Kathlene M of View from the Right believes after reading Roissy (the brutally honest rake that appears to be achieving some sort of critical mass in the media) she understands the psychology and generational roots of Game and instead displays either ignorance or willful misdirection of the truth here.
I have no intention of defending Roissy, but it is fun to pick apart someone that clearly either doesn’t understand Game, or doesn’t want to and doesn’t want anyone else to get it either.
Lets start at the beginning. She spent three days reading Roissy and another blog to get an understanding of Game. It took her three full days. I don’t know which is more telling, that it took her three days to read the blog, or that her reading comprehension is so small. Smaller bites next time, perhaps. I would suggest rereading the entire blog from the beginning, one month a day, until finished, with a pop quiz every other to make sure you learned the lessons properly.
Despite claiming that it is only the under 35 set commenting on the blog, it is evident that there are older posters. An obvious example would be Whiskey. She disparagingly categorizes the chief complaint of the men is the “dry spells” they must endure.
The whole point of the movement, which is entirely lost on our prim friend Kathlene is that it is not dry spells that are being discussed, but being completely shut out of the sexual and relationship marketplace. Forced celibacy because women are all running after the top 10% of the men and the rest of the men are invisible as partners. A perfect example of a man that has dropped out of the mating game because he has no hope (and a regular poster on Roissy) is David Alexander.
The cold reality that Kathlene does not want to admit is that a society with unbridaled female sexuality without significant consequences places most men on the sidelines. Since she finds a dry spell a “wretched state of existence” it would seem logical that she would see forced celibacy as equivalent to the torments of hell. This is the state the majority of men find themselves in. Another example of a tormented soul in this situation was George Sodini.
Kathlene then goes on to say that the men of Roissy don’t seem to get that “Life is unfair.” As if that is lost on anyone in the Roissysphere. Or that the whole point of Game is to tip the scales a little bit back so that they aren’t a complete patsy in life where everything in society from the stock market to marriage and divorce, to the dating scene is rigged against them.
This is typical female Beta shaming on her part, in fact much of her post is Beta shaming. How dare you not accept the fact that you are a “loser in life.” How dare you think you can change that. You are becoming a Cad. I don’t think I like you. If you’re a good little boy and do as your told, and apologize right now for not being respectful, I will pat you on the head and you can go sleep in the dog house while I get pounded by the bad boy that makes me wet.
Fuck that.
The third paragraph is a complete hoot! First she blames Bill Clinton ( a president the women far prefer than men, does that tell you anything Kathlene? Anything? No? *sigh*). Then she blames the absentee father (with a grudging mention of custody being the reason. Who is to blame for that, snowflake? 80% of divorces are initiated by women, and not because of abuse, but because the woman isn’t “happy” which translates to “he was a Beta boy.” Game can fix marriage. Don’t believe me? Go back and read Roissy. I’ll even make it easy for you. Look here.
Oh, and according to her the mothers weren’t there because they were working all the time. Hmmm, or maybe they were out getting rogered by the new boyfriend all the time and leaving the kid at home. What better way to learn the true nature of women then to realize your mom is a foolish slut?
The next two paragraphs skim across the truth without going into the deep waters. The current reality is in fact that hard work is not rewarded in our culture. Quite the opposite, being a good citizen is punished. Women don’t like the hard working type, they are not “fun.” It is not new that women are like this, and it isn’t a product of this generation either. Read Byron, or Cassanova, or any other rake in history.
Next up, misdirection. More Beta shaming for not liking the provider role they were born to. It’s pretty hard liking your role, if all you’re fed is shit sandwiches. If society doesn’t give a shit about you, if you have no opportunity for sex (much less a relationship, kids or a family) and that the only women that will give you a second look are the ones that have slept with a hundred men and will likely cuckold you, divorce you and take your kids away and make you slave away for her while she’s out drinking and fucking, why would you be happy? Why wouldn’t you resent it? What sane person wouldn’t?
The real big question, is why would these men care about a society that reviles them?
Next she gets confused (more evidence of poor reading comprehension) by saying that Alpha, Beta and Omega are computer gaming terms. Their true origin is nature and evolution. The Alpha wolf, the pack leader, the Beta wolves, the followers, and the Omega wolf, the bottom of the pack.
The last two paragraphs are pure projection. The Roissy way of doing things is manipulation. Everything in life can be described that way.
The politician that gets elected: used manipulation. The boss that gets more out of his workers: used manipulation. The woman that gets men to buy them drinks and dinner: used manipulation.
According to Kathlene, we don’t know how to handle rejection. In order to be good at game, you have to take a lot of rejection, constantly. More rejection than your fragile ego can take, Kathlene.
What she wants is for all the men to be a good boy, go back to dates (translation: go back to buying me dinner, and presents, and listen to me talk about myself for hours in the hopes that I grant you the blessing of a kiss at the end of the evening). Go back to working on long term relationships and learn fortitude, the ability to handle rejection and the blessings of hard work (translation: Accept the fact that while you’re taking me out for six months and I deny you sex, I will be having a good time fucking your best friend or any other guy I find appealing. Work hard and some day you can support me and my bastard children while I plump up like a blimp).
The final paragraph is more female shaming. If she had actually read the blogs, she would have understood that doesn’t work and she would have realized that being proficient at game does take effort, and the gratification is not instant.
Finally, you see no revolutionaries there. You’re wrong. A revolution is coming and you are not going to like it. Not one bit.
EDIT: Fixed the links because Talleyrand has better things to do. A
