You can see how their theory works here to understand why this is so effective

Because of the overall sexism in rape culture, men do not get raped. That is, of course they get raped, but because of the way rape victims are seen by society, men who are raped are either ignored or labeled as sissy, or gay, or simply weak, in order to maintain the illusion that "men do not get raped". And in the same vein, women can't rape men. Men, society teaches, are always horny, always seeking the next conquest and always ready for sex. So how could they be raped? Because of these very attitudes, society is extremely slow to address, much less change, the way male rape victims are treated.[3][4] The FBI did not even classify male rape as such before 2012.[5] Women are also perceived as being incapable of raping other women, often because sex between two women is portrayed as 'not real sex'. Woman on woman rape is also often not illegal, most notably in places where the definition of rape necessitates penetration by a penis. This is still true throughout most of the world, and until recently the US as well.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Rape_culture

Here is more evidence feminists promote rape culture by their own definitions with the focus on Ivy League campus .

Victims are defined and unofficially classified based on how well they conform to a (deeply offensive and sexist) specific set of standards. Standards which are almost always based on assumptions about women's value in general. A white virgin who has been beaten is a more proper victim than a Hispanic co-ed who has a boyfriend. Being raped by a stranger, vaginally, is taken more seriously than being a male victim. The more "real" a rape is, largely informs how the investigators and litigators will deal with a case.[1][2]

Or read up on it yourself and come up with your own slam dunks .

Arguments that are not effective .

Talking about the film "Rape culture" and saying they were talking about prison rape only - they were not - they were focused on women outside prison and said men were socialized to disrespect women, that's what the problem is.

Arguing about prevention strategies - this is pointless for various reasons .

1 - there is no such thing as a movement against taking care , there is only a movement against the assumption women bring it on themselves and well meaning but misguided people that think its helpful to point that out to people that experience irrationally high levels of self blame which need to be worked through with a counsellor .

2 - men and women receive all the same advice anyway, plus women get more on top .

3 - men are more likely to take risks , be assaulted and have addiction problems . Therefore any assumptions that women just lack common sense and need to be taught about risk are wrong .

4 - giving out sharia lite rules for women to follow - have a chaperone, always watch your drink etc implies that there is some terrible danger in the culture for them to warrant extreme vigilance whenever around men, there is not .