TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wrez Archive

View 935 posts and 1,169 comments by wrez on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1932

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:18 PM
1297

Edu./Occu.wrez/r/MensRights30/08/15 04:05 AM
865

wrez/r/MensRights06/08/14 03:57 PM
833

wrez/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:40 PM
771

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights05/12/14 06:54 PM
446

Progresswrez/r/MensRights07/02/15 10:10 PM
445

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:32 PM
389

Outragewrez/r/MensRights14/06/14 03:09 PM
381

Storywrez/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:17 PM
364

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:14 PM
362

Outragewrez/r/MensRights25/12/14 07:58 AM
341

wrez/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:24 AM
334

wrez/r/MensRights15/04/14 12:16 AM
328

Misleading Titlewrez/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:49 AM
319

wrez/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:21 AM
317

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:39 AM
301

Storywrez/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:45 PM
280

Progresswrez/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:21 AM
268

Edu./Occu.wrez/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:31 PM
268

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:01 AM
265

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights04/02/15 03:04 PM
262

wrez/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:10 PM
259

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:57 PM
258

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights02/09/15 06:34 PM
243

wrez/r/MensRights24/02/14 12:33 PM
208

WBBwrez/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:54 AM
202

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:58 PM
200

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights14/11/14 01:20 AM
197

wrez/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:05 AM
192

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill27/11/13 05:20 AM
187

Social Issueswrez/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:39 PM
185

wrez/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:02 PM
184

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:30 AM
183

wrez/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:25 PM
181

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights20/12/15 07:10 PM
177

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:21 PM
175

Newswrez/r/MensRights11/12/14 02:50 PM
170

wrez/r/MensRights16/04/13 11:35 AM
170

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights04/11/16 06:31 PM
164

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:51 PM
161

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:23 PM
156

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights20/12/15 08:58 PM
153

wrez/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:38 PM
152

Newswrez/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:28 PM
148

wrez/r/MensRights26/11/13 06:06 PM
144

wrez/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:12 PM
142

wrez/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:49 AM
137

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:20 PM
135

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:56 PM
133

wrez/r/MensRights03/11/14 05:22 PM
133

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 02:45 AM
132

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights06/12/14 09:48 PM
129

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:16 PM
127

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:48 PM
126

wrez/r/MensRights05/06/13 11:26 AM
126

wrez/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:50 PM
125

wrez/r/MensRights02/05/13 07:05 AM
124

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:30 AM
124

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:44 PM
122

wrez/r/MensRights22/08/16 10:00 PM
121

wrez/r/MensRights27/09/14 03:21 PM
115

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:42 PM
114

Generalwrez/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:35 AM
114

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights21/02/16 04:46 PM
105

Off Topicwrez/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 09:57 PM
103

wrez/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:21 AM
102

wrez/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:34 AM
98

wrez/r/MensRights09/11/13 12:56 PM
96

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:59 PM
94

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 11:29 PM
93

wrez/r/MensRights22/03/14 11:29 PM
92

Outragewrez/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:50 PM
91

wrez/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:48 AM
90

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights22/11/14 04:21 PM
89

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:07 AM
89

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:13 PM
88

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:41 PM
87

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights30/12/15 09:12 PM
87

wrez/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:59 PM
86

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:40 AM
85

wrez/r/MensRights06/02/14 06:25 PM
85

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:42 AM
85

wrez/r/MensRights10/06/13 07:29 PM
84

wrez/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:59 PM
82

wrez/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:20 PM
82

wrez/r/MensRights29/11/13 01:44 PM
82

Progresswrez/r/MensRights20/04/18 02:05 PM
81

wrez/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:34 AM
81

wrez/r/MensRights06/10/14 04:06 PM
80

wrez/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:07 PM
79

wrez/r/MensRights06/10/13 02:04 PM
78

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:07 PM
78

wrez/r/MensRights08/12/13 03:36 PM
77

wrez/r/MensRights06/10/13 06:06 PM
76

wrez/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:12 PM
75

Storywrez/r/MensRights19/04/15 03:50 AM
73

wrez/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:24 AM
72

wrez/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:07 PM
72

wrez/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:14 AM
72

wrez/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:57 PM
71

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:07 PM
71

Outragewrez/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:32 AM
71

wrez/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:51 PM
70

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:57 PM
69

War on Menwrez/r/MGTOW15/07/17 05:20 PM
69

wrez/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:14 AM
68

wrez/r/MensRights08/02/14 02:07 PM
67

wrez/r/MensRights06/10/13 01:21 PM
65

wrez/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:11 PM
65

Eastern Culturewrez/r/MensRights31/12/14 05:19 AM
64

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:18 AM
63

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:18 PM
63

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:41 PM
63

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights04/10/14 05:20 AM
63

wrez/r/MensRights22/10/13 05:52 PM
62

wrez/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:42 PM
62

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 05:25 AM
62

wrez/r/MensRights25/12/13 09:56 PM
61

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:31 PM
61

wrez/r/MensRights28/11/13 01:06 AM
60

Eastern Culturewrez/r/MensRights30/08/15 04:14 AM
60

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:54 PM
60

wrez/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:12 PM
59

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights02/09/17 01:11 AM
59

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights22/08/15 05:37 PM
58

wrez/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:50 PM
58

wrez/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:57 PM
58

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 01:45 PM
58

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:25 AM
57

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights22/01/16 04:36 PM
57

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:16 PM
56

Storywrez/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:30 AM
56

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:53 PM
56

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:23 AM
55

Outragewrez/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:29 AM
55

wrez/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:47 PM
55

wrez/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:40 AM
55

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:30 PM
54

wrez/r/MensRights24/09/14 09:30 PM
54

Newswrez/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:29 AM
54

wrez/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:41 PM
53

wrez/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:44 AM
53

Anti-MRMwrez/r/MensRights05/10/15 12:09 PM
53

wrez/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:02 AM
52

wrez/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:09 PM
52

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights18/09/16 06:32 PM
52

wrez/r/MensRights29/12/13 06:12 AM
52

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:17 AM
51

Generalwrez/r/MensRights08/01/17 03:37 PM
51

wrez/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:07 PM
51

wrez/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:12 AM
51

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:46 PM
50

wrez/r/MensRights03/01/13 12:12 PM
49

wrez/r/MGTOW18/05/17 02:09 PM
49

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:01 AM
49

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:42 PM
49

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:46 PM
49

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:08 AM
49

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights29/12/15 04:06 PM
48

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:38 PM
48

wrez/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:01 PM
48

wrez/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:09 PM
47

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights07/04/15 08:00 PM
47

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights20/01/16 12:00 AM
46

wrez/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:45 PM
46

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:34 AM
45

wrez/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:06 PM
45

Reverse Genderswrez/r/MensRights20/02/15 06:29 PM
44

wrez/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:37 AM
44

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 04:22 PM
44

wrez/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:19 PM
44

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:28 AM
44

wrez/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:29 PM
43

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:59 PM
43

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:20 AM
43

wrez/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:38 PM
43

wrez/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:48 AM
43

Reverse Genderswrez/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:46 AM
43

wrez/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:00 PM
43

wrez/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:42 PM
42

Social Issueswrez/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:08 PM
42

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:12 PM
42

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights08/12/14 02:31 PM
42

wrez/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:44 PM
42

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:51 PM
41

Generalwrez/r/MensRights09/05/15 06:30 PM
41

wrez/r/MensRights23/12/13 05:04 PM
41

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:03 AM
41

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights02/09/15 02:59 AM
41

wrez/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:49 PM
41

wrez/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:52 PM
41

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:37 PM
41

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:10 AM
40

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:16 AM
40

wrez/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:41 AM
40

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:12 PM
39

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:42 PM
39

wrez/r/MensRights14/03/14 01:43 PM
39

Storywrez/r/MensRights16/07/14 06:05 PM
39

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:08 PM
39

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:58 PM
39

wrez/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:27 AM
38

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:52 PM
37

Analysiswrez/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:44 PM
37

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:50 AM
37

Reverse Genderswrez/r/MensRights27/07/14 10:50 PM
37

wrez/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:04 AM
37

wrez/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:21 PM
36

wrez/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:18 PM
36

Outragewrez/r/MensRights18/09/14 11:00 PM
36

Red Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 02:06 AM
36

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:14 PM
36

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights14/01/16 02:20 AM
36

WBBwrez/r/MensRights20/02/15 03:36 PM
36

wrez/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:56 PM
35

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:48 PM
35

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:54 AM
34

wrez/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:31 PM
34

wrez/r/MGTOW20/06/17 01:11 AM
34

wrez/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:39 PM
34

Outragewrez/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:01 PM
34

wrez/r/MensRights22/03/14 11:40 PM
33

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:21 PM
33

wrez/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:33 PM
33

Blue Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill17/10/13 01:07 AM
32

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 03:47 AM
32

wrez/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:36 PM
32

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:49 AM
31

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:57 PM
31

wrez/r/MensRights16/02/14 05:06 PM
31

wrez/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:28 AM
31

wrez/r/MensRights04/01/14 03:49 PM
31

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights07/12/14 04:25 AM
31

wrez/r/MGTOW12/05/17 02:39 AM
31

Generalwrez/r/MensRights28/10/16 01:13 PM
30

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:26 AM
30

Edu./Occu.wrez/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:28 AM
30

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:34 PM
30

wrez/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:42 PM
30

Storywrez/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:29 PM
29

wrez/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:27 AM
29

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:23 PM
29

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights18/09/16 06:30 PM
29

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:55 AM
29

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights24/10/16 03:53 AM
29

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:32 AM
29

wrez/r/MensRights04/10/14 06:32 PM
29

wrez/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:32 PM
29

Social Issueswrez/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:30 PM
29

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:17 AM
28

wrez/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:24 AM
28

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:03 PM
28

Activism/Supportwrez/r/MensRights04/03/16 01:47 AM
28

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:35 PM
28

wrez/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:53 PM
28

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 01:08 AM
27

Progresswrez/r/MensRights05/03/15 09:16 PM
27

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:42 PM
27

wrez/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:48 AM
27

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 11:11 PM
27

wrez/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:48 AM
27

wrez/r/MensRights16/12/12 06:45 AM
27

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights26/06/16 08:20 PM
27

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:20 PM
27

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:17 AM
27

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights30/11/16 03:53 PM
27

wrez/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:33 PM
26

wrez/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:32 AM
26

wrez/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:59 AM
26

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:04 PM
26

wrez/r/MGTOW15/07/17 05:21 PM
26

wrez/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:43 PM
26

Intactivismwrez/r/MensRights24/04/15 11:37 AM
26

wrez/r/MensRights03/03/14 12:48 AM
25

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:58 PM
25

wrez/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:58 PM
25

wrez/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 01:39 PM
25

wrez/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:00 PM
24

wrez/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:15 AM
24

wrez/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:17 AM
24

wrez/r/MensRights24/06/13 04:17 PM
24

wrez/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:15 PM
24

wrez/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:52 AM
24

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights23/10/16 03:50 PM
24

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:13 AM
24

wrez/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:40 AM
24

wrez/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:39 PM
23

wrez/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:59 PM
23

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights28/12/15 07:38 PM
23

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights04/12/14 03:26 PM
23

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:15 PM
23

wrez/r/MensRights24/08/14 12:46 PM
23

Outragewrez/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:53 AM
23

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:49 AM
23

wrez/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:14 PM
23

wrez/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:18 PM
23

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights26/03/15 06:07 PM
22

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights23/12/16 04:08 PM
22

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:39 PM
22

Newswrez/r/MensRights14/10/14 05:48 PM
22

wrez/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:56 PM
22

wrez/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:08 AM
22

wrez/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:56 PM
22

wrez/r/MensRights19/08/13 03:31 AM
22

Intactivismwrez/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:08 PM
22

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:57 AM
22

wrez/r/PussyPass23/08/14 12:51 PM
21

Blue Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 08:15 AM
21

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights09/11/14 06:41 PM
21

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights16/08/15 02:15 PM
21

wrez/r/MensRights01/09/14 04:46 PM
21

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:50 PM
21

wrez/r/MensRights06/04/14 12:24 PM
21

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights21/12/16 06:47 AM
21

wrez/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:26 PM
21

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:37 PM
21

Storywrez/r/MensRights18/11/14 08:44 PM
21

wrez/r/MensRights02/11/14 04:07 PM
20

wrez/r/MensRights06/10/13 06:55 PM
20

wrez/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:17 PM
20

wrez/r/MensRights18/10/16 01:12 PM
20

wrez/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:28 AM
20

wrez/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:44 PM
20

Outragewrez/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:55 PM
20

wrez/r/TheRedPill28/01/14 08:08 PM
20

wrez/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:19 AM
19

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:40 PM
19

wrez/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:24 AM
19

wrez/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:17 AM
19

Anti-MRAwrez/r/MensRights20/04/15 01:29 AM
19

Storywrez/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:18 PM
19

wrez/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:06 AM
19

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights26/01/17 10:59 PM
19

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights07/10/14 05:43 AM
19

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights06/07/14 09:22 PM
19

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:45 PM
19

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights21/11/16 10:25 PM
19

Fathers/Custodywrez/r/MensRights07/02/17 03:23 AM
19

Storywrez/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:47 PM
19

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:01 PM
19

wrez/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:39 PM
19

wrez/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:40 PM
19

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:10 AM
18

Newswrez/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:57 PM
18

wrez/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:41 PM
18

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:12 PM
18

wrez/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:04 PM
18

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights23/09/15 02:56 AM
18

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 10:01 PM
18

wrez/r/MensRights29/10/12 10:31 PM
18

wrez/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:16 AM
18

wrez/r/MensRights07/06/13 01:24 PM
18

wrez/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:43 AM
18

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:11 PM
18

wrez/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:36 AM
17

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:51 PM
17

Blue Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 06:27 PM
17

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:49 PM
17

wrez/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:56 PM
17

wrez/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:22 PM
17

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:04 PM
17

wrez/r/MensRights19/07/13 12:26 AM
17

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:51 AM
17

wrez/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:38 AM
17

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:48 AM
17

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights24/10/16 03:54 AM
17

wrez/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:19 PM
17

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:41 PM
17

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:34 PM
17

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights28/07/16 12:14 AM
17

wrez/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:11 PM
17

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights03/01/16 02:54 AM
17

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:40 PM
16

wrez/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:02 PM
16

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights16/12/16 07:23 PM
16

wrez/r/MensRights19/07/13 11:21 PM
16

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:55 AM
16

Action Op.wrez/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:00 AM
16

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:20 PM
16

Storywrez/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:38 PM
16

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights26/02/15 04:46 PM
16

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:02 PM
16

Outragewrez/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:34 AM
16

wrez/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:48 AM
16

wrez/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:01 AM
16

wrez/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:56 PM
16

Edu./Occu.wrez/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:06 PM
16

Blue Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 01:50 PM
16

wrez/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:27 AM
16

wrez/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:15 AM
16

Anti-MRMwrez/r/MensRights24/12/15 07:50 PM
16

wrez/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:12 AM
15

wrez/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:46 AM
15

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:25 AM
15

Storywrez/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:14 PM
15

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:19 PM
15

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 05:57 AM
15

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:05 AM
15

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights14/12/15 11:52 PM
15

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights18/05/17 02:06 PM
15

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:22 PM
15

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:24 PM
15

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:43 PM
15

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:33 PM
15

wrez/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:25 PM
15

Questionwrez/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:49 AM
15

wrez/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:09 PM
15

wrez/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:32 AM
15

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:54 PM
15

wrez/r/MensRights20/02/13 07:00 AM
15

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:41 PM
15

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights02/08/14 04:50 AM
15

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:00 PM
14

wrez/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:58 PM
14

wrez/r/MensRights22/03/14 11:23 PM
14

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights10/12/15 11:05 PM
14

wrez/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:49 PM
14

wrez/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:03 AM
14

Storywrez/r/MensRights21/01/15 02:22 AM
14

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:22 PM
14

Analysiswrez/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:18 PM
14

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:36 AM
14

wrez/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:20 AM
14

Social Issueswrez/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:10 PM
14

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:23 PM
14

wrez/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:48 PM
13

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights16/03/15 06:21 PM
13

wrez/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:16 PM
13

wrez/r/MensRights09/11/13 12:34 PM
13

wrez/r/MensRights02/08/14 04:47 AM
13

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 02:15 AM
13

Action Op.wrez/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:23 AM
13

wrez/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:15 PM
13

Storywrez/r/MensRights07/10/14 05:38 AM
13

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:01 PM
13

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:16 AM
13

wrez/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:40 PM
13

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:16 PM
13

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights22/10/16 11:46 PM
13

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights03/01/16 02:52 AM
13

Outragewrez/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:54 AM
13

wrez/r/MensRights06/01/14 01:23 AM
13

wrez/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:35 PM
13

wrez/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:32 AM
13

wrez/r/MensRights06/04/14 02:41 PM
13

wrez/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:26 PM
12

wrez/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:50 AM
12

Red Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 07:52 AM
12

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:40 AM
12

wrez/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:48 AM
12

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights06/09/15 06:10 PM
12

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights06/09/15 06:04 PM
12

wrez/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:35 PM
12

wrez/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:58 AM
12

wrez/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:45 PM
12

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:47 AM
12

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:48 PM
12

Anti-MRMwrez/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:23 AM
12

Newswrez/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:11 AM
11

wrez/r/MensRights19/11/13 08:26 AM
11

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:48 PM
11

Reverse Genderswrez/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:53 AM
11

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights14/10/17 06:38 PM
11

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights08/10/15 05:35 PM
11

wrez/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:05 PM
11

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:44 AM
11

wrez/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:01 AM
11

wrez/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:20 PM
11

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:30 PM
11

wrez/r/MensRights30/11/14 07:48 PM
11

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:15 PM
11

wrez/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:31 AM
11

wrez/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:17 PM
11

wrez/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:14 PM
11

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights03/01/16 02:51 AM
11

wrez/r/MensRights25/10/16 11:26 PM
10

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:38 PM
10

wrez/r/MGTOW16/12/16 11:29 PM
10

wrez/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:15 AM
10

wrez/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:14 AM
10

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights15/07/14 05:38 PM
10

Storywrez/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:41 PM
10

wrez/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:49 AM
10

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights06/09/15 06:08 PM
10

wrez/r/MensRights20/01/14 02:52 AM
10

wrez/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:49 AM
10

wrez/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:33 PM
10

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:52 AM
10

wrez/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:05 PM
10

wrez/r/MensRights24/02/14 12:31 AM
9

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:27 PM
9

WBBwrez/r/MensRights05/03/15 09:19 PM
9

wrez/r/MensRights25/05/13 03:47 PM
9

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:32 AM
9

wrez/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:45 PM
9

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights30/08/15 04:03 AM
9

wrez/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:08 AM
9

wrez/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:51 PM
9

Newswrez/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:35 PM
9

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:19 PM
9

wrez/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:39 PM
9

Newswrez/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:02 AM
9

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:55 PM
9

wrez/r/MensRights19/01/13 12:43 PM
9

wrez/r/MensRights16/02/16 10:10 PM
9

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:17 AM
9

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:42 PM
9

wrez/r/MensRights04/10/13 02:54 PM
9

wrez/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:02 PM
9

wrez/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:56 AM
9

wrez/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:51 PM
9

wrez/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:47 AM
9

wrez/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:23 AM
9

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:28 PM
9

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:24 PM
9

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:39 PM
9

wrez/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:14 PM
9

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:17 AM
9

False Accusationwrez/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:38 PM
9

wrez/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:36 AM
8

wrez/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:04 AM
8

Storywrez/r/MensRights15/08/14 11:18 PM
8

Storywrez/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:20 PM
8

wrez/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:47 PM
8

wrez/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:27 AM
8

wrez/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:36 AM
8

Newswrez/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:33 AM
8

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:10 AM
8

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:41 PM
8

wrez/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:33 PM
8

wrez/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 05:08 AM
8

wrez/r/MensRights18/01/14 12:37 PM
8

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights12/11/16 10:46 PM
8

Storywrez/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:41 PM
8

wrez/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:48 AM
8

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:01 AM
8

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:12 AM
7

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:36 AM
7

Storywrez/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:25 AM
7

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:06 PM
7

Newswrez/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:30 AM
7

wrez/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:08 AM
7

Storywrez/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:33 AM
7

wrez/r/MensRights11/11/12 11:27 PM
7

wrez/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:14 PM
7

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights02/02/15 11:33 PM
7

wrez/r/MensRights09/05/13 07:52 PM
7

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights25/06/14 05:12 PM
7

Storywrez/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:40 PM
7

wrez/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:33 AM
7

wrez/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:24 PM
7

wrez/r/MensRights05/12/13 06:08 PM
7

wrez/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 03:53 AM
7

wrez/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:54 PM
7

wrez/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:20 PM
7

Newswrez/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:04 AM
7

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:03 PM
7

wrez/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:54 AM
7

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights13/12/14 06:31 PM
7

wrez/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:36 AM
7

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:07 PM
7

wrez/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:34 AM
7

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights02/11/14 06:19 AM
7

wrez/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:03 AM
7

wrez/r/MensRights26/10/16 02:20 AM
7

wrez/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:20 PM
7

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:40 AM
7

wrez/r/MensRights05/11/12 12:54 AM
7

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights04/02/15 03:17 AM
6

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:36 PM
6

Anti-MRAwrez/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:35 AM
6

wrez/r/MensRights25/06/13 08:26 PM
6

wrez/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:35 AM
6

Social Issueswrez/r/MensRights10/12/15 11:02 PM
6

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:04 AM
6

wrez/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:26 AM
6

Storywrez/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:33 PM
6

wrez/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:05 PM
6

wrez/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:57 AM
6

wrez/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:37 AM
6

Newswrez/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:52 PM
6

wrez/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:28 AM
6

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:07 AM
6

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:47 AM
6

wrez/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:04 AM
6

wrez/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:13 PM
6

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights23/01/17 06:09 AM
6

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:40 AM
6

wrez/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:57 AM
6

wrez/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:54 PM
6

wrez/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:56 PM
6

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:37 AM
6

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:53 PM
6

wrez/r/MensRights23/10/13 11:50 AM
6

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 04:42 PM
6

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:26 PM
6

wrez/r/MensRights26/10/16 02:23 AM
6

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:53 PM
6

wrez/r/MensRights18/12/14 03:57 AM
6

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights21/10/15 09:06 PM
6

wrez/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:21 PM
6

Newswrez/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:25 PM
6

Storywrez/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:30 PM
6

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:42 AM
6

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 06:39 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights12/12/12 04:29 AM
5

Storywrez/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:24 AM
5

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:44 PM
5

wrez/r/MensRights09/11/13 06:42 PM
5

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights24/10/16 10:44 PM
5

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:40 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:54 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights28/11/14 05:37 AM
5

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:26 PM
5

wrez/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:12 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights22/05/13 03:55 PM
5

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:33 AM
5

Anti-MRMwrez/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:42 PM
5

Action Op.wrez/r/MensRights07/10/14 10:50 PM
5

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:49 AM
5

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:23 PM
5

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:44 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:41 PM
5

wrez/r/MensRights24/09/14 08:21 PM
5

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:48 AM
5

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:03 AM
5

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:56 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights26/12/12 11:01 PM
5

Newswrez/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:19 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:07 AM
5

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:38 PM
5

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:34 PM
5

wrez/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:24 AM
5

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:48 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights19/10/16 10:12 PM
5

Reverse Genderswrez/r/MensRights23/06/14 08:48 PM
5

Red Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 08:40 PM
5

wrez/r/MensRights19/07/14 09:04 PM
5

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 01:15 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights29/10/16 12:54 AM
5

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:15 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:24 AM
5

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:45 PM
5

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:16 AM
5

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:52 AM
5

wrez/r/MensRights09/07/13 08:57 PM
5

wrez/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:48 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:04 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights06/04/14 01:43 AM
4

Storywrez/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:25 PM
4

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:41 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights26/02/15 07:56 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:14 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:25 AM
4

Reverse Genderswrez/r/MensRights24/09/14 11:22 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:31 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:15 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:08 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:28 AM
4

Fathers/Custodywrez/r/MensRights11/07/15 07:43 AM
4

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:01 PM
4

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:04 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:11 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights10/05/13 01:09 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:52 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:07 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:49 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:32 PM
4

Storywrez/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:50 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:38 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:25 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:38 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:01 PM
4

Storywrez/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:04 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:02 AM
4

Generalwrez/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:17 PM
4

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights10/05/15 07:24 PM
4

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:53 AM
4

wrez/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:15 AM
4

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights19/07/14 08:55 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:08 PM
4

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 06:41 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:01 AM
4

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights18/10/14 12:25 AM
4

Storywrez/r/MensRights22/01/15 08:07 PM
4

Storywrez/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:24 PM
4

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:57 AM
4

Questionwrez/r/MensRights06/01/15 01:39 AM
4

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights16/12/16 11:48 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:20 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights13/03/14 04:50 AM
4

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:04 PM
4

wrez/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:51 PM
3

Storywrez/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:21 PM
3

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:36 PM
3

wrez/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:57 PM
3

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:05 AM
3

Storywrez/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:30 AM
3

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights03/04/16 11:58 PM
3

Storywrez/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:44 PM
3

wrez/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:27 PM
3

wrez/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:22 PM
3

wrez/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:12 PM
3

wrez/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:22 PM
3

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights29/11/16 05:57 AM
3

wrez/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:41 PM
3

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:59 PM
3

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:18 AM
3

Storywrez/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:38 AM
3

wrez/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:20 AM
3

wrez/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:30 PM
3

wrez/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:52 PM
3

wrez/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:06 AM
3

wrez/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:09 AM
3

wrez/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:00 AM
3

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:01 PM
3

wrez/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:52 PM
3

wrez/r/MensRights15/11/14 04:14 AM
3

Anti-MRAwrez/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:42 AM
3

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:41 AM
3

WBBwrez/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:39 AM
3

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights27/12/14 06:20 PM
3

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:01 PM
3

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:59 AM
3

wrez/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:42 AM
3

wrez/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:56 PM
3

Edu./Occu.wrez/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:48 PM
3

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights14/09/14 01:32 PM
3

Storywrez/r/MensRights17/06/14 12:38 AM
3

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:06 PM
3

Outragewrez/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:59 PM
3

Outragewrez/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:46 PM
3

Red Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 01:51 PM
3

wrez/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:25 PM
3

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights17/10/14 04:36 PM
3

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:57 PM
2

wrez/r/MensRights04/12/14 09:38 PM
2

Action Op.wrez/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:33 AM
2

wrez/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:45 PM
2

wrez/r/MensRights01/08/14 05:54 AM
2

Blue Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 10:23 PM
2

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights31/07/14 02:40 AM
2

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:00 AM
2

Reverse Genderswrez/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:55 PM
2

Legal Rightswrez/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:03 PM
2

Newswrez/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:33 PM
2

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:24 AM
2

wrez/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/17 01:06 AM
2

wrez/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:33 AM
2

Off Topicwrez/r/TheRedPill08/06/13 01:27 AM
2

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights07/07/14 06:17 PM
2

wrez/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:53 PM
2

wrez/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:21 AM
2

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:53 AM
2

wrez/r/MensRights26/03/13 12:02 PM
2

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:02 AM
2

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:54 AM
2

wrez/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:06 AM
2

wrez/r/MensRights28/03/14 02:15 AM
2

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:48 AM
2

Anti-MRAwrez/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:34 PM
2

wrez/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:57 PM
2

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:31 PM
2

wrez/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:41 AM
2

wrez/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:09 PM
2

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:13 PM
2

wrez/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:33 AM
2

wrez/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:33 PM
2

wrez/r/MensRights25/12/12 07:25 PM
2

Storywrez/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:16 AM
2

Storywrez/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:46 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:52 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:54 AM
1

Storywrez/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:45 PM
1

Storywrez/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:12 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:38 PM
1

Outragewrez/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:38 AM
1

Newswrez/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:42 AM
1

wrez/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:43 PM
1

Red Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 06:59 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:41 AM
1

wrez/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:11 PM
1

Outragewrez/r/MensRights04/09/14 03:57 AM
1

wrez/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:52 AM
1

wrez/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 07:51 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:30 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:18 AM
1

wrez/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:07 PM
1

Storywrez/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:54 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:55 PM
1

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:55 PM
1

Crosspostwrez/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:17 AM
1

Storywrez/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:09 AM
1

wrez/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:31 PM
1

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:18 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:54 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights05/11/13 11:31 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:19 AM
1

wrez/r/MensRights29/03/13 10:00 PM
1

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:45 AM
1

Opinionwrez/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:41 AM
1

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:22 AM
1

wrez/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:33 AM
1

wrez/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:41 AM
1

wrez/r/MensRights07/01/13 09:50 AM
1

wrez/r/MensRights09/02/14 03:07 PM
1

Blue Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 08:04 PM
1

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:08 PM
1

wrez/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:32 PM
1

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:35 PM
1

Generalwrez/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:40 PM
1

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights18/10/14 12:24 AM
1

Analysiswrez/r/MensRights18/10/14 12:22 AM
1

Storywrez/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:03 AM
1

Storywrez/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:48 PM
1

Storywrez/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:06 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights07/10/14 06:19 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights06/09/13 02:34 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights22/06/13 10:18 PM
0

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights25/09/14 02:56 PM
0

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights17/11/14 04:39 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:10 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:19 AM
0

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:35 AM
0

Outragewrez/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:47 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights27/10/12 02:00 AM
0

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 03:40 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:57 AM
0

Newswrez/r/MensRights01/08/14 05:58 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights17/06/14 12:39 AM
0

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:40 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:10 PM
0

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:38 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:09 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:03 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:20 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:05 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:40 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:44 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:11 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:42 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights13/03/14 04:46 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights28/02/13 07:38 PM
0

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:59 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:47 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:08 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:26 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:25 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:43 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights08/07/13 11:39 PM
0

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:11 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:18 PM
0

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:46 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:04 PM
0

wrez/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 10:30 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:11 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:09 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:16 PM
0

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:45 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:44 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:54 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:07 PM
0

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 02:49 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights10/08/16 02:03 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:15 PM
0

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights24/10/16 03:56 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:52 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights19/03/13 09:21 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:05 AM
0

WBBwrez/r/MensRights10/05/14 01:49 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:12 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:25 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:25 PM
0

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights21/08/16 11:28 PM
0

Storywrez/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:06 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:59 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights29/11/14 09:29 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:30 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:29 PM
0

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:56 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:35 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:22 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights12/01/14 04:59 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:59 PM
0

Blue Pill Examplewrez/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 03:48 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:59 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:13 PM
0

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:54 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights05/04/14 05:22 AM
0

Discussionwrez/r/MensRights14/11/14 12:10 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights13/01/13 05:44 PM
0

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:28 AM
0

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights05/07/14 05:13 PM
0

Reverse Genderswrez/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:32 PM
0

re: Feminismwrez/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:26 AM
0

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:18 AM
0

Rant/Ventingwrez/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 03:12 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights15/12/12 08:02 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights23/10/14 01:16 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:06 AM
0

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:33 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:04 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights25/12/12 07:12 PM
0

Red Pill Theorywrez/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 04:13 AM
0

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights07/09/14 10:52 PM
0

False Accusationswrez/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:42 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:45 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:23 AM
0

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights18/10/14 09:52 PM
0

Raising Awarenesswrez/r/MensRights19/07/14 08:53 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights01/02/14 05:25 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights03/09/14 03:58 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights27/09/14 02:48 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:23 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights23/11/14 04:56 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights23/02/14 08:09 PM
0

Feminismwrez/r/MensRights24/12/15 04:45 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:39 PM
0

Discriminationwrez/r/MensRights25/10/16 10:35 PM
0

Analysiswrez/r/MensRights01/02/15 12:55 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights16/05/13 02:24 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:09 AM
0

Reverse Genderswrez/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:32 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:56 PM
0

Analysiswrez/r/MensRights06/09/14 04:43 PM
0

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:06 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:00 AM
0

Storywrez/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:06 AM
0

Blogs/Videowrez/r/MensRights06/09/14 01:41 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:12 PM
0

Privilegewrez/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:32 AM
0

wrez/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:27 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:08 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:54 PM
0

wrez/r/MensRights10/03/13 04:17 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,169 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Do we have the transcripts of all the proceedings & depositions?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 01:00 AM
4

I read some of this case. It is crazy how much they totally perverted the course of justice in this academic Kangaroo Court. We need to leave all questions of guilt & innocence with the professionals in Law Enforcement & the Judiciary. It is only there that we have due process and the Rule of Law.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:54 AM
2

I think they were able to use his previous private settlement as proof of it. He hasn't exactly hid the facts that during that era, he would frequently engage in sex after downing 'ludes.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:50 AM
3

It is only because there was a mistrial that this happened. If he had been found not guilty they wouldn't have been able to try him again.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:47 AM
1

That is an open question for a higher court to adjudicate. Let's not prejudge the outcome.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:46 AM
2

There will be multiple grounds for appeal for this case. I don't think we've seen the last of this case, not by a long shot.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:45 AM
0

Please don't conflate indecent assault with rape. They are very different.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:44 AM
9

He was found guilty of "three counts of aggravated indecent assault" but the charge was not rape. If you'd like to revisit the differences, please see this resource Cosby has a chance at an appeal, as this is the US legal process, and not a Kangaroo Court in Academia. Due to the judge permitting several women to speak as witnesses for the prosecution, there are open questions about whether or not this was appropriate.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:44 AM
8

Regretsex again? We need these 2 whiteknights & the Lying Juvenile to learn the error of their ways in prison.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:50 AM
3

She deserves to pay for the crimes of her perfidious mouth with a well-sized civil judgment. I'm surprised the police aren't going after her too for false allegations.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:47 AM
4

Recourse through the legal system is the best answer. Though he has been through a horrible series of events, a few hundred thousand should help him onto a path of recovery. This will also teach the school, ISU, about the cost of kangaroo regretsex courts.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:46 AM
3

Judge Judy has always struck me as having an incredible amount of common sense. She doesn't need the crutch of feminism.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:01 PM
31

Finally, a non-SJW leading the Education Department. Of course, you could tell she isn't an SJW just by looking at her.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:24 PM
8

It is a cultural thing
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:22 PM
6

You make an excellent point; he will likely be lionized as a defender of honor
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:46 PM
13

This woman should be prosecuted for the murder she caused.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:09 AM
21

If you want your son to be marriageable one day, tell him to stay in school now. Yeah right, so he can be a salaryman for a fat wife? That said, affluent, professional women usually have an easier time being single by choice, and two-parent households, which tend to have more time as well as more money, have been shown to be good for kids. "Children whose mothers are continuously married grow up to make higher incomes at age 40 than children raised at some point by single parents," reports the P…
/r/MGTOW18/05/17 02:19 PM
1

The proper soundtrack for this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEuU64Zt4B0
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/17 01:07 AM
21

This equally fits under legal rights or discrimination. Legal rights because this prosecution is crazy overboard. Discrimination because a male only is likely prosecuted this aggressively. Consequently, I chose the latter.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:16 PM
3

Classical Feminism was about human rights and had much in common with MR. Now, it is the collective group of identity politics, handouts, special privileges, and benefits without responsibilities. Proponents of cultural marxism and all the failures of SJWism. What a tragedy.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 06:12 AM
0

She has about a gallon of botox and filler in her face. Weird!
/r/MensRights20/01/17 06:07 PM
16

In fact, he is teaching his daughter that if she looks pretty, cute, and is youthful, she should get her free dinner. He is not teaching her to do her part, to pay her fair share, to achieve and get results. This father is an example of why blue-pill traditionalism is so dangerous in the modern society
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:49 AM
7

The Burmese language has no word for female genitalia That really does not pass the sanity test when we are talking about an expressive written language http://www.indifferentlanguages.com/words/vagina/myanmar_(burmese) http://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the/myanmar-word-for-22bf5d4a65ff0792ed773c17fa7178ed1cf76aa6.html http://www.youswear.com/index.asp?language=Burmese
/r/MensRights28/12/16 05:19 PM
5

/u/cmumford you are correct, the allegation of bias was made against the judge. Although most all cases of drunk sex from a legal perspective would be alleged rape - since neither individual that is drunk can provide consent. However, in our modern culture this usually comes down to the male being victimized by an overzealous law enforcement system, and no charges to the woman. Realistically though, people can consent to all sorts of things while drunk. Not sure when alcohol or any other intoxic…
/r/MensRights24/12/16 01:44 AM
1

Dear /u/sillymod Would you consider banning some of these obviously SJW trolls from SRS here to do damage? I know we don't like to ban in general, but since they are nonstop fucking with our voting, anything would be an improvement.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 08:52 PM
1

This is a great reason to be MGTOW. Although I am not MGTOW, one of my biggest reasons never to marry has to do with my knowledge of women, and their horrible finances. If you don't have a cold steel prenup, and also, she has more to lose than you, she is incented to try and divorce rape you. However, forget about divorce rape. The value that you bring to the table as a man can often be worth huge amounts of $ even to a casual girlfriend when you boost her earning potential by 40k a year (I have…
/r/MGTOW18/12/16 09:44 PM
1

I don't think MGTOW means voluntary celibate though, and MGTOW as most think of it, is not being celibate. It is avoiding LTRs. The historical definition of celibacy implied virginity, whereas many self-proclaimed MGTOWs have casual relationships. The point of distinction is about male agency. The push to align male agency around female imperatives. Cash is merely a representation of that, and divorce a byproduct. I do agree though that celibates of the past were very aware of Red Pill knowledge…
/r/MGTOW18/12/16 04:53 PM
1

You do bring up some good points. They simply don't want to go through all the hassle and efforts than other men put to get women, because they have less interest It is true, interest in key I don't think herbivores understand female nature in the way that we think about female nature in the western world. However, our ideas are partially western in thought, and our opinions are shaped by what we see here: bias against men, whiteknighting, horrible divorces, alimony and child support. I'm not su…
/r/MGTOW18/12/16 03:11 PM
1

Going to disagree with you here. "I have lots of female friends I'm attracted to," he says. "But you weigh up the risks and benefits and come to the conclusion that things are best left as they are. I'm lucky to work in an industry where there's no stigma attached to being single and no pressure to get involved with someone." https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/dec/27/japan-grass-eaters-salaryman-macho "Japanese housewives almost always control the household budget. They ensure the family is …
/r/MGTOW17/12/16 11:43 PM
2

Very true. It just goes to show that colleges are biased.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 02:25 AM
4

I found it very interesting that she never got Bernie on the ticket, and the Democrats lost SO MUCH momentum by biasing the primary in favor of her, over Bernie. Bernie had so much energy with those giant crowds. Bernie as an avowed socialist vs Trump the super capitalist would have made a more entertaining election, a true decision between contrasts. Not getting him on the ticket failed to unite the Democratic Party, and was one, of many nails in her election's coffin.
/r/MGTOW16/12/16 11:44 PM
1

Thanks for making this distinction; I never thought Cathy Young the Good would make such biased material
/r/MensRights16/12/16 11:30 PM
0

Reducing the supply of men improves our negotiating position. Of course they are helping.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 04:25 AM
0

Last I heard he was trying to claim leadership of it. I'm not MGTOW but I 100% support them. MGTOWs are the shock troops of MRM
/r/MensRights16/12/16 12:34 AM
6

The mainstream media will cue up for certain to suppress this story!
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:08 AM
2

It is always about Privileged White Women's First World Problems.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:07 AM
2

She looks like she would steal my lunch!
/r/MensRights29/11/16 11:00 PM
1

I'm not sure if I should cringe or laugh.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:53 PM
15

In 2016, mere application of rules of evidence to rape allegations would be considered actual rape culture.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 05:05 PM
52

This is the same woman in the story https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2276371/brit-rape-victim-zara-jayne-moisey-speaks-of-torture-in-filthy-dubai-jail-after-reuniting-with-her-family-back-in-the-uk/ Apparently, she has a great story to tell.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:34 PM
1

It was a social media charge of rape, and winning in the public mind is winning. The fact they are ignoring it shows it was not considered credible. The title was intentional.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 06:38 AM
1

False Rape Hysteria in the Media does not a conviction make. Every person in America has the right to a trial, and a jury of their peers. Even a man.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 06:01 AM
3

Of course a biased media will claim an honest correction as "trolling".
/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:34 PM
8

I love the unbiased media /s
/r/MensRights12/11/16 10:47 PM
6

$ is justice when it comes to the lies of Jackie & Sabrina Rubin Erdely
/r/MensRights04/11/16 06:36 PM
1

For example, a 15 year boy sexually active with a 14 year old girl. The 15 year old boy is at a greater risk of statutory rape charges though there is minimal difference between the two. This despite many scientists arguing that females are 1 - 2 years more mature than males of the same age. In this case, the 14 year girl is unlikely to be charged, and the boy, potentially. This is why the risk is greater.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 11:36 PM
3

The story in general is proving incorrect. There has been no damage to the alleged bathroom proved, and journalists have found it actually in perfect condition the same day of the police report. If anything, there is a rush to judgment.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:49 PM
2

Privileged White Women. Nuff said.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 11:28 PM
16

You sound like a newbie to business.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 05:19 PM
3

When someone critiques child raping, the right way to go about it is not to attack their military service.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:58 AM
8

I am not sure why a man can be charged for a woman's crime. This does not make sense.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:53 PM
3

I was a victim of domestic abuse, and I am not ashamed. Now in a healthy relationship, R++
/r/MensRights20/02/16 04:00 AM
12

The problem is that police can laugh at you if you report a female for assaulting you. I know - it happened to me.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:59 AM
6

Too many.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:58 AM
0

Attempting to pass a bill, or even attaching a poison pill, is still grounds for criticism. I'm not stopping.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:08 AM
0

This is not birth control, and there are human rights disputes about abortion/infanticide. Unlike comparison.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:05 AM
3

We men are most frequently victimized by police when it comes to the unjust use of violence above and beyond the minimum required. This police chief, by sanctioning these officers is taking a stand against disrespectful behavior.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:44 AM
10

This is beautiful. I wish every major city across the US had such facilities, and desire to help out abused men. We are people, after all.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:38 AM
0

This is outrageous! I don't know why a woman need be consulted for a man's medical issue. This should be between a man and his doctor only.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:25 AM
1

These women will tarnish the names of institutions and honorable men in order to get a payout. That they are doing it decades after an alleged event shows something.....
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:41 PM
2

When I see Title IX cases, I think of all the rampant discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:31 AM
9

Josh Duggar seems like a pretty scummy individual, but still, he should not be victimized by false allegations from gold-diggers. False allegations: Detract Law Enforcement attention from actual assaults Give the false impression of higher sex crime stats Add fuel to the RadFem "search for guilty men" fire Penalize innocent men
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:11 PM
2

Alternatively, I don't support the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" approach. It just doesn't work in politics. Neither does apologies, backpedaling, or playing defense.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 06:26 PM
3

I didn't say don't be critical. However, you are jumping on the hate Roosh bandwagon. The actual fact is, the overton window has moved so much in favor of gynocracy, that we need PUAs, MGTOWs, and TRPers to assist in providing some balance. We need to hold people accountable for their own decisions and stop the rampant infantilization that is part and parcel to the NannystateTM I'd rather support PUAs, MGTOWs, RPers, and MRAs of all diverse stripes as we restore balance. This is not a quest for …
/r/MensRights06/02/16 04:08 AM
2

Upstanding soldier there. /s
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:49 AM
22

She is a pillar of the establishment. What is really ironic is how she went after women for sleeping with her hubby Bill. Well, went after is probably the understatement of the century, but you know.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:49 AM
1

This sounds very gender neutral /s
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:47 AM
6

It would be more accurate to say "they are men saying things that could be viewed as anti-woman", or "men saying how to exploit women". When looking at reversing genders, every Women's magazine has articles like this. "Say this to seduce men", or, "How to seduce him!". Every feminist can get away with talking about reducing men in some shape or form. Even #killallmen gets support. While The Feminists band together in defense, the Manosphere eats its own.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:25 AM
6

The mother in this story is a horrible individual.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:51 PM
10

Hillary Clinton has ruthlessly attacked the women with whom her husband had affairs. Again and again she smeared them, and destroyed their reputations. If anything, her road to the Whitehouse has been built on the bodies of the women she abused. We in MR stand for human rights; the full enfranchisement, and equal opportunity of both genders. This includes all the responsibilities and duties that comes with a gender blind society, including compulsory service, if so required.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:41 PM
3

Social Justice is a bait and switch. They claim they are against discrimination, push equality, enfranchisement, when they do nothing of the sort. Their policies embodied in government assistance have institutionalized welfare queens. They claim to be for all people but exploit male utility and male disposability. They claim to support all races but target their vitriol at the broad category of white men, and western civilization, despite the fact that we are actually the leaders in female enfra…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 07:01 PM
11

This is crazy denial of rights. Not convicted yet treated as a felon.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 05:27 PM
4

The shocktroops of MGTOW (Grasseaters) will bring Japan to its knees. The West is next!
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:51 PM
1

Psychologist Derald Wing Sue defines microaggressions as "brief, everyday exchanges that send denigrating messages to certain individuals because of their group membership." Sue describes microaggressions as generally happening below the level of awareness of well-intentioned members of the dominant culture. Microaggressions, according to Sue, are different from overt, deliberate acts of bigotry, such as the use of racist epithets, because the people perpetrating microaggressions often intend no…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 04:54 PM
3

This is about the dumbest, most discriminatory, man-blaming thing I have ever read.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 11:51 PM
2

Those are some great statistics and infographics!
/r/MensRights03/01/16 02:55 AM
1

432 grams of carbs is a Mt. Everest. I hope that diagram is not accurate because if so, it explains your high body fat. Need to replace all that rice intake with some healthy fats like avocado & extra virgin organic coconut oil, but perhaps cutting calories a bit is in order also. Guide to fats
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 06:04 PM
1

The data overwhelming evidences death penalty bias against men. Some batshit crazy SJW will somehow describe this as patriarchy too.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:46 PM
0

In most US states, the legal definition depends on who is doing the killing actually. If a woman is killing her own baby, it is legal, and the baby is not a person. If there is a crime involved against the unborn baby, then the unborn baby is treated as a person. This law appears to be primarily used against men, since women that abuse drugs and alcohol are so rarely charged with crimes against their unborn infants.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 05:57 PM
7

Please, cue the downvote brigade. Abortion has everything to do with men's rights, and the greater concept of human rights, as MR is a human rights struggle. In many cases MR doesn't even recognize that women's right to abortion in the past was considered murder, and doctors even swore an oath against assisting. As men, we know that in many countries, abortion is used as a tool for gendercide ; specifically the killing of unpreferred female babies. Being for human rights, we have an obligation t…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:34 PM
3

Microaggressions are the equivalent of violence and rape? Yet another example of SJW batshit crazy!
/r/MensRights28/12/15 07:39 PM
36

I think you need to consult with a lawyer about this in order to protect your reputation, but also to seek justice. In my opinion, I would do the following: seek professional legal aid from someone experienced in the field e.g. defamation law press charges against the father. confront the allegations head-on with the investigating law enforcement take action against the slanderous allegations the woman in question is spreading draft a statement with the consultation of someone skilled in PR to d…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 05:16 AM
2

It is typical for a feminist to make everything about herself, with her first world white women's problems. Jennifer Lawrence actually was raised in rural Kentucky, so if anything, she should have claimed she was raised by some goats or sheep....
/r/MensRights24/12/15 04:46 PM
32

Countdown until "abused spouse" defense is used.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 07:10 PM
3

The regressive left is a term popularized by Maajid Nawaz in case you didn't know. You might want to become more familiar with the term before you jump to the conclusion that this is coming from a right wing ideologue. The term is also heavily used by those on the Left that support Liberal Leftism, rather than Regressive Leftism. Examples: Bill Maher & Richard Dawkins Sam Harris unloads on the Regressive Left David Rubin Interviews Ayaan Hirsi Ali on the Regressive Left Joe Rogan on the Regressi…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:59 PM
1

Why is it almost always male victims of justice system torture?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:29 PM
1

This is some pretty sadistic crap. Of course, male victims.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:26 PM
2

Every man and woman is deserving of a fair and speedy trial without torture.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:21 PM
2

No man should be handcuffed and tortured with a cattle prod, let alone in the west to force a divorce. This is unconscionable!
/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:18 PM
2

Until proven in a court of law, all public allegations of rape should be treated by the MRM as false. Even convictions should be treated with suspicion as women have previously obtained convictions for many men of color that the Innocence Project then freed. Furthermore, regret is not rape. Short of live action video it can be incredibly difficult to defend in a "he said she said" scenario if she promptly goes to the police after being peer-pressured into filing a false claim, after having consc…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:45 PM
2

Allegedly, there is lots of conflicting reports and, allegations of collusion between the witnesses. Furthermore, Bill Cosby has previously been the victim of blackmail/extortion, and yes, this was proven in a court of law.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:37 PM
3

Bill Cosby getting a multi-million dollar judgment against his accusers will go a long way towards stopping false accusations.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 11:53 PM
12

To draw a contrast, can you possibly imagine the massive outrage that an article focusing on women performing the stay at home role would evoke?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:26 PM
7

When the SJWs focus on their First World problems, and huge entitlement, they do so at the expense of both women, men, and particularly gay men in some particular countries. However, this is not isolated to specifically Muslim countries as other ideologies can also spread doctrines of oppression.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:02 PM
1

Slavery is morally reprehensible. We need to fight to ensure our seafood is produced legally.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:10 PM
1

Everyday, innocent men go to work in grueling conditions in order to build, engineer, clean, and fix our world. And men die too. The vast majority of workplace deaths are men. Most of the people performing dangerous jobs are men. In order to build our civilization, someone had to do that work. And die. Don't forget that
/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:43 PM
1

"Drivers caught driving more that 25 miles per hour over the speed limit will be hit with a $1,000 fine. If the fine isn’t paid within 30 days, it rises to $2,000, a 223 percent increase." As many of us are aware, child support cases are used to put men into jail and prison as "debtor's prisons" in the past. Now, this is spreading to traffic fines where it will have a disproportionate impact on men of color. This is one of the rare areas where even our intellectual opponents recognize the unfair…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:10 PM
2

I'm surprised that someone would publicly call for the murder of a specific gender. Not only is this morally reprehensible, it also incredibly sexist and walks the border of illegality. Public exhortations to commit murder are illegal.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:30 PM
7

Typical Feminist: first world problems, ignores her own privilege, bad sense of style, horrible cliched tats, multi-colored hair.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:26 PM
1

Gendered discrimination is never just!
/r/MensRights11/12/15 01:29 AM
1

I knew this Japanese steak house that was my hidden gem so that I could try and woo her and sweep her off her feet. We set a date and time and continued to talk for awhile. She was an HB6 at best, probably a 4 without makeup but I didn't care I was in search of love and would accept her how ever she was cause that's the kind of nice guy I was Cons: Reads like a beta journal entry. Pros: At least you are being honest with yourself.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/15 08:24 AM
2

Go team! A few more multi-million dollar paydays will teach the SJW campuses that gender discrimination pays out bigtime... in legal fees, settlements, and cash awards
/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:55 AM
111

"The incident is similar to a growing number of cases in which females in physically-strenuous jobs demand both special treatment and to be treated equal to their male counterparts at the same time." Basically, they want a good paying job without doing the fitness levels required to perform the job successfully.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:05 AM
18

The term mansplaining and trying to quiet a specific gender is inherently discriminatory. Senator Claire McCaskill is an avowed Misandrist, and by definition, sexist.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:44 PM
1

Considering all the vandalism, destroyed reputations, harassment and death threats, I think they should be asking for more than $25M.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:53 AM
8

"When the Air Force convened a pretrial hearing, known as an Article 32, in December, the government had stacked so many charges against the enlisted man that, if convicted, he faced over a century in prison."
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:20 AM
3

Actually, considering the feminist co-opting of the term, it is only fitting we completely drive it into the ground through overuse.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 06:05 PM
14

Even judges know that American prisons are a cesspool of sexual assault. The only real rape culture is the one present in jails & prisons
/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:59 PM
5

I find the abuse of men just as disgusting as the abuse of women. This is a tragedy, but there is definitely a guilty party.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:37 PM
3

I relish the fact that as a man with a cooking knife I can cause the most uppity privileged rich woman to quiver in .... high hopes "This man cooks far better than I..." "Positively smashing in his apron this bloke is!" "Could he please spank my bum with a slotted spoon?" <3 the Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights20/10/15 07:00 PM
10

Everyone knows White, Privileged RadFems only want the high paying white collar jobs sitting in a plush office.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:17 PM
9

Deciding to stay at home and raise children is a luxury few of us can afford. If a woman wants an equal playing field, she should be willing to work like a man. This is why the statistics show that women that are single and childless actually have superior earnings to men in the same demographics.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:11 PM
6

Remember, this is coming from Sweden, the ignoble owner of the title "Rape Capital" of the western world. More Cultural Marxism rather than true, egalitarian human rights.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:18 PM
18

She can be worth half a billion USD but still want more. Feminism = privileged white women wanting more money and special rules
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:03 AM
7

Be warned: SJWs are out in full force in this article!
/r/MensRights05/10/15 12:12 PM
2

I'm not sure which is worse: Apathy to male rape victims in the military, False Attempts to claim military male rape victims in the military as female victimization for political purposes OR Permitting Boy Rape because it furthers military objectives
/r/MensRights23/09/15 03:01 AM
15

I hate sexist double standards being pushed by women that think they are above the law/rules. Hope he gets a big payout.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:58 PM
6

Women can do support jobs in the military too. They should be candidates for a draft also.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 11:18 PM
19

Yes, male utility is an issue and I am not dismissing it. However, this piece of fecal matter is actively lying about physical standards in order to push the SJW mantra of "gender is just a social construct". Remember, SJWs are born deceivers completely lacking in ethics and scientific understanding of the human species.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:54 PM
5

Stop trying to tone-police. Now kindly fuckoff shitposting feminist.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 06:44 PM
21

Freedom of politically incorrect speech
/r/MensRights02/09/15 06:35 PM
5

She used SJW language, advocated killing men for having eyes she didn't like, and in general is a horrible, terrible human being, as well as a giant behemoth. mockery noun mock·ery \ˈmä-k(ə-)rē, ˈmȯ-\ : behavior or speech that makes fun of someone or something in a hurtful way : mocking behavior or speech : a bad or useless copy of something
/r/MensRights02/09/15 06:13 PM
4

Radical SJWs that advocate the death of men for a minor allegation are worthy of mockery.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:54 PM
2

Outside of small circles, there is no concept of "toxic femininity", it is only "toxic masculinity" with which toxicity is permissible... This of course is discriminatory and biased.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:44 PM
10

The gender bigots are apparently taking over Forbes now too.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:18 AM
6

This is more kowtowing at the sacred cow of woman, no pun intended.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:03 PM
6

More discrimination against men in the name of equality. Good thing much of the Californian jobs are already leaving the state.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:58 PM
12

In case this is not clear to you, if the government gives loads of money to female rape charities, but none to men, and we know the rate of male sexual victimization is increasing - this is discrimination by funding priorities. However, this is not novel. Across medicine and other avenues of life our governments fail us by dramatically funding female issues over male ones, extending benefits to longer lived females for a longer portion of their lives.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 01:10 AM
0

A strong female lead, doing traditionally male things, with acrobatics, kick ass, adventuring ~ is feminist. You are so brainwashed you don't even realize what you said is antithetical to TRP
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 05:42 PM
2

I think your comments are not properly qualified. Many military personnel are far better trained with firearms than are personnel in police departments with perhaps the lone exception of SWAT teams. Moving as a fire team, flanking, phase lines, fire control, recon by fire, carrying small arms for 18 hours at a time are skills most police do not have or know. Let alone common skills the military practices like night time assaults. Simply put, it was not uncommon for me to put 3k to 4k rounds down…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 04:23 AM
0

You failed to respond to my question and instead, you came up with a shitty response. However many children I have, or don't have, has nothing to do with the truth of what I wrote. I can see you are attempting to require a number of children being raised, as if that somehow qualifies a statement. You are applying a logical fallacy to bear, that without raising children, we are not qualified to talk about the stupidity of worshiping motherhood. I don't think such lowbrow arguments are worthy of T…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 07:08 AM
1

Is that the best response you can gather?
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 06:07 AM
2

Celebrate your mother then. Not all the crappy women that are mothers in name only.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 06:06 AM
1

You are missing the topic; this is not about bashing one person's mom. This is about bashing a concept. Being a mother could mean any of the following: fucking artificial insemination having a child adopting a child None of these achievements are particularly noble or praiseworthy. Thanks for coming, here is your giant fucking blue ribbon and trophy for doing something incredibly common. FUCK THAT. What is noble or praiseworthy is achieving despite adversity, doing superior work, confronting obs…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 04:27 AM
1

Currently, Mother's Day is made out as much more important than Father's Day. Someone needs to say fuck you to the pretentious bloating of importance for low value female occupations.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 03:39 AM
1

You are forgetting that Mother's Day is made out to be some super important day, and the cash outlays on it are fairly substantial compared to Father's Day. Father's Day should be more important, FAR MORE IMPORTANT. I don't think we should buy into celebrating motherhood any more than it is already. In fact, it should be celebrated less. The state of motherhood in the US in particular is deplorable. That is why motherhood is often synonymous with weight gain, frumpy clothes, and being unattracti…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 03:33 AM
3

I'm not sure if it would be socially acceptable for a male celebrity, to accuse one of his female harassers of having a loose, giant vagina.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:18 PM
8

The "wage slaves" are leaving the plantation
/r/MensRights10/05/15 01:31 AM
3

This article is shit. It provides a good example of a bias, in which the author conflates outcome (% of women) with career vocations. Obviously, there is no comparison for janitorial work, garbage men, or schoolteachers either. When you see something like it - cue your spidersense about how much of a crock it is, and tell other people.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:14 AM
3

In 2015, advocating for the equal treatment of men is considered sexist.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:49 AM
4

I think this is an open invitation to lowered physical standards for men as well. Men will be able to sue for unfair standards, starting a chain reaction of standards lowering.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:52 AM
8

divorce rape ~ aptly named
/r/MensRights26/04/15 03:09 PM
2

to be more accurate, would just the labia do? It sounds like a circumcision is more equivalent to partial clitoridectomy.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:47 PM
6

First we mutilate babies. Then we use the grisly trophies on women's faces. Disgusting
/r/MensRights24/04/15 11:38 AM
2

I'm concerned about how increasingly easy it is for a man to be destroyed by these kind of allegations. It seems more obvious that we need to extend the right of anonymity to the accused as well to prevent Trial by Public Opinion.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:46 PM
7

I am a critic of AVFM, though they do a great deal of good. Reading this piece though, I think it brings to mind words like muckracking, offtopic, character assassination. While I know Buzzfeed is clearly in the SJW camp, this article really takes it to new levels.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 01:31 AM
5

Key Excerpts: Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a former prosecutor, called on the FBI and Justice Department to notify defendants in all 2,500 targeted cases involving an FBI hair match about the problem even if their case has not been completed, and to redouble efforts in the three-year-old review to retrieve information on each case. “These findings are appalling and chilling in their indictment of our criminal justice system, not only for potentially innocent defendants who have been wrongl…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 03:55 AM
17

Child Support and Debtor's Prison: A marriage made in hell.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:08 PM
57

The US Military has special standards for women which water down the requirements women need to meet. In case you haven't heard yet I will break it down. In the US Army a PT test score of 60 is considered passing, per event. Pushups For a 17-21 year old man to get 100 he must score 71 pushups, and 42 pushups to hit 60. For a 17-21 year old woman to get 100 she must score 42 pushups, and 19 pushups to hit 60. Situps These are the same across genders. 2 mile run For a 17-21 year old man to get 100…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 08:31 PM
3

False accusations of rape are like a modernized version of blood libel resulting in the hideous persecution of innocent men.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 08:05 PM
1

The death penalty is inhumane, and applied mainly to poor men, and men of color but I do like your points. If someone is sent to prison wrongfully, in many cases restitution can be made. Once you execute them though - never can restitution be made!
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:11 AM
1

A biased legal system that throws the book at men is a gender issue.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:08 AM
1

A very short tldr of the scathing review by Columbia: Confirmation bias narrative bias Credibility of story based on a single "source" Uncooperative and unreliable "source" Over-sensitivity to actual rape, or fake rape victims insufficient pulling of threads in the story Fact-checking overruled Inadequate checking with impugned fraternity Lack of information provided to fraternity to substantiate allegations
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:03 AM
6

Are you really saying that men, particularly men of color, are not discriminated against by our legal system? Here is my evidence. Where is yours?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:46 AM
0

Do you have links reflecting the courtroom evidence? Post them if you have them.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:43 AM
0

unsubstantiated allegations do not a conviction make Get the fuck out with your low quality aspersions. If you do not have a conviction you have jack shit. No court of law = jack shit.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:39 AM
5

I think the MR mods are in favor of free speech even when it is walking the line around concern trolling.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:54 PM
4

In our culture, wanting equality, unbiased sentencing, a lack of male genital mutilation, fairness in divorce distributions, a stop to paternity fraud, and equal chances at child custody are considered bigoted super-redpill ideas.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:51 PM
5

I hope the fraternity impacted by the lies sues the living shit out of both the Rolling Stone, and the scam artist.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:48 PM
1

Justice is served! Judge Nanci Grant for President!!!!
/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:22 AM
1

Sex offenders are overwhelmingly male, and you become a sex offender for fairly trivial infractions. In the kangaroo courts of academia, you can labeled a sex offender for kissing someone's hand. A person can easily become a sex offender for crimes such as: 1) Taking naked photos of yourself — if you're a minor. 2) Visiting a prostitute. 3) Peeing in public. 4) Flashing your breasts. 5) Having consensual sex with a teenager, even if you're a teenager, too. 6) Sleeping with your sister. 7) Giving…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:06 AM
1

To the contrary, I know quite a good bit about BDSM. However, the issue is one of pushing a particular approach as "feminist". She equates feminism with dominatrixes only. I don't equate a preference for submission, domination, or switching as either feminist or MRA. It is merely an issue of preference, brain wiring and lifestyle.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:38 PM
-1

This is the ultimate reveal of true feminist desires. Quite simply: male submission.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 06:00 AM
1

This is a poorly worded definition; not sure if you are trolling, or merely misinformed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVXdxaaRiAU provides a better explanation.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:19 AM
2

Um, no. This is a reference to cultural marxism, not economic marxism. Harald Eia already produced a popular video on this topic, and how Gender Feminists in Scandinavia having been trying to say women and men are exactly the same. The Gender Feminists are on video saying exactly that. The series is called Brainwashing and is quite excellent. Not only was the documentary series successful, it also led to the closure of the RadFem Nordic Gender Institute that was clearly non-scientific cultmarxis…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 08:37 PM
2

Fact Check: US total war deaths ~ 654,000 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_casualties_of_war Russian Stalingrad deaths ~ 479,000 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Stalingrad#Casualties Some rounding were done to above numbers.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 02:35 PM
8

I love this woman.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:00 PM
8

Once again, we face an era where men are unjustly forced to their deaths
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:42 PM
2

http://www.rochesterhomepage.net/story/d/story/former-east-irondequoit-teachers-aide-found-guilty/64976/sDwh7f79z0uXxhPRnsa0TA Privileged White Woman
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:47 PM
0

I disagree. If hatred of women is not acceptable on their site, should hatred of men be acceptable? Curating of a website should not be one-sided, protecting one gender while ignoring attacks on the other.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:48 PM
-1

OKCupid is filtering some words like misogyny to a limited amount. If they are willing to do that for women, why can't they do it for men?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:42 PM
0

it appears there are two standards: one for misandry (permissive) and one for misogyny (restricted). It seems unfair to restrict one, and not the other.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:41 PM
1

According to the suit, plaintiffs “are kept in overcrowded cells; they are denied toothbrushes, toothpaste, and soap; they are subjected to the stench of excrement and refuse in their congested cells; they are surrounded by walls smeared with mucus, blood and feces; they are kept in the same clothes for days and weeks without access to laundry or clean undergarments...” WTF? You keep these poor minorities (mainly men) in barbaric conditions with disgusting hygiene, and deny them humane treatment…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:43 AM
1

There are 400 profiles, not 5. You cannot make anymore of a false comparison.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:55 AM
-2

So, you support a double standard against men since they are already word filters against misogyny? Nice going, troll.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:53 AM
0

Considering there were more than 400 profiles with an interest in "misandry" as of last night, your comment is neither practical, nor feasible.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:08 PM
1

So, basically, no freedom of speech? Freedom of speech also applies to reprehensible speech.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 09:04 PM
1

What you are saying is that you have to support feminism, or at a bare minimum, not make any offensive jokes in your private life, in order not to effect your job?
/r/MensRights08/02/15 08:38 PM
1

You are missing the topic. The point is calling female exploitation of students THE SAME EXACT THING male exploitation of students is called. A discussion on naming of the crime in question is a completely different topic.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:51 PM
1

this is a song about the attractiveness of fat women, sung by a fat woman. Of course a feminist would like it - it is "empowering".
/r/MensRights08/02/15 04:21 PM
28

If a male teacher exploits a girl, it should be called the SAME EXACT THING as when a female teacher exploits a boy. This is progress
/r/MensRights07/02/15 10:12 PM
0

You are correct, the TradCons are not in favor of drunkeness. However, if we tried to put women equally into the draft, and ensured 50/50 military service during true wartime - TradCons would label us the destroyers of motherhood, femininity, and all that is sacred in the world!
/r/MensRights07/02/15 06:35 PM
0

Stop demonizing someone with whom you disagree, that is in our camp. We in MR advocate personal responsibility, and self-intoxication should not be the automatic "free rape accusation" it currently is - thought it should be more accurately both parties charged with it, if we were actually adhering to the law. But society isn't, because society at large is biased against men and so when a drunk man and a drunk woman copulate, he is being charged in 99.999% of the cases.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:42 PM
4

While I agree with you that there are RadFems firmly entrenched in the progressive side of the Left, there are also Traditional-Conservative women on the Right equally intent on ensuring continued male slavery, and reducing personal freedoms. The authoritarianism and lack of personal responsibility from both RadFems & Tradcons are to be opposed. The libertarian left are definitely our allies.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:27 PM
1

No doubt our feminist media will quickly censor this, so see the text below: SHE WAS GAGGING FOR IT I have been following the latest machinations over rape allegations with some interest, as they have serious consequences for all red-bloodied males who are out on the rut. For the past ten years or more, a politically driven agenda has been thrust down the throats of court users about the deplorably low percentage of rape allegations that lead to conviction, and successive governments have been e…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:36 PM
1

You might want to read a little bit on the subject of the political left.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:16 PM
1

You need to make a better distinction between equity feminists and gender feminists, which you are not doing. Remember that some of the leaders in MensRights have a past in Equity Feminism. Who fits into this Category? Christina Hoff Somers Camille Paglia Warren Farrell
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:12 PM
1

The libertarian left is just as much our allies, as the libertarian center, and libertarian right. Let it be clear that the enemy is the authoritarian left (SJW/Radfems exemplified by Anita Sarkeesian) and also, the authoritarian right (Authoritarian Tradcons like Jack Thompson). While the libertarian left may be suppressed right now, they are definitely on our side. There are those on the authoritarian right that would definitely keep men in a submissive state to the state in order to exploit o…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:07 PM
1

I understand that and I know that the US criminal system of justice is based around proving guilt, not innocence, and all people are presumed innocent, therefore the prosecution has to make a case. However, we are talking about a far more liberal rule for evidence - as AtticusFrenchToast mentioned: You can get evidence admitted easily There is no cross-examination There may not be the Defense ability to exclude evidence There is merely an evidence bar to "guilt" No professional legal defense may…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:50 PM
7

You are wrong. The case occurred under academic Kangaroo court rules of "Preponderance of Evidence". Even under those easy to meet rules, there was no case. That type of academic court is functionally equivalent to civil court in rules of evidence - therefore he was innocent. corrected for AtticusFrenchToast's comment below.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:37 PM
3

Apparently you are new to /r/MensRights Female teachers have a documented bias against male students and this is coming from Time.com, hardly a MR advocacy.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:09 AM
99

Teach women not to abuse kids!
/r/MensRights04/02/15 03:05 PM
4

Please be aware of what is happening with Reddit, and how other subreddits in the manosphere may be preparing to react. This is pertinent to TRP, Seddit, MGTOW, Pussypass, pussypassdenied, and a few others.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 03:20 AM
-2

Preventing access to a game for 25% or 29% of someone's life = the same thing. Above is based on an 18, or 21 year old definition of adulthood, with a 72 year life expectancy. Considering that the age of game playing was previously more limited than that though, preventing access to a game til after 18 or 21 could be 50% to 75% of the target demographic audience's typical game-playing years.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 01:01 AM
3

If the T-shirt said, "we get you off for the price of a dinner and drinks" then there really would have been a fight! /satire
/r/MensRights03/02/15 11:18 PM
1

Let us not confuse ideology with authoritarianism. There are left leaning libertarians, just as much as there are right leaning authoritarians. The authoritarianism speech controls are the enemy, not the left or right.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 11:15 PM
2

The preamble of the Declaration of Independence. There is no such thing as equal rights in the US currently, due to the nature of criminal bias against men.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 11:12 PM
7

Radfem ideology has indirectly caused the death, imprisonment, and rape of men, by criminalizing drunken hookups through spreading the ideology of Rape Culture. It has denied men their careers It has forced men to sue their universities to get due process It has unjustly enriched lawyers It has turned innocent men into perverted sex offenders that are then denied basic humanity. And remember, this is just the start... A good article from Yale on the subject Radfems are not ISIS or Al Qaeda, but …
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:09 PM
9

http://40.media.tumblr.com/55dd8e85c908e3a9998aed6edfdb9b19/tumblr_neqi4btxaT1t6itito1_1280.png "“Major publishers need to enforce a zero-tolerance policy of sexism and racism and homophobia,” says Sarkeesian. “Developers need to start moving away from the entitled macho-male power fantasy in their games. They need to recognize that there are wider stories that they can tell.” She has drawn up her own schematic for such a game. It would start with a princess trapped in a tower. But no one would …
/r/MensRights03/02/15 09:42 PM
30

Carlin said it best. The real threat to free speech is from the left. Going to fix this for you. The real threat to free speech is from the Authoritarian Left and the Authoritarian Right. Radical Feminists have a great deal in common with Tradcons Example: Anita Sarkeesian "Ban & Censor games showing patriarchy or objectifying women" <- Radical Feminist Jack Thompson "Ban games showing violence or nudity " < - Traditional conservative
/r/MensRights03/02/15 05:26 PM
78

Lesson 1: Radical Feminists and their PC shills are the enemies of free speech.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:18 PM
3

Meanwhile, janitors, mechanics, engineers and construction personnel rage over the huge amount of female discrimination against their respective careers
/r/MensRights02/02/15 11:34 PM
1

Almost no post account Hello troll
/r/MensRights01/02/15 03:06 AM
1

I like that the speaker is not demonizing less traditional viewpoints, despite obviously being a christian traditional conservative. I cannot say I agree with him in all of what he said but he is at least shying away from ad hominems.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 12:57 AM
1

This should be no surprise, as Dartmouth is a bastion of the SJW, western guilt, self-hating type.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:47 AM
0

Troll account, probably an SRSer
/r/MensRights29/01/15 12:20 AM
2

There is nothing wrong with having a healthy ideal.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 08:10 PM
4

Radfem Fatties will not be content until all the healthy thin women are removed from the media. Pushing a disgusting and unhealthy lifestyle of obesity is frankly sickening
/r/MensRights22/01/15 08:09 PM
1

The name womanslamming isn't sufficiently antagonistic. I think prefer the term vagslamming, or maybe cuntslamming
/r/MensRights22/01/15 08:05 PM
3

I'm not terrified of Great White Sharks in the Ocean, but that doesn't mean I am getting in the water in Gansbaai
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 04:13 AM
8

Retired, Genius Lawyer vs the hapless trio. This is going to be an epic amount of legal ass-whooping. I can't wait for Dershowitz to destroy these chumps, then go after their licenses to practice law. Unmasking his false accuser is just gravy.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:54 AM
1

Victim's Rights Female Victim's Rights Only
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:07 PM
2

We generally focus on the false accusation of rape, but the unfortunate fact is that there are false accusations for a number of other crimes. These false accusations can lead to convictions and hard time. False accusations are not only about rape!
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:43 PM
5

Alert: we have a sexist Department of the Navy.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:19 PM
15

We need mandatory reporting for false allegations then. Shit be getting crazy
/r/MensRights08/01/15 01:10 AM
1

I know his politics may not be favored by all, but am happy to see Mr. Koch standing up to a criminal justice system that unfairly ostracizes and brands nonviolent poor men, and men of color. We can't afford wasting our tax dollars like this. We can't afford wasting the potential of men like this. We together can do better.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:27 PM
16

“I have two daughters of my own coming up on college age,” he said to the NYT. “I want them to have a world that’s got equal opportunity for them.” The fact is, they have more career options but choose not to go into technology. The idea that women must be 50% of the population in mathematical, engineering and technology disciplines stinks of social engineering, and discrimination against men. How often do we see campaigns to increase the percentage of female carpenters, janitors and steamfitter…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:34 PM
1

"Convicted rapist" by Kangaroo Court in Academia. Go and collect your multi-million dollar payout.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 12:14 AM
4

You know this has really gone full crazy when the circle expanded to include all of above. Next thing you'll know a President will have alleged involvement, and a few prime ministers to boot as well.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:34 PM
9

Reddit's parent company in Advance Publications are also similarly giant.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:35 PM
14

We can definitely compare the civil rights movement to the gender egalitarian movement. Including basic principles of fairness: Check Explicitly about equality: Check Preventing exploitation: Check
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:31 PM
12

I think we could complain about it for starters. I like Reddit and I would prefer not having to go to elsewhere.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:29 PM
3

The survey article written by Allum Bokhari are over at GamePolitics
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:22 PM
8

It was actions contrary to readers' interests that led to the rise of 8chan. I'm not sure that companies, and their leaders are always thinking through the potential issues with chilling free speech, even if it is unpopular.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:05 PM
1

Currently the /KiA letter writing has been geared towards advertisers on Anti-Gamergate publications. I don't know if those same advertisers also advertise on Reddit, or not.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:47 PM
7

Nice job trolling this subreddit.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:05 PM
9

Probably because it was a crappy comment to make, by someone that is obviously not a regular MR poster, doing a subtle form of trolling. It is only because the moderators use such kid gloves that some shits get away with it.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:05 PM
2

I nominate the name "Salem trials" as thoroughly befitting these gender-wacko trials.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:02 AM
1

Nice putting out misinformation. It is pretty clear what they want - people with no national service obligations. Women. For the record, you haven't experienced anything similar at all - and making an unlike comparison.. You weren't conscripted and forced to fight in a war, or told that you were ineligible for work because you may get conscripted. Furthermore, countries like the US have laws that enable activated personnel to resume their jobs, and a requirement to get their jobs back upon retur…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 03:43 AM
3

Just World Fallacy. Should/would/etc - all crap. We are talking about present day, so your use of this fallacy is very telling.. Men in Singapore are forced into conscription, and paid a pittance. Their bodies are held hostage for their utility, to be used in service to the state. The reserve obligations last until age 40 or beyond.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:00 PM
3

You are approving of discrimination then, since this only impacts men?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 06:23 PM
5

Above is a crappy subject line. The real story is that WP completely ignored the Male victims of sexual assault in the military, and their fight for justice, if they are even willing to speak up. The most insidious power of the media is to ignore.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 08:55 AM
1

Some say the science shows that women have more sexual fluidity than do men, but some disagree with that.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 06:22 AM
41

Meanwhile, the scandalous sagas of female teachers with students continue to grow...
/r/MensRights25/12/14 10:57 AM
2

The definition of Feminism is convoluted these days. GGers are sometimes equity feminists (gender egalitarians) not gender feminists (radical feminists with patriarchy theory)
/r/MensRights21/12/14 09:30 AM
1

Since day one, the name in quotes was in the story.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:26 PM
11

This type of torture is disgusting. If it was being used for female POWs, it would actually be called rape, but because it is being used with male POWs it is just "rectal re-hydration". Double standards suck!
/r/MensRights14/12/14 02:58 AM
1

Another mainstream media writer with gendered biases, writing a shit article about a subject for which he has little experience, and apparently, did little research.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:23 PM
3

This bill is aimed at men. As far as the ridiculous title goes, this appears to be a consensual financial transaction "the world's oldest profession", not human trafficking.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:29 PM
11

Here is some typical physical standards for occupations such as Firefighters, Combat Arms, and Law Enforcement The simple fact is a weak woman or weak man cannot physically rescue people from buildings because they are too heavy and difficult to move when incapacitated. If someone needs rescuing, you NEED someone strong capable of handling all their protective gear (can be over 100 lbs) and then an additional limp body as well. This is freakishly strenuous work even for those of us that are stro…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:30 AM
1

violentacrez = Yes She who cannot be named = No
/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:40 AM
3

We might as well start finding another place to talk.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:30 AM
0

Unlike you, I have no bias about selecting sources from which to post content. My only bias is whether or not the publication in question has content which I can repost for MR. I actually said you are barely even a MR poster And I stand by that comment. If you want to call that defensive, go ahead.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:20 AM
1

Please refrain from pushing your politics here. /r/MR is not a democratic, libertarian, or republican area. I post content from all sources because I see beyond the petty politics. Apparently, you don't.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:45 AM
5

The link works, and it definitely talks about electrocuting men. Install a mackapär which administers electric shocks above a certain height as soon urine encounter toilet. The problem is with you and your browser. Please refrain from attempting to derail the conversation from a posted link, to another link which has nothing to do with it. This could be construed as trolling.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:59 AM
1

Please, stop with the partisan petty bullshit. From what I can tell, you are barely even a MR poster.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:07 AM
2

It is disgusting that the hospital did not take his allegations seriously, leading to other victims being raped.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:52 AM
-1

We are told that one of the most dangerous places for a young woman in America today is a college campus. Bullshit. As President Obama said at a White House event in September, where he announced a campaign to address campus violence, “An estimated one in five women has been sexually assaulted during her college years—one in five.” Bullshit. (At an earlier White House event on the issue, the president declared of sexual violence, “It threatens our families, it threatens our communities; ultimate…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 10:31 PM
8

No. Rolling Stone neglected Journalistic Ethics and violated their requirements to provide the truth because a convenient narrative conflicted with their social justice interests. Rolling Stone is part and parcel to the deceit; their neglecting their duties, and that of editorial oversight is appalling. Editors are required to rein in reporters. "Victim Blaming" is actually a SJW narrative that espouses lack of personal responsibility. I do not accept it, I reject it. Additionally, I deny that R…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:16 PM
2

You are incorrect. While logistics and strategy are important we still live in an age of warriors where strength and muscular endurance are critical abilities in combat arms, Fightfighting, and Law Enforcement. The average combat load for a rifleman with merely an M4 exceeds 80 lbs. The average combat load for Mortar Teams, M240 teams, Stinger Teams, and RTOs exceeds 120 lbs. Artillery teams can move huge amounts of weight as they, dependent on weapon system, may be manually moving arty rounds. …
/r/MensRights08/12/14 03:12 PM
19

The new version makes one significant deletion. Gone is this line: “In the face of new information, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie’s account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced.” That sentiment aligned with an ugly history of blaming rape victims for their trauma and for shaming them when their stories occasionally don’t pan out. Now, the key line reads, “These mistakes are on Rolling Stone, not on Jackie.” They are unwilling to call her a liar…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 02:35 PM
5

"Barry One" is the closest match to the "Republican Rapist" from Lena Dunham's book. Since he is fairly easy to identify, this is equivalent to a false rape allegation against him. He claims not to know Lena Dunham at all.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 04:28 AM
2

It appears there are extremely good reasons for these allegations to be fake, 250,000 reasons in particular.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:31 PM
0

Equality doesn't mean ending the stringent standards for physical occupations such as Law Enforcement, Firefighting, or Combat Arms careers in the military. Currently almost every career field listed above in which women can enter male occupations, they have dramatically weakened standards which serve to lower standards.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 12:53 AM
44

When embellishment happens with a resume/CV we call it fraud. Let's stop beating around the bush - it was a lie. If I told you an event happened on a specific date and didn't, that would be a lie. That is exactly what "jackie" did. A lie.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 10:06 PM
170

A poorly sourced, inadequately investigated piece of journalism like this that led to massive changes at UVA deserves more than a mere retraction. This fantasy publication forced changes at UVA. What a complete and utter load of rubbish!
/r/MensRights05/12/14 06:56 PM
0

That's why this law isn't perfect but I believe if a father was denied leave by a mother the courts would the man a right to at least half of it. Just World Fallacy. There is no requirement in the law to give 50% of the leave to men. Men are not getting anything unless the woman gives it them. If she doesn't give him leave he'll get nothing. The courts won't change that.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 09:41 PM
2

This is discriminatory, since Academia lacks the separation of Law enforcement (police), prosecution (district attorneys), and the judiciary (judges) that together create a system of checks and balances. It is also wrong because it eliminates Due Process protections that are key to American Jurisprudence. While Campus rape should be investigated and prosecuted, we have an excellent legal system fully capable and far better qualified to handle this task. If they overreach, we have a means for hol…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 03:31 PM
2

When was the last time you saw a female teacher getting 20 years in federal prison for having a "relationship" with a male student???
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:26 PM
0

Financials of lawsuits 101: Settling a case can be done because paying out a cheap settlement is more economical than defending against the lawsuit Civil Suits are not criminal, and have a fairly low Legal Burden of Proof, as low as Preponderance of Evidence ; a far cry from Beyond Reasonable Doubt used for criminal law in the US. the DA said there wasn't enough hard actual evidence to charge and convict Cosby. If there was credible evidence, he would have been tried. Anything else is merely con…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:10 AM
0

The allegations were not that someone was merely touched inappropriately. The allegations were that Bill Cosby was drugging a large number of women (17 to 19 at least count), and then taking sexual liberties with them. So, evidence of: A. Drugging B. Sexual Liberties C. Non-consensual aspect of B D. Police reports of A, B, and C above confirming evidence Bill Clinton was accused of only B with one intern, and they found the evidence on a dress. Considering the large number of women making allega…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:51 PM
2

I am wondering if there is any evidence, or merely unsubstantiated allegations. All we've heard thus far is merely the latter.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:53 PM
-1

It is incorrect to apologize for doing that which is morally right to do. Do you think that the abolitionists should apologize for fighting against slavery? NAY!
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:05 PM
0

You are trying to argue a false premise, that women are the owners of the media used in revenge porn. I say to the contrary, the men filming it are more likely to use their own cameras, cellphones and other type of media collection devices capturing said "performance".
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:03 PM
0

"most"? I don't think so. Instead, video productions where the women clearly consent, and the men are the copyright owners, filming it on their cellphones.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:42 PM
2

I'm hoping SUNY gets sued for billions when the next group of men victimized by fake rape allegations goes after them for everything they are worth.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:40 PM
2

You fail at file format forensics. Please stop while you are ahead.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:34 PM
3

There is no sexual assault involved in media distribution. You're watering down definitions to make a weak argument more catchy. Next thing you'll do is claim it is some type of "rape".
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:30 PM
2

It isn't murky at all. You are whiteknighting this shit.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:26 PM
0

There is no grey area about it. Someone is the owner of the copyrighted media, and someone consented to be in the media.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:25 PM
0

Show me a license that a man signed when he received porn from a woman? Better yet, he most likely is the owner of the content. She merely consented to be filmed or photographed.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:24 PM
33

Attribution behind postings is near impossible. If you consent to someone producing media with you, trying to retroactively remove that consent is crazy.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 01:47 PM
0

If the politicians focused on Male issues, I can just imagine the false charges of misogyny. However, focusing on one gender only is really discriminatory.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:24 AM
0

Sexist, racist journalist activists are keen on attempting to trick people by dissuading readers that a meritocracy exists, and that behind every pay imbalance is an evil white man (patriarchy) intent on financial exploitation. However, the one woman that qualified to be in the top tier equaled in salary the overall CEO. An inconvenient fact if there ever was one.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:19 AM
0

Before you get active in a sub you should lurk awhile, Google is your friend. Men don't get 52 weeks automatically, they actually lost 26 weeks, and only have it granted at the mercy of a woman. However, the leave pool is shared between the two of them. I know of no woman that intends to give up her maternity leave to give it all (52 weeks) to a man. In the case of an unmarried couple, she is much more likely to keep all the leave for herself since there are less likely to be strong financial ti…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 03:25 AM
3

You are correct, this is bad news for men. Once again, Men are a utility to be plundered and exploited for the benefit of the almighty women!
/r/MensRights01/12/14 11:14 PM
5

You actually tried to use NAWALT on me???? Men don't get as much leave as they want, they get the leave a woman grants to them, if she decides to grant it to them after their initial two weeks of paternity leave are granted. Additional Paternity Leave (26 weeks) is now gone. Zilch, Nada. That leave has been transferred to women. In other words: Previously, men had 2 weeks of paternity leave, plus 26 weeks of Additional Paternity Leave if they qualified. Now, women will take the man's 26 weeks of…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 10:51 PM
9

The fine print reveals how bad this is for men, and you have a misleading title on it. It extracts leave from men to give it to women, granting her ALL the Additional Paternity Leave. http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=4911 Shared parental leave and pay Key points Employed mothers will continue to be entitled to 52 weeks of Maternity Leave and 39 weeks of statutory maternity pay or maternity allowance. If they choose to do so, an eligible mother can end her maternity leave early and, wi…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 09:17 PM
1

I am not a MGTOW, nor have I ever claimed to be. Barbarossa, Stardusk, Sandman and others leading the youtube MGTOW movement are hardly "insecure newbie MGTOWs"
/r/MensRights01/12/14 09:06 PM
6

Thanks for this crappy story Slate. I'm already quite accomplished in the kitchen and have extensive experience with laundry and cleaning. Those are not pressing issues we should be concerned about. Pressing issues for men are the following: Victimization via the legal system and family court Bias against men from police Male Genital Mutilation (Circumcision) Paternity fraud Lifetime Alimony Indentured servitude via Militaries / Male disposability A biased media pushing an anti-male narrative Fa…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 07:54 PM
0

There is no requirement to address every single point someone makes on the internet.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:22 AM
16

There are two tragedies in this story. First, a woman attempted to exploit the law in what was clearly a consensual relationship, likely in an attempt to extort money or attention. By doing so she victimized an innocent man, and he is now scarred, perhaps permanently. Second, when her fraud was discovered and she was undone she committed suicide I'd like to think this was some type of cosmic justice, but it wasn't. Two people with excellent futures ahead of them are now destroyed: one socially o…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:58 AM
0

Although well-written, MGTOW has changed substantially since that time (2001). MGTOW is now men that are not in permanent relationships with women (married). The website you linked is a more apt description for MRAs, and we do not claim to be "MGTOW". Please keep in mind the duality of AWALT / NAWALT.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:52 AM
1

I never said I was the boss. I said there is a historical definition for MGTOW ~ a radical movement of men that refuse marriage. This definition is supported by numerous people in the community. Attempting to redefine this, and ideologically astroturfing is unfair, and wrong.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 11:16 PM
0

Would you prefer Wikipedia's Radfem slant instead?
/r/MensRights29/11/14 11:12 PM
0

I am happy to hear that justice was done, and she was convicted. The law should be gender neutral in application. We don't need bias!
/r/MensRights29/11/14 06:07 AM
4

A woman claims she was raped, regardless of how dubious the circumstances, and 10,000 RadFems, and a million whiteknights arise to defend her honor. A man, even a celebrity, receives no such benefit.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:47 PM
4

“In response to the growing problem of racial disparity due to the ongoing dehumanization of black men, actor and activist Nate Parker is setting out on a journey of investigation,” the campaign site said. “He will venture into black communities to speak to various stakeholders about the crisis facing these men. Through the examination of specific cases, Nate will create relevant and responsive discourse with the intention of mining strong and tangible solutions to combat this ever-growing crisi…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 05:38 AM
0

Keep in mind these false accusations of rape generically applied to the Men of India enabled the Indian push towards even more restrictive laws enshrining the deity of women.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:57 PM
0

Are these merely allegations or is there some supporting evidence? I don't see any in the article apart from the potentially self-inflicted marks on his face. I've also been questioning the veracity of allegations against Bill Cosby too, so don't label me anything other than a gender egalitarian that supports due process and a fair case
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:45 PM
12

We need payouts in the 10s of millions and hundreds of millions for these corrupt kangaroo courts of Academia to receive their comeuppance. Seriously, the US is resembling a banana republic more and more each day, as the gender activists assault our legal system and deny us our rights. Where is the JUSTICE?
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:34 AM
6

The story doesn't talk about any of the serious risks of marriage to a man's well being, and paints this rosy picture that is not true much of the time. A substantial amount of marriages end in divorce, alimony payouts, among other things. Consider your options men!
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:34 PM
9

Cash payouts from civil suits are a HUGE ULTERIOR MOTIVE not to mention the opportunity to DEMONIZE a conservative black man. So, I disagree with the author.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:16 PM
6

If women are free to invent false accusations against men 30, 40, 50 years after a supposed event and destroy the reputation of men, with no evidence whatsoever, what does that say about the state of America?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 04:25 PM
-3

Whether for racist reasons, or petty partisan reasons, the mass media is giving white men on the left a pass, while going after black men on the right with a furious vengeance....
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:02 AM
0

Do you know the terms of the settlements? If they were spurious rape allegations, and the defense would have cost 100k a pop, small settlements would be more financially wise than mounting an expensive legal defense.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 04:25 PM
1

This is not a left or right issue; we now have prodigious minds from the left joining our cause. This is a matter of Jurisprudence's fundamentals of Due Process found in the US Constitution.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 08:53 PM
1

In the past I thought I was a feminist, because being an egalitarian, I thought both sexes should have equal opportunity to careers based on their respective physical abilities. My friends that had househusbands had an equitable arrangement, by each gender, in their own relationship coming to an agreement based on their own personal preferences of who would have the career, and who would stay with the children. In time, I became wise to the fact that my egalitarian "Equal Opportunity" was fundam…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 08:26 PM
-3

The matter of opinion about evidence, or lack thereof, matters not at all. What matters is the legal opinion of a prosecutor, or an attorney about whether or not there is a case based on evidence. There is no evidence, it is only conjecture, and all we've heard are allegations from a source that is likely to make a huge profit, but could never convince the cops she had a case.... The US legal system is not the court of public opinion.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 11:24 PM
-6

A multitude of accusers' allegations lacking evidence is just as not credible as one: from a legal perspective it might as well not exist. Here is an example of an exonerated man, after he was falsely convicted of multiple rapes, with multiple false accusers. However, we are talking apples and oranges. There are no charges by any prosecutor against Mr. Cosby. There is no credible evidence against him. However, there may be gold-diggers attempting to earn a financial windfall.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:29 PM
2

All unsubstantiated rape allegations that lack evidence, and lack criminal prosecution should be treated as shakedowns, politically or attention motivated. If police aren't going after something, and attention hungry prosecutors can't find fault we should not be quick to believe the verity of allegations.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 04:41 PM
1

You are making a ton of conjecture and ignoring the definition. If there is no conviction, there is only the allegation of rape, nothing more, and nothing less.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:31 AM
23

Over a decade in prison based on false charges. Not sure how society can pay him back.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 01:21 AM
1

The premise of the US criminal justice system is "Innocent until proven guilty". A jury, with the support of a judge, can convict individuals and turns them into a "rapist" after prosecution. Trial by public opinion does not a rapist make, but if you think it does, I'll remind of you the Duke Lacrosse Case. As an example, I am going to make a point. It hasn't been proven that you are not a murderer. However, it saying that, I err as I have a burden of proof.. It is relatively important that we p…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:56 PM
2

I'm marking this as a false accusation, since it hasn't been proven in a court of law, and therefore is just an unfounded allegation with no evidence.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:09 PM
1

There are actually plenty of good reasons for a moderator to out herself as female. In our present society, members of a protected class are given the most free reign in criticizing members of their own protected class and calling them out. Her writing is an example of that and supports the case that despite the fact that she is a woman, she does not support the biased legal system. While rationally we know this should not be the case, and we should be free to criticize anyone, in our PC society…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/14 10:14 PM
5

Part II
/r/MensRights09/11/14 06:41 PM
1

I am a gender egalitarian. However, this man was both abuser and abusee.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 05:25 AM
5

Better not ever whistle for a taxi. You may be mistaken for a "harasser"
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:43 PM
27

This is an example of horrible racist, misandrist behavior
/r/MensRights03/11/14 05:24 PM
26

If Lena were a man, she would have been branded and assassinated by our media already
/r/MensRights02/11/14 04:09 PM
4

I like the narrative behind this story, however disgusting it is. 1st world women exploiting 3rd world women to get rich
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:53 PM
0

There is a story with a different angle that paints him in a much more negative light.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 01:20 AM
2

Although opposed to capital punishment since it disproportionally effects men, and poor men of color, I think the title should be changed to, "The Media's relentless obsession to vindicate Jodi Arias for cold-blooded murder".
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:36 PM
0

While the Gestapo DOJ goes after colleges, men on campus are losing our collective rights to due process at an alarming rate. Let there be no doubt that Obama & Holder are opposed to equal rights for men.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:31 PM
-1

What is missing from the discussion is how cheap birth control already is, or how it could be available Over the Counter, dramatically increasing availability. The author misses both of these points, as she wants the govt to control your money
/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:26 PM
-5

Female Privilege: You can bring a baby anywhere, and no one can mention anything about it. If you refuse to get a babysitter and bring your child to your formal place of work, and someone calls you on that - it is their fault. They are merely being anti-woman.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 09:54 PM
3

Half of your comments are about how the RadFems are right wing. I'm not sure if you are trolling, or just trying to make a point, but you are not making it very well. Therefore, I take an alternate position and will correct what I see as inaccuracies in what you wrote. Radical Feminism has an undisputed link to Marxism. While 1st wave feminists definitely included, and may have been dominated by traditionalists, the Radfems we are talking about these days are not traditionalists by any means, as…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 06:27 PM
6

Removal of men's rights to due process is plain and simple discrimination. Are we going to start walking back the Bill of Rights for men next?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:22 PM
-1

Why fuck with people's career choices in any way, shape, or form? Why try to incentivize women into male careers, and males into female careers? This stinks of social engineering. FUCK THAT SHIT
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:38 AM
0

I disagree. A pioneer woman is fully in line with Traditionalism. Weaker, but not lacking agency. Not passive, not defenseless, but protected by men. Traditionalism fully embraces rights, responsibility and duty, unlike Feminism. Traditionalism has strong gender roles. This is traditionalism. Imgur Radical Fucking whoever they want. Fucking for fun. Wearing promiscuous clothing. Drinking to excess. Getting abortions. Feminism fully embraces rights, while shirking responsibility and duty. This is…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:34 AM
0

Downvoting because of a false premise "we have to be traditionalists or modernists". Neither. We don't need a singular view. This can be progressive, conservative, libertarian, or many other -isms.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 03:28 AM
8

Slutwalk. Abortion. Promiscuity. Hard to see this as a traditionalist movement.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 03:25 AM
0

They stopped doing that. Please see the sub kotakuinaction for details about it.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 09:39 PM
1

I'll denounce the patriarchy after women denounce the matriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:54 AM
1

While I am against demonizing in theory, this guy is fully deserving the title of shitlord
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:51 AM
0

In the victimization olympics, of "who was oppressed more" men in canada have already won. No women were forced to their deaths, and genital mutilation has only recently became an issue. While thousands of men died in wars they didn't want, and hundreds of thousands were circumcised against their will. Your mention of oppression is a strawman, as women under traditionalism had it pretty good. Not as much choice? Sure, I will give you that. Forced to their deaths, and cut off the pecker parts? No…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 02:46 PM
4

From the comments, "Requiring that the child reporting abuse and being told the school was unaware then to sue or lose the right within three years makes no sense. Further, it rewards the school for both misleading victims and covering up. Essentially if the admin stonewalls for 3 years and intimidates victims, they earn immunity going forward once the scope or complicity is revealed. Why would any victim know to sue a school they attend and depend on, while being misled by that school as to its…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 05:44 AM
0

I already submitted evidence, or have you forgotten? Please, tell me you are not stooping to the Argument from Age, as my age has nothing to do with the correctness of my arguments, or the gaping holes in yours. Another subreddit describes your argument as very similar to this: Charge of Puerility (Code Green) – The Peter Pan Charge Discussion: The target is accused of being immature and/or irresponsible in some manner that reflects badly on his status as an adult male. Examples: “Grow up!” “You…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 04:52 AM
0

Good. I can continue to prove your movement as intellectually bankrupt. When you make weak arguments and fallacious as you've done today, to quote GWW, I'm going to be owning your shit Looking forward to doing it on a daily. #Sorrynotsorry
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:57 AM
0

Goodbye RadFem. Have fun back in AMR where you have already been posting.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:41 AM
0

You haven't refuted the idea that men were more oppressed than women. How many women were circumcised over Canada's history? How many Canadian women were forced to fight, and die in wars? Post your evidence, if you have any. Hah
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:16 AM
0

The issue you raised was about oppression, not feminism. You claimed women were oppressed. You posted evidence. Women had less rights then, as did many men. Women weren't being slaughtered wholesale in wars, and being forced to die. Women weren't having huge percentages of the populations' genitalia mutilated. Women had it pretty good with traditionalism. So, I am waiting for your oppression, since it seemed more oppressive to be a circumcised male forced to fight in bloody wars, than it did to …
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:05 AM
0

You have provided a number of claims, however, you neglected the opposite view, that of male rights. Furthermore, your evidence is seriously flawed as it conflicts with Canada's documentation of the same. Men in most cases did not have the right to vote in Canada. "the vote was a privilege reserved for a limited segment of the population – mainly affluent men. Eligibility was based on property ownership: to be eligible, an individual had to own property or assets of a specified value or pay a ce…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 02:44 AM
0

I am concerned about both as a gender egalitarian. If you haven't been paying attention I post on lots of topic relating to men dying I regularly post links dealing with male victimization across the world the hypocrisy of feminism in many countries with extensive coverage of male massacres circumcision and lots of other topics.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 01:08 AM
0

You are forgetting, we regularly, daily, talk about male utility and disposability across the world, particularly relating to war.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:56 AM
0

I have watched probably 20 of Molyneux's videos, and 20 of Thunderf00t's. I like both of their content but am skeptical about the former and latter's extremism in certain cases. However, there is nothing intrinsically wrong with the concept of cutting ties with one's family because they are toxic, incredibly criminal, or dangerous to one's well being. It is well-known that the State will seize custody of children who are in dangerous, or unhealthy circumstances and put them into foster homes in …
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:47 AM
0

Did you read the link I posted on the White Feather's usage in WW1? Not sure if this is a matter of you being unaware of history, or you just trolling. Appeal to ridicule doesn't work well in this sub; it is a fallacy after all. Good joke though!
/r/MensRights06/10/14 10:00 PM
1

The counterpoint to that is quite obvious: Historically, women have oppressed men. Women had men fight their wars Women shamed men that were unwilling to die for them e.g. white feather Women did not proportionally share in conflict Women lived a life of leisure based on male servitude Women now exploit false paternity to deprive men of resources, while preventing children from having relationships with their natural fathers, and endangering their health through disinformation. With the advent o…
/r/MensRights06/10/14 09:06 PM
0

You may not self-identify, however: You advocate that men are the cause of most oppression You further the idea of Patriarchy Saying you don't self-identify is a distinction without a difference. You're a RadFem even if you are not consciously aware of it. That explains why you try to inject yourself into a male space and alter the dialogue. This is also why one of the rare other RadFem posters on /MR is either your sockpuppet, or someone with whom you show a great affinity.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 03:49 PM
1

Be aware above commenter is a Radfem, and actively attempts to derail and alter discussions on gender egalitarianism I didn't like your post at all, since it basically ignores the horrible things that modern feminism is doing to men and women. Whether it is disrupting speeches, making bomb threats, colluding to hijack an industry (Gamergate) or attempting a takeover of an ideologoy (Atheism plus). In reading through your previous posts, I can understand why - you are clearly a RadFem. Here you t…
/r/MensRights06/10/14 12:09 PM
0

Any in particular?
/r/MensRights04/10/14 11:48 PM
0

What you wrote sounds more like talking points. You've made a claim of 3 million dead in Iraq because of American wars. Provide your evidence that it is 3 million. Noting that your numbers wildly conflict with multiple sources on Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 11:38 PM
0

It is commentary on feminism. We as gender egalitarians support the full enfranchisement of women and men in society without bias. SJWs have hijacked the narrative of conversation on the state of women from women in the world, to the 1st World Problem Special Privilege Crusade of the Fake Feminists<sup>TM</sup>
/r/MensRights04/10/14 08:27 PM
0

While white, privileged, relatively wealthy women live in the lap of luxury, afforded excesses of government money and freedom from selective service, women in 3rd world countries are suffering. As an egalitarian, this seriously concerns me.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 06:36 PM
0

The video. I think the author of the article got it wrong, and sees a boogeyman under every bed. The video is about a stalker's fantasies. No outcry when it comes to women stalking men though, or fantasizing. Only women. Sacred cow you know.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:52 AM
-2

Please post your evidence that shows no relationship between clothing, and sexual predators. I'm thinking there is mucho evidence to the contrary since many prostitutes are victims, and they often wear less clothing. This may be correlation without causation, or it could be pertinent.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:45 AM
-2

Agree completely. 1st wave equity feminists are in the gender egalitarianism camp. Not all of them have scintillating wit like Paglia though.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:53 AM
5

She is talking about cultural marxism & identity politics If you view the bad in our society in cultural rather than economic terms (Patriarchy theory+Western Civilization rather than Capitalism), then you would want to break the institutions of the Patriarchy+Western Civ in order to reshape them in a new form. Camille Paglia, like C.H. Sommers, is an equity feminist. They are natural allies for MR, because MR is actually gender egalitarianism, and that is synonymous with equity feminism.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 09:27 PM
5

She is using those descriptions for good reason. Radfems, and a biased legal system have so conflated the definition of rape in our culture that we now relate violent and murderous assaults to drunken hookups.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 07:53 PM
3

What did she say in the article that you contend is crazy?
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:56 PM
4

You are correct, only a small amount of men would ever contemplate rape, let alone the rape/murder she calls out in her article. It would have been better had she made that explicit, that only a tiny % of men rape, and those are serial offenders. However, I do think the article is valuable since it takes the focus off of drunken hookups (two people raping each other?) and onto the actual rare crimes that do occur.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:55 PM
3

Is this every citizen, or actually just men? "Privilege", got it!
/r/MensRights28/09/14 10:36 PM
-7

I just checked all the links, they are still working. Don't assign to another redditor a problem with your browser, or internet.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 10:07 PM
-9

Which is refuted by the evidence that women were part of the script, and signed onto it, in advance. This was part of a series. I've already posted the evidence, and you have not posted anything to the contrary. Where is your evidence to the contrary, that the women were not party to the prank video?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:44 PM
-6

It is more than that. SJWs are rallying to attack him, calling him a creep and a perv. It isn't that different a situation from the video made to describe the differences between when women attack men, and men attack women, and how bystanders get involved on the side of women, but rarely for men. This is an example of the internalized whiteknights, coming to the "rescue" of the poor defenseless women who were actually in on the whole thing. When this was posted here on /MR we've had a small brig…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:56 PM
-9

Stop with the SJW shaming language. Your source Laci Green is a SJW, 3rd wave feminist.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:36 PM
-5

Man makes a video about different standards for men and women pinching butts. An observer of the video calls the man a creep and a perv. 3rd party claims it is not shaming language??? Got it!
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:16 PM
-3

When bereft of logic, insult.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:13 PM
-6

There is no requirement to "perform research prior to posting links". I intentionally post controversial links from both RadFem, mainstream, egalitarian and MR sources. I'm laughing at your attempt at censorship.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:49 PM
-6

Good job ignoring what the women said under their own names. You are basically saying women cannot make up their own minds. The point still stands - he got SJWs in a tizzy over the prank.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:44 PM
-5

You are using RadFem shaming language "perv", "creep", "pressuring", etc. You are a sexist and likely not even aware of it.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:42 PM
-3

The point was advocating for men's rights, but that there is a double standard on this. You bought into the SJW mantra hook line and sinker. If this was a woman, there would be no controversy.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:40 PM
-6

You're using shaming language, and I don't think you are even aware of it. Women are fully capable of making rational decisions, if they don't want to do something, they'll say no.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:39 PM
15

You are missing the point. If someone is in jail without being indicted, then they haven't been convicted of actually committing a crime. It could just be a poorly substantiated allegation. Additionally, in the United States we have a right to a fair and speedy trial. Holding someone for a year is not a speedy trial and amounts to indefinite confinement. We are better than this!
/r/MensRights27/09/14 10:33 PM
-1

If a male teacher did this, he would have been crucified IRL.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 11:23 PM
3

I think it may have something to do with the fit woman bit. As you know, feminists are opposed to a healthful appearance with their advocating for dangerous fat-acceptance.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 10:57 PM
8

There is much truth in the title, but the author, Katie Mcdonough, mocks it instead. Bisciotti's statement " I spoke to the team and I said it is healthy to be paranoid. Every minute you’re out — when you’re getting showered, when you’re getting dressed — be paranoid. Say to yourself: tonight’s the night somebody is going to put me in a bad situation, or I’m going to [find] myself in [a bad situation]." is perfectly valid, particularly with the SJW media ready to crucify the next male athlete, w…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 09:33 PM
8

Note the biased premises: both men and women have ideal bodies in comics -female bodies look like distance athletes and aerobics instructors -male bodies look like bodybuilders generally Heroes of both sexes wore skintight spandex garb in the past, hence the Xmen joke when Wolverine first suited up. Spiderman and woman crawled on walls, and up them. The SJWs are attempting to have male heroes turned into women (e.g. Thor) We need to stop this bias from the SJWs They are colonizing comics now, gr…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 08:40 PM
0

So basically, you refuse to back up your claims. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:52 PM
4

4chan is not MRAs; 4chan are professional trolls. However, it sounds like a false flag operation by SRS or other Radfems.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:47 PM
0

I didn't miss what you said at all, I just totally disagree. Ideological purity and the perfect moral high-ground are not requirements for providing content. I asked you to provide content on your allegations against the author If you want to link something that the author posted and get my feedback on it, I'd be happy to do that. You have failed to provide any links for me to evaluate, and possibly condemn. Thus far you have just provided allegations with no evidence. You are making the claims,…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:32 PM
0

I'm the OP. Thanks for stating what I already stated. Regardless of the source, MR is not about liberal, or conservative. It is about basic human rights. In another age, this was called natural rights. I do not work for special privileges, for Republican, or Democrat. I work for the full enfranchisement of all peoples, regardless of sex, gender identity, ethnicity, preference, or religion.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:28 PM
1

This sound disgustingly medieval. I hope she gets a nice introduction to the criminal justice system for her barbarism.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 03:08 PM
0

The journalist in question works for a conservative site, and social conservatives take positions in favor of conservatism in our culture, they also support traditionalism a stance with which many take issue. Regardless of his writing on a specific topic, it does not discount the story. If you want to link something that the author posted and get my feedback on it, I'd be happy to do that. If I looked across media, I wouldn't be able to link anything because of some perceived shortcomings in the…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 03:06 PM
32

Regardless of the source, MR is not about liberal, or conservative. It is about basic human rights. In another age, this was called natural rights. I do not work for special privileges, for Republican, or Democrat. I work for the full enfranchisement of all peoples, regardless of sex, gender identity, ethnicity, preference, or religion.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:49 AM
17

I thought at first it was the reactionaries. Apparently, I was very, very wrong.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:00 AM
0

I think this explains much of what we see in Radfems, how Radfems want to enter male spaces, and why feminine women do not concur with Radfems in general.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:31 AM
0

The SJW tweets are ghastly. How can anyone have a problem with a baby boy?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 11:44 AM
12

The god of our age, woman, seeks to ascend to the heights of power and deny basic rights to life. This is a great example of how feminism is against natural rights. "Your right to life? I'll take that!"
/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:13 PM
5

Reprogram men? What about reprogramming women? This sounds batshit crazy!
/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:05 PM
8

This author clearly has a bias against men. Of course men are negatively effected by the nude exposures. The difference being that most of society is not sympathetic to the plight of men. Furthermore, for a few stars of both genders, nude exposures has helped propel their celebrity status. This shows poor scholarship on the part of the author. I'm not surprised, as SJW attitudes and poor research go hand in hand.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 01:35 PM
0

Yes, race makes a difference. The video of Solange attacking Jay-Z made a successful prosecution effectively a fait accompli, a literal slam-dunk. Why then was nothing done, and no interviews even of the effected parties? The last study I read on it showed that gender made the most difference, but race was also impacting of prosecutions. If men of color are over zealously prosecuted by the law, or sentenced more harshly, it is logical that when these same men of color are victimized, their assai…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 09:57 PM
2

I was happy to see the crowd's negative reaction to that crazy Radfem.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:42 PM
26

This is disgusting. I'm not sure how anyone can think domestic violence is funny, regardless of the sexes/genders involved!
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:51 PM
0

I'm not, I made a faux pas after reading the transcript and first part of the video Fortunately you caught it and I reposted it with a better headline. Thanks!
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:27 PM
0

VICE receives traffic from MR
/r/MensRights08/09/14 03:51 PM
0

actually, this was editorializing, not trying to use the flair system
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:55 PM
1

I am an egalitarian and believe in equal opportunity and equal responsibilities, and always use this as a starting ground for conversations. I believe in this, and think this is the best path, regardless of race, sex, gender identity, preference, religion, etc. That does not mean equal outcomes though, and I clarify the distinctions. From a conversational approach, I ask a few questions: Should only men be forced into military service? Is it fair that we deny men relationships with their actual …
/r/MensRights08/09/14 12:21 AM
19

Lack of individual freedoms, traditionalist culture, Texas
/r/MensRights08/09/14 12:07 AM
22

Enforcing hair standards on boys but not on girls is such a crock of BS.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:22 PM
16

There are many reasons why a man would want to wear makeup, to include identity reasons, severe acne, scarring, or other cosmetic reasons. If a woman gets to wear makeup for her driver's license photos, why can't a man also?
/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:19 PM
-1

neither party can give consent to sex while intoxicated, or both can.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 06:43 PM
-2

he was drunk, it was mutual rape.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 05:45 PM
-5

James didn’t contest the allegations. But according to IOA, there were mitigating factors to the case, for example James’ own intoxication, his clean disciplinary record and the fact that they’d had sex before.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 05:21 PM
-2

The other side of the story: She got him drunk and raped him. He is the victim, she is the rapist.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:53 PM
0

Please be aware of the general flaws Radfems and bogus researchers use when coming up with fake & flawed statistics on rape: (1) redefine rape (kissing etc) (2) Lack of equivalent male statistics (3) made to penetrate trickery (4) whitewashing female rape (5) using crappy studies with high error rates / sampling bias (6) anti-male bias; charging a drunk hookup as a male only crime, when both are drunk.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:07 PM
6

That is true, many women have unconditional love for their offspring, but not all.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:06 PM
0

Roosh is one of the most prominent TRP authors, responsible for the website Return of Kings Wikipedia's article on him is less friendly, identifying Roosh as a misogynist for his series of seduction guides.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 01:47 PM
5

The $4,400 extra? We call that the penis surcharge
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:28 AM
0

You are not guilty, but we are going to punish you anyways.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:22 AM
0

It isn't anti-male? I am forced to sign up for selective service Family members forced to fight in wars Men forced to pay for children not their own Huge divorce payouts and lifetime alimony Get real, society is anti-male.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:07 AM
0

RaxL is making a horrible analogy that is good for cars, and startups, and fails when applied to humans.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:01 AM
0

She may be punished, since this involves a female victim
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:01 PM
-1

downvoting RaxL for being a condescending shit.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 05:31 PM
1

When there are numerous commenters posting about the upcoming prison rape of now convicted felon, former governor Bob Mcdonnell, there is something wrong. No one should be raped (period) Viewing rape as a part of a sentence, or something funny because it involves a man is disgusting. Rape of both sexes is abhorrent. I would never wish my worst enemy to be raped. It is an affront to human dignity whether the victim is a woman or a man!
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:13 PM
0

When there are numerous commenters posting about the upcoming prison rape of now convicted felon, former governor Mcdonnell, there is something wrong. No one should be raped (period). Viewing rape as a part of a sentence, or something funny because it involves a man is disgusting. Rape of both sexes is disgusting. I would never wish my worst enemy to be raped. It is an affront to human dignity whether the victim is a woman or a man!
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:09 PM
0

You are making a grand assumption that a woman would have been abused just as badly. This is an example of concern trolling. MR also comments greatly on feminism, and we have no intention of stopping because it is a sexist movement. You are a drive-by poster that makes some inferior posts, gets called out on them, backtracks, and basically tries to shift the narrative. Not sure how this "dog bites man" story relates to mens rights. Earlier you said it was an everyday occurrence, "dog bites man" …
/r/MensRights05/09/14 03:08 PM
0

Keep on concern trolling, while you backpedal, and try to the change the narrative. SJWs attacking men is an MR issue, particularly when the SJW then sues the victims. You should be ashamed of yourself for saying this is not a MR issue, as this is the most evident form of concern trolling. If it was a man attacking a woman there would be a huge public outcry, all the major news articles would want a piece. But because it is a man being abused, they don't care. Nor do you. You try to raise the ba…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 02:20 PM
0

You are concern trolling. Your first response was that this is an everyday activity. WAIT! A SJW attacking men, saying a bunch of SJW shit, then being arrested, getting filmed, and the film going viral, then the SJW's mom suing about the film is an everyday occurrence?
/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:28 AM
2

There are thousands of men being executed as a part of the ISIS takeover in Iraq/Syria. A shining example of disposable males; a tragedy
/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:16 AM
-1

This is actually a concern since many male careers are in and around the water. Divers, fishermen, sailors, etc.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:03 AM
2

The topic at hand is not what the victims were protesting against, or for. The topic is: an SJW attacked people (men), it was filmed, film went viral, and the SJW mother is now suing over it. Can't you stay on topic?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 07:12 PM
2

You did not provide any evidence that this occurrence is ordinary, yet you stated it was. Basically half of what you said has been hogwash, since this wasn't an everyday occurrence. You have no evidence, and your arguments are unsupported. Now, when challenged on it, you are going off topic and trying to change the subject. Not sure how this "dog bites man" story relates to mens rights. Stop concern trolling because you don't like that the topic includes pro-life The MR issue is the attack by th…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:47 PM
0

SJWs attacking people, the film of it going viral, and the SJW mother's suing people in court for filming it are everyday occurrences? You've made an extraordinary claim. Provide evidence
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:57 PM
-1

Downvoting; you didn't watch the videos The SJW was using language like "misogynist" and other things, assaulting men, and hitting people, while damaging property. If it was abortion or not, it would still be an issue, since she was breaking the law publicly while hurting people (men). There are many issues I disagree with and some I find reprehensible, but the right of people to peacefully protest should not be violated. When this video went viral, the mom who has no doubt been infecting the da…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 03:21 PM
0

I'm not sure why SRS is defending ISIS They really are sinking to new lows since ISIS opposes democracy, LGBT, SJW, freedom of religion, and human rights in general. Let us hear them explain away this one.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:02 AM
3

I'm not sure if you are either new, or you failed to do any research. Search Results http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=gay&restrict_sr=on There is a long history of MRA/egalitarian debate on the issue. More prominent posters and moderators even have stated that this is a men's rights issue as gay men are frequently victimized, attacked, and discriminated against. Furthermore, gay men are severely penalized by our biased tax system. A reminder We hold these truths to be self-evident, th…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:30 PM
5

Why is Michael Sam getting on a pro team a victory for men? Simply because there is discrimination regarding men's preferences that does not impact women nearly so severely. Gay men are often victims, while society fetishizes lesbians. Basically, it discriminates against men. The equality between the sexes is not there, and this makes it an egalitarian issue. While Michael Sam's personal choices are his own, we should view this as a positive step where men are fully enfranchised regardless of se…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:39 PM
0

Kotaku in action is not an MRA subreddit, but because they are opposed to SJW control of gaming sources, they are fighting for a good cause. Open discussion and debate should not be controlled by SJWs through their media henchmen!
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:17 AM
0

Not just false accusations, but false accusations resulting in convictions of innocent men. This is shameful for the American justice system!
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:00 AM
8

I am not MGTOW but you are reading MGTOW wrong. MGTOW is not eschewing flings, but only avoiding LTRs. MGTOW is not voluntary celibacy. In TRP terms, think of it as permanently spinning plates, and ditching them anytime they press for LTR.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 02:13 AM
9

Weddings are supposed to be about love, but because she has a negligible net worth, they are after their pound of flesh
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 02:08 AM
0

Many of us are MGTOW, MRA+, likely to get a prenup, TRP, or some other variant. If you are heading towards a marriage or LTR, it may be good to think about contractual options since no-fault is really a recipe for getting shafted. Consider carefully child support and alimony laws for each state too.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:49 AM
0

Men's Rights is an egalitarian movement and has no problem calling out sexual abuse regardless of the gender or race of perpetrator and victim. Each person has a right to be free from rape, man or woman, boy or girl. The RadFem SJW silence on this issue, and their enabling victimization is abhorrent and indicative of their political agenda. "Despite her desperate parents informing social services, she claims no action was taken"
/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:59 AM
0

Wikipedia disagrees with you. "Not including Social Security and Medicare, Congress allocated almost $717 billion in Federal funds in 2010 plus $210 billion was allocated in state funds ($927 billion total) for means tested welfare programs in the United States—later (after 2010) expenditures are unknown but higher.[3] As of 2011, the public social spending-to-GDP ratio in the United States was below the OECD average.[4] Total Social Security and Medicare expenditures in 2013 were $1.3 trillion,…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:26 PM
0

You are making a flawed argument of: A: there was a racist cop in Ferguson B: there wasn't a racist cop in Ferguson However, that is immaterial, since the discussion is not around whether or not A or B is true. Let me remind you, The topic is: C: Ferguson is "wringing ..revenue from black people and the poor" Therefore, the truth of A or B has little bearing on C. Because I am feeling particularly magnanimous today, I forgive your Red Herring.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 08:31 AM
0

men of color are the primary victims of Law Enforcement, it has everything to do with Men.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 08:05 AM
1

