Red-Pill is a weak ideology to me. Because it doesn't dive deep into understand why things happen the way that happen, they just point out "All women are all like that", but there's a very subtle missing piece, AWALT really applies in certain specific conditions, I'm not denying it, but the thing is, it is not only AWALT, it is AHALT(All humans are fucking like that) but a rational person who seeks to understand things not just for the sake of strenghtening his/her ideology, should question more. Why AWALT appears? What is the causes and conditions?

They offer hypergamy and AWALT, however as I see it, these are all normal in the current set of standards, and those labels are just superficial way of looking at it. Let's look at this way. If men were to have vaginas and had more dating options, would they have more n count and act the way women act? Would they have sex more and act more emotionally, childishly because society approves it or conditions that way from the birth? Would they act more narcissitically because society approves it and men strenghten women's position in this? To me those are a resounding yes, if so, would it be rational to judge women as whores and not deficient human as man in these circumstances when the current dating pool of women are better than men? This is the way things are, are we going to batter our heads into the sand because we can't stand the way things are blame the women for it? Did women purposely created these conditions? I really don't think so. Should we blame God or Nature after it? Red-Pill men don't shoot for understanding. Their understanding only breeds negativity and that deep, nihilistic underneath anxiety and fear against women.

I believe all men have to do is understand the way things are and accept it, the acceptance brings the "frame" already. The frame isn't a weapon that you need to hold 7/24, that is just superficial and it will only work time to time. Frame is the character, and the character developed by Improvement of the Mind, with philosophy and rationality and continously going forward in life.

This is not about bending the knee because women "got it better". Women didn't get it better, only it appears to us so, because they got it better in the areas where men lacks and craves, and that is sex and attention. But that doesn't mean their "got it better" provides them happiness. Because humans are prone to mental suffering. And the approved , conditioned character traits of women also pushes them to more mental suffering because they didn't learn the skills men had to learn. Don't men have many areas that they got better? I'm quite sure that men do. There are places and situations "men got it better" and there are situations where "women got better". However *still* things are never that black and white, and never that clear cut in life in any area.

For anyone thinks even though these makes sense, women still got it better. Think of it like this, their approved characteristics and traits by the society doesn't bring happiness already, and we say, well women got it better but they are still bitching, if they got it better wouldn't need to be that they are happy? But are they? Or their characteristics pushes them more into negative worry, rumination or insecurity and mental issues? If it were so, there wouldn't be more neurosis in women. So things are never that clear cut in my opinion. There are really big cognitive distortions in Red Pill that promotes human unhappiness. Negative Focus, Over generalization, Disapproving of Positive. Just my 2cents and I wonder how people feel about this.