‘50’ is the new ‘40’ for women to have babies. Says dubious science authority.

Mecha_Hobbit · 2019-03-08T22:15:36+00:00

Remember that stupid Spanish mare who sued because doctors wouldn't IVF her wrinkled ass at 67? And then complained that she was too tired to look after the kids and she should have been warned she was too old once she had the kids on her knees sucking on her week-old helium balloon tits for whatever thin watery blood pressure medication soaked milk they could get out of them?

DELUSIONAL.

NickTesla2018 · 2019-03-08T23:33:31+00:00

Bring on the 'tards. The baby train passed you a long time ago.

Docbear64 · 2019-03-09T00:42:12+00:00

If you haven't had a baby by 40 you need to just let it go , it is cruel to have a child that your body can't support the full development of .

801735 · 2019-03-08T22:12:41+00:00

Mhm. I mean, by the way things seem to be going, it HAS to be true. ]=)

2019-03-08T22:14:43+00:00

35 is considered "elderly" by doctors

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25185379

jamocadyn · 2019-03-08T22:53:06+00:00

We should place bets...her kid will be: retarded or autistic or be allergic to whole bunch of things...

Title	‘50’ is the new ‘40’ for women to have babies. Says dubious science authority.
Author	ploobadoof
Upvotes	20
Comments	8
Date	March 8, 2019 10:10 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/ayw1m3/50_is_the_new_40_for_women_to_have_babies_says/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/50-is-the-new-40-for-women-to-have-babies-says.501614 https://theredarchive.com/post/501614

Comments