I consider myself a humanist and pro gender equality but I'm not a feminist because as many of you already think feminism promotes victimization of women and blaming of men rather than being focused on true equality. my main doubt on mras is that I noticed a widespread mistrust and skepticism on women. I've read quite a few people claiming that women are morally and intellectually inferior to men, naturally greedy and selfish. I don't believe any of that and it's quite offputting to me reading what I consider to be bold statements, I don't even think women are much different from men in intelligence and logic. all those studies claiming that men are better in visual skills and women in language skills are quite contradicting and far from establishing any definitive conclusion. I believe that the fact that women are less involved in STEM disciplines than men is mainly because of social and environmental influences while natural differences or predispositions are marginal at best. apparently the majority of mras believes women are substantially different from men in intelligence and brain skills but maybe I'm wrong, you tell me. it's not like there is an official position regarding those issue but that's the prevalent opinion I seem to get from mras. on the other hand I acknowledge the fact that men and women are substantially naturally different in sexual behaviour and that's one of the main reason of animosity between the two genders.