TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

woyspawn Archive

View 3 posts and 550 comments by woyspawn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Hobbies with 40 to 60% women presence like climbing or social dancing, mixed sports like ultimate or flag have high ROI. There are women that come to new activities open to meeting guys. And women that usually bring girlfriends to try the activity so there is high rotation of new women. The secret is that it needs to be hobbie with high physical contact. A friend did ceramic for years (he liked it), it was 80% women but he didn't find any girl there.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 03:12 PM
3

At a transactional level, all women exchange for either resources or protection. Women can genuinely feel attracted to power and money is a proxy of power.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 01:08 AM
4

Nope, even if a wealthy man doesn't spend an extra buck in a girl, he will have more pussy than a similar man without such wealth. Money by itself is attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 10:58 PM
1

But money gives you power and power is attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 10:36 PM
1

Any part reduces sex to a frequency lower than something stipulated say... Twice a month average over the last year. Exceptions granted for pregnancy and physical illness. Frequency can be updated.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:56 PM
1

Would you agree to a dead bedroom clause?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:20 AM
5

Men don't shame women of their same age. They just become "less visible" to male attention (from the men they would like) The same way lower males are plainly invisible to the general population of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:09 AM
5

I think the attractiveness threshold in men is more flexible and regulated by the availability of attractive women. Go to a country of different ethnicity for a week and you start to be attracted to women you wouldn't even look at in your homeland.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 08:23 PM
2

You have it wrong. It's not the man that puts a lot of effort that he gets laid a lot... Or maybe he does but nobody gives a fuck about it. Men hierarchy is about results, not effort. The guy that is strong, has leadership, is social, is handsome, has money and thus gets laid, it doesn't matter if he got there through effort, luck or genetics. So, what is hard is being that man that's objectively better than the other. There is no equivalent for going after men that are "hard to get". Because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 05:37 PM
1

I don't think this is an issue. Most decisions are post-hoc rationalizations... If you assign value to God, Astrology, science, there is no difference You are most likely inventing reasons for your behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 04:57 PM
1

Gay Men, then women, then men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 10:15 AM
1

That's an absurdly low rate. I know this is unasked advice but... If you haven't tried it yet, there are some profile "marketing" guides to improve your chances at online dating. That and paying to increase your matching rate may help. I didn't had much success on it, but after following some guides I was able to close a couple of dates. On the other hand, going to gender balanced social activities REALLY changed my life. Social dancing was what I did, it increased my exposure to women absurdly …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 04:15 AM
1

Catholic Priests. Suit Guys in business trips. Political figures and Celebrities Men in dead bedrooms. Party guys. Retired guys. Kids eager to loose their virginity Truck Drivers Most romantically unsuccessful guys don't buy prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 03:51 AM
1

Desperate men aren't the only client of escorts. Even more, I don't think they are bulk of their clients.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 03:36 AM
1

An escort can remove some of the anxiety and mysticism about sex. That's not necessarily a good thing... but may help because women can feel men that are not comfortable around women and that creeps them. The way you're wording rejection is strange, tho. Has no girl ever accepted a date with you? Have you tried online dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 03:34 AM
1

'Hypergamy' is mating UP. Thus by definition it involves a direct comparison by woman between herself and the man. This is not necessarily true... Hypergamy just requires ranking the available males. It doesn't require. Comparing both genders can only be done indirectly... ie, you're a five of you can consistently date fives.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 12:48 PM
1

So you agree that those traits need to be learned or cultivated, through multiple conflicts, because they are rarely natural to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 01:20 PM
2

This
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 05:18 AM
1

Once you make a hard cut above the average, let's say "people with IQ 120"... There are not enough women for all the men in that segment... So the 130 IQ men may date the 120 IQ women, and the 120 IQ men target the 115 IQ women. At IQ 110 It doesn't matter anymore. By settling, I meant choosing. A high IQ man may fuck average IQ woman, but he'll marry one of the smartest women he can choose from.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 05:11 AM
1

Dude, better turn gay. I don't think most of those traits exist on a woman that freely chooses to be at your side.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 04:49 AM
1

Ugly nerd is not much intelligent if he wants to but can't get a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 04:46 AM
1

The man you talk about in your edit is of above average intelligence. At that intelligence segment, the higher variance in men IQ means most men need to date down on intelligence or remain single. On the other hand I'd say, women rarely settle for men with lower intelligence than themselves and most men don't have that many viable options to choose from so that selecting for high intelligence should be a priority.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 04:36 AM
2

45+ are Gen-X, boomers are over 60, at which point a 15 year gap is relatively less significant than preservation. ie, a fit man in his 60s is all around more attractive than a morbidly obese one in his 50s
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 04:04 PM
15

Nope. They like some successful/ strong / pretty men over women, but all women over men in general. There is a reason there is a team women , but no team mean, only men tribes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/22 04:47 PM
1

Have you heard about Paraguay's War? After the war they were left with a 1 to 6 ratio imbalance, and they did just fine by sharing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 02:54 PM
3

34 M, 3 years in a relationship with a 24F. I've achieved financial stability, she's not out of college, nor has ever had a job outside her family business. That's a major one. That also means that I need to go slowly on some stuff, like living together, as I don't want her to financially depend on me because that might bring a power imbalance that I don't want. My friends get increasingly boring. First it was no more nightclubs, now going to a Beer House gets increasingly rare. So I don't know …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 07:35 AM
2

Could you explain that "same person" thing?.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 01:19 AM
1

average looking gay men get a lot of more attention compared to average straight men. Why is this? My theory is that straight women have been socialized to find men undesirable at the physical level Why making theories??? Just talk to any gay man. Gay men are still men, and men want to fuck more than women on average. So there is more "sex" available. Attraction is relative get's overriden by biology. Relocate to any place with an "exotic ethnicity" you weren't originally attracted. Stay there f…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 06:50 AM
4

But how many would if they were Leo?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 06:10 AM
18

Newsflash, women are inherently valuable. Men aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 02:13 PM
1

Just shut the fuck up and don't Judge. Sluts, regardless of sex, like to brag.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 01:42 AM
1

Awesome, thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 02:40 PM
0

What are the other 3
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 11:49 AM
2

However, among the RP or FDS community there is the concept of a "high value man" and this seems to go against stealth wealth. RP/FDS seems to suggest that men should show off their high value if they want to attract a partner for a relationships and for love. Wealth is relative. You can be wealthy enough for some lucky girl while still being stealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:26 AM
1

Past certain age most people are in relationships and the dating pool reduces, butt the acceptable age gap increases.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 02:23 PM
3

It's movies old shit no man tried to defend anymore. Women are wonderful. Men are the only superficial ones. Be nice, get a good job and "some girl will be lucky to have you" And, as TRP says, life itself redpills most women. So today only unaware Chad white knights can live in the blue pill fantasy. Not enough of them interested in defending the position here. Actually the blue pill subreddit was just people making fun of TRP autistic nerds. You could say that now you have a purplish blue. Not …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:19 PM
11

That's because this sub was made for the explicit purpose of confrontation between TRP and blue pill. Thus the name. Then the blue pill sort of died, but women stayed. Then came those who must not be named. Then some active members of PPD created FDS as more woke / less conservative revival of the original TRP for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 10:41 AM
0

Society doesn't hate you... It just doesn't give a fuck about you, unless there is a war ongoing. And that's ok. The most common way men get raped by women is by getting wasted. Just don't get wasted around people you can't trust. The solution to an abusive partner when no children involved is to tell them to go fuck themselves and leave. These are the non progressive solutions to these non issues that men usually think of when the genders are reversed. What you are asking is to feminize men. No…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 05:50 AM
1

What I mean is that "a high quality man" recalibrates to a man with an stable average income, no addictions a not an abuser . A provider beta. The revenge fantasy is just that., a fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 02:08 PM
1

Because they do, all the time. With a bit of redefinition of "high quality man" to pre sexual revolution standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 06:06 AM
1

Women are naturally red-pilled. Period. The reality hits them in the face constantly. Progressive movements is denial and escapism.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 02:03 PM
19

It's not only about dumpster diving. Courting a woman is a lot of mental work for introvert / low social awareness people. Add less opportunities to interact with the opposite sex, and partial substitution of whatever needs sex fills with porn, and you need really strong incentives for Average Joe to chase Plain Jane.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 10:24 PM
6

Part of what men get from sex is validation. Recognition that you were worthy, that a woman chose to make herself vulnerable to you. That's something that you won't get from VR, the same way that even when a prostitute is nearly as expensive as a gf, most men aren't interested in prostitutes. Even more, most clients of prostitutes can be considered successful in sex (ie, have stable relationship, or don't have issues getting casual sex)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 01:44 AM
2

Evolution ( genetic or social, doesn't matter). It wasn't until safe contraceptives that women could choose to be promiscuous. It's been less than 100 years since the pill. And you're now questioning why promiscuous women are bad people, instead of thinking the reason is blatantlu obvious. Maybe in another 100 men won't care... Or maybe, in 50 years most women will be promiscuous and men will adapt to it. Or maybe not and men will prefer staying single, the same way that successful women prefer …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 05:35 AM
1

I abide to dont't ask, don't tell. That's a TRP 101, btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 10:33 PM
3

So, you're talking about a really successful gal that has to manage other people taking care of her profile... Or having a manager that takes care of all those issue for her. That's not your average of
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 06:00 PM
1

That's not the risk. Why would you give a fuck what an stranger that doesn't want to date you think of you? The real issue is that unless you live in conservative places, men will take any offer of easy sex, even if not very interested, meanwhile they're open to something that fancies them better. If you are an average girl that's an uneeded risk, unless you're open to loose relations and casual sex. When timid/ugly guys say girls should ask out more guys, they are imaging themselves, with littl…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 05:55 PM
3

I disagree, you're understating the amount of effort you need to put to keep the subscribers "engaged". Flirt with them on the messages, plan what they're doing on love sessions. It definitely isn't an 8 hour / week gig if it's your main income.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 05:36 PM
1

That's not how it works. Cheaters gonna cheat... Even with less attractive people than their current partner. And people not always choose their most objectively attractive option. Compatibility, opportunity, life matters. So this is a stupid question. Something like, if your perfect woman that not even you know how to describe, offered you a ONS free of risk, would you take it? I'd answer, I don't know the girl of my dreams, but I'm pretty sure she doesn't do ONS.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 04:16 AM
1

Only the single guy. The rest of us as pretty average. I'd rate myself a 6. We're STEM guys at early 30s but that never got me laid. Dancing did.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 06:55 AM
3

The theory is that hobbies make you more interesting. Then you have a skill and something to brag and talk about ... Then you can take a date, or just a friend to your new awesome hobbie. And that somebody mike like you despite not being Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 06:49 AM
1

Online Dating doesn't work but neither does meeting women in the real world either Except for those that do... Me and a friend met our current partners through the social dancing scene. Three other friends met their partner through tinder. The girl of the group bought a motorcycle, and a month later started dating her new mechanic. The remaining guy is willingly single with some side fwb arrangements. /*********************/ Unless by it doesn't work you really mean it doesn't work for NSA sex. …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 06:33 AM
1

Or 4, they can ignore the problem until it goes away.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 05:46 AM
0

What if doesn't have kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 07:07 PM
2

Is this a serious question? Lessons: you pay ( or some are community supported) and they let you in, because that's the service they offer. For dancing you start going to latin dance lessons, (salsa and bachata). Then you can go to Latin Clubs once you know the basics. Water and snow sports have schools that introduce you to the community. Bouldering requires a special room, Google maps will show you the closest one, then you can ask for lessons. You can find those places online, or in public bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 03:27 AM
2

Joining mixed gender social activities. For me, in particular, it was social dancing. But there are other options. Ie mixed sports, like ultimate frisbee. Cool Sports, like surf, snowboarding or bouldering. Hand skills lessons like pottery, cooking or massages. Joining scenes, in theater or music. Motorcycles and Cars if you have enough money. If you want to get laid, It's important for it to have a 50% or bigger female participation. Boxing and Music Lessons are really cool, but might be male d…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 02:33 AM
2

ideally the guy in this scenario should be attentive and make sure she isn’t straining herself so thin. Which is impossible if the girl doesn't communicate her dissatisfaction ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 10:49 PM
1

Why out of college equals models and sport stats? There is world filled with Average Joes and Plane Janes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 04:12 PM
2

And what we try to tell you is that you're comparing early 20yo GenZ with 30yo Millennials. Social Media exists since Millennials were 20yo. What else changed? What else would be responsible for an increase in Vanity?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 02:30 PM
3

If you are a young Lad you can't avoid that. Gen Z will grow out of it, as Millennials did.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 02:01 PM
2

Less, men can have non casual relationships with multiple women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 01:33 PM
2

Maybe, but that's not an accidental pregnancy. Just an strategy that might or might not misfire.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 12:00 PM
1

A bad Wikipedia snippet that has been edited already? Seems that google failed me again More than a quarter of white men (26.9%) married an Asian woman, and about 6.9% married a black woman. In contrast, 20.1% of white women married a black man, while just 9.4% married an Asian man. The current article has 1998 data that isn't as dramatic A 1998 Washington Post article states 36% of young Asian Pacific American men born in the United States married White women, and 45% of U.S.-born Asian Pacific…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 04:03 AM
1

Attraction is non negotiable. There si no explanation. it just is. Google says that more than a quarter of white men (26.9%) married an Asian woman. That sucks because that shrinks their pool a lot. IMHO, if you are an above average asian man as TRP suggests (which might be difficult). You may not be able to take part of the casual sex game, but you should be able to get a partner. If everything fails, you always can find a wife in a 3rd world country or Asia.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 03:51 AM
3

Nah, slutty women know their ways and don't get pregnant by accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 10:18 PM
1

Serial monogamy is monogamy for reproductive purposes untill first infancy passes. That's Courting + Pregnancy + 3 to 5 years. Rounded to 5 years. That would be considered a LTR by anybody's standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 05:54 AM
7

Being a provider was what gave meaning to average Joe's life. This assumed that there was a family for most men to provide. If average isn't good enough and most women are better alone, the nostalgia is understandable. But most TRP understands that that ship has sailed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 03:17 PM
11

It's not easier for men to get a relationship. It's just easier than getting a ONS
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 02:41 PM
3

I second this. 30+, only once happened through a friend. And twice through the bride at a friend's wedding.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 09:32 PM
1

By women voting with their pussies.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 02:14 PM
2

Very little things are biological imperative Just to be on the same page, do you agree or don't agree that a biological reproduction imperative exists? What's considering attractive is mostly sociological I don't see what changes if attractiveness is or isn't mostly sociological. You can't extirpate the individual from society. .
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:43 AM
3

Reproduction imperative is non biological?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:17 AM
3

I'm currently bored, so I'll try to be less obtuse. Help me understand your position. Why do you think I'm brainwashed? What do you see as immoral in a rulebook about what women find attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 03:35 AM
7

Being able to bang chicks is a proxy indicator of doing well in life. If you have an abundance of chicks available for banging it means you are at society apex by whichever standard current social rules deem worthy. If you can't bang any chick you are attracted to, you have some issues. Either you are deluded by your position in society, or you have no value at all for the rest of society. In-between is anybody else who tries to pair bond and live happy ever after. That's the blue pill dream, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 03:23 AM
7

The fundamentals are 'be an alpha male who can bang any berry they want.' Thats not a healthy way of looking at anything. But that's the biological imperative. That's what defines male success. Once you can bang, not any, but a respectable amount of berries, you can say it's your choice not to do so. You can decide to be a nice man because you want, not because you don't have the alternative. Note*, you don't need to actually bang'em to know you could if you wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 02:29 AM
2

For healthy men, their economic success offsets their looks decay (assuming you don't get fat). Most men aren't successful and slim, so post wall women can settle for these "beta" men.
/r/askTRP20/06/21 05:19 PM
1

After the paraguayan war they were left with 1 man for each + women. They are a prosperous nation today. Women may not be happy, but they'll share the available men if they must. Some even choose to share a "better" man than to settle.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 05:01 PM
0

It all comes down to the pussy cartel. Women don't want to lose the power they have. I know it and you know it. This doesn't correlate with reality. In countries where prostitution is allowed or not prosecuted clients are usually married men or guys that would prefer upgrading to Girlfriend. I never heard of a guy rejecting relationships because he's happy paying for sex. There is no power in banning prostitution. It also can't be banned. You end up with stupid shit like escorts and sugaring.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 07:10 AM
2

What's wrong with a 95 Civic :'( ?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/21 08:37 PM
1

There is a really important fenotype component to the brain development related to nutrition. With poverty eradicated from Europe after WWII, it makes sense that you're only left with IQs genetic component.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 09:14 PM
2

There is a math incongruence here. We have to assume that men and female attraction is comparable (shares the same "attraction scale"). Let's call it person attractiveness scale. The average heterosexual man doesn't care about other men, so to him the average woman is the average between all woman, not between men and women. The same happens to the average heterosexual women. To her, the average man attractiveness isn't affected by the attractiveness of other women. So, even if we assume that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/21 02:02 AM
21

What if you hate the military? or computers? Government bureaucracy? What if you're not smart enough for being a "Cyberspace Intelligence Operator", whatever that means. What if you don't want to give up 4 years of your life. There is no one size fits all answer to this question.
/r/askTRP31/05/21 04:58 AM
57

Search a list of jobs by average income and salary ceiling. Choose from those one that won't make you hate each morning, and that covers your life goals.
/r/askTRP31/05/21 02:38 AM
3

Tere is always somebody bigger, taller, stronger, smarter, richer, prettier. What does it even mean "to be somebody's go first choice". As you improve in a field, your social circle also refines, so you'll probably never be the top head. If you just want to fuck some gals, what do you care if you were their first choice, you're still fucking. And if you are looking for an LTR, if you look at it objectively both are settling for the best choice available.
/r/askTRP29/05/21 10:31 PM
1

So, if you're between the ages of 18 and ~30 about half of your peers are using dating apps. Plus, roughly three-in-ten women ages 18 to 29 are single Source so any women you approach in the real world already has a 7/10 chance of being taken. That means if you approach 365 women over the course of a year, only 110 will be single, and if you have a ~1% success rate (this is much higher than OLD), you'll go on 1 date a year. Horrible statistics using a'priori averages and completely ignoring cond…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 04:07 AM
5

Because people that like discussing these issues are systematizers, and the way they deal with complex shit like people is building simplified mental abstractions. Even if those behaviour models aren't a good match for reality, that's the best they can do. Eventually with enough experience / information, their model will adquiere enough complexity to approach reality. What you have here is a selection bias of "people on ppd = all men"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 01:52 PM
19

Because having your shit together is not easy. Also, getting older does lower your SMV: Rich and successful at 25 will get you more pussy than rich and successful at 50.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 05:03 AM
1

I don't do social media. When somebody asks for my ig/facebook/whatever, they then make a follow up question of WHY? What are you answering then?
/r/askTRP13/03/21 02:33 AM
4

The sheep's one is a master response
/r/askTRP12/03/21 10:23 AM
6

Get'em young! If you are serious about going the traditionalist / religious way. You need to find a nice girl and snatch her before she is ruined. Most girls (actually most everybody) are serial monogamist with a couple of wild stages inbetween. What you talk about, sounds closer to american college culture than american society where the average woman has an N count lower than 5 (and that includes hippies). I'm assuming here, but india should have lower numbers. So yes, it might be hard to find…
/r/askTRP12/03/21 08:22 AM
1

Dunno, I know people 50+ that have met through tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 04:08 PM
2

If the interest is in cardio, I think box focuses the most on endurance.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/21 12:21 PM
3

I don't know anybody who goes to their mother for advice to get pussy. Mothers sometimes ask questions and intervene when they see weird shit, once yo get pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 12:41 PM
2

It sounds odd that your only plan while in the army was to survive/complete your service. Why did you join in the first place? Home will get boring soon. So get home and enjoy it while you can.
/r/askTRP20/02/21 01:52 PM
2

"There are men that don't give a crap about N count" is true. "As a high N count woman is easy to find a commitment worthy man that doesn't give a crap about N count", depends on your definition of easy, and might not be true. This is the implication that I read from your op. "As a high N count woman is easy to find a commitment worthy man" is true, but that doesn't mean he won't give crap. Not in the 'it's not that important' way that most women care about N count in their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 03:08 PM
8

High N count men don't care about n count. Then, men without many choices put up with it. The issue is, there aren't as many high N count men as there are women. An those men can pair with low-ish N count women that usually don't care about sex history as much as men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 04:05 AM
1

If you ejaculate prematurely (might happen), wait 20 minutes and go again.
/r/askTRP12/02/21 11:41 PM
4

This is a guess, but It might be increased competition? In HS / college these chicks circle might have been limited to your age range. Now, out in the real world, they are available to older guys.
/r/askTRP17/01/21 12:05 PM
3

It wouldn't be weird, but you wouldn't do it. You'll probably progress economically in two years and won't risk your (mediocre) position to pursue a degree. As the parent commented, you'd cement you'd position. If you can learn trades related to your current position, I'd go that way. Otherwise, if you have what it takes to finish a degree, try to get a loan and go to a cheapest community college you can. Real computer science is academic mathematic scientific shit. It's important (think the inv…
/r/askTRP03/01/21 03:04 PM
1

Are you fucking her?
/r/askTRP02/01/21 07:35 AM
2

Only mistake was the cheek kiss. It might seem like you were still disgusted and avoidinh her lips.
/r/askTRP23/12/20 07:36 PM
1

I have a book called “Intelligent Investor” but as long as I don’t know the basic terms like spread, equity, offset etc, I won’t Did you try google? Also, with robinhood and the like, you can spend some learning money investing in stocks. Take it as a "learning by doing". Btw, stay away from futures and options and anything with leverage, until you understand the risks.
/r/askTRP27/11/20 04:22 AM
1

Grindr says, no, we wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 12:49 PM
2

He's basically saying, that RE will work as an anti-inflationary hedge, now that the FED went printing happy during corona.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 04:59 AM
1

As a rainbow colored wearing man, let me tell you that schedulded talks sound beta as fuck to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 04:47 AM
0

Doesn't parallel my experience. Academic people tend to have stable relationships, excepting some nerd + chad guys. The MIT nerd stereotype of fighting robots on Saturday night isn't most of academy. It even isn't most engineer stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 02:43 PM
1

Why you relate "academic achievement" to low sexual attractiveness?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 01:32 PM
2

Treat each time like your last. This was the best advice I've ever got from this sub. It's good to remember it from time to time.
/r/askTRP17/10/20 01:22 PM
1

Proffessionals are experts at helping men with this. Otherwise, if fucking a girl you don't know males you anxious, you could take it slower. I mean, the usual issue is that men DO want ONS.
/r/askTRP13/10/20 02:33 PM
2

There may be no tropical climates in the nuclear winter
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 03:50 AM
2

Someone needs to be strong for your family. If your sister is still under commotion and your father is devastated, you may need to take that job. Also grief comes in many colors. Think about how would you judge your loved ones of they were feeling as you do, and then apply the same standards to yourself.
/r/askTRP22/09/20 05:45 PM
8

Women need closure. An example: A girl mistreated by her bf, telling their friends that she has decided to end the relationship will get mad if the guy breaks up with her before she does.
/r/askTRP09/09/20 06:57 PM
6

Yes. He passed away from a heart attack tho.
/r/askTRP02/09/20 05:15 AM
6

My Italian uncle had a "second family" in Brazil. Which he eventually abandoned. He left them with a property saying it should be enough to cover his part. Months later the fucking carabinieri where knocking at his door. He recognized the girl, tho.
/r/askTRP02/09/20 04:59 AM
10

IMHO it's better with the frog. Most women aren't Narcs. Their decisions aren't consciously extracting value from you then ditching when you're of no more use. That the scorpion may sting even if both die from it points to accept female nature instead of trying to find an explanation for it.
/r/askTRP19/08/20 05:27 AM
3

YouTube. Not to mention there are tons of bibliography that you can online, some free, some cheap. The most relevant ones can be pirated from russia.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 08:41 PM
2

If "just getting laid" is your concern keep putting effort into dating apps. But getting laid shouldn't be the objective. Getting laid is the marker that you're on the right path. Also, good enough for LTR and for ONS have different requirements. You don't want a ONS with girls you think are unattractive, but you aren't good enough for ONS with the girls you find acceptable. Those girls might want an LTR with you. he’s creepy This is your issue. Not your looks. Not your fashion. You probably can…
/r/askTRP01/08/20 07:13 PM
1

Those piercings are not the issue. I don't like them, but if you do, keep them. Maybe don't stretch your lobes any more. Your looks are from normal, to above average ( depending on your zone ). Tinder game is hard for most men. Ditch that. So I have two possible guesses. 1) I noticed that most of your activities are male dominant / solitary. Do you have enough females in your social circle? Did you ever play guitar at a band? Or take some lessons where you organically meet new girls constantly? …
/r/askTRP01/08/20 01:53 PM
1

HtWFaIP Maybe some basic transactional analysis, like Games People Play, but I'm not sure of its applicability.
/r/askTRP10/06/20 04:45 AM
3

This is not an extroverts world, and you don't have to be outgoing. This is the tinder age, you don't even have to exit your home to get some (low quality) pussy. Introversion is not a limitation. It's just preference to 1 on 1 interactions and dislike of strangers. Extroverts like public situations. This makes a positive feedback loop, were they have social experience, and thus are good at social interactions. As an introvert, you avoid social situations, so you lack the experience. When a well…
/r/askTRP09/06/20 06:18 AM
4

"Real men TM", men with solutions to those issues, don't care about other men. At most you'll form a rejected men's club.. There is no Team Men, the best you may get are PUA night outs or online nerd spaces like TRP where you're told to stop being a faggot.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/20 05:47 AM
1

I'd not be so sure about it. My Italian uncle was visited by the carabinieri to remind him of paying the child support for his Brazilian child. Unless moving to Somalia is your contingency plan, I'd review it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 06:47 PM
2

It has more to do with the potential number of offspring You only need a couple of men for the species to survive, so you can afford more variability.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 05:49 PM
1

Without renouncing your US citizenship ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 05:30 PM
0

If what you contribute is considered valuable under capitalistic society, you'll be retributed with money for it. A teacher may be rewarded less than a banker. But the number of lives affected by the banker are more that the ones affected by the teacher. Scalability matters. Money is still a useful proxy to measure your contribution to society. (Though I admit that there are "opportunities" to make money without contributing shit)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 12:32 PM
3

China, Japan and Korea may want to have a word with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 12:22 PM
2

Let alone that not everybody can be an engineer. This is not a roleplaying game where some attributes are assigned in detriment of others, "smart, rich and beautiful", and "ugly, poor and dumb" are also things But being not very smart may help to cope with the unfairness.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 12:19 PM
5

Psychopathy, Narcissism and Machiavellism
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 01:17 AM
1

I keep doing volunteer work and help monetarily because no one spends months in those places and keeps having the same perspective on life. Genuinely interested on this. Could you describe your position after / before on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/20 07:24 PM
2

There are plenty of guys into pegging. You're disgusted about penis, not sweaty penises The real equivalent would be if you're disgusted about eating sweaty (but healthy) pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/20 05:43 AM
3

(Some) Men have disgust for the idea of marring a high N count girl. It's a gut feeling, the rest of the reasons of why it's a bad idea to wife up a hoe are post hoc rationalizations. The disgust of females about high N count males isn't that high. Also high N count men are usually highly desirable. So everything else being equal women would prefer the lower N man because of disgust. But between high N Chad and a Beta... This is only a thought experiment assuming simmetrical information, because…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/20 05:38 AM
1

Why are you asking us? Schedule a 2nd date and you'll find out.
/r/askTRP29/05/20 05:18 AM
2

I don't want to sound like an ass, but, if you were looking for a wife why did you push her into the Navy? Your story doesn't sound neutral, you went beyond emotional support to help her succeed o her decision. That's ok, but was it compatible with what you wanted? You knew of all the risks, and the years required before she could be the mother of your kids. Did you care at the moment? I might be misreading but this sounds like it was you who wanted to have a wife with a career in the Navy.
/r/askTRP29/05/20 05:15 AM
1

Your urilitarian argument is stupid unless you ignore the opportunity cost. The total damage the shotgun guy does by bothering females is completely crushed by the utility that he and his partnern would get upon success. The only way you can arrive to your conclusion is if you assign a stupid weight to the damage caused by bothering women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 09:19 PM
23

I'd recommend bachata instead of salsa. It has a younger scene.
/r/askTRP25/04/20 05:16 AM
3

Out of curiosity, could you name some of those exciting new thing the both of you tried on the last two months before corona? Also, are you in an open relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 05:11 AM
3

r /bodyweightfitness
/r/askTRP21/04/20 03:27 PM
1

There is another topic I might breech, but it may be a bit too controversial for here. You can't do that.... Tell us! I can't think of something too controversial for PPD
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:36 PM
5

I'm curious on what you think is the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 08:12 PM
1

Sexting is even more lame than masturbating to porn. Don't use it as an excuse. You clearly have no respect for monogamy, if it's just the result of a risk assessment that's stopping you from cheating. There is one thing tho. Even if men and women are different as a collective, you don't get to expect different standards for men and women. You are just trying to rationalize cheating for men but you do expect your gf to be faithful. Why are you in a LTR? You could spin plates or have an open rela…
/r/askTRP02/04/20 05:29 PM
3

I only hear excuses from you, pal. What was stopping you from working out at home?
/r/askTRP31/03/20 07:18 PM
5

I was never able to pull that off long enough to reach a second ejaculation. And, you risk the condom slipping away if you loose the boner.
/r/askTRP31/03/20 05:58 PM
1

Reverse cowgirl is the dick breaker. Not for the faint of heart.
/r/askTRP31/03/20 05:56 PM
9

And if you nut instantly, don't make a big deal from it... Just keep the foreplay until the refractary period passes.
/r/askTRP31/03/20 05:52 PM
1

It found that policies leading to greater female participation in the workforce tended to increase female variability and, therefore, decrease the variability gap Do you have any source? I only know about the gender equality paradox which seems to point the other way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 09:03 PM
2

