Something I consistently notice from criticisms of MRAs, anti-feminists, PUAs, and MGTOWs is a lack of acknowledgement that their opposition have grievances that exist for a reason. This is a tendency that I notice in the left more than the right, generally, laid upon the accusation that their enemies are "just regressive troglodytes holding humanity back from glorious proletariat utopia", thus sexist, racist, homophobic, etc, etc...

Everyone lives in narrative, if you didn't live in a narrative, you wouldn't have an identity, most likely you couldn't even exist. Feminists, and consequently Women's Achilles Heel is their unmovable Subjectivity. The superiority of men is being able to put one's self in the shoes of an opposing narrative. I surmise that this is because our male chromosomes are adapted to fighting other males and hunting animals.

We were required to predict our opponent's next move so we wouldn't die. The female brain is not geared toward such pattern recognition. It is geared toward social consensus (tribal identity and cohesion) and hierarchy (hypergamy). As /u/illimitableman puts it "Women are innately Machiavellian." The only problem is, this is only on a subjective and imminent basis. It does not project into the future, it's instinctual.

So, much to my chagrin, when I see things like #killallmen or #wastehistime2016, all I can think is Oscar Wilde's dictum: "The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about." Free publicity, thank you very much ladies. Male supremacy is inherent because we can project into the future. I ceased worrying about some possible feminist dystopia when I fully grokked this fact. R.I.P. the Black Phillip Patrice O'Neal, and in his words: "you gotta understand, bitches are dumb."