TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Win an argument with a feminist

Brainusingmgtow

February 10, 2018
8 upvotes
/r/MensRights

Next time a feminist goes on a man hating rant trying to label all men as evil and all women as victims, respond with this list of links:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh1Qq3FRwFc

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ye-ObWVKB-s

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=akFasPoWdKo

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8r7mSIpTOgw

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sa2tX5u8YPI

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=61iwVTH74TE

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PYbtnCmf4ZY

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qdfc6P26Yxw

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-6B_s-xVpyw

It can be made far longer by adding related videos, the list goes on and on.

Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Win an argument with a feminist
Author

Brainusingmgtow

Upvotes 8
Comments 13
Date February 10, 2018 3:50 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7wj43w/win_an_argument_with_a_feminist/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/win-an-argument-with-a-feminist.1179565
https://theredarchive.com/post/1179565
Red Pill terms in post
feminismfeminist
Top posts by Brainusingmgtow

Trump adresses the false allegations crisis

15 upvotes
February 11, 2018
/r/MGTOW

#hertoo / #shetoo

11 upvotes
February 10, 2018
/r/MGTOW

#youtoo part 2 (new channel/ movement)

4 upvotes
January 26, 2018
/r/MGTOW

#youtoo

2 upvotes
January 25, 2018
/r/MGTOW

#youtoo

0 upvotes
February 1, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]superzepto 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I prefer to use statistics and peer-reviewed research. Using YouTube links to win an argument puts one far too close to the conspiracy theorist camp.

[–]Brainusingmgtow[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

How does this not win the argument? If they are on a rant where they are generalizing all males automatically into the category of offender and females into the category of victims, these videos instantly disprove that claim. How can they argue with it? they are then left with no choice but to acknowledge the female offenders and male victims, making it impossible to hold the feminist narritive without clearly showing it does not support equality.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You are fighting a straw man. That is not the feminist narrative.

Feminists acknowledge female offenders.
Feminists acknowledge male victims.

There are arguments to be had about the relative numbers, and the relative amount of damage, and how it is reported, and in police investigations and arrests and charging and plea bargaining, and in conviction and sentencing, and treatment available to victims, and how they are regarded by society.

If you set out into the world waving your facts like a sword and trying to "win" arguments, the smart people will mostly just step behind a tree while you gallop past. Your days will be filled with disappointment that the brains of the opponents you can engage with do not explode, despite thorough dosing with your awesome arguments.

[–]hixidom 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They will just say that those are women with exceptional male tendencies...or some such BS.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

You have achieved nothing. Nine videos, ninety videos - so what?

Would nine hundred videos count for something? I don't know, do the math and get back to me.

Wait, I'll do it for you. Nine hundred cases of women doing bad sexual stuff since 2000 say. That is 50 cases per year. One per US state per year. In other words, 900 videos since 2000 would suggest women do ALMOST EXACTLY ZERO sex crimes. So close to zero that the difference does not matter.

Here is something to consider: The kind of people who would be interested in sitting through a bunch of un-labelled links to videos of unknown length allegedly related to something they don't agree with, are not worth addressing in the first place.

And the vast majority of people who see your post will just move on. A few will open the first one as I did, and think "huh, so what?"

Next time a feminist goes on a man hating rant trying to label all men as evil and all women as victims

If you think this is happening to you, either you have extremely poor taste in feminists (the silliest ones are found on Tumblr, if that is your obsession), or your comprehension is getting derailed by overwhelming emotions. Getting control of your emotions would be more productive than trying to pile up evidence of a point which feminists do not argue.

Women do sex crimes too. It isn't news, and if it was then a collection of news clips is exactly the wrong way to demonstrate it because women are extremely rare in sex crime convictions, they get filtered out at every step. Scientists try to determine how common they are by sampling the whole population. It is tricky to do, so put some time aside if you want to learn about it.

[–]Brainusingmgtow[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I think you're missing the point, it's just a statement which shows that some women are far worse than the average man, it's not a gender thing its an individual thing and stats on anything are unreliable and easily distorted if its a stat the media doesn't like the look of, not to mention how exactly would they know how often a female commits an offence? What is there to do that is more productive?

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

If you can find people who really believe there are no women much worse than the average man, that would be impressive. For you to expend energy on changing their mind is even more impressive. For those rather special people I imagine a bunch of video clips might be an excellent method.

Fools say you can prove anything with statistics.
People who know both statistics and fools say you can prove anything to a fool with statistics.

It isn't true though. A fool might quote some stupid inappropriate statistic as "ABSOLUTE PROOF". But you can not prove something to a fool that he does not want to believe, so it was never proof in the first place.
You can prove an unpalatable fact to a clever person with statistics however, if your statistics are solid.

The female sex offence prevalence can only be measured by victim surveys which sample the whole population. Since the behaviour is rare a large (i.e. expensive) sample size is needed e.g. 8000 of each sex. They are only run every 5 years or so because it is so expensive to do a high quality survey of that size. A low quality survey is worthless for a delicate subject like sex crimes.

[–]Brainusingmgtow[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Can you explain to me how the statistics matter to anything at all? They would only matter if men were 100% offenders and women were 0%, this is clearly not the case. People need to judge on the individual not by the gender / race , that is my message and that is why I oppose feminism .

[–]Brainusingmgtow[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And I'm mgtow cos I'm happy with porn and women are too likely to be problems. I still support their rights, but only when they support my rights. When male victims are ignored through media filtering that is destruction of my rights.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Feminists didn't invent statistics! Try Wikipedia for an intro to statistical reasoning.

[–]Brainusingmgtow[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A statistic is never reliable even if its not invented, as in the takers of the tests can lie and just because in one area the stats turn out one way, does not mean they're the same elsewhere, even if they literally took everyone into a worldwide survey, and every single person tells the truth, the stats really don't matter because it's down to the individual, not a generalization.

[–]Brainusingmgtow[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

They do in India, they only record female victims

[–]Brainusingmgtow[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Also these are far from the only points I make, I've done hours on youtube

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter