the pseudo religion of Cultural Anthropology

NeoreactionSafe · 2016-03-01T22:12:20+00:00

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_hierarchy

Female-biased dominance occurs rarely in mammals, and it is only observed consistently in hyenas, lemurs and the bonobo.[48] It occurs when all adult males exhibit submissive behavior to adult females in social settings. These social settings are usually related to feeding, grooming, and sleeping site priority.

It is true... there are a few cases of what might be called "Feminism" in nature but it is not common.

sir_wankalot_here · 2016-03-01T21:55:00+00:00

Is this a troll or is OP on drugs ? Example.

Culture is not necessarily an extension of natural law, or evolutionary pressure.

There is something called social evolution or evolutionary psychology. Culture is just as important if not more important for the success of a society as genetics.

crimsonpowder · 2016-03-02T01:32:33+00:00

If the genders were so similar, then feminism and TRP wouldn't be.

MorpheusGodOfDreams · 2016-03-02T05:09:46+00:00

Human males are not significantly physically different than human females, at least not compared with other animals.

vs.

The human female body is highly adapted for the extreme rigors of giving birth, and caring for human babies. In fact, the female body is so specialized for giving birth that it actually has a great evolutionary cost.

The fact of pregnancy proves that men and women are physically different. Men do not spend 25% of their energy on an ovulation cycle, and women who are on the pill do not magically become equal to men in any way.

Now onto the meat of your post:

The extreme leftist blank slate ideology of "equality" comes from the Frankfurt School in New York, which was the home of communist Jews who fled Hitler in Germany. They developed what is called "critical theory" which is to criticize everything and to find someone to blame for the difference between the "haves and the have-nots".

The hijacking of the Civil Rights Movement and the early feminist movement by extremist Gloria Steinem has created a major shift in America, and thus the world. Critical Theory became the norm, spread as gospel in universities across the country.

The feminist side of it is essentially a reaction to the birth control pill (human biology is the base, culture is built on top, ideology is built on top of that, like computer hardware, operating system, and programs).

When any logical attempt is made to point out the hypocrisy of judging people based on the color of their race or sex, allegations of racism or misogyny are thrown against the heretic, until they cave.

This process has been sped up by the internet age and especially twitter (where the creators are now censoring any content they disagree with). In such online communities, the most radical and devoted followers are promoted to the top of the organizations, drowning out any reasonable moderate voices.

Just like in radical Islam, the extremists are now in charge of the feminist movement. All hatred is directed at straight white men, regardless of their background or upbringing or beliefs.

TRP is the antidote to this by pulling back the curtain and exposing bullshit beliefs for bullshit. It starts with fighting the "Women are Wonderful" effect and then snowballs as we take the red pill over and over on different subjects.

To do this we bring up history and cultures that understood human nature before us. In this way we are nothing new, but rather a compilation and collection of past wisdom in a culture that so desperately needs it.

Ecclesiastes 7:28 while I was still searching but not finding-- I found one upright man among a thousand, but not one upright woman among them all.

MortalSisyphus · Tue Mar 1 21:37:13 2016 UTC

This post really is all over the place, and it's quite difficult to respond to because I'm not sure exactly what the point here is...

I wouldn't call the differences between the sexes insignificant at all. There are powerful biological differences at play here, and as science advances we are seeing more and more influences of biology and fewer of culture.

Males and females may have similar "intelligence," but they use that intelligence in very different ways and toward different ends. Even in infants there has been noted a differing propensity in interests. Men tend to be much more analytical/systematic in their thinking than females.

You are correct that culture is not necessarily an extension of evolutionary pressure. People greatly misunderstand the purpose of culture, and I may write something up on this soon.

We are a product of culture as much as we are a product of our genetic evolution.

because the social differences between men and women are cultural, not biological. And, the physical differences don't really matter.

I think this is where the real point of disagreement occurs. You underestimate the significance of biological/genetic differences.

Entropy-7 · 2016-03-02T04:10:58+00:00

Dimorphism is pronounced enough that only an elite female can best an average man physically and no elite female can best an elite male.

In terms of intelligence, men and women deploy it in different ways. Plus, evidence suggests that female intelligence does not vary from the mean as much as with men. Your average man and woman will be similar in smarts but at the high end, men completely dominate every field of human endeavor from science to art to business to politics to the military to everything.

james-watson · 2016-03-02T04:38:41+00:00

Shouldn't you be in Sweden, protesting against sexual assault by wearing your mini skirt, if you believe all this bullshit?

Females and manginas have infiltrated TRP. You heard it here first.

Moldy_Gecko · 2016-03-02T02:38:17+00:00

I get what you're trying to say and I like some of the cool knowledge, but you leave out huge factors. You're skipping biology, physiology, and anatomy. Honestly, the sciences work together to share a bigger picture. If you come at it from only one scientific view, you're boned and come out with a weird outcome (like you have) that "Men and Women" are equal. Honestly, your post is completely in line with feminism. You are saying that gender is a cultural construct. That men and women are the same (except for their baby makers) and then you lose me how you relate feminism as anti-cultural while typing their talking points.

[deleted] · 2016-03-02T03:31:10+00:00

An argument against point number one, supported by point number 5. We are a very violent war-based species. Bigger stronger human males have an advantage over other humans. That's the evolutionary advantage. And the reason women have intelligence? So they can garner more resources for themselves. You can't seriously deny that women don't gossip and have a Machiavellian twist to their social dynamics. In a survival situation I imagine the smartest ones would remove the support of the group from their female enemies, thus making sure everyone else gets more resources, and them as well. In our society it's relatively harmless, but imagine how they would act in a situation where being accepted by the group can meet life or death. Especially for women, because men are nirmally the gatherers of resources anyway so you only remove them if they're lazy.

Title	the pseudo religion of Cultural Anthropology
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	0
Comments	15
Date	March 1, 2016 8:50 PM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/48ijdz/the_pseudo_religion_of_cultural_anthropology/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/the-pseudo-religion-of-cultural-anthropology.56664 https://theredarchive.com/post/56664

Comments