~ archived since 2018 ~

Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men

UnHope20

January 20, 2021

1 upvotes

/r/Male_Studies

Archived from /r/Male_Studies

r/Male_Studies is a place to post and discuss research, data or surveys about males. Anti-male content NOT allowed.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/Male_Studies archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men
Author	UnHope20
Upvotes	1
Comments	1
Date	January 20, 2021 2:14 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/Male_Studies
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/Male_Studies/comments/l0zckp/am_i_normal_a_systematic_review_and_construction/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/Male_Studies/am-i-normal-a-systematic-review-and-construction.1216513 https://theredarchive.com/post/1216513

Comments

[–]UnHope20[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Objective: To systematically review and create nomograms of flaccid and erect penile size measurements.

Methods: Study key eligibility criteria: measurement of penis size by a health professional using a standard procedure; a minimum of 50 participants per sample.

Exclusion criteria: samples with a congenital or acquired penile abnormality, previous surgery, complaint of small penis size or erectile dysfunction. Synthesis methods: calculation of a weighted mean and pooled standard deviation (SD) and simulation of 20,000 observations from the normal distribution to generate nomograms of penis size.

Results: Nomograms for flaccid pendulous [n = 10,704, mean (SD) 9.16 (1.57) cm] and stretched length [n = 14,160, mean (SD) 13.24 (1.89) cm], erect length [n = 692, mean (SD) 13.12 (1.66) cm], flaccid circumference [n = 9407, mean (SD) 9.31 (0.90) cm], and erect circumference [n = 381, mean (SD) 11.66 (1.10) cm] were constructed.

Consistent and strongest significant correlation was between flaccid stretched or erect length and height, which ranged from r = 0.2 to 0.6.