Feminist Julie Bindel: 'Juries Have No Place in Rape Trials. They Simply Can’t Be Trusted'

contraterrene · 2018-11-21T16:02:30+00:00

This is how a tyranny begins.

lostapwbm · 2018-11-21T16:11:22+00:00

The conviction rates for rape have long been shockingly low. This is what has led one Labour MP, Ann Coffey, today to suggest doing away with juries in rape trials.

The conviction rate is low, not that there is a dearth of rapes throughout the land, but that there aren't enough EVIL males being tossed into prison on skin cases.

Look, for example, at the Ched Evans case, a footballer who was convicted of rape but later had his conviction quashed and was acquitted at a retrial that relied on evidence of the complainant’s alleged sexual history. Despite some male barristers arguing that feminist campaigners were overreacting, the case showed us how women in rape cases are often more on trial than the defendant. Then there is the scandalous case in Cork, during which underwear belonging to a 17-year-old complainant was held up for the jury to see, with the suggestion that she was “open to meeting someone”.

Look for example at the Duke Lacrosse case. Look for example at the Brian Banks case. Look for example at the Nikki Yovino/Sacred Heart case. Look for example at the recent Marley Barberian case.

Jurors are, however, far from the only problem in the way the criminal justice system deals with sex crimes. Rape myths are imbued all the way through the system, including police, prosecutors, judges, and everyone who has not been educated to challenge rape myth ideology. This needs tackling throughout the entire system.

You can either #BelieveWomen or you can #BelieveEvidence. Take your pick.

More than 800 years since trial by jury became a right, we have to recognise that women and girls who are victims of sexual assault also have a right to justice. Until we see an end to toxic rape mythology and victim blaming among the general public, juries can’t be trusted to try such cases.

In the name of WYMYN! Your common law and statutory right to be either condemned or acquitted by a jury of your peers must be stripped.

Is there anything that can't be justified 'In the name of WYMYN!'?

Let's review some feminist jurisprudence to date:

Feminists don't want women's sexual history raised
Feminists don't want women cross-examined AT ALL (Title IX in the US)
Feminists don't want relevant exculpatory evidence disclosed to the defendant
Feminists don't want the accuser's identity disclosed to the public, thereby limiting the potential for exculpatory witnesses to come forward
Feminists don't want men to have the benefit of a jury

Say it with me: FEMINISTS ARE THE HANDMAIDENS OF TYRANNY.

DangZagnut · 2018-11-21T16:29:28+00:00

Ugly rug munchers sure to think about rape a lot. I feel bad that no one ever wanted to rape them and they feel like they have low SMV.

I mean if they're not about rape, why do they talk about it so much? They must be obsessed. They must talk about rape all the time. You know for people trying to get away from rape they sure do talk about it all the time.

I don't know where I heard that, some sort of faggots complaining about MGTOW.

Lady, women lie about rape. All the time. Not all rapes are lies, but it turns out they actually do lie all the time. That's what they do. that's also why juries exist, so a bunch of people have to agree that the evidence support it.

Unless I'm on the jury, then I'll always vote against it, you know, to make up for the historical feminist rape lies. I mean, it makes sense because of your history of lying about it and people get killed.

I'll be happy to stop doing that when we admit that historical precedent doesn't matter, so when you start denying that there's historical bullshit about patriarchy oppressing women, I'll be happy to stop using historical bullshit and put away rapists.

lulz3r · 2018-11-21T17:34:26+00:00

Yeah, fuck due process!

rockorbe2002 · 2018-11-21T18:47:06+00:00

The fact that a mainstream periodical like the Guardian is publishing this is worrying.

Vidar34 · 2018-11-21T22:31:03+00:00

It sounds as though feminists want to have the power to completely ruin a man with nothing but the sentence "He raped me". No evidence, no juries, no investigation, just believe the accuser. Soon they will try to eliminate the judge from the proceedings, because they might not side with the accuser.

DickRulez · 2018-11-21T19:24:00+00:00

Sounds like it may be time for some old fashion hangings

underrated_kawasaki · 2018-11-21T18:19:24+00:00

Juries full of blue pill simps and white knights can’t be trusted most definitely, might as well be no jury at all then. Our justice system is fucked beyond repair and the only way to avoid dealing with it is to GYOW by avoiding these scandalous bitches. Go fuck legit hookers if you wanna fuck as you can fuck them anonymously and never have to see them again afterwards.

Texian_Fusilier · 2018-11-22T14:25:54+00:00

Tomorrow, the pussy hats return shouting, NO TRIALS FOR RAPISTS KILL KILL KILL! NO 6TH AMENDMENT FOR RAPISTS, BLEED BLEED BLEED BLEED! RIP OUT THEIR EYES! DIE DIE DIE!

Title	Feminist Julie Bindel: 'Juries Have No Place in Rape Trials. They Simply Can’t Be Trusted'
Author	lostapwbm
Upvotes	31
Comments	12
Date	November 21, 2018 3:50 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/9z4crf/feminist_julie_bindel_juries_have_no_place_in/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/feminist-julie-bindel-juries-have-no-place-in-rape.455619 https://theredarchive.com/post/455619

Comments