Thoughts regarding this article?

iainmf · 2020-11-04T22:57:53+00:00

Your post was removed due to rule 14, titles must be descriptive.

Titles must describe the content so that:

Users know what the link they are clicking on content before they click it
Users who are searching for specific material can easily find the post they are looking for

Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people.

When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are any words you can cut out without losing any important information.

It's a good idea to pause for a few moments before hitting the "Post" button. Check for typos, ambiguous phrasing, redundant words - and of course for unintended meanings!

darkbluexanadu · 2020-11-04T17:57:11+00:00

Its not even a mens rights issue. Just another badly written article based on a badly conducted survey.

EvilLothar · 2020-11-04T17:45:43+00:00

How about a summery, or an opinion... or even an archive link so I don't have to give clicks to the shit NYPost...

Jesus this was like the lowest fucking quality post ever. No attempt to even try to start a conversation. No effort to do anything.

"Here's this thing I may or may not have looked at, that may or may not have anything at all to do with Men's Rights... what do you think?"

2020-11-04T20:17:44+00:00

This is strange because i remember the opposite:

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/men-more-susceptible-to-serious-covid-19-illnesses

i think that the article from the New York Post isn't really complete..

trash62 · 2020-11-04T20:24:53+00:00

I liked their clever use of JavaScript pop ups which served to frustrate the reader and prevent them from concentrating on the writing so much that the low quality of the article was barely even noticeable.

By mixing the advertisements in like that, the reader is required to dedicate a substantial amount of attention to separating advertising from content, this preventing them from actually processing any of it.

The number of readers who inadvertently clicked those links was probably profitable, and the divisive click bait headline defining how, once again women are superior to men is sure to draw in a nice profitable crowd.

As to the validity of the concept? What a surprise. Women believe the state sponsored messages more than men.

Why would it be any surprise women take state sponsored fear messages more seriously? Hasn't this already been demonstrated with the fear all men message?

NotherThrowaway284 · 2020-11-04T23:02:05+00:00

https://archive.fo/TjpmM

So along with higher levels of neurotic behavior and agreeability (rule-following, in other words), women also have higher levels of hypochondria and general fastidiousness? Makes sense to me...

Title	Thoughts regarding this article?
Author	Super_Ultra_5031
Upvotes	1
Comments	7
Date	November 4, 2020 5:03 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/jo0dse/thoughts_regarding_this_article/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/thoughts-regarding-this-article.1193919 https://theredarchive.com/post/1193919

Comments