The argument is that men can only control sex versus no sex. If they have sex, then the system says they are at the woman's whims from there on out.

Women, on the other hand, have plenty of ex post facto options. They can "have a good time" knowing that they have access to morning after pills, abortions, or the financial resources of the "baby daddy." In short, the only real consequence of casual sex for women is STDs. Men, on the other hand, face unwanted children, STDs, financial ruin, and false rape accusations.

Why should men "keep their pants zipped?" Men ought to be able to financially abort their children if women are free to physically abort them. Why should women be allowed all of the decision making capacity?

The answer is that women have successfully argued the "my body, my choice" paradigm. Well, there is solid philosophy dating back centuries that says the fruits of a person's labors are an extension of the individual's body. In short, money is earned through labor (mental or physical) that an individual engages in using his/her body. This means that taking my money is actually taking my labor, which is slavery when it is coerced (such as by threat of imprisonment).

Based on this, I'm pushing for my body, my rights for men and I hope others in MGTOW will push for it as well. No one, not even a fetus, is entitled to the fruits of my labor. In short, financial abortion.

I don't care that you advocate for it or protest. You can continue to go your own way as I will mine. All I ask is that you point out this fact whenever you have the chance and that, if they time ever comes, you vote to give men autonomy over their labor and thus over their own bodies. Stop letting women define the argument. Start changing the game. They won't know what hit them.