TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mwobuddy Archive

View 45 posts and 17,382 comments by mwobuddy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
247

Legal Rightsmwobuddy/r/MensRights02/08/17 04:11 AM
214

Discriminationmwobuddy/r/MensRights23/11/17 01:53 PM
80

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:30 PM
72

Generalmwobuddy/r/MensRights22/10/17 01:45 AM
63

mwobuddy/r/MensRights03/01/17 12:37 AM
48

Anti-MRMmwobuddy/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:22 PM
44

Edu./Occu.mwobuddy/r/MensRights08/05/18 11:07 PM
34

Feminismmwobuddy/r/MensRights19/08/15 10:03 AM
29

mwobuddy/r/MensRights01/07/18 04:51 AM
23

Legal Rightsmwobuddy/r/MensRights03/05/16 04:21 AM
23

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:46 AM
23

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights27/05/18 12:12 AM
21

mwobuddy/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:07 AM
20

Marriage/Childrenmwobuddy/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:25 PM
19

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights19/05/17 06:47 AM
15

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:41 PM
15

mwobuddy/r/MensRights19/01/17 08:35 AM
15

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:59 AM
12

mwobuddy/r/MensRights23/04/16 06:18 PM
11

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights30/08/18 04:35 PM
9

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:55 AM
8

mwobuddy/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:18 PM
7

Edu./Occu.mwobuddy/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:53 PM
7

Intactivismmwobuddy/r/MensRights19/04/18 12:22 AM
6

mwobuddy/r/MensRights11/12/16 04:59 AM
6

Generalmwobuddy/r/MensRights13/05/17 12:00 AM
5

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights25/05/18 02:31 AM
5

Feminismmwobuddy/r/MensRights20/11/15 12:36 AM
5

Questionsmwobuddy/r/MensRights19/02/16 07:58 AM
5

mwobuddy/r/MGTOW03/01/18 12:13 PM
5

mwobuddy/r/MensRights12/04/16 12:17 AM
4

Edu./Occu.mwobuddy/r/MensRights20/01/18 07:29 AM
3

mwobuddy/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:55 PM
3

mwobuddy/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:42 PM
2

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights15/08/18 10:09 PM
1

mwobuddy/r/MensRights08/05/18 11:05 PM
1

mwobuddy/r/MGTOW03/01/18 12:02 PM
1

mwobuddy/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:22 PM
0

Generalmwobuddy/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:18 PM
0

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights10/02/16 05:30 AM
0

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights03/02/18 03:56 AM
0

mwobuddy/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:41 AM
0

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:41 AM
0

Social Issuesmwobuddy/r/MensRights16/11/17 02:10 AM
0

Legal Rightsmwobuddy/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:41 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 17,382 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

PERFECT
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:13 PM
1

I challenge you, to find ONE piece of what I said in my comments and post it. That's all you have to do. Copy and paste and say "this is completely wrong and here's why". All you have to do. You won't and you can't because you know you're full of shit. u/Ransal said: Simple way to stop you from wiggling around. Do you believe type 1s can live without insulin, complication free, for more than 7 days if they follow your advice? Its not a matter of what I think. Its a matter of you reading the RESE…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:11 PM
1

You've made a lot of accusations. And nothing to back it up. Twisting and distorting others words. Here's a thought. Why don't you take your hostility on this issue to ABC, since they were promoting this promising idea. Why don't you go read all the collected studies at foundmyfitness and call rhonda a lying contemptuous cunt? No, you're going no farther than here, because you're not actually interested in stopping 'misinformation' as you call it. 'Misinformation' such as "look into fasting and …
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:09 PM
3

well no shit. I could've told them this 5 years ago. The reason men experience depression as anger is because men are raised to 'be men', which means not being blubbering piles of tears, but to get mad when things don't go their way. The former is 'womanly', and even women hold men to that standard. There's nothing more repulsive to a woman than a man crying over 'petty things'. Its okay to cry in very few instances. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-diau1UxLc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHx…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:02 PM
1

https://www.leafscience.org/type-1-diabetes/ I am a type 1 diabetic who started fasting. I completed the GAPS diet for 2 years to restore gut health and microbial diversity in the gut while also following a paleo autoimmune protocol. It lowered my insulin needs significantly, but not fully. I then started fasting and remarkably am able to go anywhere from 1-5 weeks entirely insulin-free, not even needing insulin for meals. I habe done 8 fasting cycles, lasting as long as 3 full days with nothing…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:34 PM
1

Fasting increases insulin sensitivity.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:31 PM
0

I told them to do their research on promising leads. https://www.leafscience.org/type-1-diabetes/ I am a type 1 diabetic who started fasting. I completed the GAPS diet for 2 years to restore gut health and microbial diversity in the gut while also following a paleo autoimmune protocol. It lowered my insulin needs significantly, but not fully. I then started fasting and remarkably am able to go anywhere from 1-5 weeks entirely insulin-free, not even needing insulin for meals. I habe done 8 fastin…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:31 PM
1

Oh I believe it. Ive seen it in real life.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:30 PM
2

I really bet its less of "drastically increasing" and more of "with smartphones, sexting, etc being common in school, and coupled with greater awareness of women having sex with students, we see a massive explosion in the rates of those caught".
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:39 AM
0

'raped' She said her daughter, who was 18 when she started working at The Armidale School, had received support from "other" parents of boarders since the scandal was made public. "She struggled with relationships with the opposite sex," the mother added. "She would tend to be drawn to people that would manipulate her."
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:07 AM
6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBexG_DxD-s heres an in depth explanation of her behavior and men player behaviors.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 06:28 AM
10

Judge ruled the case was "extremely unusual" and the woman had been "thoroughly disgraced" He means "its extremely against the status quo argument of men as sex predators for having sex with students", because he surely cant mean women doing this is extremely unusual. Not with the massive backlog of convicted women for the last few years.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 06:14 AM
30

I know what game not to buy.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 06:13 AM
2

The onion
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:05 AM
1

Someone who posts under a publicly visible account should be fair game to being quoted, but at the same time it's trivially easy for anyone to find that account from quoted posts, so why not take the high ground? Thats a perfect explanation of the 'problem'. If someone can just do a word search on twitter for that post, and find them, they have "doxxed" them themselves without any help from OP. meaning the claim for the rule does not make sense. Chewbacca is a wookie, but he lives on endor. That…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:45 AM
1

and spiked drinks are the boogeyman of "men are evil rapists". Whats so hard to understand?
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:44 AM
1

https://youtu.be/XSOKVQmLh_s?t=74 So can she point to these "lots of men" who appear to be heckling her because of being female? They're obviously "all over the place here". Rebuttal to Serena. https://youtu.be/EjPLpPWEQYQ?t=92
/r/MensRights10/09/18 03:18 AM
20

I fight for womens rights Virtue signaling in the era where women have more rights than men.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 03:16 AM
1

its like people dont have personal accountability. the mob is completely innocent, the poster is guilty even if theyre not calling for mob action
/r/MensRights10/09/18 03:15 AM
1

Chris Cyborg looked like Vitor Belfort in a dress and heels. I can really see what he means. She looks more masculine than me.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:20 AM
1

He insults women in the league, and says they look like men. its typical for women to look more like men as they age, and for men to look more like women. See: George washington. On the other hand, masculinizing is a process of constantly being washed in hormones. Testosterone belongs to a class of male hormones called androgens. But women also have testosterone. The ovaries produce both testosterone and estrogen. Relatively small quantities of testosterone are released into your bloodstream by …
/r/MensRights10/09/18 01:11 AM
1

Does the person intend to connect different parts of their publicly available information? If not, then you're crossing a boundary they've set by publicising the unintended connection. If you publish their name and their home address (after seeing their posts with their name only) by doing some Stalking Research, then that would clearly fall as doxxing even in my opinion. But showing people's names by posts they've clearly made 'entirely public' by posting them on social media sites can't be dox…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:43 AM
1

Well, thank you for showing me you haven't done the research I was talking about.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:41 AM
2

We're talking about POTENTIAL to commit harm to others for sexual purposes. The target is "evil men". But women are doing things that are ascribed to "evil men" at this Lesbian Mecca and its all cool. Just stop. Seriously.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:04 AM
1

by providing key arguments of intermittent fasting and all meat diets as a potential for controlling glucose levels, renormalizing them, etc? All you've done is give me the typical horse in mud who wont move. if you'd done the research I feel like you'd have said "ive already looked into X,Y,Z". but you didnt'. Like I said, I dont give a shit now.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:03 AM
-1

Do the research. Or don't. I don't give a shit now.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:50 PM
5

Im sorry you didn't understand. The point of it is that women behave in all the ways they say are disgsuting, entitled, even 'creepy' or 'sexually assaulty' type behaviors, if men do it around women. But women can do it around other women and its totally cool. Like flashing people. That's indecent exposure and creepy for men to do. Like grabbing random women and pulling them into hotel rooms to have sex with them. That's entitled, rapist behavior for men to do.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:49 PM
8

"who hurt you" is typical Inceltears/twoxchromes responses to a person's words, whether that person's words are justified or not. its called poisoning the well.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:47 PM
4

I think your "nature of the beast" description hides a much more simple explanation for why primary caregivers are not a taxable role: people, regardless of gender, just don't earn any money from being primary caregivers. Child support payments and welfare are not 'earning money'?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:46 PM
-1

Like I said, there are promising leads on intermittent fasting and 'all meat diets' with regard to type 1 diabetes. Instead of putting words in his mouth do some research.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:45 PM
1

Then one questions why articles written by people on NYT can have their name exposed when linked into reddit.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:10 PM
1

No, you won't live forever. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVArDzYynYc
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:07 PM
5

look into jordan peterson's all meat diet and intermittent fasting from rhonda patrick. I think there's something in those two who says that you can actually improve symptoms, even 'control' T1 diabetes, with their programs of eating. https://www.foundmyfitness.com/news/t/fasting https://www.foundmyfitness.com/news/s/uu17jz/early_time-restricted_feeding_improves_insulin_sensitivity_blood_pressure_and_oxidative_stress_even_without_weight_loss_in_men_with_prediabetes https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:04 PM
1

If you need advice on living to that age, then I can help you out. It mostly has to do with getting specific nutrients (including vitamin D, you'd be amazed how terrible vitamin D deficiency is for aging.. in mice), as well as intermittent fasting or possible even a 'full' fast, vis a vis rejuvenation of your immune system, lower metabolic rate due to lack of fuel (which prolongs health since compare to average+ metabolism for obvious reasons), and so on. And you can even stay fit and health doi…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:00 PM
1

Did any of you guys read the article? He tried getting at a 14 year old! I wouldn't want to work alongside a female pedophile. This is such a double double standard if any you guys are actually upset about this. Im tired of having to repeat myself but here goes again... That's not pedophilia. Its been described as 'sexually normative' by the APA and all other psychological institutions for the last 200 years. Its illegal, but there is no law detailing what pedophilia is. Its not pedophilia. Its …
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:13 PM
5

Im really disturbed because I agree with you. More precisely, it has to do with the fact that I've tried to reasonably defend 'underage' males or females having sex in all apperances 'willingly' with overage males or females by asking people to rationally defend the position that it is rape/sexual abuse. In all instances we end up either with two options. Option A is circular logic and appeal to emotion arguments. Option B is outright ad hominems and devolving into "you're a sick fuck who wants …
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:11 PM
0

The same could be said for "feels before reals" arguments. Feminists are saying they "feel violated" in public, and therefore there should be a law against it. Stooping to their level would be supporting that.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:06 PM
0

http://helloflo.com/perfectly-legal-take-upskirt-photos-america/ Its a god given american right! https://thetempest.co/2018/06/25/news/back-up-off-me/ https://www.thedailybeast.com/texas-court-says-upskirt-photos-are-art https://www.sandiegocriminallawyersblog.com/now-perfectly-legal-take-upskirt-photos-georgia/ I feel like people should read the judge's arguments and decisions before knee jerking over this issue. You might learn something. For example, a Washington, D.C. judge ruled in 2014 tha…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:02 PM
-1

Its not sexist. Women can do it to men as well. In fact, they often do. Only they're more interested in "giant bulges on trains' or 'hot guy on train'. IT was rules NOt a crime to upskirt in some U.S. state recently.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:01 PM
3

This story is obviously fake. There's WAY more than '3 children' at walmart at all times. Its like a universal rule.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:53 PM
-3

Well, at least he got to be up inside that hot puss before he died.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:13 PM
1

You're desperate to push the "all men are rapists and drug women" angle, if you want to go the route of insults and accusations.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:54 PM
0

You have no evidence they were given it unwillingly either. But you're making that claim.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:46 PM
-1

I asked if they took it on purpose. You said no. You have no evidence. You're assuming they were forced to take it unwillingly. You have no evidence. This is an accusation that someone (a male) gave it to them unwillingly. I asked that question because you were assuming guilt. Quit now while you're not too far behind.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:44 PM
-2

Again, I don't see evidence here. You're just using aspersions. You're the one claiming that "hes guilty even though there's no evidence". In your scenario, women are being drugged without their knowledge. That makes a man guilty. I ask for evidence to prove they didn't take it willingly. You then claim I'm for assumption of guilt of a man. You're literally contradicting your own implications and claiming Im using the logic you were using.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:39 PM
2

Again, I ask, what evidence? I asked for this and got a teacup analogy. That's not evidence.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:35 PM
-9

I actually agree. I read the story and it turns out that she had sex with one and then the others blackmailed her for sex. Being blackmailed is not consent, and squarely goes into the "rape by coercion" category. SO they were very technically raping her. However these people have SJW justice boners for "EVIL PAEDOPHILES AND SEX PREDATORS" if its women, so they don't care about facts or reason.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:34 PM
-14

She had sex with one which makes her a sex perdatory. Then the other boys used this as blackmail to have sex with her. She raped someone, and essentially got raped right back by the underage males. What makes you think underage males shouldn't be held responsible for rape, by the way?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:32 PM
2

In other words, you take it on faith.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:30 PM
12

How exactly did they get women the vote? did they shed blood in a civil war over it? Or was it those 'evul menz' in power (white men no less), who gave it to women? They didnt even fight half as hard for rights as blacks had to during the 60's. I didn't see any evidence of women en masse protesting and being attacked with dogs, bullets, police batons, fire hoses, etc. On that note, its quite funny that police dogs still exist. They were popularized by the germans and russians after all, during t…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:30 PM
2

how do you know?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:23 PM
1

Perhaps, but did they take it willingly?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:19 PM
7

It is a myth in the UK. The rate is 0% positives at hospitals when women go in complaining they were drugged. But plenty of alcohol is in their stystem.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:16 PM
24

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/apr/07/dinah-lesbian-festival-women-palm-springs For five days in Palm Springs, Arwa Mahdawi entered an alternate reality where gay women celebrate each other with pool parties, dancing and debauchery “Flashing is normal,” Charlotte, 24, told me. “I get flashed at a lot.” Random girls pulling you into their hotel rooms are also pretty standard. It’s also about scantily clad celebration. Maybe all the clothes got destroyed during the gaypocalypse, bec…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:16 PM
4

Actually, in England the rate of 'being roofied' for people checking into hospitals is about 0%. Whenever women think they've been roofied, and they go to hospital, results are always negative.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:10 PM
4

No they're just very young
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:02 AM
19

They sexually assulter her bro. only males can commit rape and she was seduced by them because shes mentally ill and its not her fault bro. blaming her is toxic patriarchal misogyny bro.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:45 AM
-3

SERIOUSLY THIS SHIT IS WHY I DONT TALK TO GIRLS AT BARS EVEN IF THEY'RE EYE FUCKING ME OR MAKIKNG EXZCUSES TO GET ME ALONE LIKE WTF WHAT IF UR SOME CRAZY BITCH WHO WILL THINK I RAPED HER BECAUSE SHE WAS TRYING TO GET ME ALONE AND THEN I THOUGHT SHE WANTED 'IT' AND MADE A MOVE THEM SHE CRIES HELP IM BEING RAPED?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:44 AM
0

I didnt realize one sex predatory was so completely differemnt from another that its entirely unrelateid and not even in the same ballpark for arguemtns abut wherther ro not peopel deserve more punishkment or nut ty so much for fixin me errors or thinkin.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:42 AM
1

Okay so if I try to rape a 14 year old and then I get out of prison, you're cool with me having a job and being around others?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:27 AM
2

I took a look. Trying to rape a 14 year old. tried to rape child Listen here, you fucks. I've always been on the "do teachers really deserve harsh punishment when they fuck teens?" side because I want to hear valid, reasoned arguments rather than rhetoric and emotional refrains. Now, suddenly, I'm taking the opposing stance for this issue, wherein he was a FUCKNIG 40 YEAR OLD trying to child groom (IN YOUR TERMS) a 14 year old iover the internet into sex, and everyone is all like "aww that olivi…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:26 AM
-1

usermane says CREATURES dumbass.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:22 AM
9

ISNT ANYONE GOING TO COMMENT ON THE IRONY OF A SEX OFFENDER WORKING ON A SET CALLED PREDATOR???
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:21 AM
0

The point is that you'd feel differently about his being able to have a job and walk in public if he raped a toddler, wouldnt you? You wouldnt feel 'serving his time' would be enough punishment. That's the HOW and WHY these people are operating under.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:20 AM
-8

I am a 13 year old guy Boy. Not guy.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:10 AM
16

I note Williams' claims, but if a man tried to used antecedent behaviour as an excuse he would (rightly) get short shrift. fucking spot on. u/msleeduon doesn't get it. They're a kid. Experience and observation teaches men of significant age differently. Those men of significant age who pander to this "women can do no wrong" mentality are usually cynical exploiters of the positive benefits such 'political' stance can bring to their personal or professional lives, or really, really low IQ old men …
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:09 AM
-6

Yes but what if hed 'served his time' for raping a toddler and then was working on set? Its all cool cause he served his time?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:06 AM
-7

What if he'd raped a toddler? Still want to make that claim?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:51 AM
1

Ah thats the fucking problem isn't it? Women are creating the game, and making men play the game when they cant win. Men need to stop playing the game. Tell dumb feminists to shut up. Deny them when they say stupid crap like "consent needs to be explicit and ongoing or I feel disrespected'. Thats when you ghost. Men could have all the power they need to stamp this out, but they're too easily swayed by pussy pandering (white knights, soy boys) to see that playing into the delusional wishes only r…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:23 AM
1

I said that earlier. But she's saying its the sex which makes her feel unsafe.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:08 PM
8

“This is why our finding that male participants’ brains were, in most measures, more variable than female participants’ brains is so interesting. It fits with a lot of other evidence that seems to point toward males being more variable physically and mentally.” AWALT! lol.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:19 AM
1

Cruelty was a phrase used in the actual case, frm the UK.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:18 AM
5

Im calling her a bitch for saying that sex makes her feel unsafe, with the implication that men make her feel unsafe, unless she's a lesbian (which doesnt read at all).
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:16 AM
1

I'm pretty sure even the larger pet fish are still caught with nets. And the fish caught recreationally or for eating (on hooks or in nets) generally seem to be different types than the ones kept as pets. But you're making a distinction that doesn't make any sense. Oh, we eat those, and we keep these as pets. A fish is a fish. If you have to not kill "these as pets" cruelly by suffocating with bleach, then you have to not kill "those we eat" with suffocating by yanking them out of the water with…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 08:21 AM
1

Aaaaaaaaand lets just disregard fish larger than that, or recreational fishing.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:51 AM
4

Me too. Its kind of fun. The importance of it, of course, is to use behavioral modification for extinguishing those thoughts. I wasn't raped the last 99x men were creepily walking behind me, its okay.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:31 AM
1

do they still fish and gut in the uk? Help at all? When you fish, you send a sharp edge piercing through somethings mouth. Then you either disembowel it right there, or you let it suffocate and then disembowel it. But pouring chlorine is "cruel".
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:27 AM
9

breathed into his neck and pulled off his shirt. You didnt ask his consent you rapey bitch. I looked at his earnest eyes, hair flopping into his face, stubble that was already reddening my skin (I had already decided I didn’t mind). Hadn’t I already said yes several times? Wasn’t I lying there with him, my leg tossed over his, my whole body arcing toward him? At another point he kissed me from forehead to toe and said, “I think that’s everywhere.” And I almost told him that was unfair; he hadn’t…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:20 AM
1

do they still fish and gut in uk?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:47 AM
1

r/womenbehavingbadly
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:02 AM
2

So you agree he should be let off lightly?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:42 AM
1

I feel bad for him. A lonely guy who was seduced by female students who obviously were thirsty cause of his chad appearance and the fact that he's in a natural man's position of 'leader'. I mean, cult leaders don't get mass sex from their constituents because 'a man in power is so unattractive'. They were preying on him and his fragile emotional state.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 09:40 PM
7

He must've been emotionally abusive or cheater on her! You don't know her story! Maybe she's really mentally ill! Women don't do that in general, that's male typical behavior! Why can't you feel sorry for her being taken away from her kids! Shitlords! Stop gloating over women being evil!
/r/MensRights07/09/18 09:36 PM
5

Cluster B personality disorders can all sound psycopathic. For instance, they are called "I hate you, DONT LEAVE ME" for a reason. Because one minute, you're absolute bottom dwelling scum in their eyes, and the next minute, they need you all the time. They also tend to be extremely sexually provocative and slutty, both male and female of this disorder. Only problem is males have a harder time getting picked without good genes/looks, so that's why females corner the market in terms of "people who…
/r/MensRights07/09/18 09:34 PM
16

its a start
/r/MensRights07/09/18 08:43 PM
-27

Nah. That is an epic prank. That's punk'd worthy.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 08:34 AM
4

At least in this case the article uses the correct term. Because forcible sex is rape.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 12:51 AM
2

Kinda funny really, as there is a fairly large group of people who do that a lot. Yeah, they're called primary teachers.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 12:37 AM
0

Synonyms are not direct drop-in replacements for words. They often have a slightly different meaning and contextual use. Impervious means essentially "able to withstand" such as a brick wall being impervious to rain. She is not "able to withstand her chains" if your context was indicating she was ignorant of or unable to see her chains. https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/unaware
/r/MensRights06/09/18 09:17 PM
5

The roles of military application have been about highly trained but ultimately disposable machines for getting a job done. If a person can't lift as much and will cause a mission failure because all the dick swingers are exceptionally worried their female comrade got shot in the gut, that's a recipe for military/special ops disaster. They'd have to start beating the in group preference for females out of men, train them to ignore their pain and suffering.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 09:12 PM
-1

I couldn’t believe that she was impervious to her own chains The value of gender studies college education. She means blind, not impervious.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 09:09 PM
11

Special treatment is horrible. And the results (someone quitting) are typical of such treatment. A person who doesnt have to invest will quit much more easily. The gambler's fallacy is what propels most humans to continue their work. Without this mental self-trickery, we'd all be too rational about our chances at anything to actually do anything. Anyway, she didnt have to invest as much, and so she quit. But worse is that she wasted however long it took her, because she didnt get the value out o…
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:51 PM
2

It took more than 10 seconds?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:46 PM
1

Appeal to traditiion/nature.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:42 PM
4

Since when have women wanted quality? Cock carousel comes to mind. Betabux.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 03:36 AM
1

there is no loophole. youre seeing something not there to make the argument
/r/MensRights06/09/18 03:18 AM
1

They pay you in Electrum Pieces? Damn, those are pretty rare in some campaigns.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 02:58 AM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 02:57 AM
1

This is bad argumentation. You going to say "if an 8 year old seduces a 16 year old and isn't charged, they're getting away with it"? Completely moronic. Please. Fuck right off with that.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 02:55 AM
1

For the same reason if a 13 year old 'seduced' an 18 year old, the 18 year old goes ot prison for statutory rape. There's an age difference.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 02:41 AM
1

So a 13F can successfully get away with a sex crime. That's incorrect.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 02:05 AM
3

When you try to acquire illegal weapons, you're sent to jail for a long time because of the potential harm you could've done. She potentially could've radically harmed them. Its like when someone shoots bullets at a house hoping to kill someone. Maybe they dont hit anyone. Should they get a few months in jail because they didn't succeed in their attempt to carry through murder or bodily harm? Why should she get a few months for failing in her attempts to have sex with a child?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 01:44 AM
1

No, because hes the older
/r/MensRights06/09/18 01:35 AM
1

Ok. So by your reasoning, a 13 year old female can seduce any male into sex and get away with it and you'll blame the male for it. Nope. You just committed a strawman. Nothing I said supports that conclusion. If she's 13 and 'seduces' an 8 year old, she's the one in trouble. If an 8 year old 'seduces' her, she's still the one in trouble because she's the older one in the situation. if she's 17 and he's 14, then she's in trouble if she incites him to sex. If he incites her, hes in trouble. if he'…
/r/MensRights06/09/18 01:00 AM
0

They're nearly equal, so yes. If she'd been 13, he's the one in trouble for 'giving in'.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 12:26 AM
4

If thats true why dont women do it?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 12:23 AM
6

Yes doctor
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:10 PM
13

okay doctor
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:08 PM
0

When the person they're seducing is incapable of consent and/or younger than themselves. A minor 'seducing' someone too drunk to say no is rape as much as an adult doing the same is rape. A minor seducinig another minor is rape. A minor seducing a 10 year old is rape. A minor having sex with a 10 year old who 'seduced' them is rape if the minor is older than them. Or would you prefer not to punish 16 year olds for having sex with 10 year olds? And any minor using force and threats to procure sex…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:06 PM
0

Nope. That doesnt follow at all.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 10:55 PM
1

it is totally reasonable. ATTEMPTING to seduce an older person, whether you're 10 or 16, is not a crime. Attempting to seduce an older person at 18 isnt either. But in the first two cases, the older person 'falling for seduction' is a criminal rapist.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 10:15 PM
2

The fascinating thing here is he tried to delete incriminating evidence, and the victim took pictures of said evidence. It leads more credence to the value of "always record your interactions". Remember what peterson and others say about SJWs. They are resentful people looking for a cause that will give them the excuse to attack others. Like the Berkeley riots. This person was using the cover of "Im trying to find paedophiles so they can be brought to justice" to attack others. https://www.belfa…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 10:13 PM
1

Yes, you are strawmanning. No one would seriously believe someone who is 10 and incites sex or someone who is 14 and incites sex is the rapist in the scenario where the older person is 16 or 60 respectively. We all know that the younger person is the one victimized in both circumstances, the duty of the older being to deny the activity. We all know that an older person who incites sex with a younger person is a rapist. We all know that a person who incites sex with a person who is incapable of s…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:52 PM
-1

We were talking about two people who are under 18 and are the same age. Stop strawmanning.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:46 PM
2

So you mean that you completely believe what happened based on claims without evidence?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:41 PM
0

Im amazed you even have to ask. The older person is the one responsible for saying no, just as 15-25 the older person is responsible.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:40 PM
-3

So you're going to keep repeating yourself and not make a claim? We can disregard you.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:17 PM
-5

So you think an 18 year old is completely incapable of choosing to have sex with a rich 40 year old tv star?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:11 PM
2

Why would we suppress those drives? Over time, what did we learn about xx-year-olds that made us place the law above our normal behavior as primates? Feminism demanded the age of consent was to go to 21. It was fought against by politicians and psychiatrists and pediatricians and landed on 16-18.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:10 PM
-6

The one who incited the sex act is the rapist. Consider the following. 16 year old encourages 10 year old to have sex. The 16 year old is clearly responsible. 16 year old encourages 16 year old to have sex. The one that encouraged is still responsible.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:09 PM
2

16 has always been my line based on legal traditions. That said, my 9-year-old used to be able to work a full shift at the factory. Irrelevant. We're defining the term in the world we live in. You brought in "legal tradition", which itself is an "appeal to tradition" argument (read: Logical FALLACY). Then you suggest we shouldn't look to traditions a la "9 year olds in factories".
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:03 PM
2

Your parent can sign for you to join the military or get married. your parents can sign you to get married at 12-13 in a lot of U.S. states. Being able to be given away by your parents != legal rights are beginning. 16 has always been my line based on legal traditions. Age to vote used to be 21.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:56 PM
1

Odd that it wasn't attacked by feminists as being offensive to women by implying its moms who should feed the kids at home.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:39 PM
3

Right. There's explanations made by the APA and other psychological/legal sources regarding this, that it may not be a mental disorder and completely normative, however legally and perhaps culturally it has been prohibited as behavior. Normal drives don't always make legal policy. Sometimes we suppress those drives for a better world, but that doesnt make those drives abnormal, weird, or disgusting.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:36 PM
-4

http://www.ncsby.org/content/understanding-adolescents-illegal-sexual-behavior small number of adolescents may be sexually attracted to children rather than to age-appropriate peers. They may be developing a mental disorder known as pedophilia. Pedophilia involves intense sexual arousal to children 13 or younger. To be diagnosed, the person must be at least 16 years old and at least five years older than the child they are attracted to. This is a rare condition in adolescents and only a qualifie…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:34 PM
2

She got away with paying only a half million dollar fine when it first broke. Is she now going to actually go to prison? Well, she still has all the rest of that nearly 1 billion monies.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:22 PM
-2

But every day is mens day!
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:21 PM
144

16 months is "treated as seriously"? What a laugh.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:20 PM
4

volcel
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:20 PM
4

Im sorry. If you can't see understand the relational aspect of direct vs indirect violence to a movement with respect to how women choose to attack others, relating to feminism, I can't help you.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:19 PM
-2

14 is still a child adolescent. Fixed that for you. Bar/bat mitzvah targets 13 years old. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinceañera targets 15. Teenager was invented in the 1900's. The notion of "when child ends" has been pushed back repeatedly over the last two centuries. Do you cite 'still a child' because a person is not 18? then technically, a 16 and 17 year old is still a child, and yet they are legally allowed to have sex with 60 year olds in the majority of US states and UK/Canada/Aus. So…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:16 PM
4

Like I said, women use proxy violence. Women in general do it, it stands to reason feminists do it. They do it through the state and social gossip.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:12 PM
9

There are some violent people of the Muslim religion, but the majority are non-violent, therefore its a religion of peace. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfKLV6rmLxE I wish I had kept those book links around, but in the early 1900s they detailed exactly what feminism is: the attempt to use the state as proxy violence against men. Their slogan was "votes for women, chastity for men". They were trying to enforce both by legal means. That's why age of consent went from 13 to 16-18. To imprison men…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:09 PM
4

Against women's rights? Fuck no. Completely FOR women's RESPONSIBILITY, social, civil, criminal, etc.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:07 PM
6

That's not crazy. That's reasonable. if someone can't consent to sex, they can't consent to sex. There's no way someone is "mentally unfit to consent to sex" to X type of person but "mentally fit to consent to sex" with Y type of person.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:06 PM
-7

He was much younger. She was in position of relative power and high status. Im curious what you think position of relative power means. Does this mean a 40 year old with millions of dollars and a TV show is raping an 18 year old if the 18 year old chooses to have sex with them?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:05 PM
2

I thought this was the onion at first
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:03 PM
4

The history of suffragettes is full of fire bombing, stabbing men the street with long pins hidden in their fur bundles that cover their arms, etc.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:01 PM
3

Stop it! You're breaking the narrative that its rape by showing someone who doesnt appear like a victim! For what its worth, plenty of people say they regret sex with their high school bf/gf, but we don't call that rape.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:00 PM
-1

14 isnt pedophile
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:59 PM
-1

14 isn't pedophile.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:58 PM
3

He told the court: 'I was stunned it happened. When I woke up in the morning I felt pretty rubbish. I regretted it. 'It wouldn't have happened if I was sober.' Anyone elseconvinced yet that being drunk should be seen as rape?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:58 PM
0

rewarding irresponsible behavior does not reduce that same behavior.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:26 AM
1

Stupid uneducated irresponsible people exist, they are not going anywhere, so your claim is that stupid, irresponsible people will make use of contraceptives when they're free, and will not do so otherwise?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:26 AM
1

let me put it this way: What do you think of people who use welfare money to buy recreation gear? Imagine someone saves welfare checks and buys a jet ski or something similar, but they dont actually work for that money. Do you feel Satisfied, Dissatisfied, or highly dissatisfied that they are using the money they get on things to enjoy rather than necessities? Is sex a necessity or a thing to enjoy? Why do you want to subsidize people freely having sex? Do you think they're entitled to sex?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:44 AM
1

Human nature usually says "fuck you, Im not going to subsidize you having fun and paying if your risks screw you over".
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:05 AM
1

the court system is already lowly loaded. They use the threat of 20 years prison to enforce an 80% plea rate, which means 80% of cases end before going to trial.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:04 AM
2

Birth control saves billions in the long run, there's no reason for it not to be socialized. lets socialize rehab for people who take drugs as well.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 06:54 AM
-1

That's a future not written. Women can keep their legs together or buy their own condoms, just as men have had to do. Its incredible that abstinence is completely off the table as a responsible thing people can do themselves to protect not only themselves but 'future unwanted children'. Simply amazing.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 05:58 AM
-4

Remember when women wanted Hobby Lobby to pay for their anti-procreation materials? That's not even a health care issue. As women are so fond of telling men "you aren't entitled to sex". people aren't entitled to sex. If you choose to have sex, you're taking a risk. Its not like you're getting cancer or you get in a car accident. Also interesting is they demanded it for women, not for 'all people'. yeah, feminism is for everyone... lol. I think they were trying to make it a "oppressive religious…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 05:21 AM
1

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/06/we-should-stop-putting-women-in-jail-for-anything/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/12017131/Why-womens-prisons-do-more-harm-than-good.html https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/01/why-we-should-close-womens-prisons-and-treat-their-crimes-more-fairly Remember that they're like spas because otherwise they'd be inhumane. The prison system as designed with strip searches and heavy restrictions are destruct…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:24 AM
1

didnt you watch seinfeld?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:23 AM
6

unless they have a life partner with a good job. They call that the state.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:18 AM
-1

how can you poison someone with salt-water?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 03:23 AM
1

Its embarrassing to be pinned. I overstepped my argument somewhat for hyperbole sake.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 01:43 AM
1

I thoroughly enjoy attempted gaslighting through texts. But you overplayed it.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:01 PM
1

I love the 3rd grade "no u" argument. Works great.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:41 PM
2

The problem with their arguments is they want to claim its sexual assault to grope a titty but then claim its not a sex organ. If its no more of a sex organ than a shoulder, then it cant be a sexual crime to grab it. But they'll gladly define that as sexual assault.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:18 PM
2

You cant make sweeping generalizations based on 0.01% outliers.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:13 PM
1

You can look at it this way. Feminist western culture is one extreme, wife beating and acid throwing and slut stoning is the other extreme. Most people are naively moral enough to prefer the safety of feminist western culture so people aren't OBVIOUSLY hurt, such as physical, etc, allowing INOBVIOUS hurt to run unchecked (because anyone who is told that they're always right and no one should ever be angry at them develops a personality that accuses and emotionally abuses others thinking they're …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:11 PM
4

nah it was the toxic masculinity that poisoned her womb.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:01 PM
4

In US jurisprudence, criminality requires mens rea, or intent to commit the crime. Incorrect. statutory rape is a strict liability.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:59 PM
-1

and knew I would never do anything like grab a woman, or proposition her Not even if she wanted you to?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:51 PM
1

Yeah. I happens all the time every job I've ever worked. At least 2 will make a claim with HR. Its horrible. Why can't they be sane and reasonable?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:50 PM
-2

He is a sex predator and he did expose himself to others.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:49 PM
1

devaluing a person because they are an older female is the essence of misogyny.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:48 PM
3

Truly, it worked for the catholic church!
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:14 AM
4

Its also a form of self-abuse.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:13 AM
4

single use bathrooms Sort of like an AT launcher? Shoot and then throw away the launcher at 50k a piece?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:22 PM
13

Rape and false rape are both major issues. The prevalence of either needs to be taken care of, but the prevalence of the former has been monitored and taken care of for at least 50 years, by politicians wanting to protect women for their votes, by police, by staff, etc. False rape accusations, on the other hand, is serially denied as even existing, in 2018. Politicians don't say peep about it. Police handle it but often they scare a potential false accuser enough that they recant and it doesnt b…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:19 PM
4

Dont permit them to put words in your mouth and legitimize it with responding.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:17 PM
1

Show me
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:08 PM
-1

Well good news! Watching it will give you one!
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:08 PM
1

Then I fail to see your problem.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:40 PM
1

Basically. They even conducted business or 'business' in there. You should watch it. Its a glimpse into the fantasy of SJW.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:40 PM
2

This wasn't how it was supposed to be! Alley Mcbeal showed it could work! How is this such a horrible issue!?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:36 PM
1

So you agree with me? Explicit consent is the only consent that matters. Even if she's naked on your bed its still not consent.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:30 PM
2

Do something like what? It doesnt matter how a woman behaves, she's never "asking for it". I would've thought you were clear headed enough to see past the unconscious misogyny you hold.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:12 PM
1

I agree. No matter if she gets naked, spreads her pussy cheeks while on your bed, still she isn't consenting for you to try to have sex with her.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:41 PM
1

Stressing normative behavior is harmful... So desired normative behavior of 'not murdering' is harmful. Shaming people by saying 'you shouldnt murder' is harmful. Yes, I know you said criminality, but criminality is negative behavior, don't you agree? Is rudeness negative behavior? Is being unfriendly negative behavior? I hope you agree it is. Yet, shaming people for that behavior is harmful and oppressive, because it seeks to normalize 'being friendly' at the expense of someone wanting to live …
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:44 PM
6

I totally agree. How dare anyone say that socially healthy traits are desirable in the opposite gender! REEEEEEEEEE
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:41 PM
1

This raises a good question. What if they're an emancipated minor? IS a 14 year old emancipated by legal act capable of owning a house or renting apartments, capable of other things which require 'legal adult status' to do? Then woudl they be capable of taking their own child? And what of a 14 year old who gets pregnant? Is her child taken from her when its born because 'she doesn't have the right to custody'?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:40 PM
1

Most people who have siblings were raised by them when the parents were'nt around. Most babysitters are in the 16-18 year old range for 12 year olds.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:56 PM
1

Ah, you didnt have siblings.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:49 PM
-22

Just beacuse something is natural doesnt make it good. The idea of women being less valuable because they're older is misogyny.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:15 PM
1

http://archive.is/4sYMw
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:04 PM
1

Hey, if this is how bad the mother is, how bad must the father be? After all the courts sided with her.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:03 PM
11

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/30/alex-salmond-crowdfunding-scottish-independence alex is using crowdfunding to signal his power! God damn, everything is a power play to SJWs.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:01 PM
5

The Thai government clearly doesn't like the damage to their tourist industry so a police general went to investigate. Thats an interesting claim, because banning someone for making rape claims by claiming those are false claims is exactly what they might do to protect their tourist industry from taking a financial hit. If she was really raped, then it scares other would-be tourists off. So of course they would call her a liar!
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:58 PM
0

lol
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:57 PM
11

http://archive.is/4sYMw I encourage reading this. This is the mentality of some people.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:55 PM
26

Of course. If he kills himself no more sweet alimony/child support.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:55 PM
-27

Uh, that's exactly what volcel is sweetie. Incel is when even someone who is that disturbed and abusive says she'll pass on having a go with you.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:45 PM
1

Should we REALLY be applauding this equal treatment? Lets say we have right to despise her. Pulling tv shows hurts everyone involved, not just her. And what if its a great TV show? What if your favorite show turns out to have an actor or actress who might've done something wrong or horrible, and you can no longer watch it? You're now also restricted from it.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:40 PM
-24

volcel if you wouldnt. And yes, you've once again proven the issue that youth is part and parcel of female physical attractiveness.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:36 PM
1

insipid misogyny. Lol
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:31 PM
2

Given the motive (sex) opportunity (a motel room), he failed to rape her by the admission of the actress. Contradicts the theme that he rapes women, since rape is forcible sex.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:30 PM
32

So you're saying people view jobs as part of male status and invoke a hierarchy relating to them? Like perhaps some jobs being 'positions of power'?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:29 PM
2

Harvey weinstein made moves on some actress at her hotel room. The actress herself claimed this, and then claimed that she rejected him and he did.... nothing.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:14 PM
1

I can see why you'd resort to pretending like people are never physically needy instead. Im not sure what that means. You mean do I think people never get hungry? That's a physical need. Caught between a rock and a hard place. You can either shit on a pro-male argument because a feminist is making it, or you can be in the position of agreeing...with a feminist. She was not making a pro-male argument.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:11 PM
1

Those states you spoke of, did you mean sex with othet teens or adults(age of consent laws)? The whole nation accepts 16 year olds messing around with other 16 year olds. when age of consent is 16, it means they could have sex with 80 year olds if they wanted.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:10 PM
1

Its never needy to ask to cuddle and enjoy feeling close to someone.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:51 AM
1

Someone's actions being the result of their brain "automating" their decision making or their actions being a result of deliberate choice would be externally indistinguishable. Well, I hope you never have to jury for someone who murdered other people because of a brain tumor. It wasn't externally distinguishable with your naked eye, so obviously the person chose to do it of conscious free will.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:33 AM
1

To repeat: It's not. About. Him sucking. In bed So why did you say "how would you like to hear that you suck in bed"? You're completely fucking lying, but it was an answer. Oh, okay. So someone answers with something you don't like and they must be lying. Virtually any rational person would think the same thing: she's being needy. It's insecure. I'll be sure to tell my friends they're being insecure next time we're hanging out and they want to do something else like go to the movies. When people…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:32 AM
29

Drawing is bullshit. It would've crashed into the ocean leaving no survivors.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:59 AM
1

That she enjoys certain activities and wants to have someone around who will participate in those activities? This isn't rocket surgery. And you pretty neatly sidestepped my question. Did you get your reading of the scenario wrong and attribute to her shaming him for not being able to give her an orgasm e.g. "you suck in bed", or did you make this claim correctly and subsequently claim it wasn't made?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:57 AM
1

A wholly insensible person cannot "start 'initiating' themselves" any more than they could start a car and drive it. You greatly underestimate the brain's ability to automate processes. People who sleepwalk are unconscious, but can clearly drive. There are children born without any brains whatsoever apart from the brain stem. They even can reach the level of speaking words and tying those words to forms like 'dada' or 'mama', but they lack all of the brain that we typically associate with consci…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:54 AM
1

She's not shaming him for not being able to give her an orgasm. I mean, how would you want someone to deliver the news, "You suck in bed?" So did you get this wrong then?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:51 AM
1

Sex shouldnt be about your ego! So I'll shame you for not being able to give me an orgasm cause you suck in bed! Even though my orgasm is not your property and you cant say YOU made me cum! Which is it? Is a guy good enough in bed to 'make' her cum, or is that a guy participating in 'ego project', and he should stop participating in an 'ego project' and he shouldnt worry that she doesn't cum, and that there's no such thing as 'he sucks in bed' because its not under his control whether she cums o…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:40 AM
1

but you're just missing it altogether. you keep repeating it but not proving the claim. you're doing the exact same thing to her. How do you figure? Show us. No, I'm not stating "she's taking an unfair and selective read!" regarding her.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:27 AM
1

According to feminism and sjw it is white supremacist.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:25 AM
5

Presuming she wants revenge, she can simply lieabout having sex after he turned 18. Since he admits to sex before, establishing a pattern, they'll likely believe her.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:25 AM
1

The idea is having as much triggering iconography as possible in a single picture while not actually having 'hate' in it. PUA = misogynistic hatred of women. Despite the fact that it attempts to teach men how to give women exactly what they want for a short term fuck. REEE = the mocking sound of SJWs and Feminists. Pepe = white supremacist frog. Even though it had little to do with being white when it was invented.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:20 AM
1

it relies on an unfair, selectively literal reading Right out of the SJW handbook. Guys, murderous regimes are just unfairly and selectively read! Marxism is really great, honest! Of course, you could go "but Im not suggesting marxism!", but that's not the point. The point is this argument is bread and butter to SJWs. If her story isn't relevant to her article's point, she can leave it out, can't she? No, it was relevant TO HER mind, to the article's tone and 'point', which is why she included i…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:16 AM
1

archive http://archive.is/MwdIc
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:06 AM
1

because you cant follow the arguments. She put that story in the article of "my orgasm isn't owned by you". If a man isn't the one giving her the orgasm, then she cant say "he sucks in bed", because she's the one responsible for her orgasm, as she owns it. I understand you don't have much experience with lateral thinking.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:02 AM
-2

As usual, the prosecutors offered her a Pussy Pass deal. Most of the law enforcers in the CJS are no better than the general public, and judging by many of the responses, the general public has a double standard where it comes to women sexually abusing young boys He went out of his way to pay for sex. Prostitutes are victims of johns. Victim intersectionality.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:39 AM
1

Consider the following: A sober person has sex with a drunk person who cannot consent. The sober person initiates sexual contact and encourages sexual activities. THe drunk person goes along and starts 'initiating' themselves. Despite them having responded by 'switching places as initiator', the sober person is still raping them, because they started the course. Now you can follow the argument here I hope.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:35 AM
1

During an ongoing intimate encounter, the roles of propositioner and recipuent can be expected to swap back and forth several times. I take it you're not familiar with the theory of prime mover.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:15 AM
1

Are you saying she couldnt write an article that was coherent and relational to the parts of itself?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:15 AM
1

Hmm, if its "you suck in bed", then obviously "you made me orgasm" which contradicts her tagline of "my orgasm is not your property".
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:03 AM
4

It was basically a way of abusing men for "shooting beyond their league", wrapped up in a thinly veiled "its an experiment!" excuse. They told men to leave if they had a girlfriend or they'd name and shame them to their family and friends. Because women NEVER go on dates with other people to see if they can get someone better. Amirite? Just a case of a woman being a cunt. Being a cunt isn't illegal, or the world might be a better place without feminism.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 04:27 AM
0

She didn’t touch me thankfully but society has a way of overlooking male victims especially if their attackers are female. I was 14! I was more into Pokémon than sex or worried about my private size. Weird. I was worried about that stuff.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 04:24 AM
5

being poor is akin to permanent punishments. You'll be in worse neighborhoods, more victimized by crime, if you lose your job, you'll go homeless. Then you'll be arrested for vagrancy, get a criminal record, maybe get assaulted in jail, get back out on the street and have less than you had even before because anything you had with you was either left behind by police or thrown in the trash, etc, etc. Its a lot like dating, actually. If you're at zero, a lot of things will try to push you down an…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 04:23 AM
2

They cant get you in jail if you become a homeless drifter!
/r/MensRights03/09/18 04:21 AM
1

BANG
/r/MensRights03/09/18 04:12 AM
48

Notice how she doesnt say she refused because she didnt think it was right to take it.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 04:11 AM
-14

God damn thumnails are the clickbaitiest shit. I was like "she's hot" then saw a full pic.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 04:11 AM
1

https://medium.com/@funkyfeminist/my-orgasm-is-not-your-property-so-stop-saying-you-made-me-come-d7d3b6d3f1e7 jfl. “Are you there yet?” “How about now?” “Are you even close?” I remember feeling like I was on a really long road trip with a four-year old in the backseat. Then finally: “You came, right?” “Um, no,” I replied. “But it’s okay. You tried, I think.” Then go do it yourself you bitch.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 03:37 AM
3

Thats some hot troll. I love it.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 03:29 AM
2

Did he fuck her while she was underage? If yes, then he's a statutory rapist. What she claims about therapy is irrelevant to the law. Even if he'd been 17 (she'd be 14), he could still be in violation of AoC law. Your friend fucked up by having sex with an underage girlfriend. If a 40 year old can't do her, you should probably avoid sticking your dick in her as well, because this claim shes making is EXACTLY why AoC exists for 'adults' as well as 'teens'. Do you believe a legal adult having sex …
/r/MensRights03/09/18 03:09 AM
1

depends on how dsrunk I was
/r/MensRights02/09/18 10:07 PM
3

Holding it is one thing. Repeatedly using it for 8 hours is another.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 08:36 PM
-2

I did it for the lols
/r/MensRights02/09/18 08:35 PM
1

so now she's retroactively claiming she was "gender non conforming" all alone, but never mentioned it in any of the hundred or so interviews she's given, or performances from carrying a mattress, to being tied up and whipped naked, to rough anal hardcore porn...never mentioned it before. Come on dont be that way. She was just heavily confused early on in life and iddnt realize she was genderqueer or had been a victim of rape until after being rejected by the hot dick she so enjoyed.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 08:33 PM
7

Premise: Psychopaths and sociopaths seek positions of power. Being a victim is, ironically, a position of power, because it allows you to destroy someone else. Being head of a feminist movement is also a position of power.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 08:27 PM
3

Gotta reassert males as dominant is pedophilia/rape/molestation to shore up the flailing #metoo movement.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 08:23 PM
1

Thats not rape because its something which predatory men victimize women with. Its at most fraud, because female vaginal sanctity is whats important.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 08:21 PM
7

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9cdbv2/yet_another_case_of_feminist_making_stuff_up_and/e59zlu1/ Op, read here. Women use reputation destruction as revenge. I hope you will not let yourself be bullied into stockholme syndrome. Being aware of this female tendency, hopefully you will stand up for other men who are attacked under suspicious circumstances. And in case it needs to be said once again, real abusers, sexual otherwise, and rapists, should be severely punished for their real …
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:38 PM
4

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9cdbv2/yet_another_case_of_feminist_making_stuff_up_and/e59zlu1/ I'd love it if reddit provided an easy comment migration tool but whatever: You're correct. When you live with an abuser long enough, you eventually start to change your thinking to that of the abuser. Its called gaslighting. "Did I really do wrong? Was I really hurting her? Was I really abusing her by doing X?" Eventually you come to believe it. Men in the western world have gotten to t…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:36 PM
3

As women, they regularly do by the more attractive men on tinder all the time.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:31 PM
1

Its kind of hard not to see kathy newman as making this up in light of being trounced by JP. Whether you like or hate JP, what he did was show how terrible her ability to manipulate a clear thinker is, how she had an agenda, and how she failed to get him to play along. For a career like hers, that was a large hit. Now she's coming out, after that, AND after Asia argento's revelations which have heavily damaged #metoo. Shes getting her limelight back and trying to buttress a failing movement at o…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:20 PM
20

He sees the empty wine bottles, and tells me even though he believes me, my wife could press charges and I would give straight to jail. Amazing. That's what happens when toxic feminism, led by people with severe personality disorders, probably sociopathy not being the least among them, spreads its cancer.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:56 PM
1

https://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/emotional-covert-incest-when-parents-make-their-kids-partners-0914165 https://psychcentral.com/blog/emotional-incest-when-is-close-too-close/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_incest Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. Women dont emotionally incest because they're willfully knowing what they're doing. BPD/HPD moms are great at doing this without consciously being aware of it.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:51 PM
-1

