TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wisty Archive

View 83 posts and 1,115 comments by wisty on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2158

Marriage/Childrenwisty/r/MensRights26/07/18 02:43 AM
466

Generalwisty/r/MensRights05/11/15 12:39 PM
292

Edu./Occu.wisty/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:24 PM
174

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights05/02/16 02:06 PM
165

Legal Rightswisty/r/MensRights29/10/15 08:02 AM
152

Edu./Occu.wisty/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:28 PM
146

Fathers/Custodywisty/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:43 AM
126

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:02 PM
117

Edu./Occu.wisty/r/MensRights22/07/18 10:55 AM
80

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights03/07/15 11:08 PM
78

wisty/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:56 AM
78

wisty/r/MGTOW02/02/16 08:35 AM
72

wisty/r/MensRights24/03/16 01:08 AM
71

Opinionwisty/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:44 PM
59

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights27/11/15 06:03 AM
49

wisty/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:39 PM
44

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:55 AM
41

wisty/r/MensRights30/04/16 01:06 AM
40

Activism/Supportwisty/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:14 PM
38

Generalwisty/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:58 AM
37

Discriminationwisty/r/MensRights18/08/15 11:54 PM
31

Generalwisty/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:38 PM
30

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights03/09/15 10:40 AM
30

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights16/12/15 02:33 AM
29

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights26/11/15 09:55 AM
28

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights14/07/17 04:34 AM
28

Legal Rightswisty/r/MensRights22/10/15 12:48 AM
28

Theorywisty/r/MGTOW11/12/15 08:15 PM
27

Feminismwisty/r/MensRights23/01/16 05:39 AM
24

Fatal Attractionwisty/r/MGTOW16/12/15 12:11 AM
24

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights20/01/16 12:20 PM
22

wisty/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:33 AM
21

wisty/r/MGTOW24/03/16 12:38 PM
21

Feminismwisty/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:19 AM
20

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights15/06/18 03:19 PM
20

Feminismwisty/r/MensRights18/11/15 03:26 PM
19

Feminismwisty/r/MensRights30/04/15 08:00 AM
18

Questionswisty/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:12 PM
16

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights13/12/15 03:14 PM
16

Action Op.wisty/r/MensRights16/04/15 12:43 AM
14

wisty/r/MensRights19/01/16 12:32 AM
14

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:07 AM
13

wisty/r/MensRights02/03/16 09:15 AM
13

wisty/r/MensRights08/07/16 12:30 AM
13

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:47 PM
13

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights26/10/18 05:53 AM
13

Activism/Supportwisty/r/MensRights20/11/15 12:03 AM
13

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights19/11/15 11:50 PM
13

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:58 AM
13

wisty/r/MensRights02/01/16 12:03 PM
11

Edu./Occu.wisty/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:29 AM
10

Generalwisty/r/MensRights08/09/15 12:41 AM
10

wisty/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:17 AM
9

wisty/r/MensRights23/02/17 12:50 AM
9

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:45 PM
9

wisty/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:04 AM
8

Feminismwisty/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:41 AM
8

wisty/r/MensRights28/03/16 04:31 AM
8

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights16/12/15 01:25 AM
7

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:19 PM
7

wisty/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:04 AM
7

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights24/11/15 12:09 AM
7

wisty/r/MensRights20/08/16 01:54 AM
6

Theorywisty/r/MGTOW05/01/16 01:34 AM
6

wisty/r/MensRights23/12/15 10:06 AM
6

wisty/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:40 AM
6

Generalwisty/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:37 AM
6

wisty/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:59 AM
5

wisty/r/MensRights21/07/16 05:11 AM
5

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights10/08/17 11:07 PM
5

Social Issueswisty/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:04 AM
4

Generalwisty/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:16 AM
4

Generalwisty/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:42 PM
4

wisty/r/MensRights06/07/16 02:30 AM
3

Videowisty/r/MGTOW14/02/16 03:45 AM
2

wisty/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:43 AM
2

wisty/r/MensRights21/12/15 09:13 AM
1

Feminismwisty/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:56 AM
1

wisty/r/MensRights20/10/15 01:23 AM
0

Anti-MRMwisty/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:14 PM
0

Edu./Occu.wisty/r/MensRights06/12/15 06:46 AM
0

wisty/r/MensRights10/01/16 10:05 AM
0

wisty/r/MensRights20/09/16 10:34 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,115 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Good to see they included a feminist perspective: Dan Bell, founder of the Men and Boys Coalition, said he hopes the conference will encourage greater dialogue about these issues. “People do feel quite cautious about men and boys because it is seen as speaking up on behalf of a privileged class," he said. “When rigid gender roles were more enforced, the traditional masculine stereotype was that you just get on with it. Now we have moved to more awareness of gender issues – but it is mainly probl…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 09:06 AM
4

I'm pretty sure it's women who drive viewership of Victoria's Secret fashion shows.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/18 12:35 PM
1

Maybe he cheated because she was deranged?
/r/MensRights05/11/18 07:41 PM
1

I spam this article everywhere, but I think it's always relevant - https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail This last tactic is meant to identify and rehabilitate biased managers. About half of midsize and large firms have systems through which employees can challenge pay, promotion, and termination decisions. But many managers—rather than change their own behavior or address discrimination by others—try to get even with or belittle employees who complain. Among the nearly 90,000 disc…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 03:39 AM
3

The news mostly reprints what emergency services tells them (which will not include names unless its necessary) - e.g. see basically the same facts printed in a different site: https://tendaily.com.au/news/crime/a181017wpg/police-swoop-on-alleged-high-level-child-abduction-operation-20181018
/r/MensRights18/10/18 06:53 AM
2

If something is sexist against men, it's rarely called sexism. The dictionary is meant to be an accurate description of how words are used, not how they should be used.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 03:04 AM
3

IIRC "severe" means a hospital admission (or just visit?) from physical violence, because it's a straighforward way to measure it. I guess you could measure things like ptsd or cptsd but unlike physical injuries there's a huge bias in whether it's detected or not.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 10:17 AM
7

"Toxic masculinity" is a stereotype. It paints ALL men as dangerous (with the nice 'motte and bailey' defense that "it only refers to the toxic elements of masculinity). "Toxic masculinity" is worse, it's a truism. The bad bits of masculinity are bad, duh. Anyone who uses it without carefully defining it is pretty poorly educated - at best they are using a vague term that others will misinterpret. More likely, they themselves haven't realised that it's a vague term, they haven't really thought t…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:46 PM
1

A large portion of social justice seems to be about teaching (supposedly) oppressed classes to feel victimized, paranoid, and hopeless. Sometimes a revolution is worthwhile. But often, it's just a bunch of costs with no real benefits (what do they expect is actually going to happen?).
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:34 AM
1

So you basically have to be a mind-reader to tell if someone is mansplaining. OK, I guess there might be a few cases where, say, a work colleague is observed to always explain stuff to women and never explain stuff to men (assuming everything else is equal). But even then, it's still mind-reading. There's malevolent sexism and benevolent sexism. Do men treat women differently because they think they're idiots? Or are they explaining how they do stuff as a way of white-knighting? Shop talk is ano…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:03 AM
5

Or like a woman in a first-world country saying that first-world problems don't matter because third-world problems exist in Africa, all while writing a blog post about male privilege.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 04:53 AM
1

Most people have one or a combination of kinesthetic, visual, reading, or audio learning styles. I highly recommend you Google "4 learning styles" to learn more. Bogus self-help crap that's been completely disproven by every remotely credible research study.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/18 01:02 PM
1

Women live longer than men in pretty much every country in the world. As you noted, the UN doesn't count this as "gender inequality" for some reason. But it gets better. Feminists will literally argue that lessening the gap is an example of gender inequality -- against women! If men just naturally have a shorter life expectancy (more risk-taking behaviour, maybe even just simple biology - hormones can control whether your body devotes more resources to long-term maintenance or short-term perform…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 09:31 PM
3

Every dispute or argument is sort-of about "power and control". Like, my SO watches a TV channel and I want to change it then we're both trying to control what the other watches so we're both abusive by that stupid model. What really matters is the tactics. People disagree, and that's a problem for their relationship. But it shouldn't be illegal unless their disagreements are turning violent. Otherwise you're basically trying to make disagreements within a relationship illegal.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:38 AM
1

What's really funny is that they have 2 stories. A woman (who had presumably earned more) who was sued for assets, and another woman with fewer assets who had to spend a lot on legal fees. Both are apparently victims.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:34 AM
1

No they had "compensatory masculinity" instead. The article mentioned compensatory masculinity, hyper masculinity, toxic masculinity, and hegemonic masculinity. It's almost like it's some hate movement trying to reduce all the world's problems to one thing (masculinity), but since this is manifestly retarded they then have to start coming up with sub-types of masculinity rather than saying "well maybe masculinity isn't the only problem in the world".
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:26 AM
1

Don't stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:05 PM
6

IMO he's doing a shit job running the country, but as long as nothing goes wrong that's OK because the government just steers itself on inertia (for better or worse). The US has survived far worse Presidents. Trump hasn't even started any wars.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:04 PM
1

The "Pick Tax Fries" is a great example of the pink tax. You only pay it if you're stupid enough to want to pay extra for pink packaging and a bit of extra marketing.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 03:45 PM
4

Title IX: No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. Seems like they're excluding a disabled man from education because of his gender and disability. Note: Who Can File a Complaint? Anyone who believes a school has discriminated against someone on the basis of sex. You do not have to be a victim of the disc…
/r/MensRights28/07/18 03:02 PM
2

lol
/r/MensRights26/07/18 11:40 AM
60

Yep. They are required to print opposing points of view, but they usually don't title a piece about a study as a great big question mark. Imagine if there was a new climate study and the ABC titled their analysis "Is Climate Change Actually Happening?".
/r/MensRights26/07/18 05:28 AM
2

I'd add, shelters for men could end up saving the lives of women. Women are most likely to be injured (not killed, just injured) in a bilaterally abusive relationship where they initiate (basically two lower-class idiots who hit each other). If a woman is being abusive, and the guy can't leave (lower-class, so he doesn't have resources), he'll end up dealing with it the only way he can. Which can end up with the woman in a hospital or a morgue. Sure, it would be nice if violent lower-class men d…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 03:13 AM
5

He explains how to do it here: https://youtu.be/UgPICri5-5Q?t=14m56s Apparently anyone can do it (it just takes a web search and an email, not any legal standing - you do not need to be connected to the university). The Title IX office needs to send back a response, and that response has to be sufficient. And they need to let you know how to escalate if you're not happy (e.g. make a complaint federally if the uni is not self-policing).
/r/MensRights22/07/18 10:58 AM
1

Controlling behaviour is a range of acts designed So they're mind reading? I think there's a term for that. I know - crazy. A lot of this "abuse" stuff seems to be "They disagreed and one person one the argument and both people felt sad. No-one should ever feel sad". Every disagreement is about "control". If two people disagree, they both want to control the other and will use various tactics to achieve that (asking nicely, asking not so nicely, using violence, etc). It's not the disagreement th…
/r/MensRights22/07/18 02:10 AM
8

Men have hormones too. If a guy starts raging for no reason you don't go "well maybe he's having a high T day", you just go "that dickhead needs to learn a bit of self-control". If someone else tells you to listen to the excuse, tell them women are capable of controlling their emotions. No-one will disagree with that.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 11:45 AM
7

"Nice" is often things women think are "nice to have". A boyfriend who opens doors, remembers important dates (e.g. birthdays) and brings flowers is nice to have; but not particularly important (especially in the early days of a relationship). And they're just weird if you're not in a long term relationship. (There's nice things in a short term relationship, your examples are better). It's like a car. There's a lot of things that are nice to have in a car - a nice sound system, cup holders, USB …
/r/TheRedPill15/07/18 01:33 PM
1

No, you're mixing up HS (hostile sexism) and BS (benevolent sexism). Women do actually rate nice guys quite well in terms of attractiveness. They just don't sleep with them. "Yeah, he'd be a great catch for some other woman, but I'm just looking for Mr. Right Now".
/r/TheRedPill13/07/18 03:44 AM
3

You've got it backwards. Incels are MGTOWs in denial. MGTOWs know they can get laid if they just up their game. Even if they're ugly losers (and yeah, I bet quite a few are). They're making a choice not to pursue women. This is not an entirely invalid choice, and as long as they're OK with it it's not my business. Incels are going their own way, but they're whinging about the choice they made. Now seriously, fuck your noise about "3/10 losers". Take it to the nice guys sub if you want to bitch a…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/18 12:01 AM
2

Here's his Youtube channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/andrewnolch/videos Mostly his "Knowledge Report" on independent Scientology. A bit about chemtrails (I can't tell whether he was serious or not). Flying saucers. Psychics.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:32 AM
2

male feminists I had to check that no-one else had said it lol.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:29 AM
1

Roughly speaking, for every single woman there's a single man. I guess neither are trying hard enough. Like most gender issues, it's not entirely symmetrical. Guys need to try way harder to get into a relationship, while women need to try harder to get into a good, stable relationship.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 12:58 PM
2

Elton might be chopped liver now, but he's 71 and not exactly in shape. The same age as Arnold Schwarzenegger and Iggy Pop who have kept in better shape. The same age as Hillary Clinton. Yeah, men have a biological clock but IMO it just doesn't tick as loud. And now my internet search history is really fucking weird.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 10:41 AM
2

11% LGBT in a population that is 2% LGBT, and they say they need more lesbians (because there's too many gay men?). OK, the BBC will naturally skew younger and more educated, so it's not too surprising. IMO it's not that odd that there's a lot of gay men. Entertainment / media is a glamour profession, so it's very competitive and will tend to underpay (unless you become a star). IIRC (I could be wrong) gay men are often in glamour professions because they can afford to follow their dreams withou…
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:36 AM
10

Examples of women in guilds: http://www.antithetical.org/restlesswind/plinth/wimguild2.html Generally the husband (the head of the household) was recorded as the tradesman, but the wife was involved, some of the evidence being that widows frequently continued the household business.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 03:05 PM
11

"Back in the day" could mean "the period from 1932 to 1939 in Minnesota" (I just made that up) or "from the early 1300s until 1967 in most of Europe" (I also made that up). From the article, it seemed to have mostly been a thing during the interwar period. The OP is saying women NOT working is a modern (1850 onwards) thing.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 03:00 PM
1

If a man says it: "Women, amirite". If a woman says it, agree then ask for a sandwich. Then chuckle at the reaction.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:18 AM
14

I assume it's still relevant after about 20 years: Fighting Back Works: The case for advocating and teaching self-defense against rape. Yes, women can be taught not to get raped. It's not 100% effective, but unless you're insane and think that society is actually teaching men to rape (e.g. you're a self-described feminist) then it's not a bad idea. Some men are just shits (as are some women, but who cares because biologically speaking they can't do as much damage).
/r/MensRights28/06/18 01:44 PM
3

"Don't say that, he might get a girl in trouble" has resulted in a society where getting blind drunk and sleeping with another blind drunk person is how a lot of college-aged kids seem to hook up these days. This lack of competence (in men) isn't making women safer, on the contrary it's a part of what feminists claim is a "rape culture" on campus.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/18 09:22 AM
-2

You're getting downvoted. Not all feminists are that bad, but if you want to go lurk on a terf forum (the feminists who hate anyone who ever had a penis so much that they're willing to even lose their feminist friends over it by hating on transwomen) - have a look at some very fresh from the terf subreddit - https://archive.is/0uA39
/r/MGTOW10/06/18 11:24 AM
1

Yeap. If society wants to criminalise casual sex with drunk people (because we want to protect people from their stupid decisions while drunk) then it should be perfectly reasonable to charge them both. If two drunk drivers hit each other, then you don't let one off the hook because they were somehow slightly less responsible. If two men (or two woman) have a fight in a bar, the police will often arrest them both. There's plenty of cases where a victim can also be an offender. Of course, "rape" …
/r/MensRights01/06/18 11:57 PM
1

Most of the comments are probably male redditors. "He's not good enough for you, you should break up with him and find a nice guy like me".
/r/TheRedPill16/05/18 09:01 PM
3

You can have a good job, be down to earth, not picky nice, responsible, a good body and still get shot the fuck down. That doesn't sound like someone people would want to have casual sex with. It sounds like a long-term relationship prospect, so standards will be waaaay higher. Like, what is your ideal casual hookup like? A trainwreck who won't be clingy and will be out of your life for good in 3 weeks may not be classy but it seems safe. Good job, down to earth, responsible ... that's just a st…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/18 11:18 PM
6

Yes. Imagine if a woman is saying "no" to every guy who tries to initiate. She pushes them all away except for a couple of nice guys who hang around waiting for the right time. And there's no right time to escalate things with the nice guys (not necessarily because there's anything wrong with them but shit's now more complicated and difficult and they weren't even closers to start with).
/r/TheRedPill06/05/18 11:09 PM
7

I’m not sure I buy that women are inherently solipsistic People are inherently solipsistic, not just women.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/18 06:13 AM
5

I think the real problem Indians have with him isn't that he's a really offensive character (he's not at all harsh by Simpsons standards) but that he's one of the only well-known (by non-Indians) Indian character. Like, who else is there? Mowgli from The Jungle Book, the Indian guy in Big Bang, Captain Nemo, ... there's really not many. Even famous Indian people, there's really not so many in popular culture (other than Ghandi). So Apu has to bear a lot of weight on his shoulders. inb4 I'm unedu…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:51 PM
1

If you demand a special product for your own gender, you pay more. Go to a car dealership and ask for a really "manly" car, and see if they give you a really good value deal. Or get a really "manly" gaming pc. Or just about anything. If you insist on purchasing something that's needlessly gendered, you're showing the company / salesman that you're entitled and insecure, and will probably pony up a bit of extra cash to make yourself feel better.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:51 AM
2

Societal or innate? Men are seen as disposable, women are not. Men are told to take risks, and try to handle shit on their own - this is a strength and a weakness. Women are told the opposite - this is a strength and a weakness. Innate differences - men are naturally comfortable working with things, not people. Men are natural risk takers. Men are stronger, but may be less able to deal with some illnesses (testosterone is thought by a lot of people to put your body in "battle mode" more than "su…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:03 AM
5

TwoX is going on about implicit bias, despite its effects often being vastly overstated. Researchers from the University of Wisconsin at Madison, Harvard, and the University of Virginia examined 499 studies over 20 years involving 80,859 participants that used the IAT and other, similar measures. They discovered two things: One is that the correlation between implicit bias and discriminatory behavior appears weaker than previously thought. They also conclude that there is very little evidence th…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 10:50 AM
5

Those links are kind of goofy. Still, Matt Easton (the big Youtube historical martial arts expert, his main field being British Empire stuff) notes that the general sentiment of the colonial troops was that Indians were some the best swordsmen in the world (and the British troops had fought virtually everyone).
/r/TheRedPill15/04/18 10:26 PM
4

Failing fast (by being direct) gives you more chances to improve your game. Having good game doesn't let you be direct. Being direct is what lets you learn better game. This (and the vanilla self help crap like lift, be confident, etc) is all that's really important on this sub.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/18 02:12 PM
20

Just tell them to raise their standards if they keep dating guys with dick cheese. Or point out that given the prevalence of yeast infections if they think circumcision is OK do they also advocate trimming the beef curtains. You should probably then point out that you wouldn't advocate for either, and that mutilating babies because you think they might not wash enough as adults is something you'd expect from a bad mother in a Stephen King book. Also, if you want to actually change people's minds…
/r/MensRights01/04/18 11:09 AM
16

Maybe ask why they're not worried about all the causes. Should we tell women to stop liking guys who can support them, or tell guys to only date women who can pull their weight? Should we push women towards dangerous occupations? Should we expect women to stop worrying about a work-life balance, or tell men to stop working so hard (and if it's the latter, note that this means lower standards of living for families). Also, ask if it even matters that there's a wage gap. It only really crops up in…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 11:53 AM
3

It wasn't always the case. The British Union of Fascists had a lot of Suffragettes join - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Union_of_Fascists#Relationship_with_the_Suffragettes Note, the suffragettes were the militant feminists who tried to get women the vote by assaulting politicians and police officers, vandalizing artworks, and burning down buildings. They actually set back female suffrage, as a lot of politicians looked at them and said "that's why women shouldn't have the vote".
/r/MensRights23/03/18 07:03 AM
7

A lot of "MRAs" are really just anti-feminists. Is that a bad thing? Feminism is a highly reductionist lens which reduces all gender issues (and many other issues too) to being all about patriarchy. Men (as a group) have power. Everything bad is men (as a group) oppressing women (as a group) in order to maintain power. This is dumb because there's often other reasons. Name any "gender" issue and there's often a huge range of issues behind it, and it's virtually never as simple as "le patriarchy"…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 02:30 PM
9

I was going to say "bullocks, I bet she just survived a harrowing attack and shot in a state of panic". Nope. FTA: In the video, you can see Williams walk into the bond's office and takes a seat. Later in the video, Carey gets up and locks the door and tells Williams to put his hands behind his back. Williams tries to walk away and he asks "Why are you doing this for?" He then makes his way over to a balcony window, which you can't see on camera. Carey then grabs her gun from her drawer and shoo…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 09:55 AM
2

Notice how they'll never say "If your girlfriend / wife does X wrong, and you're not happy, just man up and dump her".
/r/MensRights10/03/18 12:09 PM
2

I read there was video evidence of a previous case. http://www.poliscirumors.com/topic/metoo-jorge-dominguez-is-the-harvey-weinstein-of-political-science Innocent until proven guilty and all that, but IMO he may be in trouble. Also, afaik he's not a male feminist. Not all sex offenders are male feminists.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 06:48 AM
3

Who watches the TV though? Streaming is where it's at. I don't think my TV is even tuned to pick up a station.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 06:24 AM
14

Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson is one of the highest paid actors in the world. He wakes at dawn every day and works out like a maniac. He's very likely taking human growth hormone and / or steroids, which has associated health risks. This is on top of diet, having to learn lines, and so on. I doubt many people on reddit have half the willpower it takes to make the sacrifices he does, no matter what the pay. Jackie Chan is another of the highest paid actors, but it's kind of unfair to complain about a…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:10 AM
1

UNICEF (quite a feminist organisation) seems to suggest this is a little bit of nonsense - https://blogs.unicef.org/blog/cash-transfers-whats-gender-got-to-do-with-it/ As does worldbank - http://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/should-cash-transfers-be-systematically-paid-mothers Our results on the transfer recipient’s gender suggest that the assumption that it is always better to give transfers to the mother should be questioned or at least nuanced. This is somewhat surprising given the exis…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:20 AM
3

Either "toxic masculinity" actually means something, and it's probably the wrong diagnosis (criminologists, psychologists, and police officers have a far better idea than feminists). Or "toxic masculinity" is so vague and meaningless that it adds no new information to the discussion, and it's literally just a waste of time listening to these idiots.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:26 AM
3

She probably didn't need the money and was pissed off at the BBC for some other reason. When people say "pay me more or I quit" there's usually some other reason. People don't quit over pay (unless they got a much better offer elsewhere), they usually quit over conditions or because they don't like their boss.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 11:05 PM
5

Often it refers to Critical Theory (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory). Yes, it's a vague term that's used by conservatives not marxists. Just like there's no such thing as "trickle down economics" unless you're using it as a snarl word (often but not always attacking supply side economics).
/r/MensRights28/02/18 01:41 AM
3

We live in a patriarchal society. Everything is society's fault. So everything is patriarchy's fault. QED meninists! /s
/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:18 AM
22

It's misquoting cherry picked statistics (I think it was "of the last X under Y years old only one ...").
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:43 PM
7

"Mensrights" or "MRA" used to be the snarl word used to describe everyone in the "mannosphere". But then people started pushing back with "actually that's TRP" or stuff, so they use "incel", because pretty much no-one defends the r slash incel community.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 03:24 AM
3

Well, I don't think he has anything particularly interesting or enlightening or original to say. To be fair, simply not being completely full of shit can actually be an achievement, depending on the market. His book is sold in the "self help" section, so the bar is pretty low.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 12:04 PM
1

The Chevalier lawsuit offers a different spin on the debates that played out on Google’s internal email lists and message boards, which the attorney David Lowe described in a statement as “a cesspool of bullying and harassment”. Google failed to prevent employees from using the internal platforms to discriminate against marginalized groups, the suit alleges, allowing Google employees to call LGBT co-workers “immoral” and post statements such as:“If we have fewer Black and Latin@ people here, doe…
/r/MensRights24/02/18 03:21 AM
8

If you look at these articles, they're often "every annoying thing your partner ever does". It's the result of selection bias. They don't look at normal relationships (where people disagree and even have arguments). They look actually abusive relationships, and declare everything that they don't approve of as a sign of abuse. Control just means there's a disagreement. They can say it's all about whether the control (disagreement) was reasonable or not but obviously this is very subjective. Abuse…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:19 AM
7

Most common STDs effect women worse than men. The same goes for abortions. Pregnancy and childbirth obviously. While MRAs might argue that having unwanted children can effect men more than women (or just differently), certainly neither gender gets a free pass. Condoms at my university were freely available in the women's only room (as well as a few other locations).
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:51 AM
2

To use this feature, they need a phone, which can already be used to "send some b.s. signal to the local police station".
/r/MensRights11/02/18 04:59 AM
1

It's not just about people turning to the alt right. I'm not a US citizen so I couldn't vote (well, not legally). I wouldn't have voted Trump though. I'm not a conservative. Would I have voted Hillary? Would I have bothered to go all the way to a polling booth, waited in line, then punched in a candidate I was lukewarm on? Sure, I think I would have, but there's a small chance I'd have just found something better to do with my time. 2020 is gonna turn the map blue with Trump clowning around (doi…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 10:07 AM
3

Much like someone using the term rabid or radical feminist. "Radical feminist" is often a fair accusation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_feminism Radical feminism is a perspective within feminism that calls for a radical reordering of society in which male supremacy is eliminated in all social and economic contexts.[1] Radical feminists seek to abolish patriarchy by challenging existing social norms and institutions. This includes opposing the sexual objectification of women, raising pub…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:24 AM
2

It's against certain diversity policies. But you could say the same about the Harvard Business Review then, which also points a lot of diversity programs are bad (and are actually bad for diversity) - https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:22 PM
12

The scientists whose work he has grossly misrepresented to support his ridiculous claims are probably champing at the bit to have their say in court. You'll have to get more specific than that. Start at the top. Which specific claim (please quote his memo, do not paraphrase like most of the idiots squealing about how wrong he was) do you feel is the most misrepresentative?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:46 AM
10

"White male conservative" isn't a protected class so you can fire them at will. California protects political views, so yes it is. And "at will" doesn't mean you can fire someone for any reason, it means you can fire them for no reason. The court simply has to be convinced that it was his political views that led to his firing. IIRC there were public statements to the tune of "We think his views might offend female co-workers" which makes it pretty clear that its his political opinions (protecte…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 02:34 AM
1

Another random thing, IIRC that some psychologists quite like male clients, as they tend to go in with a goal and want to solve shit, and can be on the mend in relatively few visits. The stereotype of "the patient has to want to get better" - men usually want to get better.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 03:54 PM
1

I've checked the research, but don't have it here. Most men are generally pretty healthy, healthier than women (it turns out that stressing over little things and sharing every emotional burden with all your friends in unproductive co-rumination isn't always healthy). See also, sex differences in neuroticism. It's only a few on the extreme who really have bad outcomes, but they tend to have really bad outcomes. The problem is, when men do need help they don't get it. Most of the time, they deal …
/r/MensRights05/01/18 03:14 PM
11

I disagree with most of this. There's only 3 reasons: Justification. If you're friends with a woman and there's "nothing there", then she'll rationalise it as "he's just not my type". Most of this article is justification - "I don't like my orbiter because X, Y, Z; don't just me it's all about him". Double standards - if you're "nice" then you're "relationship material" and women will think "gee, what if I get stuck with this guy, is he really my 10/10 soulmate?". If you look like short-term rel…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 10:14 AM
1

Obviously a joke / attention seeking. But it's pretty telling how they otherwise seem to think you have to be very careful with how language is used, how harmful jokes can be, and so on.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 01:49 AM
2

I'm pretty sure if I worse a muscle shirt, short shorts, and a codpiece to work I'd get accused of sexual harassment. Quite rightly - women shouldn't be forced to see that shit, just like men shouldn't have to look at under-dressed women.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:41 AM
1

While Trump's a dickhead, I think people over-estimate how much impact the President actually has.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:30 AM
3

The difference is, she's saying that Rosa Parks and the Masterpiece Bakery were cases where it was someone without "privilege". Feminism is very reductionist this way. There's always a "privileged" class and the "oppressed" class. It's never the case that there's shades of grey, and that there can be harmful discrimination that goes in both directions (possibly more in one direction than the other, but it's still all harmful). In fact, they almost seem to think that anything discriminatory that'…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:28 AM
12

The REAL problem is that no-one will say what is acceptable. Men and women (generally) want to be in a relationship at some point. It's men doing most of the heavy lifting (in terms of risky initiation). And men are simply not told how to go about it. Yeah, you can go to TheRedPill and maybe get some OK advice (and some terrible advice). Or ask your mates. But the vast majority men learn how to hit on women by hitting on women, sometimes causing a bit of offense because they don't know what they…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 04:38 PM
2

What do they mean by "privilege"? Men are naturally virtually always physically stronger than women. Yes, any crime that requires physical strength will have men as the main offenders. Just like how most serious dog attacks are larger dogs, not chihuahuas. Men are not worse people (at heart), they're just physically capable of way more violence. Plenty of women would commit violent crimes if they could bench 120 pounds. On the other hand, I've NEVER heard of a guy who had a woman ask consent bef…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:43 PM
14

we know who took all those pictures of you, alone on a beach, on a jet, on a yacht Worth noting that not all these women are prostitutes. A lot of them have a husband or boyfriend taking the photos, and faking a life of leisure for Instagram likes is their hobby (and probably a source of financial problems for their SO). So often you're being charitable if you think they're making $1000 / hour to drink those cocktails, often they worked 6 nights at McDonalds then had a screaming fight with their…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/17 11:23 AM
8

Note, nobody is saying it's OK to beat the shit out of someone half your strength, even if they start a fight.* The issue is, that policy aimed at preventing domestic violence will work a lot better if it addresses the real issues. Protesting the wage gap and "gender roles" won't help if the main contributing factors are women's violence against men, poor anger management, drug abuse, poverty, and the like. *Sure, it's funny to look at it in a funny Youtube video (as long as the loser is a guy -…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 06:07 AM
3

Or "it's creepy when a guy does it in a hamfisted way". Or "it's creepy when a guy does it at the wrong time". Whatever. That shit's subjective. Just use a bit of common sense, and don't be too over the top with aggression (either sexual or other) and don't be a pussy either - both extremes are really bad.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 10:52 PM
15

Don't be aggressive, be assertive. Of course, there's no real difference between aggression and assertiveness, other than aggression being maladaptive (bad) assertion. Basically, if being pushy to a waiter gets you a free meal, it's assertive. If being pushy to a waiter makes you look like a dick, it's aggression. The US is assertive when it threatens North Korea because it's a winner. North Korea is aggressive when it threatens to US, because it's a loser. There's no real distinction, other tha…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 08:31 AM
2

we can avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. I will focus on three Let's go one by one: conflating a wide range of behaviors as equally harmful Now, it's partly a result of mainstream feminist theory being extremely reductionist. If calling a woman "sweety" is part of rape culture, then it's really bad, right? (LoL). broadening the definitions of illegal acts and hardening their punishment, when the laws we already have are good—they just need to be enforced This seems to largely be a conseq…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:22 AM
5

Victims of domestic violence will also not be held liable for actions they may have taken in encouraging or causing former partners to breach an injunction. It's almost a good idea. To be a good idea, they'd need to actually realise that most DV is reciprocal. Very often, both partners are abusers. Or one is the main abuser, but it's not clear who. Change unilateral AVOs to bilateral "stay the fuck away from each other" orders, and it would make a lot more sense.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 02:49 AM
2

I'm pretty sure that feminists hate cheerleading and the NFL too. They just don't get attention when they rant about it.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 12:24 AM
1

I'm pretty sure posters are only in male bathrooms.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 10:33 PM
1

Some studies suggest that the most common cause of injury in bilateral situations is women hitting men, and the men hitting back. A guy who loses his shit in an argument and slaps a woman isn't likely to cause harm. A guy who deliberately engages in unilateral "abuse" (the feminist model of power + control) is pretty rare. It's the guy who is getting physically attacked who causes serious harm. Not too different to male on male violence. The other big reason men cause more serious injuries is th…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 10:28 PM
23

I'd be fine with it if it was some goofy bullshit reality TV show and the "victims" were models who signed up for some raunchy ratings-grabbing bullshit. If it were a serious show about a real workplace environment, and the models were signed on to be serious participants, I'd find it a bit off. I'm not familiar with The Apprentice though, so I'll reserve my judgement.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 10:18 PM
5

The tender years doctrine is the legal presumption that mothers are better parents than fathers.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:06 PM
2

"My son will grow up the kind of guy who is featured on r slash niceguys"
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:37 AM
27

As the old joke goes ... Q: What food will make a woman gain 40 pounds just by eating one bite? A: Her wedding cake. It's hardly just a Western European phenomena. Or as the other joke goes: Marriage is a union between a man who hopes his wife won't change, and a woman who hopes her husband will; both of whom will be disappointed.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 01:24 AM
1

Skills can be broken down into procedural and traits. Knowing "how" is a procedural skill. Having the right attitude is more a trait. Traits can be dialed up and down situationally, but people have a bias to them. You don't "learn to clean your room". That's trait based. You can get into the habit of cleaning your room. And you can learn tricks to make it easier to do this. Social skills are both things you learn, and habits you get into. And obviously you may get better if you get into them (th…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/17 09:20 AM
8

20 something, 2 kids, she's probably 18 years away from the next chance at a solid relationship, by which stage she's pushing 40. Claiming she's "beaten some chump adversary" is a lie, and it's probably not really aimed at you.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/17 12:20 PM
8

Even if you only care about preventing violence against women ... Let's say there's a guy and gal who fight a lot. Let's call the guy Micheal, and the girl Britttany. Neither has particularly literate parents, and both of them have issues with anger management and substance abuse, and limited financial means. We're talking about statistically likely offenders. After a big fight in which Britttany physically attacks him, Micheal goes to a shelter (where else will he go?). He gets turned back, bec…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 05:10 AM
2

Or tell men to not hook up with a woman who won't pull her weight, financially speaking.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:32 AM
2

Well at least he's honest about what he believes.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 03:46 AM
6

She's a big TERF which, when you read her articles, is clearly borne out of her hatred of men. All TERFs hate men. They hate men so much they won't risk letting anyone with a Y chromosome into their clubhouse, even if that means being forced out of "mainstream" radical feminism into an even crazier and less well respected clubhouse.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 09:56 AM
1

I've seen the cucks, autistic losers, time wasters, and internet tough guys here, but not so many white knights. Do the nice guys just get their posts deleted?
/r/TheRedPill30/10/17 07:25 AM
2

Is there a link to the full article? I'm just wondering whether it's referring to men who had bad mothers, or women who had bad mothers. Or both.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:50 AM
2

I've found "Nice Guys" works better than "White Knights".
/r/MensRights22/10/17 12:34 PM
15

Best part: the article notes men are choosing to be friends with each other because "men saw their female romantic partners as judgmental, and as the primary regulators of their behaviour. Sounds like "abuse" by the nonsense feminist definition in which anyone who disagrees with you in an unreasonable manner is "abusive", because they are trying to control you. Obviously it's mostly self-diagnosed, and isn't really supported by psychologists or criminologists (let alone people with common sense)…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/17 08:57 AM
9

"he's a man, so he can / should be able to handle it" IIRC, the leading cause of violence against women is men eventually "handling it".
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:42 PM
1

Does a T_D pots history tell you he's serious, or a shitposter?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 06:40 AM
12

To be fair, it's not clear if Suu Kyi is anything more than a figurehead. The military is still probably running things behind the scenes. Of course, the military may think that now they have such a figurehead, they can get away with this kind of thing with less fear of international involvement.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 11:26 AM
12

If a schoolboy were dressed in such a way that he was practically flashing his bits to classmates, he'd be getting a talk about sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 09:54 AM
1

tl;dr - Fox news opinion piece on how the "alt right" (or any backlash against any part of the extreme left) is a sure sign that "it's happening".
/r/MensRights14/09/17 12:19 AM
3

http://www.news.com.au/technology/science/archaeology/famous-viking-warrior-burial-revealed-to-be-that-of-a-woman/news-story/7c1a4c0053f4cc167676af1bcffa5e37 “The gaming set indicates that she was an officer”, says Hedenstierna-Jonson, “someone who worked with tactics and strategy and could lead troops in battle”. Remember, if you get buried with "gaming set", it means you're a high-ranking officer. And if you've got a sword and horses, it's because you're a soldier. You couldn't be trying to lo…
/r/MensRights13/09/17 11:46 PM
1

No, it just means you have a sense of humor. I hope the person who posted it does, but you get all kinds of morons on the internet.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 01:46 PM
3

Some results I found on Twitter: The next person who uses the word victimhood to mock feminists, Muslims or Dalits will get a punch in their face. if a white man in a fancy hat ever tries to tell you his opinion on feminists, just punch him in the junk and run To be fair, there's also this crap: I punch sjw and radical feminists just as many times as nazi's. Everyone is a fuckin restrictionist these days.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:55 PM
1

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/11-gender-equality.pdf
/r/MensRights12/09/17 06:17 AM
4

oops, 24/16 not 16/24. Good point.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 03:16 AM
1

It's amazing how they avoid mentioning male and female murders in ways that can be compared. A woman killed every 16 hours. So that's what ... 240 a year. Honduras has a population of 9 million. It has a murder rate of 60-90 per 100,000 (which is terrifyingly high). So maybe 5,400+ murders per year. Sure, some of the guys are probably gang members who had it coming, but it's still very concerning. So it looks to me like something like 20-30 times as many men are being murdered. This is like havi…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 12:31 PM
1

the girls view me as "weird, strange" and "nerdy" and treat me as such (always asking me to do favors for them, talk down to me, make sarcastic jabs, etc.). Let's break this down: always asking me to do favors for them This means jack shit. They ask chad to do favors. They ask "beta" guys to do favors. Some women are just lazy and think men (any men) should do all the heavy lifting at work. talk down to me, make sarcastic jabs, etc 50/50 they want to sleep with you if they talk down to you. Beli…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/17 03:36 AM
0

In generations past, women generally made men wait until marriage to have sex. To get a wife (and, therefore, sex), men had to be clean and presentable and have a good job. This, Regnerus reasons, gave men all the motivation they needed to become respectable members of society. Where's his source on that? There's books of sermons that say that's what people should be doing. There's a lot of writing about prostitution (which, at the time, included pretty much any sex outside of marriage). But I h…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/17 11:23 PM
1

Darren told Tom Elliott it led many of the year 10 students, both male and female, to challenge Ford. Some even walked out. Several then exchanged insults online with Ford, which 3AW has seen. Because nothing says "dignified" like exchanging insults with year 10 boys.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:28 AM
1

It's what feminists call a "double bind" - no matter what a woman does someone will criticize them. Because all the world's problems are due to patriarchy, including some people just being assholes who complain about anything.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 05:37 AM
1

Yeah, I suspect the vast majority of "plate spinners" are either making shit up, or just running 2-3 hook-ups at roughly the same time. Basically they're bragging about being a bit of a train-wreck.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/17 10:19 AM
1

So according to you this sub is full of incels Pretty much. Either betas or reformed betas. Chad Thundercock who never listened to the blue-pillers telling him to be a nice guy doesn't bother going here, why should he? I get the point of all the generic self-improvement bullshit. Guys figure out the magic shortcut to get laid (which is all not too hard), then the sub doesn't really fill much of a purpose anymore. Either they can try to spin more plates, or improve themselves to see a slightly be…
/r/TheRedPill26/08/17 09:29 AM
13

Dress well, get a haircut, work out, work on your social skills, professional skills, tone of voice, mentality, view on life and your own interests and passions. This sub is becoming r slash selfhelp If you want to fix your life, do it for yourself. If you want to get laid, stop being a pussy about how you approach women. It's not rocket science. It's not hard. Pretty much every guy who's not an incel does it. It's like not being fat. There's a whole lot of ways to not be fat, but most of them i…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/17 09:46 AM
-2

Is it really? Or are you looking at all the industry which uses foreskins, and would probably find alternatives if foreskins weren't cheap and easy to acquire. Circumcism is mostly just a US thing - most of the world gets on fine without it - which is odd if there's really a billion dollar industry that needs foreskins.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:45 AM
3

Just laugh at them. It's not like they can fire back with humor.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:42 AM
-5

Um, I doubt the hospitals or doctors make any real money out of this. Probably less than they get for charging for the infant paracetamol (aka Tylenol) after the procedure, let alone the cost of the procedure itself.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:26 AM
2

A stopped clock is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:57 AM
13

Betas snap when they realise that the world has screwed them over telling them "don't be a jerk". Then they go "fuck it, I'll be a jerk", and go completely over the top (think a parody of TRP). Or they kill themselves. Or they're miserable all their lives. But hey, as long as you can convince a few men to be "Nice Guys" and stay that way (even if everyone including hates them, including themselves) it's better than a guy being a little rude to a woman at a bar.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/17 03:32 AM
7

Note, that while the Nice Guy is driven by fear and insecurity, they can use Nice Guy Logic to rationalise this as feminism: Indirectness (don't want to objectify women) Nearly all actions based on fear of rejection (need explicit consent before even asking a woman for coffee in an elevator) An obsessive deeply rooted belief to seek approval, especially from women (they want women to tell them they're being good feminists) That their own needs are not as important as a womans (nuff said) There's…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/17 02:19 AM
18

Equality of outcomes or equality of opportunity? No-one is saying that women are worth less than men because most of them would rather go into medicine or law than computer science.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:15 AM
3

I think the other issue is that people don't want to be racist. When it gets to the "are you racist?" part of the test (which is really obvious) then you'll naturally be a little more cautious.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:53 AM
1

I think part of it is that men are much more likely to "get over it" than women are - especially women self-identifying as feminists. So they think women are more fragile?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 11:56 PM
2

tl;dr - women are 45% of math grads (which leads to teaching jobs), but 20% of computer science grads (which leads to boring programming jobs)
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:28 PM
3

upon request People with poor social skills can sometimes struggle to do this. Oops, sorry, is this victim blaming?
/r/MensRights06/08/17 03:25 PM
2

If they had the power they would kill you. That's a little over the top. Just because most of them hate men doesn't mean that any more than a minority of them would actually resort to such extreme measures. They despise you for your mere existence. That doesn't many of them actually want to kill all men. The more you apologize, the more you bend to their will, the more they will hate you and try to ruin you. Not untrue. You can't apologise without "mansplaining". You can't participate without "c…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 03:20 PM
7

Reconsider making Unconscious Bias training mandatory for promo committees. We haven't been able to measure any effect of our Unconscious Bias training and it has the potential for overcorrecting or backlash, especially if made mandatory. Some of the suggested methods of the current training (v2.3) are likely useful, but the political bias of the presentation is clear from the factual inaccuracies and the examples shown. Spend more time on the many other types of biases besides stereotypes. Ster…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 01:40 PM
1

Seems to have a lot less activity than Gender_Critical, which is pretty much the same (but they hate men so much they don't allow trans-women in case they're spies for the patriarchy). I'm barely twisting the facts here either - generally TERFs hate men way more than other radfems.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:59 AM
5

Lifting is a good idea, but for other reasons. IMO, this sub has turned into a self-help sub, because a lot of the regulars are in long term relationships (or getting into short term relationships with sufficient frequency that they no longer need to up their game) and are now focused on other stuff.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/17 12:26 AM
8

confrontativeness: 3.13 arrogance: 2.64 muscularity: 1.85 faithfulness: -2.27 So women would rather fuck a rude, arrogant, unfaithful fat guy than a polite, humble, monogamous guy with abs. Good to know.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 11:31 PM
1

Nick Lutz blocked his ex-girlfriend’s cellphone number and on every form of social media. So she handwrote him an apology letter and tucked it under the windshield wiper of his car. LoL, sounds like he should have gotten a restraining order instead.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:19 AM
3

It's either that or he fell onto her knife.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:51 AM
1

In actual law, there's often a "reasonable person" clause, either implicit or explicit. I.e. if the judge thinks you're just being a precious piece of shit then you'll really struggle to win the case.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 01:16 PM
10

In cases when mothers kill intentionally, Meyer said there is often another influence, such as mental health issues, postpartum depression or the loss of a close loved one. The vast majority of murderers are pretty fucked up people. It doesn't mean they didn't know what they were doing, which is the usual test for whether someone is mad or bad.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:37 PM
1

where tolerance and broadmindedness consists of admitting that lower-class Muggles can occasionally have the same genetically-mediated gifts as the gentry One of the great things about Sci-Fi / Fantasy is it can be used to show how stupid certain prejudices can be. In The Power of One, the main character is bullied because he's English, and the Boer students don't like the English. Kind of a similar thing, but was it accurate? Did the author misrepresent some aspect of this dynamic? If you're sa…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:56 AM
2

There are two major disparities in domestic violence. First, in mutual combat the woman will typically get the more serious injuries. Second, men are more likely to be the "crazy ex" who attacks their partner / children. The first is pretty easy to understand. If Rhianna attacks Chris while he's driving because she got jealous while reading his texts, and being a bit of a turd he attacks back, then the woman will likely have more serious injuries just because of differences in physical strength.…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:36 AM
1

There's sexism against men. Men are kind of like Mexicans or old people - a lot of people just would rather they didn't have too many of them around. If a man and woman have similar qualifications, a lot of people will hire the woman, because it looks good and women are somehow special. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect There's sexism against women. Which has a stronger impact? And what's the overall impact? Of course, feminists won't recognize sexism against men…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:31 AM
5

The average guy thinks runway models are waaaay too thin. In fact, if you look at the average porn star (I read somewhere that's a woman with a b or c cup with a healthy body weight) then that's probably what most guys are actually into. Kind of like how woman might have a slightly unrealistic view of what a "ripped" guy looks like, but this is mostly because of hgh using bodybuilders who are trying to please male beauty standards that are made by men.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:52 AM
2

I don’t feel it’s too controversial for me to say that the rules of “Instagram creeping” are slightly different for me, a girl. Um, no, you can't "Instagram creep" on celebrities who want people liking their photos. If you're going through a co-worker's photos and liking them to get attention, that's maybe a little different. But for a celebrity, fuck it, the article explains better: What’s the point of sending a message if the person on the receiving end won’t see it — or couldn’t care less? Al…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 07:28 PM
4

I suspect they'll be divided. More contraception = more women in the workplace = less of an earnings gap. Also less teen pregnancy which has all kinds of messed up effects. And a lot of women aren't too keen on men using condoms as a backup (some of them don't like the feel). On the other hand, a lot of them don't like the idea of men having any control over contraception. Men might lie about being on the pill. Some guys will lie during a hook-up, and say they're on it. Some guys will secretly t…
/r/MensRights04/06/17 10:46 AM
2

tl;dr - A lot of guys who hit women do so because they learnt it from their partner (or a previous partner). You don't want to be a guy who hits women. As they say, don't stick your dick in crazy, it rubs off. If you're both mad, and she hits you, there's a possibility you'll hit her back. And if it's a really big disagreement, not just a joke that offended her, she might not just punch you in the shoulder. Hell, even if you don't hit her back, what if she hurts herself? What if she gets "defens…
/r/MensRights04/06/17 10:08 AM
4

There's really two schools of thought: "Sexism is bad, because all people should be treated on their own merits." Almost everyone can agree with this, so it's a viable moral foundation. "Sexism is bad, but only when it's against the oppressed class". Aside from any rational argument against this (and there are plenty), it's not a viable moral foundation because so many people instinctively see this as unfair bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 08:13 PM
10

As this is a court case it would be in the public record if it were not fake.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:36 AM
2

Studies show that the majority of domestic violence isn't "real" domestic violence (as defined by feminists), but just two shitty people who get mad (and possibly drunk / high on meth) and hit each other. Given these are the majority of cases, even if you don't give a shit about male victims then giving them somewhere to go can be good for women. Sure, there's some cases where a woman in fleeing from a psychotic ex who are in grave danger (men fleeing from a psychotic ex just have to worry about…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 10:36 AM
4

"Feminism is good for everyone" goes back to like the time it started. Like, the final Chapter of "The Subjugation of Women" by JS Mill (https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Subjection_of_Women/Chapter_4) e.g. The second benefit to be expected from giving to women the free use of their faculties, by leaving them the free choice of their employments, and opening to them the same field of occupation and the same prizes and encouragements as to other human beings, would be that of doubling the mass o…
/r/MensRights14/05/17 08:11 AM
1

No, I think she's just a little more moderate than some and is opposing the level of polarization and purity spirals that is happening online.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:10 PM
4

I haven't seen her video yet. Is she going full MRA? Full alt right? Is she just a bit more moderate as a feminist? Is she just doing it for attention? It seems some people are really just reading whatever they want to into it.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 10:04 AM
1

Linguistic differences. "Women" means "feminists". For example, "People keep disagreeing with me because I'm an outspoken woman".
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:38 AM
1

While she's a bit of a cunt, I can see where she's coming from. He left early. When she starts to chew him out for leaving early, he keeps insisting that he didn't leave early and that he had no choice because he'd started early. From his boss's perspective, an employee screwed up and is trying to bullshit their way out of it rather than apologizing and accepting any responsibility. Then he doubles down saying that she's bullying him (I wonder why?). That said ... she kind of lacks management sk…
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:21 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_in_English_law murder is generally defined in law as an intent to cause serious harm or injury (alone or with others), combined with a death arising from that intention A bit more detail: The mens rea (Latin for "guilty mind") of murder is either an intention to kill (per the 2004 binding case of R v Matthews & Alleyne[25]) or an intention to cause grievous bodily harm (R v Moloney,[26] R v Hancock & Shankland,[27] and R v Woollin[28]). In Moloney, Lord Bridg…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:58 AM
1

Public servants never answer these questions, because they don't want to risk misleading Parliament by getting the numbers wrong. And unlike politicians, they don't stonewall with bullshit talking points that have little to do with the question.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 07:12 AM
1

Men and women both have issues. It's reductionist to claim this is all about men vs women (or even something as simple as "patriarchy").
/r/MensRights27/04/17 09:43 AM
2

If you try to punch a boxer in the face, they'll have punched you back before either of you know what's happened. It's not like he gets mad and punches her after she hit him, but had backed off. She'd have deserved it, but it would legally be assault (vigilantism is illegal for good reasons, and corporal punishment has been replaced by other sentences - maybe a week in jail is a more civilised equivalent to a punch in the face). He was simply reacting to someone throwing a punch at him.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:16 AM
10

Gay oppression - get potentially murdered (even today). Risk extremely violent assaults (sometimes of a sexual nature). Lesbian oppression - have people tell you that you're just doing it for attention. Maybe be at risk of sexual assault (probably less than straight women and gay men?). Like, I'm sure it's really irritating to have guys say "You just haven't done it with the right guy, wink wink". Let's say I'm straight. Some LGBT activist tries to tell me I'm actually on a spectrum, and am prob…
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:17 AM
3

I wonder if they host any other controvercial stuff in the uni? Hmm. Another student club ran the "After the War on Syria" conference- http://archive.is/Wk4Pw The "After the War on Syria" conference, organised by the Centre for Counter-Hegemonic Studies, will be held during the mid-semester break from 18-19 April. Dr Tim Anderson will be presenting and chairing in a number of sessions. Now, I'm not saying Dr Anderson is wrong to claim that the Assad was not properly investigated before the US re…
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:09 AM
1

If you're drunk or high and that leads to a child being harmed, the courts will generally look down on it.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 10:51 PM
12

Sure. Hell, Karen Straughan is probably the most uncontroversially popular MRA on Youtube, and is an occasional poster here.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 02:45 AM

Empirical evidence suggests otherwise - self defense classes do quite significantly reduce rapes. Google the research if you want. A lot of "rape" is not particularly violent, it's not by particularly violent guys, it's often miscommunication or a crime of opportunity. It's not about winning the fight, it's about putting up enough of a fight that it's just a little bit risky for the perpetrator. There's also situational awareness, assertiveness, decision making, etc - all of which are useful.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 10:05 AM
3

Wanna bet Google has an earnings gap?
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:28 AM
2

The letter also accused members of buying alcohol for underage students, and paying others to do their homework Well, I'm going to bet that some of the allegations were true. Though you could say that about any large group of college students.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:24 AM
2

If an economist said, "Prostitution is good because it's a career for women without other options, it should be legalised and well regulated" then he'd be vilified by feminists as well as religious nuts.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:38 AM
1

If you have 100 members who go all the time or if you 100 members 60 who go , 40 who don't. Most of the costs are exactly the same. In that case, BOTH those gyms are going bankrupt. 100 members at $2 / day will barely pay staff, let alone rent. Let's try to use a little critical thinking here. Here's a new example: Gym 1: 500 members, 500 regular members. Gym 2: 500 members, 100 regular members. Now, do you think it's cheaper to run a gym with 500 regular members, or a gym with 100 regular membe…
/r/MensRights31/03/17 03:02 PM
1

A gym costs money to run (rent, equipment, staff, etc). A gym only has room for a certain number of people. Let's say a gym has room for 100 members, who pay $2 a day. That's $200 for staff, rent, equipment, advertising, insurance, etc. Probably not profitable (i.e. LOSING money). Let's say they have 60 members who go all the time, and 600 members who are effectively subsidizing the people who actually go. Suddenly it's profitable - because it's got lots of members who don't use the gym.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 02:08 PM
-1

Do you know how gyms make money? Here's a hint - it's not by selling memberships to people who use the gym.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 01:38 PM

Devil's advocate - Men and women are different. I'm guessing women are more likely to buy a gym membership then not actually use it, or use much cheaper equipment. I'm guessing the gym is just trying to make money, by offering a discount to customers who will cost less to service, like how hair dressers might charge less for men with simple cuts.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 12:05 PM
1

Probably because too many men expect gyms to have things like free squat racks 3 nights a week, while a lot of women will sign up and use a treadmill 3 times a year.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 10:42 AM
8

I believe he was teaching about portrayals of masculinity in the literature.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 10:39 AM
4

Do you think she's safe around kids? Maybe you want to figure out how to get an AVO against her.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:26 AM
5

Feminism isn't a serious academic movement. It's a political movement. And a fringe one at that. Why bother asking them for their opinion?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:15 AM
5

That's because it's not a "men vs women" thing. Trying to reduce everything to a binary opposition is just stupid, society is way more complex than that.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 07:01 AM
-3

When you make a claim, you should back it up with sources. That's a claim. Citation please.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:23 PM
2

Private investigator Christopher Butler and former county Sheriff’s Deputy Stephen Tanabe went to prison for their roles in the DUI scam. Butler said he attempted similar schemes about a dozen times to entrap men who were embroiled in child custody battles. Seems pretty dodgy.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:06 PM
3

No, it's also stating the consequences of the norms in a one-sided way. Stating the norms, then giving a very one-sided overview of the consequences is extremely intellectually dishonest.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:36 AM
0

It's the UK, not the USA. The justice system isn't run by prison guard unions on the left, and private prison on the right.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:00 AM
2

Men report being a lot happier about all kinds of things. I think feminists refer to it as "toxic masculinity" or something. In psychology it's referred to as "emotional stability" (a typically male trait) or a low levels "neuroticism" (neuroticism is the opposite of emotional stability). Men look for the positives, because someone has to.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:08 AM
8

Incredibly, John's state of incapacitation was held against him. "Given that… respondent claims not to recall the event, we then must turn to the evidence provided by the Complainant," wrote the investigators. Seems like there's some parallels to Brock Turner. Turner was found to have digitally assaulted a drunk woman who couldn't remember what happened. Turner was also very drunk, but not quite passing out. It wasn't clear whether was any consent - they were both making out beforehand, but the …
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:20 AM
2

Sounds a lot like Brock Turner.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:13 AM
5

inb4 "what's this got to do with men's rights". It is a problem if there's policy built on very shonky statistics, and that policy is aiming to give women advantages in education and the workplace. It's both a problem for individual men, and it can be a problem for the workforce in general. Imagine if a highly productive group (say, Asian Americans, for an example that's not from the 1920s) were given a 100 point SAT penalty just because they were often over-represented at university - would tha…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:30 AM
3

Universal healthcare: doesn't work. According to worldbank, the US spends more per captia on public healthcare than many EU countries. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PUBL.ZS?year_high_desc=true Public education: would also be there in a non-socialist society OK, so you're in favour of a mixed economy (some public, some private), like many "socialists". Hard socialists (basically indistinguishable from communists) who want the majority of industry to be state run aren't too popular he…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 06:50 AM
3

MRAs typically object to there being virtually no shelters for men. It's like claiming feminists object to there being male CEOs because they complain about there not being enough female CEOs. Though I guess there's a fair few feminists who think capitalism is evil. And there's a finite number of CEO positions, so maybe feminists really do want to reduce the number of male CEOs. So maybe this isn't a great comparison. And this isn't just bad for men, it's also bad for women. If a man can't leave…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 03:07 AM
2

If they followed politics in non-western countries, feminists would have made her an honorary male (like Theresa May) - she was a very conservative President.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 10:44 PM
2

It looks like a HR resource. "Successful people" are basically "people we want". Like, there's "Horde information and data". Depending on the environment, it might be a good idea to horde resources. "Operate from a transaction perceptive" sounds like a lot of successful middle managers - they're not working for the greater good of the company, they have their own little fiefdom which they're trying to improve. It really looks like most of this comes from surveys of "stuff I want my co-worker to …
/r/MensRights10/03/17 01:32 AM
1

Devil's advocate - poor, unmarried women may be more likely to get married than poor, unmarried men. I guess that's still a bit fucked up though.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:39 AM
2

So she'd rather say that she likes Trump than conclude that women in politics are often seen more sympathetically? Trump is a "bully". A female politician who goes on the warpath is "feisty". Trump is "dumb". A female politician who shoots from the hip is "passionate". Hillary is "upbeat" and "articulate". A male politician who grins and quotes figures while talking about job losses is "plastic" and "unsympathetic".
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:14 AM
3

That's how their philosophy seems to work. It's all "messy and complicated" but once you understand "power structures" you can just be utterly reductionalist. "Men did this". "That's the fault of patriarchy". There's team men, and team women, and they think team women is losing so they want to help them catch up.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 12:48 AM
1

Because a lot of people think safety and dignity are most important for women and girls. I mean, they could point out that it's usually men who manufacture, deliver, install, and maintain these toilets, but that wouldn't be PC.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 12:04 AM
2

For a recent overview of quotas, maybe see http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=fisch_2016 One of the studies mentioned: http://gap.hks.harvard.edu/changing-boards-impact-firm-valuation-mandated-female-board-representation Furthermore, the introduction of mandatory quotas led to a significant drop in long-term market value of the Norwegian firms. A forced 10% increase of women representation on the board led to an estimated decline in Tobin’s Q (a measure of …
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:45 AM
5

They do, however, have the Socialist Alternative Club, a number of religious clubs, and a Womens' Department (not a club, but part of the "advocacy" departments of the association as a whole - I think there's a bit more funding for the "departments").
/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:20 AM
2

She told the court she was 'okay with it at first,' but later 'sobered up' and 'something clicked' and she didn't want to have sex anymore and 'froze'. If this IS true, then it's clear we need to teach women not to get raped. Like, maybe she really did freak out, but didn't know what to do. It's a common enough occurrence, and it's one that is very easily solved - teach women how to say "no", teach them to call out for help, and teach them to fight back if needed. Yeah, feminists might claim tha…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 01:26 AM
2

I wouldn't even call feminism particularly virulent. It's not like there's that many self-identified feminists. Pernicious, maybe, because of their outsize influence. The problem with feminism is the common reductionist view that the most important thing is structural equality, which means helping women and possibly hurting men - that any measure which only helps men is a wasted effort (and maybe even a bad thing as it widens the structural inequality). You can see this reductinist view when the…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:56 AM
5

There was probably a reason that she couldn't get out of the relationship. There's also reasons why men murder their wives instead of leaving them. It's usually not a good enough reason though.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:59 PM
3

To be fair, those short men will reject them in a few years for being too old.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:12 PM
3

Meanwhile, she is aware that her biological clock is ticking and worries that if she confronts Mark, he will pack his bags and leave rather than take her down the aisle and give her the babies she dreams of. So she's a "nice girl"?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:12 AM
8

A mentally ill non-custodial parent with an AVO against the custodian (in this case the grandparents) allegedly murders their child in Australia and there's not one mention of "domestic violence". Odd.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 09:38 AM
6

A San Antonio police officer was suspended for 10 days in December after he made "racially insensitive and derogatory" jokes while responding to an assault between a woman and man, the latter of whom was issued a ticket for a non-existent crime because the officer wanted to "f--- him over so he [didn't] talk s--t or call and complain." So he was suspended, apparently because he insulted a woman: "What's this girl's name? Laquanda?" he reportedly asked another officer.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 03:57 AM
2

Tappenden and the student, 18, are alleged to have gone back together after meeting for the first time on a night out Wait, what?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:22 AM
1

Weren't feminists pretty pissed at the judge for being too soft when a guy had sexual contact with some black-out drunk woman, even though the guy literally got a prison sentence?
/r/MensRights02/03/17 01:04 PM
8

Even if true, so what? Here's the options: It does so in a self-aware way. Plot twist - the matriarchy is also evil. It does so with a completely straight face, the devs defend it, etc. Hilarity ensures. I won't be pre-ordering though. Not that I would anyway, I've got way too much in my backlog to buy random shit that's not on sale and might not even be any good.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 12:02 PM
1

It's (debatably) OK to spank a kid, and you clearly think women are like children and can't be expected to not hit people. (Spanking / slapping is not hitting). I guess the traditional approach isn't to say "Women shouldn't hit men". It's "Men, don't stick your dick in crazy", which is also a valid approach.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 11:32 PM
3

It's might not be "God I hate black people". It could be just "I hope I don't get reported as racist by a black person". If the majority group is wary of interacting with minority, they may inadvertently ostracize them.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 12:08 PM

“Concepts such as bias and unconscious bias have been constantly harped on to try and change the way we think and speak. The soldiers are hating it.” Whoever is responsible should be fired - there's a ton of solid research that shows that harping on about "unconscious bias" does nothing but create backlash - https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail Voluntary programs are fine. But forcing people to go and be lectured on how racist / sexist they are just elicits a "fuck you" response.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 09:01 AM
2

You probably also think it's OK to slap a woman if she's getting hysterical?
/r/MensRights26/02/17 04:27 AM
7

True, a circumcised dick has less natural lube (the foreskin has a lubricating effect), and is less sensitive, so it's going to be a bit rougher. Though that's a bit like saying "FGM is bad because cut women are worse in bed".
/r/MensRights24/02/17 02:42 AM
5

From the experimental results: Falch says that they find that there is a connection between being positive about gender quotas and distributing more to the losing women. “Those who supported gender quotas, were also more apt to discriminate based on gender,” says Falch.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 02:06 AM
-1

Also, imagine if the guy has been falsely accused. We already know he's an idiot, because he's representing himself. If he does the cross, he'll probably look needlessly aggressive, which will not be smart in a he-said she-said case. I don't think this is a bad law.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 12:21 AM
1

FTA: Rind's study was a meta-analysis of previously published data on the sexual histories of a whopping 35,303 college students from around the world. One thing that set his project apart from most others in the field of child sex abuse was that the data being evaluated wasn't from clinical samples of adults who'd sought help for ongoing problems stemming from their being raped, molested, or otherwise sexually exploited as children or teenagers, but from random samples of college students. And …
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:16 PM
6

It happens, but the outrage doesn't just come from one side of politics.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 08:27 AM
1

The silly thing is, most of the Duluth model is "shit people fight about". Yeah, some people (of either gender) are complete assholes when they fight about stuff. But you will fight with every SO about finance, sex, etc - it's never all rainbows and unicorns. Being able to constructively disagree is what's important. Some people just flip out or act like assholes when they disagree, it's not some patriarchal conspiracy that targets victims, it's just selfish assholes. Most domestic "abusers" (go…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:27 AM
2

Yes, he's a tory.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 12:37 AM
4

There's 60.25 million married couples in the USA. There's 3.3 million Muslims. Either way, the risk is pretty much infinitesimal though.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 06:47 AM
8

I think it's best not to get too outraged over this. There's always going to be a few morons, and clearly the vast majority of the population recognises that the woman was a moron.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 06:45 AM
3

I don't really care that much about this. The bits of social science that have been badly politicized are a joke, and the bits that aren't a joke are still doing OK. It's probably hard for students though - it might not immediately be clear which courses are solid, and which are crap. But that isn't a huge change - there have always been rubbish courses that are basically "long winded rants about what the professor and their peers believes", and "analytic and / or evidenced based courses about h…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 01:26 AM
1

"If you don't like it, there's the door" is probably too harsh. "That's your opinion" might be more appropriate.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/17 07:38 AM
2

This. They think that men are, on average, privileged. And the only cure for this inequity is to fight for things that, on average, help women more than men. It's like how they talk about "systems" and "power structures" and shit. If you strip away all the postmodern word-salad, it's actually extremely reductionist. The big words just act as camouflage so it's harder to realise how simplistic the arguments are.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 02:47 AM
15

"Mainstream" feminism is extremely reductionist. They think that overall, as a class, women are worse off. So anything that helps some women is good (as it's making things more equitable on average) and anything that helps some men is highly suspicious.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 10:22 AM
3

Men kinda need confidence. Like, if you had to summerise TheRedPill into 5 words, it would be "Be confident, fuck women amirite". And they're right about the importance of confidence if you're a guy. It's not just human males that need confidence (which is kind of related to aggression) either - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone#Behavior_and_personality Testosterone is significantly correlated with aggression and competitive behaviour and is directly facilitated by the latter. There are…
/r/MensRights07/02/17 01:19 AM
6

And they can now either follow through, or face blowback from both directions. Anyone remember their "Green Police" Superbowl ad?
/r/MensRights06/02/17 08:17 AM
1

He had conflicting explanations - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4178816/Tinder-profile-Queensland-rapist-Douglas-Steele.html In one instance he said: 'I only put one finger in, I didn't think she would know because she was so drunk.' He also said: 'I only put my finger in and she was already wet.' 'The more I think about it, my finger just slipped in while I was moving her into the recovery position.' All of which sound pretty incriminating. They don't pass out hard jail time in Austra…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:08 AM
5

So all the marginalised identities in the comic have social phobia (https://thiswayup.org.au/how-do-you-feel/shy/)? Not very diverse, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 04:33 AM
2

Defend and protect women’s rights. Eyeroll. We support the Paycheck Fairness Act. From Wikipedia: "The bill would revise the exception to the prohibition for a wage rate differential based on any other factor other than sex. It would limit such factors to bona fide factors, such as education, training, or experience." I'm not sure how this would work in practice. Businesses only give different pay when they need a certain type of "talent", and it really is often a decision that's made by human b…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 12:45 AM
6

Have you ever been shopping with a woman for anything in the cosmetics aisle? It needs to be twice as expensive as the basic version, look right, smell right, and have the perfect fairy dust ingredient. And a lot of women actually prefer it if it's more expensive. Yes, some guys products are similar. For an example reddit will understand, look at the cost of a "gaming laptop" vs a "media laptop" (and spec them with the same GPU). Some idiots pay a huge premium for edgy black plastic and LEDs. Me…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 02:00 AM
6

No, it says there's a lot of semi-autists who can't stand bullshit. And feminism is the left-wing equivalent to Infowars. But because feminists claim they're all about women, people give them a pass, despite the vast majority of people thinking they're nuts. Not that many people here actually give a shit about men's rights (though we acknowledge there's issues that should be fixed), because very few people actually give a shit about men. Yet the whole of society bends over double trying to show …
/r/MensRights19/01/17 08:22 AM
4

Sarcasm is an incredibly common communication mode of mid-adolescents, right after fart jokes become passe. It could just be that they don't know how to spell "cynicism", which is more of a young adult thing.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 11:01 AM
1

While I'm not sure the 1st applies (is Harvard part of the state?), the reasoning behind NAACP v. Alabama (1958) is still partly valid from a moral (if not legal) point of view. I'm not really that supportive of free association for political causes though. It's a driver of the polarisation of ideas - people hide behind their group, and feel like it's not their responsibility to educate people on their opinions, or even be educated on the reasoning behind it - they can just go "well the people i…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 04:26 AM
2

Have you heard of Bax? https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Legal_Subjection_of_Men
/r/MensRights14/01/17 11:37 PM

Your brother has a pretty strong chance of ending up in prison. She's crazy. You don't stick your dick in crazy for very good reasons. Sooner or later they're quite likely to get in a big fight. He might be angry or drunk or maybe driving a car, and just won't be able to hold back. She'll end up with "defensive" injuries to her knuckles, and whatever injuries he caused. Note - it might not even be him who caused them - she might accidentally hurt herself, fake an injury, whatever. If he dumps he…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 11:18 AM
8

The point is that naturalistic fallacies are just that - fallacies. Something is not "OK" because it's "natural", or "wrong" because it's unnatural.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 05:28 AM
6

On the other hand: 奻 = argument 姦 = lewd behaviour. (Chinese, which is generally the same as Kanji) It's just characters.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 02:54 AM
1

women will tell you they like dudes that look like they don't lift but are cut - but that's BS It's also that women who don't know shit about lifting. I see a lot of guys in the gym who lift 2-3 plates, and still look a bit scrawny - serious bulk doesn't take lifting, it takes lifting, increadible nutrition, and usually steroids. They seem to think that if you do a few curls every week, you'll accidentally turn into Ronnie Coleman (which is why so many refuse to do anything other than treadmill …
/r/TheRedPill10/01/17 04:18 AM
4

Who expects that? Other men. Citation needed. There's a small gender difference, but simply saying THAT'S MENS FAULT is rather reductionist - http://www.gallup.com/poll/160124/americans-favor-allowing-women-combat.aspx It's mainly old people who are against women in combat. People more likely to remember conscription, maybe?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:26 AM
1