The claim is that women are more violent to men than men to women. Not that women are more violent, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 08:59 PM
2

Females select, never attract, with few exceptions like hyenas and seahorses.
/r/askTRP24/03/20 11:21 PM
3

Those are males specimens
/r/askTRP24/03/20 02:17 PM
0

Men want sex, but don’t give it to him; Slut it up if you want, but hide your N because it disgusts (some) men. Also, beware that it might rise your own standards above your value. Because , at the end of day, we all are average simps and love is a self deception that somebody is special when he/she really isn't. A high N might kill that magic. men need sex to have love Don't become an unwilling plate. Most men don't lie, they may (willingly) let your self deception run for their benefit (gaslig…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 07:23 PM
2

That's an RP criteria to avoid a dead bedroom unfulfilling LTR. It's assumed that the RP man has at least a couple of options he can choose to settle with. The ones complaining about women being too picky are men that can't measure up to those standards. Usually the bottom 20% to 40%.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 05:45 PM
2

Roma didn't fall in a day. Prosperity brought the conditions that allowed women to fight for their rights. Nobody can give a shit about feminism if you're not sure to have enough food to survive the winter. We don't know if the current state is close to an equilibrium. With some luck we'll reach the singularity before it matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 06:56 PM
1

Wow, I guessed a 10 - 15 gap. Wish the best for you both.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 05:25 AM
1

Thanks for sharing, may I ask your age gap?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 05:09 AM
2

What pushed you to retry marriage after two failures?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 02:12 AM
1

as a male, I can't understand why would anybody stay in a relationship without net benefit (under their own value scale). Let's say I admit that ( some ) women require a sort of programming to not fall into a relationship with no net benefit. OK, you avoided the LVM. With that, you're just WGTOW. But you claim to be FDS... Say you can successfully vet for a HVM. Then what? You brute force the through multiple dates vetting, and hopping that you not only chance upon a HVM but that he also instinc…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 04:03 AM
1

Focus on career is a safeguard for ditching LVM, I don't know if that's commitment attractive. Yet again I don't know howto catch a HVM, I'm just a fish. FDS has a pergamine of properties a HVM has to have. Even if I don't agree with their definition, I don't see much strategy on how to obtain commitment from one. I'd even risk saying that commitment is implied to them by virtue of being a HVM. My appreciation is that men don't operate that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 11:09 PM
1

Shouldn't they self improve to be commitment attractive to men? That's their endgame, isn't it? Otherwise it's just WGTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 10:02 PM
4

2am in Argentina. There is no cover before 2am so they can start filling the club early.
/r/askTRP29/02/20 06:04 PM
5

Crazy idea here, and just talking out my asa. But if you ever go to the point of considering suicide... Was there any success amputating the source of pain?
/r/askTRP29/02/20 01:39 AM
1

Men don’t consider personality unless they’re Redpilled or natural alphas looking for an ltr Could you expand on this? I thought that personality compatibility is inherent to how you value any partner.
/r/askTRP28/02/20 10:44 PM
0

If this is your first martial art, BJJ has a lot more sparing, and fighting experience is the only thing that matters. I've been boxing for 2 years ( one or twice a week) and i'm not at the point of regular sparing yet (once a month or less, ). I don't know of that's normal, but I know that BJJ has more regular and less steep sparing cuve. For many vs many situations, BJJ is a death trap. As soon as you hit the ground somebody standing will kick your ass. But if you're really concerned with self…
/r/askTRP28/02/20 01:08 PM
2

I meant that the only place where we can say it's with some confidence, it's when applied to OLD
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 12:32 PM
8

It's pairing vs tournament species. Humans are halfway. Women want the best man they can secure that will provide for their pregnancy / collaborate with the kid. They also want the hot guy. So, after the early developmental ages, you need to reaffirm the woman that you're her best option or the serial monogamy kicks in and she may monkey branch. Women wanting tons of dick concurrently is only possible through contraception. And even then, I don't believe it's such a pervasive behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:31 AM
2

I haven't seen any replication of those results outside online dating. And old people perceive different numbers. The ONS market, may be like that. But the real world depends on different skills, like the hability to read IOIs, exposure to women, fast thinking while talking (instead of playing word chess via text message). And slow beta game, that traditionally was how most betas paired, and that still works for several people. I see no reason to beehive you will arrive to the same 80-20 distrib…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:09 AM
6

You're overestimating the chances of matching when you're average Joe. The 80 - 20 rule does exist on online dating. So, as an strategy, it makes no sense to spend time going through profiles to check for compatibly. It's less effort to like all, and then select from the girls you matched. (You can obtain even better results "manipulating" tinder algorithm to increase your score) There is also the frustration of going through profiles of girls you think are on your range, and that you fantasize …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 04:44 AM
3

Yes, I know the definition of an hypocrite, I was hoping for an specific instance of that behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 12:43 PM
3

Why hypocrite?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 04:44 AM
3

Don't know, he did have a successful marriage by traditional parameters. And he is a recovered alcoholic and has propensity to depression. He is like the ultimate tradcon rolemodel. I agree with the word salad master, tho... And being opportunistic isn't a bad thing (on a capitalist paradigm, of course)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 02:22 AM
5

Just wanted to point that JBP is antagonist to the Supreme Gentleman. He even dedicates a chapter of his book to the conditions that trigger that sort of episodes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 02:14 AM
0

Thanks, it seems to rate relationship satisfaction. I would like to also see sex frequency and relationship survival numbers. Maybe there is a correlation between people willing to wait, sex frequency and divorce aversion. I will check it tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 01:51 AM
1

Couldn't jump that paywall. What's the measure for "better relationship outcome" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 08:44 PM
1

Never worked for me. Girlfriends don't bring girls to my friends group. Also, friends rarely bring the girlfriend. But I recognize this depends on the group dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 09:31 PM
1

Running groups are female dominated? Any rationale for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 09:29 PM
1

Salsa isn't female dominated. It's a couples dance. If it's not close to 50/50 it's boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 09:27 PM
1

I agree. But go to several ones... Some groups are easier than others
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 09:21 PM
3

Social safety nets provide an enviroment where kids of single mothers don't have a considerably higher mortality rate. Also, there are not enough incentives for women to choose different, otherwise they would. You don't get to decide who's the best mate. Only nature and time. If those kids survive long enough to have their own offspring, everything is working as expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 09:27 PM
1

I once red about listeners in Japan park benches. They charge you to go and talk to them.
/r/askTRP19/02/20 08:34 PM
0

Coolidge effect. Reproductively speaking, recurrent partners are of less value. So if you determine value by quality and number of partners, it all depends on how hawt is the drunk lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 01:59 AM
2

All value is perceived. There is no inherent value on nothing. That's XIX century economy 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 01:50 AM
2

For having that progress, you need constant sparring and train 3+ times a week.
/r/askTRP13/02/20 01:49 AM
1

Don Juan's Castaneda, the peyote shaman?
/r/askTRP13/02/20 01:48 AM
1

Spring breaks
/r/askTRP13/02/20 01:11 AM
5

Exclusivity gives you safe sex without protection. Also, even Chad can get cheated doesn't mean everybody will get cheated. RP is about knowing your odds and maximizing them.
/r/askTRP12/02/20 11:06 PM
1

I'm just a libertarian by disappointment . I wanted to be a socialist but my country made sure to make me loose faith in that flavor of humanity. If it's worth as a reference, Cuba and America have almost the same life expectancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 04:32 AM
1

Canada and Australia have a population deficit. US demographic composition is completely different. When you try opening the borders of a successful socialist country, a brexit may occur. At distance, France seems to have a lot of conflicts and Sweden is a new experiment that only time will say if they will be able to integrate the new migrants, or if their society will fracture. To me, it looks like America is the most successful country assimilating migrants (if you ignore the elephant of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 04:19 AM
1

Society decides what's humane and what isn't. I guess you're thinking about the American system Vs universal health. But by universal health you think of the NHS. Other universal health systems (ie the Argentinian) are inferior to the American one. Also universal health works with strict border controls and homogeneous societies. Socialist policies aren't as easy to maintain with weak borders and heterogeneous cultures, because the humane factor you refer to is usually associated with tribal thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 03:47 AM
2

You can't value effort. Only outcome has value, and that value is assigned by the rest of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 09:30 PM
1

Awesome writing skills
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 06:18 AM
2

American bias. In my country no woman is that day until after 40s But the dude seems legit average
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 11:02 PM
2

I've been interested on the same stuff. This was my path: On manipulation: How to Win Friends and Influence People The 48 Laws of Power If you haven't, read them, in that order. ​ For psychology. JBP perosonality and it's transformations lectures for an introduction on psychology and jungian psychology. I liked 2016 version better than the 2017. ​ One game changer for me was: Robert Sapolsky Human Behavioral Biology lectures. This basically explains the limitations of the soft sciences and helps…
/r/askTRP09/02/20 05:43 PM
2

Birds of a feather. If you're not a party guy, your friends most likely won't be party guys. You need to go out of your way to befriend other kind of people. A team sport, some scene, dancing lessons, trekking lessons. It takes effort to expand your social circles.
/r/askTRP09/02/20 04:39 PM
9

You're being stupid paranoid. This girl went out of BC to get pregnant from you. You have already told her about the paternity test. You mention no reason to suspect cheating. Unless you're french, just wait eight fucking months to do the paternity test. Chill out and enjoy the pregnancy.
/r/askTRP09/02/20 04:28 PM
7

Yes, you can. But most girls people don't know the difference between deleting an app and deleting an account. Even if she knew the difference, she would need a special motivation to go out of her way to nuke an account inside the 4 weeks period. Again most tinder users exchange phones before banging. And we're talking about a girl that lets a random tinder bloke cum in her without protection. I'm just saying that the whole story smells fishy to me. Lastly, you also feel something isn't right, o…
/r/askTRP04/02/20 03:19 PM
10

She shouldn't be smart enough to know how to nuke a tinder account. It should remain linked to her fb / phone number. Not to mention that most people exchange numbers before meeting. Most likely she's lying.
/r/askTRP04/02/20 02:54 PM
1

So dread is an exercise in futility It might not be. Let's assume you were the girl's best option at the time you paired with her. If there is no radical social environment change, and no upgrade of her appearance, both atypical situations, and you raised your value through time. You should be able to match a better girl now that she's devaluated by age, but you don't do it because you like your partner (let's call it, sunk cost). How would a woman be able to find an option to branch swing to if…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 04:16 AM
2

Wait... did I got this straight? She hired a security guy, then framed him as a sex trafficker? Did you represent the prostitute or the pimp?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/20 03:44 AM
0

IPhones were once the most sold mobile phone model. You could make a shitty limited edition phone, and that wouldn't make it valuable. Scarcity is not all. There is also a limited amount of men a woman will accept to fuck in parallel. The fact that somebody else fucked her in the past doesn't mean he still has access to her pussy, so scarcity doesn't apply either.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 10:23 PM
1

That fireman would stay a lot longer than safe there of he has consequences for leaving early. That guy would stay there longer than safe if he still as something worthy to be saved, even if he wasn't a fireman. I already said this. Even assuming that marriage and divorce were fair, (for whatever definition of fairness you feel comfortable with), absence of incentives to not divorce won't save the Marriage institution.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 12:13 PM
1

It depends. Why would you like your union endorsed by society, the state and God if breaking your union is free of consequences? I agree it makes the unions that survive more valuable, but it also makes the ceremony meaningless as those unions would have survived anyway without it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 01:51 AM
3

Social pressure and fault divorce (or no divorce at all) were incentives to make the marriage last. Some people had long lasting fulfilling marriages, others kept a facade and others just lived a hell. The fact that we now see less successful marriages shows that those negative incentives had a purpose (for some). Having an easy way out of marriage devalues it. I'm not even sure it has any value at all (ie. if you marry by pre-nuptial agreements)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 01:39 AM
3

But it requires men and women not willing to give up when shit get hard and willing to participate especially when things get hard. Suppose there where divorce conditions that both partners considered fair . I don't think that would be enough to fix marriage. What would be the incentives to endure hardness? And without incentives, marriage is LTR2.0 but with a symbolic promise.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 09:13 PM
2

It's JBP view of marriage. A contract to not run away.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 08:36 PM
3

LTR 2.0 What do you mean by this? What would be de difference between marriage and LTR cohabitation?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 07:54 PM
3

Either you're not that good at waltz, or you require a wider formation to go to other rhythm. Waltz is usually 3/4, it will only easily translate to some folk rhythms and maybe tango that's free form dancing (not exactly but you can butcher a song without major consequences). Salsa / Bachata / Rock, are 4/4 and have hand holding. But it'll really depend on the clubs you go to.
/r/askTRP27/01/20 01:37 AM
1

Go to couples dancing lessons. Lead dancing is a skill you need to train by repetition.
/r/askTRP26/01/20 08:54 PM
1

Meetup
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 11:01 PM
1

Based on Wikipedia, it's week 24 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_abortion I'm not particularly concerned about the legality of chemical abortion, as it's not possible to enforce it. I understand if you want to remain on the legal side of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 02:26 AM
1

Fine, use 90% for educated condom usage. 90% for typical pill and 85% for day counting. That's 99.87% that's an underestimation of 4 in 3000 You need to notice your pregnancy in time in order to be able to abort. You'd need to be unlucky enough to be unable to detect your pregnancy past week 24 for chemical abortion, that's lower than 1 in 450 chance according to HuffPost. You have 99.99997% Of chances of that not being you if you use triple protection. And in the unlucky case of that being you,…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 01:39 AM
1

Condom is closer to 85% but that Includes people that don't know how to correctly wear a condom. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/condom/how-effective-are-condoms Educate yourself and put it yourself for 98% effectivity. Combine them with the pill (99% when you don't miss days) and fertility cycle calendar (95% for educated women). You now have close to 0.99999% effectivity (just calculated it). Sex might not be worth the hassle, but the risk is negligible. Even more if you …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 01:16 AM
2

Don't like lifting, boxing is my thing. Never thought that beta me would need help on comfort testing. Any specific reading to suggest?
/r/askTRP21/01/20 06:17 PM
1

Lear to STFU. Why did you tell her you saw a high chance of failure? High age gap, she demanded exclusivity too soon. I didn't want to deal with an immature brat so I wanted to know we were both on the same page: We will have exclusivity but let's take it light and see what happens So you give a 21 Y/O a task to unpack her emotions and your actions? Looks like it was a projection faux pas, unpacking emotions or ignoring them are my two modes, and I guess I wanted to transmit a look at the action…
/r/askTRP21/01/20 05:14 PM
3

Awesome view, I might have been overcomplicating this shit. Honestly I don't feel quite willful to meditate on my past interactions. And then what? I'd need to self myself constantly. Doesn't sound like a safe way out. Thanks.
/r/askTRP21/01/20 03:41 PM
3

The US posture that oral sex is "less intimate" than piv is a completely foreign concept to (LATAM) me. I've only read about it in wasted teenager orgies of the UMC.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 05:08 PM
20

What's the answer to the onion question?
/r/TheRedPill17/01/20 08:11 PM
5

A particular detail on this that isn't mainstream TRP is that the hierarchies are created by men and women just limit to choose the top climber. This has 3 implications. 1) There are multiple hierarchies. You just need to climb one to have success. Which aligns with niche success proposed by purples. 2) Puts the onus on the men. ie, the reason for drug dealers high success in the hoods should be blamed on the men enabling that pecking order. 3)There is no universal alpha. All alphas are situatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 06:15 AM
2

Yry to use browser version instead of mobile
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 07:36 PM
14

I will assume you're not a trolling (which i highly doubt) 1) unicorns don't exist. Even if they exist, the mythological creatures are borderline impossible to catch. What makes you so special to have been able to marry one? Your wife most likely isn't an unicorn, which doesn't mean she isn't a good woman. But It does mean she might not stay forever besides the pathetic simp you're self describing. Put your shit together. 2) TRP is mainly a sexual strategy forum. The advice you'll get here about…
/r/askTRP01/01/20 09:04 PM
0

Dumpster diving
/r/askTRP28/12/19 03:52 PM
1

Just wanted to say there are no young millenials left. That we still are sheltered crybabies long past our mid twenties doesn't allow us to ignore that genz is already joining the workforce and voting.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/19 01:24 AM
1

I haven't seen that trend at my zone. But I know a girl that cuts her hair to symbolize "life stage passages" which to my understanding were usually dicks.
/r/askTRP26/11/19 11:56 AM
2

Who's HSP? Could you link to the guides?
/r/TheRedPill15/11/19 01:07 AM
1

Awesome, nevere thought about the breaking frame stuff. Thanks
/r/askTRP09/11/19 03:11 AM
1

Should've treated her like the three year old she was acting like. What would that look like. Should I seem bothered by her behavior? Aloof? ignore it?
/r/askTRP09/11/19 12:10 AM
1

Isn't that a sort of dramatic view? Loose frame once, loose respect from the gal forever?
/r/askTRP08/11/19 07:13 PM
1

I'm not married. I like her. What did you read to understand that from my post? Is it that horribly redacted?
/r/askTRP08/11/19 04:04 PM
0

1st, you need to fuck when you feel comfortable and want to fuck the guy. It shouldn't be a reward for the guy that ticks checkboxes The 3rd date rule is for people that try to avoid the hook up culture. It's a minimum threshold, not a maximum. Next: This is female dating strategy given from a man, so you shouldn't listen to the fish, but: Sexual compatibility is very important. No sexually experienced sane person should offer commitment independent of sexual compatibility. That's a huge red fla…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 11:15 PM
1

Most productive people don't have much time on their hands. if you reach a third 'real' date, you had time to know the guy and think about him. You know the guy doesn't find you completely insufferable. You weed out most High players that have excess of women. You signal low impulsive behavior, which should attract more relationship minded people. *Note: A desperate guy or a Chad with excess time, patience and money may also pass the screening.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 10:47 PM
3

That's correct. Taoist sex attempts male orgasms without ejaculation because girls 'steal' too much of your fire energy and has blue balls relief excercises for the aftereffects. Yes, it's Ying Yang mumbo-jumbo, but at least they are consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 08:46 PM
1

Tried one month nofap on vacations away from gf: 1) Mood difference: Maybe, if I was doing nothing my thoughts would go to sexual stuff. If I was engaged in any activity, I noticed no difference. 2) No, I didn't perceive women more attractive 3) No special female attention. But I'm slow at reading IOI. 4) Not at all. I used my current gf as measuring standard. Having a dry spell dropped my standards a lot more even while fapping regularly. 5) After a month of nofap, sleep deprivation and jet lag…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 08:40 PM
1

Limited working hours. Good body. Good money... Yep, I can see Jane bragging about his trashman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 05:26 PM
2

Music, programming and calculus can be synthesized. You don't need to abandon everything. But you do need prioritize. That's what "setting middle / long term goals" refers to.
/r/askTRP25/10/19 06:02 PM
1

Any example of those interests?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 01:02 AM
1

How long does it take to cure that shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 12:43 PM
2

This is a tentative answer. But search about dopamine spikes in the brain's reward anticipation system when the more uncertain (random) an event is. That's why most casino games have a close to 50% winning chance. 50% is the maximum addictive point.
/r/askTRP08/10/19 10:53 PM
1

I'm short two months for 3 years.
/r/askTRP08/10/19 04:07 AM
6

For amateur fighters, nothing. But in my estimation, rules are what give you the confidence for sparring. The first time I stood on a ring I fought against an amateur boxer, he was restricted to launch only jabs. I wasn't able to land a single punch. I only could take two round of constant beating. This was after a year of training. For beginners that never stood on a ring, MMA is overwhelming, you don't have the movements internalized by repetition. So it'll take a lot until you're ready for re…
/r/askTRP08/10/19 03:56 AM
14

Combat sports with sparring: box, kick-boxing, or muay Thai. BJJ is awesome, but is an strategy sport, and requires flexibility. I haven't tried it so can't say how well it works for your issue. MMA gyms are BJJ + Muay Thai usually. Don't go for that. //////////// But your issue seems of other kind, being mean won't make you tougher. Setting boundaries will. And teasing is a verbal skill about fraternization. Unless you have a bulling issue (which isn't normal in most adult healthy environments)…
/r/askTRP08/10/19 03:10 AM
1

Try social dancing. I've seen plenty Engeneering types that also care for their appearance. It's also filled with players (The better the dancer, the higher the chances he's a player). Try to not be seen hooking up inside the scene. That turns away more introvert types that are already putting themselves out of their comfort zone by assisting. Don't remain long on that scene. Girls tend to become broken quickly there.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 05:46 PM
1

Sorry, it wasn't clear for me. What do you see as feminist inside the Amish community?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 06:15 PM
2

Some say that PUAs were "fake it till you make it". TRP is "it's easier to put your shit together than fake that you have your shit together, If you're high quality enough, bitches will tolerate stuff" Also here I've heard that women are naturally redpilled. The blue pill is a blindfold that affects men only. Here you'll hear NAWALT, ie, not every girl will tolerate the same level of mistreatment, trpers are chasing damaged goods. TRP answer is a combination of, AWALT, it's just that you're not …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 06:01 PM
3

In the context of a "friendship". If the guy was frienzoned he'd receive an 'I like you but not like that' with all the same IOIs. And even those clear IOIs, can be missed by some inexperienced / low awareness men. (I had a shameful experience of having an aquitance sit on my lap at a nightclub, and only realize something wasn't right until after she stood up and walked away )
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 05:13 PM
2

Red pill is a matrix reference popularized by 4chan, so any unpopular opinion about society is a red pill ( even far right neo nationalist stances) You're talking about the MRA / MGTOW the red pill documentary. It was a sensationalist title that leads to confusion. There is no relati with "our" TRP besides depedestalization of women. And you could be all 3 at the same time. Basically the pill is that society is fucked: MRA: lets fix society MGTOW: lets avoid society traps TRP: this is how societ…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 11:42 AM
11

I don't like the hybrid Twitter / reddit flow style. I just see an endless list of messages without context. Any way to have a list of threads view?
/r/TheRedPill30/09/19 02:27 PM
5

if the name is so important then buy a knock off. No one will know but you. You are wrong. Everybody who matters would know. Including guys who can read status signals.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 11:07 AM
2

For most humans successfully forming a family or becoming a teacher are the only things that have trascendental meaning and are achievable. Contributing to technological progress (or any other form of progress) also has trascendental meaning but is not achievable by most, for those who can has enormous failure rate and even on success will only be recognized by your peers. Making money by itself doesn't have a trascendental meaning.
/r/askTRP21/09/19 06:30 PM
1

Yesterday, at an Electric Engeneering convention. The men's queue was really short tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/19 03:31 PM
1

Arguably asking for a dance is inherited from social dancing etiquette where the expectation is for the female to agree. The club scene has bifurcated from the social dancing scene and doesn't hold true there.
/r/askTRP19/09/19 10:16 PM
2

Apparently dry orgasms allow to bypass the refractory period.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/19 11:55 AM
4

Twice a month is not an avid social dancer. Lessons once a week + social dancing night club once a week is normal social dancing. An avid dancer goes to lessons 2+ a week, goes to a night club twice a week and probably practices for an exhibit once a week... And that is barely amateur dancing. What I mean, the dancing scene is filled with broken gals but your gal is not part of the scene (yet). You need to go dancing with her, at least half the times she goes and get known in the scene too. This…
/r/askTRP12/09/19 10:44 PM
0

Social media is cancer for gals https://youtu.be/XllFnSn2KAQ
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/19 09:51 PM
8

From her writing she is too smart and a nerd , for being 21. Also she's not ugly. So, if nobody ever hit on her: 1) She's been sheltered all her life 2) She's extremely introverted and lived oatrasized 3) She's autistic and doesn't cue guys to pick her up or doesn't realize when guys are picking her up Probably a combination of all 3
/r/TheRedPill12/09/19 09:42 PM
1

Airbnb might be cheaper than a hotel. Some have keypad locks so you can avoid meeting your host or grow a beard. If meeting the host, go without your girl. And edit your age from the id capture while registering.
/r/askTRP10/09/19 08:51 PM
1

Past infatuation, how do you know recognize love without reducing it to interpersonal transactions?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 06:09 PM
1

And thus, RP men aspire to be Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 06:03 PM
1

Is she studying something with a viable career path? Also, just be open about it. That if she wants an exclusive relationship you will require expenditures split proportional to income, and financial responsibility on her end. Ask her to go with her through her finances to check if there's something you don't like there. Also try to not look like a stingy bastard, frame it into future saving with a tangible objective, like vacations or a car.
/r/askTRP09/09/19 08:22 PM
1

Bachata is the most "touch happy" and currently popular among young ladies. I like salsa more, but it's not as popular. There are lots of salsa + bachata events. Tango is awesome, but it's difficult to find a young environment, it's mostly 40+ American rhythms (rock, swing, charleston) have their own scenes. seems like salsa dancing, although eloquent, may not translate well to a club environment Intermediate salsa, requires dissociation of body movements and rhythm cadence. These skills transla…
/r/askTRP09/09/19 05:17 PM
5

Works on lots of levels. On a self improvement side, you have a social hobbie, that's good for both, mind and body (it's sort of therapeutic, it's hard to explain but you disconnect from reality). And lets you meet people with backgrounds different than yours. You learn how to touch women. And you earn the confidence to do it without looking like a creep. Dancing is kino on steroids. It's basically cheating on all steps of kino escalation, below kissing. Women associate good dancers with bed ski…
/r/askTRP09/09/19 04:04 PM
3

Social dancing lessons.
/r/askTRP09/09/19 03:49 PM
2

You are more than 30. Why did he ask for your mother's permission?
/r/askTRP05/09/19 04:59 PM
1

Speculums aren't (usually) used on aroused vaginas, nor are as deep as the aroused vaginal channel. A well endowed man would lift the cervix and pass below it. That was my understanding of that answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 11:42 PM
2

Not according to this https://www.quora.com/How-long-must-an-erect-penis-be-before-it-touches-the-cervix Maybe someone with deeper anatomy knowdelage can confirm.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 11:23 PM
3

Also, the cervix on an aroused vagina isn't at the end of the vaginal channel, but at the roof, behind the g spot if I understood women anatomy correctly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 05:08 PM
1

Unless you're ok with being your own children grandfather, starting to look for an LTR at 35 might not be a smart move.
/r/askTRP04/09/19 11:33 AM
2

How's your discipline? I barely work in the office environment, my productivity would plummet working remotely. Otherwise, you are getting a 38% time cut for a 15% pay cut, I'd make the change.
/r/askTRP04/09/19 11:06 AM
2

Most open relationships end up as failures, unless there are some rules that both abide. Telling about each other partners and veto power is frequent.
/r/askTRP02/09/19 03:51 PM
6

Not necessary. Girlfriend implies going to each other family and (some) friend events among other shit.
/r/askTRP31/08/19 09:40 PM
1

México has a hugging culture with aquitances, regardless of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 09:36 AM
1

Shit, I was half drunk when i watched that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 07:42 PM
1

https://youtu.be/P388gUPSq_I Minute 1:04:30 It's a borderline case involving adolescent bonobos.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:54 PM
1

If a bonobo is convinced of high chances of him being the father ( by being the only one that fucked the girl), he will BB for the offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:38 PM
1

All men are richer under capitalism compared to theirselves in the non capitalistic parallel world. A/B test have been performed multiple times: honkong, vietnam, Korea and Germany
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:17 AM
3

I like you but I don't have time for dumb games. If you're really interested tell me when you're free, I'll pick you up for a date.
/r/askTRP29/08/19 03:48 AM
2

You learn from experience. Any contactless because too dangerous practitioner will loose against any sparring martial art with the same "practice time". That's also why I'd put my money on bjj practitioner against a boxer. Bjjs being less dangerous accumulate more sparring experience.
/r/askTRP29/08/19 03:43 AM
1

Sensory deprivation. Not everything BDSM is physical SM
/r/askTRP26/08/19 04:10 PM
2

Here goes the amorality of TRP. It tells you the thing that works. (It might be wrong). You bring your own morals and decide what to do with the information.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 04:30 AM
7

Read Mantak chia, Taoist secrets of love. It has a section on using kegels to stop ejaculation. And in building the female orgasms slowly and taking breaks before the point of no return. From a westernized POV, chakra energy circulation is introspective meditation. The book also promotes no fap. The only controversial thing in the book is that the endpoint is orgasms without ejaculation. It's objective is "chakra energy conservation" ( and blue balls), but it could be used in theory to allow mal…
/r/askTRP25/08/19 07:19 PM
2

I'm curious what did you talk about? I mean, typical exchange is negotiating the fee. You must have done something else to get cured of your anxiety.
/r/askTRP25/08/19 12:01 AM
1

For boxing search YouTube videos for shadow and bag routines. If you really want a book, I think Dempsey's is the classic of orthodox boxing.
/r/askTRP22/08/19 06:39 AM
2

Work for full body orgasms? What was your reference for making her squirt?
/r/askTRP20/08/19 08:39 PM
1

This is completely un-RP, but you could concede exclusivity in exchange for boundaries and time. Tell her that you like her, but you feel you're going too fast and you want to be sure before starting a serious relationship.
/r/askTRP18/08/19 10:22 PM
5

Salsa / Bachata lessons. .Most Women like dancing. . You have an activity to pass time and avoid interview dates. . Dancing is a cheat for kino escalation. Some places have a social dance after the lesson, or you could hit a pub. Swing/Rock/Tango are also ok but have less kino.
/r/askTRP18/08/19 09:32 PM
1

Your reality is completely opposite from mine. No childless, 30+, non hideous, self sustainable gal has issues settling, if she wants to. And you can't attribute to manhood the technology advances of a fist of lucky, hardworking, smart and visionary men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 05:12 AM
1

Loved mooderino stories. Also pratchett's witches comes to my mind with the witch/wizard dichotomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 05:39 AM
1

You made an absolutist absurd argument. Most men prefer a sub 25 gal, true. But also most men prefer any fertile woman to no woman at all, and there is plenty of older men that are ok with a post menopause woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 03:43 PM
2

I can see why it wasn't accepted :)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:09 AM
1

Check this guaguanco example: https://youtu.be/bYD4waIdkAA Besides the basic steps structure it's highly freestyle, even more than all the ballroom dances I know of.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 01:07 AM
2

Male leading is characteristic of contact ballroom dances. Guaguanco is a contactless couples dance without clear lead that isn't a clusterfuck. It's a representation of a hen flirting and then running away from a rooster trying to fuck her. Chacarera is a coreographed Argentinian dance representing courtship, again a girl running away from a guy. Also contactless. Do you have any examples of clusterfuck couple dances?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 12:38 AM
2

Well, it is a sort of hipocritical to lay only at the feet of women the de-regulation of the SMP, just because men are self serving individualist horny dogs. It takes two to tango. Men only complain about women not being sluts to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/19 07:11 AM
1

Courting, dating, and wining and dining is for young and never-married virgins. Is this a generalized TRP stance? Is all romance considered beta game even if you enjoy it? This assuming you get sex before the 5th date.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/19 06:39 AM
1

That was not explosion of birth rates, but plummetting of child mortality, and rise of health in general. I read that today life expectancy in Africa is higher than pre WWII US.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/19 02:57 PM
1

Dude, thanks. Those lectures are a gem. Have you read Zebra? Was it worth your time?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 10:03 PM
1

How do you cheek your fat % via pictures?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 06:03 PM
1

Any recommendations on how to get started on fashion? I basically don't care about it, but know that even if I spend on expensive clothes my taste is shit so I end up dressing like shit on cheap clothes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 03:47 AM
2

Did she found about TRP? And how did you clear the affair suspicions?
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 04:47 PM
2

Are you even American? You don't sound like someone who has ever spent any time here. No, but lived there 2 years working for one of the big tech companies. Might not have familiarized enough with your University system, but my understanding was that admissions were scored by a combination of SAT and extracurricular activities. If there are explicit race biases allowed, on admission and scholarship granting, do you really belive that on two equal stem applications of different genders, they will…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 04:59 PM
5

What American universities are doing this? Specifics please. https://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-adv-asian-race-tutoring-20150222-story.html Here they made the mistake of institutionalizing it. . Extracurricular activities for girls are not keeping boys from pursuing stem careers. In STEM, no, because despite the efforts, it's a useless endeavour to try to entice girls into doing something they don't like. But still, assuming it wasn't useless, you are giving girls expensive tutoring …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 02:25 PM
8

If you give female only scholarships, female only coding bootcamps, and use intersectionality to "correct" SAT scores on universities admittance, you are denying chances to a more deserving guy. There was a French experience were scholarships were openly biased for women. Most women deserted before the second year, with a corresponding drop in the total number of graduates that would be men. If I can find the source I'll post it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 01:25 PM
4

I heard in a karen straughan video that there was an American reform specific targeted for women, that destroyed the boys performance. But I can't remember the video name.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 12:54 PM
7

There is a lack of stem professionals. Even the shittiest ones get absorbed to the stem equivalent of a janitor (maintenance jobs). Because there are no arguments for "keeping women out", it has mutated to "girls are told that stem is not for them". And the fix for this is, spend money to tease girls into liking stem computers, don't care if more capable boys than don't happen to be a minority (unless Asian) aren't given this opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 12:39 PM
2

I've heard from MRAs that there's been an education reform targeted to the female average temperament. So, the average boy gets bored, has lower grades, and less access to higher education. Resulting in the current unbalance in professionals, that pushes men to those dangerous jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 12:32 PM
1

What do you mean with time-tested male-to-male friendships
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 09:34 PM
1

but if the situation were to come up where she showed romantic interest, the beta would be all in There is a moment an old friendship has such value, and you are aware of such incompatibilities, that bringing sex into it will inevitably fuck everything. So, even if you want to, the rational thing is not to fuck her.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 09:28 PM
1

Define Long Term. I think you don't decide explicitly to enter a long term relationship. You make small concessions to deepen the relationship, and if it lasts long enough and is deep enough, you just happen to be in a LTR. The expectation of monogamy is one of those concessions. RP advice is that if you have multiple partners, and don't wait a reasonable time, you're at risk of making that concession under oneitis. On the other hand, if you let a relationship to deep enough, you probably won't …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 12:55 PM
1

Childless LTRs where the couple live together but both are working are just room mates who fuck. My thoughts, exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 12:40 PM
1

No, but I think that life meaning is in the struggle for a noble purpose. All things that bring meaning to life reduce happiness, even considering the little ephemeral satisfaction that you obtain after an achievement it doesn't balance out all the shit you go through to arrive there. On the other hand, family is one of the noble causes that is realizable to most people. Not everybody can be an inventor, artist or athlete. Everybody most can rise a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 09:39 PM
2

Of course it plumbets. You can't possibly be happier with children, in an hedonistic way. The issue is equating life meaning with happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 02:33 PM
1

Although just like in Japan it probably won’t work, What's happening in Japan? Wikipedia's herbivore men page has only surveys on teenagers. Also, on Japanese flavor of mgtow, they are making themselves unattractive. It's been repeated here that women prefer to be alone than with a ballast. Also, after the war, Paraguay had a ratio of 1 man per 10, today they're doing just fine. Reviving men of the game pool, even most of them, won't affect shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 01:51 PM
1

Why you think that more sex means less happiness
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 11:10 AM
1

How is nutrition over there? A way to quickly increase IQ is to erradicatr famine, and nutrition issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 02:59 AM
2

I think women in general tend to be happier the less sex they have. Care to expand this idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 02:49 AM
2

It’ll take a fair bit longer to know if encouraging girls into stem will change things. Why such larger experiment wasn't required for law, medicine or finances, all previously male dominated fields?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 10:53 PM
2

Argentina had the world's greatest GDP per capita during 1895 and 1896, according to Madison Project.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 09:49 PM
3

Economic Liberalism in the soul of 1852 constitution, mimicking America's one, at the hands of Juan Bautista Alberdi. “Today we must strive for free immigration, liberty of commerce, railroads, the navigation of our rivers, the tilling of our soil, free enterprise, not instead of our initial principles of independence and democracy, but as essential means of assuring ourselves that these will cease being mere words and will become realities. . . . Our revolutionary wars sought to establish liber…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 09:24 PM
1

how are men adapting to many women finding success and fulfillment in their careers? Is that premise true? I thought most woman hated their jobs, like most men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 06:52 PM
1

I've only been to SF and didn't see an abnormal amount of good looking people. Fancier, maybe, but that's cultural.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 06:49 PM
7

Show me your numbers. Argentina was predominantly criollo (mestizo) during most of the 19th century. European migration explosion started in the 1880s and finished after WWII. There was no massive Latin American migration until the 1990s . Here you can see that the total foreign LATAM immigration was under 2% if you exclude Uruguay and Chile. The country was already shit by then. ​ Brazil's case is worse, because it was never grate, we've been forever sinking, they've been forever emerging. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 06:37 PM
1

Well, on one hand, pretty people have better opportunities. On the other, rich guys get to choose their partner. So, there might be some sexual selection for attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 06:10 PM
10

Examples of this decline include ancient Egypt, Brazil and Argentina What are you talking about? Brazil was always a shit. Argentina was n°1 world economy at the end of 19th century. By the beginning of 20th century its GDP per capita was 80% of America's. Since then it's been in constant decline, thanks to unions, politicians and corporations corruption deadlock. It's the example of a self cannibalized shithole. Disgenics have nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 06:04 PM
1

Assuming we are restricting to career branches were leadership required, bitchy males might make good Burger King shift managers, but I can't think of many succesful examples, maybe Steve Ballmer, but he had other peculiarities. There are other manifestations of male authority that are not perceived as bitchy. On the other hand, a bitchy woman can raise to be president of a nation. Also being a bitch is not the only feminine way to use power, the matriarch is another common one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 04:00 PM
2

Assholery is bad. Bitches are assholes; therefore, by your definition, Bitches lack some form of moral virtue. Bitches are good at managerial positions on conservative (past innovation stage) companies, or at business models with high turnover, when you want to maximize the output of a poor fucker before [s]he knows better and leaves (ie telemarketing). Since it has value, it could be not immoral, but just amoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 12:09 PM
1

Why do people think equal means "the same" or "tit for tat"? Unless you have a tit for tat situation, you have a subjective appreciation of the value that each one brings to the relationship. Under market rules, one person must think that what the other person brings to the relationship has more value that what [s]he is putting in, otherwise [s]he's making a bad deal and should stop/rebalance the relationship. In other words, no voluntary transaction is a zero sum game when you bring in personal…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 05:08 AM
4

Bitchiness is orthogonal to femininity. Even more, I've never met a bitchy career woman that wasn't traditionally feminine. There is nothing wrong with a woman deciding to be a Bitch. These qualities just are. Are aggressive, abrasive, intense, passionate women "bitches"? I never said that there was something wrong with being a bitch. I'm just saying that Capitalism selects for such temperament in women more frequently than in men, for career progression and in my humble experience. What, really…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 04:48 AM
6

Don't know, the cliche of the man giving his full salary to the wife had a reason, so it can't be that uncommon. Probably it's outdated, and today those smart women are making their own money.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 04:23 AM
3

Men have all kinds of metrics by which they judge other men, and ironically women kind of use this scale to judge those whom they deem worthy of sex. Can't see the irony. JBP theory is that makes choose the game rules and sort out the pecking order based on them. Women just select for the ones that come at the top of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 04:19 AM
5

I've the suspicion that the clearest career success path for women selects for bitchiness, and not that money makes women bitchy
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 04:14 AM
1

Do you mind if I ask where you're from? I get the impression you're not from the US Argentinian, but my experience with female bosses was working for a top 100 US corporation. My other relationships working with women: HR (still some bitches, but othogonal to my job), Academia: I've not shared projects with women, most females are ok. My boss is a woman, awesome scientist, good mentor, but horrible manager. Your stereotypical career mother. And with maternal leadership style. Since the rise to m…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 08:39 PM
1

there is also whats known as the BFOQ exception that allows discrimination where sex is a "bona fide occupational qualification" Are there any male "bona fide occupational qualification"?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 01:35 AM
3

Don't know. I'm the lonely kind, so I've been an outsider to most hierarchies, most of my interests had little to no female participation, and I'm (sort of) not good with people. I can only think of two downsides. Female managers, in my experience, tend to be of the dictatorial kind, or less politely, insufferable bitches. I've never respected their rank. Like their authority was given and not earned. Haven't had similar experience with male managers of the same kind. Women competing with males …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 01:25 AM
1

There is nothing 'men exclusive'. Whatever is left is being slowly dismantled. Ie, no more Boy Scouts, but plenty of 'female only gyms'. What some feminist might tell you is that all traditional power/merit hierarchies are male hierarchies (which is true), so there is no need for men only spaces. Women who don't want to bother with the female hierarchy (which I don't understand the motivation for, nor the advantages), still can climb male hierarchies, which is more competitive, but fairer. Ie, s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 08:33 PM
1

Female hierarchies are definitely harder to climb. They are a ruthless meatgrind that require a combination of attractiveness, smarts and social skills. The difference is that women can deflect that fight and entertain themselves with traditional 'male' hierarchies.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 06:02 PM
1

Yup, love is a desease.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 04:13 PM
1

your thoughts on women's family planning Family planning as an euphemism for abortion? English is not my native language.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 03:42 AM
1

I don't think women have it easier. But using family to play 'wooden leg' is poor for the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 03:41 AM
5

Without credible source, this is just discussing a decontextualized anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 03:32 AM
3

There are socially accepted protocols. If you get caught leering at her body, that's not acceptable, so if she catches you, you need to stop. If you start by making eye contact, then check her body, then return to her eyes, you're negotiating permission. Depending on her response, you can or can't proceed with leering. If you're holding eye contact, and she breaks it twice, keeping it is creepy. Most people don't need this written on paper, if they need it they're socially incompetent. If they a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 03:07 AM
2

Most women don't want 'good men (TM)'. It's a plus that's nice to have once you filled most the other checkboxes. So if you aim at good men without game, they are not in high demand. A 4 could easily rope up to a 6 provided she is proactive and brings something besides sex to the relationship. But she needs to do it before her 30s. Otherwise that 4 will have to compete with all the postwall girls with much better looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 02:48 AM
3

Everything is only wrong when you get caught, and not if you don’t, because morals do not apply until someone is facing repercussions for their actions Making eye contact is different from leering. Leering is a creepy behaviour. Getting caught leering is a sign of social incompetence. So, the guy who gets caught (doing unwanted) leering multiple times is labeled a creep. It don't see the issue here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 02:14 AM
1

but if men can make that choice and have it not impact their careers while women can't, how is career progression easier for women 1) Bitch at biology, career men usually wait til mid thirties to have children. 2) women with healthy pregnancies could have a 6 months leave, then resume their careers. Either outsourcing the care of the child, or pairing with a man with a flexible working schedule. The issue is that women want to have their cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 01:39 AM
1

Couldn't have worded it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 01:29 AM
1

Offers from a higher up for a big project in return for sexual favors I'm aware of the ethic concerns. But from a pure capitalistic POV, is there an issue with this? You're being offered a shortcut to prove yourself in exchange of sex. Reject it and you're in equality of conditions with your male competition and the rest of the girls that don't wore themselves up.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 01:22 AM
1

Can't agree. I work at stem related academia. There is enough competition with the industry demand that there is no place for positive discrimination. That means that each new girl has passed the screening. Yet my default bias is that a new guy will be able to pull his own weight, while with new gals I don't assume they'll be up to level. They need to prove themselves on my eyes. At entry level this is easily corrected. But if they need to repeat this after each promotion, I do think they might …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/18 10:45 PM
2

RP doesn't preach virtue but open sociopathic behavior. Shit like letting your multiple partners know of each other. I can't relate to your example because it should start with marrying an harpy. Whatever comes next was rotten from the beginning. If the questionable parts of RP work, you can only blame it on women. If it doesn't work, then why the indignation?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/18 12:03 PM
2

You may say that manly men don't manipulate their partners. Sure. But, for me, the archetype of a "manly men" has "cunning bastard" as one of it's requirements. It's needed to be able to climb most hierarchies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 10:25 PM
1

Besides property division rights, I don't know of any difference between a common law relationships and marriage. It's a huge difference, because it sets a bigger exit barrier that may incentive to seek sorting out issues. On the other hand, if you need the coercive power of the state into your relationship, why would you choose that partner on the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 10:19 PM
1

Maybe anti marriage in the sense of avoiding getting divorce raped. But there are plenty of mentions to LTR. Assuming you 'never get married', where does a LTR transforms into the equivalent of a marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 09:31 PM
0

This is what I don't get. Sure trpers are posers, but from the woman perspective, what's the difference? That they eventually break the act, or that their 'manliness' is subpar to the original version?. And if you have to choose between a loser and a loser posing as a manly man, which one would have better chances?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 04:08 PM
1

Try tinder, it's a different concept. 2 hour information gathering, 2 hours making a profile, then 10 minutes handling the app a day, while you take a shit. It's not much time to loose if it fails. But read some guide, most people doesn't so that extra edge will give you the 2 or 3 matches a week. It takes 1 week and a half of use to start getting a flow of matches. Don't give up before the second week. Also, I constantly hear that it only really works for the most attractive of men Again, if ug…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 02:08 AM
2

1) Social dancing, salsa in particular, made the trick for me. It taught me the proper way to handle Normal/common day physical contact with a woman. Also dancing as a skill is cheating the "basic level" kino escalation shown by any PUA guide. It takes dedication, about 8 classes to not be a complete mess. 2) Online dating. Read/watch videos about how to make a tinder short bio + pics + opening. And read about their algorithm. Don't pay. If you have worked to better yourself, you should be able …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 04:00 AM
5

Treat everybody here as a freak. Women want less sex than men, in the sense that for most couples, the man ideal frequency is higher and then some middle ground is negotiated.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 03:31 AM
4

Here I have to disagree. The open moves are (usually) made by men. But if a woman wants an specific man she needs to signal him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 03:05 AM
9

Girls are just as horny as men are, but pretend they aren't That's, on average, false. Women have lower libido than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 02:57 AM
1

the difference between sex (biologically determined) and gender (socially determined). Which is a useless distinction the way your are treating it because society organization is largely based on biological causes, and identity is never self determined but negotiated with the society. So assuming you can engineer societies to accommodate for less than 1% of population is naive at least, and tyrannical If I cared about your opinions on trans people I’d have asked you for them. You could have sent…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 11:58 AM
1

Women do wear pants, an some men wear / have worn dresses through history. Transgenders are not just men with wigs and dresses. Transgenderism is not about clothing. It's about individuals expecting society to give them a place that is reserved for women. (The origin and utility of that place is another debate).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 05:43 AM
1

All economic evidence points that state interventionism produces worse long term results . Yet "muh think of the poor" mentality is (or at least was) part of the Democratic platform.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 05:29 AM
1

Shitting at home is wasting your free time. Shit at work!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 05:13 AM
3

My husband already tried it in a way before we were married Could you explain why you still married him?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 04:50 AM
2

TRP doesn't deny that. It only claims that sex with nothing in exchange only goes for the top men on attractiveness (physical + charisma + power ) Men and female attractiveness can't be easily compared. You can compare men against other men, and women against other women. To say a man and woman are on the same "rank" requires to rank them against all other men and women, respectively available on their opposites environment. What you call dating below attractiveness implies that such girl had a …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 03:40 AM
1

Chads are 10 to 5 percent, depending on how cringy you're. Attractiveness is not uniformly distributed. The 20/80 rule includes the bulk of average girls too, which Chad might not have time to handle.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 02:47 AM
1

Getting a GF doesn't make you Chad. Also fucking a lot on the Social Networking age doesn't make you Chad either, unless you're fucking high SMV gals. Guess this is a kingdom of the blind case.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 02:40 AM
1

Studies show high status families wait longer to have another kid after having a son, where as lower status families wait longer after having a daughter. Any hypothesis about this pattern?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 04:57 AM
6

You cant force someone to learn how to develop social skills Says who? There are tons of literature on howto do exactly that. If you can't rise your kid to be competent enough to reproduce, you've evolutionary speaking, failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 04:55 AM
2

Or maybe you passed it through it? Did you date at late 20's early 30's band?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 02:08 AM
2

I know of no man who wouldn’t run upon hearing a girl talk about kids on the first date I'm usually the one that brings it up. If not at the first, the second or third. Maybe you're not at the right age band yet? It tells you how much you should invest on a relationship if having kids is one of your objectives. It's not the same for women, if they want to, they WILL have children with or without you or your consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 01:32 AM
2

How long should this sex holding last? Most people on both genders with 'attractive lifestyles' don't have much free time. Coordinating a date takes time and resources. Even for 'non players' (whatever that means) sex is a validation of the viability of the investment. Holding sex too far will select for certain male characteristics you probably aren't looking for, sane men will desist, and the emotional damage would be equal if not worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 01:26 AM
2

No, incel theory is that struggling men are invisible to vaginas, unless they inconvenience by making themselves noticeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 01:00 AM
1

Negging, Checks, It's my understanding that it's useful on only certain women only. emphasis on escalating casual touch, Good'ol Kino lack of interest in anecdotes (telling or hearing), Where does this come from? reluctance to answer direct questions and instead deflecting with puns. Poor man's anti shit-testing Seems you're describing PUA wannabees
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 12:54 AM
2

Traditional dating advice tells men to "treat the whore like a lady, treat the lady like a whore". How is that a Blue Pill advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 04:21 PM
2

Working out, having multiple hobbies, being financially well off, cold approaching, being witty and confident, being her best option, being Alpha, going to social events, and a bunch of other stuff. That's only for Chad wannabe. Just step out to the real world. You can be a fat and bold fucker and still have a girlfriend. You won't have ONS, and you'll need to aim lower than if you presented your best you, but that's only fair. Self improvement isn't for the pussy, it's for yourself. To stop bei…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 03:28 PM
1

Are you sure it's mostly shamming culture and not female nature the reason most women have less partners than men do?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/18 03:13 AM
1

"dunning Kruger" effect. It's specifically an effect that specifically very low ability people suffer from as per the definition I wasn't using it in the low ability sense, but in the low expertise sense. The a 'how hard can it be?' until you remove the cover of a broken device and actually attemp to fix it. Sorry if it came as pretentious. By all means I'm not saying that average Joe is useless for society. I'm just saying that no matter how hard he tries, he probably won't deserve even a side …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/18 04:16 PM
1

I'm an engineer working at academy. Most of all published papers, including my own, are garbage. The little part that's useful is more kin to a mason's job, which is, taking builiding blocks from the real smart people and use them to optimize / solve a real world issue. There is no advancement for humanity there. Ofcorse it requires highly qualified training, but we're just expensive clogs, replaceable but low in stock. Some people do groundbreaking stuff once in a while. But the story that they…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/18 01:08 PM
1

I'm an engineer working at academy. Most of all published papers, including my own, are garbage. The little part that's useful is more kin to a mason's job, which is, taking builiding blocks from the real smart people and use them to optimize / solve a real world issue. There is no advancement for humanity there. Ofcorse it requires highly qualified training, but we're just expensive clogs, replaceable but low in stock. Some people do groundbreaking stuff once in a while. But the story that they…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/18 01:07 PM
1

You're applying TRP 'we men' mentality to 'we humanity'. Those enhancements you talk about are pushed by a really tiny fraction of the population. As we progress, there are less and less low hanging fruits, so the intelligence requirements to do any innovation are absurd. The role of society is providing enough resources to maximize those gifted men/women output. But as a common man, you're just a replaceable clog on that mechanism. So nobody is missing nothing if you retire from the labor world…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/18 12:07 PM
1

Because sometimes people (especially the intellectual types) have an inner driving need to contribute back to the intellectual world in some meaningful and lasting way Most people of both genders are waged slaves. They won't contribute anything lasting to society on the labor world. The best they can aspire to is being good parents, excellent teachers, or have an active participation on their communities. Being a housewife maximizes your free time for any of those endeavours. Of course at the ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/18 01:20 AM
3

You can't have non commitment relationship and plates to spin, and expect traditional women. TRP is a response to the rupture of the old order.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 07:36 PM
1

No, but intelligent people have more sophisticated ways of amusement, which makes maintaining a relationship easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 04:15 PM
1

Talking specifically about IQ, the mean intelligence has genetic correlation. But the actual IQ an individual gets tends to regress to the mean. So in homogeneous societies, your partner intelligence won't affect much your offspring. On non homogeneous ones, partnering a smart person increases the chances of he/she belonging to a "smarter race" which would give your offspring an advantage. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 04:07 PM
1

but women judge you far more on who you date than what she looks like Could you expand on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 03:52 PM
5

You shape your life with the responsibilities you take. Providing to yourself is the bare minimum for survival. Adopting responsibilities so that other people can depend on you is what I mean. The traditional role of provider for a family is the obvious one, but not the only. It's also why several people consider military men role models. You could be a teacher to somebody. An active member of an organization at your community. Go beyond your minimum responsibilities at work. Be politically acti…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 01:02 PM
2

Most girls start having sex either when they can see potential commitment, or when the couple is heading towards that way. Potential commitment in the sense I'd commit to this guy, or in the sense this guy is signaling he'd commit to me? Some other relationships start with the couple just being friends and/or the guy being an orbiter for a while. In that sense, he’s provided the activities one would do in a commitment, while not getting any sex. And then they may or may not progress to an actual…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 06:01 AM
9

IMHO, adoption of responsibility is what shapes a man's character. That's why basement dwellers are considered perpetual teenagers. How that helps get a gf, i don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 12:31 AM
2

I'm saying your difference is anachronic at the present day for most westernized world. Sex comes before the commitment is even on the table. There is no stage of "I promise you future commitment if you give me sex now". The closest thing is "keep giving me sex, in the future I might consider commitment", which at worst gives you plausible deniability.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 12:09 AM
2

I'm saying your difference is anachronic at the present day for most westernized world. Sex comes even before the commitment is even on the table. There is no stage of "I promise you future commitment if you give me sex now". The closest thing is "keep giving me sex, in the future I might consider commitment", which at worst gives you plausible deniability.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 12:05 AM
1

You notice you are both females? I also have met plenty of opposite sex 'friends' at several social circles. A couple of them I even consider them real Friends. BUT I never had your 'falling into' experience, I don't want to say that the real world is shaped upon my experience, but maybe what you perceived as spontaneous a and natural in fact requires proactivity from the male side. Maybe this is less 'don't listen to falling into' advice, and more 'don't listen to women advice'.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/18 11:48 PM
1

the guys look like slobs, overweight or some I've known to be really really (I hate this term) beta males. In 3rd world shitholes, little money buys you Alphaness.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/18 11:25 PM
2

What the fuck are you talking about? It's 21st century. You fuck first then after a period of time comes (maybe) a talk about monogamy/exclusivity, much later you might decide to live together. All assuming you don't fuck up and get her pregnant. The difference between alpha and beta is how much you work before the first sex. If you are not even at step 1 there is no willful pretention if you don't give straight answers about commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/18 11:12 PM
1

Sure, but bet they're aware of their high maintenance genitalia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/18 01:24 AM
2

But there's a REASON so many best-selling romance novels have heroes defined by their lack of experience with women. You mean, beyond heroes being marketed to teenager and YA with close to zero experience with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 10:44 PM
1

What you describe is a sociopath, not a narcissist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/18 04:47 PM
2

AWALT id the oposite of walking around mad. If you truly believe in it, it'd be the equivalent of being mad because the day is windy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/18 03:06 PM
0

but most people are not manipulative narcissists. Please explain the selfie phenomenom and women's obsession with pictures and instagram
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/18 02:55 PM
1

Interesting, better fat than bitchy in an American or General rule?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/18 12:22 AM
2

You will never be on the recieving end of a "chad", a creep, a male abuser, nothing relationship related. The issue with most of those, is that they are self inflicted damages by women. Women select for Chads that pump and dump them and for violent fuckers, that originally were violent to others and then ended beating them up. Creeps are usually not tolerated by males and we easily emphathize with women about that. On the other hand, betabux thought everything was fine for 8 years of marriage, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 10:41 PM
1

I was thinking of something on the level of a contemporary female Shakespeare. There are plenty of succesful female authors. There are not many authors worth of the most successful title (of any gender). In that category I could only think of Rowling as a female example. The direct appeal to sexual female fantasies seems like a low hanging fruit. Obviously only women could pull that genre right and there is some skill for 50SoG being that important amongst the competition. But that made it only …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 03:02 PM
3

No way. Big bosom means big heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 11:20 AM
2

The most successful authors of our generation are woman. Are you measuring success by number of sells or quality? And besides Rowling. Is there any other female author on the most successful category? (and that is not female porn like twilight or 50 shades of gray)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 05:51 AM
2

Don't know, I believe most people can't keep being friends with somebody they've had sex with. At least I know I can't, and most people I know who tried, filed miserably. ​ If you were friendzoned, but chose to keep a friendship, and didn't wasn't just orbiting. After several years the offered sex wouldn't be worth risking the friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 05:27 AM
2

Aren't these things mutually exclusive, though? Is a woman who is "governed by emotions" capable of making a cold-hearted, logical choice when it comes to picking a man? Not that I adhere, but the cold-hearted, logical optimal choice would be programmed on "female nature" (the actual combination of genetic an social influence on that nature isn't relevant). The emotions are the emergence of that "lizard brain" programming that lead to seeming logical choices. ​ That's not exclusive for females. …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 05:04 AM
1

TRP uses strong language to appeal to disenfranchised men (either failed relationships or borderline incels) but most content is repackaged from other PUA branches. When you remove the strong language, the major points are (even if controversial): * There is a "female nature" that applies to all but some outlier females. And "this is how we think that nature works" * Most relationships with symmetrical / women biased power end badly. * Settling without having multiple concurrent partners might l…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 02:09 AM
1

Old school PUA(an unfortunate name) is extremely effective and almost altruistic while demanding men treat women with respect. TRP is the opposite. Extremely ineffective when you start crunching the numbers and demands men don’t respect women. What do you mean by old PUA? Mystery's book sounded horribly disrespectful towards women. It had all the egocentric shit of TRP, but made you also act like a clown. I've only now noticed a less sociopathic / more self improvement approach on RSA, but can't…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 01:01 AM
2

Sure, tomboys, when not lesbian, are really sexy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 06:02 PM
1

If plenty of men never cheat you can't say all do how many is for opportunity and risk assessment, and how many for loyalty?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 04:26 PM
2

He never says they are a good thing. He says they are inevitable. And that crusading against them only has generated pain and suffering through history.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 12:09 AM
1

I interpreted enforced monogamy by social pressure, and not by power of law. But imI agree there is a blur line about those being different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 12:04 AM
1

Isn't that an oxymoron, faith is opposed to proof and (in the scientific method sense) objectivity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 11:56 PM
3

If you restrict offer on the dating market, you increase attraction to lower value people. Italians used to cut your face if you pump and dumped a female relative. Some muslims stone sluts. It's not pretty, but it's negotiable. Reality is we don't give a fuck about the problem, and solutions might be seen as worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 09:30 PM
2

you can not negotiate attraction. Feminist think they can bring the big brother to: * Redistribute wealth. * Force to interact with people of other races * Force to include females in male only clubs * Regulate speach. Either banning words or forcing people say things they don't want to. * Force labor gender quotas But somebody suggests regulating the dating market (which has already been done, in several cultures) and you say it's non negotiable?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 05:07 PM
1

There is also the Natural Selection of societies. Men productivity increases when they have to provide for their families. Remove that incentive and you have the Stone age equivalent of the basement neck beard. It might have been that the causality was reversed, it was monogamy that enabled the growth of advanced civilizations and not advanced civilizations the ones that engeneered monogamy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 03:46 PM
2

There is also the Natural Selection of societies. Men productivity increases when they have to provide for their families. Remove that incentive and you have the Stone age equivalent of the basement neck beard. It might have been that the causality was reversed, it was monogamy that enabled the growth of advanced civilizations and not advanced civilizations the ones that engeneered monogamy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 03:45 PM
2

I say that approximately one year is appropriate before making it official. What would change after making it official? How are the expectations modified after making the relationship official?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 02:33 AM
2

im 5'5 on a good day. What do you mean by good day?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 02:27 AM
1

