So, to clarify, I only argue things I am 100% certain on and have proof of. I have the tendency of getting in arguments over dumb things not because I want to prove I'm super duper smart, but just because I hate when people are wrong/don't know something. It seems that no matter how much clear evidence I give, the people either misunderstand it (idk how, they're very simple things i argue) or just still claim they're right. I know that you can't really change people's minds, but I'm not arguing about things like politics, I'm arguing about objective truths. Is this just a complete waste of time and i should never try to correct anyone, or do i have to go about it a certain way? I tend to break frame and i don't necessarily show that Im mad, but inside I'm pissed.