Men slip into self-evidence certain ideas that academics call constructed and say destroy our culture (and our culture shapes who we are and how we think). Men, through their control of culture with their positions in the media, literature, the university, and art, allowed them to manipulate the people without needing to be physically present. To the point where their biases are internalized by the unthinking masses. Including women. Women as well think about themselves and the world in a culture that’s been dominated by men.

This is how the “patriarchy” is described. And this is how Heidegger described “Verjudung” or “Jewification.”

“It is woven throughout social institutions, as well as embedded within individual consciousness. This isn’t about one person being a jerk to another. This isn’t about one woman making ‘misandrist’ jokes on Twitter. This isn’t about that one time you saw a black cop pull over a white guy for seemingly no reason. This is about a cultural value that is systematic in that it exists within the very fabric of our society and is practiced (albeit often subconsciously) in the very institutions we’ve been taught to trust – you know, like the exclusive, white-cis male-written dictionary. This is about an attitude that is so deeply embedded in our minds that we act on it without thinking. This is about a force that surrounds us and influences our relationships to ourselves and others.” - Everyday Feminist

“At its most elementary level, the term 'Judaization' (or 'Jewification'- I shall use the terms interchangeably) simply reflected the belief that Jews wielded disproportionate influence and occupied (or were about to occupy) pivotal positions of inordinate economic, political, and cultural power. This was its most obvious and familiar meaning. But it often went beyond this to refer to a more subtle, deeper danger: Verjudung connoted a condition in which the 'Jewish spirit' had somehow permeated society and its key institutions, one in which Jewish Geist had seeped through the spiritual pores of the nation to penetrate and undermine the German psyche itself.” - ‘The Jew Within’: The Myth of ‘Judaization’ in Germany by Steven E. Aschheim

This is because feminism is based on the ideas of the French Heideggerians - Foucault, Derrida, and Simone de Beauvoir, primarily.

The postmodern left today has no problem at all blaming transphobia, racism, and misogyny on cultural groups, not individuals. They believe they have the right to prejudge individuals, saying they’re problematic even without being aware of it based on nothing more than that individual’s cultural and ethnic background (“Ethnicity - an ethnic group; a social group that shares a common and distinctive culture, religion, language, or the like” – dictionary.com). This is because postmodernism, the notion that individuals have “subconscious” biases as a result of their culture, that truth is culturally relative, that it differs from one group to another, the reduction of everything individuals think, say, and do to their culture via their culture’s language is a form of racism that goes back to German Romanticism (Johann Georg Hamann, Johann Gottfried Herder, and Johann Gottlieb Fichte), and it was the racism of the Romanian Iron Guard, Mussolini’s Italy, and Nazi linguists (such as Jost Trier, Leo Weisgerber, and Otto Reche).

The Nazi Heidegger expressed this culturally reductive racism using Husserl’s phenomenology, and it was then picked up by the French Heideggerian philosophers Simone de Beauvoir (a hebephile who groomed girls far younger than 18 to then sleep with another hebephile, Jean-Paul Sartre), Michel Foucault (a serial r*pist of boys aged from 8 to 10), Jean Beaufret (a Holocaust-denier), Jacques Lacan (a psychoanalyst who would physically hit his clients, pull their hair, and sleep with them), Jacques Derrida, and Paul de Man (a former Nazi collaborator).

Unfortunately, the nature of Heidegger’s Nazism was hidden until his death in 1976 and wasn’t even fully revealed until his Black Notebooks were published in 2014 - decades after Simone de Beauvoir, Derrida, Foucault, Jean Beaufret, Lacan, and Paul de Man cemented their influence in American academia and gave birth to a movement called “identity politics”. Millions of people are being indoctrinated into Heidegger’s Nazism every year in our universities.

The postmodern left (who I believe many call the “woke”), first off, believe that everything we can know is a cultural construct, even things that clearly are not (for instance, gender, loneliness, and a need for love, or the right to free expression). Secondly, they deliberately interpret cultural norms in the worst ways possible (e.g. marriage is a patriarchal institution). This is unequivocally ideological, since they are interested in finding the hidden nature of intolerance in ideas and concepts that appear to everyone else as being obvious and common sense, while they, with their elite position above the crowd, can see the true nature of things, which is to say they are “awakened” to what everyone else remains oblivious to.

Slipping ideas into self-evidence was how Heidegger felt Jews controlled things (what was called Verjudung - the Jewification of German culture), this idea that we think completely in terms created by our culture is a racist argument, and this seeing of things the average person doesn’t was Heidegger’s anti-democratic elitism – all the while, this outlook rejects the idea that individuals have the ability to think independently for themselves, which is a deeply illiberal notion. What do you call a political movement that is anti-democratic, elitist, illiberal, and racist?

If they seem like the real fascists, it’s because they are.

This is the result of 4 years of research: https://maestrofrenhofer.substack.com/p/an-expose-of-postmodernism-and-american