I thought feminists thought that men being grateful for a woman's time is part of rape culture?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 12:40 AM
2

LoL, the Duluth model. It's basically a list of shit people disagree on. The majority of domestic violence isn't the result of some evil mastermind trying to control the other partner, it's just two idiots who can't disagree without hitting each other.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 12:25 AM
1

I doubt the Qld. Police can do much about some loser in another continent (they're probably not Australian).
/r/MensRights02/01/17 10:59 AM
1

To be fair, Australia has a very limp-wristed justice system. Violent crimes just don't get the hard sentences they often deserve. It might be bias, but generally murder / attempted murder has a very high bar (and sometimes the sentence isn't that much higher than GBH).
/r/MensRights28/12/16 06:25 AM
1

Feminism has no clear definition of what "rape culture" is. It's just stuff they don't like that they think has something to do with rape. And they often have conflicting definitions. Feminists are not taken seriously be most criminologists, psychologists, or pretty much any other group of academics (even ones who know a lot more about crime than feminists). There's a reason for this. OK, let's take the one thing they all agree is part of rape culture - that women aren't believed. Feminism argua…
/r/MensRights27/12/16 06:15 AM
2

Or worse, she'll think you're set on a long term relationship. Not escalating for a guy is like a girl talking about her wedding plans on the first date.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/16 04:30 AM
1

I doubt it. You can teach a negative but it's rarely helpful. "Don't smoke" isn't as effective as telling people to find a displacement activity (chewing gum?). "Don't eat crap food" isn't as effective as saying "eat an apple". "Don't hit back" isn't as effective as saying "go to the police". Of course, if the police are seen to be more likely to arrest the man (even when he's innocent) then I'm not sure what you'd say. "Restrain her and get force her out of the room" maybe (oops that's what Tos…
/r/MensRights23/12/16 05:16 AM
2

As long as the DV industry refuses to educate men on any options when faced with abuse, men will figure out how to deal with it by themselves. Forcing angry men (and who isn't angry if they're subject to abuse?) to figure out what to do isn't always the best for either party.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 10:50 PM
1

They are (probably) cheaper on a unit basis, and they provide less.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:36 AM
1

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/49763#section0 Distinctive features of the VHA system—such as its mission, mix of enrollees, and financing mechanism—complicate cost comparisons with other sources of health care. One useful analytic approach, which was most carefully and comprehensively employed by researchers in 2004, estimates what costs would be if private-sector doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers supplied the same number and types of services as those actually delivered by VH…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:20 AM
4

The government spends more money paying the private sector that it would cost them to do it themselves.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 02:56 AM

Not really. Look at healthcare - the US has some of the highest government spending on healthcare per capita (and has since before Obama, it's not all his fault). It would actually save money by going to a Canadian style system (or a hybrid one like Australia). Privatisation doesn't always work. Especially when the government is still the main customer (through outsourcing, subsidies, vouchers, etc), as private companies are smarter than the government and figure out how to rip off those tax dol…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 02:38 AM
3

Here's a red pill for people who don't particularly agree with TRP (for all the obvious reasons). Nice guys don't want sex, they want a relationship (which includes sex, but that's only part of it). Women don't want a relationship, they want sex. At least, if a guy isn't 10/10, they don't want a relationship, because it's scary to settle. "Nice guys" are basically telling women they are interested in a long term relationship, which minimises their chance of any relationship - a woman would much …
/r/MensRights21/12/16 12:33 AM
5

You're overthinking. It's just immaturity. If you tell a 8 year old he can't be an astronaut, he'll sulk. Because no-one says that, because it doesn't matter what he thinks as long as he's happy, so he registers the disagreement as an attack.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/16 03:19 AM
2

It's not so much that all women are like that. It's that all men make excuses when women are like that. "No, she's not really like that, she'll realise I'm a nice guy / she wasn't emotionally cheating / she needs to find herself by having a road trip through Europe with her friends" ... ROFL It's like when women say "All men are like that". It's not literally true, but it's close enough. "No, I'm sure he really values my friendship / doesn't want to commit because he doesn't want to get hurt / j…
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 04:41 AM
11

No, feminists are impossible to please. They already know the answer (misogyny, patriarchy, women are worse off), so everything is somehow evidence for it. There's not rational framework, it's just "X exists, sexism exists, X must be sexist (with some flimsy rationale), which is partly why sexism exists".
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:13 AM
9

This long timeframe of "bizarre" abuse was described as "unusual" by Judge Sharp, although the police maintained this was because the man held a psychological grip over the woman. Of course. Since it's no longer the 1950s, and they can't claim women are financially dependent so easily (especially in NZ with a strong social safety net) it's now some magic "psychological grip". Yes, there's dysfunctional relationships. But I'm pretty sure feminists aren't lobbying for the police to arrest women wh…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 03:21 AM
1

Genetics is more the shape of muscles. A lot of muscles stop where the tendon begins. If you've got some short muscles with long tendons, you can make those muscle fatter, but they're unlikely to get longer. And yes, genetics do change how much you bulk up, and how strong you can get. But what you eat (and let's be honest, in a lot of cases what drugs you take) changes that as well. But mostly, looking "movie star" fit is about losing fat, while still having a certain amount of muscle. (And yes,…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 12:21 AM
2

Feminists would call this an abusive relationship. I don't think it's helpful, to put all dysfunctional relationships in the "abusive" basket, it's like they just want to blame all the world's problems on oppressive men. It's best to be specific - she was an obnoxious control freak.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 12:05 AM
1

What's dumb is that there needs to be a "downtrodden sex". Like, I'm a healthy guy. I'm healthier than at least 50% of the population. That doesn't mean I never need to go to a doctor. Men have gender specific issues. Women have gender specific issues. Feminists do get this, but think it's irrelevant, as they're wrapped up in this "patriarchy" conspiracy theory - anything to directly help men is bad, because it's giving more "power" to the side that's already got too much power. Completely reduc…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 07:48 AM
2

Men are in fact often their own worst enemies The same is true of women. It's kind of a human thing. A lot of received traditions regarding "masculinity" are wrong, I would even call it "toxic". BUT its not a thing we should allow feminists or tradcons to talk about. The problem is, it's often an overarching term. Pick any group, and start criticising a specific trait that is common on that group, and you can have a productive conversion about whether it's a good thing - the problem is that many…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 06:01 AM
2

Also, rich people are the only ones who pay net taxes. It's just the result of the earnings gaps. If a mother works part time, she'll pay less tax (and earn less). Single mothers have to get child support from some source (and it's not clear to me how the US system is at all functional - it seems focused on avoiding all social welfare even if it means putting destitute fathers in debtors prison). Kids are expensive, time and money wise. Women are more likely to be primary carers (for both good a…
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:36 PM
2

Potential Title IX? I mean, if there's anyone who did a study on "Effects on female something something" and didn't get a 50% reduction in marks then it's pretty clear the uni is penalising students who are interested in male health, so they're discriminating against roughly half the student body.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 07:10 PM
6

Here's another thing to think about - the government should only be able to consider a draft when things are so dire they can handle the political fallout of female conscripts coming back in boxes.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:58 PM
2

The more a country gets to be a social democratic utopia, the less women think the idea of staying up to 3am trying to fix a compiler error in their assignment for a job that pays a few dollars more is a great life choice.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 07:12 AM
1

The same way most sane, well adjusted women do it. You just filter out the dipshits.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 06:35 AM
1

Yep, it's because the stereotype of men as sexual predators. If straight men are a danger to women, gay men must be a danger to men. Of course, being "deviants" the phobia is exaggerated.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 06:05 AM
8

Mutual violence, and substance (alcohol) abuse. What a shock. I thought I heard that domestic violence is only caused by patriarchy, and the links to mutual violence and substance abuse is just a coincidence?
/r/MensRights25/11/16 06:48 AM
6

I hate to make this political, but Judge Larry Noll (assuming there's only one Judge Larry Noll) ran as a Democrat. Noll is now retiring. Apparently his successor as the Democratic candidate is Angélica Jiménez, I wonder is she's also in favour of giving custody to the parent with a criminal record for domestic violence? It's often worth checking ballotpedia whenever there's a US judge, as they often are elected officials.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 06:33 AM
4

The guy writing the article completely misinterprets what the concept of "toxic masculinity" actually means It's a deliberately ambiguous term. Obviously not all masculinity is toxic, just the bad parts. But binding a movement together with "We all agree we hate some aspects of men" is kind of a hate movement at worst, and a clusterfuck that is unable to achieve anything due to infighting and confusion at best.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 03:46 AM
2

Disclaimer, this is all just opinion. "Abusive" is a dumb term, because the bullshit feminist theory implies she's in control. She's not, she's just a bit of a raging cunt who lacks control over herself. People will chime in with "BPD" or "depression" or some shit. It's possible, I don't know. You also sound a bit depressed (at the very least fed up) or codependent, I don't know, I am not a shrink, and real shrinks don't make internet diagnoses. I want a divorce The next time she says it, tell h…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 03:14 AM

This AWALT shit is bull. I get why TRP uses it - it's because a lot of guys (even fairly savvy ones) will white knight a woman if they think she's hot. "Sure, many women are selfish, just like many men, but this one is a unicorn who is a wonderful person and just has a few issues she needs to work through that totally aren't her fault". A lot people are pretty selfish, especially when there's an ugly lawsuit. But not all women are "like that", it's just a meme that's men to encourage a bit of he…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 01:21 AM
3

progress for men and boys should never come at the expense of the interests and wellbeing of women and girls OK, does this mean wellbeing in general of women and girls? Or does this mean that no woman or girl may ever be disadvantaged? Because you can't tackled domestic violence against men without alerting men to the fact that some women and girls are not good people, and don't deserve their victim's time or sympathy.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 01:10 AM
1

Here's "Memory" by Andrew Lloyd Weber - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-L6rEm0rnY Here's "Laudate Dominum" by Mozart - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaEGwph2Qr4 Pretty similar in quality, IMO (aside from the quality of the singer). Mozart has more characteristically Mozarty quirks (the flourishes and those blue notes leading into a new phrase) which some people really like, while Lloyd Webber is a lot more versatile. I wouldn't call Lloyd Webber the greatest modern composer ever, either (tho…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:22 PM
4

Tulsi Gabbard It's worth reading up on her record: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard#Military_intervention Basically she's Bernie Sanders, if Sanders were a 35 year old veteran and didn't have such strong links to the USSR. IMO she's be a bit of a powder-puff on domestic policy, but you could say the same about Bush, Obama and Trump. And she passes my number one ask for the commander in chief - she's got a record of not being too keen on unnecessary wars.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:03 AM
2

No, they'll just hate Trump (and Pence, and the GoP). There's a bit of debate in the left as to why white-collar men feel like they've been left out. Some come to the logical conclusion. The ones who say "Well fuck them, who cares" are then getting told "That's why they voted Trump".
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:20 AM
2

i mean we have emotions for a reason Like almost everything (especially in psychology), emotions can be adaptive and maladaptive, especially if they're taken to an extreme. There was a study on racehorses. They found that the best racehorses are those with average proportions. Average is highly underrated. In many ways, average performance comes from extremes, and great performance comes from being very average. Emotional stability is one of those things where the population average is less than…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/16 02:31 AM

“It’s the muscle memory of 10,000 years that’s in our DNA where we’ve run the show forever,” Moore told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes. “Next Tuesday possibly ― hopefully ― a woman is going to lead the most powerful country on Earth. In other words, the 10,000-year reign is over.” Implying this never happened. Hasn't this guy heard about the Victorian Era? Also implying the US is really that special. The UK has a female PM (and had Margie Thatcher). Germany has one. Shitloads of countries have or have had …
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:20 AM
2

OK, read up on game theory. https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1994/5/cj14n1-13.pdf A revolution is pretty much the same as a riot - no-one wants to be the chump who starts it, because if no-one else joins in then they're fucked. A revolution doesn't just start because a critical number of people want it to. You need a critical number of people acting, because they need to be safe from being targeted; but you also need them to know that their IS a critical nu…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:18 AM
2

I think she's being a bit of a prude, but still, let's remember that even The Gradiuan has called out the damage that the ideological approach to family violence has done - https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/19/australians-are-being-told-that-gender-inequality-is-the-root-cause-of-domestic-violence-but-is-it It’s a long-running debate – psychologists and others emphasise the individual reasons why someone becomes violent, while acknowledging the cultural. Feminists overwhelmingly empha…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 01:53 AM
1

Google "lesbian paradox" - gay men make less than straight men, and lesbians make more than straight women, suggesting that women and men DO make choices based on what choices they think their partner will make. And everyone knows that gay men are generally pretty happy people. Also, BROADEN the topic. "Sure, you say it's not equal. Women have lower pay on average, due to choices. There's a glass ceiling. There's a bit of sexual harassment. These are things we are comfortable having school child…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:34 PM
1

It's not even comedy. It's really just a guy screaming down a microphone I take it you're not a massive fan of Bill Burr then?
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:27 AM
1

I'm not totally convinced. The whole "masculinity / stoicism is bad" thing seems extremely reductionist. If you want a stable financial situation, you generally need to "suck it up" to get there. It can be an issue when guys really need help, but the vast majority of cases (e.g. if someone isn't clinically depressed) then the benefit of "sucking it up" to improve their situation will often outweigh the benefits of getting a hug. Until you get to the most extreme case (completed suicide), men are…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:25 AM
2

Did she get that sick burn from /r/forwardsfromgrandma?
/r/MensRights28/10/16 01:59 AM
3

I've seen this before, the problem is is everybody is assuming that minorities and women are automatically going to vote Democrat this time round. Statistically, they've done so for decades. It's hilarious how they want to pin it on Trump. Well, Trump does turn off women more than the average GoP candidate to an extent, but probably because of policy (women are more likely to disagree with harsh immigration policies). Nate knows this perfectly well, he just dislikes Trump and plays up the "women…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:05 PM
1

AFAIK, the Women's Equality Party isn't that terrible, more just misinformed. It's like a bunch of high profile women heard the "Feminism is about equality" line, decided they were feminists, and formed the party. The main problem people have with her is that a lot of people don't find her too funny. She's actually a good foil (she makes genuinely funny guests more funny) with her deadpan delivery, but she isn't very flexible. Fry was an OK foil, but could also get laughs if the guest was no goo…
/r/MensRights22/10/16 08:17 AM
9

If he had locked a 12 year old on his balcony, there would be no discussion about his culpability. He didn't murder her but IMO he is 100% guilty of negligent homicide. Because women are too stupid or irrational to be left unattended on a balcony? He denied her decision to leave You're sure she decided to leave? Her mobile phone and handbag were in the apartment. Did she actually decide to leave, or was she shouting "I'M LEAVING" while attacking him? forced her on to the balcony to the point he …
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:35 AM
1

Let's say you've got a religion. The Priests say "It just means being a nice person!". There's a few celebrities that are famous for promoting it, and a few normal people who say they're a part of the religion, and they repeat the definition that "It just means being a nice person!". But the Priests (who generally do a postgraduate degree in the topic) are not nice people.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:22 AM
7

Yeah, he shouldn't have. But if someone's physically aggressive with you you don't always have the time, especially if you're just 15 years old, to determine what not to do Yeah, men need to know what to do when attacked by a woman. It happens a lot, and not all men can stay completely stoic and in control when they're being physically assaulted, so they need to know ahead of time what to do.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 01:44 AM

Get ready for the white knights pointing out that a hip throw on concrete is excessive force. True. He could have slapped her. A quick jab would have ended things in an instant. There was no reason to use a hip throw. A "non-violent" take-down like a hip throw can do a lot more damage than a strike when you're not on a dojo with padding on the floors. He shouldn't have used a throw like that, it can potentially be lethal. It makes you wonder, if men were told to slap a woman if she's hystericall…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 01:31 AM
2

Interesting point. The problem is it's hard to implement as grades are typically norm referenced (relative to your position in the class). Yeah, the teacher might say "Everyone can get an A", but you can bet your ass that's not going to be true in practice unless it's a very easy to measure grade like a spelling test or math test. Even on a highly objective test like a spelling test, you can bet that if the teacher sets it they'll take the ability of the class into consideration when setting it.…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 09:06 AM

Because some crazy retard murdered his son (then got shot by the cops), and his ex-wife realised it was violence against women, became an advocate, and became Australian of the year. The woman who murdered about 5 kids and herself? No it would be culturally inappropriate to mention that. Plus it wasn't violence because it was a woman and she must have just been crazy.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 03:07 AM
1

/r/tiadiscussion is pretty sane, but not very popular.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 04:33 PM
4

So if you're dealing with a crazy psycho like this, lock her out of the door and get her out of the building where she has fewer ways of killing herself and getting it blamed on you, then she's the police's problem and not yours An adult is responsible for their own actions, even if they're a woman. If he pushed her out of his apartment, maybe she'd have walked into traffic just afterwards. Without her handbag and mobile phone, would she have had "no other option" than to stumble into traffic, a…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 06:21 AM

It sounds like the kind of program that creates backlash - https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail Do people who undergo training usually shed their biases? Researchers have been examining that question since before World War II, in nearly a thousand studies. It turns out that while people are easily taught to respond correctly to a questionnaire about bias, they soon forget the right answers. The positive effects of diversity training rarely last beyond a day or two, and a number of…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 03:44 PM
119

It sounds like the kind of program that creates backlash - https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail Do people who undergo training usually shed their biases? Researchers have been examining that question since before World War II, in nearly a thousand studies. It turns out that while people are easily taught to respond correctly to a questionnaire about bias, they soon forget the right answers. The positive effects of diversity training rarely last beyond a day or two, and a number of…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/16 03:41 PM
10

It works pretty well with race. If you grow up in a house and neighborhood with all men, then you can easily explain why "male privilege" is like a class thing. But women are just as likely as men to have family connections they can use (which can be hugely important), good role models in the family (also important), etc.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 01:55 PM
5

Um, also a woman will also quite happily tell their SO not to eat or drink something they think is unhealthy. I mean, different people say it different ways. A "passive aggressive" line like "I'd have another myself, but it looks a little unhealthy" or an aggressive "Stop stuffing your face with those, you're fat enough already". Also, what's it with feminists being upset by "passive aggression", I mean, unless you're genuinely upset by someone telling you to stop stuffing your face they're gene…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 03:47 AM
5

There are two coffee shops. One sells five types of coffee, take-away only, no chatting with the barista. Customers walk in, call out an order, and leave with their drink. The customers like good, cheap coffee. The other has thirty different types of coffee drinks, lots of tables, the barista will help you decide on the drink. Customers mill around looking at stuff, ask a lot of questions, and change their mind three times before they purchase. Often, they return the coffee if it wasn't what the…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:08 PM
2

Maybe the Texas then? So what's the Florida of Australia. The NT? Let's see - Googling "NT man" got this - Flying dildo hits bucks party guest, draws blood, and they got plenty of crocs.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 10:14 AM
12

Christian Right or SJW? It's Queensland (the Florida of Australia), so it's hard to guess.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 09:56 AM
2

Relational aggression (hen fights) is WAY more common in girls than boys. A group of schoolboys might insult each other, but it's seen as just mutual pranks / joshing / roasting. They don't do it to hurt each other. They might bully an outsider, but they generally don't bully their friends. At worst, there's a bit of a pecking order, but male friends only pick on someone who is relatively close to their level, and they don't try to gang up on a friend. (Generally speaking). Schoolgirls, nope, th…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 01:09 AM
1

The incident was actually a social experiment to see the public's response Should have guessed. Anyway, it's wrong but it's funny.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 01:00 AM
1

The rationale is that "gendered" products cost about 7% more for women. For example, pink razors cost more than black ones. It's a bit like how you go to a clothes shop where poor people go, it's way cheaper for some unfair reason. Oh wait, no, it's market segmentation and if people choose to pay more then companies will happily let them. Women just love buying expensive toiletries. I'm willing to bet that if pink razors were cheaper, men would just buy them, just like they buy the cheap shampoo…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 11:26 AM
5

So basically they're doing a he-slut walk?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 11:18 AM
8

The only meaningful redress is comprehensive structural change to create material parity. This is what will allow women to enjoy the same independence as men. Translation from Bullshit-to-English: Inflate pay in female-dominated fields to match those in other fields. You misspelled "institute full communism".
/r/MensRights11/10/16 11:15 AM
1

Where the 50s actually the way feminists portray them, or is this just a myth? I mean, in the 50s they did have misogynists on TV shows. You know, the horrible boss who thinks women are idiots or sex objects. But wasn't he the bad guy? I mean, if a bad guy in a movie kicks a dog, does that mean our society is OK with kicking dogs, or does that mean we're really offended by it so it's an easy way to make the audience hate them?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 04:18 AM
6

I was laughing so hard at her claiming she feared having Acid in her face on the way to the cinema. Maybe she thought some crazy feminist might have mistaken her for an MRA?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:15 AM
3

One of the comments sums it up well: After reading about her parenting style, I think he should definitely fight for custody. Her children do not go to school, choose whatever they want to learn, no exams, no rules, go to bed whenever they want, make no friends, never go outside the house unless traveling with parents around the world. He married into a mess! Maybe he can have his own three and she take the adopted three and see how they turn out, like south and north Korea I'm not going to bash…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:18 AM
4

The "rape" accusation only came out when Paula Jones was suing Clinton for sexual harassment (he allegedly propositioned her and exposed himself in a hotel room). There's often a bandwagon effect, though it's not clear whether real victims come forward, or it just results in false accusations. I think the Jones accusation is a lot more believable. I think that a guy like Bill in a hotel room with a woman he's flirting with would quite possibly whip his penis out and ask for a blowjob. Likewise, …
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:26 AM
4

It looks like Cassie Jaye next to him. On the other side I think is Karen Straughan, Warren Farrell, and a few other MRAs. Probably something to do with TheRedPill movie.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 04:49 AM
3

You'll never get feminists on board with that attitude. Here's how to proceed: The foreskin is basically a natural lubricant. Not all women like chafing. MGM leads to desensitization, which means sex is going to involve a lot of hard thrusting. I guess some women like things a bit rough in the bedroom, especially if it's what they're used to, but it may not be a good thing. Hell, I'd get snipped tomorrow if it would make me a god in bed. But the heavy duty "for extra sensitive men" condom effect…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:23 AM
1

And when women end up in hospital, it's not unlikely they struck the first blow. I'm not saying men aren't at least partially responsible for that, but it's easier to teach people to not initiate than it is to teach them not to retaliate. We should be putting some effort into the lowest hanging fruit - teaching women the absolute bare minimum of how to be a human.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 01:34 AM
2

Yahoo was already irrelevant. They were actually making a bit of money, but they were just cashing in on their existing user base. Now they're not even really making money (other than the 2005 stake in Alibaba). It's hard to say whether their decline in profits (not just their inability to make anything that grabbed a lot of new mindshare) was going to happen anyway.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:08 AM
1

There's plenty of things men have a higher standard deviation on. You're right that IQ isn't the only factor.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 06:04 AM
4

And I guess Yahoo tripled its share price since 2012 (when Mayer became CEO), though its P/E went from ~10 to ~100. And let's be perfectly honest, it's safe to say the share price is almost entirely due to Yahoo's 2005 stake in Alibaba.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 02:18 AM

This is a Ghostbusters reboot level shit show. I don't think that's entirely a fair comparison. Ghostbusters was a damp squib in the box office, but I think it still made a small profit overall.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 01:13 AM
2

A lot of discussion about Futrelle. Some of his older writing is interesting. The time he was a conspiracy theorist - http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/whos-responsible-for-this/Content?oid=888047 The time he was a radical Marxist - http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/marx-on-the-skids/Content?oid=888465 Some writing on pornography - http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/reading-the-politics-of-pornography/Content?oid=883416 The time he predicted the alt right - http://www.chicagoreader.com/c…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:53 PM
6

And the main argument seems to be "Paul Elam is a big meanie!". Yeah, Warren Farrell isn't a big meanie. Straus isn't a big meanie. Christina Hoff Sommers isn't a big meanie. They are just quietly ignored.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 11:37 AM
7

The study suggested that 71 per cent of indigenous murder victims are male. Yes, most likely murdered by other indigenous men or women. It's not rocket science. Low employment, low education, living in communities with very low socioeconomic status, substance abuse - all very strong predictors of violence (domestic or otherwise). It's not a gender issue, it's a social issue. I'm not saying I have the answers, you'd probably have to ask a few criminologists, education experts, economists, and pro…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:38 AM
1

In most jurisdictions, self defense is only OK to the extent that it is necessary. If it is only necessary to slap someone in the face to stop an assault, then it's not OK to throw a haymaker. Also, if you defend yourself against a woman then it's probably best to to admit this to a police officer. Even if you don't defend yourself, it's possible you'll be the one spending the night in prison.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 10:01 PM
1

He's a skeptic. He likes to call out bullshit evidence. It's kind of his thing. So for some reason people thought he was some kind of anti-feminist, when he suggested some of their arguments are bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:02 PM
3

But it's sexist against women! Implying women should carry out the UNPAID LABOR of shopping in the mall. Implying men need a break from women (misogyny!) / women need a break from men (truth, but only because of Patriarchy!). Male space. Implying women are primary carers of the whole family unit. Encouraging internalised misogyny (why should women care if their boyfriend / husband is bored?) Reinforcing gender roles. "Pay for" = capitalism. OMG you could do a whole thesis deconstructing the hidd…
/r/MensRights02/10/16 06:55 PM

If the genders were reversed, any reasonable person would say it's because of shock.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:38 AM
13

tl;dr - a woman who was just diagnosed with terminal cancer got snappy when she didn't want chemo (a slight life extension, but there's always trade-offs) and argued with her husband over this. Did she say she thinks that men should never, under any circumstances, ever hit a woman, even if they're dying of cancer and lose their cool for a brief moment? If not, she's not hypocritical. She's just having a very bad day.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:17 AM
3

Sexual violence, childhood trauma and pressures from social media are being blamed for dramatic increases in the number of young women self-harming and having post-traumatic stress disorder or a chronic mental illness. Tumblr? "I’ve heard of PTSD being an issue for women and the report doesn’t surprise me. Lots of people go through awful experiences and PTSD is also being more recognised than it used to be; there’s a rising awareness about it. This means now a lot of young women are more willing…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:45 PM
4

Feminists can go rogue. Look at Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:10 PM
4

Pretty much, yep. The man-haters aren't too keen on masculinity. The radicals aren't keen on gender. I think some of the more aware ones worry that if you actually start looking into how society treats men, you're opening a big can of worms. It's mostly supported now, but I doubt it will last.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:09 PM
6

It seems to be based on a similar project in UNC, which seems to be based on "Positive Masculinities" (which boils down feminist-friendly messages phrased "real men do / don't ..."). Note, "Positive Masculinities" is controversial in feminism, for reasons which should be obvious. But obviously, it's going to depend on the guys running it.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:48 PM
20

MRAs seem to have misplaced priorities and a highly twisted notion of social justice. They fail to understand that claiming your rights doesn’t mean marginalisation and taking away of the rights of the other group. Projection. Most MRAs think men and women have different problems. Mainstream feminism is zero-sum though. Patriarchy / inter-sectionalism is all about reducing everything to a privileged oppressor class, and a victim class, and trying to drag down the oppressors. So of course they ha…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 06:00 PM
2

So do they suggest people call "high maintenance" women selfish and entitled, and "hysterical" women neurotic?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:17 PM
1

Like the Thermidorian Reaction I guess? A bunch of "reactionaries" got pissed off with The Terror, and reacted by removing the Jacobians from power. It's a common theme in Marxist literature. From Mao's red book: Historically, all reactionary forces on the verge of extinction invariably conduct a last desperate struggle against the revolutionary forces, and some revolutionaries are apt to be deluded for a time by this phenomenon of outward strength but inner weakness failing to grasp the essenti…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:23 PM
4

Not a bad article, but it completely missed the role of reciprocal violence. The most common type of domestic violence in young couples is women hitting men, and men hitting back. The type of domestic violence most likely to end up causing serious injury in young couples is women hitting men, and men hitting back. There's also the crazy ex case (generally older couples). In that case, it's usually one crazy perpetrator, and the damage is mostly done when it's a crazy guy. None of these are very …
/r/MensRights27/09/16 12:48 PM
1

Not a bad thing. Self defense classes tend to reduce rape and false rape accusations. There's a study that found about a 50% reduction in rapes. Sure, it is discrimination, but I'm still in favour despite the discrimination. You won't have a self-defense instructor perpetuate feminist rape-culture, e.g. "women have to have sex if a man is a little bit pushy, because they're defenseless damsels". Nope, if there's no lethal threat, there's a few steps women should learn to take (e.g. saying "no", …
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:00 AM
8

'Their job is to be a kid. It is mum's responsibility to be a parent, to call the shots. The young person is not the man of the house; mum is the parent of the house.' Lol, it's all the fault of le patriarch, and not parenting. Right. Still, let's be honest. An awful lot of women with abusive partners are themselves a bit abusive - "there's no such thing as a perfect victim" (well, there can be, maybe 30% of the time). And whether the children are picking up these abusive behaviours (threats, ve…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 09:08 AM
5

If you read up on their kids, these two are exactly the kind of people who will fuck their kids over because they're utterly insane. Or at least, there's one who is (there's conflicting reports). 6 kids. None of them have been to school (they're home-schooled by a bunch of nannies, because their parents are both too busy shooting movies), they get dragged around the world to broaden their horizons, no-one ever says "no" to them, expensive toys (like a whole house that's just for the kids). It's …
/r/MensRights26/09/16 10:15 PM
10

Archive: http://archive.is/GEb4F And let's be honest. Most of these are still alive, despite the best efforts of feminists.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 01:13 PM
1

HOLY SHIT that is some of the most blatant misuse of statistics I've ever seen. The BBC actually wrote a story on this: http://archive.is/tO4mQ
/r/MensRights26/09/16 01:01 PM
1

BAE Systems is a major sponsor. That's a good, feminist organisation, right?
/r/MensRights26/09/16 12:47 PM

he's so unreasonable Is he wrong?
/r/MensRights26/09/16 03:40 AM
3

I think if you read it carefully, he's not having nightmares about the picture frame attack, but about the relationship in general. Maybe there's a broader pattern of hysterical / crazy / abusive behaviour?
/r/MensRights26/09/16 02:19 AM
1

B-but it's not domestic abuse. It's not a pattern of controlling behaviour, it was just an angry outlash during an argument. (sarcasm) That's how they justify this shit. It wasn't "controlling" behaviour, or at least not a pattern of "controlling" behaviour. But, that's bullshit. The vast majority of domestic violence isn't about power and control, it's angry chavs with substance abuse problems who get mad and do dumb shit like hitting each other with picture frames. And 2/3rds of the time if so…
/r/MensRights26/09/16 01:45 AM
2

TIL that Jakie Chan makes more than Jennifer Lawrence.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 03:22 PM
1

Rice's retaliation was disproportionate and over the top. So what would reasonable use of force look like? A slap?
/r/MensRights25/09/16 01:59 PM
16

So Brad Pitt was drunk and they got into an argument on the plane. As a "source" claims, they can all get a bit "boisterous" (gee, actors who sort out differences by screaming at each other, then getting upset at how the other one is "over-reacting" - what a shock). And of course it's getting called "verbal and physical abuse". While it's shit-tier gossip, this article is interesting: http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/chaos-inside-brad-pitt-angelina-8888950 Pitt, 52, had previously desc…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 01:30 PM
1

I will work to the other side of the street to avoid one even though that particular one is likely to not be a (blank), as I can't tell. /r/StormfrontOrSJW Actually, the blank isn't even necessary.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 10:59 PM
16

Sounds like they're both massive dipshits, and could both arguably charged. She slowed down outside his house to give him the finger. He then hopped in his car and followed her. The poor cop had to tell both these assholes to calm down. Yes, he's taking the guy's side, when he's warning the woman. He probably told the guy that if he follows her again then he'll be in deep shit (which is why he was talking to the guy for so long). Of course, he doesn't let them know he's warning the other one, be…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 09:57 PM
6

Not necessarily true though - https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Toni_Schmader/publication/222691589_Attribution_to_discrimination_and_self-esteem_Impact_of_group_identification_and_situational_ambiguity/links/09e41509bc64504f9b000000.pdf Across conditions, however, the more that women discounted ability as a cause of their negative feedback (i.e., blamed discrimination more than ability), the higher their self-esteem. Of course, high self-esteem isn't great if it's effectively having artifici…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 10:26 AM
6

I thought there was in-group bias with women though? And yet females have far more relationship aggression (friends fucking over friends, e.g. the bitchy "she smells, she's not our friend anymore" bullshit). It's weird. I guess a synthesis is that women have an in-group bias towards other women in general ('the sisterhood'), but claw the fuck out of other women in their clique ('the competition'). Men are the opposite. Men hate other men, unless they see them as "bros" (e.g. they've shared a mea…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 10:41 PM
1

Ask them if they'd be better off single, and encourage them to come up with a specific plan for how they'd get out ("just in case"). If they can figure out where the exit is, they might use it. Now, the "abuse" label might not be great - even if they know they're in an abusive relationship, they might suspect other people will not believe it. A more believable explanation is "the bitch was crazy" (same thing, not as PC, but more likely to be accepted by mainstream society).
/r/MensRights19/09/16 04:05 AM
1

Also worth noting, about 70% of domestic violence is reciprocal (and of non-reciprocal violence, it's mostly female perpetrators) - often couples with substance abuse problems / anger management issues / etc who hit each other. When they say "there's no such thing as a perfect victim", it's not entirely true (some victims are innocent); but a lot of victims are also perpetrators. Ignoring violence against men is ignoring one of the largest predictors of violence against women.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:40 AM
7

From the victim statement: He said he had asked if I wanted to dance. Apparently I said yes. He’d asked if I wanted to go to his dorm, I said yes. Then he asked if he could finger me and I said yes. Most guys don’t ask, can I finger you? Usually there’s a natural progression of things, unfolding consensually, not a Q and A. Obviously he was lying. No-one follows the "affirmative consent" script, there's usually a natural progression of things.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 04:11 PM
2

Your understanding of the phrase "social construct" is different to mine. But that's OK. It's just a social construct. We can both be right, can't we?
/r/MensRights17/09/16 04:06 PM
1

The problem is, "social construct" is a bullshit term. It can mean anything from "gender is 100% biologically determined, but our understanding of it is by definition a sociological phenomena" to "gender is 100% nurture, not nature". Different people will read it different ways. Atoms are a social construct. Religion is a social construct. Fashion is a social construct. Everything is a social construct, so it's completely meaningless to say that anything is a social construct unless you're tryin…
/r/MensRights17/09/16 10:06 AM

It's a load of shit. This is all "stuff that people do in a relationship that annoys the other person". Feminists get a bunch of domestic abuse victims, find out what upset them in the relationship, and get things like "He hit me, he was sarcastic, he left the toilet seat up", all stuff that might be a deal breaker in a relationship, but most of it's just people being selfish / jealous / annoying / assertive / defensive / almost anything. There's a lot of relationship "sins", but they aren't all…
/r/MensRights16/09/16 11:46 AM
10

Feminist theory is very simplistic, reductionist, and immature. They apparently can't grasp the idea that there can be two groups who both have a mix of advantages and disadvantages, not some simplistic binary hierarchy with an oppressor and victim group. Sure, they might say they understand the messy, complex situation, but the always end up like an 8 year old trying to decide which side are the "goodies" and the which is the "baddies" in the a cartoon. It might make sense if you talk about rac…
/r/MensRights16/09/16 11:23 AM
2

On top of this, he wrote he was never fearful of being rejected by his friends at school for showing an interest in STEM fields, nor did he ever have to face a bombardment of images and slogans telling him his only worth lay in his physical appearance. What a nerd.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 11:20 AM
0

Trials are emotional processes. Which is why a defendant cross-examining the alleged victim is not going to result in a fair trial - they'll look like a bully, or manipulative, or they might appear overly-emotional themselves. The alleged victim can play to it. It's got to be one of the dumbest things that can possibly be done in a courtroom. This change would protect innocent defendants and genuine victims.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 05:05 AM
3

No, it's the "more likely as a result". If I'm shot, I'm more likely to be shot as a result of a crime than a police officer, because while police officers are far more likely to be shot in a crime they might also be shot by accident.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 03:35 AM
5

Frances Hall, who killed her husband in 2013 by knocking his motorcycle off Loop 1604 South while chasing his lover in what authorities said was a jealous rage, was sentenced Tuesday to two years in prison. It was the lightest possible sentence after the jury agreed with defense lawyers that she acted under the influence of “sudden passion,” which reduced the punishment range for murder to that of a second-degree felony. Another two-year sentence for aggravated assault will be served concurrentl…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 01:44 PM
8

Virtually none of them are self defense. Unless a woman has a fire-arm, she's not going to kill a man who is attacking her. Yes, sometimes the man was "abusive" (though maybe he was also acting in "self defense" - a lot of women initiate violence, a lot of violence goes both ways). It's often "self defense" in the same way a man who punches out a nagging wife is "self defense" (she was being controlling!). Yes, maybe the other partner was out of line, but not enough to legally be self defense. T…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 11:21 AM

Here's one (note it's young couples): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1858633/ One of the most imperative concerns regarding the mutual violence or the women’s use of violence against their partner is that the physical consequences for women are far more severe than those for men (Stets & Straus, 1990). Feld and Straus (1989) found that when the woman engaged in physical aggression the probability of the violence in couples was likely to persist or escalate in severity over a 1-year …
/r/MensRights14/09/16 09:19 PM

Or she's an actress, or just making it up. But yes, the character she's playing ...
/r/MensRights14/09/16 08:02 PM
22

Probably work by Capaldi (news article, but she's a serious researcher) - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/glenn-sacks/researcher-says-womens-in_b_222746.html
/r/MensRights14/09/16 07:35 PM

"Is not funny, at least not for them" IIRC, the majority of domestic violence injuries occur when a woman starts slapping a man, and the man hits back. Yeah, legally and ethically, you should only use reasonable force to defend yourself. A jab or a slap is probably reasonable (though it could get you in hot water, due to the double standard), not a hard punch. But when two people are mad at each other, reasonable doesn't always happen. One of the primary causes of domestic violence injuries is w…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 06:24 PM
1

The number of white managers and directors is usually closer to 90%, even in companies where white engineers represent only 50% of the entire workforce. Surprising? Not really. Even though whites on the average might be less excited about hardware, cables, build servers, routers and firewalls than Asians and Indians, many of us certainly possess the skills that help us to coordinate, organize, establish and optimize processes and routines, support and nurture growth - abilities essential for run…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 12:40 AM
2

Or she knew he had it on tape, and was hoping making the first call would get her off the hook.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 07:50 PM
5

If men had periods, feminists would say that the invention of the tampon is proof of male privilege.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:13 PM
1

I think the media did it. Ghostbusters wasn't clearly a "feminist" film, it was a remake with an all female cast, that would mostly make its money of children. The anti-feminist mannosphere may have snarkily criticised it for "femwashing", and fans may not have been happy with the remake, but who gives a shit? It's a fun, goofy movie that's going to make most of its money from children (toy sales). The media (and the male director / co-writer) then portrayed it as a controversial "feminist" film…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 07:17 AM
1

"Fearless". He's a conservative who loves attacking progressives. He's great fun when progressives are wrong, but I'd say he's more an outspoken contrarian than actually "fearless".
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:33 AM
4

Amazingly reductionist question. Unless you think, in a paranoid fever dream, that there's always a binary opposition of privileged and oppressed classes, the question doesn't make a lot of sense. A better question would be which areas men are suffering in, and which areas women are suffering in. But no, these nutcases need to break it into virtuous victims and evil oppressors, because it makes sense to someone with the emotional maturity of a 12 year old. I get it, in some cases there were lega…
/r/MensRights06/09/16 10:39 AM
8

If I get drunk, grind on an equally drunk gay man at a bar, make out with him in a park, and then realise the next day he slipped a finger in, would you call it rape? I guess it's a bit different, if you think women are like children.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 12:01 PM
5

They tend to view skeptics and dissenters as cranks. If pressed, a gender scholar might say something like “We don’t expect biologists to engage with creationists, so why should we have to include gender essentialists, or privilege-deniers?” There is a difference. We reject creationism because there is no evidence to support it. By contrast, the notion that biology is at least partially the basis of gender is an empirically supportable, and even well-supported, proposition. The gender scholars r…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 10:03 AM
4

Maybe she needs a wake-up call (which it seems she's had), and will be willing to work things out (marriage counseling?). Lawyer up anyway, and keep records. You don't want to get screwed if things keep getting worse. There's a huge temptation to try to look for "just cause" to end a marriage (or any relationship really) - thus the whole "OMG it was abusive I HAD to get out". People want to blame their partner, otherwise they're admitting they were partly at fault. The whole point of a relations…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:34 AM
1

Also, if society can start admitting it's about anger (even justified anger, at times), not "power and control", then maybe they can actually do something about it.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 06:08 AM
1

Yeah, I agree. Ray Rice's girlfriend had some pretty obvious anger management issues, so I have little respect for her, and I can't say I give a shit about what happened next. Ray Rice was also a dick, who I have little sympathy for (though at least he held out a bit longer, so he deserves a bit more respect).
/r/MensRights05/09/16 05:40 AM
4

If you don't think female violence against men is an issue, you don't care if women occasionally get hit in retaliation (research shows this is one of the main causes of DV related hospitalisations). Perhaps men should be told to hit back, but do so with reasonable use of force. A slap will probably end a fight, but is unlikely to cause any damage. If a guy gets hit multiple times (and when a domestic starts, both partners are already pretty mad), then the guy is likely to eventually going to sn…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 10:47 AM
2

It's no different to men, in a sense. "Nice girls" probably don't get as many phone numbers. Cleavage, a short skirt, thigh high boots, heavy make-up etc. may not signal "nice girl you can introduce to your parents", and it might make some people feel a bit uncomfortable (both men and women) but it will get a few more phone numbers.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 10:04 PM
4

There's plenty of research that shows men tend to not care about education / income, while women go for education and income (especially higher income than them). You can actually see that with the lesbian paradox. Gay men are fitter than straight men, and earn a bit less. Lesbian women earn more than straight women, and aren't as fit. (Yes, those are averages). People who want to date men work on their looks, people who want to date women go for a higher income. Men aren't afraid of intelligent…
/r/MensRights29/08/16 12:18 PM
4

There's no reason for police to get involved. She isn't breaking any laws. But people should probably encourage him to break up with her Agreed. Well, technically she might be breaking the law in the UK, but it's a silly law. The police aren't there to punish people for being assholes.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:11 AM
3

So she's shit in bed, and has poor communication skills. Doesn't sound like a crime. Of course, that can be a bad experience. Not all bad experiences are "rape" or "abuse" or even "harassment", life is more complicated than that. Especially with sexually inexperienced people, there's no reason to think that every bad experience needs to be blamed on malice (either you did something wrong, or they did something wrong).
/r/MensRights25/08/16 07:06 AM
4

inb4 this is bad because it might effect other women
/r/MensRights21/08/16 02:51 AM
9

I think I've figured out why they define every single disagreement in a relationship to be"abuse". They've re-defined DV to mean "control" (for a mix of reasons - partly because they don't want to admit it's mostly lower-class assholes with poor self-control hitting each other). Every little disagreement is about "control" - a man wants to "control" the toilet seat, and leave it up. A woman wants to "control" the toilet seat, and leave it down. They disagree, it's about "control", so if you're c…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 02:56 AM
5

It's OK. When women do it, it's not "gendered staring".
/r/MensRights20/08/16 02:52 AM
1

A question for MRAs - do you think you had any possible impact on this, or was it just universities making smart business decisions? A question for feminists - if MRAs had no impact on these decisions, is it possible many feminist goals were not achieved by feminists, but simply by women being able to work due to jobs requiring less physical strength (a result of capitalists like Ford, and unions pushing for better conditions).
/r/MensRights17/08/16 08:12 AM
3

Six Sigma "black belt" I'd guess.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 08:04 AM
6

If you're running a martial arts club, and one of your senior students is beating the shit out of a junior student, and you do nothing to stop it, it's your fault.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 07:41 AM
15

Which cop? Deputy R. Delgado, who punched him in the face, and forcibly removed him from his home? In his report, the deputy mentions he punched Cruz to “get control of the scene.” “I thought once a judge saw me, and especially after seeing my eye, she would think, What was the reason for all that?” Cruz said. “I did not hurt that [officer] — I did nothing to him. When he punched me, I did not look at him as a police officer anymore. I looked at him as a thug.” Sounds like the deputy is guilty o…
/r/MensRights17/08/16 07:36 AM
7

They think everything is a zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 06:15 PM
1

We don't understand women's physiology We definitely know hysteria is not a thing. Even if it was, men and women would have it equally. Pick one.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/16 06:13 PM
2

I don't think it's helpful to generalise too much. Anyone can be a really shit boss. Maybe she hates men. Maybe she's a bit incompetent, and tries to cover it up by blaming everyone around her (especially people lower on the food chain). She's trying to micro-manage a job where you need to be making a lot of decisions - that's a sign that she's a bit of an idiot - she should be trying to explain the factors you need to consider, not ride your ass for making a poor call. tl;dr - shit boss, can ha…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 05:14 AM
11

You're holding men to a far higher standard than women. You expect men to not retaliate against violence, while you expect women to ... what? Sure, most men can stoically take a hit without letting instinct kick in. But some men fall short of this standard. On the other hand, unless a man or woman is absolute trash, it's really easy to just not strike the first blow. Yes, some men initiate violence against women - they're absolute trash too. A campaign aimed at stopping women hitting men might h…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 12:04 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Womyn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herstory It's often partly driven by the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis. It has some merit, but it's got to be taken with a huge grain of salt. It's a left-wing conspiracy theory that bad words are brainwashing people into behaving badly. The word "History" is brainwashing people into thinking history is all about men. There are right-wing examples - neuro-linguistic programming is basically the same thing, hidden messages in music, Jack …
/r/MensRights31/07/16 09:59 AM
8

It's a medical fact, women will have a slightly % higher body fat than a similarly healthy man. A female supermodel has curves. It's not just the mass of the breasts either. Notice how women have slightly rounder faces (unless they're unhealthily thin)? Teenage girls go apeshit when it kicks in, because they think they're getting fat. But there's a difference between the kind of curves a healthy woman has, and fat. It's like, muscle weights more than fat, but if you're 300 lb it's probably not b…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 07:51 AM
3

Meh. Feminism is a big enemy of Men's Rights (they censor and attack MRAs, even mild-mannered ones like WF) but they aren't the cause of a lot of issues. They're an obstacle to addressing the problems, not the problem itself.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 07:14 AM
1

Trump does have a different standard. But it's not because he's a man, it's because he's a reality TV star.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:50 AM
2

Do you know what the number one cause of death for pregnant women is in the U.S.? MURDER. That's a misconception. The leading cause of injury-related pregnancy-associated death (so that includes some time after birth) is motor vehicle accidents. Homicide is second. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1449204/ And it may not even be a causal relationship - low socioeconomic 18-24 year old women are at a relatively high risk of being murdered (most DV is young couples). That's the age whe…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 07:09 PM
2

OK, it's not legally self defense. Big deal. But there's a big difference between "teaching men not to hit women", and "teaching men not to hit women when they're being attacked". As you say, "too many men are slipping through the cracks", and "more training seems in order". The reality is, a large bulk of the domestic violence industry is in complete denial of the facts. Men don't injure women because of patriarchy or "toxic masculinity". They hit women because they lack self control, and in ma…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 01:50 PM
2

If you punch someone, and they punch you back, who was responsible for it? I mean, maybe they should have had far better self control than you, but you have to accept some responsibility. It's a lot easier to teach people not to strike the first blow than to teach them not to defend themselves.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 12:51 PM
2

Like seriously, you expect people to care as much about Ray Rice being domestically abused? If you think it's OK for women to hit men, then you have to accept the consequence that a few will end up unconscious on the floor. Are you OK with that? (Yes, I'm being a prick here) Given the effort that goes into training men (since they're little kids) to not hit women, I think it's not going to be the most bang for your buck to double down on it. I really think you'd do more to reduce violence agains…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 12:10 PM

Like it or not, when it comes to only serious physical injuries and death, men do commit the most domestic abuse. By far. It's not abuse to hit someone who is hitting you. As the research shows, the largest cause of injuries caused by domestic violence (not abuse) are woman hitting a man who hits her back. Most domestic violence is dyadic (two people who are causing it). Women are quite likely to be initiators. Think Ray Rice. Or remember when Rihanna started attacking some guy in a car, after s…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:56 AM

LoL, when she told other teachers what she was doing, they were horrified.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 11:28 AM
3

Adrian Bayley is an Australian serial rapist and eventually a murderer. The first time he was caught he got out after less than 2 years. Early release, because he'd done a bunch of seminars in prison, and "told them what they wanted to hear".
/r/TheRedPill15/07/16 08:55 AM
0

I'd guess his personal circumstances, and not taking care of them appropriately were more of a factor. I mean, it's funny to call feminism / chivalry a cancer, but it's not as bad as actually having cancer, or having mental illness, or having lost a job, or a whole host of other really major problems that actually effect you. Maybe he was screwed over by courts on something like child support, not seeing kids, having an ex smear his as a rapist / abuser (to win a civil suit - it's actually prett…
/r/MensRights15/07/16 06:52 AM
3

Some people think being a drama llama = expressing their emotions. There's a difference between processing emotions, and processing emotions in a way that drives away everyone who would otherwise suport you. Men probably have a finer line between the two (because women are allowed to be a bit more "emotional"). But that doesn't mean men can't "stoically" deal with negative emotions in a positive way, and men a usually as good as anyone at expressing postitive emotions.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 06:08 AM
3

There was complete radio silence until after the kickstarter ended. I'd expect them to try the same shit again. I suspect they'll only attack if it's already trending.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 10:09 AM
4

Why even bother arguing with feminists or countering feminism in any way It gets attention. Large slabs of feminism are insanely stupid, and making fun of them gets a lot of attention. It's a short-cut to get "the system" (which seems mostly pro-feminist) to pay attention. There's like, dozens of real MRAs. Hundreds of active slactivists. Thousands of passive slactivists. How would you rate this (actually very small) group has done, in terms of getting attention? I guess it might help the moveme…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 10:03 AM
1

Let's remember - the "blame all men / patriarchy" crowd silences serious researchers who try to find other factors - https://theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/19/australians-are-being-told-that-gender-inequality-is-the-root-cause-of-domestic-violence-but-is-it It's a Catch 22. If you think "excuses for DV are part of DV", then anyone coming up with solutions is just creating more excuses. It's like a cult - simply questioning the proponents is seen by them as absolute evil. There are reasons why …
/r/MensRights01/07/16 07:17 AM
4

I don't think you know what 'gendered' means. If a feminist says it, it means it happens to women. It's only 'gendered' if it happens to women, because only women are oppressed. Only women are really oppressed, because only women suffer from gendered oppression.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 06:06 AM
6

A column by Nina Funnell in RendezView last week inaccurately portrayed the work of White Ribbon, including the depiction of White Ribbon as a fundraising club that provided no benefit to women experiencing violence. Unfortunately her article missed the point of White Ribbon, that the organisation is targeting primary prevention and not the provision of tertiary services like a women’s refuge. Our remit is to stop the violence at the source and the source is men. This is why feminism is bad for …
/r/MensRights29/06/16 11:39 AM
7

“When people are reminded during a test of a negative stereotype about their race or sex, psychologists say, it creates a kind of test anxiety that leads them to underperform,” the article explains. As the wikipedia page for stereotype threat notes, the meta-analysis suggests it's probably just publication bias. There's lots of studies. The small studies show large positive and negative effects. The large studies show small effects. Stereotype threat is clearly a bit of a joke, to anyone with an…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 01:01 PM
2

Big, A League of Their Own I literally had to check what they were on IMDB. And it's not like they were his break-through (that would have been Splash). Sleepless in Seattle Some 90s RomCom? He also did "You've Got Mail". And more recently, stuff like The Da Vinci Code; but they're not really what he's known for. The Green Mile and Forest Gump were pretty big though.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 01:31 AM
2

https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2013/12/in-men-high-testosterone-can-mean-weakened-immune-response-study-finds.html In the study, women had a generally stronger antibody response to the vaccine than men. But the average response mounted by men with relatively low testosterone levels was more or less equivalent to that of women. A localised infection (as well as some flus) can actually cause an immune over-reaction, so a "weak" immune system isn't always a bad thing. Men may have historica…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 01:16 AM
2

No, testosterone does lower immune system functions. It also raises pain tolerance. Men are probably more likely to get the flu, but unless they're really sick they'll deal with it without a huge fuss.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 12:29 AM
1

Nah, wait for the OMG UGH WHY DO SO MANY GUYS TRY ASKING ME OUT IN SAFE SPACES LIKE SLEAZY NIGHTCLUBS AND INTERNET DATING SITES! article.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 11:36 PM
2

Veterans' suicides are, in general, in no way womens' faults. A vast number of vets undergo messy divorces when they leave the service. The wife gets upset that hubby isn't pulling the same paycheck and / or the relationship is already fucked due to deployments.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 10:40 AM
10

AWALT does not mean all women are shit. AWALT means that men (and a lot of women) will put up with a ton of bullshit before actually saying "Wait, this woman is a total trainwreck (or at least, grossly overvalued)". Plenty of women have a conscience (just like they often have brains, even if they don't use them). One of her friends could have thought that her husband actually deserved to know about what was going on. Yeah, it's possible there was a bit of jealously as well, but I'd say it's actu…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/16 09:02 AM
1

That's because hopping into a car while drunk is decision that puts everyone else on the road at risk. You could argue that hooking up while drunk puts both parties at risk. But who is the perpetrator, and who is the victim? Unless, of course, one of them is clearly incapacitated, or drinks were spiked. I guess you could say that the whole drunk hook-up culture is a problem. I mean, everyone knows that a night-club / college party is a place where drunk guys hit on drunk gals. Plenty of relation…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 03:04 AM
1

Very few teachers are actually hardline gender feminists. Professionals who deal with boys and girls on a daily basis get a lot of reality checks if they think boys and girls are basically the same. Some teachers just dislike boys though. The problem is (and it's not just confined to teaching) that while most people think the core tenants of feminism are batshit crazy, they listen to their expert advice on things feminists are even less qualified to pontificate on.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 01:24 AM
1

So do these women want more members like Michaelia Cash and Sophie Mirabella?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 04:17 AM
1

They note several times that the "manosphere" is nebulous, sometimes overlaps, and sometimes feuds. It's far better than most articles IMO.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 02:36 AM
2

Legal guns do increase the murder rate a bit. It's easier for stupid, disorganised criminals to get them. OTOH, swimming pools are more dangerous. Cars are extremely dangerous. And most foods will give you cancer. Like most controversial issues, there's more emotions than evidence when it comes to guns, which is why smart people disagree so much on them. It's ironic - the issues the most annoying SJWs think is important are generally the least important issues, because they're the issues to whic…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 06:40 AM
1

Not sure how I feel about calling this "abuse". Is it a systematic an intentional campaign to totally control a partner? Or is it just someone being a selfish asshole? I mean, it's kind of "abusive" behaviour, but that doesn't mean it's automatically part of an abusive relationship (as defined by radfems). Things that happen in every relationship, whenever something goes wrong: People lie about some stuff, or misunderstand each other (gaslighting!) People argue about some stuff (abuse!) Sometime…
/r/MensRights05/06/16 08:36 AM
1

Just a comment - ask yourself who benefits from population growth. Maybe people with more than one house (and maybe stocks)? Maybe wealthy older people (who will benefit from house prices, and rely on a large young population when they retire)? Sounds a lot like a vested interest - people who have an incentive, and know they have an incentive. And of course, banks, because we know what happens to them in a housing downturn. It also sounds like the personal circumstances of a lot of legislators a…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/16 11:19 AM
0

There's pretty much been radio silence from the media on it. Bad PR. Journalists didn't want to mention it, because they didn't want to do any PR for the film while talking about the allegations. Seems like there's been quite a cost due to the allegations.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 07:55 AM
3

At a guess - women will be able to be more picky, marrying richer men. Men will work harder if they don't want to be single. Women will have more options, and choose not to take big risks / work as hard / work in unfulfilling jobs that pay well.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:50 PM
2

Consider the feminist definition of domestic violence - it includes "power and control" (virtually every argument in a relationship is over "control", often over control of things like budgets that affect both of them). "Gaslighting" is fucking vague - in almost every argument both people genuinely disagree over what's previously been done and said. Toss in the whole "feels over reals" attitude, and the victim complex. If you stretch the definitions just a tiny big, every relationship conflict i…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 10:41 PM
4

Hard to say if there's more MtF or FtM. FtM men may just come across as androgynous. They might not make a big deal about saying "I'm a man!" because no-one's going to judge them for wearing short hair and a suit. If they use the men's room, it won't cause a panic. If they use the lady's room, it won't cause a panic. People are a bit less threatened by "women", so it's not as big a debate. If people classify FtM folk as "women", then they typically won't make a big deal of things. Why get mad ov…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:34 AM
-19

I tend to agree with /u/mwobuddy. It seems to lack significant premeditation. She's an obnoxious cunt who attacks people when she's mad, but that's actually reformable (if she works on her anger management). Actually, I'd like to see 12 years with a really short minimum. If she can get her shit under control in prison, and stay clean on the outside, then she's reformable. 12 years prison is a shitload of tax dollars.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 06:49 AM
3

The study is commonly cited as evidence that courts don't discriminate against men, even though the actual data show courts did. So it does discredit an argument used against mens rights.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 03:27 PM
1

Massive set of sources linked here: http://freakonomics.com/podcast/the-true-story-of-the-gender-pay-gap-a-new-freakonomics-radio-podcast/ Look up "lesbian paradox" - lesbians make more than straight women, gay men make less than straight men. The implication being that gay men won't have to support a woman, and lesbians won't have a man support them. (There's also stereotypical lesbian engineers, and gay hairdressers - but is that can just come back to them balancing fabulous sexy work vs getti…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:44 PM
6

From the original article: However, underpinning his eccentric plans for a beard tax lies a more serious message. "I'm trying to raise awareness of the ridiculous state of tax in the hairdressing industry," explained Mr Kent. "I am trying to highlight these ridiculous taxes we are expected to pay and the beard tax is an exaggeration of this. "I have been writing to the government for many, many years on the tax affairs of hairdressing and all of my calls fall on deaf ears. "So, I decided to come…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:07 PM
4

Very good point. Except in extreme cases, any accusation without a date is not an accusation, it's basically slander - you can't falsify it if they won't allow an alibi.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:52 AM
-1

Let me be devil's advocate ... Schools see this shit on a weekly basis. Unless the Principal is a retard, they'll know it could go either way. "Harassing" messages - could that be misinterpreted? He might have said she looked fat in a photo. Or he might have left a device unattended, or logged in on a school computer, and someone pranked him. Or there's a second account (his or a classmate's). Who knows? Kids are shits (sorry to say that, but most of them are; we all probably remember shit we di…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:45 AM
4

In this case it shouldn't. It's referring to the one who initiated the case (presumably sole custody is often sought by someone with a strong case - e.g. they believe there is criminal negligence from the other parent), and whether it was sole legal, physical, etc. As I understand it these are apples to apples comparisons, coming from the same original source.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 09:21 AM
3

Check research, not blogspam. https://primatologie.revues.org/1090 Bonobos live in a male-philopatric structure. This means that males are born and die in the same group while females of 6-13 years emigrate to neighboring groups (Furuichi et al., 2012). Males will stay all their lives with their mothers. Females are accepted into new groups weaving future alliance bonds. Female chimpanzees do not have frequent social interactions with other females, whereas female bonobos maintain close social a…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 06:24 AM
1

Correction, 73.8%-95%.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:51 AM
1

Unfortunately there is no data on how often women get custody if they apply for it. Either way just having a statistic for "contested custody" as a whole would probably be the most helpful. Do you have any statistic that compares like with like? Feminism 101 - avoid showing any statistics that derails the narrative. If you're showing a statistic that shows men have it easy, never show the statistic for women. If you're showing a statistic that shows women have it hard, never show the statistic f…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:44 AM
1

Do you think the feminist movement is harmed by its antagonism towards the MRM?
/r/MensRights30/04/16 10:02 AM
9

threatening to end the relationship Can someone explain why this would be sexual misconduct? If it really is a deal breaker, then it's only fair to let the other partner know. I guess it's generally the guy though, and I guess some feminists think that women are entitled to an ongoing relationship.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 06:30 AM
1

Not really true. Men do commit more violent crime, by a large margin. They're more likely to hit people (almost always other men), and far more likely to cause serious injury. But even accounting for that, yes, they're more likely to be investigated, charged, sentenced to prison, etc. I guess black men would be an example of intersectionality.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:59 AM
3

The second one is worse because people (including the perpetrator and victim) might not think it's rape. /s
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:18 AM

I'll copy-paste my comment from last time this hit: People (feminists and anti-feminists) are all sperging out over Arya. What she said: And then someone explained it to me. And I remember thinking, “Isn’t that just like everyone?” And then I realized everyone is not a feminist, unfortunately. But I also feel like we should stop calling feminists “feminists” and just start calling people who aren’t feminist “sexist” – and then everyone else is just a human. You are either a normal person or a se…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:02 PM
2

Freud is treated as a joke by most psychologists anyway. Psychoanalysis basically just means "patient sits on a couch". There's probably more statistical testing of psychoanalysis than surgery - it's not all baseless anymore, and there's neuroscience that informs the design of the methods they use. While there's still more Freudian practitioners (who IIRC get reasonable results on upper-middle-class neurotics, but it takes years of expensive therapy) that's pretty rare now.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:41 AM
2

Talk therapy (psychoanalysis) helps in many cases. It's not a great therapy in all circumstances though. It's like medication. It has its place. Its place isn't in a classroom, with an un-qualified practitioner calling the shots. Since you want to get into details: Talk therapy often helps create a model for dealing with issues. "This happened and I got upset". "Yeah, it's OK to get upset. It's helpful to process emotions. Let's have a minute to be upset, then we can move forward". Source: Googl…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:30 AM
6

Google "Nocebo". If you tell people they should be hurt, they get hurt more. Hysterical / psychosomatic diseases are a thing. And is there any real difference between "real" PTSD, and PTSD you developed because you think it's normal to get it? Real treatment builds resilience, not fragility. I'm not saying "don't take mental health seriously". I'm saying "take it seriously, and let the professionals help, not radical agitators". Mental health is a funny thing. Unlike most diseases, it doesn't al…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:19 AM
8

No one believes me The teachers aren't that stupid. It would be a rare school to not have had similar investigations against staff members. No, they don't announce it. ("Attention all students, Little Johnny says the PE teacher offered him an A+ in return for sexual favors ..."). I guess they're taking accusations against other students seriously too now? They want to cover their ass while it gets sorted. The police is getting into this. As /u/speakingofsegues says DO NOT LIE ABOUT ANYTHING! Eit…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:45 PM
1

It's a complex issue. Actual victims don't want people saying "I TOLD YOU SO". Obviously. Men are naturally a lot stronger and generally hornier than women, so they need to learn some restraint (which they do - e.g. men learn not to hit women). Mainstream / Radical Feminists think that rape is due to the social construct of masculinity / patriarchy, and that by "deprogramming" everyone from gender roles men will be "taught not to rape". On the other hand, teaching women not to be raped (not to f…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:08 AM
2

Ben Shapiro and Vox Day are also kinda pushing this sort of thing. Here's the thing - if you're a 19 year old in university, it seems like the world is liberal. If you're an intolerant left-wing ideologue, it seems like a reasonable thing to encourage demonising people on the basis of things they say. When they hit 23, with their shiny new Masters in Sociology, they're going to be looking for jobs. A lot of employers are 60 year old Republican Christians. If the climate has shifted to one where …
/r/MensRights12/04/16 04:26 AM
1

IANAL, but maybe the supervised visitation and sole custody is because of the mother's family. If the judge sees it as an ugly split (and you can't deny it's ugly), then they see it as high risk. The judge wants to minimise conflict, which means supervision and sole custody. Yes, it's unfair that it's you who gets penalised, when it's the mother / boyfriend / brother who are the risk factors, but for childcare cases judges are mostly interested in minimising problems that might effect the child,…
/r/MensRights09/04/16 09:13 PM

People (feminists and anti-feminists) are all sperging out over Arya. What she said: And then someone explained it to me. And I remember thinking, “Isn’t that just like everyone?” And then I realized everyone is not a feminist, unfortunately. But I also feel like we should stop calling feminists “feminists” and just start calling people who aren’t feminist “sexist” – and then everyone else is just a human. You are either a normal person or a sexist. People get a label when they’re bad. OMG she s…
/r/MensRights09/04/16 07:03 PM
1

Jokes on them. If you read the full interview, she's a lot more nuanced.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 04:34 PM
1

Remember that the beta mind wants to struggle. In the Matrix movie that was part of the programming that people need to believe that struggle earns results. When you make a sudden move and surprise people with Game that disturbs their idea of how things work so they dismiss it's truth. Success IS a struggle, if it's the kind of success that normies don't have. Having a few friends and doing what it takes to pass on your DNA? That's kind of what you've been bred for - it takes a special kind of t…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/16 10:31 AM
1

It's just virtue signalling. How many men will publicly say what type of women they're really into? Go ask Ben Affleck what kind of woman he likes. Is he going to say that weight rules most women out? Will he talk about personality, or whether she's conventionally feminine and attractive? Then look at his behaviour.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/16 11:48 AM
1

This control seems almost always framed as a mind-reading thing. Plenty of guys have a "crazy ex" who was kinda controlling. Is it an attempt at control for control's sake, or jealousy and possessiveness, or a crazy attempt to keep the relationship together? (Does it matter?) Anything can seem like a "patten of control". It's like cancer on WebMD. If you want to find it, you can (and I'm not saying it's not ever there). It's certainly something a lot of laymen seem to diagnose (especially on the…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 11:03 AM
1

Like I said, I don't have a balanced view. There's no point blaming victims if you're there to support them. But look at everything you've said - it's "the minds of the participants are where the damage is done". But people aren't psychic. Are these "abusers" smart, empathic people who are in the minds of their victims? Or are they just a dumb asshole who carelessly makes their victim's life hard? Is the victim still in the relationship because a criminal mastermind has trapped them in a web of …
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:52 AM
4

Didn't Hillary Clinton defend (allegedly) worse? http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 03:58 AM
3

Ptolemy the First was Macedonian, not Greek. Many of Alexander's best soldiers were Greek (Phillip his dad expanded into Greece, gained a shitload of influence and allies, defeated the Athenians, and contained the Spartans but didn't really fight them), but Ptolemy was actually one of Alexander's childhood friends, not a Greek ally.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:54 PM
7

Let's have a look at the report. http://files.rcfv.com.au/Reports/RCFV_Full_Report_Interactive.pdf The causes of family violence are complex and include gender inequality and community attitudes towards women. Yeap ... more interested in gender equality than battered women. Good to see the feminist lobby has its priorities right. Even the Guardian is sick of their shit though - http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/19/australians-are-being-told-that-gender-inequality-is-the-root-cause-of-d…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 03:24 PM
1

Rather than the two of them working through the miscommunications (or just dealing with the fact that their relationship wasn't working for both of them), he was brainwashed into thinking that she was deliberately hurting him.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:46 AM
1

The only solution to that would be to throw out the massive buckets of maternity pay, but that just leaves men and childless women holding the check. Give custody to fathers by default, and threaten women with alimony and child support if the husband wants out. If women want a part in their child's life, they have to bring home the bacon. You might even see women make more than men!
/r/MensRights29/03/16 02:57 AM
7

If they paid teachers more, but expected them to work long inflexible hours with less flexibility in how they can teach (leading to better student outcomes, but worse job satisfaction), then more men would consider it a career option.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:38 AM
5

Pro tip - if your career relies on being a good feminist, change it.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/16 12:18 AM

Nah, the conclusion is basically "Stay away from the icky lower-class men, only a supreme gentleman like me is worth a relationship".
/r/MensRights25/03/16 10:55 PM
5

tl;dr - girls are victims of "male issues" (suicide, sports injuries, etc) which receive disproportionately low attention (because of male disposability).
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:11 AM
2

Judge's decision: http://www.ontariocourts.ca/en/24Mar16.pdf thanks GamerGhazi (tips trilby)
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:03 AM
1

Is this about the gomeshi guy? Yes I wasn't a fan of his prior to what happened, frankly didn't even know much about him besides hearing his program a few times on npr. Was he basically one of those sjw/white knights that used being a sjw/white knight as a way to profit and get laid? Yes. But he was apparently a bit rough in bed.
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 05:51 AM
1

Hobbies. Cooking can be a hobby. Home decorating can be a hobby. Gardening can be a hobby. Men have similar things. Are you into furniture restoration? Maintaining an old car? Cooking? Wanna restore a shed? Congratulations, you can spend all your free time on "housework"!
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:14 AM
1

He should have learnt more about feminism - then he wouldn't be in trouble. Ooops he's talking to Naomi Wolf - https://youtu.be/ha5hV7Z3tKA?t=14m35s And Gloria Steinem - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icx9KAnDJ48 And he has a minor in Women's Studies. I guess that like joining the clergy, studying feminism doesn't always make you a good person? Or maybe he's innocent?
/r/MensRights24/03/16 12:24 PM
2

It's Australia. 25 years is on the high side for homicide. Actual murderers get less. Australia is pretty geared towards prevention / reformation, not retribution. The weak point is that a few psychopaths get off way too lightly (e.g. Adrian Bayley) but generally it's a good system. I'm guessing she'll get at worst 6-12 months (all juvie, no transfer to a real prison), and a stern lecture from the judge about how her decisions effect her future.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 11:09 AM
1

Didn't you know? All feminists are women (otherwise they're just 'allies'). All women are feminists (whether they know it or not). Therefore "feminists" and "women" can be used interchangeably.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 09:15 AM
1

Consumer spending?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:05 AM
2

Apparently, metacanda wants to nickname him PM Zoolander.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:26 AM
12

Stop. Listening. To. Feminists. This tumblr-feminist-inspired relationship advice is BPD in a bottle. The idea that the world sucks, that you're powerless, and that you're a bad person (internalized misogyny / a privilege / etc) is an extremely unhealthy worldview. Avoid these people like the plague, unless you're a well-trained therapist who's being paid. If you have some tumblr-feminists around you must deal with, here's an article on schema therapy for BPD - http://www.therapist-training.com.…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:45 AM
2

It assumes in-group bias. There's some cases where there is genuine in-group bias. Often race and ethnicity can result in grouping (people living in ethnic enclaves, white flight, in-group hiring, etc). It makes a bit less sense when you talk about gender though, as it's not really generational. It also makes a bit less sense, because there's less clear in-group bias - there's the women are wonderful effect, sexual harassment, male jealousy, female jealousy, backbiting, and other weird shit. It …
/r/MensRights20/03/16 03:48 AM
1

Also, the footage was taken out of context.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:24 AM
5

Speculation: I guess a lot of them think they're unlovable. Men fucking women is exploitation, isn't it? (Let's assume they're either reformed traditionalists, or sex-negative feminists). There's no way a woman could actually enjoy a man ravishing her, right? They want to do bad naughty things but feel guilty about it, so they try to promote their feminism to offset the guilt. They think that if they can stop some other men being disgusting rapists, they've earned enough karma to do what they se…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:15 AM
1

Yet, Mens Rights is working. Awareness is huge, mostly thanks to feminist hit-pieces. Feminists see MRAs as a disproportionately influential boogyman, and run hit-pieces against MRAs (as a movement) and MRA talking points. Having idiots attack your argument is often more convincing than putting it forward yourself. For example, any time there's a discussion on violence against women, someone will ask "what about men?". Feminists will then start ranting about how this is derailing, and that every…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 04:25 AM
1

Labelling specific behaviors as maladaptive in certain circumstances is OK. Assigning a gender to a whole host of maladaptive behaviors is just stupid. First - it's vague as fuck. That's why you get these dim-witted apologists saying things like "Actually, that's not what we mean by toxic masculinity". Push them for a solid definition, and you'll get another excuse "Well, I can't speak for feminism, but it's a bunch of bad behaviors like stoicism, dominance, etc". Second - with a few exceptions,…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 03:08 AM
1

But no one's buying. There are very few people in the market for a "See, Feminism is Actually Evil" package. In the US? About half of Democrats and 90% of Republicans.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 02:43 AM
5

He's not as sharp as he thinks he is, but he's miles ahead of the Australian media pundits. I'm going to post this Guardian special feature for about the 100th time here: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/19/australians-are-being-told-that-gender-inequality-is-the-root-cause-of-domestic-violence-but-is-it Well connected and powerful SJW gender ideologues have been throwing battered women under the bus, because they think gender equality is more important. Harassing actual family violen…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:18 PM
6

Is it healthy to claim that any impingement of boundaries or lack of respect constitutes "abuse"? It sounds like black and white thinking to me. I'm pretty sure this brittle thinking makes people more likely to be both victims and perpetrators of actual abuse. Here we go: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226716303_Multidimensional_Dichotomous_Thinking_Characterizes_Borderline_Personality_Disorder In theory, dichotomous thinking can be a unidimensional or a multidimensional process. Unidi…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:42 AM
1

Is this the bank under investigation for rates-fixing, and getting sued for sexual harassment on the trading floor? And see also: https://theconversation.com/australian-of-the-year-david-morrison-as-a-warrior-for-women-shows-belief-in-the-male-protector-lives-on-54470 The Male Champions of Change head up companies such as Telstra, Qantas, the Commonwealth Bank, Woolworths, Citibank and IBM and hold the most senior roles in Government, Secretary of the Prime Minister & Cabinet and the Treasury. A…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 01:12 AM
1

Let's define the term first. From Wikipedia: Gaslighting or gas-lighting is a form of mental abuse in which information is twisted or spun, selectively omitted to favor the abuser, or false information is presented with the intent of making victims doubt their own memory, perception, and sanity. Instances may range simply from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred, up to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. OK,…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 12:14 AM
0

"Gaslighting" isn't really a thing. It's a feminist dogma, like Scientology's "suppressive person", and it's based on a play not anything scientific. 99.99% of the time "gaslighting" isn't one partner trying to convince the other that they're crazy, it's just one partner (or both) being a pig-headed self-justifying asshole. DO NOT READ THIS FEMINIST SHIT IT WILL MAKE YOU ALMOST AS CRAZY AS IT'S MAKING YOUR BITCH WIFE! This feminist drivel is designed to make women hate men / make abused women fe…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 02:51 AM
0

You don't have to shout to stand up for yourself, just don't get flustered if she gets upset. She's behaving like a teenager who screams "I HATE YOU!" at her parents. It's not an explosion of built-up resent, it's an emotionally undeveloped baby having a tantrum for no reason. So don't take it personally. Your choice is to leave (and do it without causing any drama), or to deal with it. The way to deal with it isn't to go full /r/theredpill (though there's a grain of truth to hat they say), it's…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 02:41 AM
5

I'd add that you're partly to blame. A lack of self respect, for example. As you said here: Or I'll apologize and she'll sense that I am being insincere because I honestly don't know what I did wrong. Your insecurity is part the problem (her being a bitch is the other part of the problem). She's not a complete idiot. She will sense your general insecurity (which she is causing), and interpret that as the relationship being insecure. She's probably BPD, and afraid of abandonment, so when she sabo…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 07:32 PM
9

If you're abusive your'e doing her a favor by leaving. If you're not so abusive, you're doing yourself a favor by leaving. She doesn't respect you. If she respected you, she wouldn't be such a cunt. She won't change, it's not your job to make her change, you don't have the right to change her, and you don't owe her shit. And since she has a patten of violence, your only real option is a clean break. Do not have one last argument to explain yourself - there's a high risk she will hurt herself or …
/r/MensRights12/03/16 06:59 PM
7

It's Australia. There's a conspiracy of insane feminists who have hijacked the domestic violence industry, to the point where it's even harming women - http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/19/australians-are-being-told-that-gender-inequality-is-the-root-cause-of-domestic-violence-but-is-it Public servants lie to Royal Commissions. The NSW Coroner Court had a shitshow inquiry that found men who are murdered by women are virtually all "abusers".
/r/MensRights12/03/16 06:51 PM
1

I'd care more about the efficiency of what they actually do. They're a left wing non-profit - they have a few feminists, and they probably have to kiss the ring anyway, but every group in that space will be similar.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 12:58 AM
3

Director and chief scientist at the Black Dog Institute Helen Christensen said increased risky behaviour among young women could have contributed to the rise in suicide rate, although more research was needed to know. "Young girls are becoming more assertive and less risk-averse. They're drinking earlier, smoking earlier ... all those associated behaviours might lead to more impulsivity, which might lead to more risk-taking, more injury, more suicide risk," Professor Christensen said. Predictors…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:25 AM
17

Feminagging.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:07 PM
7

They actually believe that women are still paid a lot less than men for the same work. About 30 years ago, when it was true, you'd have made a killing if you employed women, because there was a lot of untapped talent. But when 21 year old kids are telling you that it's the next big thing (and they're just repeating the orthodoxy their teachers drilled into them), you've missed the boat by about 2 generations.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:05 PM
2

It's the state where they had a Royal Commission into domestic violence, and the state's top civil servant made some interesting claims to the commission: Violence against women by men is by far the most common form. Gender inequality and negative attitudes towards women are a major driver of family violence. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3x0zax/so_who_misled_the_victorian_royal_commission
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:28 AM
2

My Kitchen Rules is a reality TV show that features pairs of contestants (usually husband / wife teams) opening a kitchen. One of the contestants (Tim) had a partner (Dee) who some people though was a bit of a psycho bitch. Clementine Ford (an outspoken feminist writer / blogger) says there's "services". The Men's abuse line generally assumes the men are actually at fault, and tries to put them on a behaviour plan.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 12:44 AM
1

Anyone got some links to the lesbian paradox? Lesbians (who won't have a guy pay their bills) earn a lot more than straight women. Gay men, on the other hand, are far more likely to pursue low paying but rewarding, easy, or fun careers like hairdressing and childcare.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:56 AM
1

It's all the fault of capitalism patriarchy, and an ideal feminist society won't have underemployment because everyone will be put to work by the democratic people's state.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:51 AM
1

Also, funny how it's up to the man to seek help.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 09:17 AM
2

It's amazing how misogynist those female viewers on the hashtag are, talking about how they wish they could slap some sense into the woman.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 10:49 PM
1

Latham isn't entirely right about this. But on certain subjects, even an infant who just shat his diaper can be more on point than the elites who insist the Emperor is fully clothed. Reminder - radical feminists are so obsessed with inequality that they're willing to torpedo, defund, suppress and harass serious researchers working to reduce violence against women, and it's such a shitfest that even The Guardian ran a feature article on it - http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/19/australi…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 03:41 AM
4

From what I understand, diversity is implemented in the workplace so that the company can generate some off the cuff ideas. Nothing screams "off the cuff" like propaganda about how everything is sexist, racist, and homophobic. Keep talking about race - it makes everyone really super-comfortable, which leads to free and creative discussions! By adding diversity into the mix, you're bound to get some different ideas that can break up a toxic business culture. By "toxic", they usually mean "competi…
/r/MGTOW26/02/16 09:19 AM
0

The answer to that is just the truth: Obviously men do more damage. Men are bigger and stronger. But less severe violence is still an issue (which is not being addressed for men), and it can even lead to severe violence (which can be a two way street). Note - they don't like hearing the truth. If you don't stop Ray Rice getting slapped around in an elevator, it's difficult stop him knocking his wife out in self defence / retaliation. I'm not making excuses for a black man lashing out in self def…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:30 AM
7

I can imagine this backfiring. "Did you not tell your husband that his hobbies were too expensive, he needs to spend less time with friends, and that the toilet seat stays down?" Yeah, I know, courts can be biased. But once the precedent is established, it will be used by both sides.
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 09:04 AM
1

THIS IS AN EXCELLENT ARTICLE!
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:25 AM
6

a few years ago, a major health organisation commissioned him to research alcohol’s role in interpersonal violence but refused to publish it because it didn’t like its conclusion that alcohol was a causal factor They should have a Royal Commission into this.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:09 AM
1

But this is an odd question. It's like hearing "What should radical Christianity / radical Islam do to make you join?" Um, nothing. If they want to fly under my radar, they have to stay out of public policy. If powerful public figures start quoting Biblical verses or the Koran to justify what I think are stupid decisions, I'll oppose the relevant religion. If they quote feminist propaganda while making stupid decisions, I oppose feminism. If they started talking about "disposable males" while ju…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:49 AM
1

Yeah, I know, many of them are just busy guys who'd rather kiss the ring than deal with a tantrum.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:21 AM
3

Hmm http://businessnews.blogs.latrobe.edu.au/2015/08/28/women-in-leadership-event-proudly-hosted-by-la-trobe-business-school-and-ipaa/
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:13 AM
2

Note - she's one of the better known columnists in Rupert Murdoch's favourite paper, The Australian. This is a paper that loses a lot of money, but still exists because Murdoch really likes it (unlike his more populist papers / channels / networks).
/r/MensRights22/02/16 01:03 AM
2

I suspect the defence supplied that photo.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:42 AM
2

What I really mean (un-PC version): Religious fanatics, ideologues, and other such lunatics are generally pretty fucking incompetent at anything other than attention seeking, self justification, and other symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder. But I didn't say that because it's a bit rude to the Christians and Feminists who aren't complete idiots. Feminists use "abstinence only" as an example of Christians being counter-productive - poor sex education results in more unwanted pregnancies…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:22 AM
4

It's sometimes correct. Personally, I think the insane bullshit many feminists spout about domestic violence actually hurts women. If "abstinence only" can result in more STDs and abortions, is it possible feminist policy can result in more violence against women? A lot of anti-feminists don't actually care that much about men. Men generally don't care about other men, they care about women. Even many people in MRA groups often think males are basically disposable. That said, more shelters for m…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:06 AM
3

But remember - even if the majority of women with black eyes got them just after slapping a guy, it's victim blaming to suggest they shouldn't put themselves in that kind of danger.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 12:58 PM
9

You'd think actual feminists (from Mary Wollstonecraft in 1800 on) would argue that encouraging women to give up careers is part of patriarchy. The gilded cage of female privilege has been a theme in academic feminism for over 200 years. However, as Bax noted (in about 1900), feminists are divided between the political (the ones who want to close the wage gap) and the sentimental (the ones who just want better terms and conditions for women). While they might argue otherwise, their actions show …
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:11 AM
4

When companies market to children like this, it's called "Pester Power" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPH94cdAkg4
/r/MGTOW16/02/16 10:16 AM
1

Maybe they figure it looks ruder if they censor it?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 09:28 AM
7

It's interesting to read Bax (a 100 year old MRA): Here's his Fraud of Feminism - https://www.marxists.org/archive/bax/1913/fraud And the Legal Subjugation of Men - https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Legal_Subjection_of_Men While some of his views are outdated (anything concerning medical knowledge, but he isn't alone in that) it's quite interesting. If you look up things like "rule of thumb" - it was an urban myth. People say "a man could beat his wife with a stick no thicker than his thumb", b…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 11:02 AM
4

How many times do we have to use the word "feminag" to have it become a new word?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 11:42 AM
3

The good news is that positive construal can be taught. “We can make ourselves more or less vulnerable by how we think about things,” Bonanno said. In research at Columbia, the neuroscientist Kevin Ochsner has shown that teaching people to think of stimuli in different ways—to reframe them in positive terms when the initial response is negative, or in a less emotional way when the initial response is emotionally “hot”—changes how they experience and react to the stimulus. You can train people to…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:05 AM
1

Publicising this will go a long way to closing the wage gap. Telling a 17 year old college applicant that doing gender studies will make them poor isn't going to convince them not to do it. Telling them that gender studies will make them less desirable than an engineering major - that will sting. Most people don't care that much about wealth - it's relationships that are important. However, money is important in long-term relationships. Men already know this (as they've long been expected to be …
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:59 PM
5

What's wrong with feminagging? Yes, it's sexist. So what? You can see from Bax's writing, even 100 years ago feminists were pretty happy to have a double standard - they can be feminine (damsaling, nagging, tantrums, etc) and then call foul if anyone calls them on it, because OMG gendered slur!! If a man were to act like this, they wouldn't be a nag. They'd be a whiny loser. While holding women to the same standard as men is seen as harsh and sexist, I don't see why they should at least be held …
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:37 PM

Or maybe, the people who complain are not the women who are actually getting attention.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 09:32 AM
1

They sound a lot like a "race realist" though. I can imagine a /pol/ack troll arguing along those lines.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 04:56 AM
1

Are you sure they're not just a troll?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 12:01 AM
2

It's worth noting: Women get tonnes of advice on how to attract a male (e.g. Cosmo) Men get fuck all (other than really poor advice, intended to tame the beasts) Female sexuality is seen as self-destructive - it's a risk to expose women to men, but if it's their choice then it's acceptable. Male sexuality is seen as dangerous, and few people other than, say, Roosh offer much advice.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:34 AM
1

I know the dynamics of abuse can be complex. I know that women can both love and fear their abusers. But these women were not battered wives. They were not in relationships with Mr. Ghomeshi. They barely knew him. They had no reason to fear him, and he had no power over them at all – except the power of his charm and celebrity. They could have walked away. They didn’t. Is this the case in a nutshell? Ghomeshi is allegedly a complete asshole, who engaged in reckless rough sex without safe-words, …
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:22 AM
1

2009. It's not like this is new research, it's well known. People who act in ignorance of this (who have any real credentials) are not ignorant, they are frauds.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:48 AM
1

AVO
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:39 PM
1

Some of them get paid OK - http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Degree=Master_of_Arts_(MA)%2c_Women%27s_Studies/Salary#by_Employer_Type Last time I checked, male gender studies grads made a lot more than female ones, but that's changed now (it was only due to the extremely small sample - probably one guy who was reporting a high salary).
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:40 AM

impersonating an Uber driver Is that like impersonating a police officer? Unless you've booked the driver (so there's a log and payments and stuff), there's no real difference between an Uber driver and any other driver on the street. He was impersonating a guy with a car and a smartphone.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:26 AM

I'd call it mild sexual harassment, and the only really sinister thing is the age (I'd assumed she was about 20).
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:54 AM
3

It's possible he was rough, and recklessly didn't take precautions (giving some kind of warning, safe words, etc); but they put up with it anyway (for a while).
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:51 AM
14

Harley Quinn Smith, star of upcoming film ‘Yoga Hosers’ and daughter of director Kevin Smith, was chilling outside a Starbucks in her neighborhood in California when two men in a vehicle approached her, claiming to be her Uber and trying to convince her to get into their vehicle. “They didn’t have the Uber app on their phone and were clearly just two disgusting dudes trying to kidnap a girl standing on her own,” she wrote in an Instagram post, adding she was too shaken up to remember to take dow…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 04:34 AM
6

It's OK, it the US they indoctrinate teachers to indoctrinate boys: http://www.ncate.org/Standards/UnitStandards/UnitStandardsinEffect2008/tabid/476/Default.aspx#stnd4 Candidates connect lessons, instruction, or services to students’ experiences and cultures. They communicate with students and families in ways that demonstrate sensitivity to cultural and gender differences. Candidates incorporate multiple perspectives in the subject matter being taught or services being provided. They develop a …
/r/MensRights06/02/16 04:10 AM
1

You know what else is "Grey Literature" (or based on grey literature)? Basically every statistic produced by the government. Including the wage gap itself.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 12:37 AM
5

How does a boy know he can kiss a girl (and other things)? He's supposed to take initiative, but how does he know with no one teaching him? RooshV is teaching him, probably badly. It's mostly con artists, narcissists, and PUAs who risk the stigma of teaching men how to "take advantage" of women. Women have it a little easier, I think. It's not actually taboo to teach women how to have relationships - it's seen as destructive to women (they might end up giving away their virtue), but from a harm-…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 09:40 PM
2

Papers generally include a section on why the problem is important. Often, authors are lazy, and just grab a credible sounding number. It raises some question of the author's competence if they don't vet sources properly (or they include dodgy sources for political reasons), but that doesn't totally invalidate their results. The overall numbers from the paper are a bit high, but this could include very marginal cases - "had sex and didn't really want to" type scenarios. I'd expect it's mostly th…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 09:37 PM
1

Fuck 'em. If a feminist says "Don't teach women not to get raped" in person, I'm gonna nod along. I don't argue with crazy people. But posting it as a response can convince onlookers.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:39 PM
1

You're a traditionalist. MRAs are not generally traditionalists. We're generally more tolerant of traditionalists than radical feminists - men and women have some differences, on average, so it's not bad if men and women behave a bit differently. MRAs and feminists (radical feminists) are all progressives on gender issues. Mens rights isn't about "men wanting the respect they used to have in the past", it's about men wanted equal respect in this brave new world where men and women are equal, but…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:04 PM
1

If you're in the US, you can probably contact your local congressman and ask if they have any more details. Assuming their office is nearby, handing in a letter (in person) to them (or their staff) can make an impression. Also, say why the issue effects you - if it's making you afraid (in the case that you need to retrain) that gatekeepers in the education sector can punish you for political opinions.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:03 AM
0

So you don't like RooshV. You recommend TRP instead?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:50 AM

RooshV is not an MRA, but he highlights an important double standard. Women don't have their sexuality demonised. Yes, people discourage them from having a sexuality, but it's for their own good - because they are best staying away from icky gross exploitative men. You can buy Cosmo in a supermarket. It's seen as risky and a little self-destructive, but it's sure not seen as harmful to men. You can't buy much that gives men advice on hooking up, despite there obviously being a huge demand. If an…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:32 AM
2

Also for lols - http://www.listsofnote.com/2012/04/einsteins-demands.html
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:33 AM
1

OMG UGH YOU MRAs DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT FEMINISTS ARE ABOUT DESTROYING GENDER ROLES!! Nope. Because a belief in patriarchy is also centrist to feminist beliefs. EVERY gendered thing in society (aka patriarchy) is purely there to give men advantages over women. That's feminist ideology. I'd be very surprised if you found any feminist (other than ones like CH Sommers) who will disagree with that bolded statement. Since EVERYTHING that MRAs / feminists have an issue with is part of patriarchy (advan…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:20 PM
-5

Sorry OP, but mentally ill people exist, and ignoring them (when they're being assholes) is just a part of being a grown-up. Also, the reason the cop treats you like a criminal is because cops treat basically everyone like criminals. It's their job to presume guilty until proven innocent, and the court's job to presume innocent until proven guilty. Also, I bet they were in a bad mood because two well-meaning idiots (the woman who told you to stop, and you who listened to her) caused a traffic ac…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 06:01 AM
6

Saying feminism is part of the patriarchy is regressive backlash against feminism, which is part of the patriarchy CHECKMATE SHITLORDS!
/r/MensRights01/02/16 05:37 AM
3

Even if we go through court again, the kids have changed their stance after the lies she has told them, so it won't be smart to go to court. Ask a lawyer, but sometimes a judge will get very suspicious if the kids start saying "daddy doesn't love me". It can end up a case of parental alienation.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 04:16 AM
7

You joke, but this is a central tenant of feminism - anything which is good for women or bad for men is rationalised as somehow being part of patriarchy (either because it is actually bad for women, or because it justifies something that's bad for women). It's like if you find a contradiction in a holy book - a true believer will say "Actually, there's a good reason for that, and it proves that our side is actually right". Idealogical libertarians (the kind who will find some way to blame the go…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 02:31 AM
7

He shouldn't be having any interaction with her at all if she has a restraining order against him. She may attempt to interact. In which case, document that. If she tries to get a restraining order, then tries to patch things up, a savvy judge can read between the lines.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:06 PM
1

It's not new. More like 6 months old. Unless they're promoting it again?
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:03 PM
5

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Legal_Subjection_of_Men The Legal Subjection of Men (1908) by E. Belfort Bax As against her husband, the law confers on a woman who has married him the unilateral privilege of maintenance. The earlier law made this privilege dependent on her obedience, cohabitation with her husband, and her observance of outwardly decent behaviour. The present law has set her free from all these restraints. Since 1857 the Secular Court, which then assumed jurisdiction in matrim…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:48 PM
2

That's quite a SF or SJW title. https://youtu.be/bFOumnJsi_U?t=4m19s "Now we have to attack what we perceive patriarchal culture coming into a culture that's isn't patriarchal, and make sure that we tell people not to be like that." I got an idea - treat refugees like human beings. Help them to become law-abiding citizens, and if they don't want to be law abiding citizens then let the legal system deal with them without fear, favour, or prejudice.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:25 AM
1

Massive Freudian slip - https://youtu.be/BU-iOGRqUdg?t=7m15s "You're demonising feminists" "Most normal women don't hate men!'
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:07 AM
1

If anyone wants a laugh, this (much earlier) stuff by Dr Phill (on male victims of DV) is pretty crazy - http://drphil.com/shows/show/1661/
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:05 AM
2

If you're not a Christian you're a Satan Worshipper. I guess that kind of shaming might work on people with really low self esteem?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:53 AM
4

Yeah, not all misandrists are feminists.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 05:51 AM
1

Digging a bit, it seems Mark Scott (former ABC boss, who oversaw a lot of their feminist stuff) isn't actually on the list. Channel 10 is though. Sure, they report on the press releases, but I guess the ABC doesn't need any pressure applied.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:35 AM
1

They managed to convince the head of the Australian Army to change the way things worked, it seems - http://www.annesummers.com.au/pdf/asr11/davidmorrison.pdf Background - https://www.humanrights.gov.au/our-work/sex-discrimination/projects/male-champions-change Not sure if they're too keen on fighting for issues that effect men, but their succinct playbook is something I think people should be aware of.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:26 AM
1

Relevance - this process seems to have been behind a number of Australia media narratives, e.g. everything the ABC touches.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:57 AM
17

With misunderstandings about the nature of feminism, caused by groups on either side of the spectrum propagating myths by either emulating a stereotype or holding these stereotypes up as representative, we’re in danger of rewinding a lot of the progress that’s been made. ... The government has made fighting radicalisation a priority under the current guidelines. It is my belief that websites like Return of Kings and their ilk are actually radicalising vulnerable young men into misogynistic thoug…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:45 AM
6

tl;dr - Feminists are dead. Feminists don't have to be your audience anymore. They're losing their power, and that's why they're so mad. HOWEVER, damselling and white knighting is unlikely to end, even if critical theory goes away. Women are still going to have some in-group bias. Men will still try to pretend that they're the only good man out there, and that all the other men are evil. Karen hopes we might get to the point where masculinity isn't vilified so much. IMO, it's a generational thin…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:26 AM
6

As I understand it, social work generally gives them enough reality checks that they'll eventually go mad, or re-examine their views.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:57 AM
1

The wage gap is due to incentives. Courts typically provide women a safety net. If custody typically went to the higher earning parter (the one who's setting a good example for children to follow?), or was split by default (unless one parent couldn't afford it, then tough luck to them) and alimony didn't exist (why should it?), you can bet women would reconsider their choices pretty quick.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:58 AM
-2

Honestly, I think people are too judgmental towards Sarkeesian. Compare her to almost any other SJW. She's a bit hypocritical, but it's not like she's going on aggressive witch hunts against individuals, she's criticising games. She's hypocritically criticising behavior - the products that were produced are not up to her (impossibly high) standards. Most SJWs hypocritically criticise people - publicly applying very damaging labels ("abuser", "misogynist", "rapist", etc) to people for not meeting…
/r/MensRights25/01/16 04:53 AM
2

He's like the child who said the emperor has no clothes. He's of some use, even if he also happens to shit himself in public.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 09:49 AM
1

Also, I expand a bit on a long twitter rant here: https://twitter.com/femfowl/status/691089797243236354 Want more evidence of how hard left-feminists are driving public policy? Here's extracts from the witness statement by the Secretary of Premier and Cabinet of Victoria (a pretty important state civil servant, and in Australia it's the states who run law enforcement and education) - addressing a Royal Commission - http://www.rcfv.com.au/MediaLibraries/RCFamilyViolence/Statements/WIT-3049-002-00…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 04:02 AM
1

Yeah, an example I was thinking of using is injecting krocadil into your eye socket. That's a coping mechanism. It's just a very bad one.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 03:44 AM
2

I don't think he's as bright as he thinks he is. He's trying to reduce everything to socioeconomic status (class). It's a step up from reducing everything to le patriarchy, at least. But he's just not digging through the research. No mention of the role reciprocal violence plays, or of any of the prevention strategies being tested (Duluth vs cognitive strategies, whether women need to be taught, etc). Sadly, the insight to shit-stirring ratio isn't very high. The worst thing? He used the god-awf…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 11:31 AM
1

The key seems to be that people think 'coping mechanism' is a positive statement. Pretty much anything you do to escape or avoid negative emotions is a 'coping mechanism'. Violence is generally a maladaptive one. Feminists are butthurt that he offered an explanation that wasn't 'patriarchy'. But normal people are mad, because they've been fooled into thinking he was justifying it. Explaining isn't justifying or excusing. You can explain bad behavior without approving of it (in fact, you probably…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 06:04 AM
3

Part II Since Latham is a bit of an idiot, let's look at what can be done that's not fixing "class issues" - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405177/ As articulated by Pepler (2012) and Langhinrichsen-Rohling and Turner (2012), preventing IPV requires an understanding of the characteristics that constitute a healthy romantic relationship. Specifically, as delineated by the Centers for Disease Control (2008), these characteristics include: (a) belief in nonviolent conflict resolution;…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 05:53 AM
1

The journal it was published in has an IF of over 3, so it's probably not a bad journal (yes IF can be meaningless). Conclusion: It is unfortunate that “clearly we have only just begun” to design prevention programs that are based on empirical evidence from well-designed studies regarding the etiology and course of IPV. Too many resources of time, effort, and money have gone into previous IPV prevention and treatment programs that were not grounded in the research evidence and are therefore more…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 09:11 PM
1

I can't be fucked reading, but the general gist of this argument is "If women were running the world it wouldn't be so shit". OK, sometimes they don't say "women", they say "people with non-masculine cis-het values". Like the Christian Right, they "hate the sin (masculinity), not the sinner (men)". It's not COMPLETELY illogical. If society has completely broken down (Somalia? Syria?), and it's a horrible, violent, dog-eat-dog world, then maybe a different society would be better. It's not a lack…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 01:00 PM
1

I think the CIA role is somewhat exaggerated (Whitlam was making plenty of enemies within the country anyway), but yes, the CIA did help push him out. Australia pulls the same shit when we can get away with it.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:43 AM
1

He's the former Labor leader (and would have been Prime Minister if his party won the election), 2004 IIRC. You can play the radio show and skip to 8:00. Basically, he's talking about the feminists push on domestic violence, and say feminists have hijacked a genuine problem (domestic violence in poor / ethnic ares) and are hijacking it for political reasons (claiming the solution to domestic violence is to help upper-middle-class women). I'm paraphrasing a bit, but that's his main argument.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:29 AM
5

Similarly, it's common for guys to get a bit upset after a bad break-up. A tiny minority murder their ex. Some murder their kids. And they're quite rightfully put in prison for a very long time (or maybe even executed). Sure, they might be depressed (which is linked to impaired judgement), but they still know what they're doing and they wouldn't do it if they weren't complete monsters.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:49 AM
6

I'd be interested to know what happens to Queens who lose wars vs Kings who lose wars. Also, penis envy (posing as a "strong male" because of patriarchy) is out: In addition, present evidence against several alternative accounts. One such account suggests that queens may have fought more wars to signal they were strong, regardless of their actual capacity. If this is true, we should observe a larger effects early in the reign, when it would be most valuable to send this signal. However, we obser…
/r/MensRights19/01/16 04:50 AM
2

I think it's /pol/?
/r/MensRights18/01/16 09:42 AM
1

Like terrorists, crazy women usually aren't a danger unless you go out of your way to seek them out.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 08:54 AM
2

As Airport once said, "Autism in women is often misdiagnosed as feminism".
/r/MensRights16/01/16 08:35 AM
20

To be fair, most of her jobs have been working with men. Rose Law Firm, Wallmart, TCBY, and Lafarage board of directors, the U.S. Senate, the State Department ... none are really pink ghettos, and I doubt she often had to report to a female manager. She's probably had a lot of women do a good job of filing, fetching stuff, and helping remind her of appointments though.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:43 AM
3

If you treat all your co-workers like they're autistic, you create a very unfriendly work environment.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:15 AM
5

Interesting stats here: http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_images.jsp?cntn_id=111458 It seems being married means men do about 1 hour less of housework, and women do about 7 hours more. Weird stuff. I'm guessing this is largely driven by cooking (either shopping for ingredients, or meal prep). Also, cleaning pots, pans, etc.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:11 AM
2

Were you born yesterday? The panhandlers get a commission. The rest goes to head office, to do more marketing and management. They fund ads for membership drives and merchandise. It's all about 'raising awareness' (and paying the hard-working awareness raisers). You people all think Anita Sarkeesian is a con artist? The really professional organisations raise 10 times the awareness, and 1000 times the cash (at least).
/r/MGTOW14/01/16 03:54 AM
1

Anyone 13 or older can create or sign a petition on WhiteHouse.gov. In order to participate in the We the People platform on WhiteHouse.gov, users must create a WhiteHouse.gov account and verify their email address. I might be wrong, but as far as I can tell it says nothing about citizenship, and the ZIP code is optional. The only restrictions I've seen are the need to verify an account, the age limit, and only one signature per petition.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 03:13 PM
1

No, anything "studies" is likely to be a good deal of critical theory on "why this group is oppressed".
/r/MGTOW13/01/16 04:10 AM
6

i picked her up at a party thinking she was in trouble, she texted "help" and found her out of her mind drunk. I'm assuming she's not a complete retard. If she needs help, she can call 911. Or a friend. She doesn't need you. Sorry to burst your bubble, but she can actually survive without you, she just might have to stop behaving like a spoiled brat. The only thing you should do to help her is call emergency services if she threatens self-harm (so they can take her in for a psych evaluation). Mo…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 03:54 AM
3

The man has literally exposed himself to a female reporter before He's suing for defamation though, so maybe he didn't.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 02:12 AM
1

A croqueembouche is a cake used by stacking a whole bunch of profiteroles together. That's the great thing about profiteroles. Even if they're imaginary, or full of air, some feminist will tell you that they're real, because they're in a croqueembouche made up of so many profiteroles.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:27 AM
2

Sure, THAT profiterole might be imaginary. But its existence is justified by the presence of so many other profiteroles!
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:23 AM
3

Correlation is not causation. Let me explain: A lot of people don't get married because they are poor. A lot of marriages break down for financial reasons. It's not just financial reasons. Drug or alcohol addiction. Mental illness. Just about anything that can kill you can also kill (or prevent) a marriage.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:44 AM
3

One thing worth noting is how OLD feminism is. Feminism was quite popular in the days of JS Mill. It's over 100 years old, and has long been the main ideology of the elites. Yes, it took a bit longer for women to get the vote, but that's much like, say, gay marriage - it was a popular idea amongst the elites long before it was legislated. And before feminism, women were still put on a pedestal. There's plenty of examples of people citing journalists who were saying things like "IT'S 1782, WHY CA…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 10:44 AM
1

I think the numbers are getting a bit exaggerated. It could be a few small groups of organised trouble-makers, and the bulk of the "up to 1000 North Africans" could just be guys who were a bit rowdy (catcalling, hitting on women, maybe being a little scary) but not really organised. Combine a small number of real villains with a large group of guys who are just a bit sleazy, and you've got a really scary story.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:03 AM
3

A lot of them seem to be angry that some guy wasted their time. I guess they feel entitled to a long-term relationship, and get mad if the guy isn't willing to be in it for the long haul?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 05:26 AM
13

In the last ~5 years, Conservatives went from a small minority online, to pretty much equal numbers. Rural broadband has almost caught up with college campuses. And there is a grain of truth in that image. Feminists talk about "The Patriarchy", like it's something intrinsically evil. When they're actually talking about pretty much our entire society, not simply the grossly sexist bits, then it's not entirely unfair to say they a bit anti-social.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 02:33 AM
1

The relationship is not good for either of you.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 01:53 AM
2

Rape culture?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 01:52 AM
3

Nor is Mel McLaughlin, the "victim" (of "workplace sexual harassment" - a black guy hitting on her), making a big deal out of it (at least, not publicly). I think the word she used was "overblown".
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:48 PM
5

Male feminists. The problem is, as feminists, they can't really talk about anything where women benefit from gender roles. Because in mainstream feminism, women are always the primary victims of sexism, and men just suffer collateral damage. Nothing is ever unfair for men. Men simply have to deal with the collateral costs of oppressing women. For example, women are slaves, so men have to keep them fed and clothed. Men drive women into undesirable occupations, and underpay them, so the occasional…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:45 PM
1

And yes. I am using a throwaway because I wouldn't want people on my main account to know I hate fucking feminism. We can play semantic games ("actually, it's about equality!") but 80% of Americans say they aren't feminists. So I think it's safe to say most people dislike what they think feminism is.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 08:26 AM
3

This shit isn't new. Here's a 2012 article from the same site (Harvard Business Review) with similar conclusions - https://hbr.org/2012/03/diversity-training-doesnt-work A study of 829 companies over 31 years showed that diversity training had “no positive effects in the average workplace.” Millions of dollars a year were spent on the training resulting in, well, nothing. Attitudes — and the diversity of the organizations — remained the same. It gets worse. The researchers — Frank Dobbin of Harv…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:48 AM
2

Well, the NSW Coroners Court (Domestic Violence Death Review Team) found that in every single homicide in NSW that they reviewed, the man (whether he was the victim or the perpetrator) was abusing the woman in their 2013-2015. Every. Single. One. (Except the few cases were there was no DV on any side - e.g. pure financial motives). And very few cases included the woman abusing the man, or so they found. It would truly be shocking if a coroner was making shit up.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 02:05 AM
2

I guess the leaders of these rights organisations (or the politicians funding them) are less likely feel guilty about underaged male prostitutes?
/r/MensRights03/01/16 08:08 AM
2

Here you go - a 1959 training video on how to be a good white knight in the workplace. https://youtu.be/j8ADfS8WQmw?t=1m30s So ... it's just gen X and Y?
/r/MGTOW02/01/16 06:32 PM
1

Most 12-17 year old boys who use steroids aren't using them safely.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 06:09 PM
2

Those aren't "super models". Super models have a healthier weight - they tend to actually look sexy. Clothes models are just as thin as humanly possible, because ... fuck knows. I guess they want people to think they'll look thin in their clothes? But super models actually tend to look attractive, so they are a bit more curvey.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 06:07 PM
1

That's bullshit, and you know it. A couple of MGTOWs sperged out, as some MGTOWs are prone to do. There were still plenty of people who would have spoken to the BBC, even within MGTOW.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 12:57 PM
1

https://theconversation.com/the-ironclad-logic-of-conspiracy-theories-and-how-to-break-it-31684 Step One – Agree on a phrasing of Premise S and Premise C for the issue at hand. The earlier examples show how this can be done. Premise C (the conspiracy theory) - Women are oppressed in virtually every way. The only oppression men face is when it's unavoidable collateral damage (e.g. men have to work because women aren't allowed to). Most people don't see it as oppression, because of patriarchy. Pre…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 02:39 AM
1

At least they're talking about it. Who else (in the media) is?
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:53 AM
1

Foxes and hedgehogs. People with low complexity integrative thinking (or whatever you call it) tend to reduce things down to one big issue. Everything is sexist, racist, homophobic, anti-male, heretical, a Jewish conspiracy, cultural marxist, big government, capitalism ... you name it, there's some idiot who blames ALL the world's problems on the one simple cause. I swear, if it weren't for these idiots the world would be OMG IT'S GOT ME TOO! (Note - this idea has some great evidence, but it's a…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:22 AM
2

Note - a significant number of injuries and deaths of WOMEN are caused by violence triggered by those women being violent to men - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405175/ If the police don't teach women not to hit men, and don't teach men to leave violent women, they are risking the lives of these women (who do not deserve to be stabbed, even if they were the ones who brought the knife into the confrontation). Feminists are using domestic violence victims as a literal sacrifice, to …
/r/MensRights29/12/15 11:34 AM
13

On the other hand: Yes, young men have changed, in the sense that many are finding power over their lives in striking out on entrepreneurial and other risky ventures that have a less predictable course than the four years of undergraduate education. Perhaps they are telling us by their absence on campuses that something is wrong with academe. I think this actually hits the nail on the head. Men are expected to be the wage earner. Going to college for 4 years, and loading yourself up with debt is…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 07:15 AM
12

Is it just me, or is it hidden from /r/news because it's "analysis / opinion"? Wait, no, it's totally gone - https://www.reddit.com/r/undeleteShadow/comments/3y95ea/13_911_calls_for_domestic_violence_against_men_on/
/r/MensRights26/12/15 05:00 AM
-13

The reason why they like to "victim blame" is that there's rarely a victim. A fair majority (70%?) of DV cases are two idiots with anger management issues, who escalate small problems into fist-fights. There's a number of men and women who are just victims (30%?), but it's a bit rarer. And there's actually less physical injury in these cases (probably more psychological trauma though) - no-one ever died because a controlling partner slapped them and they just took it - the injuries happen more o…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:21 AM
3

I mean, I know it refers to a woman with numerous sexual partners, but why is this actually an insult? Because women react to it. If a four letter word makes a woman so butthurt she'll write a newspaper article about it, then it's obviously a word you'd want to use, if you wanted to offend women. It's the same reason 6 year olds say "fuck", even though they don't know what it means - because it gets a reaction. What makes me angry is that you reduced me to your perception of my sexual worth, som…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 03:50 PM
1

Earlier this month, Nona Willis Aronowitz wrote a piece for Matter titled “(Not) All Men: Why women want to believe Our Dudes are the exception.” It was about how women—even very feminist women—can rationalize or deny sexism perpetrated by the men in their lives. One of the “major obstacles in the Fight Against Patriarchy,” she wrote, “is that a sexist guy will always seem like an outsider—a bad-news ex-boyfriend, perhaps, but not your male feminist friend, your super chill brother, your gentle …
/r/MensRights25/12/15 11:29 AM
5

I think I've figured out the "pink tax". For most consumer items, women are the default. Men don't care. For a handful of items, men are either the default (razors?), or it's gender neutral (lego?). Some (but not all) women, being accustomed to their privilege, feel like they are losing out. They demand special pink items, and companies see a way to profitably meet this demand.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 10:11 AM
2

It's a bit later, but here's a 1913 article - https://www.marxists.org/archive/bax/1913/fraud/chap3.htm WE have already pointed out that Modern Feminism has two sides or aspects. The first formulates definite political, juridical and economic demands on the grounds of justice, equity, equality and so forth, as general principles; the second does not formulate in so many words definite demands as general principles, but seems to exploit the traditional notions of chivalry based on male sex sentim…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 01:02 AM
14

"More than anything else in the world, they fear the influence of men of intellectual independence." Albert Einstein, on those who have reason to shun popular enlightenment. - http://www.filosofiaesoterica.com/ler.php?id=1397 A few more extracts (I've cut out a lot of it from its actual context): The shepherd boy said to the horse: “You are the noblest beast that treads the earth. You deserve to live in untroubled bliss; and indeed your happiness would be complete were it not for the treacherous…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 12:14 AM
3

I've often thought about men vs women in terms of intelligence and I think a big part of the problem is that Feminized culture sees memorization as the end all measure of intelligence. It's reasonably valid. Memorising facts and processes helps create a framework for thinking. The human brain is OK at memorising things, and really shit at "critical thinking". Most "critical thinking" is the ability to recognise pattens. Really. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_psychology (yes there's some…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 11:55 PM
7

Since WWII, the main reason to have relatively untrained boots on the ground (as opposed to special forces, or at least professional, highly trained modern infantry units who are closer to special forces than a conscript) is to occupy a hostile population.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 11:36 PM
1

That's not the only problem. Situational Couple Violence (two angry chavs / bogans / rednecks hitting each other) is one of the major causes of domestic homicide / severe domestic violence.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 10:11 AM
1

Basis for saying he doesn't consider a mutual conflict 'domestic violence proper' (e.g. a couple getting into a fight, because they both have anger management issues and are both under the influence) If we compare adult male and female victims of any form of violence by a partner or ex-partner, women are more likely than men to experience frequent, prolonged, and extreme violence. They are far more likely to be sexually assaulted. They are more likely to be injured, to live in fear, and to suffe…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 09:15 AM
5

Regardless, only a court can deny you access to your children and there has to be just cause. Legally, that's true. In practice?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 11:10 PM
3

Please let's not compare this to Einstein. In April 1933, he also discovered that the new German government had passed laws barring Jews from holding any official positions, including teaching at universities. Historian Gerald Holton describes how, with "virtually no audible protest being raised by their colleagues," thousands of Jewish scientists were suddenly forced to give up their university positions and their names were removed from the rolls of institutions where they were employed. Absol…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 10:25 AM
1

AVFM Maybe Reason? Without knowing what the argument is, it's hard to say who'd agree with the argument.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:15 AM
3

I bet they're just pissed he brought it up at all. It's not like he's derailing a serious discussion about it.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:48 AM
-2

theredpill would certainly have a lot to say here about frame, and how he lost it a long time ago. And how he needs to control her, else she will destroy him, which is not wrong in my opinion, but here I was, happily not giving a fuck about my shoes, thinking thank god for mgtow. If you own a dog, you have to control it, or it will destroy you (or at least, destroy a fair bit of your furniture). Sounds like theredpill is being a bit misogynist? You can own a dog, and it's irresponsible to abando…
/r/MGTOW19/12/15 01:42 AM
5

So it's unfair because they are losing their privilege?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:30 AM
3

You're not understanding why. Feminists are deeply and bitterly divided. There's the gender feminists / radfems, who think gender should be eliminated. Then there's ones who care about women, because women are wonderful. About 100 years ago, Bax called these the "political" and "sentimental" feminists. The only compromise position these groups can find is "women are always in the right.".
/r/MensRights18/12/15 08:32 AM
3

Is that the site that wishes it was Gawker?
/r/MensRights18/12/15 03:16 AM

She's a nice girl, caught in the friend (with benefits) zone?
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:55 AM
6

I bet they're really just mad he acknowledged the problem. The Guardian's coverage very rapidly veers off into some UN Women report about women's safety in New Zealand.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:03 AM
0

Mainstream media. The acronym is pretty common on almost any "alternative" discussion forum - rightwing, leftwing, heterodox economic discussion, conspiracy theorists, and anyone else who thinks the mainstream media is largely biased. Probably a bit more common on the right (think terrestrial radio).
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:46 PM
2

If that does happen, expect some extremely panicky pearl-clutching in the MSM.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:41 PM
6

Oh no, embarrassment. Something no man should ever face! No, the issue is that he's let himself think he's morally doing the wrong thing if he "abandons" her. That's why it's shameful for him - because he thinks he's doing something wrong. (At a guess - internet armchair psychologist)
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:50 PM
3

Why is it a nightmare? He needs to just man up and dump her. Women aren't dogs or small children, no matter what some people think - it's not wrong to "abandon" them. Yeah a few white knights were saying "gee, she might be depressed". Yeah, if a dog is acting up, you might not be taking care of it properly, and you need to start treating it better. But human beings aren't dogs.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:42 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_the_United_States#Vietnam_War There were 8,744,000 servicemembers between 1964 and 1975, of whom 3,403,000 were deployed to Southeast Asia.[51] From a pool of approximately 27 million, the draft raised 2,215,000 men for military service (in the United States, Vietnam, West Germany, and elsewhere) during the Vietnam era. The draft has also been credited with "encouraging" many of the 8.7 million "volunteers" to join rather than risk being drafted. The…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:18 AM

They don't learn WHAT to think, they learn HOW to think, right?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:11 AM
2

It's scandalous. Look at that Strauss paper- Thirty Years of Denying the Evidence, on how female to male violence is misleadingly covered up. They should have some kind of investigation into this, maybe even a Royal Comm ... oh who am I kidding.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:43 AM
4

Oh boy, part of the Secretary (not RC) statement: Prevention As the Royal Commission has heard, to achieve sustained change, prevention initiatives should go 'wide and deep' across the community. Initiatives need to begin at early childhood and continue to engage at key points in the life cycle. The government is undertaking a number of key gender equity and prevention initiatives including: A commitment that increases the representation of women on paid Victorian Government boards by requiring …
/r/MensRights16/12/15 06:20 AM
1

If you want to find other examples, you can dig here http://www.rcfv.com.au/Public-Hearings Honestly, most of it seems OK (other than the fact that it often ignores men). There's only a couple of witnesses who go on about power relations and patriarchy. Most talk about poor co-ordination and stuff.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 05:45 AM
1

True, but it's not the RC's job to play politics. Yes, people hope it's their job, but it's really not their job.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 04:26 AM
2

Note - contact is here: http://www.rcfv.com.au/Contact While I can't see a judge charging anyone with perjury, it might be good to remind them that it's their job to find the truth, not play politics, and the expert witnesses should be doing the same. DO NOT FUCK WITH THE ROYAL COMMISSION ITSELF. You can go to jail for insulting them. And they are meant to be neutral, and will be royally pissed off if you imply otherwise. Judges might be biased against men, but they are not "brainwashed feminazi…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 04:05 AM
5

Mostly RooshV. Upside - he explains, inadvertently, why feminism is a joke - https://youtu.be/b8RxL9kuBs4?t=33m17s
/r/MGTOW16/12/15 01:30 AM
1

He also explains, inadvertently, why feminism is a joke - https://youtu.be/b8RxL9kuBs4?t=33m17s
/r/MensRights16/12/15 01:30 AM
1

It's a hot-button issue throughout the manosphere, and especially on MGTOW sites.
/r/MGTOW16/12/15 01:20 AM
2

I'm not actually MGTOW either. But yes, "man up" is seen here as a hugely fucked-up sentiment, which is generally used to shut down people who talk about men's issues. "Your girlfriend hits you? Man up you pussy." "Society is spending millions helping women get into university, despite more women then men getting into university? Man up you pussy." Mainstream society (feminist or just traditionalist) assumes that men can do anything, and women are feeble children. If men have problems, they have…
/r/MGTOW16/12/15 12:56 AM
5

Reggie Yates mostly just covered RooshV who has almost nothing to do with MGTOW. The three main manosphere groups are pick-up artists / reddit's "theredpill" subreddit (RooshV), men's rights, and MGTOW. PUAs basically say "BE A REAL MAN, BE AN ANIMAL, IMPROVE YOURSELF, FUCK BITCHES GET MONEY!" MGTOW basically says "gender relations are fucked, being single is better for men these days". Men's rights tries to highlight problems facing men. ALL are anti-feminist, because mainstream feminist theory…
/r/MGTOW16/12/15 12:50 AM
2

inb4 "Man up is bad" No, not if it means men looking after themselves, and leaving a situation where they put both themselves and their loved ones in danger. Yes, it might be nice if the relationship police would fix everything that was wrong with every relationship. No, it's not going to happen. If men do actually need to look after themselves (unlike women?), then being a "man" definitely includes taking reasonable steps to ensure their own safety. inb4 dehumanisation Well, if women are human …
/r/MGTOW16/12/15 12:16 AM
1

Obviously stories get shared (with no names or identifying details). Anything leaving a paper trail is a bad idea, because the patient might end up seeing them (because even if there's no identifying information, no names, faces, etc, it's a breech of trust).
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:57 PM
6

When a woman does it it's not "entitlement", because gender.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:47 PM
20

The wife said she was about to hit her husband with a picture frame but changed her mind and grabbed a butcher knife instead and hit the defendant with the knife’s blunt side on his leg. The defendant was able to grab the knife away so the wife ran outside the house calling out to people and the police “because she wanted the defendant to get in trouble.” ... Camacho said whatever happens between the couple, whether they stay together or separate completely, they should get counseling. Assault w…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:26 PM
2

Also, with a lot of DV being reciprocal, stopping women hitting men would make those women a lot safer.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:10 PM
2

Feminism has always tried to destroy society, but now it's, like, really trying to destroy it. Women have all the power. Feminism is just a misandristic hate cult that wants to see all men banned from the world forever. Men are the truly oppressed beings now - in fact, there is no one more oppressed than the humble white man who isn't even allowed to express his own opinions and have them be universally respected anymore. It's a real tragedy. If you make boys and men think about feminism, you ar…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:05 PM
0

If the consequence of hitting a man is he mans up and leaves, you can bet it wouldn't happen. Yes, I know it's not always so simple.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 11:50 PM
0

So? Isn't it best for people to stop being victims?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 10:32 PM
1

Is this an appropriate follow-up? Maybe a bit MGTOWy. http://i.imgur.com/8vEYWN1.png
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:33 AM
1

http://www.npr.org/sections/ombudsman/2015/12/08/458834769/nprs-on-air-source-diversity-some-improvement-more-work-to-be-done Gender, too, was effectively constant, with male sources outnumbering female sources two-to-one. Overall, in fiscal year 2015, 30 percent of NPR's sources were female. (Transgender and multi-gender sources were too small of a percentage to show up in the findings.) Conspiracy theory - the beardy goon-men have to interview women, or it will look like they need to employ mo…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:41 AM
1

Yeah, but they're the happy, crazy types of feminists (unless their husband gets sick of their shit and packs a suitcase).
/r/MensRights14/12/15 12:06 AM
4

edit: Selling libertarianism won't fly - the party is too split. The GoP has to represent the a certain number of the American people, and that's the price of democracy. This is missing the BIG picture, and the even BIGGER picture. The BIG picture is conservative feminists (people who think women have the right to choose to be women, and that doesn't make them inferior). The BIGGER picture is it can extend to other "minority" groups, who the left have been failing for 40 years. Testing this on f…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 11:53 PM
1

Unless you're very very bi, you're always going to have a biased sample.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 07:05 PM
2

Kelly and Johnson (2008) declare: “because of the paucity of research on women’s Coercive Controlling Violence, the quantitative data reviewed [in their article] will focus on men” (p. 482). Other research shows the sample selection problem in Johnson’s methodology. Graham-Kevan and Archer (2007) found gender-asymmetrical CCV (that is, the male-only perpetration that Johnson claims) typical of only one of their four sample groups (a shelter sample), the only sample that Johnson relied on to arri…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 06:42 PM
3

Do you have any source? Or was his "corrected" findings the result of people exposing biased figures?
/r/MensRights13/12/15 05:50 PM
1

I think they handled it badly. The couple are both a bit mentally ill IMO (PTSD and beta as fuck), but neither are being intentionally malicious (unless they're both lying). It seems like they both need therapy, but it's not clear that either of them are bad people. Just a bit crazy and a bit thick. I'm not even excusing all mental illnesses - someone who's just an incurable cunt is technically mentally ill, but it's their personality that's broken. PTSD isn't a bad personality, it's a bad set o…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 05:42 PM
2

I can't tell, was she intentionally hitting him, or lashing out reactively because of PTSD from her past relationship? The presenter tells her that any violence is about power and control, even though both partners are insisting she just goes into fight mode if she's surprised. Maybe that's a lie, it's hard to tell from the 2 minutes they're talking. Yeah, the guy's a mangina (co-dependent?). But the woman doesn't seem to have any intent to hurt him, and she's trying to get help (not trying hard…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 03:43 PM
2

From the festival website: With access to over 60 motivational speakers and interactive workshops, body work (massages, yoga and meditation classes), and natural therapy sessions (Naturopaths, Osteopaths, Chinese Medical Practitioners, Life Coaches, Energy Healers and dozens more), as well as psychic readings; we’ve created a nurturing space where you are free to explore, pamper and nourish your mind, body and soul. Not really feminists, but "free spirits". I'd rage against these people but unli…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:24 PM
2

“We have one female general partner at GV.” Maris said, using the acronym that the venture unit is changing its name to since becoming part of Alphabet, the Google holding company. “It’s not good enough. Because we’ve failed. Because we haven’t succeeded in finding women for that role, probably because it was easier to find men. That’s not really a great answer.” That sounds like self-invalidation. You don't have women on the board, because you screwed up? Get some therapy man ... these SJWs are…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:10 PM
1

Movember is men's health (men's cancer, mental health, fitness). No-shave November, which seems to be a copycat is general men's and women's health (mostly gender-neutral cancer).
/r/MensRights13/12/15 07:36 AM
2

I am always amazed when I am asked in accusatory tones “Why do you want to prevent women being helped?”. I want to end violence against every woman, man and child. They want to end it against only women. This speaks volumes of them, not me. Ignoring the fact that these critics seem to act like the lives of men don't matter ... It's quite possible feminists are contributing to violence against women. Ignaz Semmelweis discovered that hand washing saves lives. Despite various publications of result…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 06:26 AM
3

If you don't care what a person thinks That sounds like "manning up" to me.
/r/MGTOW12/12/15 12:38 AM
1

Manning up is the biggest societal joke I have ever heard. It implies there is a standard model for what defines a man. There is. But that model has changed. (No, there's not really a single model, but there's certainly a set of models; and almost everyone agrees that white knights do not belong in that set). Women are perfectly capable of supporting themselves (financially, emotionally, etc). Men who enable them to be damsels in distress are not doing the right thing for themselves, or women, o…
/r/MGTOW11/12/15 11:18 PM
2

Yes, that's assault. Or you an apply for an AVO instead. I know nothing about you or your father, so I don't know whether you can patch things up, or what the best way to do so is. Leaving, and patching things up in a controlled way (long distance communication, and meeting in public places) is probably safest for everyone. I live in a very traditional town and I feel like they would just laugh at me for being a pussy Fuck 'em. Anyone who thinks like that is a coward. Someone who can settle thin…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:41 PM
1

Yes, many education courses are run by feminists / SJWs, and it's important he finds out before enrolling in a uni whether or not it's cancer. The feminist-run education courses are useless, don't teach how to teach, and are extremely stressful for people who value intellectual honesty. I've seen a friend (not an anti-feminist, just a guy who isn't intellectually dishonest) really struggle in one. All education courses have some Social Justice type units, but if they are teaching bell hooks (Ani…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:34 PM
1

Don't let unjust societal pressure and norms tell you what to do. I think it's a phrase worth reclaiming. I don't think anyone's tried to reclaim it, because OMG FEMINISTS WILL SAY IT'S TOXIC MASCULINITY but fuck 'em. Being responsible for your own happiness and success is a traditionally masculine trait (there's women who "man up" too - see any woman who's successful at being something other than a damsel), but it's one of the good ones.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:19 PM
3

Funny comment on the article: If you're a man married to a woman: How much say did you get in the ceremony of your declaration of love? How much did the ceremony represent you? Was it a female lifetime dream that you were invited to like a guest? Who chose the style of decoration in your living environment? Are there any rooms in your home that you've chosen the decor? Do you live in an entirely female styled zone? Have you ever chosen a holiday destination? How much say did you get during any h…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:00 PM
1

Yeah, I might be wrong on Republicans and Sanders. The internet can be biased. But I really get the impression that Republicans do not like Clinton at all.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:43 PM
1

Most MRAs are not Republicans. This is a stupid strategy, unless you're a Democrat. Sanders polls slightly better than Clinton in general elections - http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/ Maybe it's just because he's less well known (?) but it seems people generally like Sanders once they get to know more about him. From what I can tell, Sanders is respected (if not liked) by most Republicans. They think he's got bad policies, but they don't think he's a bad person. The…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:35 PM
3

There's actually a few articles by this guy on the site: https://www.marxists.org/archive/bax/ including books The Legal Subjugation of Man and The Fraud of Feminism.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:49 PM
3

Being charitable, maybe his wife is just being rude and awkward because she's not used to video interviews, and Steve is just worried because he doesn't want the interview to be a train-wreck.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:19 PM
1

It's there's actually some evidence for this. Factors: Men are physically fitter, and much better at things like swimming, climbing, etc. Men are better able to get to get out of danger. Imagine you're swept out to sea, have to clear obstacles or lift heavy objects, or are running to a shelter - men are more likely to survive in most cases. A natural disaster is the sort of time when you may need to do heroic shit to survive. Location / occupation. If women are at home when an earthquake hits, a…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 06:09 AM
3

It seems she's smarter than the average feminist then. The general thrust is that men and women are different, and it's unfair than females can't pursue "feminine" success (taking selfies, buying shoes, or whatever it is she thinks females want to do). Or that the jobs which females choose to do are just less well paid / respected than the ones men do. I'm not sure what her metric of "feminine success" is. A lot of women probably think being a good mother is, and it's certainly a lot more respec…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 04:43 AM
1

Interesting. The New Matilda is the most left-wing news site in Australia that I'm aware of (unless you include Green Left Weekly, but that's more propaganda than news).
/r/MensRights08/12/15 05:02 AM
1

A very good article.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:56 AM
3

Personally, I'd de-emphasise rape stats. No-one really cares (since everyone agrees it's a problem anyway), and go for DV. You can't say, teach women not to hit men. You can't say that, because mainstream feminist theory says you can't. It's "victim blaming" or denying that domestic violence is a part of patriarchy. Simply suggesting that women may be at fault is part of the problem, right? So you can't talk about it. But studies have shown the opposite - teaching women not to hit men can preven…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 06:34 AM
-1

Isn't it hilarious how feminists are still stuck in the 50s?
/r/MensRights06/12/15 07:38 AM
1

I can't find any mention of the gender of judges in that paper. And other papers find differently - http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=668544 The findings regarding gender in the case of serious offenses are quite striking: the greater the proportion of female judges in a district, the lower the gender disparity for that district. I interpret this as evidence of a paternalistic bias among male judges that favors women.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:41 AM
8

Judge Angela Morris said Franklin, now under psychiatric care, acted 'despicably.' Referring to her claims about the phone messages, Judge Morris said: 'Your response when faced with your actions was to blame your own son.' The judge added: 'I have watched the video of the first police interview and that was not, in my view, a woman struggling with a mental health problem. 'Quite frankly, whatever the rights and wrongs in your marriage were, what you went on to do was absolutely despicable. 'You…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:45 AM
15

How is a $850,000 settlement "disbelieved on evidence"?
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:07 AM
-3

Reading the judgement, he's on a pretty decent income (almost 4 thousand pounds / month), and has the property mortgage free (and it's customised for him). So the 2,000 is for the wife's rent + expenses + child support. The only time the judge really got shitty in the judgement when he noted that they'd spent a total of over 100,000 on legal costs. And at the press for their reporting (especially naming one of the children). It's worth noting that Simon was injured in 2008, and the marriage ende…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 09:34 PM
4

Judgement - http://www.levisonmeltzerpigott.co.uk/images/newsOtherDocs/Simon%20Vaughan%20Judgment%20271015.pdf
/r/MensRights02/12/15 09:07 PM
5

She bought a bungalow in rural Shropshire for £295,000 without a survey, then found it was structurally unsound. It was demolished and rebuilt by her father, at a cost of £300,000, but still failed to meet building regulations. Donna’s financial decisions appeared to be injudicious at best, reckless at worst. Almost £600,000 was spent, yet Simon today has a property valued at just £410,000. Injudicious doesn't go far enough. £300,000 seems like a pretty high price for building a rural bungalow. …
/r/MensRights02/12/15 08:55 PM
3

"Hi Andrew Bolt! I'd call you a cunt too, but then...you know that." ~ Clementine Ford, 2014. https://archive.is/xq3iK "I'd call Scott Morrison a cunt but we all know he lacks both the depth and warmth. And the ability to deliver humans into safety, obviously." ~ Clementine Ford, 2014. https://archive.is/xq4mx "Andrea Moss really is a disgusting, hideous bully. Could she be any more of a rank hypocrite? Gina was right - she is a cunt. #RHOMelbourne" ~ Clementine Ford, 2014. https://archive.is/lm…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 01:38 PM
0

There's a second accusation, which claims he beat up a co-star in front of some crew. It's basically all up to what the witnesses actually saw now.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:22 PM
9

And she's got banned from Facebook - http://www.smh.com.au/national/enough-is-enough-clementine-ford-to-lodge-police-complaint-over-trolling-20150626-ghyr8w.html
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:59 PM
2

It depends. If they makes them look as retarded as feminists (who pull similar stunts), it can detract. I guess it depends on the level of aggression and decency, whether the underlying ideas have merit, and shit like that. Stunts are fine. The balaclava protests outside courts put people off.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:07 AM
1

Or they had really terrible childhoods like most of the men in prison.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 05:25 AM
1

tl;dr - it's like asking why Fundamentalist Christians tend to: Support tax cuts Oppose universal healthcare Support the right to bear arms Support the military Support Israel (even if they're not those crazy Christian Zionists) Oppose affirmative action Could these be partisan issues, and not something that's clearly a result of their religious beliefs?
/r/MensRights29/11/15 05:19 AM
8

I don't buy it. Feminists aren't afraid of Islam. They know perfectly well that they're very well protected (by the men they hate). How often do you see a small yappy dog ever stop yapping because a pit-bull walked past? Feminists don't attack Islam because they're socialists, and socialists support Islam. Simple as that. Not "government should provide healthcare" Democratic Socialists either, unless they're very moderate (Steinem I'd say is a moderate). Islam is an oppressed class. Feminists / …
/r/MensRights29/11/15 04:42 AM
3

IIRC, polling suggests there's more women who are strongly pro-life (and more strongly pro-choice). Men lie mostly in the middle. Yes, 54% of women are pro choice. 46% of men are. link. But that doesn't account for how extreme they are (on either side). There's been a recent increase in pro-choice women, but it's small and unstable. Over time, it's been age and party affiliation (and probably religiosity) that determines things. The people screaming at protests, or sending pictures of fetuses on…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 11:32 PM
5

There's been studies done on forcing violent women into intervention programs, to see if it reduces violence against them - http://elearning2.uniroma1.it/pluginfile.php/115810/mod_resource/content/1/Mutual_treatment_Violence.pdf A term to search for is "Mutual IPV" on Google scholar, if anyone wants to dig further. No doubt the white knights will find this all a bit uncomfortable. They'd rather have women get beat up than accept that not all women are perfect, and that they aren't that much bett…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 05:08 AM
2

Batty was OK early on, mostly talking about mental health. Then she got "educated". I think she means well.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 10:28 PM
4

Let me get this straight - a network that has Karl Stefanovic co-hosting its breakfast show is doing less biased reporting than the Australian Broadcasting Commission? (Yes, everyone knows it's an act, and he's not actually an idiot).
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:17 PM

A conservative Christian lobby group in New Zealand. Someone remind me how it's always feminists trying to help men?
/r/MensRights27/11/15 03:38 PM
6

This will be very good for certain ethnic minorities, but I expect it will have next to no impact on women.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:17 AM
3

pdf http://elearning2.uniroma1.it/pluginfile.php/115810/mod_resource/content/1/Mutual_treatment_Violence.pdf
/r/MensRights26/11/15 09:56 AM
1

See also: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1858633/ (same author, earlier article, more opinionated) Judy Bitch actually covered a HuffPo summary of it. It suggests that preventing violence against men would go a long way to preventing violence against women.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:20 PM
6

He is. And he's not particularly well informed about a lot of things. And he's sloppy about his facts. But he's saying stuff that other people won't. People like CH Sommers, Cathy Young, even Sargon of Akkad tend to be a lot more careful with their facts, and work as serious journalists / academics / whatever Sargon is. Milo is a trashy populist who shoots off his mouth. But he does it well, and he's funny, and he's talking about issues that other people won't.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:19 AM
0

Sounds like a logical consequence of a society where sex is often associated with alcohol (and other drugs). Hit on someone in a pub, frat party, etc, and there's a good chance alcohol is involved. So logically, feminists who oppose sexual advances in spaces where drugs / alcohol are not expected (elevators?) are a part of rape culture? Or do they expect everything be arranged by marriage brokers or Tinder? Hey, I know - a woman who's not looking for a relationship could wear her hair up, like i…
/r/MensRights24/11/15 02:46 AM
1

That would certainly be a big factor.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 02:04 AM
3

FemiNazis come up with a plan that will be lauded by ACTUAL Nazis.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 11:29 PM
1

When it happens to women it's gendered rape, gendered shackling, and gendered inferior medical care. Because men are the default gender. edit: forgot the sarcasm tag
/r/MensRights22/11/15 08:43 AM
3

She probably does't hate Mexicans. She probably hates (or is fighting with) her husband, and blames all Mexicans (that also explains the misandry).
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:47 AM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guthrie_vs._Elliott Feminist critic Anita Sarkeesian began to receive large volumes of online harassment following a 2012 Kickstarter campaign for the Tropes vs. Women video series.[1][2] One form of harassment commonly decried in the media was a Newgrounds game in which players punched a photograph of Sarkeesian, causing her to appear progressively more bruised and injured.[3][4][5] The game's creator, Benjamin Daniel, who had previously made a similar game about p…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:48 PM
1

Feminists like Anita Sarkeesian Literally who ... You raise a very good point, but let's not pretend Sarkeesian is influential except in the fields of feminist video game theory, and the UN Women response to mean words on the internet. Not the actual UN, but a quasi-UN organisation. Yes, if there was equal treatment of men and women, men would be better off in these areas.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 05:20 AM
1

Also, look at their web news coverage. Combine BBC quotes that Davies bashed feminism (excluding the vast majority of his contributions) with the SNP quote, and the BBC has effectively run a hit piece - rather than addressing the pertinent points Davies raised - while siding with the SNP. Of course, the points Davies raised were examples of the government not caring about inequalities men face, as not addressing these inequalities may lead to negative outcomes for men - but perhaps the BBC doesn…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 03:21 AM
-1

Wait, maybe it's not that the BBC tried to mislead people. The article could be cribbed from a similar HuffPo article.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:23 PM
4

"Ugh, these MRAs just complain about feminism! What's that? Sentencing disparity? POWER PLUS PREJUDICE, DOESN'T COUNT!" "Ugh, these MRAs just complain about feminism!"
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:53 PM
5

continued: Or that Davies suggested unequal treatment by family courts could be a factor Suicide, especially in the numbers that we see for men, is a huge, tragic problem, and we need to work together to achieve change. One thing that leads men to contemplate suicide is the breakdown of a relationship, especially if children are involved. It is clear that the courts are more likely to place children with the mother than with the father. This is a massive area where men face very different treatm…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:13 PM
11

tl;dr - the BBC article could be interpreted as "Tory calls for debate on male suicide, uses it as an excuse to complain about feminism". In reality, he spent a huge amount of time talking about male suicide, and other inequalities faced by men (and the government's indifference at best to these inequalities). The BBC even includes a quote to that effect: SNP MP Paul Monaghan said he found many of Mr Davies' remarks "unrelated to the title of the debate", saying the Scottish government was "deep…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:43 PM
4

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmhansrd/cm151119/halltext/151119h0001.htm Women represent men better than men! If we had had more women like her, and others, in this place over the past 100 years, perhaps more of the issues raised by my hon. Friend the Member for Shipley would have been better debated and more fully addressed, because such issues are often picked up by women Members of Parliament.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:38 PM
3

Yeah, of course. You can never think straight if you're under pressure, unless you've already thought things through (and preferably drilled). Instinct just kicks in. Like the woman probably realises she was over the line, and will either blame herself, or dig her heels in to justify her actions ("well, he might have been a bad guy").
/r/MensRights20/11/15 11:08 AM
5

A partial explanation of the wage gap? Men place less flexible working requests - http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/03a641db-b428-4dd5-bc4e-e6b7a0ce0408?in=14:31:50 So it's their fault if they have less time for family. Victim blaming ahoy!
/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:12 AM
5

Oh boy - primary victims of suicide anyone? http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/03a641db-b428-4dd5-bc4e-e6b7a0ce0408?in=14:16:00 Worry about families first, then talk about prevention.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 09:38 AM
4

Women of college age tend to be middle class or better. Very few middle class women won't go to college. Would it really be a shock if poorly educated working-class women with limited employment opportunities in a poor high-crime neighborhood are at greater risk?
/r/MensRights20/11/15 08:41 AM
7

You had a video camera, and didn't start videoing her? Lesson learned now?
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:19 AM
4

HOLY SHIT! http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/03a641db-b428-4dd5-bc4e-e6b7a0ce0408?in=13:55:30 He gets called out for anecdotes, 2 minutes after complaining that the government doesn't release statistics on custody. And gets called a misogynist.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:12 AM
3

Also, no statistics. I hear they are actually a bit better, but I suppose a lot of men would be more willing to take a "plea bargain" then fight an uphill battle (would their lawyer really suggest they fight a losing battle?). Seriously people WATCH THE DEBATE! Unless you trust The Guardian to summarise it for you.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:01 AM
2

No. The Guardian will say the Tories were bad, Labor cares about men, and men's health is why we need feminism. Murdoch's rags will say that Labor is bad, the Tories care about men, and that's why we don't need feminism. Then they'll pull a few quotes from both sides, that reinforce their points. News organisations don't report so often on men's / women's issues to tell the truth, but because they know it draws in rubberneckers and partisans (on both sides). A balanced overview would probably be…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:39 AM
2

It doesn't suggest that men are at risk, because of things like high expectations, lack of a safety net, etc. I think the difference between MRAs and feminists is why they think masculinity exists. The MRA answer generally being that it's nature, and an adaptive response to a society that doesn't value men just for being men. Quibbles aside, it's great that she's saying it's a major issue that urgently needs to be addressed.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 11:54 PM
4

I was alive at a time when women dealt with metric tons of bullshit Didn't men also have to deal with metric tons of bullshit?
/r/MensRights19/11/15 08:00 PM
5

That's only part of the story: The wage premium paid to lesbian workers is a bit of a mystery. Sure, lesbian women are better-educated on average, are more likely to be white, live predominantly in cities, have fewer children, and are significantly more likely to be a professional. But even when you control for these differences, the wage premium is still on the order of 6%. Part of this 6% is suggested to be that lesbians, knowing they can't rely on a man, choose to earn more.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:50 PM
2

Tagged feminism, because it's wage gap. An interesting explanation though.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 03:28 PM
1

On average, a 13 year old white kid reads about as well as a 17 year old black kid. Maybe that's a bit out of date, and it seems to be changing pretty rapidly now, but still ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_the_United_States#/media/File:NAEP-reading-trends-race-2004.png Obviously though, she doesn't really mean "you gotta be educated". She means "you gotta agree with me".
/r/MensRights17/11/15 03:53 AM
2

Imagine a person who is the sole victim of society. Someone who – if it were not for the societal makeup of the world, if it weren’t for the images the public had been force-fed by the media, if it weren’t for the fact that making money required hard work, if it weren’t for the innate desire for others to be loved – would be a very happy, outgoing person. Imagine someone who, deep down inside, is one of the elite, the beautiful, and the charming; if it weren’t for all the chemicals in the air, t…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:56 PM
13

Also, there's a big difference between logged in and logged out users. Logged in users like politics, because you can discuss it. Logged out users don't want to talk, so they'd rather have funny cat videos. Because if you don't want to argue with idiots on the internet, you don't really want to look at a politics thread. They could run a separate voting system for logged-out users, so logged out users see a different ranking (assuming they care enough to vote). Or they could just track click-tho…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:23 PM
1

AVO
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:13 PM
1

I'm not saying anyone who mistakes a double standard and a double bind is an idiot, but a philosophy professor should know better. It's pretty much their job to get words right.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 04:10 AM
1

Either you're misquoting him, or he's an idiot. That's not even a double standard, it's a double bind (two conflicting standards). You can find the definitions if you go to "double standard" on wikipedia. A double standard is "men who sleep around a lot are studs, women who sleep around a lot are sluts". And yes, EVERYTHING is a double bind, if you are highly neurotic or anxious; because there's always people who discourage extremes. The reason feminists care about these double binds is they thi…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 03:51 AM
8

So a member of a group associated with the group running the protests is allegedly a b-cluster maniac? I'm pretty sure even most of the protestors know that the inner circle of activists has more than a few crazies in the mix. Most of the protestors aren't stupid - they generally consider the organisers to be useful idiots. Organisers will organise the protest, and talk to the media, possibly failing their degree in the process - but if they organise a protest that people are interested in then …
/r/MensRights13/11/15 05:32 AM
3

They are loosely defined to mra's, who get their definitions from slogans and random feminists who don't really know what they are talking about, or else look at the wiki definition, but dont find out what it actually means. The only people who know what this shit "actually means" are generally so disingenuous there's little point debating them. I guess a better strategy would be to recognise the motte and bailey as something worth turning up the heat on. "Rape culture does not exist in the west…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 02:02 AM
2

I can't help noticing it comes out just after funding stops. Odd. I'm sure it wasn't deliberate.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 02:27 AM

Coincidence. The "red pill" (a term used by MRAs long before TRP existed) in the title refers to the radical idea that society might oppress men more than women in some situations.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:38 AM
7

IIRC, the pro-life lobby is mostly female. And the GoP panders to them.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:07 AM
1

Also, future income. More than 12 months out of the workforce, and you better be shit hot to find another good job.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:05 AM
10

Imagine her reaction if Lee told her he was dumping Ann. No real problems, just looking for a change of scenery.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:45 PM
4

Referring to PUAs as TRP is a reddit thing. The whole world isn't reddit. Not even the whole internet is reddit.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:50 AM
6

It's an ideology. All ideologies are like that. Ask a Marxist why the financial crisis happened, and the answer is too much capitalism. Ask a hardcore libertarian, and the answer is too much government intervention. Ask them the cause of any problem, and it's the same answer. Feminism is pretty similar. Only, Marxists and Libertarians are (sometimes) open to debate. They don't think that the problem is how people think, they think that there's actually a real problem out there. They don't really…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 05:44 AM
-2

It's like DV, only much more so. The most serious cases are mostly men. But when you're focusing on less serious cases (and a lot of these programs tend to - it's the police who deal with the most serious cases, and the psychopaths who commit them aren't easy to "educate"), it's probably more equal. The vast majority of "real" rapes are perpetrated by men. Men have much higher sex drives (on average), and only a handful of woman can physically overpower a fairly weak man who is willing to fight …
/r/MensRights06/11/15 03:35 AM
3

I think it's mostly just that university has changed. Maybe in Newton's day you could get up to the current state of research by 1st year university, then spend 2 years listening to actual researchers talk about the bleeding edge stuff they were doing. Undergraduate, even a fair bit of post-grad University is now an extension of high school, but they haven't adapted. You have a vast swarth of the population attending, so they have to cope with people who don't really want to be there. Degrees ar…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:44 AM
1

People don't know how to think rationally or objectively, or to see their own bias for what it is. To some extent, and they rarely get much better. I think studying the history of ideas can be sort of useful, but those aren't the courses that are labelled "learn how to think".
/r/MensRights06/11/15 01:12 AM

The movie is about the MRM. The term "red pill" was used by MRAs before reddit's TRP, and TRP is only really a reddit phenomena (outside of reddit, they're PUAs).
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:31 PM

Google News can find literally 7 stories with the words "Cassie Jaye Kickstarter". 3 are by Breitbart. 3 of the other 4 matches are false positives. I guess that's the power of the patriarchy - I guess they're willing to bury a movie about Mens Rights, just because it's giving feminists the right to reply in the movie /s
/r/MensRights05/11/15 12:47 PM
3

Almost any course that says it "teaches you how to think, not what to think" does the opposite. Aside from certain metacognitive strategies, you generally don't learn "how to think". People already know "how to think", they just don't know the basic facts, checklists, processes, etc. Most of the "learn how to think" courses put you in a situation where you have to think of ways to justify the lecturer's opinions. This is a marketing / brainwashing technique - you justify the lecturer's opinion, …
/r/MensRights05/11/15 11:58 AM
1

Probably best to note that it's partly semantic. Like, you're both for equality. But you think that things are better for women in some ways, worse in others. And after about 100 years of feminism (about 50 years with extremely strong institutional support), the things which are obviously bad for women and possible to do anything about have all been done. In fact, a lot of women's problems might be things that don't bother feminists. Like women don't need to succeed, because society will take ca…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:53 AM
1

There's been studies. IIRC, without quotas, there's a slight positive correlation between the number of women and profitability, IMO because it tends to indicate the firm promotes on merit (more than seniority / connections). With quotas, it goes the other way.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 12:17 AM
1

The first rain shower, or the forlorn hope?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 11:27 PM
4

There's a lot of hopium in what you've written Guilty as charged. As much as Cassie Jaye impresses me, I fear in the end she'll say something along the lines of "yes, men have issues, but feminism is the answer". I doubt it. There's plenty of reasons why someone might think mainstream feminism (radical feminism - the kind that thinks gender barely exists, that we must have total equality, and there's an evil patriarchal conspiracy embedded in society through subliminal messages, and we'd have a …
/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:27 PM

Well, we don't know what Cassie Jaye thinks of the MRM. She's said her real opinion will be at the end of the documentary, when it's released. At a guess, it will be something like this: Men do have real issues, and they're not being addressed. MRAs have drawn attention to these issues. A lot of the stuff that MRAs say is right, and needs attention. Some MRAs can inflame shit a bit, and some are more interested in skeptical criticism of feminism than helping men (but how is that a bad thing?) If…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:25 PM
1

People are social animals, and are almost always reasonable judges of character. Reading people is more innate than constructing sentences. Even people with very low "EQ" are actually pretty good (just not quite as good). Some people can hide the crazy very well, but it's usually not the case. BUT, people tend to ignore it in women, because they just rationalise it away. There's a variety of reasons why it happens. Lack of self worth, assumptions about her being good in bed, simply the fact that…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:24 PM
2

Cue a million people on Twitter saying "oh yeah she wants to stop talking about it, then why is she still talking about it, stupid dumb fat feminazi." Well I'm not actually, let's talk about what you want to talk about. But just FYI, when I read your tweets in my head you sound like Biff from Back to the Future. Who? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biff_Tannen Biff is a large, rude, arrogant and violent bully who obtains what he wants by intimidating others into doing his work for him, or by cheat…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:41 AM
3

It was men reinforcing that men need to be strong, silent, emotionless providers who have all their shit together, etc? Because last time I checked, the way men are expected to behave correlates bizarrely with the exact traits that women have historically found desirable in mates. That's part of "The Patriarchy". "The Patriarchy" is just the word feminists use for "society". Yes, it's a bullshit dishonest tactic, because it's obviously a loaded term. And they do misuse it (switching between it m…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:35 AM

There's a bit of an extreme MGTOW vibe in this thread. Though normal MGTOWs, who just think women don't deserve special treatment, aren't wrong. Never help a woman if you wouldn't help a man in a similar position. And be aware - a crazy man can try to murder you. A crazy woman can have the police try to murder you. So be just as cautious around women as you would men. Yeah, 90% of people are not assholes, or crazy. And people are usually pretty good at detecting the 10% who are assholes, or craz…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:49 AM
2

Criticism becomes harassment when someone is no longer a participant, but a target. For example, saying "That woman debating against free speech is full of shit" is criticism, if she can promptly reply "It's a debate, you have to argue for your side, even if you don't completely agree. Do you think Jack Gleeson is an asshole based on his portrayal of Joffrey in Game of Thrones?" The right to reply is pretty important. By replying, people can ensure they aren't misrepresented, and they are harder…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:22 AM
1

It's quite possible the article doesn't fairly represent the students.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:12 AM
5

It kind of already is - according to the national curriculum, 2 social movements are studies as part of Modern History - http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/seniorsecondary/humanities-and-social-sciences/modern-history/curriculum/seniorsecondary#page=2 Also, a fair bit of the pomo bullshit in English is arguably feminism, if the teacher knows what they are talking about. Unlike History and English, this is likely to be an elective; like Religious Studies.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:21 AM
2

Most people seeing this flash by on the screen, I suspect, will remember the giant CANNES and won’t even notice the word “independent” underneath it. Or, like the reporter for the San Rafael Patch, they’ll change the “independent” to “international” in their minds. At the very least’s it’s a graphic seemingly designed to capitalize on the confusion between the Cannes Independent Film Festival and the real Festival de Cannes. No, Jaye isn’t doing anything illegal here. But trumpeting an award fro…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:02 AM
2

I'd say it's a huge step. Women have had about 60 years of this kind of WGTOW propaganda. Making it gender neutral certainly makes it easier to identify female entitlement.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:33 AM
3

I can, however, point to something too often ignored: There is still a yawning gap of understanding and sensitivity between the straight and LGBTQ world. It seems these "tourists" are closing that gap of understanding, somewhat. Or maybe not - they might just be there to have a laugh (though is it really possible to tell?). On the other hand, bachelorette parties are annoying enough for straight men to deal with.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:06 AM
7

The problem of sexism is seldom discussed in mainstream Victorian classrooms. The likes of Mary Wollstonecraft, Gloria Steinem and Judith Butler are yet to feature on school book lists. Really? Let's check the national curriculum - the one basically all schools need to follow: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/seniorsecondary/humanities-and-social-sciences/modern-history/curriculum/seniorsecondary#page=2 Unit 2: Movements for Change in the 20th century Through a detailed examination of TWO …
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:57 PM
3

It does sound a bit like the grandmother is partly behind it (probably in part to protect her grandchildren).
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:19 AM
1

Old media (news websites), new media (Facebook, Twitter), "darkweb" (redchanit).
/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:09 AM
3

Look, I get that Nazi is a neat little suffix. And I realise the English language is in constant flux. But the crux of the matter is that ‘Nazi’ has just one, unequivocal, meaning. It is not a catch-all term for extreme behaviour. Imagine if we all went round freely adding the letters ‘KKK’ to the end of words. It isn’t debatable. And it isn’t acceptable. Paging Joss Whedon - how about comparing GamerGate to the KKK? How about every left-wing protest, when they compared conservatives to Nazis?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:49 AM
6

She almost certainly does have some troll pledges, but I'd say the greatest danger to the project at this point is over funding. It's "almost certainly" meeting the stretch goal of an Oscar-qualifying theatrical release, even with trolls pledges, cold feet, etc. It's trending towards $222,316 (source https://www.kicktraq.com/projects/cassiejaye/the-red-pill-a-documentary-film/), so it will almost certainly meet its biggest stretch goal. At this point, Cassie will be at risk of hubris, scope cree…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:01 AM
2

OK, so men are violence because the patriarchy has brainwashed them into thinking women haven't made significant contributions to history?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:23 AM
0

Screw them. inb4 go back to TRP Really, a lot of women just want some physical contact, and act out when they don't get it. Or you could try cuddling. Whatever works. Guys are probably pretty similar - if you've got a lot of pent up rage then a fight, a bit of exercise, sex, jerking off, yoga, whatever. But guys learn that before they learn how to shave. Women don't (generally) start fights because they want to hurt people, it's often just trying to blow off steam. Guys generally learn not to be…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 09:14 AM
2

Old article.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 08:04 AM
1

Either he didn't listen to his lawyer, or his lawyer was incompetent.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:39 AM
3

Journalists are usually very careful to slap "allegedly" in front of every claim that may be in a court case. And yes, he'd have to provide documentary evidence (performance reviews, performance metrics, emails) and / or witnesses.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:33 AM
4

Hopefully it won't be a puff piece, and I doubt it will be a hit piece either. Neutral, and from a credible director would be very good.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 09:25 PM
1

That could be a single 10k donation (Mike Cernovich had promised to match up to 10k, and that seems around the point he should have payed it).
/r/MensRights27/10/15 09:23 PM
2

The men are just trying to get around things like internalized betashaming. Not to exploit the ladies. It's all the patriarchy's fault - don't hold them responsible for their actions.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 08:55 PM
12

Sounds like you're in favor of financial abuse /s
/r/MensRights27/10/15 08:32 PM
6

I was actually going to point out the old Playboy as an exception to the rule. Only sexual deviants buy nice things, if they're men. Playboy was one of the few publications catering to straight men who would spoil themselves. I guess it became a bit too niche?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:52 PM
8

The strongest predictor of being a feminist isn't being a woman. It's being a Democrat (especially a progressive Democrat). It's not going to help win centrists, swing states, or keep the Republicans from foaming at the mouth at the thought of a Clinton presidency. The Republicans HATE Clinton. Like, they aren't keen on Obama, and they don't like Sanders, but they absolutely DETEST Clinton. She's like the George W. Bush of the Democrats. If she wins the nomination, then the Republican candidate …
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:42 PM
3

What's amazing is how little coverage of this film is coming from the anti-MRA crowd. It's like they know if they talk about it, it will get bigger. Kind of like internet harassment, but unlike internet harassment they don't want this film to happen.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 02:24 AM
21

I think you'll find the sale of the foreskins are virtually zero revenue. In fact, they likely toss most of them out. Yes, they can be cloned into valuable skin grafts (or beauty cream additives - Oprah), but the cloning process is what costs money, not the starter skin. There's just so much supply in the US. The main reason for pushing the procedure is the same reason almost any unnecessary procedure gets pushed - the government / health insurers pay for it. Or maybe the doctor once lost a pati…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 08:41 AM
1

Obviously as you move down the scale to things like "got laid while a little tipsy", the numbers tend to equalize.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 08:12 AM
9

B-but when it happens to women it's gendered.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 08:08 AM
3

"The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error." The inspiration for xkcd 1357 fixed - …
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:41 PM
5

It's been a long time coming - http://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2015/feb/14/letters-censorship Keep in mind, TERFs may at times be a useful tool, but they tend to lean towards hating men so deeply that they think that not even castration is enough to redeem a man from his original sin. Very nasty regressives, who get very annoyed at the thought of people with a Y chromosome trying to take their female privilege (though they don't quite phrase it like that). Their main use is as bait / wedg…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 04:31 PM
3

inb4 someone points out that the documentary has nothing to do with TRP. Or claims it's a bad name. The whole world isn't reddit. Not even the whole internet is reddit.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 07:14 AM
1

"In the meantime, heated tents will be set up... by the end of the week," he told reporters, vowing that "no woman, no child will remain without a shelter in this city". Patriarchy in action?
/r/MensRights23/10/15 03:45 AM
3

Since the suffragettes won us the vote wot?
/r/MensRights23/10/15 01:43 AM
1

Assuming they're guys, share another link with them - http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/19/why-i-wont-date-another-male-feminist How I'd phrase it: Well, I hope none of the guys getting mad are just doing it to impress the ladies. It's a little sad if they are - no-one likes a white knight, and women aren't all as stupid as the white knights think they are. It's possible that some of them can say, with a straight face, they're not just defending m'lady to be a white knight. But I…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:45 AM
4

TEDx
/r/MensRights21/10/15 10:26 AM
2

Yes, feminist hit pieces associate MRM with PUAs, but they rarely use the term "The Red Pill". It's only redditors getting confused.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 03:52 AM
16

Female entitlement. They objectify men, and treat them as possessions, leading them to violently lash out when their toxic femininity was undermined by men acting as strong independent human beings who don't need no woman. (I'm only half sarcastic here).
/r/MensRights21/10/15 03:15 AM
6

Only redditors make the association between the phrase "the red pill" and the subreddit.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:26 AM
7

The former Bulldogs star was charged on Monday night with assault occasioning actual bodily harm and common assault. "They relate to an incident at his home at about 7.30pm yesterday allegedly involving his 25-year-old wife," a police spokeswoman said. Sounds a bit sus - if there's actual harm done to the woman. But as always, due process. We don't know what happened.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 09:29 AM
5

Supply and demand. Shareholders of large software companies care, if they believe that a few tiny concessions (fewer Star Trek posters?) will see women gladly go for jobs that require 18 hour debugging sessions at crunch time, memorizing thousands of bits of rapidly obsolete info, and working in a job with little social interaction. The plan is to then lower wages. inb4 toxic work environment Yeah, but it's not like more warm bods will make things better.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 09:18 AM
2

She says men may be victims but the problem with domestic violence is that men see women as possessions. She's also ignoring the vast majority of cases. Most DV is Bazza hitting Shazza, because Shazza smacked him around when he smoked the last of the meth. (Or whatever the ethnic equivalent of those names are). I guess rich, upper-middle-class women don't have to worry so much about that, and just want the police to play some daddy-figure (telling their hubby to threat their princess right). But…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:48 PM
4

The PM has no jurisdiction over DV, it's the premiers (roughly equivalent to governors, in US terms) who run law enforcement, shelters, health, etc. The PM shouldn't have any real right to release a DV package, but he did it anyway because the federal government collects most of the taxes, so they like to get the credit for spending it (and the states can either accept it, or fight it and risk losing the money). The federal government only really has jurisdiction over marriage / divorce, not cri…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:00 AM
1

But their relationship became increasingly tempestuous that belied the £20,000 engagement ring Mr Austin gave to Dr Blakemore. At a barbecue to celebrate the engagement, it was claimed she flew into a rage when he passed out naked in a drunken stupor in their bed. Apparently they'd had plenty of actual spanking sessions. It's kind of hard to tell though - was she in a "rage", or did she just hit him a bit harder than usual?
/r/MensRights19/10/15 02:57 AM
2

In fact, while the number of complaints received by the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission has gone down significantly since the 1990s, the percentage of cases found to have “no reasonable cause” has only risen. I take it she's not "naively" interpreting this, because it looks an awful lot like sexual harassment / inequality is disappearing, while baseless complaints are on the rise.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 12:53 AM
3

I've never heard "The Red Pill subreddit" get mentioned by the MSM. Occasionally PUA sites, but never TRP. I think we tend to vastly overestimate the importance of reddit.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 06:09 PM
0

TRP is mostly a reddit term for PUAs. And I'm pretty sure most redditors know the difference.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:16 AM
1

USAF, US Navy. Not the Australian / UK equivalents. I think that's why people are a bit confused - they're thinking the US Navy works the same way as in their country.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:35 AM
1

Probably a fair few international posters. Every member of the Australian military will be trained with small arms (assault rifles). Soldiers (anyone in the Army) will do bayonet training screaming "KILL KILL KILL!", machine gun training, grenades, as well as first aid, navigation, communications, etc. Every sailor learns navigation, steers a ship, does night watch, small arms drills, visits the engine room, etc. I'd imagine most Australian / UK sailors learn to use Naval guns. Looking up the tr…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:21 AM
13

Funny thing - women got the vote several years after the suffragettes disbanded (while the large suffrage movements, the non-militant ones, kept on with their peaceful marches and polite debates). It turns out that domestic terrorism isn't a great way to convince the majority (men, women, or the elites in Parliament) that women voting would be good for democracy. At one point, the suffragettes burned down the house of an MP. An MP who was pro-suffrage.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:29 PM
5

Archive - https://archive.is/6KeoX
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:24 PM
2

Given you've only got a few more videos online, don't worry too much. Almost anything people say will just be a result of you not having done dozens of videos and really nailed the format. Maisie Williams (Arya Stark in Game of Thrones) started a Youtube Channel not long ago, and lots of people complained about the editing. Yes, I see you've got a few other short videos, but it seems to take a while for Youtubers to really get the format down pat.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 04:22 AM
3

What's the "LGBT community"? There's LGBT men's rights people. They may or may not agree on every point, but they care about some of the issues. Then there's things like the rainbow / lgbt subreddit split. (lgbt is soc-jus, rainbow is basically everyone). If you mean diversity officers an uni, and the uni diversity club ... I'd say that's mostly because MRA tends to be something people find a bit later in life. It's not yet part of the establishment (unlike, say, feminism and anarchism). I'd say…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:44 PM
2

Plant also said Stubblefield was not honest to the jury in the studies she cited about facilitated communication. 'There is no methodologically sound study in the US or the world that confirms this practice works,' he said. Judge Teare had barred expert testimony on facilitated communication during the trial because she determined that it was not a recognized science. It seems the judge wasn't too impressed with it.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:49 AM
3

Or society was too smart to waste reproductive potential on environmental testing. At least in the societies that survived. Nature vs nurture is almost impossible to untangle.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:31 AM
1

The only places I've heard anything like that are sites like Manboobz, 4chan, or 8chan. Nobody really cares what these people say.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:27 AM
1

I guess when it happened to Nixon, it was different, because it wasn't gendered?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 11:06 PM
0

Oh good. The fundamentalist Christians can start screaming about how they are the real victims of oppression. Because no (hitler.jpg) hate (stalin.jpg) group (mao.jpg) ever (david_duke.jpg) claims that it's their members being systematically oppressed, and that they have to fight back.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 08:18 AM

Yeah, the article is flat-out wrong, even though the title is right. From Wikipedia's definition of radfem: Radical feminism is a perspective within feminism that calls for a radical reordering of society in which male supremacy is eliminated in all social and economic contexts. Radical feminists seek to abolish patriarchy by challenging existing social norms and institutions, rather than through a purely political process. This includes challenging traditional gender roles, opposing the sexual …
/r/MensRights28/09/15 03:17 PM

It's pretty clear she's not talking about "women's rights", but radical / mainstream feminism - a religion in which "good" (feminism) vanquishes "sin" (gender roles) which is created by the "devil" (patriarchy - an invisible force which can only be perceived by the fact that women choose to behave differently to men). Of course, extensive study is required (and should be mandatory in schools, universities, and the workplace), so that "sins" are still detected - as with any religion it gets more …
/r/MensRights28/09/15 02:44 PM
4

Some of them are probably just cranks with a very small viewership.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 06:51 AM
2

Page 15: "Women are 27 times more likely to be abused online than men". Really?
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:05 AM
2

It's probably partly the "ice epidemic" (aka meth). Looks of cheap nasty stimulants are being sold in poor communities / neighborhoods (often mixed with alcohol abuse), especially rural areas. The numbers aren't really increasing that much (it's increasing in use, but not by much), but it seems there's a lot more heavy use in the lower rungs of society. There's a handful of people who murder their partner during or after a nasty break-up. They tend to get the headlines. But I suspect a lot of th…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 09:42 AM
1

Gay men earn less in the UK. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/lesbians-earn-more-than-straight-women-but-gay-men-are-penalised-9934289.html I think they may have more disposable income though.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 05:04 PM
1

What's also interesting - lesbians make more than straight women, and gay men make more than straight men. Make of that what you will.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:45 PM
0

Some of his earlier writing is OK (if it's the same guy) - http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/whos-responsible-for-this/Content?oid=888047 The conspiracy theorist here, of course, is Joseph McCarthy. But to anyone who has ever spoken for more than a few moments to a devoted conspiracy buff, the logic is all too familiar. Conspiracy theorists don't start their inquiries with the obvious questions--who killed Kennedy? who bombed the Murrah building in Oklahoma City?--but by asking instead about …
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:18 PM
4

The un-gentlemanly act of being openly skeptical towards a member of the fairer sex. It's uncouth to criticize women and children when they speak up; instead you should chivalrously humor their attempts to engage in political debates. I think social justice types spin it a bit differently, but that's the gist of their arguments.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:17 PM
1

Morally, I'd say it depends on the nature of their relationship. Legally, you're right.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 11:20 PM
5

Q: How do you know if you're talking to a feminist? A: She tells you.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 11:58 AM
9

Did you watch the video? The media is absolutely pummeling her. As is mentioned in the video, she has just made a video called "Dear fat people". There's dozens of stores about how she's a horrible person for fat shaming.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:07 AM
1

They don't seem that bad. Clicking on a random article on Powell's other org (https://www.thecalmzone.net/2014/11/masculinity-audit/) doesn't ring any alarm bells. The only thing that really bothers me is they seem to be more interested in fund raising and awareness than offering services. Comparing their site to, say, beyondblue (https://www.beyondblue.org.au/) there's a lot less useful information, and a lot more "this is a big problem!" hype. But I'm not too familiar with them.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 02:35 AM
4

While under-representation may well reflect disadvantage, it may not. A pattern of under-representation might reflect active and advantaging choice, rather than disadvantaging barriers. Maybe women also face advantaging choices, not disadvantaging barriers?
/r/MensRights07/09/15 02:59 AM
-2

It's possible the incident is just horribly written up (he asked her where she lived, then followed her, and she kept walking until he gave up?). I'd believe the NSW police suck at writing before I'd believe they'd bother with such a non-incident.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 11:50 AM
1

/u/timoppenheimer is onto something. The U.S. circumcision rate is steadily declining. In 2002 it was 65%, 56% in 2006, 54.5% in 2009. (http://circumcisiondecisionmaker.com/circumcision-facts/) A lot of the time, I hear parents saying they don't want their son looking "different". If rates fall much further, they're going to look different to their classmates if it's cut. Pretty soon, it will be the mushrooms, not turtlenecks, that get funny stares in the gym showers. Getting this information ou…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 01:35 AM
2

I'm not so sure. FTA: On its website, I put a foreskin fibroblast in a shopping cart and called its office, where a perky customer representative informed me that I can buy the flakes for a cost of $85.00 Basically, foreskins are pretty worthless. There's a huge supply. $85 sounds like a bit, but medical research stuff is expensive. Yes, if the supply crashed, prices would increase, but I doubt they'll run out. One foreskin can be used for decades to produce miles of skin and generate as much as…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 01:09 AM
3

However this is the equivalent of feminists getting outraged over a man complimenting a woman on how nice she looks. I'm pretty sure this is the point.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 10:59 PM
-1

This is not about sticking it to the libs or proving the libs are whiny bitches, yet a whole bunch of you morons keep trying to warp it into that. STOP IT. Go preach this stuff at Freeperville if you want to make it about partisan politics and the corresponding ideologies. SJWs is mostly code for "libs who are whiny bitches". If anything, it's often centrist Democrats, Libertarians, and eclectics using it, not Conservatives. Conservatives don't need a slur word for "liberals", they already have …
/r/MensRights04/09/15 07:42 PM
1

Next up, Kermits Frogontology breakdown?
/r/MensRights04/09/15 06:45 PM
5

Nope. If you believe that (almost) everything is a Jewish / Communist / Lizardman patriarchal conspiracy to control the global financial system / corrupt your bodily fluids / harvest the sheeple brainwash women into oppressing themselves, then EVERYTHING is problematic.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 06:44 PM
1

Is anyone else getting a Dolores Umbridge vibe? https://youtu.be/qMHqxkRYt64?t=25s
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:00 PM
8

Some MGTOW suggested: Do the Men's Rights groups have any media savvy at all? They should have a spokesman out in front of this thing: "We congratulate Kermit for escaping an abusive relationship. If you need help, <link to MR material>" If nothing else, the reaction would be colorful. The public pushback would be a great reference later when explaining popular flinch opposition to the very concept of Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:08 AM
8

I recall Mrs. Piggy as an abusive, controlling emotional time-bomb I think that's usually explained away as a "harmful stereotype against women". Though they seem not to have spotted it yet.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:14 AM
3

If the study was done in the 60s, I'd imagine it's now optimal for women, not men. Obesity has gotten far more common, and larger people like the temperature to be lower.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:06 AM
1

Well it's normal in all other crimes to put the focus on perpetrators . For example anti drunk driving campaigns don't revolve around teaching non drivers not to get hit by them, and as a result people don't have the bias that the victims of drunk drivers really brought it on themselves . Here's a big pdf on how to not get robbed, as a shop-keeper. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/police/article/31555 Drink driving is a victimless crime, except in a small number of cases. That's why you need to te…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 08:18 AM
1

I'd say their pig-headed opposition to "teaching women not to get raped" is part of rape culture too. Whenever sexual assault is discussed, you can always spot the feminist. They're the ones with the false dilemma - that if you're not converting everyone to feminism, you're not part of their solution. It's like having the Christian Right in a birth control discussion, opposing anything that's not abstinence, then wondering why abortion rates in the US are so much higher than most of Europe. (Yes…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 06:23 AM
5

From Wikipedia: Henry was arrested for a series of sexual assault that took place in downtown Vancouver between 1980 and 1982. On March 15, 1983, Henry was convicted on ten counts of sexual assault the basis of weak identification evidence. He was given an indeterminate prison sentence and declared a dangerous offender. Attacks similar to Henry's alleged crimes continued after he was incarcerated. In 2002, the Vancouver police re-opened 25 unsolved sexual assaults that took place between 1983 an…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 04:27 AM
10

The surprising thing is how old that law is. It makes it look like the characters from "Mad Men" voted for equality in California. Wait, Mad Men was set in the 60s, not 50s. So it's the older, more traditional characters in Mad Men who would have voted for that law.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:43 AM
3

"I get blamed by everyone anyway". So fucking close to self-awareness. Yet so far.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:44 AM
1

LoL at the linked article, by the same author: “I’ve been in court where a judge would outright admonish my clients for not working or looking for work, telling them that ‘care-taking for a child does not absolve you from supporting yourself.’ This is a harsh reality check for some stay-at-home moms, who sometimes have a real sense of entitlement about the decision to stay home. On one hand, that was a marital decision, but on the other hand, the marriage is over,” Richardson says. “There is lit…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 05:00 AM
11

Another solution - https://theconversation.com/should-universities-have-to-pay-back-unpaid-student-debts-46028
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:12 PM
14

Here's a sample of the "deranged rantings" this "stay-at-home psycho" produced, which led to widespread condemnation (and pressure on advertisers), leading to his resignation / firing (it's not clear which): Not surprisingly, as grief has moved beyond the private domain, it has become subject to ideological obsessions and political manipulation. This is evident in the Left-feminist campaign on domestic violence. Earlier this month at the National Press Club, Batty launched a new publicly-funded …
/r/MensRights30/08/15 01:15 PM
-1

Maybe. Googling the trust, they seem to come up with some pretty reasonable advice. The next bit (from a different group) seems a bit less pragmatic: "Our fear would be that something like this could be used to say to women, 'Don't put yourself in a position where you could be raped.' "Victims could potentially be blamed if they got in a mixed carriage. We must never blame the women."
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:34 AM
1

A charity set up in her name, the Suzy Lamplugh Trust, now campaigns for women's safety. "We don't think the answer to this problem is creating women-only carriages," says Kristiana Wrixon from the trust. "Action should focus on tackling perpetrators' behaviour and demonstrating a zero tolerance approach to sexual, physical and verbal abuse on public transport." The face of modern feminism, folks. "We can't take this discriminatory action against men. Not because discrimination is wrong, but bec…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:57 PM
2

And there's more: Shortly after, she published Facebook posts about Conrad and created a Facebook event page for a fundraising baseball tournament that she organized in Conrad's memory. http://www.southcoasttoday.com/article/20150822/NEWS/150829806 Also, her comments to friends and family afterwards.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:01 PM
1

Sorry, but that's the new definition of trolling, not the more-inclusive old-school one. Trolling is a lot broader. Flaming is belligerent. Clever trolling can just involve politely bringing up a hot-button issue, so other people do the flaming for you; especially if it's in a discussion that has nothing to do with what you just said. Like if I were to subtly bring up global warming, hoping it would cause hot-headed people to try to explain their views on it. (Yes, I just trolled). The presenter…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:31 AM
2

That's a self-contradiction like meat eating vegetarian. Liberal authoritarian is arguably a contradiction. But the left has almost always been heavily authoritarian. The term started with the French Revolution. I wouldn't call the instigators of The Terror anti-authoritarian. Want modern usage? I guess the social revolution of the 60s was anti-authoritarian. But since about the 70s, they've mostly had the trappings of anti-authoritarianism, while pretending it's still the civil rights era and t…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 09:11 AM
3

Good points. Also likely female officers will probably be deployed to domestics, sexual assault cases, etc (and there's never a shortage of domestics, and you don't just want two white knights sorting them out). It's not easy work, but I doubt it's as dangerous as traffic patrol (where road deaths are common) or dealing with an armed robbery.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:44 AM
3

I got banned for posting this article: http://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2015/feb/14/letters-censorship
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:35 AM
15

What no feminists says ever: "If she's a bitch, then leave her".
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:38 AM
1

If she's consistent, it's just a semantic debate. Does she think that drunk sex is something she'd call rape?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:50 AM
3

Feminism goes full red-pill?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 12:28 AM
3

The way it's generally used: DV is used by men, who rationally / instrumentally use it to control women. (There's also cases where women hit men, but it's a woman-child acting out of anger, not a thinking adult male using violence as a tool). This ignores the fact that most violence is (generally lower class) people who can't solve problems without raging and hitting each other, often with escalating cycles of retaliation (they argue, shout, then it escalates to hitting, with the woman getting t…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 02:32 PM
0

Prison is meant as a disincentive. The logic follows ...
/r/MensRights22/08/15 05:08 AM
3

A former cheerleader. This isn't a 19 year old hooking up with a 17 year old. It's a 48 year old and a 15 year old.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 04:28 PM
4

But when it happens to women, it's gendered. (eyeroll)
/r/MensRights21/08/15 01:47 PM
7

Someone should make the same complaint about virtually every women's magazine. The only magazines that don't drip with "muh soggy knee" in Australia are the men's ones (science, business, sport, etc), and the cooking / home decorating ones for women. The vast bulk of women's magazines (fashion, celeb bullshit) is for more misogynistic than Zoo.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 02:25 AM
2

Well, she was trying to secure equal treatment for her daughter. By the dictionary definition ...
/r/MensRights19/08/15 07:50 PM
3

You'd think organizations treating rape investigations as an internal matter is part of rape culture. Did we think the Catholic Church was right to do it like this? There's always going to be pressure for an organization to hush things up - quietly asking the accused to leave (or transfer), rather than actually doing a real investigation.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:55 PM
1

LoL. "If you want to freak out about something, freak out about [the Republicans going after Planned Parenthood, not the shirt a scientist wore]."
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:42 PM
5

If women are 60% of college graduates, doesn't that mean that women make more than men? Gender studies (and related courses) might not pay as well as you might imagine.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 08:57 PM
2

I suspect immigrants would also be more likely to take a car (due to many of them living in the outer suburbs, driving taxis, etc). It's mostly just where people live, where they work, and what their job is. And note - a lot more men are cyclists. It seems more are making an effort, it's just not always possible.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:51 AM
7

This could all be a bunch of scripted TV bullshit and I find it hard to care much at this point. this
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:45 AM
10

What they did find was a “marginally significant” tendency for a greater number of female evaluators to have an impact on their male colleagues, making them less likely to vote for female candidates. The authors suggest that this may be because “as soon as a woman colleague joins the committee, men perhaps reduce their commitment for gender equality, or it might also be that their male identity is strengthened”. Or because men are more likely to have huge blind spots, when dealing with women. Wo…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:51 PM
2

Yes, because women are wonderful
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:21 PM
1

'Debate?' Here's how it will go down, Gamergate and others will make their points about the type of movement feminism is becoming, the judicial process and freedom of speech. AFAIK, it's not going to be a debate, because anti GG didn't want to come. It will be GG talking, and a few SPJ linked journalists (real journos) saying "OK, so how can you prove that?".
/r/MensRights15/08/15 06:07 AM
1

I've demonstrated logically and factually how believing these cultural rape myths does contribute to and normalize rape . You haven't proven that it's a substantial contribution. And I would suggest that prioritizing "rape myths" over every other factor has the effect of silencing opinions. That means discussing prevention is more difficult, and so feminism may be a bigger part of "rape culture" than rape myths.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 12:15 PM
1

But the peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. (snip - a huge slab about truths tha…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 11:40 AM
1

I'd say you're not substantially contributing to it, and that it's a fair idea to put forward in a discussion. See, JS Mill, On Liberty, the entirety of chapter 2.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 11:22 AM
1

You'd be surprised. Yes, rape culture is a collection of beliefs which allow rape to exist. For example, the acceptance of rape myths, blah blah blah. It's insidious, because it means that if you deny rape culture exists, you're part of rape culture. It's like saying "Faith can only be understood by those who have it". Fine, get high on your own supply.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 11:04 AM
1

"Rape culture" isn't even what I'd call a theory. OK, the theory is, there's elements of culture which are somehow conductive to rape. Fine. Want a cookie? Now, what are the components of "rape culture"? The short answer is, "whatever the feminists speaking thinks is bad, and is somehow related to rape". A conservative could argue that a culture that allows women engage in casual sex, drink without a chaperone, and live in a mixed dorm is "rape culture". They wouldn't be totally wrong, either, w…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 10:44 AM
1

True, there's idiots in every group. I checked out "askfeminists". It's got more ex cathedra reasoning than most religious subs. I'm not saying the posters there are complete morons, but they have very little basis to most of what they say. (Yes, MRAs can be just as bad)
/r/MensRights14/08/15 10:18 AM
1

No, atheists can hold their own in debates with religious people and their arguments aren't strawmen and things that aren't really true . So that explains why feminists are always so willing to defend their beliefs!
/r/MensRights14/08/15 10:03 AM
1

The killallmen prank exploits the fact mra's tend to know little to nothing about feminism and will react to trolling feminists as if they are real frequently . I was under the impression that 4chan started "killallmen" just to make the snarky feminists look like insane radicals. Also, saying "MRAs know little to nothing about feminism" is like saying "atheists know little to nothing about religion".
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:10 AM
2

Kind of like how "coontown" was mostly just a prank?
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:46 AM
1

Let's not assume sexism here, the editors might just think photos of high-school girls look better than boys. (Though that's also disgusting).
/r/MensRights14/08/15 02:43 AM
3

Or it's because it's sort-of MRA, but plausibly deniable. Because pretty clearly, the establishment (patriarchy?) hates MRAs.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 05:00 PM
6

I'm pretty sure she can get a guy without posing as an anti-feminist / MRA, and is just being hyperbolic. It's like saying a "fake gamer girl" is just trying to attract guys. It's possible a "fake MRA girl" may be partly in it for the attention / YouTube hits (you could say the same about some other prominent MRAs), but I really doubt it's to find a date. Girls can still actually find dates, and internet communities have a high ratio of people in other time zones, so why bother? And even if they…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:35 PM
5

She told me that even when women spread those stereotypes, for instance, they where "taught" and first made BY men. Because for years and years men have always been in a position of power and dominance towards women – so even when a man face problems, those are directly arising from men in power. From "the prevailing ones". Collective blame. There's some call to say that state actors (the US government apologizing for slavery, even if it wasn't the current government) to take the blame for past …
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:44 AM
2

There is research which agrees with this. Also, the sentencing gap can narrow significantly with a female judge.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 03:00 AM
1

Ask the red pill: sperm is cheap to produce. Biology. Evolution. K vs r selected reproductive strategies. (Yes, they use the same logic as this article): "Put simply, women have evolved to invest far more in a relationship than a man," Morris said. "A brief romantic encounter could lead to nine months of pregnancy […] while the man may have 'left the scene' literally minutes after the encounter.”
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:24 PM
2

He's National Party (rural / social conservatives - in coalition with the centre-right Liberals). So they'll be mad no matter what he does.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:42 AM
10

And because women have more to loose by choosing the wrong partner, they are also more likely to pull the plug on a relationship – with 70% of divorces in the US filed by women. Wait, what? Women are the picky ones, and they choose to end the relationship? Seems more like there's a heavier penalty of men (legal? custody?) or some kind of social bias.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:40 AM
7

Mr Noriega, who no longer works for South Western Ambulance Service, said he was "exhausted" from working over the Christmas and New Year period. Well, it can be a busy time of year, and paramedics can just be over-stretched. Waiting hours for an ambulance isn't unheard of. Obviously they fucked up (those are classic meningitis symptoms, but can just be flu). Still, it wouldn't gone well if it was a woman being "hysterical".
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:22 AM
0

/u/_Lautremont has some interesting points, but no. It's not the CIA or thinktanks (though they may pitch in, if it serves their aims). The elites love causes that let them take the moral high ground. Generally, they talk about issues that were getting solved around the time they were growing up. And then there's sexism - women, children, noble savages, and animals make great victims, if you want to moralize.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:09 PM
2

Haha, watch the video: "Are you a feminist?" Designer 1: 100% feminist! Designer 2: I'm a humanist, I think that covers the whole thing. Designer 3: The idea that on every level, men and women should be treated equally, so in that sense, yes. Designer 2 suggested better maternity leave for men. Some stuff about fair pay. Something about sexist imagery being a problem. A surprising amount of waffle, for a <4 minute video.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:45 PM
1

Read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carly_Fiorina Then remember WP:BLP (Wikipedia is extra careful about negative information on living people).
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:28 PM
2

The best way would be to suggest that the janitors might be offended.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:20 PM
1

The research is that men score higher on assertiveness and lower on agreeableness - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149680/ on average. Men are generally more assertive. However, individual variation is far greater than gender differences. Women do score higher on neuroticism though. Men might complain less, because they don't need to complain. Most men won't feel it's the end of the world if their shoe doesn't fit. But that's just on average.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:02 AM
6

Same thing higher lesbian wages (IIRC ~10% higher than straight women), and lower wages for gay men (IIRC ~10% lower) does for the wage gap. A lot of the difference was noted to be in non-gender-normative career choices. Maybe people who expect to support a family pick higher-paying careers than people who can expect a free ride? Nah, they'll ignore it, say it's homophobic to talk about it, and say it was caused by homophobia.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:06 AM
2

No, this is just hilarious subreddit drama. It's a TV show. They make the protagonist out to be a little sympathetic, by giving him great justifications for everything he does. Walter White is a prick. An awesome prick, but still a prick. You're seeing him as a real person. A real person who cuts a swathe of bodies (even if they're mostly lowlifes) to build a meth empire is a bad person. /u/Deezlutz is still seeing him as a TV character. You're really just bickering at cross purposes.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:50 AM
1

I think there's a lot of confusion over whether Walter is a good character, or a good character. Yeah, he was awesome, as a hero / anti-hero / villain (depending on what part of the show it was - he came across as an edgy hero when he was murdering someone more evil than himself).
/r/MensRights06/08/15 03:39 AM
2

I loved the character, but he wasn't a good person.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 03:11 AM
8

What has this got to do with men's rights? It's not even that dumb as a feminist campaign. Yeah, it would be nice if men had a class of people telling them that they will never overcome people's expectations of them, that they need to live in fear, and that an evil conspiracy is out to get them ... no wait that would suck. There's nothing to be jealous of when feminists do nothing but make women feel under attack. Yes, there's other issues where a lobby group would matter, but this is just the S…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 02:37 AM
2

He's evil, yeah. But everything bad he does was essentially excused with "well, he's just being a responsible man". People defended him until roughly the end of season 2. Then they realised he's just a dick.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 01:47 AM
2

It's highly unlikely. The blowback would be epic. They could get away with banning coontown because virtually no-one gives a fuck about it, and quite a few people have wanted to see it gone for quite some time. I don't think there's a real "slippery slope" argument. They've always been willing to ban the absolute worst subs (in terms of content).
/r/MensRights06/08/15 01:04 AM
4

Original article (as far as I can tell) - http://bbs.youth.cn/thread-9021532-1-1.html Edit, wait there's 163.com watermarks. Original - http://news.163.com/photoview/00AP0001/95347.html#p=B03P829Q00AP0001 I was looking to see what the comments were, but it's too idiomatic for me / Google Translate (some were basically "why so does she need to wear so few clothes?", and one wondering what the real purpose of the photos is - Chinese netizens are a skeptical lot)
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:24 AM
6

It's interesting that you put it as "women are mothers, because they're really good at it". How about "women have the option to take time off, but there's no way a man will ask his wife to go support the family while he stays home and cares for kids". It would just be misogynist to expect the woman to support the family, unless there's extenuating circumstances, right?
/r/MensRights02/08/15 04:53 AM

When's he up for re-election? edit: December, 2016 - http://ballotpedia.org/Dennis_M._Wiley
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:11 PM
7

10: Calling us crazy No matter what, do not ever call us crazy. Never. Haha, is that a sore point?
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:48 PM
2

That's not very trans-friendly. Should make them both gender neutral (and if anyone can't handle peeing in a stall that a man / woman might have peed in, they need to grow up - "girl germs" and "boy germs" isn't usually a think after primary school).
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:30 AM
1

They just don't know if it's there or not. The second opinion will probably be "it's probably worth a look, just in case". If you're in the UK, and it's on the NIH, it shouldn't be a big issue, if you have the time. Also, I'm not a doctor, but I can say for sure that ulrasound is an absolute fuckload better these days. It's quite possible that a scan now will either show something, or if they can't find anything they'll be more sure of the result.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 02:18 AM
3

It's a cancer risk if it's hiding somewhere it shouldn't. There's much better medical imaging now, so maybe they want to have another look with a fancier machine?
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:29 PM
6

What they don't consider - we can download the list, and identify fellow "reactionaries". We can modify it to identify them (only there's just a handful of devout misandrists on reddit, so why bother, unless it's to see which mods to watch out for?).
/r/MensRights28/07/15 10:32 PM
0

Yes. But I think he's more self-aware than you might think - he knows that saying stupid shit (but with a little plausible deniability if you read what he says carefully) gets people talking about him, which raises awareness. He actually wants to be a drama llama, because he knows it gets attention. Whether or not you think he's putting on the role gleefully or reluctantly is up to you though. I have no idea.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 11:10 PM
1

I think it is important to remember that these gender bias's have existed for as long as our patriarchal set-up. While feminism may not be focusing on male gender specific issues in general (we can't do everything) feminism is not the reason they exist. Wait, what was that? cannot by design or definition address the gender specific bias's men face In other words, when feminists say that feminism also helps men, they're full of it? Because you hear that an awful lot.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 12:53 PM
2

Notice how men say "crazy", women say "asshole", and feminists say "abusive" (if it's a male)?
/r/MensRights23/07/15 11:17 PM
-6

It wasn't so much a job as an honorary title. The main harm is reputation.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 03:27 AM
3

It's an anonymous story from 8chan's /pol/.The fact that you're taking this as seriously as a paper published in a sociology journal is disturbing. If only because it highlights how little academia is trusted on this matter.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 02:02 AM
1

What's even more funny is how SRS hates Feminism, and vice versa. Really, the two subs won't mention each other. I think it's a bannable offense on both (unless you're talking about how terrible the other sub is, and even then ...).
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:15 PM
2

EP isn't rubbish. I think it's a reasonable teaching tool, as it can lead to fairly credible explanations of observed phenomena. Of course, these observations (and EP predictions) need to be validated with empirical tests. Evolution isn't rubbish. IIRC, antibiotics was invented thanks to Florey's knowledge of evolution (he knew that from the principals of evolution, molds were likely to create anti-bacterial secretions, so he did a literature search and found Flemming's discovery of penicillin).
/r/MensRights20/07/15 03:25 PM

.4. There Is No Evidence That ‘Diversity’ Improves Company Performance I think Milo's wrong here. He tends to be a bit sloppy with his research. Yes, there is good evidence that diverse companies do better. Companies with no women at the top are often bad companies, which don't hire and promote based on merit - so of course there's a correlation between diversity and performance. HOWEVER, it's a historical correlation, which could be the result of those companies simply caring about merit and pe…
/r/MensRights20/07/15 08:55 AM
5

When I grow up, I'm going to invent HEALTHY ICE-CREAM! And I'm gonna eat DESERT for DINNER ever day! And I'm going to be a famous movie star, and the President, and an astronaut ... Seriously, that's how they sound. But they don't think they're going to grow up, so they just wanna complain.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:41 AM
7

So the two "victims" said they were willing to harass someone to the point of suicide? And harassed a guy who said they were going too far? Sounds like the police arrested the wrong person.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 12:07 PM
1

In practice, the only thing feminism does is also two fold. One, is advocate for women in all arenas -- regardless of equality or it's negative impact on other people -- resulting in sexist laws and funding that favor women being maintained, and sexist laws and funding that favor women being created... and two, whine on the internet. Which accomplishes nothing. I disagree. In practice, they don't advocate for women in all areas, mostly just upper-middle-class women. However, the academic rationa…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:12 AM
3

The definition of feminism is advocacy for women's rights. The dictionary definition, yes. In practice, a significant part of feminism is concerned with gender roles and patriarchy; and claims to be the only true egalitarian movement.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:30 AM

She doesn't want to join the military. She's arguing that it's a double standard. In theory, all feminists would be behind her. Selective services discrimination is part of the Patriarchy, and it hurts women (and men, but mostly women). Just because something happens to hurt men doesn't mean it's not part of the patriarchy (which ultimately hurts women more than men). Conversely, helping women also helps men, because it's destroying the patriarchy. So she's one of the feminists who actually beli…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 06:32 AM
1

It's more likely that it's because amr is a fairly small group.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:52 AM
25

a petri dish for the web’s dullest, dumbest impulses, a lowest common denominator clearinghouse of lazy memes, stolen porn, casual racism, a recruiting ground for hate groups, and an overall bummer. pot meet kettle
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:53 AM
9

Good video on how feminists have messed up DV prevention. The Duluth Model is the left-wing equivalent of Dr. Strangelove's General Jack Ripper ranting about precious bodily fluids. But a simpler answer - because it's easy. Suggesting men should have rights is so taboo that it's really hard to say. Saying radical feminists are crazy - most people just nod knowingly.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:13 AM
6

It's not really feminism to blame here. That's just the way things are. A single woman is virtuous. A single male is a loser. It's these damaging gender roles that feminism is going to fix! Or so I heard some 20 odd years ago.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:47 AM
2

Milo is not as smart as he thinks he is, but he's not stupid either. I think he's a bit of a bully - having a good time at the expense of idiots.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:29 AM
12

Fucking fantastic article.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:25 AM
1

It's because of capitalism patriarchy. Communism Feminism will help men too.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:01 AM
5

Or because she couldn't make reddit worth $250 million (the valuation at which the VCs invested). Banning controversial subs didn't work. I'm not sure what would. Two CEOs have left less than a year after the investment.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:39 AM
0

Imagine you live in a dictatorship. A lot of people hate the king / generalissimo, but they don't know that this is a commonly held view. Often, it's a public gathering that triggers the revolt. A bunch of people realise that there's too many dissidents to be quietly taken down. Online spaces can fill the same role. We know that there's a lot of us, and a lot who vaguely side with us. Obviously there's limits (as there should be - not every interest group is right about everything), but people k…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 11:34 PM
-1

Didn't see the fine. Yeah, crazy litigious neighbors are always a problem. They've got some imaginary reason why someone is a problem, and they'll just cause trouble. Anything you do is just more fuel for their paranoia. There's very little that can be done about them. It's probably possible to beat the charges, but only if defend against them. But it's hard to stop people filing / calling the police. Keeping a record (with dates and times) might help. Filing a restraining order, if there's any …
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:23 AM
-8

If you're in a poor area, some people are just hypersensitive. They probably lived next to a meth addict who wouldn't be quiet unless the police were involved. She wants the police there, because it can be dangerous to confront some people (and she might not be bright enough to figure out the difference). Source - have lived near one such person - some old guy. Everyone thought he was a PITA. Some people would make noise outside his apartment just to make him do his dance, which was also pretty …
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:02 AM
1

Sex and the City is pretty much the opposite of everything that's wrong with modern feminism. If it were written by modern feminists, Samantha wouldn't exist (it might be slut shaming?), Miranda would get promoted to partner by throwing a tantrum, Charlotte would be never grow from being a sex-negative snobby trust-fund twat (like her first husband), and Carrie would just rant about patriarchy, not how hard it is to make choices and deal with the shit life throws at you. If you haven't watched i…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:49 AM
-5

Kim Kardashian is far smarter than most people think. It's the George W. Bush effect - someone reasonably smart (not high-brow, but smart), who knows that they'll be much more popular if they come across as dumb. She's not the only person in the world with a sex tape. If she wasn't smart, hard working, and a master of social media / brand management, she'd have had 15 minutes of fame and nothing else. Thinking she's dumb because she's a reality TV show is like thinking Oprah is dumb because she'…
/r/MensRights05/07/15 09:54 AM
1

No, it's because if you use your real name, and say gender roles hurt men (and aren't a feminist), you're a pussy.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 12:00 AM
2

IIRC, women are more likely to leave a relationship than men. The toxic role men have, of holding a relationship together at all costs, is just another way matriarchy is bad for women too. No - really - even in fiction. Walter White is a great example. Complete psychopath. Puts everyone around him in danger. But at least he's holding his family together, right? And at the start, he was just making meth to support his family. I suppose feminists would call this patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 11:56 PM
3

As much as an asshole as Walter White was, notice how he never crossed the moral event horizon of abandoning Skyler ... even to the point where it was truly detrimental to every party involved? He was at heart a good guy, trying to look after his family, right?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:49 PM
5

The researchers looked at different variables to understand why divorces tend to be filed by women. They suggest three main explanations: Over-exploited wives who do the majority of housework and parenting may feel that they have nothing to lose by leaving. Wives may have already benefited from financial investments made by a husband (for example, paying for education) and no longer require his support. Wives expect to get, and subsequently keep, custody of their children — if they didn’t, they …
/r/MensRights02/07/15 09:49 AM
1

Growing up means facing contradictory standards. There's two solutions I can think of: Grow up. Be willing to face criticism, with the understanding that some criticism comes from people who are simply wrong. Join a cult. Then at least you've got a common set of standards.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:42 AM
1

6oodfella is a comedian, I think. He's around with the "dictionary definition of feminism" line.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:04 AM
1

I am disappointed. No-one said "cult".
/r/MensRights01/07/15 04:56 AM
1

Deepfreeze?
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:42 AM
10

The reason people attack feminism rather than fighting for Men's Rights? It's easier to say you're anti-feminist than pro men's rights. Anyone can be an anti-feminist (unless you're vulnerable to witch-hunts). Especially if you qualify it, and say you're OK with the sane ones. Saying men might need rights causes a lot more cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:17 AM
2

TW:word document. This could be fun. One of the other big journos accusing Hunt has previously wrote in depth about biological differences between males and females - http://facultyfiles.deanza.edu/gems/reberm/wk1whatsthedifferencebetwee.docx We are, I hope, moving past the old politically correct notion that we are pure culture, that children are born blank slates to be influenced--or, worse, manipulated--by the adults around them. There's a straightforward reason why we are a male-female speci…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 04:28 AM
2

Feminism has taught us that there's a fine line between addressing problems, and becoming an asshole content to wallow in self-pity and paranoia. I guess there's few lines that feminists use: Why do you think Men's Rights is a bad thing? Aren't you being a bit prejudiced? If this is making you uncomfortable, maybe that's a good thing? I think the big lesson is taking advantage of volunteer opportunities. Getting people organised to run something like a charity (collecting for warm clothes for th…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:38 AM
1

It can mean couch-surfing, living in a shelter, etc.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:07 AM
8

I think it means "male". Or "anti-feminist". It varies.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 04:21 AM

More women in law enforcement / justice isn't always a bad thing. There's a study on sentencing that found female judges handing out much fairer sentences. Female cops could also be a lot fairer. There's very few well-grounded women who believe than women can't be assholes. Just because a feminist asks for something doesn't mean it's a bad idea. Broken clocks are right twice a day. Edit: Here we go: I can't find much, but it seems that Brazil has gone from 3.5% of prisoners being women, to 7%. A…
/r/MensRights27/06/15 03:24 AM
3

Yeah, it probably wasn't due to "emotional distress". Unless she was drying her eyes with high-denomination bills that the cops just happened to pick up.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 03:16 AM
4

I think I've figured out what pissed the feminists off. OK, there was the reporting out of context. But let's look at why they wanted to misreport him: Hunt effectively claimed that older male scientists try to accommodate women as best they can. He's showing that the "patriarchy" is doing its best to accommodate women. It's not perfect. Sometimes people don't always do the right thing. But everyone is doing the best they can. Obviously, it can't just be that young female scientists (who benefit…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:19 AM
10

“Now seriously, I’m impressed by the economic development of Korea. “And women scientists played, without doubt an important role in it. Science needs women and you should do science despite all the obstacles, and despite monsters like me.” What a horribly sexist sentiment. Suggesting, even jokingly, that old white men in science are "monsters" and "obstacles". Maybe he deserved the flack? edit: /s
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:13 PM
1

reposting with np tag: http://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/361561/digging_into_the_claim_that_female_journalists/ tl;dr Most of the female journalists are jouranlist-activists, and a lot are active on Twitter. The same is not true for the male journalists. By my count: There’s 9 female journalists. 5 are heavily activist (trolls, feminists, anti-ISIS, pro-Labor). 2 are minority. There’s 5 male journalists. 2 are activist (pro-gay rights / anti-big-finance). None are clear minorities (…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:04 AM
2

If teaching women to say "no" (loudly, clearly, with escalation to shouting for help) is enough to prevent the vast majority of rapes, then anyone who opposes it is part of "rape culture". If mattress girl's tape is an accurate portrayal of events, and she didn't escalate saying "no" to shouting for help because she just couldn't think straight at the time, then this is a perfect example of the kind of thing that can be prevented with a little education to women. The fact that they are worried a…
/r/MensRights20/06/15 11:40 AM
1

Feminism is a part of rape culture?
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:50 PM
92

Pao's not the real problem. reddit is a clusterfuck of bigoted mods. Many of the mods do their jobs well, but the ones who don't end up ruling over circlejerks. FPH censored "fattie sympathisers". TIL can't stand politics they don't agree with. The only thing reddit does to reign in bad mods is deleting their subreddit, if the admins disagree with the mods. I think they should be pushing for more reddiquette across every subreddit. Unfortunately, it's hard work to manage mods. After all, they do…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:44 AM
-1

If she's going down, I'd rather see the people who backed her go down with her.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 12:35 PM
8

The paper he talks about: https://j4mb.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/131029-two-pages-handout-for-cambridge-presentation.pdf Note that the focus is on quotas. There's some evidence that boards with more female members do better, but I think that's in the absence of quotas. The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation (2011) Professor Ke nneth R. Ahern (University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business), Professor Amy K. Dittmar (Univ…
/r/MensRights07/06/15 09:51 AM
-24

Can people stop going after her? Please? It's pointless. Even if you assume she's completely at fault (we just don't know), most people seem to be judging it even harsher than people on this sub. Instead, let's remember a minute that she's the victim of enablers in the media. They pumped her and dumped her. It's the media (and possibly academia) who savvy observers should be going after. Things didn't get to this point in a vacuum.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 08:49 AM
6

It's like plea bargaining in the US.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 12:39 AM
1

U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice members: http://judiciary.house.gov/index.cfm/subcommittees
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:51 AM
6

I though that was going to be Tony Abbott, the master troll. He knows that stirring up feminists makes him look sane in comparison. A female Labour MP in the UK? That's interesting. Also, 2013 ...
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:02 PM
2

Well, the same goes for violent women. A good deal of DV is reciprocal. If two people are hitting each other, and one wants out, then their ability to do so shouldn't depend on their gender.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:00 PM
1

If it's against an individual, there's other laws (slander, libel, assault, etc).
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:17 PM
27

When men kill themselves, it's because of toxic masculinity. Feminism will fix that too. But first it has to focus on the symptoms of patriarchy which directly effect women. /s
/r/MensRights28/05/15 04:11 PM
1

AVO = apprehended violence order. Basically, the cops (or a judge) orders someone to stay away. If the son is leaving home soon, he can get an order that the stepdad can't go near him. I'm not sure what the options are if that's not possible. Maybe the police will just give a warning, and point out that it would be very difficult if the stepdad had a court order to stay 500m away from the stepson. They are typically pretty easy to get - the usual attitude is better safe than sorry. They're usual…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 03:09 PM
1

I wouldn't think a chokehold is too serious. Most deaths from fights are from blows to the head, or from falls. A chokehold is almost a soft submission technique, which you use to win without too much damage. Unless the guy went limp, and his stepdad kept the hold on, it probably wasn't a huge danger. The story seems odd. The son comes out yelling to check the router? It seems like he knew the stepdad unplugged it, and there's a lot more too this. I can't see how an unplugged router leads to blo…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 07:45 AM
8

According to ballotpedia, his term won't expire until 2021.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 04:37 AM
4

I don't think Liana was lying. The impression I got from her original video is that she had a fight with one person in Men’s Rights Edmonton; which this video confirms. She was making a mountain out of a molehill. She apparently couldn't be unbiased about HBB, because one guy from MR Edmonton was rude to her .... yeah OK. I've got a lot of time for Liana K. She's a feminist, but she's usually intellectually honest. I do think she overreacts to criticism, but she's also someone who gets a lot of …
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:38 PM

This is really old. Suey Park has actually gotten a lot saner as time goes on.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:56 PM

"Men are stupid" (or insert a less PC group) is an idea, not an insult. But people may take it personally. However, the general idea is sound. As long as you're able to say "I don't mean you personally, but in general ..." then it may be offensive but it's not a personal attack. Of course, that means that you have to couch insulting claims as generalizations, or explain the logic behind them (If the Bible is literally true, then ...) so some ideas can't be made. But I'm OK with that.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:53 AM
2

I can see the point of a women's room, if it's for stuff like counseling (maybe gender-centric literature). And given the tendency for people exposed to feminist thinking to be sexist, racist and transphobic (source - http://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/spcl/documents/PersSocPsycholBull-2012-Craig-0146167212445210.pdf), it seems reasonable to ask them not to be. If there was a "whites only" room (for some reason), asking participants not to get too racist would be a necessary countermeasure.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:45 AM
3

Not really. Even Stormfront is not a hate group, by SPLC standards. Their official hate groups actually do stuff, not whine on the internet. Source - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JO1Yesw8D0k (David Pakman interviewing one of the SPLC writers - warning, highly disingenuous at times). They did refer to a bunch of "manosphere" sites as misogynist, though. There was a big wave of articles in early 2012, then basically nothing. I'm guessing they since figured out it was kind of bullshit, and are n…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:54 AM
2

A lot of people are upset because something bad happened to a Stark. Danny, Tyrion, Jon, and the Starks are the main characters. Anything bad that happens to them is a big deal. This is probably more true for the younger Starks, as they were children (both the characters and the actors) when the series started. Remember the execution, and the Red Wedding? People were upset. Theon Greyjoy was also a big deal. People initially had mixed reactions (because he's an asshole), but they eventually star…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 08:13 AM

When guys say "don't stick your dick in crazy", it's not sexist or ablest. It's code for "avoid emotional abusers".
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:58 AM
3

Word swap game - https://youtu.be/OHjG-qYjxNo?t=3m34s There's no political philosophy or movement that doesn't contain some of that, whether it's conservative or lib. There's probably some gay individuals that do have an agenda, and there's certainly conservative versions of that as well. And so for movements as big as this, there should be people watching out for that, both internal to the group and external. And so there's a role for the MRAs feminists. But then they're continually bringing up…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:18 AM
2

They've been pushing the idea of a "manosphere" since about February 2012. https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=manosphere%2C%20radfem&date=1%2F2011%2049m&cmpt=q&tz= Possible motive? http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/splc-linked-to-anti-mens-rights-subreddit/
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:55 AM
8

You're mainly wrong because MRAs didn't say much about Mad Max. It was Return of Kings, which is a PUA (theredpill, in reddit terms) site. RoK doesn't call itself MRA. MRAs don't consider RoK to be MRA. They're both male-centric, and anti-feminist (well, some feminists are OK), but there's a big difference. Some feminists seem to try very hard to lump all anti-feminist or pro-male groups together as MRAs.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:16 PM
8

However, making discrimination salient (victim mentality) encourages discrimination. They did a study - white women exposed to feminist dogma showed higher levels of conscious and unconscious racism. http://psp.sagepub.com/content/38/9/1107 You could argue the same happens with whites obsessed with "anti-white" discrimination. You could even argue the same with some mannosphere groups. Equality is the right move, not identity politics. Also, intersectionality is hardly a new development. The mod…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:12 PM
1

Yep. "Patriarchy" is bad for women and men. Feminists only fight it when it's preventing women from doing stuff. MRAs only fight it when it's preventing men from doing stuff. And of course, they spend a lot of time bitching about each other. I'd blame the feminists for that /s
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:07 AM
3

Interestingly, female judges may give out more equal sentences - http://spokane.wsu.edu/academics/crimj/Brody/class_readings/gruhl.pdf
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:23 AM
3

The problems low socio-economic status men have and cause aren't problems for many university professors.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:33 AM
1

Unfortunately, the extremists in a group are often the loudest.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:17 AM
2

http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Patriarchy_hurts_men_too "The patriarchy hurts men too" is a set of silencing or derailing tactics in feminist discussions. Forms can include, but aren't limited to doing these in a discussion about women's experiences or oppression: pointing out that not all men benefit equally from the patriarchy (see Geeks are oppressed) pointing out that performing masculinity can be difficult (being expected to be a romantic or sexual aggressor) or dangerous (being expecte…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:51 AM
2

We've heard. So where are the feminist campaigns that focus on male issues? Go to any feminist space, and start talking about male issues, and I bet you'll be shown the door. Or be told that once the patriarchy is demolished those issues will just go away, but for now we have to worry about another issue (like the tax on tampons).
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:57 AM
1

From one of the linked articles (http://psp.sagepub.com/content/38/9/1107 ): White women primed with sexism expressed more pro-White self-report and automatic intergroup bias, compared with White women who were not primed with sexism Overall, the results suggest that making discrimination salient triggers social identity threat, rather than a sense of common disadvantage, among stigmatized group members, leading to the derogation of other stigmatized groups. Implications for relations among memb…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:49 AM
1

Also: Overall, the results suggest that making discrimination salient triggers social identity threat, rather than a sense of common disadvantage, among stigmatized group members, leading to the derogation of other stigmatized groups. Implications for relations among members of different stigmatized groups are discussed. So highlighting systematic bias against a group makes them more likely to degrade other groups. I'd say that's a result of zero sum thinking. Note, this is also a good reason fo…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:43 AM
2

Most men and women aren't crazy. If you look at internet comments, you're looking at a lot of things people wrote when they were "passionate" (a euphemism for "too angry to think straight"), and often the dumbest comments are the ones you really notice.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:43 AM
4

I'm pretty sure it's because a lot of the women are former prostitutes, and stayed in the business.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:30 AM
1

A C-cup is roughly average. 6' is more like a D-cup. Actually, it's a big more complicated (due to obesity skewing the statistics), but C cups are about average for a healthy woman, and D cups are a bit above average.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:22 AM
2

Yep. And most women will think you're 6'1". In my experience, you can generally subtract 2 inches from whatever most women say. I actually saw a post on reddit by Rory McCann's ex (The Hound from Game of thrones). She dumped him because at 6'6" he was too freakishly big. A lot of women are pretty clueless on male heights. It's like men guessing cup sizes. A 14H sounds good if you just rattle off a random number, and don't know what it actually means.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:10 AM
1

The quotation you point out as mistaken need not be the actual statement of the author's main point. It's enough to refute something it depends upon. And for god's sake don't straw man. If you're trying to disprove something, give it the benefit of the doubt, and try to make it as solid as possible before knocking it down.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 01:31 AM
12

Most people who write about gender politics in media / academia think that anti-feminism = misogyny FTFY
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:45 AM

Some people think that anti-feminism = misogyny. If you want actual misogyny, it's easier to find on a default sub. It's kind of like saying the atheist sub is nihilist. It might be anti-Christian, so it's got the whole "God is dead" thing going, but it's nothing compared to the defaults.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter