After Man vs Bear and Indigo policy to allow women but not men to avoid sitting near the other sex, I think we live in a Suspect Culture, in which Men are seen as "Suspect Community".
By semi-quoting a paper:
Before moral panics such as the many moments of emerging waves of feminism, violence "was framed as a problem that originates in society and that is to be solved for society as a whole, it is currently seen as a problem that originates in" men and male socialization "and which needs to be addressed by the" ‘Men's community’. "All members of that" ‘Men's community’ "are now considered as potentially ‘suspect’ when they do not openly and explicitly adhere to Western" feminist "values and take action to distance themselves from the" ‘machism enemy’. "Further societal implications of this discourse, in which the" ‘Men's community’ "is constructed as a ‘suspect community,’ are also discussed."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10611-018-9802-y
"The “suspect community” is not merely the product of legal and security apparatuses, but the product of a larger cultural apparatus or “imaginary”. It is redefined as “a community created in and by the securitised imagination and enacted in a processes of ‘othering’ through a range of security practices of counter-terrorism”. The “suspect community” is not an embodied community, but an imagined one, whose boundaries are permeable and shifting and in the eye of the beholder"
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17539153.2013.867714
[–]Admirable-Falcon9995 11 points12 points13 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ElisaSKy 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]whosiewhatsie67 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Current_Finding_4066 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ggleblanc2 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link