~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
doublea9211
[–]lono124 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yea. No point pussyfooting about it.
[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They respond favorably to it, if we're talking about attraction and sex. I have no idea if they "like" it; I suspect consciously they don't like it, but attraction is ultimately a subconscious process, not a conscious one. Hence girls will complain about the bad boys they're fucking to the nice guys they're using as emotional tampons.
[–]I_am_Norwegian3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
No. A lot of women like dominant treatment though. It all depends on the person.
[–]Viaate1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
The fuck is this shit. I thought this was TRP?
Dominant treatment doesn't always mean alpha righteousness, and deflecting shit-tests for the betterment of the relationship blah blah blah.
The key word is DOMINANT, you can treat a women like absolute shit, and she will be in love with you to the point where it is an obsession. You can physically, and mentally abuse women and they will love you even more for it.
Women don't want to be treated "crappy" nor do they want to like being treated "crappy" but I'm telling you from first hand experience the most stuck-up, prude, bitch will fall in love with you if you throw in some "crappy" treatment, with love and good fucking.
It all depends on the person.
NAWALT?
This isn't motherfucking BDSM bullshit this is TRP get the fuck out of here with that shit
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
Dominant does not mean "treat like absolute shit". That is merely the extreme end of this term.
Dominant means being the leader. But a leader can be nice or can be evil, the point is he is the leader. For example in ballroom dancing the man leads the woman. That is perfectly dominant but not shitty.
Dominant means you are either a good king or an evil tyrant, the point is you are in charge. But you don't have to be the evil tyrant! You just have to be in charge. You can decide to be the good king as well. Depends on what she deserves.
EDIT: angry crap removed.
[–]Viaate0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I agree.
I think it depends on how you want to act, being this way is not good for the women(s) or society in general. Unlike the moral alpha male, the selfishness of this type of behavior is all consuming, and destructive instead of being beneficial for all people involved, even those indirectly involved.
It's up to you how you want to take these truths, and apply them.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
I think - and it is not an insult, but not a praise either - you are a bit like a Machiavelli for our times. You point out you could be succesful with behavior even the textbook 1950 patriarch - my ideal goal - or the average pussy slaying PUA would find immoral. You are right. It is a fact. But I am averse to pointing out such facts too often because they are too seductive. It is also a fact that people in the slums can make money by selling crack, or that "banksters" can get away with mega fraud in the billions. But I would not really want to put that on posters and in school textbooks to give everybody ideas, you know what I am saying? :)
Or a closer example, Communist brainwashing of American POWs in Korean POW camps by brutal methods did actually work. Very similar methods, break down and rebuild, make them low self esteemed (forced to rat out friends), keep them insecure (punishment almost always sure, reward not sure), and so on... But really this is not an idea to be copied...
I have actually read an autobio of a pimp and rapist and generally scum who did exactly what you said. It was not translated to English, I tried googling him (Heinz Sobota) to no avail, so just take my word that it was eeriley similar. It was horrifying. And yet women borrowed that book from me. Seriously this is the "can, but not want to look into" territory for me.
[–]Viaate0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
you are a bit like a Machiavelli for our times.
Haha I wish, I'm just some dude on the internet.
Seriously this is the "can, but not want to look into" territory for me.
That's okay, I'm just spreading information.
[–]I_am_Norwegian1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
NAWALT only applies when talking about behavioral traits on a wide scale though, right? What you're talking about is almost military; breaking the person down only to rebuild them to your liking. It might work, but it's immoral.
[–]Viaate3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
breaking the person down only to rebuild them to your liking. It might work, but it's immoral.
Yes. But it is what works. TRP is about what works, it's the redpill for godsakes. Any women can be broken to be your sex slave. Pimps for decades have turned out normal, well behaved women through sheer game. And the game of "crappy" treatment, little bit of love and care, and good fucking, will make any girl fall in obsessive, dangerous love with you.
It may be immoral, but it works, and is a part of swallowing the red pill. Abusive, evil men will control harems. You don't have to be this guy, and instead be the moral alpha male, but evil behavior still and will always attract women.
[–]I_am_Norwegian1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, I guess. That's how it works in all areas of life, huh, hadn't thought about it that way before.
[–]RedSunBlue4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Best leave all talk of morals at the door.
We're mostly concerned with cause and effect here.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, but a cause that would effect a harem of brainwashed sex slaves who are useless as persons is not a very good cause. Just imagine what kind of mother would that woman become. I think the idea is to fix screwed up, historically abnormal relationships, not to introduce entirely new kinds of abnormity.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]lono124 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]I_am_Norwegian3 points4 points5 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Viaate1 point2 points3 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Viaate0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Viaate0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]I_am_Norwegian1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Viaate3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]I_am_Norwegian1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RedSunBlue4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link