Which political ideology would you consider to be the one suited for a society of Alpha males? In a world where the authority of the state is removed, who creates the pillars of societal cohesion? To not be able to look outside of yourself for assistance and having only yourself to lean on would be a situation which demands that you exact from inside yourself moral integrity at all times.

A girl I knew recently was a typical girl in some ways. Many girls do not like confrontation and derive their authority from external sources, either males or the police. Now, due to having hardened up a little from life, I always would prefer to outright confront people who are imposing themselves into my life on unsuitable terms.

Let me explain: From this girl's encounters with people she found disagreeable, I was with her one time in the car with my sister when we found a guy sitting on his lawn with a pellet gun, looking to shoot gophers when they would appear. Thinking that it was a real gun and that, well, he could have been out trying to shoot people, she called the police and was all excited to play the part of a concerned citizen. She definitely got off on the proxy power it generated though; it was like a drug to her.

Well, I was just acting annoyed as fuck and disinterested, after which I watched as a group of maybe 10 police officers came to block off the neighborhood and set up parameters for confronting this guy, grabbing all of their assault rifles and then talking to the guy for about 15 minutes. I personally didn't feel any threat from the guy, and was thinking the whole time that I was so annoyed by their behavior that I should have just rolled my eyes and walked up to the guy and asked him what the fuck he was doing and just de-escalated the drama before it happened. This is surely an Anarchist strategy, as being a person who likes to thrive on personal integrity and strong-willed, friendly confrontation without external help is an admirable goal. Many men on the receiving end of this sort of confrontation will appreciate your bravery and your display of masculine values. But without using yourself to impose a sense of order in a chaotic world, we are lost in a sea of connections through external mediums and lose the ability to demand that people act their best selves at all times - we lose our ability to relate to each other.

Another time, during a late-night text session with her, she was telling me how she was busy because she had noticed that a drunk neighbor was being disorderly, (or something), and had called the cops to put a stop to it. Now, who knows how bad they actually were, since I wasn't there, but the fact of the matter is that I felt that she was a chick that gets off on external validation and elicits power from others when she can't find her own. Again, my strategy as an aspiring Anarchist would be to confront them personally in a firm, yet friendly way. This is behavior that is lost in a society of emasculated males and a rampant misuse of the state.

I tell you all that I'm an aspiring Anarchist because the ideology is a glorious one. Yes, I am all but certain it is highly impractical in too many ways to institute society-wide, of the main reasons, one being contract law, (which I despise). But I find many great flashes of insight in the mindset of a theoretically-constructed person who has no one to look to for morality and rules to live by other than his very own lived experiences, experiences which should compel a principled Anarchist to live by enlightened guidelines for his behavior, enlightened by the hard science of cause and effect, not the letter of the law.

Who is a man under a society without the state? Is he a wimpy, feminine beta male, with no muscles and is in touch with his emotions? Does he not find out truth and learn on his own volition? How down-to-Earth is he? Will he play the game of political correctness? Or will he demand, one-on-one, that people be people and exact respect from them, while also giving it to those who earn it?

Just the other night, I was with some girls who were downright immature. Well, one was, and the other was shit-testing me for the most part, not being simply immature. I suppose they were playing the script of a gender war that is being waged for them in proxy, (little do they consciously sometimes know), by the media. Because I'm not compelled to believe there should be a gender war, I am often confused when I feel the effects of it in my conversations with people. Institutionally, there may indeed be discrimination, but what the fuck do I care? I care mostly about how it effects my interactions with females. Without the power of the state and 'cultural Marxism' to influence change, I'm not sure why people should feel like they need to prove anything in everyday interactions with people who ought to be considered just another person. A society without a state to influence and control personal integrity would be a society with less pissing matches between people who check different boxes which denote sex, religious and political affiliation, and so on. This is because they would need to find their own integrity, based on tried and true methods for living a life in balance with others around you.

Anarchism may not be practical, but the idea of it should be enough to compel a person to perpetually ruminate in their minds that cause and effect are determined by your actions and inactions. In determining what being an Alpha male ACTUALLY means to me, this thought experiment helps me the most to craft my motivations and understandings of my world; this is an ideology for the mature, and a recipe for masculinity.