TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Danish Woman Given Just Three Months in Prison for Sexual Relations with Underage Asylum Seeker

White_Swallow_

October 26, 2017
21 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/10/26/danish-woman-three-months-prison-sexual-relations-underage-asylum-seeker/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Danish Woman Given Just Three Months in Prison for Sexual Relations with Underage Asylum Seeker
Author

White_Swallow_

Upvotes 21
Comments 15
Date October 26, 2017 7:05 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/78xs94/danish_woman_given_just_three_months_in_prison/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/danish-woman-given-just-three-months-in-prison-for.1174697
https://theredarchive.com/post/1174697
Top posts by White_Swallow_

Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings

3486 upvotes
November 6, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Gravelfoot 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

Breitbart should not be trusted without a second source to back up any claims.

The age of consent in Denmark is 15, so by no means was the asylum seeker "underage".

The reason this is a case at all is that the relation falls under the paragraph where it is illegal to have sexual relations with someone under 18 towards whom you have the role of trusted guardian.

"Den, som har samleje med en person under 18 år, der er den skyldiges adoptivbarn, stedbarn eller plejebarn eller er betroet den pågældende til undervisning eller opdragelse, straffes med fængsel indtil 4 år."

The important part here is that you can be covered by this paragraph if the person is under 18 (and 15 or above) and you are entrusted with this person's education or upbringing ("undervisning eller opdragelse"). And this is directed towards parental figures and teachers.

So yes, she broke the law and ended up paying 10.000 dkk and got 3 months + a year under observation (maximum possible sentence was 4 years in jail). On top of this she will never work with people under 18 again, which is as it should be.

She was never going to get near the 4 years in jail, since that is meant for very severe cases like those where parents/guardians have sex with their kids/adopted kids. Also, she had no priors and the case was not about the boy being hurt (underlined by his own testimony during the trial) but about the fact that he felt he was under undue pressure because of her role in his asylum case.

So it was a very good thing she was found guilty, but the sentence was not out of the ordinary considering the particulars of this specific case.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

So yes, she broke the law and ended up paying 10.000 dkk and got 3 months + a year under observation (maximum possible sentence was 4 years in jail). On top of this she will never work with people under 18 again, which is as it should be.

Which is strange. She'll still be able to fuck under 18 year olds. And if she got her jollies before becoming a teacher, then one moment she'd be fucking them non-stop, the next she'd be teaching them afterward.

[–]Gravelfoot 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Since the age of consent is 15, then there would be nothing wrong with that scenario.

The problem isn't the age of the younger person; the problem is when someone over 18 is in a position of authority over someone under 18, it creates an imbalance of power, that puts into question the younger person's ability to consent.

The reason why she will never work with people under the age of 18 again isn't that there is anything wrong with her having had sex with someone under 18. The problem is, that she abused her role as an authority figure to pressure someone into sex.

[–]Arby01 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The problem is, that she abused her role as an authority figure to pressure someone into sex.

The question is - would a 52 year old guy having sex with a 17 year old girl in exactly the same circumstances have received the same sentence - if yes, then this seems like appropriate results. If no, then this is a pussy pass.

You suggested this was not out of the ordinary for sentencing. Have a comparable but reversed case?

[–]Gravelfoot 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Here is one about a 48 year old man breaking §219, which is another paragraph about not having sex with people towards whom you are in a position of power. It is essentially the same as the paragraph that the woman broke. Also carries a sentence of up to 4 years in prison.

"Der er ansat eller tilsynsførende ved fængsel, forsorgshjem, børne- eller ungdomshjem, hospital for sindslidende, institution for personer med vidtgående psykiske handicap eller lignende institution, og som har samleje med nogen, der er optaget i institutionen."

In essence it talks about not having sex with people who are in an institution of any kind (like prisons/homes for kids/mentally impaired/etc.) if you work there. Again it is not about the age but about the fact that one person can pressure the other unduly due to their position of authority.

The 48 year old man had sex with a 19 year old pupil in a home for troubled kids/young people. He got a 3 month suspended jail sentence and a fine of 10.000 dkk.

https://www.tveast.dk/artikel/tilstaar-sex-med-elev-skal-betale-10000-kroner-i-erstatning

[–]Arby01 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So there's some equivalency. That's good to see. Thanks for doing the legwork to show it.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She was just opening her borders to the underprivileged immigrants.

[–]Rethgil -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Even the United Nations have suggested that this is an epidemic with endless cases of women raping and abusing vulnerable underage asylum seekers from war torn countries who have already been traumatized.

The victims aren't accusing any governments-they are accusing people who claim to be volunteers. Which rules out a hidden agenda and makes this even more disturbing.

The fact that its mostly female rapists is perhaps why the media aren't interested in the UN reports.

[–]BernieSandersgirl101 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

That's horrifying. What kind of scumbag rapes somebody who is already so traumatized?!

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I don't think there are female rape-gangs going out and raping unwilling immigrants.

[–]BernieSandersgirl101 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Still, one rapist is too many.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Except it ain't one is it. The UN wouldn't be worried about their OWN organizations facing an epidemic of similar cases if it was just 'one' would they.

We're seeing a similar rape epidemic among female teachers and male children who they rape.

Maybe women are more likely to rape when they are in carer roles?

[–]BernieSandersgirl101 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know, but still. One is too many. That means more than one is too many as well. I hate rapists, especially those who rape the vulnerable.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wtf? What kind of comment is that? You wanna be flippant and unrealistic about females rsping already traumatised young males?

So they don't go in gangs? I notice you use the male allusions there to try to spin things onto men again. Female rapists have their own tricks and methods for grooming. So what? So we should ignore them? Unbelievable.

[–]BernieSandersgirl101 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. I was replying to Mwobuddy when I said that one was too many. I despise those who hurt the vulnerable like that. Now imagine this, you're a vulnerable immigrant man, who escaped horrific terror and forced conversion. Then you get raped. Now you're hurt, and scared. If you tell somebody that she raped you, she'll probably say that you raped her. Now who are they going to believe, you or, in their eyes, the nice white woman who volunteers. Then, what if, when they believe her, they deport you?! That means that, after you get raped, the tormentors that you thought that you escaped from, they might get to forcibly convert you, if you were escaping from that. Can you imagine how traumatizing that would be, to get deported back to the hellhole that you came from, to get forcibly converted after you got RAPED?!

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter