If you need to remember anything else about feminism it's this:
Feminists believe that punching up on men is OK because to them it's part of the greater good of eroding the oppressive force of male privilege. Resistance to it is resistance to class struggle and freedom for all. Gynocentric feminists and intersectionalists are both utilitarian, it's just one is solely invested in Patriarchy (hence include/culminate in TERFs) whereas the other is invested in Kyriarchy (the progressive stack, which ends up with cognitive dissonance when misandry is transphobic, or racist, classist, etc.)
For utlitarians, some injustices are greater than others and it doesn't make sense to treat issues with equal weight.
Ironically tradcons are the same. Trads see no problem in throwing people outside of their ideal traditional family under the bus, because The Greater Good is a stable society and 'family values', not freedom for all.
Egalitarians are from what I've seen deontologists, they are trying to harm as few people as possible because an action which results in harming one individual is still immoral. They don't always succeed, but it's what they believe in.
A significant chunk of, though certainly not all MRAs, are egalitarian deontologists.
#notallfeminists of course, but most are utilitarians
edit: So I debated whether this would lead to the libertarianism vs. authoritarianism debate. I don't think it's quite that simple though.
Feel free to disagree, as I may be totally wrong.
[–]The-Author 17 points18 points19 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]LacklustreFriend 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]The-Author 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BloomingBrains 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link