That is not hype. That is documented evidence of how the criminal justice system penalizes people, most of which are locals, of color. Please stop distracting from the subject at hand, as that is off topic. Asking whether or not the cop is a racist is a rabbit trail.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 08:03 AM
1

Wrong again. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrapment
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:49 AM
0

entrapment is not forcing you to do something illegal, it can be merely encouraging you to do something illegal. "go ahead, steal that car".
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:04 AM
0

Stop defending unlawful behavior. You're a fucking apologist for corrupt law enforcement and a racist court system. If you lock the doors, automatically causing someone to miss a court date, they get additional charges. Beyond unethical, that is evil and malicious.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:03 AM
1

That is almost the same as planting evidence. Basically no crime is treated as a crime. Why are you defending the court system when they do crooked shit?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:52 AM
2

Automatically stereotyping all people in Ferguson as "looters and rioters" is incorrect, rather a crude and immature response. There are some looters there, but how many are from there, vice imports, is a question. If Law Enforcement has been ripping off Men of Color, should they be happy at their exploitation then?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:41 AM
-2

Hope the big words were not too much the turn off for a small mind :)
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:37 AM
1

Downvoting for no evidence. I'm a libertarian but will respond with evidence. http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/report-us-spent-37-trillion-welfare-over-last-5-years_764582.html http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/us_welfare_spending_40.html http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/18/report-welfare-governments-single-largest-budget-item-in-fy-2011-at-approx-1-03-trillion/http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/commentary/item/13460-enough-spent-on-welfare-in-2011-to-give-every-poor-household-nearly-$6000…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:01 AM
2

It is weird, but the idea that treat both men and women equally is now considered to be a strange idea by some. Some people want special privileges.....
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:05 AM
3

Why is this an MRA issue? Destroying families is tied to the criminalization of men of color. The primary victims of that familial destruction were the black men carted off to prison, and the generation that grew up without fathers, causing a negative cycle.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:55 AM
8

If this is mainly hurting men (which it is) and we know the legal system is biased against men (which it is) and particularly men of color (which it is) then it is definitely a men's rights issue. If there is an issue that is a men's rights issue 50% and a race issue 50%, it doesn't automatically stop being a men's rights issue. Considering you are new around here, you should try and get a feel for the subreddit before you try to tell people what is and isn't good content for this subreddit. Unl…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:08 AM
4

"According to the report, the Ferguson Municipal Court often starts hearing cases a half-hour before the official scheduled start time, and locks the doors five minutes after the court officially opens. Those who miss their hearing can then be charged with failing to appear, while missing court flat-out will likely result in an arrest warrant." That sounds like entrapment.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:19 AM
0

Cheerleaders are not employees of the NFL Generally, they are independent contractors. You cannot impact these contracts unless you mod them (requiring approval from both sides), or execute a new contract. So this only impacts men.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:32 PM
5

Hey, I'm going to go to school and assault a little boy for bullying my daughter and get off scot free Welcome to the Pussypass!
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:49 AM
1

Women, at home, chilling like villains. Men, getting stripped and executed in the desert. "Women have always been the primary victims of war" -Hillary Rodham Clinton
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:33 AM
0

So, if the outcome of a set of policies in effect discriminates against men, are you fine with that? Just asking, since that is the result.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:26 AM
0

So basically, this is 99.99% targeted at men then. Best to leave this to the criminal justice system.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:16 AM
-1

So, you are agreeing that this is targeted at men only
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:23 AM
-1

Ray Rice's wife abused him. Yet, he is being used as the poster child for "abuse" because he responded to her abuse and defended himself.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:47 AM
2

Yet another article written from a SJW perspective. Notice how we are demonized, and SRS are heroes. What a load of BS
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:01 AM
4

If he started a fight, or did something rash, would that show mastery of himself, and social situations? No, it definitely would not. The OP isn't claiming to have been all that early on, but realizes that, in spite of everything, he has come out way better in these trades. Fundamentally, there is a question at hand: Is it more TRP to take as your lover a 40 year divorcee with kids, or to a young, beautiful woman?
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:13 AM
3

You are making an appeal to generalization, and you have provided no data. Provide evidence that men are currently enjoying a "healthy, pleasurable sex life" as if circumcision had no impact. I will provide evidence to the contrary, but you are still responsible to provide evidence. First of all, men die from it: Julius Katzenstein: 8-days-old, bled to death after circumcision, 14 December 1856, New York, NY, USA. Myer Jacob Levy: 8-days-old, bled to death after circumcision, 18 April 1858, New …
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:00 AM
4

AVFM is making serious allegations about the veracity of a story, that the NY Times reported version may include false information and/or plagiarism. We need to have these questions answered, and to determine if the NY Times has invented a fake story, or, is recounting a false story. Alternatively, they have other information and the NY Times is reporting more accurately. Let us explore these alternatives and let the NY Times start to share more detail in a well-sourced story. Or a fabrication, …
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:36 AM
-1

Here is a sentence for a man, same state. http://articles.herald-mail.com/2008-10-02/news/25054432_1_squirrel-hunting-trial-term-murder The difference being they threw on the extra charges for a man.
/r/PussyPass23/08/14 08:42 PM
0

The house was part of the settlement. It explains why she is so wealthy despite her income.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:03 PM
1

Boys are sexually abused too. It happens to both sexes.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:54 PM
1

Disagree. When a man that worked for 40 years has almost everything he owned taken from him, rape is the most apt word.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 08:31 PM
0

What you said about the appendix is both unscientific and medically incorrect, as we now know about the Appendix's function. That weak an argument may float in /r/atheism but it will not float here. It has every relevance to state sponsoring of murder, just as the practice of medicine has had prohibitions against abortion. You do know about the original hippocratic oath, right? The issue is quite simple. For a government to authorize the execution of helpless infants (born or unborn) is not radi…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:17 AM
1

Flawed argument. Someone that is brain-dead is still a person. The state of their awareness has nothing to do with personhood. An unborn infant may actually have a greater chance of awareness than someone that has lost much of their brain to damage and will never recover. However, I'd like to thank you for making an argument that could be equally construed as supporting non-consensual euthanasia. I've said many times that those supporting abortion (killing infants) would be likely to support cap…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:10 AM
2

You claimed they are a parasite. I claim instead it is symbiosis, mutualism or commensalism as both mother and child receive benefits. Definitions of parasite applicable: 2 : an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism 3 : something that resembles a biological parasite in dependence on something else for existence or support without making a useful or adequate return There are numerous health benefits associated with childbirth, foremost of which are the reduction in variou…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 09:11 PM
-10

Many women agree they should be able to terminate with extreme prejudice that mass of tissue they claim is a parasite. In previous times, we called this infanticide. I still do. I say it is a living person, and that the protections we grant to the greatest of us we should also grant to the weakest, extending to the unborn, convicts, etc. Say no to state sponsored execution of any type!
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:14 PM
0

How would the mass media respond to a fundraising committee dedicated to getting money for men only? This is discriminatory!
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:47 PM
5

"a new offence of “domestic abuse” designed to criminalise men who bully, deny money to their partners or cause psychological harm" Cripes! There goes the budget
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:08 PM
1

great husbands Emotionally sensitive & servile Beta bux!
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 04:28 AM
-1

Please stop trying to demonize other men because you disagree with them. There are many redditors that are simultaneously on MR and TRP TRP, just like MR, has a mix of redditors. Some are traditional, some aren't. Some MRAs are traditional too, some are MGTOW, some are MRA+, and some are merely cautious. To jump to the conclusion that TRP is traditionalist is not merely incorrect, it is totally erroneous.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 10:31 PM
3

Paying out alimony + knowing you have MS and won't be able to book gigs in the future + experiencing severe financial stress already = enough to kill a man
/r/MensRights17/08/14 10:21 PM
0

She throwing herself out of the moving car really shows how crazy she is. It is a miscarriage of justice that the police never investigated sufficiently to see this.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 08:06 PM
0

You can be a "tough guy" and huge movie star, and still be a victim.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:03 AM
16

suspended sentence for a repeat offender that regularly assaults people? Crazy!
/r/MensRights15/08/14 11:49 PM
2

This subreddit is heavily brigaded by SRS and AMR, and recently it has became even worse. As SRS and AMR are mass downvoting content, in particular linked content, they are skewing our results.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 12:23 PM
-1

So, if a "Redpill" author makes a great MR point, you are going to downvote on principle? And what for that matter is "Redpill" anyways? I heard are quite a few definitions for it. However, your approach sounds both dogmatic and pedantic, as if you are overly attached to a label of sorts. By the same, some of our strongest advocates in MR are considered Feminists, e.g. Christina Hoff Somers author of http://www.amazon.com/Who-Stole-Feminism-Women-Betrayed/dp/0684801566
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:26 AM
0

How many times have writers called for women to be sent to prison until they are dead?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:00 AM
6

Not sure if a troll, or an idiot. Intelligence and nutrition have correlation
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:52 AM
2

More million dollar payouts are needed to rectify this situation of innocent men being framed by dirty cops. We need to starve the prison system of funds!
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:46 AM
2

I hope that man receives a 7 figure payout in exchange for those 25 years
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:43 AM
8

I'd actually argue things are getting worse for black men, with the destruction of the nuclear black family, and the loss of jobs.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:19 AM
4

Strangely, in all but one case, it was all the guy's fault. I'm wondering now, if that is the case in the 70% of divorces or more that women initiate. How is that for egalitarianism?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:25 PM
0

This is by far the best analysis yet on Robin Williams' life from a MR perspective. Kudos Stephan!
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:35 PM
0

Robin Williams was a famous man, and a star, and had his flaws. The gynocratic family court took him for 20 - 30m dollars, with lifetime alimony obligations of over a million a year. 50k a month in alimony to one ex-wife alone! These demands for cash contributed to his depression by making him take roles he didn't want, and forced him to liquidate assets. I care about victims, male and female. He was one.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:31 PM
0

Example 1: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2dgkxy/robin_williams_killed_by_exwives_unfair_alimony/cjp9tm4 SRS AMR poster
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:56 PM
-3

I'm not sure about being driven to suicide, but going to take a stab at reading the tea leaves differently. He had to pay 50k a month in alimony for one marriage, and a profit sharing percentage close to that for another. His 3rd marriage was on the rocks, sleeping in different beds, etc. He starts to think that he is likely to get divorced AGAIN, lose another 10-20m he was already liquidating, then add another 50k a month spousal maintenance. That is sufficient reason for suicide.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:51 PM
-1

The data about his "serious financial issues" were already in the press, along with the potential for his having to lose his homes.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:15 PM
6

I have complained to the admins about it now. It appears to be the usual suspects in AMR and SRS.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:00 PM
1

If you destroy someone's life work and cripple them financially, or use false accusations to put someone behind bars for 20 years leading them to get raped on the daily, there is more than one person responsible.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:16 AM
10

he was facing bankruptcy. That is far more than simple "financial troubles".
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:14 AM
-4

Journalists are uncovering the truth now. Robin Williams was financially shattered by the divorce settlements with his ex-wives and was facing bankruptcy. He truly was a victim of our horribly biased legal system.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:06 AM
3

The truth is now out; he was facing bankruptcy. Your post could not be more wrong.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:59 AM
0

Remember, he "exclusively advises affluent women".. "on the most advantageous way to divide marital assets, compute alimony and negotiate more favorable settlements" This is the same slavemaster that spoke out against ending lifetime alimony laws, and is struggling against alimony reform.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:12 PM
18

If that is true, and he was so well off, why did his friend say, "“All he could talk about were serious money troubles. There were clearly other issues going on and Robin sounded distant during the telephone conversation. Robin was known for being so generous to his friends and family during the height of his success, and would help anyone out that needed it. There was also frustration that Robin expressed at having to take television and movie roles he didn’t want to take, but had to for the pa…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:01 PM
78

Robin Williams was a great comedian, but also the victim of a biased legal system.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:45 PM
0

Looks like knowledge of the false rape accusation nightmare is finally hitting the mainstream
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:58 AM
2

Does a joint account make sense? Not really. Too much opportunity for abuse. It enables her to think your assets are her assets. That is dangerous! If things go south, she will raid your joint account, and any other shared asset she can take, and the law will most likely let her. Keep your assets separate. Think seriously before you do anything that can damage your rights to independence. Acts that have SERIOUS legal consequences: Letting her move in with you Sharing an account with her Letting …
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:43 AM
0

An untold waste of law enforcement resources, both FBI and local authorities... Not unlike a false accusation of another sort.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:30 AM
5

She said he was only hurt to an extent. Never did she explain that this was rape, an abuse of authority. She told it as a love story that was merely slightly incorrect. In her words, "an affair".
/r/MensRights10/08/14 02:47 PM
10

NPR is a citadel of feminist dogma; practically as bad as Salon or Jezebel
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:47 PM
0

As a male CEO, I have been asked what kind of car I drive and what type of music I like, but never how I balance the demands of being both a dad and a CEO. The most important part of the article. Male utility is all around us, and we rarely ever notice it.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:40 PM
4

The question I have with infants, is simply, what are their rights? There is no doubt that unborn infants are the most defenseless citizens we have, except maybe convicted felons may be very close. As ~50% of the victims are male, I do think it is an MRA issue and no doubt I will be convicted of conflating issues and downvoted by the authoritarians of murderous intent. I believe every human being has a right to life and that right should not be abridged by others with power over them, whether th…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:48 PM
3

Victim blaming redefined
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:29 PM
2

The issue I am raising is spousal abuse includes male victims.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:27 PM
-1

Basically, fuck men!
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:39 AM
3

I'm hoping the DoJ loses this one. Based on below evidence, I think they will. “The Pennsylvania State Police is committed to hiring the best qualified applicants regardless of gender — every applicant must be physically prepared to perform the duties of a trooper,” the department said in a statement. The Physical Readiness Test “was developed and validated by an independent party after performing a job task analysis, defining tasks that required physical abilities to perform them, and defining …
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:39 PM
1

She basically has no expenses whatsoever! Lives at home: Check On parent's health plan: Check It is very clear that she wants $2100 a month simply to generate income for herself, not for "child support"
/r/MensRights05/08/14 12:53 PM
5

"Women have always been the primary victims of war" -Hillary Rodham Clinton
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:14 AM
-1

Considering she lives at home and has minimal expenses, the "child support" is more likely going to be "Bristol's spending money". Not that the situation is that different from other mothers milking child support, but it isn't in every case that the mother is a stay at home mother with a wealthy family..
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:38 PM
2

They have shared custody. She didn't pay child support when she made bank, now she wants it. pretty simple
/r/MensRights04/08/14 01:19 AM
4

So, Bristol should have paid child support to Levi when she was making 6 figures. But she didn't. She still comes from an incredibly wealthy family. She sold a house for 175k in cash in May of 2012, then claims to be bankrupt basically 2 years later. Now she is living at home, once again a dependent of her mother. She has minimal expenses living at home. Why does she need 35% of his measly income?
/r/MensRights03/08/14 10:18 PM
5

Levi makes $62,000 a year, and has a family to support. Sarah Palin's last reported salary was a $1,000,000 a year from Fox News alone, not to count for speeches, and other income. Her husband previously was also making 6 figures too. I think this is a perfect example of a child support nightmare. A wealthy family that needs no assistance is seeking to plunder the wealth of a man that is already required for his growing family. After the alleged 35% that Bristol wants, he'd be left with 42k a ye…
/r/MensRights03/08/14 03:49 PM
2

Incredibly wealthy family yet seeking child support.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:12 AM
20

Modern day slavery
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:39 PM
1

Sounds like torture to me!
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:43 AM
2

Let's not make this which ethnicity is victimized most; we men can stick together, we face much of the same issues. All men are enslaved by the current tax system that serves redistributionist. Many ethnicities receive the brunt of our feminized culture, not just whites. "Evil White Menz" may be demonized more, but they don't experience the harsh end of law enforcement as do Men of Color. We're still brothers though.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:38 AM
14

No editor in America has the chutzpah to approve a headline "Our sex-obsessed culture is turning women into pigs" Why do we let a female writer, or any writer for that matter, so demonize us?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 10:52 PM
6

If there was a male politician saying he preferred "Rich women with tight vaginas, that never talks" there would be a colossal tsunami of outrage. I doubt anyone would dare defend such a fellow, let alone write editorials.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:56 AM
1

Actually, his punishment was more severe as he was initially dismissed from the team. Furthermore, booting someone from a team then doing an investigation afterwards is not due process. I am going to paste liberally from Wikipedia's article on Due Process. Background: Clause 39 of Magna Carta provided: No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 06:44 PM
0

For the sake of clarity, MRAs support the rights of gay men to adopt. We are against the sexual exploitation of boys.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 09:11 PM
0

Xnom, please stop trolling.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 08:43 PM
1

shit False Accusation happens
/r/MensRights15/07/14 05:39 PM
1

Remember, male privilege!
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:51 AM
1

This is a who pays question, not a civil liberty. The HobbyLobby decision does not prevent certain types of contraceptives, merely who pays for them is up in the air. Nothing in the HobbyLobby decision prevents you from paying to get these off plan items. However, the ability to practice your own religion is a civil liberty.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:48 PM
1

It is not "bullshit" and I disagree. A sole proprietor for a company can be the company from a legal perspective which explains part of the reason why lawyers encourage individuals to incorporate. I do not take an authoritarian approach to everything. The power of the market would enable competition between such companies. While there are muslim organizations in the US, there are also christian, jewish, and other faiths. I'm not in favor of dictating to them their personnel practices which infri…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:52 PM
1

A company held by one person is that individual's alone. A company can be synonymous with a person from a legal perspective here in the US. If you force one of these individually owned companies to do something, in effect, you are forcing the sole proprietor to do something, which violates that individual's religious freedom.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 02:05 PM
1

So, basically you are against religious freedoms of company owners (not publicly traded companies) Well, the SCOTUS didn't agree with you.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:57 PM
0

This has quite a lot to do with men and I will explain why. The overwhelming mainstream media narrative is "the war on women; women are oppressed, 77 cents per female dollar, women assaulted by men". This narrative feeds stories that are continually pushed and line up with this narrative. This provides ammo for Radfems. So, if they can create a fictitious story that lines up with the narrative that women are being discriminated against, they continue its perpetuation; a sort of snowball rolling …
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:36 PM
1

I made no statement about the morality of any of above, only the legality. It was intended to contrast. Under our current system, men have very limited amounts of choice. If a woman mugs you, harvests your sperm, impregnates herself (Rapes you), and bears a child, I have 100% confidence you will be responsible for child support. That is quite similar to what is happening with young boys.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:54 AM
7

If a woman aborts her baby it is legal. Her choice. If you abort her baby against her will, it is illegal because it violates her choice. You will be charged with murder. If you kill someone, with or against their will, you will be charged with murder. If you kill someone with assistance from the State in execution of your prison job, you will not be charged with anything, it is your choice. If you kill someone in defense of your State, attacking another State, you will not be charged with anyth…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:31 AM
11

That is a dangerous precedent; political opposition can then claim that having to walk around people (AKA anyone that disagree with them) is "disturbing the peace" and jail the protestors. It is important to consider both sides of an issue and not jump to an authoritarian response.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:21 AM
4

"free speech zones" are basically a way to silence opposition by controlling dissent.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:17 AM
6

Translation: I don't like what someone says. They are hateful & [insert pejorative term]. We need to silence them. Let's control their ability to communicate and keep them away. Why don't we give them a free speech zone, and put it far far away. Like Siberia.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:15 AM
6

The idea of dismissing someone's comments based on gender is the epitome of sexism. Thanks to RadFems for showing us true hypocrisy!
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:36 AM
1

Part II
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:55 AM
2

This is a great lesson on recovering from failure and potential
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 02:04 PM
1

Surrogacy exists both in the US, and overseas. In the US, it is alleged to run 120k or more. In other countries, it can be under 25k including the cost of the birth. That is hardly something that only the wealthy can afford particularly when you consider the cost of childbirth alone, here in the US.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:47 AM
1

This will damage gay couple's chances to have children, as well as men with the means to support a child, without a woman. While lesbian couples can easily procure sperm, obtaining a surrogate is not easy. Furthermore, many women in poor countries have incredible earning potential through surrogacy. The rich rewards they receive help lift them out of poverty and raise their standard of living.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:48 PM
13

I'm praying for a big lawsuit, and millions billions of dollars in payouts. Hurting their wallets can help create equality
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:30 AM
5

One of the best parts is early in the video when Paul Elam mentions the media's response, and how they ask biased questions when reporting, rather than inquiring about the numerous threats. If it was a Women's Rights movement being disrupted by Male Supremacists, imagine the media firestorm!
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:29 AM
8

We occasionally have the crackpots in here that promote anti-female attitudes. It seems we are pretty good at policing ourselves though, and we tend to rampantly down-vote such a thing. Women hating is not acceptable in our community. This is probably one of the most salient differentiators between us and Radfems ~ besides fighting for equality, we have love for the other sex. Radfems that call to kill all men don't.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:27 PM
0

The > 95% is the number that are men. Of the 300 though, all were false convictions though ~ correct according to the law, based on flawed evidence.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:17 PM
1

A direct video link in case Firefox doesn't show it
/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:49 PM
0

Going to disagree here. Part of the reason to have leave at all is to enable for father-child bonds to develop at a young age. Building a strong bond starts at infancy, and helps in a child's development. We men are more than just paychecks to sustain families!
/r/MensRights24/06/14 06:09 PM
11

Why not let people go into whatever fields they naturally want to go, instead of trying to artificially engineer a gender based % in every field?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 05:56 PM
0

There was an allegation made that he had an affair with some of these subordinates, and that these relationships happened over several years. Have you heard anything about some female military officers being tried for adultery yet? I haven't.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:32 PM
-1

You are missing the point. Cosmo advises on sexual strategy for women. TRP does it for men. You are calling out TRP optics yet you refuse to condemn Cosmo as equally bad. Therefore, I am making the case that you are sexist against men. You are giving a women's magazine a pass, and refusing to do the same with men. Now I think you are going to vacillate some more, but never say that Cosmo is just as bad as TRP. Not that they are, just you are that bigoted....against men. You might as well call it…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:02 AM
1

Some Radfems advocate killing all men. Sounds kinda similar to terrorism to me.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:06 AM
0

I am going to downvote you and I will explain why. You are making a blanket generalization and attempting to apply it to all members of a specific subreddit. Not all members of TRP support gender roles, just like some members of MR do. Neither automatically qualify all members as having the same beliefs. Many members of TRP have MR beliefs. I am most active in MR but also participate in TRP. Dicto simpliciter (spoken simply, i.e., sweeping generalization). This is the fallacy of making a sweepin…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:05 AM
-2

I heard that when you lack a viable argument, insults always work to grand effect, but what you are saying is actually sexist at the core. Your argument, distilled is this, "Women can have sexual strategies, men cannot". Please state again for the record what is wrong with men having sexual strategies the same as women? Here are some Cosmopolitan articles. http://www.cosmopolitan.co.uk/love-sex/sex-blog/how-to-land-a-rich-man http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/relationship-advice/train-boyfrie…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 11:20 PM
-3

Let us not delude ourselves. We are calling for men to have equal rights with women and for an end to sexist discrimination that harnesses male utility, and exploits it. This happens both at the personal level, and at national levels by the State. We already wear one of the biggest targets in a misandrist society. How much bigger a target can we get?
/r/MensRights21/06/14 11:16 PM
1

I don't remember abolitionists ever being told to stop fighting a war against slavery.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 11:11 PM
1

In many ways, I will give you that, it is Cosmo for men on Reddit. How many people are calling for us to hate Cosmo, and everything it stands for then?
/r/MensRights21/06/14 11:08 PM
1

This is a dialogue. Since TRP was being demonized here, I chose to defend it here. Why are you trying to shut down the conversation?
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:41 PM
2

There are a large number of trolls that would love nothing more than to remove any strategy from men. SRS Radfems bridgading Mensrights and TRP on a regular basis, we know all about this. However, when did exhorting your fellow man to be a better man become evil? How is it that women's magazines like cosmo frequently offer the same strategies, but when men do it we are "bad"? Don't fall for the weak attempts at thought control coming from the Radfems. Feminism is all about power - defining what …
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:37 PM
1

If the genders were reversed would you still think that?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:56 PM
3

No. Much of the discrimination and bias that happens against men is outrageous. If it happened to women, there would be nonstop media blitzes running it 24/7 for weeks on end. We need to highlight these issues and retain the flair.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:49 AM
1

The post is here though I don't think you did any research before spouting your misandry. It is quite simple ~ according to that misandrist law, a penis is required for rape. The worst a woman could possibly be charged with is "sexual violation"
/r/MensRights15/06/14 06:39 AM
1

The article was written by a news source. While I know you are a RadFem troll, at least be honest with the discussion.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 02:31 AM
3

The legal definition is now posted and what you posted isn't even accurate. It is Rape vs Sexual Violation.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:35 PM
3

Stop trying to change the subject.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:34 PM
8

The point isn't how many pushups you can do, or I can do. Being compared with those in elite military organizations isn't either. The issue is one of gender bias where a woman has a standard that is easy to achieve, and a man has a much more difficult standard.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:03 AM
2

So, you are saying abuse of boys by their caretakers is not an MRA issue? Uh, no. This is an MRA issue.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:10 AM
1

How much of a platform for her religion has Valeria obtained from her exotic looks? That isn't crazy, that is downright calculating
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 01:36 PM
2

A superior actor like Benedict Cumberbatch can get roles easy. While I appreciated his acting acumen in Sherlock Holmes and Star Trek, listening to this definitely increased my respect for him.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:26 PM
2

Keep in mind that trying to say this is only an issue for angry white straight men is an attempt to minimize the issue. The author's poor research obviously failed in turning up luminaries like TJ Sotomayor, or the fact that some of the most effective MRAs are women themselves.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:54 AM
3

Feminists were once concerned with equal opportunity. Now they want to vote themselves in special privileges, having us male helots work on the plantation for them. That is why feminism has become a dirty word and many people think it is now a non-issue.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:31 AM
1

By your logic, any felon convicted for the most grievous of crimes is a monster, and should be treated horribly. What about humanity and adhering to the Rule of Law?
/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:13 PM
1

This type of torture is illegal under the US constitution's 8th Amendment. No excuse for such barbarism in modern society, even for convicted felons. They are still people and deserving of humane treatment.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:26 AM
3

I think you are forgetting about the draft. The WW2, Korean War, and Vietnam vets were not all volunteers. Male utility at it's finest!
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:55 PM
1

There are a host of issues with this bill. Freedom of expression first and foremost. However, that has never stopped the SJW, and their allies in the ThoughtPolice
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:07 AM
1

War most definitely gives men a sense of purpose and energy. When we are getting drafted and forced into compulsory service (SLAVERY), it gets pretty serious. Male Slavery to serve the military machine is still a problem in 2014.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:35 AM
4

Important fact: almost all the nefarious individuals in her fake story were evilmenz
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:49 PM
2

Downvoting simply because Equal opportunity is not equal outcome In our life, we make decisions and those decisions have consequences. No one should be handed a plum position on a company board, or a congressional seat.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:07 AM
6

So, what you are saying is I can redefine any crime I choose if it has a male victim? Nice logic there buddy.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:16 PM
1

Power is a relative term. Due to the special protections granted to women, the immunity from the draft, biased legal penalties, inordinate financial rewards for marriage, biased convictions, and public opinion, I will say that women have more power than men. You never mentioned the equivalent to "keep your legs closed", where fathers with children via multiple women, or much success with women are demonized. Women, since the 60s, have had more power than men regarding reproduction. The power to …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:43 AM
1

I have read feminist subs on reddit and they appear to rarely police their own. Downvoting for inaccuracy, and an unrelated term that in no way proves, or disproves bigotry ~ Cunt.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:31 AM
7

I would not characterize TRP as opportunistic, but rather a different perspective on what drives female attraction. It is essentially amoral, merely information. What you do with it is what counts. You can view female equivalents everywhere, in magazines like Cosmopolitan with articles like: http://www.cosmopolitan.co.uk/love-sex/sex-blog/how-to-land-a-rich-man http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/relationship-advice/train-boyfriend http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/dating-advice/How-to-Be-a-…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:21 PM
4

“Since the president signed the bill, there is total confusion. The community members can’t distinguish between male rape and homosexuality. The confusion is due to lack of knowledge on male rape. People don’t believe male rape exists,” said Kabenga. Gay men shouldn't be discriminated against. Rape victims are not automatically gay, or "asking for it", regardless of whether male or female.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:42 AM
3

It is always men that are made out to be the pedophiles. That is BS
/r/MensRights10/05/14 01:50 PM
2

If she were a man, she would already have been described in ghastly terms as some ghoulish mass-murderer. Instead, the media only provides sympathy. Double standards!
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:48 AM
1

This is not very much different from a "creepy" moniker, and fake shock over a non-issue.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 10:20 PM
1

Her frame of reference was quite simply, stronger than his. She was the stoic, he was weak.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 07:52 PM
2

Remember, women are using the "abused spouse" defense with alarming frequency. The victim in this case was described as a mild and non-violent Swede, in spite of the attempted character assassination by the defense. Killing a man and getting away with it scot free via the fake abuse defense is the epitome of privilege
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:35 AM
4

This is not trivial. I'm wondering if she could get disbarred for something this misconduct.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:23 AM
2

In case you haven't been paying attention, these are the same arguments used against the MRM, by the same radicals. That is the same tone, tinged with equal parts of hysteria and insanity. And yes, that the same exact "Biting the hand that feeds".
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:18 AM
1

This is pretty weird as they look related... Even worse are the garish comments about castrating men
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:53 AM
-1

This is offensive, because it basically supports the idea that only men are abusers. Nothing could be further from the truth!
/r/MensRights05/04/14 05:23 AM
1

The story linked is not the actual story, but instead a question I pose to you. If a man did the same thing, via any other means, would he also have national magazines coming to his defense? If he assaulted an unborn infant via smoking crack around the mother, and forcing the mother to inhale the fumes, causing the child's death, would he not be found guilty and likely served up as another justly convicted man? C/d?
/r/MensRights28/03/14 02:17 AM
2

It is refreshing to see an article this balanced on the subject
/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:17 AM
16

Who do you think is typically killed? That is right, a man. This is a Men's Rights Issue.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:36 AM
6

While we know that people do heinous things, let's lay the blame where is should be - with the responsible parent!
/r/MensRights22/03/14 11:41 PM
1

Half of women's history month is fake, the other half fails to recognize women's contributions to society via parenting. A woman does not have to occupy a traditional male role in order to be noteworthy, but if you follow the mainstream media, that is the pernicious story they constantly ram down our throats.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 11:33 PM
20

We are in a frightening situation when police choose not to overpower a 95 year old man, and instead resort to tasers or beanbag guns.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 11:31 PM
6

"The most insidious power the media has, is the power to ignore", Unknown
/r/MensRights22/03/14 11:24 PM
8

That comment history is clear evidence of the realization that Feminism, and the fake aggrieved would-be censors are going too far. Victims turning equals, becoming oppressors...
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:15 AM
2

Deconstructed, your essay is a series of half-truths, inaccuracies, bias and victim-blaming. You are trying to control tone, and with your limited posting history, I believe you are either a troll, or a feminist sympathizer.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 08:36 PM
6

So, you can't get the video to load, which includes half the story, and then you say the headline is a lie. FAIL
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:23 PM
2

It bothered me greatly, seeing people being assaulted for sitting in a seat reserved for a specific gender.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:41 PM
10

The story included a video; from the Video in the story, "The plan, set up by Neumaier, was for them to rob a man she, whom she believed to be carrying a lot of cash". The Huffington Post story corroborates this version of events, "Efemia A. Neumaier has been charged with conspiracy to commit armed robbery after the man she was seeing discovered her Facebook messages to Thomas setting up the attack, the complaint says." She selected the target, planned the home invasion, and robbery. She is invo…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:31 PM
6

proxy violence is a horrible thing
/r/MensRights14/03/14 01:44 PM
7

After the marriage is over demands for your money will increase!
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 01:47 PM
3

Domestic abuse is domestic abuse, regardless of sex. Acting as if only one sex commits this crime is symptomatic of what is wrong with our society.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:34 PM
8

Huffington comPOST supports the abuse of men. Why: They ignore valid statistics on female on male violence They perpetuate fake and flawed statistics They sweep abuse of men under the rug They explain away mental abuse that women practice They perpetuate the fraud of Rape Culture, as if it is increasing Huffington comPOST is sexist, and misandrist company that deserves our boycott.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:01 AM
5

Change the sex. How often does the press clamor for the naked photos of a drugged up woman?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:06 AM
-1

He does not deserve to lose protection because he is a man. We don't see discussion around requests for photos of Lindsey Lohan's after her numerous arrests. That would be creepy...
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:05 AM
-1

How often do they propose to release this to the press, when it involves a naked woman?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:02 AM
-1

If it was a she instead of a he, imagine the outcry!
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:08 AM
2

This is not particularly good advice. Contract jobs can pay a particularly large premium over W2, in some cases, a 10% to 30% premium, or even higher via firm-fixed price contracts where you as the owner are the performer of the work. Sure, it can be feast or famine, but the rewards are much higher for a great performer
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 04:27 AM
1

It is 2014, not 2012.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 03:42 AM
1

the relationship was over a year. So, he was 16, or maybe 15 when it first started.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 11:06 PM
2

He was 16 when this started, and is under the age of consent in India.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:23 PM
0

Just look at the photo, and tell me you are not thinking about one of those slutwalks
/r/MensRights23/02/14 08:10 PM
15

here you can find her actual pay which is 58% higher.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:44 PM
0

Please refrain from making this an attack on Infowars. The truth of what was written is either accurate, or it isn't, regardless of the source. While Infowars does have a certain angle, so does CNN, ABC, NBC, along with Fox, or the DailyKOS. I see you are choosing not to argue the accuracy of it, but instead, to demonize the source because you dislike his politics, and the conspiracy slant.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:27 PM
0

Whether it came from Alex Jones or not, doesn't refute the information.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 07:06 PM
3

Please argue with science in another subreddit.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 02:21 AM
1

As many people know, there are numerous studies pointing out the relationship between lack of full-term pregnancies by the age of 24, abortion, and massively increased chance of breast cancer. This in part explains why growing rates for breast cancer is such a modern scourge, and aligns well with TRP. Many women with lower SMV are attempting to redefine fat as curvy, chubby as average, and skinny as anorexic. We must resist the promotion of unhealthy lifestyles!
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 01:14 AM
4

Personally, I'm surprised this statue hasn't been defaced yet. It is, after all, a symbol of the PATRIARCHY
/r/MensRights09/02/14 06:53 PM
3

Get your SJW trigger warning BS out of this subreddit Everyone knows it is a weak attempt at speech control.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 06:51 PM
4

Walking around in the snow, almost naked, in Winter? Get real!
/r/MensRights09/02/14 06:50 PM
15

Obese is > 30.0 in BMI for women. Many of the women in those photos meet that criteria. The comment stands.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 12:41 AM
8

Keep in mind that many of these women are attempting to push a new ideal, where obese, instead of athletic, is celebrated. This is an incredibly dangerous approach to health
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 11:12 PM
6

Is the real story about misplaced feminist outrage, or their intolerance for a vulnerable, defenseless man?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:52 PM
7

Before, when exposed to the story of Woody Allen, I am sorry to say I accepted a biased account of his "guilt" that was oftentimes stealthy antisemitism. It is only when reviewing more circumspectly the timeline, that I drew some different conclusions. Story one that reveals some of Mia Farrow's dangerous behavior Story two which includes a richer overall narrative Fully examining the story, and our legal system behooves us to provide to Mr. Allen the benefit of the doubt. Making a case in the p…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 10:59 PM
2

Jump right to the Hospital's Report
/r/MensRights06/02/14 06:26 PM
2

This is an example of the type of puff pieces we can see commonly from those with a left wing agenda. It lacks any type of rigorous examination of the facts.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:09 PM
2

You are making a giant, and incorrect assumption that I was posting there. Notifying a commercial site of a TOS violation is not harassment.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:20 AM
-1

Notifying Wordpress is not censorship. Wordpress was not designed to handle various hateful and abusive types of content, and they make it clear as such. If I was at a work function and someone was making vulgar racist or misogynistic comments, I would speak up against that, and escalate. This is the online version. Furthermore, if we never stand up against sexist content that victimizes men, then it will continue. I want future males to live in a more equal and fair society.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 05:58 AM
1

Please keep in mind that the infographic is missing the most obvious statistic - that it is mainly men in prison.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:35 AM
-2

That herd of whiteknights is fucking epic!
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 02:16 AM
0

With all the prison/jail rape occurrences, aren't men the majority victims of rape anyways in the US?
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:58 AM
1

I think you particularly see this with foreign accents, and the high SMV placed on the same by women. A good scottish, irish, english, australian or Kiwi accent can work to great advantage here in the US. However, this is completely contextual, since in their native countries it really doesn't matter much, and an American accent is attractive in particular countries.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 11:06 PM
0

This is beauty redefinition, e.g. crappy attempts at increasing SMV. Look, this beautiful curvy deserves a hawt muscle guy, guys just don't understand how gorgeous she is. Own that shit girl!
/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 10:18 PM
0

"we who are about to die salute you!"
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 11:47 PM
0

Insulin is right. Prolly a type 2 diabetic because she is a lard ass, not the other way around!
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 11:46 PM
2

It is also taking out the competition. Think how much easier it will be for 7s - 10s if they can convince chubby 1-6s to get even more fat!
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 11:45 PM
4

When the judicial system breaks down or over-penalizes, it hurts the overwhelming victims of the justice system - men. This is a Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:01 PM
14

I feel bad for the blue pill chumps that got taken for a ride, or rather, years of paychecks. Hypergamy is a beast!
/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 08:01 PM
6

The issue is not goodness or badness of what she did. The issue is that she lied publicly about it, and the media narrative of "strong independent woman conquers the world" is quite incorrect.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 06:02 PM
2

MRM is about double standards. A frequent discussion point is changing genders on a situation. It also includes much "Look at this outcome, & how horrible it is". Biased legal system, biased perception of men and women, male victimization, etc. TRP explains the why behind it, and how women have fundamentally reshaped many societies into what they think would be their paradise, but isn't in actuality. I don't think MRM is in any way, shape or form "us vs them". I see it as a stepping stone toward…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 11:49 PM
3

How many young women do you know at the peak of their attractiveness that meet the narcissistic tendencies pointed out in TFA? What happens when they hit the wall and can no longer command the attention?
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 06:43 PM
-1

modern society makes also it incredibly easy to get fit. There are gyms everywhere that are cheap, with great hours. Healthy food is an option at most establishments. Water is everywhere. Many employers help employees out with these things too. We choose to eat. We choose to exercise. Or not. Stop trying to duck the argument for personal responsibility and agency.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:00 AM
0

STOP with the SJWish my feelz, catering to the exception bullshit. Seriously, Mensrights is under cultural assault by the People's Liberation Fat Acceptance Front In almost all cases, the state of our bodies are up to ourselves. Diet, exercise, self-control, activity, etc. What really irks me is the "Lack of Agency" argument embedded into fat acceptance. As if we are not masters of our own destiny.... My fat ass genes enslaved me, they made me eat 500 extra calories a day so I gained a pound in …
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:53 AM
0

My Feelz!!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:50 AM
9

I hate when I read shit telling men how to behave, obviously written by women looking to milk a man of his time, money, and ego.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 08:01 PM
0

Parasitism is where a relationship where one organism harms another, or provides no benefit. There are numerous health benefits, social status, and personal fulfilment associated with full-term pregnancy for women, let alone the fact that the human species is a social animal in which the young care for old, and vice versa. The proper biological term for this is mutualism. Evidence of health benefits of childbirth are listed below: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.22001/pdf http://h…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:22 AM
1

She almost got off scot-free, if you count the 120 hours. Wow, this does not sound like justice.......
/r/MensRights01/01/14 07:08 AM
6

More than half the media is SJW tumblr types, willing to sell out for statist goals any chance they get.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:26 PM
1

I think a small cock is an issue, though not a huge one, no pun intended. Previously I dated an Italian girl. She put on her wall a picture of me in the shower that made it clear where I stood on the equipment perspective, and left it up there all the time. This is basically the equivalent of showing off a trophy. Her friends were significantly more flirty after that because they knew I wasn't hung like a tadpole & they could see I was in great shape. There are also many women that check out a g…
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 10:16 PM
2

bad genes basically! Do you want to invest your life-energy into a toxic cesspool, or into a thriving biosphere? Personally, I am more body focused than anything, so long as she doesn't look like a troll, or have some weird asymmetric face
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 09:13 PM
3

I think this is a great wake up call. Alpha fucks, beta bucks. Just due to the history involved, I'd make her start putting out all those things she should have been, then still dump her :)
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 09:10 PM
6

This is false. Not everyone is beautiful. There are ugly people and beautiful people.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 05:17 PM
17

This is physically lazy, dangerous and unhealthy. I'm disgusted!
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 05:29 AM
7

Here is a story on parents unable to pay child support forced into imprisonment as evidence. Of course, this mainly impacts men due to biased child support laws & custody granting.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 09:59 PM
10

There is no such thing as a "good redpill gf" that let some guys run a train on her then, but magically reformed now. A zebra does not suddenly become a horse. You either are, or you aren't. Getting a bunch of dicks doesn't automatically reform a woman. If she is trickling on something 16 years ago, my guess is she has lots more skeletons in that closet. If I was he, would be getting paternity tests for all those kids.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 11:31 PM
15

Notice the graph "Women Who Have More Non-Marital Sexual Partners Are Less Likely to Have Stable Marriages"? Very similar to other statistics we have seen - women that marry as virgin brides & do not cheat have very stable marriages.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 04:00 AM
2

There are a huge amount of fallacies in that blog post. Lie #1 - "You are attracted to people that can kill you (Imagine being exclusively attracted to grizzly bears.)" Rebuttal - Women can kill men too. Unfortunately, if they do it, they are more likely to get off scot-free. Where do you think the word "pussy-pass" came from? Lie #2 - "Almost your entire worth is based on the genetic beauty lottery." Rebuttal - ever heard of plastic surgery and creative makeup and the innumerable types of stoma…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 10:11 PM
3

I consume MRA, MRA+, MGTOW, and TRP media, among other things. See here for definitions Logically, I think MGTOW is the most risk-adverse, and TRP the most personally satisfying. There may actually be few distinctions a good match from an MRA+ perspective and that of a more TRP HB10 with a great personality and attitude. I think MGTOW appeals more to men that are playing it conservative with risk; some know what Game is, and care not to play it due to thinking the penalties too severe. TRP may a…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 05:22 AM
33

It is common knowledge that many female victims are sexually aroused during their own rapes, and can experience orgasm the same. However, that does not mean we'd then say rape did not occur. This is the difference between physiological responses, and consent. Men deserve the same. An erection, ejaculation, or orgasm is not consent whether the victim is male or female!
/r/MensRights22/12/13 01:59 AM
5

Add to that, the ability to extract child support $ from your rape victim. Next thing you know, these Teacher-rapists will be trying to extract alimony.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:03 PM
3

The point was already addressed previously. I don't feel the need to rehash every argument that was already addressed previously. I am raising a different objection to the use of abusive language by calling the previous Redditors idiots. The correct way to do that would be to say, "the comment was idiotic". However, the use of unusual language raised my curiosity, so I did search on the user's comment history. However, are you attempting to tell me that I cannot engage a redditor's lack of decor…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:26 PM
6

You are already on notice for negative posting & SRS posting. Let's stop while you are ahead and keep things positive!
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:47 PM
12

I noticed two things wrong with what you wrote - abusive attacks and poor sentence structure. It also appears http://www.reddit.com/user/kinderdemon you have significant SRS & SRS related commenting history. If you want to sway people to your point, I'd be more eloquent, and more civil. For now though, I am going to downvote you; having gone to the trouble to explain the why to you. Hopefully you can learn how to behave yourself better around here.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:46 PM
1

I raise this as an issue because, if the sexes were reversed and it was a female general, would she have been fired? No, I think not. She would have been described as "hard-charging" & in-touch with the troops.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:45 AM
-5

No doubt we try to treat foreign diplomats well. However, with the recent crackdown on diplomatic fraudsters, this happened. The kid gloves are coming off. In TFA you'll notice this paragraph, "In India, fear of public humiliation resonates strongly and heavy-handed treatment by the police is normally reserved for the poor. For an educated, middle-class woman to face public arrest and a strip search is almost unimaginable except in the most heinous crimes."
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:31 AM
3

MGTOW - Men Going Their Own Way - Basically men eschewing marriage. Proponents are Stardusk & Barbarossa There are a few different approaches towards relationships that we regularly discuss including: Bluepill - basically what most men do with women, no prenup, etc. Defensive - Adding the prenups to bluepill to make it more defensible for men. Practiced commonly by the wealthy MRA+ - selecting for high quality women with MRA leanings, egalitarian, espoused by Rocking Mr E. See http://www.youtube…
/r/MensRights16/12/13 12:31 AM
3

You are 100% correct. While I haven't chosen the MGTOW lifestyle for myself, there are very sound and logical reasons for men to protect ourselves this way.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:31 PM
1

Asking for equal rights is never chauvinism.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 12:48 AM
1

A shining example of traditionalismTM
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:56 PM
1

This reddit section is known for it's arbitrary censorship discretion and bigotry egalitarianism as well. So it goes both ways. Correction in process. And anyone thinking feminism is like communism in Russia just really doesn't understand politics. Feminism doesn't have that much power understands that feminism is now the System. If it did than women's reproductive rights wouldn't be undermined as it is all encompassing as they are now. Rapists Female rapists wouldn't go free. The Maryville boys…
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:55 PM
2

I asked you to post good statistics that fully included male victims of rape "made to penetrate" and inclusive of prisons/jails. You failed to do that. http://poisonedwell.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/less-than-20-living-women-have-been-raped/ I asked you to post good statistics comparing male and female income equalized for education, hours worked, and occupation. You failed to do that and instead posted an article from Wikipedia that jumps to a grand assumption that salary discrepancies are due to…
/r/MensRights13/12/13 03:43 AM
0

I like many of the things Cathy Young has to say and she is a gifted writer. However, I think she needs to have a more positive attitude towards AVFM, and also the MRM in general. Saying that MRAs are not egalitarian does not help our cause. One of our most common responses here in MensRights is to flip gender and ask questions. I think this is a great approach towards identifying bias whether about sentencing, convictions, or merely flawed perceptions.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 02:20 AM
13

I cannot concur with your statement, "men do have an easier time in the work force and we are not nearly as often victims of sexual crimes" On the topic of work force Please show your statistics that support this point, equalized for education, hours worked, occupation, and performance. I'd settle for the first three though. Additionally, show your statistics on sexual crimes victims that are fully inclusive of sexual assaults in jails and prisons and "made to penetrate".
/r/MensRights13/12/13 02:14 AM
0

Was the "good old days" marital rape, or a request for a return to traditionalism?
/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:30 AM
-1

Going to take that for a no.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:23 AM
1

Finally, a grand false assumption about motive. Nice going there buddy. I am merely shooting for awareness.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:15 AM
-1

Is a callout thread a call to censorship? Please stop with the false claims!
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:55 AM
8

Blame it on the PatriarchyTM
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:45 AM
-2

When you make up new links bashing them more, don't you think your banning is pretty germane to the discussion? Judging by your abusive attacks against me, telling me to eat a dick or whatever it is that you said, your conduct thus far does not strike me as polite conduct.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:43 AM
3

I particularly like your point about coercion. Social Justice Warriors are notorious for calling coercion rape. Get an overdue tax bill with a threat? Shit, the IRS is raping me bro!
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:38 AM
-2

Only one comment on AVFM? Are you sure you are being honest?
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:34 AM
-1

My claim "his posting". Your claim "which posts" He has more than one post preceding this that bashes AVFM & AVFM staff far before this set today. So, do your homework and look through his post history, or stop talking about it as if he is a saint that made one critique of AVFM. Additionally, he should have been much more forthcoming about his being banned from their forums and having an axe to grind. That is called "Full disclosure"
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:33 AM
1

Beyond a right, it can actually be a duty in abrahamic religion.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:22 AM
0

You are apparently not reading all of the posts in the discussion. I clearly stated this is not about criticism. By continuing to shift the discussion back as if this was merely about criticism, instead of a banned user with a chip on his soldier making a series of posts about AVFM raises other questions.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:13 AM
1

To be the radfems of MRA would require them to seek special privileges for men, privileges not granted to women. Please share where AVFM is advocating these "privileges" for men.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:59 AM
-5

Did you look through his post & comment history or not? I am assuming not, due to your response. Please share where in the article there is an endorsement of marital rape.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:55 AM
-2

The topic is not criticism. The topic is, continually attacking a friendly publication, coming from an uneducated source and making hyperbolic statements simultaneously. There is a vast chasm of difference between the two. Friends don't let friends use the false equality fallacy.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:34 AM
1

You are saying we need to be the first to bash AVFM? That we need to kowtow to the criticism of someone that is not even current with MRA thinking (disposability, utility, etc), or even to give them a platform for attacking our friends? No. MRA is not about inviting in people to attack MRA publications while making inflammatory posts, in repeated patterns. If a user wants to push an anti-AVFM platform, they can do it on SRS, another subreddit.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:30 AM
-6

You've been bashing AVFM quite a bit in your posts. "The friend of my enemy is my enemy." Ok then!
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:22 AM
1

I doubt MSNBC's advertisers would find this blatant misandry and racist behavior acceptable. We should boycott them!
/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:14 PM
1

The alleged accuser is named in the source article
/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:46 PM
2

The Bureau of Prisons stats are coming from http://www.bop.gov/news/quick.jsp
/r/MensRights08/12/13 03:37 PM
6

ShitRedditSays is the the name of it.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/13 02:27 AM
28

We have a huge amount of SRS fans
/r/TheRedPill06/12/13 01:27 AM
2

From TFA, "What’s more, most rapes, especially in college settings, take place long after things have gotten hot and heavy, as studies show the majority of victims ages 18 and 29 have a relationship with their attacker. My best guess is what most qualifies as “rape” on college campuses nowadays takes place after the panties come off willingly." I'm not sure whether she is saying it is fake rape hysteria via regret, merely a case of two drunks humping, or that a man is forcing the issue after she…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 06:11 PM
17

A cold approach can be unwelcome if you: are a low value male used canned openers are unattractive don't know how to make conversation
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 03:17 PM
4

I'm not sure if being a gold-digger is despicable or not. For thousands of years women have survived by attaching themselves to a powerful male and obtaining access to his resources. What we think of as being in poor taste may just be typical female behavior that is deeply ingrained.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 08:37 AM
1

I don't believe this is an accurate representation of what MensRights is actually about. Many redditors from MensRights are also active on TRP, and vice versa. We believe that most modern-day feminists are female supremacists that seek further empowerment and are not good relationship material. In TRP parlance, women hunt for the ultimate alpha in the form of the State to compel men and further privilege themselves. Many MensRights posters look at the sub as a place for discussion, and either bl…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 08:34 AM
20

exactly my thoughts. This happened in Europe and the women there are less fat-friendly than the US. But apparently they have fat feminists too!
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 04:36 AM
2

Going back to the playground, when little boys kicked little girls, did they really pull their punches or go full bore? For a woman who is acclimatized to men groveling at her feet, some hostility can actually be quite refreshing and passes the novelty test.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 04:32 AM
0

I concur with you, that the majority of women do marry for love. The question is this ... what causes that love?
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 01:26 AM
2

I watched some of the shows on the Japanese male-hosts that provide company for women and saw a few of the same traits. An emphasis on being very slender, good-looking, incredibly polite, funny and charming while dressing well and the appearance of wealth. Translation = high value males. Asian society has always been more comfortable with a different balance between the masculine and feminine. You can see that in books like The Tale of Genji, or modern chinese films where a renaissance man with …
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 01:23 AM
2

I'm a pretty regular poster on MensRights , mainly an irregular lurker on Seduction and a regular reader here on TRP. I think in many ways that TRP has replaced Seduction as the go-to place for effective technique, what works and doesn't, and taking a realistic look at yourself (self improvement). Seduction seems overly female friendly these days and internally censored, being heavier on separating desperate guys from their cash kinda gimmicks. What I like about TRP is the focus on theory on mal…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 01:12 AM
0

Wtf are you talking about? Eminem is beta as fuck. His wife banged around with a bunch of other guys and he still came back to her. Had fights with her about her seeing other dudes in front of him, particularly athletes. That is all about the beta.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/13 05:14 AM
3

This example of parental alienation is woeful. It is quite obvious that the mother has mental issues and is not doing what is in the child's interest.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 09:46 PM
7

Once your relationship is at that point and your spouse withholds from you intentionally - that is abuse! I'd divorce over that. It is quite clear she is hateful and petty. Hopefully the husband was smart and got a prenup.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/13 10:34 PM
1

Some time ago found a study that referenced Asian women as having the highest hip to waist ratios. Think that with a ratio of .6 of hips to waist being a fatty would be extremely pronounced particularly when you are trying to compete
/r/TheRedPill27/11/13 10:22 PM
145

I think she is doing a great thing by fighting against unhealthy, dangerous lifestyles. It is a scary thing when the morbidly obese are gaining societal acceptance for a toxic lifestyle that will put them into an early grave.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/13 05:23 AM
14

From TFA, The CDC describes ADHD symptoms as follows: “A child with ADHD might: daydream a lot, forget or lose things a lot, squirm or fidget, talk too much, make careless mistakes or take unnecessary risks, have a hard time resisting temptation, have trouble taking turns, have difficulty getting along with others”.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 06:07 PM
4

Basically you are approving of doctors discriminating against men, because the doctor regularly treats the HOLY VAGINA. Many gynos further specialize into specific types of care; high risk pregnancies aren't treated by typical gynos anyways.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 09:56 PM
1

Most men I know love women.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:28 PM
7

I view there being many responses to misandry in our world. Men's Rights PUA MGTOW among others I find much to appreciate in all of above ideas and I would prefer not to be prescriptive about forcing someone to agree with me about a specific reaction. If someone wants to be a PUA, or a MGTOW, that is up to them. While I can identify with many elements of above ideas, I consider myself different from them. However, I learn from them. MGTOWs best examine the risk that women represent to men when t…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:45 PM
3

This is the case of an extrajudicial killing of a man. Although he may or may not have been guilty of a crime, in civilized society men are to be judged by a jury of their peers, and sentenced by a judge; not executed by a lynch mob as if it were the antebellum South This is a Men's Rights Issue.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:49 PM
1

Are you saying a woman would have been arrested for the same thing? You're a horrible, misandrist troll.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:24 AM
1

Another article on the same here
/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:32 AM
3

Why is this a Men's Rights Issue? Because the DOJ is packing prisons with minor offenders, most of whom are men.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 12:35 PM
2

I read through many of your comments on MensRights. Though some were constructive, many were quite negative and to use another subreddit's term, were quite bluepill in nature. In above text you basically painted broad brushstroke for all the MR posts, good and bad, attacking the redditors in this specific sub. Considering the excellent posting we have that is often far superior to SRS and feminist equivalents, I would say we are winning the battle. You added little to it either one way or anothe…
/r/MensRights07/11/13 04:01 PM
2

Somehow, I am certain that the Patriarchy is to blame for this.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 11:31 PM
1

Charged is not prosecuted; There is a vast difference.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 11:03 PM
3

A person is a felon after conviction for a felony, not before. Innocent until proven guilty. The issue here is the comparatively minor charges for heinous acts, and a biased legal system.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:27 PM
24

If it was a man, he would have been charged with attempted murder. Men's Rights is also about equality under the law & equal sentencing
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:16 AM
1

It is great to hear that men are fighting the battles for equal rights! For far too many years we've been discriminated against, whilst women receive preferential treatment, custody, and special benefits. This war for equality reminds me of the epic words of Martin Luther King Jr., put into an egalitarian context "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by their sex, but by the content of their character."
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:53 AM
3

To hear of classical designs influenced by Palladio besmirched is so typical of Feminist haters on classical & European civilization. Shall we take the aesthetics of the ancients, and their imitators, or shall we take those ogres strolling around in a "slutwalk"?
/r/MensRights28/10/13 08:14 PM
9

Caitlin Flanagan supports ignoring the Rule of Law, while espousing vigilantism. Quite a tragedy in this civilized era. She'd be at home in the antebellum south, in the middle of a lynch mob, holding a noose to murder an innocent black man.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:28 PM
1

This subreddit is about Men's Rights. A business supporting anti-male speech is an MRA issue. You are a horrible troll.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 03:14 AM
1

Are you saying that misandry OR misogyny are OK from a business perspective? US Businesses do not operate that way! Respect for all sexes is important, and favoritism is not in the American way. Eat a downvote, shitbird
/r/MensRights28/10/13 01:59 AM
6

Keep in mind the collaborator, Feminist agitator and Commissar in chief, Tracy Clark-Flory. When she isn't pandering to her misandrist "slutwalkers", she is writing articles like this
/r/MensRights27/10/13 11:32 PM
0

I think we should start a campaign to notify Wikia management about this, and failing a good outcome, a boycott. Frankly, it is a disgusting tactic to have this misandry so evident.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 10:36 PM
1

Wikipedia article on it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternity_Court Youtube has videos Folks, we are going mainstream!
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:14 PM
1

Thought police = exaggeration. The issue is concern trolling in a very specific manner that is being used in a spam-like manner with little logic to support it. Basically bad posting that is attempting to end conversation because the author only supports a narrow definition of Men's Rights. Those of us that take a more broad view on what is Men's Rights, particularly related to negative perceptions of men, male disposability, or men as victims view this tactic as an attempted curtailing of a val…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 08:10 PM
5

There are many definitions for it. You only pointed to one source, the first from google, in an attempt to prove your accuracy, and in doing so, ignored numerous other definitions that provide far more detail. I see your single card and I raise you. "A concern troll is a false flag pseudonym created by a user whose actual point of view is opposed to the one that the user claims to hold. The concern troll posts in Web forums devoted to its declared point of view and attempts to sway the group's a…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 05:09 PM
9

The perception of women as harmless doves, beyond reproach, and men as sex-crazed violent cretins is a Men's Rights Issue. The perception that women are the only "safe" caregivers for children is likewise, a Men's Rights Issue. Although I can point out the statistics on the legal system institutionalized bias against men, in convictions, sentencing, or custody of children, alimony and child support, that would make every male court case a Men's Rights Issue. Not really my point, even though it i…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 03:25 PM
0

An attempt to turn us into Feminism? Quite a master of hyperbole aren't ya? Joining and participating in Mensrights and doesn't mean we need to turn a blind eye to trolling. If you think that is the case, apparently, I missed the memo. Moderators try to do a number of things: Curtail trolling Keep the conversation on topic Stop abusive posting & doxxing purge low-content posting I'm asking for them to do that here too.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 03:01 PM
5

At first I thought "A profit-making institution is asking us for capital to create something that they will own, sell, and derive a profit on?" Looking into it a bit more, came across this page http://www.parsemusfoundation.org/vasalgel-home/ which explains some more about the need for investment, and how it is organized more like a corporation backed by an NGO/nonprofit. "Vasalgel is being developed by the foundation as a “social venture,” a company that makes enough money to stay afloat but no…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:34 PM
-1

You bring some good points, namely: Hands off moderation policy Sexism. On the case of the former, think we are paying a price by being subject to trolling. However, that doesn't mean we need to be blind to a problem, particularly when it detracts, or adds nothing to the conversation at hand. This is the essence of low content posters, even more than posting dubiously related imgur graphics as emotes. For the latter though, it is more complex. Wikipedia defines sexism as including, "Sexist attit…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:02 PM
1

This is a textbook example of the "it is not a Men's Right issue" concern troll. Men have a right to self-determined genital integrity. This is a Men's right issue.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:37 PM
3

You are correct. Equivalency would require damage to the ovaries and other locations that could imperil fertility and regular hormonal development
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:31 PM
0

We've seen this before with Elizabeth Smart and others. So I ask you - would a male child attract so much attention?
/r/MensRights23/10/13 11:51 AM
1

You are attempting to explain away greater numbers of male victimization by creating a selective standard you can use against male victims.Whether it is the through male-on-male, or female-on-male violence, it is still male victimization. This gets back to the concept of the disposable male, a MR concept. Beat him up, or kill him, cut his half of his dick off - he is a man, he can handle it. You seem to have a blind eye to the epidemic of violence; nation states capitalize on men in order to wag…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 05:53 AM
1

Unfortunately, the mods are not curtailing that form of trolling. I can only hope it becomes a big enough problem where they are forced to take action against the concern trolls.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:00 AM
15

Men's Rights is also about men as victims. The point is not that "look men are abused because of misandry" but more complex than that. Women hurt men, grieviously Female on male crime is severe The perception of men as abusers is wrong In certain instances, male abuse is more severe Penis removal being more frequent
/r/MensRights22/10/13 06:11 PM
5

Discrimination, bias and perception are all interrelated. If I focused only on discrimination, that would not provide justice for men. When a man walking his son around the park has the cops called on him for being a pedophile, that is not a discrimination issue so much as one of bias and perception. The common perception is that men are somehow subhuman criminals, just waiting to molest and sexually assault. This is how "Rape Culture" has tarred and feathered men of all stripes.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 05:59 PM
20

Every man deserves a fair, impartial judge. This is an MRA issue
/r/MensRights22/10/13 05:53 PM
-13

Did you even look at the title of the destination webpage in question? I guess not. The reason is, the Title is the same as the submission. Stop being a lazy ass!
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:10 PM
-9

Don't blame a redditor for reddit functionality. Reddit suggests titles, and no change was made to the suggestion.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:07 PM
-6

This is an MRA Issue because: A man was victimized The cause or effect have little to do with the victimization He has been deprived of his rights to live a rich life Men as victims of violence and crime is definitely an MRA issue.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:05 PM
1

There was no embellishment of the title. You know Reddit suggests titles. abuse of men is an MRA issue to some
/r/MensRights22/10/13 01:55 PM
-3

Let me get this straight: you are saying that abuse of a man is not an MRA issue? you are saying that a man's right to being genitally intact is not an MRA issue?
/r/MensRights22/10/13 01:53 PM
-10

This is a Men's Rights Issue because: All men have the right to live full and rich lives free of abuse All men have the right to self-determine genital state
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:24 AM
1

Considering that "not a Men's Rights Issue" is a quite prominent form of concern trolling, I am going to have to disagree with you. Many people are becoming aware of this statement, and how it is being used to silence discussion. That many of the people saying this have SRS, or non-existent posting history strengthens our concern factor.. Boy abuse? "not a Men's Rights Issue" Murderous woman killing men? "not a Men's Rights Issue" Discrimination against men by bias in favor of women? "not a Men'…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:47 AM
-3

If i remember correctly, there was more to this story that preceded her assault, and i thought it included inappropriate physical contact. We need to fact-check this first before jumping on a bandwagon
/r/MensRights19/10/13 01:36 PM
0

You are borderline to doing concern troll advocacy here bud. Let the votes decide, don't attempt a false appeal to consensus either!
/r/MensRights19/10/13 01:27 PM
0

Men/males are an oppressed minority in the US. I take wide latitude defending males of all ages against the unjust. Just as victimizing of men in prison is laughed at, so also is the victimization of boys. That is why I do not concur with your statements. Men's Rights applies to the young also
/r/MensRights19/10/13 01:24 PM
-17

Sources don't win discussions - good talking points do!
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:09 PM
18

An excellent point compadre! Gender reversal shows that a woman would never get penalized, much less had her public image destroyed.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 02:56 PM
12

I'm not sure if this is a poor attempting at trolling, or just total ignorance of Men's Rights issues, going to go with the former. It is completely symptomatic of criminalizing male sexuality, even to the point of catching innocent victims. Eat downvotes, troll
/r/MensRights18/10/13 02:55 PM
107

We live in disgusting times; there is a false perception that men are merely sex-crazed neanderthals, that we do not deserve the full protection of the law.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:45 PM
2

Rules of the professional media 1 Remember, it is always acceptable to bash men, and never acceptable to bash women.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:45 PM
12

You would think with the obesity epidemic in the western world that she would be celebrated. Instead, no, the fatties are out in force.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/13 01:08 AM
12

Authoritarian Feminist Supremacists start with politically correct speech, followed by quotas, then special laws to favor themselves. They follow this up by criminalizing behavior they don't like. They won't stop until the men are in chains, if we are even permitted to live.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:33 AM
1

The abuse of a man, regardless of relationship, is an MRA issue. Violence against men is an MRA issue.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 09:51 PM
0

The abuse of men by women is a men's rights issue. It can be an old woman and a young man, or a young woman and an old man. It is still an MRA issue.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 09:49 PM
3

Abuse of boys is a men's right issue (period).
/r/MensRights12/10/13 09:49 PM
1

It sounds like there is an assumption being made that the husbands are abusive. With all the horror stories, and ways in which women exploit the system currently to maximize their benefits, is that even a question?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:20 AM
2

When you marry in certain legal systems you are making a life-long contract. But if you aren't forced to make that contract and you do so full well knowing how it may turn out, it does not authorize you to react in a murderous fashion.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:41 PM
1

I think it is you who are engaging in baseless speculation. You're trying to play Reddit Lawyer and you are not even good at it.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:41 PM
2

Prosecutors are not going to drop a case like that, unless the texts specifically contradicted her claims and were something that could not easily be explained away. Your point is refuted.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:18 PM
5

The American legal system is based around on the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" based on reasonable doubt. The texts proved reasonable doubt, cut and dried.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 04:41 PM
8

Come clean and admit that the reason the prosecutor scuttled the case is because said prosecutor knew the texts were damning because they proved it was not rape. You're just tap dancing.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:49 PM
0

Feminism is trying to do the same with the Atheist movement. Look at some of Thunderf00t's videos
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:00 PM
13

This shows that modern day justice for men is a travesty.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:52 PM
3

Please remember that through our Nation's f'd up drug laws we have a significant amount of black men entering the legal system on a regular basis, and this process not only subjects them to violence in institutions, but also destroys their families and chance for normal careers. The difference is that black men are also much more likely to be victims of state violence via the police & courts where the stacked odds of mandatory sentencing destroys lives.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:32 AM
24

Keep in mind that with much of the sexist media, equality only goes in one specific direction: Men losing ground, and women gaining. If there is a career field in which women make incredible money, or have superior work-life balance (teaching), then they will blatantly ignore gender disparities. Men, the decks are stacked against you!
/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:22 AM
3

This is a Men's Rights issue obviously because women have no problem discriminating on male income, attractiveness or height. But, when men apply the same rules to women, primarily based on weight, they get bent out of shape. Commonly known as hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 10:35 AM
6

There appears to be no defense for the male victims of rape.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 11:56 PM
4

The issue is not the legality, but rather the public outcry, or lack thereof. That IS an MRA issue!
/r/MensRights04/10/13 06:22 PM
2

Why is this a MRA issue? If the situations were altered and it was a man, I can only imagine the giant outcry. This story doesn't conform the predominant narrative, that men are killers though, but it is receiving press.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 02:56 PM
1

Since I know some SRS "shitlords" will start downvoting this, I am going to be proactive and tell you why this is MRA content. First of all there is a Male victim (not uncommon in certain groups) Male victim abused by a female authority figure Reference material http://archive.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm01/cm01.pdf
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:34 PM
-1

Writing a big wall of text and going all defensive doesn't make you right. Saying you are an MRA, using feminist arguments, does not an MRA make.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:35 PM
2

It has everything to do with Men's Rights. There is the perception that men are: sex-crazed violent animals in need to be in prisons not fit parents rapists-in-waiting I post articles like this because it goes to the double standard.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 07:01 PM
2

I am happy for this. The rules of civil, and non-violent behavior are as applicable to men, as they are to women.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 02:37 PM
1

I think you should press charges. You were raped by this woman!!
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:36 AM
8

She looks like a violent woman. I'd be careful around her.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 08:35 PM
-2

You are using feminist talking points, and feminist logic. Apparently you are unaware of it too, and get defensive when called out.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:47 PM
-5

RAPE THE MEN!
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:41 PM
-2

Typically weak & nonscientific feminist response. Crude language: Check Changing the subject: Check Straw Man Argument: Check If you come in here expecting to find a safe place in which your nonscientific hogwash is treated like a sacred cow, you've come to the wrong place.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:56 PM
-2

Lots of fallacy and myth in what you wrote, basically you subscribe to the Swedish mode of thought. Certain differences exist between brains and bodies, and these innately predisposition certain sexes to have natural advantages in particular disciplines. Furthermore, this also means they will find more fulfillment in particular career fields too. Your nonscientific, all the sexes are the same but for environment flies in the face of reality and natural dispositions children have. You really shou…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 04:49 AM
3

Please note, this is not intended to be a political discussion on the merits or lack thereof of H. Clinton. Rather, this is about how a blind eye is turned towards male suffering and males as victims of violence. Men are overwhelmingly the victims of the most grievous violent crime - murder.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:35 AM
1

Please stop spouting nonsense. Marx merely sought to redefine Capitalism as "industrial Capitalism". Capitalism existed long before then, in the Assyrian era, under the Romans, during the Arab and early Muslim expansionist period, and in the early medieval times.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 10:12 PM
1

Declining labor value and societies dominated by greed occurred for thousands of years, prior to the advent of capitalism. You are confusing globalism, and the eradication of artificial scarcity in the labor market, with an outcome that is in no way related. Capitalism, if anything, rewards extreme competitiveness. The problem with socialists is they always assume labor is inherently valuable, and capital is cheap.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:20 AM
1

FALSE PREMISE. There is nothing in the Capitalist labor market, or Socialistic system that requires two people to have careers. You are confusing the effects of globalism (declining labor value), greed (giant house, 2 cars, new everything), and feminist outcomes with Capitalism.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:32 PM
1

With the downvoting I see on your response that looks like good research, I can only assume either MRA-socialists are out in full force, or vote brigading is going on here.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:21 PM
0

Your argument is fatally flawed. Basically, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness - Except for the rich guy. As child support payments can be stratospheric, even for the wealthy, this is an issue for all men. Stop saying that because someone is wealthy that they should not be protected from sexist, discriminatory laws.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:09 PM
1

shaded attempt at speech control: Check minimal posting history: Check Likely SRS troll: Check
/r/TheRedPill04/08/13 10:57 PM
2

RedPill is not about hurting women or revenge strategies. Crummy trolling.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 02:24 PM
4

legally, anything can be redefined. Legality can also run contrary to natural rights.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:53 AM
1

Hunting / Gathering is a full-time job for male hunters. There are numerous documentaries of how the bushmen live, in which you can observe how primitive societies actually function.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 05:24 PM
10

Female Privilege in action.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 12:33 AM
1

I will call this out for what it is. A blatant attempt at speech control. We are egalitarian at our very core. They are not, and western culture is gradually waking up to this fact. We have the moral highground. They are an anachronism. A misandrist throwback to an era of burning crosses and white hoods. Similarities between Radfems and the KKK: terrorize their opponents demonize their enemies try to squelch free speech believe that a significant population is lower value regularly attack the st…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 03:08 PM
0

You are saying that an arrest, getting thrown in jail, put in prison, is not force or violent seizure? Ok.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 12:31 AM
1

Was the submission not in compliance with policy?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:12 PM
3

Believe it is a gay thing referencing the strike down of DOMA by the US Supreme Court
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:55 AM
1

Apparently, I know English definitions better than you rape 1 [reyp] noun, verb, raped, rap·ing. noun 1. the unlawful compelling of a person through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse. 2. any act of sexual intercourse that is forced upon a person. 3. statutory rape. 4. an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the rape of the countryside. 5. Archaic. the act of seizing and carrying off by force. verb (used with object) 6. to force to have sexual inte…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:48 AM
2

The criminal justice system does rape men, particularly black men First you get raped by the justice system or biased family courts Then, you get raped in jail
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:12 AM
1

So, basically, you want to cover up the sins of Women?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 06:29 AM
2

Men kill women and women kill men. Nothing new. The courts took care of it, if she got away with it then it would be a MRA issue. Your first two sentences are accurate, it is your third that fails to meet the smell test. It is not merely justice we must see done, but also to enlighten the perception that it is only men that kill, and that women are harmless. This false perception comes into play each time a woman gets off scot-free for murdering her husband while claiming abuse. Destroy the perc…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 03:12 AM
1

The Iroquois were matriarchal, matrilineal, and also, extremely warlike; they had a powerful confederacy in the Eastern United States that dominated many of their neighbors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iroquois
/r/MensRights22/06/13 10:34 PM
0

Are you saying the MRA agenda is the same as a monotheistic religion? Please, tell me the variety of weed you are smoking.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 11:16 PM
9

You notice that the vast majority of the exonerated are men of color. The legal system is biased against men in general, but even more-so against men of color.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 05:59 PM
0

Reproducing in sufficient number to breed feminists out of existence has nothing to do with traditionalism or religion, particularly when doing with a noble egalitarian agenda (stopping sexist feminists). The act of fathering children is not "traditionalism" Please retract sir.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 06:24 AM
2

She sounds like she uses people, and has little skill in reading them. "He kept trying to talk to Jake, who wasn’t feeling his “I really want to get you on my show and maybe into your pants” vibe "I’d always wanted to see Metric live, and I thought I might be able to make Keith my best gay friend in Toronto. I was still a newbie and needed friends. I also figured that the friendship might lead to exciting Toronto career opportunities down the line. He did say he liked my writing." What a schmuck…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 10:33 PM
25

The black man is the preferred victim of US Law Enforcement, and also receives biased sentences, courtesy of the Judiciary at federal and local levels.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:30 PM
14

So female emotional outbursts are acceptable (hugging, crying, etc) but male ones are not (backslapping, high5, fistbumps or chestbumps, etc). Apparently, it it not acceptable to act like a man in the courtroom, unless you appear serious and somber. Emotional displays are restricted to women. Just in - The Pussy Pass extends to more than just sentencing and guilt. It also applies to courtroom decorum.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:21 AM
9

The judge threw out the agreement because she felt insulted over what is considered a male way of expressing appreciation. Stick to the story and stop injecting your version of events. There was no sexual assault, no contempt, and it was merely a man acting happy in the moment, much as a woman does regularly hugging her lawyer. Just because you have a good history in some regards, doesn't mean I am going to give you a pass to make anti-male comments in this forum. Not going to happen. You said h…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:56 AM
9

You said he deserved a rough sentence, and he was committing sexual assault. You also don't understand some male actions, and are not giving him access to a pussy pass that would be extended to a woman in identical circumstances were it a female action (embrace rather than pat on the rear). Explain to me again how I am being patronizing? Seriously, are you an MRA?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:49 AM
7

Appeal to history = flawed. Just because you have been here a long time doesn't mean you are in the right. Currently, you are in the wrong. And yes, I am calling you out for it.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:17 AM
1

The way this judge was defines true patriarchy. Or is it matriarchy in this context? :)
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:15 AM
10

Sonja, stop acting like a know-it-all. If two buddies punch each other softly in fun, it is just that. Not a violent act. Not assault. It could easily be a happy moment in the right context. We men do not have to conform to your female perspective on giving full body hugs, sobbing, and crying in each other's arms. Stop acting like you are the aggrieved party. If you are attempting to be the Internet Lawyer of Reddit, you are doing a horrible job.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:14 AM
7

I think in this Sonja is showing how little she knows of other cultures, failing to understand this is roughly equivalent to a more subdued high5 from a black athlete's perspective. As someone who has played a large amount of sports, it is fully understandable why she would say this. She is a woman She doesn't play sports She doesn't understand black culture If it was an emotional outburst from a woman, it would have been completely acceptable (e.g. giving her lawyer a hug) or sobbing and appear…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:10 AM
35

This is anti-male and racist in nature. You see, many black male athletes will act in this manner and it is partly cultural and athletic in nature As someone who has played much sports, there is nothing remotely sexual about this gesture in this context. It means effectively, "good job". Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:01 AM
5

A pre-nup is like a condom. You put one on to protect yourself from unknowns. Why feel like an asshole for protecting yourself? How she acts now may not be indicative of how she will be in the future. However, given what you have already described in her behavior, I would be concerned.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 04:48 PM
1

Calling Bullshit. Senator McCain "Women, do not join the military until this crisis is fixed". The message implies that it is the poor women suffering under the boot of evilmenz. How could you say the "rest of the article is admirably gender-neutral"??????????? Quote "he cannot in good conscience advise women to join the service as the military grapples to contain and curb its sexual assault epidemic. " You are attempting to twist the message he broadcasted loud and clear. The message is simple …
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:01 AM
10

You mean we shouldn't talk about the prison rape crisis? (primarily male victims)
/r/MensRights05/06/13 03:14 PM
3

First of all, you talked about many issues. Name calling Rudeness Anger emotion Put-downs Since when did demonizing or ridiculing something become ineffective? It is quite effective when done right, e.g. satire, or crusades. If you notice many effective movements utilized these two things to great effect. If you think calm, rational arguments are the only ones that receive rave reviews, you are seriously deluding yourself. Now that I have been quite reasonable though, I have one more thought for…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:00 AM
4

bodertz was talking about the fear of rape causing women to fear men. Don't be a horrible instigator if you are unwilling to read over the comments.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 04:25 AM
-5

But s/he is claiming a non-insignificant portion are. Or at least implying it. This appears to be conjecture as the number of men was not qualified. You are putting words into his mouth. However, I will do some qualification of how women seek wealthier partners via a reference. Yes, women are gold-diggers. Now do you want to play some more semantic games, or argue with TFA?
/r/MensRights02/06/13 04:21 AM
17

You are quite correct that it is a single instance, and may not represent reality, or the totality of male population. Likewise, OuiCrudites never claimed that all men were avoiding relationships.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:27 PM
-9

Quite simply, it is a question of narrative, intent & perception, rather than conspiracy. Maybe you are a feminist apologist, or you cannot see the big picture? Looks like I got it right the first time!
/r/MensRights27/05/13 07:44 AM
-2

Unequal application of the law that is applied to men and not women. Kind of like the draft / Selective Service
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:27 PM
-4

Note: In today's misandrist climate I don't think marrying is a good idea anyways, but that is another issue.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 03:48 PM
8

Scott, basically you provided a non-answer. You see, male exceptionalism for certain fields is the norm, rather than a rare event. These fields are linked to certain male attributes for which males are uniquely well-suited, which explains why governments like to compel our service... As men don't go out of our way to celebrate success, you claim we cannot take credit for it. And yet, to do so is considered boastful. The claim is a general one. Men are most often those breaking down burning build…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 08:13 AM
11

Scott, you are missing an important element in the videos. Self-sacrifice is considered a noble trait that men embody generally. While there is a link to Traditionalism inherent, it is also in a man's natural instinct to utilize his life in the service of others. It is only with the advent of RadFem (2nd wave feminism) that men were required still to embody this (Whiteknight principles), while failing to recoup the large amount of benefits associated with such service. Keep in mind that for mill…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:15 AM
8

Are you saying that it wasn't men doing noble things? While it is true that men have collectively done horrible and wonderful things, men as a whole are doing the hard jobs, the dirty jobs or the great and noble deeds. Your whole post reeks of marginalizing men. Let us celebrate success.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:05 AM
2

I'm not sure when involuntary servitude became acceptable, simply because an individual makes a high income. Please refrain from using white knight arguments like "Honestly, what the hell is this post for? You're paying for your kids and your ex wifes lives - that something you agreed to do when you made her into a stay at home mom - as they were solely dependent on you." That is an attempting at shaming, a badly written one, and we frown on it. 154k a year in an expensive area doesn't go very f…
/r/MensRights18/05/13 07:27 PM
2

TradCon typically is to assign WhiteKnight roles to men. It appears instead that he is talking about Game in the female context. E.g. What are you doing to ensure your man views you as the best catch, rather than playing a guilt trip. While there is an element of Traditionalism in the article, it isn't purely so.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 10:32 PM
1

So, if men are victims by accident, or by unjust governments that is acceptable, but you give them a pass when it involves an irresponsible mother, not fulfilling her familial obligations, while cheating? Summary - you are defending female irresponsibility. Female irresponsibility and a "me-first" attitude among modern women is definitely an MRA issue because men are expected to "man-up" while women get a pussy-pass that covers irresponsibility, allows them to cut family bonds for whatever b.s. …
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:44 AM
0

Following your logic, the fact that men are killed regularly in wars wouldn't matter either, as they are deceased. Males have a right to live out their natural lives too, and not just in the service of a woman.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 02:22 PM
1

Gender is not relevant? Men are regularly demonized in family court, when it comes to paternity issues, and subject to being made into pedophile perverts. Are you saying the story would have been reported exactly the same, and that a man would receive the same exact sentence she is likely to receive? I post the stories I do for a particular reason - to point out that women can be just as criminal and dangerous as men can be. It is issues of pussy pass, criminal sentencing, custody, and perceptio…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:22 PM
0

I notice in your post history on MRA issues, you regularly try to pass judgement on what you think are good and bad stances, and who should be in the cause, vs outside it. Whether you want to adhere to a pussy pass principle, or dislike fratboys, I don't quite care. However, it is quite germane to this conversation.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:16 PM
-4

2 males died. "Not a men's right issue." FUCK YOU!
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:39 AM
3

Child conceived during the marriage? Sounds like an invitation to be cuckolded. More like, child conceived during the marriage, that a paternity test proves is your natural offspring, to which you consent to have. Remember, paternity fraud happens, as well as crazy women going off the pill without your consent. Mama's baby, Papa's, maybe? Personally, I think your Fiance' is looking at the option of milking you for your money already - she looks at this as a financial trade, and yet, wants you to…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:04 AM
-1

The video adds some much needed detail. Not only did she kill her 2 boys, she was also cheating on her live-in boyfriend which explains why the sex happened in a car.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:39 AM
10

Should force that little shit to pay back every dollar in police time spent investigating the false report. Getting some experienced detectives to start interviewing everyone involved I am sure cost some money.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 01:11 AM
1

This is actually discriminatory against women and I am against discrimination in all forms. People should pay for their own insurance based on the statistical risk of their driving. Also, it sets a bad precedent for health insurance by making men vulnerable to female health insurance tabs.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 11:24 PM
1

You failed to provide any evidence. Discussion is over. Please retract all your claims as you provided no support for it whatsoever.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:06 AM
1

Show your evidence to support your preposterous and unscientific claims: Traditionalist marriage being based on agrarian culture, and no linkage to hunter-gatherer societies Your evidence that women are not hypergamous Please cease to use your weak prostitution analogies that lacks any kind of critical analysis. You seem intent to paint my argument into inflammatory politically charged terms rather than addressing them. If we recognize that money is a proxy for resources, you could by the same c…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:11 PM
1

Do not blame the messenger. You are confusing a historical recounting with support for a particular stance. A traditionalist view of marriage is a romanticized money for sex tradeoff that includes family raising. Are you disputing sexual selection and parental investment from a biological perspective, and saying that human females are not hypergamous?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 07:38 PM
1

I never said anything about my view. All discussion was about a Traditionalist view of marriage. I never called anyone a prostitute or maligned the resources for sex exchange. Please stop with the ad hominem attacks.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:53 PM
0

You need to read the definition of marriage and from a legal perspective before we continue this discussion. You seem to forget that in Traditionalist views, women were supposed to keep their virginity intact until marriage. That is still the view in much of the Muslim world where virginity is highly prized and is well-documented I never said women don't care about sex. As an egalitarian, I want equality for both sexes.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:07 PM
1

I am not a proponent of Traditionalism, however, Traditionalist marriages were eminently more equitable than the current anti-male system backed by the courts. I do not concur with what you wrote about no legal punishment for one's behavior within a marriage. There should be penalties for paternity fraud to include the disavowal of all child support to said fraud and the ability to sue for damages for all investment made into the process That is justice!
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:20 PM
-1

It is an RadFem discussion style to draw attention to tiny minorities in an attempt to divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 06:18 PM
5

Marital duties is an element of Traditionalist view of marriage and the inherent obligations that came along with it. In the Traditionalist view, men provided utility (resources/protection) women provided utility (sex/domesticity). Religious obligations required both men and women to engage in sex in order to maintain the family. The issue for we MRAs is the lack of reciprocity. Either both parties should be required to perform, or neither. Radfems want to penalize men when we don't have sex, wh…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:37 PM
0

If you are going to say that masturbation provides the equal benefits to regular sex, please back that up with scientific studies comparing the two. The point is that from a Traditionalist perspective, denying sex to your partner is incompatible with the marriage contract of money for sex partnership. There is a word for a situation where one organism takes benefit, and the other is harmed/deprived. Parasitism
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:40 PM
-3

I am suggesting that sex is a basic need. Men, in order to achieve sex will do dangerous occupations that decrease their lifespan will stay in abusive relationships that decrease their lifespan will stay in high-stress occupations that decrease their lifespan will give away all their money to a female partner that may leave them destitute and decrease their lifespan I never said anything about a forced relationship and someone required to keep someone else happy. I am saying that the premise of …
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:15 PM
1

There is another reason why he could have deleted the tweet. Obscenity/indecency charges. "But officer, she did that to me against my will". Right buddy, and that explains why you were rubbing your cock on girls prior to that? :)
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:56 AM
-9

You mean to say whereas withholding oxygen will result in death in >= 20 minutes, water within a week, sleep within a week, food a month to 2 months. People can die from heartbreak as well, caused by different reasons. It is called broken heart syndrome What is more than that, is many men pursue dangerous occupations specifically so that it may enable their romantic relationships. Those life shortening "dirty jobs" are not done for nothing. "People can live their entire lives without having sex …
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:53 AM
-11

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs says otherwise. If you held back oxygen, water, food, sleep, homeostasis, or excretion from your dearest partner in the world, it would be abuse, and in certain cases, murderous. Sex is in the same category. A decent and moral being wants their partner to achieve at least the minimums required for decent quality of life. You can quit with the rationalization now.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:58 AM
1

One of our strongest proponents is GirlWritesWhat We accept anyone regardless of race/ethnicity, color, national origin, sex, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation. While we are accepting of almost all religions, worshipers of RadicalFeminism may find it more difficult here. Similarly, there is an egalitarian bent to RedPill. So, if you are constantly pushing genderist politics in a way that discriminates against men, you might find it more contentious here.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/13 04:34 AM
4

The intentional withholding of sex by either is abusive. What is disturbing about this article though is that I have never heard of a woman likewise penalized for sexual withholding.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:09 AM
1

He gave consent when he put her hands on his junk. BTW, you know what implied consent is right? You haven't read the accounts of what happened and by continuing this discussion while being willfully ignorant, you are either trolling, or whiteknighting.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:29 AM
1

You, and the other belligerents need to read up on the story before you go off claiming rape. He was putting girls' hands on his cock and he wanted stagehead. And got it.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:09 AM
3

"Qui tacet consentire" - Silence is consent. However, Danny Brown raised above that, by moving women's hands to his penis while performing. He gave implied consent. I'm calling you out for support of RadFem ideas of consent.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:06 AM
-3

dropcode, you need to understand what happened before spouting off at the keyboard. Also, silence, or assistance are considered consent.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:58 PM
3

SRS Argument alert! PROSPECTIVE SEX PARTNERS MUST SIGN ON THE DOTTED LINE BEFORE FUCKING. Dropcode, seriously, you are in the wrong sub. He was rubbing his junk on girls, gettin them to touch it, and when he got a chance for stagehead, he took it.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:55 PM
5

In the Three Great Monotheistic religions alignment with Traditionalism, and from a historical perspective, there was obligation and duty flowing in two directions in a relationship. All three of them are very similar in the regard that spousal rape was not compatible with the religion, but sex was also an obligation/duty flowing in both directions in a relationship that is required of both partners to each other. In certain cases even, minimum frequency is specifically mandated! In Judaism http…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/13 10:45 PM
1

I think negging is quite positive in the western world of overblown female egos based on 0 accomplishment. There is another word men use for the same thing - grounding, or smacking someone with reality.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/13 10:01 PM
5

She looks rather average to me. Around where I live, regularly see gorgeous Desi women.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/13 12:41 AM
2

The author is approaching the discussion from RadFem and politically correct perspectives. She makes it sound as though it is only evilmenz complimenting women when women are often touchy-feely, and complimentary or insulting to other women based on appearance. Too many mentions of rape culture as if rape is a daily occurrence. The author attempts to trivialize male opinion and make it of no consequence. Conclusion: I think the article is a thinly veiled attempt at speech & thought control.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:10 AM
1

You claim you have an interest, and I am a practitioner in the field. Big Whoop! List of wikileaks fuck-ups I can see from what happened Not using asymmetric keys for one thing. Allegedly, Assange's key was in the history file the entire time also Storing sensitive key material in plaintext Storing sensitive key material on a filesystem Reusing symmetric keys Storing symmetric key encrypted docs for which there was already a key exposure Allowing symmetric key encrypted material to be torrented …
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:52 AM
0

What you wrote is inaccurate, and it is clear you don't know what you are talking about. Wikileaks told The Guardian the symmetric key would work for a small amount of time only. Apparently, Wikileaks kept the file encrypted with the same symmetric key permanently. Later on, when the file was released much later 7 months later it was merely a matter of brute-forcing the key, or finding it from Wikileaks staff. Wikileaks staff also told people to find the key in Leigh's book. As Wikileaks staff w…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:39 PM
13

