https://theredquest.wordpress.com/2019/12/03/woman-validates-the-red-pill-the-beauty-exec-fantasizing-about-the-single-dad-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-5495
-----------------------------------------
And also, RPD... you surprise me, as you are a HIGH VALUE, SKILLED MAN, but... you do a surprisingly good job representing pathetic Redpill attitudes. Ones I don't think serve you, but DO in fact show how that crew thinks. Again, I am often surprised you are associate with them at all.
> [women] are pretty delusional when it comes to what it is they can get in the sexual marketplace
> further inflated by the false validation they get from social media
Yeah? And? What is the goal here? To magically correct girls thinking? Or maybe to just find solidarity in complaining? Again, you do so well as a Player, I am surprised you repeat these mindsets and EMPTY COMPLAINTs. So ineffective.
> hypergamy VASTLY shrinks the sexual marketplace, which obviously has a negative effect on men
Wow. You are searching for "just rationale" for why low value males can't get laid. THAT is CORE redpill thinking. So much of redpill is "the basic complaint that women want the better one." This is actually what I think of redpillers = A complaint lobby. While men of game are out "finding solutions." Huge difference... and I think you're in the latter camp, but won't let go of the former.
I said last week (and I was being a dick, but it was an illustrative "dig") that HYPERGAMY is "PUSSY ENVY" in men. Can you hear it here?
I do not think you personally have "pussy envy." But you are using the talking points of men that do. "If only average, lack-luster men had pussies, they'd have more choices." Right? So embarrassing. Is that what they want? To be "a six" with pussy, just so they'd have more dates? I think that IS what they want. Disgusts me.
If redpill was more than complaints, they would see the "harsh truth" that most men ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BREED. NATURE wants it that way. Good genes, all that. And you don't have to have 6-pack abs... because MANY CRITERIA are selected for. Poor, "non white" POETS get laid. Out of work, fat FUNNY guys get laid. Etc. But guys with "low LIFE FORCE" (credit: Pat Stedman), and no obvious value do not... so what then? The SMP is broken? No... it's perfect. Why would nature want to pass on middling averageness to the next gen? That is not how nature works.
YOU surprise me... as you are not "middling averageness." You kick ass. And yet you come off as a spokesperson for the "I deserve" guys that refuse to hustle enough to build value and FIND THEIR NICHE.
> increased value plus lots of options mitigates hypergamy
It doesn't MITIGATE it at all. You have been "indoctrinated" to think hypergamy is a bad thing, something that needs "mitigating." Hypergamy is simply and ONLY "I want the better one." Men do it too (they just have fewer choices, which I think IS your central pain point here). And you, Sir, you ARE the better choice (much of the time). And yet you use hypergamy as if it was a cancer, when in fact it is your paycheck. Can you see that? This is a core tradition of LOW VALUE "I deserve" types in the redpill... of which you DO NOT resemble.
> mostly targeting Asian girls who are likely to perceive you as having higher value simply due to the fact you’re a white American
This, my friend... is insulting BS. It's you doing SJW level thinking. "White privilege," straight out of ditsy college chicks mouth. You're RIGHT, girls DO DIFFERENTIATE. But do all white guys kill it? No. Why?
Pay ATTN: Did I PERSONALLY KILL IT before game? No. I did not. Did I get "whiter" since then???? Is that why I get laid now? C'mon man. Come up a level. Drop this BS. I got good at GAME. THAT was the difference. GAME itself is value. PLUS, I increased my value in other ways. So, +++.
I feel like I am taking off in FEMALE PSYCH... actual, deep lessons in female psych. That is EXPERIENCE, not "whiteness." THAT is why I am getting better. Not because I am bleaching skin. Ridiculous.
LET'S DO BETTER: I am a bit different (both here, and in a crowd of all white people). That accounts for the "white thing," but ALSO accounts for MY GAME. My interest in PSYCH. My interest and SKILL in EMOTIONS. Girls have met dumbass white guys that think their passport will get them laid, and it does not. They are "white too," right? When they meet me, its my GAME that separates me.... not my whiteness (totally insulting and beneath you, you know better).
You are digging into this pathetic "you're white" to justify your hypergamy theory... when you have much better reason to explain why I am any good. And I think it's BECAUSE you have too much redpill in your diet.
> fairly wealthy compared to the average guy–so again, another increase in value which offsets hypergamy
You don't know how I dress, but I wear $40 black jeans and $20 tshirts and $50 Adidas. You know how I meet girls. I do have some money... but how do they know that on a cold approach? I don't wear a watch ($$$), I wear a $10 silver ring I have had for 20 years and a $10 leather bracelet? So how does my wealth hook them?
It doesn't. Again, insulting. You're doing SJW "economic inequality," but from the low value Redpill POV. It is amazing how similar the redpillers are to SJWs. It is a FACT they are a response to the rise in feminism/SJWs. THEY are the mirror the equally sad/pathetic thinking on that side.
I have a nice house, but girls don't see that until I bring them home, right? Again... it's irrelevant. But more so... I lose girls, all the time, to guys that will never have the resources I have, that are not as "white" as I am. Why? Because this is all more interesting/subtle than 'white game"/"rich game" allows for. You know all this.
What girls MIGHT see in me/RedQuest is our IQ. We are smart, and that shows quickly. It's an "honest signal." Not every girl likes it, but it's a proxy for "rich." It's a proxy for "successful." It is a proxy for "capable." SMART/effective a type of VALUE. How does an unsmart guy compete with that? He emphasizes other points, other niches. The OPEN MIC SINGER. The ULTIMATE FRISBEE GUY. The RELIGIOUS GUY. The MEDIATOR. A million niches... rooms where he could be "her best offer."
"But, but, but... what about guys that FAIL to do any of that?" "What about guys that fail to demonstrate value?" "Doesn't hypergamy mean those guys won't get a shot at getting laid?" <-- this is redpill. The "I don't have any value, so" POV. And we should shun this BS. It holds guys back. That POV (not the function of hypergamy) is cancer.
To point to my WHITENESS and my WEALTH is beneath a man as smart and successful as you are. But it's typical "SJW" equivalent analysis of the redpillers. Terribly under-educated, bitter, small POV.
I think you were totally disrespectful here, actually. Not that you need to care. But you gloss of over "advanced daygame," and what you might know about my specialties, and go for "white"/"rich." And I think you do that to DEFEND "low value" guys that use Hypergamy as a platform to complain.
Dude, I was white forever, and had a bit of money since I was 28 (which I earned, BTW. #VALUE)... and I didn't get good until I was "old" BECAUSE OF GAME. Because I got into game when I was older... so I am better now that I ever was. You know this. Why on earth would you dumb this all down? I'm shocked.
> no use blaming women for it, other than perhaps being delusional about what they can/should get in the sexual marketplace
"Muh Hypergamy" (aka PUSSY ENVY) - as it's used - is MEN being delusional about what they can/should get in the SMP. Can't you see it?
I am so surprised to see wise men sucked down this path... that is why I try so hard "TO 'PILL THE REDPILLERS." They obviously need it. This shit is cripplingly bad POV.