But there are Women out there getting Wet sucking dick in glory holes Wut? Where?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 02:09 AM
1

B/c they want to appeal to this guy they put up with a lot of nonsense from him and compromise their own interests I've seen both, girls that stopped doing things they enjoyed because their BF didn't like it (ie. Dancing). This is what they regret, after looking back, if they relationship crumbles. But also I see girls mimicking their BF interests, and when asked they say they actually enjoy it, but stop it after braking. Things like following sports, listening to music styles, joining new age s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 01:49 AM
2

I think only Chad tier guys with sex guru black belts can keep a girl in such unstable condition. What you describe is even between a ONS and a plate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 09:55 PM
1

Yep, edited after re-reading it :(
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 08:52 PM
1

Average guys have relationships all the time. They don't have casual sex often (or at least didn't in the pre Tinder world). With sufficient low standards and sufficient IQ for putting your shit together, anybody can have a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 08:46 PM
3

I have casual sex many times with the same partner. That's not casual, dude. It's actually the complete opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 08:42 PM
0

So it would be you dumping them and not them dumping you. Still, not Trump voter is a weird requirement for coupling.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 11:53 AM
0

I'm sure there are lots of men who would drive me up the wall but be a perfectly fine husband to some other woman. What? Why would he do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 11:06 AM
1

She is (or at least was) a second wave feminist. Even with the discrepancies inside feminism, I don't see her much far away from her contemporaries. I was just referring to the no feminist ever part the comment. If we restrict feminism to the 3rd wave, I don't see an unified body of demands. Same as with gender fluidity, feminism became a self identification label of disconform with the statu quo and something something vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 05:52 AM
3

Lookism is part of nature. You either accept nature or bring state coercive power to correct nature for a grater good at the cost of individual freedoms. Some call the natural order fair, others (you in this case) call equality of outcome fair. The same way that even if a grater good can be rationalized out of social justice it's still in direct opposition of the dictionary definition of justice (read fairness). When you try to correct your perceived unfairness on the dating market, you are eith…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 03:11 AM
2

No feminist has ever, ever demanded that women be held responsible for their actions. Have you listened to Camille Paglia about second wave feminism? https://youtu.be/fYK13VBTzsQ
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 02:48 AM
0

Where TRP goes irrecoverably and fatally wrong is that a woman who won't fuck you before you muscled up or got rich, but will fuck you afterwards, is not a woman you should ever pursue in the first place. Are you talking about the same actual woman or the same type of woman Unless you live on small town, there is no reason to take the risk. No second chances is a good principle on TRP, because reconstructing your image takes dedication and effort and still has big failure risk. Financially speak…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 02:43 AM
1

Because most Western Civilization, if not fair, it has the fairest individual rights there have been in all human history. In the specifics of lookism and the dating market: they are right, it's fair. Any corrections on the market imply restrictions on individual liberties. When people say life is not fair they actually mean life is shit compared to their little mind utopia.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 02:25 AM
11

This is the most creative use of red pill theory I've ever read
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 02:06 PM
6

MRAs point to feminism for the social system tilted towards protecting women. In a world where women are not 'valuable resources' anymore but still protected and men are still disposable but have none of the previous benefits. TRPs claim that sexual liberation and nanny states don't mean more sex to everybody. Just more sex for Chad. So men that previously would dedicate their lives to their families, now loose those because women have a chance to walk away. Feminism destroyed the old social con…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 11:50 AM
1

Why is it that RPers only seem to know manipulative outlier women? Because men pay for it. So they know it's bad behavior. They might be sociopathic enough to act despite that knowdelage. Women (according to redpill) when acting sociopathic, aren't self aware of it and society almost never makes them pay for such actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 11:22 AM
3

It's tradition in all LATAM. Mexico even has reverse catcalling (drunk girls driving around and screaming things to guys).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 01:04 AM
1

1) Focus on career, particularly STEM bucks. Money is an enabler in that it allows you to buy nice clothes, expensive gym membership, certain cosmetic enhancements but it does not, in itself, actually generate attraction aside from in the purely provisioning sense STEM bucks is a myth. Nobody goes STEM for the money. There is more in law, financial or enterpenuring. A smart tradesman earns more than your average STEM minion. See the top STEM nerds: * Bill Gates was a shark worse than the most de…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 12:43 AM
1

Well shit, you learn something new everyday. Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 12:09 AM
-1

Why are two mathematicians writing a paper outside their field of expertise? You don't need a fucking maths PhD to calculate a sampled variance. They are either lousy mathematicians, were assigned to an unrelated department or published something unrelated to their department in which case it won't be endorsed by their home institution.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/18 11:13 AM
1

Then why are you posting here? You either fucked him and discovered he had a short dick, or didn't and it's not thread relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 10:53 AM
3

Too lazy to check, but I remember JBP pointing to studies that characterized mass shooters as low in agreeableness and nihilistic Extreme low agreeableness is a male trait, that correlates with most criminals being males. The idea is that if you're living in hell, and are nhilistic, you don't see any possible redemption and want to extend your hell to the rest of society. Still haven't seen any justification why Americans have a higher incidence on mass shooters.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 03:59 AM
1

You can still count as casual the first encounters leading to the LTR
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 02:24 AM
1

You can still count as casual the first encounters leading to the LTR
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 02:24 AM
2

I'm assuming you slept with his friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 01:59 AM
1

-I can’t undersrand why a girl like you is single. This one is in serious need of clarification.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 01:51 AM
1

Could you point the study? I remember one where guys self assessment was closer to the mean assessment of the opposite gender, than viceversa. (This was a shitty test at a singles club)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 01:38 AM
1

Monogamous LTRs should be counted as "off the market". But that depends on the ratio/frequency of cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 01:15 AM
1

Default custody goes to the mother, a non working father would never get custody, unless ceded by the mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/18 01:20 AM
1

Contraception is what killed mainstream monogamy. Then came nanny state and the "transition" west is currently in. Your argument is dumb. If Chad chooses to stay on the market, women can have all their sexual needs filled by Chad. Remember that mostly men are the ones looking for variety, so your policy would do nothing for bottom barrel men (assuming those are the ones you try to help)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/18 03:24 AM
3

Most MRAs don't hate women, but the system. They know there are shitty people of both genders. They just know that when against a bad woman, they are also against the state. The machine is genderless and has always fucked on the little guy/gal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/18 01:34 AM
2

Current law expects to support the life style level the child would have if he would still be living with his father. That often ends lifting the life style of an "unproductive" (for lack of a better PC term) mother. Couple that with default custody to the mother, and you end up with an unfair situation to the father. Alimony should be a function limited by the lowest of the to parents incomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/18 01:25 AM
2

Why solitary yoga?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/18 12:54 AM
1

Women in healthy relationships report higher happiness than women without a life long partner. Also women with lower N count have happier marriages. Older women (post 30) also have lower chances of divorce, but TRP assumes they're just betabuxing, so they wouldn't be truly happy. A redpilled parent should rise his daughter to know of the social dating dynamic. Choose for LTR instead of casual sex (that's delay sex until the LTR is on the table). Even including college education seems a viable li…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/18 05:19 AM
1

Oh, the old if ugly, better be funny or die alone. I would argue we have equal control of our looks and personality. If you aren't at the bottom of the barrel, both can be faked/improved a little
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/18 03:18 AM
1

Actually, I have had a date ask me about my relationship experience. Not much a terper I see. That's a shittest 101
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 03:56 AM
1

Are you sure you wanna know how deep the rabbit hole goes?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 03:29 AM
1

This isn't totally carzy advice to u/Shakturi101, but there is a threshold between 23 to 25 yo. After that there won't be much value to your virginity as your chances of pairing with other virgins would decrease considerably, making the market value of your virginity (if it exists at all) useless. If virginity is a load for you, you can "cure it" with a hooker.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 03:14 AM
1

The idea that dating self improvement is limited to PUA style manipulation, grooming and lifting.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 01:09 AM
1

My guess is suck it up and endure if casual. Be patient if starting a relationship. I'm no gal, but running away seems more uncomfortable than the alternatives.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 01:07 AM
1

It's easier to get life than learning to fake one. There is tons for self improvement beyond "ticking girls to make them wet".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 12:54 PM
3

So you're proposing that when both of them are in private and intimate and about to start intercourse, the girl realizes that the guy is inexperienced and says: "chap, I don't fuck virgins", puts on her blouse and walks away? This fantasy is equivalent to the girl laughing at a naked man with a small dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 12:00 PM
1

We agree, I was talking about men picking up all/most the bill
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 08:42 PM
1

At least budget won't be a constraint on accepting dates. I never had a budget issue, but I never aimed too high either. Dating money is a constant complaint among terper betas, there is no reason not to believe them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 01:43 PM
1

If you assume right the 20% Chad , 60% Beta, 20% incel ( which seems an overstatement ), the narrative is that 60% is having issues getting casual sex, not getting into LTR. Finding a LTR requires effort and Dissatisfaction is a given but runs both ways. It's difficult to find "the right one".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 11:18 AM
3

Does casual sex break women, or are women who choose casual sex already broken? I'd answer with, "who cares?" Don't let broken people into your house. They break shit. This is Taoist tier widsom.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 03:16 AM
1

Betas eventually get relationships but not without great trouble, it’s just not trouble for the women in them. Things are not hunky-dory for most men the way you believe. What do you mean by this?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 03:06 AM
1

Most women do not like casual sex: we aren’t men. Most women are serial monogamists. Source for this? Women may want stable LTR more than casual sex, but that doesn't mean a woman would reject casual sex even if it didn't put at risk her LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 02:56 AM
1

Good for you if you're still trying. Just keep in mind that it's your personal score. If, unfortunately, you give up on real life approaches, online dating IS less emasculating than the whore way.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 03:32 PM
2

I saw your link, told me nothing new, Brazil started working in late 80's, close to every non Islamic third world country. You want to attribute it to feminism because feminist organizations bitched for it. I say that pure economic reasons make contraception campaigns a good health policy. I was talking about non Islamic societies where sexual education and contraception is common knowdelage. It's a guess, because I haven't found studies of general sexual knowdelage on danger populations. I migh…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 03:26 PM
3

Sexual market rule 1. Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Unless you're Chad they don't need to impress you, so don't bitch about lazy profiles . 1) Tinder is a tool for women providing IOI with neon signs instead of the social approved protocol. This is the reason why Tinder is a good tool for men with any kind of socialization impairments. The catch is that you get women with worse looks that you could get on open field if you hadn't said socialization issues. Also, people in Tinder are either p…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 03:00 PM
1

Lol how can most third world countries pay for such things Usually there are condoms available at hospitals, because a condom production cost is around 7 cents. Compared to subsidizing a single mum's kiddo, it's money well spent on each secular state I know of. It's economy and not feminism. Also, stop blaming the church, they don't condone fornication. If you don't care about having sex outside wedlock why would you care about what the church thinks about contraception. Or are we really pretend…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 02:20 PM
2

readily available contraception. You mean paid by the state? Or allowed in theocracies?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 01:11 PM
2

If women issues decrease with economy issues, bitching about them seems counterproductive. You should protest for saner economy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 01:09 PM
3

I,'ll ignore your introduction, because I assume you had it settled in those links. Know that most of us don't agree with them. BTW your tl;dr takes 40% of your post. I'll belive it was gold purge trolling from your side. the fact that there are GMs falling behind in the dating world now and what can be done about it Since all history there've been men falling behind the dating scene. You are assuming that: * There is a new change affecting GM only. (You haven't proof of this, or the percentage …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 04:49 PM
1

This, I couldn't have worded it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 05:23 PM
2

It's a symptom for high functioning autism. Socialization doesn't work on automatic pilot for them, so they NEED to understand the rules to properly function in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 03:38 AM
1

I've read that female autism goes under diagnosed because they learn to socialize by peer pressure and imitation. Was your experience like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 03:31 AM
2

You know why they call'em unicorns? They fuckin don't exist. If they existed, the lore is that they can't be caught. Crossing cultures is a recipe for disaster. It takes two special temperaments to make it work. If you're willing to travel 17000km to find a skirt, you might better look for a conservative woman outside of Urban America.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 03:18 AM
6

You don't go to war. Your husband does, meanwhile you cuck him with the first chad that paid his way out of enlistment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 02:59 AM
1

That wouldn't solve the issue, Chad would fuck the migrants. Just exile all the incels to 3rd world shitholes. Give them some change and send them to Vuvuzela. They'll find plenty of desperate gals there.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 01:09 AM
6

All their baggage is attributed to their introversion and fuck ups as children and early teenagers. Once they get to college they isolate themselves, lack the skills to make friends, have no confidence, and shitpost on 4chan, reddit, and dive into anime, memes, and video games and they have the audacity to complain about the behavior of women Holy shit, I should paste that on my bio
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 12:54 AM
1

What's wrong with IOIs? Is Negging is still a thing? I thought it was dropped after 1st gen PUA.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 02:50 AM
2

Didn't know that u/SRU_91 had a second account.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 02:24 AM
5

tl;dr; 1 and 2 are objective descriptions, but C I hate toxic masculinity A) I hate a type of masculinity that's toxic B) All masculinity is toxic and I hate it all This is an appreciation issue. Make a list of what constitutes "toxic masculinity". If for each situation you: * Change the male performing the action, then suddenly it stops being toxic. * Change the gender of the receptor. Then the situation stops being toxic. * Swap the genders in the situation. Then it stops being either toxic or…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/18 11:20 AM
1

Not white, not American. I believe zionists hold double standards. I believe balkan small populations made a big mistake. I think burgers know how to deal with immigration. God emperor Trump will fix the small edges.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 11:23 PM
1

Paraguay had a 10 to 1 ratio after their war. One generation later the country was repopulated.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 10:14 PM
2

walks into GMGV Oh a post named tl;dr about the primer. Let's see what's this sect is about. Checks the author name, starts sweating Opens the click bait Gets crushed under a wall of text
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 09:49 PM
8

Average recividism rate is around 43% Unless you believe in "the one" fantasy, dating a felon is high risk taking, and, under most contexts, a sign of bad judgement. If Atlas assessed the risks correctly before making her choise, kudos for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 09:31 PM
2

My understanding (based on hours of JBP YouTube videos) is that, that's what the conductivist school does. It doesn't try to fix your inner daemons, just get your shit together and achieve a goal by doing small steps. The authority is what forces you to take the small steps. The shrink "praxis" is suggesting steps small enough you don't die trying them (ie: social weirdos trying PUA cold approaches, then getting banned from places) The issue is that the vocal incels are, mostly, smart guys, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 08:51 PM
1

I usually don't touch my close friends, of either gender. I do have social circles where the contact you mention is more frequent with extrovert females: mixed sports, theater clubs, social dancing, etc These groups have 50% female participation. It's also the kind of circles where average men get IOIs. The sperg narrative is that they tried engaging in such social activities and the groups never open to them. They stay alone in a corner, talking to nobody.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 01:51 PM
3

Obviously it's because they are all whores. It just bothers you because they refuse you as a client.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 11:07 AM
1

Tried thinking really hard for it. Besides contact/combat sports I couldn't come up with an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 11:02 AM
1

I see my nerd joke was missed :( The failure rate is calculated as total_failures / total_tries. If you didn't even try, you don't have a 0% failure rate, but a 0/0 quotient. That quotient is a math error called indetermination. An thus, u r gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 05:54 AM
1

If you are good looking, in theory, you receive tons of IOI, and should be good enough at reading them to have below 50% rejection rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 01:53 AM
2

Sorry to disappoint you , but 0/0 is an indetermination. Are you sure you're not closet gay?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 01:51 AM
1

Do you have a source for your numbers? Or you just pulled them out of your ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 01:47 AM
1

How long is the optimal long? Say you've a new coworker. TRP says you should make an advance ASAP to avoid the friendzone. My experience is that such advances are frowned upon when rejected. Like females get angry for those males even trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 01:38 AM
2

Yes there is. Personality can be measured quite reliably. Even if I concede that no two persons are the exact same, they can be close enough. And different to IQ and body ratios, personality is more maleable, it evolves and can be changed ( with drugs or willpower ). If your objective is just getting laid, there is a combination of self-improvement, proactivity and lowering of standards that will get you laid to some level of satisfaction. If it's worth the effort is debatable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 05:24 AM
3

some guys that are referred to as beta or omega by macho TRP thinkers may have other redeeming traits that had not been considered Considered by whom? Is 'justice for those guys' an eufemism for pussy? Because other than TRP, nobody talks in those terms. What's your objective? What are you trying to model here? It feels that instead of wanting to better the lives of betas/omegas, you want to engineer society so omegas don't have such a hard time. My advice is, first decide if you want to either …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 02:15 AM
3

Ok, will bite: This is all wrong and your categories are shit. PUA / RP "theory" isn't there to make an accurate sociological analysis. It's just there to explain social dynamics to spergs that can't figure them out on their own. 1) Alpha - Beta isn't even a one dimensional analysis. Only taking the reductionist approach you get "one dimension" and that dimension is "things that make ladies wet". 2) Do you want to formalize this? Take physical appearance, take the 5 personality traits and take I…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/18 09:13 PM
1

That talks about what's perceived as immature from a woman's point of view. Things like playing videogames, engaging in risky behaviours for fun or the raise of chaos in the house when the woman absents. It's not the same critique.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/18 06:09 PM
5

Baby has a strong sexual innuendo. It's not used frequently. But South America has other terms that wouldn' be accepted in Saxon culture. "Güera / Morena" - ( white / brown ), "Bonita / Linda" ( cutie ), "Mami" ( mum )
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/18 05:58 PM
1

There ain't no free lunch. Unless you're Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/18 05:44 PM
1

That translates to "My daughter". Depending on the use it can express age gap and it's implied widsom gap. Only when used from close in age it implies ownership of their partner or disregard in their opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/18 05:29 PM
1

Normalcy can't be the aim for anybody. If you are not normal from the beginning, you become a shell. It's exhausting, it gives you little casual sex, it's unmaintainable for LTR. And it's boring as fuck and much harder than it sounds. Self improvement, learning how to read IOI and growing a pair is a much better strategy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/18 04:48 PM
1

I agree. And even under TRP frame, such expectations are not unreasonable, but require a lot of effort and have a high failure rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 07:11 PM
0

Wait... IRC? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 06:52 PM
2

My understanding is that biggest teenager in the house means that women can afford to not be logical at times. Not that all women are emotional all the time, but that the equivalent behavior from males wouldn't be tolerated by society. And so, in facing an event with a woman ruled by her emotions, you need to recognize it to be able to deal with the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 06:43 PM
2

read in the worst possible way it suggests women should devote herself to a man who potentially offers nothing of value to her life. No humor, mediocre sex, minimal time, effort, etc. It's ridiculously entitled. It's not entitled because the woman has already chosen that man voluntarily. It's not like 8 years later she realizes his man never was funny. If the guy is a workoholic that gives her minimal time, chances are he was like that since the beginning. Here I'm ignoring that people do change…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 06:11 PM
1

What? The virtual sex... I can get it. But why flirting? And using pictures of a stranger (aka porn), do you also consider it cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 12:33 PM
4

Expecting an woman to love you for your intrinsic persona, not for how society determines your value. Expecting a man to love you enough to refrain from actively seeking other pussy, only because the risk of loosing you is not worth it. After TRP, it's sad how such simple expectations become unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 11:38 AM
3

No, all things being equal, women prefer the asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 07:36 PM
1

You can use the mobile browser instead of the app
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 12:03 PM
2

Alpha males usually have a distinctive fashion. I suppose it comes naturally to them. trpers just imitate that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 06:47 PM
1

Do you have any description of what exactly you've tried? Not the methods but your actual experiences where you failed? Did you try tinder? What went wrong? How frequently do you go on a date? Did you try socializing? Do you actually small talk with anybody? You seem like a really smart guy with a complete broken model of how the world works. My only intuition here is that you are not contrasting that model with the actual world otherwise such model wouldn't survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 02:37 PM
1

Ouch
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 02:12 PM
0

I was voluntarily virgin til mid 20s. In the sense that never actively tried to bed a woman. Had a "normal" social life in a STEM male dominated field. Mostly male friends, not too many of them. Never had friends that hook up girls. So no role models. Some female friends, you may say I was border orbiting, but never acted as an emotional tampon, nor had fantasies about dating them. I like to spend my time indoors, but I don't have bad conversation skills. Not many friends means I didn't socializ…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 01:34 PM
2

Can't source them, but remember reading about divorce rates faillig for millenials, when you segregate divorces by age. Of course, if waited until late 20s to marry, and if most these marriages are "well thought", it stands to reason they will last 8 years or more, so there might be a wave of divorces coming.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 11:49 AM
1

Seems you misunderstood my point. I'm proposing that the idea of a monogamous 1 on 1 society is what makes those self assessed "wothy men" think they are getting woman of lower value than they think they deserve. That's the delusion. I assumed clear that I think that nobody deserves shit. Not men, not women. When you say "men out of their league" or "less attractive", It's all relative to the market. To the amount and relative value of women, and the amount and relative value of men. Relative to…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 03:11 PM
1

Any evidence to support that? Hypergamy means "worthy men" are partening with women less attractive than what they would on a perfect monogamous society. What you call entitlement I call men oblivious of social dynamics. By proposing that a men can be more or less attractive than a woman (ie , that you can compare them), you may fall on the same caveats than those deluded men The SMV means that your attractiveness is determined by supply and demand, and you deserve as much as what you can effect…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 12:32 PM
1

What is anti-woman exactly? Is the prejudice in knowing that there is a high probability of a woman leaving you, or cheat on you, out of the blue, even if you played by the good man book, while other people can get away with jerk attitudes? Or do you think that if a woman mistreats a man it's only because he didn't care enough about his relationship? Is there a difference in morality between consciously or unconsciously manipulating a partner? You may call that malevolently sexism but women get …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 10:46 AM
5

The biological clock for women starts ticking faster somewhere between late 20s and middle 30s (if it ticks at all). That's when women lower their standards to catch a man that otherwise wouldn't have been on their radar. If lucky, an average beta on his 20s will become an average beta with money by 30, raising his SMV. If such beta wants a family why wouldn' he target younger women? I don't completely subscribe to the Beta Bucks theory, but I think the dating market dynamics proposed by TRP are…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 12:36 AM
4

I haven't seen many men hating women through the manosphere. I've seen men hating a woman that ruined his life, but that's a different thing. Could you point what's misogynistic about TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 12:06 AM
7

A late 20s early 30s man can still target mid 20s girls. Why would he settle with the ones that got their biological clock ticking, but otherwise didn't care about him?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 11:57 PM
3

Doesn't work like that. Plenty of 50yr fucking 35/40 assuming he succeeded financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 11:51 PM
1

A lot of men live oblivious of social dynamics. It probably isn't your case, but having a clear image of how your looks rate and what expectations you might get from self improvement can be useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 09:37 PM
1

Fair. I thought you were saying that it was tougher for men to know their SMV. Not that sex life is tougher for low SMV men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 09:27 PM
1

45 to 50% convention going people are female https://coggle.it/diagram/WH26mf4eeRkGIvvZ/t/anime-expo-demographics Yet that's much more than I expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 09:18 PM
1

What makes you think there is a recent explosion of incels?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 08:38 PM
1

"Chad" is the Apex of a hierarchy. If you limit the universe to anime convention going people, you still have all the pussy going to the 20% of anime convention going Chads. Aggravated by the fact that nerd conventions aren't a 50% gender distributed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 05:19 PM
1

What is the hepatitis pill about?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 05:13 PM
1

Where does one meet introvert women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 04:38 PM
1

Open a female profile then compare yourself (not your fake profile) to the MALE profiles on your area. You don't need to be gay to rate the ugliness and style of other males.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 04:17 PM
4

Categories are what allows us to function in a world that overflows with information. If there is something wrongly classified, it needs to screw ME strong enough to deserve a recategorization. That's what intersectionality people don't accept, that categories are there to operate in the world, and not to socially engineer their Utopias. As a man, lesbians are in the "treat like a woman but don't loose time trying to advance on her" category. Do you think they deserve extra attention?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 05:28 AM
2

IMO, TRP attracts trad-cons because it gives answers to people that played by the social rulebook and got the short stick. trad-cons, on average, don't like much about gay culture. That doesn't necessarily mean they care what they stick up their butt, or that there aren't gay people that are also trad-cons.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 05:16 AM
0

That doesn't match my life experience. You seem to imply that social skills don't deserve merit, that hierarchies are limited to financial success and that knowing when you can get away with sociopathic attitudes has no real value. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs came to my mind by your comment. But, if it was that easy, why aren't you doing it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 04:32 AM
1

Why is it tougher for a man than for a woman? TRP always spergs about females having wrong notions of their SMV because of Chads.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 03:33 AM
1

Making a female dating app profile and comparing yourself against your competition seems more realistic than comparing yourself against the mainstream 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 03:29 AM
1

Facial atractiveness shouldn't be that hard to gauge, if it hasn't already been done. Face recognition software have tons relevant facial features recognized. So you just need to merge that with female scoring. Having a big enough corpus of female scorings is the difficult to access data, i think only dating apps have that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 03:24 AM
1

I can't see how banging a lot of women can fill your creative needs, unless you take it from the PUA perspective. In that case, perfecting gardening, a sport or an art might be just as fulfilling.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 01:15 AM
1

That was never the claim. The dynamic is that women either consciously or unconsciously insinuate interest to males (or if confident enough openly approach them). Some men are socially incompetent to read those cues, our don't get cued frequently enough to learn the game. Some men never get cued at all. There are probably gals that aren't social competent enough to catch a random guy's attention. I think such gal's friends helped them to fix the issue. Or today, tinder bypasses the courtship rit…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 10:59 PM
1

How it doesn't? If you're competent enough, and the pyramid you're climbing is corrupt, you can easily change to healthier ones. Our you're meaning that sex isn't distributed through meritocracy? Because my experience is that is that it also does as long as there are women sharing the pyramid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 10:43 PM
1

I once matched a cute Asian with nice ballet pictures. She had sapiosexual on her profile. Felt so pretentious that I didn't even bothered to say hello.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 02:18 AM
1

That is your mistake. Natural order doesn't want anything. Natural order doesn't give a fuck about low quality men. Natural order sets the scenario, and the strategies good enough to survive it are the ones replicated. Notice that it's good enough, neither the best or the optimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 02:08 AM
1

Has that study been replicated / correlated with age? I've only seen the associated infographs, never the original studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 05:44 AM
3

You first need to define a clear metric of "setting us back as species" Those Omega subpar traits may also include tolerance to a virus that wipes 95% of the population. That's why variability isn't useless. Evolution is not an optimum strategy but a bruteforce one. The smart strategy, if you're even proposing one, would be eugenics. Beyond the moral concerns, there is also how you prevent wiping something required to survive in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/18 11:02 PM
3

You seem to belive that Nature selects the gen pool. It doesn't. Nature is the environment, the game rules. Those that can't reproduce under the current game rules are self-selecting themselves out of the gen pool. The catch is that the rules are constantly changing. So, on the question of why females are genetically encoded to choose who they mate with and males will fuck everything, even hideous omegas. It's been already told here that from an evolutive perspective, you have a comprise between…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/18 10:33 PM
1

Why is the penis size included there? I mean, by the time you use it you already scored. I'm no woman but I don't think talks about average sized dicks are interesting, do you won't get a reputation for it. If you are a 6, you may get a reputation about you package and that adds to your SMV, but you would need to be que successful despite your size to accomplish that reputation .
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/18 07:38 PM
4

Do you really believe that the ones being flirted don't know about it? Can't speak for women, but most men enjoy a flirty waitress. If the waitress enjoys doing it / comes naturally to get and the customer is happy, what's the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/18 07:18 PM
2

Is America really the rad-fem/incel hellhole insinuated by this post? I mean, isn't flirting how you usually find a mate? How is flirting restricted at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/18 07:14 PM
2

In my particular case, PUA videos. If your scratch past the misogynistic shit, like nagging, you learn some useful things (that are probably obvious to most women). Stuff like reading cues, kino escalation, having a fucking life so you have something to small talk about, how to start a conversation with strangers or how to apply some marketing to a tinder profile. Otherwise you end on the eternal friend zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/18 07:05 PM
2

There is no woman too hideous/gross/weird that will be deprived of sex if her standards are low enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/18 06:50 PM
4

Why are they detrimental? It seems that you're proposing that even mere the existence of omegas is detrimental to the species. But you never justified that assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/18 06:46 PM
5

The Khan had around 10000 children . The most fecund reported woman has 40 and might be a myth. That's what "only a few" means in this context. She will have only a few not for being unfit, but for being a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/18 06:43 PM
4

Arguably, he isn't. A real man, through a traditional lense, is a man who doesn't procreate before being able to sustain a family. Let's take the most noble case. A man in a two income family that becomes a widower. He could lower his life style, to sustain his children. Eventually finding a new partner that helps him to rise his children. Being a provider is expected from men. Fulfilling that role doesn't earn him any medals. Expecting recognition for coping with life is a futile endeavour.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/18 05:40 PM
12

It's not about financial success, but hierarchical success. Nature is about power dynamics. For multiple reasons women were excluded in most hierarchies. There have always been female exclusive hierarchies, but their relevance pales in comparison with male ones. After feminism / technological advances (depending who you ask) women were enabled to compete against men. But most hierarchies are dominated by hyper-competitive men. So a woman that's able to compete with those men is by definition str…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/18 12:10 AM
1

Don't know the rest, but what you call fat I call normal, and what you call fit I call ripped. ​ Unless you've a hanging belly, I'm not convinced the extra female attraction you get when fit is more due to attitude change rather than females perceiving how ripped you're under you clothes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/18 04:45 PM
1

It's a concept taken from evolutionary psychology/sociology, that men lives are worth less than women and child lives. MRAs take the concept to justify why while [in their view] women have it better than men in almost all measurements (except reported domestic violence), feminist complain about patriarchy and oppression. Search "karen straughan" on youtube for a [non jackass] exposition of MRAs arguments. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/18 02:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter