Why, people wonder, do women raise betas when it screws up the reproductive success of their offspring?
Why, if they supposedly want the “sexy sons” would they try to do it even to an alpha’s sons?
It cannot be because the mothers want to shit test their own sons and take them out of the evolutionary race. That would be counter productive to the mother’s own genes’ survival.
The natural check on female behavior comes from the man, the father figure, whether that is the herd/harem that women seem to naturally want to return to, or the forced monogamy of a stable thriving and advancing civilization, or the chaotic matrist society that we are currently descending into with all the contaminant violence, destruction and death.
So women naturally try to make their sons, all their sons beta, and men can have varying degrees of influence on their sons depending on where they are in the hierarchy and what they know and how much they are (or can be) involved in their sons lives.
Why though?
It is quite simple. The goal of women, all women, feminists, conservatives, the demure wife, the hell bitch, the princess amazon, is to extract resources from men (plural).
Just as the man who sleeps with a lot of women with very little resource expenditure has game, the equivalent for women is the woman who gets lots of resources out of men without giving sex, or giving very little of it. That is female game.
We all know plenty of betas that do tons of stuff for a woman that they are not sleeping with, because they love her. In fact, the entire government structure we have in place is set up to extract resources from the productive members of society and give it to women. (That women were foolish enough to place themselves in that meat grinder too, is a perverse justice).
So women raise their sons to be beta, to extract the resources of their sons, just like any other man. It provides a greater chance for the mother to survive and produce more offspring, especially if there is no adult male around to protect her, to have her sons fulfill the protector/provider role.
One must remember that our society is so far a field of what it has been like through most of human history. For most of history, women on average, died sooner than men, not anymore. Men become adults at 13, yet they are tied down to their families (for obvious social structure reasons) but this is not a natural state.
These facts (and the absence of fathers) extend the ability of the mothers to influence, control and condition their sons to continue to serve them. Our society pushes this too, because women want to extract everything they can from men.
Just because a woman becomes old and can no longer produce children, does not mean the drives change, just as men still fancy after young healthy (fertile) women even as they age.
It is, as with all the things, a self-centered narcissistic drive that is innate in all women.
