TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

An oldie but a goodie. : TheRedPill

Pornography_saves_li

March 11, 2014
3 upvotes
/r/RedPillWomen
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title An oldie but a goodie. : TheRedPill
Author

Pornography_saves_li

Upvotes 3
Comments 26
Date March 11, 2014 11:04 PM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/RedPillWomen
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/206ido/an_oldie_but_a_goodie_theredpill/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/RedPillWomen/an-oldie-but-a-goodie-theredpill.165228
https://theredarchive.com/post/165228
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by Pornography_saves_li

An oldie but a goodie.

47 upvotes
March 10, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Announcement and call for submissions - Red Pill Magazine

46 upvotes
March 5, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Comedy - the Red Pill connection *should* be obvious - its me, every girl ever.

44 upvotes
January 8, 2016
/r/TheRedPill

How the MRM can improve.

39 upvotes
November 2, 2017
/r/MensRights

Origins of political correctness.

22 upvotes
July 1, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Why men are told to 'man up'.

18 upvotes
September 2, 2013
/r/MensRights

A good primer on group psychology, or, how you are manipulated.

18 upvotes
September 15, 2016
/r/TheRedPill

A fine example of Red Pill thinking, outside of sexual strategy.

17 upvotes
October 3, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Excellent post. Respect has to be maintained and guarded. We have discussed the importance of being respectful of our men (both when we're in their presence and when we are away from them) on this sub in the past. Guarding against outsiders that try to get us to bad mouth our SO's is extremely important. When everyone else is trying to tear down their relationship (or undermine the integrity of yours) it's essential to speak up and set the record straight. The ladies on this sub know how important it is to speak well of their SO's to outsiders. Women love an equal playing field - when they're unhappy in their relationship (or discontent with being single) they will do everything they can to get you to commiserate and gripe alongside them.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

It's a little to churchian for us, but I'll approve it. I'm not sure what input you think you'll get, as it's preaching to the choir

You know we aren't the Christian "man up" crowd, yeah?

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

right, of course, but its not a new insight, its the ideas we are based on. but it was a good story that hit great points

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

This shows an example of the terrible hypocrisy that feminism has caused within the church.

I'm prone to preaching about religion, so I'll try to be concise. A Christian Woman is called to be bride to her bridegroom, just as the church body is supposed to be to Christ. Theologically, she is supposed to submit to her husband as a measure of her faithfulness.

Put succinctly, her devotion to her husband should be comparable to her devotion to God. The epistles are quite clear on this.

That Pam was so easily swayed is disgusting. However, the fact that the church condoned her faithlessness sickens me with moral indignation. His ostracism in spite of the fact that she continued her relationship with the bastard-sire is beyond ludicrous.

I've got a lot to say of the religious implications of the situation, but as this is an agnostic space I'll hold my tongue. Secularly, it's disappointing that feminism can erode a firm, long-standing cultural tradition of respectful reverence towards good men.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Spiritual discussions are based on premises which can't be proven. It's irrelevant to talk about spiritual points that others don't agree on, and condescending to speak as if your listeners have already accepted the dogma that is the foundation one's arguments.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

It's not disallowed, It's just irrelevant and weird to most of us. The religious language comes off alien and unnecessary--it doesn't add anything and we already agree with the nonreligious part. I read sunshine Mary and other religious blogs as well, but for the nonreligious points

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Like most MRA's, You sound just like a feminist. Feminists regularly crop up here proclaiming that we have false consciousness because we haven't been sufficiently exposed to feminism. Now you are claiming we just haven't been sufficiently exposed to religion. Atheists make up a small minority and almost no one in the US grows up simply ignorant of religion. FWIW, my undergrad degree is in religion studies concentrating in Jewish and Christian Scriptures culminating in an Independent study project translating the book of Ruth from Biblical Hebrew. To say I'm familiar with religion would be an understatement

This is a space for redpill ideas, not for feminism and not for religion either. We may intersect with some religion blogs occasionally but we aren't here to be preached religion at. I understand from your posting history that you consider yourself to be a founding member of the men's right movement and such, but that confers no status upon you here and gives you no right to try to change our tone. I would say the same thing to any feminist trying to get her nose under the tent to try to change our tone as well

[–]alphabetmod 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I understand from your posting history that you consider yourself to be a founding member of the men's right movement and such, but that confers no status upon you here and gives you no right to try to change our tone. I would say the same thing to any feminist trying to get her nose under the tent to try to change our tone as well

I knew you were for equal rights! :p

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, shrill mras and shrill feminists are equally invited to stfu on my sub. You should see his butthurt response

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Are you insane?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

As a non-Christian woman, I often notice this kind of hypocrisy in the Church(es). This post shows it fully but also shows how bad non-Christians can be too, because the same things often happen whether you're religious or not.

Here, we understand that respecting your husband and making him the happiest you can is most important. I never badmouth my SO around him or others and am careful about even "playfully" bad mouthing him (e.g. "You're so silly," or "You're such a dork!"). Even if we're having problems, I don't bring them up around other people. I work it out between us. If they are brought up, if someone tries to only he was in the wrong, I remind them I screwed up too (most often more so than he ever could) and that we're both human beings. Then I work to steer the conversation away from the topic.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

I believe so, yes. I police myself often so I don't fall back into the old patterns of thinking. The herd mentality is strong despite women often screaming about individuality. It's a terrifying thing once you're on the outside of the herd.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

The new groups have already begun forming (see: here and TRP), but calling it a herd makes it sound like we aren't trying to be better than the "original," so I'd say new terminology is in order.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure what you mean by "you dismiss that effort and wisdom at your peril." Please clarify.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 12 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

True. TRP and RPW both aim to move beyond the ignorance created by TBP, though.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Self-policing fosters the habit of objectively identifying one's own shortcomings. This sort of introspection is vital to increasing one's own value, which is the crux of red pill theory.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter