I think feminists even have a hard time with this truth, because historically they don't like to defend sex workers (whores) who have been beaten and abused. And for the most part "sex positivism" kind of starts and stops at an AWALT situation where 80% of women are "kind of slutty" or "relatively slutty." Generally speaking, most women are dirtier and/or less sexually moral than men. It just goes with having a vagina/uterus/ovaries.

But then there's Super Sluts™ and you can find them right here on Reddit. Just check out these subreddits and try not to trip out on the shit you find there.

The girls in those subs aren't really professional sex industry girls, these are young women between 18 to 25 who are raising the bar in the world of sluttiness without doing it for the money.

I think there is a tendency for MRAs and feminists alike to suggest that all of these women are crazy and deranged sex addicts. You could almost agree but there is real data on professional whores who've turned their sluttiness into dollar bills. By choice. The narrative is that whores turn to whoredom "against their will." In fact, this works really well with the whole feminist "victim paradigm." I think it's bullshit, and nowadays in Western society whores turn to whoredom because they want to. They're not victims any more than you're a victim for being a pizza delivery guy.

The evidence suggests that the modern day sex industry worker chooses to be a sex industry worker and actually really and truly enjoys her work. Whether she's a stripper or a prostitute, it apparently beats all the other jobs available to her. Combine that with the fact that right here on Reddit you can find women who've freely chosen an "abundant sexual path" without monetizing it, and it's because they really and truly want to take that kind of path.

What I think we have is the law-of-unintended-consequences-NAWALT. By that I mean you can find a Super Slut™ who is definitely not like most women. (Because most women are only "sort-of-slutty," as I said.) The woman with the torn uvula, for example. This might be going out on a limb, but I really believe not all women are like her.

That said, there is no "society" that "Bernie Sanders" can possibly build that will subtract a genetically-built Super Slut™ from her Super Slut™ genetic code. It seems to me that SJWs think that if a perfect world was built, there would be no Super Sluts™. I think that's untrue. I think Super Sluts™ have been around since the beginning of time, they're around today, and they will continue to be around in the future - forever.

Obviously, MGTOWs who slip back into dating would never want to date a Super Slut™, so in a way they're not really relevant to your life, but I think they are relevant to understanding human nature. They are a piece of the overall puzzle, and I think it's healthier to accept that they exist, they're not fabricating their stories, and that they're not "victims." There really are 1 or 2 (or more) women in your neighborhood trying to set records and enjoying the shit out of it.