TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zktr Archive

View 20 posts and 436 comments by zktr on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
235

Social Issueszktr/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:16 PM
140

Social Issueszktr/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:31 PM
81

Social Issueszktr/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:51 PM
49

zktr/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:54 PM
44

Activism/Supportzktr/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:14 PM
37

Feminismzktr/r/MensRights18/04/16 12:39 AM
34

Feminismzktr/r/MensRights23/09/15 06:57 PM
28

Discriminationzktr/r/MensRights22/11/15 04:55 AM
26

zktr/r/MensRights13/05/16 08:26 PM
24

Feminismzktr/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:24 PM
24

zktr/r/MensRights23/04/15 09:46 PM
23

Feminismzktr/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:15 AM
23

Discriminationzktr/r/MensRights19/07/15 04:29 PM
19

Feminismzktr/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:48 PM
12

Action Op.zktr/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:06 PM
10

Feminismzktr/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:41 AM
8

Social Issueszktr/r/MensRights28/02/16 10:34 PM
8

Feminismzktr/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:30 AM
7

Discriminationzktr/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:26 AM
0

zktr/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:29 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Oh okay.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 11:04 PM
1

You forgot to use archive.is. Yahoo News has been infested with feminist garbage lately.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:02 PM
1

They all crawl into your beds anyway No... no they don't crawl into my bed.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:29 AM
1

Think of the SJW-pushing done by the Obama administration in its 2nd term (pay gap speeches, etc). Now multiply that by 10. There was none his first term. Emboldened by reelection, it began to pop up time to time. Embolden the party with a 3rd consecutive term and they'll feel they've been given a mandate by the people to push their SJWism far and wide and permanently embed it everywhere.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:15 AM
1

Sure they've been doing it since then, but their party managed to keep it hidden until 2012. I had no idea about it, and in my everyday observations before 2012 there was relative harmony between the sexes, starting late elementary school (~1996) and lasting until 2012 when modern feminism started taking over social media.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 10:08 PM
11

I had thought that "girls vs boys" thing had ended in 4th grade. Then 2012 / 2013 happened - grown adults acting like they're back in elementary school. The sooner this recent feminism fad ends the better.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 06:16 AM
2

You really should archive BBC articles using archive.is - especially their articles relating to Feminism. They've be really terrible lately.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 08:34 PM
1

You're welcome, though I wouldn't say they've been "aggressively indoctrinating for decades". I just meant that they've been aggressively indoctrinating over the past few years. Before that, the ideas were a part of their party, but "in the back seat", and it was easy to be unaware of them (like I was).
/r/MensRights26/05/16 08:31 PM
2

But they don't just use it - it's been a part of their party for decades that they just didn't emphasize until a few years ago (personally I had thought it had finished up in the 60's, and I didn't know about the crazy ideology and beliefs, so I was a moderate democrat). The leftist parties have absolutely been working behind-the-scenes and in-the-open to to spread the ideology. As a federal government employee, I routinely get mass-emails from the administration to all government workers matter…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 12:33 AM
2

You're talking about individuals. But when it comes to official party lines, it's the leftist parties that are actively pushing 3rd wave feminism and race-baiting. They're the highest-level organization putting these ideas into gullible people's minds.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 08:52 PM
1

It shouldn't be, but it has to be, because the left is the one pushing the SJW ideologies. The right also has a lot of bad ideas, but right now we need to send a message to the left that they need to drop their recent SJW extremism before they can be put back into office.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:04 PM
1

Melissa McCarthyism
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:01 PM
1

It definitely got worse in 2014, and 2015 was pretty bad too. Sometimes it seems like it's starting to get better, then something happens that makes me think it's still just as bad as ever. Canada is fucked for a long time, with their "Pope of Feminism" president. At least the USA is probably about to get a big dose of "Fuck the SJWs" from Trump (no I wasn't rooting for him in the primary, but now he's the least-bad option, and I think he's gonna move back to the center soon for the general elec…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 03:26 AM
2

Interesting - the binders comment was in October 2012 - long after I had lots of bad experiences with SJW feminists I knew in real life. I guess I just brushed it off and was still of the mindset that the right's bad ideas were much worse. It's true though that 2012 was before SJW feminists had fully inserted themselves into public positions and started openly pushing their shit all over the place - there were just a lot of underground sources and groups that kept causing stupid drama to occasio…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 01:21 AM
2

Whoah... my memory was off by a lot! I've been saying lately that it started at the end of 2012, but I just went back through my Facebook history and apparently I first encountered it in APRIL 2012, and was fully pissed off at it by May 2012. I'm having a hard time trying to remember how I justified voting for and rooting for the Democrats / Obama to win the presidency in November 2012 - I guess I must have still thought the SJWs/feminists were a tiny fringe of lunatics with no power that the re…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 06:47 PM
1

I first noticed it in late 2012, basically right after I voted for Obama. Edit: After going through my Facebook history, it turns out I actually first encountered it in April 2012.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 04:02 AM
1

Interesting explanation about their blind spots. Explain to me how it doesn't boil down to "judging solely on looks". Are you trying to say that it also has to include "believing that the person is a non-human object"? Because nobody believes that (other than the rare occasional psychopath). In fact, for a person to be sexually interesting to another person, they have to be seen as a living human, because humans are only attracted to humans - not inanimate objects (generally). 3rd wave feminist …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:32 PM
1

Pretty sure that's not the case. In fact, I tend to be the opposite - I think girls are flirting with me when they aren't (and often they objectively are flirting, to any outside observer, but apparently not in their own minds). And I'm pretty sure that's much more common than the opposite case for guys. If this girl was flirting with me, she must have been reading some of that red pill crap about "negging" and doing it completely wrong. We literally had zero interaction until she said "You look…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:20 PM
2

Goddamnit, those last three links are full of horribly illogical bullshit. Complete detachment from reality. I found myself banging my head against my desk several times in reading them. It's so great how feminists "femsplain" how men think to men, all the while complaining about men "mansplaining". And just as I said, those articles all still boil down to "judging someone solely on their looks", which women do just as often as men do.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:48 AM
1

Interesting list - never seen anything like that before. However, 99% of the time when it's used today it's in the context of a man judging a woman's appearance. Also, feminists themselves are guilty of several of these items, and the average woman is also guilty of several of these items. Also it's pretty terrible of them to twist Kant's words to make it seem like he was on-board with their ideology (which didn't exist yet). Also, for a more sane and down-to-earth analysis of the topic, check o…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:05 AM
1

No that's okay, I knew what you meant. Yeah it doesn't really have a clear definition. But if you define it by how it's used, it seems to mean "judging solely based on looks", which both sexes do, and they act like it's a much worse thing than it is and like only men do it.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:50 AM
1

That's a good article - I might need to save it for later.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:36 AM
2

Okay, please define it for me then. I've never heard any definition or description that can't be summarized as just that.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:00 AM
4

You have men you weren't interacting with randomly come up to you to start a conversation about how extremely terrible you look? I've never even once heard a woman make this claim - not even a feminist. Surely you meant "men complimenting your looks". And no, this isn't the only time anything like this has happened. Several times I've had random ladies I wasn't interacting with come up to me and insult my appearance. On a regular basis random ladies I wasn't interacting with look at me and react…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:32 PM
6

The rest of the conversation was something like: Me: "Did you really just say all that to me?" Her: "I did" Me: "Well, you have an ugly nose" Her: (something I forget, acting as if I were hitting on her and she were rejecting me) Me: "Wait, you're acting like you thought I was interested in you... I wasn't" Her: "Well then it looks like we're two people not interested in each other" Me: "Okay. And watch what you say to strangers."
/r/MensRights13/05/16 08:55 PM
2

It's judging solely on looks, whether in a good or bad way. That's how feminists use the word.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 08:49 PM
3

Well they both like to hold up handwritten signs.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:55 PM
1

Oh, so you mean "lock him out of implementing his ideas if he were president"?
/r/MensRights05/05/16 08:05 PM
2

Why would the GOP lock him out? Didn't you hear? Everyone else in the party dropped out as of today.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 07:06 AM
4

Until today I would have disagreed about voting Trump - but now he's the ONLY choice for anti-SJWs. Let's hope the worst things he's said were just pandering to the far right and we'll see a much more reasonable side emerge now that he has no in-party competition.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:26 AM
1

Laws granting a few non-typical rights to women isn't the same thing as an entire movement that could be called "feminism". Granting those few rights is far removed from what feminism aims for. Survival wasn't guaranteed at all - there was always the threat of invasion, disease, injury (and no significantly legitimate medicine). Guns didn't exist and machines were primative, so physical strength was crucial to differences between gender roles. No birth control meant women would have like 10 kids…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 07:08 PM
1

And yet she believes that women are "objectified". Projection.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 12:17 AM
1

Not sure what you mean. "Feminism" as it exists today is "The Patriarchy (Conspiracy) Theory", which was invented in the 1960's. Before that, there was the Suffrage Movement, etc. From what I've read, there were no political organizations comparable to anything that could be called "feminism" before the late 1800's.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 12:15 AM
9

I say we keep the draft, but only enlist the obese. All of them. We've got so many, we'd win the fight by sheer numbers of people with guns, and as a side effect we'd greatly reduce the obesity epidemic. Two birds with one stone.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:33 AM
14

And the Washington Post is promoting it. Washington Post has gone full-feminazi in the past couple of years.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:31 AM
13

if you sign up for a military Historically, most people fighting in wars have never had much of a choice about it. There have always been versions of the draft, and when your town is being invaded it's always been the men's responsibility to defend everyone or die - they would be killed whether they wanted to fight or not. In wars, men are generally targeted for killing, and afterwards women are targeted for unwanted sex but not usually killing. That's being a "secondary victim", and I'd choose …
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:26 AM
4

Right - the "Patriarchy Theory" is one of the core ideologies I was talking about. That, and the idea of "pervasive hatred of all women by men" (misogyny), and the idea that men have been oppressing women for millenia (rather than the obvious historical facts that reliable birth control and modern technology only made feminism's goals possible within the past 50-to-100 years and that there have always been advantages and disadvantages to both sexes), and the idea that gender has no origin in bio…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:09 AM
8

Also it's important to note that the core ideologies from which all their ostensibly-noble ideas are derived are blatantly man-hating, anti-scientific, and historically illiterate. The most common type of feminist today is the one that just hears about and believes the ostensibly-noble ideas and may or may not know the surface-level of the ideologies, but doesn't understand the full extent of the ideologies and what's so wrong about them.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:29 PM
157

You forgot her classic line about women being the "primary victims of war".
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:21 PM
2

History shows that appeasing Nazis is never a good idea.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:08 AM
1

Well, it's more complicated than that. I try really hard to sculpt my beard to make my jaw look square (like Brad Pitt), since it's well-established that this is the facial structure ladies tend to be drawn to. My beard still hasn't fully grown down from the top of my sideburns yet, so it's still thin enough that depending on the lighting you can see through it, which ruins the illusion. But I do frequently get compliments from ladies on my beard, and I actually did get laid twice (and almost go…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:27 AM
1

What? Bernie Sanders is a self-proclaimed "strong feminist" who claims to be good friends with Gloria Steinem - the inventor of Patriarchy Theory. Look up the interview on Youtube. He may possibly be WORSE than Hillary on this subject.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 06:52 AM
1

I grow my beard to try to be more attractive to the ladies. Not sure if it's working. "Patriachy" be damned.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 06:38 AM
4

It's definitely discriminatory, however, few men would want to go to a men-only club night. In spite of what feminists say about men hating women and wanting to exclude them, it's kind of the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 06:27 PM
1

Oh okay, that clears up what you were trying to say a little. Hmm, do you have a source that 70% of single people in city centers are women and that it's due to discrimination? That's a good point that most prisoners, homeless, and excluded people are males. Though I would say that men are not specifically targeted for marginalization based on their sex - they're just not given special treatment like the other sex is given. And most of us get used to these possibilities and "man up" about it. An…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 02:17 PM
1

And in reality there are some strong correlations between the sex and marginalization, exclusion, stereotypes, happiness, education, neighborhood I don't think any of these are true. "Marginalization" means "one group intentionally not including another group" - a group choosing less frequently to participate in something is not marginalization. Same point for "exclusion". For "stereotypes", there are just as many stereotypes about men as about women. And most of them have some element of truth …
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:58 PM
1

Oh, sorry, you're right. I skimmed the article and missed the part where she disagreed with Chelsea's statement.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:48 PM
13

It has a good overall message, but it has one part I disagree with: "boys actually run the world" That depends completely on how you look at it - even before the modern era when almost only men worked outside house, women still had a huge influence on the world and on what men did, and raising the world is a pretty big part of running the world. And now almost all women are working, while still having the same effects on and influence on men, so now it really can be said that they DO run the wor…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:47 AM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFsTr0kGAqU
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:32 AM
1

Close enough. He didn't say "strangers" - that was my paraphrasing of his overall message.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:38 PM
2

Right, I haven't heard of and can't think of any secular arguments against ALL abortion.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:08 PM
1

Right, there definitely are religious arguments against abortion. My point was that there's also a secular argument against abortion past a certain point in the pregnancy. Also, even for those who use religion to argue against it, they most likely are also motivated by feeling bad about killing a developing baby, which is also the motivation for the secular argument.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:49 PM
1

Sure there is. The secular argument is that they consider a developing baby to be a human and they think killing it is wrong. I'm not anti-abortion - I think it should be legal before some point in the third trimester, whenever the baby could be considered sentient. Also, at least Kasich is somewhat moderate about it - he supports all the exceptional cases that far-righters like Cruz don't support (rape, incest, threat to mother's life).
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:37 PM
1

He may be religious, but he's no theocrat - especially compared to Cruz. Or Carson (even though he's out). Do you have any examples of Kasich trying to put his religious views into law?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:13 AM
0

You disagree? Prove me wrong rather than just downvoting.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 05:18 AM
1

This is the current, mainstream left, as of 2012. At least in the USA.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:13 PM
1

This is the current, mainstream left, as of 2012.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:12 PM
0

This is the current, mainstream left, as of 2012.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:11 PM
1

Sure it is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony#Situational_irony
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:54 PM
1

Yep. Also to get a driver's license, a man has to register for the draft, while women don't. Isn't that ironic? It's brought up so often that in Saudi Arabia women aren't allowed to drive, yet in the United States the default condition is that men aren't allowed to get a driver's license.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 04:53 PM
1

I'll give you that most of these statements aren't usually stated this directly and concisely - they like to dress up these ideas in pretty coats of paint to make them seem less extreme, and a lot of the more casual feminists only see the pretty coats of paint. The "core beliefs" I was describing (in no particular order) are: 1.) The Patriarchy Theory, 2.) The idea of pervasive "misogyny", 3.) The idea of women being oppressed by men (even in the first world), 4.) The idea that gender is a "soci…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 02:57 PM
3

Yes it does. All throughout the wording of the study, and the fact that they made a chart of all the times whether or not the "women and children first order" was given (why was it a commonly-known order at all?), not to mention that this is just one manifestation of chivalry, which is well-documented and ubiquitous, and if you go looking at other quotes about the Titanic sinking (even from Suffragettes) they're all making the assumption that men sacrificing themselves for women and children is …
/r/MensRights16/04/16 04:41 AM
3

It may be true that people generally prioritize themselves over strangers, but the fact that they're assuming that men sacrificing themselves for female strangers is something that's noble and fair and to be encouraged is evidence of the fact that the attitude is and has been prevalent, even though people revert to fight-or-flight in extreme situations. The deep entrenchment of this mindset is in direct contradiction to the feminist assertion that women have no social advantages. By the way, her…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 04:05 AM
1

Regardless, to register to vote you have to be registered for the draft.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 03:27 AM
1

Whoah, I had no idea the most famous scene in the movie Titanic was a direct reference to the Titanic memorial statue in Washington DC (which I didn't know existed).
/r/MensRights16/04/16 03:20 AM
1

Modern feminism is neurosis masquerading as a continuation of the Suffrage Movement.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 03:04 AM
2

One of the goals of ideological feminists is to destroy the family unit. This is well-documented.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 02:54 AM
1

Not all who call themselves feminists these days fully understand the ideological underpinnings or the implications - we're in an era of "pop feminism" where people are like "Oh of course I think everyone should be treated fairly! That's what feminism means, right?" But it's well-documented that serious ideological feminists at best are critical of marriage but grudgingly accept it, at worst have been out to completely destroy it, since the 1960's when feminism was transformed (largely by Gloria…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:21 PM
1

My point was that they said "text books" and then sent a Wikipedia link instead, and I didn't feel like digging through it to see if there were any text books referenced. Also, in case you didn't see my other comment: I did some research to find actual scientific research on the subject, and what the actual scientific sources say is that it's usually 100% about sexual desire, but occasionally also about other things mixed in with sexual desire: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beas…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:55 PM
2

Actually I've learned about it through 1.) Knowing too many of them in real life, 2.) Reading their own articles and their own publications, 3.) Arguing with them online and in real life. Prove to me that these aren't their beliefs - that the things I mentioned as their core beliefs aren't actually their core beliefs, and that the things I mentioned as things most of them believe aren't actually things that most of them believe.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:46 PM
1

Show me sources that prove that that that's what feminists really mean - I've had countless arguments and read countless articles that clearly demonstrate that that's not what they mean. In fact, on this very article's comment section, I got banned for arguing that it's not usually about demonstrating power and always involves sexual desire - the commentators very clearly stated they believe it's never about sexual desire at all. And this is consistent with everything else I've heard and read fr…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:22 PM
3

Be careful about using the word "troll" the wrong way. The word is supposed to mean "someone who goes around saying things they don't actually believe just to get a reaction". But feminists misuse it to mean "anyone who argues against core feminist beliefs". Don't use it to mean "anyone who argues for feminist beliefs" - that's not what it means.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:17 AM
6

So you believe that men as a group have conspired all throughout history to oppress women, out of hatred for all of them? You believe that men as a group conspired long ago to randomly invent all the ideas about secondary sex characteristics (which you refer to as gender) rather than them being either directly from biology or the result of the interaction between biology and the world? You believe that men have all the social advantages and no disadvantages, while women have all the disadvantage…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:13 AM
2

Just started using it because of this. It's not bad.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 04:26 AM
1

Right, I meant that a lady can be considered a "10" by the majority of guys while only having small breasts (there's a wide range of preferences there), being thin but not looking like they're literally starving (which can actually be a turn-off), and having some degree of the masculine traits of height and jaw squareness.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 07:33 PM
2

As with most things feminists say, that's a huge oversimplification, but there is a grain of truth to it. Men are attracted to femininity, which a large part of is "lack of testosterone-induced pubescent changes". Prepubescent boys are feminine to a large degree (but not entirely). Men are also attracted to youthfulness. On the other hand, a lady can be very attractive without having large breasts, without being excessively skinny, and most guys don't really care about height or jaw squareness (…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 12:37 AM
3

What do you mean "boyish"? If you mean "thin", thin is attractive unless they look like they're literally starving, in which case it's a bit off-putting. If by "boyish" you mean "lady with a buzzcut", yeah that's not attractive.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 10:12 PM
1

Haha, true, I probably shouldn't have included that. It was mainly to give context to the link under it.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 05:06 PM
1

I'm not sure I understand your question.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 05:04 PM
2

I just did a more thorough search - what the evidence shows (ignoring the nonscientific evidence-free feminist sources) is that it's usually a combination of factors, and that it varies between cases - in the most common case it's 100% about sexual gratification, but much less frequently you get extreme psychopaths who lean towards the anger side (but it's still sexual because they're aroused and getting sexual gratification from it). https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/201104/i…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:46 AM
2

No, but there were plenty of descriptions blatantly pushing feminist dogma. The only hope I can see is sending SJWs a message / cutting their funding by voting them out of office (as bad as their opposition party is on some other topics).
/r/MensRights08/04/16 06:47 AM
1

Hmm. Most of those are fine. A few are questionable, depending on the approach they go with it. One or two are kind of dumb. Also, one of the people's last name is "Poo". On the other hand, the Time Magazine thing: they're pushing BS like Emma Watson's "He For She" and the lie that the pay gap is due to discrimination. Also the votership of the poll seems to be SJW-skewed - a lot of the worst options from that perspective have the most 'yes' votes.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:39 AM
1

Hmm... didn't find anything on the subject there, and the articles there are neither a textbook nor a curriculum.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 09:10 PM
1

First of all, that's not from an actual psychology department - it's a curriculum for some kind of Teacher's Institute. Second, right from the start it's filled with blatantly inaccurate feminist rhetoric - this curriculum is politically motivated propaganda, rather than an actual scientific exploration of the subject by an actual psychology department.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 09:09 PM
1

Modern feminism exhibits most of the characteristics of a cult: http://abuse.wikia.com/wiki/Cult_checklist http://csj.org/infoserv_cult101/checklis.htm
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:12 PM
3

That's not a textbook, it's Wikipedia, which feminists routinely dominate on controversial subjects. Last time I checked, mainstream psychology wasn't saying anything like that. Do you have a source on the textbooks you were referring to?
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:11 PM
6

Many different combinations of motivations, sure, but sexual desire is always one of the motivations. Feminists nonsensically insist that sexual desire plays zero role.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:09 PM
2

I've lost three real-life friends over these kind of tactics Only three? I've lost track of how many I've lost, but it's probably ten times that.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:05 PM
5

Modern feminists seem to define trolling as "making any argument against central feminist dogma". This is how they've used it ever since I learned of their existence years ago. The actual definition of trolling is "posting inflammatory statements that you don't even actually believe solely for the purpose of seeing people's reaction and getting them riled up".
/r/MensRights07/04/16 02:33 PM
10

Funny thing is, I never even said I was an MRA - they just kept making that assertion based on the fact that I was disagreeing with them. In fact, I wouldn't even really consider myself one so much as an anti-modern-feminist. And they kept on using the same combo of two logical fallacies (straw man and ad hominem), even after they blocked me (saying I was "justifying rape" by saying the motivation is sexual rather than just to demonstrate power). This is the exact same pattern I've been seeing f…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 02:27 PM
7

If the main motivation were to dominate and show power, why would they use their penis? Why not just put them in a chokehold? Why not just knock them out with a punch to the face? Besides that, would you really consider an up-to-no-good frat boy getting a girl blackout drunk and having sex with her to be doing it just to show how much he hates her? Does that make any sense to you?
/r/MensRights07/04/16 02:21 PM
11

This is literally the worst hive of extreme feminists I've ever encountered online outside of Jezebel and Buzzfeed.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 05:49 AM
36

Wow, RawStory just blocked me from the comments section for disagreeing with the narrative. All my comments were just deleted, and they actually made a reference to "disappearing me", which is literally what communist dictators do to censor dissidents: http://imgur.com/Mvbcoza This site is pure garbage. Is this a popular site? Or is it nothing to worry about?
/r/MensRights07/04/16 05:45 AM
9

All my comments were just deleted, and they actually made a reference to "disappearing me", which is literally what communist dictators do to censor dissidents: http://imgur.com/Mvbcoza
/r/MensRights07/04/16 05:44 AM
12

Wow, RawStory just blocked me from the comments section for disagreeing with the narrative...
/r/MensRights07/04/16 05:39 AM
54

Holy shit, there are a lot of hardcore feminists posting in the comments there, "outraged" over the fact that she said that rape could even SOMETIMES not be about hatred (even though in reality it rarely is, and never is completely).
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:05 AM
10

Use archive.is . And stop using Yahoo/Google - they're both currently pushing feminist BS. Bing seems clean right now.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 03:49 AM
1

Shit, now Yahoo is pushing feminist BS on their news page. Bing looks clean right now though.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 03:38 AM
2

Shit, now Yahoo is pushing feminist BS on their news page. Bing looks clean right now though.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 03:37 AM
1

Not a perfect article - has some problems - but good overall.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:30 PM
1

Men are vastly superior to women- SEXIST! Just kidding, but that's literally how the conversation would go if you were talking to a feminist.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:31 AM
1

disagree with the statement that women's opinions are contrary to science Haha, not what I said - read it again. I was talking about feminists - not women (though the majority of them are women). Feminists often conflate the two words "women" and "feminists", acting like they're synonyms, even though only 1 in 5 women call themselves feminists. To make it more clear, I just edited the post to replace the word "their" with "feminists'". I thought we did discuss the duality of privilege more than …
/r/MensRights04/04/16 06:21 PM
2

Hmm. That's only partially debunking it, and it has some obviously wrong things mixed in (such as claiming that women are discouraged from going into medicine - apparently they've never heard of nursing). Other than that, this was 2004 - long before SJWs were common and taking over tech firms.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 10:30 PM
3

Hmm. But doesn't most of the gap that's not attributable to different fields happen when a lady gets married and has kids? When she gets married, she shares her husband's money. But I guess for single ladies the theory makes sense. Well, stats show single ladies in their 20's already make more than men in their 20's, and the economy is still doing terribly.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 10:27 PM
1

Sure, but if they work more hours they'll have less time and energy to shop. If there are actually people behind pushing the pay myth who know it's not true and are doing it to increase consumer spending, they didn't think about that part, or the fact that married women invariably end up spending their husband's money, since they would pool their incomes together.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:47 PM
1

Haha, that's why I always hover the mouse over links before clicking them.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:24 PM
1

Haha, it does seem like that sometimes. I don't think there's actually a downward trend - just random jumping around, as a symptom of the fact that the methods they use to obtain the numbers are inconsistent and flawed.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:22 PM
2

Hmm... it was interesting for a while, but they make some huge mistakes in their reasoning. They talk for a long time about how it's important to see the tradeoffs for every supposed privilege a group has - the pros and cons - but then right after that, they go on a lengthy discussion on how it's a privilege to not get unwanted attention, completely ignoring the fact that getting romantic interest so easily is a huge privilege. It's the other side of the same coin. I would do almost anything to …
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:41 PM
1

I've made this same point to a couple of lady feminists in real life, and they weren't able come up with an argument against it.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:22 PM
1

But feminism is already anti-marriage - they see it as an oppressive institution invented by men to enslave women. Boycotting marriage would be giving feminists exactly what they want.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:04 PM
1

Not gonna make a positive difference in consumer spending vs a stay-at-home mom spending 90% of her husband's money. It actually might reduce a lady's spending, since working longer reduces free time and energy to go out shopping.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:01 PM
1

It does sometimes, but often it's his own fault.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 04:40 AM
1

Sanders, Clinton, Trump, and Cruz all know the wage gap is mythological You forgot Kasich - he's spoken against the pay myth, and his approval ratings are the highest of any candidate. http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/news/a47369/john-kasich-equal-pay/ He also just happens to be the only candidate that polls say can beat SJW PC Hillary. Also, when did Cruz say anything about it? I can't find anything about him talking about it.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 02:48 AM
2

That was a pretty good response. For once. Usually he puts his foot in his mouth with every response to every question ever.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 02:47 AM
1

Kasich has spoken against the pay myth, and his approval ratings are the highest of any candidate. http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/news/a47369/john-kasich-equal-pay/ He also just happens to be the only candidate that polls say can beat SJW PC Hillary. Also, when did Cruz say anything about it? I can't find anything about him talking about it.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 02:46 AM
1

Wrong: Kasich knows what's really going on: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/news/a47369/john-kasich-equal-pay/ He also just happens to be the only candidate that polls say can beat SJW PC Hillary. Also, when did Cruz say anything about it? I can't find anything about him talking about it.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 02:32 AM
1

I'm sure Microsoft doesn't have a clean slate either. I'd go with the one that's doing less attempted public indoctrination.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 10:04 PM
3

Good idea. Just make sure the links are from inarguably reliable sources.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:22 PM
1

Sure. I'm mean, MSN has posted a few SJW-leaning articles, but I don't remember anything too blatant.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:02 PM
1

Possibly, in general.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:01 PM
2

Obama recently passed a regulation requiring businesses to submit data to the government on the sex and income of all employees. It included a few other things I forget, but it definitely did not include things like "hours worked", "specialty", and "education level". That's just the first step, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 08:02 PM
2

But if there are laws and regulations forcing things like, for example, "all employees designated as doctors must make the same yearly salary given the number of years worked", they will be forced to pay more to people who work less and do less economically valuable specialties.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 07:39 PM
0

If it actually causes them to work more. But it seems like what they're actually trying to do is force employers to actually pay them more than men for the same amount of work and for specialties that are less economically valuable.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 07:31 PM
3

Paying women more for less work isn't gonna cause 34% more productivity...
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:40 PM
1

Hmm. I can't find that on the page, but that is a weird article. I think I was mixing up Return of Kings with A Voice For Men when I thought that this was unfair. I do remember reading some bad things about that Roosh guy that runs this site.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:11 AM
1

Did they? Source? That seems unlikely - I remember recently seeing an article on there talking about how it was important to bring more homosexuals into the anti-modern-feminist camp.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:59 AM
1

Ironic that she's saying everyone else needs to "grow up" when the modern feminism she's espousing is the result of little girls not growing up and being stuck in the "girls versus boys" phase they should have grown out of by middle school.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:18 PM
4

By the same logic, not voting for Bernie makes you antisemetic.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:02 AM
1

FRAUEN FROWN
/r/MensRights28/03/16 10:13 PM
1

http://memegenerator.net/instance/64933945
/r/MensRights27/03/16 01:32 AM
2

I agree - that's not fair to cancer.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 05:45 AM
1

My point was that he used to be the host of a show celebrating masculinity, and now he's pushing the ideology that demonizes masculinity.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:13 PM
3

Ironically, he used to host The Man Show.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:46 PM
1

90's.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:44 PM
7

When I was a kid, girls said girls are better and boys said boys are better. Then we all grew up. Except apparently some of us didn't and are now feminists.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:44 PM
4

And drunken miscommunications.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:38 PM
4

Looks like the rape rate is directly proportional to mainstream music quality. Hmm...
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:36 PM
1

True. I guess it would be better phrased as "women who are physically capable of driving and haven't had their license revoked by showing they're unfit to drive have the right to drive, while men with these same basic qualifications don't.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 06:59 PM
3

So true. Last night I was at a packed karaoke event where there was an hours-long waiting list for performing. I was looking at the signup list, and a girl walked over and was like "I'm just gonna write my name up near the top of the list in this little space between these other names." She was completely serious. I explained to her how unfair it would be to everyone else, and eventually she backed down, but I think only because she thought I was an organizer. But I got the feeling she was gonna…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:56 AM
26

To make it explode a 2nd time, explain to them how men don't have the right to drive. It's also a privilege men receive for signing up for selective service. That's right - in America, women have the right to drive, and men don't.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:48 AM
1

Maybe it's just in the USA.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:34 PM
1

She openly pushes modern feminism in all its insanity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxj-VSex4vQ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3ct8ul/women_have_always_been_the_primary_victims_of/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/468jxs/hillary_clinton_if_we_broke_up_the_big_banks/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/49crwm/when_a_man_chides_hillary_clinton_for/
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:48 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxj-VSex4vQ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3ct8ul/women_have_always_been_the_primary_victims_of/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/468jxs/hillary_clinton_if_we_broke_up_the_big_banks/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/49crwm/when_a_man_chides_hillary_clinton_for/
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:46 AM
2

No, she openly pushes modern feminism in all its insanity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxj-VSex4vQ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3ct8ul/women_have_always_been_the_primary_victims_of/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/468jxs/hillary_clinton_if_we_broke_up_the_big_banks/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/49crwm/when_a_man_chides_hillary_clinton_for/
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:46 AM
1

But what lack of rights (or threat to rights) are not the direct result of feminism?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:38 AM
3

Her idea about "if both genders consent" should make her realize how wrong modern feminism is - for example, since the pay gap is due to women prioritizing things other than money, she should be okay with it.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:42 PM
3

Maybe the sexist glaciers were created by giant sexist air conditioners with fans made of sexist carbon fiber.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:36 PM
6

This headline reminds me of the study about "sexist glaciers" and the study about "sexist carbon fiber".
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:49 AM
2

The only reason I frequent this subreddit is because of how much modern feminism pisses me off.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:36 AM
1

Insanity.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 07:15 AM
1

thin and tanned were unattractive No, looking like you're literally starving is, and always has been, unattractive. And being tan has never been a universally attractive trait - I still don't understand where that idea came from, since there's no evidence that it's something that anyone selects based on. And obesity was NEVER considered attractive - I've heard this argument a million times, but I've never been given any solid evidence for it.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 05:43 AM
2

sexual battery Isn't that what you use to power a dildo?
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:42 PM
6

No one here believes there isn't a gap in the average earnings between men and women. The lie we speak against is it being due to discrimination. All the economic reseach agrees that it is not.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:35 PM
6

Feminists are bad at math and science.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 05:13 AM
1

Yeah maybe he's just saying what his party/administration is forcing him to say. Either way, I think we need a break from this party/administration for a while so they can reassess their priorities, and so people can clean up the messes they've made.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:49 PM
1

Basically. Though I disagree that he's not a leftist - he's definitely far-left and solidly-left on a lot of topics, though he's more moderate on others (and yes, he couldn't be considered anti-war). A prime example of how he is definitely a far-leftist on some topics: he keeps on pushing the wage gap discrimination lie. I work for the federal government, and every "International Women's Day" he sends out a letter to every government worker, harping on how "women are still discriminated against,…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:45 AM
1

Yeah. It's not even worth using the word "conspiracy" because that implies clandestineness - this is completely 100% out in the open. Using the word "conspiracy" to describe any time people work together for a purpose is silly.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:35 AM
1

In the same way that The Beatles were a conspiracy to create music. In the same way that a baseball team is a conspiracy to hit balls.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 09:50 PM
1

Which is what? There are actually people conspiring to push modern feminism on everyone - this is obvious and completely verifiable. Just look at MTV / CNN / Washington Post / Huffington Post / BBC, etc, etc, etc.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:55 PM
3

Wrong - they were matriLINEAL. Not matriarchal. Historically there have never been any societies where women didn't do the majority of the childcare and men didn't do most of the physical labor / physical defense / stuff that required being out away from home most of the time. This is the only way society could be without modern technology, particularly reliable birth control.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:27 PM
2

I first noticed it at the end of 2012, right after voting for Obama a 2nd time. It's almost as if the people with these extreme ideas had all gotten together under-the-radar and then when their party got elected a 2nd time in a row they said "well, looks like everyone loves us and we can bring out the big guns now".
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:21 PM
3

This is actually incredibly common with devotees of organized religions. Some of the smartest people in the world believe in completely illogical things like creationism, and "an all-powerful being creating the devil and then being incapable of getting rid of him, waging a constant fight against him". Feminism is basically an organized religion. People are good at compartmentalizing their minds to be able to hold contradictory ideas, and to hold some of their thoughts to particular levels of log…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:12 PM
2

The people that get called "SJWs" subscribe to a huge conspiracy ideology called "Intersectional Feminism". Anti-SJWs and MRAs do not subscribe to any central ideology - we just try to stick to logic, science, and solid evidence. THAT is the difference. "Social Justice" in itself - REAL justice - is great. But having a batshit crazy ideology about it and acting batshit crazy to push it on everyone is what makes you an SJW.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:03 PM
5

MRAs only exist as an attempted counterbalance to modern feminism - to point out how wrong they are and to fight their terrible ideas. If feminists stopped, MRAs would stop.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:01 AM
1

"we once couldn't vote" trump That's probably a good thing that you couldn't vote Trump. :P
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:00 AM
16

I don't understand why feminists think quoting "we run the world" works in favor of their ideology - if they do in fact run the world, then that clearly refutes their theory of "The Patriarchy".
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:54 AM
2

Has anyone else ever noticed how similar the Feminism logo is to the Foot Clan logo from Ninja Turtles? Makes total sense actually. http://i42.tinypic.com/5kj6l5.png
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:51 AM
1

Actually it was random. I vaguely remember seeing people write about how some feminists make this claim, but the way I found the article was I was reading something about my "PIV Card" I use to log in to my work computer, and I was like "wait a minute... PIV means something else - that's pretty funny" So I googled "PIV" and this article was one of the first things that came up. When I went to post it here it did alert me that it had been posted before, a long time ago, but I decided it was worth…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:47 PM
1

And let people with the same ideology create laws, run the government, and control most public media.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:30 PM
1

Interesting article - thanks for the perspective. Well I didn't say "gay men seem to get along with feminists just fine" - I said "ladies", not "feminists". From what I've seen, gay men tend to have a lot of lady friends - it seems to me that they relate to them on a friend-level more easily than straight men do. I've noticed the co-opting of gay issues by feminists - feminists are always trying to legitimize their twisted reanimation of an expired movement to the public by attaching their ideol…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:16 PM
1

Well I think that's more a matter of "if you're gonna keep using the word 'misogyny' then you better also accept the word 'misandry'". But I think we'd be better off without either word. But then again, there are some feminists that do seem to truly hate all men, with ideas like "reduce the male population to 10% of the population" and "put all men in a concentration camp". You'll never hear anything like that from a so-called "misogynist". The feminists that say things like this are almost alwa…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:38 PM
8

Misogyny being defined as "hatred of all women" is not a real thing. Men are biologically programmed to love women, since we're attracted to them (though obviously not all women). The only possible exception is gay men, but they seem to get along with ladies just fine. He is willfully misinterpreting. Explain to me how "bleeding out of her eyes, bleeding out of her - wherever" clearly means "period"? Seems a lot more likely to me that he was trying to think of a way to expand on "bleeding out of…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:05 AM
3

Only a feminist uses the word "misogyny". As many stupid things as Trump has said, he's never indicated that he "hates all women". He's also going along with the media misrepresentation of his "bleeding from her eyes" comment being about a period, which never made any sense to me. And he's also going along with the thing about "insulting a woman's appearance = insulting ALL women", though his wording made him seem confused on whether he actually thinks this or not - but then why did he even brin…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:01 AM
2

I miss the days before late 2012 when you could be completely oblivious to the existence of modern feminism, rather than having it constantly shoved in your face like it is now.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:34 AM
10

What about Uncles Day? Surely she included that in her proposal, right? Right?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:30 AM
7

You forgot to use archive.is
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:33 AM
1

claiming it's social issues forcing women into lower paying fields I don't know about that - just yesterday, Obama mass-emailed every US government employee about Women's History Month, in which he repeatedly referred to the supposed pay discrimination.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:09 PM
1

And yet Obama is still trumpeting the discrimination lie - just yesterday, he mass-emailed every US government employee about Women's History Month, in which he repeatedly referred to this supposed pay discrimination. January can't come soon enough.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 02:34 PM
1

And yet Obama is still trumpeting the discrimination lie - just today, he mass-emailed every US government employee about Women's History Month, in which he repeatedly referred to this supposed pay discrimination. January can't come soon enough.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 11:30 PM
2

One step at a time... at least they're adding to the pile of very credible sources proving the gap is not discrimination.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 11:16 PM
1

I like the idea, but I don't like how it suggests BBC and Slate as alternatives - they're often just as bad.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:36 PM
2

That's how you would expect a business to operate, but when a business is run by hardline ideologues, profit isn't their top priority.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 10:06 PM
5

another woman another feminist woman
/r/MensRights01/03/16 10:03 PM
1

Haha, no, and I'm not telling you what my other account is. I don't use it on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:40 AM
2

Actually, Libertarianism is separate from left-right: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_BaDJLbW_zPs/SRevLtyzt3I/AAAAAAAAAFI/xBkkL9pvxak/s1600/old%2Bnolan%2Bchart%2Bwhite.png
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:29 AM
1

Well okay then.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:25 AM
1

Vaguely. I guess I meant "on a large/significant scale" - this was just a minor thing. All politicians lie, and all political devotees stretch the truth. But the sheer scale and collusion of hiding the truth that the left of the 2010's is guilty of is far unmatched by the right.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:08 AM
0

Someone on the far-left is, by definition, a liberal. Even though lately they've been abandoning classical liberal ideas.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 10:57 PM
1

I wouldn't say that exactly - the right does other underhanded and stupid things, but not "rewriting history" or "intentionally hiding the truth".
/r/MensRights28/02/16 10:56 PM
1

I only know about her because of the South Park episode about safe spaces.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 04:28 AM
1

Oh, so I guess some kind of slang term or something.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:44 PM
2

princeso is a male princess in spanish A male princess? You mean... a prince?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:47 AM
1

The Merriam Webster dictionary defines it as simply "a hatred of women". The Wikipedia page also defines it as such in the first section. Even "Urban Dictionary" defines it solely as that. Some other dictionaries do include what you wrote, but the most common usage is "hatred/dislike". And if we're just talking about "ingrained prejudices against", then its inverse (against men) is at least just as common.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 05:39 PM
3

You need to brush up on your history to remember how different life was without modern technology. They were (and are) literally inferior STRENGTH-WISE (inferior meaning less). That had a whole cascade of effects on how society must function in order to account for that. Not to mention the effects of lack of birth control, which were even greater. And you're ignoring the BENEFITS society always conferred on women as a group (protection, financial support, etc). Yes there was a certain percentage…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:33 AM
4

I didn't say any rights were being denied, simply that it's an area that needs activism Activism means trying to convince people to do something. Who are you trying to convince to do what? First you need solid proof that men are actually discriminating. Otherwise, you could be trying to convince women to strive to be more career-oriented. But what if a large percentage of them don't want to be? Is that an acceptable outcome, or will you shove it down their throats until they comply? Maybe if you…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:16 AM
2

'internalized misogyny' That's so wrong on so many levels. First of all, being comfortable with the way things naturally end up due to sex differences sans modern technology hardly qualifies as "hating all women". Second, there's really nobody that hates all women - straight men are attracted to them and live for them, gay men usually relate well to them, straight women usually relate well to them, and gay women are both attracted to them AND relate to them. In fact, based on scientific research…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:09 AM
5

Treatment of women in third world countries Often bad, but if you look into it you'll see the average male is usually treated even worse. FGM exists and is in many cases worse True, but it's much less prevalent. The solution to preventing all involuntary xGM is to reduce religious fundamentalism. Domestic violence. This is an issue for both genders, though Yes. Abortion rights This isn't as simple as "a right denied to women". I'm not against abortion in general, but it's not a fundamental right…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:48 PM
8

Well no - remember, changes in societal structure had only just begun to be possible during the Suffrage Movement - reliable birth control had just been invented and was not yet widely available, and industrialization of society was still relatively new. Those are the main ingredients for allowing roles to change from the default. Also, only a certain percentage of women really wanted to live a different lifestyle. A large percentage was actually against suffrage.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:38 PM
3

In some countries. In first-world, non-theocratic countries, there are no rights men have that women don't.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:35 PM
2

mansplaining Okay you're right - sexism is definitely still a problem - you just proved it by your endorsement of discrediting a person's argument solely on the basis of their sex. Of course if modern feminists went away, the problem would be solved.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:33 PM
5

Only historical feminism, which achieved its goals decades ago and was replaced by an authoritarian, illogical, anti-scientific, historically inaccurate conspiracy theory, which is the backbone of SJWism.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:08 PM
7

Exactly. Nothing I did or said was "scary". I didn't even get any hint that there was anything wrong until one of them randomly said "you're really scary". I walked away immediately. A lot of ladies have trouble distinguishing between "unattractive" and "a threat". Relatedly, a lot of ladies also have trouble distinguishing between a guy's looks and his personality - if she feels un-attracted to a guy then obviously there's something wrong with his personality, even if she turns around and goes …
/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:04 PM
18

I was once told I was "scary" just for making small talk with a few ladies in a bar.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 07:47 AM
1

They won't even give her a real gun. Apparently she is soo inept she carries a dummy one Reminds me of the Will Ferrell movie "The Other Guys".
/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:17 PM
1

The idea that "objectification" only/mainly happens to women, when all it really means is "natural physical attraction" and men are judged by their looks just as much (though usually on different aspects).
/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:07 PM
1

I listen to a lot of NPR. There's the problem right there.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:08 AM
0

How many feminists do you know who would actually say, "Yes, that's what I believe" to that summary? Most of them would probably dodge the question. But all feminists I've ever encountered openly state that they believe these things, though less succinctly summarized, and worded in ways to try to make them sound valid. What I wrote is an accurate summary of what the meanings of these words boil down to, based on the words of all the feminists I've encountered. pissed about the injustices their g…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 07:38 AM
1

I'd imagine the majority of them nonetheless still are a bit put off by strong criticism of it Right, that's why I make the distinction between "historical feminism" and "modern feminism" - a lot of them are still under the impression that "feminism" just means "ladies being able to vote and work, etc". Even I thought that until a few years ago - I thought it was just something in the history books that ended decades ago. But remember, polls show that only 1 in 5 ladies even identify with the la…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 05:59 PM
1

Have people so quickly forgotten how effectively the GOP has stymied Obama's actions as president? Hillary's going to probably face even worse opposition. I'm not worried so much about her effect on laws nearly as much as her potential effect on the people I interact with on a daily basis. I really don't like being around modern feminists / irrational SJWs, but their ideology is spreading and taking over communities and social groups where they don't belong. It's even affecting my attempts to fi…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:43 AM
1

You could be right that Hillary isn't sincere about her belief in feminism, but that doesn't even matter - she'll be pushing its messages all throughout the campaign, and because of the current state of her party she would continue to push it all throughout her presidency and fund its advocacy groups - regardless of whether she believes it or not. Bernie would too, given the current state of the party, but probably not as directly since he's not a woman. Yeah, McCain is pretty moderate and would…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 05:11 AM
1

"I don't think she has any particular loyalty to Feminism" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxj-VSex4vQ Try not to gag. Also, remember her line about the "primary victims of war"? Not to mention all the campaign rallies I've seen where she's clearly pushing modern feminism.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 05:57 AM
2

The problem is that the core tenets of feminism generate hatred of men. If I were a woman and believed that men as a group hate women as a group and conspire to hurt them and artificially created gender roles to hurt them and get everything they want because of "privilege", I would probably also hate men. Though I actually kind of do dislike most men, since they're my competition for the ladies. No in-group bias here. Just a reality bias.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:24 AM
6

I think what people are upset about is the blatant double standard while continuing to insist that women as a group are socially marginalized when in reality they're the center of attention.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:16 AM
1

Makes sense, but one problem: do Hispanic Americans believe him? Saying stuff like that could cost him the votes of Hispanic voters, which would hand the presidency to the Democrats.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:38 AM
1

Hilary is worse - she's openly pushing modern feminism. If she even gets the nomination, we'll be getting non-stop feminist propaganda for the next 6 months, from her and from countless media outlets emboldened by her candidacy. If she gets the presidency, we'll be getting the propaganda for the next 5 years.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 09:29 PM
1

It matters - not because of what any particular candidate will do law-wise, but because of what messages will be pushed to the public as a result of their candidacy / presidency. If Hilary even gets the nomination, we can all except non-stop 3rd wave feminazi propaganda for the next 6 months, from her and from countless media outlets emboldened by her candidacy. If she gets the presidency, we'll be getting the propaganda for the next 5 years. If Bernie gets the democratic nomination, at least th…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 08:58 PM
1

I don't think so. I'm pretty sure it's because the writers are radical feminists/SJWs and therefore feel compelled to spread their gospel.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:08 AM
7

SNL has been blatantly pushing SJW-ist and radical feminist ideas lately.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:04 AM
1

Well I said the MRM shouldn't have a theory, I didn't say that what I described as an alternative was a theory. Also that's only (part of) the definition of "scientific theory". There are definitely lots of things best described as theories that have no basis in reality, such as conspiracy theories and the feminist patriarchy theory. In those cases, it's a body of ideas that are claimed to fit together into a system, regardless of whether or not there's sufficient evidence to prove it.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 07:56 AM
4

We should not have "a theory" - our basis should be proven science, common sense, and a thorough understanding of history. We do not need anything outside those, except maybe core rebuttals to feminist theories, with references to the aforementioned basis.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:28 PM
3

1) On popular pages, maybe. But I'm talking about random, less-popular pages. Such as the "vocal fry" page that I randomly came across last night that had an entire section of crazy feminist BS. 2) Yeah you should definitely add a justification - just edited the post to mention that. 3) Sure, I just meant in the case where the subject it brings up adds nothing useful to the discussion and is just crazy, inaccurate BS.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:07 PM
4

Science pages get infected with feminist anti-science all the time. For example, yesterday I randomly ended up on the page for "Vocal Fry" and there was an entire section about how "women do vocal fry to sound masculine and men attack women for using vocal fry in order to silence them from speaking". Pure insanity. I never even noticed that ladies ever use "vocal fry" but now that it was pointed out, it's obviously just a result of speaking calmly and casually, and I've never heard a guy critici…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:05 PM
1

"Self Actualization" and that's the real motivator behind rapes Hmm... I just looked up the definition of "self actualization" - not sure how it relates to rape. Like I admitted before, there IS evidence that SOME rapists get an ADDITIONAL pleasure from the power aspect, but it's a sexual pleasure. Without it being sexual, there's no reason to use your penis to exert power over someone. "You may have difficulty getting casual sex, but your not plotting to rape either" No, because I have self-con…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 01:42 AM
1

"ease of getting casual sex" Maybe for you, but for ugly guys it's incredibly difficult - especially if he has standards about how ladies look. "high availability of prostitutes" Not sure where you live, but in most of the United States prostitution is illegal to participate in and can get you a jail sentence. You can find prostitutes if you try, but it's tricky and you have to worry about whether or not it's a set up by the cops. Not to mention it's incredibly expensive. I'll admit I've met up …
/r/MensRights09/01/16 07:12 PM
1

I agree that the most effective lies are the ones based on a kernel of truth, but I've seen no evidence that any rapes at all are "mostly for the sake of feeling power". Do you have any sources where convicted rapists are saying that it was mostly about power?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 03:38 PM
1

There are some cases where the perpetrator does get a rush from the overpowering aspect, but even in those cases it's ALSO about sex. Feminists insist it's "not about sex", but that's completely illogical, because 1.) The guy has to have an erection and have sex to do it, therefore he was sexually aroused and had set out to have sex, thereby making it about sex, and 2.) If it were exclusively about power, there are MUCH MORE effective ways of overpowering a person than inserting your penis into …
/r/MensRights05/01/16 06:34 AM
1

But even in those cases it's not ABOUT power - it just involves USING POWER. It's about using power to get sex. Sex is still the motivation.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:35 AM
1

This belief that's been adopted since ~2012 is exactly what's ruining their party and guaranteeing they won't be winning any majorities any time soon.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:42 AM
5

Not surprising - her song "That Don't Impress Me Much" is my top most-hated song of all time.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 06:14 AM
1

Oh right, I misunderstood. I agree. Funny that the people who talk most about sexism are the worst sexists, with their intentional gender segregation and framing everything in terms of whether someone is a man or a woman.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 05:47 PM
2

I just don't find women and their opinions per se all that interesting You mean "feminists" - remember, only 1 in 5 women even nominally identify as a feminist.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 05:50 AM
1

I don't think it's projecting - it's very obvious where they're coming from, based on the wording. Sure that's definitely a part of this topic, but at that point it's no longer about gender and so no longer relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 09:06 PM
1

Wait, did you just say that thin people aren't real? I'm a thin person. I'm real.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 09:01 PM
1

Now you're getting into the subject of "how big should the government be", rather than "is one gender being treated unfairly". I don't know the answer to that question.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:16 AM
5

Most guys have to shave much more often than ladies and so we have to buy more razors. Razor heads are $5 each. Assuming you replace your razor head every 2 months, that's $30 / year. Factoring in shaving cream, a quick websearch shows me that you can get a bottle good for 50 shaves for $21. So that's 7*21 + 30 = $177 / year for guys shaving. I'M SO OUTRAGED AT THE MATRIARCHY! Even if ladies shave half as often as that (which they don't), it would still be more expensive for guys. Better start a…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 03:08 AM
1

Oh. Apparently a lot of states don't tax food. I didn't know that. But still, it's a purchased good and so it's taxed like other purchased goods (toothpaste and razors are also taxed), and we're talking about $3 / year - that's nothing, even for people making minimum wage.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 03:03 AM
2

Interesting. In the USA, sales tax is typically around 5%. Apparently in the UK tampons are 5% while everything else (including razors) is 20%.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 03:01 AM
1

Oh. Apparently a lot of states don't tax food. I didn't know that. But still, it's a purchased good and so it's taxed like other purchased goods (toothpaste and razors are also taxed), and we're talking about $3 / year - that's nothing, even for people making minimum wage.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:58 AM
2

Oh. Apparently a lot of states don't tax food. I didn't know that. But still, it's a purchased good and so it's taxed like other purchased goods (toothpaste and razors are also taxed), and we're talking about $3 / year - that's nothing, even for people making minimum wage.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:57 AM
1

Well that's why you shouldn't overdo it. Also there's eliptical machines, stairmasters, biking, and swimming - those are easier on the joints.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:53 AM
3

But how do they even justify labeling it as its own tax when it's really just a product at the store that gets taxed the same as any other product at the store? There is no separate rule that says what rate tampons should be taxed at - it's standard sales tax.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:24 PM
2

Exactly. It's ironic that she wote "WHAT?" right after that, because that was MY reaction, but because I knew it was an outlandish lie. The sad part is, most of the people reading the petition will react credulously without fact-checking and feel outraged. Edit: apparently some states don't tax food. But still, it's a purchased good and so it's taxed like other purchased goods (toothpaste and razors are also taxed), and we're talking about $3 / year - that's nothing, even for people making minim…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:42 PM
1

Sure, but we can all agree that cardiovascular health is much more important than joint health - you can't die from a "joint attack". Also, road running is only bad for your joints if you overdo it or have a pre existing condition.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:56 PM
1

Oh, that actually makes more sense given the numbers.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:50 PM
1

True, though the two can be intertwined.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:45 PM
1

I mostly agree, but the people that go around saying stuff like the "like a girl" campaign actually do literally deny the physiological differences.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:43 PM
15

They're not mystified - they're 100% certain it's because men hate all women.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:39 PM
2

I've seen a lot of dumb petitions, but this one is particuly disturbing because it has so many signatures and because it's being pushed by an extremely popular magazine.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:36 PM
1

If you're a former personal trainer, you should know that the only way to be cardiovascularly healthy is by doing cardio, eating right, and being a healthy weight (which you achieve by doing cardio and eating right).
/r/MensRights07/12/15 04:28 AM
1

"Obviously you've never done a heavy squat, I would cite you the endless articles and sources attesting to the fact that the squat is a full body lift" I've done plenty of squats. I just googled it and everything says the only muscles it works significantly are the lower-body muscles (which is what I meant when I said legs). The most pronounced strength difference between the sexes is in the upper body. "citing powerlifting totals to argue that body builders are stronger than a woman is ridiculo…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 02:47 AM
1

"If she was being anti-science she would have said ..." Yes, in isolation that quote could be interpreted in more than one way, but it's not in isolation - it's 100% obvious she's referencing the "like a girl" campaign, which clearly denies the strength differences between the sexes. "this is as about as removed from HAES as can be" See the following quotes from the article: "Society's idea of beauty and the ideal body image constantly changes, especially when it comes to women" (Standard line f…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 02:07 AM
1

"That's significantly higher than any male body builder" I don't know where you're getting your numbers from - I can't find anything about her doing 2000 pounds. Here are the male and female all-time powerlifting records, which clearly show what I'm talking about: http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/records "When you're squatting 500+ plus pounds its a whole body lift" No it's not - the only muscles that are being used other than for support are the legs. Supporting weight on your frame is not the …
/r/MensRights07/12/15 01:52 AM
1

It's full of clear implications and standard lines of the "healthy at every size" and feminist ideologies. Just because she's trying to keep it subtle doesn't mean she's not trying to push her ideologies. It's "feminism lite" - it's a slippery slope. She just graduated from Mizzou - do you really think she's not trying to push feminism / SJW-ism?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 01:06 AM
1

She does steroids. And she still can't come close to the records of the top male bodybuilders. Strength-wise, steroids essentially make a woman a pseuo-man (steroids are synthetic testosterone), so people who do steroids shouldn't be a part of this discussion.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 01:00 AM
1

But do they do steroids? Also, the default difference in leg strength is less than the difference in upper body strength. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism#Humans Yeah, with excessive training some ladies can get leg strength comparable to a moderately strong guy. But there's a huge offset in default strength and maximum strength. And steroids may have been involved. And it's only a small percentage.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:58 AM
1

Funny you should say that - I googled the author's name and found a YouTube video from her on the same topic, which has a subject line reading "Women can be just as strong as men." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeOXZ2_tMvo The quote in the article, ""I'm not strong for a girl, I'm just strong" implies that men are not naturally stronger than women. This is anti-science. Males produce 20 times as much testosterone as females. Steroids are synthetic testosterone. Strength-wise, by default a man …
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:50 AM
2

It's a slippery slope - they get a foot in the minds of ladies with "feminism lite", then they keep on adding more and more.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:46 AM
1

"doesn't use the word gender at all" It uses the words "men" and "women" 20 times, "babe" 3 times, and "girl" once. "says nothing about obesity or HAES" It says "cardio" 4 times - each time, it's discouraging ladies from doing cardio, diets, and trying to lose weight. And it says "Society's idea of beauty and the ideal body image constantly changes, especially when it comes to women", which is the standard line for HAES people who believe that obesity used to be attractive. Examples from the art…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:40 AM
1

Actually she was only endorsing weightlifting, while discouraging cardio. Not doing cardio can lead to obesity. The only exercise that contributes significantly to weight loss is cardio.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:36 AM
1

If you're single and straight, it makes sense to care about making people of the opposite sex interested in you.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:35 AM
4

"I'm not strong for a girl, I'm just strong" Implying that the "for a girl" qualification isn't necessary - that men and women are equally strong. "Using the hashtag #liftlikeababe" A derivative of the "like a girl" campaign which tries to make everyone believe that there's no merit to a guy saying a weak guy does a physical task "like a girl", even though the strength level of most ladies is literally that of a very weak man. It's denying the fact that men are naturally stronger, implying that …
/r/MensRights05/12/15 10:26 PM
0

"I'm not strong for a girl, I'm just strong" Implying that the "for a girl" qualification isn't necessary - that men and women are equally strong. "Using the hashtag #liftlikeababe" A derivative of the "like a girl" campaign which tries to make everyone believe that there's no merit to a guy saying a weak guy does a physical task "like a girl", even though the strength level of most ladies is literally that of a very weak man. Do you have a source that there are women that are stronger than 90% …
/r/MensRights05/12/15 10:20 PM
3

I would say that before 2012 most left-leaning news was reasonably logical/rational/evidence based. Then came the takeover by radical feminists and SJWs.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:33 PM
3

Yeah I've noticed that switch - ironically, the crazy has moved from Fox News to Vox News.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:31 PM
-2

It's denying the fact that men are naturally stronger, implying that "gender stereotypes" are to blame for more men being into lifting and more ladies being into cardio (rather than people trying to appeal to the instincts of the opposite sex), and pushing "healthy at every size" anti-science by denying that obesity is naturally unattractive.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:50 PM
-2

It's denying the fact that men are naturally stronger, implying that "gender stereotypes" are to blame for more men being into lifting and more ladies being into cardio (rather than people trying to appeal to the instincts of the opposite sex), and pushing "healthy at every size" anti-science by denying that obesity is naturally unattractive.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:48 PM
1

Hmm, do you have a reference for that? I'd believe that a certain percentage of ladies would have a point of height difference where they decide it's just not practical, and so the number of messages would go down somewhat. But I've definitely seen ladies that were like 5 feet dating guys that were like 6' 4".
/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:03 PM
1

Interesting. Maybe it has something to do with their history with the conflict between north Ireland and southern Ireland - the Irish often have red hair.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:31 PM
1

Interesting. It must be a regional thing. Some of the most attravtive ladies I've ever met have red hair. According to another poster on this thread, it's common in the UK to dislike redheads. But I've never noticed anyone seeming like they did in my area (US east coast).
/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:29 PM
1

The female height preference is relative to their own height, not absolute. Some of them say that, while some of them say "over 6 feet" or "over 6 1". But the ones that say "taller than me" don't practice what they preach - I always see even short ladies going for really tall guys. It's kind of like when a guy says "as long as she's not obese", but still really wants to go for the ones that don't have a big gut at all. It's like setting a minimum standard, but nobody strives to achieve the bare …
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:01 AM
1

I don't understand this idea about people disliking redheads - I've never heard anyone they say they dislike redheads (other than Cartman), and I like them just fine (even dated one for a while). Maybe it's a regional thing?
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:50 AM
1

You could be acting in ways that turn them off, or maybe you have narrow shoulders or a very non-square jaw. Or maybe the scars are prominent and weird them out? I don't understand this idea about people disliking redheads - I've never heard anyone they say they dislike redheads (other than Cartman), and I like them just fine (even dated one for a while). Maybe it's a regional thing?
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:49 AM
-2

They also tend to not be interested in a guy if he's very very fat. Guys tend to not be interested in a lady if she's fat at all. As an average-height guy who knows lots of average-height guys and lots of tall guys, and who's talked about this subject with lots of ladies, I can tell you that they absolutely do prioritize height. Most of them consider "under 6 feet" to be too short, even though the average adult male height is 5' 10". I've even heard a couple ladies say that under 6' 1" is too sh…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 05:31 AM
1

You forgot to archive the article. You're rewarding them with advertising money and sending the message that publishing these kinds of articles is a good idea.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 05:15 AM
2

But they can't be an actual feminist by its actual ideological meaning without hatred towards men, or at least holding extreme misrepresentations of men that lead to hatred. The core tenets of the ideology are sexist misrepresentations and breed hatred towards men. And if they just mean that they agree with what the original, historical feminists did, to get the vote etc, then it doesn't make sense to call yourself one because that wave ended decades ago and was replaced by a very different ideo…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 04:59 AM
2

I'd say it's more like "under 32" go mainly for looks, "over 32" go more for stability/income/personality. But I don't think it's really an age thing so much as "Oh no, I'm getting less attractive as I age - I better lower my standards!". So for a really good-looking 33-year old, an average-looking guy making a lot of money is still probably out of luck.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 10:37 PM
2

Ugly guys by your perception as a straight man. Women love height. They also go for jaw squareness/width and shoulder width. These "ugly guys" probably had at least one of these aspects in abundance. Improving other aspects can stop them from being dealbreakers, but if they're not physically attracted they'll say there was "no chemistry". I do think if you're a celebrity that can replace looks to a degree. But that's obviously not easy to become. Or to a lesser degree, you can do things like pla…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:48 AM
4

It's not that they care about those things instead of looks - it's that they want those things in addition to looks. Those things can't replace looks. Women are generally more picky overall than men.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:14 AM
1

It's a myth that ladies don't care about looks. They just care about different aspects of looks than men care about.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:04 AM
2

In my experience it's the opposite. I make way more money than most people my age, but my luck with the ladies is shit.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 04:48 AM
1

"Yeah, when hell freezes over" http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/hell-mi/48169/daily-weather-forecast/2211114?day=1 Looks like Hell freezes over tonight. Will she keep her end of the bargain?
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:16 AM
3

http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/hell-mi/48169/daily-weather-forecast/2211114?day=1 Looks like Hell freezes over tonight. Will she keep her end of the bargain?
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:31 AM
1

Can someone please start a counter-petition to remove it? Even if we don't get the same number of signatures, it will show that there's significant support.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 12:49 AM
6

"I know they're trying to establish dominance, but..." Exactly the same as if a religious fundamentalist casually said "I know they're being posessed by a demon, but..." This is worse than religious fundamentalism, because it promates hatred and misunderstanding between the sexes.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 12:31 AM
2

HAHA, I just got a package in the mail from the school asking me for donations. Great timing... yeah right.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:30 AM
5

He might have, but I guarantee you the courses will not limit themselves to that - it's a package, called "intersectionalism", and the theory of "privilege" meaning anything other than class and financial status is intersectionalism. The people doing the course will be indoctrinating them with intersectionalism.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:44 PM
3

While he does not directly mention gender, gender is ALWAYS included when these types of people talk about "privilege" and "social justice". There is no possibility it's not included in this. None. Also, when they talk about "identity", they ALWAYS mean "the feminist theory that gender was arbitrarily fabricated by men to oppress women". Come on, you should be familiar with these terms by now.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:32 PM
2

As an alumni, I definitely won't be donating to them if they continue with this. Not that I was before, but maybe if they reverse this I will.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:13 PM
3

*If a man acts awkward, he's considered creepy. If a woman acts awkward, she's considered cute. *If a man expresses dislike for obesity, he's villified as an "objectifier". Women are allowed to openly talk about how they only like tall and handsome men.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 11:34 PM
1

Well I didn't say those 2 things are the ONLY requirements for it to be defined as harassment - but they must be present. Obviously, for example, if your boss keeps on telling you that you have a deadline coming up, after you told them to stop mentioning it, that's not harassment because it's their job to get you to do work by deadlines. I would say another important part of the definition is "unnecessary/unreasonable given a position you hold". A public figure making controversial claims should…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:14 AM
1

Exactly. That line was where I stopped reading.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:10 PM
1

Actually she was doing some of that harping - look up the video she did with BuzzFeed, and her interview with Crowder. I understand that she may have just been saying what she thought she needed to say to win, like politicians do, and I want to forgive her and support her, but it'll take a lot to win me back.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:07 PM
1

I'm not a Trump fan, but I have no idea how anyone could misinterpret so badly his "bleeding" comment the media jumped all over. That was a huge non-sequitur.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:03 PM
1

Your definition of harassment leaves out the 2 key defining aspects of actual harassment: repeated, and communicated as unwanted. Without both of these, it is NOT harassment, under any circumstances.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:47 PM
4

I prefer watching female sports, but just because I'm a straight guy and so I like to look at attractive ladies.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:43 AM
3

They did just hang Reality last week on South Park.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:36 PM
1

Use archive.is
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:09 PM
1

You forgot to archive the article.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 04:51 AM
7

You should tag Bill Clinton on the post, considering what was recently revealed about Hillary's history of domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 09:03 PM
1

I do that every time someone posts an article about her.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:46 AM
2

If other people are listening to the conversation who aren't as emotionally invested, their minds can be changed by a good argument, even if the person you're arguing with can't have their mind changed.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:37 PM
7

When people say "about power", they mean "the motivation is to feel a sense of power". What you're saying is that it "involves using power". Big difference.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 04:48 AM
1

So now even the right is engaging in divisive identity politics. Lame. But still, they're not actively pushing it like the left has been lately - this is just a drop in a pond in comparison. I still think the left has to be sent the message that they need to put feminism back in their closet before people will vote for them again.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:09 PM
1

So now even the right is engaging in divisive identity politics. Lame. But still, they're not actively pushing it like the left has been lately - this is just a drop in a pond in comparison. I still think the left has to be sent the message that they need to put feminism back in their closet before people will vote for them again.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:07 PM
5

What's the deal with this trend I've been seeing of people saying "my feminism". That's like saying "my existentialism" or "my Marxism". You can't just throw together a bunch of ideas and define them with the same name as an already-existing ideology.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:55 AM
2

Exactly. I disagree with you that she's ugly, but people make fun of Trump's looks ALL THE TIME. Guys make fun of each other's looks all the time, but if a guy treats a lady like one of the guys, all of a sudden he's attacking all women and hates all women. The hypocricy is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 07:07 PM
17

Incredibly ironic considering that in that very debate Carly pretended that Trump judging her looks is somehow an attack on ALL women, and of course the media echoed that non-sequitur.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:55 PM
1

Melissa McCarthyism
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:49 PM
1

Wow. This lady is a lunatic. Every single quote from her filled me with a deep sense of dissonance between what she said and reality, and anger over the fact that this type of insane and divisive thinking has been spreading lately.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 07:08 AM
1

Or be born with the genetics to be really tall and/or have a wide/square jaw and or/wide shoulders.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 03:16 AM
0

Actually, Norway isn't socialist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model "Right-wing and Fascism are two stops on the same road" Not a good analogy - right-wing is a collection of ideas that don't necessarily combine coherently into a single system. What I meant to say is that socialism is like a watered-down version of communism, and it's often spoke of by socialists and communists as a "transition stage from capitalism to communism". http://www.marxmail.org/faq/socialism_and_communism.htm
/r/MensRights31/08/15 03:34 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=Tq5OQafDVxc Luckily most of the comments are calling out the bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:52 PM
2

But Socialism vs Capitalism isn't a binary thing - there's a gradient, and some countries lean more one way or the other. The United States isn't 100% capitalist, but it's primarily capitalist. A socialist president would work hard to move the country down the gradient towards Socialism, and the end result would be a country that's more socialist that it was before.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:30 PM
1

Well socialism and communism are two stops on the same road, and if that's the road he wants, it makes sense that he would push ideas that lead down that road. Explain how what I said isn't something that would result from socialism or communism.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:25 PM
2

Haha I actually just thought of "Bernie Panders" yesterday - looks like I'm not the only one.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:23 PM
0

If you think about it - paying all women the same as all men, regardless of profession and hours worked, requires communism / socialism. Bernie is a self-proclaimed socialist. It all makes sense now.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 05:30 AM
0

If you think about it - paying all women the same as all men, regardless of profession and hours worked, requires communism / socialism. Bernie is a self-proclaimed socialist. It all makes sense now.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 05:30 AM
6

I was rooting for her, until I saw the video she made with BuzzFeed where she pushes 3rd wave feminist bullshit. And yet in other places she said she was against identity politics. Typical two-faced politician. I think she's actually a plant from the democrats - they want to sneak in a feminist republican candidate, to neutralize the fact that a lot of people will vote against the democrats because of modern feminism.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 05:23 AM
2

I've also only ever voted for democrats until recently. As crazy as some of the stuff the republicans say is, I think the thing to do now is to suck it up and vote the democrats completely out of power, to teach them a lesson: put this feminist bullshit back in the closet. Then we can vote for them again. I'm sure they'll be smart enough to put 2 and 2 together and see that the more they've pushed feminism, the more elections they've lost.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 05:16 AM
1

"I definitely think it is changing pretty quickly over all" I hope so, but I'm not convinced yet.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:22 PM
1

But the kind of stuff I've been seeing in The Washington Post is the kind of article that's carefully worded in such a way that a lot of people will just blindly accept it without questioning. For example, the front page of the print edition was recently covered with an article about a new study showing that "1 in 5 college females will be sexually assaulted" - of course people are gonna believe it if it's a study, but if you look up the study and analysis of it, you see how incredibly flawed th…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:16 PM
1

Oh, okay. I just saw it was The Washington Post and immediately pressed the back button. They've been on my shit list lately after they started posting tons of radical feminist articles, and once even on the front page of the print edition.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 07:45 PM
-2

You forgot to use archive.today. We don't wanna give them traffic revenue.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:17 PM
1

"Two Female Teachers Busted On" Nice wording.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:32 AM
4

Ironically, the professor guiding this survey proved by his own words that there's sexism against men, when he negatively generalized all men as believing that men are superior to women.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 07:20 PM
7

"She said she didn't feel safe telling me her name" Wow... that's fucking ridiculous. She was being paid to help your life-threatening situation, and all she can think about is protecting herself from you knowing her first name?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 09:07 AM
4

Best comment on here.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 06:01 AM
2

That one part is a pretty big deal, but also the whole thing centers around "gender roles" as the one and only reason. In my limited experience, I have one friend I grew up with who tried to kill himself a few times, and it was because he was down about his bad luck getting girls to be interested in him. And personally I've had some suicidal thoughts (never came close to really doing it), and it was also because of my terrible luck with the ladies. But feminists don't like to admit that women ha…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:57 AM
6

You make some good points, but look at my other comments - there's definitely untrue femininst dogma in there. Aside from what I said in earlier comments, the whole thing centers around "gender roles" as the one and only reason. In my limited experience, I have one friend I grew up with who tried to kill himself a few times, and it was because he was down about his bad luck getting girls to be interested in him. And personally I've had some suicidal thoughts (never came close to really doing it)…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:15 AM
8

"Another common explanation relies on the social constructions of hegemonic masculinity and femininity" If you click the link about "hegemonic masculinity", it's all about the feminist idea that "men intentionally dominate women for their own benefit, and masculinity and femininity have no basis in biology". And it's calling femininity a "social construct", denying the fact that it arises out of sex differences. And I'm sure you know that people who call gender a "social construct" always say th…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 10:46 PM
1

Also it's important to realize that it's still early and so it's still possible that Carly Fiorina or Ben Carson could get the nomination. Either of them would definitely stand a chance against Hilary. Not saying it's likely, but it's possible.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 06:23 AM
1

I don't think anything is set in stone yet. Bush could win if he works hard to show that he's not like his brother, and Trump could win if he tones down the inflamatory stuff and says things that moderates want to hear. He definitely has the money to hire people who can tell him what he needs to do - being the president isn't rocket science, you just need to be able to give speeches and have a good team of advisors and people working under you.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:13 PM
1

I don't know how much funds really matter, but Trump is one of the richest people in the country. If he tones down the inflamatory wording about immigrants he might have a shot, and Christie is a moderate (fully acknowledges human-caused climate change). A lot of people don't like Hilary, and a lot of moderates/independents don't like the SJW stuff that she will inevitably center her campaign around, and they're the most important voters. Sure a lot of ladies will vote for her just because of he…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 03:21 AM
1

Oh right, those were yearly rates. Do you happen to have the sources that the 1 in 50 version comes from?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:02 PM
3

The difficulty is eliminating excess greed without stifling the other side of the same coin: motivation to achieve more.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:13 PM
0

And if you disagree with me, prove me wrong with a good argument. I'll give you a simple example of why it doesn't work - I once was at the beach and saw a seagull sitting on a fence post. I put a piece of bread on the fence next to it. As it started walking towards it, another seagull swooped down and grabbed the bread. People are animals too. It's our instinct to prioritize ourselves and the people we care about over a stranger. Socialism pretends this isn't true.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 04:39 AM
3

She did get one thing wrong though: she said that if you look up the government crime statistics for rape, it's around 1 in 50 women. I looked it up and she was way off - it's actually about 1 in 392 women between the ages of 18-24 (the most at-risk group): http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsavcaf9513.pdf Page 4, Table 1: 2/1000 college women, 3.1/1000 non-college women. Average that, you get 2.55/1000, which is: 1 in 392.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 04:11 AM
-2

Full-on socialism goes against human nature. It would only be possible after technology reaches the point where competition for resources is a meaningless concept. Which isn't gonna be within our lifetimes, if ever.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:13 AM
5

Only in the Democratic Party, and only recently. I didn't even know it existed in any significant degree until the end of 2012, and I voted for Obama twice before then and called myself a moderate democrat (now just a moderate). If the democrats lose in 2016 I fully expect them to put feminism back into their closet with the realization that pushing it pisses off moderates, who are the most important voters. I actually want this to happen - in spite of the bad ideas the Republicans push sometime…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:09 AM
2

Full-on socialism goes against human nature. It would only be possible after technology reaches the point where competition for resources is a meaningless concept. Which isn't gonna be within our lifetimes, if ever.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:03 AM
8

Bernie Sanders is a 3rd wave feminist, parroting the pay gap discrimination myth. And he's openly a flat-out socialist.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 09:03 PM
2

Good points, and interesting story. I just felt the need to post my story because it reminded me of how I kept seeing posts from feminists on this same topic, narrow-mindedly assuming it was the other way around, and that it was set up that way for nefarious purposes. Just wanted to chip away a little more at their victim complex.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 04:34 AM
1

Oh. That's annoying.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 05:41 PM
1

How are you able to access the old post after I deleted it? It was worded incompletely the first time, and the title didn't have the proper emphasis on the main point, so I needed to re-word it.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 05:06 PM
1

I needed to re-word it; it was worded incompletely the first time, and the title didn't have the proper emphasis on the main point. It's not exactly identical, and I made some major edits right before deleting and re-posting.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 04:55 PM
1

Everyone at the gym, and anyone who doesn't like being too hot when it's 95 degrees out.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:56 PM
2

I wasn't commenting on anything else about the club scene - only the discriminatory dress code and how opposite it is to frequent complaints by modern feminists.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:56 PM
3

That's part of my point. Modern feminists are often complaining about "sexist dress codes" and not being allowed to wear sleeveless shirts, while ignoring the fact that ladies are allowed to wear them much more often than men are. I forgot to say that in my original post, but just added it.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:54 PM
2

I tried to, even though the party I was invited to was there, but most of the other bars in the area had the same policy (while being full of ladies in sleeveless shirts).
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:53 PM
1

The shirt was like this: http://slimages.macys.com/is/image/MCY/products/3/optimized/961583_fpx.tif?01AD=3vaVPBjNjwSR_dskm0pzqMqapqvcA7MYGLBHx4jsRJ0o0s7LblwWIBQ&01RI=890537C9169B88F&01NA=
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:52 PM
3

That's ableist against people with Asperger's Syndrome.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 06:49 AM
1

Please don't directly link - use archive.today. You're giving the author ad revenue.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:42 AM
2

You forgot to archive the link. You're giving them ad revenue.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:13 AM
3

Well-said. I also noticed the inconsistency between the word "bro" and the typical programmer.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:12 AM
5

Well, I'm sure Darth Vader is capable of complex emotions even though he's "more machine now than man" (according to Obi-Wan).
/r/MensRights05/07/15 01:33 AM
1

That's what I thought, but after doing a lot of reading I came to the conclusion that even the smallest effective dose can still mess up your natural ability to produce testosterone. And it's illegal, hard to get, and can get you arrested.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 09:18 PM
5

Actually it's 5-12% of men. And that's just in high school. I'm 29 and I'll admit that I recently seriously looked into trying steroids. I decided against it. http://www.pamf.org/teen/risk/drugs/steroids/ http://www.drugfree.org/join-together/five-percent-of-teens-use-steroids-to-increase-muscle/
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:14 AM
1

I'm not sure - it's a decent article, but the site it's hosted on is trash - just look at the "related stories": "How To: Stand Up to Your Doctor About Fat-Shaming: Here are some strategies for turning your doctor’s office into a safe space." Ugh. Medical expertise means nothing to these people.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:53 PM
1

Oh, I just looked it up and you're right. Maybe it used to be true a long time ago. But it's still true that there are a lot of fathers that choose not to spend time with their children or choose to leave entirely, and it's proven that this is correlated with all sorts of societal problems: http://www.fatherhood.org/father-absence-statistics
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:26 PM
0

"The difference in metabolism between any 2 people is pretty insignificant" That's demonstrably false. For example, all my siblings and I have always been able to eat whatever we want, as much as we want, and not gain a pound. Even right now, I'm stuffing my face with pizza, actually trying to gain weight (going for muscle though), and it's extremely difficult to gain anything. You can't possibly believe that I have the same metabolism as a 300-pound person who's always saying "these chips will …
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:13 PM
1

Actually, the tendency to put on fat more easily is genetic. But you can fight the tendency with self control. Before industrialization, relatively safe societies, and medical technology, the obese were genetically selected against in a million ways. But nowadays those selection pressures are removed.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 08:34 PM
1

I don't think Jon Stewart is an SJW. Before the past couple of years, I'd never heard him say any SJW-ish stuff - I always saw him as a left-leaning moderate. More recently he said a few SJW things, and then shortly after he retired - I think he might have been seeing the problems with SJW-ism and trying to turn back, but his producers and writers wouldn't let him, so he quit. Of course he won't say this publicly, but it seems likely to me.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 06:50 PM
2

John Oliver has always been a hardcore narrow-minded feminist SJW - I knew this years ago, before he even had his own show. The sooner his show ends the better.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 06:22 PM
1

I think he was referring to the tendency in urban black communities for single fathers to not stick around to raise their kids.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 06:11 PM
3

The spelled "sexiest" wrong.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 03:41 AM
6

Please don't direct-link - you're giving them ad revenue.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 07:00 PM
3

Sorry, my comment wasn't very specific. I was asking for proof that Jeb believes that feminist rhetoric represents most/real women. I got the impression from the quote that he was just being strategic - choosing his words carefully so as to avoid giving feminists any ammunition against him / ammunition to convert any ladies who are on the fence of feminism.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:49 PM
0

Source?
/r/MensRights18/06/15 05:34 PM
5

Actually, if you google "ideology", the first example listed in the definition is "republicanism". It's true that "feminism" is nominally more focused than "republicanism", but a collection of ideologies can be considered an ideology itself. And "feminism" could also be considered a collection of ideologies if you really think about it. And even if republicanism couldn't be considered an ideology, it doesn't invalidate the argument - the logic was basically "Group X was good for Group Y, and Gro…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 05:03 AM
3

Okay it was sort-of an apology, but it wasn't a retraction - it was a clarification. The way I interpret this is "I'm grateful for the original, historical feminist movement, but I don't buy into the modern-day version, and that's what I was trying to say".
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:44 PM
10

From what I remember, she didn't really apologize - she basically just said that they were misunderstanding what she meant by it.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:49 PM
1

Haha, must have.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 07:22 PM
1

Yeah, that's wrong on so many levels. I mean, arm length doesn't affect throwing strength as much as muscle strength - a longer arm needs more muscle to be more powerful. But it's a thoroughly-proven scientific fact that males naturally grow stronger muscles, mainly because of testosterone. This is science denialism, on an even worse scale than denying evolution or climate change, because this goes against empirical evidence that you see every day. You don't need a science degree to see that alm…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 07:15 PM
5

True, but feminists take it to the extreme - they literally have trouble understanding the most simple and obvious things that most people learn when they're 5. For example, that men and women are biologically different. ( 9 second relevant clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3wcxHiorJ4 )
/r/MensRights16/06/15 07:20 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/lv3JsRq.png
/r/MensRights14/06/15 08:58 PM
1

Also, if you're such a stickler for dictionary definitions, as a self-proclaimed feminist you might be interested in the dictionary definition of "rape". It's not what feminists say. They're trying to make it the law everywhere that if a guy and a girl get drunk and screw, the guy raped the girl - even if the guy is equally drunk. I'm not making this up. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rape http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3108406/Courts-assume-women-t-consent-sex-drunk-Rape-rep…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 05:03 AM
1

Sometimes dictionary definitions are out-of-date or incomplete. An example: the dictionary definition of "Freemason" only describes the historical aspect of it, without even mentioning the elaborate conspiracy theories that surround it in modern times. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/freemason The argument in that JPG is a false equivalence fallacy. To be a feminist doesn't just mean that you believe that men and women should have the same rights - it also means that you believe that m…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 04:52 AM
1

Not all - most. It's not based on just one comment. I've heard other ladies imply the same thing too many times to remember. The most recent - I was on a hike last weekend and I overheard a lady casually mention that another guy on the hike is short - but he's taller than me, and I'm 5' 9.5", and I was wearing thick soles that made me seem closer to 5' 11". So basically she was calling a guy who's about 6 feet tall "short". Another recent example: I was talking with a really short girl (she's li…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 06:15 AM
1

The thing is that modern feminists are the "fringe feminists". If you're a dictionary-definition feminist, there's really no need to call yourself a feminist, since there's almost no one that disagrees with what the original, historical feminism set out to accomplish, and did accomplish. There are no rights that men have that women don't have. The dictionary states the definition based on the original, historical movement. That movement is not the same thing as the modern-day ideology. The origi…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 06:02 AM
2

Not exactly what I said - I said that basically all modern feminists say that attraction is a "social construct", and therefore guys shouldn't be any more attracted to thin ladies than to obese ladies. But then they say that gays being attracted to the same sex isn't socialized, which is contradictory (though I agree with that - it's what the scientific evidence says). Glad we agree that "healthy at any size" is BS, but every self-proclaimed feminist I've ever met in person or encountered online…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:38 PM
2

Not sure what you mean, but I'm guessing you're asking about point B in my last comment. I actually had a lady once casually mention that I'm short, and I was like "wait, I'm not that short, I'm average, and I'm taller than you". And she said that, to her, any guy who's not a few inches taller than her looks like he's shorter than her. And she was like 5' 7".
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:26 PM
1

Christie looks great. She just got her career started in 2009, whereas Hutcherson got started in 2002, and Tom Cruise has been a star since the 80's.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:21 PM
2

The short actors that are considered attractive: a.) Are actually around the average male height (5' 10"), but the female preference for height is so deep that they consider average to be short. b.) They always have square/wide jaws, which is the second most sought after trait. c.) Are usually cast with shorter guys to make them look taller than they actually are.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:17 PM
1

"stems from gender roles" I don't think that's true - I've seen plenty of scientific evidence that suggests that it's a result of instincts. Same with guys' preferences for the non-obese.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:11 PM
2

The short actors that are considered attractive: a.) Are actually around the average male height (5' 10"), but the female preference for height is so deep that they consider average to be short. b.) They always have square/wide jaws, which is the second most sought after trait. c.) Are usually cast with shorter guys to make them look taller than they actually are.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:08 PM
2

I agree that it's not a men's rights issue that women are more attracted to some looks than others. What is a men's rights issue / anti-modern-feminism issue is the implications of this. Modern feminists go around vilifying guys for being attracted to women for their looks (they call it "objectification"), even though women do the same thing. They go around saying things like "guys would be just as interested in obese women if it weren't for The Patriarchy brainwashing them into wanting thin wom…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:57 PM
3

Maybe some guys are like that, but you wouldn't believe how many ladies in real life I've heard flat out say that they aren't interested in a guy under 6 feet (and once I heard 6' 1"), and how often I hear girls say or strongly imply that they want a guy who's tall. One example: this past December I went on a "Santa Pub Crawl" where everyone dressed up in Santa costumes (minus the beard) and went to a bunch of clubs. A random lady at a club that I was walking past said "Hey Santa!" I stopped and…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:47 PM
4

Interesting. Looks to me like the comments weren't indications that they found your height unattractive - rather, they were just poking a little fun at you while kind of being jerks. The fact that they were dating you is proof enough that they found you attractive. The thing about heels seems to me like he was embarrassed about his own height, rather than your height. But most guys aren't gonna not date a girl they're attracted to just because they're a little embarrassed about how the girl make…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:09 PM
3

Hmm... I actually never cared about height, even when I was younger. Were these nasty comments after you broke up with them / declined to continue dating them? If so, then the comments were obviously just to get back at you. Also, were the comments specifically about your height, or did you just assume that they were?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:29 PM
4

I don't think that's true. I've never found taller women less attractive. I've only heard a couple of guys say they prefer ladies shorter than them, and they were 6'2" / 6'4". There's a biological component to it, just as there's a biological component to men disliking ladies with bulging stomachs.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:05 PM
1

I had a vaguely similar situation back in college, but just the part about her not remembering it, and about knowing that she gets "bold" when drunk. We were both drunk, and she was very very clearly and actively into it, but I had no idea she was blacked out. The next day I talked to her and mentioned it and she acted surprised and insisted it never happened, and then got mad at me. This was about 10 years ago. She blocked me on AIM and we never talked again. I'm just really lucky she hadn't be…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:11 AM
5

Even if he wins, we all know she's not doing any time.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:05 AM
1

I'm not a very attractice guy - when was in college I only "got lucky" once. But if they're defining clearly consentual sex while the guy doesn't know that the girl is blacked out, then I am a rapist - the girl said she didn't remember it the next day. 0% of anyone if they had been there could have possibly believed that she didn't want it. But with this definition, probably 90% of adults are rapists.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:00 PM
1

Well, both of those guys are from "A Voice for Men", which is sometimes a bit on the extreme side of the anti-feminist spectrum. The Red Pill also goes a little overboard sometimes. Some groups that I've found to be reasonable most of the time: /mensrights, /TumblrInAction, and /KotakuInAction (though they're specific to video games). Also, you should check out the YouTube video blogger "The Amazing Athiest" - he frequently makes anti-feminism videos, and he's also gay.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/15 11:18 PM
3

Looks like Jimmy Buffett is gonna have to change the lyrics of that one song from "Why don't we get drunk and screw" to "Why don't I rape you".
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:33 PM
1

I'm a little late to this conversation, but I just wanted to say something: I think that every anti-feminist group needs to set their top priority to "divesting" gay men from feminism. I believe this would destroy feminism's popularity. Why? These days, the vast majority of people believe that we should be nice to gay people. One of feminism's biggest weapons is saying that if you're against them, you hate gays. They push the idea that gender was fabricated unnaturally by men in order to oppress…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 04:08 AM
1

I'm a little late to this conversation, but I just wanted to say something: I think that every anti-feminist group needs to set their top priority to "divesting" gay men from feminism. I believe this would destroy feminism's popularity. Why? These days, the vast majority of people believe that we should be nice to gay people. One of feminism's biggest weapons is saying that if you're against them, you hate gays. They push the idea that gender was fabricated unnaturally by men in order to oppress…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 04:05 AM
1

"Neo feminists are completely opposed to gay men" Well, maybe theoretically, when you put it that way, but in practice they're actually teamed up. I think that every anti-feminist group needs to set their top priority to "divesting" gay men from feminism. I believe this would destroy feminism's popularity. Why? These days, the vast majority of people believe that we should be nice to gay people. One of feminism's biggest weapons is saying that if you're against them, you hate gays. They push the…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 04:04 AM
1

I'm a little late to this conversation, but I just wanted to say something: I think that every anti-feminist group needs to set their top priority to "divesting" gay men from feminism. I believe this would destroy feminism's popularity. Why? These days, the vast majority of people believe that we should be nice to gay people. One of feminism's biggest weapons is saying that if you're against them, you hate gays. They push the idea that gender was fabricated unnaturally by men in order to oppress…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 03:56 AM
11

Wishful thinking - studies and articles like this pop up pretty often, but feminists just ignore them.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 03:19 AM
1

"LGBTTQQFAGPBDSM" - wow... look at that more closely: "LGBTTQQ.FAG.PBDSM" Was that intentional? Are they trying to reappropriate the word? Or are they just that careless and oblivious?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 12:44 AM
3

I first read it as "blame on enotall". Whoever Enotall is.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:48 PM
3

It makes perfect sense to me that the numbers would be lower 7 years ago. Feminists starting pushing their ideology really hard sometime in 2012 and it started to become trendy. Before that, it was more of a hidden part of the far left that most people weren't aware of (I personally didn't know that anyone still called themselves a feminist until like 2011). The more they've pushed their crazy ideas, the more people have seen how crazy it is, and now the backlash is building up - hence the recen…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:06 PM
3

It matters because the more people who are against the ideology, the less trendy it will seem, and so it will reduce the odds of encountering this type of obnoxious and un-dateable girl in real life.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:02 PM
-1

You're judging actions you don't understand as malicious without trying to understand the person's actual intent. You're dehumanizing a person into "bad person" rather that trying to understand them as a human being. Who's the creep again? Girls at clubs often put their butts against guys they want to dance with, without asking them first - how should I judge them, in your view? Is patting someone on the back violating their personal space? What if I sat on their foot? Would that be violating th…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:38 AM
-4

I wouldn't have cared if anyone did it to me, and if a girl had done it I actually would have found it endearing. And stop creep shaming me. There are so many words in the English language - "creep" doesn't mean "any guy that does something you don't like or makes you feel a negative emotion". And stop derailing this. It was supposed to be about the absurdity of what she said. What precipitated it is completely irrelevant to its absurdity - her words were intrinsically absurd.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:07 AM
-3

I think we're done here. You're not gonna believe me so I'm not gonna try anymore. You weren't there. It was an extreme overreaction. The things she said were absolutely ridiculous. Her thought processes was fucked up by modern feminism. That's what this post was about - the absurdity of what she said and the underlying thought process. Though I see from your other posts that you actually buy into her ideas, so there's really no point in talking to you about this. And yes, she literally said "pr…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:26 PM
-2

It really wasn't as serious as you're interpreting it. It was about 15 pounds for about 1 second, on a completely non-sexual part of her body, because she was literally right where a bench would be if I were about to sit on one. Seems you and her both lack a sense of humor.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:17 PM
-3

Glad to see you find her reaction as unbelievable as I did. I'll swear on whatever you want me to swear on that I was not lying. In fact, she may have said privilege more than 10 times. The word was the bulk of what she said. It would have made a hilarious parody of feminism if she weren't being serious - kind of like Poe's Law. She didn't actually say "patriarchy" or "oppression" (and I didn't say she did), but it was 100% clear that's what she was going for. Yes it may have been something a ch…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:55 PM
-4

I get what you're saying, but obviously I was wearing pants, it was in the least-sexual location on her as possible, and it was only for a second. Even if it might have been a little rude, surely you can't think that her reaction that I described was reasonable. And just the content of what she was saying was just such batshit crazy feminist nonsense.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:49 PM
-5

I'm not lying. "How the fuck does privilege relate" That's exactly my point - her feminism-soaked mind took a playful gesture and turned it into "me exerting my patriarchal privilege to oppress her". You really had to be there - her reaction was completely uncalled for and over-the-top. If she had never read any feminist stuff, she probably just would have been like "hah hah, very funny".
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:17 PM
-9

I guess this is more of a "you had to have been there" kind of thing that doesn't translate well into text. She was right next to me, and I only put maybe 15 pounds of weight on her back. There was nothing remotely sexual about it, and it was clearly in jest. No, a guy would not have cared - especially if a girl did it. Her feminism-soaked mind took a playful gesture and turned it into "me exerting my patriarchal privilege to oppress her". You really had to be there - her reaction was completely…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:16 PM
-7

I guess this is more of a "you had to have been there" kind of thing that doesn't translate well into text. She was right next to me, and I only put maybe 15 pounds of weight on her back. There was nothing remotely sexual about it, and it was clearly in jest. Her feminism-soaked mind took a playful gesture and turned it into "me exerting my patriarchal privilege to oppress her". You really had to be there - her reaction was completely uncalled for and over-the-top. If she had never read any femi…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:15 PM
0

There have been posters all over the Washington DC metro trains lately that say "if it's unwanted it's harassment". I can't tell if they're trying to tell people that that's literally the only criteria, or if they think it's just easier to read that way, but from past experience I get the impression it's the former and not the latter. If it really is the only criteria, that means that as a man I'm harassed several times every single day.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:51 AM
0

While you're right about STDs, unprotected anal sex spreads other infections such as dysentery and urinary tract infections. Also just the idea of people getting shit on their dicks is enough for them to be grossed out and worried about cleanliness - even before people knew about germs, they knew that coming into contact with poop is bad for their health.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:50 PM
0

Hey, how about instead of downvoting my comment you state your reasons for disagreeing with it? You know who else does stuff like that? Feminists.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:21 AM
-2

You all are starting to sound like feminists in this thread... you're doing just as much mental gymnastics as they do. The reasons why homosexuality and especially male homosexuality have always been looked down on are simple: 1.) Male homosexuality implies anal sex, which the idea of causes an automatic gross-out feeling from most people (it should be obvious why), and until the invention of condoms it was a sure way to spread diseases and infections. 2.) Homosexuals don't reproduce, so parents…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:34 AM
1

Thanks for the clarification, Hillary.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:07 AM
7

"been subject to the worst crime you can be subjected to and survive" What? Did they just say that about rape? I'm sure it's bad, but the WORST? How about getting your arms ripped off? Is that not as bad as rape?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:36 PM
12

Therapist = TheRapist. Seems relevant somehow.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:53 AM
6

Hahaha this article seems like it's directly based off of an article about feminist reactions to a Christina Hoff Sommers lecture.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:45 AM
20

Yes, they did say that it does not exist. They said "rape is caused not by cultural factors". How does that NOT mean "rape culture" doesn't exist? They said it's not caused by culture.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:06 PM
0

Yes there is. She listed her #1 favorite book as a book by a feminist that parrots all the usual talking points. Not just a favorite book - her #1 favorite book. Not #2. Not #7. Nor was it #5. Her #1 favorite.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:53 AM
0

So if she listed the Bible as her top favorite book, I couldn't infer anything about her world views based on that?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:26 PM
-2

That was the point. It was parody / role reversal.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:25 PM
0

There's a difference between liking a book and listing it as your #1 favorite. Especially when it's basically a thinly-veiled propaganda textbook.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:56 AM
2

She listed a book as her top favorite. I googled the book, and based on its description and the fact that it's her favorite book I could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that she believes that only men "objectify" by judging looks. I replied in an obviously ironic way to make a point, which hopefully but unlikely will cause her to re-examime her views.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:47 AM
1

Hasn't replied so far. Probably won't.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:44 AM
0

I replied to make a point and to hopefully make her re-examine her views. And I did upload some closer pictures right afterwards anyway. And it has to do with countering 3rd wave feminist illogic, which is the main reason why MRAs exist.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:41 AM
1

She listed a book as her top favorite. I read the description. And I've never encountered a feminist that didn't believe in objectification as a one-way street against women.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:39 AM
0

Nope, she listed a book as her top favorite. I googled the book, and based on its description and the fact that it's her favorite book I could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that she believes that only men "objectify" by judging looks.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:37 AM
8

Like I said, she listed a feminist book as her favorite book. I googled the book and it was the typical feminist BS, which always includes "men judging a woman's looks is objectification (so what if women also judge men's looks)".
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:53 PM
11

I know. The point was to point out feminist hypocrisy by reacting in a way that a feminist might react if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:31 PM
2

The room should have also had padded walls.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 12:23 AM
1

Not "the patriarchy" - that's an extremely oversimplified idea of pre-industrial society. When a society doesn't have access to relatively safe communities, birth control, and pre-fabricated basic necessities, the only society that CAN work is women having/raising children and tending to the house while men work and are protectors. "The patriarchy" is a theory that insists that it's an unnatural power play by men to oppress women, when in reality that type of society is the default when modern t…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 07:07 PM
1

Yeah I saw this a while back. Good cause, terrible wording that may have been intentionally like that.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter