Legal rights are for shit when a woman lies: Adoption Industry Gets Another Man's Child

2009-02-18T23:08:09+00:00

The article says the fact a man's child was taken from him is of lesser importance than the supposition that, if his child hadn't been taken, another child would have been adopted.

If it were my child taken I would sure as hell never concede that!

The wrong of lesser importance is that Ralph Lowery's parental rights have been sabotaged by the mother of his child. That's a terrible wrong, but Lowery is an adult and he can have another child if he wants.

Tell a man whose child has been taken from him by fraud and force "you can have another one"? Fuck you!

2009-02-19T05:35:21+00:00

The actual article gives a more complete picture than this blog does, and somehow does it without the inflammatory rhetoric.

AnnArchist · 2009-02-18T16:10:01+00:00

These should be submitted to feminism subreddit so that they start to understand why we speak the way we do.

Title	Legal rights are for shit when a woman lies: Adoption Industry Gets Another Man's Child
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	20
Comments	10
Date	February 18, 2009 3:37 PM UTC (17 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7yd9p/legal_rights_are_for_shit_when_a_woman_lies/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/legal-rights-are-for-shit-when-a-woman-lies.1054894 https://theredarchive.com/post/1054894

Comments