~ archived since 2018 ~

‎"With the Benefit of Hindsight" Podcast Exposes the Penn State Hoax that Ruined the Lives of Several Men

icefire54

November 18, 2022

1 upvotes

/r/MensRights

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	‎"With the Benefit of Hindsight" Podcast Exposes the Penn State Hoax that Ruined the Lives of Several Men
Author	icefire54
Upvotes	1
Comments	11
Date	November 18, 2022 12:41 AM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/yy6jz4/with_the_benefit_of_hindsight_podcast_exposes_the/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/with-the-benefit-of-hindsight-podcast-exposes-the.1140386 https://theredarchive.com/post/1140386

Comments

[–]Aimless-Nomad 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]FuckinNogs 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]icefire54[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]FuckinNogs 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]icefire54[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]icefire54[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]icefire54[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The thing is I read it, and it affirmed that Sandusky raped children. I didn’t get a single but if new information after reading for as much time as I had available. I’ve asked you to briefly explain it, and you’ve taken the time to respond twice now, but not typed the singular sentence explaining the main point that was requested of you. This justifies my suspicion that you are trolling. You have the opportunity to dispel that suspicion at any point by just typing one sentence explaining why you believe he is not necessarily a rapist. Calling me lazy for reading what you provided, and finding the opposite of what you said it would prove is just an ad hominem fallacy on your part. I’m not taking your opinion as gospel when you say it “debunked the Penn State hoax” when everything I read from your source said the opposite. Spend 2 minutes right now scrolling through your own source and copy and paste the relevant bit to your main point, or else just don’t respond… or call other people lazy lol.

[–]icefire54[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link