On a scale of 1-10 how biased do you think this article is?

CompetitiveOffer5339 · 2024-10-03T16:46:07+00:00

10, if you asked any normal human being who did research and wrote an article. They’d say girls are becoming more common, and give an actual reason besides “gIRls gOoD meN BAd”.

Capable-Mushroom99 · 2024-10-03T16:43:37+00:00

Not biased just stupid. They literally say in the article when you ask the same question you still get the same answer, but somehow the author thinks that asking a different question and getting a different answer means attitudes have changed. Also they mix up the answer to a theoretical question about a future baby and make it sound like this reflects an actual preference of a real son or daughter. When you look at actual data about what people do there is really no change; the sex ratio varies very tightly around 105 boys for every 100 girls, and people with 2 children of opposite sex are still more likely to stop having children. This reflects an actual preference for having children of both sexes but with the next most preferred choice being having boy(s).

EvelynsLair · 2024-10-03T13:14:05+00:00

Wow, looks like we're finally leveling the playing field! I guess sons can let go of that 'first in line' paranoia. A solid 7, for old times' sake!

Title	On a scale of 1-10 how biased do you think this article is?
Author	Remarkable-Rate-9688
Upvotes	25
Comments	3
Date	October 3, 2024 1:04 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1fv797v/on_a_scale_of_110_how_biased_do_you_think_this/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/on-a-scale-of-1-10-how-biased-do-you-think-this.1531956 https://theredarchive.com/post/1531956

Comments