Australia - Research says men have time limit on fatherhood similar to women's body clock. Haha haha haha - so desperate are these cunts.

secant128 · 2017-06-27T05:11:32+00:00

"Most men want children" that's an assumption right? I don't want children if they are not mine anyway because custody will most likely be awarded to the mother so in the end, the children are not mine anyway, then whats the point of having children from men's perspective?

Second of all, even if I want children, still it's not fair for the children. Just because I want children that would justify me having children and bring them to this misery and suffering in this shit pile of a world where they face unjust law systems, single motherhood, gynocentrism, rapist teachers, ADHD drugs, etc? No I am not that narcissistic and selfish to only care about what I want and omit what the children will suffer in the future.

Therefore, even if artificial womb and skin cell eggs are here, I would still need to consider because this world is pretty much done I don't want to put another person here in which the collapse is heading straight at him/her.

In order for anyone men or women to want to have children, the world at least has to be a worthwhile place to live in for the children in order for the adults to want their children to come to this world duh...

mckenzie_friend_au · 2017-06-27T06:26:48+00:00

Haha. The only actual fertility window mentioned is the female's. The "researcher" is saying that guys have an unrealistic expectation of the female's reproduction age with ivf. Nothing about his ability to procreate.

gods_bones · 2017-06-27T06:52:38+00:00

How is this anybody's problem except women's? It's their eggs that turn rotten and die, whereas an 85 year old man can still have a baby as long as he picks a healthy fertile hole to breed. It's as if journalists today are too fucking stupid to even think, let alone write.

Sure there might some dumb blue pilled cucks who already surrendered to their wife's wishes and is wasting his money on pointless scams like IVF after nature already told her no, but for the most part, the vast majority of women after 35 (not 40) will already be too far gone to attract any new man to mount her. Biology dictates that men will not waste their seed on a dusty graveyard. That's why women need marriage to exist.

ikhwan_arif · 2017-06-27T06:08:50+00:00

The desperation... is just sad and delicious at the same time.

JlmmyButler · 2017-06-27T10:20:16+00:00

there are only a handful of studies honestly discussing limitations on male fertility.

outside of individual problems, nothing happens until the guy is 40+
sperm quality starts to degrade beginning at 40. the largest real effect of this is sheer fertility rates -- it takes longer to conceive. this is not problematic for guys with women under 30 as the female's egg quality is still good, and there's still plenty of time to keep trying. but if the woman's clock is end-stage (35+), IVF is practically a requirement.
sperm quality degradation is massively overstated. multiple studies have used visual sperm quality under a microscope to imply drastically worse birth outcomes. this is fake news false. although # and % of quality sperm does visually and measurably fall, the average load has 200-500 MILLION sperm. a guy who is 50+ still has tens, if not hundreds of million healthy swimmers in a single load. low quality sperm almost never makes it through the egg wall, which is why negative pregnancy outcomes based on old male age are still a fraction of 1%.
in contrast, negative pregnancy outcomes based on female age are huge. at 30, her fertility rate goes into freefall, meaning the probability of conception from intercourse plummets. at 35, rates of all the bad shit begin to liftoff... debilitating birth defects, stillbirth, miscarriage... they range from 35-60% at the age of 35 depending on her genetics and health and only climb. no women should be birthing kids at 35+. it's not that it's impossible to have healthy kids after that... it's that it's a huge risk to the health of the child.

i'm in my mid-30s and i see the harpies who waited post-wall to latch down a guy... they go from pregnancy photos all over social media to everything disappearing overnight. literally every single one has had miscarriages or children with serious birth defects.

reality check: women who are still single and over 27 missed their window. last kid at 34. mothers average 2 years per kid when trying, so #1 is at 32. couples are averaging a bit over 5.5 years from first date to pregnancy meaning she's 27 or younger on the first date. even if you rushed it and only dated for 3 years before deciding to have kids, that's 3.75 years from first date to pregnancy, so she just turned 29 at latest. women after 30 have this ridiculous delusion that they'll meet a guy, get married within a year and immediately pop out a baby. yeah, fucking right.

DangZagnut · 2017-06-27T11:49:52+00:00

Such a mangina article, desperate to help women out. White knighting and lying about everything, desperate to masturbate in a human sock.

2017-06-27T13:02:30+00:00

"risk missing out as fathers"

L

O

L

The real risk is raising a kid that isn't yours. Statistics for British men are 1 in 50 kids are not the kid of the father. That's FUCKING 2%. If i raised a kid that wasn't mine I would kill the bitch for ruining my life. Too many men living lies then once they get that red pill shoved up their ass, some of those men just go Rambo.

The real risk is BEING FORCED to miss out on fatherhood because the mother of your children lied about abuse and took your children.

The real risk is deciding to be a father, investing 100's of thousands of currency into fatherhood, just to have your boys be simps and your girls be sluts. It's extremely difficult to raise kids properly and away from the liberal and sexual culture.

I am not suprised that the author is a woman. She doesn't know, nor does she care, about the risks of marriage and fatherhood. This is what happens when men, fathers, husbands and brothers become the enemy. You can't just fuck over 50% of the population and expect to get away with it.

SnapshillBot · 2017-06-27T05:01:37+00:00

Archived for your convenience

Snapshots:

This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is

^{I am a bot.} ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

Cuck-WTF · 2017-06-27T07:23:47+00:00

Say that to potus. How much of his life has he been a father and loved it.

2017-06-27T09:22:13+00:00

The time limit on fatherhood is when the man enters the grave, lol

2017-06-27T13:25:50+00:00

Desperation is a stinky Cologne. Luckily I don't wear Cologne and just bathe with soap and body wash and that's all I need.

Teflon0819 · 2017-06-27T14:08:35+00:00

They think women's fertility starts to decline at about 40...

Starts? More like finishes.

Joel928 · 2017-06-27T15:25:06+00:00

Um, deluded feminist bitch's ovaries are drying up down under... and that's a MAN'S problem?

Message to the Mountain Lions of Oz: Quality men in their 40's lost interest in you shrieking barren harridans YEEAAARS AGO!!

P.S. Your fertility craters after 30 - not 40! (Hate Fact!!)

2017-06-27T15:49:42+00:00

hahahah they honestly believe that my fertility is based on if a chick is fertile. Nope...I just need to trade her in for a newer model with less miles.

Read: Hugh fucking Heffner.

Title	Australia - Research says men have time limit on fatherhood similar to women's body clock. Haha haha haha - so desperate are these cunts.
Author	iamanarci
Upvotes	50
Comments	22
Date	June 27, 2017 5:00 AM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/6jqjt9/australia_research_says_men_have_time_limit_on/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/australia-research-says-men-have-time-limit-on.578195 https://theredarchive.com/post/578195

Comments