I'm not sure why someone would want to get married in India if that misandrist law passes.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:33 AM
-1

Irregardless of allegations involving rape, if we are going to choose a poster-boy for innocence, let us not choose someone having blood on his hands. Lest I be accused of bias, keep in mind that The Guardian is a center-left publication. There are many innocent men suffering the state-supported system of injustice that is the modern day Vaginocracy. A petulant Senex iratus is the last type of "victim" we need.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:22 AM
1

http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/04/19/eric_schmidt_money_is_the_only_reason_julian_assange_redacted_wikileaks_files
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:50 AM
2

Many women are innately high drama. It is part of their nature.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:50 PM
2

I think it is more about valuation, and perceptions of value. High drama game works because of women associate drama with high value males.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 01:49 AM
5

This is a play on sympathy, as if there is equal balance between right and wrong in the world. In fact, the opposite. Women, and their conspiratorial partner, Big Government, continue to put men under the boot heel of injustice. Paying for women's health insurance Doing the "Dirty jobs" Being destroyed in family court Being perpwalked on Campus Kangaroo courts Suffering our criminal justice system Inequity is alive and well. The fact is, there are not lots of positive stories in this situation. …
/r/MensRights27/04/13 06:02 AM
6

This is a horrible turn of events. This man wants to care for his child, while the mother wants to get rid of the child, and put it up for his adoption. Children have a right to be with their natural parent(s), over some couple that no relationship to them whatsoever.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:18 PM
1

Reddit is a business. Fairness is good for business because it keeps our eyeballs glued to the site, and the ads on the site.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:32 PM
1

.3% may be a high income strata with large disposable incomes.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:31 PM
2

At 2:06AM EST, we have 245 users browsers, and Men's Rights is increasing in popularity. I'd say yes.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:08 AM
0

I am not sure I agree with you. He didn't seem dysfunctional, so much as into a particular type of relationship. His relationships favored his own interests, rather than female interests, and that is the vast majority of the castigation. Many women would not be insulted for having another man's baby, while in a relationship. While should we go after him? Why are we trying to enforce female rules of behavior instead of accepting male-ness that can appreciate a bountiful rump, or a well-endowed Dé…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:53 AM
1

This is a reflection on Feminism constantly on the attack against men, and while it makes our women to be superior, competent, and yet also the victims. IF ONLY THERE WASN'T THE PATRIARCHY! Playing defense when our opponent is punching us isn't going to win us the court of public opinion. Believe that is typhonblue's comment.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:39 AM
1

You are in the right. We need to have a story told. One of injustice, where a woman cries false rape, and a man is put in prison, left destitute, his career destroyed and reputation tattered.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 03:21 AM
1

Taking down Register-Her will reduce accountability. We have victims, in many cases men. We have offenders and ethically challenged individuals. It is right and correct that we are grieved and seek justice.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 03:19 AM
2

Would be happy if merely something so basic as Egalitarian was added to that list.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 03:12 AM
2

I'm not defending attacks against you, but I can see why they occur, given the following: Much of what you wrote contains emotional appeals. You've attacked something people hold dear, and you did so with emotional arguments. Disagreement on logic is appreciated, but emotion based, or shaming attacks, which you evidence, will not win you allies here.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 03:09 AM
-3

Additionally, how many women do kegels and have everything in good, tight, working order? It is all too easy for women to joke about male penis size, but then to have a floppy loose vagina a truck could drive through.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 10:57 PM
1

First of all I think you are trolling, however I will respond. Pedophilia, hebephilia and ephebophilia all have definitions. You'd be wise to understand them. Attraction of both males and females happens to occur around the ages at which fertility/virility onsets, but with a minimal amount of characteristics, doesn't peak until much later. Your premise is inaccurate as many men consider women in their mid 20s to be at peak attractiveness, but that is really a range. As many women don't fully und…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 06:40 PM
4

The media, always heavy on the shaming, does not condemn the women for leaving their raped men. On the other hand, there are Guides for men to help out raped women. Could this be media complicity, or even worse, tacit approval of male rape such as in prisons?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 03:04 AM
27

That is just pandering because wartime rape impacts men too, oft more severely than women.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 05:46 PM
0

When a woman is raped in the US, it is often a one-time occurrence. When a man is raped in a prison, it becomes a daily event. Reading this article you'd think male victims were few and far between, and their suffering is trivialized.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 10:02 PM
-1

I didn't ignore your point at all. When I lived in Europe, rapes of women were making national headlines. You are disarmed sir, as you have no evidence of "The idea that one rape getting national headlines somehow means there aren't hundreds of other rapes happening at that same moment has got to be a joke." I think you are a fake-rape-statistic manufacturer that likes to spout off how much women are raped in various low crime rate countries, but you cannot present any evidence to the contrary, …
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:30 AM
-1

You are making a grand assumption that hundreds of rapes happening are in a specific country that had a low rate of rape. This is a spectacular claim worthy of SRS. I'm calling you out on it. Prove there are hundreds of rapes that happened in any one day in Sweden in 1995. Otherwise, I will take it that you didn't read my comment, and you are make unsubstantiated claims that you cannot prove, for which you lack evidence. Or you misread my statement and you need apologize. In either way - prove o…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:13 AM
-1

In some European countries in the past, one rape of a woman would make national headlines. Rapes of women will often make the local news, and the blotter at least.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:10 AM
1

It would be nice if there was an article in the newspaper, or a news story each time a man was raped. It wouldn't happen though, because many people view male rape in the criminal justice system as a part of the punishment. Not to mention our airwaves would likely be saturated...
/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:17 PM
1

Why do women hurt men?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 11:13 PM
3

You are approaching this as if you are the grieved, hurt sex. Typical SRS sobbing pussy routine. When in fact, men are the overwhelming victims of violence of all types.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:02 AM
10

When men are the cash cows upon which the female predators feed, women are the primary victims of men's deaths. No more servant class to cough up all his money and life for the Matriarchy!
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:31 PM
2

Response: (1) How many men have been killed throughout history for the same thing? (2) How many men have been murdered for religious beliefs vs women for the same thing? (3) How many men have been killed by their governments for alleged crimes, vs women for alleged crimes? (4) How many men have been executed in war for being part of the losing side, or merely the civilian population? (5) How many men throughout the known history have been killed for whatever reason, vs women?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:25 PM
6

Female tactics vs men can rise to the level of comedy.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:09 AM
1

So you are saying you support the self-destructiveness and want him to continue that type of behavior? Are you aware that the type of text in above is a GIANT RED FLAG to any opposing counsel. They'd have a field day with that. Stop playing up the emotional feel-good isms that are typical of SRS.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:50 AM
6

Above strikes me as self-destructive in many places. It is clear you need a lawyer, and also, a mental health professional. You have unconditional love from your family - so keep it together.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 06:57 PM
2

For the record, I don't support the use of racial name-calling. The issue is the concept of the "justified beatings"
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:34 PM
3

If a woman received the beating rather than a man, would the media likewise say she "got what she deserved?"
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:24 PM
2

From where did you obtain the allegation count that was not prosecuted? I haven't been able to find that, and the # is critically important.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:39 PM
0

It started with a personal story, but morphed into something much different. There was an extensive discussion of comments, as if it is only men that make sexist comments. Reading that article though, you'd think it was only the "evilmenz". Standard biased article.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:00 PM
2

I'm not sure you are reporting that accurately. She was going out with her boss and media reporters around Silicon Valley know about it, and failed to report on it because they wanted to keep Google happy. This, because they made $ from Google directly or indirectly (juicy stories, etc). The scandal part wasn't that she was going out with boss as much as the other media not reporting it. Whether or not there was collusion may be merely conjecture though. If you read both articles you'd know they…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 10:17 PM
3

The whole story appears to be a bit of historical revisionism. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505125_162-57485382/yahoos-marissa-mayer-more-sizzle-than-substance/ She was sleeping with a founder (Larry Page) and took credit for other's accomplishments.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:26 PM
0

You apparently failed to read the post in context. Another poster said that men marry for reasons other than attractiveness or youth. I never made that point specifically. Instead I said, marriage is about tradeoffs - if a partner brings nothing to the table, why get married? As looks are a depreciating asset, why trade in them only? There is nothing wrong with a man expecting a fair trade in a marriage. If he is bringing millions to the table, she better have the same, or a tiny waist and a gia…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:17 AM
1

I know, you want me to pander to the unattractive crowd. Well, it isn't going to happen.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 11:35 PM
2

Are you saying women trying to enter male career fields has nothing to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights04/03/13 08:17 PM
1

I feel quite alright as a fucking Tyrannosaurus Rex then!
/r/TheRedPill02/03/13 07:21 AM
2

Thanks for your retraction. On the issue of rewriting history, it is just that - history. Supporting the rewriting of history for PCness is just a form of cultural and historical marxism. Currently there is an emphasis in our feminist dominated society to classify some particular male roles as the bestest uber roles to which all must aspire. I'd say instead that as an egalitarian I value the contribution of everyone around me. To be a great mother and housewife is every bit as noble as being a N…
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:56 AM
1

First of all, chubby != fat. Second, I am not making fun of chubby people. Third - I am expressing an aesthetic perspective on heavier women. There is nothing emotional about that. A feminist approach is to tell us people have equal value, and equal attractiveness "It is on the inside that counts". This is akin to the feminist approach of eliminating distinctions between the male and female, sweeping generalizations and claiming the exception can also be the norm. I am opposed to feminist standa…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:14 PM
0

That argument can be quite circular in nature, and could be applied to men to a limited degree also. E.g. "Survival of the fittest"
/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:54 AM
3

I've been noticing a trend which may better explain the phenomenon in this sub. Many of the SRSers and feminist apologists use weak emotional arguments, apart from the previously disproven studies. When an emotional argument, or shaming argument is used, it often includes some name-calling and gets downvoted mercilessly, as it should be. When someone disagrees and makes a logical, coherent post according to standard rhetorical practice they generally get upvotes. However, this system is not perf…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:52 AM
1

Although there are definitely some women and men that are narcissists, it would be an error to assume that ALL women are narcissists.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 03:21 AM
5

Those are some quite disgusting signs. Imagine the outcry if MRAs held up such a sign with men replacing the word women.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:09 AM
0

Good for her, because so far she is a business failure too.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:13 PM
-8

There should be a law against chubby girls wearing miniskirts, even in a parody video.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:12 PM
2

A lame attempting at shaming filled with generalizations........ You are approaching an argument from a position of ignorance, not knowing my history. First of all, i qualify for the VFW, have an honorable discharge, have a fairly fat medical record consequently, and served in a female-restricted position. Hint: 11B1P with 3-325th ABCT & 1-508th ABCT . A vietnam vet would buy me a beer if I didn't get him one first - we are bros like that. Don't you know the military is basically the world's big…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:46 AM
1

You mean that it is something you disagree with, therefore you are going to assign a label to it that does not accurately reflect the content. Please do not play fast and loose with the truth on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:38 AM
4

Radical Feminism killed it.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:36 AM
2

Although you claimed there was a religious bias, I did not see any in the article.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:34 AM
0

Since when did Horowitz become a neo-nazi? Conservative yes, fascist no. You are acting in a feminist manner by adopting their language and loose definitions of language.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:59 PM
0

A conservative news source or liberal one does not a neo-nazi make. To say that the author (horowitz) is a neo-nazi is conflating issues.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:56 PM
0

Lock up your little boys - you can never be too careful around those filthy female sex perverts!
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:13 PM
6

Marriage: At best it is a spiritual union between two people that love each other deeply where they find true happiness together and stay joyfully married for their natural lives. Regularly, it ends in divorce after a few years In bad cases, it is a maelstrom of pain, and suffering where a man finds his income forever ruined, his social life destroyed, and his name dragged through the mud, while losing his children in the process. At worst, it concludes with paternity fraud (some substantial num…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 10:43 PM
2

It sounds like you are attempting to do a covert ad hominem attack, rather than address the issue at hand. A long term relationship that satisfies can exist without marriage. All long term relationships are not always a marriage A marriage is not always a long term relationship. A marriage can significantly assist in wealth extraction from a man.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 09:21 PM
4

The list is my list, not your list. Stop trying to tell me how to think or how to behave. I do not accept your feminist value system or your illogical shame-game appeal to emotion.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:13 PM
-1

Wholesale reject your lame attempt at shamegame. I refuse to capitulate to feminist values that dictate I be attracted to all women equally regardless of actual beauty, youth, fertility, etc.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:10 PM
3

Actually, many have stated that I am objectifying since I recount her fading looks and middle aged status, and she was quite clearly irresponsible and impoverished.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:02 PM
4

May withstand a legal challenge. http://www.carolannwilson.com/articles/divorce.prenuptial.html <-- prenup overturned http://www.themarkslawfirm.com/prenups-tough-to-break-but-not-impossible/ <- conditions http://www.mylongislandlawyers.com/family-prenuptial-agreements.php <- law firm with experience overturning prenups. Keep in mind that if you are not forking out a substantial amount of $ in the advent of divorce, the prenup itself may be considered unenforceable due to being unconscionable, w…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:00 PM
4

I think there is nothing wrong with considering all of a woman's qualities and assets when considering a permanent relationship, and also a relationship that may imperil my wealth, life, sanity, and future children. So yes, I would think about: her family her money her intelligence her looks her measurements (no fatties) her height (I prefer closer to my height) her fertility (I want children) her fidelity her belief system her sense of fashion her voice her family history of mental illness her …
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:36 PM
4

I like the idea of relationship roulette too - I am dependent on finding that One Good Woman that refuses to exploit huge systematic advantages against me, and by her good graces I am able to count myself lucky. I'm saved, saved by the grace of the One Good Woman !!!!!
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:17 PM
5

I applaud your effort to ask tough questions and getting to the heart of the matter. Don't let your friends fall prey to shaming tactics and peer pressure, forcing them into marriage. Remember, there is no construct designed to milk a man for money so efficient as marriage. I'm not anti-marriage though - just believe in going in eyes wide open to both the good possibilities and bad ones. Two important question for we men: "What can I get out of a marriage that I cannot get from a long-term commi…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:40 PM
19

The general gist is simple: She brings little to the table and he brings a great deal. However, I do not subscribe to any ideals that require we men have to have relationships with: ugly women poor women irresponsible women murderous women If a woman is given carte blanche to pursue wealthy attractive men, why does it suddenly become an issue when a man does the same? Bias!
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:22 AM
9

The existence of a subreddit neither proves nor disproves that women read it, think like what is written in the articles, or practice hypergamy as an evolutionary/adaptive trait. Seriously, you can do better than that. Or is that the "big guns?" My turn: https://www.google.com/search?q=marrying+a+rich+man
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:07 AM
59

I like your post. First of all it is flat out wrong, as I looked at responsibility, income, attractiveness, age, desire for children and length of relationship not merely economics. Second because it is a shining example of everything that is wrong with our culture. Many women would not look askance at anything I wrote if the sexes were reversed. In fact, there would the tacit approval. "oh my, a millionaire?" eyes lighting up You see, women can regularly talk about marrying up for a man with su…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:57 AM
30

If she is pressuring him for marriage a few months into a relationship, then be afraid, be very, very afraid.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:30 AM
7

Show me the long list of women lining up to marry poor men, writing books about it, articles in cosmopolitan and the like. I'm waiting..........
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:29 AM
4

I found a good book for you. http://booksarefun.com/a-rich-man-s-baby.html
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:27 AM
3

Pussy-Pass in action: less likely to be convicted less likely to do real time can claim spousal abuse can claim abuse by the young child (victim) can claim abuse even by a near infant (victim)
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:22 AM
9

The vast numbers of men with great character and compatibility gracing covers of magazines worldwide is driving circulation through the roof. Seriously, you make me chuckle. Higher status males with status, power, money, ability or looks (generally 1 or more required) is what women seek to obtain. Don't kid yourself.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:20 AM
12

Objectifying is only wrong when a man does it.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:13 AM
8

If a woman does it, that is fine, but if a man does it then it is "shallow"? Don't you find that incredibly sexist? If a woman can desire attractiveness and money in a man, why can a man not expect the same?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:59 AM
0

looking good is a sign of good genes. Men historically valued attractiveness for both its own sake, and the promise of better sons too (though I doubt we realized it then).
/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:49 AM
19

Your comment reads like something a RadFem would write. Women idealize marrying up. What is wrong when I suggest the same, or at least marrying someone on the same level as my friend? Oh no, suddenly that is "objectifying".
/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:48 AM
15

I think your insinuation that a man has to disregard her lack of money, her lack of beauty, her financial irresponsibility and failure to secure a good job for "what's on the inside" as blatantly sexist. What woman would advise her friends to go out with a deadbeat bum without a good job that happened to be ugly too and only had the value of an erection? If a woman can think a certain way about men, what is wrong about men applying it to women? Women's value of men: sense of humor good looks big…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:45 AM
14

NEWSFLASH Meanwhile, vast hordes of obese ugly women are crying out about the massive numbers of men chasing them.....
/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:37 AM
3

Historically, men traded their resources for beauty, sex and love. Whether it is hunting high-risk game to bring back the giant haunches of meat, dangerous factory working, working 12 hours a day in a cubicle or fighting wars. If she brings little to the table apart from beauty, sex and love and the last 2 can be fairly equal among some women, of course I would look critically at their beauty. That is part of a trade of course. Keep in mind that for thousands of years we men have sacrificed grea…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:05 AM
15

Marriage is not a relationship. Marriage is a societal stamp that enables a woman to deprive you of your wealth, well-being, and could enable her to murder you and get out scot free (see Pussy Pass). A relationship can exist completely independent of marriage. I did not advise my friend to end his relationship; only to halt marriage plans.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:56 AM
1

Men marry attractiveness and youth, good sex helps too, or at least the promise of it. An old woman has little to offer in the first two departments.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:49 AM
12

She'd have more to offer a man if she was in her prime. Relationships for modern men are about a trade. A good one, a bad one, but still a trade. Your $, sanity, and potentially your life are all at stake.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:47 AM
23

We men are willing to trade our money (lifeblood) in exchange for beauty, love, and sex. In fact, we've been quite content fighting wars for women, getting our limbs chopped off and working crazy hours for a woman. There is nothing wrong with wanting something beautiful that puts out and actually cares for you. Stop buying into RadFem bullshit of all women are beautiful crap, or that I owe a relationship to women that are butt ugly and unattractive.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:46 AM
13

50ish both
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:44 AM
18

Are you saying that he should have married the woman in spite of her: dismal career prospects lack of meaningful employment disregard for fiscal responsibility quickly fading looks and her great incentives to try and overthrow a prenup to capitalize on my friend's wealth?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:43 AM
0

I actually felt very sad for the woman in the video. She is unhappy and lonely, and it shows throughout the entire video. She is paying for some companionship, being used, and then discarded at the end of the night. Though we want to correct the sexism against men that is modern day feminism, let us never forget that the Radfem attack on traditional relationships also includes female victims too. Empathy for those with sadder, duller lives as a result.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:36 PM
0

I think there is lots of conjecture in that document and it appears to lack scientific rigor in analyzing the why behind much of the results. Like many men, I am not threatened by success. Though I value good looks a great deal, if I happened to meet a brainy hot doctor or media figure, I wouldn't be opposed to having a relationship with her. All things being equal, I would prefer to go out with the woman making more money. Someone like Giada de Laurentiis would be a rather awesome catch. We men…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:26 PM
-2

There is a general anti-male bias in the media, that being: having a man is dangerous. Men create violence There is little use for men Men are disposable. I would say those are false, and that a man being around actually creates a more safe environment.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 02:27 PM
1

Happy to see that the child is where she belongs - with her father that wanted her. Disappointing bias in the overall story as it did not discuss a father's right to a child or express the slightest amount of sympathy for his plight.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:43 PM
-4

I think this is a good time to raise the topic. A woman is safest in a marriage with a man, including from general violent crime. http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2004/03/marriage-still-the-safest-place-for-women-and-children http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2004/pdf/bg1732.pdf
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:38 PM
1

I think it should start by talking about the abuse the woman is committing against her husband by denying him the intimacy that people require. Instead, they put it onto the "evilmenz".
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:53 AM
5

It is a logical fallacy typical of political correct ideology to require membership in a "minority demographic" in order to discuss the rights or privileges of said demographic, unless you are a white male, a christian, or some other unpopular demographic.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:56 AM
3

RadFems are right, there is a war against women. Unfortunately for them, they are completely incorrect in the manner in which the war is being waged. It is not patriarchal oppressors, but instead women killing women by selectively murdering their unborn female children. Freedoms taken to extreme has resulted in a womb being a dangerous place these days. Now, the innocents are subject to the capricious whims of a selfish mother. I leave you now with an extract from the original Hippocratic Oath, …
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:20 PM
1

Corporate interests could also be multi-national interests, or in China, government interests (since the govt retains a % in most large companies). I have never claimed feminism is controlling these companies. You are fundamentally misunderstanding what I wrote.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:26 PM
1

I only claim what is in the same article you posted in your source - that marketing and advertising are appropriating feminist ideas as useful to sell products. The economic system has no real bearing, as that type of marketing/advertising could be used regardless of the economic system in question. Does this sound like a recent, or old phenomenon? http://www.savethemales.ca/000180.html
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:25 PM
1

I did not take a marketing campaign and call it feminism, you claimed channeling via capitalism. Then you posted sources on "advertising/marketing attempting to direct feminist thoughts toward product buys". 1990s girl power was not when the idea of the disposable male came about that is highly related to the subject at hand. Women being told they didn't need a man far predates that. I hope you continue this discussion so I can start pulling down loads of historical evidence to the contrary - th…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:09 AM
1

An economic system (capitalism/mercantilism) is not marketing/advertising. You are attempting to paint a broad brush, but thus far have posted no convincing evidence. Advertising/marketing can occur in multiple economic systems, and did occur prior to capitalism. Therefore, I am going to dismiss your arguments as unsupported and unrelated.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:02 AM
2

Again, you are conflating consumerism with capitalism. Stop while you are ahead.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 01:36 AM
2

I think you are conflating multiple issues and, you are refusing to post your sources. Issue 1: You can have it all via being a super career woman and putting biology on hold. Issue 2: Be hypergamous - seek out the perfect man, upgrade away Issue 3: Buy lots of things and find self-worth in them (consumerism) In effect you are stating that Issues 1, 2, and 3 are all ideologically based on capitalism? Capitalism != Consumerism. Capitalism is an economic system, whereas consumerism is an approach …
/r/MensRights18/01/13 01:35 AM
3

Point out your sources supporting said extraordinary claims.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 12:49 AM
3

neo liberal conservative? Could you speak english instead of trying to confuse the issue. RadFems lied, now women in a race against the clock from a reproductive perspective are going to be barren spinsters. It really is quite simple.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:29 PM
4

Men can have children in later life without IVF treatments. Only a younger woman is required.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:06 PM
1

I pity RadFems. Most do not realize how clueless and out of touch they are with the female mainstream. "Privilege", "Patriarchy" - AKA, batshit crazy. They do not realize the toxicity they inject into relationships with their mantra of "evilmenz" and how that negatively impacts their ability to have successful relationships with men (if they are not a lesbian).
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:04 AM
14

That is about as useful as saying the same thing about a democratic convention or a communist one for that matter. It adds nothing to the conversation except your political bias
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:43 AM
-1

There are a number of issues with this. First of all we can easily think up adaptation/evolutionary reasons why men might care less about the immediate personal cleanliness of their personal environments, whereas a woman would care. In a hunter-gatherer society, the females might be gathering nearby to the current domicile while males may be ranging far distant in order to pursue higher value game. This is related somewhat to how women use landmark navigation and males use euclidean navigation s…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 05:24 PM
2

I feel horrible for all the men in China growing up with no chance ever to have a spouse. The numbers simply don't exist to magically recreate the missing women China needs. The comments I added [The Real War Against Women] was my editorializing. It is meant to indicate that this is an actual war against females, rather than the make believe wars we see so often due to biased statistics of unlike populations in the workforce.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:25 AM
1

I didn't know this was a problem in Canada too. Although it is an unpopular opinion as seen by a large amount of downvoting received, I think the power of the state to permit violence against the defenseless (infants in the womb), or the near defenseless convicted criminals) is also correlated with the use of the power of the state against those with limited means of defense - men. Unchecked power of the state against individuals frees the state to commit central planning abominations, resulting…
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:22 AM
0

To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize -Voltaire
/r/MensRights06/01/13 11:15 PM
4

"According to the FIR, the girl, a student of class two, was abducted from in front of her house in Manzoorabad in Rahim Yar Khan by three women and a man." In 3rd world countries, women are sometimes involved in a kidnap, rape & trafficking. However, this fact is paid little attention by RadFems who like to point out the "evilmenz" while ignoring female complicity.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:16 PM
1

The article was just window dressing lacking detail, and the academic article is not accessible. I find your evidence currently quite lacking currently, and you did not post any evidence to the contrary either. I dispute whether or not it is the established fact you are trying to present it as.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:52 AM
11

Where is your evidence for pornography being sourced by human trafficking, and not professional porn stars? Are you conflating the porn that is generally consumed by men and women with POV self-made media from abusers? Why do you not mention that women are also huge consumers of porn?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:57 PM
-6

This sounds like some of the same issues that Thunderf00t is fighting in the atheist / rationalist community http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKKQdJR7F_I&list=UUmb8hO2ilV9vRa8cilis88A&index=1
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:02 PM
2

Very true. I can unfortunately imagine the amount of innocent children that have died due to paternity fraud and missing information later on experiencing a medical crises... "But Doctor, there is nothing on the chart about carrying that gene?"
/r/MensRights05/01/13 01:55 AM
9

This is great news to hear about. When there is paternity fraud, not only is the father deceived, but also the child. A child deserves a relationship with the true father!
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:54 PM
1

My point wasn't that it was a minimal sentence. Rather that women commit sex crimes too, and there are lots of perverted women out there, NOT just men.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:25 AM
2

Logic fail If enough token females are not included, or no qualified females are found, it is automatically a "war".
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:00 AM
2

Except white women I presume?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:59 PM
2

No wonder Reddit staff is breaking the "rules" ; we have a fox guarding the henhouse. If anything, this shows our need of having our own space, not dependent on AVfM or others, just our own. User supported.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 12:00 PM
-4

I think you can punish her with social condemnation. For a woman, isn't that fairly grievous?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:55 AM
0

3rd wave feminists that are sex positive types don't view an intrinsic war between men and women. If they are recycling the old, tired diatribes, they are still technically 2nd wavers even if they are young. Sex positive feminists may have started 1st or 2nd wave due to advanced age, but some are now 3rd wave. A good example is Betty Dodson. She fucking loves men! She is also a cougar and a half like you wouldn't believe. You'll have to watch out for some of her older work as it might be conside…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 06:25 PM
1

MR is egalitarian at its core. So, to divide groups in leftist fashion is not how MR operates. Having said that, I will also say that gays are very disenfranchised due to the current system that rewards women and penalizes men by performing stealth wealth transfers. I've heard of gay men donating sperm to lesbians and you know how the State feels about raiding wallets of genetic providers... To the extent that we can empower men, we also empower gay men. What are gay rights? Generally: Same-sex …
/r/MensRights02/01/13 06:09 PM
-1

I think we need to come out publicly to support 1st wave feminism, and specifically oppose 2nd wave feminism. 3rd wave feminism in general is so sex positive that men are adored. There are certain individuals that are still considered radicals, without being 2nd wave feminist - specifically Camille Paglia
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:20 PM
31

A series of lawsuits, just waiting to happen?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:16 PM
-9

they are saying these guys are not nice because of a few questions: The guy wants to be in charge The guy wants a woman that shaves her beastly legs The guy doesn't approve of interracial marriage The guy wants to marry his own ethnicity I don't think above has any bearing on nice or mean, but only right wing politics, or being from a few select religious groups - Christians, Jews, Indians.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:16 PM
19

Logic fail - being against interracial marriage, or wanting to marry someone of the same race does not a racist or asshole make. Many jewish people can trace their ancestry back over 2,000 years. I don't see how it is fair that I deprive them of the right to decide who exactly they want to marry, or call them "racist" for wanting to marry within their own group, and retain their jewishness in the process. In many ethnic/religious groups, marrying outside of the race can lead to family/religious …
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:13 PM
0

Send in your complaints to OKC about this. http://www.okcupid.com/feedback I complained under the "Complaint" category. Perhaps we should do this with Tumblr also?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:04 PM
1

Do you consider yourself a first wave, second wave, or third wave feminist?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 12:26 PM
3

There are really two schools of feminism - gender feminism, and equity feminism* Equity feminism, also called first wave feminism, is the equivalent to Mens Rights. Equity feminism sought to obtain equal rights for women and at its core is Egalitarianism. It can be summarized as equal rights, equal opportunity and equal protections for women. Many women subscribe to the ideas of equity feminism even if they aren't aware of it. However, almost all of the battles of Equity feminism have already be…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 11:01 AM
2

First of all, I don't associate with the type of woman that would commit a false rape accusation by selectively choosing with whom I associate to the extent possible. Second, anytime a penis goes near a vagina I realize there is the possibility of a pregnancy occurring and I accept full responsibility for my part in that potential conception, even if I don't want it to occur.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:45 AM
1

Death-grip is seen as more than just a hand; it is a hand use with a particular tightness that a woman having good PC muscles would mimic. But yes, it would help premature ejaculators.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:21 AM
6

The title was a summary; in the process of summarizing, information is lost. Everyone with half a brain or experience watching cop shows understands how a plea deal works, how it avoids a trial, and how someone facing years might escape and get off scot free, with a suspended sentence or years of probation. TL;DR Don't be such an internet lawyer.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:21 AM
-11

"Nelson told police that she was leaving her job at Planned Parenthood ". A woman complicit in the murder of innocents also lying to the police? I never would have guessed.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:38 PM
8

I think her babysitting career is over.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:16 PM
36

Gentlemen, the scales of justice are balanced against us.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter