.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:50 PM
6

Courts have already made a religious practice illegal. Female circumcision is illegal even for religious reasons.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:54 PM
19

It is allowed by the government.That means no protection of the law.Yes it is government business as there are laws for girls that forbid that.Government make compulsory to not allow girls circumcision.I would agree with you if was not this case.Government can allow or forbid things by law.Both instances can produce harmful effect on human bodies.Action or inaction from government can be both harmful. Yeah, I know. It's so fucking weird on me. The Patriarchy controls women's bodies! But abortion…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 11:38 PM
19

It's not illegal in any state unlike FMG which is. It doesn't exactly fit with the meme, but it is an example of how women's health is clearly a priority over men's, yet politicians spout this bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:40 PM
1

You don't think all those things happened to men too? Men have had parts of their genitals chopped off for millennia in order to control their sexuality. How convenient that you can say even if women reinforce something it's ultimately men's fault. Men get to be the bad guy no matter what. This especially doesn't make any sense considering women dominate childhood education and so have more control over culture than anybody. You could just as easily say women dictate gender roles and men learn t…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 06:54 PM
2

Me'n have had control over sexual norms? What a joke, man. Recent studies have already demonstrated that women are the ones who enforce things like slut shaming. It's obvious why. If they don't keep the supply low, they can't control men (and society at large) with their sexuality. Do you really think men, who you just described in your comment as sexual predators, would actively make it harder to have sex via sexual norms if they were in control?
/r/MensRights20/01/19 11:39 AM
1

I'm pretty sure what actually gets you cucked is being so insecure you forbid your girlfriend from associating with other male human beings.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 11:17 AM
1

I didn't have a gf when I met her for coffee. You're misreading the post. I had a gf years later when she sent me the unsolicited nude. At the time of the coffee meeting, I had merely gone on a couple of dates with one of her friends. As for the shower one, yeah that's my fuck up too. The point of the post is not that I'm angry about the events themselves. I'm angry about the double standard.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 11:16 AM
3

Yeah, I agree. I'm not all that upset about the things in and of themselves, but the double standard is infuriating.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 11:12 AM
1

I didn't have a girlfriend when I met with her. That was years ago. I had been on a couple of dates with one of her friends, but I wasn't in a relationship.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 11:10 AM
1

Did you read the post backwards. The meeting was years ago. The nude picture was recently.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 11:08 AM
59

Yeah, go for it. I love the site. Keep up the good work.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:59 PM
1

You're the worst.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:50 PM
10

Yeah exactly. It's a great mentality. Unlike Gillette which apparently thinks wrestling and hitting on women is ruining society.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:05 PM
10

After any of this anti-male shit, the response seems overwhelmingly negative, the Gillette ad being a great example. Yet the media is still just filled with it. It's almost as if feminists are running the country and censoring anything they don't like...
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:02 PM
23

Aggression and risk taking are toxic masculine traits according to the APA. These guys have mental problems and need therapy to correct their masculine ways.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:47 AM
8

Yeah I love how my Facebook page is filled with armchair sociologists claiming that masculinity was invented a few thousand years ago to control women despite the fact that there are still uncontacted tribes out there whose social hierarchy is based on whoever's chopped off the most heads.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:44 AM
6

Good.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:41 AM
2

I've posted this picture to explain why the ad is offensive. The response? Those aren't even close to the same thing. Why not? I'm too dumbfounded to explain.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:43 AM
2

The message was poor. Allowing boys to fight and "be boys" isn't the cause of the problems identified in the ad. If anything, it's the opposite.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:22 AM
7

Female oppression is a myth. Read one book about or set in WWI and come back and tell me women have had it worse historically. A bunch of women guilt tripping men into letting themselves get blown to bits in trenches for no reason doesn't sound like the role of an oppressed class.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:17 AM
3

I always figured it was a severely miscalculated mating strategy.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:10 PM
3

That's true, but I don't think that's all of it. I believe women definitely make a lot of decisions as to what products are purchased regardless of who hands over the money at the cash register. Recently I decided to start using creatine and asked a couple boxing buddies if they'd ever used it before. They both said, "No way, my gf would kick me to the curb is she caught me using that stuff. Your gf lets you use it?" I was dumbfounded.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:19 PM
10

This is a good point I didn't consider. I can imagine a lot of Emperor's New Clothes going on in that meeting room. No one wanting to be the first to point out they shouldn't make the ad lest they conventiently get sexual harassment complaint the next day.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:15 PM
8

I like toxic feminity just as a way to show them how insulting it sounds, but personally would never use the term. I don't really think that exists any more than toxic masculinity. I love both masculinity and femininity. I hate feminism.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:53 PM
17

We should be individuals first. I'm not a rapist and I'm not a WWII hero. I'm just me.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:49 AM
15

Well whether it's true or not, P&G believes it, which is why they think they can get away with this ad.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 08:21 AM
2

Yeah, I agree. People often have a lack of situational subjectivity and instead latch onto the symbolic meaning of words.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:17 PM
2

It's rape. Should she be in prison for 30 years? No, but I don't think any rapist should be in prison for 30 years. Given she was 16 herself and she didn't use violent force, I don't think she should be arrested or anything. If anything, she should've been reprimanded and sent to therapy at the time, but now it's too long past. It's still rape, though.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:47 PM
5

The myth of male power. Men have never somehow controlled society and subjugated women. Going to get blown to bits in trenches and going down with the ship so the other group can live is not something one demographic usually does for a demographic they oppress.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:59 PM
6

I like how Jon Haidt mentioned how we need a vocabulary to show this culture for what it really is. I like "call-out culture," but we need a specific name for people who try to ruin other people's lives simply so they can seem like a white knight to their equally destructive peers.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:56 PM
1

Agreed, but I prefer this sentiment to the other at least. Simply because the majority of men will at least be inclined the aspects of masculinity stemming from biology.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:37 PM
1

It's like they don't know what semantics are.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 10:30 PM
1

You got us! Men who defend themselves are insecure.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 09:38 PM
6

I consider myself a classical liberal. Although apparently since I don't believe in toxic masculinity or the patriarchy, I'm basically a Nazi.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:12 PM
4

Yeah, men haven't done anything about it because it isn't a thing. The problems men face aren't a result of "toxic masculinity." They're a result of bullshit like this, telling them their natural state is to blame for society's problems.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 11:23 AM
4

Did you read the article? That's not what it's referring to at all. It's blaming the aggression, risk-taking and competitiveness of boys for misogyny and homophobia. Those things are a natural part of being male. It's original sin for men.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 07:37 AM
2

Yeah, what do you think I'm saying? It's not unhealthy to focus on masculinity. Men can be whatever the fuck they want, especially things they have a natural tendency to be like competitive and aggressive. You know what's unhealthy? Telling boys they're unhealthy for being who they are.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:19 AM
13

I'm sure telling boys they're inherently broken from the start is a great way to help them build self esteem. Or maybe it's just a great way to make money on the self-loathing men out there.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:41 AM
8

What are you even referring to as "toxic masculinity?" I hate that term. Men have the right to be whoever they want, just like women.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:39 AM
29

Masculinity is not a disease.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 05:46 AM
1

Except they only sobered up for like two weeks and then got right back at it.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 01:32 PM
1

No, I'm saying blaming society for your problems doesn't help you in life.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 07:42 PM
15

I'd like to know the comparison of funding to assist woman victims of violence and child victims. If I remember correctly, children are victims even more often than women. They seem to receive less attention, though. Which is just fucking crazy.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 10:25 PM
-8

I love strong women. Something more or less mutually exclusive with feminism it seems to be. I think it has to do with assuming the role of the victim, which I think is something we have to be careful not to do with Men's Rights. There's plenty to fight for, but we can't blame the social structure for our problems.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 10:22 PM
4

I hate that excuse so fucking much. Movements have names, and they are called "movements" because they have general trends. It'd be like criticizing Nazism and someone being like, yeah, some people take it too far, but really it's just about being proud of your heritage. That's not the fucking point. And in fact, if feminism were really just about equal rights, these people wouldn't need to defend the criticism of its name so much. That only happens because it's a movement and people get religio…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:39 PM
4

Men and women suffer from body dysmorphia at the same rate. What, hair transplant clinics, penis enlargement pills and steroids don't exist? It's like feminists have zero perspective.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:37 PM
9

German law requires 10% of spaces to be women only? What the fuck is happening to Western society? I like how all these feminist publications came accusing him of sexism. Like... he's blatantly pointing out a double standard. How can people be so obtuse, it's crazy.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 01:03 PM
11

I just encountered one in France. They're closer to the exit and building where there are people. Even closer than the handicap spots. It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:22 AM
14

And definitely doesn't prove any of our points or anything... /s
/r/MensRights26/12/18 05:43 PM
3

I don't know why you're getting downvoted. I don't see where he said anything about this specific thread either.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 05:42 PM
19

Listen, "bro," I live in a society where I was taught constantly as a boy it was my duty to sacrifice myself for women. Then I grew up and those same women (feminists) started complaining they were oppressed by me. The turning point for me was when I read about a ship wreck clear back in the 19th Century where twelve-year-old boys went down with the ship so women could take the lifeboats. Let me be clear, men are not oppressed, but neither are women. Both genders have advantages and disadvantage…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 05:04 PM
8

Gotta be a teenager.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 04:48 PM
39

My girlfriend and I had a conversation the other day because she a news story of some woman being killed and was ranting about how women have to be scared just leaving their house. I said that's irrational. I'm in much more danger leaving the house than she is because men are far more often the victims of violence than women. It's just that you never see those cases on the news because no one cares. A woman gets killed and the city starts an ad campaign to end "violence against women," but there…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 04:13 PM
20

Man I'm so fucking tired of American puritanism masquerading as "progressivism." I live in a Southern European country, and here everyone is touching each other all the time. Hugs, kisses, adults to children, between men and women, and no one cares. Which is awesome because I'm pretty sure human touch is essential to mental well-being. These fucking feminists are doing the same thing as the sex-shaming religions they're always bashing.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:56 AM
3

I believe the accused until proven guilty like I do with all other crimes.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:05 AM
24

I think mothers shit talking fathers behind their backs has got to be the number one cause of mental health issues. It certainly is of all mine.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 12:13 PM
4

Man I sure hope that second update is true.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 12:12 PM
2

I'd like to see some sources for your claims. Either way, Frankenstein is definitely an example of how much feminism is a result of indoctrination in schools. How many times did my elementary school teachers tell me that SE Hinton or JK Rowling used their initials because they wouldn't get published if people knew they were a woman. Of course, that's utter nonsense. Women were publishing popular novels clear back in 1818. If you view all the information with a blank slate as an adult, it's obvio…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:08 PM
9

My favorite is this: I'm a man and I'm married and I also had to have this explained to me before I understood it. It's better to just believe your wife that what you said was problematic and try to come up with a better way to express your intention. So why was "Pleasant" problematic? Well, I don't know, you're better off asking your wife. These poor self-loathing bastards.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 07:30 PM
0

I think men should just stop making advances. Women refuse to make advances, so men have to somehow mind read to know if it's wanted or not. Which is fucked because these days an unwanted advance apparently equates to rape. Honestly I don't understand why any American male would put himself through the minefield that is heterosexual dating when you can watch porn for free and sleep with prostitutes for cheaper than it is to date a woman. It blows my mind that you can find so many posts like this…
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:21 PM
1

"Equality" has a new definition in Feminist Newspeak. It's the same as when Communists put "the people's whatever" on all their shit.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 01:40 AM
6

On my grandparents farm, they kill and eat the roosters while leaving the hens because they make eggs to eat and more chickens. While that's a great metaphor for exactly how human society treats the sexes, I don't actually give a shit about those roosters and happily eat them fried and breaded. This is men's rights. Not male organisms' rights.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 01:14 AM
3

I wouldn't have anything against a women-only music festival except I know damn well a men-only music festival would get taken down in about five seconds.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 12:36 PM
7

The social ecosystem (public school) doesn't prize males at all. There was an experiment done--I'll go try to find it--where audiences of plays claimed to hate typically masculine characters. Then when the same story was remade with the character being a "progressive, modern male" people hated him even more. For boys it's damned if you do damned if you don't. They have no direction. No fathers, raised by feminists at school with the few remaining male role models completely castrated, begging fo…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 11:52 PM
9

That's some 1984 shit.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 10:24 AM
648

If you are a man, you must support your child or be denied government services. If you are a woman, there are literally government services to help you get rid of your child.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 10:23 AM
4

Any male who said anything about killing Senators would be arrested.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:15 PM
5

Smearing their names is the excuse the plaintiffs are using to block the emails. It's clear from the article Weinstein's attorneys are claiming they defend him in court.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:14 PM
4

If they think that then who cares what they think.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 10:46 PM
5

By "Men" do they mean the feminization of society?
/r/MensRights14/12/18 04:15 PM
21

Remember when Chris Hansen pushed all the sex offender registration laws, and then when it was revealed he would technically have been a sex offender under his own bullshit, he backpedaled. Just waiting till he gets #Metooed himself.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 10:21 PM
3

That girl is just so damn edgy.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 05:30 AM
5

I remember after the election all the wealthy liberals on my social media were posting contrite things about how they realize their party has lost touch with working class men, etc. For about two weeks. Then they were back to blaming everything on white men.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 04:05 PM
1

Yeah, that's what I'm pointing out. Letting boys play games that tap into their innate aggression isn't teaching them to "murder." It's building on their natural strengths. I had a Facebook friend once (a humanities grad student, go figure) post about how literally all sports were examples of toxic masculinity because they promoted "aggression." We're not friends anymore, needless to say.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 04:02 PM
8

Didn't you know masculinity causes school shootings! That's why they've only started so recently...
/r/MensRights12/12/18 11:22 AM
9

I often disagree with Republican policies, but when I see bullshit like this, I just can't vote Democrat. I guess I'll throw my vote away on a third party.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 07:32 AM
9

Aggression and protection ARE the male forms of nurturing. That's not the same as murder. In 2018 genders can't have strengths and weaknesses.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 07:04 AM
4

The capitalist pigs only care about profits! The patriarchy pays men more for the same work! ...
/r/MensRights12/12/18 06:59 AM
8

And women HR representatives enforce dress codes.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 05:13 PM
2

Explain to me how women have been oppressed. Teaching young boys to sacrifice themselves for women is not something societies usually do for people they oppress.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 05:09 PM
-3

First of all, no your analogy is terrible. Literally the opposite of what she's saying. Second of all, you're assuming women are or were an oppressed group. Which they aren't and weren't.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 03:08 PM
575

Exactly. If feminism were simply about allowing women to have the privileges of manhood, I'd be all for it. But that would mean men should have the privileges of womanhood and women should also suffer the disadvantages of manhood. In every situation, feminists adamantly oppose those two things, though. Feminists want to be taken seriously at work. But telling them what to wear is sexist? As if men haven't been wearing uniforms since the beginning of civilization.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 02:33 PM
7

Yeah the original cartoon was just a movie. The new live action one has a blatant political message tucked in.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 05:00 PM
1

Ah. Well sure I can agree with that then. I certainly don't mark male on voluntary self-identification forms.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:40 PM
3

No, it isn't. I like being a man and I like women that are women. Other people can do whatever they want, but I shouldn't be forced to be "gender neutral" or whatever bullshit by telling me my masculinity is "toxic."
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:35 PM
153

As dolls become more lifelike, feminists have to do this shit to maintain power. Once men have sex dolls, feminists won't have a way to control men anymore, unless they ban them.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:51 AM
16

Fuck her.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:49 AM
4

Feminism is partly to blame for the fact that households almost always need two incomes these days. Wages for men have basically stagnated since women joined the workforce. The supply has increased, so employers can pay workers less.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 09:40 PM
3

I never said anything about half the population. "Feminists" aren't half the population. They aren't even half the women. And no, women have had the short end of some sticks sometimes. I can't imagine if you were born 1895-1930 you'd choose to be born male.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:02 PM
6

I see it on t-shirts all the time. I'd love to get my hypothetical son a "The future is male" t-shirt. These t-shirts may be all fun a girl-powery for educated adults, but imagine how they wreck a little boy's psychology. Trust me, I was one.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:33 PM
31

Yeah, I was gonna say... I don't think drafted 14-year-old boys in the Congo have it great exactly...
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:30 PM
6

privileged Privileged is being able to campaign relentlessly to have the perks men get like government positions (if that's really a perk) without ever having to deal with downsides of being a man... like getting drafted. And then when men create a movement to get rid of those things, calling them insecure. ​
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:22 PM
1

Or they believe that equality has long existed and women are trying to game the system. Equality has always existed, at least in the sense both gender roles have had their advantages and disadvantages. Modern feminism wants to remove the disadvantages from the female gender role and the advantages from the male gender role and leave it at that. That equates to all advantages for women and all disadvantages for men. If that's "equality," then I don't want it. ​
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:13 PM
7

You're kidding right? I'm going to go put "The future is male" on a t-shirt and when the mob attacks me, I'll just tell them I didn't mean "only us," I meant "all of us." We'll see how that goes over.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:07 PM
5

Just read through her Twitter feed. It's spoiled, pretentious nonsense, but she criticizes "Men" constantly.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:15 PM
184

And then they don't understand why white men won't vote for them...
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:53 AM
2

You know why.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:34 AM
2

I guess it's time to read all those books.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:21 AM
19

Yeah she's from fucking Highland Park, IL, and went to Brown. She's one of the most privileged people on the planet.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:19 AM
21

Professional writer here. Fuck Dana Schwartz. But thanks for convincing me 100 percent feminism is bullshit and MRA is personally worthwhile.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:06 AM
70

How the hell can feminists claim women are oppressed in the West. Jesus.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:05 PM
4

Eliminating gender-only organizations, even if it were applied equally to both genders, is not something I as an MRA would support.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:01 PM
77

Across Wall Street, men are adopting controversial strategies for the #MeToo era and, in the process, making life even harder for women. Cry me a river. How terrible that women can't have their cake and eat it too. ​
/r/MensRights03/12/18 10:05 PM
2

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, right.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 08:56 PM
8

What in God's name is the purpose of this?
/r/MensRights03/12/18 06:42 PM
16

The thing people don't get is that you can't just leave kids a blank slate or they'll end up 20-year-old kids (modern college students, anyone?). This is a perfect example. So encouraging traditional male customs like wearing pants is wrong? So what's the alternative? Encouraging traditionally female customs? That's somehow okay, though?
/r/MensRights03/12/18 06:10 PM
20

Every boy learns around seven years old that society is dog eat dog for men in order to cater to women.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 06:05 PM
7

If I recall correctly, the MeToo movement went too far on its like second outing.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:50 PM
6

Even girls are doing better at school, and more women attend university.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:10 AM
15

A bill for services you didn't order. And if you're a man, services you probably didn't even use.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:09 AM
7

Yeah, welcome to 2018. If it's traditionally female, women can still lay exclusive claim to it. If it's traditionally male, women get that to. Oh, and if you're a man and do something traditionally male, that's "toxic."
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:07 AM
1

Historically combat has been handled almost 100 percent by men. They shouldn't have to give that service to a bunch of feminists who think it's okay to steal from a man just because he talked to them. And notice I said "feminists" not women, because I would and I hope those same men would protect my mother, sister and girlfriend because they aren't spoiled feminists.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 11:55 PM
2

Certainly not a well adjusted one. Just the other day a middle-aged woman in the grocery store told me I was really attractive and my girlfriend must be really happy. That seems even more "sexual" than complimenting a smile, but I didn't even think anything of it. I don't think a well adjusted woman would complain about this either. But a woman who sits behind her computer complaining about men all day because she's too afraid to go out and interact with the real world might. That's because she'…
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:44 PM
3

Yeah, I mean. Is she saying his saying she has a great smile is somehow a violation? I just don't get it. Her being a socially awkward ball of anxiety doesn't mean another human being talking to her is malicious. Is that what she's trying to say?
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:39 PM
15

What is even the problem here exactly? I kept clicking on the picture because I thought there must be more.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:35 PM
18

Feminists are making it a minefield just for a man to interact socially with a woman. Men should just stop associating with feminists and see if they change their tune about men when they have no food, manufactured goods or protection from robbing, murdering, raping invaders.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:30 PM
11

Estrogeneralizing
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:03 PM
12

That's also not what the federal judge ruled. He ruled it was not a federal issue--not that it was protected by the Constitution.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 06:57 PM
2

They have their own specialized doctors for fucks sake...
/r/MensRights02/12/18 05:20 PM
1

"Kids who are assigned male at birth learn through playground fights and so forth to see the world through the prism of winners and losers." Does he mean kids with a Y chromosome? The same Y chromosome that codes for aggressive play behavior and competitiveness. I teach elementary school. I make a lot of competitive games, and the coddled kids inevitably get tantrum-level upset when they lose. Then the advice from other teachers is to make the games cooperative rather than competitive so no one …
/r/MensRights29/11/18 05:15 PM
4

R/relationships almost always gives the opposite of good advice. Think about it, who's going to be browsing and commenting on a relationships forum? Probably not anyone in a successful one.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:43 PM
1

That poor self-loathing bastard. I'd like to know what his parental situation was growing up.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:37 PM
6

They don't hate male sexuality. They want to control male sexuality.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:00 PM
18

Exactly. Feminists think they represent women despite the fact that a majority of women don't identify as feminists. True arrogance.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 11:32 AM
5

"When it comes to issues that directly pertain to women's bodies and experiences, be quiet and listen." Maybe the biggest double standard I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 09:08 AM
2

Circular logic obviously. Women are better. Women are kind. Therefore kindness is better. Women are kind, so they must be better.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 11:07 AM
6

Yeah, there's a reason I've stopped watching anything produced by Netflix.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 01:08 PM
35

"The majority of people agreed the child is the main victim of the situation." What the fuck?
/r/MensRights29/10/18 12:59 PM
3

Yeah I'm just pointing out what a spoiled brat she is.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:33 PM
114

Fuck her. If only women could be conscripted.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:41 PM
5

Make up a similar flier for a women's workshop on how femininity poisons society and see what happens.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 06:00 AM
9

I want to feel sorry for those guys in the thumbnail who actually think feminism is a good mating strategy, but I can't.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 05:55 AM
3

Their slogan is "believe women", which is akin to saying "don't believe men" if they claim they are innocent. Never really thought about it that way. That makes it even scarier than it already was.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 10:07 PM
1

Are you under the impression that men had universal suffrage in 1905? Or that they even do now?
/r/MensRights13/10/18 06:09 PM
6

Yeah, it's using a the theme of the book as an analogy for the theme it's discussing...
/r/MensRights13/10/18 05:27 PM
4

What he's saying is the dictionary is just relaying how the general population uses the word, not how the editors think it should be used.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 09:01 PM
10

"Toxic." That was new word adopted by SJWs when they realized they'd been using "problematic" incorrectly the whole time. It's a great way to call something bad when you actually have no argument behind claiming so.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 08:51 PM
36

Yeah, this is one of those totally backwards things about feminism that's convinced me women have never been oppressed as a class. One gender role involves back-breaking physical labor while the other gender role involves staying home and spending time with your kids. Which of these is oppressed?
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:43 AM
2

If sexual jokes qualifies as harassment, I've been sexually harassed by women at nearly every job I've had. It's never affected my mental health slightly. Some people just need something to be angry about to justify their existence.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 11:39 PM
1

Ah yes Belarus, the great colonial power. This is fucking idiotic. They don't care about "decolonization," whatever that even means. Japan and China colonized far more territory than Finland ever did. This is just an excuse to hate white people.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 11:08 PM
13

"She was talking about how I am privileged as a white male that no person would look at me as a sex object when I am in public such as a bus or train and that my chances of being raped are very low." Women objectify men all the fucking time. More so in my experience. "How big was he" is the first question every girl asks her friend when she hooks up without fail. It's just that women are attracted to a smaller range of men, so it's easier for them to take the high road and act like they aren't l…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:22 PM
2

" A cosmopolitan view allows “toxic masculinity” to apply to the objectifying sentiments in the excerpts I showed from r/TheRedPill, since it reflects a specifically sexual and negative attitude that cannot readily apply to women." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:07 PM
11

Because a social paradigm where women are used as rewards for men acting "worthy" isn't good for men. It's not good for women either, but feminists never seem to complain about it for some reason.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:24 PM
17

I know I say this on like every thread, but it just feels like I'm in the fucking Twilight Zone or something. How can someone say men act entitled to women, and then two seconds later say men should "make themselves worthy" of women... It's just... bizarre. I don't understand.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 01:27 PM
7

Yeah, I would say in general women handle rejection much worse than men. Isn't that, like, a saying? "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."
/r/MensRights20/05/18 10:24 PM
18

If there were any stock in this, it would come from the fact that society treats girlfriends as if they're rewards for men who behave correctly socially. That's where the nice guy obsession comes from. Men do everything they've been taught to do to get a woman (which apparently should be their sole motivation in life), and then can't get one. And guess which gender is the one reinforcing this paradigm? Also, I liked this: " In most mass shooting / killing spree cases there's is a strange connect…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:26 PM
8

Didn't you know? Women don't do bad things, dummy.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:20 PM
5

Yeah, I can agree with that.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 09:02 PM
10

In general I thought these were good responses for both. That said, maybe I misunderstood, but did that girl say childbirth isn't natural and a woman's body isn't designed for it? What? Also, that poor guy with the backpack. It's obvious what cognitive dissonance he has. He knows white male privilege is bullshit, but he has to toe the party line. Finally, I don't understand the whole, it's bad that men have to be tough, thing. Isn't toughness good... for men and women. I'd teach my son or daught…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 06:39 PM
17

"It's only been a hundred years since women got the right to vote in this country." And how long has it been since the common man could vote in the UK? I don't know the selective service laws in the UK, but at least in the US, one would argue that men still do not have universal suffrage as any man who doesn't agree to go to war can't vote.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 10:50 AM
7

I try not to let the anger take over, but I can't help it. To compound it, all these powerful women use mutilated human flesh for their beauty regimens then have the audacity to talk about female oppression and gender equality. It's like I'm living in the fucking twilight zone.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 10:35 AM
1

It's not remotely the same. I dated a woman for nearly four years, we lived together, etc. I never even knew her salary, though it was considerably more than mine. I never cared to know either. If she'd have had HIV, I'd definitely have cared to know. Whether it's dishonest or not, finances and HIV status are not even remotely similar.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:37 PM
6

What circular logic bullshit. "I hate men. If there weren't any men, the world would be better for me." No shit.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:15 PM
13

I've worked in tons of schools and extracurricular activities throughout my life. Girls are not punished for the same behavior that boys are punished for. Plain and simple.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:08 PM
24

My dream is to be a sci-fi writer. Almost every single publication says they are looking for stories by women and people of color. I've been tempted to resubmit rejected stories under a female name to see what would happen.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:00 PM
3

I usually say women are born with inherent value while men are not, but the trade off is if a man can develop social value, he can usually keep it most of all of his life. Women lose their inherent value somewhere between 30 and 35 when they are no longer reproductive assets. There are advantages and disadvantages to both. The problem with feminism is they are revolting against the disadvantage women have yet reinforce the disadvantages for men and destroy their advantages. Nothing remotely like…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:57 PM
5

Yeah, I agreed with the general point of #1, but the title made no sense. Rejection is usually personal. And in my experience, women take it way worse than men do. But yeah, you just have to learn to deal with it.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:30 AM
1

So how is this not cultural appropriation?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:38 AM
31

He'd get lynched in the street. Sandra Bullock will probably get an Academy Award next year.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:33 AM
4

So how long till men can't vote?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 02:57 PM
21

She got off easy. This guy went to Westpoint and is a decorated officer. Being a general has probably been his dream since he was a child, and she fucking ruined it all to get views on her blog. You'd have to pay me a lot more than $8.4 million to trade in my dreams. And the worst part is it wasn't even an ambiguous situation. She just straight made something up.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 02:52 PM
1

I was thinking the same thing.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 02:50 PM
7

How, exactly? Honestly asking. This post isn't misogynistic or something. In fact, what's being highlighted is a woman discarding a man's opinion simply because he's a white man. I can get the argument that it's useless information because it's only one instance of something, but I don't immediately see how it "harms" this subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 12:44 PM
13

Why does every post on this sub have to have someone arguing that it doesn't belong here? If it doesn't interest you, then just ignore it.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:55 AM
31

Asians saying shit like this always tickle my funny bone. Her ancestors were also colonizers, and currently in the US, most Asian ethnicities make more than most white ethnicities. So... what exactly is the difference?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:53 AM
1

I think the thumbnail is obviously staged. No one interviewed was sitting remotely like that.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:44 AM
4

See, you are implying that my preferred lifestyle is harmful. You're basically doing the reverse of what you're criticizing. No, they aren't harmful. I have no problem with the traditional male gender role, for the most part. If you do, then don't do it. I won't stop you from being whatever the hell you want, so why do you want to stop me?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:41 AM
3

May result in stoicism And what exactly is wrong with stoicism? There's a reason the word comes from one of the most popular philosophies of all time. Controlling one's emotions is not a bad thing, and complaining all the time is not somehow a good thing. Just because men express their emotions in ways you don't or attempt to control them doesn't make them "toxic." Men who come forward with issues shouldn't be called wusses either. Men can handle their issues however the fuck they want, just lik…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:39 AM
43

Oh, I'm not lost or confused at all. I know exactly what feminists want. To have their cake and eat it too.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:28 AM
1

Yeah, the classic double standard. "But that's just your experience." This whole damn post is based on one person's experience, a person who is then trying to prescribe his personal solutions to others who don't even feel they have a problem.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:11 AM
4

It's what your post is saying. If I want to be "hypermasculine," why can't I be? Because you in your infinite wisdom know what's best for me? It's like telling women wanting to be an independent professional instead of staying at home or vice versa is toxic. It's unparalleled arrogance. If you're a man, be whatever man you want. If you want to be sensitive, if you want to like typical female hobbies, if you want to cry in movies, I don't give a shit or judge you. Stop trying to project what you …
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:08 AM
2

Why would she? She's been paid millions of dollars for having big tits. She doesn't actually have to be a competent professional in her industry. It's hilarious because she was on 30 Rock where Tina Fey made considerably more than her male costars. She's an idiot.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:12 AM
55

I always request male professionals that I will be seeing regularly. Women do the reverse, so why can't I? The reasons are the same.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:49 AM
12

"Men are not defective, we are fine the way we are." Oh, didn't you hear? Only women are allowed to choose the kind of person they want to be.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:47 AM
3

Not a single guy in that video had his legs spread farther apart than his shoulders, so they weren't taking up any extra space. It's just feminists wanting something to complain about so they feel like they have purpose.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:44 AM
5

Manspreading is proof of how spoiled and entitled Western women have become. They have more privilege and luxury than anyone in the history of the world yet still have the audacity to complain about the most ridiculous of "problems." Ironically, I never see video cameras pointed at the women taking up nine seats with their bags of newly bought clothes.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:49 AM
7

$20 says she claims this cancelation is evidence of the patriarchy and oppression of women.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:42 AM
6

And all the girls "do so of their own free will." Do you think the majority of male teacher and female student cases involve guns to heads? We can endlessly debate the psychology of sexuality between a teacher and student, but the fact is there is no difference if the student is male or female.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:37 AM
3

"For more GPS trackers..." More and more Big Sister every day.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 08:40 AM
3

I think the 600k refers to like anger management programs for men, not for male victims. That's why it's in the right column.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 08:39 AM
1

I can tell by the tone of the letter how much tiptoeing the writers were having to do. I just don't fucking get it. It sounds like this professor is having to listen to her students tell her what's better. If people think they know better than their professors, why are they paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to go listen to them?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 12:42 PM
1

Someone posted a link on here just a week or two ago about a survey where most women say they prefer their best friends to their husbands.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:09 PM
2

That's fine. Not everyone has to be like you.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:37 PM
10

No. It isn't a thing. You know how we have to accept women how they are? If they want to be a businesswoman in pants suits, that's fine. If they want to be a stereotypical fifties house wife and wear high heels and do make up, that's also fine. All our choices are shaped by culture. You have to apply the same to men. I aspire to a stoic John Wayne type with grit who doesn't cry. And I'm allowed to. I'm tired of modern society telling me I'm an asshole for the kind of man I want to be. Especially…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:36 PM
1417

Women say that shit constantly. Is that fragile femininity?
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:21 PM
49

Even that's still beating around the bush. They might as well say, it's a felony to fail to conform to our gynocentric ideology. That's basically all the justice system has become anyway. It's like when I see posts about how women used to be thrown in insane asylums for "interests in reading" or whatever, and I always want to be like... and what do you think is happening with men in America right now? Except, you know, with like millions of them.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 09:52 AM
28

God shit like this makes me want to MGTOW.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:38 AM
1

Yeah, some fairly blatant circular logic on their part.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 09:32 PM
3

Well I would say the whole complaint here is it's being publicly funded under the guise of oh these poor women pressured into losing their virginity. That said, you don't see a problem with women lying to their husbands about their sexual history. And the blatant contradiction of saying they want it to be a sacred thing with their husbands but are willing to make it a sham?
/r/MensRights11/05/18 05:22 PM
6

I tried to imply the issue in the title. If a man did this, he'd have a Title IX complaint against him. Or he'd be in jail.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 05:18 PM
23

Uh, no. This article is conflating number of rape accusations with number of actual offenses. Which is the whole fucking problem. 1 in 5 women have been raped? No, 1 in 5 feminists in a voluntary university survey might say they've been raped. But dig deeper and you'll learn they weren't "raped" at all. Maybe they experienced something they do to men on a regular basis. I've seen several women post the MeToo hashtag, and then their stories are things they've literally done to me. This article is…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:37 PM
73

Then it'll just be capitalism's fault too. Why can't she be a totally unproductive member of society and still make six figures? Oppression!
/r/MensRights11/05/18 11:45 AM
9

Yes it does. It's following in line with a bullshit cultural paradigm that allows women to cry rape if they regret their consensual choice to have sex. No, sorry ladies, if you want to sleep around, that's your choice. But if you therefore become unattractive to men, deal with it. These women want to have their cake and eat it too, and the taxpayers are going to foot the bill for it... all so they can fool their husbands into thinking they're someone they're not.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 11:41 AM
11

"The NHS will agree to fund ‘hymenoplasty’ procedures for ‘physical’ and ‘psychological’ reasons which could include women regretting losing their virginity."
/r/MensRights11/05/18 11:22 AM
2

I hope the judge in this case let's all the parties know how much of his time they've wasted.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:36 AM
14

I wonder how those couple counseling sessions go. I wonder whose fault everything is in the relationship.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:22 AM
8

It freaks me out that you can even be acquitted for an accusation and TWENTY-TWO years later, people will still try to ruin your life over it.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:14 AM
1

I assume someone accused of something is innocent until evidence proves otherwise. As it should be for everything.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:12 AM
20

So tax payers have to fund women lying to their husbands... whom they supposedly want something "sacred" with? Talk about female privilege...
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:07 AM
4

Well, something that's not startling at all is that HuffPostWomen clearly doesn't know what "particularly" means.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:44 PM
686

What I want to know is how there was enough evidence to convict these guys if the incident never even happened.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:33 PM
17

By interesting do you mean completely unsurprising?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:13 AM
3

I think it's valid because that sort of incorrect blame giving creates an us vs. them environment in politics that's only going to make it worse.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 02:30 PM
5

This post is a link to another sub where they are blaming men for this law.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:03 PM
4

I don't understand your point at all. This post and all the comments I've seen have been discussing the principle I just mentioned.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 11:27 AM
9

You mean, only this sub would point out that while plenty of male government officials support women's bodily autonomy and this law was enacted by a female governor, the soccer moms that represent the largest voting bloc in the country are still lopping parts of genitals off their sons. But we're supposed to swallow this feminist rhetoric that the evil men are trying to take away women's freedoms.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 10:51 AM
11

I know. Soccer moms run the country. Who the fuck is the patriarchy? A few executives who have to give all their money to their ex-wives?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 09:11 AM
3

The entire premise of this is hilariously nonsense. Right, all mass shooters end up in prison or executed, the exact opposite of power... so... How does this make any sense?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 09:05 AM
3

What about the three thousand other double standards codified into law in the US makes you optimistic that the soccer moms who run this country wouldn't vote that down? Or even that they'd receive any significant backlash?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 12:54 AM
8

For one, you are comparing two different things. You don't compare FGM to circumcision, you compare it to MGM of which circumcision is a type. There's also a type where the penis is completely sliced in half. How does that fit in your ranking system? There are some forms of FGM as well that are far tamer than circumcision, but I don't see you trying to legalize them. Really, though, who gives a shit? As an uncircumcised male, everything you've said about this makes me tremble with rage. The idea…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 12:13 AM
7

I like that how that person talks about veiled misogyny when they're blatantly misandrist. If they weren't, why would they even be comparing the two things? Men care about something? Belittle it!
/r/MensRights05/05/18 01:08 PM
2

What's hilarious is it's not even remotely true, that description. Men hold the power in familial relations? Have they not watched a sitcom in the last 50 years. That's not the culture we live in. But you hit the nail on the head. Nazis somehow convinced everyone that the Germans had been the victims of that Jews all along, and now Feminists are convincing everyone women are the victims of men.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:14 AM
5

Is that literally the response they send. God that makes me angry. Let's chop of your eyelid and tell me a little flap of skin can't be mutilation.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 08:26 PM
7

Girls can join boy scouts but boys can't join girl scouts. Equality! - everyone on my Facebook feed
/r/MensRights03/05/18 07:33 PM
1

I don't agree, but I think that's a perfectly valid stance. I never understand why people on either side of the abortion debate act like the other side is heartless idiots. Both are rational positions.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:23 AM
1

I like this guy's debate strategy. Him: My anecdotal evidence proves you wrong. You: Mine and several others' anecdotal evidence proves me right. Him: LOL but it's just anecdotal evidence, you idiot!
/r/MensRights01/05/18 11:21 AM
6

Nothing destabilizes society faster than males not getting laid. That's why the monogamous relationship paradigm evolved culturally in the first place. Feminism has now destroyed it, and we're just seeing the beginning.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:11 PM
2

You're obviously completely incapable of coping with someone disagreeing with you, so I don't see the point of continuing this conversation. If you want to have a discussion instead of just talking like an arrogant, self-assured asshole, let me know.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:05 PM
1

How civil of a participant you are. I think you don't know what picky means. Just because women want to fuck a smaller percentage of the male population does not mean they don't want to have sex as much. That's like saying a child who's a picky eater doesn't like eating as much. And just because they are too repressed to know how to satisfy their sexual needs doesn't mean they don't have them. That's exactly what the word means. I think you need to reevaluate how to communicate. The whole point …
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:14 AM
2

I agree women want sex just as much. They are simply more picky and often more repressed.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:52 AM
59

Every girlfriend I've ever had has said something jokingly in bed about how my dick is hers. I always respond with "well then this pussy is mine." 6/6 girlfriends have gotten mad and indignant. It's unreal.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:50 AM
1

Yeah, I'm saying in response to working bars and construction.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 09:12 AM
5

I don't know how hard the police track down fathers not paying child support. I'm guessing fairly hard. And European countries have extradition with the US.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 08:56 PM
2

But a hundred years ago we got the right to vote slightly before them!
/r/MensRights29/04/18 08:51 PM
8

This sounds like so many of the cautionary tales my drill sergeants told me. One of my best friends is in the French Foreign Legion. PM me if you wanna talk about it.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 07:33 PM
4

And like always, "toxic masculinity" will get the blame, even though it's actually that bullshit feminist rhetoric that should.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:44 AM
1

There WAS mass outrage over a shirt that said "Little sister for sale" or some such nonsense.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:41 AM
2

Women do this to me all the damn time. They just are oblivious to the double standard.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:38 AM
12

Enough stories in this sub will show that women abuse men and children equally. They just aren't held accountable. Women have done something to me current feminist society considers "harassment" in nearly every workplace I've had. Men just don't report harassment because like in my case, it doesn't really bother me that much, and two, no one would care. I don't know anyone who's been raped or anyone who's raped anyone. I know three men who've had false accusations made against them, including my…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 09:51 AM
1

Sorry, but I don't understand the point you're making. I'm not saying people disapprove of men's partners. I'm saying women usually think they are settling. You might be addressing this and I am just missing it.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 08:34 AM
1

The entire monogamous relationship paradigm evolved as a way to control men. So it's sad that everything everyone's told you you need to be happy is bullshit. On the other hand you've found the key to your liberation? Well ignorance is bliss, as they say.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 09:35 PM
5

No, just like women not being able to vote a century ago doesn't justify hating men today. I guess "trying to justify" is what I meant.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:48 AM
2

"Will you please come live for free in my house and control all the money and my social life in exchange for begrudgingly having sex with me on my birthday?" Basically slavery.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:02 AM
2

In the past I find it hard to say women were "oppressed" as a general group. Men and women had different roles and corresponding advantages and disadvantages. These days women want the same advantages men have had, but they don't want to accept the disadvantages. Feminists want to vote and participate equally in government but they don't want to get drafted. Feminisits don't want to have be the primary caretaker of children but they want default custody of them. Feminists want control of their s…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:57 AM
2

Well off the top of my head there's at least been a long tradition of portraying Africans stealing people's wives. Take 1000 Arabian Nights, for instance. Obviously that mythos has continued into present day. That's probably played some role in justifying their subjugation.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 09:25 AM
9

No, I don't think she's a bad person necessarily. I linked it here because I think this woman is a victim of a cultural undertone that we discuss in this sub. I know one data point doesn't prove that, but I thought it worth sharing. The undertone is that women always deserve better. Women are perfect people, men are terrible and is lucky to have any woman he's with. Consequently, there's always some problem in the relationship. Supportive husband and great father who provides for his family? Doe…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:04 PM
93

Yeah, the story of pretty much any historical oppression is the oppressors claiming they were actually the victims.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 03:11 PM
25

Well no doubt men make similar wrong choices. However, I think there's a general cultural sentiment that any man should feel lucky to be with the woman he's with--so most women believe they can really do better and they're settling even if it's not the case. That belief leads to sad stories like this. The comments were surprisingly refreshing for r/relationships, but there were still the few implying the guy is somehow a dick.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 02:57 PM
1

Or every sitcom where the woman abuses her husband yet at the end of the episode, he's the one who's supposed to apologize and change.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:32 PM
1

That sounds like a good post. Can you link me to it?
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:30 PM
24

On the Facebook post, several people asked for examples and were swiftly banned. I wrote: "Right, of course. I've never read a book with an unlikable male character. Have you ever thought about the male perspective reading literature where the dominant measure of a character's worth is what women think of him? And how that might affect his self-esteem? No, everyone sees what they want to see. Which these days means politicizing literature to the point that, surprise surprise, no one reads it any…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 09:58 AM
7

Oh, I definitely say something. I tell her what behavior is acceptable for me and why. As for B, I'm not a perfect person or partner either. We're both working on things.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:23 PM
53

Man that last part about the big hurt hits close to home. My gf is constantly saying guys in movies are sexy, saying the waiter is handsome, telling her friends right in front of me that some other dude is hot. Then one time we were on the subway and I turned to look as the door opened. An attractive woman got on and I moved a little to give her room. When we got off, my girlfriend said, "It's really disrespectful for you to check out other women right in front of me." I said, "I wasn't checking…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:21 AM
16

State sponsored and mandated indoctrination, everyone. If I think of any advice, I'll post again. Right now just dumbfounded.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:04 PM
6

I think what you mean to say is you can't relate to having a completely delusional worldview.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:57 PM
3

Except that every serial killer's neighbor is like, "I don't know, he was quiet. Didn't seem like the kind of guy who'd hurt someone." And this is the kid's mother. I think it's safe to assume the assessment of her child's character is biased.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:29 PM
121

You'll never be able to convince women that most men have better things to do than even think about much less harass probably not even desirable women. But the feminist media has done a pretty good job of painting all men as sex-crazed animals. Ironically the stereotype of women throughout most of history.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:23 PM
4

So many women have done things to me that are apparently worthy of #MeToo outing. (I don't honestly agree, obviously. They were just misread or ambiguous situations or workplace jokes that didn't bother me.) Then the same women go and post the hash tag. It's just beyond everything.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 12:18 PM
7

That sub might as well be called r/doublestandards.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 11:33 AM
8

These things are posted in Men's Rights because there is a societal myth that women don't abuse their children/partners/etc. When in reality, that's not the case. They just aren't held as accountable. These posts aim to prove that this position is correct.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:54 AM
7

If you called something feministless, would the school even let the event occur? Much less announce it with what appears to be an official email account?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:49 AM
168

Ever since I was a child it's baffled me that in stories of infidelity, if a man cheats on a woman, he's the bad guy, and if a woman cheats on a man, he's still the bad guy.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:16 PM
1

I'm immediately skeptical of anyone claiming they do all the work around the house. Just like I'm skeptical of anyone who says they do all the work at their office. It must necessarily be true occasionally, but since EVERYONE says it, it must statistically usually be untrue. It's like my ex who'd bitch at me because I was wiping the counters before sweeping, even though that makes more sense to me, but if I wanted to balance the checkbook in order to budget for the upcoming trip that was her ide…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 10:47 AM
7

Guy's wife had been nagging him to do more chores around the house and send his daughter to his mother's until she'd finally had it and left him, admitting that she'd been secretly on anti-depressants for a long time and hadn't loved him in a while. All the top comments were women linking things about how men never do housework including a r/TwoXChromosomes where a woman says she won't have sex with her husband anymore for a bunch of reasons, one of which being he doesn't do housework. I made a …
/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter