Since we now have robotic sex dolls, boil in the bag babies (remember the premature lamb in the external womb) and a way for men to officially lactate and breast feed, will men really need relationships with problematic females in the future?

thetruthhuntsme · 2018-01-13T11:55:40+00:00

No, but blue pill sucking losers of traditions long dead will "value a real woman over a robot!"

Or whatever they say when they cry on Twitter/Reddit

0066617752331 · 2018-01-13T13:23:03+00:00

What the fuck. Let’s just fucking go extinct if everything is that fucked up

CIAC50 · 2018-01-13T12:49:48+00:00

Last thing I need is a pair of tits.

rtmlex · 2018-01-13T13:31:03+00:00

Lactate and breast feed. What the fuck?

MagnusVeritas · 2018-01-13T14:21:41+00:00

The end-point is the biological obsolescence of gender via transhumanism and genetic engineering.

maelggo · 2018-01-13T12:41:44+00:00

I can't even read the link, it has ads and menus everywhere.

Robotic sex dolls suck. They cost like 50 meetings with relatively high end escorts, including anal option. You'd have carefree safe sex for years with actually good looking women, some of them capable of a pretty good show. And you definitely wouldn't have to spend that much, after a while it would be boring anyway.

Sex is very overrated as a "need". You don't "need" to have sex or even replace it. Just look at the research, most papers studying male celibacy do not conclude on something missing for those man, and those who do are usually sponsored by pro-marriage religious groups, which tells a lot about their agenda.

Comments