Feminist biased article on a bill trying to be passed redefining rape, and some other more or less sensible things being passed. what do you guys think?

Embogenous · 2012-05-25T09:42:41+00:00

Against. While I'm pretty iffy about ambiguous definitions, I don't at all support the "forcible" thing. And I'm pro-choice, so I oppose the rest.

TracyMorganFreeman · 2012-05-25T10:30:26+00:00

I wasn't aware abortion could be an itemized deduction.

This article nonetheless sensationalizes the issue, in what appears to be a proponent for tax credits for abortion, but opposed to justifications of it.

As for narrowing the definition of rape, I'm suspicious it's as simple as the article makes it out to be, but as shown it's rather silly.

2012-05-25T17:03:25+00:00

I think it definitely needs to include women molesting boys, particularly getting pregnant by them.

It also needs to include when women have plied men with alcohol.

It also needs to include when men and women have sex but the man didn't enthusiastically say "yes"

Title	Feminist biased article on a bill trying to be passed redefining rape, and some other more or less sensible things being passed. what do you guys think?
Author	rensin
Upvotes	0
Comments	3
Date	May 25, 2012 7:55 AM UTC (14 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u46sn/feminist_biased_article_on_a_bill_trying_to_be/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/feminist-biased-article-on-a-bill-trying-to-be.1021109 https://theredarchive.com/post/1021109

Comments