This explains the male feminists at the women’s march quite well

ThrowawayGhostGuy1 · 2018-01-21T17:38:19+00:00

It’s finally starting to sink in why I’d lose respect for anyone that posed in a photo like this.

ColmM36 · 2018-01-21T19:59:49+00:00

Meh. I'd argue more so that they lack any sort of self confidence or esteem to take a confident picture of themselves, smiling or otherwise, and resort to pulling a stupid face in order to try and fool others into thinking they're cool and fun or some such

oktober75 · 2018-01-21T18:31:09+00:00

Is that whil wheaton?

Alexxx_87 · 2018-01-21T19:24:18+00:00

[deleted]

Sol_Install · 2018-01-21T18:38:40+00:00

Holy shit. Shawn Murray. The fucking scammer responsible for No Man's Land.

Amnesia2508 · 2018-01-22T01:03:52+00:00

The expression on the Bonobo and on the male cucks is not the same - there's a subtle but important difference.

The Bonobo's face is slightly downturned and eyes moderately turned up indicating cowering and submission.

The male cucks don't have this 'cowering' but their expressions and demeanour are on the feminine side to submit in a different way and crucially to a different audience. Their whole sexual and social strategy is acceptance through supressing more masculine traits and emphasizing lighter, more superficial expressions that signal them as a non-threat. It also has the curious effect of 'hollowing' them out so what you end up with is paper men with no real grit and no stoicism. They are hollow, frustrated and angry men filled with marshmallow deep down. With no grit emotions also have freer reign, which adds to their feminine traits even more.

These men are almost trying to be more like children to prevent the possibility of them ever being perceived by women as threatening or expressing masculinity that would single them out for social/verbal aggression from women.

So the goal of submission is the same as the Bonobo but the reason for the subtle difference is the audience they are expressing themselves (and submitting) too. They are not trying to appease Chad they are trying to appease women and so without such an overt threat of physical violence, they don't need to lower their face/keep upturned eyes to watch for a fist to prevent it from being attacked. They simply need to submit through smiling and lightening masculine traits.

The crucial trait of cucks and soy-boys is the self willingness to hollow themselves out to make themselves more socially nimble and malleable. This allows them to more easily change their behaviour again later on if required by others around them. Lack of stoicism makes men malleable and changeable both in expressions and emotions and so they lack a centre.

They aren't men - they are actors and that is what a cuck is, an actor who can and will turn his behaviour on a dime. As a result they might also be highly strung and more awkward because they lack a centre to provide inner resolve, confidence and peace.

Funkygodzilla · 2018-01-21T19:05:25+00:00

I could take any group and find photos like this though and collage them together..

acjj1990 · 2018-01-21T18:29:31+00:00

Unless you're at a haunted house or watching a scary film, there's no reason for such an expression

ClonedLiger · 2018-01-21T19:19:24+00:00

It's a great thesis and beginning argument. I'd like to see a full paper on it; possibly with some type of face evaluation like in "Lie to Me." I know that's a tv show, but I'm sure programs like that could be made to dectect, and confirm with at least a 75% accuracy level.

2018-01-21T21:18:32+00:00

Excellent research

herpderpfeynman · 2018-01-21T22:16:59+00:00

I love this shit.

Blumol · 2018-01-22T04:09:11+00:00

My blood is boiling look at these "men".

PMmeYOURrareCONTENT · 2018-01-22T07:37:55+00:00

Not sure about this, I think the grimace is slightly different. Definitely retarded and an interesting topic too, but I think it's not quite the same thing, as the context is different.

The fear grin is more like something you see in some foreign countries/movies, for some reason I particularly think about Asians, where someone gives you this very teeth-y submissive smile that basically communicates "I hate your guts, but I recognize I can't do shit about it". For example some Mafia henchmen in movies or some staff in resorts aimed at middle class Western tourists.

I don't really see this kind of emotional expression in the West too much, not sure why. My guess is, we repress it and overcompensate instead. It indicates slavery and submission and our rulers have taken psychopathy to a level where they won't even allow the slave to openly express that they are slaves, so they have them pretend that they are free instead.

In a paradoxical way, this humiliates the Western slave even more while making him perhaps look a little more dignified on the surface (as long as no closer look is taken).

These screech-faces definitely have some connection to submission/slavery, but I think it's more along the lines of "I believe [or am required to believe] that this stupid grimace is a symbol and method of increasing or sustaining my social rank."

jasonmiles2014 · 2018-01-22T03:35:33+00:00

Just discovered that such extreme cuckery causes volcanic diarrhea

Bing_Bang_Bam · 2018-01-22T06:59:44+00:00

Looking at those sad, feminized cucks hurt my soul. Where's Chariton Heston when you need him?

IsYourNameBoop · 2018-01-22T12:56:54+00:00

Did you know bonobos have a lot of sex

Puntingnuns · 2018-01-21T21:56:45+00:00

In the Southern U.S. it's called a "shit eating grin."

TheSelfRefName · 2018-01-21T22:18:43+00:00

[removed]

Title	This explains the male feminists at the women’s march quite well
Author	55togo
Upvotes	202
Comments	59
Date	January 21, 2018 4:47 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/7ryqyv/this_explains_the_male_feminists_at_the_womens/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/this-explains-the-male-feminists-at-the-womens.604114 https://theredarchive.com/post/604114

Comments