Of course women love you. They love you now. They love you now, the benefit you provide now, the lifestyle you share now, the age you are now, the future you could have now.

But then solipsism, hypergamy and female nature take place in a tactical mindset of optimising their environment to serve themselves to provide for offspring. This is reflected by their desires and needs, and expressed through their emotion. When woman are happy, they ain't being eaten by a tiger. Positive emotion is a unconscious confirmation of positive survival status.

The problem nowadays is that a woman's emotions are no Longer A good Reflection of Thier Survival Status.... But the addiction and obsessesion to keep them optimal remains, for it was what got us here.

She loves you in the moment, but she can change because she is allowed to change, with emotion not having to matter beyond itself and being allowed to insist upon itself without any quality control employed. And in a era that cannot answer a simple question:

"How do you a put a woman in line? Take all the time you need."

We end up letting their emotions repeat themselves and not resolved themselves, with no morality via culture or religion anymore to control emotion to make it serve something higher than itself to avoid Rampancy and its gambit on our world. What this world bends to for female happiness should come as no surprise for what is at play here.

Emotional Rampancy is not only the religion of the West for females, it has scarce recognition or demand for recourse.

She does love you. She loves you now and nothing is 'wrong' but everything can go wrong, and are equipped by a culture or society or Morality to have power and authority to correct it? No.

But how does this world stop deviation, entitlement, and pressure her to actually make a adult decision she can't change without penalty? What when another shiny things wonders buy and she can buy it at the store in a world that sets only an agreeable price tag, not a limit for her emotional rampancy... now Witness the female wardrobe of her fashion for control, with most women having empty wardrobes only if they were denied the funds to buy.

TFM was right, they are children with permitted emotional Rampancy in an age that refuses to even question women without it being consider heresy, because it contradicts male and female programming and the naive world built around it.

That's why divorce rate is so high, and women get away with everything as they become more shallow, confused and disorientated from their gender role their instincts were build on whilst sitting on their unwisely maintained, traditional pedestal of desire and envy built and repaired by the simps that have no identity outside of their instincts to serve women and achieve validation through them.

She always loved you. It just wasn't the lie you were sold. It's transactional love or opportunistic love and not very sellable, so media sold your love to you men and let you project it onto women to believe your enslavement was possible ecstacy.

"When moral standisation becomes individually acceptable, infectious and contributing obedience to Social Sanity becomes unstoppable until all individual freedoms and potential become societal imprisonment".