The Aussie government is continuing it’s push to control every facet of their citizen’s lives. The latest is a crack down on small breasted porn stars and female ejaculation. Attraction to the first being deviant behavior, the second just being plain ‘abhorrent’ and apparently no different than urinating. Who knew?
From the UK register comes this article by John Ozimek,
Breasts came under the spotlight a year ago, as Senators Barnaby Joyce and Guy Barnett commenced a campaign against publicly available porn. Rounding up magazines from corner shops and filling stations, Senator Joyce claimed that publications featuring small-breasted women were encouraging paedophilia.
Has a causal link every been found, or is this just more hysteria that sounds plausible? Just asking. I like women. Give me a decent waist to hip ratio, feminine features and a nice ass and I could care less what the size of their breasts are (although the LTR does happen to be more than amply endowed in that area). My proclivities aside this does seem to be a tempest in a teacup.
As far as female ejaculation is concerned,
The films are being banned on one of two grounds:
1) That the depictions are a form of urination which is banned under the label of ‘golden showers’ in the Classification Guidelines or
2) Female ejaculation is an ‘abhorrent’ depiction
Ah, the old Victorian mores raise their ugly heads once more. It’s the patriarchy keeping female ejaculators down! No, wait. Porn leads to the objectification of women! Damn, I’m so confused.
