Red Pill and Evolution

somebullshitrp · 2016-08-15T18:07:24+00:00

The Red Pill does not specifically advocate against having kids. TRP gives you the tools to take control of your sexual destiny. If you decide to have kids or not, that is up to you.

A lot of people on here advocate against having kids simply because it will (proven by science!) decrease your overall happiness, and very likely lock you into either a relationship with a woman, or one with the government (when they force you to pay the woman).

TRP itself is just a toolbox (how many times have you heard that?) enabling you to maximize your sexual effectiveness. Having kids or not is a separate issue altogether.

VasiliyZaitzev · 2016-08-15T20:40:43+00:00

In the extreme hypothetical world of hardcore Red Pillers....

There wouldn't be divorce rape and guys who got married would be in de facto open marriages. IOW, the dating environment would look like Russia, where even a schleppy guy can nail a hot chicks if he knows WTF he's doing.

assholesfinish1st · 2016-08-15T16:43:21+00:00

You're confusing TRP with modern sexual tendencies. Condoms, pills and abortions happen. TRP just advocates not getting locked down. We can even turn it around and say that feminism is responsible for the divorce rate and because of that, feminism is "anti-evolutionary". It's women's responsibility to make a stable family, which is why so often you'll find a Beta Bucks raising an Alpha Fuck's kid.

Nicolay77 · 2016-08-15T22:07:01+00:00

It's actually the other way around, TRP is the tool you have to ensure it is your genes the ones that pass to the next generation, instead of the genes of another opportunistic male.

That is, if you want to have children, with the current economic and legal environment working against us.

But there is the option to go to another country and meet better women.

G4RRETT · 2016-08-16T00:18:18+00:00

Evolution and the urge/drive for gene passing does not account for the rules, norms, penalties, and dangers of modern (feminist) western societies. Although impregnating every girl you sleep with would be advantageous and even desirable from an evolutionary perspective, in the modern feminist west what has worked throughout human history has basically been turned on its head.

Axel_Black · 2016-08-16T01:05:01+00:00

I've read the book as well, and have already contemplated the things you're saying for a couple years now. My genes are a genetic code. That code mixed with my experiences have formed me to be exactly who I am today. Let me reiterate.. I am not my genes, and I am not my experiences, but rather a product of the two. My genes don't actually have desires; they don't WANT me to reproduce. My genes HAPPEN to be set up in a way that is conducive to sexual reproduction. It encourages me to bust a load in some busty-big-ass-dumb-bitch. But our higher intelligence, essentially the executive branch of our brain, doesn't have to do this. Why did some of us evolve to out-think our natural tendencies to reproduce? I don't know, probably statistical accident. Doesn't mean I can't accidently knock a bitch up.. the dick, and your urges are designed to betray the executive mind. Also, don't even get me started on that starving pussy, salivating all over the place, and looking to suck up all the sweet sweet gravy. Back to the point.. You don't have to do what you're genes "think" is good for you. Do what makes you happy. Do what YOU want. So you don't make a little punk - ass that looks kinda like you. Who cares. Your conciousness IS you, and once your body dies, the machine that powers your consciousness, you probably disappear.

Poof.

But hey man, DO WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANT. Life is a game. Play it. Dont. Eat cheetos. Build a business. Build some muscle? Fuck some hoes. Die. Repeat?

gu4po · 2016-08-16T02:04:06+00:00

Ever wonder why the head of the penis is made of the same stuff that lips are made of? That type of flesh appears only in a few erogenous zones- the anus, the vagina, glans of the penis, and lips. Oral sex serves no reproductive purpose, and yet, there it is.

We evolved to have non-procreative sex, and it is common in many animal species. Fucking for fun is not unique to humans. What is unique to humans, is family planning.

I will say, though, that fucking for fun may detract from our efforts to procreate. But if it weren't for blowjobs, or the idea of a blowjob, most men would probably toss themselves off a cliff, seriously impeding their ability to procreate.

anddennn · 2016-08-15T17:21:28+00:00

If the vast majority of men suddenly got woke and refused to distribute their seed, society would adapt or perish. I suspect it would be the former.

trpthroway123 · 2016-08-15T16:38:53+00:00

We are an extremely small sect of males. We're not even one thousandth of a percent of the world. To think this type of thinking has any effect on the large scale is laughable.

How many guys have you seen out there with multiple kids, multiple baby mommas, who are beta bitches?

I never have. They're always some sort of Chad. It's the alphas of the world out there spreading their seed. Just because we take advantage of it to get more girls doesn't mean there aren't 1000 times as many natural alphas out there doing their thing.

Here's a hypothetical. We men, beta or alpha, Chad or Bob, will fuck up contraception with 1% of the women we sleep with.

Who passes on their genes to more people, Chad who slays 1000 girls in a few years, or Beta Bob the 30 year old virgin who marries a post-waller with a kid and has monthly duty sex?

[deleted] · 2016-08-15T17:40:49+00:00

Swallow the race red pill, and look to date people within your own race.

Title	Red Pill and Evolution
Author	rpcube
Upvotes	7
Comments	12
Date	August 15, 2016 3:56 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/askTRP
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/4xu8is/red_pill_and_evolution/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/askTRP/red-pill-and-evolution.109766 https://theredarchive.com/post/109766

Comments