You're stupid. Most guys don't even pay attention to that.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:42 PM
1

They're raised by single mothers in an incestuous emotional relationship. Why is it men are so "lost" while the rate of single motherhood has gone up tremendously? Women are mothers who predate on their son mentally by trying to make them "her perfect little man" the guy she always thinks she ever wanted, respectful and polite and completely genteel, but reality is THAT ISNT THE GUYS THAT MADE HER PANTIES WET IN THE FIRST PLACE. Single mothers are victimizing their sons and reducing their future…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:35 PM
2

They're trying to change the law so that lying about your job or your intentions is rape. This is an extension of Age of Consent law, which was "teen women are being lied to by men to get sex from them, and then dumping them", back in the late 1800's to early 1900's. They want to expand it to "any lying to any women about your intentions is rape".
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:28 PM
1

It's good that whatever contact there was between you two was not much since in America only those 18 and over should have such relations. Depends on state actually. Over 30 states are '16 and up'.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:23 PM
2

As feminists are so proud of saying 'the prison system is designed for men'. Makes sense it'd be called penal colonies.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:22 PM
4

In the U.S., I notice a great deal of men have been , in almost a real way, mentally castrated. You're correct. When you live with an abuser long enough, you eventually start to change your thinking to that of the abuser. Its called gaslighting. "Did I really do wrong? Was I really hurting her? Was I really abusing her by doing X?" Eventually you come to believe it. Men in the western world have gotten to the point of going along with the abusive relationship feminism has with themselves and rea…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:04 PM
1

Lets say this is true. Is this proof that teens can be sexually victimized by other teens? Isn't this proof enough that age of consent should extend to punishing teens for having sex with each other? after all, she was vulnerable, being young of mind and body. Instead of a blanket ban on teens having sex with teens because of the POSSIBILITY of abuse, just like the blanket ban on teens having sex with adults on the POSSIBILITY, people seem to want to make it completely okay. Now the sticking poi…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:54 PM
3

thats what happens when you hand out gender claims like candy.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:46 AM
9

maybe its because of all the men out of work?
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:18 AM
1

Nice context.... NOT
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:58 AM
1

AH, I think you got confused. A 19 year old is an adult woman. If she has sex with your 14 year old son, he's definitively a child and she's raping/molesting him since shes an adult. And there's a high likelihood of that happening because she's always hanging around in the same sex pen they call 'high security high school'.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:47 AM
1

Having sexually active adult women with 14 year olds in close quarters all day long is a recipe for rapes. Im not talking "oh its like they're hanging out at the mall". They're actually integrating with each other, interacting, etc. Why don't you think 14 year olds deseve protection from adult female upper classmen?
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:53 AM
1

n ah theyre equal
/r/MensRights02/09/18 02:38 AM
1

Oh okay so lets no true scotsman.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 01:18 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/HotTinderExpirements/ Go here. Read the first article.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:57 AM
1

Clearly you haven't seen the word-frequency-bubble chart of women's responses to Tinder/other websites. height job ethnicity car are all the highest ratings for "what makes women swipe right".
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:47 AM
-3

Having grown women around children (14 years old) is rather weird.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:45 AM
3

you got a license to carry that bat, son? That things got an assault grip, making it easy to hit people without getting tired. you're under arrest.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:44 AM
2

Thats what she said.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:44 AM
4

Im sure a lot of people have expressed condoning violence on trump like "he sexually assaults women he deserves to be kicked in the balls/raped in prison" or so on. But words and actions are different things. It is hypocrisy for people who condemn violence (rape) to commit violence (batting), justifying it as "he deserved it for the sign he was holding". its an ironic repercussion for him, but its a quality hypocrisy from the woman involved. She literally victim blamed in her head the moment she…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:41 AM
4

I know where to stop sending my money.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:11 AM
17

Damn that harvey, when will he ever stop ruining people's lives!?
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:09 AM
0

Remember that shows are terrible if they feature someone who committeda crime. We should have very few movies and TV shows to watch at all. Nothing with lindsay lohan in it on any streaming service, ever. She went to jail as a criminal.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:08 AM
3

Hey, if you think violence is acceptable for people with 'a message you don't like' can I go bash feminists with a metal bat now thanks to your beliefs? That's the problem with advocating violence. It could end up used against you for what you say because its 'offensive'. And shes getting felony charges. Delicious felony charges.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:06 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4GcdLlfhK8
/r/MensRights01/09/18 11:18 PM
-4

This is actually beautiful. If they are willing to commit deadly violence, they deserve to get punished. More guys need to go out on the town with signs like this. Also 19 and going to high school.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 10:22 PM
7

“We try to cut men like him out of public life, but nine months later, we get a call with the bad news,” wrote Amanda Hess for The New York Times. A Boston Globe headline announced: “Starting with Louis C.K., the creeps are creeping back into the spotlight.” Thats what its about. Even if its false accusations. Women use accusations to destroy reputations. Why do people think it stops at high school level and doesnt continue into adulthood? People tend to continue doing things that they benefit f…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 10:11 PM
2

But bringing the innocent to trial would be unfair! Similarly, no one would accuse an innocent person!
/r/MensRights01/09/18 10:07 PM
16

Because they see you post here so you're obviously 'bating' them.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 10:06 PM
8

Holy fuck. Women break every single fucking rule on that list. How'd you like to go to the gym and have to see women in Victoria Secret underwear because they choose sheer tops and bottoms. They go there to be looked at. They then get bitchy when they get looked at (if its a guy not worthy of looking). And weight dropping is usually done by people lifting heavy things who can't finish the rep or wont because it draws attention to them. Those people are assholes destroying equipment for an ego bo…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:24 PM
2

mm that felt good. thanks
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:21 PM
2

That's pretty cute. I have neither the time nor the inclination to sockpuppet all day. Also cute is your assertion that "people who have open eyes are really just hurt and damaged and can't see straight". I take it you don't date or hang out with people regularly enough to watch and listen. I've seen all types. Women who talk about misogyny and how men objectify women, and then get highly turned on when an atractive stranger touches their ass, even accidentally. They'll also cheat on their curre…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:18 PM
3

Well no shit.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:14 PM
5

"This festival was necessary because of everything that happened during festivals last year," says the 27-year-old student with long pink hair and purple lipstick as her friends nod in agreement. Look at the pictures. Fat old women who are still children. "gotta party even though Im 40!". https://www.thelocal.se/userdata/images/1535791318_sdltd1ece8e-nh.jpg
/r/MensRights01/09/18 07:42 PM
3

because hounding people after prison always makes them less likely to commit crimes. It doesnt stop criminal behavior. It just gives people a shortlist of suspects to round up in case a crime happens.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 07:39 PM
2

It didnt get me pissed so much as 'trigger' the connection of false rape accusations. Its just something to keep in mind when you watch movies. An otherwise normal event of " girl sees guy, acts like she wants sex" is actually "trying to lure a predator", because predators are guys who want to have sex with women that want to have sex with them, and show interest in them. In fact, the entire scenario plays out as "woman tries to attract man, waits to be groped by him for his reasonable belief th…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 07:01 PM
1

I assume you positively discriminate all the time. You don't select shit workers or people with bad reputations into job positions. People refuse to hire convicted sex offenders. We don't set them near schools, etc. Positive discrimination. You don't select the ugliest man or woman with the least going on in their life for a sexual partner. Positive discrimination. PD is a force that permeates all our lives. On the other hand, trying to put in people who are less qualified is NEGATIVE discrimina…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:56 PM
10

Im watching jack reacher right now, and apparently the reason the woman was sent to try to pick up jack and take him outside the bar is 'he's a predator'. In her words "you were supposed to start groping me, I thought you were a pervert". Because only males are perverts who have sexual desires and want to try to get laid or something. Just another random tidbit of 'male sexuality evil' laced in our culture. Okay jack reacher 2 turns the "men are misogynists" sexism up to 11. He tells her to stay…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:45 PM
-4

I did to rustle you.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:26 PM
1

well he doesnt respect how equally bad women can be.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 05:57 PM
0

trans rights are mens rights only in as much as everyone deserves equal protection under the law. Trans people are not 'real' men or women when they convert. Either you're a real man or woman on the inside and what you look like on the outside is a 'social construct which doesn't matter', or what's on the outside does matter and you're born your gender. Trans deserve care and human respect as people, but they are not actually changing their gender.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 05:57 PM
3

Everyone in here woudl assume if she's 15 andfucking one 15 year old, she's 'in a consenting relationship', if she's fucking 20 15 year olds or 1 40 year old 'being used for sex'.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 05:50 PM
3

Double standard sounds pathetic. Misandrist makes people question what that means, and exposes them to new ways of thinking.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 05:41 PM
2

Hes saying 'statistically, women are not predatory and get involved with bad men which is why they go ot prison'. That doesnt match up with what we know about the differences between men and women. Men and women commit predatory behavior in different ways because of gender differences in behavior itself. Women prefer molesting toddlers+ age, men prefer 8-12 years old. Men prefer punching someone they dont like, women prefer trying to destroy them mentally and socially with accusations, threats, …
/r/MensRights01/09/18 05:35 PM
1

leers impolitely
/r/MensRights01/09/18 01:55 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwWsZQr7ZEk What age do you think the actress is here?
/r/MensRights01/09/18 01:27 AM
2

She doesnt look like a child. She looks like a 25 year old. You seem to agree that people do not choose their attraction. So why are you saying im trying to force you to be attracted by argument? You're falsifying your position.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 01:25 AM
2

Is attraction a choice in your mind?
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:35 AM
5

Yeah but Jordan Peterson still subscribes to the blue pill of women never as bad actors but as victims of predatory men, of being naive, and men as useless. He never talks about men being predated by women, for money, for abuse/revenge, sex, etc. All his talks have framed women as victims of men, even if they commit crimes. Hes still right about a lot, especially concerning religious iconography and analogies, but he's still very much a "women are victims, men are victimizers" kind of guy in a l…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:26 AM
9

When we do shit like the Misandrist of the month it plays into their hands that we are misogynistic. hang on. So when we call someone a racist, that means we're the racists?
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:23 AM
2

Its really hurting my head to read this. You know the conspiracy over on the right leaning subs of popular culture being used to help pedophilia become normal? She's probably the biggest proof of that. You mean, like ALL human culture has been attracted to youth and fertility? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Paulus_Bor_-_Bacchus_-_WGA02449.jpg/220px-Paulus_Bor_-_Bacchus_-_WGA02449.jpg She's about mid 20's by now. She looks exactly like my mid 20's female friends. You're…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:20 AM
1

You seem unreasonably certain that our various ancestors, throughout history but particularly in prehistoric times, tended to engage in consensual sex. Yes. This is true. For the most part, sex was consensual.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:08 PM
4

Maybe the fact that you see her as only a 12 year old and not a sexy adult says you have the issue.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:48 PM
1

However, who the fuck would be attracted to Ariana Grande? She looks like a child. You know what makeup is for right?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:45 PM
1

Yes, yes, feminsm says all women were victims of rape until 1990. Move along.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:42 PM
10

I strongly believe that a person's behavior is far more indicative of a situation than a person's words. I.e. if a woman is out boozing with a man at 2 AM and goes back to his place, she is not going there to pray the rosary. Obviously. The feminist doctrine is that she can drink all night with you, get completely naked, spread her ass cheeks while on all fours, and is still "not asking for it". Then they want you to ask for explicit consent. But if you do, not only is it 'unsexy' and kills a la…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:31 PM
1

You should add that "natural evolution" puts males on top, as we see in most mammal species, including humans throughout most of history. This is the fallacy of feminism. Men are SELECTED FOR by women. Being put on top requires the consent of those 'under' you.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:10 PM
2

he hypotheses that this is because they risk their lives to bring home meat. The higher status comes with a cost, however, in that males are much more likely to be killed (either while hunting or in interpersonal conflicts); and this doesn't mean women have no power, far from it. without evidence that a man has 'hunted down food at risk to himself' he is worthless, because that imbues him with value. This has occurred because (a) men invented female birth control and safe abortion a This is a bu…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:29 PM
5

But if men are the beacons of rationality and logic we are described to be surely there are more effective ways to get the point across. If I were a feminist and I read about that, my first thought would probably be "See? They are exactly how we thought and are nothing but man babies trying to sound better than they are." Which would be terrible logic. Rather than just put misandrist of the month, provide the quote that caused her to be labelled that and provide evidence debunking it. If we figh…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:40 PM
7

I have a great idea. We're being invaded by a foreign country and they're using machine guns right? Well, we should probably stick to using harsh language because if we stoop to their level, we'll be just as bad as them! Why can't we call out sexism against men where its real? This is called tone policing. People don't listen to messages about why feminism gets things wrong by men staying silent about how women treat/perceive men.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:30 PM
10

Yes, some aspects of MRA beliefs can be somewhat childish. Misandrist of the month Misandrist of the month is a childish belief? Oh, do tell how its a belief that someone was a misandrist where in fact they were not? Do tell us that "misandry doesnt exist guys". So why does Karen risk rubbing the sisterhood up the wrong way by aligning herself with the much maligned men’s rights activist movement? It’s a question she gets asked a lot. Look at this shit. "The Sisterhood". Its like some crazy LARP…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:24 PM
7

Only women matter. Their ovaries are invaluable.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:19 PM
5

Why is the western world so invested in cutting boys in so many ways
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:05 PM
1

That's weird. By the lay definitions used of people regarding why 15-16 year old on 40 year old sex is rape: Inferior mental capacity possible position of power inherent power imbalance By those tenets, anyone should call it rape, even regardless of the legal standards.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:37 PM
1

Ive got a serious question: Is having sex with a dog 'sex with a dog' or 'raping a dog'? I've seen videos of women having sex with dogs, is why I ask. Typically what happens is she lets herself get mounted, and the dog is not forced or held down, etc. Clearly there's a power imbalance in that the female is human and the male is a dog. Clearly there's a lack of ability to 'make good decisions' present with the dog vs the human. This is a serious question, because I've always read comments/news ar…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:22 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hB07EJhMBRs
/r/MensRights31/08/18 04:43 PM
19

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKNAzl-XN4I Because males are high risk infants and low value primates, as individuals. Therefore to try to act like a male is anywhere near as important as a female, whether its a child or an adult, is to be contrary to natural laws. Natural laws have developed through natural selection, and our morality adapted around these natural laws. That's why there's moral outrage when we think of women or little girls being threatened/harmed by 'useless predatory males', …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:22 PM
1

The reason women arent in office more is because they're scared off from running because of the inherent patriarchal system of oppression telling them they cant do it.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:43 PM
3

This guy is just a mouthpiece for the elites who have a hand up his ass controlling what he says and does.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:42 PM
2

https://www.nature.com/news/2009/090109/full/news.2009.12.html https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21590699 Here ya go. Honestly, I'm shitting on you because its stupid to call the behavior 'grooming'. Apparently 15 and 17 is 'normal human interpersonal relation' behavior, 20 and 22 is 'normal blah blah blah', but 15 and 19? That's GROOMING! Automatic. It cant be a real development between two individuals who like each other. Its just flat out grooming. Cue boogeyman phrasing and scary music.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:36 PM
2

There's a saying, first comes the change in behavior, then the personality changes after. It takes time for personality to change, but consistent action that 'old person' wouldnt do does change the personality.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:25 PM
11

3am and I'm currently balling my eyes out over the possibility that I will not see my nearly 2 year old son for the next 4/6 months because my ex "doesn't want me to see him incase I keep him". This is her ensuring she gets main parental rights because whoever the child is with the most when decision time comes is who gets to be the 'main'. Probably coached by her lawyer.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:04 AM
58

All men need to do is start listening to all the women's self help books. You deserve it all, even though you haven't earned shit. Best looking S.O. with high paying job, self esteem, etc. Just for being born with a dick. You have good days and bad days, and everyone around you just needs to accept that. If men started taking the female self esteem industry seriously for their own lives, at least life would be fair. Everyone would be miserable caused by everyone else.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:01 AM
1

HEY! you didnt answer my question. Okay how about I make it easier for you. Is prostitution abusing positions of power for sex? A woman wants money. She chooses to engage in sex for money. Where is the power coming from? Its economic. is a john using a prostitute a rapist? His position of power is economic value. Is he coercing her with his money? She knows that if she doesnt suck him off for money ,he'll find someone else willing to do it. Does that create pressure for her to perform?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:57 AM
3

feminist subs suck! they'll ban dissenting viewpoints or people they don't agree with! lets be just like them!
/r/MensRights31/08/18 12:49 AM
2

Old news to me.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 12:48 AM
4

From south africa, that place with female rape gangs?
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:57 PM
3

This is called enabling victimhood mentality.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:54 PM
0

If Im 120 IQ and a woman is dumb enough to be fooled by me, say 80 IQ, am I taking advantage of my position of IQ power and therefore a rapist?
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:45 PM
5

That's right. Perform good little monkey, you may get a treat!
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:56 PM
-4

OK, maybe "abusing his position" would be a better way to say it. People cant 'abuse' positions if no one wants to play along.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:54 PM
2

the initiator of sexual contact is the criminal, the recipient of the initiation is the victim. Its completely logical. A person who is drunk is still responsible if they run people over. They can therefore still be drunk is they grab/fuck people who are too drunk to say no. Ive been telling people this was coming for a year.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:50 PM
2

He abused his power. You cant abuse the willing. Yeah, he had SO much power. I mean, he could command them to suck his dick and they couldnt say no!
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:42 PM
1

Honestly if I could I'd fully support it. Let it all burn.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 04:36 PM
1

If a dog shits on the carpet, do you punish it or give it a treat?
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:16 AM
9

I agree with them. There are two types of women. The 'moderates' who 'are not like those other women who are crazy', and the 'crazy' who are the feminists pushing social and legal changes. But the moderate ones dont have a voice. They keep their head down and let gynocentricism reign supreme. Words about 'I dont think that way' are nice, but they're also useless. If you sit by and do nothing, then you have allowed something you think is wrong to be perpetuated. Until they actually voice that cur…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:15 AM
2

Presumably subreddit bans for us, like r/twoex'sinaweek. explain
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:08 AM
10

itd be criminal to use it and not tell a woman, because she was expecting to be able to rope him into child support.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:06 AM
2

I hope he is charged with extortion by the DA because that's a sign of incompetence. Any reasonable lawyer would tear that charge apart and get him off.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:02 AM
2

except when men cheat on women its called emotional abuse by the self-help industry and psychology fields, which are largely feminized to promote women's hypergamy and 'self-esteem' at the expense of demonizing men.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:01 AM
2

Thats what feminists of 1800-1900 said; women are inherently asexual and its men and their ruthless sexual desires that make women ever have sex in the first place. They've been playing this game for a LONG time, telling men "women don't really want sex".
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:00 AM
7

Im sorry that you're incredibly naive. https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/05/health/why-women-cheat-partner/index.html These women were turning to infidelity not as a way to explode a marriage, but as a way to stay in it. Whereas conventional narratives of female infidelity so often posit the unfaithful woman as a passive party, the women I talked to seemed in control of their own transgressions. There seemed to be something new about this approach. Often, they loved their husbands, but felt in some fu…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:57 AM
-1

There is a certain point where it is your fault. you choose cheaters.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:56 AM
3

Marital Indecent exposer is also sexual harassment. She can not change in front of you without your consent. Ive been telling this sub something similar for A. WHILE. India has followed the feminist logic of 'nonconsent to nudity/touching' to the logical conclusion of that movement. As you cannot change in front of your own husband or wife in India without their consent or its sexual harassment, so you also cannot (or at leas should not) kiss or touch your husband or wife in their sex organs or …
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:55 AM
8

https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/05/health/why-women-cheat-partner/index.html Some women turn to infidelity not as a way to explode a marriage but as a way to stay in it rhaq, please dont be so blue pilled. https://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/guide/why-do-women-cheat#1
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:48 AM
1

I agree. Its only natural that a group has been campaigning to be viewed as helpless manipulated victims and oppressed, as a group, by another group (men). After all, when women are CHOOSY maters as jordan peterson says, as evidenced by historical evidence as well as contemporary, how can "that which selects" be the victim? Victim of their own choice? Women want the position of being considered out of control while being totally in control. Thus there's always an out for their actions (he seduce…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:53 AM
6

Not if they havent raped anyone? If all survivors fear coming forward because they might be exposed as hypocrites, that says a lot about those supposed 'survivors'. https://i.redditmedia.com/ctIZiWzzftIUciZpq7ER8usvQz0Qjf8e5BUQmXAR--Q.jpg?w=937&s=ec5ac72e9caeff404a357bd4ba88f24f hey guys check this out.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:33 PM
1

Well. Lets imagine the reverse. The government says "you have no right to sex". Therefore at any time, they could restrict a woman from having sex with anyone she chose, because without the right to it, they can control her choices. Now suddenly the "you dont have a right to sex" argument sounds like Handmaids Tale, a dystopian future. That is what would be true if you don't have a right to sex. Similarly, if you didn't have a right to freedom, a government could just imprison you on a whim. Tha…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:24 PM
-1

technically, you do. you have the right to food too, as no one can restrict you from having food, as long as you can pay for it. If you can pay for sex from a woman, not in real dollars, but in a 'relationship' or ONS kind of 'payment', then you have the right to sex as well as the state cannot restrict you from it. If you're laboring under the motte and bailey technique of assuming 'right to sex' means 'right to sex with a specific person or persons', then that would be a strawman.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:17 PM
1

is sex access a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:08 PM
5

People were impregnating preteen girls in the middle ages and it took a while for us to start giving them reasonable human rights. Which became illegal in 1200 AD due to age of consent law being around 12 years old.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:06 PM
-1

Cope 110%.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 01:33 PM
8

I forgot that specific parts of the world are not actually a part of the whole world.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 01:32 PM
-2

we knew you didnt get laid, no need to admit it.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 01:07 PM
0

Wonder who would benefit from that being legal. everyone in nevada or the uk
/r/MensRights29/08/18 01:07 PM
8

well, at least we know you have no defense
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:09 PM
8

Because its the natural extension of 'blackmail' law which makes that rape. Because someone is in "a position of power" and using it to "exchange for sex". People have no problem with calling it rape for 17 and teacher. No one should have a problem here, either. Unless they want to admit hypocrisy, that is.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 11:09 AM
27

this is an international forum. Therefore stop talking about your part of the world here! LOLOLOL.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 11:09 AM
1

Dont see how your argument of "well international law" counters "state laws determine whats rape and not rape". You're still using the "law makes it so" argument.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 10:33 AM
8

India is waking up because they went from traditional to #metoo MUH RAEP KULCHUR in less time than a jet takeoff. If feminists were smart they would've done the slow frog boil that western culture went through. They caused a backlash by overextending their hand and intensity.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 09:55 AM
1

Yep. Mattress girl should report it.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:21 AM
46

Because its an 11 year old. No way around this.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:14 AM
1

downvoted because this guy would probably ignore women talking to the kids and not think they were grooming.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:19 AM
1

Basically he's trying to say he has 'werewolf syndrome' and doesnt shave that shit, and yet still was able to pull poon because of his height. Possibly also shes drunk 24/7 and doesnt realize its not a wookie costume.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:14 AM
1

Women in college obviously have a reason for crying rape after drunk sex. They wouldnt do it otherwise.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:13 AM
10

thats saying something. How many survived?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:05 AM
3

The U.S. is in fact the only country in the world that has a freedom of speech clause. No other country.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:04 AM
2

For Clarity, since you need it; 17 year olds are victims of rape now? Kids now? Where the law says so - YES! Kids now? Don't be daft! Age of consent and age of majority are two separate legal issues - don't argue like a feminist, it makes you look silly. You just made the argument that rape is defined solely by the law. I hope for your sake that's not what you really think. Because if your country ended in civil war tomorrow and the government went tits up, people could then have sex with babies…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:40 AM
0

First of all, it would help if you could make your points an even semi-coherent manner. I made it as easy to understand as possible. You can't believe in age of consent as a standard of "when rape happens", because it entirely contradicts the concept of rape as something that happens whether or not a law is present. If you remove the law, does rape stop happening when someone has sex with a 14 year old? If yes, then you believe the law is the marker of rape, which is an incomprehensible stance. …
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:31 AM
1

most hippos dont cry rape after.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:59 AM
-1

By definition that is sexual predator behavior.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:58 AM
1

You want relaxed punishment for men who do this? Then make women harshly accountable in the current atmosphere they made intended for men. Because when women become victims of their own rules, suddenly the rules become draconian and must change.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:57 AM
1

She touched my on my bottom sir. my bottom is not a touching post.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:55 AM
2

Id rather a responsible machete owner than an irresponsible nail clipper owner.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:54 AM
1

Whats your call on a group of friends you go out with and one of the girls walks by you and you feel her forearm brush your whole ass as she goes by? Accident or is she checking?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:54 AM
4

Thats the spirit.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:52 AM
0

No. I don't have a double standard. The double standard exists because of the feminist agenda of female hypoagency, which they co-opted from traditional chauvinism. If you think 17 year olds are rape victims, I have some terrible news for you. You're allowing 17 year olds to get raped legally in the majority of your U.S. states.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:48 AM
-3

male rapist You're using loaded language of a predetermined judgment. You missed the point entirely as well. If people are arguing that its the LAW which creates the claim of rape, then changing the LAW would change the claim implicitly. They never seem to grasp that rape is something that can happen even if there is no law preventing it. Because if they did, they would argue that whatever age of consent is, a person under 16 or 18 is being raped by having sex with someone older. And if that is …
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:46 AM
1

Telling men to not whine is trolling.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:40 AM
1

Because the APA has refused to recognize sexual attraction/action with someone 14-18 as being a mental disorder or being 'particularly deviant'. Imagine if that were the case, and 16 year olds would be considered sexual deviants for attraction to other 16 year olds. Consider the following: We are for gay rights because "sexual attraction IS NOT A CHOICE SHITLORDS!". So, sexual attraction isn't a choice, is that correct? Well, when you're getting into teen years, suddenly you're sexually attracte…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 06:43 PM
-8

well he IS a sex predator. By any technical measurement of the people on this sub, sex predators are EVIL SUBHUMANS
/r/MensRights28/08/18 06:38 PM
-9

Ah, then all we have to do is reduce the law to 14 tomorrow and 15 year olds will be adults who arent raped. That's the fallacy in adherence to the law as evidence of a claim.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 06:37 PM
1

well then clearly two teenagers having sex is also rape and unconsensual since they're too young to consent.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 06:36 PM
1

https://i.redditmedia.com/ctIZiWzzftIUciZpq7ER8usvQz0Qjf8e5BUQmXAR--Q.jpg?w=937&s=ec5ac72e9caeff404a357bd4ba88f24f Picture highly relevant.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:28 PM
1

GROOMED I TELL YA
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:22 PM
-6

"rape" and "kids". 17 year olds are victims of rape now? Kids now?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:21 PM
1

Oh so we just use the magic word grooming and suddenly everything's all better.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:19 PM
-1

There's a lack of balls in today's men. Not only are they unable to blow this kind of behavior off and feel unaffected by it, but they can't even do anything about it except cower in fear in front of them and then ask a bunch of misogynists how to cope. Come on. Get some balls, men. Solve things.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:28 PM
-2

Only because one of their own (or more) has recently bit it. Not because there's been 45,000 per year forever.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:17 PM
1

r/braincels
/r/MensRights28/08/18 11:04 AM
1

.#Ibelieveher Those sexy 17 year olds always sexually assaulting people. I used to see that in high school parties with alcohol.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 11:00 AM
1

fraternize is such a patriarchal term meant to exclude women.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 09:57 AM
0

This behavior is animalistic. Stop being a woman.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 09:56 AM
1

I didnt say good. I said 'not bad'. There is a continuum you know. If this were the 70's, you know what a typical guy response would be? "Oh, you silly old ladies, yeah Im hot what about it?". Now men are like "I need a safe space, an old woman looked at me in a sexual manner!". Jesus, man-ladies... jesus.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 09:53 AM
-1

Its either bad or not bad based on cultural values and interpersonal mediation.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:37 AM
1

Do we want to go the direction of being like WESTERN WOMEN? Where we are weak and fragile and older women using elevator eyes on your body make you crumple into a ball of self-pity? Go read some Musashi and get your balls back.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:09 AM
1

Sweet. I found another person who doesn't understand that pedophilia is a psychological and not a legal term. Who doesn't understand that pedophilia definitively means prepubescents, which 17 year olds are not. That it has nothing to do with age of consent.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:08 AM
1

https://rightnerve.com/gandhi-was-an-adulterating-incestuous-pacifist-murderer-but-he-was-always-nice/
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:07 AM
1

Yet Gandhi’s philosophy when fully understood shows bizarre applications. In 1920 he wrote, “I do believe that where there is a choice between cowardice and violence I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done, had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908, whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defended me, I told him that it was his duty t…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:06 AM
1

That's a good way of leaving a discussion you can't reconcile with your bad thinking. Have fun with that.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:05 AM
1

You aren’t going to stop teens from having sex. That’s just a fact of life but you can stop adults from preying on them. you arent going to stop people from murdering. That's just a fact of life. BUt you can stop adults from killing others. You make zero sense. You're alternatively using the phrase "sex" and "preying on". You cant stop adults from "preying on". Evidenced by the fact it hasn't stopped despite the law. Your argument here is terrible. You cannot hold children to the same standards …
/r/MensRights28/08/18 06:29 AM
-2

Why would you be crying with such bone structure guy? You can get tons of stacies with that jawline.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:28 AM
3

Seems like it was a concerted eugenics+war winning effort. Grind up the low IQ men and they'll probably take out a few enemies as well.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:27 AM
1

What about Anthony Weiner and what punishment he received, through a deal after sexting a 15 year old girl? He was doing a lot worse, that's the one they charged him with.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:25 AM
-1

True, but this is sexual abuse and pedophilia. So a 21 year old fucks a 17 year old and its sexual abuse and pedophilia? God damn.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:24 AM
4

now I want Argento to prove herself innocent just to make McGowan look like even more of an asshole too bad she admitted having sex with him when he was 17 which is illegal.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:24 AM
-6

Get over it? You can only feel victimized by consenting to that feeling.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:23 AM
2

There’s an obvious response here. “Well,” you might say, “they were sexually assaulted, and they are victims, even if that’s not how they feel.” But let’s try a little perspective. Technical definitions on a questionnaire may not, in fact, line up with someone’s lived experience, and people should be free to reach their own self-understandings when it comes their status as victims (or non-victims). What this person is basically saying is "sexual touching or sex is all about how you feel about it…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:20 AM
1

Two 15 year olds have sex. Most people would think “yea that’s kinda normal age of that type of thing”. appeal to nature/appeal to tradition fallacies. Not a basis for laws. Do you want to outlaw sex under 18 or do you just want to fuck a teen? I want to do the former if we 're really concerned that someone under 18 is vulnerable and can thus be victimized sexually. As a law stands which allows such to occur, it cannot be a good faith law of intention to protect vulnerable people from sexual har…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:16 AM
6

There is a social norm that women belong and must be submissive to men. lol?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:56 AM
12

Have you watched red dragon? the profile of the serial killer is "he feels like god. Would you give that up?". People are loathe to give up power or take advantage of opportunities society gives them because it might be unethical or immoral. Society as a whole basically begs certain groups to act unethically or immorally by saying they won't be treated harshly for it.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:55 AM
1

See! That's what true privilege is. Being so dangerous yet forgetting how dangerous you are because society has normalized you!
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:52 AM
1

Either they're a victim or they aren't. You can't have a schrodinger's cat problem of whether someone is a victim or not based solely on age. It is established that it is BEHAVIOR which matters, and if an adult is potentially abusive, and a teen can also be potentially abusive, then the law needs to punish either adult or teen as if they had committed abuse, regardless of the facts of the case. That is how AoC law is run against adults. Abuse is considered de facto by interaction, regardless of …
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:50 AM
1

You didn't know ghandi very well, did you? Also, fyi, ghandi had 'celibacy tests' where he'd have two teens lie naked in bed and watch them all night to see if they could withhold from carnal desires. Also he used to have married women of teenage to mature age sleep in the same bed with him, naked of course, as 'testing himself'.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:44 AM
1

The claim that all men become assholes after they've "pumped and dumped" a woman is a good example of the backwardness of this kind of thinking; not all men do it. You didn't understand the point. Its not that 'men become assholes after a breakup'. Its that women change their opinion of the man to suit a narrative of 'he is/was an asshole', because its a form of ego protection as well as rumor spreading, which is the most highly preferred method of female vengeance behavior other than physically…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:41 AM
1

No, Im being feminist/SJW. Remember, remarking on a woman's physical appearance is reducing her to the level of an object you want to splooge all over. A bit like a r/cummingonfigurines. If you dare comment on how some femoid is hot looking, then you're a sick, sick objectifying misogynist.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:39 AM
1

I agree and think it's completely fucked up. How are we supposed to work together if we cant share a living room, kitchen and bathroom? Remember, theres a fear of getting raped. After all most men are rapists.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:36 AM
1

All it has to be is an empty object anyone can put their claims in themselves.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 11:41 AM
11

Women are the primary victims of war.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 11:20 AM
0

Its literally written there.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:52 AM
2

sex with adolescents isnt pedophilia.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 09:21 AM
2

honesty begins with the self.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 08:01 AM
2

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5419837/Millions-women-forced-work-drop.html I approve of you. An anthology collection of all works of obvious "protect/save women" posts ranging from how hard they have to work or https://www.girlsaskguys.com/dating/a24973-there-aren-t-enough-men-for-women-to-date-in-the-us-explained-with as a single, collected work, would really provide a 'story' of how the west is basically gynocentric and runs on the appeasement of women and debasement of men, even the…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 07:50 AM
-1

Two 14 year olds are on the same level. A 14 year old and a 40 year old are not. Ah, so you're one of those types. It doesn't matter if "they're on the same level". One can manipulate the other into sex and thus victimize the other, because the other is a vulnerable person. The law isn't, or shouldn't, be concerned with the fact that the victimizER is young or old, but that the VICTIM is young, and thus incapable of making that good judgment. As we can throw a 14 year old in prison for aggravate…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 07:41 AM
2

"Hate" and "sexism" when it's against them, "Fragile" and "immature" when it's against us. its hard to remind myself so often that people's opinions are like assholes.. Everyone has a personal opinion that doesnt make it right all the time.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 07:40 AM
-2

Where are people complaining about two 17 year olds having sex? They complain when you infer from the logic AND the law that one is victimizing the other and of course they should go to jail and be a sex offender. The whole age of consent thing isn’t about male sexuality it’s about taking advantage of people who cannot fully grasp the ramifications of their actions. Right, which one 17 year old can do to another. Or one 14 year old can do to another, etc.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 07:21 AM
2

It should not be okay to say anything of the kind. It should be legal. But not okay.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 07:21 AM
1

what drawing is a adult woman leering at a young boy?
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:40 AM
1

I agree with your premise on its logical consistency. I've done the devils advocate for this argument plenty of times. People just cant stay sane though. If a 17 year old fucks another 17 year old, they're crossing a line, and thus they're a sex predator, by law. But everyone gets shook as fuck suggesting a 17 year old should get prison. Its not like the competency or ability of the victim in the 17 on 17 case has gotten any better. But AoC law has always been about attacking male sexuality. So …
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:38 AM
2

Isnt that twitter pic an actual picture of her straddling a young guy?
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:36 AM
5

I think its telling. The fact its not considered discrimination when it is, because its about 'helping a woman'. The fact that a person told someone else to 'grow up'. I want to rent a room to men only, to give them college financial aid, etc. But if women complain? Ill just tell them to grow up.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:34 AM
2

God damn. Tif every there was an article that could play the "reverse the genders" game and cause outrage, this would be it.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:09 AM
2

while they talk about guys being misogynistic, they still have few qualms about random drunk hookups. One has a kid and still goes out man hunting. She tried to get a threesome with me and a friend last year, while she had a boyfriend.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:08 AM
18

Mothers tend to molest their infant - <3 yr old boys while boys and girls were molested/sodomized by girls/women who were unrelated such as baby sitters, teachers, friends of family etc. Im aware of the disgusting trend. WOmen do it to infants-toddlers-little children. Men do it to 'adolescents'. Probably the tendency for men to be viewed as child molesting paedophiles for sex with people who are actually pubescent vs prepubescents.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:07 AM
1

Initial attraction is 99% skin deep. You are lying to yourself if you think it’s not. Not only that, but initial attraction distorts a person's rationality and produces cognitive bias. If an attractive man says something 'gross', its 'funny or sexy'. If an ugly man says the same, its 'creepy and disturbing'. I've done this with catfishing on dating sites with hot vs ugly males. Hot males are more likely to be seen as attractive when saying 'perverted things', while ugly ones are more likely to b…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:45 AM
1

Well, hopefully one's attraction to girls is slightly more than skin deep. I find it remarkable that people are calling what she wrote "a tantrum" but seem not to see that what he did was at least as much of a shit fit. Oh! Oh, oh oh! This is hilarious. Google "the death of mixed attractiveness couples". Women, given the option, will date men of higher attractiveness, REGARDLESS of personality. Actually, what happens is the halo/horn effect. An attractive male, whether its due to high status/mon…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:41 AM
1

She didn't attack an entire gender. Guys, lets have a chat about talking to women... I didn't read that as "hey, some guys".
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:23 AM
2

Actually it does, by definition. " Babies should have the right to consent." Remember. Its "okay to say this by definition".
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:22 AM
1

Calling people attractive is disgusting and objectifying.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:18 AM
5

You realize that more than once, the case where a 17.X year old, has had sex with an adult, has been thrown out in the past due to a judge dismissing the case summarily, correct? This is in California. Age of consent is 18. A teacher was imprisoned in california for having relations with an 18 year old having it exposed that they started when she was 17. There's a thing called strict liability. It means that ignorance of the law is not an excuse. When ti comes to violating age of consent, it is …
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:16 AM
2

Who's basically a perve? Pretty much any guy who looks at me and I don't think would be worth dating. Eweee! Another perve looked at me! More unwanted sexual attention. So gross. Next time I take one of those gender studies surveys (out undoubtedly within a week), I'll be upgrading my experienced victim status from weekly to daily. basically
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:14 AM
2

Despite all appearances to the contrary, the big scheme of things is dependent on all the individuals that make it up. The side which has stood strongest will make progress. This is already coming into effect as modern young women look around at ageing feminists and think "I don't want to be like that." I was around some early 20's girls recently who were talking about guys being misogynistic. They're still drinking the kool aid
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:12 AM
5

Why don't we call out every fucking landwhale piece of shit as a dirty rapist. Honestly, guys really need to start creating rumor mills against women as women do against men. The only way change happens is the Mutually assured destruction clause.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:10 AM
7

And this is why male movements fail. They're actually based on a premise of fairness and integrity. That's why males are still viewed as disposable. Because they refrain from tit-for-tat behavior.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:07 AM
11

n the UK single disabled males are treated with open sexist contempt and subjected to repeated disability hate crime. I don't know a single visibly disabled guy in the UK who has not been abused. If you look normal, and you have an internal disability, then you're really the worst, most offensive human being ever, as long as you have a penis. Because we cannot see your disability, and negative or antisocial behavior (like breathing hard while glancing at women) is further proof you're just an ev…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:05 AM
1

Lets not make SJW feminist type screeching claims. She liked that thing that said "in Ygam", apparently alluding to sexual assault as wrong when it happens to little boys.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:57 AM
8

Wasn't Jimmy Bennett 17 in 2013 though? A lot of places within the U.S. and outside don't consider that any sort of crime unless there are extenuating circumstances. I am interested if there were extenuating circumstances there because a guy that is 17, apparently nearing 18, having sex with an older woman just isn't scandalous or interesting to me. I would say the same thing if the sexes were reversed. The spirit of the law matters more to me than the letter of the law.... Too bad for her. The …
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:53 AM
47

This is actually good news. The sex offender registry needs to be reformed, and "No problem is ever fixed until it affects women", so now we might finally see some progress on this. This really should be in the info sidebar of this sub. Men dont matter. Its when harsh crime penalties start affecting WOMEN that things change. There needs to be clear awareness of reality. Otherwise a movement ends up being a delusional SJW group that can't really affect change.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:51 AM
68

Its roughly analogous to the disparate punishments meted out to male and female Nazi collaborators in postwar Holland: the men were killed, while the women — gasp! — had their heads shaved. Perfect example of male hyperagency and female hypoagency, for anything ranging from sexual behavior to traitorous country behavior.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:49 AM
74

How it hurts the poor wittle women who make up 7% of the list... but fuck how it hurts the 93% majority of men who make up the list, which likely has more than 7% innocence rate where they were falsely accused... but hey, it's all about those poor women. Once gain, when men do sex crimes, they're just being typically male, evil, misgonyistic, rapey, etc. Throw them in a cage and throw away the key. When they get out? They're still subhumans. But women?... ah, women. They're just mentally ill. Th…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:48 AM
1

SJW are concerned with class 100% of the time. What are you on?
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:42 AM
6

Fucking hell. This is normalized violence against men but women, oh hell naw!
/r/MensRights26/08/18 01:58 PM
9

Theyre only doing the most natural thing. Sex sells, and women are in short supply for men as a general rule, therefore a pair of tits is far more of a "job applicable skill" to pull in customers.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:12 AM
1

Well, I guess you can take back your post saying "I dont want to be combative". You've given me a bunch of taglines/claims with no supporting arguments. Try again, please.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:48 AM
2

Adam Smith actually argued same, suggesting that a "free market" would ideally produce equal outcomes. What is an equal outcome? An equal outcome in a free market would mean people with poor products are not paid for their products and fail. People with good products are paid and succeed, and neither has an artifical imposition for or against them to either prop them up or hold them down. If the argument of 'equal outcomes' from Adam Smith is 'in the free market, everyone will become equally wea…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:21 AM
1

humanity is corrupt
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:16 AM
3

In under a month, the half-American political commentator raised $5,660 - with the excess donated to male focused charities. WTF is half american?
/r/MensRights26/08/18 01:13 AM
4

Egalitarianism (from French égal, meaning 'equal') – or equalitarianism – is a school of thought that prioritizes equality for all people. Egalitarian doctrines maintain that all humans are equal in fundamental worth or social status. Egalitarianism is a trend of thought in political philosophy. the doctrine that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities. If a man is suppressed from achieving 'dominant male' status, that is not egalitarianism, because he's being prevented f…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 01:08 AM
2

Nomadic foragers simply do not allow one man or a minority of men to dominate either resources or sexual access. Then that is oppression of sexual selection. And that's not egalitarian. This doesn't mean that physically attractive/skilled men don't have more sex, however. If women are not 'monopolized by one man sexually', and thus must find a mate in a man previously deemed below suitability, that would mean 'more sex', because anything on the positive side of zero is more.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:51 AM
0

This is technically not correct. In egalitarian societies pretty every man has sex: That's bullshit. oehm explains this seeming contradiction with the claim that hunter-gatherers have “reverse dominance hierarchies”: the adult males in the society form a general coalition to prevent any one of their number, alone or with a few allies, from dominating the others. Male egalitarianism is not necessarily extended to females—the degree to which females are subject to male despotism varies, even among…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:40 AM
1

Eyewitness accounts are still evidence, you just have to intelligently analyse them. eyewitness accounts have zero accuracy.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:39 AM
2

Bringing the innocent to trial would be unfair, so of course they're guilty.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:38 AM
5

How the fuck you going to PLAN to sexually abuse your goddamn kids? Have people lost their minds?! Hello, yes? Middle east calling.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:33 AM
6

So she is more approving of actual rape culture than of someone having sex with a person they are interested in while they don't actually feel totally into sex?
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:32 AM
6

capitol crimes back in the late 1800s. Those damn buildings committing crimes again?
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:29 AM
1

I was hoping you'd understand that I was suggesting dowries exist because females are valuable.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:20 AM
1

Also, Im not sure you understood the question. If one teen gives another alcohol, why is it not rape. If an adult gives a teen alcohol why is it rape? Lets assume the teen is overage for sex but underage for alcohol. Sex with 16 or 17 year old = legal in most states. Giving alcohol to minors = illegal. Giving alcohol to minors and having sex with them = very questionable behavior, possibly rape if they were too drunk to consent. This is their argument. A 16 year old of legal sex age given alcoho…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:42 PM
1

Its not pretense. Its mockery.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:35 PM
1

Because Age of Consent usually allows for teens to consent to other teens. Untrue. In the UK, age of consent is 16. If a 16 year old and 15 year old have sex, the 16 year old can get 2 years. If a 15 year old has sex with another 15 year old, they can get 2 years, a 13 year old, they can get 4 years. If they have sex with a 12 year old, they can get 5+ years. In the U.S. in california, a 17 year old having sex with a 17 year old can get a year or so and has to register as a sex offender. In mult…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:30 PM
2

you think that's not possible in the U.S. where an under 16 could marry an older man legally?
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:18 PM
1

you understand why dowries exist? I feel as if you don't. You know why this sub exists? because males are disposable. Females are valuable.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:17 PM
3

I may remind you that it is legal in lots of U.S. states for someone under 16 to get married and if they do then age of consent law is often rescinded in such cases, meaning you could marry a 15 year old and have sex with them.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:16 PM
1

It probably gives you new insight into the Russel dowelripple event where george gets caught peeking at his daughter's cleavage and elaine goes "but she's 15!" and they say "its a reflex, you dont consider age in the face of cleavage". The early 90's... probably the most perfect time in human history in terms of relative sanity.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:13 PM
43

That's the way it should be. A simple mistake which did not harm. An apology. The apology accepted. A private apology after basically publicly insulting your boss's boss is no apology at all. They're doing this for the brownie points of 'diversity hire'. Women are treated like children... tell your ultraboss to suck your balls and dick, apologize confidentially, get her ultraboss to try to SECURE A JOB FOR HER.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:41 AM
2

I also brought up that I believe it is on par with removing a womans clitoris (something he agreed wasn't right) but he said that I am disrespecting his religion by comparing the two. Actually, its more like removing part of the clitoris. I mean, men can still be stimulated. Its just not as severe because of the hardening the the tip thanks to having no protective sheath and thus basically becoming a giant callous from rubbing on clothing all day. Every rub your tongue on one and feel how rough …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:38 AM
5

Ya know what's fucking bullshit about this? I'll tell you friends, is my friend took a plea deal in a rape case, and he has to spend the rest of his life as a sex offender. He was innocent. Because society wants people to go into prison forever. Thus the government appeases society by stacking on every single criminal charge in a cumulative prison time, thereby giving society what it wants. So that when it comes time to try even innocent people, they'll come to you and say "look, we'll burn you.…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:29 AM
12

Because possible vaginal exploitation is so, so much worse than men going to prison for decades or being branded as a subhuman monster and expelled from school at the least harsh. Remember, vagina >> penis in value.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:25 AM
1

Im amazed how angry and illogical Ive made you. That's a lot of power to give someone.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:24 AM
0

Its hard to take you seriously when you're being subjectivist about the history of chinese proverbs, most of which come from 2000 years ago, pre communism pre socialism.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:23 AM
1

needle dick would be awesome. Imagine being able to slip in and out without anyone noticing like frank reynolds in the 70's.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:20 AM
0

This is tantamount to saying "operation paperclip had a lot of ex-nazi scientists help create the technology of the U.S. and nazis were terrible people therefore they were completely wrong and invalid!". Proof is in the pudding. All cultures, even highly individualistic ones, still work heavily on reputation, as evidenced by continued attempts to destroy reputations of politicians in those same countries of the west, for political gains. Want to impeach trump? Attack his reputation and make him …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:19 AM
0

You're saying status isn't real. Maybe in the quasi-nihilistic buddhist-zen sense. Not in the 'real world'.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:14 AM
0

https://www.inspirationalstories.com/proverbs/t/chinese-on-reputation/ Listen. Reputation means something. Females attack people's reputation. being called a loser or creep by a female is a form of social destruction. You can prance around all you like saying "only a weak person would worry about their reputation", but the fact is that women perpetrate reputation destruction against other women as a form of bullying, in lieu of actual physical violence. Because reputation and status are importan…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:50 AM
2

Arguably, its worse than calling women the C word.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:47 AM
0

Why are you making a distinction? If a teen gives a teen alcohol and both are underage, why is that not rape?
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:01 AM
3

No, she's a victim of feminism, because it was feminism who demanded an age of consent of 18 in california, which she broke.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:16 AM
1

I wish I could spend a month in a CIA prison to experience it. Dont want to have to pay the price to get there tho.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:15 AM
0

I actually agree. It's obvious the guy was into it and the age thing is just a random number. If you're talking about maturity, we don't fully mature until we're like 24, so should that be the age of consent? No. Different people mature differently. Some people at 18 are less mature and more volnurable than some 15 year olds. Depends on the person. You're getting downvoted because there are reverse-SJWs in here, who are fighting for 'male rights' but still adhere to 'power dynamic' values of SJW…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:13 AM
2

The problem isn't the age of consent it's that established professionals have a clear power imbalance over younger newcomers. Okay. Why does the law stop at 18? Why not make it illegal for 18 and 40? After all, theres a clear power imbalance there. IF you believe in the archaic theory that the brain matures at 25, then obviously 18 is heavily imbalanced toa 40 year old on that alone. If you believe the newer theory that brains dont mature until 30-40+, then there's still a large power imbalance …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:09 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jy1bGm5TR3I Here's her national anthem. I'm his lover not his mother Why you starin' at each other? What's your problem? I'm not his keeper, I'm his teacher Ho, 'n it goes deeper What's your problem? I can't control these feelings I have inside I had to let go, let go of my pride Age is a number Don't steal my thunder Can't love no other, other, other You're my boy Keepin' you inside so they don't see that you're my boy Keepin' you inside so they don't see that yo…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 12:44 AM
1

I love these retard reverse SJW fucks on this board who downvote obviously correct or considered answers as if its lies or disinformation.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 12:43 AM
-1

We are talking about an adult giving alcohol to someone underage and having sex with them. If someone is too drunk to consent, sex with them is not okay. If someone is underage, giving them alcohol is illegal. Sex with 16 or 17 year old = legal in most states. Giving alcohol to minors = illegal. Giving alcohol to minors and having sex with them = very questionable behavior, possibly rape if they were too drunk to consent. If two adults get drunk together, say over 22 years old, and have sex, eve…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 12:39 AM
0

Jerry Seinfeld dated a sixteen year old and I don't consider him a monster (it was legal in the state he lived in). If it's legal and no one is being harmed then go nuts. 17 year old https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bl2JtWmIIAMD81c.png Look at how huge those tits are.. My problem with your argument of "well its legal here" is it calls into question what you think is or isnt rape by violation of age of consent law. Is it "its legal so its okay and they're not a monster" vs "its illegal so they're rapi…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 12:34 AM
0

mature until we're like 24, so should that be the age of consent? wrong. Its 30's to 40's. The nebulous "we dont mature til 24" is based on PFC development but that continues until the 30's to 40's, at which point it finally stops.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:46 PM
-2

Shit, all my high school parties where sex was heavily involved after drinking were completely wrong then.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:45 PM
76

“Hope you slept well my love,” one message read. “Missing you.” Looks like women don't think they're sexually assaulting or raping when they are. Typical
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:40 PM
3

Well gosh, I guess if men just weren't so rational, hard-working and driven to provide for their families they'd stay home more and have more time with the kids if men weren't that, they wouldnt get picked for sexual relationships by women. A man's value is his work and ability to climb hierarchies.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 03:22 AM
-1

Oh shut up. He doesnt have to act out in front of judges or lawyers.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 03:09 AM
4

Right, but she broke the age of consent law, and according to EVERYONE in this sub, breaching AoC law is tantamount to molesting/raping children. Their only concern, JUST LIKE PUBLIC AT LARGE, is whether a law was broken, because they get their morals from legal lines and commit circular arguments in support of believing that. Everyone in here has said "15 year olds can't consent you sick fuck, AoC is 16 under that is a child" is explicitly saying "AoC determines the bright line between child an…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 02:57 AM
1

obligatory. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ckv_Dz-Sio
/r/MensRights23/08/18 01:00 AM
6

https://www.thefirmformen.com/articles/7-shocking-statistics-fathers-rights/ Although it’s clearly stated in many places that courts shouldn’t arbitrarily favor mothers over fathers, it apparently still happens quite frequently. On the U.S. Census Bureau’s own website on its About Child Support page, it still clearly states, “Child support can be important to custodial parents (mostly women) and their children as a source of income received, as well as to noncustodial parents (mostly men) who ma…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 12:59 AM
1

A protester holds a placard reading "enough of patriarchal justice" during a protest against the release pending appeal of five men convicted of sexual assault "To be clear, ladies and gentlemen, if they say no it means no, and if they don't say yes, it means no," Mr Sanchez told parliament. Only yes means yes. Good. They're going to follow the footsteps of explicit consent as U.S. Colleges do. This will definitely turn out well. Why did she stay around them? Why did she allow them to have sex w…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 12:50 AM
1

They were acquitted of rape, which under Spanish law requires violence or intimidation to be used. Police said the victim was "passive or neutral", keeping her eyes closed during the attack. Says they were acquitted.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 12:49 AM
-3

Congrats on tossing the harpy to the curb.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 12:46 AM
3

She then stated: 'Child sexual assault is a heinous crime and is against all that I and the #MeToo movement stands for. I remain dedicated in the fight for all victims and change the culture that encourages the abuse of power in sexual relationships.' This is so funny because they wouldnt be able to say shit if this had happened in Nevada. Suddenly its not child sexual assault because 'the law says it aint'.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 12:12 AM
7

Some of the most high rated of the worst rated comments: His life didn't turn out the way he wanted so he blames some woman he was lucky enough to get off with when he was 17? AND got he paid for his trouble? And then still goes public?? You seriosuly couldn't make this stuff up. She should sue him and get the money back. I'm not a fan of this woman, but this 17 year old has no case. Don't really think it's anyone's business what two consenting adults do tbh. I personally couldn't sleep with a 1…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:54 PM
8

"The horny kid jumped me"... "I didn't know he was a minor"... Remember, its not rape if they jump on you.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:47 PM
14

Men are less likely to talk about mental health problems, less likely to seek help, and less likely to report crimes committed against them. What’s to say they also aren’t reporting failed suicide attempts? Ive been thinking about that lately. https://www.forbes.com/sites/learnvest/2013/04/01/10-signs-youre-burning-out-and-what-to-do-about-it/#ab98caf625b4 The natural response to this behavior in men is "suck it up and be a man". The reponse when women do it is "talk about it, get help, take car…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:36 PM
2

Violence against women act. Because when violence occurs, its bad, but when it happens to women, its so awful there needs to be extra laws.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:34 PM
7

https://www.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/brf-03-2008-women-in-prison-en.pdf https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/womens-blog/2014/apr/22/prison-women-trauma-stephanie-covington Why prison isn't working for women | Life and style | The Guardian https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11342408/Are-men-natural-born-criminals-Prison-numbers-dont-lie.html Are men natural born criminals? Prison numbers don't lie - Telegraph EVEN JORDAN GOD DAMN PETERSON FRAMES WOMEN AS VICTIMS …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:34 PM
8

Pictured in bed together, but these people still need more evidence. Sentencing would already be over if the genders were reversed. He doesnt look like a victim here to be honest. In any other state with A0C 16 he wouldnt be. This SHOULd however be chased down very vengefully and thoroughly because if she isn't held legally accountable, then feminism is saying women breaking age of consent law doesnt matter. Also it makes great precedent for males to get away with doing the same. As long as pict…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:28 PM
0

By any metric, one who is able to gain something because of someone else's diminished state of mind/low social class/low mobility (whether that's bound to a wheelchair or being too poor to move to a place where the jobs pay better since there's no minimum wage) is necessarily being exploited. Slaves are people who are exploited because they lack the education, the experience, and the freedom to go to another job, even if they're adults. Elderly people are at risk of being exploited because they'…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:09 PM
2

"more stuff for women", actually. Because VAWA was more stuff for women, not equality.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:02 PM
3

gotem
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:59 PM
4

respectable feminist Find one first.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:56 PM
1

Why do people continue to play this equivocation game? While that was part of feminism, a second part was controlling men and their sexuality, and not protecting men like women are/were protected.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:56 PM
5

No. Its always been like this.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:55 PM
54

The biggest detriment to their movement, which started off with noble intentions, is that today's feminists treat it like a zero-sum game. Uh, when did feminism ever have noble intentions? They sought the rights of voting when they did not also seek the responsibilities of harsh imprisonment for crimes, being equal in sewage working detail and slaughterhouses, or being drafted. They did not seek parity in age of consent law when they upgraded it with lots of whining and raging from 13 to 16-18, …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:54 PM
7

isnt it Femopause by now?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:32 AM
6

its probably evolutionary. You want a strong, dumb partner. Strong to protect you, dumb so easy to manipulate into proxy violence.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:28 AM
6

stop redpilling, it scares the children.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:10 AM
3

so you're saying go catholic or go to school?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 05:34 AM
4

Did you just try to fempslain to me?!
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:57 AM
1

For future reference, coercion is considered applied when unwanted sex takes place as a result of either force, threat of force, or exploiting drug use. Alcohol is a drug. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/jwh.1998.7.371?journalCode=jwh.2
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:53 AM
0

If two people get drunk and decide to have sex, one person isn’t necessarily coercing the other. How do you know one of the individuals in this scenario would have wanted to have sex sober with the other as well? If they wouldnt have sex unless they were drunk, that is definitvely coercion for sex because the person who got sex from the other is taking advantage of their diminished inhibition. A person who voluntarily and knowingly used drugs or alcohol might be considered “physically helpless” …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:48 AM
1

Here's your argument: if both are drunk it isn't rape. it isn't rape because it isnt coercive. coercion only happens because one are drunk, but both are drunk. Its circular logic.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:40 AM
0

If two people are both drunk and both want to have sex, it’s not coercion. You're making a claim. Why is that true? Suppose person A goes out looking for sex at a bar. Person A and B are both drinking. B would never have had sex casually with person A, but since they're now under the influence of alcohol, they're coerced by the drug substance, and thus person A can take advantage of this in order to have sex with person B. Thus person A, despite being drunk is taking advantage of person B and th…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:34 AM
0

The sober person is able to consent while the drunk person isn’t. that's not the basis of why its rape. Its not a comparison of "consent states compared between two people". Its only about whether one person is 'taking advantage' of the other through coercion. The argument 'one is able to consent and the other isn't' is not the basis for what constitutes rape. The argument of what constitutes rape is ONLY ever "can the person being propositioned for sex consent". If no, its rape.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:29 AM
1

but two drunk people having sex isn’t necessarily rape. You can’t draw parallels to stabbing here. It doesn’t make sense. Is a sober person having sex with a drunk person rape? Why?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:14 AM
16

Its almost like they dont like age of consent law and use exactly the same arguments I've used when its one of theirs is being attacked, but if its a man, fuck him. Go to jail spacey.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:08 AM
0

clearly you are not a woman. Jokes aside, rape is a crime of violence, and stabbing is a crime of violence, both violate a person's body and will. A person who is too drunk to consent is under a coercive agent. Thus being asked for sex from another drunk person and compliance makes them a victim of rape if they're "too drunk". because as we've established, a drunk person can be guilty of crimes of violence.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:02 AM
1

you're really saying 1+1 = 3 here. We've shown that it DOESNT MATTER that the perpetrator is drunk or underage if they commit a crime. A crime is anything from assault to rape to convincing a drunk person to have sex.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:56 AM
0

Because neither of them did anything wrong while they were drunk. The situation is only really different if one person is intoxicated and the other isn’t. The sober person can take advantage of the fact that the other is impaired to have sex with them when they otherwise would have said no. You keep repeating your top level arguments but there is no lower level argument. We've been over this. lets make it easier. An adult is drunk, but rapes someone at knife point. That KNIFE is coercion. The dr…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:47 AM
0

Both people have to consent to sex. And if one doesnt, its rape.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:45 AM
0

If you initiate sex while drunk, you initiate it, but you can’t actually consent. This is largely irrelevant because while they cannot consent, they are targeting someone else who can't consent. The drunk person who is intitiating sex is playing an active role. It doesn't matter if they can't technically consent, just as a 15 year old can't technically consent but can be guilty of raping someone else by applying coercion. That was the point of bringing 15 year olds into this argument. Despite be…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:27 AM
1

Because neither of them did anything wrong while they were drunk. Yes, one did. The one who initiated sexual activity on the other. Because the other, by virtue of being 'too drunk' can't consent, so they are victim. Drunk people are still held criminally responsible for committing aggressive/violent acts. Rape is a crime of violence. Inability to consent is rape. Being too drunk is inability to consent. Thus A = B = C = D. D is too drunk, can't consent. C cant consent, which makes it rape. B ra…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:16 AM
1

If they’re both drunk, it should be treated the same as if neither are drunk. I think that’s the easiest way to put what I’m trying to say. Why? Is there not rape occurring here? if not, why not?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:09 AM
2

I’m not saying that if someone who is drunk rapes another person that it isn’t rape. If a drunk person rapes someone, they raped someone. My point is that if two drunk people have sex and both of them consent to it even though they’re too drunk to legally consent, it’s not rape Again, you're making a distinction which makes no logical sense. If a drunk person asks someone who is too drunk to consent for sex, that consent is invalid, regardless of the first person being drunk. And according to yo…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:06 AM
3

That's fucked up A man who did this with women would both have to be godly in appearance, act/look wealthy, and also would immediately become plastered all over the news with his name and subsequently be fired from any jobs he had, and be socially condemned. The article tone sounds like "haha silly fun at men's expense". She then asked all the men who had been dumped by their previous partner to raise their left arm and all the men who had done the dumping to raise their right arm. She told all …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:23 AM
1

its probably fake. Probably.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:22 AM
1

"A female paedophile who had sex with a schoolboy then accused him of rape has been jailed for four years and eight months." Incredibly rare for such criminals to be referred to as paedophiles by the media. Looks like we're making at least a little progress. I don't think media using false arguments/claims is progress. That's exactly what we're all here for right? To get rid of those kinds of things in media/law?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:18 AM
44

"I love you, Jerica," Enriquez's sister yelled. "Don't you ever (expletive) forget that." [4]​ Another family member took aim at the victim's family, uttering another expletive before being escorted from the courtroom by a sheriff's office deputy. [4]​
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:15 AM
1

You're taking the body and thinking you have to work to look good. VS is selling the clothes and saying "put these on and you'll look this good". Quick fix/lazy thinking vs hard work.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:13 AM
2

Interesting point; those body types have a feminine morphology as you stated. What would that appeal to? Hetero males? Why?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:12 AM
1

There's not enough "sexually objectified" men in the media. And I'm not just saying that because I like seeing the perfect bodies and whatnot... well maybe that's a part of it ha... but because it irks me how feminists frame this. Yes but women blame attractive women in movies (seriously, some women have been disapproved for roles for being 'too attractive' before), porn, etc, as degrading to women because it makes men only want the best. They don't have a problem with this stuff creating "unrea…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:11 AM
1

We should be praising physical fitness. and mental
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:09 AM
1

culture is always swinging. What worries me is whether the swing will be too far. Its gotten so extreme now, what could be the opposite, equal reaction?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:09 AM
3

Not having sex with a drunk woman is the right thing to do. If she’s too drunk to consent, it’s rape. If both of you are drunk and unable to consent, then it’s not, but if she’s drunk and you’re not, you’re still raping her That logic doesn't parse. If a drunk person knifes someone else, they are still responsible criminally for their actions even though they're drunk. if a drunk person initates a sexual encounter on someone "too drunk to consent", they're still a rapist. You're falling into the…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:56 AM
1

Romactiohorridy
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:45 AM
0

Shit nigga just get on a treadmill like drop some weight nigga.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:44 AM
5

Yes, let's ensure a 50:50 male/female ratio of firefighters. We'll have to lower the standards, but protecting women's feelings is more important than human life. Feminists are a fucking public safety hazard. you really should've seen this coming given that 80% of males have more upper body strength than women, and they still want women in front line combat roles for "equality". Im surprised they haven't gone as far as suggesting they want to see men/women coming home in bodybags 50/50 split to …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:43 AM
2

Jesus christ.... Everything is framed through the lens of how it affects women, and never how it affects men. This is what fuels mgtow and braincels
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:40 AM
10

Asia isn't Weinstein's only victim, and her claim against him was dubious in the first place and likely wouldn't have been taken as seriously by the public (even if feminists would still have gone batshit over it) if it was the only one. The recent developments do cast some more doubt her claim imo, but it may be worth ignoring that to push the point that someone can be both a perpetrator and a victim, which is an important meme to get out there so feminists can finally get a clue about sexism a…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 10:19 PM
14

It's too ironic to be believed. A powerful voice against sexual abuse being identified as a child rapist. And a powerful voice for "believing the victim" calling for cautious analysis of all available evidence before making a judgment. Because when harvey is accused, its a disgusting sick man with male sexual predatory behavior, when Asia is accused, its a woman who just got a little too handy no big deal and why would you want to harm a woman with prison? It doesnt fit the narrative of women as…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:05 PM
1

No, but in that scenario....it IS the moral thing to do in the middle east. You said it yourself. And doing the moral thing is "okay" by definition. We may not like it, I don't like it, but it just is. Nope. That's incorrect. Moral relativism isn't a thing. Stoning women for being raped is immoral and evil.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:14 PM
1

Dude im so smart, they said I was capable of being top class at harvard but I said fuck that noise.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:36 AM
1

It seems you're unwilling to answer question anymore, so I guess this would have to be rhetorical. You are falling back on "developed" which could be used to attempt a really desperate and stupid argument against what I've said..... which would require ignoring the fact that I've continually brought up neuroplasticity . You're a moron and I am deeply disappointed in myself that I was not able to realize it much sooner.... Can you see that you're getting angry only because I disagreed with you an…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 10:39 PM
1

You: The person in question suffered severe trauma to the craneum. The sequels of such an event would likely be completely unprecedented.... such trauma would be the springboard for ongoing internal lesions and faults in the CNS. Others: The damage to Gage's frontal cortex caused by the iron rod seems to have resulted in a loss of social inhibitions. ... He used the experience of Phineas Gage as a case study to support his claims. The details of Gage's life after his accident are unclear. https:…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:51 PM
1

What matters are the choices we make IN SPITE of those things. Human will is absolute and sovereign, this is the default until proven otherwise and guess what, your premise has been forwarded for centuries and no one has had success in proving pre-determinism to even a slight degree. No. That is incorrect. I don't think you even know what a "rationalization" is ..... but if you do, that would make your statement , somehow even more egregiously incorrect. "Someone does something. That makes me an…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:41 PM
1

What "narrative"? Btw, for what its worth, everyone lives a narrative. Every individual, every subculture, every nation lives a narrative. We all live in stories we tell ourselves about our lives, about reality, about events. That's why its not so easy for depressed people to dig out of depression. They live in a narrative where neutral human interactions are twisted into negatives to fit their internal narrative. Humans are rationalizing machines. You aren't the author of your thoughts, nor you…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:15 PM
1

two words: Phineas gage. One word: Doljonijiarnimorinar. It seems like you're basically mocking an obvious case study in which a man lost part of his PFC and was then subjected to rages and impulsivity and lack of self-control, by calling it fantasy. Can I please, pretty please, have your sources confirming your claims that the PFC is developed by age 20-25, and that teen brains change without any stimulation input? (btw, you can't give me sources on the latter because it is unethical to use und…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:05 PM
16

This is hilariously ahistorical. Men have been at the FOREFRONT of "social equality" movements since forever. Right. Who gave women equal rights and protections from spouse rape? Old white men. Because apparently they're the only ones in power for the last 120 years, but somehow, somehow, the laws changed to improve women's lives while only old white men were in charge of making/changing laws. hmm.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:59 PM
4

I prefer the funnier interpretation: Feminists are so fucking hysterical and deranged at this point that telling a man to work safe so he can provide for his family is misogyny, becuase obviously he should work dangerously and thus lose household income causing his wife and children to suffer in poverty due to lacking 1/2 the income required to even live, and that would no longer be misogyny. Feminism see attempts to prevent as misogyny.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:57 PM
1

Mine is based on the major structural changes that the CNS suffers during one's teenage years even in absence of stumuli to justify it. Once you are in your 20s, the neuroplasticity of the CNS is markedly decreased and only really occurs after hard-stimulus like trauma or extreme focus, again for example musicians. That's not true. You can arrest brain development by preventing stimulus. bhttps://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/oct/14/childhood-stimulation-key-brain-development https://www.ncbi…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:51 PM
1

Lol? I think the author of that pile of trash is heavily relying on the reader to have no understanding of neurology or better still, etymology. The author was using the same argument that people used for "the brain doesnt finish maturing until 25. Yep, that is in line with what I said earlier "the human brain becomes fully developed at about 20 years of age, not 40." , obviously "about 20" covers it. Yes, I put that link in there because that is 2011 science. other links are 2016+ science. Agai…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:24 PM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11815703 Participants were categorized by age into young adults (ages 18-35 years; n = 97), middle-aged adults (ages 36-55 years, n = 197), and older adults (aged older than 55 years, n = 49). Differences in demographics, gambling variables, and ASI composite scores were compared across the groups. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2010-12-brain-fully-mature-30s-40s.html Brain is not fully mature until 30s and 40s - Medical Xpress try again. I don't say wild bull…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:19 PM
2

Its deece.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:17 AM
2

This is great because of the double standard. He said he knew what he was doin at 15 with the teacher. He just said "I dont wanna see women go to jail for getting young big [means sex from a 15 year old]". Then he says he got sent to big boy prison for 3 months for statutory for having consensual sex with a 15 year old girl when he was 16. Glorious double standards.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:48 AM
66

when men hang toddlers and try to run people over, they're just evil. When women do it, they're 'sick' and need our support.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:45 AM
-4

Im so fucking mad cause she aint even hot enough for that pussy pass bro
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:44 AM
1

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2010-12-brain-fully-mature-30s-40s.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4055490/You-think-grown-18-brains-don-t-fully-mature-hit-30.html\ https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=141164708 But emerging science about brain development suggests that most people don't reach full maturity until the age 25. I just want to give you that last link with copytext to show you how people BELIEVED SO FUCKING HARD "you're not mature until 25". Now sc…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:31 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEdsQ9J5J7k here you go fuckface.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:46 PM
0

Some kind of law that states mature men are above age 36? A man is mature when he is matured emotionally and in many aspects of life not by a number. Just the way someone isn't an adult because they cross a certain threshold that's the number 18. why dont you google these questions. The brain doesnt mature until the 30's to 40's. Young adulthood extends to around 33-35.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:42 PM
2

https://youtu.be/kqz4FYGRRbw?t=34 They run over women with cars. She died. https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article215443835.html A second person was injured when a Sacramento Police Department patrol car ran into a 16-year-old boy as he was fleeing officers Sunday night, according to an attorney for the woman who said she was also struck. They also run over teens with cars to stop them. This is deadly force, in the same level as firing a gun at someone. You think people don't fire guns i…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:34 PM
3

Statutory rape was invented to be a weapon against men. yep. Hell, statutory rape laws are enforced against men harder than real child rape laws are enforced against women. also yep.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:12 PM
2

Ah. In the U.S. anything you do that 'resists' = guns come out and you get shot. For instance, if there's 5 guys on top of you and you struggle, you'll get shot in the back. If you're running away, you'll get shot in the back. If you try to drive off, you'll get shot. Basically comply or die theory.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:11 PM
1

Probably the feeling of being responsible for her death, the reality of the situation, the loss of the only person who actually had his back, etc.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:10 PM
1

Edward Cullen he wasn't a mature male when that trash came out. He was what, 20-22 at most? Mature adult starts around 36.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:09 PM
1

I dont understand. An asshole attacks a bunch of women, but because he's Muslim he gets shot in the leg. Tyrone steals a car stereo and runs and gets shot in the back. Hank is a mentally ill homeless person and police surround him with guns instead of tasers and riddle him with bullets if he lunges at them. What is life right now?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:59 PM
15

Third-wave feminism Is all about freeing women from any social or societal consequences regardless of their actions Dont put undue blame on them. Regardless of Andrea Dworkin's insane squirrel eating mentality and its toxic effect, First wave feminism and suffragettes were JUST as concerned with freeing women from social and legal responsibilities.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:57 PM
5

There was some old woman in the UK who molested or raped someone under 10, and was given a 5 year sentence. The footballer, 28 year old whatever, had sexual contact with a 15 year old and was given a 6 year sentence for fondling.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:55 PM
1

In Super the main character is raped by the female psychopath he picks up. Its all gushy! If the reverse had happened in that movie, it would've been panned as absolutely disgusting. Instead there was 'meh' to it. Its all about promoting the narrative. That doesnt fit so feminists don't get mad about a man being raped.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:52 PM
1

go have fun on Tor and find out for yourself.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:51 PM
9

Its because women have been demonziing male sexuality for over 100 years. Its no wonder we view male sex as inherently predatory, but playing Tit for Tat isn't going to improve the situation, unless we see women very SUDDENLY being given long prison times for doing this kind of thing, en masse. If that were to happen, rather than slowly, it'd create a system shock.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:49 PM
-1

t's definitely a double standard. People hate the fact that young girls have any kind of sexuality at all, let alone that they're often sexually attracted to older, mature men they really don't seem to be, at all. I think its actually quite rare, because I rarely see them looking hungrily at old, bald, fat men.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:47 PM
3

Just remember, in the movie HE (underage male) sexually assaults HER (lifeguard female).
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:47 PM
1

Im anti abortion if it's unborn but if its post birth, abort away. I like people to know what they're doing.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:36 PM
1

Also I wouldn't dismiss moral relativism. Moral boundaries are set by societies and they are not a global thing. You can't dismiss moral relativism without dismissing the importance of having moral boundaries in the first place. So stoning women for being raped is okay because that is the moral thing to do in the middle east? Moral relativism is typically the cowards way out of arguments over morality and it doesn't hold any water whatsoever.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:34 PM
1

What is dead can never die.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:13 AM
1

Then what you're saying is "moral relativism". its fine for them, but not for us, there is no absolute morality. Saying "because its in the U.S. it is rape patently describes moral relativism, and not only that, but also it describes that you think rape is completely based on whether something is legal or not. If this is the case, then reducing age of consent to 15 in the U.S. tomorrow would mean it stops being rape, but that is nonsensical. it would suggest the difference between a normal perso…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:59 AM
2

Even babies can get sexually aroused, as evidenced by their masturbation and erections. That doesnt mean they understand sexuality, what they're doing, or anything like that. It means that their bodies and senses RESPOND with arousal, just like an unconscious person.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:56 AM
1

What was the motive. For famous people who are hitting the female wall, to get money, relevancy, and social currency. For random women, to display their insanity.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:48 AM
1

so you're admitting you dont know how the sexual arousal response works in animals?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:45 AM
1

but the main motive for saying “me too” in those rallies was to show other people it’s ok to come out No it wasn't. If you believe that, you're drinking the kool aid.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:22 AM
2

Yes, they can be, otherwise nocturnal emissions would be a fantastical mystery.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:21 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_erection The phenomenon has been attributed to pressure on the cerebellum created by the noose.[3] Spinal cord injuries are known to be associated with priapism.[4] Injuries to the cerebellum or spinal cord are often associated with priapism in living patients.[2] Unconscious people don't have priapism you ninny.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:11 AM
1

Id argue most of those people were not actually victims of anything but claiming support, and the ones who were in those marches claiming it are the mentally ill type who love claiming that kind of thing because victimhood is sweet, sweet nectar to damaged individuals. There's munchausen and munchausen by proxy, you know.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:48 AM
1

What has #metoo been about?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:34 AM
1

Depends. Do you believe that its immoral and rape when it happens in france even though its legal?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:29 AM
1

So people in france are getting away with rape because the law ends at 15? I hope you wont commit moral relativistic discussion escaping. Tell me that France is literally allowing rape of 15 year olds. How about 16 and 37? Rape? 98% of the world sets that AoC and its more common than not in the U.S.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:18 AM
0

But I’ll say my assumption is coming from the fact I don’t thinks 90% of women or people are sociopaths who lie to hurt others and for their own good So people in the most narcissistic job possible, acting, now represent all people? That's like saying all the SJWs in academia represent all people everywhere.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:10 AM
1

Its more like 10% of women actually victimized 90% getting off for the payday after realizing they could dogpile on after they'd had CONSENSUAL relations with someone.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:35 PM
0

In your dreams, kid.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:24 PM
1

Yeah, not like #metoo exists or anything.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 09:57 PM
2

This is what nearly every #metoo actor, and I mean actor as in "they're a bad actor, faking for fame", has been doing. "But multiple women accused him so it must be true!" maybe one of them or two. Not all of them. Most make the CHOICE of free will.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 09:56 PM
-1

you mean using google = a whole booklet. Okay. I can see you're not worth the time to have a discussion with, kid. Move along.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 09:41 PM
1

you're cute.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 09:41 PM
-4

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/pedophilia Pedophilia is considered a paraphilia, a condition in which a person's sexual arousal and gratification depend on fantasizing about and engaging in sexual behavior that is atypical and extreme. Pedophilia is defined as the fantasy or act of sexual activity with children who are generally age 13 years or younger. Pedophiles are usually men and can be attracted to either or both sexes. How well they relate to adults of the opposite sex varie…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:44 PM
9

Sounds like you automatically generated a fantasy of expectations and those expectations were not fulfilled. I think Niel degrasse tyson said something to the effect of that, wherein we have no information so we make conclusions, argument from ignorance or whatever. If they claimed "we're gonna win millions and its a sure thing", then your argument is valid. If they made no claims, then you can't argue they didn't fulfill their end of the 'deal', insofar as deals are rational with donation funds…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:43 PM
1

You reacted to people condemning that statement by throwing around wild accusations at them. false somebody condemned the statement suggesting asserting that only attractive woman can be raped I also would condemn that. However #metoo has rarely been about actual victims. Speaking of projection - I'd bet you accuse others of being secret rapists for good reason: I haven't accused others of being 'secret rapists'. And no one was discussing projection until now. Maybe you have something you want t…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:02 PM
12

No one HAS to donate. You might as well ask "how ethical is it to give money to a beggar knowing they cannot pay it back to you?". If you don't believe in trying to make changes in society, don't donate money to those causes. That's all.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:55 PM
-9

I think he'd probably need physical therapy more. All those high fives probably ruined his wrist. had sex with the student in her Crawford High School classroom, her car and her home dozens of times, the report said. Hes 15, she's 37. 'RAAAAAAPE." He's 15, she's also 15. "Oh, well that's totally normal and no one's mind is being destroyed by sexual contact" I just cant get over the obvious hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:51 PM
-1

I hope you remember that if your son gets arrested for molesting his girlfriend of the same age in school and it becomes a big thing, even though they both 'consented'.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:50 PM
3

condemning the false statement that only attractive women in particular can be raped Yep, I would condemn a statement suggesting only attractive women can be raped. Everybody is weirded out by your conduct and rightfully so. You can read everyone's minds now? There's a word for that. Delusion. Go take your meds.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:46 PM
1

tfw not even horny sex crazed women want to harass you.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:06 PM
3

I know where you're going with this. http://www.ejhs.org/volume11/Newman.htm It Starts in the Womb: Helping Parents Understand Infant Sexuality http://changingminds.org/disciplines/psychoanalysis/articles/infant_sexuality.htm Melanie Klein notes that a baby's sensations of sexuality is based in its simple and innocent baby's experience and sensation. It is not the sexuality as as perceived and experienced by an adult. https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/development.html To parents of infants and t…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:51 PM
3

Can we stop adding bad science to the world? Please? Yes, you ARE actually aroused. That arousal may not be willful. You may not want to be aroused. Its just like women who have orgasms during rape. They dont WANT to have orgasms, but their biological system which responds with arousal and finally orgasm does it anyway, in response to physical sensation. You should be saying "arousal is not consent". Not "erection is not arousal". The reason you'll lose this battle is because you're making a non…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:23 PM
0

Shudder* And what does "having the potential to rape" have to do with being a victim? At least we know you like stalking people.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:13 PM
1

stealing a BMW makes sense. Stealing a trashed up honda is more like a cry for help.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 02:49 AM
-10

Ive seen this about 5 times now on this sub
/r/MensRights17/08/18 12:25 AM
-7

As long as you deny your potential to rape, the Jungian shadow, then you will never be able to understand the rapist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yhlvqmy-3UI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1e97FNLk1Lw
/r/MensRights17/08/18 12:16 AM
3

Im well versed in knowledge on this aspect. ITs completely true.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:58 PM
-10

I commend her for thinking for herself, but saying someone could not have been raped because they aren't good-looking is ridiculous. Rapists are psychopaths. They don't evaluate people like the rest of us do. They look for easy victims, not fashion plates. You're making a no true scotsman. by claiming 'theyre psychopaths', you're preventing yourself from seeing the rapist IN YOU. Like "I could never send jews to a death camp to get executed, those people are psychopaths". Yeah, had you been in G…
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:03 PM
2

Happens to me. Happens Wtf? Why isn't that past tense?
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:29 PM
2

Remember, female sexual selection is amoral. They literally admitted to that by "you cant help what you fall in love with", which it itself a form of evading intellectual responsibility. If you've read any blackpill or redpill material, if you've watched jordan peterson on "what women want", then you'd know it has nothing to do with being a decent person and everything to do with being able to achieve dominance in a hierarchy. Walking this back to 100,000 years ago, the environmental pressures w…
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:14 AM
6

because domestic violence is framed as males beating females until they get detached retinas. That's how most people feel.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:11 AM
0

Dont you care about rape victims bro? Imprisonment for false claims would have a chilling effect on women who fear that they will be called liars by the police!
/r/MensRights15/08/18 11:54 PM
0

I dunno, you seem to talk about the same kind of men, so Im wary of taking advice from you.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 11:50 PM
2

I think the issue is "is it really the media, or is the media slave to the whim of the people?". They just give the people what they want. If misandry didn't sell, it'd disappear.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 11:49 PM
0

No, you realized you were wrong and now you're going balls deep in defense of your idea because you would feel shame to admit defeat.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 10:46 PM
47

Its not like this is inconceivable. The newspaper is about headlines that pull eyeballs. If a woman is claimed as victim, everyone wants to know. If a man is, "meh".
/r/MensRights15/08/18 10:43 PM
0

Thats because your theoretical is irrelevant to the real properties of male and female sexual selection.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 10:39 PM
1

Oh, I wasn't aware you had access to genghis khan's social policies. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2044614/Sex-stormtroopers-How-French-women-fell-Nazi-invaders-Second-World-War.html https://www.zoosk.com/date-mix/dating-advice/dating-advice-women/why-do-girls-like-bad-boys-what-we-can-learn-from-the-science-of-attraction/ According to this study, male narcissists are much more likely to have "misogynistic" attitudes than normal men: A total of 104 male undergraduates, aged 21 years on…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 10:18 PM
1

You think that women cannot choose conquering men. female as sexual objects and not agents. female hypoagency. Derp.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 10:12 PM
2

The reason stockholme syndrome is the female syndrome is because they're designed by nature to conform to the morality of the winning party. Next you'll tell me all those French women who were fucking nazis were really coercively raped and not just enamored of dominating men. https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/78558.html Sleeping with the enemy: Collaborator Girls - War History Online http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2044614/Sex-stormtroopers-How-French-women-fell-Nazi-invaders…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 09:55 PM
3

i totally forgot women hate successful men
/r/MensRights15/08/18 09:39 PM
4

yeah because genghis khan was totally unpopular with women.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:37 PM
20

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/inside-porn-addiction/201408/how-porn-really-affects-relationships https://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/wp20130801/is-pornography-harmful/ https://fightthenewdrug.org/porn-gets-wrong-about-female-sexuality/ https://www.quora.com/Does-porn-industry-harm-women https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/research-details-pornographys-harmful-effects-women-society Because porn is seen as a thing which men watch which makes them more harmful and degra…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:54 PM
1

My wife is constantly asking me about how what she's wearing looks, but even if I like it, she'll keep changing till she finds something she is satisfied with. If it was for me, would not my approval be a sign to stick with what she's wearing? shes pumping you for desirability in whatever shes wearing regardless of her individual preference.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 06:53 PM
1

probably for the same reasons men want women I just want sex Search that string in the link I provided.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 06:17 PM
1

Do women see men as people? Not so much. So why would a modern women want a man? Above and beyond asset transfer, it's the same issue as a trophy wife, so the other women can see that they've made it. https://www.thecut.com/article/why-women-cheat.html if women don't want men, then they wouldnt be cheating.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 06:09 PM
1

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/denise-geelhart/its-time-to-stop-fat-shaming_b_6867346.html https://www.health.com/mind-body/stop-negative-body-talk https://www.healthline.com/health-news/my-doctor-fat-shamed-me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tylDTJYHPYk This isn't just some isolated issue. Its anger and attempts to change how we behave.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 06:03 PM
3

Child support is meant as reimbursement for money/labor expended on behalf of the child. It's not meant to purely be spent on material goods and services for the child(ren). If she chooses to have the child, she's making the choice to being into existence something which requires upkeep, completely on her own. She isn't getting anyone else's opinion. Its her body, and HER CHOICE. If its HER CHOICE, then she's choosing to become burdened. Should a person pay for another person's choice to become …
/r/MensRights15/08/18 06:01 PM
0

And then they'll continue to post those memes.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:55 PM
2

Since by and large today women consider male attention sexual harassment, it begs the question of why they would seek what they don't want. Is that why women are demanding male attention while being morbidly obese by shaming men for "thin preference"? Because they don't want attention? The trick is they don't want it from YOU specifically because you're not high value enough, but they want it from men they find highly desirable. And if they get your attention so you look, but you're too afraid t…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:52 PM
2

No one is forcing you to marry these women with a gun to your head. We are ALREADY there, where men do not want women who are like that list. This list is a complaint against MALE PREFERENCES.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:48 PM
1

was I attacking you?
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:47 PM
3

should i defend inhuman shit?
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:00 PM
11

yea, what they're saying is reversed. What men have to do: Pursue a woman who isn't thin. Pursue a woman who doesnt want to cook. Pursue a woman with short hair. Pursue a non-feminine woman. Pursue an ungraceful woman. Pursue a woman who won't have sex with him. Pursue a woman who doesn't shave. Pursue a woman who has a terrible diet. Pursue an unfashionable woman. Pursue a woman who doesn't wear pink. Pursue a woman who treats males' opinions and criticisms as bullshit. Because they're either s…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:34 PM
1

But people are cheering the 'normal' sex offender registry.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:29 PM
3

If men winked out of existence tomorrow you wouldnt see women continue to wear whore uniforms and high heels. They'd all go back to sweatpants and eating ice cream. Lets not perpetuate the myth that women don't dress to receive male attention.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:28 PM
0

males have more sexual agency than females.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:19 PM
2

A statement of fact isn't criticism.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:17 PM
2

Australia is heading down the path of 9 year olds being married to people of the muslim faith.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 01:21 AM
10

Meh. What she did was flat out sexual harassment and the punishment was just. Pretty sure its actually sexual assault.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 01:19 AM
1

Can you provide any evidence for your argument? That bio children are not explicitly called bio children of adults if adult and child are both victim?
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:28 PM
1

illegal alienation of illegal aliens!
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:27 PM
5

grown man with a teddy bear in the background. Point invalid. Next. He did say he enjoyed a good burn.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:25 PM
21

Feminism is against sexual violence. he experienced it and wasn't sure how to deal with it in light of being laughed at by the audience. That alone is case enough for it to belong to feminism... except it happened to a man not a woman.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:23 PM
6

Im making alternate subs to mirror main subs people have issues with, as I go along with the months. https://www.reddit.com/r/FeminismAlternate/ Here you go.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:22 PM
1

Thanks for your permission. The fact you think its "her child" automatically disproves the notion that the law was applied well enough to "protect the child's identity". In fact, everyone WILL assume that. The real way to have protected the identity of "her child" would be to not even discuss it in the print. But knowing that people will assume its her child, why not write "her child"? What's "A child" doing hanging out with a woman?
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:18 PM
1

Im suspecting the female in the article. I can think of a lot of reasons, like confidentiality. Imagine you're a kid, and somebody just flew an airplane into your house. Maybe you don't want people asking you questions. And anyway, most states have confidentiality laws for child victims of crimes for that very reason. And anyway, most states have confidentiality laws for child victims of crimes for that very reason. translation: confidentiality laws bro! they wont say "her child", they'll just s…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:11 PM
1

why wouldnt they say "her son"? didnt she verify his id to rescue?
/r/MensRights14/08/18 07:57 PM
1

The article does say, though that he called up his biological children and told them to leave the house, which would imply pretty strongly that he also had non-biological children whom he didn't tell to leave the house. That's true. its an implication, but an implication without verification. Papers are known for their misleading implications. On the other hand, if the "boy" had been youd (female)'s, they would've certainly said "and her son". The fact they didnt is what speaks volumes, because …
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:29 PM
1

I don't think this is what you may be implying. It says in the article that the boy was her child from a previous marriage. Can you show? Also why does it say "a boy" then and not "her son"?
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:52 PM
22

daily reminder its shameful for males to have consensual sex.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:00 PM
-14

because mras are disgusting vile males with misogyny and bad attitudes towards women so women are obviously smart enough to steer clear of them before getting into compromising positions, of course.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 01:50 PM
1

see: self help industry aimed at women.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 01:49 PM
0

Youd's wife as well as a boy were inside the house at the time of the crash. They were lucky they escaped and the plane did not hit other buildings or any power lines, police said. Youd's biological children were not in the home at the time of the crash. Youd's wife as well as a boy were inside the house Hmm, this is suspicious as fuck. Lets play RTG. Youd's husband as well as a girl were inside the house at the time of the crash. They were lucky they escaped and the plane did not hit other buil…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 01:45 PM
0

cant get that HPV leading to cervical cancer now. Gotta snip the boy's tip.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:46 AM
2

No one make rape jokes on the internet! Women could potentially see one!
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:45 AM
4

At a certain point you have to ask whether this is just a well crafted channy troll designed to instigate.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:44 AM
1

Nope. Never. Tabula Rasa baby!
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:42 AM
39

Mr. Reitman, who is now 34 and is a visiting fellow at Harvard, says that Professor Ronell kissed and touched him repeatedly, slept in his bed with him, required him to lie in her bed, held his hand, texted, emailed and called him constantly, and refused to work with him if he did not reciprocate. Mr. Reitman is gay and is now married to a man; Professor Ronell is a lesbian. She put my hands onto her breasts, and was pressing herself — her buttocks — onto my crotch,” he said. “She was kissing me…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:38 AM
2

She slapped another woman's ass as a joke. Woman was not okay and threw a punch. I bet she thought it was a guy. Then she goes into overdrive mode on seeing who she hit to spin it.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:34 AM
1

Ive got 8000. come at me bro.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:33 AM
3

At this stage of human development Im sure we can all thank/blame kafka for unleashing that unholy abomination into the water for the femSJWs to grab onto.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:31 AM
1

Its called a katar
/r/MensRights14/08/18 12:08 AM
5

Go ahead and explain how this has any relevance. Apparently you seem to think that if you're a statistical anomaly, then the rules shouldn't apply to you.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 12:07 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfwN0X8YnWo
/r/MensRights13/08/18 09:18 PM
35

Of course they're mad. Because women don't lie about rape. So if she accused him, he's guilty and he got away with it because of a good lawyer and because of his penis-power of patriarchal entitlement. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAwLYJYsa0A
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:03 PM
5

of course. he may be exonerated but he still instills fear and anxiety in women. Thats reason enough to give him the boot.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:02 PM
8

Hahahahahha.... oh if only gay people made up more than 2-5% of the population. If lesbians were very common and treated like this, we'd see some changes.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:01 PM
3

All the female terrorists of the suffragette movement didn't put a dent in the progress of "equality for da wimmunz".
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:00 PM
4

There is actual data showing women in general view treatment equal to males as being treated worse (misogyny). Its because of the natural female in group preference for females and male out group preference for females. Just look at typical people who don't call themselves feminist but still maintain the party line that women are treated unfairly in work.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 06:40 PM
2

People are mad at the perception that the police don't take this kind of thing as seriously when women are the victims. Right. Because men magically get away with it even though they don't. Women are treated like men (imprisoned for a crime), and suddenly its misogyny where women are being treated worse, even though they're treated the same. Thank you for supporting the point.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 06:38 PM
2

Its a daily reminder, as in women already feel this way and this is more evidence. We've got the studies telling us women view real equal treatment as misogynist, if men treat women the same as they treat other men.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 06:34 PM
5

Daily reminder: women see fair treatment as oppressive misogyny, and chauvinistic 'female preferential' treatment as actual fairness. You can't tell me ALL THOSE PEOPLE only represent toxic feminists and not women in general.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 06:28 PM
5

You'd have to make feigned resistance to the idea and pretend you really don't want it, otherwise they wont give it to you.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:49 PM
3

I think he was saying he'd take being raped by some women for 'corrective reasons'.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:29 PM
11

Just more proof that women don't make laws intending to be punished by those laws, they only want to see males suffer consequences for things they should be able to do to males.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:28 PM
1

The woman in the article should be executed, whatever number you pick. So if we pick the number 27, she should still be executed.. You'd need someone with good knowledge of these things to make the actual decision. But you're making a claim that a 16 year old with a 14 year old is relatively okay. Explain why. Im not going to argue over the arbitrary upper limit. Why is 16 and 14 okay and and why is 16 and 26 pedophilic?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:27 PM
4

Because of the guilt by association fallacy. Bret Weinstein says there are adaptive reasons for the existence of rape. Those same people who call you a pedophile would probably call him a rape supporter. Explanation seems to mean support. Actually, I don't think they really believe that, rather it is a common underhanded shaming tactic to silence arguments or disagreement. If we continually ignore the WHY and the underlying causes of such sexual behavior which are written into our genetics, then…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:25 PM
1

Why is it okay for a 16-19 year old to have sex with a "naive and easy to manipulate 14 year old"
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:23 PM
1

Can you answer one question? Why is it okay for a 16-19 year old to have sex with a "naive and easy to manipulate 14 year old", but it is pedophilic and worthy of execution for a 21 year old?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:06 PM
1

No it's not the same. Everyone can be affected by MeToo witch hunts That's a non-sequitur to the original statement, which is that people defending #metoo accused have been called "rape apologists". What you're doing is saying "pedo apologist" for someone arguing for reason related to something which is not pedophilic. As long as you don't fuck kids you can't be a pedo. That's incorrect as given by the standard accepted definitions. You seem to have a personal definition, but that doesn't make i…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:01 PM
3

because hormones and sexual feelings develop between people who are always around each other. Because nature doesn't care about morals of the 21st century and we're still 50,000 year old cavemen. Have you read Musashi? Look at the 'normalcy' of sexual behavior there where mid teens is considered "old enough". In 50,000 BCE, you wouldn't find people worrying about this. You were an adult when you were 13. That's where the Bat/Bar Mitzvah practice comes from; ancient values turned religious ceremo…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:59 PM
1

For the same reason guys who go after 14 year olds do it. Because of the power rush. That's stupid. They do it because they're physically attracted and enjoy the attention.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:55 PM
1

This is like someone suggesting not all #metoo moments are actual sexual assault or harassment wants sexual assault/harassment normalized. No, this is not pedophilia. What you're doing is https://owl.excelsior.edu/argument-and-critical-thinking/logical-fallacies/logical-fallacies-guilt-by-association/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Morality_and_the_Law Danet pointed out that lawyers who choose to defend someone found guilty of an indecent act with a minor end up facing serious public backl…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:49 PM
1

In addition, if your only argument against sex is because someone is naive and easy to manipulate, does that mean that sex is okay if that person is not manipulated? After all, they aren't abusing the naive individual.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 02:16 PM
1

They're naive and easy to manipulate because they haven't learned much yet. This is a subjective argument. All brains differ slightly. If you imagine a typical bell curve, and imagine that people are placed on that bell curve for "ability to reason and navigate social interactions" then OBVIOUSLY there's going to be massively superior individuals at one end of the bell curve for any given age range, while there are a majority clustered more or less around the middle, and a minority at the low en…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 02:11 PM
1

Neither are 21 year olds. What do you mean by "fully developed"?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:49 PM
55

Thats when you turn around and say "If you think men cant talk about women's experiences, why do you think women can talk about men's?" and then fart at her.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:48 PM
1

Excellent. I admire your consistency and willingness to claim that you believe what the law says is irrelevant with regard to sex between two 14 year olds or a 14 year old and an 'over 20' year old. Most people hedge their arguments in appealing to the law as the source of their rationality, and then become decidedly less rational and fully abusive if the argument goes past 2 responses or so. So tell me, what is the difference between a 14 year old having sex with a 14 year old, and a 21 year ol…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:40 PM
1

In a large number of states an individual can marry someone under 16 and then the laws regarding statutory rape are suspended, such that If, say, a 21 year old married a 15 year old, they could legally have sex with their wife/husband. You think this person should be murdered for doing what is legal?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:35 PM
0

You're actually the one arguing semantics, so lets see how your argument works out. Anyone over 20 fucking with a underage boy or girl should be executed. So in Florida or Commiefornia, a 21 year old having sex with a 17 year old should be executed? Remember, you said "underage boy or girl", and 18 is AoC in those two states. So if we reduced AoC to 12 tomorrow, suddenly you'd be completely okay with anyone over 20 having sex with a 14 year old? After all, they are no longer "underage", by defin…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:26 PM
3

Did you just find out that dress codes differ for genders, as if genders are different?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:23 PM
2

yeah, because the nazis were a minority group. It wasnt like most of the germans actually went along with it.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:18 PM
1

Oh boy, here we go. Did you know that 16 year olds can be pedophiles? Yes, because the pedophile label is applied to persistent sexual desires for anyone who is prepubescent (under 13). Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is and call for death for 16 year olds who fuck 14 year olds?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:17 PM
1

Well heres -1! Get trolled!
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:36 AM
2

Karma is relevant if you comment in women's or feminist subs because you can get a negative score and will then only be able to comment once every ten minutes. Most places are like that. If you get a neg comment score in r/bass, you get throttled to one post per 8 minutes. That's why you find some really cheap meme/saying to karmawhore off some post.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:36 AM
1

Have another -1 on the house from me!
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:35 AM
2

Fucking saved. Those sources.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:33 AM
22

What did they think would happen by supporting an unjust movement?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:32 AM
0

I get what you are saying, but look at the bright side, all of those feminists who think that they're above men, see something like this and crap their pants. Doesn't that make you feel at least a shred of joy? Equality. Always push for it. Yes and no. While things don't change unless women start suffering (men are disposable), its still a thing to have a moral high ground where you don't make others suffer the same unjust fate.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:31 AM
3

That is exactly why people are demanding this be called rape.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 10:52 PM
2

The first part is ONLY true if the man is very attractive. They still pick the men. They just do it passively. At least she admitted, if only by accident, that it hurts women much more to be rejected because they expect to be the ones doing the rejecting.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 10:04 PM
-1

Im confused. Since when do rapists and rape victims have willing live video chats naked with each other?
/r/MensRights12/08/18 09:55 PM
-3

The 14-year-old student, a boy who was not in her class, told police he had sex with Enriquez at least twice at a Greeley park. Two other boys said she sent them nude photos of herself, and one of those boys took screenshots of a video chat with Enriquez in which she was naked, blowing kisses and showing a negative pregnancy test. 2 14 year olds do it? "oh they're just in love". someone older does it with a willing participant who happens to be 14? "that evil rapist!".
/r/MensRights12/08/18 09:49 PM
-1

I would say that based on the recent articles of the case, it might be possible.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 06:21 PM
1

I know. Its crazy right? I mean, those silly fucks downvoted my claim that any unwanted sexual interaction is sexual assault, such as kissing your SO/spouse without an affirmative consent yes. Because while they believe this is true for 'strangers' or 'people you just met for 10 minutes but have been eye fucking each other althoug there hasn't been any kind of talk of sexy times', they consider you to have the PRIVILEGE of getting 'one free unwanted cunt grope or kiss' on your SO, and must only …
/r/MensRights12/08/18 06:20 PM
1

relax, babe.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:16 PM
4

I was expecting more mosques.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 06:41 PM
2

Its been this way for 50 years.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:52 PM
2

https://youtu.be/ukorQJbRrMA?t=41
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:19 PM
2

There's this thing called being an adult where it's not a moral imposition to have requests in your life. You clearly have not been a woman have you =D
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:14 PM
4

Not even if someone wants to take those drugs, and agrees to eating it? How is that different from agreeing to drink alcohol? Its funny everyone in here is like "guiz its not rape if she drinks alcohol then agrees to fuck you". But all the sudden she takes quaaludes willingly and "thats rape!". Drugs are drugs. At least be consistent.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:14 PM
0

You asked for an answer and got what is the best possible answer, and call it a dodge. Its okay if you're a bad faith actor. Im used to it.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:19 PM
0

Id say it has to be decided based on each case's merits. Its pretty obvious you're trying to discuss this in 'bad faith'.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:15 PM
-5

