I'm very hesitant to believe the Chris Savino allegations. as if you think about it, we don't have the full story. I checked out the original article where the claims were made, and ya know what's missing from it? Evidence. All they had were the accusers claims, and that's it. I think there's a possibility that Savino could be innocent, and because I could be wrong, I have expressed this take of mine on Reddit several times, but every time I do, instead of getting helpful insight, I get attacked and mocked, told that I never seen a victim, or that the accusers don't need evidence, yada-yada-yada.

I really can't help but feel like we're missing something. For instance, Savino was suspended, and after 2 weeks of investigating on Nickelodeon's part, they upgraded it to a firing... what happened during those 2 weeks? What did they find? What's Savino's side of the story?

Plus, from what I hear, he actually sent a DM to one of the victims, apologizing for the things he allegedly did, showing he might've been wanting to improve if given the chance. If I were in charge of Nickelodeon, and learned he was actually guilty, I'd give him the following options:

A) Lose his job

or

B) work with me to find a suitable rehabilitation program, that if he so wishes, I'll pay for out of my own pocket.

When I express any of this, like I said, I typically get attacked and mocked. Hopefully people on here are actually sane.