This has come up quite a bit in MGTOW circles. Those who have argued with of women are often frustrated with the seemingly random direction of the conversations. If you are the classic man, your urge is often to "get to the bottom of things" and get to the truth and a resolution of sort. Yet, you are met with a litany of logical fallacies like:

  • Moving the Goalposts
  • Strawman Arguments
  • Red Herrings
  • Inconsistent Comparisons
  • Oversimplification of Complex Issues
  • DARVO (Deny, Attack and Reverse Victim and Offender)

Some of these actions are to escape accountability, responsibility, or agency. But what about the women who DO argue in a logical fashion? What makes them different from the rest? Encountering this is a pleasant suprise like a double peanut M&M. This logical unicorn will cause most men to proclaim "NAWALT!!!" and date or wife-up one of these women--only to be jacknife power-bombed later down the road by the same woman's hypergamy or other expressions of female nature or Briffault's Law.

What makes these two groups different in their logicak skills? Having dated some in high school and uni, this was always a question for me. I never understood it until I listened to this video. If you were ever confused about how women approach logic, hopefully this will be as eye-opening to you as it was for me.