TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Petition the FBI to add "forced to penetrate" to the definition of rape

antilopes

July 29, 2019
73 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.change.org/p/department-of-justice-petition-the-fbi-to-add-forced-to-penetrate-to-the-definition-of-rape
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Petition the FBI to add "forced to penetrate" to the definition of rape
Author

antilopes

Upvotes 73
Comments 14
Date July 29, 2019 12:41 AM UTC
(6 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cj3xqm/petition_the_fbi_to_add_forced_to_penetrate_to/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/petition-the-fbi-to-add-forced-to-penetrate-to-the.1205196
https://theredarchive.com/post/1205196
Top posts by antilopes

UK secretly reverts rape conviction target back toward the old 50%, culling weak cases.

61 upvotes
September 25, 2018
/r/MensRights

US military has equal 10k sexual assaults per sex per year

28 upvotes
September 12, 2019
/r/MensRights

Feminist legal scholars support DeVoss's new campus sexual assault policies.

24 upvotes
June 25, 2020
/r/MensRights

Incel far-right extremist wages war on yoga pants, kills 2 in Talahassee

7 upvotes
November 4, 2018
/r/MensRights

Australian conviction of a top Catholic cardinal can not be reported there yet because of another pending case. (WaPo archive)

2 upvotes
December 13, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]rofl1969 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

Hey doesn't the CDC or the crime bureau already classify forced to penetrate as rape? Why does the FBi have a different definition?

Edit :

You're right, they don't. Sign the petition folks

[–]Tamen_ 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It's actually the other way around. CDC does not categorize "made to penetrate" as rape. FBI has stated as response to direct questions that "made to penetrate" would fall under the FBI definition of rape.

[–]chadwickofwv 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

FBI has stated as response to direct questions that "made to penetrate" would fall under the FBI definition of rape.

What they say means absolutely nothing. The only thing that matters here is the actual legal definition, which does not include made to penetrate.

[–]Tamen_ 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

FBI’s definition of rape is not a legal definition in the sense that it is used in any laws. It’s a definition used for collating crime reports from law enforcement agencies across all US states. The legal definition of rape is defined in state laws and they differ. Currently most states would at least by letter include made to penetrate as rape. A number of states does not use rape as a legal term anymore, but have opted for using sexual assault of different degrees. Many of those definition of sexual assaults which involves penetration would include made to penetrate. Rain.org has a section on their website where you can look up how rape/sexual assault is defined in any state.

[–]rofl1969 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/sv_surveillance_definitionsl-2009-a.pdf

I got the gist from this CDC document that they had added made to penetrate as part of the definition of sexual violence back in 2009. But they also don't actually use the word rape in this document unless they're discussing rape crisis centres. Otherwise they use "sexual violence" which includes made to penetrate.

Just wanted to point this out so people know that male victims are not officially supposed to be ignored by the system according to these definitions? (but of course the ignoring of male victims by female perpetrators is definitely a problem.)

[–]Allesanderealsnormal 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Except that they define rape as being forcefully penetrated.

​

https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/2015data-brief508.pdf

[–]rofl1969 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that's really fucking unfortunate

[–]antilopes[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The CDC is concerned with health, but the FBI is only about crime.

The majority of severe trauma is not a crime, and little of what is criminal ever is reported to police.
FBI statistics are collated from police, they do not do their own surveys. (FBI suggests its definition to police, but each of the hundreds or thousands of police departments do their own thing for definitions).

So it would be surprising if the CDC found the FBI definition or measurement methods suitable for health purposes.

[–]antilopes[S] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know whether this petition is realistic but it can't hurt to raise it as a public issue.
The petitioner's single bizarre example is a poor argument but the petition is there so it might as well get used.

The FBI definition is used in its UCR (Uniform Crime Reporting) and other more detailed reporting system(s). These collate data from the huge mess of different police internal systems, which vary not just by state but by county sometimes.

The FBI has no budget or power to make police departments follow its reporting categories, it just presents the categories and police data is mushed into the category that it fits best. In some cases the fit is so bad no data is entered, this happens with F>M rape in at least some states I think. So it might be the bulk of police reporting systems (and the laws they reflect) which would have to change before the FBI could change, I don't know.

[–]AskingToFeminists 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

From what I remember, the FBI already declared that their definition of rape wasn't saying who had to do the penetrztion, of the victim or perpetrator, and that therefore it already included "made to penetrate".

But at the same time, they don't really want to make it clearer either.

[–]chadwickofwv 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That means nothing. They are merely avoiding the subject because they do not want it changed.

[–]antilopes[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My memory of a few years ago agrees with you, that the FBI did clarify that it was reversible. At the time I wondered if they were being deliberately vague to de-emphasise the equality of their definition, to avoid upsetting conservatives perhaps.

But a recent attempt to find a reference was unsuccessful, it seemed the owner of the penetrating bits was the only possible rapist. I'm still not really clear on this, the phrasing is ambiguous.

[–]Tamen_ 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

FBI has on several occasions replied to direct question about this and their replies has been that "made to penetrate" would fall under the FBI's definition of rape. However, FBI has not heeded calls to make this unambiguously clear in their reporting guidelines to the reporting law enforcement agencies (LEOs). More precicely the reporting LEOs report back to FBI either using NIBRS (National Incident-Based Reporting System) or using so called summary reports. Guidelines for NIBRS has a definition of rape that would include male victims of "made to penetrate". The reporting guidelines for the summary reports does not make it explicitly clear that "made to penetrate" is to be considered rape. When I looked into this in 2015 about 61,6% of LEOs reported using summary reports.

More details can be found in these old blog-posts of mine (NB! I haven't verified that all links within them still works):

https://tamenwrote.wordpress.com/2014/04/04/fbi-clarifies-definition-of-rape/

https://tamenwrote.wordpress.com/2015/05/10/an-update-on-fbis-definition-of-rape/

[–]antilopes[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for that. It is pretty weird how the FBI refuses to remove the ambiguity in their definitions, it might be there would be political blowback so they leave it as it is and hopefully educate police depts quietly by other channels. I think I have seen one of the replies you mention, it might have been in a clarification letter sent to police.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter