Something I'm trying to understand

TheWindyCity · 2014-08-23T20:57:33+00:00

Women are like homes in that regard; while you'd have no problem staying in a motel 6 for a few days you sure as hell wouldn't want to live in one for the rest of your life. For that you want the nice new house, that is in great condition and hasn't a 20 people living in it over the past 10 years

-Tyler_Durden- · 2014-08-23T14:22:20+00:00

TRP doesn't despise women for being slutty; it just states the fact that these women do not make good LTR material. It's okay to make a promiscuous (disease free) woman a plate; but, for your own good, do not enter into a relationship with them.

As for male promiscuity; women may say it bothers them; but, their actions show otherwise. If a woman lands a man with a high SMV, his body count will not bother her.

Simply put, women and men have different preferences in regards to a potential mate.

Cum_on_doorknob · 2014-08-23T21:53:20+00:00

On hypocrisy in general. If Joesph Stalin said "Murder is wrong." Would your conclusion be: Stalin is a murder, Stalin saying murder is wrong is hypocritical, if something is hypocritical it is false, therefore murder being wrong is false? No, invoking hypocrisy is simply a distraction from the truth. The truth is in the general population, when you hear that a woman has banged a ton of guys, something inside you makes you feel (right or wrong) that they are lesser. Women do not get this feeling about men banging many women, in fact they feel the opposite usually.

Mengs87 · 2014-08-23T15:28:23+00:00

It's all about zoning: the sluts belong to the plate spinning zone. Treat them with caution and do not make any emotional investment in them.

The high quality ones, on the other hand, belong to the LTR zone.

Confuse the 2 types at your risk.

TDCRedPill · 2014-08-24T19:27:52+00:00

Could someone explain this?

Yeah. You don't buy a motorcycle if you're planning on using it for carrying tools to a work site every day. You don't by a truck when you want to save gas and love going on bike rides.

The more partners a girl has had, the more of a risk she is for investing in a long term relationship; she is more likely to instigate abuse and divorce. If you want a long term relationship, it is considered smarter to fish from the end of the pool with the least amount of failed relationships under their belt, rather than the end with the most failed relationships under their belt.

If you don't want LTR's? Then go nuts. Ball slapping orgies for all who want because consensual adult sex is awesome in all it's forms, even the one's I don't want to mentally picture or participate in. Go nuts, who cares about the relationship history?

We don't hate sluts; they're awesome. Consensual adult sex is awesome in all it's forms, remember, so happy satisfied sluts lead to happy satisfied people in great numbers. God bless 'em, every one. The world needs more love. But if you want an exclusive, committed LTR, it's a losing bet. We're telling you a motorcycle would fit your needs better than a truck, not telling you trucks are worthless and anyone who owns a truck is stupid.

BCFtrip · 2014-08-23T14:16:35+00:00

Getting laid isn't the same pursuit as getting married. Be the villain here.

hepatosplenomegaly · 2014-08-23T15:48:35+00:00

Simple. Men and women aren't the same.

circlhat · 2014-08-23T17:31:39+00:00

Each gender chooses their own standards. Women prefer a men that has sleep around as that is their choice.

Men do not prefer a women who has slept around, and that is their choice.

whitey_male · 2014-08-24T04:42:20+00:00

It is hypocritical. But the hypocrisy from women is far greater and isn't going to change any time this millennium, so you could see the notion of wanting to sleep with lots of women as recompense and a defence mechanism.

BluepillProfessor · 2014-08-24T21:03:16+00:00

It's been said but let me reiterate. TRP LOOVES sluts. We just don't think the are good for LTR's.

Remember the hard rule: You can't change a slut into a housewife....but if you choose right you CAN change a housewife into a slut (for you).

In some threads where the dude is looking LTR they are going to slur the slut and rant that the slut is not a "high quality" woman (i.e. a faithful woman who is a good prospect for a LTR). In others where the dude is looking for quick snatch they say the opposite.

It is not 'hypocrisy' it is different people talking about their preferences and beliefs.

RP is VERY consistent. For example the advice for RP women (who are looking to lock down a LTR) is to be the high quality woman. They advise the girls to NOT be the slut, not give it up on the 1st or even 2nd date, not flirt with other guys, not talk about your other lovers etc.

2014-08-23T22:40:00+00:00

Sluts are great. I love sluts. The thing is, they aren't LTR material or "high quality". Ideally you want to have the type of chick who fucks 100 guys 1 time as a plate to fuck around with and dump once you get enough of her, and the type of chick who fucks 1 guy 100 times - a girl who suppresses her built-in hypergamy to be better LTR material - as your long-term girlfriend.

Basically everyone has the right to do with their body as they please. Girls are free to ride the cock carousel, and we are free to not respect them because of it. Just like we are free to not respect fatties, narcomaniacs, lazy/greedy people etc. But since most girls ride the cc anyway you might as well take full advantage of it, because a high partner count is a desired trait for a dude, but not vice versa. It's the natural order of how shit works. Different standards don't make a double standard.

I struggled with this particular topic for a while too, but this is how I understood it after doing some required reading. But, as someone else said, TRP just gives u the facts - opens your eyes to what the fuck is really going on. You can make your own decisions and try to have an LTR with a slut or do some other dumb shit, but eventually you will get fucked in the ass and end up learning the hard way and creating an AWALT reminder thread here. It's all up to you.

SebZear · 2014-08-24T01:04:06+00:00

An implicit assumption you're making is that one must dissociate from those who one despises. This assumption is widespread. In fact, moral policing is very often for the primary purpose of finding who to shun, banish, lock up, or shove into the next life. But like many, if not all, assumptions towards social behavior, it falls apart under logical scrutiny.

The purpose of shunning is to enforce moral behavior. Thus, if one discovers a moral transgression in someone else, one has the social duty to shun them. Not shunning them, in turn, is interpreted as cowardice, duplicity, and if done for one's own gain, selfishness.

Machiavellianism is the understanding that personal, social, legal, intersubjective, and objective moralities are all VERY different beasts with different purposes and machinations, and that one should take advantage of the open season.

BCFtrip · 2014-08-23T14:15:44+00:00

http://www.returnofkings.com/41900/the-inevitable-gap-between-theory-and-practice

Title	Something I'm trying to understand
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	17
Comments	19
Date	August 23, 2014 2:03 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2ed62a/something_im_trying_to_understand/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/something-im-trying-to-understand.19912 https://theredarchive.com/post/19912

Comments