Is the happiness and fulfillment of bottom tier women dependent on the suffering and misery of men?

Did I get that right?

So we have this "resource starved" women problem. Of course, we say get a job but they say that the problem is love and intimacy and men not caring enough.

Something about sympathy because if men weren't paying for bottom tier women, their maslows hierarchy of needs wouldnt be met, and won't somebody please think of the children!

But there's a reason these girls aren't getting high paying jobs or marrying good stable men with decent jobs. It's a free market hence very competitive. These girls have shitty products, are shit saleswomen or both. Basically no man wants to buy what they're selling. And some set their price too high (they only want hot men with six packs or men with six figure incomes).

And these failed saleswomen are sad, but not to sad. They can't get a decent high paying job or get a man to pay for them. But that's alright, because women are the majority of the voting population and the state will transfer them all the resources they need from the men you don't want to marry, and from the men who won't marry you. And they can still have the babies of the man that wont marry them, and someone else will pay for them, because won't somebody please think of the children! They certainly won't starve, because the government will put men in jail for refusing to pay.

Once upon a time it wasn't a free market. There was a social contract, and the market was regulated. Men worked for 40 or 50 years, or until their bodies failed, producing excess resources that they provided to women and children. You could say that this social contract underpins our entire civilizations evolution from a bunch of tribal hunter gatherers out-competing the neanderthals to our current position. They produced so much excess resources that our civilization took control of 3 new continents (4 if you count New Zealand as a continent - geologists would love to have a debate with you!). Being young and wild and free was shamed. For the men, and the women, you had a job to do, a role to play, a purpose, even if you didn't choose. And pre-birthcontrol that lifestyle would have been much harder.

Women married men they didn't feel anything for. Either high status men with income that they submitted to in exchange for resources, or assortative mating with equal-tier men. They had sex with and raised kids for these men. The high status women who couldn't find higher status men got shipped off to nunneries.

After the sexual revolution women no longer had to date and marry bottom tier men. Now they could sleep with turbo-douche chads who's actions were a drain on society and who disrupt social cohesion everywhere they go, but it didn't matter, because chad could impregnate them and then they would either get billy beta to adopt their kids, trick billy beta into thinking the kids were his, or, worse comes to worse, the state would forcibly transfer resources from billy beta and other high income men to provide for chad's useless, social cohesion destroying children.

Online dating was the dating markets version of globalization hence "Chad( The Chinese) is stealing our women( manufacturing jobs)". So anyway these men stopped getting sex and we're back to current 2020. Now we have the sexual revolution on crack cocaine and meth, as hordes of women are able to queue up for a select group of men who have harems.

At the same time as the sexual revolution, the state increasingly started transferring massive amounts of excess resources produced by men to the lower value women who previously had to marry for resources. Some women got good jobs and didn't really need these resources, but many didn't - no matter, the state would still force men to provide for them.

It seems there's no middle ground. Either the bottom tier men get wives and are happy and productive, suffering from shorter lives, greater stress, and more health conditions due to all the work they do while their wives are miserable that they had to marry their equal in the mating market. Or the women date who they want, get impregnated by useless men who destroy social cohesion everywhere they go, and who wont marry them or fulfill their responsibilities to society, and the state forcibly transfers resources from billy beta + high financial status men to pay for Chad's useless society-destroying children. For some reason, the men still have to keep working to pay for them.

Fascinatingly, the logical conclusion of the sexual revolution and women's sexual liberation is women serving in informal or formal harems for men who use their power in the sexual marketplace to exert power over many women. And the low value men, well, I guess we keep feeding them video games, porn, alcohol, marijuana and painkillers to keep them sedated.