1. If foot, anal, bald head, facial hair, diaper, bdsm, and all kinds of other weird fetishes are acceptable, then so are race fetishes. SJWs claim to be so against "kink shaming", yet somehow a person's Asian eyes or BBC/BBbooty can't be included in that protection from kink shaming. Which is it? A person can change racial biases, but they can't help what gets them hard/wet. Let their kinks be unless they're harmful kinks such as pedophilia and rape.
  2. It only gets called a race fetish when someone is attracted to a non-white person. When it comes to MOC/WOC liking whites, they never call it a fetish when that's what it is most of the time. It seems like SJWs don't realize they're even more racist for claiming that being attracted to whites for their racial features is normal or somehow way better morally while being attracted to Asians or Blacks for physical reasons is problematic. Both are normal, but only one is normalized for some reason.
    I think the white SJWs who claim this subconsciously want whites to remain at the top of the race hiearachy, so they try to portray any praise POC get for their ethnic features as a fetish or defect in someone's sexuality. It's the same archaic nazi bullshit about how certain groups are subhuman and unworthy of even lust, except it's repackaged as leftist concern-bullying. Horseshoe theory?