Is it just me or has anyone else noticed an uptick in the type of posts where an OP claims to agree with most of FDS philosophy then tries to propose a scenario that they insist exists outside the norm of fundamental FDS ideology and logic?

I read these posts and feel very skeptical and get the sense that they’re proposed in bad faith, but they get legitimate responses and energy from people.

Seems like folks either don’t read the handbook, don’t browse the sub, believe they are fundamentally exceptional, or—and this is the most radical of ideas but that doesn’t devalue its legitimacy— are using these posts a tactic to slowly enable dissent within the sub.

Is anyone else seeing this?