How young is young enough to be victimized by rape? That's a really foolish question. Rape can happen to anyone of any age. Even if you ignore the trauma of being raped (which you seem to ignore)... He was 15, and she was 37. Go fuck yourself. If we ignore that, then everything else you've stated is irrelevant. But we aren't ignoring it. We're questioning whether it is true. To rewrite it so its more understandable to you.. Even if you ignore the trauma of being raped (which you seem to ignore).…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:05 PM
-4

Exactly! Jello pudding pop guy wasn't finding unwilling women. They wanted to take drugs and fuck! But now he's an oppressor and luring them!
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:27 AM
16

If you could have all the benefits of being an autonomous adult, while at the same time be given preferential treatment in law, job finding, and social situations, would you be able to resist such a compelling set of gravy benefits?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:26 AM
2

well I hope you wrapped your rascal two times so it was joyless and without sensation as a way to punish her.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:25 AM
2

Das racis. I knew plenty like this in college. One minute, they want attention and will fuck anything with a dick, the next they'll say how men are gross and only want sex or they're entitled, blah blah. Girls used to hook up regularly and then complain they were butterfaces guys only wanted to use for sex, even though they put out easily without making their intentions known beforehand. And then if OTHER guys they aren't attracted to hit on them, those guys are creepy and entitled.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:14 AM
1

One night when I was visiting, I was going to sleep in the spare bedroom, but I had the urge to check out what her response would be to me if I were to make a pass. So I softly knocked on Crystal's door and when she opened it I asked "Care for me to join you?" and, to my surprise, began kissing me and we had sex together. I don't wish to brag, but it was enthusiastic consent and she lavished praise on my performance. In the future, I saw her a few more times and we also had a few more encounters…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:12 AM
-13

I thought i'd speak down to your level with regard to the form of language manipulation cases can take, such as "its not just a bump on the head, you could be caring for him forever, you should sue". Exaggeration and "client-beneficial claims" are part and parcel of lawyering. If you're ready for a grown-up version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOepidwOPx4 But the point is that we don't know the real perspective of the supposed victim. Even if we ask them directly, they may have been coached …
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:08 AM
-2

true but id still hit it
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:12 AM
2

When everything is equal under the law, but women are treated worse just for being women, if that exists, that is a reason for feminism as a social, not legal, movement. Similarly, when men are treated worse just for being men, thats is a reason for MRA as a social, not legal, movement. If there is a bias favoring women in court and punitively acting against men in court, that is a legal issue which both feminism and MRA should be in existence for. Unfortunately, I haven't met many feminists who…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:10 AM
2

Dont you know the natural order of things? Get famous, THEN do drugs/show you're an MRA.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:01 AM
-9

I agree with you in this case.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:51 AM
-19

Who's writing that? Who's advocating this need? Perhaps he didn't even want to go, but it was considered 'self evident' that he needed it, and was forcibly sent to it, and thus he needed it because he was there, and thus there's a bill that needs to be paid. That's the line of logic when outsiders push agendas on others. Its seen all the time, especially in lawyer-speak. Lawyers don't say "well, they wanted counseling for him even if he didn't want it". Because that doesn't sway a judge/jury. Th…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:44 AM
2

In all seriousness, Im using both spoken and unspoken arguments of feminists/women who feel that unusual male behavior is creepy and even rapey. There are even pages on the internet saying "autism is not an excuse to be creepy". Creepy is a blanket term used to encompass a wide range of male behavior which does not conform precisely to expected or desired norms of interaction. This term is often used to describe what is autistic or autism-like behavior, because it provides a method of condemning…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:42 AM
1

Wrong, the harmfulness comes from having sex while not really wanting to have sex, not from being 15 - children (by which I generally mean under 18 Untrue. If that were the case, the law wouldn't be a blanket ban against sex with ANYONE. Also look up Romeo and Juliet laws, I think they are called. Doesnt work in California, Florida, or the UK. If you're 15 and bang 15 in UK, you're breaking the law. Same in those two states, for example, of the U.S. And yes, you can go to jail for it and become …
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:11 AM
1

you could if you tried harder.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:41 AM
4

Based queen lindsay.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:26 AM
9

A Parole Board panel will decide next month whether she poses a risk to the public and should be released or sent back to prison. Uh, Im going with yes. A source told The Sun: ‘It’s sufficiently serious for Andrews to be returned to custody. It’s a huge blow to her.’ Oh poor her. Everyone, lets sympathize with a murderer who couldnt get her hands on a millionaire's money.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:26 AM
4

Theres a phrase, people who have empathy are socialist when they're young and conservative when they're old. It seems like people are doing the leftist politics out of a sense of empathy, but they've never experienced what it would be like. They're asking for a radical change without having ever experienced that change firsthand.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:24 AM
4

I assume she would say "I can't just stay quiet because then this alt-righter ben shapiro will accuse me of cowardice, so I'll pull the like-catcalling card to try to silence him by shaming."
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:22 AM
1

That's an interesting new scenario you've created. So far, nothing had been said about what the women looked like. You made the assumption only 'beautiful' women are sharing the 'hot guy'. I wish them a happy departure from the gene pool. That is particularly malevolent.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:10 PM
1

masturbation/suicide
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:49 PM
21

Could you imagine I write an article saying "boys are superior to girls in learning ability"? HOW SEXIST! Think NYT would publish my Op Ed? Im quite certain they're basing it on the fact that more females are going to college than males, and grades are higher for females in primary school, despite the fact that gender bias has been proven in the school system giving males lower grades for equivalent work.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:41 PM
5

While we all revel in the evul male feminist getting his comeuppance, we should remember that males in power are random targets of female proxy violence via "sexist/homophobe/rapist" claims. Whether or not he actually has done the things claimed is not proven, and if he has not, he's more proof that despite attempting to appease feminism and 'deal with toxic masculinity', he is STILL a target. They're shooting their own soldiers.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:38 PM
1

Exactly, she wasn't saying he was catcalling.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:33 PM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/apologies-freud/201210/why-women-want-married-men I've seen it a lot. If women have the option of choosing a random selection of men, 3+ will prefer to 'share' the hottest guy and all have sex with him rather than pick an uglier guy. Poly is quickly becoming "the thing" of the new millennium.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:32 PM
1

She's not really calling him a catcaller, though. She's saying its equivalent by continuing to persist. She's piggybacking on the #metoo wave to try to shame him into silence, which is disgusting, but she's not really calling him a catcaller. Just a "patriarchal man perstering women because he thinks hes entitled to their time". Which basically tells you how many squirrels are running in her head (all the squirrels).
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:28 PM
2

Plot twist: The reason they want to ban it is because gender is a social construct and such classes are reinforcement of gender norms.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:20 PM
2

Like it'd matter. you'd just mate poach as women are wont to do, or 'share a stud' like women are wont to do. Any woman who doesn't have a steady boyfriend or steady amount of dick in 2018 is basically a wealthy person starving to death in a shopping mall filled with fast food joints.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:19 PM
6

bad bot
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:15 PM
1

That pertains to workplace, catcalling is street.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:14 PM
3

I mean, the dude is objectively attractive. On one hand it's a little hard to listen to someone who looks like that whine about body standards. On the other hand, if even he gets that crap it sort of puts in persepctive the extent to which the rest of us merely averagely attractive mortals have to contend with this. Exactly the point r/braincels has been making forever. Similar point Jordan Peterson had to say regarding the stats on how women find 80% of men below average attractiveness.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:11 PM
-40

There is a casual relative logic about it. Asking for someone's time when they don't want to give it. Catcalling is that. So is asking for a debate she doesn't want. Therefore catcalling is like asking for a debate.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:04 PM
7

since when is sexual harassment criminal abuse? She’s campaigned on several major progressive promises, including “Medicare for all” and the abolishment of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Holy shit. She wants literal open borders, no need for checks.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:02 PM
25

Amazing. Its like women WANT the ability to falsely accuse males of rape.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 08:16 PM
1

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-I-only-attract-creepy-and-socially-awkward-men https://www.girlsaskguys.com/girls-behavior/q950779-why-do-young-women-call-shysocially-awkward-men http://www.doctornerdlove.com/socially-awkward-isnt-an-excuse/ https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/out-the-ooze/201604/why-some-people-creep-us-out-so-much https://www.today.com/health/what-makes-person-creepy-these-behaviors-physical-traits-study-finds-t85401 https://www.majorleaguedating.com/creepy-weird-awkward-sket…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:32 PM
1

https://iwastesomuchtime.com/93540 This might help it out.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 09:03 AM
3

Or how men let it happen. Its men's culture too, right?
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:29 AM
8

Translation: "Do what I want even if Im not attracted to you". She is not entitled to a beardless male. Oh. It looks like the author is trans.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:27 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyP57uaFO-k
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:25 AM
1

It says a lot about feminists especially that they feel the need to rub their biological traits in our faces as achievements because in reality it shows how little they've achieved in life if that's all they can come up with in the end. The woman commenting gets it feminists constantly like to lift up certain women as 'role models' but in reality the reason they're doing it is because they're that fucking useless they can't go and do things by themselves. Genders are just a social construct, bro…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:19 AM
1

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/09/us/miss-massachusetts-contestant-me-too/https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/09/us/miss-massachusetts-contestant-me-too/ A beauty queen gave up her title after a skit was performed at the Miss Massachusetts competition that made fun of the #MeToo movement. Maude Gorman was one of the contestants in the Miss Massachusetts pageant earlier this month, when a crack about #MeToo was made on stage. Gorman, who said she was gang raped when she was 13, said the moment she heard the…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:17 AM
1

dont worry, I've been learning from you all this time. Probably not the things you intended but all the same.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:26 PM
1

Welp. Some new rope-fuel for r/braincels
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:05 PM
1

that's a sweet link. I hope it works out for you.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:03 PM
1

Still nothing relevant.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 06:54 PM
1

I think you've lost the plot here. Nothing you're saying is an an argument. Its basically an ad hom wrapped in a non sequitur.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 06:30 PM
0

And they should be on that list, because they're contributing to the delinquency of another minor, creating and distributing child porn, etc. They should TEACH civics and law and teach them why sex underage and why sexting underage is illegal and DAMAGING to them and their brains. It shouldn't be some "oh the scary pedobear is gonna rape you but its totally cool if you both fuck because you're both underage". Even in the UK, age of consent is 16 and 15 year olds can get time for sex with 13-15 y…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 06:17 PM
1

Basically, yes, since you are an adult and thus you have a responsibility for refraining from harm that is greater than their responsibility for lying. After all, the reason you can't shag a 15 year old is because they're considered mentally incompetent. Even if she lied, she's still the one harmed by your act of sex with her, because age of consent law implicitly says such people are harmed by sex. For instance, assume a woman is high on MDMA and she begs you for sex and says she's sober. You'r…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 06:15 PM
1

Very few other cultures practice stoning punishment. New Zealanders? No. Russians? No. Chinese? No.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:09 PM
1

maybe autistic people should be less creepy when they hit on women? Just a radical idea.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 04:40 PM
1

You have to be conscious to consent. But while conscious you can consent to acts being performed while unconscious. you OBVIOUSLY did not read the links saying "consent becomes invalid when someone is unconscious". People cannot consent in advance to sexual activity that takes place while they are unconscious, the Supreme Court ruled Friday. READ please.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:59 PM
1

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/no-consent-in-unconscious-sex-case-supreme-court-rules/article4263384/ People cannot consent in advance to sexual activity that takes place while they are unconscious, the Supreme Court ruled Friday. https://www.rainn.org/articles/legal-role-consent Unconsciousness: Was the person sleeping, sedated, strangulated, or suffering from physical trauma? https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/apr/27/oral-sex-rape-ruling-tulsa-oklahoma-alcohol-consent The …
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:29 PM
1

You do admit they stone people.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:26 PM
1

You said I believe in equal rights So which is it, you want stoning like islam and no equal rights, or equal rights?
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:41 PM
2

because a reasonable person would be able to tell if someone is underage. Orly? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3186964/Judge-reconsiders-case-man-19-sex-offender-registry-25-YEARS-sleeping-underage-girl-met-hookup-app-lied-age.html I also feel like you dont understand how the justice system works when left to the discrimination of an individual. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obmt_PkIfBE Judges become more harsh and conservative with their rulings if they've gone an extra 10 minutes wi…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:41 PM
1

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/06/we-should-stop-putting-women-in-jail-for-anything/?utm_term=.4ec474f45dd1 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/women-demand-equality-so-why-should-female-criminals-be-spared-j/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/12017131/Why-womens-prisons-do-more-harm-than-good.html It's right to close Holloway Prison. Women's prisons do more harm than good
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:39 PM
0

Thats targeted longterm harassment. Since its a woman, that's a hate crime in the UK.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:37 PM
1

pressured boiling tub of lye. 5 hours. Its how medicals dispose.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:36 PM
1

Beauty before morality. Genes dont give a shit. Women have been selected for appearance for 10000's of years. Obviously certain tendencies will slip through the net. The same holds true for males, although since males are less attractive as a whole, and more disposable, the numbers are made up for by those highly attractive machiavellians who have similar tendencies in their genetics pumping and dumping massive amounts of hoo-ars.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:35 PM
1

you said Her head with a rock, yes. Not for equal rights
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:33 PM
1

That is entirely incorrect. That's why you cant have sex with a woman who passes out. She cant say "if I pass out, you can still have sex with me", because consent has to be ongoing which means CONSCIOUS.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 11:44 AM
6

obligatory https://imgur.com/VdgBW
/r/MensRights09/08/18 11:43 AM
3

hows this relevant?
/r/MensRights09/08/18 10:33 AM
3

can you imagine pulling out money because growth isnt fast enough?
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:55 AM
3

They're all in the dumpster fire.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:54 AM
4

And why should it be allowed? Because you honestly believed, does that make the victim less harmed? I know she was 15 but I honestly believed she wanted it.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:52 AM
8

I also like how they're doing a 'find and replace' for buzzwords and phrases like "they'll go for any under 18", just like the typical encouraged phrasing of propagandist MSM pieces about the 'pedo hysteria'.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:52 AM
8

No one is fuming. This is called having a laugh.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:50 AM
0

Lets not go full islam here.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:01 AM
1

Well, under the feminist theory that sex degrades women and improves man's lot in life, it'd be all good.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:01 AM
1

You can give consent in advance No, you really can't.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 04:48 AM
4

Its actually pretty scheming. Used to be wars were fought for land and poon. You beat up the other tribe and take their women. Now you just give them asylum from their husbands in order to get an influx of women. So sneaky, Obama!
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:36 PM
2

I mean mocking the person saying 12 years is "only". Because 12 years is a significant amount of time.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 02:46 PM
1

No because there isn't a risk by having her around the child. She needs to have sole control of them for a long period of time to compel them to do it and set up the appointments.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 02:45 PM
1

Sure, because if she steals them thats kidnapping already.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:44 PM
2

There is implied consent for many acts when you are in a long term relationship with someone. There is no such thing in the law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implied_consent#Sexual_assault Anyway, all you have to do is ask yourself, "can an unconscious person consent"? Consent must be ongoing and informed.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 12:42 PM
1

My second claim is the reasonable implication of your initial post. No. You're performing the black and white fallacy. Simple she pimped out her eight year old. The fact that she is alright with that sort of action means she is a danger to any child near her, she shouldn't be among the public ever again. That doesnt follow logically, only emotionally.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 12:35 PM
-1

Yep. sleeping people cant consent. We used to think wives didnt have the ability to deny consenting to husbands, but we got over that. What you're doing is privileging physical sexual behavior based on how long you've known someone. But consent doesn't care how long you've known someone. IT only cares if a person can make a conscious, informed decision.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 12:33 PM
-1

if he'd had more character, he wouldn't have been vulnerable to her feminine wiles.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 12:21 PM
-41

true. 2 years is a bit much.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 12:17 PM
1

OP correctly thinks it's not enough you're making a claim. Reason it. your comment clearly thinks it's a bit much. You're making an incorrect claim.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 12:16 PM
2

That's not how the english language works. Sorry friend. On the other hand, saying "only" suggests the OP thinks its not enough.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:46 AM
2

They call that flashing... LOL. That was just her bra.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:45 AM
1

Did I say that? Is that even implied?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:43 AM
0

"only".
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:28 AM
5

romantic is sexual. sexual is not necessarily romantic.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:22 AM
4

Good. Then we won't see your comments because you'll stop seeing posts.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:48 AM
2

Im glad you understand that 16 year olds having sex with other 16 year olds should be imprisoned for pedophilia, according to your argument. Retard.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:41 AM
2

What the fuck is wrong with you? Jared wanted to bang toddlers. R kelly is nothing like that.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:40 AM
5

but she was hot in Gia, always walking around naked, young, thigh gap. mm.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:06 AM
-1

Lewd acts are defined as unlawful behaviors that are sexual in nature, performed with the intention of sexually arousing either the perpetrator or the person to whom the conduct is directed How is that not sexual assault? The term “sexual assault” means any nonconsensual sexual act proscribed by Federal, tribal, or State law, including when the victim lacks capacity to consent. A kiss is a sexual act if the intent is sexual.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:22 AM
1

This is extraordinarily gross. To actually bring in divide-and-conquer feminism to a group with no privileges... What's the end game exactly, trying to convince people that homeless men deserve even less resources? Yes but she's getting paid for this, so in the end she's winning.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:14 AM
2

given the 'no tits' scenario, im thinking trans-woman.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:40 AM
8

Anyone who can contact taht 17 year old should try to get her done in for "grooming minors online". While it might be legal to set up a fuck session with a 17 year old in person, if the aoc is 16, its still set at 18 to have 'sexytalk' online, which is a federal communication act.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:40 AM
0

so I sneak into your daughter's room a night and kiss her on the cheek/hand. You dont want sexual assault charges brought?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:04 AM
3

Kissing sleeping ANYONE is sexual assault if you're doing it for sexual reasons. I don't see what the controversy is about that statement. A person who isn't conscious can't consent. Consent requires being conscious. Inability to consent = sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:00 AM
4

I did a google images and yes, its her.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 02:58 AM
-19

waddayamean no?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 02:53 AM
4

It isn’t up to feminist to invalidate the lived experience of men. They say it’s “mansplaining” if men try and talk over women’s issues- how is this any different? It’s pure womansplaining. Thats always the way I run it. Woman says: "you can't talk about women's experiences because you haven't lived them". I say: "therefore, you can't talk about men's experiences".
/r/MensRights08/08/18 02:53 AM
34

..Is that heather shuster in the picture?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:38 AM
1

which one?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:31 AM
-28

would still smash
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:30 AM
15

THis is funny. We support children because it gives us something in return in the form of citizens who produce value. The government has an interest in running schools because it wants increased value. Schools grant scholarships to intelligent people because they're investing in someone who will give them a good name and who will probably make donations in return later on. Investment with the expectation of something in return is how the world works.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:57 PM
6

It doenst fit the narrative
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:46 PM
0

bro this is a bad attitude for attracting women bro
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:35 PM
-2

just dress better bro. If you don't take care of yourself physically, why would she wanna get with you? dressing well is a personality trait women like bro.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 12:33 PM
-2

its one of the normie accusations against r/braincels that they should actually take their appearance better and they'd have dates.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:00 AM
14

because females arent responsible for sexual behavior. Male are.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:10 AM
2

Actually it should've been MGTOW.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:09 AM
10

Women are free to joke about sex, penises, vaginas, make lewd comments regarding passing individuals (as long as they dont hear it, sometimes even if they hear it, its just "for giggles"), and even touch strange males on the face, but then act scared, indignant, or offended when they hear a man do the same to women or themselves.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:08 AM
-12

nah, this is all wrong. If you look like you dont care about your appearance, of course she should bully you about being incel because you could stop being a neckbeard and work out and wear some tight fitting, coordinated "this month" clothes, and then you'd be worth dating. Update: Im dismayed at how poorly everyone couldnt tell I was mocking the typical arguments, and yes, these are the typical arguments, used by people when incels complain about their problems.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:07 AM
2

english doesn't suck. Its application sucks.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:01 AM
1

Police are individuals. The government doesnt have a policy of "going after" someone and revealing their crime accusations to employers. If the police do that, that's individuals doing it.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:00 AM
1

wooo #maxoutrage lol. That was great stuff.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:03 PM
-12

No source. No validity. 4/10 would still smash.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:51 PM
-14

Now you're getting it.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:50 PM
23

"You must understand that acts of this nature cannot and will not be tolerated by the community. Talking to them like they're a 12 year old.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:48 PM
-33

IUPG is for COURTS, not individuals. People are free to feel how they like, and hold opinions, however rightly or wrongly, based on evidence or what they think is evidence, even if its really conjecture, heresay, and delusions. That's not fair, but that is life.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:47 PM
-49

But this isn't the government punishing someone not guilty, this is regular citizens or businesses. Freedom of association and all that. Its hilarious. Im not saying its right, assholes. I'm saying this is what is reality.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:34 PM
2

oh that rule. Yeah, you have to have evidence properly submitted at the proper time or it is inadmissible.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:33 PM
-57

Not guilty isn't the same thing as innocent. Guilty isn't the same thing as having done it. Especially when people believe rape isn't taken seriously by police.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 11:48 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/94vb3j/angry_people_who_have_a_quick_temper_are_more/ Ill respond more thoroughly when I get around to it. But reflect on that link and your own comments.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 08:56 AM
4

That's the funny part. Everything else seems up for grabs according to those who are arguing more popular opinions such as "controlled immigration/assumed innocence until guilty is better". When people argue those things, and then are called racists or rape apologists, it seems those people accused of thought crime find it ridiculous and think there's room for argument. But when it comes to the last one, those same people will perpetrate the same kind of arguments they've been victims of (ad hom…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 07:38 AM
3

I've heard women say that if a man is abused it's his fault for not being able to stand up to his wife or girlfriend. Joe Rogan says men cant really be raped by women, they have to allow it to happen.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 07:09 AM
0

So you feel that a 16 year old is being legally raped by a 60 year old in Nevada or the UK simply because the age of consent is too low, or do you think that since it is legal it isn't rape? In those areas the law suggests they can give that consent. I want to make sure I have it right, that you believe adults are getting away with rape in those areas?
/r/MensRights06/08/18 07:00 AM
0

That’s not the definition of rape Actually it is. Rape definition is - unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will So as far as I understand you, violating the law regarding age of consent makes it rape. Thus a 16 year old in UK, Canada, or Nevada, is not a rape victim even if they're having sex with a 60 year old, but a 16 year old in New York, Florida, or California IS a rape victim if they're having sex with a …
/r/MensRights06/08/18 06:55 AM
7

I wonder how much of China's situation is just getting rid of "disloyal komrades" by fabrication.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 06:44 AM
2

Nothing much changes when men are cannon fodder. What you should be waiting for is women to get falsely #metoo'd and then suddenly it'll be a huge problem.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 06:43 AM
-2

Really? I guess I didnt read the OP close enough. So she held down someone or drugged them or otherwise used them against their will?
/r/MensRights06/08/18 06:38 AM
0

What is consent? Do you believe an unconscious person can consent? do you believe a 14 year old can consent to another 14 year old?
/r/MensRights06/08/18 04:41 AM
22

No true scotsman abounds. Feminists: "if you get upset you're alone, you're not really a nice guy, you were just trying to manipulate women into sex". SJWs: "Only a racist would be for controlling immigration". Feminists: "only a rape apologist would defend someone accused of rape, or suggest what happened wasn't rape". People of this sub: "only a pedophile apologist/defender would question whether age of consent laws constitute true rape or not".
/r/MensRights06/08/18 04:03 AM
15

You are still in the phase where you think fucking a chick with a boyfriend is cool because you are just more alpha than he is. Wait until you get into an LTR with said slut, so that when you eventually fail (and you WILL fail some shit tests) she’ll start pulling the same couch shit she is pulling with you on her current cuck. I agree. You don't start things with cheaters. That's a lack of respect for yourself (sloppy seconds) as well as just begging to be cheated on in the future. I've been wi…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/18 03:24 AM
1

I think that would be excessive punishment for that particular crime, especially for a first offense. Is a person not a sex offender on the first offense of sexually assaulting someone? What am I reading?
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:52 AM
2

Making children better people is child abuse.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:01 AM
2

Say a man grabs a woman's cooch while passing by her in a bar. Should he be a sex offender and get prison time? Should a woman get the same if she does it to a guy's dick?
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:56 AM
6

https://whatistalent.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/gender-portrayals-in-classical-greek-statuary/ http://www.strangeclosets.com/hcov/Paraphrasing/doryphoros+by+polykleitos+essay-2605 Yeah looks like these guys have a problem with their plastic diet. Also, https://theconversation.com/why-did-humans-evolve-big-penises-but-small-testicles-71652
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:28 AM
3

That's a claim not a source.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:25 AM
1

No. I admit that the issue is blurry when it applies to kids who are both 15 and otherwise consenting for most intents and purposes its not blurry at all. I think I might be able to see why you're having confusion. Can an unconscious person consent at any time? What is the ability to consent?
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:25 AM
5

They built about 10 sockpuppet accounts to keep spamming that as each one got blocked. All around the 25th of june
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:44 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/720uay/til_jerry_seinfeld_dated_a_17yearold_girl_when_he/ Letting "what is the law?" define your morality is the fourth stage in Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development. If a person is going to grow beyond that stage they tend to do so as a teenager. Many people reach adulthood and live the rest of their lives never getting past this stage. I just looked up Rob Lowe's story. He slept with a 16-year-old he met in a nightclub when he was 24. …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:19 PM
1

What exactly is sad about the need to discuss a serious topic so we don't err in our judgment?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:09 PM
6

Wikipedia isnt a great place for politically charged data. You have to ask how much of that data is derived from falsely designed feminist studies. Furthermore, they hedge the numbers with 'confirmed'. What does confirmed mean? What is the veracity?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:59 PM
1

gotem
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:58 PM
1

Let me correct myself on that I'm not saying that it doesn't happen I'm saying it isn't as likely to happen and more so if it does it's not as bad as when a grown woman is raping a 14 year old if it's bad at all. But you admit that 15 year olds are raping each other, yes? After all, there is a lack of capability to consent present in both instances.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:54 PM
-1

are you suggesting this wouldnt be rape in europe?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:52 PM
30

After all, no innocent man would kill themselves. No true scotsman.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:50 PM
-2

I've reported you for targeted harassment.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:48 PM
1

So where do you draw the line? If you say a child can consent, can a child consent to someone 16? 17? 18? 20? 40?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:47 PM
25

Source it or its fake news
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:44 PM
1

We're already on r/feminism because look at all the shit flinging and accusations and hatred by people wishing to make a claim rather than have a discussion. Its 100% cathy newman in here and the irony is that while most of these people were cheering peterson for showing how intellectually derelict an ideologue is, they play the exact same game here.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:41 PM
2

In my opinion the main issue here should be the relation between them - student x teacher (similar to subordinate x boss). That is the most important part of the issue.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:38 PM
0

well she will get it if she gets pregnant.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:37 PM
1

its very clear you think children can consent to sex, even when the law says they can't. You're not making your arguments coherent other than that. age of consent is age of adulthood. That's incorrect. Age of adulthood is set at 18, and consent is typically around 16. And your cited article is the exception not the law. No, that article showed how minors can abuse other minors sexually, in supposed 'consenting' activities.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:33 PM
55

Have you seen the kind of defense people pull if anyone says anything negative to a female online? There's essentially a text or voice dogpile on the offender for 'treating a girl badly'. That tells us the majority actually steps in to stop it when it happens to females.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:32 PM
1

I honestly think you are not getting the argument because your an Intel and your mad at women. Im mad at women which is why I dont understand how a minor can consent to sex? That makes zero sense. However most children can not manipulate or be in a power position over another kid. Thats incorrect. https://rewire.news/article/2013/10/09/new-study-finds-alarming-rate-of-sexual-coercion-among-teens-young-adults/ As an adult your matured and thus understand those things. However a child doesnt and i…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:27 PM
0

Describe how two minors can have consensual sex when neither one can consent.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:18 PM
0

But minors cannot consent to sex. How do you deal with that?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:17 PM
85

So this guy claims false accusations were not real, and now he's claiming they are real because he's the one targeted by them. Talk about self-serving. It is proper, also, to question the very foundation of the accusation’s weight; whether asking another adult to sleep with you, if it even happened, is harassment. yep, that's exactly it. Asking anyone to sleep with you is sexual harassment if its an unwanted question.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:02 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality_throughout_the_Life_Span Im not convinced by your argument. They do know morals.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:43 PM
1

I haven't defended anything yet.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:05 PM
0

Two minors having consensual sex is not exploitative. How do you know that? Are you suggesting they can't exploit their own peers? Are you suggesting that they're not manipulated by peer pressure? After all, if they are as vulnerable to manipulation as you suggest, then clearly they could be victims of their 'boyfriends' or 'girlfriends' who are the same age.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:36 PM
1

Im not projecting anything. You made very specific statements that could be read as you approve of coercion as long as people are the same age. Just as you read my statements as if they approve of rape, according to you. It seems you don't like being treated the same way that you're treating others in this discussion. Coercion is rape, in the vast majority of cases (except for extreme edge cases like your "I love you" example). Coercion is rape. I was just trying to make the point that age can b…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:31 PM
1

I, too, enjoy Cathy newman and the vice interviews. Why do you feel it necessary to lie?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:23 PM
0

You're making the implicit claim that minors cannot exploit minors
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:21 PM
1

For suggesting holding someone accountable?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:17 PM
2

How can that many people find this amusing enough to like? Its not even funny.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:57 AM
0

Yep, exactly like that. If someone uses their age to coerce a younger person into intercourse, that's rape. Key word: coerce. As well as that, there's the fact that it's a teacher, which gives additional authority. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/10/08/230428115/many-teens-admit-to-coercing-others-into-sex Then this kind of coercion is not rape? If two people are 20 and one coerces the other, its not rape? If someone uses their age to coerce a younger person into intercourse, that…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:50 AM
-1

Actually, it is up for discussion. If we suggest that someone having sex with an older person is being raped, they must logically be raped if they're enticed into sex wirth someone close to their own age as well.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:47 AM
0

But that's blackmail. blackmail isn't blackmail when it isn't used to apply pressure. Age-related power dynamics. just like 18 and 40 Age-related power dynamics, and general development of the student's own authority. What constitutes student authority?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:37 AM
0

the mere fact of being a teacher constitutes abuse of power Why? A 15-16 year old is more questionable. With a 17 or more year old, it'd be fairly difficult to use the teacher's status to coerce them so usually blackmail would be involved. Why? Why? And, Why would blackmail be 'usually' involved with a willing participant? However, in high schools teachers generally have far less authority over students than middle schools Untrue.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:29 AM
0

The fact that it's a 30 year old teacher abusing their position of power to have intercourse with a 14 year old student. What if its a 20 year old teacher and a 17 year old student? is it still an abuse of power? What constitutes an abuse of power? The mere fact of being a teacher, or of intentionally attempting blackmail such as threatening bad grades?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:24 AM
0

We're not actually back to square one. You could explain what makes it rape in your opinion.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:19 AM
-1

Laughable. I ask for reasoned arguments proving the case here, and people start making accusations.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:18 AM
0

Well, since you've admitted that it is regardless of law, you're finally making a personal argument to which many countries to not agree.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:16 AM
2

shani is love. shani is life.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:16 AM
0

Well, since you've admitted that it is regardless of law, you're finally making a personal argument to which many countries to not agree.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:15 AM
-1

Why don't you act like a man and say what you really want to say, coward?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:10 AM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/94lg3u/smh/e3n1mpv/ Right here. Don't you pay attention to yourself?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:07 AM
2

Its true. Every time you smile at them it just boosts their ego but also gives them something to bitch about, which is more humble bragging for more ego boosting.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:05 AM
0

Then you've denied your own previous argument, that being what is illegal makes something true.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:04 AM
1

No it wasn't. It really wasn't.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:02 AM
1

Sure, I do agree with the rest of what they were saying, but that one comment does not indicate that. It only indicates support of that one statement. you admit that you do agree with the rest, which is what I'd surmised from your comments, because you wouldnt have parroted them if you didn't agree. Its not that complicated to understand. But the point is that Im still not impressed by your lack of arguments.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:56 AM
0

So you admit that its not a question of actual intent, harm, etc, but a question of laws? Do laws make something true?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:54 AM
-1

The problem is you're using Loaded Language to suggest that one is implicitly okay and the other is implicitly not okay, then you're claiming that because a person is suggesting that both should be seen as not okay and not just one, that person is 'arguing for pedophilia'. If they can't consent, then those who are using them are harming them. try again.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:53 AM
0

Thats not true in Germany.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:52 AM
-1

They are equivalent in that in both instances, the recipient of sex acts is unable to consent. Yet you're going to allow one and disallow the other, suggesting you are not interested in protecting individuals from harmful acts.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:48 AM
1

No, seriously, dude. I think you need help. That is implicit support. Im sorry if you can't understand that.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:48 AM
0

you are prefacing your argument on an underlying assumption, that the first is 'experimenting', and the second is 'taking advantage'. That's not how a good argument works.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:42 AM
0

Still not an argument.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:28 AM
2

Are 18 year olds less mature than 40 year olds? Why can't you answer that?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:27 AM
-1

Im asking you for an argument to support your position. Instead you're making ad hominems. try again when you have an argument.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:21 AM
2

Are 18 year olds Not less mature than 40 year olds? what the heck is your point?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:20 AM
1

I don't know. I think he thinks parroting the common belief will make him safe.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:20 AM
-1

That's not the relevant point. The relevant point is that he should feel the same way if he had a teenager who gets a blowjob from another teenager. Because in either case his child could not consent.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:19 AM
-5

Im not defending rape or pedophilia at all.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 05:01 AM
-1

You're ad homing.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 05:00 AM
0

yes, we both agree that anyone who commits rape should be fired from teaching (if not at the very least put in prison). Who are you arguing against?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:56 AM
1

That isn't an argument.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:49 AM
-10

you're making a strawman allegation.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:43 AM
-4

The person who incited the indecent act. There's always a primary aggressor. For instance, if we had an 8 year old and 14 year old, we'd clearly point to the 14 year old as a rapist/primary aggressor. Thus we can recognize that a 14 year old is capable of inciting a child to indecent acts and thus being a victimizer of the person who 'consented' in response to sexual demands.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:43 AM
2

Incorrect. One can be charged as inciting another child to indecent acts.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:41 AM
0

No it’s not rape for a 14 year old to blow another, at least in the eyes of the general public. Its still rape by law in most places. Even the UK. Reason for this is because they are both adolescent and unable to make the best decisions. Adolescence is notable for having hormones and lack of maturity that make us do stupid things. A 14 year old convincing other teens to do drugs or steal is considered to be motivating others and is guilty. A 14 year old who uses a knife to commit rape or murder …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:37 AM
8

There's a lot of possibilities. She tells him she'll have a threesome, pretends to get down there, bites it off. She has sex with him a few days later, bites it off in revenge. Etc.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:21 AM
1

They can consent to each other as neither has more power or knowledge. Nope. They cant, because the law says they cant'. And again, 18 and 40 has disparate knowledge and power.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:18 AM
4

ts;du.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:54 AM
0

Okay I never presented a law, I was saying that it is rape when one has more power over the other due to age and position/job. Alright, is it rape for a poor 18 year old to have sex with a rich 40 year old who's a politician? No because they are BOTH old enough to consent. Okay, NOW we're talking bout law. So you do agree that one 14 year old is molesting the other? They could be, it depends on if they both consent Bzzt. Neither can consent as a 'consentee', as in, a person who 'assents' to a be…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:47 AM
8

Not every allegation is true. Want to keep batting this ball around?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:41 AM
5

evidence Well, this woman is just like that mattress 'girl' (lets fcall her woman she,s an adult). Its possible both of them were raped and then were asking for more sex because rape victims sometimes behave in weird, contradictory ways, according to feminist research, such as wanting to have sex with their rapist again. Its also possible they're liars.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:41 AM
-1

There have been sub posts in recent threads which treat male and female sexual behavior as completely identical. These SAME people then try to use an argument of "what if it was your daughter (instead of son)". That's how they are recognized
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:37 AM
-1

You didnt support your premise either.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:34 AM
5

The majority of 'sane' women know, that today's feminism is bogus. The problem is, they are more than happy to continue exploiting the benevolence of men. Either be actively discriminating in your conduct or just GYOW. Tranquillity cannot wait! It seems like its at least 1 in 10 who are wholly into toxic feminism when I meet people. Then again, I do live in a terribly socialist state.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:33 AM
11

By biting down, I assume?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:32 AM
22

All of her posts read like a troll. How can someone repeatedly make jokes about killing more men?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:31 AM
-1

I was saying that it is rape when one has more power over the other due to age and position/job. Alright, is it rape for a poor 18 year old to have sex with a rich 40 year old who's a politician? Is it rape for an 18 year old to have sex with a 40 year old police officer? How about their 40 year old boss? All of those have age/position imbalances as well.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:28 AM
1

They could be, it depends on if they both consent But neither can consent, by law. You're now denying the law which you were supporting previously.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:22 AM
0

It’s different if a 30 year old molests a 14 year old So you do agree that one 14 year old is molesting the other?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:17 AM
-1

That's a specious argument: "im X therefore I know". Tabula rasa means blank slate, as in "genetics dont matter, people are empty vessels", which is ANTI-biology, just as "genders are social constructs and a boy can be made to play like a girl if he isn't programmed socially" is also ANTI-biology.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:16 AM
-3

if you're an MRA, and you've argued about whether having a beer or two constitutes a woman being raped, and you get called a rape apologist for questioning it, and then you subsequently come here and do the same thing, you're a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:14 AM
-34

14 year olds who rape by threat of knife are treated as criminals. Clearly, we can consider a 14 year old a rapist. So why is it not rape if its a 14 year old having sex with another 14 year old? In many states, it actually IS rape if this happens because the states have no R&J law. Also because the law defines what she did as rape. As above, that therefore means you agree with the law claiming 14 on 14 is rape, in states where there is no R&J exception. IF you disagree, you're implicitly saying…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:11 AM
-82

Im still not impressed.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:06 AM
0

I am saying that, because you are trying to argue that it is okay for an adult teacher to have sex with a 14 year old kid. No, I'm trying to find a reasonable argument from you as why its bad. The parent comment was saying that 14 year olds used to have sex with adults all the time, I was saying that there were many things that happened back then that were horrible. Also, again, fuck you. Your replies throughout this post are disgusting. Yes, and the implied claim is "we did bad things in the pa…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:01 AM
-3

One is completely normal and happens to most 14 year olds, Argument by nature fallacy vis a vis "its completely normal". Completely normal or accepted socially does not make something right. Lol I can't tell if you're a troll or no Beginning with a poison the well/ad hominem is the first sign of a bad faith argument. the other is a person in a position of power that can manipulate the other into doing things that they might not normally want to do, since they are either intimidated by the positi…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:58 AM
-1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_manipulation Psychological manipulation is a type of social influence that aims to change the behavior or perception of others through abusive, deceptive, or underhanded tactics. If none of this is happening, then there is no manipulative behavior going on. Unless you disagree with what constitutes manipulative. If you want to make a claim of what is manipulative which extends beyond this 'normal' definition, we can go from there. Semantics okay seems …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:45 AM
-6

None of this is a counterargument. It actually reads like a young teenager's vitriol. Why do you feel any differently to a 30 year old woman who abuses your child vs a 14 year old?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:45 AM
-16

pedophilia is a desire for prepubescent children. Not for adolescents. The APA which guides all definition and mental disorders claims that pedophilia is abnormal, but attraction to adolescents is normative. I've also noted how you didnt answer my question, at all. Is it rape for one 14 year old to blow another? If not, why not? What makes it rape when she's older? It seems like you CANT answer the question.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:35 AM
1

Also, fuck you. There's no reason to act like that. Your argument was bad. That's all. I don't think an adult should be having sex with someone who is still in high school. But its possible in most of the world and most of the U.S. If you feel strongly about that, you should be protesting it. My argument was that there were many bad things that we did back then that we don't do now. No, your argument was that many things we used to do were bad, so what you're talking about now, being something t…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:35 AM
1

I dont really get how this is related to sex at all.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:31 AM
1

I dont really get how this is related to sex at all.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:30 AM
1

Compared to adults, children are mentally underdeveloped but they certainly can manipulate adults with tears and lies. The majority of cognitive development is done by 12-13 years old. The brain doesnt finish developing until the 40's. The neural density of the brain is similar at 40 as at 2 years old.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:28 AM
-58

Found the person who doesn't understand the english language nor how to make arguments without ad hominems.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:26 AM
0

The teacher has years of maturity not to mention authority over the student. The reason you can date in the office So you could technically date an 18 year old as a 40 year old in the office, and potentially as a boss, and despite authority and 'years of maturity' that's cool.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:26 AM
-1

Blank slates means no genetic influence. Social construction of gender is a tabula rasa argument.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:25 AM
-2

When you are 14 you have not fully developed physically or mentally. Maybe during early human times people had sex at 14 years old, but also during early human times people owned slaves, people raped each other all the time, bestiality and pedophilia were common. Should we allow those things to happen also? We are not living in a time where the life expectancy of a human is 20 years old. We are not living in pre-historic times. We are living in a modern society where kids should not be having se…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:22 AM
0

You might enjoy it in the moment, but you would almost certainly be worse from it. Your first few sexual encounters will shape your sexuality a lot later in your life, and a sexual encounter with an adult when you are very young would fuck up brain in so many different ways. How are you making this claim without any data? What makes it different from sex with someone who is also 14? Why doesnt THAT sex 'fuck up your brain'? You're making arguments based on nothing. At least provide reasoning.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:19 AM
1

I was a teen, too, and of course I fantasized about teachers. The problem is that like I said earlier, it won't be like a fantasy. You may not want to stay behind and fool around, but you will. Okay lets break down your argument. Its a fantasy. Do you also fantasize about peers as a teen as well as teachers? If your fantasy coming to fruition is bad, then both would be, right? In fact, neither will be like a fantasy. You may want to call it off, but she won't let you. If you do, your b turns to …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:15 AM
-5

It means blank slate as in "boys and girls are equal".
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:13 AM
-164

Is it rape for one 14 year old to blow another? If not, why not? What makes it rape when she's older? Im really amused at the level of Cathy Newman/Vice in here. I asked you to explain why a 14 year old wouldnt be a victim of another 14 year old, a question is getting accusations.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:10 AM
1

Its in his lectures you can easily find it by looking for a lecture on intelligence or IQ mirrored from his main. Its not his field of expertise, but he's talking about others' work. All that is considered multiple intelligences either falls into general IQ or personality traits.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 06:23 PM
1

In '83 Gardner proposed his theory of multiple intelligences. In some of these areas women are indeed "smarter" than men, in others not. That is just how we are created. Those multiple intelligences have been casually dismissed by Jordan Peterson.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:49 PM
12

Women are smarter. They've managed to maintain their position of 'oppressed group' up to 2018 in the most free places in the world, get everyone to believe them whenever they make claims of male impropriety, etc. That takes a lot of smarts, and a lot of stupidity on the male side to play along.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:46 PM
1

Well, pedant, you buy your weed by the ounce. It just happens that you do it by buying multiple ounces, but the measurement is still "BY THE OUNCE".
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:23 PM
1

Mother jailed. Face blurred. LOL. Apparently criminals are victims.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:16 PM
2

"raped"
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:52 PM
2

people not using imperial measurements? There's more than MURICA out there...
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:50 PM
2

Not even a rapist?
/r/MensRights03/08/18 05:04 AM
1

At some point the person should be able to identify the power imbalance, at some point they have to have agency in regards to this and what they want to do with their own life. Why do we have a legislation against power imbalance in key areas like teacher/student but we haven't done it for high IQ/low IQ though? What about people who have damaged Prefrontal Cortexes and are basically on the level of a teenager in their 30's, from cocaine/alcohol/head trauma or whatever? Where's the protection fo…
/r/MensRights03/08/18 12:29 AM
1

There's no such thing as a fuzzy scenario. Just a scenario which hasn't been adequately explained and explored.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 12:19 AM
1

That's what they actually want. Did you see Bret Weinstein and the school president/child boo fiasco? They cheered because they bullied a president to put his hands down. The more you give, the more they'll want. People who do this want to FIGHT, not to actually have both sides come to an agreement. Not listening would be shutting down that behavior, and western women WANT men to not listen, to have their own opinions, and be willing to argue. When they say "shut up and listen", this is a tactic…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 11:55 PM
1

If you like arranged marriages so much, go ahead and have one. But other people should have the right to decide for themselves, and not have the decision made for them. If I could have an arranged marriage of my own will, then it'd be normal marriage and not arranged. Silly boy.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 11:52 PM
7

The root of the reply guy phenomenon, Marcotte and Wade both said, seems to be a misplaced sense of entitlement to women’s time that is far from limited to the internet. LMFAO. See, when women talk, you shouldn't respond. When they want to speak, you should listen and then walk off. Having a conversation with a woman is 'entitlement'.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:05 AM
1

Studies have shown that arranged marriage often have equal or sometimes higher rates of 'actual love' between the parties as it develops from a consequence of acceptance of each other and their lot in life. In contrast, in the west, the grass is ALWAYS greener on the other side, and there's incentives to climb the cock hierarchy for women, hence majority of divorces in the west being women driven. Apparently their love didn't last long enough.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:02 AM
2

Thank you for proving all my points. "something is has a law, therefore the law makes it factual". Like how blacks used to be property, therefore the law made blacks factually property? "Quit normalizing rape". I called the "rape apologist" defenders.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:54 AM
2

Do they have the life experience to not be influenced by someone who is "cool" (older) has a car, possibly an income and more sexual experience? Enter the movie trope of "sexy hot high school jock with expensive car slays pussy of vulnerable teenage girls left and right and then dumps them after and calls them sluts". The issue I have with this particular retard rodeo is that if its 40 and 18 having sex, people will go "you sick fuck, 18 years are basically still children, you're an adult" If it…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:54 AM
-3

It doesnt work if you're using a strawman in your take of piss. Why would you want to take someone's piss anyway? Kinky,.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:42 AM
1

This is true. So you need to sub to all controversial subs, that makes you a member. step 2 is to post some asinine responses now and then, rapid fire, like taking a shit. step 3 is to then be 'legitimately' able to make posts and votes on issues like this when it comes up by 'coming through your sub feed' rather and a crosspost link. Now you cant be accused of brigading.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:27 AM
1

wow, im amazed you havent been downvote brigaded for suggesting an adult having sex with a child is okay.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:21 AM
1

What are you talking about? I was agreeing with you, assuming that kid had an orgasm There's an unspoken claim in your argument which is "both are victims of rape".
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:20 AM
5

No. I said ‘why does this outrage you’ and you haven’t really answered, just accused me of a bunch of weird shit. this case is not as outrageous as forceful, horrible, bloody rape. It seems like we don’t know enough about specifics here, but we do know both of these people are basically children. 19 and 13 at the time of the crime. Children do stupid things. Should a 19yr old girl know better? Of course. But generally speaking, women in these situations often see the relationship as based on lov…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:18 AM
2

Ooh, ooh, I know this one! It means that maidens used to be able to claim rape without having to prove use of force back in 1200 ad, like older women had to do, and that feminists of the 1800's then demanded age of consent to rise to prevent prostitution (even though they could've made a law simply against prostitution for teens itself), and they wanted to unilaterally punish males of all ages, such as teen males, for sex with teen females, and they actually wanted to push the age of consent to …
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:15 AM
-3

Bigotry? Is immigrant a race now?
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:53 PM
4

"but did she want it"? Most people, rightly, consider rape a forced, unwanted effect.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:44 PM
1

Yeah dude, having sex with a 13 year old is totally a rational thought. It was apparently rational up to 120 years ago, and it is still rational to people in utah and the middle east.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:41 PM
2

What turned you against feminism? Reality.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 03:44 AM
0

It was normal until 120 years ago. Its still normal and much, much worse, in the muslim world of 2018. You know Those Utah freaks who are mormon practice 'common wives' with 12 year olds', and we're importing muslims who believe in the Koran as strictly literal, meaning "its okay to marry/bang 9 year olds". Also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaQ8CNLE1bk
/r/MensRights01/08/18 03:33 AM
5

Lol. Thank you for ignoring common sense, rationality, evidence, and self-thought.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 02:15 AM
3

Most women do not want to be GBTP by random 'losers'. But they DO want to be GBTP by a high status, highly desirable male. What? That's not close to the same thing. Are you admitting your argument was terrible? Things that sound one way actually are totally different.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 02:13 AM
3

And a woman going "oh god it hurts" sounds like she's being attacked when she's getting consensual anal.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 01:34 AM
0

Just because you stab someone doesnt mean you intend to murder them dead. You might just want them to suffer. Most people aren't going "okay Im going to aim for his liver to try to get him to bleed out" when they stab someone in rage.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 01:06 AM
2

Well if you're coy about exposing your dick to everyone in the vicinity.. however if that's your thing, have fun putting out fires with your piss.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 01:03 AM
1

Politicians are really whores of the common man in a democracy, because they get power by pandering. Are politicians really to blame or is it society in general?
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:57 AM
4

Im suggesting that life is complex and few people know it all, that we shouldnt listen to left-leaning politics coming from actors and actresses because they've spent their life honing a craft rather than delving deeply into philosophical theory of politics as well as current evernts, and that there's a phrase "because I have become extremely good or well versed in one thing, i remain a dunce in other things", is a typical human condition. Most people call it pedophilia for an 'adult' male to fu…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:03 AM
1

Maybe they're compatible anyway since mental development isn't necessarily correlated with physical development, Uh, what? Is the brain a magical metaphysical 'soul organ' now which does not correspond to genetic and environmental influence by growing just as the body does? But the first one just says girls mature mentally and physically earlier, and the second one says that people regardless of gender, age at different rates, and there was no correlation with which gender had higher biological …
/r/MensRights31/07/18 11:41 PM
1

logically, it may be one explanation for the findings of the former if the latter holds true.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 11:22 PM
1

You literally have no counterarguments, just ad homs and poisoning the well attempts.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 11:21 PM
1

Because it is common for two thirteen year olds to experiment consensually. If something is common, does that thus make it right? If something is uncommon, does it thus make it wrong? Is that really the logic you want to describe while calling others pea-brains? Slavery was common prior to the 1800's. Why was it wrong in spite of being common? Your argument is ad populum. We're not talking about that. we actually were talking about the seeming inconsistency of the article calling it a 'relations…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 11:06 PM
1

Did I say something incorrect? This sub would call it a relationship if it was two 13 year olds, despite neither of them being able to consent in any legal sense.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:52 PM
6

you're making an interpretation based on your ideologies and desire to vilify individuals. You aren't making a fact based conclusion.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter